20130667 Ver 2_401 Application_20150715

To: Mrs. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Adara Alexander Place Apartments
Minor Permit Modification Pre -Con.
Notification
I am sending you the following item(s):
Date: July 27, 2015
** FEDERAL EXPRESS "
Job No.: DDV -14000
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
2 Stormwater Impact Analysis
5 Sets of Stormwater Sheets
5 Minor Permit Modification Pre - Construction Notification
1 Submittal Check: $240
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑
As requested
®
For approval
❑
For review and comment
Remarks:
Copy to:
Raleigh- Durham
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
(919) 361 -5000
❑ For your use
❑
LAF t�• ��
:D
JUL 2 R 2015
, u. H•WATERk
401 8 BUFFER pER� RCES
i
Signed:
George Buchholz, REM, WS
Environmental Consultant/Project
Manager, Water Resources and
Infrastructure
Charlotte
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Charlotte, North Carolina
(704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com
i

�J McADAM.S
July 27, 2015
Mrs. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Minor Permit Modification Pre - Construction Notification — 401
Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Basin Riparian
Buffer Authorization
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
DDV -14000
Dear Mrs. Higgins:
On behalf of DD Alexander Place LLC, we are submitting a permit
modification to a previously issued Approval of 401 Water Quality
Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Basin Riparian
Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15, 2013). The previous
applicant was Crowne Partners, Inc. and sold the property. The current
applicant and owner, DD Alexander Place LLC, amended the site plan and
changed the location of a roadway crossing an unnamed tributary to Little
Brier Creek. The roadway now crosses a 100 year floodplain area. Due to the
amended the site plan and the roadway now crossing the 100 year floodplain,
we are requesting the proposed project be authorized under Nationwide Permit
14 from the US Army Corps of Engineers and Water Quality General
Certification Number 3886. The Adara Alexander Place Apartments project
is located in the northwestern section of Wake County approximately 0.2
miles west of the intersection of ACC Boulevard and Alexander Town
Boulevard on the south side of ACC Boulevard in Raleigh, North Carolina.
The following attachments are included as part of this permit application:
• Signed Agent Authorization
The John R. McAdams • Issued Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE SAW- 2013 - 01773;
Company, Inc. September 18, 2013)
• Issued 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Basin
Raleigh / Durham, NC Riparian Buffer Authorization (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15,
2905 Meridian Parkway 2013)
Durham, North Carolina 27713 • Fig. 1 - USGS Quad — Raleigh West
(919) 361 -5000 • Fig. 2 - Wake County Soil Survey (Sheet 57)
• Fig. 3.1 - Existing Conditions (Alta/Land Title Survey prepared
Charlotte, NC by John A. Edwards & Company)
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd, • Fig. 3.2 - Existing Conditions w /aerial
Suite 111
Charlotte North Carolina 28226
(704) 527 -0800
McAdamsCo.com Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

Mrs. Karen Higgins
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
July 27, 2015
Page 2 of 6
• Pre- Construction Notification
• Fig. 4.1 - Overall Grading & Storm Drainage Plan
• Fig. 4.2 - Overall Grading & Storm Drainage Plan (notes &
legend)
• Inset 1 (Impact Area 1 — High Flow Bypass Channel)
• Inset 2 (Impact Area 2 — High Flow Bypass Channel)
• Inset 3 (Impact Area 3 — Culvert & Road Crossing)
• North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 0768; May 2,
2006; Map Number 3720076800J
• Two courtesy copies of the Stormwater Design Notebook
• Five copies of the Construction Drawings and Final Site
Review Drawings
PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS & HISTORY:
The Adara Alexander Place Apartments project is located in the northwestern
section of Wake County approximately 0.2 miles west of the intersection of
ACC Boulevard and Alexander Town Boulevard on the south side of ACC
Boulevard in Raleigh, North Carolina. Approximately 95 percent of the
subject property can be characterized as forested land and can be generally
characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak- Hickory Forest according the NC Natural
Heritage Program classification system. The remaining 5 percent can be is
comprised of utility easement and characterized as maintained land. There are
two unnamed tributaries to Little Brier Creek located within the subject
property. Land use within the vicinity of the subject property is residential,
commercial, and forested areas.
The previous applicant was Crowne Partners, Inc. and was issued a
Preliminary Determination and Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE Action Id:
SAW- 2013 - 01773) on September 18, 2013. In addition, the previous
applicant was issued an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and
Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer
Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667) on July 15, 2013. Construction activities
associated with the above mention issued permits have not taken place. The
current owner of the subject property, DD Alexander Place LLC, has amended
the site plan and the roadway crossing an unnamed tributary to Little Brier
Creek.
DIL -14000

Mrs. Karen Higgins
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
July 27, 2015
Page 3 of 6
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The proposed project involves the construction of a roadway crossing across
an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek for the purposes of developing a
multi - family residential complex. The proposed multi - family residential
complex will consist of multi - family residential units and the associated
infrastructure, including roads, utilities, city sewer, and stormwater
management facilities. The new applicant purchased the subject property and
proposes an amended site layout which changes the location of the roadway
crossing an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek. As a result of proposing
a different and modified site layout, there are proposed stream and buffer
impacts associated with the road crossing and buffer impacts associated with
two high flow bypass channels. The proposed impacts reduce the total amount
of impacts previously authorized. No impacts to wetlands are proposed.
Impact Table
Stream Impacts
Impacts
Permanent Stream Impact (culvert):
64 linear feet
Permanent Stream Impact (dissipator pad):
29 linear feet
Total Stream Impacts
93 linear feet
Neuse River Buffer Impacts
Impacts
Permanent Zone 1 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 1, Inset 1):
843 square feet
Permanent Zone 2 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 1, Inset 1):
431 square feet
Permanent Zone 1 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 2, Inset 2):
644 square feet
Permanent Zone 2 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 2, Inset 2):
400 square feet
Permanent Zone 1 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 3, Inset 3):
4,397 square feet
Permanent Zone 2 Neuse River Buffer Impacts (Impact 3, Inset 3):
3,683 square feet
Total Permanent Zone 1 Neuse River Buffer Impacts
5,884 square feet
Total Permanent Zone 2 Neuse River Buffer Impacts
4,514 square feet
Total Neuse River Buffer Impacts
10,398 square feet
It should be noted that of the total 93 if of permanent stream impact, 291f will
be associated with a rip -rap dissipator pads which will be installed flush with
the existing grade of the stream beds to allow for aquatic life passage. The
previously issued Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE Action Id: SAW -2013-
01773; September 18, 2013) and an Approval of 401 Water Quality
Certification (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15, 2013) authorized 143 linear feet of
stream impacts. The proposed multi - family residential complex reduces the
previously authorized stream impacts by 50 linear feet.
DIL -M000

Mrs. Karen Higgins
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
July 27, 2015
Page 4of6
The proposed Permanent Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts associated
within the road crossing are less than 150 linear feet and are less than one -
third acre. The previously issued Authorization Certificate per the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15,
2013) authorized a total of 13,536 square feet of Neuse River Buffer impacts.
The proposed multi - family residential complex reduces the previously
authorized total Neuse River Buffer impacts by 3,138 square feet.
Stormwater Manaaement
The City of Raleigh is a delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater
Management Plans. The review and approval of the SWMP is part of the City
of Raleigh's review process. A copy of the final approved stormwater
management plan will be provided to NCDWR. Attached is a Summary of
the Stormwater Impact Analysis and Preliminary Design of Stormwater
Management Facilities. Stormwater management for the proposed project
will be accomplished by incorporating engineered stormwater best
management practice facilities throughout the project to capture and treat the
stormwater runoff from developed areas. The proposed design meets
minimum requirements for exemption of stormwater runoff controls outlined
in section Sec. 9.2.2.(E. Lb) of the City of Raleigh UDO.
AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION:
The previous applicant, Crowne Partners, Inc. was issued a Nationwide Permit
29 (USAGE Action Id: SAW- 2013 - 01773; September 18, 2013) and an
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per
the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667;
July 15, 2013) for 143 linear feet of stream impact and a total of 13,536
square feet of Neuse River Buffer impacts. The current applicant, DD
Alexander Place LLC, recently purchased the subject property and proposes
an amended site layout which changes the location of the roadway crossing
across an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek. This modified site layout
reduces the previously authorized stream impacts by 50 linear feet and
reduces the previously authorized total Neuse River Buffer impacts by 3,138
square feet.
MITIGATION:
The Adara Alexander Place Apartments project proposes a total of 93 if of
stream impact. At this time, the applicant does not propose compensatory
DIL -14000

Mrs. Karen Higgins
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
July 27, 2015
Page 5 of 6
mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State for the
project. Permanent Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts associated with the
proposed roadway crossing across an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek
are less than 150 linear feet and are less than one -third acre and are considered
an allowable use. In addition, Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts
associated with the high flow bypass channels are considered minimal and an
allowable use. Therefore, the applicant does not propose compensatory Neuse
River Riparian Buffer mitigation.
SUMMARY:
Previously, a NWP 29 ((USAGE Action Id: SAW- 2013 - 01773; September 18,
2013) and an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ # 13 -0667;
July 15, 2013) were issued to Crowne Partners, Inc. The previous applicant
sold the property to DD Alexander Place LLC (current applicant and owner).
The current applicant and owner amended the site plan and changed the
location of a roadway crossing an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek.
According to the North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 0768 (May
2, 2006; Map Number 3720076800J, attached), the subject property does not
contain a regulatory floodway but it does contain a 100 year floodplain area
associated with the unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek. The roadway
crosses the 100 year floodplain area associated with the unnamed tributary to
Little Brier Creek. According to the attached Overall Grading and Storm
Drainage Plan (Figure 4. 1), the percent fill in the floodway fringe is 31.8% for
the proposed project. In accordance with the City of Raleigh Unified
Development Ordinance chapter 9, Article 9.3, the proposed encroachments
are allowed since the floodway fringe encroachments do not exceed 50 %.
The amended the site plan proposes a total of 93 linear feet of permanent
stream impacts and total of 10,393 square feet of Neuse River Buffer Impacts.
The proposed multi - family residential complex reduces the previously
authorized stream impacts by 50 linear feet and reduces the previously
authorized total Neuse River Buffer impacts by 3,138 square feet.
The proposed project is a single and complete project and confined within the
property boundary. Appropriate land use control measures will be in place for
areas which will require them. Additional impacts to streams and wetlands
located on the property are not proposed. At this time, the applicant does not
propose compensatory mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters
of the State for the project. In addition, permanent Neuse River Riparian
Buffer impacts associated with the proposed roadway crossing are less than
150 linear feet and are less than one -third acre and are considered an
DIL -14000

Mrs. Karen Higgins
Adara Alexander Place Apartments
July 27, 2015
Page 6 of 6
allowable use. Furthermore, Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts associated
with the high flow bypass channels are considered minimal and an allowable
use. Therefore, the applicant does not propose compensatory Neuse River
Riparian Buffer mitigation.
At this time, we are requesting authorization that the proposed project
qualifies under 401 Water Quality General Certification Number 3886
Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer
Protection Rules. Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you
should have any questions or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (919) 287 -0890.
Sincerely,
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
George Buchholz, REM, P/roject Environmental Consultant Ma nager
Attachments: Listed above
DIL -14000

in
;Zj�
- -- A D A �-$,
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentPronerty Owner
Name: DD Alexander Place, LLC
Address: 403 Corporate Center Dr, Suite 201, Stockbridge, GA 30281
Phone: 770 - 474 -4345
Project Name /Description: Adara Alexander Place Apartments
Project Number: DDV -14000 Project Manager: I George Buchholz
Date: July 14, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: David Shaeffer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company,
Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The
14th day of Julv 2015.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The .John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff. You should call The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to
arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
DD Alexander Place, LLC t
Print Property Owner Signatur
Cc: NCDENR -DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AA001
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW - 2013 -01773 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- SOUTHEAST DURHAM
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Crowne Partners, Inc
Christina Nawrocki
Address: 505 North 20th Street, Suite 1015
Birmingham, Alabama, 35203
Telephone Number: 205- 328 -3120
Size (acres) 14.46
Nearest Waterway Brier Creek
USGS HUC 3020201
Nearest Town Ralei h
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 35.9107
Longitude: - 78.7759
Location description: The nroiect area is located 0.21 mile west of the intersection of ACC Boulevard and Alexander Town,
Boulevard on the south side of ACC )Boulevard in Raleia_h, Wake Countv. North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the placement of fill material into 143 linear feet of stream,
to facilitate the construction of a roadwav which would access a multi - family residential development.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit Number: 29
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE PERMIT GENERAL AND REGIONAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated Julv 11. 2013 and the enclosed plans Sheets EXI, C1.0, C2.0, C2.1, and C3.3
dated Mav 03, 2013. Any violation of these conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a
stop work order, a restoration order and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone 919 - 807 -6300) to determine Section 401 requirements.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State, or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact David Shaeffer at 919- 554 -488844 X31 or david .l.shaefferousace.armv.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 9/18/2013
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/18/2017

SAW-2413-01773
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at httv://p er2. nwo.usace.armv.rniVsurvev.lhtml .
Copy furnished:
Agent: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Stenhen Brown
Address: 2020 -E Starita Road
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28201
Telephone Number: 205 -328 -3120
Property Owner: SLF Ruby Jones, LLC
Post Office Box 56607
Atlanta, Georgia 30343

