NC0089079_Complete File - Historical_20150706

30 5-0 2_
ATTA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
July 6, 2015
Mr. John R. Townson
Environmental Management Director
PSC Box 20005
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0005
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Permit NC0089061
Borrow Pits 2 & 3
Rescission of NPDES Permit NC0089079
Borrow Pit 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Townson:
The Division has reviewed your permit rescission requests received on
June 30, 2015. The Division' has no objection to your request. Therefore,
NPDES permits NC0089061 and NC0089079 are rescinded, effective immediately.
If in the future your organization wishes to discharge wastewater to
the State' s surface waters, it must first apply for and receive a new
NPDES permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Charles H.
Weaver at (919) 807-6391 or via e-mail [charles [e-mail]] .
S�,nc rely,
/1/-
7
r(S/Jay immerman, Director
0/ Division of Water Resources
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office / Jim Gregson
NPDES Unit
Teresa Revis / Budget
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 512 North SalisburyStreet,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
9 9
Phone: [phone]/FAX [phone]/Internet:www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

Weaver, Charles
From: Bowden, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Charles; Chernikov, Sergei
Subject: permit rescission requests for NC0089061 and NC0089079 - Borrow Pits - Camp
Lejeune
Attachments: BORROW_PITS_2_3_10_RESCISSION_PKG.pdf
Charles and Sergei,
Not sure who is supposed to receive this, but Page 2 of the attachment contains the rescission request for both permits,
along with additional information. For some reason, the request was addressed to Nathaniel. WIRO concurs with
permit rescission.
Thanks. kevin
Kevin Bowden
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(phone) 919.807.6397, (fax)919.807.6494, (e-mail)
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content
is exempt by statute or other regulation.
1

•
Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to present-Barrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Resc... Page 1 of 1
Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to Present ►
}
Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to present: l)
Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Rescission NC0089061 Tags&
NC0089079 Notes
ID# 21391
Document Type Correspondence
Document Title Borrow Pits 2,3,and 10 Permit Rescission NC0089061 NC0089079
Date Received/Created 5/29/2015
Date Signed
Mail Status Outgoing
Document Status Final
Author MCBCL/EMD
Program 5090.20.1 Water Quality
Keywords NC0089079 NC0089061 Borrow Pit
Building/Room# Bldg 12/Rm 236 �
Storage Bookcase tc � ��Route EQ: i Lowder°11CaWoodall Townson
Mailing Instructions Certif.!•d
Comments
Working File Link Lejeune Working Files - 5090_20.1 Water Quality - Borrow_Pits_2_3_10
Director Comments
Permament Yes
Attachments Enclosure_1_NC0089061_Cover_Page.pdf
Enciosu re_2_NC0089079_Cover_Page.pdf
Enclosure_3_N PD ES_I nsp_Rpt_NC0089061.pdf
Enclosure_4 NPDES_Insp_Rpt_NC0089079.pdf
.. ... ..........._ ..........................
Created at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D Close
Last modified at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D
https://em.usmc.mi l/sites/le/hd/Lists/Official%20Document%20lnventory%20Jan%20I%2... 5/29/2015

t,'£NT ��d UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
7 \ \`� MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST-MARINE CORPS BASE
4� PSC BOX 20005
41 iVl
Q'l M CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0005
\\i--- rx`Y 5090.20
BEMD
JUN 0 3 2015
Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section-NPDES
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
Marine Corps Installations East-Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
(MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ) was issued two National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) individual permits associated with wet
mining/dewatering for borrow pits 2 and 3, permit number NC0089061,
and borrow pit 10, permit number NC0089079 on 23 June 2011 and 27
April 2011 respectively. Enclosures (1) and (2) contain the cover
page for each permit. MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ requests permit rescissions
for both of the aforementioned NPDES permits.
All site work within each of these borrow pits is complete.
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
Wilmington Regional Office (WRO) , conducted an inspection of borrow
pits 2, 3, and 10 on 27 May 2015. All borrow pits were considered to
be in compliance. Copies of these inspection reports are included as
Enclosures (3) and (4) .
If you have any questions or need any clarification on the
information provided, contact Lauren Acosta, Environmental Quality
Branch, Environmental Management Division, G-F, at [phone].
Sincerely,
OHN R. TOWNSON
(111--
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding General
Enclosure(s) : 1. Permit NC0089061 Cover Page
2. Permit NC0089079 Cover Page
3 . NPDES Compliance Inspection Report for Borrow
Pits 2 & 3
4. NPDES Compliance Inspection Report for Borrow
Pit 10

AV
NCDINit
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R.van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
May 28,2015
Mr.Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Subject:NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Borrow Pit 10
Bougainville Dr,MCB Camp Lejeune
NPDES Individual Permit No.NC0089079
Dear Mr.Paul;
A site inspection was conducted for Borrow Pit 10 located off Bougainville Drive in Camp Lejeune. I
conducted the inspection on May 27,2015 and met on site with Mike Taylor from EMD and Carl Owen from
ROICC. The Division of Water Resources(Division)appreciates the assistance and information provided by
both Mike Taylor and Carl Owen during the inspection procedure.
The borrow pit is covered under an NPDES individual Permit NC 0089079 for discharges of wastewater
associated with wet mining/dewatering. It Is my understanding that during the mining of the pit,there was
no discharge to Northeast Creek. It is also my understanding that the pit is now reclaimed(although you •
still will have to officially close it out with the Division of Energy,Mining and Land Resources).
I have enclosed a copy of the inspection details. At this time,you are considered to be in compliance and
the Wilmington Regional Office recommends and supports Camp Lejeune requesting a rescission of the
NPDES Permit NC0089079. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 910.796.7306. i will be glad to assist you. I have also enclosed a copy of the
inspection report.
Sin ely
oanne Steenhuis
Senior Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section •
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDENR
Enclosure:inspection report
127 Cardinal Drive Extension,Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
Phone:[phone]\Internet:www.ncdenr.aov •
M Equal OppoMrilyl Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper
Enclosure(4)

A
Permit NC0088081 owner•Facility: MCe Camp Leieune Borrow Pits 2 end 3
Inspootton Dole: 05/28/2015 Mepectton Type: CompSence Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NR
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 ❑ II ❑
application?
Is the facility as described In the permit? ❑ ❑ 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • ❑ 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: The sites are borrow pits and site 2 was partially cleared,but the pit was not excavated.
•
Page# 3
Enclosure(3)

united States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washiplca,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040.0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires8.31.98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Codo NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fao Type
1 („ I 2 I5 I 3 I N00089070 111 121 15/05/27 117 181„I 19 I c I 201
21I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 111I I I I I I re
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 QA Reserved•-••• •-----
t37 1 70I3 I 71 I I 72 I ,J, 1 "1 I 174 75� 1 1 1 1 1 1 183
Section B:Facility Data L
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,91s0 include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 00:40AM 16/06/27 11/08/01
MCB Camp LeJeune Borrow Pit 10
Brewster Blvd •
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Camp LeJeuno NC 28542 10:00AM 15/05/27 18/07/31
Name(s)of Onsite Representeitve(s)/TIles(a)/Phone end Fax Number(s) Other Facility Date
Name,Address of Responsible Offlcial/rtlle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Neal Pau1,1005 Michael Rd Camp LeJeune NC 28547252IIDeputy Public Works
Offiicer/910-451-2212/ No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
111 Permit II Facility Site Review
•
Section 0:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names)and SIgnalure(e)of nspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Joanne H Steenhuls WRO WQlll 4-i2a)f/
Signature of Manage :ni 0 A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone end Fax Numbers Date
James Gregson r_..W1ROWQ/// 6.5 ;�t�.-
EPA Form 3680.3(R•!-94)Previous editions are obsolete.
•
Page# 1
Enclosure(4)

A
PermIt: NC0089079 Owner•Facility: MCB Camp Le}6une Borrow Pit 10
Inspection Date: 0 512 112 0 1 6 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
permit Yes No NA Nq
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ � ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ❑ ❑ I ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The area Is a borrow pit and it is not fenced off.
Pagafl 3
Enclosure(4)

4
Scardina, Maureen
Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Original Message
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM
To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen
Cc: steven.whitedOusmc.mil
Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns. Thanks
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office
Original Message
From: Whited CIV Steven J 1mailto:steven.whitedOusmc.milj
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Hunkele, Dean
Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Dean,
Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information below regarding
the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like to suspend reporting until we
get a better idea on when the dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits.
Please advise.
v/r
Steven
Original Message
From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East 1mailto:lonny.sleeperPnavy.mill
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:40 AM
To: Whited CIV Steven J
Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai; Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair, Joseph; Wright,
Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Steve,
The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3 and 10) are
currently not dewatering and managing the water by pumping to cells within the existing pits.
Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present time.
When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that a request for
the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations will begin be submitted to them.
As of today the contractor has developed a plan which is not requiring any dewatering and
with no definite date when the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated.
Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the request for
authorization to construct is requested?
For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with that contractor on
how they plan to operate that area.
1

ArCIA
NCDENR •
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 4, 2012
Mr. Lonny Sleeper
MCB Camp Lejeune
OICC MCI East
1005 Michael Rd
Camp Lejeune, N.C. 28547-2521
Subject: Waiver of Monthly Reporting Requirement
NPDES Permits NC0089061 & NC0089079
Borrow Pits 2 & 3/Borrow Pit 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Sleeper:
The Division has reviewed your request to suspend submission of monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs).
After consideringthe recommendations of the staff in the Wilmington Regional Office, I have agreed to
g � �'
waive the requirement to submit monthly DMRs for the subject facilities, effective January 1, 2012. The
DMRs up through (and including)December 2011 should be submitted as usual.
Be advised that if and when any wastewater discharge occurs, the discharge must be monitored as per the
terms of the NPDES permits and other applicable rules or statutes. Please keep the Wilmington Regional
Office apprised of any pertinent developments that arise regarding either facility, especially if the
discharge is re-activated.
While requirements for operator visitation, monitoring and reporting are being waived, you are still
required to pay the Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee that is associated with this and
all NPDES permits.
If you have any questions, or if you wish to request rescission of either permit, contact Charles H. Weaver
at 919 807-6391.
• Since•ely,
(/:(
Coleen H. Sullins •
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office/Dean Hunkele
NPDES Files
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 North Salisbury Street,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] I FAX [phone]/Internet:www.ncwaterquality.org • Naturally
•
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

♦ •
Weaver, Charles
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM
To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns.
Thanks
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office Division
of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section http://www.ncwaterquality.org/
Direct Phone: (910) 796-7387
Main Phone: (910) 796-7215
Fax: (910) 350-2004
Address : 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends call
The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Original Message
From: Whited CIV Steven J [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Hunkele, Dean
Subject : FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Dean,
Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information
below regarding the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like
to suspend reporting until we get a better idea on when the
dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits. Please advise.
v/r
Steven
Original Message
From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9 :40 AM
To: Whited CIV Steven J
Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai; Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair,
Joseph; Wright, Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV
NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
1
Il -

Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Steve,
The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3
rcurrentlynot dewateringand managing the water bypumping to
and 10) are g g p p g
cells within the existing pits . Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present
time.
When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that
a request for the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations
will begin be submitted to them. As of today the contractor has developed a
plan which is not requiring any dewatering and with no definite date when
the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated.
Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the
request for authorization to construct is requested?
For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with
that contractor on how they plan to operate that area.
If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me.
V/r,
Lonny Sleeper
LT, CEC, USN
Project Engineer
OICC MCI East
Camp Lejeune, NC
(0) 910 .451 .2581 ext 5272
(C) 910 .376 .0074
(F) 910 .451.5899
(DSN) 751.2581 ext 5272
2

Or SLOW'COUNTY p�
NORTH CAROLINA i T'
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of County and State of said publisher, duly commissioned, qualified
and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared ,
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he (she) is Jimmy Williams, Editor
(Owner, partner or other officer or employee authorized to make this affidavit)
of THEACARTERET PUBLISHING CO., INC., Carteret County, N.C., engaged in the publication of a news-
paper known as Tideland News, published, issued, and entered as second class mail in the Town of Swansboro,
in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice
or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Tideland News on the
following dates: 5/4/11 and that the said newspaper
in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
such publication,a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina.
This the 2nd day of June , 2011.
WA/ \)a2,12 —
C. _ Signature of person making affidavit
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 2nd day of June , 2011.
Notary Public
'mission expires August 24 2014

LEGAL NOTICES
•
Public Notice
North Carolina
Environmental ,
Management Commission/
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to
Issue a NPDES
Wastewater Permit
The North Carolina En-
vironmental Management
Commission proposes to
issue a NPDES wastewa-
ter discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below.
Written comments re-
garding the proposed,per-
mit .will be accepted until
30 days after the publish
date of this notice. The Di-
rector of the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) may
hold a public hearing
should there be a signifi-
cant degree of public inter-
est. Please mail comments me
information re-
quests to DWQ at the
above address. Interested
persons may visit the
DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC to re-
view information on file.
Additional information on
NPDES permits and this
notice may be found on
our 'website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/wpb/w
q/swp/ps/npdes/calendar or
by calling(919)807-6304.
MCB Camp Lejeune re-
quested a new permit
NC0089079 for Borrow Pit
10 in Onslow County;.this
facility discharge is treated
groundwater to Northeast
Creek, White Oak River
Basin.
MCB Camp Lejeune re-
quested a new permit
NC0089061 for Borrow
Pits 2 and 3 in Onslow
County; this facility dis-
charge is treated ground-
water to Northeast Creek,
White Oak River Basin.,
My4

•
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretar
y
June 23, 2011
Mr. Carl Baker,Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune,North Carolina 28542
Subject: Issuance of NPDES
Permit NC0089079
Borrow Pit 10
Onslow County
Facility Class I
Dear Mr. Baker:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for a new permit. Accordingly,we are
forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
This Final Permit includes the following major changes from the Draft Permit:
• The daily maximum TSS limit has been increased to 15 mg/L.
If any parts,measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable
to you,you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt
of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes,and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 One •
Phone:[phone]\FAX:[phone]\Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet:www.ncwaterquality.org /
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer Naturally i� �/�tura"/y

Please.note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance'of the permit. This permit does.not affect the legal requirements
to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit
that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Sergei Chernikov at
telephone number [phone].
Since-eh-,
oliotatc
oleen H. Sullins
cc: NPDES Files
Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office/ Surface Water Protection
Louise Slate([e-mail])
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]\Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 North C arol i n a
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org . Naturally Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

• h ►
Permit No.NC0089079
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
MCB Camp Lejeune
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Borrow Pit 10
Bougainville Drive
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County
to receiving waters designated as Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 2011.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2016.
Signed this day June 23, 2011.
leen H. Sullins, Director
ez4f Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

yy 1 1
Permit No.NC0089079
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pit 10
is hereby authorized to:
1. Upon receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Water
Quality, construct a 0.41 MGD groundwater treatment plant consisting of a
settling basin and pumps, located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pit 10,
Bougainville Drive, MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and
2. After submitting an Engineer's Certification, operate 0.41 MGD treatment
plant located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pit 10, Bougainville Drive, MCB
Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and
3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into Northeast Creek, which is classified as SC NSW HQW waters in the
White Oak River Basin.

U
µ
to 'i ..•w. f' .., '. ` �; .\ �'
C � fps t '
•__�Z!TE Zq f a 4-! ;
,: / 4 r '
BP-1Q M
4 Q BAG -- ------oRI wi
'0 w
'�o et i.
ens►LONE sT E SPA o
,_ Ig INCHONSTREET ,
la
.00
.11 ...., . .:..
t
°i ' ? Z
m s1
N
.. 4) 4.- 1....or . .e4g--,.:: , ': . ,.. ,i9,'"A p,;;N- AigrA-4..4).4 ,s,;6 8
..........„. ....,,,,, ..., .,
ti,
•
rft_i
NC0089079 -,Borrow Pit 10
Facility :
Outfall#: 010 Location
Latitude: 34°43'36"
Longitude: 7°22'01" M C B Camp
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Stream Class: SC-NSW HQW Le sane Onslow County
Subbasin: 03-06-02 Map
River Basin: White Oak
✓��'�4 not to scale
Hydrologic Unit: 03020301

Permit No.NC0089079
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until
expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 010. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[PCS Code] Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample
Average Maximum Frequency Location
Flow 0.41 MGD Weekly Instantaneous Effluent
[50050]
pH > 6.8 and<8.5 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent
[00400]
Total Suspended Solids 10.0 mg/L 15.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent
[C0530]
Temperature(°C) Weekly Grab Effluent
[00010]
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than
trace amounts.

'ONSLOW COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
t
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned,a Notary Public of County and State of said publisher, duly commissioned,qualified
and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared ,
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he(she) is Jimmy Williams, Editor
(Owner,partner or other officer or employee authorized to make this affidavit)
of THE CARTERET PUBLISHING CO., INC., Carteret County, N.C., engaged in the publication of a news-
paper known as Tideland News,published,issued, and entered as second class mail in the Town of Swansboro,
in said County and State; that he (she)is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice
or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Tideland News on the
following dates: 5/4/11 and that the said newspaper
in which such notice,paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
such publication,a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina.
This the 2nd day of June , 2011.
I \ a2,t,t..,------'
IAA")
�� Signature of person making affidavit
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 2nd day of June , 2011.
k.,( -C 'Th ` ( dle
Notary Public
My commission expires August 24, 2014

Note to File
MCB Camp Lejeune,Borrow Pit 10
Permit NC0089079
The proposed permit is for dewatering a borrow pit to construct the Base Entry point and road at
MCB Camp Lejeune.Projected flow is based on the conservative assumption of the dewatering the
entire pit. Operationally,the pit will be excavated in cells,which will decrease the discharge because
some of the water will be stored in other cells.
The discharge will be to the Northeast Creek,which is classified SC NSW HQW.Therefore,the
TSS limit of 10 mg/L will be applied. The groundwater analysis indicated that organic contaminant
are not present.
The permits are needed for limited time period until construction projects are completed.

•
•
Chernikov, Sergei
From: Slate, Louise [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:17 PM
To: Chernikov, Sergei
Subject: Figure for borrow pit 10
Attachments: figurel_BP10.pdf
Sergei,
Here is the figure for Borrow Pit 10.
Borrow Pit 10
Lat 34 43'36" N Long 77 22'01"W
Louise O. Slate, PE, LEED AP I Senior Engineer I Environmental Department
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
3301 Atlantic Avenue I Raleigh, North Carolina
Office 919.876.0416 I Direct 919.831.8006 I Fax [phone]
Email loslate(cilmactec.com I Web www.mactec.com
1

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number NCOO
Please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name Commanding Officer, US Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
Facility Name MCB Camp Lejeune
Mailing Address Public Works Division PSC Box 20005
City Camp Lejeune
State / Zip Code NC, 28542
Telephone Number 910-451-2213
Fax Number 910-451-2927
e-mail Address [e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road Brewster Boulevard
City MCB Camp Lejeune
State / Zip Code NC 28542
County Onslow
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Carl Baker, Public Works Division, MCB Camp Lejeune
Mailing Address 1005 Michael Road
City Camp Lejeune
State / Zip Code NC, 28542
Telephone Number 910-451-2213
Fax Number 910-451-2927
ELigig wi
4. Ownership Status: n
JAN272011
Page 1 of 5 C-MI 10/08
'°-W4T ER QUALITY
'�, i �;0URCE BRANCH

•
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Federal ® State ❑ Private ❑ Public ❑
5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s): 1442
6. Number of employees: N/A
7. Describe the treatment system List all installed waste treatment components with capacities,
describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space provided is not sufficient attach a
separate sheet of paper with the system description.
As part of dewatering borrow pit 10, groundwater will be pumped to a stilling basin and
discharged into Northeast Creek. If necessary, pumped groundwater will be run through a silt
bag to reduce TSS before being otherwise treated and discharged.
8. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitation guidelines? No ❑ Yes
If yes, specify the category? 40 CFR 436 C
9. Principal product(s) produced: mineral soil for roadway fill
Principal raw material(s) consumed: no materials consumed in pit
Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es):
The borrow pit will be excavated to a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. Pits may be excavated in
a series of cells to manage groundwater. Groundwater discharge will be pumped from cells to cell or
from the cells to a stilling basin equipped with a skimmer and discharged to Northeast Creek.
Suitable soils excavated from the borrow pits will be used to construct the road bed for the Base Entry
Point and Road. Unsuitable soils will be spoiled within the borrow pit area and permanently stabilized
according to the approved plans. Side slopes of the borrow pits will be 3:1 down to the groundwater
table and then will be 2:1 to the bottom of the pit.
Page 2 of 5 C-MI 10/08

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
10. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed
(List specific amounts consumed and/or units of production over the last three years)
Product Produced or Raw Material Product Produced or Raw Material
Consumed Consumed
(AVERAGE) (PEAK)
per Day 1,000 CY 1,500 CY
per Month 20,000 CY 25,000 CY
per Year 175,000 CY 175,000 CY
11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ® Intermittent ❑
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only
Discharge Flow
(GALLONS PER DAY)
Sanitary - monthly average none
Utility water, etc. - monthly average none
Process water - monthly average none
Stormwater-monthly average none
Other-monthly average
Explain: Groundwater from borrow pit
Monthly Average 410,000 gpd or less -> 12,300,000 gal/month
total discharge (all types)
13. Number of separate discharge points: 1 Outfall Identification number(s) 10
14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude):
Northeast Creek
Page 3 of 5 C-MI 10/08

