HomeMy WebLinkAbout820035_Routine Inspection_20230824of Visit: -4
,n for Visit: (DRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �60(7 County: c 4-IM t
Farm Name: ( �r zCy, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: &""' ZK.o?X Title:
Onsite Representative:
It
Certified Operator: t1 /L)l7 o
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Region: Aga
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
MA`2$Y$&Y'.4{trk$$19 $4'q ibpM&'NtM {14$A#$1'h.4b4#$aa#{'»$M$4M•4 $ 4b44C§
€#kaa$aeMaF 4tA8axaAdadk$'989 A4d i�S ad$$d+6a#di4H 4•#aaa t4$##$ $ "4%'A§ $6A M84M@x#'Mw#K.Ysk MOA$W M.i S: $+av #4,"$aY6B
a&Aa##=444SU65 MOka x Mrca b4v &66 ad4##tg9' #8m8AN #Y3Mba p i1P$i(,$ p ply N4§
$} $'-/
19 'b#4RutFan3$$BA.. ,,��@@ 4 & $$
$'°aIY HM 8tX A94#Y###4m sk§A 4ba.vq#k7QBI I1#466
#tiw8GA4 -F 'A#Ali#"$aAAA$$MMM+IXktr9$#A$M146•.
S ax5e S afrt'
5s #'
A.A jaii*
arm#4A, a At
4 bP#$IX$$••$$$¢$�Y •4$# b0$$A b $i6�SM?44 *1#4,A #• 3.%�*o !i id�(K'} 4 ac 9R'$ $ .�,
a asmaa�1$'$r•.�a rsqq.�.Sm3"ouaara`aaet496Rsys"Y$�$aeaaei$m
�€lab$$4d.'a',&�r
0" lit !4 ffi'A��#±!}^88$$ y�M'"
Agsr.
4 914 aiiM#k4`x m Tt raa
#'1 Wean to Finish e Layer
Dairy Cow
all Wean to Feeder _ U V $ Non -Layer
4�� Dairy Calf_
Feeder to Finish
A G4. as $a
3 IIIMA r$
1 gg # �a
.._.. aaA�'.°� $
4 DairyHeifer
,r g Dry Cow `f
Farrow to Wean
to. Farrow to Feeder
* MAr 1tty"„$$$ l c if
}° Layers
s Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
a#N Farrow to Finish
*
Gilts
la Non -Layers
(m ; Pullets
9#$ AAMB A'R$AA
a'z$§MA a4k$#$� Turkeys
4at�
Beef Feeder
A4; aM
Beef Brood Cow § . k
A#�.&#av&aa,ax bfl%sM a3a8e k#ffa.aR.AA4$aMtM$Aq:gq
s.sa •'a4+auaa aaMv4aAaaaca$bauaxiAf 9
$§%4#�#$$AA�B&a3k%$F#t$m$-x: &R�$ g *skt
m ° Boars
80
x4F'R$kN:'44$'(h%k4$
#A4ra4'Maxzae„,a$A+as4xaa
1 Mf 14#41&a#M Y5 &9. asa anatxra
I,
a# $ ma$ f #aM##s+M me
4a ier A:mAa'.$�M$sti
d4#
m$9 P9d 4k# $k%,
j,'40A, 21g, A$= Turkey Poults
.. , 5 Y
$6A
's4. am am aMa'a�
M4.#tAa$p $4$aM$$4M Mad'4MM.a<# aems+a
Ma <As $ 4 *aMI$ •&aa50 dA
$$s
Other
, $$ 4 � e4a *a sti
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes [::]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J:rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued
Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): C
Observed Freeboard (in): 19
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Q�es
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
4�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
12r"Ves
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ICJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[—]Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area,
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): IJ at -A
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
-En-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
-eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E"'] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Q�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
[:]Waste Transfers
[]Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking []Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
.2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued
Facility Number: $' Date of Inspection:
l
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes -E]—No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes J°No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes E:rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes /❑"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes „E No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes -allo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes L�VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [—]Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [—]Yes F ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Eno ❑ NA ❑ NE
�ANWOtms f ilita' m� ter ern aanasi�uai ons fuse d�ftionaisaa � �� tips Sc � � gas 31�101, s � �s� ���ss �� � s� �*:1
�rza�ax
�� &x� ^ ✓�
A-,1,��
Reviewer/Inspector Name: lV rR fie h2 lee Phone: 'T/D/ 83s =- el7yi
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �/p _j ^ Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020
I !\
FACILITY#-. 3�FARM NAME: S LAGOON LEVEI(2
PERMIT Ivs)
f7 3 ,93
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALSQ.
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL 46:: S -
- OIC CARD YES OR NO —
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (*21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER {�
DATE 23Ia2 NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE 1103
NITROGEN LEVEL ! '�
DATE l 1 a-3
NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT (u ii
- EVERY 3 YEARS:
DATE 96'I "3
- P-1 (NO MORETHEN 400)
- PH (N.Wf4o,1e.)
- CUIZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
RR2 (#2I)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
NITROGEN (N)
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
-tJ 33
CALBRIATION (#24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATIONS
FLOW RATES
v A FALL (m1)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT 4Z .
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (#21 &m)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE _
0: _P: A �� % RATIO OF SLUDGE L�
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 ANo 921)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_
'If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30u
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October in -Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September lam- Ends April 15t -
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30u
.Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15w- Ends August 31st