20220420 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220315

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
20220420
1
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
What amout is owed?*
Fee received
$240.00
Fee needed - send electronic notification
$570.00
Reviewing Office*
Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Parrish Hills
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
1 b. Primary Contact Email: * 1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/15/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Black Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.51478-78.64385
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
JONES CREEK, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05904,0597
2c. Contact Person:
Lanny Clifton
2d.Address
Street Address
5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
Address Line 2
City
GARNER
Postal / Zip Code
27529-8417
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Road
Address Line 2
City
Selma
Postal / Zip Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
same
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Angier
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
160400-62-6029
2c. Project Address
Street Address
17137 NC HWY 210
Address Line 2
City
ANGIER,
Postal / Zip Code
27501
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Black Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C, NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011202
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number
2b. Property size:
-69.0
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions are the site is mostly woodland with a few acres of cleared farmland on the north east side. The property is in a rural setting that is changing to S/D homesites.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
69
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1167 Ift
u

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:'
Purchase of the project is to provide 16 home site building lots in a S/D setting
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The 69 acre tract is located in Johnston County with address 17137 NC Hwy NC 210. It is mostly wooded, the north end is mostly upland with a small wetland along the west side. The
south end is mostly wetland resulting from the wide floodplain of Black Creek. One street will be installed from NC 210 roughly going through the middle of the tract. The existing wetland
on the west side of the tract is extending into the planned street. We plan to fill the top 0.09 acres of the existing wetland to install the street.
Bull dozier, track hoe and motor grader will be used to clear the street. Sediment control will be installed to protect the rest of the wetlands on the tract. There will be no stream impact. The
utilities will be installed along the street. Septic will be on -site on each building lot. The project will only provide 10 building lots, I don't for see any indirect impacts from this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
Preliminary JD package submitted with this PCN
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
U
2a1 Reason M
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
r,.)Type of Jurisdicition*
2g. Impact
area
Impact 1
Culvert fill
L
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
No
__]
Both
I
0.090
(acres)
�
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.090
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.090
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
We slid the road just far enough uphill to save Lot 10 on the east side. After the road cleared the wetland we dipped the road to the west to add some
room to Lot 10. The road stopped short of crossing Wetland B to avoid the wetland impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The wetlands are marked on the drawings and marked in the field. They will be protected by silt fence before construction begins. Care will be taken to
keep the equipment out of the wetlands, work will not be allowed around the wetlands in wetter than normal soil conditions and inclement weather.
u

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Amount of impact is less than the required threshold for mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
This project's stormwater plan must be approved by the Johnston County Stormwater group.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is an only 10 lot S/D that does not have any future phases planned. I do not expect this project to spur any additional development that could affect
water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh

5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage-1) Occurrence of Atlantic Pigtoe over 70 years ago, The Atlantic pigtoe is dependent on clean, moderate -flowing water with high
dissolved oxygen content in creek and riverine environments. Our project will not impact a stream, no affect. 2) Coppery Emerald occurrence within 1
mile pre 2004. They prefer creeks and other slow -moving acidic streams, in forested areas. We will not be impacting any stream, I have not seen any on
or near the project.
IPaC-1) Red -cockaded Woodpecker - The red -cockaded woodpecker makes its home in mature pine forests. No mature pine forest on the project, no
affect. 2) Neuse River Waterdog - They are usually found in streams wider than 15 meters (m), deeper than 100 centimeters (cm), and with a main
channel flow rate greater than 10cm/second. No affect, not working in stream, also no habitat. 3) Carolina Madtom - Prefer clean water with permanent
flow and are not tolerant of siltation and turbidity. No habitat, also not impacting stream, no affect. 4) Atlantic Pigtoe - The Atlantic pigtoe is dependent on
clean, moderate -flowing water with high dissolved oxygen content, no habitat, not impacting stream, no affect. 5) Monarch Butterfly - Are found in
meadows, roadsides, and sandy areas where milkweed plants grow. None have been observed on the project, no habitat, no affect.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
None in Johnston County
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
website above
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
website above
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
Parrish Hills PCN Attachments.pdf 18.35MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
I have attached a vrything below. If you have any question please don't hesitate.
thank you
Wyatt
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.

Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
Date
3/15/2022

PCN Application Additional Information Package
Name: Parrish Hills
County: Johnston
Date: 3/15/22

Table of Contents
1) Agent Letter
2) Maps
A) Soils
B) Quad
3) Project Drawings
a) Impact Map
4) Endangered Species
5) SHPO Documents
6) PJD Package

5/13/2021 Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 1/2
DWR Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name *
Contact Email Address *
Project Owner *
Project Name *
Project County *
Owner Address:*
Is this a transportation project?*
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
Wyatt Brown
[e-mail]
JONES CREEK, LLC
Parrish Hills S/D
Johnston
City
Garner
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
27529
Country
United States
Street Address
5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Stephanie Goss, Rick Trone
Parrish Hills is a 10 lot S/D located at 17137 NC HWY 210, Angier NC in Johnston County. A small wetland impact is
needed for the entrance. Plans are attached.
(I downloaded this form from your website, I attached the construction plans, they do not show now, also there isn't a place
to request a meeting date). If you don't have all the information you need please contact me.
thanks
Wyatt
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
5/13/2021 Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 2/2
Signature *
Submittal Date
x This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
x I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
x I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you
can submit an application.
5/13/2021
-Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Parrish Hills
S/D
Inbox
[e-mail] 11:55 AM (10
hours ago)
to me
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre-Filing Meeting
Request Form for Parrish Hills S/D that you submitted on 5/13/2021. Attached is a copy
of your request.
All certification requests (applications) must include documentation that a pre-filing
meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to
submitting the certification request.
The Division can not accept an application for your project earlier than 30 days from this
pre-filing meeting request. Applications that do not meet this 30-day requirement will be
returned.
Please save this email/attachment; it must be submitted with your application to
document that this requirement has been met.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond
to this email address, as responses are not monitored.
May 13, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Parrish Hills Subdivision, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described 17137 NC Hwy 210, Angier, NC 27501 (PIN 160400-62-6029) for the
purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown’s Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
_________________________Harold G. Carroll, Jr. – Member [e-mail] 919-639-3281_________________________
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.Scale: 1:8529 - 1 in. = 710.71 feet(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)Johnston County GISJune 23, 2021 Feature 1 Feature 2
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names InformationSystem, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and NationalTransportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; NaturalEarth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers forEnvironmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed May, 2020. Feature 1 Feature 2
Know what'sbefore you dig.SITE0SCALE: 1" =SCALE OF MAP MAY VARYDUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.100' 100'100'VICINITY MAPSCALE: 1"=2,000'20'10'x70'SITE TRIANGLER/W25' RR/WROADWAY30' RPROPOSED ROAD SECTION DETAILTYPICAL DETAILPROPOSED 50' R/WTYPICAL CROSS SECTIONFOR PROPOSED 20' ROADPROP.(R/W)25'-0" (TYP.)CL25'-0" (TYP.)10'-0"CROWN 1/4" PER FT.10'-0"6'-0"SHOULDER1" PER FT.3:13:16'-0"1:1
8" ABC ONCOMPACTED GRADE6"1 1/2" S 9.5 B SUPERPAVEASPHALT MIXPROP.(R/W)6'-0"SHOULDER1" PER FT.3:13:16'-0"INTERIOR INTERSECTION DETAILA50'RA35'R 6'6'ROW50'20'15'25'R1" PER FT.SECTION A-ALCSLOPE AS REQ'D.35'35'R3:13:1SYMMETRICAL CUL-DE-SACTYPICAL DETAIL50'RA35'R ROW50'20'15'320'10'SITE TRR/W25' RROADWAY30' RNC HWY 210SITE PLAN INFORMATION:1. OWNER:GINGER SUE PARRISH, JOY PARRISH JOHNSON, JACK MIKLAS2. STREET ADDRESS:17137 NC HWY 210ANGIER, NORTH CAROLINA 275013.P.I.N.: 160400-62-60294.LAND USE (EXISTING/PROPOSED):SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL5.TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS:106.TOTAL AREA:75.73 ACRES7.CURRENT ZONING:AR8.BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT - 25 FT.SIDE - 5 FT.REAR - 5 FT.9. DENSITY SUMMARY:MAX DENSITY (AR)1.5 UNITS / ACRE * 75.73 ACRES = 113 UNITS MAXPROPOSED DENSITY(10 UNITS / 75.73 ACRES) = 0.13 UNITS / ACRE10. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA:MAX IMPERVIOUS11.35 ACRES (15%)STREETS0.48 ACRESMAX IMPERVIOUS PER LOT43,045 SF11. INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY:NO (PER FEMA MAP #3720160400K)EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 20, 201812.WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA:BLACK CREEK (C, NSW) TO NEUSENOT IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA13. DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY:50' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY8'-0"6'-0"VARIABLEPAVEMENTWIDTHSHOULDERWIDTH5'-0"1/4" / FT.- 1/4" / FT.+1" / FT.+2" / FT.+3" / FT.5'-0"- 1" / FT.-2 1/4" / FT.-3" / FT.DRIVEWAY TURNOUT GRADESTYPICAL DETAILSWEETBRIAR RD (SR1539)NC HWY 21030' R10'x70'SITE TRIANGLER/WEXISTING ROADWAYR/W25' R20'50'30R/W'R20'30'CONNECTION DETAILNC HWY 210 - (60' PUBLIC R/W)43,563 SF / 1.00 AC.FINAL DRAWINGSFOR REVIEW ONLYSEALC-4768COPYRIGHT © 2021 FREEDOM FIRM, P.C.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESSACTING UNDER DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT,PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,OR LAND SURVEYOR TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THISDOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERSTHIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX THEIRSEAL AND ADD THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY"FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE AND SPECIFICDESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATIONS.SEAL041318FREEDOM FIRM, P.C.162 FLORA DRIVEBENSON, NORTH CAROLINA 275041 -- --C3ISSUED FOR: PERMITSPROJECT NO.: 21-002DRAWN BY: CSBCHECKED BY: CSBREVISIONSPARRISH HILLS SUBDIVISIONPRELIMINARY SITE PLANN/FVICKIE LYNN WHITTINGTONPIN: 160400-63-5740DB4779 PG 020N/FSTAR VALLEY SUBDIVISIONN/FMINNIE S. COTTENPIN: 160400-52-2323DB2430 PG 710N/FNOEL & JUANITA BRADLEYPIN: 160400-64-7352DB4692 PG 120N/FMATTHEW & TAMMY DONNELLYPIN: 160400-64-4532DB5142 PG 423N/FCARL & LISA MOSSMANPIN: 160400-64-2644DB 5160 PG 384N/FMINNIE S. COTTENPIN: 160400-52-2323DB2430 PG 710N/FMINNIE S. COTTENPIN: 160400-54-6033DB2592 PG 0131235678910MAIL KIOSK30,250 SF / 0.69 AC.30,222 SF / 0.70 AC.NOTE:THIS PARCEL TO BERECORDED AS OPEN SPACE INACCORDANCE WITH SUBJECTNCDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT53,319 SF / 1.22 AC.138,683 SF / 3.18 AC.73,693 SF / 1.69 AC.33,173 SF / 0.76 AC.37,889 SF / 0.87 AC.APPROXIMATELOCATION OF100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN30'30,250 SF / 0.69 AC.430,250 SF / 0.69 AC.WETLANDSWETLANDSSTEEL BRIDGE CROSSING, LLC.5160 HWY 42 WESTGARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 2752950' RIPARIAN BUFFER(50' MEASUREDFROM TOP OF BANK)50' RIPARIAN BUFFER(50' MEASUREDFROM TOP OF BANK) Impact 1
185190195200205210215220225230185'190'195'200'205'210'215'220'225'230'-0+50 0+00215.97215.72215.77216.161+00216.43216.64216.62216.672+00216.75216.84216.66216.523+00216.10216.05215.89215.164+00214.47214.14213.73213.385+00213.32213.26213.39213.406+00212.72211.75210.69209.747+00208.56207.10205.21203.088+00200.62197.80195.08192.879+00190.889+50-2.08%0.75%-1.25%-5.00%-10.00%GRADE BREAK STA = 0+00.00ELEV = 215.975GRADE BREAK STA = 9+00.95ELEV = 190.847PVI STA: 2+00.00PVI ELEV: 217.19K: 50.00LVC: 100.00BVCS: 1+50.00BVCE: 216.82EVCS: 2+50.00EVCE: 216.57HIGH PT. STA: 1+87.50HIGH PT ELEV: 216.96PVI STA: 6+00.00PVI ELEV: 212.19K: 32.00LVC: 120.00BVCS: 5+40.00BVCE: 212.94EVCS: 6+60.00EVCE: 209.19PVI STA: 7+75.00PVI ELEV: 203.44K: 36.00LVC: 180.00BVCS: 6+85.00BVCE: 207.94EVCS: 8+65.00EVCE: 194.44(wtr)(wtr)(wtr)(wtr)(wtr)(wtr)WWWWW
0+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+16Know what'sbefore you dig.0SCALE: 1" =SCALE OF MAP MAY VARYDUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.50' 50'50'STREET "A" - PROFILE VIEWHORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 50'VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5'STREET "A" - PLAN VIEWSCALE: 1" = 50'FIRE HYDRANT w/HYDRANT VALVEASSEMBLY6" SDR-21 WATERLINE3'NC 210 - (60' PUBLIC R/W)70' BUILDING SETBACKAS-BUILT NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEER &OWNER WITH AS-BUILT SURVEY OF ALL INFRASTRUCTURE,UTILITIES AND STORMWATER DEVICES. ENGINEER, OWNER,JOHNSTON COUNTY, AND NCDOT MUST APPROVE ALLINFRASTRUCTURE PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. ALLBONDS AND SURETIES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND ACTIVEFOR AT LEAST 1 YEAR AFTER AS-BUILT APPROVAL.3/4" WATERSERVICE (TYP)STREET "A" - (50' PUBLIC R/W)120'325'R9EX. 12" WATER MAIN (APPROX. LOCATION)72 LF - 18" RCPw/ FES EACH ENDINV. IN - 213.84INV. OUT - 213.0024" MIN6SITEVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1"=2,000'NC HWY 210SWEETBRIAR RD (SR1539)FINAL DRAWINGSFOR REVIEW ONLYSEALC-4768COPYRIGHT © 2021 FREEDOM FIRM, P.C.