090134_Routine Inspection_20230822

YVI S q f"
Type of Visit: (D'C'ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: . a -Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: dJ Arrival Time: Departure Time: s i ouuty: f% _
Farm Name: %%{�m/`p� % p Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,1,677�x ��✓�it�/' /`i�i�+ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 17e—e, rr tom/ Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
b
Latitude:
Phone:
Region: /17�d
Integrator:GLvO�y
Certification Number: G
Certification Number:
Longitude:
X * dim #XI#4# ## 3Ap9x � W{rybG a 9Ri&9&Y#wz5W #��#'H4a'#a4 Y#$T'6 #k$3 & i5gk9F?t#tt bA:���aew nXx�#:#abENet9$&RKKN4ffi¢$g;myy}�.rr9X�a# ra1��aya# �kp�x#ea��a'..p ¢r��puyu s,�y.�3y���i(§§ays�
5 4FSY 9 19ro #,3fpg'ga"s 4"#.8II A 4441.3t4r4ZRa4*&43I#9 6$ ^fr 63F t�4 �9an.'.6 "AaF gam
#g kr iNi-S 'k ,4 �!" rfk"4as14 a
ana'AAalm°s �a#tta?Gl$$}}s ¥''�#k #� I�a�7{� y,7#�+. +nas*a�lail�lmd4s�#µ7vaaa*u
8# 'dc' 9 #935��€�4&9mks#m KKa#. a,
`56 wmvOtto & w m as 9a
Oa a,xaG#iPa i'.
d# ..
Wean to Finish Layer
�
Da' Cow
Wean to Feeder UD 3 Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish AlaSr X�aaa#&sA'�a
�s# .. # +a �� � as � �
Farrow to Wean
IRS
` fA S Dairy Heifer
Dr Cow �,..
e�.�*#
x
Farrow to Feeder �.a¢ail�;r axi y!
Non -Dairy
*a Farrow to Finish ' Layers
&
q Beef Stocker #
ray Gilts Non -Layers
1! Boars" Pullets
a#. Beef Feeder
"ar Beef Brood Cow
ks say$ es"RRYOU ab��e°nn urm���a a)m says �s"o-s. Turkeys
N A% dd d Y
X A9 #9 #4#ffi iE gf1Fil 4*.+A41 tk 1V A=4kk4'A W#'O .moltIO
9141
x#*¢ $ Xa a �—K
Aix XXa.aa�#aams#�X a#droax aae#€9,a bXe4#A:#, 4�,s��.
$`hAII$£AYr#8#9'AY�{�4Yk#KKM4$.p fl2#itt$1Yt Y.Akv&W&:
B#;pgt# k##trm 3#i §ta8.R 6&&2e9#b'##bKKttr#bffi
a .�414" kn6am,#ax #Y�iX An#sm W16111v TurkeyPoults
$40 AA&d 3 20k, te4ba.4 bX Bsa#. t. at -0 mb R�
'ggr
s##.a#rtix X@rt9 A4k #A@Y�ArmfAil# M3A8#k Hit
A�8Sk
Other
#
L&aqA.yA#gip
a ec�#z#**a�rasfCamaµ�: {$x¢ryry qq @&§P}
E§ #R 'd3KKBd'4,'b Y#B At & Xs#£ 'N$R'4�&bd#.. i3 ",.
@F'#k #F N38+fr##A4ak4ait dsi # #%. SY#.. bk6 #' 8 d..'.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
,Efl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
[;�PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - 13CI Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes . 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: !
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J❑ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes .L�J_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ef�no
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes L2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes La�IVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
ep�
12. Crop TYpe(s): l� pt " , /I9'r--e SrJi��l eGcs✓a(9/GQr.�
� y v
13. Soil Type(s): L C' I
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [—]Yes 2rf to ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 'FZ 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[:]Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes E2�NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes , ❑1No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes J,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes UFTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes El -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,❑-No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,E�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ,gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EJ—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes JE2.,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes [2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 0`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReviewerQnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9,1e ?,3t�--IF2S'67—
Date: ?1Aar�3
511212020

FACILITY#-. !3yl3y FARM NAME: I'`-�/�'�'1 l LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT N BER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CAR9rYEsbRNO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROPTYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST 5 NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps S R NO(01
_
WASTE REPORT (Ki)
-GOOD FOR 60cDDA S BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE �_ �r/ �� NITROGEN LEVEL % 62
5 DATE 141 9-3 NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE > a a' NITROGEN LEVEL fed �i
SOIL REPORT (rei)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if 4 orless)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (a2i)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)_
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITRO EN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (una)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALj1BftATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES /.a..
.. RAIN FALL luzq
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT _
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
SLUDGE lure a2sl
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
0: ,, P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE T�
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND u21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS_MORTALITY_
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October i� - Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February 15n - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1�-Ends March 31�
Oats: Opens September ice- Ends April i5t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1•t- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15i - Ends August 31 st