Action ID Number: SAW -2013 -01773 County: Wake
Permittee: Crowne Partners, Inc
c/o Christina Nawrocki
Project Name: Crowne Partners, Incorporated, Crowne at Alexander Place Apartments
Date Verification Issued: 9/18/2013
Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDIC'T'IONAL DETERMINATION (JD): September
18, 2013
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Stephen Brown, 2020 -E Starita Road,
Charlotte, NC, 28201.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Raleigh Field Office Crowne Partners,
Incorporated, Crowne at Alexander Place Apartments, SAW -2013 -01773
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This preliminary JD is for the impact area
only.
State: NC County /parish/borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.9107° N, Long. - 78.7759° E.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Brier Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 143 linear feet: 6 width (ft)
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent
Wetlands: N /Aacres.
Cowardin Class: N/A
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non - Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIES):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9/18/2013
[] Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit
applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary ID is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby
made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD
before accepting the terns and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD
could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any
form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on
the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal
court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as
is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal,
jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make

Attached is:
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
A: INITIAL PROF'F'ERED .PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
See Section below
A
B
C
D
E
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future, Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the. permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section Il of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

Wrr�s
DE R
North Carolina Department of.Envirorment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
July 15, 2013
Crowne Partners, Inc.
Attn: Christina Nawrocki
505 North 201h St., Ste. 1015
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
DWQ # 13 -0667
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH'ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS
AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE PER THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROTECTION RULES (15A NCAC 020,.0233) WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Crowne at Alexander Place
Dear Mr. Nawrocki:
You have our approval for the impacts fisted below for the purpose described in your
application dated June 27, 2013 and received by the Division of Water Quality (Division) on June
28, 2013. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification
Number 3890 and the conditions listed below. This certification is associated with the use of
Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with
your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification and the
following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification, General Permit and /or Buffer Rules are rriet. No
other impacts are approved, including incidental impacts.
Wetlands, Buffers, Stormnrater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (! 11eBSCaPe)
i i50 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. North Carolina 2%699 -1650
Phctte' 91� 330 -63D11 FAY: 919 - 307 -6494
i;aarnst: h p: /lpc:iaLncdanr �ryiaveh;v,q ;lws
An Equal Opportunity ,Affirmative Action Employer

Type of Impact
Stream
Buffers — Zone 1
Site 1
8. uffers — Zone 2
Site 1
Buffers — Zone 1
Site 2
Buffers — Zone 2
Site 2
Buffers —Zone 1
Site 3
Buffers — Zone 2
Site 3
Crowne at Alexander Place
DWQ## 13 -0667
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 2 of 4
Amount Approved. Amount Approved
(units ) (units)
Permanent Temporary
143 (linear feet)
0 (linear feet) 1
454 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
302 (square feet)
!
0 (square feet)
367 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
300 (square feet)
j 7,745 (square feet)
4,368 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
2. Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) Approval From Local Communitv Required
You are required to provide one copy of the approved SMP, including plan details on full -.
sized plan sheets, with proof of City of Raleigh's approval. The approved SMP must be
submitted to the DWQ Webscape Unit (1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, PVC 27699 -1650)
before.any impacts authorized in this certification occur. The following requirements also
apply:
® The approved SMP must be constructed and operational before any permanent building
or other structure is occupied at the site.
* The approved SMP as well as drainage patterns must be: maintained in perpetuity.
® The.SMP may not be modified without prior written authorization from the City of
Raleigh. A copy of the approval letter and the'rdodified SMP must be submitted to the
DWQ Webscape Unit prior to the commencement of the modifications.
3. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as diffuse
flow at non- erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-
concentrate before discharging into a stream as identified within -15A NCAC 2B.0233 (5). If
this is not possible, it may be necessary to provide stormw.ater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen and phosphorus. This may require additional approval from this Office.
4. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Anv Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of

Crowne at Alexander Place
DWQ# 13 -0667
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 3 of 4
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with .orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with 15 NCAC 02H .0500.
6. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification and
Buffer Authorization. if you-change your project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to submit a new application package with the appropriate fee. if the property is
sold,'the new owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and General Certification
and is responsible for complying with all conditions.
7. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification and Buffer Authorization can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of
General Statute 150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of
Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the
OAH at htti): / /-www.ncoah ".corn/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431 -3000 for
information.
Within sixty (60) calendar slays of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH.
A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH
filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between
8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at (919) 431 -3100, provided the original and one copy of
the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending by First Class Mail
via the US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714
if sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609 -6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:

Crowne at Alexander Place
DWQt# 13 -0667
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 4 of 4
Lacy Presnefl; General .Counsel
Department of Environment and. Natural Resources
1601 Mail. Service Center.
Raleigh, NC 27699 =1601 .
Please send one (1) copy of the petition to DWQ:
If sending by First Class Mail. If sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx): _ f
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
NC DENR- DWQ — Webscape Unit NC DENR- DWQ — Webscape Unit
1650 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter - completes the review of the Division- under section 40.1 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0233 , Please contact Cherri
Smith at 919 - 791 -4251 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincer ly,
Danny Smit , Su,pervisor
Surface Water Protection — Raleigh
Regional Office
Enclosures: GC 3890
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Raleigh Regulatory Field Office; 3331 Heritage Trade
Drive, St. 105; Wake Forest, NC 27597
Stephen C. Brown; Terraco.n Consultants, Inc.; 2020-.E Starita Road; Charlotte, NC
28206
DWQ RRO 401 files

Water Quality Certification No.. 3890
GENERAL CERTIFICATION VOWPROJECTS -.ELIGIBLE
FOR U.S. ARMY CO!RP$ DF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT
NUMBERS 181MINORDISCHARGES1; 29`(RESIDENTIAL :DEVELOPMENTI..
39 (COMMERCIAL- AND INSTIT TIO( AL DEVELOPMENTPV
41 (RES�IAI'tt!!r- F?EISTtNG: DRAINAGE DITCHES?, 42 (RECt 9ATIONAL FACILITIES),
44 (MINING ACTIVITIEP). AND 46: (DISCHARGES IN DITCHES),
AND RIPARIAN ARE. PROTECTION.Rl1LES ('BUFFER RIILESi
Water Quality Certification Number 3890 is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401, Public -Lauds 92 -500 and 95 -217 of the United States and subject, to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality .(DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 02H%0500 and 15A NCAC 02B.0200
for the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are
not part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters-or navigable waters ofthe United
States as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 29, 39, 41, 42, 44, and 46) of the Corps
of Engineers regulations and for the Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC
02B .0200:
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate .
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92 -500 and 95 -217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth_
Activities tweeting any one (1) of the following thresholds or circumstances require written
approval for a'401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality (the
"Division' ):
a. Any impacts to streams involving excavation or dredging; or
b. Total stream impacts within the project boundaries equal to or greater than 150 linear feet
of stream, including temporary and /or permanent impacts; or.
c. Any stream relocation; or
d. Any impact - associated with a high density project (as defined in item (A)(iv) of the 401
StormwaterRequirements) that is not subject to either a. state stormwater program (such
as, but not limited to, Coastal Counties, HQW, ORW or state - implemented Phase'li
NPDES) or a certified community's stormwater program; or
e. Temporaryy or permanent impacts equal to .or greater than one -tenth (1/10) acre of wetlands
or open waters; or
f. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters designated as: ORW, SA, WS -1, WS-11, or
Trout, or wetlands contiguous to waters designated as a North Carolina or National Wild
and Scenic River; or
g. Any impacts to coastal wetlands [15A NCAC 07H .0205)], or Unique Wetlands (UWL) [15A
NCAC 02H.05061, or
h. Any impact associated with a Notice of Violation or an enforcement action for violation(s) of
DWQ Wetiand Rules (15A NCAC 02H.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H
.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
02B.0200); or
i. Any impacts to streams and /or buffers in the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, or Catawba River Basins
or-in the Randleman, Jordan or Goose Creek Watersheds (or any other basin or watershed
with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at the time of application)
unless the activities are listed as "EXEMPT" from these rules or a Buffer Authorization
Certificate is issued through N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) delegation for
"ALLOWABLE" activities.
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143- 215.3D(e), written approval for a 401
Water Quality General Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a project also requires a
CAMA Permit, then one payment to both agencies shall be submitted and will be the higher of the
two fees.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890

Water Quality Certification No. 3890
Activities included in this General, Certification that do.not:.meet one .of :the thresholds
listed above do not require written approval. from the Division as long as `th. ey, comply with
the Conditions of GerEifieation:'fistecf. below.: if any.-of these Conditions cannot be met, then
written approval from the 0105lon. is; requited::
Conditions of Certification:
1. No impacts Beyond those Authorized in the Written Approval or Beyond the Threshold of Use
of this Certification
No waste, spoil, solids; or fill of any kind shall occur in .wetlands,- waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of-the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification, as.
authorized in the written approval from the Division or beyond the thresholds established for
use of this Certification without written authorization, including incidental impacts. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices shall be performed so that.no
violations of state water quality standards; statutes, or rulesoccur, Approved plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of this
permit. .
2. Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices and if applicable, comply with the specific conditions and
requirements of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit issued to the site.-
a. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of .the sedimentand erosion;control
measures must be such that they equal or exceed the requirements specified in the most
recent;yersion of the North. Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste. pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control .measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
c. Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with .the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the
Mining Act of 1971.
d. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control measures
and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at ail times.
e. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas (PNAs),
SA, WS-1, WS -11, Nigh Quality (HOW), or Outstanding Resource (ORW) waters; -then the
sedimentation and erosion control designs must comply with the requirements set forth
in 15A NCAG 046 .0124, Design Standards. in Sensitive Watersheds.
Water.Quality Certification No_ 3890

Water Quality Certification No.. 3890
3. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed._in wetlands or waters.
Exceptions . to this,condition require application submittal-Wand written approval by the
Division. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, then design and placement of ternporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted..in.a..manner that may resuit in dis- equilibrium of wetlands, stream beds, or banks,
adjacent:to or upstream and downstream of the above structures_. All sediment and'erosion
control devices shall be removed and the natural grade restored within. two (2) months of the
date that the Division of Land Resources (DLR) or locally delegated program has released
the specific area within the project.
4. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
An NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit is required for construction projects that disturb
one (1) or more acres of land. This Permit allows. stormwater to be discharged during land
disturbing cohsfrucilon'activities-as stipulated in the conditions of the'permit. if your project
is covered by this permit, full compliance with permit conditions including the erosion.&
sedimentation control plan, inspections and maintenance, self - monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements is required. A copy of the general permit (NCG010000),
inspection log sheets, and other information may be found at
hito: l/ oortai. ncdenr .ora /weblwa /ws /sulnodessw#tab -w. .
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) shall be required to be in full
compliance with the conditions related to construction activities within the. most recent- version
of their individual NPDES (NCS000250) stormwater permit:
5. Construction Moratoriums and Coordination
If activities must occur during periods of high biological activity (i.e.. sea turtle nesting, fish
spawning; or bird nesting), then' biological monitoring nnay be required at the request of other
state or federal agencies and coordinated with these activities.
All moratoriums on construction activities established by the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (WRG), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), NC Division of Marine Fisheries
(DMF), or National Marine Fisheries Service .(NMFS) to lessen impacts on trout, anadromous
fish, larval /post - larval fishes and crustaceans, or other aquatic species of concern shall be
implemented._ Exceptions to this condition require written approval by the resource agency
responsible for the given moratorium.
Work within the twenty -five (25) designated trout counties. or identified state or'federal
endangered or threatened species habitat shall be coordinated with the appropriate WRC,
USFWS, NMFS, andlor DMF personnel.
6. Work in the Dry
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted so that the flowing stream does
not come in contact with the disturbed area. Approved best management practices from the
most current version of the NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, or the NC DOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams,
and other diversion structures shall be used to minimize excavation in flowing water.
Exceptions to this condition require application submittal to and written approval by the
Division.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890

Water -Quality Certification lac. -389.0
7. Ripadari Area Protection (Buffer) Rules
Activities located;in the protected riparian :areas (whether, jurisdictional .wetlands.onnot),
within located-In
- Tar= Parnlico; or Catawba.River.Basins or in the Randleman, jordan; or
Goose Creek Watersheds (or:ar -.y other basiri:or ��atersh�d.rith horror: rules }:shat! be.lirnited
to. "uses= identified within and constructed in.accordance wiith.15A NGAC 0213 .0233, .0259;
.0243; ;0250, :028 and .0605, and:shali be located, designed, constructed, and maintained
to have minimal distur-bance.to protect` water quality to the maximum extent practicable
through. the use of besf man agement.practices. All buffer rule requirements, including diffuse
ffoyvrequirements, rnust:be.met.
8. If concrete is used during the construction, then all necessary measures shall be taken to
prevent direct contact between uncured or curing concrete and waters of the state. Water
that;inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to waters of the state.
due to:the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life/ fish kills.
0. Bridge deck drains shall not - discharge directly into the stream :Stormwater.shall be directed
across the bridge and pre=- treated through site- appropriate means (grassed swales, pre;
formed scour holes;.vegetated buffers;. etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the
most current version of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Exceptions to this condition
require written approval by the Division.
10. Compensatory Mitigation
In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (h), compensatory mitigation may be required for
losses of equal to or greater than 150 linear feet of streams (intermittent and perennial)
and/or equal to or greater than one (1) acre of wetlands. For linear public transportation
projects, impacts equal to or exceeding 150 linear feet per stream shall require. mitigation.
Buffer mitigation _may be required for any project with Buffer Rules in effect.at the time of
application for aetiviities classified as "Allowable with Mitigation" or "Prohibited" within the
Table of uses -.
A determination of buffer; - wetland; and stream mitigation requirements shall be made for any
General Water Quality Certification for this Nationwide andfor Regional General Permit.
Design and`rnonitoprig protocols shall follow. the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington
District Stream. Mitigation Guidelines (April 2603 )-or its subsequent updates. Compensatory
mitigation plans shall be.submiited to the. Division for written approval as required in those
protocols. The mitigation plan inust be implemented and /or constructed before any impacts
occur on-site. Alternatively; the Division will accept payment into an in -lieu fee program or a
Mitigation bank. in these cases, proof of payment shall be provided to the Division before
any impacts occur on site.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890 4