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESSACTING UNDER DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT,PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,OR LAND SURVEYOR TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THISDOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. ANY LICENSEE WHO ALTERSTHIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX THEIRSEAL AND ADD THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY"FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE AND SPECIFICDESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATIONS.SEAL041318FREEDOM FIRM, P.C.162 FLORA DRIVEBENSON, NORTH CAROLINA 275041 -- --C4ISSUED FOR: PERMITSPROJECT NO.: 21-002DRAWN BY: CSBCHECKED BY: CSBREVISIONSPARRISH HILLS SUBDIVISIONSTREET "A" PLAN AND PROFILE823457MAIL KIOSK2" PERMANENTBLOW-OFFASSEMBLY6"x2" REDUCER2" SDR-21 WATERLINE10INSTALL APPROX. 30 LFBORE & JACK WITH12" STEEL CASING PIPEINSTALL 12"x6"TAPPING SLEEVE ANDVALVE ASSEMBLY18" RCPPROPOSEDGRADEEXISTINGGRADEEX. BOXCULVERTFIRE HYDRANT w/HYDRANT VALVEASSEMBLYFIRE HYDRANT40 LF - 6" DIP+/-30 LF - 12" STEELENCASEMENT PIPE6" SDR-21 WATERLINE2" SDR-21 WATERLINE
FIRE HYDRANT3' MIN COVER6"x2" REDUCERWETLANDSWETLANDSNOTE:THIS PARCEL TO BERECORDED AS OPEN SPACE INACCORDANCE WITH SUBJECTNCDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT230'R230'RSTEEL BRIDGE CROSSING, LLC.5160 HWY 42 WESTGARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 27529RIPARIAN BUFFER AND WETLAND IMPACT TABLEWETLAND IMPACT - 4,018 SF / 0.09 ACRERIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT - 0 SFRIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT - 0 SFSTREAM BED IMPACT - 0 LF Impact 1Impact 1 Table
NCNHDE-17393
March 12, 2022
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Parrish Hills
Dear wyatt brown:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project AreaParrish HillsMarch 12, 2022NCNHDE-17393Element Occurrences Documented Within Project AreaTaxonomicGroupEO ID Scientific Name Common Name LastObservationDateElementOccurrenceRankAccuracy FederalStatusStateStatusGlobalRankStateRankFreshwaterBivalve4370 Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe 1951 H 3-Medium Threatened Endangered G1 S3No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project AreaNo Managed Areas Documented within the Project AreaDefinitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 12, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Pleaseresubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.Page 2 of 4
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project AreaParrish HillsMarch 12, 2022NCNHDE-17393Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project AreaTaxonomicGroupEO ID Scientific Name Common Name LastObservationDateElementOccurrenceRankAccuracy FederalStatusStateStatusGlobalRankStateRankDragonfly orDamselfly33753 SomatochlorageorgianaCoppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-VeryLow--- SignificantlyRareG3G4 S1?FreshwaterBivalve4370 Fusconaia masoni Atlantic Pigtoe 1951 H 3-Medium Threatened Endangered G1 S3No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project AreaNo Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project AreaDefinitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 12, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022. Pleaseresubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4
3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. % ...ii
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction
in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location r lb-
Johnston County, North Carolina
‘31\#11. fr
. ‘ S
6„:._. _,,..;
. ..? 0
loic ...
\ o
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 1/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
101
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
isdc\CI
11111/41441\SIIIII3\6°11.
013
OC)
SAO
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 2/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly. /4
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following: \044\11.
1 . Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. INS
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
CP
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for yo roj
