20150754 Ver 1_401 Application_20150715

WITHERS e- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
115 MACKENAN DRIVE
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27511
919.469.3340
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9`h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
LETTER OF TRANSMMAL
DATE JUly 27, 2015 I JOB NO 02140471.10
ATTENTION Ms Karen Higgins
PHONE#
919 -807 -6363
RE Sanford - Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer
401 Certification Application
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change order ❑ Diskette ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
4 7/27/2015 02140471.10 401 Certification Application Packet
1 7/27/2015 02140471.10 CD of Application Packet
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Foryour use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
Signature:
Date:
COPYTO: File SIGNED: Martin Richmond
If enclosures are not as noted, kindlynotifyus at once

WITH ERS r RAVEN EL
July 24, 2015
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Andy Williams
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27857
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS l SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
°12@R0yC
.D
JUL 2 9 2015
DENR - WATER RESOURCES
401 8 BUFFER PERMITTING
Re: City of Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer —NW 12 Permit Application Submittal
Sanford, Lee County
W &R Project #02140471.10 2 0 1 '5
0 X54
Dear Mr. Williams and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the City of Sanford, Withers & Ravenel is requesting authorization from the USACE to
use NWP 12 for 1.21 acres of temporary wetland impacts and 182 if of temporary stream impacts
associated with the construction of the City of Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer. The
proposed project does not result in permanent impacts, and therefore written authorization from
NCDWR is not required. However, since this is a municipal project, we are requesting an email from
DWR confirming that written authorization is not required so that we have written documentation for
our files.
The proposed project is located in Sanford, Lee County, North Carolina. The proposed sewer
alignment crosses Persimmon Creek and its associated tributaries, which are located within the
Cape Fear Basin (HUC 03030003). The Water Quality Classification for Persimmon Creek is: Class C
and the Stream Index number is: 17 -40 -2.
Proposed Project
The proposed project consists of the construction of ±7,750 if of 8" gravity sewer. The proposed
sewer line will be located within a 30' easement with a 10' permanent access /maintenance corridor
through wetlands. The proposed sewer line will begin at an existing sewer line west of Chownings
Drive in the Carthage Colony Subdivision (Latitude: 35.452789 °N; Longitude: - 79.197266 1W) and will
cross Persimmon Branch and flow in a southwest direction to an existing sewer line at 2255 Tramway
Road (Latitude: 35.438042 °N; Longitude: - 79.217304 °W) in Sanford, Lee County, North Carolina.
Project Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide sewer access to a new VA Clinic located on
Tramway Road and the Liberty Health Care Facility in Sanford. The VA Clinic will house offices for 15
practitioners with a project flow of 3,750 gallons per day (gpd). The project will also eliminate a
private pump station serving the Liberty Health Care Facility that is currently permitted to pump
13,650 gpd to another sewer shed within the City of Sanford collection system. The proposed sewer
line will tie into the existing City of Sanford sewer system for treatment at the Big Buffalo WWTP.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel [phone] fax [phone] www withersravenel com I License No C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel [phone] fax [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel [phone] fax [phone]

Sandford — Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer — NWP 12 PCN
07/24/15
Proiect History
Wetlands and streams within the proposed sewer alignment were delineated by W &R in April 2015.
The Preliminary JD Request in support of the delineation has been provided as an Appendix. We are
requesting issuance of the Preliminary JD, specific to the impact areas only, in conjunction with
issuance of the NWP 12.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of ±1.2 acres of temporary wetland impacts and 182 if of temporary
stream impacts for construction of the sewer line. The impacts will occur within a 30' construction
corridor. Contained entirely within the 30' construction corridor is a 1o' permanent
access /maintenance corridor.
The proposed 1o' permanent access/ maintenance corridor will result in the permanent conversion of
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands as a result of regular mowing /maintenance of the
corridor. The 1o' permanent access /maintenance corridor will result in ±0.524 acres of "permanent
conversion" impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to final design of the proposed sewer alignment, a detailed wetland delineation was completed
for a loo' wide corridor so that impacts to wetlands and streams could be minimized. A preliminary
review of the results of the wetland delineation was conducted with the project engineers to identify
environmental constraints (i.e. wetlands & streams) and site constraints, including topography,
property setbacks of existing residences, and the presence of multiple ponds. The topography of
the alignment was the biggest design constraint for design in order to maintain required gradients
for the gravity sewer to work. For example, if the alignment was shifted at Impact #6 to avoid the
stream and wetland impacts, the depth of the trench would have increased substantially. Deeply
trenched sewer causes both an increase in construction costs, as well as logistic and safety issues
with the maintenance when the manholes are very deep. Modifications to the alignment to
minimize impacts where possible were incorporated into the final alignment. However, due to the
location of the wetlands and streams within the corridor, as well as site constraints dictating design,
impacts could not be avoided completely (see attached Wetland Location Exhibit).
Wetland impacts were minimized by designing the sewer alignment to either impact only the outer
edges or cross the wetlands at the most narrow point when practical.
The proposed stream crossings have been designed to cross the stream channels at perpendicular
angles to minimize impacts. The proposed diversion (Impact #6, Exhibit #2), is required due to
necessary construction close to the channel. This stream is a spillway channel from an upstream
pond, which has resulted from the primary outfall of the pond no longer functioning. (Note: this
stream would not present under `normal' circumstances, as the pond outfall is not working). The
proposed temporary diversion will not affect the stream quality or function.
Permanent wetland and stream impacts were avoided by eliminating permanent stream and wetland
crossings (e.g. rip -rap or filled crossings) for the permanent access corridor.
WITHERS '' RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
F uf�iH ff RS i RFRR HF RS i Sv RYf vnR.s

Sandford — Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer — NWP 12 PCN
07/24/15
Upon completion of the installation of the proposed sewer line, the disturbed wetland areas will be
returned to natural grade and seeded with a wetland seed mix to restore wetland vegetation. The
seeding will consist of a mixture of native species as specified on Sheet 11 of the Sediment and
Erosion Control Plans, which has been provided as an Appendix. Only the 10' permanent
access /maintenance corridor will be regularly mowed, and the remainder of the restored wetlands
will be left undisturbed.
Mitigation
Since the proposed impacts for construction of the sewer line are temporary, no mitigation is
proposed for these impacts.
As a result of the "permanent wetland conversion" impacts exceeding o.10 acres, mitigation is
required by the Corps of Engineers. Therefore, the applicant proposes to mitigate for the ±0.52 acres
of permanent conversion impacts through the purchase of 0.5 acres of riparian wetland mitigation
from the Division of Mitigation Services. A copy of the Letter of Acceptance from the Division of
Mitigation Services has been provided as an Appendix.
The current request is for 182 if of temporary stream impacts, ±1.21 acres of temporary wetland
impacts, (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Martin Richmond
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Wetland Location Exhibit
• USGS Quad Map
• Lee County Soil Survey
• Sheet 11 of the Sediment & Erosion Control Plans
• DMS Letter of Reservation
• JD Supporting Information
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS &- RAVEMEL Page 3 of 3
F ufiH ff RS i IL-ERS i Sv RYf vnR.s

PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM

T_
r
1. Processing
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ No
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ® Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer
2b. County: Lee
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Sanford
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: N/A — Linear Project — City of Sanford Sewer Easement
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
� No �
i
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Sanford
4b.
Name:
Hal Hegwer — City Manager
4c.
Business name
City of Sanford
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
PO Box 3729
4e.
City, state, zip:
Sanford, NC 27330
4f.
Telephone no.:
(919) 777 -1119
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
Paul.weeks @sanfordnc.net
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Martin Richmond
5b.
Business name
Withers & Ravenel
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
115 MacKenan Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27511
5e.
Telephone no.:
(919) 469 -3340
5f.
Fax no.:
(919) 467 -6008
5g.
Email address:
mrichmond @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
N/A — Linear Project: ±7,750 If gravity sewer
North End near Chownings Dr:
Latitude: 35.452789 °N Longitude: - 79.197266 °W
(DD.DDDDDD)
South End near Tramway Dr:
Latitude: 35.438042 °N
Longitude: - 79.217304 °W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
N/A — Linear Project — Alignment is ±7,750 If in length
Persimmon Creek
Class C; (Stream Index # 17 -40 -2)
Cape Fear Basin (HUC: 03030003)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project alignment is located entirely within undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity of the project
consists of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses, as well as agricultural and undeveloped woodlands.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±1.2 acres within proposed project area (sewer easement and temporary construction easement)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±182 If of streams within the proposed project area (sewer easement and temporary construction easement)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed gravity sewer is to provide service to the new VA Clinic and the Liberty Health Care Facility.
The proposed 8 -inch gravity sewer line will extend from the existing sewer at Carthage Colonies subdivision to a new VA
Clinic located on Tramway Road in the City of Sanford. The VA Clinic will house offices for 15 practitioners with a
projected flow of 3,750 gpd. The project will also eliminate a private pump station serving the Liberty Health Care Facility
that is currently permitted to pump 13,650 gpd to another sewer shed within the City of Sanford collection system.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project M14 consist of the installation of 7,750 If of 8" gravity sewer line, which will extend from the new VA Clinic on
Tramway Road to the existing sewer line at Carthage Colonies subdivision, which will ultimately convey wastewater to Big
Buffalo WWTP for treatment. The sewer line will be installed using traditional excavation and installation techniques.
Typical commercial clearing, grading, and excavation equipment will be used to install the sections of sewer within the
alignment.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑Yes El No El Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Withers & Ravenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley and Martin Richmond Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The wetlands and streams within the proposed sewer alignment were delineated by W &R in April 2015. The
Jurisdictional Determination packet and documentation supporting the delineation have been provided as an Appendix to
this PCN. We are requesting issuance of a Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 12.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands
® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Impact 3
(Corps - 404, 10
❑ Open Waters
❑ Pond
Construction
other)
Exhibit 4
❑ P ® T
2. Wetland Impacts
® DWQ
Exhibit 6
❑ P ® T
Impact 16
® DWQ
If there are wetland im
)acts proposed on the
site, then complete
this question for each wetland area impacted.
❑ PER
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Exhibit 1 ❑ P ® T
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 2
Sewer Installation
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.083 ac
Exhibit 2 ❑ P ® T
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 5
Sewer Installation
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.028 ac
Exhibit 3 ❑ P ® T
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 7
Sewer Installation
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.021 ac
Exhibit 4 ❑ P ® T
Sewer
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 9
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.047 ac
Exhibit 4 ❑ P ® T
Sewer
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 13
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.441 ac
Exhibit 4 ❑ P ® T
Sewer
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 15
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.075 ac
Exhibit 4 ❑ P ® T
Sewer
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 17
Construction
Headwater Forest
El No
® DWQ
0.002 ac
Exhibit 4 ❑ P ® T
Sewer
® Yes
® Corps
Impact 18
Construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.046 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts 1 0.743 ac
2h. Comments: The perpetual maintenance (e.g. mowing) of the 10' permanent access /maintenance corridor will result in the
permanent conversion of forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands at Impacts 1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 19, resulting in ±0.524
acres of permanent conversion impacts, which are not addressed in the Wetland Impact Table, as they are only acknowledged
by the Corps of Engineers.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact
number - Permanent
(P) or Temporary (T)
Exhibit 1
❑ P ® T
Impact 3
(Corps - 404, 10
Exhibit 2
❑ P ® T
Impact 6
other)
Exhibit 4
❑ P ® T
Impact 11
® DWQ
Exhibit 6
❑ P ® T
Impact 16
® DWQ
Type of impact Stream name
Sewer Crossing
Diversion for
Sewer Installation
Sewer Crossing
Sewer Crossing
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Persimmon Creek
UT to Persimmon
UT to Persimmon
UT to Persimmon
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
(INT)?
other)
® PER
® Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
® PER
® Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
❑ PER
® Corps
® INT
® DWQ
❑ PER
® Corps
® INT
® DWQ
Average
Impact
stream
length
width
(linear
(feet)
feet)
5'
43 If
5'
59 If
3' 40 If
3'
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
40 If
182 If

