820123_Routine Inspection_20230817 (4)

lyye UI VISIr -%t LU111PILIUMC 11IJt1ec LUl11 v"PUI ULIUU IICVIUW V JLI UCLUI C GV aIUUHUL `) I UCHU1ca1 ASbISLilnce
Reason for Visit: ( Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:
j a Arrival Time:
Departure Time: �County:
c^y%
Farm Name:
9—// Owner Email:
Owner Name:
xt//Z
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4%4� /�/ 4� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Region:
Integrator: ��
Certification Number: / %
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
k 5v �14;'Qa#?#%49+iY 4J
��ktyyYyy..,$�444£4{. b4Yd A#U teafi##:•kGA mYb94C##4&ih9&$Tnd 4Y`4 km%S kL4'ifTWhKK# pIkiAb# .�I9#S3a #4k.#£$@*(iS$'rySk4apS
#AYld$ma# vdaM+x ARAaALbYba?YttrtN +6£p9L Y54hx'ttF*M.'mAd'1'F1.d56p,i6i #'$atl#§#4' egl4kiM:Out .So
pY#4t..d$sA
d 4#3$48pp6(5Y�#�k{k�#j#i}-0k3i3kt`
14040
3F.Xfi
aaAaFokwlq�o fflal[�&oVt
'kth94:Y4 SA#%k#5tfl#'s4##ajL*y-8p3tkM
ryeSA
#§V{ b x
4 S
ax£aa ttm+r
iitg
k
a# aAAiryCrek@xe wsaa ad'a3
a
M... Wean to Finish #bs
ow
Dairy Co
Wean to Feeder Non Layer
s Dairy Calf !;
t Feeder to Finish ,;;,r,*a#`aa'eab$@. Dairy Heifer b
b' a ap«'t£k. a n'
Farrow to Wean ae i$$aas .sY�
A#
FA D COW
is oka x£a
Farrow to Feeder 1 : n a -£a Iti
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish <$ Layers
kg Beef Stocker
44 Gilts * Non -Layers
tt Beef Feeder 4a
a B40
oars Pullets
A Beef Brood Cow 0
77.�g#taaIIWItAA4"#<t rnn akk a.�k akz% mx.! TuYke s
#§atrvb4t#yla+ta%43-a..Y4P n Il tlt low +x Nb##kyk §P3.ka'
%-,5p 6}xs8# kv`oai"P".0 y
1111H-1-1�N'
a#mi�tiaa'k%'#a;tm%aau#.asxv...4s£m#aA4xba£At'%g1
S6 r is P2'kmd+n#temdkx2s5Atrb f'fkd#4#ka##}N&A
d#PS%akii 3R^#: 'n+Ad
Ai�E era4to
4a.%kk#d%ax ka LEA#.#a:+t 4kA+,# Turke Poults
k#kr Ai+a4'E9%8 kxe &ut$' a
Other
:4«'a1i;> was#g$ se#{}�#ja'5at 14'a tkaAa
§iroo 42AI1 �..
4k N>6#H54#'rpm.:mt H
" a 5..ah#Ad kt3Y kN am s4A.x Rv.ti YYY P°
$YFb * a:.tr'r ai'n fi$tt *'so A�""tat}
3 A#Yx +.f.% S#.uN #pR33A$�.Aka A' a 1"oW#.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _❑JVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: ]j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
p6
Observed Freeboard (in): v�d
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
4ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
]:Flo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
.❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑-TTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
„ 3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
.F7rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Caropp Window❑ Evidence oof" Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �L�{ /�G2tizut (�L/0/i &3
13. Soil Type(s): /0p � 0", 6 Or ,d
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes EfjIgo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes _jENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes C:] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes effi'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ,®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes A:n No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
'E].No
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yeso
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes E]"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes -[3-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes , f-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes _[�3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes .Ef]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name: k/ 1' 1e X 'f
r5d4�
❑ Yes ,E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑..No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 10 Y.3`J��979�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 9 // 7�a j
511212020

FACILITY* tf6 FARM NAME: � �' � T /� LAGOON
PERMIT (na)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTEUTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) WO)SOIL TYPES Or,6 "/3
CROP TYPES Cal A,r;-
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (a i)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER 7 �
'
�lli)
DATE
NITROGEN LEVEL S /G
DATE �
NITROGEN LEVEL Z. J l
DATE 16 0-b-
NITROGEN LEVEL X G/
a ! (P 1 2'�
SOIL R9
c�r21r
- EVERY 3 YEARS: -
DATE
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Not.if40,I..)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (u2i)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
.2 /-7b-3 ") q(,
��l ill a�3 3. as

CALBRIATION (x24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES lip S
RAIN FALL (x2t)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT _
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
� /�}SLUDGE (trig a2s)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE (p `
0: .3. �- P: cS, �5- % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (n22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM __CROP YEILDSX _MORTALITY__�
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS —PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NOPONDINGREELSFEED BINSLAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1-t- Ends September 30*
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t-Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15N - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15t^ - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1�t- Ends April 15t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30th
.Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September 15�
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 �
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15i - Ends August 31st