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and criticaeill'abitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
\tr._ )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 3/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
1 . Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are
regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
101
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 isdc\CI
Amphibians
NAME \IIIVAL4,S
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi iliteni\woThreatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
III
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772 GU
Fishes ClIC)
NAME STATUS
°c\ (1"),
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 4/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Cling Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found101
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164 i*S\10
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus iv Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habita s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
‘e..)
THERE ARE NO CRITI HABITiV AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 5/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1 . The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
1\414
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ so4( \O
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
ilk
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/manageme /project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list
and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee
that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public
have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the
relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic
Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your
migratory bird report, can be found below.
\ r
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 6/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA BREEDING
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS AVERY
LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE"
INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT h.
LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA. '
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Ap 1 to A 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA 41#11C.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
r)"
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project
area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please
make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
.Ant
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 7/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1 . The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( ) e
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys. 111140(11a414
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having o data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 8/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American
(This i
---- ---- ---- —
BCC-BCR(This s a Bird
of Conservation
Concern(BCC)only in
particular Bird
Conservation Regions
(BCRs)in the
101
continental USA)
Red-headedII--
BCCWoodpecker Rangewide(CON)
(This is a Bird of11/4
Conservation Concern
(BCC)throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.) (m6 \ami \lif
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
eft, it
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 9/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN).The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network(A N)..
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? ro
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore
energy development or longline fishing).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 10/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird S dy and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report C-\ \Is°11
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures,visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
itik )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 11/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries ICI
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. ° 1/4dC\
, likikiV,
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
alpeort ik ) i'-
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
diollms* Nape'
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that
intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations 411"1\
ilk wilt
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 12/13