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P FIT
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or for impact
Temporary (T)
131 ❑P ❑T
B2 ❑P FIT
B3 ❑ PEI T
6i. Comments:
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to final design of the proposed sewer alignment, a detailed wetland delineation was completed for a 1 00' wide corridor so
that impacts to wetlands and streams could be minimized. A preliminary review of the results of the wetland delineation was
conducted with the project engineers to identify environmental constraints (i.e. wetlands & streams) and site constraints,
including topography, property setbacks of existing residences, and the presence of multiple ponds. The topography of the
alignment was the biggest design constraint for design in order to maintain required gradients for the gravity sewer to work. For
example, if the alignment was shifted at Impact #6 to avoid the stream and wetland impacts, the depth of the trench would have
increased substantially. Deeply trenched sewer causes both an increase in construction costs, as well as logistic and safety
issues with the maintenance when the manholes are very deep. Modifications to the alignment to minimize impacts where
possible were incorporated into the final alignment. However, due to the location of the wetlands and streams within the
corridor, as well as site constraints dictating design, impacts could not be avoided completely (see attached Wetland Location
Exhibit).
Wetland impacts were minimized by designing the sewer alignment to either impact only the outer edges or cross the wetlands
at the most narrow point when practical.
The proposed stream crossings have been designed to cross the stream channels at perpendicular angles to minimize impacts.
The proposed diversion (Impact #6, Exhibit #2), is required due to necessary construction close to the channel. This stream is a
spillway channel from an upstream pond, which has resulted from the primary outfall of the pond no longer functioning. (Note:
this stream would not present under 'normal' circumstances, as the pond outfall is not working). The proposed temporary
diversion will not affect the stream quality or function.
Permanent wetland and stream impacts were avoided by eliminating permanent stream and wetland crossings (e.g. rip -rap or
filled crossings) for the permanent access corridor.
Upon completion of the installation of the proposed sewer line, the disturbed wetland areas will be returned to natural grade and
seeded with a wetland seed mix to restore wetland vegetation. The seeding will consist of a mixture of native species as
specified on Sheet 11 of the Sediment and Erosion Control Plans, which has been provided as an Appendix. Only the 10'
permanent access /maintenance corridor will be regularly mowed, and the remainder of the restored wetlands will be left
undisturbed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques used to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts include the installation of Erosion & Sedimentation
Control devices prior to construction of the utility line. Access to impact areas will be from high ground, and bridgemats will be
utilized as needed to minimize the extent of impacts within the construction corridor.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) I Type I Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.5 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: The 0.50 acres of wetland mitigation is specifically for "permanent conversion impacts ", as required by the
Corps.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
10�IGm
❑ Yes ❑ No
N/A %
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project consists of a subsurface gravity sewer line which will not result in any impervious surface or impede natural
diffuse flow.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
ORW
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: The proposed project is being funded by the City of Sanford through ❑ Yes ® No
Golden Leaf Funding, but no state or federal funds. The proposed sewer line is
less than 18- inches and less than 3 miles of disturbance, and therefore does not
exceed the minimum criteria requiring an EA. Therefore, SEPA or NEPA approval
through the State Clearing House is not required.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed sewer line will provide service to the new VA Clinic and the existing Liberty Health Care Facility. The
proposed sewer line has been designed to provide additional capacity as future projects come online and require sewer
services. Additional development could potentially occur as a result of availability of sanitary sewer from the construction
of the proposed sewer line. However, any future developments will be required to meet federal, state and local
regulations which will prevent impacts to nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed sewer line will not generate wastewater. The proposed line will convey wastewater from exterior sources
to the Big Buffalo WWTP in Sanford.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at httos:// ncnhde .natureserve.orq /content/mao to
identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the
NHP data did not identify any occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0
miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any
federally protected species known to occur in Lee County, except for the Northern Long Eared Bat.
Potential habitat for the Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3' DBH, which is used
for roosting during the day. Since the entire project area consists primarily of mature forest over 3" DBH, there is potential
NLEB habitat present. In an email from USFWS dated April 15, 2015, the USFWS has specified that a project may result
in an adverse effect on the NLEB if there will be cutting or destroying of mature trees within 0.25 miles of a known
roosting site, or if the project involves the cutting or destroying of known occupied roost trees during the pup season
(June 1St — July 31St). The only known active roost tree site is in Currituck County. The proposed project is not located
within 0.25 miles of any known roost trees. Clearing of mature forest between June 1 St and July 31St is not anticipated for
construction of the proposed project. Therefore, W &R concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect" the NLEB.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Lee County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: htto: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hi)oweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The proposed sewer line will be located within the 100 -year floodplain associated with Persimmon Creek, which is the
only stream within the proposed alignment with a mapped FEMA 100 -year floodplain. The sewer line has been designed
as an aerial crossing through the 100 -year floodplain, with the bottom of the pipe located above the 100 -year flood
elevation. The proposed sewer will not affect storage within the floodplain, or result in a rise in flood elevation, and
therefore meets FEMA requirements.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Engineered calculation of the 100 year flood plain.
Martin Richmond -
July 24, 2015
Withers & Ravenel
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WITHERS O� RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, Citv of Sanford (Client) does hereby appoint Withers &
Ravenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state
and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and
approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian
buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit
applications /requests for the Citv of Sanford — Persimmon Creek Gravitv Sewer,
extending aooroximately 9.300 linear feet, from west of Chowninas Drive in the existing
Carthaue Crossina Subdivision to 2255 Tramwav Rd in Sanford.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date: '$ /'Z-t I (-
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Sig ature of lient:
Withers & Ravenel. Inc.
(Name - Print)
115 MacKenan Drive � I �
Carv. NC 27511 (Si natu
Tel. (919) -469 -3340 Q x 31
Mailing Address
--3 c -0- n *-) �� b
City State Zip
Phone: °\ �� "1 r1 '� k 1 \'1:1�
Email: �-W\
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] ; fax: [phone] www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 ; tel: [phone]: fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road 1 Suite G Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT

Designer >�a Swle ' . 100
°a,e I SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER WITHERS RAVENEL
1PkeBy I.b— �,1a WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT — OVERALL ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
°w °a W
rae � 0=140471.1. I SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
LEE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP

GRAPHIC SCALE �/ v \ V J ��v
0 500 1000 / ( \ • , 1
Nl-
1 1
1 inch = 1000 ft.
10" •
k. - �� 1.0
• !•
•' f
1334`
'oo..-5 -Tra
Z
t
1
Rio
0
.• -� "
J• • � � - r f 115 � � ti.5�� �k� -� •,�. � _
•
SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER USGS QUAD - SANFORD WITHE1118 RAVENEL
!N•INlCRS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
MfB
0 500 1000 _ MfD , MfB MfD
i Cp
1 inch = 1000 ft. \ ' MfD MfD `-
hD, S p I MfD
MfB J � ' MfD�
f E
° � � /M � / �M f E M f
i 4 w /(
)oA DoA
GhB
C° ,' MfE MfD �. MfD
� DoA Cp
00 to -
GhD W
J ' ° B �
o
� �o 000
°
M
f\ D O
DoA MfD fp °_°
O o 0 ' °
MrB Ch c-a OO 000 0° 00 OO
04 M
_ f
B
MfD Tramway MfD ° °° 0
� ° O Cl FuB DoA ,' WE FuB DoA DOB C� MfB °° rx�
GhB
FuB � i ° � c c fr
;h G B
1
�— w FuB °
W � ° °
` GhD �
MfD Ch DOB
DoB Co
MfB DoA DOB DoA 0 DOA, \
FuB GhB DoA
tw Ch DoA
GhB 78
f, - DoB o8 ^ �� �GhB
SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
LEE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 5
WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL
RESTORATION SPECIFICATIONS

