Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210303 Ver 1_Macon County - B204 - MCDC Final (2023)_20230823MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is required to prepare environmental documents for state -funded construction and maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either "Yes" or "No". Complete Part D of the checklist when Minimum Criteria Rule categories 98, 912(i), or 915 are used. TIP Project No.: State Project No.: 17BP.14.R.159 Project Location: Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut Creek in Macon County, North Carolina. Project Description: Replace Bridge 204 a 20' W x 2 Span 13' L timber deck on I- beam structure on existing location and replace with a 2 Barrel 12' W x 6' H x 204' L Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert near Franklin, North Carolina. The project will utilize an onsite detour during construction. Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: Regional General Permit 50 and 401 Certification. 1. Outside river corridor = Yes. 2. Below impact threshold. = No. RGP 50. 3. Tree clearing = Yes. (follow winter clearing moratorium). 4. Trout watershed = Yes. (follow moratorium unless verification NCWRC letter states no). 5. NLEB HUC = No, greater than 0.25 miles from known hibernacula site. Project will require a written Regional; General Permit and written 401 Certification. Special Project Information: The bridge and surrounding area were surveyed on 9.30.2020, 5.26.2021 and 6.8.2023 and no listed species were observed. The bridge is too low to support bat roosting (lack of bat roosting will be confirmed before construction). Tree clearing will occur from October 16 to March 31 to protect possible Indiana Bat roosting. 08/18/23 1 of 4 PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA YES NO Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer. 1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under X the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not required? If the answer to number 1 is "no", then the project does not qualify as a minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required. If yes, under which category? (9) Reconstruction of existing crossroad or railroad separations and existing stream crossings, including, but not limited to pipes, culverts, and bddges• If either category 98, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist. PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS Items 2 — 4 to be completed by thn inee 2_ Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality impacts? 3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the environment? 4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department? 9 Iq Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer: 5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value? 6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list? 7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or ground water impacts? 08/18/23 2 of 4 YES NO 8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their natural habitats If any questions 2 through 8 are answered "yes", the proposed project may not qualify as a Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental assessment (EA) may be required. For assistance, contact: Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch P. O. Box 25201 Raleigh, NC 27611 (919) 733 —3141 Fax: (919) 733-9794 PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS Items 9-12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. YES NO 9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action? 10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent fill in waters of the United States? RGP 50/401 Certification 11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as mountain bogs or pine savannahs? 12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act? Items 13 —15 to Vcompleted by the Engineer. M 13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes? Cultural Resources 14. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? 15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas? Questions in Part "C" are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource agency may be required. If any questions in Part "C" are answered "yes", follow the appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project construction. 08/18/23 3 of 4 PART D: (To be completed when either category #8, #120), or #15 of the rules are used. Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. 16. Project length: 17. Right of Way width: 18. Project completion date: 19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground surface: 20. Total acres of wetland impacts: 21. Total linear feet of stream impacts: 22. Project purpose: If Part D of the checklist is completed, send a copy of the entire checklist document to: Don G. Lee State Roadside Environmental Engineer Mail Service Center 1557 Raleigh, NC 27699-1557 (919) 733-2920 Fax (919)733-9810 Email: dlee@dot.state.nc.us DocuSignedb'y,, ES "'/� / � Reviewed by: B01EC543F Date: Zach T. Shuler, P.E. Bridge Program Manager Division 14 DocuSigned by: EPA2DAC8979C7943DDate: Patrick J. Breedlove Division 14 — PDEA Engineer 08/18/2023 08/18/2023 08/18/23 4 of 4 Bridge 204 SR 1369 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut Creek near Franklin, North Carolina (Macon County) 17BP.14.R.159 Regional General Permit will be required and a written 401 Certification. A trout moratorium may be applied to the permits at the request of NCWRC. • Project will adhere to NCDOT best management practices. Avoidance of erosion and sedimentation into Walnut Creek (Class C; Tr.) and downstream habitats. • Trees will be cleared from October 16t" to March 31 st to avoid potential roosting by Indiana bats. `} r 1'� 1, o +, .