Water Quality Certification No. 3390.,
11. Relocated stream designs should include the same dimensions, patterns, and profiles as the
existing channel (or a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the
maximum extent practical. The new channel:should be constructed in the -dry and water shall
not be turned into the neW.channel until the banks are stabiliz ed. .Vegetation- used .for bank
stabilizafibn shall be .limited to native woody species, and should .irciude establishment of a
30 -foot wide wooded and an adjacent 20 -foot wide vegetated.buffer; on both - sides of the
relocated channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating
appropriate erosion control matting materials .and seedling estabiishment,is allowable,
however malting that incorporates.plastic mesh and /or plastic. twine shall. not be used in
wetlands, riparian buffers or floodplains as recommended by the North Carolina Sediment
and Erosion Control Manual. Rip -rap, A- Jacks, concrete, gabions or other hard structures a
may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the stream; however, the
applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to determine the extent
of rip -rap coverage. Please note that if the stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, April 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (or its subsequent updates), the restored length may be used
as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation.
12. Stormwater Management Plan Requirements
All applications shall address stormwater management throughout the entire project area per
the 401 Stormwater Requirements, referenced herein as "Attachment A" at the end of this
Certification
13. Placement of Culverts and Other Structures in Waters and Wetlands
Culverts required for this project shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles-are not altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows.
Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal
profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams must be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48
inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life.
When topographic constraints indicate culvert slopes of greater than 5 %, culvert burial is not
required, provided that all alternative options for flattening the slope have been investigated
and aquatic life movement/ connectivity has been provided when possible (rock ladders,
crossvanes, etc). Notification to the Division including supporting documentation to include a
location map of the culvert, culvert profile drawings, and slope calculations shall be provided
to the Division 60 days prior to the installation of the culvert.
When bedrock is- present in culvert locations, culvert burial is -not required provided that there
is sufficient documentation ofthe presence of bedrock. Notification to the Division including
supporting documentation such as, but not limited to, -a location map of the culvert,
geotechnical reports, photographs, etc shall be provided to the Divisiona minimum of 60
days prior to the installation of the culvert. if bedrock is discovered during construction, then
the Division shall be notified by phone or email within 24 hours of discovery.
if other site- specific topographic constraints preclude the ability to bury, the culverts as
described above and /or it can be demonstrated that burying the culvert would result in
destabilization of the channel, then exceptions to this condition require application submittal
to, and'written approval by, the Division of Water Quality, regardless of the total impacts to
streams or wetlands from the project.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890

Water Quality Certification No. `3390
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure-continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.- Additionally, when
roadways, causewaysj. br other fill projects- araconstructed across FEMA- designated:.
floodways or weifands, openings such as culverts or bridges.must be provided to maintain
the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may
result in destabilization of streams or wetlands.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening
methods.
14. All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area retumed to natural
conditions within 60 days of the determination that the temporary impact is no. longer
necessary. The impacted areas shall be restored to original grade, including each stream's
original cross sectional dimensions, plan form pattern, and longitudinal bed and bed profile,
and the various sites shall be stabilized with natural woody vegetation '(exce.pt for the
approved maintenance areas) and restored to prevent erosion,
15. All temporary pipes( culverts/ rtprap pads etc, shall be installed in ail streams as outlined in
the most recent edition of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and
Design Manual or the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual so as not to restrict stream flow
or cause dis- equilibrium during use of this General Certification. I
.
16. Any riprap required for proper culvert placement, stream stabilization, or restoration of
temporarily disturbed areas shall be restricted to the area directly impacted by the approved
construction activity. All rip -rap shall buried and /or "keyed in" such that the original stream
elevation and streambank contours are restored and maintained. Placement of rip -rap or
other approved materials shali.not- result in de- stabilization of the - stream bed or. banks.
upstream or downstream of the area.
17. Any rip -rap used for stream stabilization shall be of a size and density so as not to be able to
be carried off by wave, -current action, or stream .flows and consist. of clean rock or masonry, .
material free of-debris or toxic pollutants. Rip -rap shall not be installed in the streambed
except in specific areas required for velocity control and to ensure structural integrity of bank
stabilization measures.
18. A one application of fertilizer to re- establish vegetation is allowed in.disturbed areas,
including riparian buffers, but is restricted to no closer than 10 feet from top of bank of
streams. Any fertilizer application must comply with all other Federal, State and Local
regulations.
19. if this Water Quality Certification is used to access building sites, then all lots owned by the
applicant must be buildable without additional impacts to streams or wetlands. The applicant
is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable without requiring additional impacts
to wetlands, waters, or buffers if required to do so in writing by the Division. For road
construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized from natural high ground to
natural high ground.
20. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters, and protective buffers within the project boundaries in order to assure
compliance for future wetland,, water, and buffer impact. These.mechanisms shall be put in
place at the time of recordinq of the property or.of individual fats, whichever is aoproodate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
httv:l /riortal.ncdenr.oro/ web /%ici /swr)/ws /401 /Certsan'doermits /apply /forms. The text of the
sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to a specific project.
Documentation of deed notifications shall be provided to the Division upon request.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890 6

Water Quality Certification No. 3890
21. If an environmental document is required under the National or State Environmental Policy
Fact (NEPA or SEPA), then this General Certification is not valid until a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSi) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State_
Clearinghouse.
22. In the twenty (20) coastal counties, the appropriate DWQ Regional Office must be contacted
to determine if Coastal Stormwater Regulations will be required.
23. This General Certification does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to obtain all other
required Federal, State, or Local approvals.
24. The appiicanUpermittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with §303(4) of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of
State and Federal Law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being
met, including failure to sustain a designated or achieved use, or that State or Federal law is
being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, then the
Division may reevaluate and modify ttiis General Water Quality Certification.
25. When written authorization is required for use of this certification, upon completion of all
permitted impacts included within the approval and any subsequent modifications, the
applicant shall be required to return the certificate of completion attached to the approval.
One copy of the certificate shall be sent to the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh at 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1660.
26. Additional site - specific conditions, including monitoring and /or modeling requirements, may
be added to the written approval letter for projects proposed under this Water Quality
Certification in to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards.
27. This certification grants permission to the director, an authorized representative of the
Director; or DENR staff, upon the presentation of proper credentials, to enter the property
during normal business hours.
This General Cerfification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the
corresponding Nationwide and /or Regional General Permit. The conditions in effect on the date
of issuance of Certification for a specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project,
regardless of the expiration date of this Certification.
Non - compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project may result
in revocation of this General Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and /or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality, including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species, or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890

Weer Quality Certification No. 3890-
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina_
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 99, 2092.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By t
Charles Wakild, .P: E.
Director
History (Vote: Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3890 issued March 19, 2012 replaces
WQC Number 3821 issued April 6, 2010; WQC Number 3631 issued March 19, 2007, WQC 3402
issued March, 2003; WQC Number 3362, issued March 18, 2002; WQC 3287, issued June 1,
2000; WQCs 3106 and 3108 issued February 11, 1997. This Water Quality Certification is
rescinded when the Corps of Engineers reauthorizes any of the corresponding Nationwide or
Regional General Permits and /or when-deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of
Water Quality.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890 8

Water Quality Certification ilc. 3890
Attachment A: 401 Stormwater Requirements
The requirements listed below shall be implemented in order to comply with Condition 12 of this
General Certification. For the North Carolina Department of Transportation, compliance with
NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250 shall serve to satisfy the 401 and Isolated
Wetland Stormwater Requirements.'
A. Design and Impplementation Requirements. All projects, regardless of project area,
amount of built -upon area or amount of jurisdictional impact, shall meet the following
stormwater design requirements:
i. Non- Erosive Discharge to streams and Wetlands. Stormwater conveyances that
discharge to streams and wetlands must discharge at a non - erosive velocityprior to
entering the stream or wetland during the peak flow'from the ten -year storm.
ii. Vegetated Setbacks. A 30 -foot wide vegetated setback must be maintained adjacent to
streams, rivers and tidal waters in areas that are not subject to -a° state- Riparian Area
Protection Rule or other more stringent vegetated setback requirements. The width of
the setback shall be measured horizontally from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the top -of -bank of streas and rivers, and the mean high waterline of tidal
waters, perpendicular to shoreline. n mVegetated setback and filters required by state rules
or local governments may be met concurrently with this requirement and may contain
coastal, isolated or 404 jurisdictional wetlands. Non jurisdictional portions of the
vegetated setback may be cleared and graded, but must be planted with and maintained
in grass or other vegetative or plant rnateria1.3
iii. Construction and Operation. The stormwater Management plan must be constructed
and operational before any permanent building or other structure is occupied-or utilized at
the site. The Stormwater management plan, including drainage patterns, must be
maintained in :perpetuity:¢
iv. Coordination with Other Stormwater Programs. Projects that are subject to another
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) stormwater program, including (but not iirnited to) the 20
Coastal Counties, HQW, ORVV or state - implemented Phase It NPDES, or a Certified
Community's stormwater management program, must be constructed and maintained in
compliance with the approved stormwater management plan.5
v. Stormwater Design Requirements for Projects Not Covered under item (iv).
Projects that are not subject to another DWQ stormwater program or a Certified
Community's stormwater program shall meet all of the following requirements:
a. Low Density. A site is low density if all the following requirements are met:
The development has a built upon area of twenty -four percent (24 %) or less,
considering both current and future development. When determining the amount
of built upon area, coastal wetlands shall be included; however, ponds, lakes and
rivers as specified in North Carolina's Schedule of Classifications shall be
excluded. if a portion of project has a density greater than 24 %, the higher
density area must be located in an upland area and away from surface waters
and drainageways to the maximum extent practicable.'
2. All stormwater runoff from the built upon areas is transported primarily via
vegetated conveyances designed in accordance with the most recent version of
the iVC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Alternative
designs may be approved if the applicant can show that the design provides
Water Quality Certification No. 3890

Water Quality Certification Flo:. 38.90
equal or better water quality..protection than the practices specified in the manual.
The project must not include a stormwater collection system (such as piped
conveyances) as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0202(60).'
h. High:€Meneity. Projects that do not meet the Low.:Densibi req =uirements shall meet
the following requirements;
1. Stormwater runoff from the entire site must be treated by structural stormwater
controls (BMPs) that are designed to:remove eighty -five percent (85 %) of the
average annual amount of Total Suspended Solids JSS), Stormwater runoff
that drains directly to Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) must also be treated. to
remove thirty percent (30 %) of Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP),3
2. All BMPs must be designed in accordance with the version of the NC DWQ
Stormwater Best Management. Practices Manual that. is in place on the date of
stormwater management plan submittal. Alternative designs may be approved if
the applicant can show that the design provides equal or better water ,quality:
protection than the practices specified in the manuaLo
3. DWQ may add specific stormwater management requirements on a case -by-
case basis in order to ensure that a proposed activity will not.violate water quality
standards.1'
4. DWQ may approve Low Impact Developments (LIDS) that meet the guidance set
forth in the Low Impact Development. A Guidebook for North Carolina."
5. Proposed new development undertaken by a local government solely as a public
road project shall follow the requirements of the NC DOT BIViP Toofbox- rather
than Items (1) -(4) above.12
B. Submittal Requirements. The submittal requirements listed below apply. only to projects
that require written authorization as indicated in the applicable General Certification as well
as projects that require an Isolated Wetlands Permit. Any required documentation shall
be sent to.the Wetlands, Suffers .and Stormwater Compliance and Permitting Unit at
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276994650.
L Projects that are Subject to Another DVVQ Stormwater Program: If the project is
subject to another DWQ stormwater program, such as the 20 Coastal Counties, NQW,
4RW or state- implemented Phase 11 NPDES, then. the applicant shall submit a copy of
the stormwater approval letter before any impacts occur on:site.13
ii. Projects that are Subject to a Certified Community's Stormwater Program. if the
project is subject to a certified local government's stormwater program, then the applicant
shall submit one set of approved stormwater management plan details and calculations
with -documentation of the local government. Is approval before any im..pacts occur on site.5
iii. Projects Not Covered Under Items (i) or (ii): If the project is not subject to another
DWO .Stormwater Program or a Certified Community's stormwater program, then it shall
be reviewed and approved by the DWQ through the Water Quality Certification
authorization process.
a. Low Density. For low density projects, the applicant shall submit two copies of the
DWQ Law Density Supplement Form with all required items.13
Water Quality Certification No. 3890 10