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges]
Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shall be grab samples,for all other parameters 24-hour
composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average.
If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
NOTE:Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLY for the parameters
currently monitored. Summarize the past 3 years of effluent data.
Parameter Daily Monthly Units of
Maximum Average Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (GODS)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Total Organic Carbon
Total Suspended Solids 10 10 mg/1
Ammonia as N
Temperature (Summer)
Temperature (Winter)
pH 6-9 6-9
Fecal Coliform (If sanitary waste is
present)
Total Residual Chlorine (if chlorine is
used)
16. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit
numbers or check none if not applicable):
Permit
Type Permit Number Type Number
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) none NESHAPS (CAA) none
UIC (SDWA) none Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) none
NPDES *NCG010000 Dredge or fill (Section 404 or 2010-00436
PSD (CAA) none Other
Non-attainment program none
*ONSLO-2010-104 ESCP-Stormwater Discharge for Construction Activities
17. List any chemicals that may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential
amounts.)
No chemicals are anticipated to be discharged.
Page 4 of 5 C-MI 10/08

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
18. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
19. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed name of erson Signing Title
Oixe + J /_ //
Signature of Applicant Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than$25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
Page 5 of 5 C-MI 10/08

•
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
1. Determination that proposed discharge is allowed
Several potential restrictions exist to wastewater discharge to surface waters. These are:
• Zero flow stream restrictions
• Receiving stream classification restrictions
• Basinwide Water Quality Plans
• Impaired waters and TMDLs
• Presence of endangered species
Borrow pit 10 for construction of the new Base Entry Point and Road at Marine Corps Base(MCB)Camp
Lejeune are proposed to discharge to Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin,Onslow County.
The drainage area of Northeast Creek at the discharge points is approximately 50 square miles.
Northeast Creek is a tidally affected stream up to the highway 24 road crossing,approximately 1.5 miles
upstream of the discharge points. There are no zero flow stream restrictions on Northeast Creek.
Northeast Creek(19-16-(3.5)) is classified as an SC, HQW, NSW. It is also classified as a primary nursery
area (PNA). According to 15A NCAC 02B .0224(1) (b) (ii), new or expanded wastewater discharges in
High Quality Waters have limitations on discharges of total suspended solids (TSS)of 10 mg/I for trout
waters and PNAs and 20 mg/I for all other High Quality Waters. Based on this Rule, effluent is limited to
10 mg/I for TSS.
Basinwide Water Quality Plans for the White Oak River Basin indicate that Northeast Creek is part of the
New River watershed,which is contained entirely within Onslow County. It drains portions of Hoffman
State Forest,the City of Jacksonville,the Village of White Oak, and MCB Camp Lejeune. The discharge
points for dewatering borrow pit 10 is located on Northeast Creek between ambient monitoring stations
PA 10 and PA 11. This is near the transition from impaired to non impaired water quality status for
aquatic life. The stream reach upstream of PA 10 at Highway 24 is rated impaired to its headwaters.
According to the state 303(d) list, Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)a is listed as impaired for aquatic life in
non-shellfish harvesting waters due to low pH and chlorophyll a and supporting for recreation.
Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)b is supporting for aquatic life. There is no TMDL developed for Northeast
Creek.
According to the 404/401 permit developed for the Base Entry Road,there are few Threatened/
Endangered (T/E) species in Northeast Creek. These are the manatee,American alligator,and short
nosed sturgeon. Of these manatee sightings are rare. Short nosed sturgeon sightings are historic,
meaning they have not been seen in over 50 years in this location. The manatee and short nosed
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting,Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis
1

sturgeon are subject to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The alligator is listed as
threatened due to similarity of appearance. It is not subject to section 7 of the ESA.
2. Projections for population and flow
The discharge request is not due to wastewater generated by domestic populations. This is limited to
wastewater discharge to dewater a borrow pit to construct the Base Entry Point and Road at MCB Camp
Lejeune. Therefore population projections are irrelevant to this discharge. Flow projections have been
conservatively developed. It was assumed that the entire borrow pit would be dewatered from one well
located in the center of the pit in order to excavate in the dry. Operationally,the pit will be excavated in
cells, which discharge less water because some water may be stored in other cells. Based on these
conservative calculations, a maximum of 410,000 GPD will be pumped from borrow pit 10.
3. Evaluate technically feasible alternatives.
Borrow pit 10 is intended to be used for two years during the construction of the Base Entry Road at
MCB Camp Lejeune. This is not intended to be a permanent discharge. Once the borrow pit has been
excavated to its design depth, it is intended to be graded so there is a 3:1 slope or flatter down to the
water line and a 2:1 slope or platter below the water line. It will then be permanently stabilized in place.
No additional pumping from this pit is anticipated. Alternatives to be considered include connecting to
an existing wastewater treatment system, land application,wastewater reuse, direct discharge,and a
combination of alternatives.
It is not considered feasible to connect fresh groundwater from a borrow pit to an existing wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP). Adding too much freshwater would impair the media (i.e. kill the bugs) used
in digesting domestic wastewater. Furthermore, a new sewer line would need to be constructed to tie
the borrow pits to the existing sanitary sewer lines. The cost to direct this water from the borrow pits to
the WWTP on base is not supported by the short term nature of the dewatering operations, nor does
this quantity of freshwater into the system support the ability of the WWTP to treat domestic
wastewater.
Land application is not feasible. MCB Camp Lejeune currently does not have a permit to land-apply, nor
is there suitable land nearby where it could be applied because large spray areas are required. The land
surrounding the borrow pits is used for military operations. It is a shorter distance and less cost to
discharge to Northeast Creek than to an area that may be suitable to land-apply.
In general,wastewater reuse is not feasible because there is insufficient demand for the quantity of
water that will be removed from the borrow pits in the dewatering process. With that being said, some
of the water from the borrow pits could be used to control dust or moisten the soil as part of the road
bed construction process. Using water from the borrow pits for this operation conserves potable water
for domestic use on Base.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting,Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis
2

Direct discharge is the most feasible option. Dewatering is intended to keep the construction site
cleaner and operations running smoother by excavating fill material in the dry rather than in the wet.
The pollutant of greatest concern is total suspended sediment (TSS). To limit TSS, discharge will be
pumped from cells within the borrow pit to a stilling basin and from there to the bank of Northeast
Creek. Before the water is discharged into Northeast Creek, it will be run through a sediment filter bag
which will serve as another level of treatment and as a means of dispersing the flow and slowing it down
before it enters the creek. If necessary PAM can be added to the stilling basin to encourage settling of
sediment and produce cleaner discharge.
4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
If discharge were to be pumped to the WWTP serving MCB Camp Lejeune, a 6-inch force main would be
required to carry 285 gpm from the borrow pits to the sanitary sewer trunk line. This connector
provides a full flow velocity in the pipe of 3.2 ft/sec and a friction loss of 0.643 feet/100 feet. This
system would require additional design cost and a wastewater extension permit in addition to the
construction cost. Typical construction cost for an 6-inch ductile iron force main would average
approximately$36.50 per linear foot (source R.S. Means estimating guide 22"d annual edition—2007).
In addition to cost,this process could add months to the schedule, potentially causing construction
delays. Adding this much freshwater to the WWTP could also be detrimental to treatment of domestic
wastewater.
Land application of wastewater from the borrow pits is not feasible for several reasons. First, a geologic
study is required to ensure soils are suitable for infiltration and that there is enough separation between
the soil surface and seasonal high water table. A permit to land apply wastewater is required and a
spray irrigation system would have to be designed. The permit and design process is estimated to cost
$50,000. In order to dewater 285 gpm seven days a week,two big spray irrigation guns are needed at a
cost of$40,000 per gun. Assuming 1 inch of wastewater can be applied per week, 105 acres are needed
for this volume of water. Even if soil infiltration capacity is such that it can handle more than 1 inch per
week, a very large area is required for the spray field. Large tracts of land are not readily available near
the borrow pits so significant cost and effort would be needed to pipe the water from the borrow pit to
the spray field and these areas would not be available for military tactical operations for a period of
time,which is detrimental to the mission of MCB Camp Lejeune.
The most economically feasible option is discharging into Northeast Creek. Costs related to this option
include the cost of pumping and maintaining the pump and associated intake and discharge lines,the
stilling basin, and maintenance of the sediment filter bag at the end of the pipe serving as both a filter
and a level spreader. A potential cost is for polyacrylamide (PAM) application in the stilling basin to
encourage more settling of TSS.
Of these three options, discharging water from the borrow pits into Northeast Creek has the lowest
capital cost by far and lower recurring costs.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting,Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis
3

Q/
Ili
41
o,
a J
Q
3
O c..)
DO
a
a)
c
w
c
0
CJ
C
7
O O
3 w.
co O N
= C O h - co co Ln CO co N O) 1- LO CO CO 1` — N '— O � � CO N CO C) N a0 N- O c0 — CA
.a LO N (70 V CO N N �t co - co Ln — co C) co C) — Lo — co in O co Lc? ti N- 1` ti Lo � ,- C))
w, 'a to 'N N ti (O O Ln N Cn N- Ln (-6 .- e- 4 O N 4 .- O (A 00 (O in ti CA O .- N M 4 Lo CO ti O o0
E a) Cp '— ti CO CO LO LO V *CT CT 'CT M N N
a , , , , , , , , , .
C a (n C h
�j E m—_ o
N a0 cc in N M CO - - Cn O (`') N O O � CO N '71- N- CO Cn L() CA N LO .- O CO .- CO N-
th ` .0 3 O LO N LT) M O Cn ti C) CO LO CO N O CO N O C) O CO O CO �t CA N LO CO N- I.- CO Ln C0 CO
.--, a) -p C7) C, 'N 1` O Ln N O t` M ,- ,- co co 1` N O O ,- M 4 in f` 00 O , N CO Ln co co co
Q.
N U) O C_ O `,O co in co �t V M M M M M N .- .- ' ' ' .- ,- ,- .- N N N N N N N N N N
EZT L C t a O 13 i i i i i i i i i
7_ CC �0 O E y
a — I-- n E -co Cn 7a o) co
L.
O CY) a pd) CM O E C LO O N I's LO N O CO CO COO Ln d' CO 0) CO CO CO MCA N c0 O CO .4 LO N LO CO N 1- CO 0) N co co
a •� .. CC) C C O co •co coLUO1- NCO0NCDCONLU (OO .ctNCONCO ' .- 1- Ln1— COO) - MCMMNN— Oh LO
C O C 00 .5 '�ct O O N 00 N O 1` U) 4 M N O M Ln 1� ti C) ,- - co (f) CO 1` CA O ,- N CO LO LO CO
0 O E . O ' O M M N N N N M M M M M M
G x .- �.5 l o Cn
_ to
N
CO O •C E .0 o .- CA CO CO N O O N I-- (T O CO N CA LC') CO CT O N CO ,- CO CO (O CO CO LO O
p E y t� c Cp II II II N ap N Q. co. N 0 Q. co. 'cr. O N N- 7 Cr). N O M 7 N M N a0 N (O (O O O O CA C°. CO N
CD 7 C O co 0 d U) -� - e- in co N. N O .- M co co O co En 1` a0 co ,- N d' Ln CO f` CA O O , N M 4
111
O a d c E to CO CO N ,- .- ' .- N N N CO CO CO CO M CO LO LO L(� LO L(� LO LO CO CO CD CO CO CO
0 II II II II II II co
jII
N rn Cn 0 I- .. t- (A
M .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a °4 N — N M �t to (O ti 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co O O O O co O Ln O in O co O co O Ln O Lo
co — II
O co .- N M LO CO ti N- CO CA O O N Ln 1` O N LO 1` O N LO 1` O N
= O j y N N N N M M M r LO LO
73 O
CO
a
a)
a i-
a to 2
i

Borrow Area 10
based on Driscoll correlation with density from split-spoon
k= 106.5 gpd/ft^2 sampling
T=k*b b= 40 ft based on NCDENR hydro framework database
T= 4260 gpd/ft
T= 4260 gpd/ft Driscoll
If center of pit well
Need 10 ft of drawdown minimum
Further distance from pit is NW corner near C & D', approx. 780 ft
Therefore:
A = 4500 ft
B = 780 ft
C = 9780 ft (2xA+B)
With pumping at 285 gpm
Drawdown at B= 10.31
Drawdown at C= no discernible
So theoretical drawdown (B-C) = 10.31
Note: negative drawdown values indicate no measureable drawdown is expected at these locations
Reference:
Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd edition. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MN, 1089 p.