^+'I .pi d °� e w U o F u ` v a .•. N .=L7 O °;e � � ®b � fir. l 0 v 1 yl8 . ocv P' ;7 O1 r,"�,:]+ u � ell W S0 G n G Y N t7 ~ O ;ltr �Ar O O 4 z� j 0 0 o l n . y � a JJ1 0 ulall'1 a a E ,C O b �+cin o O O d O 4 az �_ E c_'a v A {_ m r M t N Q LO � O C C U N Ili o N a o d d o J NCDOT Bat Bridge Habitat Assessment Form Updated 3/23/21 Bat Habitat Assessment Form NCDOT Bridges Observers: 13 r-ee oYoe TIP or DOT project number: /ME. /4Z./?.45� Date: ('• . Zo23 Bridge Road (Name of facility carried) W,/n.t - eyet Ral �S•G /5-53e County: Ma evo7 Bridge Number:_ Crossing (Name of the feature intersected): - WA),nK� C"efok. % Surrounding habitat w/in 1 mi. Urban/Commercial Q Suburban/Residential 7-0'� of project footprint (approx) Herb/Shrub/Grassland 5"/• Agricultural_-Z Deciduous/Evergreen/Mixed Forest (A0V•_ Woody Wetland/Herb Wetland/Open Water Df. Any trees >3" DBH within project footprint? N/A des no _ _ Complete this section for Indiana bat counties (Avery: Cranberry Mine area only, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, Rutherford: Bat Cave/Lake Lure area only, Swain) Any shaggy trees or snags >5" DBH? N/A] no If yes to shag/snag, how much sunlight do they receive during the day? N/A 1-3 hours A-6 hours 7+ hours If yes to shag/snag, list species of habitat trees >5" dbh //yy/octt 5.0 rv►raod. agk- kIf snags >S"DBH are present in sunlit areas, provide photos and location. If large hollow trees are present, provide photos and location. Presence of: In project footprint In vicinty (0.5 mi) Caves yes no yes Q Abandoned mines yes no yes if 'yes' to any of the above, provide photos, description, and location. Major water source in project footprint N/A river stream/cree pond lake swamp Suitable drinking habitat in the form of non -stagnant, smooth or slack water? �os no N/A Structure specific questions: Artificial lighting unknown yes no Guard rails Deck type Beam type End/back wall type Creosote evidence none concrete concrete metal none concrete oncrete timber Suitable roosting crevices present (%2 - 1'/e" wide) Deck drains amber metal er open grid tee timber masonry Max height of bridge deck above ground or water (ft): (.0_ Bridge alignment N/S E/W W/S Human disturbance under bridge high med Evidence of bats using bridge? (photos needed) Below section completed only if bats/evidence of bats observed: Emergence count performed? (If yes, complete form next page) Evidence of bats using bird nests, if present? Type of Evidence (circle all that apply) guano Roost Type Roost Material Bat species present (list all species): 0 no yes yes NE/SW none yes S) yes no yes no staining bats observed crevice open area metal concrete Notes (list each species locations and estimated number of each species): jrr h 4� North Carolina Department of Transportation — Division 14 Botanical Survey Project Name: Maco&i 2014 Project Location: NgI nw4- C,rcyw -Zaad r! 5rt Observers: Date County: (0. 8. 2023 Streams Presents: Yes No Stream Name: VJdm t4- C-frck, Wetlands Present: Yes No Wetland Name: Canopy Description: ba1G tiw, lock la olu u �o d Understory Description: wad vns or% do s rc m. LAvyoffy:hqsixes o ht v USFWS iPAC Threatened & Endangered Species List: ❑ Bunched Arrowhead Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No ❑ Green Pitcher Plant Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No JZ Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant Habitat Present: Yes Vo Species Present: Yes Rock Gnome Lichen Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No Small Whorled Pogonia Habitat Present: es) No Species Present: Yes & ❑ Spreading Avens Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No Swamp Pink Habitat Present: Yes (N� Species Present: Yes ❑ Virginia Spiraea Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No ❑ White Irisette Habitat Present: Yes No Species Present: Yes No Project Tracking No.: 16-02-0114 o NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not 1 tfill 0 ,1 valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. - PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: NA County: Macon WBSNo: 17BP.14.R.159 Document: Minimum Criteria F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3 or 14 and TVA Project Description: The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut Creek in Macon County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as a 600 foot (182.88 m) long corridor running 300 feet (91.44 m) north and 300 feet south along Walnut Creek Road from the center of the bridge. The corridor is approximately 150 feet (45.72 m) wide extending 75 feet (22.86 m) on either side of the road from its present center. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: Bridge No. 204 is located east of Franklin and west of Thorpe Lake in Macon County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the southeast corner of the Corbin Knob USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on February 22, 2016. