SW3230501_Wetland Determination/Report_20230823

nl PiL D
P I LOT E N V I R O N M E N T A L , I N C
March 4, 2021
Mr. Jay Eaves
CESI
P.O. Box 268
Concord, North Carolina 28026
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
12400 Old Camden Road
Midland, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 6492
Dear Mr. Eaves:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 51.5-acre tract located at 12400 Old Camden Road in Midland,Cabarrus County, North
Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials
into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters
of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to
approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required prior
to impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type,
location and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed
impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 6492
March 4,2021
The findings and conclusions in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features, are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Global Positioning System (GPS) location of jurisdictional features has been conducted by Pilot
personnel in the field utilizing a Trimble handheld GPS unit capable of sub-meter accuracy. Field
GPS data has been post-processed by Pilot personnel and digitally provided to the client for
assistance with preliminary planning. Pilot expresses no warranties or liabilities to accuracy of
GPS locations and/or provided GPS data.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 51.5-acre tract located
at 12400 Old Camden Road in Midland, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The site is identified on
the Cabarrus County Geographic Information System (GIS) as parcel identification number (PIN)
55340702340000. The scope of services included a delineation of jurisdictional features(streams,
wetlands and other surface waters) on the site. The site boundary was not marked at the time
of our field delineation.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory(NWI) Map and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
( The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts Far Branch along the western site boundary.
The map does not depict other surface waters or wetlands on the site. Drainage swales that
could contain additional surface waters or wetlands are depicted on the site.
( The USDA Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County (Drawing 2) identifies the following mapping
units on the site: Chewacla sandy loam (ChA), Herndon silt loam (HeB), Kirksey silt loam (KkB)
and Tarrus silt loam (TaB &TaD). The Chewacla series consists of somewhat poorly drained,
moderately permeable soils that occur on floodplains. The Herndon series consists of well
drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to moderately steep
uplands. The Kirksey series consists of moderately well drained, moderately slowly
permeable soils that occur on slopes. The Tarrus series consists of well drained, moderately
permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to very steep uplands. The ChA soil mapping
2

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 6492
March 4,2021
unit is identified on the Hydric Soils List for Cabarrus County. The other soil mapping units
are not identified on the Cabarrus County Hydric Soils List.
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Cabarrus County (Drawing 2A). In
addition to the Far Branch depicted on the USGS Topographic Map, the published soil survey
depicts streams within drainage swales on the northern and southern portions of the site.
( The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3) depicts a linear freshwater forested/shrub wetland along
the western site boundary, in the general location of Far Branch as depicted on the USGS
Topographic Map. Other surface waters or wetlands are not depicted on the site.
( The FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) identifies the site within Zone X,an area of minimal flood hazard.
Field Delineation
Pilot conducted the site visit on February 25, 2021. A single-family residence and an out-building
are located on the northeastern portion of the site. The remainder of the site contains a field
and wooded land. Ponds are not located on the site.
Streams are located on the northern and western portions of the site. The streams have defined
beds and banks, evidence of an ordinary high-water mark, meanders, substrate sorting and riffle-
pool complexes. Streams SC and SD1 contained flowing water with strong stream characteristics
and appear perennial. Streams SA, SB and SD2 contained flowing water in areas, areas with
stagnant water and areas with dry stream beds with weak stream characteristics and are
intermittent. Pilot marked the stream origins, confluence points and approximate locations
where the streams cross site boundaries with blue and white striped surveyor tape. The streams
were geo-located with a handheld Trimble GPS unit and digital elevation modeling data.
Wetlands are located adjacent to the streams on the site. The wetlands are separated from
surrounding uplands by topographic, vegetation and/or soil breaks. USACE Wetland
Determination Data Forms, supporting our opinions, are included as attachments. The wetland
boundaries were marked in the field with red and white striped surveyor tape and geo-located
with a handheld Trimble GPS unit.