GENERAL NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS BASED ON NAVD 88 DATUM. HORIZONTAL CONTROL BASED ON NAD 83 DATUM. FIELD
SURVEY INFORMATION PERFORMED BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
2. COORDINATE CONTRACT SO CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE CAN BE FOLLOWED.
3, CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS TO CONFORM TO CITY OF SANFORD SPECIFICATIONS AND
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONTRACTOR TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS
ALL PERMIT APPROVALS AND EASEMENTS ON JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES
I
4. SHOP DRAWINGS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER BEFORE EQUIPMENT IS ORDERED.
5. KNOWN EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE TO ACCURATELY LOCATE BOTH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO
START OF CONSTRUCTION (ONE CALL CENTER 1 -800- 632 - 4949). ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ANY
DAMAGE TO KNOWN OR UNKNOWN EXISTING UTILITIES RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR FAILURE TO
ADEQUATELY PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BE BORNE SOLELY BY CONTRACTOR
THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES SHOULD BE CONTACTED AS A MINIMUM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
r WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS 888- 599 -3166
• BROADPLEX FIBER. OPTICS /HIGH SPEED INTERNET 828- 433 -4506
e DUKE ENERGY 800 -762 -0592
• PSNC 877 - 776 -2427
• CABLE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC 004 -562 -3061
• CITY OF SANFORD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 919- 777 -1119
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IF REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF
NEW WORK AND COORDINATION WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY_ THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL OR
SEPARATE PAY ITEM FOR THIS WORK UNLESS SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT IN BID FORM
6. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPORT ALL UTILITY POLES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE UTILITY
POLE SUPPORT WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. IN AREAS WHERE OVERHEAD POWER LINES ARE
PRESENT, CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT UTILITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO DETERMINE MINIMUM
REQUIRED EQUIPMENT CLEARANCE (MEC) DISTANCE BASED UPON LINE STRENGTH. NO EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES
WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN 30 FT OF ANY SUPPORT POLES OR GUY WIRES WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM OWNER. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR ALL UTILITY POLES AS NECESSARY
COMPACT TRENCH 5 FT EACH SIDE OF UTILITY POLES TO MINIMUM OF 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
7. PIPE TRENCHES TO BE NO STEEPER THAN 1:1 FROM EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT
8. STABILIZE, SEED AND MULCH, AND PAVE SITE AS INDICATED IN EROSION CONTROL NOTES PRIOR TO
FINAL INSPECTION
9. CONTRACTOR TO MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO SAVE PROPERTY IRONS, MONUMENTS, OTHER PERMANENT
POINTS AND LINES OF REFERENCE AND CONSTRUCTION STAKES. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AT
CONTRACTOR EXPENSE TO REPLACE PROPERTY IRONS, MONUMENTS, AND OTHER PERMANENT POINTS OF
REFERENCE DESTROYED BY CONTRACTOR.
10. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS DIRECTED BY OWNER, TO INSTALL NEW
UTILITIES ON ROADWAY RIGHT -OF -WAYS, CONTRACTOR TO MAKE EVERY EFFORT DURING CONSTRUCTION TO
PROTECT TREES THAT WILL NOT BE REMOVED AS MARKED ON PLANS LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (LOC) TO
BE EDGE OF PERMANENT EASEMENT, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCE), EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(EDP) OR SILT FENCE LINE (OPEN AREAS) AS INDICATED ON INDIVIDUAL DRAWINGS.
11. MAINTAIN PLANT PROTECTION FENCING ON SITE UNTIL ALL OTHER WORK IS COMPLETED WITH EXCEPTION
OF FINAL INSPECTION REMOVE FENCING FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
12. PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED VIA LEE COUNTY TAX MAPS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY
REPRESENT ACTUAL PROPERTY LINE LOCATIONS
13, BUILDING LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOWN FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
14. FURNISH, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WHETHER OR NOT
SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO PROTECT ADJACENT CREEKS, RIVERS, ROADWAYS, ETC, FROM SILTATION AND
EROSION,
15. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FOR ALL AREAS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,
16. PROVIDE PROPER OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PER STATE AND LOCAL LAWS. TO MINIMIZE THE
IMPACT OF DIESEL FUEL TO THE ENVIRONMENT
17 RESTORE /REPLACE ALL SIGNS, MAILBOXES; ETC. ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ORIGINAL
CONDITION.
18. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING GRADE UON ON DRAWINGS.
19. PLACE ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION.
PROVIDE NECESSARY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO CONTROL RUN -OFF REMOVE
EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE AND DISPOSE OF LEGALLY
20. VERIFY LOCATION AND WIDTH OF ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS WITH NCDOT, LEE
COUNTY, AND CITY OF SANFORD PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION
21. CONNECTION TO EXISTING CITY OF SANFORD MANHOLE IN CARTHAGE COLONIES SUBDIVISION SHALL BE
COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS STAFF PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. BYPASS PUMPING PLAN SHALL
BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER,
22. CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLE PRIOR TO THE EXISTING PUMP STATION ON LIBERTY HEALTHCARE
FACILITY SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS STAFF AND THE LIBERTY HEALTHCARE
FACILITY MANAGER PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, BYPASS PUMPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY
ENGINEER.
0115101=0-b= 1. OBTAIN A WRITTEN PERMIT FOR ROCK BLASTING FROM SANFORD ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT. BLASTING FOR ROCK REMOVAL IS LIMITED TO MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY 8:00 AM TO 5:00 PM
AND TO NOT EXCEED ANY OTHER MORE STRINGENT WORK HOURS STIPULATED ELSEWHERE IN
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. COMPLETELY REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AND THOROUGHLY COMPACT UNSTABLE
AND /OR ORGANIC MATERIAL ( "MUCK ") ENCOUNTERED IN TRENCHES OR IN ROADWAYS
3. PROVIDE FOR AND MAINTAIN SAFETY MEASURES NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS ON WORK
SITE AND FULLY COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT
ACCIDENT OR INJURY TO PERSONS ON OR ABOUT LOCATION OF WORK, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE
PROVISIONS OF OSHA REGULATIONS. PROTECT ALL TREES AND SHRUBS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN IN VICINITY
OF OPERATIONS AND BARRICADE ALL WALKS, ROADS, AND AREAS TO KEEP PUBLIC AWAY FROM
CONSTRUCTION. ALL TRENCHES, EXCAVATIONS,. OR OTHER HAZARDS IN VICINITY OF WORK TO BE WELL
BARRICADED, AND PROPERLY LIGHTED AT NIGHT.
4 CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND NECESSARY PROTECTION AS REQUIRED BY
CITY AND BY LAWS OR ORDINANCES GOVERNING SUCH CONDITIONS. HE /SHE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY, OR THAT OF OTHERS, BY CONTRACTOR, HIS /HER EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS
OR THEIR EMPLOYEES, AND TO CORRECT AND /OR REPAIR SUCH DAMAGES TO SATISFACTION OF CITY OF
SANFORD AND /OR OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES HE /SHE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND PAY FOR ANY SUCH
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY
5. CITY TO NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING CONTRACTOR ADHERE TO OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) REGULATIONS OR STANDARDS HOWEVER, CITY MAY REPORT SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS
OF UNSAFE PRACTICES TO APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY.
6 NO CONSTRUCTION TO BE INITIATED WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY OF ROADS THAT ARE MAINTAINED BY NCDOT
WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF NCDOT NCDOT APPROVAL TO BE EVIDENCED BY AN APPROPRIATE
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AND /OR DRIVEWAY PERMIT, AS APPLICABLE A COPY OF APPROVED
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AND /OR DRIVEWAY PERMIT TO BE IN CONTRACTOR POSSESSION AT JOB SITE AT
ALL TIMES THAT WORK IS BEING PERFORMED. NOTIFY NCDOT DISTRICT OFFICE AND POST ANY REQUIRED
INDEMNITY BOND PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK IN NCDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY.
7 INSTALL PUBLIC UTILITIES WITHIN NCDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY PER POLICIES QL PROCEDURES Q
UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY j''((�,,..,,�FF 'r LATEST REVISION, AS PUBLISHED BY NCDOT,
bIVF$KNI NICNWAY, OR THOSE OF CITY, 6NiYlEIR, YN OPINION OF ENGINEER IS MORE STRINGENT.
B. KEEP EXISTING PUBLIC STREETS OR HIGHWAYS OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES UNLESS PERMISSION TO
CLOSE STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF, IS GRANTED BY ENGINEER. CONTACT CITY OF SANFORD POLICE
AND LEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS BEFORE ANY STREETS ARE FULLY OR
PARTIALLY CLOSED. INSTALL PROPER AND SUFFICIENT BARRICADES, LIGHTS, SIGNING, AND OTHER PROTECTIVE
DEVICES WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY BY POLICE DEPARTMENT OR ENGINEER.
9 ALL MATERIALS INCORPORATED IN WORK TO BE ACCEPTED BY CITY OF SANFORD FOR MAINTENANCE TO
BE NEW, FIRST QUALITY MATERIAL INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS OR THESE SPECIFICATIONS,
WHICHEVER, IN OPINION OF ENGINEER, IS MORE STRINGENT OR APPLICABLE. IT 15 INTENT OF THIS
SPECIFICATION TO PROVIDE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS OF HIGH STANDARD AND QUALITY AND
TO PROVIDE MATERIALS FREE FROM DEFECTS IN WORKMANSHIP AND PRODUCT. EQUAL MATERIAL NOT
SPECIFIED MAY BE USED PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION AND SAMPLES ARE FURNISHED TO ENGINEER NOT LESS
THAN 14 DAYS BEFORE DELIVERY TO CONSTRUCTION SITE. ENGINEER WILL ISSUE WRITTEN APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS. CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND /OR LATEST REVISIONS TO APPLY IN
ALL CASES WHERE MATERIALS ARE DESCRIBED
10. PRESENCE OF A CITY EMPLOYEE AT WORK SITE TO NOT LESSEN THE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR
CONFORMING TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND /OR SPECIFICATIONS. SHOULD ENGINEER OR
INSPECTOR ACCEPT MATERIALS, OR WORK THAT DOES NOT CONFORM WITH APPROVED PLANS OR
SPECIFICATIONS, WHETHER FROM LACK OF DISCOVERY OR FOR ANY OTHER REASON, SHALL IN NO WAY
PREVENT LATER REJECTION OR CORRECTIONS TO MATERIALS OR WORK WHEN DISCOVERED CONTRACTOR TO
HAVE NO CLAIM FOR LOSSES SUFFERED DUE TO ANY NECESSARY REMOVALS OR REPAIRS RESULTING FROM
UNSATISFACTORY WORK. ANY WORK THAT HAS BEEN COVERED WITHOUT INSPECTOR APPROVAL, SHALL AT
INSPECTOR REQUEST, BE UNCOVERED AND BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT CONTRACTOR EXPENSE.
AFTER REGULAR WORKING HOURS OR WEEKEND WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND TO
INCLUDE ONLY SUCH WORK THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE CONTINUOUS OBSERVATION BY AN INSPECTOR,
11. CITY OF SANFORD DOES NOT PROVIDE FREE OR OTHERWISE UNMETERED WATER FOR USE ON ANY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CONTRACTORS OR CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL TO NOT TAKE WATER FROM
HYDRANTS, BLOW -OFFS, WATER METER BOXES, ETC CONTRACTORS DESIRING TO USE CITY WATER FOR
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES TO APPLY TO THE DPW FOR WATER SERVICE AND TO PAY FOR THE WATER
SERVICE PER CITY OF SANFORD POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS BULK WATER FOR CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER
WATER REQUIREMENTS MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE SANFORD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 225 E
WEATHERSPOON ST BULK WATER FOR CONSTRUCTION MAY ALSO BE OBTAINED FROM A FIRE HYDRANT USING
A CITY APPROVED METER WITH BACK FLOW PREVENTER. BULK WATER RATES WILL BE BILLED PER LOAD OF
WATER OBTAINED AND BILLED AT CURRENT CITY BULK WATER RATE
12. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE GUARANTEE, ON WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR PERIOD OF 1 YEAR
AFTER DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY CITY OF SANFORD. ANY DEFECTS OBSERVED WITHIN 1 YEAR GUARANTEE
PERIOD TO BE REPAIRED AND /OR REPLACED TO CITY SATISFACTION AND COST OF SUCH REPAIRS TO BE
BORNE BY CONTRACTOR GUARANTEE TO APPLY TO STREET CONSTRUCTION, SIDEWALKS, SEWER MAINS,
MANHOLES, SERVICES, WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES
13. RIM ELEVATIONS TO BE SET MINIMUM OF 2 FT ABOVE FINISH GRADE IN SEWER OUTFALL AND MINIMUM
OF 1 FT ABOVE 100 YR FLOOD ELEVATION ANY MANHOLES WITH RIM ELEVATION GREATER THAN 4 FT
ABOVE FINISH GRADE SHALL BE FLAT TOP.
yy[Ty ONSFRUCRON AREAS:
IN THE AREAS DESIGNATED AS WETLANDS ON THE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
ABIDE BY THE CONDITIONS OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NO. 12 AND
NCDWR 401 WQC INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES PLACED IN WETLANDS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE
NATURAL GRADE RESTORED AFTER THE DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES HAS RELEASED THE PROJECT
2. ANNUAL SPECIES SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS SHALL BE PLANTED IN JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS FOR
SOIL AND EROSION CONTROL PERENNIALS SUCH AS FESCUE ARE PROHIBITED.
3. NO FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED WITHIN 10 FEET OF STREAMS.
4. THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR (INCLUDING ACCESS ROADS AND STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS) IS LIMITED
TO 40 FEET IN WIDTH IN WETLANDS AND MUST BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL.
5. MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT LIVE OR FRESH CONCRETE FROM COMING INTO CONTACT WITH
WATERS OF THE STATE UNTIL CONCRETE HAS HARDENED_
6. AN ANTI -SEEP COLLAR. SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DOWNSTREAM (UTILITY LINE GRADIENT) WETLAND
BOUNDARY AND EVERY 150 FEET UP THE GRADIENT UNTIL THE UTILITY EXITS THE WETLAND FOR BURIED
UTILITY LINES ANTI -SEEP COLLARS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DOWNSTREAM (UTILITY LINE GRADIENT)
BOUNDARY OF EVERY STREAM CROSSING ANTI -SEEP COLLARS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CLASS B
CONCRETE OR PRE -CAST UNITS SEALED WITH SILICONE -BASED SEALANT.
7. THE GENERAL CERTIFICATION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY PERMANENT CHANGES IN PRE- CONSTRUCTION
ELEVATION CONTOURS IN WATERS OR WETLANDS THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR
RESTORING WETLAND CONTOURS ANY EXCESS MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED TO A HIGH GROUND
DISPOSAL AREA
B. SEWER LINES AND MANHOLES IN WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED. MANHOLES TO BE
LINED PER DWR REQUIREMENTS AND HAVE WATER TIGHT COVERS AND EXTERNAL JOINTS WRAPPED WITH
CONSEAL OR EQUAL.
Rnvsral I'" `}" PERSIMMON CREEK TRIBUTARY OUTFALL
Yr;M 4S KO1C0
Chwn SEWER EXTENSION
1 I cneadBV I n ..,
VC, Ix1.0411 a1 k Sanford Let! CDurtly North CatoliIa
DESCRIPTION
MINOR CONTOUR INTERVAL
MAJOR CONTOUR INTERVAL
PROPERTY LINE
ROADWAY CENTERLINE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
EASEMENT LINE
CURB & GUTTER
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
AIR RELEASE VALVE ASSEMBLY
STORM SEWER FACIUTIES
WATERLINE
BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY
STRUCTURES
FENCING STRUCTURE
WOODSLINE
WATERWAYS
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
SILT FENCE
CHECK DAM
STONE DRAIN
INLET PROTECTION
WATER BAR
SOIL BORING
LEGEND
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
EXISTING PROPOSED
N/A
N/A
- - -W-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GENERAL NOTES AND LEGEND
N
NA
w
Sr
ftw
IIIIIII
9_
!"==ION WATER. MAINS TQ_S WE .Ea
A. LATERAL SEPARATION OF SEWERS AND WATER MAINS
1. WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 10 FEET LATERALLY FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED
SEWERS, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR BARRIERS PREVENT A 10 -FOOT LATERAL
SEPARATION - -IN WHICH CASE:
a; THE WATER MAIN IS LAID. IN A SEPARATE TRENCH, WITH THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM
OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER.
h THE WATER MAIN 15 LAID IN THE SAME TRENCH AS THE SEWER WITH THE WATER MAIN
LOCATED AT ONE SIDE ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH, AND WITH THE ELEVATION
OF THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE
SEWER.
B. CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER
1. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FOR A WATER MAIN TO CROSS OVER A SEWER, THE WATER
MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT
LEAST 16 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR
BARRIERS PREVENT AN 18 INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION - -IN WHICH CASE BOTH THE WATER
MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS THAT
ARE EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE
OF THE POINT OF CROSSING.
C. CROSSING. A WATER MAIN UNDER A SEWER
1 WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FOR A WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE
WATER MAIN AND THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH
JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET ON EACH
SIDE OF THE POINT OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED
AT THE POINT OF CROSSING
R
,E56X
�JI'r rtF.' i
PRELIMINARY
NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1
115Macle Dr Cary,N hCa h.2)511 -N-B" `

