20231146 Ver 1_Mitigation Bank Prospectus_20230815 (2)

Pie
a �
PROSPECTUS WILDLANDS UPPER NEUSE UMBRELLA
MITIGATION BANK
Draft Site Name: Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Durham County, NC
Neuse River Basin
August 8, 2023 HUC 03020201
USACE Action ID No. TBD
DWR# TBD

PREPARED BY:
DRAFT PROSPECTUS
Wildlands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Site Name: Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Durham County, NC
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
USACE Action ID No. TBD
DWR# (To Be Determined)
W
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
August 8, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................................. 1
1.0
Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives........................................................................
1
1.1
Introduction...............................................................................................................................
1
1.2
Bank Location............................................................................................................................
1
1.3
Goals and Objectives................................................................................................................. 1
1.4
Qualifications of Bank Sponsor................................................................................................. 2
2.0
Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank..................................................................
3
2.1
Ownership Agreements............................................................................................................. 3
2.2
Landowner Information............................................................................................................ 3
2.3
Proposed Service Area............................................................................................................... 3
2.4
Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank...................................................................................
3
3.0
Ecological Suitability of Site..................................................................................................
5
3.1
Bank Site Characterization........................................................................................................ 5
3.2
Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas ...................................................... 7
3.3
Threatened and Endangered Species........................................................................................
8
3.4
Floodplain Compliance.............................................................................................................. 8
3.5
Site Constraints and Access.......................................................................................................
8
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan...........................................................................................................
9
4.1
Stream Restoration................................................................................................................... 9
4.2
Stream Enhancement I.............................................................................................................. 9
4.3
Stream Enhancement II...........................................................................................................
10
4.4
Stream Preservation................................................................................................................
10
4.5
Wetlands.................................................................................................................................
10
4.6
Vegetation Plan.......................................................................................................................
10
5.0
Determination of Mitigation Credits...................................................................................
11
5.2
Initial Allocation of Released Credits.......................................................................................
14
5.3
Subsequent Credit Releases....................................................................................................
14
6.0
Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan.....................................................................
14
6.1
Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability......................................................
15
6.2
Hydrology................................................................................................................................
15
6.3
Vegetation...............................................................................................................................
16
6.4
Other Parameters....................................................................................................................
16
7.0
Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability........................................................................
17
7.1
Maintenance...........................................................................................................................
17
7.2
Adaptive Management............................................................................................................
18
7.3
Long Term Management Provisions........................................................................................
18
8.0
References.........................................................................................................................
18
TABLES
Table 1.
Mitigation Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................... 2
Table 2.
Landowner Information.......................................................................................................3
Table 3.
Project Soil Type and Description.......................................................................................... 7
Table 4.
Federally Protected Species in Durham County, NC............................................................... 8
Table 5.
Proposed Easement Crossings............................................................................................... 9
Table 6.
Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits..................................................................................
12
Table 7.
Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits................................................................................
12
W Wildlands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page i

Table 8. Stream Credit Release Schedule......................................................................................... 13
Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule......................................................................... 13
Table10. Maintenance Plan.............................................................................................................. 17
FIGUREF
Figure 1
Service Area Map
Figure 2
Vicinity Map
Figure 3
NCDOT Draft STIP FY 2020-2029
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
Site Map
Figure 6
Watershed Map
Figure 7
Soils Map
Figure 8
Concept Map
Figure 9
LiDAR Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Historic Aerials
Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms
Appendix C
Existing Geomorphic Data
Appendix D
EDR Radius Report Summary
Appendix E
Landowner Authorizations
kv Wildlands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page ii