3/12/22,7:27 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation,visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
01111111. 1111116.1
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/AZRWNN L2PBFCLE7UPC4VQ7NSQQ/resources 13/13

Johnston County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., NGA, USGS
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
Parrish Hills
✔
~69 acre tract for home sites in a S/D
JONES CREEK, LLC
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
35.51478, -78.64385, 17137 NC HWY 210, Angier NC
160400-62-6029
Johnston
Angier
UT to Black Creek
03020201
✔
✔
May 13, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Parrish Hills Subdivision, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described 17137 NC Hwy 210, Angier, NC 27501 (PIN 160400-62-6029) for the
purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown’s Environmental Group, Inc has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.

_________________________Harold G. Carroll, Jr. – Member [e-mail] 919-639-3281 _________________________
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELDOFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
17137 NC HWY 210
Angier, NC 27501
Johnston
160400-62-6029
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Gr
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
919-524-5956
[e-mail]
JONES CREEK, LLC
5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
GARNER, NC 27529-8417
919-971-5353
[e-mail]
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 3

D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorpsauthority.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, andthe JDwould beusedto avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitialstep in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
See attached letter
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
~69.0
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
ƒNorth Arrow
ƒGraphical Scale
ƒBoundary of Review Area
ƒDate
ƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.51478
-78.64385
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJD cannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Wetland A 35.51830 -78.64261 0.42 ac. wetland 404
Wetland B 35.51546 -78.64405 9.76 acres wetland 404
Stream 1 35.51423 -78.64214 1157.0 lft non-wetland 404
Stream 2 35.51874 -78.64397 0.95 lft
non-wetland 404
4-6-21
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
CESAW-RG-R
NC Johnston Angier
35.51478 -78.64385
UT to Black Creek
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
aerial, soils. preliminary wetland map
Wyatt Brown Digitally signed by Wyatt Brown
Date: 2021.06.04 20:03:47 -04'00'
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.Scale: 1:13131 - 1 in. = 1094.22 feet(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)Johnston County GISMay 13, 2021Result 1id:160400-62-6029Tag:13C03053XNCPin:160400-62-6029Mapsheet No:1604Owner Name 1:JONES CREEK, LLCOwner Name 2: Mail Address 1:5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 WMail Address 2: Mail Address 3:GARNER, NC 27529-8417Site Address 1:17137 NC HWY 210 Site Address 2:ANGIER, NC 27501-Book:05904Page:0597Market Value:184050Assessed Acreage:68.890Calc. Acreage:69.060Sales Price:270000Sale Date:2021-04-16
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.Scale: 1:8529 - 1 in. = 710.71 feet(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)Johnston County GISJuly 17, 2021
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names InformationSystem, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and NationalTransportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; NaturalEarth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers forEnvironmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed May, 2020.
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.Scale: 1:8529 - 1 in. = 710.71 feet(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)Johnston County GISFebruary 23, 2021
17 -
n
1111,-
Wetland A
/�/ /�` . .• 0.42 acres
DPA f'r r / r . A
4.1i1P.t....'"
A P ( - • Stream 2, 95.0 Ift
��� .. �t �4 /-i�1 , 142.5 sqft, 0.003 acres
IP I. ,, tit ', 4 II' 1 II
I,` � , inn'
a .�
prJ y . _ '
Fli -
it e ii
P.Y. 1 9 i
Y
i
./
i
II
DPB
•
Wetland B 3 / _
9.76 acres / P0' * r
Stream 1, 1157Ift,
/rid'
2892.50 sgft, 0.067 acres
it
r
.._ 4
a JP
6 J A 44 41,4, ‘41141eZt n
Parrish Hills allAigh
Preliminary Wetland Map
BROWN'S
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP. INC. 200 100 0 200 Feet Drawn by Wyatt Brown
4/6/2021