c
3
NO,
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 7,750 LF OF B —INCH
GRAVITY SEWER IN THE CITY OF SANFORD. NORTH CAROLINA WITH A TOTAL DISTURBANCE OF
APPROXIMATELY B ACRES. THE PROJECT BEGINS WITH A CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING MANHOLE ON
THE CITY OF SANFORD COLLECTION SYSTEM LOCATED IN THE CARTHAGE COLONIES SUBDIVISION NEAR
GLOUSCHESTER ROAD THE PROPOSED LINE WILL HAVE AN AERIAL CROSSING OF PERSIMMONS CREEK
( CLASS C ) IN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN AND CONTINUE THROUGH HEAVILY WOODED PROPERTY
PARALLEL TO AN UN —NAMED TRIBUTARY TO PERSIMMONS CREEK UNTIL A CLEARED PROPERTY BEHIND
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE FACILITY AND THE PROPOSED VETERANS AFFAIRS CLINIC SITE. THE PROJECT
WILL CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER FROM LIBERTY HEALTHCARE AND THE PROPOSED VETERANS
AFFAIRS CLINIC.
THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR WILL INVOLVE THE CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF A TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT GENERALLY 40 LF WIDE ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE CORRIDOR UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED. FOLLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION THE SITE WILL BE RESTORED WITH SEEDING AND
MULCH PER THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR A 'PIEDMONT' AREA UNLESS WHERE WETLANDS ARE RESTORED
WITH THE WETLANDS SEEDING SPECIFICATION A PERMENANT EASEMENT OF 20 LF WIDTH WILL BE
MAINTAINED BY THE CITY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AT ALL SITE
ACCESS POINTS. DUE TO THE LINEAR NATURE OF THE PROJECT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL
PRIMARILY BE SILT FENCE WITH STONE OR FIBER WATTLE OUTLETS ALONG THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF
THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR AND WATER BARS ACROSS THE CORRIDOR IN AREAS WHERE SLOPE IS
A CONCERN. TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS WILL BE REQUIRED ACROSS THE SMALL UN —NAMED
TRIBUTARIES ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR MOST OF WHICH ARE 3 -4 FT IN WIDTH TOP OF
BANK TO TOP OF BANK
CONSTRUCTION SEOUEINCE:
1. NOTIFY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE AT (919) 791 -4200 OF CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT AND
SCHEDULE PRE — CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE IF REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER.
2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. SILT FENCE. STONE DRAINS, AND OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN
ON THE APPROVED PLAN. CLEAR ONLY AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THESE DEVICES. SEED
TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, BERMS, AND BASINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
3 BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL. INSTALL SILT
FENCE AROUND STOCKPILE AREAS. DISPOSE OF UNSUITABLE SOILS AND ALL OTHER WASTE
MATERIALS OFF —SITE IN A LEGAL MANNER.
4. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED DAILY AND ALL SPOIL SHALL BE PLACED ON UPHILL SIDE
OF TRENCH WHERE POSSIBLE.
5 AREAS TO BE LEFT DORMANT FOR LONGER THAN 14 CALENDARS DAYS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY
STABILIZED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS.
6. CONTRACTOR TO CONDUCT A WEEKLY SITE INSPECTION AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT TO
DETERMINE WHICH AREAS CAN BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY SEEDED, WHICH DEVICES NEED
MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, ETC AND TO ENSURE THAT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE
PERFORMING ADEQUATELY. PERFORM ANY NECESSARY MAINTENANCE
7. STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINISHED GRADE WITH VEGETATION OR STONE BASE.
ALL AREAS TO BE PAVED SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH STONE AS SOON AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO
FINAL GRADE. MAINTAIN DIVERSIONS, INLET PROTECTION AND SEDIMENT BASINS UNTIL SITE IS
COMPLETELY STABILIZED.
B FERTILIZE. SEED, AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS ACCORDING TO SEEDING SCHEDULE.
9 WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED, CALL FOR AN INSPECTION BY
AN ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
10. IF SITE IS APPROVED, REMOVE ANY TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCES, STONE DRAINS,
SEDIMENT TRAPS, ETC. AND RE —GRADE AND SEED OR STABILIZE ANY RESULTING BARE AREAS.
11. WHEN VEGETATION HAS BECOME ESTABLISHED, CALL FOR A FINAL SITE INSPECTION BY AN
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. OBTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AND REMOVE ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES WITHIN 30 DAYS.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. TOTAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION /LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 7.53 ACRES
2. ANY AREA DISTURBANCES BY CONTRACTOR NOT SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ARE TO
BE PERMITTED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY.
3. PURSUANT TO G S 113A- 57(2), THE ANGLE FOR GRACED SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO
GREATER THAN THE ANGLE THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER ADEQUATE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE OR STRUCTURE.
4. SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED SHALL, WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF
GRADING, BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER,
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE OR STRUCTURE SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
5. PROVIDE A ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP) TO STABILIZE DISTURBED DITCHES IF ANY
SIGNS OF SCOURING ARE EVIDENT EVEN IF NO RECP HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS.
6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE DOWN SLOPE OF ANY AREAS FILLED WITH EXCAVATED
MATERIAL TO CREATE A LEVEL SURFACE FOR EQUIPMENT.
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT OF
1/2 —INCH OR GREATER, ANY NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT FURTHER
DAMAGE AND EROSION. STRUCTURES AND MEASURES THAT SHALL BE INSPECTED ARE OUTLINED
BELOW.
I — SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR FAILURE AND
NECESSARY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE WITHIN THE SAME SEASON.
SILT FENCE — ANY FABRIC WHICH COLLAPSES, TEARS, DECOMPOSES, OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE
SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF
FENCE WHEN SEDIMENT ACCUMULATES TO 6— INCHES OR GREATER.
STONE DRAINS — INSPECT FOR EROSION AROUND THE EDGES AND BETWEEN SILT FENCE AND
DRAIN. REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND DRAINS. ADD STONE TO DRAINS AS REQUIRED
MAINTAINING DESIGN HEIGHT AND CROSS SECTION.
INSPECT CROSSING AREA FOR BLOCKAGE, EROSION OF ABUTMENTS,
CHANNEL SCOUR, RIP —RAP DISPLACEMENT, AND PIPING. MAKE REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY TO
PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE — INSPECT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES FOR CONDITION OF SURFACE
TOP —DRESS WITH NEW STONE AS NEEDED.
STOCKPILES — CHECK REGULARLY FOR SEDIMENTATION AND DESTABILIZATION.
A. BOUNDARIES OF WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED WILL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD BY A
LICENSED SURVEYOR TO ENSURE THAT THE DISTURBED WETLANDS ARE RESTORED IN THEIR
ENTIRETY.
B. ALL FILL PLACED WITHIN THE WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED AND EXCAVATED DOWN
TO NATIVE SOILS
C. LOGGING MATS AND STEEL PLATES WITHIN WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO
FINAL GRADING.
D. WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL GRADE AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2 -7
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTED BY WITHERS & RAVENEL DURING THE DESIGN
PHASE OF THE PROJECT WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE NATURAL GRADE OF THE
RESTORED WETLANDS. DURING GRADING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A
SURVEY CREW ON SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE RESTORED
WETLANDS MATCHES THE PRE — CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS WITHIN THE DISTURBED
WETLANDS.
E. GRADING WITHIN WETLAND AREAS SHALL USE ONLY NATIVE WETLAND SOILS. OFFSITE FILL
WILL NOT BE USED TO ASSIST WITH GRADING EFFORTS.
F. SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY
WORK.
G. AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE RIPPED APPROXIMATELY 6" DEEP, TOTAL SEEDBED
PREPARED DEPTH SHALL BE 5" TO B" DEEP.
H. LOOSE ROCKS. ROOTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE
SO THAT THEY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF
VEGETATION SURFACE FOR FINAL SEEDBED PREPARATION, AT FINISH GRADES SHOWN,
SHALL BE REASONABLY SMOOTH.
I. UPON SUCCESSFUL RESTORATION OF THE NATURAL CONTOURS OF THE DISTURBED
WETLANDS, THE DISTURBED WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH NATIVE HERBACEOUS
WETLAND SPECIES TO PROVIDE STABILIZATION UNTIL NATURAL RECRUITMENT DIVERSIFIES
THE VEGETATION COMPOSITION OF THESE AREA THE DISTURBED WETLANDS WILL BE
SEEDED WITH A WETLAND SEED MIXTURE CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES AND
APPLICATION RATES:
SIC MIXTURE 4;PVC35 RPTANICAL NWF
APF`,ICAT IQN RAZE
SOFT RUSH JUNCUS EFFUSUS
2.5 LBS / ACRE
SMART WEED POLYGONUM PENSYLVANICUM
2 LEIS / ACRE
LIZARD'S TAILS AURURUS CERNUS
2 LEIS / ACRE
RYE GRAIN SECALE CEREALE
40 LEIS / ACRE
(USED AS FILLER TO
INCREASE SEED DISPERSION)
SEED BED PREPARATION:
GRASSING AND SEEDING — THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING THE
LAND, LIMING, FERTILIZING, AND SEEDING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHEN UNDER CITY
CONTRACT. WHERE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR DEVELOPER ON AN
EXISTING CITY— OR STATE — MAINTAINED STREET, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR FERTILIZING, LIMING, AND SEEDING THE DISTURBED AREA WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION,
THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SEEDING ANY DISTURBED AREAS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED
NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE SEEDING AS REQUIRED TO RESTORE THE PROJECT TO A
CONDITION EQUAL TO THAT EXISTING AT THE TIME OF AWARD OF CONTRACT.
ALL ROOTS, STONES, AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AND OVERALL SHAPING OF THE AREA
TO LEVEL OUT HIGH AND LOW SPOTS SHALL BE DONE. THE SOIL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO
A DEPTH OF THREE INCHES AND WORKED INTO A SUITABLE SEED BED BY DISCING,
HARROWING, RAKING, OR BY OTHER APPROVED MEANS THE PREPARATION OUTLINED SHALL
NOT BE DONE WHEN THE SOIL IS FROZEN, WET, OR OTHERWISE IN AN UNFAVORABLE
CONDITION.
FERTILIZER AND LIME OF TYPE AND IN QUANTITIES HEREINAFTER SPECIFIED SHALL BE
DISTRIBUTED OVER THE PREPARED SEED BED AT THE SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE AND
SHALL BE HARROWED, RAKED, OR OTHERWISE WORKED IN TO THE SEED BED. SEED OF
TYPE AND IN QUANTITY HEREINAFTER SPECIFIED SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED UNIFORMLY OVER
THE SEED BED AND IMMEDIATELY HARROWED, RAKED, OR DRAGGED TO COVER THE SEED
WITH A LAYER OF SOIL. AFTER THE SEED IS COVERED, THE SEED BED SHALL BE
COMPACTED BY MEANS OF A ROLLER OR DRAG AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER.
ON SLOPES OR WHERE REQUIRED, A MULCH OF APPROXIMATELY TWO INCHES LOOSE
MEASUREMENT DEPTH SHALL BE APPLIED. MULCH SHALL CONSIST OF CURED HAY OF
AGRICULTURAL GRASSES, GRAIN STRAW, OR OTHER MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
USE 150 TO 200 GALLONS PER ACRE ASPHALT EMULSION WHEN NECESSARY FOR
ANCHORING MULCH AND KEEP IN PLACE UNTIL GRASS ROOTS ARE GROWING.
FERTILIZER SHALL BE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER KNOWN IN THE TRADE AS 10- 10 -10, OR
EQUIVALENT QUANTITY ON A 1 -1 -1 RATIO, SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 800
POUNDS PER ACRE MIN.
LIME SHALL BE OF AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL BRAND AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE
OF 4,000 POUNDS PER ACRE MIN.
SEED SHALL BE APPLIED AS FOLLOWS:
I. MIXTURE OF TALL FESCUE 409 /ACRE AND RED FESCUE 309 /ACRE; AUGUST 15 THRU
OCTOBER 30;
J. MIXTURE OF TALL FESCUE 609 /ACRE AND RYE 259 /ACRE; NOVEMBER 1 THRU
J. WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 1005 BIODEGRADABLE "JUTE' TYPE EROSION JANUARY 31;
CONTROL NETTING OR EQUAL INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER DIRECTIONS.
K. SAME MIXTURE AS (A); FEBRUARY 1 THRU MAY 30;
EROSION CONTROL SELF INSPECTION:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND— DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE
PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS
BEING FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT
OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE SELF — INSPECTION PROGRAM IS SEPARATE FROM THE WEEKLY
SELF — MONITORING PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
THE FOCUS OF THE SELF — INSPECTION REPORT IS THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A -54.1 AND 15A
NCAC 480131 THE SELF — INSPECTION REPORT FORM IS AVAILABLE AS AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET
FROM HTTP: / /WWW DLR ENR.STATE.NC.US /PACES /SEDIMENTATION —NEW HTML. IF YOU HAVE
QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM, PLEASE CONTACT THIS OFFICE AT (919) 791 -4200.
GROUND STABILIZATION CHART
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
DIKES, SWALE$. DITCHES, AND 7 DAYS NONE
SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) 7 DAYS NONE
ZONES
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ME 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ME
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1. 14 DAYS ME ALLOWED
ISLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50' IN LENGTH
I ALL OTHER AREAS WITH 14 DAYS NONE. EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HOW ZONES
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
I'''I`' LIY, AS NOTED I PERSIMMON CREEK TRIBUTARY OUTFALL
Ch,kA Ga' SEWER EXTENSION
- I 4Mr/Pra 5
cnr<em ev - 1� �.
u1CW 021.0471.0, Sanford Lee County North Carolina
L. MIXTURE OF TALL FESCUE 609 /ACRE AND 209 /ACRE BROWN TOP MILLET; JUNE 1
THRU AUGUST 15.
IRRIGATION, IF REQUIRED, WILL BE 0.25 INCHES /HOUR MAXIMUM.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE GRASSED AREA FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3)
MONTHS AFTER THE GRASS GROWTH APPEARS AND SHALL RE —SEED BARE SPOTS AND
REPAIR ANY AND ALL ERODED AREAS DURING THIS TIME.
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
1 ♦ pis
SE
PRELIMINARY
NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS 11
I li Machenan Dflrx Cary,r:°,Ih Car1I 215H 1,1919- K4]3J0 wwwwilhe,uaamel c°m Lianas.° 3,