Water Quality Certification Flo. 3890
b. High Density. For high density projects, the applicant shall submit two copies of a
DWQ BMP Supplement Form and all required items at the specified scales for each
BMP that is proposed.13
iv. Phasing.: Stormwater management plans may be phased on a case -by -case basis, with
the submittal of a final Stormwater management plan per Items (I) -(iii) above required for
the current phase and a conceptual stormwater management plan for the future phase(s).
The stormwater management plan for each future phase must be approved by the
appropriate entity before construction of that phase is commenced. The approved
stormwater management plan for each future phase must be constructed and operational
before any permanent building or other structure associated with that phase is
occupied. 4
Stormwater Management Plan Modifications. The stormwater management plan may
not be modified without prior written authorization from the entity that approved the plan.
If the project is within a Certified Community, then the applicant shall submit one set of
approved stormwater management plan details and calculations with documentation of
the local government's approval for record - keeping purposes. If the project is subject to
DWQ review, then the applicant shall submit two copies of the appropriate Supplement
Forms per Item (III) above for any BMPs that have been rhodifted for DWQ's review and
approval.15
1 The stormwater.requirement for 401 applications is codified in 15A.NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5) and
(c)(5)
2 Non erosive discharge rates.are required in SL 2008- 211 §2(b)(1). The 10 -year design storm
standard is codified in 15A NCAC 02H .1008(f)(2) and- I008(g)(1).
3 30 -foot vegetated setbacks are required in SL -2006- 246 §9(d), SL 2008 - 211 §2(b), 15A NCAC
02H .1006(2)(c) and .1007(1)(a).
a Construction and maintenance of the stormwater plan is necessary to satisfy 15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(5).
5 Conveys application procedure to streamline the permitting process and reduce any unnecessary
duplication in the review of stormwater management plans.
6 Low density built upon area thresholds are set in SL 2006- 246 §9(c) and SL 2008 - 211 §2(b).
7 The requirement for low density development to use vegetated conveyances is codified in SL
2006 - 246 §9(c), SL 2008 - 211 §2(b), 15A NCAC 02H .1006(2)(b) and .1007(1)(a). The Stormwater
BMP Manual is also referenced in 15A NCAC 02B .0265(3)(a) and .0277,(4)(e).
a 85% TSS removal is required in SL 2006- 246 §9(d), -SL 2008 - 211 §2(b), 15A NCAC 02H
.1006(2)(c), 15A NCAC 02H .1007(1)(a)_ The 30% TN and TP removal requirements for NSW
waters are set forth in 15A NCAC 026 .0232, 15A NCAC 02B _0257(x)(1), 15A NCAC 02B
.0265(3)(x) and 15A NCAC 026 .0277(4).
s The Stormwater BMP Manual is also referenced in 15A NCAC 02B .0265(3)(a) and .0277(4)(e).
10 The requirement for DWQ to ensure that water quality standards are protected before issuing a
401 certification is codified in 15A NCAC 02H.0506.
1, The LID Toolbox is also referenced in 15A NCAC 02B .0277(4)(g).
'Z The term "public road project" is defined in15A NCAC 02B .0265(3)(a).
t3 Conveys application procedure to streamline the permitting process.
14 Phased development is addressed as a "common plan of development" in 15A NCAC 02H
.1003(3).
15 Procedures for modifying stormwater plans are set forth in 15A NCAC 02H.101 1.
Water Quality Certification No. 3890 1 q

/F
WAL- MARTNREAL ESTATE
yE BUSINESS TRUST WAL -MART
D.B. 9657, PG. 2033
` 0786.02 -57 -7062
I NRB�
30' DUKE POWER EASEMENT I
BM 2002. PG 1290 - I
DB 10693 PG 2109
N/F
CREST BRIER CREEK APARTMENTS LLC
PABLO DIEGO
D.B. 14587, PG. 2147
PINS/ 0768.02 -66 -8274
TOTAL LOT AREA =14.46 AC
TOTAL LOT AREA WITHIN FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND FUTURE FLOODPLAIN = 133,804 SF (3.07 AC)
TOTAL AREA OF PROPOSED FILL IN FEMA FLOODPLAIN = 29,904 SF (0.69 AC) 22.3%
W
N PROPOSED WATER VALVE
D EXISTING WATER REDUCER
► PROPOSED WATER REDUCER
0 EXISTING MANHOLE
• PROPOSED MANHOLE
G EXISTING CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
0 EXISTING DROP INLET
a PROPOSEO DROP INLET
Q EXISTING FLARED END SECTION
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
CO CLEANOUT
FOG FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
_ •� ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
•• TREE CONSERVATION AREA
IIALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL SE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF RALEIGH
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. J�
GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FEET )
1 ch = 50 tL
}
m
6
,,idtgh CARGG
- a
O F,
GI
}Z
a 8
N �
G 3 ro {CO SOD
Q a $
Z �
ro o'IIII
z
w 0
V
d E
a
� � z
d "
d ai�
d >!w
w ° o
� I
V �I
�I
M U
s
tl
SHEET
C -3.0

A
f *(
i 'to V-11%
L
R�_T�' \.
w W-11
li
wght`
*.,USG .5 1NUTEf D "SOUTH AST D RH N R CARD IN :2013 NATI NAL
LAT: 35.910651 N, LO,NNG: - 78.775857 W
N ALEXANDER PLACE APARTMENTS
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATION
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet PROJECT #: DDV-14000
I inch = 2,000 feet RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

Cr
SUBJECT PROPERTY wt
PIWL
rC
Cr
C r
r
f'
MfC
a Irwll tH ? 4 "l
CM p
ti
4
USGr: S IL SURVEY SHEET 18. WAKE COUNTY,. NORT AR LIN
LAT: 35.910651 N, LONG: - 78.775857 W
N ALEXANDER PLACE APARTMENTS
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATION "
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 250 500 1,000
Feet PROJECT #: DDV -14000
t inch = 500 feet RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA ��

