090034_Routine Inspection_20230828

I. ypc m v mu: .+C/ i,oulNuxiuce lusPOCuull V vpcl auuu nevlcry %_o ou uClulC L' VUIa Alanl lJ IUCllllleal ASS15lanee I
Reason for Visit: -G-Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 Arrival Time: 1?r / Departure Time: 30I$Y// County: &2401
Farm Name: Y r 2c--,, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
of V
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
�__440 _1 Title:
v
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Region:
Integrator:
or
Certification Number: 9
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
��ESrt ��##m 8§ti#Xk%9#xY4 aam x�+tt^gwe lama g
��6+ryrybrrAl�ts0�165 W4�r..g$gNA#gg�N �d0W0m aega�,sk Wk9a+sR+E�04jm�a�pa�h¢§aj firya a�q �$t�h3#�#*�w.b������a#�wWW4�#��Si �>6��&eata�,#�'8. �.:
9 3b8'tfr.,a EPtA aB%##t&Wma%$it %a8�4>##4#k#CY%kk#g,A9#4g �gsss%&#§k&'Sd'#Afs%44'W#4aSa 3su asmy�" kl/
aaas �y##�
....
%
f Ulf.*. IrNVxs*'
Wean to Finish z.5 Layer # Dairy Cow
�3
Wean to Feeder Non Layer s Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish <<i<d D U °v� r
� �� Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ` � �. as � � tj lH Dry Cow
# '
pm
Farrow to Feeder # ¢
ee ; ..e°s Non -Dairy
male#
Farrow
to Finish a Layers $II Beef Stocker
*�
Gilts m�... Non -Layers 401 Beef Feeder
..'
*' Boars #'Pullets Brood
Turkeys maa#s a a�
r*q#aB+kdS WaiBmlaan"naaa•mm4#%S'#4&am�&a%:'4tm
m
%usue«, ^�s�ari�a#aa�bmarao-`aaaw�xts#se�§mBe�i�t.•
b�Be'rt�Eefa#�m;ac #%Cou2aw
§m�k#xi
a�#�ka�<*#i#',
.q#p&kYk#9&#k
k%#0 Turkey Pouets
mmga r�tr
Other
a4xmxs�.bx°de�
a
i
a1%a -"ao-s$Nzmas
+.:aamfr,
su#%ssmiBan &
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yeses ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,.Q-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q-T�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: g �
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes [2<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[—]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: l
Spillway?:
q
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 37
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 21o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
T
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[—]Yes �rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes _ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes f�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes [�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes j2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Window ❑' of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
,, ""Crop "Evidence
12. Crop Type(s): 007h,7 /Jti Gtr/It �otyvu�2
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes vO-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes _[3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes �Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes [2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �EyNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes J:�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes [2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes L2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall
Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:]Yes ❑i'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - 3
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes -EFT4o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E]'No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 'E:rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes [3-go
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ,.ENo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes „❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes _[DNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [—]Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: g-
511212020

CALBRIATION heal
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALISRAT;D EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION 961a-L
FLOW RATES 1-2
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
�y����� SLUDGE (#2&2s)
-DUE r� EVERY YEAR: DATE JJ (/
0:P: Y3 %RATIOOFSLUDGE— 40
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND 921)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY�1
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1 st- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15u - Ends June 30t
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1�- Ends March 311t
Oats: Opens September 1�t- Ends April 15t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30t
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1st -Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15u - Ends August 31 st
n 0 . , i �iV"1

FACILITY#: ©L _'3rFARMNAME: ��'�-/ LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT Insl
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- - EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NYMBER OF ANIMAL
- 010 CARD Y ES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS ` G�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR. CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (xzf)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 5 j � NITROGEN LEVEL d '00
DATE V aO / 3 NITROGEN LEVEL `. _?
DATE q d-) I �'1 NITROGENLEVEL 1�45
SOIL REPORT (4z+)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 7
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Noteif4.,Ie.)
- CUIZN (NO MORE THEN WOO) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPOIROGEN(N)_
FLOW RATES
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)