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE

Pat McCrory
Governor
F
WDERR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Mitigation Services
July 23, 2015
Hal Hegwer
City of Sanford
PO Box 3729
Sanford, NC 27330
Project: Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: January 23, 2016
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this
decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies
as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the
DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations
associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143 - 214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on
the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu
fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River Basin CU I Stream (feet) I Wetlands (acres) I Buffer I I Buffer II
Location
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non - Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Cape Fear 03030003 I 0 I 0 , 0 0.50 0 0
1 I 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915.
cc: Andy Williams, USACE - Raleigh
Troy Beasley, agent
Sincere .
eo45BStanfill
�Adet Management Supervisor
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -8976! Internet: www.nceep.net
An Equal opportunity t Affirmative Acton Employer - Made in part from recycle, paper

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION

WITHERS ERS , RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Citv of Sanford — Persimmon Creek Gravitv Sewer
Applicant - City of Sanford
Hal Hegwer, City Manager
Sanford Municipal Building
225 E. Weatherspoon St.
Sanford, NC 27330
Property Owner - Multiple — see attached City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Project Location — Proposed gravity sewer line alignment located from existing sewer line
west of Chownings Drive in the Carthage Colony Subdivision to existing
line located at 2255 Tramway Rd in Sanford.
County — Lee County
Nearest Waterbodv —
Persimmon Creek
Stream Index:
17 -40 -2
Classification:
Class C
Drainage Basin — Cape Fear Basin
HUC Code: 03030003
Decidearees — North End: 35.452789 °N; - 79.197266 °W (near Chownings Dr.)
South End: 35.438042 °N; - 79.217304 °W (near Tramway Dr.)
USGS Quad Map — Sanford Quadrangle
Soil Survev Sheet(s) - Lee County Soil Survey — Sheet 5
Total Length — ±9,300 linear feet
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

iliir
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: yo 6 coo a yt(k &M
City, State: (0 �c
County: 90
Directions: ak a 0 i ffff va 6Omp ijb
O iw of Z eD n i M
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1%0 hey #A ad W
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: nKft Id -Wi & R&
Mailing Address: nk W- 0
Telephone Number: a ffhb I s
Electronic Mail Address 1: bow
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: I -a &h yc 6 SBA
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Versi&b 2013 g 3

iliir
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
9i
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
W1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an a_mroved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Versi&b 2013 g 4

iliir
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area :94 M I df acres
_Q I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑✓ Project Coordinates: 34B Latitude a Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
0 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
0 Aerial Photography of the project area
0 USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Versi&b 2013 g 5

iliir
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
✓❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http: / /www.usace.armv.miI/ Missions/ CivilWorks/ RegulatorvProgramandPermits /res supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htto: / /oortal.ncdenr.ore /c /document library /get file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &grouold =38364 and,
htto: / /www.saw.usace.armv.mil/ Portals /59 /docs /reaulatory /i)ublicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.odf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Versi&b 2013 g 6

iliir
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Versi&b 2013 R 7

iliir
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larder than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I I "xI7 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Versibb 2013 g 8

iliir
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non-
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Versibb 2013 g 9

4hiloir
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Versi" 2013 Ili

iliir
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Versibb 2013 119

A TTA CHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
yG 6 * HW M99
Z E VYA 03 f c 3
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
W s i a,* ek OW 0 f c
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Le co City: a
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 40 Eq °N; Long. 31W EO °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: r
Name of nearest waterbody: r&-
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
a linear feet:aiz width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: -i#
Stream Flow: J&
Wetlands: 0 acres.
Cowardin Class: -i#
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: Ne
Non - Tidal: rm
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
✓❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant: 1uhr Mnd -Wi & r&
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
app licant /consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: I% a cW
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: le 9O *b -96 5
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
E
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer
Preliminary JD Inventory Table
Page 1
Estimated Amount
Class of Aquatic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
of Aquatic Resource
Source
in the Review Area
Non - section 10
Wetland A
35.45246
- 79.1978
Riparian
0.22 acres
wetland
Non - section 10
Stream 1
35.45205
- 79.1975
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Non - Section 10
Stream 2
35.45046
- 79.1996
Riparian
521f
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland E
35.44901
- 79.2009
Riparian
0.20 acres
wetland
Non - section 10
Stream 3
35.45044
- 79.1996
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland F
35.44615
- 79.2049
Riparian
1.69 acres
wetland
Non - section 10
Stream 4
35.44542
- 79.206
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland G
35.44434
- 79.2086
Riparian
0.30 acres
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland H -1
35.44379
- 79.2092
Riparian
0.23 acres
Wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland H -2
35.44354
- 79.2094
Riparian
0.09 acres
Wetland
Non - section 10
Stream 5 -1
35.44415
- 79.2088
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Page 1

Sanford Persimmon Creek Gravity Sewer
Preliminary JD Inventory Table
Page 2
Non - section 10
Stream 5 -2
35.44392
- 79.209
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Stream 6
35.44237
- 79.2095
Riparian
100 if
Non - wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland I
35.44352
- 79.2098
Riparian
0.17 acres
Wetland
Non - section 10
Wetland K
35.44146
- 79.2128
Riparian
0.20 acres
Wetland
Page 2

WITHERS O� RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, Citv of Sanford (Client) does hereby appoint Withers &
Ravenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state
and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and
approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, streams, riparian
buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit
applications /requests for the Citv of Sanford — Persimmon Creek Gravitv Sewer,
extending aooroximately 9.300 linear feet, from west of Chowninas Drive in the existing
Carthaue Crossina Subdivision to 2255 Tramwav Rd in Sanford.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date: '$ /'Z-t I (-
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Sig ature of lient:
Withers & Ravenel. Inc.
(Name - Print)
115 MacKenan Drive � I �
Carv. NC 27511 (Si natu
Tel. (919) -469 -3340 Q x 31
Mailing Address
--3 c -0- n *-) �� b
City State Zip
Phone: °\ �� "1 r1 '� k 1 \'1:1�
Email: �-W\
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] ; fax: [phone] www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 ; tel: [phone]: fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road 1 Suite G Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

PIN
9631 -86- 5489 -00
9631 -97- 4930 -00
9631 -87- 4988 -00
9631 -64- 8818 -00
9641 -09- 5617 -00
9641 -08- 1805 -00
9631 -76 -3324
9631 -76 -4207
9631 -76 -1056
9631 -65- 3170 -00
Property Address
2100 BRANTLEY RD
1901 CARTHAGE ST
0 CARTHAGE ST
3100 TRAMWAY RD
1715 CARTHAGE ST
0 CARTHAGE ST
0 PIONEER DRIVE
0 PIONEER DRIVE
0 PIONEER DRIVE
0 TRAMWAY RD
Mail Address
2332 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY SANFORD NC 27332
1817 CARTHAGE ST SANFORD NC 27330
5508 DEN HEIDER WAY RALEIGH NC 27606
2334 41ST ST WILMINGTON NC 28403
707 DENADA PATH SANFORD NC 27330
615 SEVEN LAKES NORTH WEST END NC 27376
PO BOX 508 TROY NC 27371
PO BOX 508 TROY NC 27371
PO BOX 508 TROY NC 27371
PO BOX 1320 SANFORD NC 27331
Ownerl
WALL, SHIRLEY B
LUTTERLOH, ERIN KAY
YARBOROUGH, BRETT BENSON
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE PROP LEE TRAMWAY LLC
HOLT, W M JR
DONNELL, MICHAEL L
FIRST TROY SPE LLC
FIRST TROY SPE LLC
FIRST TROY SPE LLC
TRAMWAY ONE ASSOCIATES LLC

1
�1 '1
Legend
City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
Overall Map
i
,
B TT BENSON
ire 4
9631 -76- 4207 -00
JIMMY RAY WALL
Figure 6
JIMMY RAY WALL
Figure 8
9631 -65 -317 -00
TRAMWAY ONE ASSOCIATES LLC
Figure 10
9631 -64- 8818 -00
THCARE PROP LEE TRA
Figure 9
Sewer Main Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT CERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
9641 -09- 5617 -00
HOLT, W M JR
Figure 1
9641 -08- 1805-00
NNELL, MICHAEL L
ME-F;iq 2
1.000
I00■
Oaf
201
It'
2,000
Feet
WITHERS �� RAVENEL
ENGINE E R5 1 FLAN Nf RS 1 5URVE VUR5

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
/ PIN: 9641 -09- 5617 -00
�-
L-ni WA,ju 'm al AY'n�llln L: a o o
9641 -09- 5617 -00
• JR
ewer Main
ewer Easement
9641 -0 18 x805 -00
,• L L
JPIN I Sewer(LF) I TCE(SF) Easement (SF)
19641- 09,5617100 1013 19878 202681
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
'IkkiJfijep U103
■
r
N
I.—
9641-18-5887 -00
.-
9641 -18- 7421 -00
• LLC
0 50 100 200
F
WITHERS R"ENr=L
EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 I `19VE IEt R%