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. All distances are horizontal ground.
2 All dimensions ee in feet unless oth—as noted.
3. All area. computed using coordinates from measured field data.
4. The ALTA /AGSM Land Title Survey shown hereon 1, NOT FOR RECORDATION.
5. Except o shown an my, there are no enan- ohments o subject property.
B. This rvey mttfw .11 stole- requbad minimum standards. n
7. Except ae shown an r y, there Is no obo —oula evidence of recent earth moving work, ba.ding
construction or bulldlnqq addltlwt of the subject property.
S. There 1s na vlalble .vial once of any cemet.d.. w burial ground. on the property.
9. The legal description as shown on this survey tleeorlbes the same property as Ne iNe commlbnent.
10. Electric, fiber optic, gas and telecommunication utility line may ar may not be located In the public
right -ol -way to serve the subject property. Thee, lines we underground and have not been marked
d Iheratwo are not sham an the survey,
an 11. MI recorded documents ore referenced to the Wake County, North Carol- Registry of Deeds,
12. No wetland area(.) dellneatV an the subject property by United Stales Fish and Wildlife Servke
National Wetlands Inventory 'FWS Weti-d. Mapper°.
13. H.Hzontol Datum le HAD 83 and Vertical Datum 1. MAID W.
14, Subject Property 1. located !]thin en area designated oa having speaks flood hazards. Property is
located In Zane 'AE' and X° as donned by F,dsrol Insurance Rate Map Number 37200768001 with an
.11. tiva data of May 2 2008.
1S. No bWdmga or structures exl.l on .ubjer:t properly.
16. Na parking wens extol on sublet, praPerly.
17. No site Improvements exist on subject property.
OWNER: SLF RUBY JONES LLC
c% RYAN, LLC
PO BOX 56807
ATLANTA. GA 30343
SITE DESCRIPTION: T.W. ALEXANDER PLACE
LOTS 51 & 53
P8N/ 0768.02 -66 -5694 & 0768.02 -66 -1345
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA: 144602 AC
LAND USE: VACANT
TOWNSHIP: LEESVILLE
REFERENCES: D.B. 9526, PG. 1886
B.N. 2002. P0. 1289
PARKING SUMMARY
NO PARKING ON SUBJECT PROPERTY
LEGAL O IOIPTION
LOT 51
BEGINNING at a point, said point being the common Southeastern most corner of Lot 41 as recorded In BM 2002, Pages 1282,1290;
thence N RI'16'25 "E, 630.23'a, a point; thence 530'38'23"E, 343.98'to a point; thence S61702'40"E, 324.38'to a paint, thence
549'14'57 "W, 569.63't. s point; [hence N49 °56'50 "W, 210.68- to a Point; thence N55- 037'W, 100.49'W a point; thence
N49- 57'4M, 391.35'W the point of BEGINNING containing 8.1550.a..a d being the same LM 5l as recorded in RM 2002, Pgs
1288 -1290, Wake County Rrguary.
LOT 53
BEGINNING at a point, said Point being the common Northeastern most corner of Lot 52 as recorded in SM 2002, Pages 1289 -1290;
thence 56°24'38 "E, 13831'to a point; thence 570'14'39 "E, 35641'to a point, thence 599'14'57 "W, 604.86'to a paint thence
N61'02'40 'W, 324.38' to a point; thence N30'38'23 "W, 343.98' to a point; thence N48'16'251, 76.74'to a point; thence 560'57'50 "E,
123.69'to a point thence N7W40'56 "E, 137.81.10 a paint; thence N64- 151113"E, 1A5.97' to a Point; thence N31- 48'33 "E, 42." to the
point of BEGINNING containing 6.3052 acres and being the same Lot 53 as recorded in 8M 2002, Pgs 1288.1290, Wake County Registry.
/ N
—� WALJIART REAL ESTATE
D.B. TRUBT WAL -MART' \
D.B.868.0PG.2033 �I- (/ / ,\ %
r� Old ef]I�� yO/al PINE 0788.02 -57 -7062 \ \YV ///
&M/AGSM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
To: Davis Development, )nc and Chicago 710. Inawenm Company: .'�. • ,' • . . \• ( • '�- �• , J ����^�� ar_ � `_/ � •� � / /' ^ w�. \ ` l � \
. nod-- 't`-- '- `•�''+fi'a /, " ..; Fes'— ••nee\ - : �• .,.• • y \ ` ��
This le to certify that this map or plot and the survey on It N basal ware 'fie'• J. ''�e' ,' / :' \ �\ \,�
mode In ocoortlanca with the ton Minimum Standard Datol Raqukamenb tar ' \ \ . / : ✓; %. I. r \
ALTA /AGSM Land TIUe Survey., jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, -
d Includes Items 1. 2, 3, 4, S. 8(b), 7(a), 7(b), 7(c)C 8, 8, 11(0), 13, 14. 16. 17, f /p✓ - ,
18, 18 and 20 of Table A thereof. The field work was omPletad on July 24, 2014. '\ • ' •f-: n�.ey.`�.,t�,, T,,. -• �••• _ -- \
to %lh - R. Callahan. P:L.S.a - SEAL
RR a of surveyor 0g22977
ucenes4rvumoar
NOTES CORR .P IN
ES fTND G TO SCHFOIII_E A. SECTON 11 fFXCFPTI0N5J
VERBATIM, AS PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMM17MENT FILE N0:
14-11741GH EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 7, 2014 AT 3;00 P.M.
I. Detect., Ikna e
colic reps, ativarae attaching e, setter matter, If any, iVe tad, Rust
appearing a the public scads or acquires f r yalu. of to the Effective Data but prior
m the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the .stole or interest ar
mortgsge thereon coleratl by this Commltmmt - NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
2. Tuxes a aseeasments for the year 2014, and subsequent years, not yet due or payable.
- NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
3. Any dhwaponcy. filet, -. shortage In area or ba -dary llnea, a aachment,
rwmbronce, vralotion, variation, overlap, setback, easement or claims of eaaoment,
iparian right, and title to land within roads, ways, railroad.. watercourses, burktl
grwMa, mwahas, dredged w Riled areas w lend below the mean highwater mark or
Ithln the bounds of any adlominIf body of water, ar other adverse circumstance
aH.cting the Title that would be disclosed by a current inspection and accurate and
mpoln, land survey of the Land. - AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
4. Book of Maps 2002, 1280 -1290; Book of Mops 2004, page 1056; Book of Maps
2006, pages 1667 -14`2111 ook or Maps 2008, pages 1075 -1076; Book of Maps 2010,
page 552; Book of Mops 2008, pages 1390 -1391; Book of Map. 2000, pages 327 -329;
Book of Mops 1990, pages 1275 -1276; Book or Maps 2003, page, 859 -860; Berk of
Maps 2003, pages 1707 -1709; Book of mope 2004, pug.. 515 -517; Book of Maps
2005, pages 538 -540; Book of Maps 2005, pages 2462 -2463; Book of Map. 2006,
pages 1546 -1547 and Book of Maps 2003, pages 247 -248. - BM 2002, PGS
1288 -1290 AND SM 2003, PGS 247 -248 AS SHOWN ON SURVEY. BM 1990. PGS
1275 -1276 HAS BEEN SUPERCEDED AND NO LONGER AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY. ALL
OTHER MAPS LISTED DO NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY.
5. Covenants conditio
rr Alastlore eoscs, Pro and
lions provided iw In Declaration of
Protoeelve Covenm ns'Iw
b Alexander Plane other retarded d Book 9657, pogo 1865
and any related mope, plane, bylaws and other documents) and amendmigion, but
omitting any covenants w talus' an., if any, booed upon rote, color, religion, sax
s,zua7 aulankatlon, famNlat status, Ile! statue, duablyty, haMkap, rwtion.1 origin.
ancestry, scarce of income' come, as set forth In applicable state w federal laws, ..crept
to the extmt that Bald covenant w restrictlan Is permitted by applicable law. - DOES
NOT AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY
6. Covenants, conditions, restd.""., ea .Went., and Ilms provded far In Declaration of
Mostor Plan Prot Covenants far TW Alexander Place recorded In Book 10497, page
2138, as emended by First Amendment to D -1-11- of Master Ism Prot -tale
Cavmants for TW Alexander Place recorded m Book 11021, page 1387, and my related
maps, plane, bylaws and other daeummt(,) and ameadment(s), but omItUng any
wnunts w
a restrictions, if any, based upon race, edw, religion, sex, sawai uHmtotinn,
familial status, mwital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of
Income, as set forth in applicable state ar federal laws, except to the extant that said
covenant or restriction N pemnftted by applicable law - AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY,
NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
7, Consent Judgment to the North Carolina Department of Tran,pa tation recorded M Book
7032 page 212. AS SHOYN ON SURVEY
S. Easement(s) to Carolina Powar & Light Company recarded In Book 3180, page 102 and
Book 3184, page 275. DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
9. Easement(a) to Duke Power Company recorded M Book 1055, page 555. DOES NOT
AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
10_ Memorandum of smart recorded
In Book nt a 676
Agra 2 s amended b
• page
Memorandum of Flra Amendment ( e anent to Agreement antl .d by em of Agreement
recorded In to ream pore 1955, as further amended by Memorandum of Second
Amendment to Agreement recorded In Book Easement re page 2n B k further emended by
Fourth Amendment to Agreement antl Easement recorded h Book 13945, pogo 549. -
DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
11. Cross Easement Agreement by and be /wear SLF Ruby Jones, LLC and Foism- Glenwood.
LLC recorded In Book 9857, page 2011. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
12. Eosement(e) to Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC recorded M Book 10272, page 2604. -
DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
11 Transit Eoeemmt to the City of Raleigh r...rdad m Book 13975, page 1067. - DOES
NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
14. Reaffirmation of Agreement. recorded In Book 14208, page 602. - DOES NOT AFFECT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
15, Temporary Access and Construction Ucenee recorded in Book 14208, page. 60B and
Big. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
I& Deed of E ... mmt far P. -mt Slope and Temporary Construction Purposes recorded
In Book 14208, page 630. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
17. Non- Exclusive Drainage Easement recorded In Book 14208, page 639. - DOES NOT
AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
18, General Warranty Deed Easement far Sanitary Sewer Purposes retarded in Book 14299,
page 2009. - AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
19. Declwatlon of Cmss Access Easement recorded in Book 12812, page 2185. - DOES
NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
20. Right of Way Agreement to Duke Energy Corporation retarded In Book 10693, page
2109. - SHOWN CN SURVEY
21. Offer of Cross Access. Easement and Permanent Slope Easement recorded in Back
14562, page 2439. - BENEFITS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
22. Temporary Grading and Construction Easement recorded In Book 14562, page 2465. -
BENEFITS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
21 Declaration of Use Restriction recorded in Back 15517, page 1706, Retied by
Partial Release recorded in Book 15569, page 1446. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT
PROPERTY
(. (' 'S "BURRING. $TBAAK•f .''��' ' ;,y
NFf1SE iSVER'BUFFE K'%
F� .SIY QM'TOP - f /, , \� -aty OF
J
_ BM 200:
\`-+, — __•fin=- � /'�>'• - _ � � _ / /' -," �,� "= '.�I'___ _ _._ L'`.� � \`' \ �.
'T0� YEAR-FU TURE FL R N
..
7-- -- -"- -_� - - -� '.��Fdn AR 3i>��ei' � /': FEMAFraM�7zew6HDa_, `.�•1\I,` �:\�,
,= - /: '' -s ' "- - i '+AE717ARY
, -', 'i -2Q0!( t•. l,`'�
w -
.r'' - ---ill '- ,,,�'�,,' /�•'�',�'.� --- LOTS! � \ �� , \\, ','�P`I @. \`
" �� -"" '' '/ - -"= 8.1550 AC. _ ` \' �`, �,, `,\ •. \, ` `.
- _ - —_ - - -- \`
nd ,�
z ' 60'_BUI(pIN�SEI)3ACK
k�A�ii lit; \'.
P"DUKE' POWER \E EME'NT \\`,t
Bt,{ z002, Pp flap : \'. .\'.'`
\ !Rj gg D9 10893 P6. 17N
\.
11
1 � EST
AN ENT;
1 ' PIN 07f
OFFER OF CROSS ACCESS AND
PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
OB 14562. PG 2439 AND
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
OB 14562, PG 2465
RGURE 11 MR CONDITIOM
11 ;.
l
GRAPHIC SCALE
1N TCET ;
1 iucli = 60 n.
Y
2
W
rc
a
°
IL
N
U N
g H
3 ET
iW
� 3 W
Z
I� IIII�I�
fIllill IIN
I
I
Iilllli II
IIIII
Ililpll�l
l
K
U
W o�
U Z W
a C M
�
Los
W od > F
_ z
Z U-) l Q
WQ3;c�
r--5
0
Qr
0
I
M
11
SHEET
1 of I
LEGEND
O
- IRON FOUND (AS DESCRIBED)
O
- IRON SET (5/8' REBAR)
EI
- CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
o
- LIGHT POLE
O
- POWER POLE
e1
- "RE HYDRANT
®
- WATER VALVE
Q
- SEWER MANHOLE
O11 FJ
- STORM/ORMNAGE STRUCTURES
t zx.n
- SPOT ELEVATION
- FENCE LINE
— — —
- RIGHT -OF -WAY
-- -- - - --
- EASEMENT LINE (AS DESCRIBED)
— — —
- BUFFER LINE (AS DESCRIBED)
- - - - -- 329 - - - - --
- CONTOUR LINE
- OVERHEAD POWER LINE
sp
- STORM GRAIN
- SEWER LINE
to %lh - R. Callahan. P:L.S.a - SEAL
RR a of surveyor 0g22977
ucenes4rvumoar
NOTES CORR .P IN
ES fTND G TO SCHFOIII_E A. SECTON 11 fFXCFPTI0N5J
VERBATIM, AS PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMM17MENT FILE N0:
14-11741GH EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 7, 2014 AT 3;00 P.M.
I. Detect., Ikna e
colic reps, ativarae attaching e, setter matter, If any, iVe tad, Rust
appearing a the public scads or acquires f r yalu. of to the Effective Data but prior
m the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the .stole or interest ar
mortgsge thereon coleratl by this Commltmmt - NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
2. Tuxes a aseeasments for the year 2014, and subsequent years, not yet due or payable.
- NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
3. Any dhwaponcy. filet, -. shortage In area or ba -dary llnea, a aachment,
rwmbronce, vralotion, variation, overlap, setback, easement or claims of eaaoment,
iparian right, and title to land within roads, ways, railroad.. watercourses, burktl
grwMa, mwahas, dredged w Riled areas w lend below the mean highwater mark or
Ithln the bounds of any adlominIf body of water, ar other adverse circumstance
aH.cting the Title that would be disclosed by a current inspection and accurate and
mpoln, land survey of the Land. - AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
4. Book of Maps 2002, 1280 -1290; Book of Mops 2004, page 1056; Book of Maps
2006, pages 1667 -14`2111 ook or Maps 2008, pages 1075 -1076; Book of Maps 2010,
page 552; Book of Mops 2008, pages 1390 -1391; Book of Map. 2000, pages 327 -329;
Book of Mops 1990, pages 1275 -1276; Book or Maps 2003, page, 859 -860; Berk of
Maps 2003, pages 1707 -1709; Book of mope 2004, pug.. 515 -517; Book of Maps
2005, pages 538 -540; Book of Maps 2005, pages 2462 -2463; Book of Map. 2006,
pages 1546 -1547 and Book of Maps 2003, pages 247 -248. - BM 2002, PGS
1288 -1290 AND SM 2003, PGS 247 -248 AS SHOWN ON SURVEY. BM 1990. PGS
1275 -1276 HAS BEEN SUPERCEDED AND NO LONGER AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY. ALL
OTHER MAPS LISTED DO NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY.
5. Covenants conditio
rr Alastlore eoscs, Pro and
lions provided iw In Declaration of
Protoeelve Covenm ns'Iw
b Alexander Plane other retarded d Book 9657, pogo 1865
and any related mope, plane, bylaws and other documents) and amendmigion, but
omitting any covenants w talus' an., if any, booed upon rote, color, religion, sax
s,zua7 aulankatlon, famNlat status, Ile! statue, duablyty, haMkap, rwtion.1 origin.
ancestry, scarce of income' come, as set forth In applicable state w federal laws, ..crept
to the extmt that Bald covenant w restrictlan Is permitted by applicable law. - DOES
NOT AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY
6. Covenants, conditions, restd.""., ea .Went., and Ilms provded far In Declaration of
Mostor Plan Prot Covenants far TW Alexander Place recorded In Book 10497, page
2138, as emended by First Amendment to D -1-11- of Master Ism Prot -tale
Cavmants for TW Alexander Place recorded m Book 11021, page 1387, and my related
maps, plane, bylaws and other daeummt(,) and ameadment(s), but omItUng any
wnunts w
a restrictions, if any, based upon race, edw, religion, sex, sawai uHmtotinn,
familial status, mwital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of
Income, as set forth in applicable state ar federal laws, except to the extant that said
covenant or restriction N pemnftted by applicable law - AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY,
NOT A MATTER OF SURVEY
7, Consent Judgment to the North Carolina Department of Tran,pa tation recorded M Book
7032 page 212. AS SHOYN ON SURVEY
S. Easement(s) to Carolina Powar & Light Company recarded In Book 3180, page 102 and
Book 3184, page 275. DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
9. Easement(a) to Duke Power Company recorded M Book 1055, page 555. DOES NOT
AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
10_ Memorandum of smart recorded
In Book nt a 676
Agra 2 s amended b
• page
Memorandum of Flra Amendment ( e anent to Agreement antl .d by em of Agreement
recorded In to ream pore 1955, as further amended by Memorandum of Second
Amendment to Agreement recorded In Book Easement re page 2n B k further emended by
Fourth Amendment to Agreement antl Easement recorded h Book 13945, pogo 549. -
DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
11. Cross Easement Agreement by and be /wear SLF Ruby Jones, LLC and Foism- Glenwood.
LLC recorded In Book 9857, page 2011. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
12. Eosement(e) to Progress Energy Carolinas, LLC recorded M Book 10272, page 2604. -
DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
11 Transit Eoeemmt to the City of Raleigh r...rdad m Book 13975, page 1067. - DOES
NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
14. Reaffirmation of Agreement. recorded In Book 14208, page 602. - DOES NOT AFFECT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
15, Temporary Access and Construction Ucenee recorded in Book 14208, page. 60B and
Big. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
I& Deed of E ... mmt far P. -mt Slope and Temporary Construction Purposes recorded
In Book 14208, page 630. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
17. Non- Exclusive Drainage Easement recorded In Book 14208, page 639. - DOES NOT
AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
18, General Warranty Deed Easement far Sanitary Sewer Purposes retarded in Book 14299,
page 2009. - AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
19. Declwatlon of Cmss Access Easement recorded in Book 12812, page 2185. - DOES
NOT AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY
20. Right of Way Agreement to Duke Energy Corporation retarded In Book 10693, page
2109. - SHOWN CN SURVEY
21. Offer of Cross Access. Easement and Permanent Slope Easement recorded in Back
14562, page 2439. - BENEFITS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
22. Temporary Grading and Construction Easement recorded In Book 14562, page 2465. -
BENEFITS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY
21 Declaration of Use Restriction recorded in Back 15517, page 1706, Retied by
Partial Release recorded in Book 15569, page 1446. - DOES NOT AFFECT SUBJECT
PROPERTY
(. (' 'S "BURRING. $TBAAK•f .''��' ' ;,y
NFf1SE iSVER'BUFFE K'%
F� .SIY QM'TOP - f /, , \� -aty OF
J
_ BM 200:
\`-+, — __•fin=- � /'�>'• - _ � � _ / /' -," �,� "= '.�I'___ _ _._ L'`.� � \`' \ �.
'T0� YEAR-FU TURE FL R N
..
7-- -- -"- -_� - - -� '.��Fdn AR 3i>��ei' � /': FEMAFraM�7zew6HDa_, `.�•1\I,` �:\�,
,= - /: '' -s ' "- - i '+AE717ARY
, -', 'i -2Q0!( t•. l,`'�
w -
.r'' - ---ill '- ,,,�'�,,' /�•'�',�'.� --- LOTS! � \ �� , \\, ','�P`I @. \`
" �� -"" '' '/ - -"= 8.1550 AC. _ ` \' �`, �,, `,\ •. \, ` `.
- _ - —_ - - -- \`
nd ,�
z ' 60'_BUI(pIN�SEI)3ACK
k�A�ii lit; \'.
P"DUKE' POWER \E EME'NT \\`,t
Bt,{ z002, Pp flap : \'. .\'.'`
\ !Rj gg D9 10893 P6. 17N
\.
11
1 � EST
AN ENT;
1 ' PIN 07f
OFFER OF CROSS ACCESS AND
PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
OB 14562. PG 2439 AND
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
OB 14562, PG 2465
RGURE 11 MR CONDITIOM
11 ;.
l
GRAPHIC SCALE
1N TCET ;
1 iucli = 60 n.
Y
2
W
rc
a
°
IL
N
U N
g H
3 ET
iW
� 3 W
Z
I� IIII�I�
fIllill IIN
I
I
Iilllli II
IIIII
Ililpll�l
l
K
U
W o�
U Z W
a C M
�
Los
W od > F
_ z
Z U-) l Q
WQ3;c�
r--5
0
Qr
0
I
M
11
SHEET
1 of I