Drawing 5 shows the approximate locations of the streams (including our designations),
wetlands, data points and flag numbers. The locations and designations of features shown on
Drawing 5 are preliminary and subject to change during agency verification(s) of the delineation.
3

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 6492
March 4,2021
Watershed Classification
The site is located in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin. Far Branch and several unnamed tributaries
to Far Branch cross the site. The NCDEQ-DWR has classified Far Branch as Class C waters.
Consultation with the local planning authority is recommended to determine local
buffer/stormwater setback requirements for the proposed development.
Agency Verification
The delineation has not been verified by the USACE. We understand that our flags will be
surveyed to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional features and applicable
surface water buffers. The delineation, including locations and designations of features, is
subject to change during agency verifications.
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
/11.1)
Michael T. Brame, PWS David S. Brame, PWS
Principal Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2—Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A— Published Soil Map
Drawing 3 — NWI Map
Drawing 4— FEMA FIRM
Drawing 5—Wetland Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
4

, ,, , _,,, 0,--1-- ,:•_ _. . . ,, ,Ay---r4s )---- it- — •
_.•-•?
,-- N.,..) , ,-., f.
•
- __ -." .--- .. ss 'L'11-‘ 1 - ' ,‘" \___,..As.. • Olib
,;,:l j'-e. ,/ii---\ c . te---- •- -(1-._ _,--:- 7-%7 - • '
-IN, 1 \:_s..--„___ ,,, ... ) ‘,...,.,,, f,-p?.."
t U—J
` qi.� \) -- ___, '--V- ..r.s laiprof 1
•Pioneer Mills._ �_ k..ra', I Ir.. „:.,,, , _ _ , ,44:i / .__,- • -„:?...i.4,
�.. }°f /-.
to
. L/N, (-----'Th --- •44..._s
1
\ l (r•
75jiiir L.-- r\ roN "...../ -
( i • /- '1-' ) V '\'k;‘_ 1 . ....,, ,__
l ' / 1 ,-----\ ..„.....„......2-s•s< ,----...„\.7,, ,
, i 4
• -.:-)
,._, , ,
4•\ ' /Crit, l0 ,' d) \i i-
•06.., ..• .........„ , i 1r70 (... ..‘ co ‘ '\
,,_---.4.It-N\ , I132 VI fv4e, ,;.--f. J-../— .,_.L7------- )4., ,1 "0,
\ 't!r / • r-
- -- • • ' ' •• 72:2 .I: •3 •' 2--4.) .• •-•-•:_/ • 4 0 4
--a___,::::--1 . • ...) . IV' 11- - • qi/ e. 1 ,,\ •
- ,- cf) ‘°', --- . '' ) 1p ) \,
y �- Park
LI
G 1 !1!T 1 9321, c.,_\ "/ l
-i J .O �I n.
.� j
r ,,
! �� of , 'c
..:7)* r N.
, ,( r-"% s l __,1, -N.--- 1
' , iJ�_ , F s C •ram -a- �z � - J~
+ -'�
000
' \ J '� v' , .ems /
,,, ,t.. __.2. .1 ..4v_1:17::: 1 __.I 4....i.*: ,41,,),,...661.'-:71:7'.7.
i,....,i1,7-1,.,- ,___/'
-1,64::..,....„
l --‘, .jio,„ • Adz_ v ♦'s.�a b,
,,,...4 \ __.ii.. . \_ 7.iy, 0.,____i_. .„/?/ill., ,_,.,:,r_ 2 ,,, i,,,\ ,
... 3y
e___
-�_, r., - - ' _' LEGEND
J • \ Site Boundary
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map �`f �'''`' g 12400 Old Camden Road
y' Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
Concord SE and Midland, NC
Quadrangles pfLOT1' "� Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Scale: 1" - 2,000, PILOT ENTIRD\ MPNTAL. NC Pilot Project 6492

tip ` ` . > - ....