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Parrish Hills City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 4-6-21
Applicant/Owner: Jones Creek, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DPA
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section,Township,Range: Selma
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): wet flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 1.0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.51860 Long: -78.64392 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland area is in woodland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ✓❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
O Surface Water(A1) ❑-f Aquatic Fauna(B13) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑✓ High Water Table(A2) LI Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ❑0 Drainage Patterns(B10)
0 Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ 10 Water Marks(B1) IJ1. Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
✓❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows(C8)
ElDrift Deposits(B3) LI Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ✓❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) J J FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
✓❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1 inch
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: DPA
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum 40 X FACW- That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Pinus taeda 10 FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50 =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species x 3=
1 Ligustrum sinense 20 X FAC FACU species x 4=
2. Ilex decidua 20 X FACW UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4. Prevalence Index =B/A=
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. 0 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. ❑✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8.
a 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 =Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft sq. ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Woodwardia virginica 30 X OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Impatiens capensis 20 FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
9. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
50 =Total Cover -
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Smilax laurifolia 10 X FACW
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/2 100 SL
6-14 10YR 4/1 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
O Histosol(A1) 0 Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) ❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) 0 Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) TU 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑ Black Histic(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) �- Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) -CI P• iedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 2Depleted Matrix(F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) 0 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑I Red Parent Material(TF2)
L I
❑ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 0 Redox Depressions(F8) V• ery Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) 0 Marl(F10)(LRR U) O• ther(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) .❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) 0 Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) 0� Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
O Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Parrish Hills City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 4-6-21
Applicant/Owner: Jones Creek, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DPB
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section,Township,Range: Selma
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): wet flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 1.0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.51573 Long: -78.64292 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland area is in woodland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ✓❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
O Surface Water(A1) ❑-f Aquatic Fauna(B13) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑✓ High Water Table(A2) LI Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) 0 Drainage Patterns(B10)
0 Saturation(A3) 10 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) El Moss Trim Lines(B16)
El Water Marks(B1) IJ1. Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
✓❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows(C8)
ElDrift Deposits(B3) LI Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ✓❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓� Geomorphic Position(D2)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) J J FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
✓❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 inch
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: DPB
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Pinus taeda 60 X FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Acer rubrum 10 FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
70 =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species x 3=
1. Acer rubrum 30 X FACW FACU species x 4=
2. Ilex decidua 10 X FACW UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4. Prevalence Index =B/A=
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. 0 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. ❑✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8.
a 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 =Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft sq. ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Woodwardia virginica 30 X OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
9. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
30 =Total Cover -
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Smilax laurifolia 10 X FACW
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/2 100 SL
5-14 10YR 6/1 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
O Histosol(A1) 0 Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) ❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) 0 Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) TU 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑ Black Histic(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) �- Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) -CI P• iedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 2Depleted Matrix(F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) 0 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑I Red Parent Material(TF2)
L I
❑ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 0 Redox Depressions(F8) V• ery Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) 0 Marl(F10)(LRR U) O• ther(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) .❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) 0 Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) 0� Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
O Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Parrish Hills City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: 4/6/21
Applicant/Owner: Jones Creek, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DPUP
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section,Township,Range: Selma
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex, none): convex Slope(c/o): 0.5
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.51770 Long: -78.64350 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Area is in a open field.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
❑ Surface Water(A1) 1❑-f Aquatic Fauna(B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
El High Water Table(A2) E1 Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) 7 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows(C8)
ElDrift Deposits(B3) El.
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
O Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
O Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
ID Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) J J FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) 0 Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Bore depth to 14 inches for field observations
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: DPUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) FAC species x 3=
1 FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3. •
4. • Prevalence Index =B/A=
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. ❑ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8.
❑ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Festuca 60 x FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
7. than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
9. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
60 =Total Cover -
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 100 S loam
5-14 10 YR 6/3 100 s c loam
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(A1) 0 Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T,U) ❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) 0 Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) TU 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑ Black Histic(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) �- Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) -CI P• iedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) 0Depleted Matrix(F3) LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) 0 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑I Red Parent Material(TF2)
L I
❑ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 0 Redox Depressions(F8) V• ery Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) 0 Marl(F10)(LRR U) O• ther(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) .❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) 0 Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0,S) 0� Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
❑ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0