^! `
is � • t � /. A`�� G��7 '�, ' � �.wr „ ... _ .
r .
SUBJECT PROPERTY
�ttfgo, H "..
t
LEGEND
SUBJECT PROPERTY 3:
2 -FT CONTOUR
N
1
�
.0 0,
,
�
:
y!le
4r ,
R� 4'
NC OneMaap, NG Centeno; Geographi ormation and Analysis. NC 911
Board J� t, , �i nll- t
� J
N ALEXANDER PLACE APARTMENTS
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATION "
FIGURE 3.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 125 250 50o
Feet PROJECT #: DDV -14000
I inch =250 feet RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA

o�oF WArE9oG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
171i o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
X Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 3890
1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes
1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express X Riparian Buffer Authorization
le Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for
because written approval is not required? DWQ 401 Certification:
X No
1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer
1 h below.
1 h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a Name of project: Adara Alexander Place Apartments
2b County: Wake
2c Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d Subdivision name:
2e NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed: DD Alexander Place LLC
3b Deed Book and Paae No. DB: 016055, PG: 02685
3c Responsible Party (for LLC if Fred Hazel
applicable):
3d Street address: 403 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 201
3e City, state, zip: Stockbridge, GA 30281
3f Telephone no.: 770- 474 -4345
3g Fax no.:
3h Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
For the record only for Corps Permit:
X No
X No
X No
X No

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is:
4b Name:
4c Business name
(if applicable):
4d Street address:
4e City, state, zip:
4f Telephone no.:
4g Fax no.:
4h Email address:
Agent Other, specify:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name: George Buchholz, Environmental Consultant/Project Manager
5b Business name The John R. McAdams Company
(if applicable):
5c Street address:
5d City, state, zip:
5e Telephone no.:
5f Fax no.:
5g Email address:
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC, 27713
919- 287 -0890
919- 361 -2269
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
1

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0768665694, 0768661345
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.910651 Longitude: - 78.775857
1c Property size: Approximately 14.4
2. Surface Waters
12a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Little Brier Creek
12b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c River basin: Neuse Basin; HUC 03020201
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The Adara Alexander Place Apartments project is located in the northwestern section of Wake County
approximately 0.2 miles west of the intersection of ACC Boulevard and Alexander Town Boulevard on the south
side of ACC Boulevard in Raleigh, North Carolina. Approximately 95 percent of the subject property can be
characterized as forested land and can be generally characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak - Hickory Forest according
the NC Natural Heritage Program classification system. The remaining 5 percent can be is comprised of utility
easement and characterized as maintained land. There are two unnamed tributaries to Little Brier Creek located
within the subject property. Land use within the vicinity of the subject property is residential, commercial, and
forested areas.
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.00 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,963 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is the extension of Capital Center Drive.
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The proposed project involves the
construction of a roadway crossing across an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek for the purposes of developing a multi-
family residential complex. The proposed multi - family residential complex will consist of multi - family residential units and
the associated infrastructure, including roads, utilities, city sewer, and stormwater management facilities. The new
applicant purchased the subject property and proposes an amended site layout which changes the location of the roadway
crossing an unnamed tributary to Little Brier Creek. As a result of proposing a different and modified site layout, there are
proposed stream and buffer impacts associated with the road crossing and buffer impacts associated with two high flow
bypass channels. The proposed impacts reduce the total amount of impacts previously authorized. No impacts to wetlands
are proposed.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the X Yes
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what X Preliminary Final
type of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional Agency /Consultant Company:
areas? Name (if known): Stephen Brown Other: Terracon Consultants,
Inc.
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Preliminary Determination issued September 18, 2013 by David Schaeffer ( USACE representative); USACE Action ID. SAW -
2013- 01773.
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained X Yes No
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?

5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Previous applicant was Crowne Partners, Inc. and was issued a
Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE Action Id: SAW- 2013 - 01773; September 18, 2013) and an Approval of 401 Water Quality
Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667; July
15, 2013).
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
6b If yes, explain.
Yes X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands X Streams — tributaries X Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0
2h. Comments: No wetlands are proposed to be impacted by the project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream ugh
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
Impact Area 3; Fill (culvert) LIT Little Brier Creek Perennial X Corps 8 feet 93
Inset 3 Permanent
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 93
3i. Comments: See Figure 4.1, Inset 3. It should be noted that of the total 93 If of permanent stream impact, 29 If will be
associated with a rip -rap dissipator pads which will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream beds to allow for
aquatic life passage. The previously issued Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE Action Id: SAW- 2013 - 01773; September 18, 2013)
and an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15, 2013) authorized 143 linear feet of stream
impacts. The proposed multi - family residential complex reduces the previously authorized stream impacts by 50 linear feet.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water
of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
5f. Total:
5gComments:
5hls a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,
then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitiI
ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar - Pamlico Catawba Randleman
Other:
6b. 6c.
6d. 6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1 - Impact Area High Flow Bypass
1; Inset 1; Channel; Outfall
UT Little Brier Creek No
843
431
Permanent (Stormwater Wetland)
B2 - Impact Area High Flow Bypass
2; Inset 2; Channel; Outfall
UT Little Brier Creek No
644
400
Permanent (Stormwater Wetland)
B3 - Impact Area
3; Inset 3; Fill (road crossing)
UT Little Brier Creek No
4,397
3,683
Permanent
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 5,884 4,514
6i. Comments: See Figure 4.1, Insets 3. Permanent Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts associated within the road crossing are
less than 150 linear feet and are less than one -third acre. The previously issued Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Basin Riparian Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15, 2013) authorized a total of 13,536 square feet of Neuse River
Buffer impacts. The proposed multi - family residential complex reduces the previously authorized total Neuse River Buffer
impacts by 3,138 square feet.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The previous
applicant, Crowne Partners, Inc. was issued a Nationwide Permit 29 (USACE Action Id: SAW- 2013 - 01773; September 18,
2013) and an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Basin Riparian
Buffer Protection Rules (DWQ # 13 -0667; July 15, 2013) for 143 linear feet of stream impact and a total of 13,536 square feet
of Neuse River Buffer impacts. The current applicant, DD Alexander Place LLC, recently purchased the subject property
and proposes an amended site layout which changes the location of the roadway crossing across an unnamed tributary to
Little Brier Creek. This modified site layout reduces the previously authorized stream impacts by 50 linear feet and reduces
the previously authorized total Neuse River Buffer impacts by 3,138 square feet.
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Proper
sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during construction and installation as described in the Erosion
Control Plan sheets (to be prepared) and reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and City of Raleigh. All
work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non - jurisdictional, stable ground. As such, a
temporary diversion channel and temporary coffer dams will be utilized to construct the proposed road extension so that work
within the stream feature can be performed in dry conditions (see attached Inset 1). The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet
protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install devices. All erosion and
sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case
less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion
control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent
seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The proposed road extension will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X No Yes
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2blf yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for
this project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b Credits Purchased
Type:
Stream
DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Quantity:
3c Comments: The Adara Alexander Place Apartments project proposes a total of 93 If of stream impact. At this time,
the applicant does not propose compensatory mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State for the
project.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: I
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: I
acres

4h Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that Yes X No
requires buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c 6d 6e
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). Permanent Neuse
River Riparian Buffer impacts associated with the proposed roadway crossing across an unnamed tributary to Little
Brier Creek are less than 150 linear feet and are less than one -third acre and are considered an allowable use. In
addition, Neuse River Riparian Buffer impacts associated with the high flow bypass channels are considered
minimal and an allowable use. Therefore, the applicant does not propose compensatory Neuse River Riparian
Buffer mitigation.
6h Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers X Yes No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. The City of Raleigh is
a delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater Management Plans. The review and
approval of the SWMP is part of the City of Raleigh's review process. Two courtesy
copies of the stormwater design notebook is included, and a copy of the final approved X Yes No
stormwater management plan will be provided to NCDWR. Stormwater management for
the proposed project will be accomplished by incorporating engineered stormwater best
management practice facilities throughout the project to capture and treat the stormwater
runoff from developed areas.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
44%
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? I X Yes No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:

If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The proposed
development is located within the Neuse River basin with stormwater runoff from the proposed development draining into Little Brier Creek. According to
the N.C. Division of Water Quality Basin Wide Information Management System (BIMS), Little Brier Creek [Stream Index # 27- 33 -4 -1] is classified as
C;NSW at this location. The proposed development will be subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in Section 9 of the City of
Raleigh Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater management on this site shall address two primary issues:
(1) peak discharge rates and (2) water quality management.
Calculation Methodology
• Rainfall data for the Raleigh, NC region is from NOAA Atlas 14. This data describes a depth- duration - frequency (DDF) table describing rainfall
depth versus time for varying return periods in the Raleigh, NC area. These rainfall depths are input into the meteorological model within PondPack for
peak flow rate calculations. Please reference the rainfall data section within this report for additional information.
• Using maps contained within the Wake County Soil Surveys, the on -site soils were determined to be from hydrologic soil group (HSG)'B' and
'D' soils. Since the method chosen to compute both pre- and post - development peak flow rates and runoff volumes is dependent upon the soil type, care
was taken when selecting the appropriate Soil Conservation Number (SCS CN).
1. Within each sub - basin, an approximate proportion of each soil group was determined using NRCS Soil Survey Maps. Once an approximate
proportion was determined, a composite SCS CN was computer for each cover condition. For example, the pre - development soil composition of
Subbasin #1 consists of approximately 40% HSG 'B' soils and 60% HSG 'D' soils. Therefore, for the open area cover condition, the composite SCS CN
is computed as follows (assuming good condition):
Composite Open SCS CN = (0.40 x 61) + (0.60 x 80) = 72
2. This type of calculation was done for each of the studied sub - basins in an effort to accurately account for the difference in runoff between the
different hydrologic soils.
A composite SCS Curve Number was calculated for both the pre- and post - development condition for each subbasin using SCS curve
numbers and land cover conditions. Land cover conditions for the on -site pre - development conditions were taken from surveyed information collected by
John A. Edwards & Company. Land cover conditions for the onsite post - development condition were taken from the proposed site plan.
• The time of concentration was calculated using SCS TR -55 (Segmental Approach, 1986). The Tc flow path was divided into three segments:
overland flow, concentrated flow, and channel flow. The travel time was then computed for each segment, from which the overall time of concentration
was determined by taking the sum of each segmental time. The post - development times of concentration for all on -site subbasins were assumed to be
5 minutes due to the high amount of impervious onsite.
• The existing onsite topography used in the analysis is from two different sources. The existing topography generally located within the property
boundary is from field survey by John A. Edwards & Company. The remainder of the topography is from Wake County GIS data. Please refer to the pre -
and post - development watershed maps for more information.
• PondPack Version V8i was used in determining the pre- & post - development peak flow rates for the 2 -, 10 -, 25 -, and 100 -year storm events.
The Federal Highway Administration's HY -8 version 7.30 software was used to model the hydraulics for the proposed culvert.
• Nitrogen export calculations for the project were computed using the City of Raleigh Apportioning Method. Due to the amount of existing
impervious onsite, this method was used to "assign" the proposed open space to either existing or new impervious surfaces. Since the proposed site is
commercial, the maximum allowable TN -export (before an offset payment is allowed) is 10.0 Ibs /ac /yr.
Discussion of Results
Release Rate Management
Stormwater runoff from the proposed project area will discharge directly to a FEMA - regulated floodplain (Little Brier Creek, Basin 18, Stream 16). At the
point where Little Brier Creek crosses under US -70, the drainage area is approximately 1 square mile. It is the Engineer's professional opinion that by
delaying the peak flow onsite, the peak flow would occur more closely to the peak flow for the receiving watershed, and thus more likely to result in a net
increase in the peak flow for the larger receiving watershed. Therefore, no detention being proposed as a part of this project at this time.
Water Quality Management
Per the City of Raleigh Method 2 for Quantifying TN Export, the proposed design will meet the 10.0 Ibs /ac /yr maximum nitrogen export rate, prior to an
offset payment, for a commercial development. An offset payment is proposed to buy -down the remainder of the nitrogen export to a maximum of 3.6
Ibs /ac /yr. Please refer to this report for further calculations.
2d Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
been attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Certified Local Government
City of Raleigh
Phase II
X NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
Yes X No

4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
been attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
X Session Law 2006-
246
Other:
Yes X No
X Yes No
X Yes No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or Yes X No
the use of public (federal /state) land?
1b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of
an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or Yes No
State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by
the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final
approval letter.) Yes No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Yes X No
Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
Yes X No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result Yes X No
in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The proposed project is a
single and complete project with appropriate land use control and stormwater measures in place for specific areas which
require them.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated
from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Waste water will be directed into an existing
treatment facility operated by Wake County, under agreement with the City of Raleigh maintained sewer line.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species X Yes No
or habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Yes X No
Act impacts?
5clf yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat? The USFWS web page (hfr): / /www.fws.aov /endanaered /) and the Natural Heritage
virtual workroom (httr): / /www.ncnhr).ora /web /nhD /nhD -map- viewer) were accessed on June 26, 2015 to determine if
the project would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. Based on this research, the dwarf
wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon — E), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii — E), red - cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis - E), and northern long -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) are federally listed species that occur in
Wake County. In addition the bald eagle (Halieaeetus leucocephalus) is listed on Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act. Based on field inspections, it is believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and endangered species and
their known habitat will occur due to the construction of the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I Yes X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? An interactive map
called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (httr): / /www. habitat. noaa .00v /Drotection /efh /efhmapper /) was accessed on
June 26, 2015 to determine if the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation Yes X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant
in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A review
of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office interactive map, which shows the locations of properties and districts in
Wake County, North Carolina entered in the National Register of Historic Places (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /) was conducted
on June 26, 2015. It did not reveal any listing within the project area. It is believed the proposed project will not occur in or near
an area that has been designated as having historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I X Yes No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map
Panel 0768 (May 2, 2006; Map Number 3720076800J, attached) shows a 100 year floodplain area located on the
subject property. A regulatory floodway is not located within the subject property. In addition, according to the attached
Overall Grading and Storm Drainage Plan (Figure 4.1), the percent fill in the floodway fringe is 31.8% for the proposed
project. In accordance with the City of Raleigh Unified Development Ordinance chapter 9, Article 9.3, the proposed
encroachments are allowed since the floodway fringe encroachments do not exceed 50 %.
Page 10 of 10