Executive Summary
Wildlands Holdings X, LLC ("Sponsor") proposes a modification request to add the Camp Creek
Mitigation Site ("Site") to the Wildlands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank). The Bank is
currently in development with the Hatch's Hill mitigation site in Wayne County (SAW-2021-01309;
NCDWR # 20211424v1). Wildlands Holdings X, LLC is managed by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands)
and developed for the sole purpose of holding mitigation banks. This prospectus is for the second site to
be developed under the Wildlands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank, which will include
restoration of streams and wetlands along Camp Creek and its unnamed tributaries (Figure 1). The
purpose of the Bank is to provide stream and wetland mitigation credits to compensate for impacts to
Waters of the United States and/or State Waters within the service area, Hydrologic Unit 03020201
(Neuse 01), as depicted in Figure 2. The resulting conservation easement is estimated to be 24.7 acres.
1.0 Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives
1.1 Introduction
The Site being established under the proposed Bank is located on an active agricultural farm that
includes bordering woodlands. In addition to Camp Creek, the Site contains four unnamed tributaries to
Camp Creek that, for the purpose of this project, are referred to as Copley Branch, Ellis Branch, TLC
Branch, and T1. The Site is located in the DWR Subbasin 03-04-01. All project streams flow to Camp
Creek, which is classified as a Water Supply II Water (WS-II), a High Quality Water (HOW), and a Nutrient
Sensitive Water (NSW).
A review of historic aerials from 1937 to 2020 shows the Site streams have existed in their approximate
locations over time. Even the forested areas are virtually the same. The one exception is the area south
of Camp Creek between Range and Bahama Roads. Between 1955 and 1972, this area was cleared and
Ellis Branch was moved from the middle of the area to run along Bahama Road.
Within the project area, the streams are mostly eroding and incised. Wetlands have been degraded due
to historic channelization and channel incision. The wetlands on the site have been hydrologically
disconnected from the stream channels.
The Sponsor proposes to restore 2,900 linear feet (LF), enhance 1,020 LF, and preserve 760 LF of the site
streams. The Sponsor proposes to re-establish 9.187 wetland acres, enhance 3.499 wetland acres, and
preserve 0.134 wetland acres. This stream and wetland mitigation will include a conservation easement
area that is estimated to total 24.7 acres.
1.2 Bank Location
The proposed Bank (36.226290' N, 78.828518° W) is in northeastern Durham County approximately
eight miles northwest of Butner, NC (Figure 1, Figure 2). The site is located within the Hydrologic Unit
Code (HUC) 0300201040010 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-01. The project site drains to Knap of Reeds Creek
which drains first to Lake Butner and then to Falls Lake.
To get to the Site from Raleigh, NC take 1-40 West to 1-885 North and 1-85 North. From 1-85, take the Red
Mill Road exit. Go left on Red Mill Road and continue to end. Go right on Old Oxford Road and travel 2.6
miles before turning left on Cassam Road. At the end of Cassam Road turn left on Range Road and go 4
miles. Camp Creek flows beneath Range Road just south of Isham Chambers Road.
1.3 Goals and Objectives
The proposed Bank described above will provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River
Basin. Project benefits include site specific improvements and watershed scale benefits.
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 1

The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 1. Project goals are desired project
outcomes and objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The project will be
monitored after construction to demonstrate success. A detailed monitoring program will be described
in the forthcoming mitigation plan.
Table 1. Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Construct stream channels that will
Improve stream
maintain stable cross -sections, patterns,
Reduce shear stress on channel boundary.
channel stability.
and profiles over time. Repair eroding
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion.
stream banks with bioengineering.
Install habitat features such as
Increase and diversify available habitats for
constructed riffles, cover logs, and brush
macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians,
Improve instream
toes in restored/enhanced streams. Add
leading to colonization and an increase in
habitat.
woody materials to channel beds.
biodiversity over time. Add complexity
Construct pools of varying depth.
including large woody debris (LWD) to the
streams.
Reconnect
Construct stream channels with
Allow more frequent flood flows to disperse
channels with
appropriate bankfull dimensions and
on the floodplain. Support geomorphology
floodplains.
depth relative to the existing floodplain.
and higher -level functions. Improve wetland
hydrology.
Restore wetland
Restore riparian wetlands and associated
Raise local groundwater elevations.
hydrology, soils,
soil structure by raising stream beds,
Periodically inundate floodplain wetlands and
and plant
plugging existing ditches, and planting
vernal pools.
communities.
native wetland species.
Restore and
Plant native canopy species in riparian
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion
enhance native
zone and plant native shrub and
and runoff. Increase nutrient cycling and
floodplain and
herbaceous species on streambanks. Treat
storage in floodplain. Provide riparian habitat.
streambank
invasive species within the project area.
Add a source of LWD and organic material to
vegetation.
streams. Support all stream functions.
Permanently
Establish a conservation easement on the
Protect Bank from encroachment on the
protect the project
Bank.
riparian corridor and direct impact to streams
from harmful uses.
and wetlands. Support all stream functions.
1.4 Qualifications of Bank Sponsor
The Sponsor, which is managed by Wildlands, was developed for the sole purpose of holding mitigation
banks. Wildlands is a multidisciplinary professional engineering firm that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost-effective manner. To
execute stream and wetland mitigation projects, Wildlands assembles a team of project specific
subcontractors to perform surveying, construction services, and planting. Each of these subcontractors
has substantial experience in stream, wetland, and buffer restoration in North Carolina and a substantial
full-time professional staff presence in North Carolina. For this project, Wildlands will serve as the
Authorized Agent.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 2