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE or within a mile of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2016), there are no known historic architectural resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), historic maps (North Carolina maps website), and Google Street View application were examined for information on environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance. Bridge 204 and Walnut Creek Road cross Walnut Creek north to south. The creek drains to the south and it a tributary to the Cullasaja River. A stream confluence with Ledford Branch is immediately southwest of the bridge. These waterways are part of the Little Tennessee drainage basin. The project area consists mostly of steep side slopes with narrow benches west of the road and adjacent to the creek (Figure 2). Houses and concrete/gravel parking lots occupy the benches or have been cut into the hillside. Ground disturbance is heavy in this area. Property to the east belongs to the US Forest Service. Disturbance on this property is minimal, but the road has been cut into the hillside. According to the USDA soil survey, the Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex (CuD) covers most of the APE (see Figure 2). This series is well drained, but has a slope of 15 to 30 percent. The Edneyville-Chuestnut complex (EdE) also falls within the APE primarily to the east on US Forest Service property. It too is considered well drained but with a much steeper slope of 30 to 50 percent. Hillsides with slopes of 15 percent or more are not typically tested, since they are unlikely to yield significant archaeological sites. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 6 Project Tracking No.: 16-02-0114 A review of the site files shows no previous investigations or known sites within a mile of the bridge. Although more research is needed in the area, this project will not provide the necessary data as slope is steep and has a low potential for contain significant resources. Lastly, a historic map review was conducted. The 1907 USGS Cowee topographic map is one of the first in which an approximate location for the project area can be determined (Figure 3). This map shows a road with a similar alignment as Walnut Creek Road and a crossing at or near the current bridge location. All structures are depicted outside of the project limits. The circa 1910s US Post Office map illustrates a similar road layout with a new structure southwest of the stream confluence (Figure 4). While, the 1933 Soil Map for Macon County is missing this structure (Figure 5). As a result of this map review, it appears unlikely that any remains of significant historic structures will be encountered within the APE. Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: The defined archaeological APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 204 in Macon County is unlikely to impact intact and significant archaeological deposits. This is due to steep hillside slopes and previously ground disturbance from development along the benches. As long as impacts to the subsurface occur within the defined APE, no further archaeological work is recommended for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 204. If work should affect subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultation might be necessary. Also, this state funded project requires a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 26(a) permit. A copy of this form is being provided to TVA for their use in their Section 106 compliance including Tribal consultations as appropriate. Copies of this form are also being provided to The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, and The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED C. Damon Jones NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST ❑ Photos El Correspondence Other: images of historic maps 3/1/16 Date "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of 6 Project Tracking No.: 16-02-0114 Soy 7 i IJ 7. F one Mile Radius (Shaded) Around Prqlec:Area r j!. AL5 J, rV z -4 -7- N -2 1 v Z17 - -J 0 U.V V, Bridge 204 WA APE (Rea) k: D. • f J �1111 I'M 1, v q % rrr A _J vv� J, q., IN Miles 1.500 w E Macon County [Deters S Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Corbin Knob (1946; photorevised 1978), NC USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 1 � ��Ir� � i� � • r' I / f. + ; L i L 1 i t `� ►_rrr r�ir !1 4 � ; rirl�rl *fir rri �� fir tt •; �t, ti �4 *; � rim �iI'w �r� IL EVD r_r I `• • �__►____ y if • j 1 �~ -_V rrr ��•!* fr` t .i r!�_►►�y�► - --ram i! ! � ►`►w ►�-►err r-' � 1 �----- :Evl NkAi ! �1014, D'� Project Tracking No.: 16-02-0114 ` (HV �=r t Pro'ect Area:' r - _ 1 + f�P1 10 if 4 . I Figure 3. The 1907 Cowee USGS topographic map showing the location of the project area. Project Area 7 7 4 i v • z. Figure 4. The circa 1910s Rural Delivery Routes for Macon County showing the location of the project area. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 5 of 6 Project Tracking No.: 16-02-0114 r Project Area �iC, I 4 Figure 5. The 1933 Soil Map for Macon County showing the location of the project area. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 6 of 6 Project Tracking No. (Internal Use 16-02-0114 t'iRb HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES R r, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM ` This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: County: Macon WBSNo.: BP17.14.R.159 Document Type. - MCC Fed. Aid No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permits : ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type(s): NWP 3 or 14 TVA and Cert. 401 Proiect Description: Replace Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Rd) over Walnut Creek. SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW Description of review activities, results, and conclusions: Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on April 11, 2016. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, or SL in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). The bridge itself, Iredell County Bridge No. 204, was built in 1973. The structure does not exemplify any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type and is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The Macon County online tax data reveal no properties in the APE greater than fifty years of age. No survey is required. Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project area: Using HPO GIS website and county tax data provides reliable information regarding the structures in the APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION ®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED .N NCDOT Architectural Historian Date Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY RF,QUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. Page 1 of 2 �07 'wo v 44. It Jvv dm W)c fw *4r" if! 9 4w -1 ' � � Via. � , x,� .ra�yy,, � F( _ 14. e lK ■ Y4 Macon 2 - Vicinity Map � 0 'tR r U -..p it w 7- - f—,t le T m n rm p in -r rn n P rp.- GE.6 Ll• FA - NP 4 n, _ — yew �n e 3 a I M J932 ft JO..�w f - r. Ono { 14 I � � fti•,�� � � � � � �� y,?tiR t�wrX�t rreva N �3030__ o `,• t7eaOoveo Om Qa0nd0� [53�5p L r ; 17BP,14.R.159 - Macon 204 - Quay! Map OSDV • «_l .-ti � 5 s� #� • a • 4 w� - , A �/i 1. �M f Keener �ti `` _ f _ I '(� ���[ �`ree� :gib `� fl �•- ` � � y/t# tl • �� !� �Z ; �� tarp s ,rtt, ���_ Sack i1Va�r' M to vi lle nut . *ram � '•� r I } ' 1 r �r`� �� _ . � � � r •� f r °F NORTH NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ATTENTION i'EMP. REPAIR -PLATES WELDED TO BEAMS AT ti� 490� SCATTERED LOCATIONS. ytiv v DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BRIDGE MANAGEMENT UNIT OF TBRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION TYPE: Routine Inspection COUNTY MACON ROUTE SR1533 LOCATION .2 MI.S.JCT.SR1531 BRIDGE NUMBER 550204 INSPECTION CYCLE 2 YRS ACROSS WALNUT CREEK SUPERSTRUCTURE TIMBER FLOOR ON CONT. I -BEAMS SUBSTRUCTURE ABUTSNOUNT MASONRY;CRUTCH BT:TIM. CAP/TIM.POST&SILL SPANS 2 @ 13' CONT. LONGITUDE 83015' 33.11" PRESENT CONDITION POOR INSPECTION DATE 09/11/2012 PRESENT POSTING Not Posted NOT POSTED COMPUTER UPDATE POSTING LETTER DATE OTHER SIGNS PRESENT DELINEATORS [4] LOOKING NORTH LATITUDE 350 9' 74.73" INVENTORY RATING OPERATING RATING PROPOSED POSTING ANALYSIS DATE SUFFICIENCY RATING M.P. 0 SIGN NOTICE ISSUED FOR No WEIGHT LIMIT No DELINEATORS No NARROW BRIDGE No ONE LANE BRIDGE No LOW CLEARANCE NUMBERED REQUIRED Roy Cooper, Governor 0■0■� INC DEPARTMENT OF ■■�■m NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ■ ■■■ June 9, 2023 Patrick Breedlove NCDOT-Division 14 253 Webster Road Sylva, NC 28779 RE. Macon County - Bridge 204, 17BP.14.R.159 Dear Patrick Breedlove. d_ Reid Wilson, Secretary Misty Buchanan Deputy director, Natural Heritage Program NCNHDE-22261 The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map. The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butlerWncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program DEPARTh1EN7 OF NATURAL_ AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699 OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX 919.707.9121 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area Macon County - Bridge 204 Project No. 17BP.14.R.159 June 9, 2023 NCNHDE-22261 No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database. No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area Managed Area Name Owner - Nantahala National Forest - Nantahala Ranger US Forest Service Owner Type Federal District NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project. Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on June 9, 2023; source: NCNHP, Spring (April) 2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 4 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Macon County - Bridge 204 Project No. 17BP.14.R.159 June 9, 2023 NCNHDE-22261 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic EO ID ntific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State Group L Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank i AL Date dbm Rank < < M i _11111 Dragonfly or 33445 Calopteryx amata Superb Jewelwing 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S1S2 Damselfly Low Rare Freshwater Fish42043 Salvelinus fontinalis Brook Trout 2022-10-26 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G5 S4 Rare Natural 31061 Chestnut Oak Forest --- 2011-05-09 BC 3-Medium --- --- G5 S5 Community (Dry Heath Subtype) Natural 29040 Montane Red Cedar- --- 2011-05-09 AB 2-High --- --- G2 S2 Community Hardwood Woodland Vascular Plant 9551 Gentianopsis crinita Fringed Gentian 1968-Pre H 5-Very --- Endangered G5 S1 Low Vascular Plant 23934 Hackelia virginiana Virginia Stickseed 1968-Pre H 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2 Low Rare Peripheral Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area rite Name esentational Rating _ Collective Rating Grindstone Knob/Cedar Knob R3 (High) C3 (High) Houston Knob R5 (General) C5 (General) Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name wner Owner Type Nantahala National Forest - Nantahala Ranger US Forest Service Federal District Highlands -Cashiers Land Trust Easement Highlands -Cashiers Land Trust Private Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on June 9, 2023; source: NCNHP, Spring (April) 2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 3 of 4 NCNHDE-22261: Macon County - Bridge 204 June 9, 2023 ® NHP Natural Area (NHNA) Q Buffered Project Boundary ® Managed Area (MAREA) Q Project Boundary Natural Heritage Element Occurrence (NHEO) Sources: Esn, Airbus DS, USGS, NCA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA, Intermap and the GIS user community Sources Esn, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NCAA, USGS, ® OpenStreetMap contributors, and the CIS User Community Page 4 of 4