Gco�it �
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
� /y //s
Date

✓ /%/ / /// / % // y.G.. // BYJON\
we
✓ / _ 'Ex.`s !�n p/ I /� / SLF RUBY JONES LLC w: \ \ .\ _ \. \ 1 -- i •�
PIN: 0768664919
/? , oz
/ DB 009526, PG OteBe s
/ �� %� / n���L/ / / / BM 2002 -1290 PROPOSED CITY OF RALEIGH 7- �' -\ �� '`� \�` \ \ Z '9JR 1+
OWNER: 1 \ 3 \ \/� STORM d9"'9 /,f (``� �� ``\ 1.67 AC GREENWAY EASEMENT (TYP.)\ \� - - 98
N /6TCCEE
PIN: ESTATE BU9WAL -MART REAL ESS TRUST
OB 00 076877082
BM 9857. PG 02033
2002 -01290 / - N / , ,/ , /1 /\ , �`
22.33 AC / /- / - +"- - \1, / / r 1 r PRIVATE STORM (DRAINAGE
\ �- /� ` 'FASEMENT
:.PROPOSED Cln OF RALEIGH � r-� r ` D0 703, PG 212
J !/ GREENWAY EASEMENT (TYP y' : ^� / 4 /1
-/ 1. EX. 20' PRVATE STORM
% DRAINAGE EASEMENT\
PG
l l Ex. zD' cm of RALEIGH— \
,EX 1429 SEWER EASEMENT INSET I. �'
DB 14299, PC 2009 =/ �/ / �"/ — '\ CENTERLINE
/ I / / I .GREEK
�. HIGH FZQW- SlF
BYPASS % " ! YEAR`h•L GR �� \ \ \ \ \ \ �°� \ /
CHNE
/ ANL \ / '
( �/ .-\ \\ ` � � /ETA FIRM Sj20078800J
5' SIDE YARD
L
SET BACK UNE
EX. 30' CITY OF RALEIGH/ " `ry .NEUSF'RNER FPE� - -S ` / /' (• / / 1
SANITARY SEWER EA31ENT
✓ 55pp�M;1002. �._.h /`
\ / B PG 1290 , 1 i �� - \ F1LTE STD. ` / _ 9E-
1 FC600PlAJ
f sn
M 007689gC
j - �i /.i %�i�, Il 1 � I / / /f I s \\ 'SPREAO):R // // � i •!1� / //� .� `�7` _ - "v_ -� � -_ _ - -_ -- _ \` � /}+`�
\./ ♦'° ��� / / fir \ / rI �/ / .INSETS \ / �/ / / /,.RE 11414G
-, ,. e� ,.• ,f / i ! / .t\ \ I I / / �jr \ - -% / / •1 / / / / / (OESIGNI�
cuL� L � // / fir/ /�
TAI 0—ALL
12 - - -i._ - J� 1 / / / / / / / , - - - - - % ♦/ ,
100 YEAR F372 7 N � / �/ / // % //✓ /(DESIGD TH
Y- ERS}
FEMA FIRM 3720078800) - � / � W EX
1 / TOP COF BANK ♦�/G / "/ /"'T' �- / , RIPRAP /
[/ VELOCRY -- \ ¢ y
='c 1 i // / �} / i'.• / //� -/ � / '� y \QISSIPAT 1 I / `P_
G ECNRWY 3p. EASELMEEIGNH
PROPOSED M MO EIGH 6M E200
REENWAY( AENT T / / , / ♦ / �I / / / / • \ / - \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ I I I I I 1 / / e^ _� /�
/� / /i, ,/i / �ETAININ \ \�) \ l�\ t\ \ \ \\ ( I \\ 1 \\ \���� /)'1'Y \ 9 PUBLIC it o
♦/ - _ 'DESIGN DY 0 H S \
\ \ // / RIGHT -OF( -WAY
/l ,/ - 1l \ \ \..`\ \ \ � \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ ANNA
\ \ 1 / I/ // ♦ i I C
r "P
au
'INSET 2 i / . /r/ / i ..z"r� I /� -/ _ \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ / /� / _ ♦ ♦ //� EX. 30' DUKE POWER EA
CENTERLINE 1 ( :1 \ 1'
FLOOD P F�`R I \\ \ \ \ \ \ \378.7 \ \ \ \ \/ 9 v\ /// / BM 2002, PG 1290 Z
/% / // / / �3 / /O FEMA 720Q7 (\ \�\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ - / / //� ,/ / .� \\ OB 10693, PC 2109 y►�
STORM jx7AINAGIV —�i /f
/ ` F ACCE /MAINTENANCE
•,�/ X ��\ EASEMENT
P-1 ou
NE E`RNER FFER
j ` `/ /// / Hlcn ►Crn+ ` 1 / l / / / / , e - 5D' oM r�1R q� B tr+K
\ ✓ %' // , eYP s BM 2 ,LPG '2 %Q 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ � ✓ / �� 20' STORM DRaNACE \ \
NEL / / - \ YOp£ \ \ J. ♦ I > ACCESS / MNNTENANCE
``\ ✓ ` //`/. / / / / / / 00 , i \ �\ - \ \\ �� \ .�` d'9T V 1 EASEMENT (TYP.) \ 0
/ / j / - ✓ /// � / // / / 1 / / / VARIABLE IO7H C -. _ q � i�\- ` \\ \ \ \\ z� � \ \ / � � \� r � ✓
%� /EAS£�A 1{T (TYP. - - - \'- ,' \ \ - \ \ ` \ \ b \ m
//j / 11 // / / / j / (AO,BIPION CDR � \ \ \ �C �C RETAINING WALL I�6 • ` /�rL
/ OEEO),% _ `\ \ SEWER_ EASEMEHT_ �' -\�� (DESIGN BY OTHERS) a r \
\429 2006 \ �\ 1pt QC �♦ lo' SIDE YARD
YEGE D / �/// I / / / / / ' / / / _ \ \\\ ` ` 4 REEK" ` 'T \iC 'd`I \ SET BACK LINE n r/^yQJly'
R 5T /I I / / / , `>.- / / - - - _ . _ _ ' \H i K----
�\ \
\ \ (( If // O
\. \� LEVEL �\ I / // $ / / / ./ __ \�
\_ "\ , PREADER 2 _I I / A / / / 1 % /\ \\'\ OWNER: \ \
\ % / / // / / \ !� / / _ - _ _,_ - ` \ \ \ / /` } \ G&I NII BRIER CREEK LLC \ \ \ \ t•I
- \ \ \ PIN: 0768668274 \ \ n
�, \ \ \. / // / •� .v - - ` \ \ \\ .�\ \ DB 015717. PC 00327 \ \
Q BM 2011 -01020
14.48 AC
0 Fri
'�
\ ' \ STORM DRAINAGE �_ / / , / / / / / / l y l �l'u l /' / / / / _ \ /\ - \ \ \ _ _ O
\ ACCESS /MAINTENANCE -` s,✓/ n ' \
EASEMENT \ >
100 YEAR FLDDOPW / / / / RETAINING
/ / (DESIG�BX .ZITHERS)
\ FEMA FIRM 372007688;:
50' FRONT YARD A• y ♦ \ � ?�
\ SET BACK LINE / / / / / / / / 'S� '�4 1 / / / d / j
�c� \fi 0 O
b lf�
♦ \\ \ \ ,9�f 9 � ` �Gs/` "T ` jp . p C pa f S j I �. \ \,./ / / // / / ss° l r // / / l / / 7 S; fP ��/ t /' /♦ , i -' i
` a a
O Lo o 0 EX. 30' DUKE POWER EASEMENT
BM 2002, PG 1290
RETAINING WALL #3 / 08 10693, PG 2109 o II
I
i ` > p n
(DESIGN BY OTHERS) a
x \/ ! / / / Q O
EX. WALL
�a 9/A: \( ), GRAPHIC SCALE v d
�EX. 70'.20' CROSS ACCESS ANO
�. \ \ \ ( 1 I \ /� / /• \� PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT a a z v a
�� 5� 1 �� 2�0 OW] d F
h W Ol A
DB 14562, PG 2439 AND
I� \a \'.I TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ d^ EX. WAL
� DB 14552, PG 2465
100 ft / JMCADAMS
\ \�\ • / / =�" 1 inch = .

NOTES & LEGEND
SIZE: 14.46 ACRES
WATERWAY: BRIER CREEK
HUC: NEUSE RIVER BASIN 03020201
LAT: 35.9107; LONG: - 78.7759
TOB JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
50 FOOT NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS = 93 LF
TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT) = 64 LF
s. TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (DISSIPATOR PAD) = 29 LF
(TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACTS = 10,398 SQ FT
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE I = 5,884 SQ FT
TOTAL NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 = 4,514 SQ FT
GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION CALCS
ESTIMATED AVERAGE
BUILDING #
TOP OF CURB
PROPOSED FFE
ELEVATION (FT)
—RD—RD—RD-
1000 -NORTH
N/A
N/A
1000 -SOUTH
382.95
384.95
2000 -NORTH
381.40
383.75
2000 -SOUTH
381.75
383.75
3000 -EAST
400.60
402.60
3000 -WEST
389.30
391.93
4000 -EAST
383.40
385.82
4000 -WEST
373.15
375.15
N
GRADING LEGEND
0 FLARED END SECTION
U
ENDWALL SECTION
—RD—RD—RD-
CATCH BASIN
DROP INLET
■
STORM SERVICE INLET
—TP —TP —TP —
LD LD
•
STORM SERVICE ROOF -DRAIN
O
JUNCTION BOX
250
252
by
DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW
------- 250- - - - - --
LINE BREAK SYMBOL
-------
252- - - - - --
250.50
250.00
TOP & BOTTOM CURB ELEVATIONS
\TW= 223.00
-TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
BW= 213.00
- BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
(NOTE: BOTTOM OF WALL IS GROUND
ELEVATION NOT WALL FOUNDATION)
+ 250.60
SPOT ELEVATION
TOTAL LOT AREA WITHIN
87,712 SF (2.01 AC.)
FLOODWAY FRINGE
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM WITH THE
LATEST VERSION OF THE CITY OF RALEIGH AND
NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88
TOTAL AREA OF PROPOSED FILL 27,863 SF (0.64 AC.)
WITHIN FLOODWAY FRINGE
% FILL IN FLOODWAY FRINGE 31.8%
STORM DRAINAGE
STORM SERVICE LINE
ROOF DRAIN, 8" ADS
NON - PERFORATED TUBING OR
EQUAL 1.0% MIN. SLOPE 3' MIN.
COVER PVC SCHEDULE 40 IN
TRAFFIC AREAS
TREE PROTECTION
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WOODED AREA
10' CONTOUR
2' CONTOUR
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
EASEMENT LINE
NfNp�
z�
NIz
N� n
t'
rn
Q
w
� z
W nz
A Ao
w��
aS °z
W z.
v U
0
o
v
rl 3
W a
m
�x
a v i.y
N
0
N
N OO
N N
n
3
0
0
0
o
a
o
i
c
o
o ° ,_n
o
't
Q I
I oo M
> o Z
p �
p > o
p
o p
z
F w
U �
W d
w
a
�J MCADAMS

\
--_ l HIGH FLOW
BYPASS \ 100 YEAR 0-1
CHANNEL ,\ / ---FE-VA FIRM )z:
5' SIDE YARD
SET BACK LINE =_
IMPACT AREA I
ZONE
_ BUFFER '7-
FAT FI / _ :IMPACT
111111111 � " m PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT) = 0 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (DISSIPATOR PAD) = 0 LF
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE I = 843 SQ FT
�X NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 = 431 SQ FT
3/7".
J
" nM JOHN R McADAMS
COMPANY. INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Lcense No.: C -0293
MCADAMS (1733 -5646• McAdamsCo.�
X: \Projects \DDV \DDV - 14000 \Storm Wetlond \DDV14000F4.dwq, 7/21/2015 2:09:22 PM, Buchholz, George _
L
PROJECT H0. DDV -14000
ADARA ALEXANDER
n
4000E4.OW
N
TS
PLACE APARTMENTS
SCALE:ME:DDVl
SCALE: = 30
INSET 1
W
DATE: 07-13 -15
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA -
3/7".
J
" nM JOHN R McADAMS
COMPANY. INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Lcense No.: C -0293
MCADAMS (1733 -5646• McAdamsCo.�

