820065_Routine Inspection_20230829

for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I L�1C��J Arrival Time: dUD Departure Time: i UO County: 644� Region:pC
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: � IIY2( p_ 4 ✓OF Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
llleC>e,� Title: Phone:
Integrator•
t( Certification Number: �QY%
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
rem w**,��#s��$¥ ¥.#a$: vs•• # a a
aa'��9�AB���AAkRs �d3�#K�'ffi4iA. � bk�#34'$kA63a;3�+b as Aa€`Waws� A4��� Ro#Ig#ai%@%E�+�.#a.k#ar##a aaR�e61 ¥n$X�# r•¥. 4Le##
a#mw$¥rs#c$a aa�naxma q�y sa$a'N$µ�AA asasg+(may#*jAA¥�u%s*+###g�aa ms,agayaa..a:aaaa
L9#¥46
aara
a p>r�oa$t#sss#a#xA�ro
•A-�.4 #¥# sasa§w #1 A La 84#45
..........u§s
t§4a
# Wean to Finish
Layer
:¥, Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
i Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
%�*a s
r¥� �# na"=�
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
¥ Farrow to Feeder
�,
3� Farrow to Finish
a [[
�.a v �"�a. �3� ..3om�a�%� r! !
Layers
: �, # Non -Dairy
.,'
it Beef Stocker
Gilts
# Non -Layers
##x Beef Feeder
a
¥ Boars
; pallets
jBeef Brood Cow * s
a%maaa ataa€*"waa�i°saa#$m #sa Y Turke spawaxx4na#+#«$##wa#¥#8i[SM¥Y%4b#'
ro$n¥a+ke� ,$.a�4wmm m�aa mwaaaam �##�aaa#¥ +##wn$�r
Turkey Poults
# w*
t#¥#as•ar �aaae:#c. :4xss e#xo-¥¥a#
#i
Others$4
t#nsm¥ux #?au
4 tow 4$# n; %#s#$*
111*111411.
a
tr ##b%U
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes )q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [—]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'S;j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
-[E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Yk 3j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,I'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes • 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E]'JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes &o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes •eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes 0No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable
Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑1 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (�Oz�C e , % �), ( 6i u 644ie 6 & 05
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ NE
p r i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes E�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]Yes 2�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes EE'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes _E-Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes a -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E_>o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number:
Date of Inspection: �
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _17rNo ❑ NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E2-&o ❑ NA
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _Q' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes L2"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ENo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes -E� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes _E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Ef�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes _J� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes -EEh'(To ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [344o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ons 4 tl ne a H mH 0"3 a'
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: % al -C l7 /1-le/el G rJ Phone: q'!-o 113s-9?F —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: lcs_)aPii ,� Date: O !a j' /aj_
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY#: P FARM
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO
r�
LAGOON
PERMIT MQI
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) M20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#2t)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER n
w �
DATE
NITROGEN LEVEL 7
DATE �7` �3
77
NITROGEN LEVEL /®f'/��
,
DATE V0jol3
NITROGEN LEVEL y k tO Gl
oZli�l a-3
l-DES°
0-19Z)1,3
SOILREPORT(�­i
- EVERY 3YEARS:
DATE Ll/aIZ2-2
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 4001
- PH (Note if 4 or leas)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MO RE TH EN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
IRR2 (#21)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROG
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (n4)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CAIi17R/!3 EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION 7 �2
FLOW RATES P'ad
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
AR:DATE -DSLUDGE (urt ass)
-DUE V YYE�`%/vT..J�
0: P: 3,,7 % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
. S--/
OTHER FORMS (azz AND R21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS_MORTALITY
'If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREASTREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 s - Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October ist- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st- Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st - Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15* - Ends August 31 st