820538_Routine Inspection_20230824

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �� w+� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Time: dUs3d County Region: /C7-4d
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:_'
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
b$#Si%4b'.+4Qdk3fr la A ^ktP Y 4ia#p ktlI.AY v tlk F4A Yt#Fbrt
.+��i$xi,bvm4`M1�iKffiM"th t.SB##di?dg'&
f%##beg%sCb4i xa^x¢#ny kR!iIT
$a#($pt+d'u
4S9mYa
a#b4eik••#;'ar S�I#kxCd4d$irr�o+dafu
rParxis�
S,�@��y#.xo-
,Ntzaa s"ai�#ka
,ir}t,btx�krIt (asIuze0 d.':..
y9
yyy',x6� �5
e>assm>#a# 4a' #rash#%bauaw naaax uaaYaa$4v It
tdadae igetaa t ""ky`
a�I86
bad#an4#,a4t4k N`tr=kY%6#d&akn ## t?bk8 S6Ni$#x§K tki°a�'i��bhnAdbi 4b4�'�14$%�N
$.�a#k�'SdY 8Y8t$W&g#b�X����#tom f#bkb5�%k k'$H9
Wean to Finish 'qa Layer
Wean to Feeder %U Non La er
jDairy Cow _ '$
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish sasba a* �e xie#a"° "'* *%mmsaa Dairy Heifer
III MONT, t i
Farrow to Wean a NOaa�$°r".v.i�s#$�
fag; a'
Dry sa
6a 44
ad kIi=a a t k,Yyb xx4#9a%@§
§§ Farrow to Feeder hh rr�� h. a a r
d##$ 4'. £ 'a
*** , �.... Non -Dairy+
as Farrow to Finish aY La ers
'r': Beef Stocker VO.
Gilts ;' Non -La er
ilm Beef Feeder;
jj113oars ;k Pullets
Beef Brood Cow >'
i44##n
5'A#16ti $'IaStk N9aY a`xt atm is i hmabdb#+'k C+it iS m O
b%akta aawas**§a'a%taw §uw'aa<+`.ca a'ea zs. sxi+s ON, . Turkeys
gB4 RA4#u.#au nuxa n§&#;pexeaa 84##
t%SiY'kq 5#%#4t4x#iRrtrt
Xk#axt%xi.;o-5aamaaayxaazrzae%a q
#k###4 b4'R IiRY dkxM#%55 et#&##++4 dka#4
+$%4t tiror T'bktkd#k rya e+y ea xa eka Turkey Poults
eska$a %aa k`3§#e4 k4 tRa3+A {4#ttre+aak k4§%5;444akk
as#aa.o-$.s%s#axx%,�xi.:#
qx ,, sstztwa
6�gIL�-y�Iaa
v4%MA�.%e+a$a z#$4 $a$9 k.
aaasYax is#*sa�saian a>znma aaa$#eaz #a�a
Other
+{R�..
ka
kYxA A§#$Yi4$8-0G$b.AY "}>r I5$b P.43'&�bb.$-0*r b99 3#i'R..
$k §ieTiaT^x .d �t .YtlBM$tdkt "r 1'tt&: *P G.R#P...ti#P ':.." n. y.• x4xut tYa-4fF kkx%#t8: a 461f #Q SR'9t YY#Po $.+»kF 4+t4#S.P Ae} R$RddkS%4$%`4
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes -[D-ido ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes E3-iNTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L2-�IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - 53 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes -n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): J j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ,,0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes 11�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes .E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[—]Yes E]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ErRo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ,EfrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes .�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes .PJ—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,. ]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E51No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes Lallo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes A�!r No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: Y2 - S
Date of Inspection: aj
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes f nl�o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes „Q�'No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: „4.e" %TG%i///,v '
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _PPNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes E37�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes •�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E5- Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E]'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes , I To
[—]Yes �No
❑ Yes _ED-1�0
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
5—
Date: j
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY*.� 63XARM NAME: LAGOON.LEVEL
RMIT Mal
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- - EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (*21)
-GOOD FOR 60 /DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 7� I/a3 NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE dl��[ �'3 NITROGEN LEVEL .2.70
DATE 1 �/ L�y3 NITROGEN LEVEL �2,, ,l
q/I �-7
SOIL REPORT (n iI
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE%-
P-1 (NO MORETHEN 400)
PH (Note W4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN_
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
IRR2 (#2i)
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N)
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (uts)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION - i L `'-
FLOW RATES 2,�
RAIN FALL (m )
-INITIAL AFTER I"RAINEVENT -
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (mi azs)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (u22 AMC) 421)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDSMORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1=t- Ends September 30*
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1 �- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15* - Ends June 30N
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August I
Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31A
Oats: -Opens September 1�t-Ends April 15t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30t
Soybeans: Opens April 1-t- Ends September 15t .
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31.t
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15w -Ends August 31 st