820159_Routine Inspection_20230824

ITvne of Visit:-PrComoliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
for Visit: iE�_Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral
Date of Visit: SnArrival Time: Departure Time: %QD
Farm Name: ��"7 .� eO
Owner Name:'
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 1(
Certified Operator: ��"•mur
Back-up Operator: I"xL�rn.L—
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Other O Denied Access
Region:
Phone:
Integrator: LA4e0
Certification Number: �/aC�7��91at
Certification Number: i7 ?37 2
Longitude:
wxa#K#n xa.am8o-:pd eri.. �aa x��44�ak##iFra4406�e �s+ii����aM14a'i %.
e d4§$+§@#tdMP#�3F k@9xagfru. ad M#9.aw m5A #t�ka.e #n W '�+h �}p ��qg
asaixg%§�&#ixga aa��aeaam��vaaa��yaaaka�#a u#aa xx �w�a�ewx a�$�aa�s°x'•.�xa�e�� x�.. e�
{ §d83x#.�i3#�xi# WA "#Aik p1�¢ #kWaSfr I LL§4
#bIC�'fr.8bQ3r#%Ad3Nr E &F fi§tn#.:3yA'b46gW9$6ito*�a#@@98abi
u#fr 3gx
F#pB i0f m#e 4fr5�a}
9q*afr was
#§ A8'
##b$a8&'Fd�94 9H'#:##pb#y3
# ,...
e��'(
kpY¢$frx fro �do-y
tt
Wean to Finish a, Layer
`
� ; Dairy Cow vi',
I
Dairy Calf.
A Wean to Feeder 9-Ud Non -La er
x
Feeder to Finish if s" �* '� a is
91 aJ x,,��
IN a Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ��*��qPg�
urrre � D Cow
1It
Farrow to Feeder I � u tl fr #I a i a
imam
P, Non-Dairy
x" Farrow to Finish U
Layers I
Beef Stocker ;
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
s� Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Bee' f Brood Cow
arammk„axan§ia aaxaw>ai#oar
aapeaTia'#ai i`xne*t+rixmaex;k ..-
a'sTurkePoults
#ixwxai
iarasaas
egap&aaax w�l�aaiaa
5xsxmixatsafrrofr.ssaaea°Ysr i.#i10
as afro as yaxmp�a xa�#max sy5%a
Ix»mex4gr
xwexnia ,..
azasi
samxtn,ali
a aaa,s�..
fr.a
Other
uai:x-e 4
tit
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 4�!No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[D'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment ��
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ E Yes tvoo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ,E] o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes Ca'1'4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes FfE Qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes <ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes J❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Winddow' ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
pt
12. Crop Type(s): ( ,/p1/YI�2_Z ��i✓L
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes -a�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes Ef'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Q"&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes -&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes &No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes .-E3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Q-I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 5a - _75C1 1 1 Date of inspection: oz�7 a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes _Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J:j NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�r<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Phone:gy�/J
Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY#: 1�a" FARM NAME: &6m LAGOON LEVEL
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
PERMIT (:ns)
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#TI)
-GOOD FOR 600DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATEA/0/70
NITROGEN LEVEL Cn �7
DATE &/6W1-'J
NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE `� / 3 l��
NITROGEN LEVEL
l/�
SOJOIL REPORT (tZ
- EVERY 3 YEARS:
DATE kl6w&?
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
.dFC
- PH (Note if4or leas)
- CUIZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
/V st

CALBRIATION (kxa)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBR TEq EVERY OTHER YEAR
- DATE OF CALIBRATION �y
- FLOW RATES / oZ-
RAIN FALL (n21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT '
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
% SLUDGE (uxi a. xst
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE -3hZa
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE v
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE -
OTHER FORMS (p22AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1A-Ends September30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1 �- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15t -Ends June 30t
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1'
Rye: Opens September 1 k- Ends March 31A
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15t" -
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t -
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31-t
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15* - Ends August 31 st