O/F CREEK
STORM D &NAG
ACCESX1/MAINT NANCE /
EASKMENT
HIGH LOW
BYP SS /
ANNEL
C
J
ZONE 1
BUFFER o O O
IMPACT /
644 ZONE 2 '
SO FT ,BUFFER o
/
/ IMPACT
/SO FT ���
Xo
/ �VEGE ED T -
fjJTER ST'Rr
�C)
\ LEX/EL
PREADER 2
IMPACT AREA 2
M M PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT) = 0 LF
.. IMI � PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (DISSIPATOR PAD) = 0 LF
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE I = 644 SQ FT
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 = 400 SQ FT
l
1
%**,It 0/
X: \Projects \DDV \DDV- 14000 \StormVetlond \DDV14000F4.dwq, 7/21/2015 2:10:38 PM, Buchholz, George _
L PROJECT No. DDV -14000 ADARA ALEXANDER " THE JOHN R MCM1100
FILENAME: DD V 14000E 4. DWG COMPANY. INC.
PLACE AP E� 2905 Merldlan Parka y
SCALE: 1 = 3O� Durham, North Carolloa 27713
Lir aoe No.: c -0293
y DATE: INSET MCADAMS
733-5646 •McAdamsCo
07-13-15 RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

d e
.,..nose, ♦i.'....••.� ,.,.,
�• •' 3 c�.ss�oss•�
•,.ssc2��F��
• .ssss•s
.i0�•�40's �`��
♦s:oss•
s \� • STREAM
IMPACT
.�
64 LF
s
IA; •�= ��
IMPACT AREA 3
//�,
/ T�kTED
/ FILE STRI
r.o )
/
356/-
ris
.,
l�
a i r• � I /
OZONE 2
BUFFER
i IMPACT
Opp-
1,182
SQ FT
ZONE 1
BUFFER
IMPACT
2,138
SQ FT \
�\ 1
RETAININ I" U�I�A
(DES
� � DL`5 \N BY 0 H\ \)
N 06 YE R FUT�R�
FLOODP All
v� FEMA F :i720g7E80I0J
\ \�\ \ `NE SE —RWER BVFFER��
�\ \ 5@' 0M TAR ON EKNK
w w w w w w w w PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT) = 64 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT ( DISSIPATOR PAD) = 29 LF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS = 93 LF
V111111A NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 1 = 4,397 SQ FT
NOTES
1) RIP -RAP DISSIPATOR PAD TO BE
INSTALLED FLUSH WITH EXISTING
GRADE.
2) ALL WORK WILL TAKE PLACE
DURING DRY CONDITIONS AND FROM
HIGH, NON - JURISDICTIONAL, STABLE 3
GROUND. COFFER DAMS AND A i
TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL WILL
BE UTILIZED TO CONSTRUCT ROAD
����CROSSING SO WORK CAN BE PERFORMED
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 = 3,683 SQ FT IN DRY CONDITIONS.
X: \Projects \DDV \DDV - 14000 \Storm Wetlortd \DDV14000F4.dwq, 8/32015 3:53:35 PM, Buchholz, George
PROJECT NO. DDV -14000 ADARA ALE)CANDER
L
=JOHN R McADAb13
FILENAME: DDV14000F4.DWC PL AC A ■Tr' CONPANY.BIC.
GSCALE: Pitt aCE ` ii E� Du ham Meridian tohna27713
4 1 ° = 50 INSET 3 U3-56 a No.: c-am3
(„ DATE: 07 -13 -15 MCADAMS `�) 733 5648 • McAdamaCo.com
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

N, 9'11tiw G — -- e FEET
- I ap a 790000 FEET
S.
� 1 i
L
t" 3
.., - a • ..
yf
,.
711; a
ov
..... .....��Y
-�► •° s
. t!AIYy a4f*7a.^
tYj Tay�y��1 « i
,
d'SF ••,rte ^- .wa�ir 1`' „ 'j,'
taw ti Mae. , ` { {{ � �,{• t�b�� ` �,,.,. w.. • �f y,,�
ZONE AE .,
w
-- � 141.1.- . B•" � -_ ^!y
ON E
'E
.,? J ✓�
v' rY r (r' C �"' � ; .3' sera r., .� "" .. � '/. • T`� +M.. � ^.
4a� ,n } a .e r„ - 'f.�r •'��
('[TN I I .�,.
1,1 RALLIGFI Gl7
__ R • ,,. ` I N ` ,�`"y.. , . - .., 170 ? 41
,'A
rvn` .� \. V � .1•AYna •Y � ����1�!{ � : ? ��'/ ... ,I ( �11,J1
ed,a �:. rx�a�C �" .^. 7 / ! err. n. . r � ... .: � . -..�� -. _ `J•:1./
ZONE AE °.. ZONES /I
fie+ ±" � !P• r � l � �. 7 ' � ' �1 zT•�- . - (.
Ito ,�. °teA„ 1 r,w1"' •
M
7
t7o;
f^" •f7
Li 1e t
I �
y
f .T� 9 0943
�as+
__j)
701OS t ( ONE AE /
�
/ -
Y E20942
780000 FEET I . _ ' i ZO L AE I - 1 _ I i71)7 t 7N000 FEET
]B'G]30'W ]8'a]h'W 78. 16'30 "W 79 46'0'W
2060000 FEET 2070000 FEET
TNo digh it Flood Imurenm Rote Mep (FIRM) was Fvotlucotl th.ugh o unquo
­o. Ito,tn«ahlp boNrean too SWo of N.M Caali,a and tho Fodo.l
E.bM,my M.n.gam.nt Agency (FEMA). The State of Nonh Carolina hue
impbrnen ong re eppi,oboo to Wodpldn m reeoth- to decrease the
a.tl with flood,g. This ie dam iothob id by M, bohn, comntitmad
mop flood haiartl e.m d No bcol level. AB a part of th®eaon, tho Sldo al
NoM Oarokm has plod In a Coope,etmg TxMi,al Skis lWoomam with
FEMA b produce end --in Ws oie. FIRM.
NORTHCAROLINAFLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONALFLOODINSURANCEPROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
•ct0 NORTH CAROLINA y,.
O e
L PANEL 0768�bt;
rW
ru Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
DURHAM COUNTY 0086 0768 J
RALEIGH, CITY OF 33] 70243 0188 J
�• WAKE COUNTY 370388 O78B J
Q
C�
0
Ca
Z
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FORZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP Fw ir4ornWian antl quosaone about this rasp, evebaMe protluda ®eocietotl wnM1 Nis FIRM irchtd,g Map Proppupn:
storic v..iom of this FIRM, hew b artlar potlucN or Iha Naeoral Flaatl msurerce Prog.m th genera,
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING hi ® Nor6t Carolina Slate Pbne Propdion Feet (torte 3200)
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT won,ioo OFEM4Mepinlarmetiene% cM1engeatt- 6,t- FEMA- IAAP (tA„- ]36- M2])orWaitBwFEfMMep Datum: NAD1.83(HorNOnlap,NAVD10. Vertbsl
Servico Ceme, wabei.dhaWtmsc.bma.gov. An swmpanying fbotl lreu.nw Slutly rayon. Leber of Mep )
FIRM (LOMR)or Letterof Mep— ohont(LOMA) revisingp. of P'a Fenot. and dgilal —ion, of thb
HTTP: / /FRIS.NC.GOV /FRIS FRMmeibeamlleble.Vitittho — CerotinaFloadplenMIepp FhN.mxehaitedhhp/Iwww Roodrtepamrt, 1'6,000
nobo the FEMA Map Sorvb. cam «. 1 inch = 500 feet
-Without Base Flood Elevation BFE) CooenurkflosennaeirN land— djecom FIRM pono must obohn a cunomroW-he a jbborn pool ea wall as 0 250 500 1,000
Zone A,V, A99 tho current FIRM Intloz. Tneao mry be ordaretl tl'vectly hom the Map Sorvbe Camar al Ins number liatetl above.
With BFE or Depth zone ere, Ao, AM, vE. aR Feet
For ummuniy eM countywide rasp tlmea robr to LM Fbatl Imvarca Slutly rep«t br 1NC junatlic4on.
SPECIALFLOOD -Asters
® Regulatory Flood Way T_I..rc Pro bm,rerceta..auaebbtha pammanla. oo, xaet ro„r lnaam„p�eeomormlma Nenonel 0 75 150 300
HAZARD AREAS Food Imura,ae Prog.m d 1A00.6a11.6620.
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas Bes,Zp lnlormelion M« month®FIRM wa provMOtl In aigia brnmt by the NOnn Cardine Fbodplain PANEL LOCATOR
Mappirq Prog,am (.CFA&). The — WIN. In ohon can be tldemirctl hom IM1e... — aveilebb In tho
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average '4blFLOODtldabasa ant In Pre Technical SuRiort Deter Not. —I, TSDN).
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: It onaccmdtodI.. reeppee nondtiapenelctncxwbh You, I-el
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile Zone x mmmmky ro again more inbrmdbn, each s Iho oob m Iovai al pro.dlon provided (w .h may..caod tho
tparwnbam,wFCM1ence oval) antl Emegonry Acton Plm, on IM1e bvee syatam(e) sM1Own ea provitling prdedion. f ...VILLE COUNTY
Future Conditions ) %Annual Treaigdaeeadriakin,"ok,olriak« eras. prop« tyo ...broaid- ho.o— hieodt .... o «noad i
Chance Flood Hazard zone x rce ar� naodpmanng err other p 1b , mI ... F., ..,b I—oban on noon i— not.., 0—toot 4
paniea ah --the FEMA W—IN d http:]hw Ioma.9.A.vrcahNIi,d.obh. � i,
OTHER
FLOOD HAZARD Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS If. ProvebnMty A «.dhetl Levoe(PAL) rate 1 t I
ROOD HAZARD aPPea,s an Nla Para). check w#h yotr bcol cpmmudy m ova'n more inbnnaticn, rich as me estimofetl bvol 01 M te4 t2 ED FRANKLIN COUNTY
See Notes Zone x p,deebon provMad I— may .weed the 1- percent ®ruwelcM1arce level) antl Em«gercy -ion Plan, on Ifs aeS .� BB zz t
OTHER Areas Determined to be Outside the buss aydem(a)4nwn as provkling yabdion. TO mdmain acvaditari -IM1e lavaeowaar «cammunityis DURHAM COUNTY W
regd,etlbaubma the tle. ant tlocument.ion rceeasery to comply with Sedbn66.10ofbo NFIP.gWd thin Mdt III te21 M3 MaI I9TV1
AREAS _ 0.2 % Annual Chance FloodplainZOnex Ifuacooth —y. orowmrmmrcLprovimmanaaaaaaymlaanaaed ,manldian «Bn,amtaa�aowmantauan g( BS M IB B t
ryavMed IMlceros IM1e loves ayslam doers not comply whM1 Section 65.10 requremo,m, FEMA will ravine the (load
M1ore,d end risk inbrmation br Ihb arm ro tonal do- ercretliadon of the Ievea ayalem. To mFpelo hood risk in b ttt lln It39�1)a 1159186 Itt ItB9 N
- -- - --- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer midaal risk arse., Paparo awna..na,mitlenla era enmp.gea m mmiae, rasa imwarce and aaedp,opang 164 j'
Accredited orProvisionalryAccmdRed wdherprobgivemeaswee. F« morainbrmaaonon flood ireurenco, bleradetlpaniesaM1OUldvieilaaFEMA ms Ia unto n 17911 �4
—ho et hhplMVnv .fema.eoWbuabnaetnBpthd.x.ohtm. , 4ne 8 7B n1 7111 3P ]
GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall 1 17[9( ,m „) 7B om ]a) )97 nm m nzt not na us, int-W 1. ;
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVEACTION NOTES TO USERS, F«somac« Ifiaodngzamcaa AEZana NMI i5 1651)5 ,B i9 n0 itt6 n3�,3F 11 1 6 tB61
STRUCTURES Ittt,ttlr, Non - accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall wlagory has been dvkled by aLimK Ol Moderate Wavo Adion(LIAIWA). Tho LIMWArepreeonb the approai.. �II "It.
_
Iandwartl limit oltYn l.S -bd brmNin9 wave.Th.....olwave tm>ads b «woen IM1e VE Zano antl theL— O S B n05�1t1: nss nln 151,
BM651G, North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (o,te —nth¢ oho.lim end tla LiMVIA br areeo where VE Z.. era oat itl hoid) wal tot anti111 b, but lees ,Oa 12 13 7s1 7478 794_70.71 In. ]B VM
savare h.n those in the VE Zom. �t31 173 1 ns Its 1n�,95 tM9
BK45510o National Geodetic Survey bench mark 71 7x 75 781 t3 711 ,9: na�tl=nz_.,i na ne1 n4 tn1 nag
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
BM5510® Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench made �7� n 73 )a 4sz 78.13 r ,B:aman3 nz:cty na 153 ve 131
B1 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE 't 79 751 76*77107111 t97a7> a Ifll naI n5 t
TM1b map may inebde approebmde hountlanea olthe CBRS far hIonhotionel p«pwoe ony. Flood Imurenea b not ,11 734 ,3 4,aI0t5 ,6� >1 , 019( INK nic I,M VH na 60
Water Surface Elevation(BFE) Wolo —in CBRS..br ot.d.rm that.. rawly bdha,sabe.nbelly impovad oh or.hor tha,mlNa)
ttdi«Md an the m.p, For mw. bbrmelbn aao nnp:nwww.Ma.eav,m..taonaervdbrJw . aw ear.i«.nthtl, 4. 7 J s] tsc 1BZam
a - - - - - Coastal Transact Fls Rappn. «tall the u.s. Fdn e,ttl wildde se,ripa cparom« sa,r;ea cam« at Iago-3aA -woo. b e 3 Ba ass 11laes7 1BN SB1e Ira t
- - - - - -- Coastal Transect Baseline ®CBRS Area 0 Otherwise Protected Area oast acs] assn ®71Mn 'V IONNSTON COUNTY
sea — elf
— - — Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature e 7 °
HARNETiCOUNTy 0s7 \
OTHER Limit of Study -�
FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary
4*6 S MAP NUMBER
372007611001
i. MAP REVISED
"'" 05/02/06