,
,� "� GAD --60 n `, - .' ~ •
. " 10,A . ‘ 4. ir _...--' .*- ._ jboist r _
0
, _ ,,;,. , • I , - • j ,
r, �k raft
r
- . •.4 e *4. li
vh is
f ,� :.JI is f I.ilt •'/ • *
• •• . �+,a. 'rr, ,• l •i'. ram •v ' •
• , ..-• . r r� r♦ 1p.
�r�{ l �� - •` f i.4. ''` - ' , ? , om` .
,. rrK .I, �•i'� ice_ `., ,•� ` ', Y 1 1•-.'
a 4' - 4 . tCtlieb' �1 r `i + ' �ti • 7 7
, 44, .., % .it,-.4,0..e.:-
;1, /4. _ .
A • •4, A'. ,' .* t 4,..„,,,,,k:. ,,,, .
. :., ..,
_,, , ,„,, .... ,„ i1/4 ,.. rif,.. .t.. .,,./.. tL - 1 ' ' 1 III
^v�Rt •' {y_. fir. A � ;• ` �'f't =4'1' +; : .1- ' ' s' , 1• P
*-. '4' N ''''*3 f -,..:-., 1 '`,;, ...o04;;I:;‘_r '<-- . ,
41
. •:.-4r . i ,5,1( 44•J Is:
• .- !�• r' ;y-, .: f:. ' -\. A r.•
ti Ch-. cegi .,: p ' ..Vii•.04fir T--4 ,et, I 4. .,,-t;4-41. •.:.e.,
I 4, ,
• i , -7 it
a 8, ` .v• ^/ `0
- . ,••-4. t, 3— v q , ., ,, ,,
li.,,,,,,,,,, 118 tes,'' *.V.. t • -1,'` -• . Aft Is
.4* `: `•trt'.4 ` 4 i LEGEND
1 �'�, .. s C.
( , Q. - r. •41t• Site Boundary
k "lid/
Web Soil Map
Drawing 2 t r kf. ;`' 12400 Old Camden Road
USDA Web Soil Survey _ )1`'- 1` ,-
of Cabarrus Count NC r Q Approximate 51.5 Acre Tract
y' PIL01 Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Scale: 1" = 400' PILOT PNVIRD. MINTAL,iNC Pilot Project6492

i ,6i%. .04.0:,. 0 „ .
f (#"i .a) ( t 4 r.I.I.E:sie-dli4C7-
I__, ,
; giiirr-/,}1
, .7. i
ii
i *1011131 __..._.„44.4.
spodr fro r
Tea, . .4.,..
. '' 4, -
_, . . , 11P 1
- iii.„,, : "00,Fr ,
3
io
.111
% ''SS $ i li. I 8 l
...
. s
,i1,12:,.....-.0-pid.---. -, - • . ..__
•
. _
r
1
JJ
.di - .
II
NsI
1
idoil'
I
LEGEND
PI la�: Site Boundary
I. I. ■
Drawing 2A `;" '. ,., Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey c.
t. t • '' 12400 Old Camden Road
x r' Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
of Cabarrus County, NC
Published 1988, Sheet 8 PILOT Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Scale: 1" = 400' "`°' MENTAL
"` Pilot Project 6492

t'f 4. -_-- r.
s
1I
v
.i' 1. rim, - s
I I
.. I ._,.
I M
♦ 1•
7171 - t • + _
•
•
•
' Vis,
V e
` li t
. i
. I I I • ' — '• . I -i'.1;41/ . ' &
• Illibli-
I I d,
•
ti.t.
' , iiftc
.i
r
Y
•.: •,;.•*.tie.• ...*-t .; 4,41 , NI „,e ',i. „ ,,,r. 's•
+'! " .. t "ram
' ' " LEGEND
v _. •
z ' _ 0` ~..4.
Site Boundary
V+.1 Freshwater Emergent
_ _♦ f Freshwater Forested/Shrub
r, , 4 X + Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
f { Estuarine and Marine
�''N II Freshwater Pond
}�' � � r 11 Lake
Pe�' t 1S-,'' Riverine
. Other
.3
NWI Map
Drawing 3 ?�y ,r '' ' , ,•,, I.