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9641 -08- 1805 -00
ewer Easement.
9631-97-4930-09'
L I �ItOH, Eli I
N9l
L L
I
I
D 0
JPIN Sewer(LF) TCE(SF) Easement (SF) 1
19641 -08- 1805 -00 1058 21366 211661
\ -- I
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER:THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
ewer Main
Y l7t1rUt-QA
9641 -18- 7421 -00
MCBL LLC
0 50 100
200
m Feet
N
WITHERS R"ENr=L
EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 I `19VE rO R%

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer e
PIN: 9631 -97- 4930 -00
9631�88T8T48'1 -d0
D
96.3 "1�98�3751�d0
9631 -97- 4930 -00
L
Ys.�ira.�e1P�
o
JPIN Sewer(LF) TCE(SF)
19631 -97- 4930 -00 1 1339
Legend
Easement (SF) 1
26873 267461
9641 -08- 1805.00
• L, L
wer Main
X
9631 -97- 6049 -00
DOUGLAS, &DOUGLAS,
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
0 50 100
200
m Feet /
WITHERS �C RAVENEL
ENGINE E R5 1 FLAN Nf RS 1 5URVE VUR5

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9631 -87- 4988 -oo
N
JPIN Sewer(LF) I TCE(SF) Easement (SF) 1 0 50 100 200
9631 -87- 4988 -00 1 543 9757 10820 Feet
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND WITH ERS R"ENEL
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 19VE IEt R%
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9631 -86- 5489 -oo
On
OKA
JIMMY R
9 -3 -7i
6 —qq —4
hqq h "IVA
JPIN Sewer(LF) TCE(SF) Easement (SF) 1
9631 -86- 5489 -00 1389 78726 27760
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
t. _ ewer E g-s em n
K 9631 -86- 5489 -00
WALL,
N
9631-87- 4988 -00
0 50 100 200
reet
0)
WITHERS R"ENr=L
ENGINEERS, R14NNER5 I `VRVE TORS

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9631-76-4207-00 / - - -
1uvUC_l4 Mom G3
9631 -76- 2583 -00
9631-76- 2435 -00
BALLARD, ► A
1118 SF Sewer Easement
9631 -76- 3324 -00
cap»
9631 -76- 4209
VM
r4i 1V1 1V1 kTA R, L
JPIN Sewer(LF) TCE(SF) Easement (SF)
19631 -76- 4207 -00 56 1668 1118
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
9fi31- 86T5489T00
WALL,
ewer Main
96�31�-76-51®28 -00
lily L
0 25 50
00
Feet
N
WITHERS & R,A►VENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SIJRYt VQRS

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer e
PIN: 9631-76-3324-00 /
&LdW1 V L�, .lUut;.L
Ai�- •�nrin9_��11 L�i
9631 -76- 1374 -00
WA: LLARD,
nuou
PIN Sewer(LF)
9631 -76- 3324 -00
\ X�
Legend
9631 -76- 1056-00
L
TCE (SF) Easement (SF) 1
273 4661 f 54541
r
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
9631 -76- 4207-00
L
J 9631 76 5128-00,-
�I�Ii� L
0 25 50 100\
Feet
WITHERS &' R"ENr=L
EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 I `19VE 10 R%

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer e
PIN: 9631 -76- 1056 -oo
9631 -76- 1374 -00
BALLARD, A
9631 66- 8;199 -00'
L CHARLES ,R
9631 -76': 141-00
96-V- 5- 3170 -00
E.IdE`��'' LLC;
PIN Sewer(LF)x x TCE(SF) Easement (SF)
19631 -76 1056 -00 269 5403 53441
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS..
11T61:K1
AJ
9631-75 - 3471 -00
KEY, JIMMY G
0 25 50 100
Feet /
WITHERS R"ENr=L
EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 I `19VE IEt R%

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9631 -64- 8818 -oo
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
01. iiE:S LLC
I LF 6" Sewer Main
3111164-88081.84-
PROP LEE TRAMWAY LLC
il
0 50 100 200
Feet
WITHERS & R,A►VENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURYEVORS

City of Sanford Easement Exhibit
Persimmons Creek Tributary Outfall Gravity Sewer
PIN: 9631-65-3170-00
Ile
9631 -65 31_;,70 -00
LLG
9631 -64- 8818 -00
IfflUERITIT4111, 1,__ .. L ►. 1
(SF) Easement (SF) 1
35956 365981
� 1
Legend
Sewer Main Temporary Construction Easement
Sewer Easement - Parcels
DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP IS NOT ACERTIFIED SURVEY AND
HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
i
e
� 1
s
0 50 100 200
Feet
1 ,
WITHERS R"ENr=L
EN GINEE R5 i 81411 NE R5 I `19VE IEt R%

J
W
zN
wG
Y
sj W
I '
N
zz
W
i
6
in
Im
W
IN
W
J
M
O
N
J
w
Q
z
O
¢
v
x
O
z
ry
>w
w
Q
V
w
w
r z
U�
0
Z
0 �
CLj
^v L/
r/
^w
I —
^r)
ry-,
O
LL.
Z
I ^ LY
V / O
z
� - a
_ a s
•0111 'A315V3S - Md OZ:90:> S10Z 'LZ HAW 'AOP-M - 6ap'sl!O!y.3 Iso.bad 01' \0V0 \spwjjQM \!o+d \SO Maa+O Wo s+ad P+o��o5- Ol'lLYOf I \OLaO- Y{ \Yl \M

GRAPHIC SCALE j� _`(, r c j')J!` �y %J \ . ♦(�.. , r rp„ �� ` ``��"
0 1500 3000 x ■ IS '~ r G `\ �f7 V' �'♦ Y f \` 1`'
1 inch = 3000 ft.
:�- `.. ((�� U I , ` \) )r `NI �S 1%�J`n'yl►n/;/ -� ., � ,r "1 �.(f '1 / `r , `� ,\
1, � �, L I /{ �-S\ —' �'• fr �`�l�(// �'/ ,r • " � � � i 7 � ,� � �� _ `�. - 9 ��� off, ' ' , I-� .�-�t
_ �� •^ J.,,� � � - i� .. �p �,� �/ �(f l.� 1 tier � 1, � ,
��.,1��1� ✓_ �(`�7 ,�1 �1r �♦� ! f .�i I(;'" 'y ,,(",� 1� `%, C�" .�,� �t ` • ". {. f ., d•� N� .I f V.
fe
)��., _ _ _ —� /iV i _� � ;•�7 V -lam_ •,! _ �. ..�j �f\i' _ ����i �� `1 ,Le •i: ,\' `,. j� Z � (y ,c�: i \ '�
7 1'1111 `i��r _ °. i �.. p ! i 1 (.. •,: ?L5 �Y
lV/ T i /.- 'i /`—I' - ,11 � \ '�li 1 , * r •� � �/ '.� Y a d `� �'�. • � �'R SrK : � )f — �,`_� ,
I lrr �i �. / ��� '�� '�,� I� I_ � �•1�1 \�' �� !•, {j�yiy\1 � � � ,r •���T � �� - n:� � �Y.. ,� 'll
i°
N.
, •� . ;, �' � y `� _ ) �,. ' I '� � � f � - , i `//ANN ` 1�, •�, _��..�-' ,�• � � � � j ��
U�� I �1 �v� ? I/ � �� •�� 1 �• '`.�, - \�'��� �t ;��•I _ � -l+ d •`" - / f% - ��- ,� �� t , i ,/% 11� f/r, _. '',1� ;
�' -�> -. `fir.. - �, - — �' -.� - -, ��� J, °- alp �•���/'.1r \� • �`'�•L�• � `'� �� /• ^_4 _;� +f
fx_
SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER USGS QUAD - SANFORD WITHERS RAVENEL
ENNINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
MfB
0 500 1000 _ MfD , MfB MfD
i Cp
1 inch = 1000 ft. \ ' MfD MfD `-
hD, S p I MfD
MfB J � ' MfD�
f E
° � � /M � / �M f E M f
i 4 w /(
)oA DoA
GhB
C° ,' MfE MfD �. MfD
� DoA Cp
00 to -
GhD W
J ' ° B �
o
� �o 000
°
M
f\ D O
DoA MfD fp °_°
O o 0 ' °
MrB Ch c-a OO 000 0° 00 OO
04 M
_ f
B
MfD Tramway MfD ° °° 0
� ° O Cl FuB DoA ,' WE FuB DoA DOB C� MfB °° rx�
GhB
FuB � i ° � c c fr
;h G B
1
�— w FuB °
W � ° °
` GhD �
MfD Ch DOB
DoB Co
MfB DoA DOB DoA 0 DOA, \
FuB GhB DoA
tw Ch DoA
GhB 78
f, - DoB o8 ^ �� �GhB
SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
LEE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 5
WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

GRAPHIC SCALE �/ v \ V J ��v
0 500 1000 / ( \ • , 1
Nl-
1 1
1 inch = 1000 ft.
10" •
k. - �� 1.0
• !•
•' f
1334`
'oo..-5 -Tra
Z
t
1
Rio
0
.• -� "
J• • � � - r f 115 � � ti.5�� �k� -� •,�. � _
•
SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER USGS QUAD - SANFORD WITHE1118 RAVENEL
!N•INlCRS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Designer >�a Swle ' . 100
°a,e I SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER WITHERS RAVENEL
1PkeBy I.b— �,1a WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT — OVERALL ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
°w °a W
rae � 0=140471.1. I SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

R WITHERS RAVENEL
Wk 1 � .00' .., �..
III °° 11,1,,,5 SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT - EAST
nuked sy ""'� ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
THe oar +ooi.io SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

, „a G1111111 DA1P ,,,, +s SANFORD PERSIMMON CREEK GRAVITY SEWER WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT —WEST WITHERS RAV E N E L
Icne�k�a ey
re iob NOT.13 aaun
oi.+o SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA I I ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M lid - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat: 45 Long: 1B
Soil Map Unit Name: qD@ t is l3n
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Ts i * VII d)
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: EFP
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
NWI classification: HIM F1
❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑X No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes ❑X No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Yes ❑x No ❑ Within a Wetland?
Yes ❑x No ❑
nhw IdM 4 m 4F A- 3
Yes ❑ No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes El No
El Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 7 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts in git 46
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4iiWRQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP1-
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size )
Number of Dominant Species
1.00
x❑ FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
ffiL aefPI dt
Vo
❑ PVU
®
Total Number of Dominant
4)
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
9 %
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
4Y°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
Ob lal#t
6/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
0/0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
_X_ Dominance Test is >50%
1 L*I lad i
3/0
IM K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 PC shot
0
x❑FPC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3MM ydw
6/0
❑PUN
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
O
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
No
X❑ WW
2. WG% a&
0(0
❑ CEL
S
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
0
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
No
ID FA C
2*
�o
OVID
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
.�/
Vegetation
❑
`/0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
It# ell * w8 * shlt mjrp
on
Id Dili
M
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabLA

SOIL Sampling Point FP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
4 7 ffa I'o
7 -9 T'o
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
Ion yt is rah, Itb
Ion 'W Gil dM
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
H Idric Soil Indicators:
®Polyvalue
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
- Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_E Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
1* Ws16 W dqD V. ft git .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
ER
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat:46 N Long VV
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
Soil Map Unit Name Go t Is k' NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No El (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology# 16 *&1 ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SMVI ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
❑x No
❑
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
❑ No
x❑
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
❑ No
x❑
Remarks:
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
TIS i * vahl b nhw
so
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
0 del *6 G
H, I M
J a td
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
lift 4 m af A sTn E
\fie Mrs
0
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0� Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
[_I. High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
® Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift
Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes El No
„
El Depth (inches): > 8
Saturation Present. Yes ❑ No
X❑ Depth (inches): � � Wetland Hydrology Present. Yes X
❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
Vw t * va 16 Ap V. ft ** .10
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4i@RQfti*A

