820377_Routine Inspection_20230824

Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I I Arrival Time: �; 3 Departure Time: / _: /t7 County:S &LNI i Region: R�d
Farm Name: 1
,.14 t✓r/Cltuoe++ryQ Owner Email:
Owner Name: h`"Q�j �.ul'r7a O'�TG, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �" &Wx� Title:
Onsite Representative: le
Certified Operator: / )J
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:~L�^Gl,
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
kYk#$k $9dt$db3$4A+n4 huVtYRV APo$'bY+whPRa#t}3
94s4#44A a#nx Rsm �a$i wAad ta*l$NtruUk�94ge£natav5tit4vA}A »M..arwsxi3Ak$K#.RAvR$. #rtR N,A 4t$YPok 6qiA re INA. UUYR= §it1tY$At4
91}di
Y{�#1kk#$AdFp
¢s{�pSt!�Y
94##5QQ9;
1$#$1#fi@Y1...aA P4
#Ck�FMSA
A"b$
A a?MtgY #Po
hApro0#9§
n�8��aiea
LYY{.{6#&#`xA4$n
Fd
$Atkt
$WN$N4 w6R3Vbb 4£tkM qb#$Sb8
f$A$a4saPo#4#
Wean to Finish Layer
# y
s}
#. Dairy Cow
FA
a Wean to Feeder / Ud g Non Layers
Ad Dairy Calf r
Feeder to Finish $*#adA4#:{`'
gaa�`Y
Hka@d#@4�R+9#a Av5@$##3419g
AA{.6$#d$4A 9�'k4 1� qkx%a+}t49$ ) �kp
4d$fi$-0 k aar
$�� DairyHeifer
$'%
p{$.
Farrow to Wean 3#t#4#$+4ak n`C$A$9bk
nresggnN. u Dry Cow
*31$$ F
+#.4
susaai 4
I$4 Farrow to Feeder k #+# di)� $§ma$i i¢ o a_
Non -Dairy
SSA' Farrow to Finish a', Layers
sg. Beef Stocker„
kk3 Gilts;'
Non -Layers
t W
Beef Feeder
Boars
a'
Pullets
akk Beef Brood Cow
ak
$§4iY.5XA9Wd A+A�9##4 kPRY
1N,A##A *M1 w^n&X#'§F3frko-4}3A9$AY#kh`:
4'P N4i44q$}RBi 'X tiF6d
Y
Tnrkey$
4#$kd##Gk##RA&Aax @rti'pP9 id kMA 35FibiAd%S S$
Y4$tdmk#Yi OX#4§k4%k}S qt9 bi bt##yXB4'%p#$'41S#A"
4#kb$F#iA'g6S$..
AN'141 �# A5a,'$j�#^�.b$
.{k}n#$}fd'#`X38R$µ 8K48 F#?64#tP
$„ t$•a'#s1a Po
4k >F2R B458 $5%
k#$:$53 A{#a$ sA;",,
-.!,",,—.Turkey
Turkey Poults
t`4C.M#3i5.`61.A^}i$kWP$Aq 4's b'd $045k
IANN,1401t #1R$$$#$§a#t$#$ A: t.nA$I#}A'§#a.a
$tA'k#'k#$U4# i#+�td.§.a&t#$1a$AAn%§#i#W&4}@#m >b'#
iN` a
:#a
Ens ie
is as
Other
§A.YB#A C'u-na m
Y$k#:bfi%%k§'.*4£HdNHr$$§4E}$Na
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,®'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _E5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is heavy less
storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus rainfall) than adequate?
❑ Yes
,E]"Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: y/
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):70
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
_Q o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
,D"14o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
.® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
J-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Q-*f4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 64c- u Olsj ) OS
13. Soil Type(s):in�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes .71No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑5-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes -E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes -1n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E_ T,1b ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes J;�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �;No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 0 No
[—]Yes .®No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - 7
Date of Inspection: v2 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes. 0 iq0
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes J . o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YeslE�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _,Ej`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -ED.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes __D'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,Q"No
❑ Yes --©-No
❑ Yes j:]-No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 11) 6-3 --97'5
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1�- /a y/;z3
MATIMIMIJ

FACILITY#: v — FARM NAME: N & &L.(� LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT 4ns)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD R NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (420)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan MapaYES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (s21)
-GOOD FOR/ 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE �` a'��
NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE 3/a-d a'3
NITROGEN LEVEL JL �-
DATE t, G!
NITROGEN LEVEL Z • �G --
/3,63
26
SOIL REPOORT I�i)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: -
DATE C960 D
P-1 (NO MORETHEN 4 0)
PH (Note if 4 or Ies )
Cu1ZN (NO MORE THEN WOO) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#2i)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (r41
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES 11 O
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER I"RAIN EVENT —
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS ESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
/e /!�/a2 SLUDGE (m1 a2s)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 6 1 Ll/
0: I P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AMC) #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM _CROP YEILDSMORTALITY .l\
'If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1�t- Ends September 30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends .tune 30t
Cotton: Opens March 15ffi - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31A
Oats: Opens September I �t- Ends April 15�
Wheat: Opens September IA - Ends April 30u
Soybeans: Opens April tst-Ends September15t
Fescue: Opens August 1 st- Ends July 31 A
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31 st