__
USFWS NWI - 12400 Old Camden Road
Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
Wetlands Mapper P'LDT Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Scale: 1" = 400' PILOT £Nv111ONMeN,AL,INC Pilot Project 6492

!' • e •'
•00 , -____
, \ -_. a• a
. -- . ''. '''• ."' .w.
aC . . ' I ,.- ' Iremo"!. _ - - • .
-•••"1- '..,t • .. di ' . \ ' ,- , _ ••••••/,'"'.
- 4.: " *VP.— " • . ( . , ..
,..fr'1:•!-....% ., ‘ ..v..,
‘„••• .,-., . 1t, 1.. •.• .t-
..t- -' .- ••44,,,;,4... :- .
. _ ""-. .1, ;•-• 7'... ,•--.••• .-_-_ •
_
•.,:.i...., is . • ""-!-. .4. --- , ._:6r.'-' 1: V 0.... ,.. ---- • .1. - ., .
I .
.4...- - ' .4 Ift-' - 4,1,.., • • . I- - - . 1 : -. •
•••:.'r yr,.,wx,,,,ple: e..,. _!..., .,..,., ,..
•„A-.,...!'; ..ii ,..05
,„ ,. . . .' .1.0'i '-,• ' J,
0.4,-.:; .f..• - '•7 I.f,111:1-':: 4,. .11:‘ . .OieK''•k .4=- 1 -%
r 11 Al.i....4,.. ...: 11 1
tt.i. -ts.:.. 'r •
*,
, .• , . - , . '- •• o'" '4.'•-• ...0: tr• *.:: '‘ ' 4 1•&..,°N.IL • • ' vi•• ••
i,..-N.': '.. oNsf.. , 1.- -r 71 . t '..,:.; i..1?It' id .4iii,.- -',",• .
• . • •).- -;. '', ,• . "• • . 4.-. ... .,„...,..1 , ....., .4 4p. '4...
. -
:it-N •'I.!'%.: .. ..!. . -.41
a
'r .'f•A''''• . . ' ' —..
1* 't', ' .. ' 'It , • ,,
/4 - -''' •••e$ !Cs.4.. -` It ia;/:::1 ,Pdr?-, ':•1/1,,..-.: -F ' : 4144.1i N,
: ; ,.,.., • .. it
. ‘i,4.- ie.:It, - .- :.,. ,f•JO° '
41151
-4•• .. - ..,..44. ,.,.
,,... .........--- . -w .. _
.. ... .
. .•Se •, .. • - • .4..1.1/4 ,1k a, -.. ... . * 11/4%,_
••y 9.N; k' '0.‘.. ' . 'it' 1,1% 7-6 0.' 4 1 ' ! V 6 i...fbe' t ••••,'
1*.• \-, l: IN .6: :-%/Psik,- • t? %it. 4.-:".... . . . 1 N.,e,•*, • . . % d•'-,,i',,l."' I
ig,0%,.. ,... .. 0%4-, 7.• . , "..,.\-1. .,; ,ii :' ,'-, .),-;:,...e.:-:
.1- s...,. 4'''' - " ‘,...••• .
. ro, 'bk • • • ' L-.14- .1',. ... ..'titili• • • • , . -'' . X 'It. • •'••-li.- 1.
. - ' • :, -% .., . _•-• . . `i.----;;; Ati-,, .. 1.1t-.4 T.-.,..,.,.: ', .-'.(1,' jwit.., •,! ,r. ''' , , ‘` A '•'• To iii*.'.',".., •.i.' '
' 6 ... ' i.." ' <.' ' • '•10107.5..;,t.ii ,;` .1...' ',''-,2 •
. - . .- . ,,,;• ,. .4,.. ..-- 4A . .:0-,.,,-,,t,,:. • 'r TN ',.7,Apb,...,...;.., - , 7‘11/11q -. ..>"7. •
.. 6 ';'•• ,.., ),. - - :Cgs'''. . ". • 1 lirreekr4114,7‘ ' 4 . , ',N--
. i \: : • • • 1-‘4 „ . it...4, • . - . f' f.. .1.. * ./t1pe k
,- , . . . ‘ •,. ..„_ • i te.... ' .'''76.1 .1..