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Sampling Point: EP 2
Tree Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
®
Number of Dominant Species
�lafyfi
§o
E] FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2. (DO bb
510
❑ FiaQ l
®
Total Number of Dominant
7
3•
❑
W
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
❑
❑
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
®
Percent of Dominant Species
-RIO
5.
❑
496/00*
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
❑
7
610
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
IYo
W°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: 5 IN )
OBL species x 1 =
aef Pi dtt
No
Q FA CJ
FACW species x 2 = 2
�lafyfi
�o
x❑
FAC species x3= 9
3,
❑
FACU species x4= 2
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
8
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
�o
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
X Dominance Test is >50%
1 L*I uda
NO
K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
❑
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
❑
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 IN
1. AlIm
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
114i
2.
3.
4.
5.
NO
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
4yo
x❑ WW
®
Sam
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
El
pr
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
❑
W
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
❑
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
❑
496/00*
❑
610
= Total Cover
IYo
x❑ FA C
❑
610
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
F # a \W * Shtt mjrp on
0 Ill ao PM d# aft aid
® Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes ❑ No
k Dili b aho ishtt
it >3
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4iiiI§RQftiabLA

SOIL
Sampling Point: IP2-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
a 9 ffm TYo Ion ah
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
H Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Idric
Histosol (Al)
- ®Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
�Redox
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No x❑
1* ids 16 W 16 ap fit gElb .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat: 45 Long: 1B
Soil Map Unit Name: qD@ t is l3n
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
NWI classification: HIM F1
❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑X No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
❑X No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
❑x ®
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
No within a Wetland?
❑x ❑
Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Remarks:
TIS i vahl b nhw
WV6
Do D sTn e#
of W Cad E� a
ali A \ .albs
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
E Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
BWater Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
El No
El Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 7 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts ft git 46
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4iiWRQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP1-
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size )
Number of Dominant Species
1.00
x❑ FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
ffiL aefPI dt
Vo
❑ PVU
®
Total Number of Dominant
4)
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
9 %
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
4Y°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
Ob lal#t
6/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
0/0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
_X_ Dominance Test is >50%
1 L*I lad i
3/0
IM K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 PC shot
0
x❑FPC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3MM ydw
6/0
❑PUN
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
O
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
No
X❑ WW
2. WG% a&
No
X❑ CEL
S
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
0
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
No
ID FA C
2*
�o
OVID
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
.�/
Vegetation
❑
`/0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
It# ell * w8 * shlt mjrp
on
Id Dili
M
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabLA

SOIL Sampling Point D
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
4 7 ffa I'o
7 -9 T'o
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
Ion yt is rah, Itb
Ion 'W Gil dM
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
H Idric Soil Indicators:
®Polyvalue
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
- Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_E Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
1* Ws16 W dqD V. ft git .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
ER
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat:46 N Long VV
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: CW
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
Soil Map Unit Name Go t is k' NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No El (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology# 16 *&1 ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SMVI ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Remarks:
TIS I * vow 4) nhw mo WN
0 Go W6 C allIll E� a td M Mrs
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Q m zy D sTn a#
M
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0� Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
[_I. High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
® Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift
Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes El No
El Depth (inches): > 8
Saturation Present. Yes ❑ No
X❑ Depth (inches): � � Wetland Hydrology Present. Yes X
❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
Vw t * va 16 Ap V. ft ** .10
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4i@RQfti*A

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP 4
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
Number of Dominant Species
�I�yfi
§o
E] FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2. (DO bb
510
❑ FiaQ l
®
Total Number of Dominant
7
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
-RIO
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: 'b IN )
OBL species x 1 =
aef Pi dat
NO
Q FA CJ
FACW species x 2 =
I�
�o
x❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
�0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
X Dominance Test is >50%
1 L*I ud�
NO
K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
®
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
❑
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
2/0
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
6/0
X❑ FIQN
®
Sri
2•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑
496/00*
11.
❑
12.
❑
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
G/O
=Total Cover
,/
6O
x❑ FA C
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
�
Vegetation
❑
W/ 0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
It# ell * w8 * shlt mjrp
on
Id Dili
M
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabLA

SOIL
Sampling Point: IP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
a 9 ffm TYo Imo, ah
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
H Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Idric
Histosol (Al)
- ®Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
�Redox
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No x❑
l* W S 16 W 16 ap f it gElb .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat:41t Long
Soil Map Unit Name: no 6 f 8 f) at 20
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
0 NWI classification: HISS F1
El No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑X No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
❑X No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
❑x ®
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
No within a Wetland?
❑x ❑
Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Remarks:
TIS i Ab v01W b nhw
MV6
F m 4F @i vs amb
Qrf ch gm
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
E Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
BWater Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
X❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): © Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts in git 46
ff�* seam
US Army Corps of Engineers aIifhl4i@RQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP5.
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
Number of Dominant Species
1.
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
❑
®
Total Number of Dominant
6
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
3/0
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
N°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadino Stratum (Plot size: b )
OBL species x 1 =
1 Pe
5/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
�0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
X Dominance Test is >50%
1 Lil aef Ol d t
NO
❑ VW
— Prevalence Index is 53.0'
ffift Ial*t
F0
E] PC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.19 36
5/0
❑ VC
4�
�0
x❑ VON
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
❑
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
WO
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
5/0
❑ FIC
®
Sri
2•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Iwo
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
NO
x❑ FA C
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
NO
Vegetation
❑
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Fd # mll # \As * slht mjrlb
*D
kl! Do*
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabA

SOIL
Sampling Point: EP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
in CRIB TY0 Ion em
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
H Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Idric
Histosol (Al)
- ®Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_E Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
1* WS16 W dqD V. ft git .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat:41t Long
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
Soil Map Unit Name: no 6 f 8 f) at 20 0 NWI classification: 0
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes El No El (If no, explain in Remarks.)
l�¢lyQ
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, 6Wydrology# 16 *&1 ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SMVI ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Ts i al(fe VII d)
HYDROLOGY
Yes
❑x
No
❑
Yes
❑
No
x❑
Yes
❑x
No
❑
n i a" WV(b
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
F m if
Yes ❑ No ❑
A ws ash (Erf 46 tqb
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift
Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): © Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts in git 46
US Army Corps of Engineers aIifhl4iiWRQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP&
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
Number of Dominant Species
1.
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
❑
®
Total Number of Dominant
4
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
8/0
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
N°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadino Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1. N
❑
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
NO
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
X Dominance Test is >50%
1 Law Mf Ol d t
No
❑ VW
— Prevalence Index is 53.0'
ffift Ial*t
Yo
E] FPC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.19 36
IYo
❑ Fi�C
4dl�
�o
Q VON
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
IYo
❑
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
310
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
®
Sri
2•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
NO
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
41Yo
x❑ FA C
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
4Y0
Vegetation
❑
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
F�# mll # N8 * slht mjrlb
*D
kl!
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabA

SOIL Sampling Point: EP&
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
80 MA Wo im so W1, em
8 -9 TYo km 'W all dm
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
H Idric Soil Indicators:
®Polyvalue
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
- Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
�Redox
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No x❑
l* W S 16 W 16 ap f it gElb .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat: 4B Long: a
Soil Map Unit Name: qD@ t is l3n
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation El, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: EF
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
NWI classification: HIM F1
❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑X No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
❑X No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
❑x ®
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
No within a Wetland?
❑x ❑
Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Remarks:
TIS i vahl b nhw
WV6
H w 4F H- 5 sTn e*
of W6 G , I aw ) a
ai A \ .a h
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0 Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
E Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
BWater Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
El No
El Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 7 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts ft git 46
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4iiWRQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EPT
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size )
Number of Dominant Species
1.00
x❑ FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
ffiL aefPI dt
Vo
❑ PVU
®
Total Number of Dominant
1
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
9 %
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
4Y°
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
Ob lal#t
6/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
0/0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
_X_ Dominance Test is >50%
1 L*I lad i
3/0
IM K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 PC shot
0
x❑FPC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3MM ydw
6/0
❑PUN
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
O
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
No
X❑ WW
2. WG% a&
5/0
❑ CEL
S
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. 091d Alba-0
No
x❑ RIM
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
❑
7.
nffi AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
SO
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
No
ID FA C
2*
�o
OVID
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
.�/
Vegetation
❑
`/0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
It# ell * w8 * shlt mjrp
on
Id Dili
M
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabLA

SOIL Sampling Point P
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
4 7 ffa I'o
7 -9 T'o
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
Ion yt is rah, Itb
Ion 'W Gil dM
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
H Idric Soil Indicators:
®Polyvalue
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
- Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_E Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
1* Ws16 W dqD V. ft git .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): EP, T Lat:49 Long
Soil Map Unit Name: Q011111h t 16 *
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Ts i * VII d)
Rbi rie
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
Slope ( %): < 2/0
Datum: NUB
NWI classification: HIM F1
❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑X No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes ❑X No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Yes ❑x No ❑ Within a Wetland?
Yes ❑x No ❑
nhw IdM K 0 4F K- 6
Yes ❑ No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): © Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts ft git 46
ff�* seam
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4i@RQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP&
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
Number of Dominant Species
1.10
�0
E] FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
ffift lal�yfi
610
®
Total Number of Dominant
6
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
&0
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
9/0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
Ob lal#t
6/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2. Pe QhM
�0
l Fib
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
3/0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
X Dominance Test is >50%
1 M
®
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
®
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
❑
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
NO
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. w00% a&
&0
X❑ CEL
2. a3ld chum
5/0
X❑ WIM
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
AWW
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
NO
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
1Vo
x❑ FA C
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
3/0
Vegetation
❑
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Fd # Oi # \As * slht mjrlb
*D
kl! Do*
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabA

SOIL
Sampling Point: EP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0 -8 IR4 5/0 1W 3'0 C M Ion yt 13 ah &&
8- 9 ffN 2140 1W IYo C M Ion
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
H Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Idric
Histosol (Al)
- ®Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_E Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑
1* WS16 W dqD V. ft git .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

Project/Site: Slam dt 'GS City /County: 10 co
Applicant /Owner: Y10 6 dh State: rc
Investigator(s): T lb &M bw - MR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ER T Lat:49 Long
Soil Map Unit Name: Q011111h t 16 *
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil El, 6Wydrology#
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Remarks:
Tis i Ab VII b n i * do WN
HYDROLOGY
Sampling Date: a
Sampling Point: ER
NWI classification:
Rbi rie
Slope ( %): _
Datum: NEB
❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
16 *&1 ❑x No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
aff K- 6
Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
El High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
BDrift
Deposits (133)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): © Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
t
VW t ve ap ts ft git 46
US Army Corps of Engineers aIiehl4iiWRQfti *Vi

NH33M Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: EP9
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
Number of Dominant Species
1.10 36
F0
x❑ FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
ffift �I�iyfi
NO
x❑ W
®
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
❑
®
Percent of Dominant Species
&0
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
❑
7
®
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
Sadinq Stratum (Plot size: 'b IN )
OBL species x 1 =
Ob lal#t
6/0
x❑ FA C
FACW species x 2 =
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
3,
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
®
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
15/0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
-X Dominance Test is >50%
1 k* Mil;
6/0
x❑ K
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
®
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
❑
4
❑
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
®
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
❑
5
510
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
®
Sri
2•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
❑
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
❑
5.
❑
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
®
7.
❑
AWW
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
8
®
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
❑�
11.
❑
12.
❑
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
NO
=Total Cover
1.QTfBi6f*
15/0
x❑ FA C
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
®
Hydrophytic
5
NO
Vegetation
❑
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Fd # mll # \As * slht mjrlb
*D
kl! Do*
US Army Corps of Engineers a1iehl4*RQftiabA

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1P9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
a 9 ffm TYo Ion ah
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
H Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Idric
Histosol (Al)
- ®Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
_❑Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
-01-oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
®_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
�Redox
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Dark Surface (F6)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-0 Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No x❑
1* ids 16 W 16 ap fit gElb .10
US Army Corps of Engineers ditI- WRQftiabVi

