Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090751 Ver 1 - FINALBeamons Run Closeout Report Final6_23_15 - 7/30/2015NC DMS Closeout Report 6/11/15 Project Name Beamon's Run Project ID 24 Project Type Buffer Restoration and Preservation Site Basin Neuse 14 digit CU 03 County Green Applicable Buffer Rule Neuse Buffer Rule (Grandfathered Site) Consolidated Buffer Rules Date Planted 2000 Date of Supplemental Plant 2009 Protection mechanism Conservation Easement Easement Acreage 79.91 Stewards DENR Encroachments & Resolution Yes- multiple encroachments Signs installed, Notice of Violation sent to landowner for ATV trail Accepted for transfer to stewardship Y Buffer Widths Measured from TOB (linear feet) 0 -100 100-200 0 -100 100-200 Total mitigation units Beamon's Run Asset Table: Grandfathered Site buffer widths up to 200 feet from TOB are eligible for restoration credit at 1:1 ratio Project reaches are rural- subject Buffer Buffer Mitigation Resulting Buffer width Mitigation Credit Ratio Mitigation Credit ratio Units Units (sq. ft.) 147,015 298,299 1,546,719 610,092 2,602125 Restoration= 1:1 Preservation = 10:1 0 -200 = 100% R 147,015 100% R 298,299 100% P 154,672 100% P 61,009 50% 147,015 298,299 154,672 30,505 630,491 Notes Beamon's Run Vegetation Data: Table 7. Veg Plot Criteria Attainment 2012 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 24 Vegetation Survival Threshold Vegetation Plot ID Met? Tract Mean VP1B Y (688) VP2 Y (364) VP3 N (202) 50% VP4 N (0) VP5 Y (445) VP6 Y (526) VP7 N (81) VP8A Y (567) VP9 N (0) (331 stems /acre) VP10 N (162) VP11A N (81) VP 12A Y (728) Beamon's Run Vegetation Data: Scientific Name IBeamon's Run Vegetation Data: Current Plot Data (MY112012) E24- 01 -0001B E24 -01 -0002 E24 -01 -0003 E24 -01 -0004 E24 -01 -0005 E24 -01 -0006 E24 -01 -0007 E24- 01 -0008A E24 -01 -0009 E24 -01 -0010 E24- 01 -0011A E24- 01 -0012A Common Name Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Acer negundo boxelder Acer rubrum red maple 54 2 33 12 1 1 9 1 11 10 5 Baccharis baccharis 1 4 4 Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Betula nigra river birch 17 17 29 6 Carpinus hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 1 1 2 12 Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic white cedar Crataegus hawthorn 5 1 Crataegus monogyna oneseed hawthorn Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 2 2 5 1 1 2 7 7 8 W 1 Ilex decidua possumhaw 1' 15 1 6 Ilex opaca American holly 5 W27' 1 2 2 Ligustrum sinense Chinese privet 1 7 , 1 N Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum 12 8 1 3 37 25 5 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree 3 Mimosa sensitive plant 1 Morella cerifera wax myrtle 1 1 Nyssa tupelo 1 Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Pinus palustris longleaf pine 3 3 3 Pinus taeda loblolly pine Prunus serotina black cherry 1 Quercus alba white oak 3 2 2 2 1 7 7 55 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus falcata southern red oak Quercus lyrata overcup oak Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak 6 6 6 2 Quercus montana rock chestnut oak Quercus nigra water oak 2 1 5 5 7 1 2 2 2 16 16 38 Quercus phellos willow oak 4 7 7 12 3 3 5 3 3 9 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 Quercus rubra northern red oak 38 1 Salix nigra black willow 1 Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy Unknown Vaccinium blueberry Stem count 17 17 111 9 9 34 5 5 11 0 0 53 8 8 77 10 10 18 2 2 6 13 13 63 3 3 10 3 3 41 2 2 22 17 17 51 Species count 1 1 10 2 2 6 2 2 5 0 0 7 3 3 7 3 3 9 1 1 4 4 4 7 1 1 7 3 3 6 1 1 8 3 3 10 Totals Stems per ACRE 688 688 4492 364.2 364.2 1376 _ 202.3 445.2 is 0 2145 3217 323.7 3116 404.7 404.7 728.4 80.94 80.94 242.8 526.1 526.1 2550 121.4 121.4 404.7 121.4 121.4 1659 80.94 80.94 890.3 688 688 2064 Appendix A: Project Correspondance rA '**— I os stem 'el�lellt PROGRAM October 26, 2009 To: John Dorney — DWQ FROM: Marc Recktenwald — EEP RE: Riparian Buffer Sit Evaluation for Beamon's Run site- Greene County (Meuse 03) EEP #24 DWQ #2009 -014 QR@ r=oe�� NOV 3 0 2009 DENR • AIATER QUALITY WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH By memo dated July 8, 2009 (attached), Cyndi Karoly - NCDENR -DWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit, requested that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) clarify the amount(s) of Riparian Buffer Mitigation and/or Nutrient Offset Credit the subject site would be able to provide. The memo identified the primary areas of concern as follows: 1. EEP must delimit all of the mature buffer areas on the site and make certain that they are removed from the ledger. Response: The mature trees within the 200 foot buffer is part of the excluded areas on the attached map. 2. The discrepancy between the amount of buffer credit shown on