• A' ISa. •,,,,.•-• 1,./ii •r- .'-, -- •k• •., • ..":: ' ,41' .4.--:.. - .'' *...".',' • . ' ,' - ..!'ll, 7-, A,i
••,a% ...•. . 'f-9, •10,4.,-•-''„. ....y 41 _•. :.••-,.., !it;'1.,..6 0414 41 ". .
s ' •
..-;.y.! s ,•-_-:t. ,, r. .4"•, • . i , :^.- 1•".-- ,,•,.tv•••%.* ' ,. _ .."-:',‘- I. . ..' ,. , .a....44' V1
• . ,s -
,ir •• ,
..,. • .-t.-: •. ' '. • , i _ k it.
- .•,.. ''. t isl , - • •
PANE -. .- .1V •yalIk. —II..4wk,Ny.,Lrka I': R ' OF KNJOat,F cf_LC'ko(L):,[:, H A7 •R rt'aggpx _ , • •
.•
. ‘.-
.
I• 4 . .. '
iSfift 'AI • . •.. i,'• • I r IIII,
fftla4Kv400 t -
GGZ. INAllgriflg
, .
. .- .
. • ,
., . . . .
- .1‘,/- ;' .,;,1401- : 'Vie' • . --..• 2 .e.- ' ' ',It.'
1,.-. • .
+, . `'-', .' ., .. •• e‘ 4* • ••qi,1 1 i
.:...,e . .:"
, ,7t....• .- . . .AL. . •,- . - ..../4 ' .....% - . . . .
- ...,
11111b-: t.' '''4• *.j..' -A -.. ..a. '-. : i — ' . - i..,---7 .,....• . .., . ,.. ‘.
14 ' ' • AI AI. '
•-' A?.. .. ' , • .
is :H.-- ' ' t• - vs ,..4 , ..., 1,„.... . ,... •
'
- • • t, a , • . , - •k
4 • . A'' ' •. t •% '.P. . .. •li• '.•' :441.• 1.t.2. .•.7
. In , 1,4- ,•
‘.• ' . 4:. .. . .,; i
.
• ..,\.; .-a" • l' : ., ' . 0 4
. e .e. LEGEND
.. . • - . - • 0 1 . -7 .. ..1.•,,, . .1,4',.•A. . , - •40 „
• i l'• ''' ... * p‘ s di,' . . • •• . : \:•...V., ' ' S..'' Site Boundary
, .'"• 4te . ..„; ' ..- • • 4. ), . •
19..;:...Annual..-_..harce Float Hazard
,Is .,.,• ., ' .,..., . • .
, A • I ,-,. •
A ..
N,r . ' ..• lb. ••„*4•44- . f,Regulator!" Floode,ay
,.- , • K Special Floodmay
-'v• .4,.. .14::144. 1•-
4 ,-,-.41 .. Area of Undetermired Flocni Hazard *V.
: - A
.t 'R.._ • Ile j,„v-Ili . 'Pr I 0 2'1...Annual!_.ha-ic•e Hood Hazard
j`:i I • • •*•!.. tfti
r Fi_ture Cciriditiork; 19 4 I -I-
. ".:..firiUd.'.-. idi-u_e Flood Hazard
:40_44 ,,0.;,,, . • . .‘... iiii Area .,ith F:educed F:tsk Due to Levee
• ;'I'• 7)I '
Ali&AlikaidriL . . i
i ‘,, • „
'•':: / '..'..s :::, ; j, , ,.','' . FEMA FIRM
Drawing 4 . .4' ,.!' ' 'i'ili'1— ',.