` I ' Legend
•
• ,
f_ , .' re11 � Outfall Location
�� IT
�„ 1 1`s Roads ,
ti
11
• :i ,a 1 _Pr I' 40, a Borrow Pit Boundary
`` : ! F1 Camp Lejeune Boundary
N ,,TE
1 . _ a •
NC ROUTE '' f
24 -1 - !-
•N'Ill , - ''' '-' .2' ..1 1 i / r• war ii... ,_
O BOVGgINVILL
o E RIVE
W
p .,
C� O
j; �x - -
O w (
�') PSILON P\QPr1 j
\110, •
Cy , SET O _ Q
q� O`��ti y 70
'Z y INCHON STREET
7y O< v ,�i, Ii
�° € it �`'
�" o 0 9P 4.
O
OqO
E '", .3- 4 N'90 D
a) ` . Outfall 10 0 _ '
x
N
a
3
0
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND-MIDATLANTIC
m
'm
FY10 MCON PROJECT 1382
BASE ENTRY ROAD
of - •' ' ~�' ! BP-10 OUTFALL TO NORTHEAST CREEK
E Source: USDA: ,' „ ,;..<..
Natural Resources Conservation Service
6 s, 6 ._1, . CAMP LEJEUNE-JACKSONVILLE,ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0 1,000 2,000 FIGURE 1 JANUARY 2011
a Feet ,

. 2 1 3 ► 4 l • 5
NAD 83/NSRS 2007 ; _ •
�:lli
.�o��
iis:ear
d w. /Ilk 1 -iii. _ _ NI.— \ • .
•
.1
RIP RAP STILLING 'A.7 .f•
\\.. - .
BASIN OUTLET :A `,$\ STABILIZED RANCE
k
4" �� ��`4t(% !N DEW
AY CO UCTE T"MOU ALENT)
J :?..,4: `�•� LE = 131
STILLING POND :1-...-:. (PHASE I
W/SKIMMER : : N `�.�-a�-L=ei.6_1n;- `'si.----d, 9t-9L-a- � - =�='-o;=- CONSTRUCTION) r
m
DISCHARGE .X.: - ��� •. 04 02:58 P -20-2011
5'X45'(APPROX) •4 . •
SEE DETAILS ,� l ��- . ' as� ti
.5: . -.,ram _-- ^' Erin
�� 25'UN-EXCAV —s•, �.. ` � c�y.. �. � _ ����t••
ER 4� ozeau
x:'x: AT D BU
�' :f:r: FF== -_— _ `•--- t P ,--- Sib \\ f f4GINEti'r
--.‘r ...-,V -1111k
I'li 4:j`is ! fi � \ -
II e: EXCAVATION A ` • v. l
.:is :. EXCAVATION AREA ' t o _' !� *'. N�.•` 4.�
EXCAVATION AREA ''••'� : RI' 'AP STILLING +u�.
oh •i I l5 B IN OUTLET ` ati ` ^-��N.
p- 417.-
,,,..„-z.......„,,
''s 2 p ,'y Vw F-st . V , MACTEC I RKBK JV
STABILIZED STILLING POND �` ��: �� �' .
ENTRANCE '' ' W/SKIMMER ''
I6 l,4i p114.- 0':a:
-41-
DISCHARGE `'
15'X45'(APPROX) • 1 Wo4111
j/
/5 DETAILS
, \) \-
PHASE 1/ P13831 -
GATE 1 138 STORM 'vb' `- '
Nikle,- \ - 1
,l -- - 4 ILA
u
B
' �f __________________________ �� g
l5 r: � FUTLIF?E GATE COMPLEX �;' 0
\ z
..........................................
25'UN-EXCAVATED /% •PERMIT :sUNDARY .. -i' \ r = CV a
BUFFER (TYP.) f' NEW BASE ENTRY ROAD t O i
M CI-
EN
- NOTES: e\ O L.
d ROADWAY REMOVED FROM PUBLIC) ��1,\ V Z O
., ACCESS IN PHASE I AND AVAILABLE /,% I. WATER HANDLED BY THE STILLING BASIN AND SKIMMER IS PRIMARILY 6. CONTRACTOR HAS OPTION TO USE GATE COMPLEX STORMWATER POND ik\ w
+_ AS HAUL ROAD. . PUMPED GROUNDWATER (NOT STORMWATERI TO FACILITATE EXCAVATION AFTER IT'S COMPLETION IN PHASE II. POND TO BE RETURNED TO DESIGN NO:\ 0 0
o f'..: r. BELOW WATER TABLE. CONDITION UPON COMPLETION OF BORROW ACTIVITIES. •...•.\ W O :i
LEGEND
n PER :OUNDARY ;r1.4
7
� 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE WATER WITHIN THE PIT ITSELF TO THE 7. SITE IS LOCATED IN ONSLOW COUNTY.NORTH CAROLINA `� Z 3 ��
m ( :.'S AC) mr EXTENT POSSIBLE USING TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS.IF WATER MUST BE �� W E m s
o - 'p TEMP HAUL ROAD 07 AC) • iN PUMPED FROM PIT TO SPECIAL STILLING BASIN.CONTRACTOR SHALL 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB THE AREA WITHIN THE PERMIT 2 Z 0
Y1' SEE NOTE 5 ;f PROTECT THE PUMP INLET (WET WELL OR SIMILAR)TO MINIMIZE BOUNDARY LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BASE ENTRY ROAD (P1382) m
e �'' ENTRAINED SEDIMENT. SPECIFICATIONS. 6 •\
A ' 4 LL
m 3. SKIMMER ORIFICE TO BE SIZED BY CONTRACTOR USING NORTH CAROLINA 9. GROUNDWATER OR PRE-TREATED GROUND AND STORMWATER WITHIN THE A
m
0 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MANUAL DESIGN GUIDELINES PIT WHICH MEETS THE WATER DUALITY CRITERIA CAN BE DISCHARGED < _
o STABILIZES ENTRANCES USING PUMP RATE AS DETERMINED IN THE FIELD VIA A TEMPORARY STILLING BASIN OR SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IN ACCORDANCE Z
WITH DETAILS.THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE CLEAN AND SEDIMENT LADEN
4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING WATER IN COMPLIANCE WATER STREAMS FROM MIXING.AND REDUCING THE LOAD ON THE STILLING BASINS. "S
WITH THE NC GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT CRITERIA .NIa.NO
' /0. POND ELEVATION WILL FLUCUATE WITH CHANGING GROUND WATER -"`••••
3 L - 5. TEMPORARY ROAD TO BE RELOCATED AS NECESSARY DURING PHASE II LEVELS AND STORMWATER EVENTS. W�125593a2C
L f/ TO ACCOMODATE GATE COMPLEX STORMWATER POND CONSTRUCTION. a: -
,aa CG403
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 1 5

1 .
C I 3 a
, _
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN . , ,
,,,.
FILTER BAG ) 1 .,
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD ,,I —
Existing Ground
A 6" i57 STONE IN ACCORDANCE Special Stilling Basin
WITH SECTION 1005 OF NC DOT
k:P;9',g „d,.¢,� STANDARD SPECIFICATION
��� �.? •,,,( Existing Terrain
• # �� CROSS PIPE(S): SIZE 03:SS:OSP 1-20-2011.,
*4,.. a i DETERMINED BY (-OS'
, i
0$' 4 4 CONTRACTOR / r'FESS/
rkfti
i '•�t ,� �+J // ---�� / f 1 028447
C - // _t •1��r,F.t00".0`�ir t - - / ' ,. . .. e r �y. 'tiC FE�'r
Q FUN 11., �.� �' t�' 4 4 1 /1»`�;Jam_
l� , .6. ��s..,iegt...�_ tyot�� - 15.0' to 20.0'
-Ni
/ �'�1 F? 'k'�e/',`' r 1p/
STREAM CHANNEL -(/ F/ f ,_ I
s`'a A41
liv7 -- 8" of Sediment Control Stone
1310M'
CLASS 8 RIP RAP Cf..i ai*'�,�,`ik'.'_9� CLASS B RIP RAP Filter Fabric MACTEC/RKSK JV
—
Not To Scale
.-,...ar xer,<
NOTES:
1. Provide Stabilized Outlet to Existing Ground
2. Sediment bags should be sized based on the volume of OS
PLAN VIEW water being pumped (pump flow rate), quantity and type JRE
of sediment and the permittivity of the given bag size per SNN
manufacturer specifications.3. Consideration should also be given to location. (Steep MTM
C' sloped surfaces are typically not recommended as the bag _- B
U
12" MIN. 8,57 STONE, 6" DEPTH (MIN.) may roll.)
4. Each sediment bag can handle a 2", 3" or 4" discharge
NATURAL NATURAL hose. The hose can be placed along any edge by making zo
GROUND 'Mil GROUND a small incision into the fabric, inserting the hose and then
1
l 0:1 clamping the fabric to the hose via wire, ties, clamp, rope
"'� - . -. or similar to create a good seal.
5. To improve surface area and performance of the bag, r w. vi
J
place it on a permeable/porous surface such as hay bales, CY.CVI
a
CLASS B RIP RAP aggregate or similar. Take care to select a media that will d w
not damage the bag . use of a ground cloth can alleviate CD
c damage from occurring. a L,
- — CROSS PIPE(S) (SEE NOTE) 6. Care should always be taken to properly monitor 0 C c —
g FILTER FABRIC performance to ensure that pump rates or concentrations O Mi
nVAR of sediment are not excessive. Failure to do so may Z m z
o cause bag to fail. ec U H o
0: SECT ION A-A 7. Avoid multiple pipe discharges into one bag. One bag i m `�
per discharge is recommended. 0 Z
o MART» � B. Filtered water runoff from the bag should be dispersed. Z 3m Take care to avoid causing erosion. Ui 81 n
9. Replace sediment bag when capacity as defined by the W Z x
� W
NOTE: PIPE(S) manufacturer is reached. Properly dispose of used FOR TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PASS THE PEAK OR sediment bap off site. x
BANKFULL FLOW, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM A 2-YEAR PEAK STORM, WITHOUT OVER TOPPING. 10. Routinely inspect sediment bag when pumping to ,Vag
5 A ensure it is functioning properly. Replace bags that are A
m torn, at capacity, or otherwise not performing effectively.
y
"0ca
a
0 0
0
scuE, AS NOTED
EERPEtt.o., P-II82
vcomsmcomm
C1
.1K/4 dURf X4
aVc
12559371A
c
c sxEEr 68Ar^a 619
\aC CG530
5 1 5 1 5 .,.M, .n 200,

NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet ❑ Regular Addition
ID Discretionary Addition
Q Gp !JI 0'Sari change,but no
NPDES No.:I ILI 0 I.I SI 1 L L 1 •• status change
O Deletion
Facility Name:
1 SI 0 1$1$I.C2_1 VJ 1 IF'1_12 T1 I I IC)1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I
City: ICi AIM I 1 ILIef31EtUi Nit E-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t I i 1
Receiving water:114 1 0 i 4`1 Ti HI E.i/�1 S i :j IC 1 R.I C 1 EiJ j I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I
Reach Number.11 19 1 -1 I I Co 1—"ILI 3 f • 1 51 _I
Is this facility a steam electric power plant(SIC=4911) is this permit for a municipal separate storm sewer
with one or more of the following characteristics? serving a population greater than 100,000?
1.Power output S00 MW or greater(not using a cooling pond/lake)
2.A nuclear power plant 0 YES;score is 700(stop here)
3.Cooling water discharge greater than 25%of the receiving stream's 7Q10 flow rate ❑ NO(continue)
❑YES;score is 600 (stop here) arNO(continue)
FACTOR 1:Toxic Pollutant PotentialI PCS SIC Code: 1I_I_II Primary SIC Code: I 1 I` 1 L-1 ZI
Other SIC Codes: I_1_1_I_I 1_1I_II 11111 I1 1 1 1
Industrial Subcategory Code: 1 01 0 1 0 I (Code 000 If no subcategory)
Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A. Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one)
Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points
E No process ❑ 3. 3 15 ❑ 7. 7 35
waste streams 0 0 ❑ 4. 4 20 ❑ 8. 8 40
❑ 1. 1 5 ❑ 5. 5 25 ❑ 9. 9 45
❑ 2. 2 10 ❑ 6. 6 30 ❑10. 10 50
Code Number Checked: !0 IC) I
' Total Points Factor 1: 101 01
FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream Flow Volume (Cc:implote oitherSection A or Section 0:chock only ono)
Section A—Wastewater Flow Only Considered Section B—Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered
Wastewater Type Code Points Wastewater Type Percent of Instream Code Points
(See Instructions) (See instructions) Wastewater Concen-
Type I: Flow<5 MGD ❑ 11 0 tration at Receiving
Flow 5 to 10 MGD D 12 10 Stream Low Flow
Flow>10 to 50 MGD 0 13 20
Flow>50 MGD 0 14 30 TYPE I/III: <10% 0 41 0
Type II: Flow<1 MGD 0 21 10 2 10%to<50% 0 42 10
Flow 1 to 5 MGD ❑ 22 20
Flow>5 to 10 MGD ❑ 23 30 2 50% 0 43 20
Flow>10 MGD 0 24 50
/ Type II: <10% 0 51 0
Type III: Flow<1 MGD C9' 31 0
Flow 1 to 5 MGD 0 32 10 2 10%to<50% ❑ 52 20
Flow>5 to 10 MGD 0 33 20
Flow>10 MGD D 34 A 2 50% 0 53 30
Code Checked from Section A or B: 1 3 1 1 1
Total Points Factor 2: 10 1 01
1

,
NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
FACTOR 3:-Conventional Pollutants NPDES No.: I I I I I I I I ' -I- I
(only when limited by the permit)
A.Oxygen Demanding Pollutant(check one) ❑BOD ❑COD ❑Other:
Code Points
Permit Limits:(check one) ) <100 lbs/day . 1 0
C3 100 to 1000 lbs/day 2 5
CI >1000 to 3000 lbs/day 3 15
—. >3000 lbs/day 4 20
,Cside Checked•.T�!
Points Scored: IC?I b 1
B.Total Suspended Solids(TSS)
Code Points
Permit Limits:(check one) CI <100 lbs/day 1 0
100 to 1000 lbs/day 2 5
) >1000 to 5000 lbs/day 3 15
>5000 lbs/day 4 20
Code Checked: i 2-1
Points Scored: i0 I Si
C. Nitrogen Pollutant:(check one) ❑Ammonia ❑Other:
Nitrogen Equivalent Code Points
Permit Limits:(check one) G?- <300 lbs/day 1 0
O 300 to 1000 lbs/day 2 S
CI >1000 to 3000 lbs/day 3 15
C1 >3000lbs/day 4 20
Code Checked: I 1 I
Points Scared:i 0 I 0 I
Total Points Factor 3:1 n 151
FA
CTOR 4: Public Health Impact
is there o public drinking water supply located within S0 miles downstream of the effluent discharge(this Includes any body of
water to which the receiving water is a tributary)? A public drinking water supply may Include infiltration galleries,or other
methods of conveyance that ultimately get water from the above referenced supply.
(If yes,check toxicity potential number below)
U. NO(If no,go to Factor 5)
Determine the human health toxicity potential from Appendix A. Use the same SIC code and subcategory reference as In Factor 1. (Be
sure to use the human health toxicity group column—check one below)
Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ No process 0 3. 3 0 ❑ 7. 7 15
waste streams 0 0 ❑ 4. 4 0 ❑ B. 8 20
❑ 1. 1 0 ❑ 5. 5 5 0 9. 9 25
Cl 2. 2 0 0 6. 6 10 010. 10 30
Code Number Checked: i I_I
Total Points Factor 4: i_I_I
2

1
NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
. FACTOR 5:Water Quality Factors NPDES No.: IiIllIliII
A. Is(or will)one or more of the effluent discharge limits based on water quality factors of the receiving stream(rather than
technology-based federal effluent guidelines, or technology-based state effluent guidelines),or has a wasteload allocation
been assigned to the discharge?
Code Points
❑ Yes 1 10
Li,/ No 2 0
. B. Is the receiving water In compliance with appticabk water quality standards for pollutants that are water quality limited In
the permit?
Code Points
C3v Yes 1 0
O No 2 5
C. Does the effluent discharged from this facility exhibit the reasonable potential to violate water quality standards due to whole
effluent toxicity?
:_6, t Points
❑ vex 10
.;., Code Number Checked: A 1`2-1 B i t 1` C 1'2-I
Points Factor 5: AI 1 a1 + 8101 :.0(SD , 0:1 0iTOW.
FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters
A. Base Score:Enter flow code here(from Factor 2):13 1 ( I Enter the multiplication factor that corresponds
to the flow code: I C 10 l
Check appropriate facility HPRI Code(from PCS):
HPRI 0 Code HARI Score
Flow Code Multiplication Factor
❑ 1 1 20 11,31,or 41 0.00
0 2 2 0 12,32,or 42 0.05
13,33,cx43 0.10
IN 3 3 30 14 or 34 0.15
❑ 4 4 0 21 or51 0.10
22or52 0.30
❑ 5 5 20 23 or 53 0.60
HPRI code checked:13a I 24 1.00
Base Score: (HPRI Score) 30 x(Multiplication Factor) 0 0 (TOTAL POINTS)
B. Additional Points—NEP Program C. Additional Points—Great Lakes Area of Concern
For a facility that has an HPRI code of 3, does the facility For a fadllty that has an HPRI code of 5,does the facility
discharge to one of the estuarks enrolled in the National discharge any of the pollutants of concern into one of the
Estuary Protection(NEP)program(see instructions)or Great Lakes'31 areas of concern(see instructions)
the Chesapeake Bay?
Code Points Code Points
0 Yes 1 10 ❑ Yes 1 10
No 2 0 QV-No2 0
Code Number Checked: Ai 31 B 1 z-I r 1 7-4
Points Factor 6: A101Oi + BiOiOi t CiOiO? i 0 (TOTAL
3

•'
r
NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
SCORE SUMMARY NPDES No.: I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-
Factor Description Total Points
1 Toxic Pollutant Potential 0
2 Flow/Streamflow Volume 0
3 Conventional Pollutants 5
4 Public Health Impacts C)
S Water Quality Factors a
6 Proximity to Near Coastal Water
TOTAL(Factors 1 through 6)
Si.Is the total score equal to or greater than 80? ❑Yes(Facility is a major) allo
52. If the answer to the above question is no,would you like this facility to be discretionary major?
❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below:
Reason:
NEW SCORE: 5
OLD SCORE
Permit Reviewer's Name
L_I
Phone Number
Date
4

•
�QF W A TF9Q Beverly Eaves Perdue,Governor
0,< G Dee Freeman,Secretary
• North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
I
-c Coleen H.Sullins,Director
Division of Water Quality
April 8,2011
Mr. Carl Baker,Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune,North Carolina 28542
Subject: Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA)
Permit NC0089079
Permit NC0089061
Borrow Pits 2,3,and 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has reviewed your Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA) for
the Borrow Pits 2,3, and 10. The Division concurs with the conclusions and recommendations of the
EAA. The EAA you have submitted is sufficient to meet the Alternative Analysis requirements for a new
discharge.
The Division will now proceed to the permitting of the discharge. The entire permitting process may take
between 60 and 120 days. If the draft permits causes significant protests from local citizens,governmental
organizations,and/or environmental groups a public hearing may be scheduled and issuance of the final
permit may be further delayed. In some cases the Division may modify or deny the request for a new
permit based on the public hearing results.
If you have any questions about the NPDES permit process, contact me at the following e-mail address -
sergei.chernikov(a,ncdenr.gov,or telephone number 919-807-6393.
Sincerely,
Sergei Chernikov,Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
Complex NPDES Permitting Unit
cc: NPDES File
Wilmington Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
Louise Slater(e-mail copy)
MAC1EC Engineering and Consulting
3301 Atlantic Ave.,Raleigh,NC 27604
Mailing Address Phone[phone] Location NprthCaro1ina
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] 512 N.Salisbury St. A/at/trail,
ll,
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 Raleigh,NC 27604
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

