HomeMy WebLinkAbout820632_Routine Inspection_20230822Date of Visit: Arrival Time: i�7 Departure Time: ;U ounty:�7 Region:
Farm Name: Y/t/!'u� '0 /� j��_® Owner Email:
Owner Name: ✓ <YlYnfr4 c� UCUi 2t% /'� L4Ne Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: G}i7 j / l�7 Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
r/
q
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
ME
s $Ht
##$$ 0 #*411Ani4'A 40P $M
ON,# *
qtr& H,. %*A,*' 6 EXk'.'F H gPMH
#'�`r4mb
H #,+HS$�gp41�}p
a e$aaN
a$a,0sa�> mes as a a° ffa5lEau '#P ffi4., 4aw ma+s.$tIW*ema dd gg vital
$ as x)�a a#4 '" ma $$ g�HasHu npg.4g� aqpam ro 4 exmw$u#AN&* '091'" H iri & rx I
H49AW4.H44 $4 xx&a #dgSp#6$g p$9b9:
�+ryt8 �' �Hggm��,.aHyya,,�b��'#yyiyy}ffiak §
$��a
*amaa
tta�rpprgaengLLxb�k$#St
6H @#Ho gg yy,gg�q�H ..gg �,
ok dAu k OI'S 4r trt3 Pm a#°W �et4�?M 4' `SLJppg 9 4Yd ssx H±e`sx
iy1 '""
Ha§n *,
yk
+�.. �44p,6y,F14� p## q�ye�}pyk #S
@#W$.@Pkc k'k # A�W 9H*
' p'''69 0 kkH�## �k S7 SIM
+r ra+t * WSH
'W€a •1c +rt'.t!via
H`,'t#. VON let, 4#�lVu�`d§S# t.w NRdSCm
4
§#a4
@a¢Knka+deor Y.aa
14
Wean to Finish
LayeraH
Da i Cow
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
1 INon-Layer I
$a4
Da i Calf u
DaHeifer
°¢S
Farrow to WeanON
Dry Cow,
Farrow to Feeder
KKKK$^It".+H1,�II)
Non -Dairy g
allFarrow to Finish;
Layers''
Beef Stocker
'Ea Gilts
e i Non -Layers
, Beef Feeder
ea,. #H3
st) Boars $; Pullets
43 fl4
#aR.3F4AH3 mp 1#�mH atrA R$ a TUrke
a Beef Brood Cow �*
$H i$^'H#44#<83444f #t Y.%#$&R&M&tr k5$k4 a$&4cH8pi&#H
gg$tx+Rne4
S
H##4$6epp$g 4ffa�4Yi4kAx�}ili H#k$#9fl'S&H6 gb
HA.${#44� ,H'HH mr # H � ma3 t a '.saan Turkey Poults
v4 rio-m A^Isma #�daa
b
5}Wj 9 A $#Y'k4%& ya
HHHH RHrh rH"xx 4d$'>a`b# &
>Ax BHRE HH Y
d$ Other
$ m 3 $ # aRffi'd8 BH.H 4# #•kt
x a aasg$� w m H+. aHra to SS'an#n�
d'##m #8Y $NQ+"I44PkX $4i is gp$$at y#
a
)*$.$aaa wag
$$$.
5 $.Yp A6 A ^'
4N' 6 R# x... • n kkd kl6... n b.
3{. #A.Sx
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes la"Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued
Facility Number, jDate of Inspection:
d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
4ai�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
J
❑`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
,E]rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[—]Yes
0'�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
.®�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
.®`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ TaTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area/
12. Crop Type(s): Aft L)lt al ��7iszzC�.�Gz
o�ZGc�
/ifj/
�%S
13. Soil Type(s): _&16
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ED'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
. 2�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
,❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
C244o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E]'�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
J2,)Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes on No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[—]Yes fNo
❑ Yes Z2-'No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes D-No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
E]-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ED'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes -N' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4Q] �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .P4-140
❑ Yes ,®ENO
❑ Yes j7vj Io
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 2<?z?6_— W.i
Date: A159-14b
Page 3 of 3 511212020
FACILITY#: FARM NAME: �"'tlr%� LAGOON LEVEL. -
PERMIT pns)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE
CURRENT NUMBER OF AN
OIC CARD YES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES -
CROP TYPES
ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER [/
DATE ' /l6'6a3 NITROGEN LEVEL 4
DATE 2alc?24� NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE a- 027- NITROGEN LEVEL I- 3 7 .
OI REPO T (421)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE ,2Z
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (N.t if 4or less)
- CuIZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU zw
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
IRR2 (#21)
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
dL/ CoO�
CALBRIATION Ipx<I
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CA RAT D,5VERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION y�h
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (*21)
-INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
,,, /�.SLUDGEIxsisxs7
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE �/
0: P: . 2 % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE -n e
OTHER FORMS (uzzANosz1) ! 23
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDSy MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1n-Ends September30u
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1 � - Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February i 5t - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15� - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1n-Ends March 31't
Oats: Opens September 1¢-Ends April 15�
Wheat: Opens September IA- Ends April 30tn
Soybeans: Opens April tst-Ends September 15w
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 rt
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15w- Ends August 31st