12400 Old Camden Road
National Flood Hazard Layer , . - - -- - •- ,,,
- - Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
_. .
from FEMA Web Map Service
PILI31r 4/. .---- Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Scale: 1" = 400' PILOT ENv1120 .. MEN-AL.INC Pilot Project 6492

T •
•
A * (1,-.
Or
©a
WC1-17 • 1. - ' `
0.370 Ac. WD 1-16
0.303 Ac.
W B 1-23
0.368 Ac. -
SD1
1,430 LF
WA 12-18 l - •
0.134 Ac. li
eriji.
DP , • � S a
, . i SC C 0 4
175 LF DP-3 7
WA 1-11 ''i
0.392 Ac. 1
i
DP-2 - t
F
`3\ 5B I -
175 LF
SA a ► `
10 LF - _
41.
DP-1 ri `
_ . ( I,
. ' - • 1
1 i
I
Legend _ -
L. Site Boundary • --
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
11.10 ,
Wetland
Perennial Stream WETLAND FLAGS =
-• Intermittent Stream STREAM FLAGS= V///////1
Culvert , _ . THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THIS
( Data Point MAP INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5 t la �
? Wetland Map
� , '3,
Aerial Imagery from ESRI '. �:�'"� 4 •
.
12400 Old Camden Road
_ j
and Pilot GPS Data Approximate 51.5-Acre Tract
—
Scale: 1" = 300' PILO*'� Midland, Cabarrus County, NC
Date: 3.1.21 PILOT ENYIRO \ MENTAL.INC Pilot Project 6492

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Camden Road City/County: Midland/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2.25.21
Applicant/Owner: NA State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): DSB Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): swale Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.241528° Long:-80.575802° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Tarrus silt loam-TaD NWI classification: upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Ulmus alata 15 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Nyssa sylvatica 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Cornus florida 5 Yes FACU FAC species 20 x 3= 60
2. Juniperus virginiana 5 Yes FACU FACU species 35 x 4= 140
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 55 (A) 200 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.64
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _ _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
15 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5yr 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-16 7.5yr 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: February 25, 2021 Project/Site: Old Camden Rd Latitude: 35.242970°
Evaluator: David Brame county: Cabarrus Longitude:-80.574922°
Total Points:Stream is at least intermittent 16.5 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Midland
if 19 or perennial if 30* CE-phemerintermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 (1) 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No C Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow OO 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 R
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 (1) 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No�0 Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 0 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 0 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 0 1.5
25.Algae CO 0.5 1 1.5 _
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other 0)
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Contained water but above average rainfall. No evidence that channel intersects water table
Sketch: See Drawing 5 (DP-2)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Camden Road City/County: Midland/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2.25.21
Applicant/Owner: NA State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): DSB Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flood plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.243915° Long:-80.576306° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Kirksy silt loam-KkB NWI classification: upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Platanus occidentalis 40 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus americana 20 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 75 x 2= 150
1. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU FAC species 15 x 3= 45
2. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. Quercus nigra 5 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 100 (A) 235 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.35
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _ _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
15 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 5 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex intumescens 5 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Rumex crispus 5 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Arundinaria gigantea 5 Yes FACW Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10yr 5/1 60 7.5yr 4/6 40 D M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Camden Road City/County: Midland/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2.25.21
Applicant/Owner: NA State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): DSB Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): side slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex Slope(%): 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.244118° Long:-80.576138° Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Kirksy silt loam-KkB NWI classification: upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Juniperus virginiana 15 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Carya ovata 35 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 20.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 5 x 2= 10
1. Juniperus virginiana 5 Yes FACU FAC species 15 x 3= 45
2. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU FACU species 90 x 4= 360
3. Quercus nigra 5 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Ulmus americana 5 Yes FACW Column Totals: 110 (A) 415 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.77
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
20 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: _ 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Allium canadense 15 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10yr 3/3 100
8-18 10yr 4/2 90 7.5yr 4/6 10 C M Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0