Date: March 29, 2011
To: Sergei Chernikov
- ,t/P E S 9 Lao ,�
/
From: Linda Willis, Env. Eng., DWQ,SWPS 4(4.t.0_12a4_)
Through: Rick Shiver,Wilmington Regional Supervisor, DWQ,SWPS V" ,�(�---
Subject: NPDES Permit Applications NC0089079 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pit 10
And NC0089061 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3
NPDES Permit Applications were received by the Division of Water Quality for three borrow pits for coverage
under individual NPDES wastewater permits. Camp Lejeune proposes a discharge of 410,000 gallons per day of pit
wastewater to the Northeast Creek from borrow pit#10 and up to 720,000 gallons per day from borrow pits#2
and#3 collectively. The classification of Northeast Creek in the vicinity of the discharge is class SC, NSW, HQW.
The application for Pits 2 and 3 indicate a TSS daily discharge of 100 to 1000 lbs/day. The TSS will be restricted at
10 mg/L per day to meet HQW water quality limitations. This would result in less than 60 lbs/day TSS. The
discharge needs to occur in the main stem of Northeast Creek since the input of freshwater to the small tidal
creeks would change the nature of the receiving streams adversely, potentially preventing their function as a PNA.
Salinity in the creek(as well as the mainstem of Northeast Creek)ranges from 0.47 parts per thousand to 24 ppt
depending upon the tide.
The following considerations are offered:
1. The receiving waters are classified HQW(along with SC)since this area of the Cape Fear River is a Primary
Nursery Area. TSS should be limited to 10 mg/L daily maximum as well as monthly average. Temperature
and pH should be required for monitoring.
2. A means to sample the discharge from the settling basin needs to be provided since the outfall to the
Northeast Creek may be difficult to access for sampling purposes. A diffuser should be used at the end of
the pipe.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
DWQ CO Files
DWQ WiRO NPDES
Qr---
D
M AR 31 2011
DENFR-vvArER QU��H
POINT SOURCE B

•
PROJECT SUMMARY
Feasibility Study Estimate
For
Dewater Borrow Pits 2, 3, & 10
Camp Lejeune
Camp Lejeune, NC
Client: Owner: Cost Estimator:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Camp Lejeune Aiken Cost Consultants
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Camp Lejeune, NC 1010 East North Street
Charlotte, NC 29208 Greenville, SC 29601
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Connect to WWTP BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 221,110 $ 11,056 $ 232,166
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 332,776 $ 16,639 $ 349,415
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 490,276 $ 24,514 $ 514,789
Total Project $ 1,044,162 $ 52,208 $ 1,096,370
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Land Application BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 944,149 $ 47,207 $ 991,356
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 1,140,680 $ 57,034 $ 1,197,714
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 1,337,210 $ 66,861 $ 1,404,071
Total Project $ 3,422,039 $ 171,102 $ 3,593,141
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Water Reuse BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 236,970 $ 11,848 $ 248,818
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 208,150 $ 10,407 $ 218,557
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 373,865 $ 18,693 $ 392,558
Total Project $ 818,985 $ 40,949 $ 859,934
ACC Progr000ivo
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Direct Discharge BASE BID CONST CIO TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 105,631 $ 5,282 $ 110,912
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 132,802 $ 6,640 $ 139,442
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 127,367 $ 6,368 $ 133,736
Total Project $ 365,800 $ 18,290 $ 384,090
EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS
TOTAL PROBABLE BASE The projected cost to midpoint of construction including bidding
BID = premium.
CONST C/O = For budgeting purposes experience dictates that change orders during
construction are likely to add 5% to the ultimate cost of the project.
TOTAL = The total recommended budget including the non-competitive bidding
premium and construction change orders.
Project Notes / General Comments
This estimate has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted estimating practices and principles.
Aiken Cost Consultants' staff is available to discuss our methods, pricing, assumptions, or estimating philosophy
with any interested party. Please contact us by phone at [phone], by fax at [phone], or by e-mail
at [e-mail].
Aiken Cost Consultants estimates are intended to be used as a professional opinion of the probable cost of
construction, based on our understanding of the design at the time the estimate was prepared. We have no
control over General or Subcontractor overhead and profit percentages, bidding climates, schedules, contractor's
methods of determining prices, continuing design modifications or addenda, etc., therefore, we cannot guarantee
that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will be within a certain range of this, or subsequent, cost
estimates.
Individual line item pricing shown in the attached estimate reflects probable construction costs obtainable in the
geographic region of the project at the time this estimate was prepared. It assumes competitive bidding for every
portion of work, for all contractors. In order to compensate for the possibility of a poor, or unfavorable bidding
climate, a reduced number of bidders (both general and sub-contract), or other subjective factors beyond our
understanding, we have added a non-competitive bidding climate contingency to the bottom of the summary
sheet. We recommend that the owner and NE allow for this possibility through additive or deductive bid
alternates that equal or exceed that amount.
ACC Progressive
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

Aiken Cost Consultants 4/1/2011
Greenville, South Carolina 2:52 PM
MAC15 Dewater Borrow Pits 2, 3, & 10
Feasibility Study Estimate
DESCRIPTION
G SITEWORK
G10 BORROW PIT No. 2
G1010 Connect to Wastewater Treatment Plant
8" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System
Additional Design & Permitting
Additional Costs for Schedule Extensions/Delays
G1020 Land Application
8" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Irrigation Guns
Additional Design & Permitting
G1030 Water Reuse
Dewatering Pump
Trucking & Spraying Water
G1040 Direct Discharge
Intake& Discharge Piping
Excavating Trencher > 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System Maintenance
G20 BORROW PIT No. 3
G2010 Connect to Wastewater Treatment Plant
8" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System
Additional Design & Permitting
Page#7

Aiken Cost Consultants 4/1/2011
Greenville,South Carolina 2:52 PM
MACS Dewater Borrow Pits 2, 3, & 10
Feasibility Study Estimate
DESCRIPTION
Additional Costs for Schedule Extensions/Delays
G2020 Land Application
8" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher>24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Irrigation Guns
Additional Design & Permitting
G2030 Water Reuse
Dewatering Pump
Trucking & Spraying Water
G2040 Direct Discharge
Intake& Discharge Piping
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System Maintenance
G30 BORROW PIT No. 10
G3010 Connect to Wastewater Treatment Plant
6" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System
Additional Design & Permitting
Additional Costs for Schedule Extensions/Delays
G3020 Land Application
8" Ductile Iron Mech. Joint Pipe
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Irrigation Guns
Additional Design & Permitting
Page#8

Aiken Cost Consultants 4/1/2011
Greenville,South Carolina 2:52 PM
MAC15 Dewater Borrow Pits 2, 3, & 10
Feasibility Study Estimate
DESCRIPTION
G3030 Water Reuse
Dewatering Pump
Trucking & Spraying Water
G3040 Direct Discharge
Intake& Discharge Piping
9 P 9
Excavating Trencher> 24"wide&6' deep incl. backfill
Dewatering Pump
Filtration System Maintenance
PROJECT SUBTOTAL >
Page#9

PROJECT SUMMARY
Feasibility Study Estimate
For
Dewater Borrow Pits 2 & 3
Camp Lejeune
Camp Lejeune, NC
Client: Owner: Cost Estimator:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Camp Lejeune Aiken Cost Consultants
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Camp Lejeune, NC 1010 East North Street
Charlotte, NC 29208 Greenville, SC 29601
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Connect to WWTP BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 221,110 $ 11,056 $ 232,166
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 332,776 $ 16,639 $ 349,415
Total Project $ 553,886 $ 52,208 $ 581,581
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Land Application BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 944,149 $ 47,207 $ 991,356
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 1,140,680 $ 57,034 $ 1,197,714
Total Project $ 2,084,828 $ 104,241 $ 2,189,070
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Water Reuse BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 236,970 $ 11,848 $ 248,818
Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 208,150 $ 10,407 $ 218,557
Total Project $ 445,120 $ 22,256 $ 467,376
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Direct Discharge BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 2 $ 105 631 $ 5,282 $ 110,912
ACC Progressive
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

Borrow Pit No. 3 $ 132,802 $ 6,640 $ 139,442
Total Project $ 238,432 $ 11,922 $ 250,354
EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS
TOTAL PROBABLE BASE The projected cost to midpoint of construction including bidding
BID = premium.
CONST C/O = For budgeting purposes experience dictates that change orders during
construction are likely to add 5% to the ultimate cost of the project.
TOTAL = The total recommended budget including the non-competitive bidding
premium and construction change orders.
Project Notes / General Comments
This estimate has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted estimating practices and principles.
Aiken Cost Consultants' staff is available to discuss our methods, pricing, assumptions, or estimating philosophy
with any interested party. Please contact us by phone at [phone], by fax at [phone], or by e-mail
at [e-mail].
Aiken Cost Consultants estimates are intended to be used as a professional opinion of the probable cost of
construction, based on our understanding of the design at the time the estimate was prepared. We have no
control over General or Subcontractor overhead and profit percentages, bidding climates, schedules, contractor's
methods of determining prices, continuing design modifications or addenda, etc., therefore, we cannot guarantee
that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will be within a certain range of this, or subsequent, cost
estimates.
Individual line item pricing shown in the attached estimate reflects probable construction costs obtainable in the
geographic region of the project at the time this estimate was prepared. It assumes competitive bidding for every
portion of work, for all contractors. In order to compensate for the possibility of a poor, or unfavorable bidding
climate, a reduced number of bidders (both general and sub-contract), or other subjective factors beyond our
understanding, we have added a non-competitive bidding climate contingency to the bottom of the summary
sheet. We recommend that the owner and NE allow for this possibility through additive or deductive bid
alternates that equal or exceed that amount.
ACC Progressive
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

•
PROJECT SUMMARY
Feasibility Study Estimate
For
Dewater Borrow Pit 10
1 Camp Lejeune
Camp Lejeune, NC
Client: Owner: Cost Estimator:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Camp Lejeune Aiken Cost Consultants
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Camp Lejeune, NC 1010 East North Street
Charlotte, NC 29208 Greenville, SC 29601
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Connect to WWTP BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 490,276 $ 24,514 $ 514,789
Total Project $ 490,276 $ 24,514 $ 514,789
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Land Application BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 1,337,210 $ 66,861 $ 1,404,071
Total Project $ 1,337,210 $ 66,861 $ 1,404,071
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Water Reuse BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 373,865 $ 18,693 $ 392,558
Total Project $ 373,865 $ 18,693 $ 392,558
TOTAL PROBABLE 5%
Direct Discharge BASE BID CONST C/O TOTAL
Borrow Pit No. 10 $ 127,367 $ 6,368 $ 133,736
Total Project $ 127,367 $ 6,368 $ 133,736
EXPLANATION OF COLUMNS
ACC Progressive
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