IMPACT EXHIBITS

'ROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER"
i'�
`PROPOSED 20' \ \ \ \ \ \ \\J i
SEWER EASEMENT �\ % /
\� \ W�
TS� 1 : %�- ,IIII � /i
\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ �/ 1 111 // // Q
\ \ \
l^'
Il�l�il���r�\\1 \ \`1 \� \�� \ \ \1\i� \Jll\ \ill �\ \� \\� \. 4� "'k� %i�>, /., X11
�. (I � � III
PR� OPOSED GRAVITY_ SEWER//
EXISTING ` _ � � � PROPOSED VA
PUMP STATION \` — _� \�� l I FACILITY \ \
PROJECT SUMMARY
PROPOSED 20'
SEWER EASEMENT
. „ —
S
pf
WETLANDS ; I. )% — // / r EX. TOP OF BANK is
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT WETLAND _
J'4 qi /II /lil�i /III i I(` CONVERSION IMPACTS — 22,819 SF WETLANDS —
_�— \U _
(0.524 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS — ® — 53,068 SF (1.218 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
\ TEMPORARY CHANNEL — — 182 LF
No. Revision Date By I Des,�e, WAR 3ea�e 3W I PERSIMMON CREEK E E K
ID.-By GM Dre 5 I OVERALL SITE PLAN WITHERS RAVEN EL
checked By foh No. SEWER OUTFACE ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
w :R 02„047,.,0 I Sanford Lee County North Carolina M Ke a o e w ,Northceoh a s„ t 1'9,s-06s -3340 fex9,�b�boo6 .,.,.,.w,he,,. "Ill -,.,n

W W W W W
W 'W W W W/ I I I I I I I I 1 / 'L,/
MH -101/ /I
�II
FORESTED
WETLAND
, -
IMPACT # 1
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT W W W W 1
1,121 SO. FT. /0.026 AC.
/ ' \ W W W W WI IW X \ \\ \ /
W
/I 1
IMPACT #3
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
43 LF
I = W/I ���' " I �► I I
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
\ \ W W 10' MAINTAINED CORRIDOR
IMPACT #2
+1 W TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
/ W W W 3,625 SO. FT. /0.083 AC.
W
/ 11
/ / -�\ \\i // /� 6 W// 117
20 TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
y �\ EASEMENT
PERMANENT ! \ I I
MH -102 20' SEWER
X ° °� \ \ EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
I I I I I
F
1 inch = 50 ft.
PERMANENT WETLAND _ �� — 1,121 SF
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.026 AC)
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
WETLANDS — O
TEMPORARY IMPACTS — ® — 4,746 SF (0.109 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL — — 43 LF
PERSIMMON CREEK WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS & RAVENEL
SEWER OUTFALL EXHIBIT 1 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Sanford Lee County North Carolina .....n .c.�, - �_r,ii r -. esau �. -eswa x�� - �,�-t—

IMPACT #4
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT 'o /
409 SO. FT. /0.009 AC.
\ = _ IMPACT #6
— TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
\ 59 L
M
7' o/
/ I
MH -104\
N.
-10' MAINTAINED CORRIDOR
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
375 -
l_ — _� i / i� i - - - --
375 _ �� �! IMPACT #5
PERMANENT- — — —r 1 —_ % j_ _ — TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
— - 1,207 SO. FT. 0.028 AC.
20' SEWER _ /
EASEMENT
20 TEMPORARY \ \
CONSTRUCTION
MH -105 �� �� /� EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT WETLAND — }c�4 - 409 SF WETLANDS - F
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.009 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS - ® - 1.616 SF (0.037 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL -
- 59 LF
PERSIMMON CREEK WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS &' RAVENEL
SEWER OUTFALL EXHIBIT 2 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Sanford Lee County North Carolina .,n���n . ,,, - �_r,ii r - ,eau I'll . 1 ,��t�

PERMANENT l l l /l/ lL;j, ///
I I - - - -/ 20' SEWER f
I I EASEMENT I � (
I
I IMPACT #7
/ TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT I W I �i I III 11 1120' TEMPORARY
/ 929 SO. FT. /0.021 AC. I I I I , \
/ I I III 111 II CONSTRUCTION
W ,L II I II EASEMENT
IMPACT #8 I I IIII 1111 I I
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT ,, y �// /I I' 10' MAINTAINED COORIDOR
932 SO. FT. /0.021 AC.
1 111 li
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
H- 106,
N13 b—
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT CONVERSION WMPACTDS 932 SF WETLANDS — F
(0.021 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS — ® — 1,861 SF (0.042 AC)
PERSIMMON CREEK
SEWER OUTFALL
Sanford Lee County North Carolina
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL — — 0 LF
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS &I RAVENEL
EXHIBIT 3 1A1 CKeninENGINEERS I PLANNERS 4I SURVEYORS
a n rya i -sii 111 _ n — �a��_',_

I I I I I I/ l /// / / // / \ \\ 1 1✓ W W �W� W W W / W /A J�(�/
l I I l l 1 W W W W/
W W/ W
IIII I II I I I I I I I\ \` W W W W ✓._W� W
/�f
\ ` W PERMANENT
�� `r
20 SEWER a
/
EASEMENT
�
IMPACT #9
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT -'k + % W
/ / I 2,045 SO. FT. /0.047 AC. W W
W W W
IMPACT #10 o` MH -107 / / 20' TEMPORARY
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT , W �"/ /
` 805 SO. FT. /0.018 AC. W W .' W W , `// CONSTRUCTIO IN
10' MAINTAINED COORIDORI� W W
IMPACT #11
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
40 LF
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER 1 1 I I I I
/MH -108
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
r �'�����yy WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT WETLAND — }c�4 - 2,045 SF WETLANDS -
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.047 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS - ® - 2.850 SF (0.065 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL - - 40 LF
PERSIMMON CREEK WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS &' RAVENEL
SEWER OUTFALL EXHIBIT 4 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Sanford Lee County North Carolina .,n�.. n . ,, r _ ,eau �, . -e— "1—,,,,,

/-4
//— — - - — — — — — — — — — — —
/- - -- —
425
420 ---- - - - /// /i / / /�� =_ =410_ IMPACT #12
- - - - - -f _ - - - _� -_ /� ; j/� �% ; ; _ PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT \\ \
- - - - - - - ---PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER-- -405-,- 16,330 SO. FT./0.375 AC. \ \\
— — _- - -- � 415 — — — -
��„ / / - - _ / r • �; . • r , . , `� \ -- 10' MAINTAINED CORRIDOR / \�
/ tl i-G \
\ \ / 4( �„ �/ ` . �. ` ` 4.44 ° ` . \ �MH -1 12 �• 4 . -� . ° 4 / -
� . • ' • ` , . 4 FORESTED `, . • ` ` LL .. - -_
\ \ ` \ \ \ y \ ` `, . 4 . • WETLAND ' " 405
Jo
zz
\\ \'410 =__
\\ \ \PERMANENT\ `,
�� \ \ =�� MH -113 -
" 20 SEWER\�1 \ �, . . , r �/ // /� / / IMPACT #13
\ \ \ \ kr 11 // / //i
EASEMENT \ \� �" x-"� ��� / // / /j // TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ '�/•� / / /// /// // / / / 19,214 SO. FT./0.441 AC. \ �420
\� \ \420. //-
\
/X� \ \` \ \ \ \•
425 //\ \\ '� .r II III / / / \ \ \ \� \ �\ - - -43
- /�-- - \ \\ I � I III I \ \ - _ 430
�i
N\\
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
I I I I
1 inch = 80 ft.
No. Revision Date By Des— I -,l
W &R 1'.80'
Dawn By Dare
PAP 8/9/15
Checked By 1°b N°, W$R 02140471.10
PERSIMMON CREEK
SEWER OUTFALL
Apex Wake County
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT WETLAND 16,330 SF WETLANDS -
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.375 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS - ® - 35.544 Sf (0.816 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL - - 0 LF
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
North Carolinal I EXHIBIT 5
WITHERS & R"ENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS WE -5
115 M -K—n Drive Cary, North Cazo14 -7511 t 1: 919-069 -3340 f.19-6 -N008 www.wilhersrzvenel._

//77/
�-
//
EX. TOP OF BANK
—445— 'MH -115 _�—
—
/ 1 \ '� w •\ ` ` / —I
J-
— - — — — — — _ PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER f ' • " :� .. / _ — — _ —
• \` - ` PERMANENT 20'
\ r\• �� 1 .� —440
\ ti MH -118 \r .� \� SEWER EASEMENT
�"�.� "� �
— 10 MAINTAINED CORRIDOR
\ �MH —t16 20' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION _ �_ _
- - -
_
E A SEMEN T
_
\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 1 • • .—`MH -117
71 �`\`
IMPACT 14 IMPACT 16
PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT / / / I — // / /� TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
_ 1,116 SQ. FT. /0.026 AC. 40 LF
IMPACT #15
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
v /
I / / 3,286 SQ. FT. /0.075 AC.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
WETLANDS IMPACTS:
VV��y
PERMANENT WETLAND _ �OC�9 1,116 SF
WETLANDS —
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.026 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS — ® 4,412 SF (0.101 AC)
80 0 40 80 160
STREAM IMPACTS:
1 inch = 80 ft.
TEMPORARY CHANNEL — ' ' • — 40 LF
No. Revision Date By I ID-1 , w.R SCd1e,.8D,
PERSIMMON CREEK
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
She�No.
I I Drawn By Dare
GM 8/9/,5
SEWER OUTFALL
WITHERS �' R" E N E L
WE -6
che�kdev ,abNa.
I I wea os,aoa,.,o Apex
Wake County North Carolina
EXHIBIT 6
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
„s Ma <Ke�a�o,we cary,NOnnca�or�aysn ,eks,�- ,6433m bx9,�b7�oo8 w�,.wBne�aye�ei.<om

I i i I I i l l yl
PERMANENT
20' SEWER
EASEMENT I /
IMPACT #17 I► �,/`(W W W / °
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT/,) I I
85 SO. FT. /0.002 AC. ►► ,IOW W W W °/ / / i
I I i
W W W W .y / /, MH -1 19
1 � .Y W W •Y / W .Y �' /
/20 TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
W •Y y "" W /
I I ►'I� W W y W W �W / � /
W W W\ W •Y •L � / / � / / /
II I II W W \ L Y .y
II 1� •Y W W •L •Y •Y •Y W
W W W W W •Y W / / /
Y \W W
I W W •L W W W W W W - / I
\W W W \\ = �� W, PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER / I
W W .Y •Y W W W W / �� / / / / I
�y •Y W •Y W W •L // // // I / / I (.
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
I I I I I
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
r �'����yy WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT WETLAND — }c�4 - 0 SF WETLANDS -
CONVERSION IMPACTS (0.000 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS - ® - 85 SF (0.002 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL - - 0 LF
PERSIMMON CREEK WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS & RAVENEL
SEWER OUTFALL EXHIBIT 7 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Sanford Lee County North Carolina 1��.n * ,,, - �_,-,ii r - Beau I'll

MH- 121 �kOOSy�/
IMPACT #19
\ PERMANENT WETLAND CONVERSION IMPACT
\ 866 SO. FT. /0.020 AC. W W W W W W W W y
\ " 11 1 \ 1
1
\ \\ \\ 1 1 \\ 10' MAINTAINED CORRIDOR"
10
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
\ \ \ PERMANENT V-
I I 1 1 20' SEWER \ \\
\ I EASEMENT
I I
IMPACT #18 i
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
1,998 SO. FT. /0.046 AC.
I I / X
20' TEMPORARY w W w w
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT\ \ Quo_
/ I I
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
s
E 1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS LEGEND
S�I, ����yy WETLANDS IMPACTS:
PERMANENT CONVERSION WMPACTDS — �C;X�04 — 866 SF WETLANDS —
(0.020 AC)
TEMPORARY IMPACTS — ® — 2,864 SF (0.066 AC)
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY CHANNEL — — 0 LF
PERSIMMON CREEK WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS WITHERS &- RAVENEL
SEWER OUTFALL EXHIBIT 8 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Sanford Lee County North Carolina s -Y. a n rya nsn 1Pi s • - n -