820217_Routine Inspection_20230817

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: JE)Itoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrivall. Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: /`�7J o""'W_ �— 0 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: &__Y i'� / 51�4 Title:
Onsite Representative: /
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
r
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
ii3#4$34H YE3.4£$t9Rlk#¢§kxS+YY:xta#£#�k kk%`d*3M1}§kgkt#YB"Fb;t'A4a .4}rtA Y.e}L`>8et ai dV£dC4 A't%4 m
tr$+A
}#°a0$amv ff sAa km Px>#ffi4%.katix fro *x#a% ,#s kx ub4 Ya5#rs xtx,nx#a8st§kxid+0 ID4^Y#$Xd3•R ,65 #WN#'Pd Aaa48�R #Rttm BBd:a 4 Il3Ff 8F#„de€k P.
& S -
$k W}}/pf,ftr.btkxa#k•N�aa#t$azt<+1It'j'xxba8aelit'ta0'$}}�a%t��"e'#a
kip •Y %###'
'd�4g#4xW.$tq GYxRTart#4#dp#k4§#a#'#b#%3#K#$.Y+t N$##3�%xy s+>•48x qkd$ t# d
# &tt PH 4#%tr'k'. +3ta b&tlUk
6S#4#Y$#W$#L##'s.#L"A#'a
Wean to Finish' La er I
Dairy Cow'
Wean to Feeder b+ Non Layerk
as
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish d � *r ky "r A #'aYm ns4"iil aa1' 11p
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean kfra$ m}au n° "a assrske i }. ' i n 14,§ D Cow
A a'f5t 64 #a qt RBxx* bk #b 54 ##$! $
#
y #ss c
¢) Farrow to Feeder �$ n$= r b outs++._:, „C,•,pit�.,„
#o-bsx Non -Dairy{
Farrow to Finish l Layers
t
9i5 Beef Stocker : s
Gilts mx Non -Layers
p Beef Feeder,°
Boars I" Pullets
$� Beef Brood Cow = �'
#fir#tna rd
+puea>i% a{*II� m�tyta,Ra,,R.ea"z .. akNk &.Roa*ba>'"S"of, Turkeys
kae
qt ¢"'ta4w$k'dkW.. y+A St tt'$k tr4k%6•k #ktr#ti#t9 G#',.,
TurkeyPoults
}kq A#x#R'0.44*4rt Moff**+4oY#4 k¥it,*trd4
¢$,$a#k�6 aaaaax•. # s kba$kx$frntr55�. v
t4 „k t#gfr#,
Other
q+ 4pq$EHWdd`dnM.. S-0!k ik k'
$8a$fr4 ##tx *x: mvt#x b&kk}xk#gas + 4
6.i}}$Pb6ifr yb+q9 ##ilnt++tt'a'^n bffi M^. i4kj44#iR §{k•}qy, $i#A
#� u 74743Ak{d rs#.x
}#§k8$i�a flq $4X£`tb##Yq�+tk R6G#4iR@§6k #q # a
xYk# Xn#.k.ifrdfd it3$4dxhC+Y
hA ktlSA 83sY$#W4 )td i'YAtV#@ �k..
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes11 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - ( Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ,.e'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes „❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: l Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Eno
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes J2'Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment 1 threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
2'1'es .o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes _ago
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes E❑ I o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes EDVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes f7jl�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Wiindo/w� ❑ Evideence of Wind Driiftft ❑ Application Outsideof Approved Area
—
12. Crop TYpe(s) _ I .��(/1 GGta IaJ C (s (� •� CC vO %J//C �/(d ScC, ( �Cta �Gy ccc�r
i
13. SoilType(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes -ETRo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ,Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes , ®""No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ,.❑'Nb
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes _Q�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes[:J.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes f nMo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes go ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? (—]Yes .�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes .-ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. j�
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 4�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes _L2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes E3iVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes `0 Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes -E7`&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes -o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes []—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ®-N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes "❑'t<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / TG I StJ r� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY# -() FARM NAME: ZnLf� LAGOON
PERMIT RI91
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (tt20)
SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (n i)
-GOOD FOR 60/ DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
2`
DATE � !/ r
DATE
NITROGEN LEVEL
[ •�
NITROGEN LEVEL I%
DATE `G��,�[ a -,I
/r�"'/�
NITROGEN LEVEL 4��1 `� i
�2, ov
REPORT (t ,f-24_1
- EVERY 3 YEARS:
/SOIL
DATE _�[lS�h'3
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if4 or less)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW
IRR2 pai)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION M24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALI RATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION G�� ? /
FLOW RATES
�d
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
// SLUDGE(�a25,
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 1 ���3 %
0: ...__.P: %RATIOOFSLUDGE
0: .2, b' P: �S`e Sf % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (u22 AND 921)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
`If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1�t- Ends September 30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31 A
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1�-Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1� - Ends April 15t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30w
.Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15�
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31st