TOTAL PROBABLE BASE The projected cost to midpoint of construction including bidding
BID = premium.
CONST C/O = For budgeting purposes experience dictates that change orders during
construction are likely to add 5% to the ultimate cost of the project.
TOTAL = The total recommended budget including the non-competitive bidding
premium and construction change orders.
Project Notes / General Comments
This estimate has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted estimating practices and principles.
Aiken Cost Consultants' staff is available to discuss our methods, pricing, assumptions, or estimating philosophy
with any interested party. Please contact us by phone at [phone], by fax at [phone], or by e-mail
at [e-mail].
Aiken Cost Consultants estimates are intended to be used as a professional opinion of the probable cost of
construction, based on our understanding of the design at the time the estimate was prepared. We have no
control over General or Subcontractor overhead and profit percentages, bidding climates, schedules, contractors
methods of determining prices, continuing design modifications or addenda, etc., therefore, we cannot guarantee
that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will be within a certain range of this, or subsequent, cost
estimates.
Individual line item pricing shown in the attached estimate reflects probable construction costs obtainable in the
geographic region of the project at the time this estimate was prepared. It assumes competitive bidding for every
portion of work, for all contractors. In order to compensate for the possibility of a poor, or unfavorable bidding
climate, a reduced number of bidders (both general and sub-contract), or other subjective factors beyond our
understanding, we have added a non-competitive bidding climate contingency to the bottom of the summary
sheet. We recommend that the owner and NE allow for this possibility through additive or deductive bid
alternates that equal or exceed that amount.
ACC Progressive
4/1/2011 Cost Management System 2:52 PM

•
SG$
' r 1
Laboratory Report of Analysis
To: Kim Charles-Smith
MACTEC
5710 Oleander Drive
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Report Number: 31100471
Client Project: Camp Lejeune
Dear Kim Charles-Smith,
Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the referenced project for the received
samples and associated QC as applicable. The samples are certified to meet the requirements of the National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report and supporting data will be
retained in our files for a period of five years in the event they are required for future reference.All results are
intended to be used in their entirety and SGS is not responsible for use of less than the complete report.Any
samples submitted to our laboratory will be retained for a maximum of thirty(30)days from the date of this report
unless other arrangements are requested.
If there are any questions about the report or services performed during this project, please call Barbara A. Hager
at(910)350-1903. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns which you may have.
Thank you for using SGS North America Inc.for your analytical services. We look forward to working with you
again on any additional analytical needs.
Sincerely,
SGS North America Inc.
Digitally signed by Barbara A.Hager
-& L n vtintii—Ltcb-( DN: CN =Barbara A. Hager,C=US,O=SGS Wilmington, NC,
1, �ll/ OU = Project Manager
Date: 2011.03.24 16:02:51 -04'00'
Barbara A. Hager Date
Project Manager
[e-mail]
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.0 Certification#481
SGS North America In 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.scis.com
Member of SGS Group

SG$
Laboratory Qualifiers
Report Definitions
DL Method, Instrument,or Estimated Detection Limit per Analytical Method
CL Control Limits for the recovery result of a parameter
LOQ Reporting Limit
DF Dilution Factor
RPD Relative Percent Difference
LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike(Duplicate)
MS(D) Matrix Spike(Duplicate)
MB Method Blank
Qualifier Definitions
* Recovery or RPD outside of control limits
B Analyte was detected in the Lab Method Blank at a level above the LOQ
U Undetected(Reported as ND or<LOD)
✓ Recovery is below quality control limit. The data has been validated based on a favorable signal-to-noise
and detection limit
A Amount detected is less than the Lower Method Calibration Limit
J Amount detected is between the Method Detection Limit and the Lower Calibration Limit
O The recovery of this analyte in the OPR is above the Method QC Limits and the reported concentration in
the sample may be biased high
E Amount detected is greater than the Upper Calibration Limit
S The amount of analyte present has saturated the detector. This situation results in an
underestimation of the affected analyte(s)
Q Indicates the presence of a quantitative interference.This situation may result in an
underestimation of the affected analyte(s)
Indicates the presence of a qualitative interference that could cause a false positive or an
overestimation of the affected analyte(s)
DPE Indicates the presence of a peak in the polychlorinated diphenylether channel that could
cause a false positive or an overestimation of the affected analyte(s)
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound
EMC Estimated Maximum possible Concentration due to ion ratio failure
ND Not Detected
K Result is estimated due to ion ratio failure in High Resolution PCB Analysis
P RPD>40%between results of dual columns
D Spike or surrogate was diluted out in order to achieve a parameter result within instrument calibration
P 9
range
M1 Mis-identified peak
M2 Software did not integrate peak
M3 Incorrect baseline construction(i.e.not all of peak included;two peaks integrated as one)
M4 Pattern integration required(i.e.DRO, GRO, PCB,Toxaphene and Technical Chlordane)
M5 Other-Explained in case narrative
Note Results pages that include a value for"Solids (%)"have been adjusted for moisture content.
J
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

. SG$
Sample Summary
L. /
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Received Matrix
BP-2 31100471001 03/16/2011 14:35 03/17/2011 15:25 Water
BP-3 31100471002 03/16/2011 12:40 03/17/2011 15:25 Water
BP-10 31100471003 03/16/2011 16:15 03/17/2011 15:25 Water
`Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405 I
It 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

•
SG$
Results of BP-2 `--
Client Sample ID: BP-2 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624 {
Parameter Result ual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1
Benzene ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromodichloromethane ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromoform ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromomethane ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1
Chlorobenzene ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroethane ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroform ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloromethane ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1
Dibromochloromethane ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1
Ethyl Benzene 0.800 J 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1
Methylene chloride ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1
Tetrachloroethene ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1
Toluene ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichloroethene ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1
Vinyl chloride ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1
m,p-Xylene ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1
o-Xylene ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1
tert-Butyl methyl ether(MTBE) ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1
_....J
... ,
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

. _SCSI
"—Results of BP-2 1. 1
Client Sample ID: BP-2 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
?-Results by EPA 624
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units
Batch Information •
Analytical Batch: VMS1098 Prep Batch: VXX1204
Analytical Method: EPA 624 Prep Method: EPA 624
Instrument: MSD3 Prep Date/Time: 03/21/2011 16:58
Analyst: BWS Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 40 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/21/2011 15:12 Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL
l J
l l
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sos.com
Member of SGS Group

. .
. .
SGS
Results of BP-2 4
Client Sample ID: BP-2 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
(Results by EPA 625 ,
Parameter Result ual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Phenol ND U 3.22 6.81 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND U 3.01 6.81 ug/L 1
2-Chiorophenol ND U 2.97 6.81 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND U 2.78 6.81 ug/L 1
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND U 3.04 6.81 ug/L 1
Hexachloroethane ND U 1.91 6.81 ug/L 1
Nitrobenzene ND U 2.98 6.81 ug/L 1
Isophorone ND U 2.85 6.81 ug/L 1
2-Nitrophenol ND U 2.68 6.81 ug/L 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND U 3.01 6.81 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ND U 2.89 6.81 ug/L 1
2,4-Dichiorophenol ND U 2.81 6.81 ug/L 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND U 2.36 6.81 ug/L 1
Naphthalene ND U 2.64 6.81 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND U 2.07 6.81 ug/L 1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND U 2.70 6.81 ug/L 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND U 1.07 13.6 ug/L 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND U 2.77 6.81 ug/L 1
2-Chloronaphthalene ND U 2.72 6.81 ug/L 1
Dimethyl phthalate ND U 2.92 6.81 ug/L 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND U 2.56 6.81 ug/L 1
Acenaphthene ND U 2.81 6.81 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND U 0.910 34.1 ug/L 1
4-Nitrophenol ND U 1.73 34.1 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND U 2.51 6.81 ug/L 1
Fluorene ND U 3.32 6.81 ug/L 1
Diethyl phthalate ND U 2.86 6.81 ug/L 1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND U 3.35 6.81 ug/L 1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND U 0.673 34.1 ug/L 1
Diphenylamine ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.78 6.81 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobenzene ND U 2.63 6.81 ug/L 1
Pentachlorophenol ND U 2.11 34.1 ug/L 1
Phenanthrene ND U 2.71 6.81 ug/L 1
Anthracene ND U 2.63 6.81 ug/L 1
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND U 2.60 6.81 ug/L 1
Fluoranthene ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1
Pyrene ND U 2.74 6.81 ug/L 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND U 2.57 6.81 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)anthracene ND U 2.67 6.81 ug/L 1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND U 2.38 13.6 ug/L 1
Chrysene ND U 3.00 6.81 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND U 2.66 6.81 ug/L 1
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

1 -SG-Si. . .
Results of BP-2 --- 1
Client Sample ID: BP-2 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625
Parameter Result Qual, DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND U 2.67 6.81 ug/L 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND U 3.15 6.81 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)pyrene ND U 2.53 6.81 ug/L 1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND U 2.93 6.81 ug/L 1
Acenaphthylene ND U 2.72 6.81 ug/L 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND U 1.99 6.81 ug/L 1
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol 80.8 33.1-118 % 1
Phenol-d6 85.4 49.0-120 % 1
Nitrobenzene-d5 90.2 46.0-118 % 1
2-Fluorobiphenyl 75.3 50.0-107 % 1
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 80.6 29.3-152 % 1
Terphenyl-d14 55.8 22.1-142 % 1
Batch Information
Analytical Batch: XMS1042 Prep Batch: XXX1134
Analytical Method: EPA 625 Prep Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD10 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30
Analyst: CMP Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 734 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:11 Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
J
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

. ,
1 •
SGg 1
1
Results of BP-3 1
Client Sample ID: BP-3 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
>iResults by EPA 624
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1
Benzene ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromodichloromethane ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromoform ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromomethane ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1
Chlorobenzene ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroethane ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroform ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloromethane ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1
Dibromochloromethane ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1
Ethyl Benzene ND U 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1
Methylene chloride ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1
Tetrachloroethene ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1
Toluene ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichloroethene ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1
Vinyl chloride ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1
m,p-Xylene ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1
o-Xylene ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1
tert-Butyl methyl ether(MTBE) ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1
J
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. I5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

•
SG$
Results of BP-3
Client Sample ID: BP-3 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624 1
Parameter Result ( us Qj, LOQ/CL Units QE
Batch Information
Analytical Batch: VMS1098 Prep Batch: VXX1204
Analytical Method: EPA 624 Prep Method: EPA 624
Instrument: MSD3 Prep Date/Time: 03/21/2011 16:58
Analyst: BWS Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 40 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/21/2011 14:48 Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL
J
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

