Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0021491_Pretreatment Inspection_20150724 ATA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart Governor Secretary July 24, 2015 Ms. Christine W. Bralley, Town Manager • RECEIVEDIDIrNRIDWR Town of Mocksville JUL 2 g 2015 171 Clement Street Mocksville,NC 27028 Water Quality permuting Semen SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Town of Mocksville NPDES #NC0021491 Davie County Dear Ms. Bralley: On July 23, 2015 George Smith, of this office, conducted an inspection of the Town's pretreatment program. Ms. Heather Adams, Pretreatment Coordinator was present for the inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program by reviewing the files, which include: POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the enforcement response plan(ERP). Background Information Currently, the Town has 1 significant industrial user(SIU). The House of Raeford (#004) is a food processor. POTW Interview The Town has one WWTP (Dutchman's Creek) on the pretreatment program with a 0.68 MGD permitted flow. There were some NPDES permit violations for BOD and TSS during February 2015, but these were a result of operations, not pretreatment issues. Program Elements The Headworks Analysis (HWA) was approved on September 24, 2010. The next HWA is due September 30, 2015. The data was collected and the HWA will be submitted before the due date. The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved on December 9, 2014. The next IWS is due December 31, 2019. The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on June 11, 2014. The Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) was approved on June 15, 2010. Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) was approved on July 1, 2010. 450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105 Phone:336-776-98001 Internet:www ncdenr.gov File Review A review of the file for House of Raeford (#004) revealed that the monitoring data was well organised and compliance evaluation was correctly performed. A slug control plan is required and kept in a file. The plan was recently updated to show the latest contacts. Action Items • The next pretreatment annual ieport is due on March 1, 2016. Ms. Adams is implementing the pretreatment program in an outstanding manner. The pretreatment compliance inspection is satisfactory. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact George Smith or me at(336) 776-9800. Sincerely, W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources,NCDENR ATTACHMENT cc: Heather Adams,P.O.Box 670,Bailey,NC 27807 PERCS Unit—Monti Hassan WSRO Files NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION(Complete Prior To PCI;Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1 1. Control Authority(POTW)Name: f,w ri e Y')oCkS V i 11(. 2. Control Authority Representative(s): c v f�da,�S 3. Title(s): I` e- r e e i. nu•.t Z 4. Last Inspection Date: 7- y- i Z/ Inspection Type(Check One): 24CI ❑ Audit 5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? [ YES El NO 6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES [BYO Order Type,Number, Parameters: NA- Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑YES 0 NO PCS CODING Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type 1_1%-11 1 NICIO 10 I -J / '1111 / l Jb71Z31 ' 1 l P l 1 S l J 1 1 (DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC) 7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)? t SNS 8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs)? 0 CNS 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? C 10.Number of.SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0 11.Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 e% NOIN 12.Number of SIUs With No IUP,or With an Expired IUP 0 NOCM 13.Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods(Total Number of SIUs in SNC) G PSNC 14.Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods MSNC 15.Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods I C) SNPS 16.Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-annual Periods POTW INTERVIEW 17. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? ❑YES NO If Yes,What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? i3 Did OPe/Lc�o t t S•S'�t GS� e� Qf�tc�uct,4- lt �eic�<� r55 FGb aces- 18. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial ❑ YESNO Discharge(Interference,Pass-Through,Blockage,Citizens'Complaints,Increased Sludge Production,Etc.)? If Yes,How are these Problems Being Addressed? 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods?Not Been Published for SNC for Reporting: 1\/47-4 { Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published: 20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders?For all SIUs on an �'/14 n Order,Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? ( T 21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication?If Yes,Which [] YES EIILN6 Ones? LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: // 22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequ ies? [I2'YES ❑ NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Mo itoring? aYES ❑ NO 24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? [U4'ES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? [26 ❑NO 25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? E14-ES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself! 26. If NO to 23 -26, list violations \i 41 - 27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES El NO If yes,which ones?Eliminated: Added: Ai /H' NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1 • 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in their files,complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter,and dates consistent with Program Info: Program Element Last Submittal Last Approval Date Next Due, Date In file? Date In file If Applicable Headworks Analysis(HWA) El Yes El No `I/i t o acres❑ No £rt 3;;,;to 17' Industrial Waste Survey(IWS) El Yes❑ No a./ ❑ No O.ae... Si, „101? Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO) ❑ Yes❑ No G j 1 i l rY ['Yes❑ No Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) ❑ Yes ❑ No , /is/10 ayes❑ No Long Term Monitoring Plan(LTMP) El Yes El No - 71 4o Lid"Yes❑ No INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT(IUP)FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION) 29. User Name 1. 404s,. dA.1,,l 2. 3. 30. IUP Number COOL/ 31. Does File Contain Current Permit? les ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No 32. Permit Expiration Date a--/- 1 7 33. Categorical Standard Applied(I.E.40 CFR,Etc.)Or N/A Al/4 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior 1 r es ■ No ❑Yes El No El Yes El No to Permit Issue Date? 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? 1 es ❑ No ❑Yes El No El Yes ❑ No 36. a.Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill.Control Plan? a. Mires❑Noa. ❑Yes ONo a. ❑Yes ONo b.If No,is One Needed?(See Inspection Form from POTW) b-[EW. es-BNd'09 b. ❑Yes ONo b. ❑Yes ONo 37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification,Does File Contain a Toxic ❑Yes❑No /A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Organic Management Plan(TOMP)? 38. a.Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. Ids ONo a. ❑Yes ONo a. ❑Yes ONo b.All Issues Resolved? b.❑Yes❑No�A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Complete []les El No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow? 40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-Custody Forms? I [es ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No 41. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the SIU Complete itss❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Sampling as Required by IUP,including flow? 41b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did SIU submit all reports lzs❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A on time? 42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula(CWF),does ❑Yes❑NoI(A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A file include process/dilution flows as Required by [UP? 42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits,does file include ❑Yes❑NoIpA ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP? 43a. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Identify EKes ❑ No ❑ Yes El No ❑Yes El No All Limits Non-Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? � 43b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify tI}'Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑NoDN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A All Reporting Non-Compliance from SIU Sampling? 44. a.Was the POTW Notified by SIU(Within 24 Hours)of All Self- a. es❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑NoCNA Monitoring Violations? / b.Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b.tpes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes ONo❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware / c CVfes❑No❑N/A of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? �•❑Yes❑No❑N/A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 46. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Was the SRI in SNC? ❑ Yes I o ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 47. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was Enforcement Taken Dices❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A as Specified in the POTW's ERP(NOVs,Penalties,timing,etc.)? � 48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑Yes❑Nol�t ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes❑NotekA ❑Yes❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 50. a.Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.❑Yes❑Notp14k a.❑Yes❑NoON/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.Is SIU in Compliance with Order? b.❑Yes❑No tikk., b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This El Yes 114To El Yes ❑ No El Yes El No Requested Information For You? NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2 FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: T—rrns.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector .Type 1_1'11 L1� 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S 1 2 1 (DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC) 1. Industry Inspected: 2. Industry Address: 3.Type of Industry/Product: 4. Industry Contact: Title: Phone: 5.Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection.Form or Equivalent? 13-, S ❑ NO 6.Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Tho?ou ly? Comments: A. Initial Interview El YES ❑ NO B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO D. Sampling Review El YES ❑ NO E. Exit Interview ❑ YES El NO �. Industrial Inspection Comments: OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: Requirements: Recommendations: NOD: ❑YES Erfkr:1O NOV: ❑ YES ErkO QNCR: ❑ YES 00 POTW Rating: Satisfactory L------ Marginal ,,ll Unsatisfactory PCI COMPLETED BY: DATE: l' /du //15— NC jNC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3