the EEP ledger and on the 2003 monitoring report must be reconciled and explained. DWQ shall be copied with a map showing mitigation locations. Response: The amount of buffer credit in the 2003 monitoring report (5.8 ac) is based on a 50 -ft buffer width in the March 2000 restoration plan (5,050 ft x 50 ft = 5.8 ac). We do not know whether the restoration plan was ever finalized, but believe it was not because it contains apparent errors —it includes areas marked as planted that were clearly never planted. The 2003 monitoring report is inaccurate documentation and is also incomplete. The amount of buffer credit shown on the EEP ledger (in IMS; 12.29 ac) is based on a 200 -ft buffer width, excluding areas that were not planted (mature buffer) or were encroached upon (farming or mowing). The amount of buffer credit will be amended to add previously excluded mown encroachment areas that are regenerating and farmed encroachment areas if they are replanted (see also #5 below). North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service (enter, Raleigh, N( 27699 -1652 / 919 -715 -0476 / www.nceep.net 3. EEP must present a written case as to why this site should be included on the "Grandfathered List ". Response: Apparently there was miscommunication internal to EEP regarding this project that resulted in its being inadvertently omitted from the "Grandfathered List "; it should have been included. The project was instituted and constructed before DWQ's cut -off of October 7, 2007. The restoration plan for this project is dated March 2000, and the project was planted in Nov/Dec 2000. 4. EEP must present written evidence as to whether beavers were present on site in 2000 in order to justify the buffer measurement from the beaver pond edge rather than the top of stream bank. Response: EEP staff and the monitoring firm measured the buffer width from the present beaver pond edge in keeping with the DWQ Buffer Clarification #2007 -005. http:// h2o.enr.state.nc.us /ncwetiands/ documents /Beaverlmpoundments.pdf) S. Areas that have been cut will need to have access permanently restricted and replanted if the planted woody stems are not present. Documentation of the presence of these stems will be needed if replanting is not contemplated. Response: Site access has been permanently restricted through the conservation easement. We have also asked landowners to stop encroachment (which they have agreed to do and done so far), and marked the conservation easement boundaries. We will replant any farmed encroachment area within the 200 ft buffer. We do not plan to replant those mown encroachment areas where trees are regenerating at a density of the minimum of 320 stems per acre, but will document regenerating woody stems as described in #6, below. 6. EEP will need to conduct five years of monitoring on the site since no monitoring has been done. Response: This site is nine years old. EEP ask DWQ to consider allowing EEP to monitor the entire site once to document stem density for the entire site and monitoring the replanted encroachment areas for three more years during which time EEP suggests documenting regeneration of trees in mown areas with photographs. 7. Please be aware that areas slated for wetland mitigation credit shall not be counted as buffer mitigation credit. Response: EEP will not seek wetland credits for this area. If DWQ allows the project to be added to the "Grandfathered List ", EEP will add the area within 200 ft to the calculated buffer area. 2 Final riparian buffer acreage as per Figure: 0.24 acres river birch 0.15 acres cypress 3.7 acres long leaf 8.2 acres oak mix --------------- - -- 12.29 acres Based on the above information, the Debit Ledger will list this site with 12.29 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units. Cc: Cyndi Karoly — NCDENR -DWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit ff " A a NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary July 8, 2009 TO: Suzanne Klimek — NCEEP Jeff Jurek - NCEEP FROM: Cyndi Karoly - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit RE: Buffer Mitigation Site Evaluations Beamon's Run (Barnhill Farm) Buffer Site — Greene County (Neuse 03) DWQ # 2009 -0014 (EEP Project ID # 24) Site Visit: 6/30/09 JRD Contact Person: John Dorney The Beamon's Run Buffer Mitigation Site includes buffer restoration along Beamon's Run and Contentnea Creek. According to the monitoring report, 5.8 acres of buffer mitigation credits were created by planting a wooded buffer along Beamon's Run and Contentnea Creek. However according to the EEP ledger, 10.9 acres of buffer credit are available on the site. Kevin Miller and Jessica Kemp from EEP as well as Kyle Barnes and Chris Pullinger from DWQ were also present on site. The site was planted in 2000 but only has one year of monitoring (2003) due to confusion on the part of EEP and its contractors. The monitoring report was very limited and no monitoring data were collected in 2003. The 2003 report was basically a visual inspection of part of the site. Several significant problems were observed at this site which must be corrected. First, most of the mature buffer has been removed from the ledger but small portions still remain. These must be delimited and removed from the ledger. Second, the discrepancy between the ledger (10.9 acres) and the monitoring report (5.8 acres) must be reconciled and reported to DWQ with accompanying maps. Third, this site is not on the "Grandfathered List" which would make it possible to get credits to 200 feet. EEP must make a case in writing why this site should be considered for inclusion on this list. Fourth, it is not clear whether the buffer measurement should be from the top of bank of Beamon's Run or from the edge of today's beaver ponds. The as -built plan only shows one beaver pond at the top of the segment. If EEP can present convincing evidence that the beaver ponds were present at site planting and construction in 2000, then the buffer measurement can be made from that line. Otherwise, the buffer width will be measured from the stream as shown on the as built plan. Fifth, areas that have had trees cut for hunting lines or vehicular access will need to be replanted if sufficient woody stems do not remain from the earlier planting. Sixth, since no monitoring data have been collected on the site, five years of monitoring will be required for the site. ITEMS TO ADDRESS: First, EEP must delimit all of the mature buffer areas on the site and make certain that they are removed from the ledger. Second, the discrepancy between the amount of buffer credit shown on the EEP ledger and on the 2003 monitoring report must be reconciled and explained. DWQ shall be copied with a map showing mitigation locations. Third, EEP must present a written case as to why this site should be included on the "Grandfathered List ". Fourth, EEP must present written evidence as to whether beavers were present on site in 2000 in order to justify the buffer measurement from the beaver pond edge rather than the top of stream bank. Fifth, areas that have been cut will need to have access permanently restricted and replanted if the planted woody stems are not present. Documentation of the presence of these stems will be needed if replanting is not contemplated. Sixth, EEP will need to conduct five years of monitoring on the site since no monitoring has been done. Finally, please be aware that areas slated for wetland mitigation credit shall not be counted as buffer mitigation credit. cc: Matt Matthews Kevin Miller, EEP Jessica Kemp, EEP 401 OversightlExpress Review Permitting Unit One 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 NorthCarohna Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 '! // Phone: 919 - 733 -17861 FAX: 919 - 733 -6893 v!atural�ly Internet: hftp: Il h2o,enr.state,nc.uslncwetlands/ An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer Mitigation Project Name Beamon's Run DMS IMS ID 24 River Basin NEUSE Cataloging Unit 03020203 Project Type Riparian Buffer Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 11.64733:1 1.1 1.1 c c o o c m E o Z p 'o c c ° o e p O E « C E d G W R N o N O A VOI d U L C L O E O. v O 2 O O O) L O. C L tp C O. Cd ' ci L C ` K C w C C N O y C y . w N ~ O Z w m E E m N EL R fO ll N U w m m L z CL m E d N K O Z Z c Z O Z m O O U a y m m U U N N y m Beginning Balance (feet and acres) 445,314.00 -001 1 Beginning Balance (mitigation credits) 445,314.00 185,177.00 DMS Debits (feet and acres): DWR Permits Imf act Project Name NCDOT TIP R -1030C - US 117 1999 -0413 Improvements 149,470.00 2,156,811.00 2001 -0823 Johnsie Markham 330.00 NCDOT TIP R- 1030AA - US 117 from 2001 -1253 NC 581 to SR 1300 7,405.20 City of Wilson Wastewater System 2005 -0163 Improvements 26,040.00 NCDOT TIP U -3823 - SR 1158 2004 -1764 Widening 46,061.00 NCDOT TIP U -3823 Add'I - SR 1158 2005 -1764 Widening 234.00 2001 -1506 Ninth Street Sewer Improvements 18,600.71 2001 -0992 CP & L Raleigh Operations Center 19,050.00 2001 -0829 St. Lawrence Homes 975.00 NCDOT - Upgrade of SR 1550 2001 -1092 (Edmund Latta Road) 5,881.00 2001 -0768 Appaloosa Run East 225.00 2001 -1314 Meadow Creek Subdivision - DHIC 1,525.00 2001 -0374 Roxboro Commons Shopping Center 7,734.00 2001 -1818 NW Cary Parkway 2,260.00 2001 -0907 Brier Creek 39,225.89 2000 -1062 Maynard Road 435.60 NCDOT TIP R -2000A - Northern 2003 -0918 Wake Expressway 86,520.17 NCDOT TIP R -2547 / R -2641- 2001 -1689 Knightdale Bypass 33,341.43 Remaining Balance (feet and acres) 0.00 0.00 Remaining Balance (mitigation credits) 0.00 0.00 Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 07/21/2015