090077_Routine Inspection_20230822

Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: —U kcoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: 7 J� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Sxa—oz yt �1��. P�j Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
e!
Latitude:
Region:
Phone:
Integrator:
v Certification Number: G 9 Op z-
Certification Number:
Longitude:
���4�+ry u..x#m#.8�w m��B� #aA9##b �&B sa�R# 8 k # ,pg%##a4#Yladati.'#4k9 v9}9:h9 p#tYi agy;:gsgi+dg�.g#k��#wt#a�+�smeuba #�y. Wk##0%ro
yy ##�� ew as aa� �x#xx�a a� x# a���puea�kiFY�'�k+ �a#aka ar ��•aram ��spn+9�pav�xi pmm��.,,ggxv
sF#�avkpp�d#�HI'���ece �en�4+9N/�# r�s# S# mxa#r##sa w5daa�5Nx akggyuymy��4S(N�++pua
pe�###�F�m�#y,at
ngeni.g#a
3
9�0�46�a����md�y�fr#ygYw��aS�a{�:,i�9
46" ffi�m�tl A 4k#�� 4�#� $��k�k.�A*9a� �5;4Y1'90. ,24144�.21-172*90114#@ wea`tkxR.",,sssx
01a Wh'�
Wean to Finish ILayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder �260 to on La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 111 ; 0 � Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean asm. esv#s &n3s Dry Cow
�� Y
Farrow to Feeder $ Ins et +$+ Non -Dairy
tip tYY�) +
$ Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
aGilts Non -La ers Beef Feeder
+
Boars 114 Pullets Beef Brood Cow
I'
+9 IX.?'
Re4 k MddBk# s
x mxx m#iM �{.4Nmw B3a4++*k••�eki#ie'aPS&}eg$#3
Y $� a..dax�yaax+a+wx:w.�sx e.a#a a ff+#aa#+r.aa Turke aa. e+ d.kYSr k�§W# x~p Wo-att4#3 uesas�akasw
u aa�s�a+ ax«aarm3o-� ma#. r ao-.ea' a sa va xa �,+a °aa 4eak IDk b3Fe£k#6
$swan'(°km
Turke on to emax+ a a+�++ a amseas
.+mx g k x asm� Y ta�axv^x+SBIs *&UR;+,bkk
gg n Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): /q
Observed Freeboard (in): a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
,[].No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
(� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
T-
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes `[�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,®'Pio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
[—]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
,❑..No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
J=_�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [ o
❑ Yes MIo
❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -Eq�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes -allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 4E3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 77 1 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
, 2-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
En'&o
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
;E]�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes 25V
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
j2r^No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
J�no
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Eo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[]Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[]Yes
®/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:(1
Date:
511212020

—)FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL FACILITY#:D
PERMIT ms)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS (�
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER / //
DATE `2/�,.3 NITROGEN LEVEL L t ( 7
DATE �/ 7/9 NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE &" NITROGEN LEVEL
'7
S/QIL R/EPORT (uz7)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: - DATE IG to / �'✓
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Nora if 4 or ieos)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN woo) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
I RR2 (u2-I)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N) -�7
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (x24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIB ATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION ,��-1 .
FLOW RATES /?,may C� 3
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
91 %3 / )ay SLUDGEIuz�s2s)
-DUE VERY YEAR: DATE (
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (a22AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS1� MORTALITY
`If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON. BARE
AREASTREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30*
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1 n- Ends March 31 A
Corn: Opens February 15N - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15�- Ends August 1A
Rye: Opens September 1n-Ends March 31A
Oats:.Opens September 1�- Ends April 15N
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30w
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1st -Ends July 31A
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15f - Ends August 31st