. SGg , .
c1Results of BP-3 ti
,m '
Client Sample ID: BP-3 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
}-1Results by EPA 625
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Phenol ND U 2.39 5.07 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND U 2.24 5.07 ug/L 1
2-Chlorophenol ND U 2.21 5.07 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND U 2.07 5.07 ug/L 1
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND U 2.26 5.07 ug/L 1
Hexachloroethane ND U 1.42 5.07 ug/L 1
Nitrobenzene ND U 2.22 5.07 ug/L 1
Isophorone ND U 2.12 5.07 ug/L 1
2-Nitrophenol ND U 2.00 5.07 ug/L 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND U 2.24 5.07 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ND U 2.15 5.07 ug/L 1
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND U 2.09 5.07 ug/L 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND U 1.75 5.07 ug/L 1
Naphthalene ND U 1.97 5.07 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND U 1.54 5.07 ug/L 1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND U 2.01 5.07 ug/L 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND U 0.799 10.1 ug/L 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND U 2.06 5.07 ug/L 1 '
2-Chloronaphthalene ND U 2.03 5.07 ug/L 1
Dimethyl phthalate ND U 2.17 5.07 ug/L 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.91 5.07 ug/L 1
Acenaphthene ND U 2.09 5.07 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND U 0.677 25.4 ug/L 1
4-Nitrophenol ND U 1.29 25.4 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.87 5.07 ug/L 1
Fluorene ND U 2.47 5.07 ug/L 1
Diethyl phthalate ND U 2.13 5.07 ug/L 1 j
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.49 5.07 ug/L 1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND U 0.501 25.4 ug/L 1 I
Diphenylamine ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.07 5.07 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobenzene ND U 1.96 5.07 ug/L 1
Pentachlorophenol ND U 1.57 25.4 ug/L 1
Phenanthrene ND U 2.02 5.07 ug/L 1
Anthracene ND U 1.96 5.07 ug/L 1
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND U 1.94 5.07 ug/L 1
Fluoranthene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1
Pyrene ND U 2.04 5.07 ug/L 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND U 1.92 5.07 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)anthracene ND U 1.99 5.07 ug/L 1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND U 1.77 10.1 ug/L 1
Chrysene ND U 2.23 5.07 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND U 1.98 5.07 ug/L 1
Print Date: 03/24/201 I N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sos.com
Member of SGS Group

•
. .
. ,
SGS
f—
Results of BP-3 b -_--.�.
,.n
Client Sample ID: BP-3 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625 {
Parameter Result C, 1pi DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND U 1.99 5.07 ug/L 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND U 2.34 5.07 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)pyrene ND U 1.89 5.07 ug/L 1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND U 2.18 5.07 ug/L 1
Acenaphthylene ND U 2.03 5.07 ug/L 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND U 1.48 5.07 ug/L 1
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol 69.3 33.1-118 % 1
Phenol-d6 74.1 49.0-120 % 1
Nitrobenzene-d5 82.0 46.0-118 % 1
2-Fluorobiphenyl 73.3 50.0-107 % 1
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 69.5 29.3-152 % 1
Terphenyl-d14 91.1 22.1-142 % 1
Batch Information 4 - 1
1
Analytical Batch: XMS1042 Prep Batch: XXX1134
Analytical Method: EPA 625 Prep Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD10 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30
Analyst: CMP Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 986 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:34 Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
I
I
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com
Member of SGS Group

. .
. .
SG8
6
Results of BP-10 -
1
Client Sample ID: BP-10 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-A Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethane ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1
1,2-Dichloropropane ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1
Benzene ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromodichloromethane ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromoform ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1
Bromomethane ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1
Chlorobenzene ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroethane ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloroform ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1
Chloromethane ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1
Dibromochloromethane ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1
Ethyl Benzene ND U 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1
Methylene chloride ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1
Tetrachloroethene ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1
Toluene ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichloroethene ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1
Vinyl chloride ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1
m,p-Xylene ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1
o-Xylene ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1
tert-Butyl methyl ether(MTBE) ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
It 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557,www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

SG$
r Results of BP-10
Client Sample ID: BP-10 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-A Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Parameter Result Qu LOQ/CL Units QE
Batch Information
Analytical Batch: VMS1098 Prep Batch: VXX1204
Analytical Method: EPA 624 Prep Method: EPA 624
Instrument: MSD3 Prep Date/Time: 03/21/2011 16:58
Analyst: BWS Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 40 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/21/2011 14:23 Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL
J
t l
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com
Member of SGS Group

. _SUL
1,
i. Results of BP-10 1
Client Sample ID: BP-10 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
}-Results by EPA 625
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Phenol ND U 2.46 5.20 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND U 2.30 5.20 ug/L 1
2-Chlorophenol ND U 2.27 5.20 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND U 2.12 5.20 ug/L 1
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND U 2.32 5.20 ug/L 1
Hexachloroethane ND U 1.46 5.20 ug/L 1
Nitrobenzene ND U 2.28 5.20 ug/L 1
Isophorone ND U 2.17 5.20 ug/L 1
2-Nitrophenol ND U 2.05 5.20 ug/L 1
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND U 2.30 5.20 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ND U 2.21 5.20 ug/L 1
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND U 2.14 5.20 ug/L 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND U 1.80 5.20 ug/L 1
Naphthalene ND U 2.02 5.20 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND U 1.58 5.20 ug/L 1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND U 2.06 5.20 ug/L 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND U 0.820 10.4 ug/L 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND U 2.11 5.20 ug/L 1
2-Chloronaphthalene ND U 2.08 5.20 ug/L 1
Dimethyl phthalate ND U 2.23 5.20 ug/L 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.96 5.20 ug/L 1
Acenaphthene ND U 2.14 5.20 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND U 0.695 26.0 ug/L 1
4-Nitrophenol ND U 1.32 26.0 ug/L 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.91 5.20 ug/L 1
Fluorene ND U 2.54 5.20 ug/L 1
Diethyl phthalate ND U 2.19 5.20 ug/L 1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.56 5.20 ug/L 1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND U 0.514 26.0 ug/L 1
Diphenylamine ND U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.12 5.20 ug/L 1
Hexachlorobenzene ND U 2.01 5.20 ug/L 1
Pentachlorophenol ND U 1.61 26.0 ug/L 1
Phenanthrene ND U 2.07 5.20 ug/L 1
Anthracene ND U 2.01 5.20 ug/L 1
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND U 1.99 5.20 ug/L 1
Fluoranthene ND U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1
Pyrene ND U 2.09 5.20 ug/L 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND U 1.97 5.20 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)anthracene ND U 2.04 5.20 ug/L 1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND U 1.82 10.4 ug/L 1
Chrysene ND U 2.29 5.20 ug/L 1
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND U 2.03 5.20 ug/L 1
t I
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com
Member of SGS Group

. SG$ • ,
Results of BP-10
Client Sample ID: BP-10 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-D Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
.Results by EPA 625
41.11
Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Units DF
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND U 2.04 5.20 ug/L 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND U 2.40 5.20 ug/L 1
Benzo(a)pyrene ND U 1.94 5.20 ug/L 1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND U 2.24 5.20 ug/L 1
Acenaphthylene ND U 2.08 5.20 ug/L 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate ND U 1.52 5.20 ug/L 1
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol 68.1 33.1-118 % 1
Phenol-d6 73.5 49.0-120 % 1
Nitrobenzene-d5 77.6 46.0-118 % 1
2-Fluorobiphenyl 70.8 50.0-107 % 1
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 60.5 29.3-152 % 1
Terphenyl-d14 70.8 22.1-142 % 1
,Batch Information „-
Analytical Batch: XMS1045 Prep Batch: XXX1134
Analytical Method: EPA 625 Prep Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD6 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30
Analyst: CMP Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 961 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011 15:26 Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C.Certification#481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive,Wilmington,NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

Locations Nationwide
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Alaska •Maryland
•New Jersey New York
___!;)(4i:5__
SGS North America Inc. North Carolina •Ohio
www.us.sgs.com 101117
°CLIENT e-rELV. /
CLIENT: ( (u SGS Reference: l 3 /(OG ���� PAGE / OF
CONTACT: Z. a K)se ` .J PHONE N0:(dl(7) 8 31 go C/ Prese111
PROJECT: CJ J 1O NO SAMPLE Used�ail�eS ��
Cj431P e..ci cv►^t SITE/PWSID#: TYPE
REPORTS TO: C Analysis
q p Regwre///// REMARKS
( t5 S it 2 FAX NO.:(' l ) 63 I —6 I 21, NN CO cm
T O
INVOICE TO: QUOTE#: A GRAB O f `I .Ca C-• PO.NUMBER: N rERB NO. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE TIME MATRIX S
"Bp' '3,a,1( JL35 'L S 6 3
AP— 3 3.it, i i (Zy17 c,,i,_) & 3
Q3P I .7•it, ►I ios e.,W S 4' 3
5 4
Collected/Relinquis d :(1 Date Time Received By: O Shipping Carrier: Samples Received Cold?(Circl YE NO
,--__ 3•/2H ISzf
Shipping Ticket No: Temperature°C: �i f
quis d By:(2) Date Time Received Special Deliverable Requirements: Chain of Custody Seal: (Circle)
INTACT BROKEN ABSENT
Relinquished By:(3) Date Time Received By: Special Instructions: e
Relinquished By:(4) Date Time Received By: Requested Turnaround Time:
❑RUSH ❑STD
Date Needed
A
200 W.Potter Drive Anchorage,AK 99518 Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] White-Retained by Lab
0 5500 Business Drive Wilmington,NC 28405 Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] Pink-Retained by Client

SGS North America Inc.
Sample Receipt Checklist(SRC)
Client: /te1W Work Order No.:3(cV T 7(
1. Shipped Notes:
Hand Delivered
2. /c COC Present on Receipt
_No COC
Additional Transmittal Forms
3. Custody Tape on Container
7-No Custody Tape
4. _Samples Intact
Samples Broken/Leaking
5. /(Chilled on Receipt Actual Temp.(s) in °C: 5_7 C
Ambient on Receipt
-Walk-in on Ice; Coming down to temp.
Received Outside of Temperature Specifications
6. 7Sufficient Sample Submitted
_Insufficient Sample Submitted
7. Chlorine absent
HNO3 <2
-HCL<2
Additional Preservatives verified(see notes)
8. j Received Within Holding Time
Not Received Within Holding Time
9. 74 No Discrepancies Noted
Discrepancies Noted
10. No Headspace present in VOC vials
ZHeadspace present in VOC vials>6mm
Comments: ��4- J /W a o /4/eo y,c(s
Sep o-,ld /i ire, 674 IL? i.s ��y l3 //.
Inspected and Logged in by:
Date.'% 3it?///
MI_11.5

•
- 71�-411117
4e R .- „wDur24i!a� S • •
1 >a'^"- z i
,x.
BF-10
---....-:L.,,m0j1,114...zL-oftlyel , , ,
/1411111.101
co x
U
... ":1)
so
LSO Li 1
, �p$%LONE ST E SPR
.40
.73
14404
y 3
} y t� 9 IsTRi
73
Ulli
PQ R �. 1 fill
�Nj
` 'h e may. O
fi ,ir
4,,,,
jet
` - Outfan q) g
% f I.
•
NC0089079 - Borrow Pit 10
."i
Facility - '
t)utfall#: 010 Location
Latitude: 34°43'36'
Longitude: 7 i°22.01" M C B Camp
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Stream Class: SC-NSW HQW Le jeu ne Nola, Onslow County
Subbasin: 03-05-02
River Basin: White OakMap not.to scale
Hydrologic Unit: 03020301