Email: [e-mail]
2.0 Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank
2.1 Ownership Agreements
The Site is located on one parcel owned by two individuals, and an option agreement to record a
conservation easement for the Site has been signed by the landowner. Upon completion of the review
process for the bank prospectus, the Sponsor will submit a detailed mitigation plan and an umbrella
mitigation banking instrument (UMBI) for the site. The UMBI will provide detailed information regarding
bank operation and the long-term management of the Bank. Once the final mitigation plan is approved
and the accompanying instrument executed by members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the
Sponsor will record a conservation easement on the Bank.
2.2 Landowner Information
Table 2 lists the landowner name, parcel identification number(s), deed reference, and address
associated with the parcel on the site.
Table 2. Landowner Information
Landowner
Parcel ID Number
Deed Reference
Address
Steve and Deborah Copley
950-01-34-8432
Estate File Number 1996 E/000135
6704 Bahama Rd.,
950-11-10-3503
Rougemont NC 27572
2.3 Proposed Service Area
The Bank will be established to mitigate impacts to Waters of the United States and/or State Waters
within the service area depicted in Figure 1. This service area includes the Neuse (Hydrologic Unit
03020201) and the City of Raleigh, Falls Lake, Wake Forest, Hillsborough, Creedmoor, Rolesville, Garner,
Knightdale, Cary, Clayton, Smithfield, and portions of Durham, Morrisville, Holly Springs, and Fuquay-
Varina.
2.4 Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank
2.4.1 Need
RaSinwidP
The Neuse 01 River Basin, as described in the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2009
Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (RBWQP), is undergoing rapid population growth. Wake
County is the most populous county in the state as of 2020, growing by 25.4% between 2010 and 2020
(ncdemography.org). Johnston County grew by 27.9%, and Durham by 21.4% in that same time period.
Wake, Johnston, and Durham Counties are expected to grow by 18.4%, 25%, and 13.9% respectively (NC
Office of State Budget and Management, 2020). This increase in population increases developmental
pressures, change in land use, and the need for expanded infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.) all of
which create the necessity for impacts to Waters of the United States to be mitigated for appropriately
and allow the economic growth of this region to continue while the environment and water quality
remain a priority.
The Sponsor expects Bank customers will include private enterprises and public entities with North
Carolina Division of Transportation (NCDOT) as the primary client. Figure 3 depicts the potential projects
set forth by NCDOT for fiscal years 2015-2025 within the Neuse 01 watershed. This includes
transportation projects along several state, regional, and transition highways.
Sources:
w. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 3

Carolina Demography. "NC Population Growth 2010-2020". https://www.ncdemography.org/2021/08/12/first-look-at-2020-
census-for-north-Carolina/ Accessed: 10/26/21
Office of State Budget and Management "Projected Population Change in North Carolina Counties: 2020-2030".
https://files.nc.gov/ncosbm/demog/countVgrowth 2030.html Accessed: 10/26/21
Local Subbasin
The proposed Bank is located in DWR subbasin 03-04-01 and HUC 0300201040010. The Site includes
Camp Creek. Camp Creek flows into Lake Butner, which flows to Knap of Reeds Creek then Falls Lake and
eventually the Neuse River. This Site is two miles north of an existing DMS full delivery project, Dry
Creek, that was initiated in 2015. The site is also in close proximity to the Camp Butner National Guard
Training Center, which is a sizeable protected area that is considered by the NC Natural Heritage
Program to be a Managed Area.
The 2009 Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan lists major stressors in Subbasin 03-04-01 to be
total suspended solids (TSS), nutrients, and chlorophyll a. The 2010 (amended 201Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) highlights the importance of riparian buffers for stream restoration
projects. Riparian buffers retain and remove nutrients and suspended sediments. The RBRP states that
"priority [restoration] projects should increase or improve buffers." Another goal of the RBRP for the
Neuse 01 HU is to support the Falls Lake watershed plan. The Falls Lake water supply is downstream of
the Site and is classified as water supply waters (WS-IV) and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The RBRP
also states that a goal for the Neuse 01 CU is to, "...promote nutrient and sediment reduction in
agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers."
The Neuse River basin is also discussed in the 2005 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission's
(NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP). In the report, non -point source pollution including nutrient loading
and erosion from stream channelization for agriculture attributed to degraded aquatic habitats in the
basin. Additionally, fertilizers and livestock contribute 60 percent of the nitrate and phosphate found in
the Neuse River basin according to the report. This report notes the importance of stream restoration
and land protection efforts in the watershed to address the observed stressors.
The Camp Creek Mitigation Site is beneficial because of its location within the targeted local watershed
and its potential to address the goals of the Basinwide Water Quality Plan, the RBRP, and the WAP
through stream and buffer restoration, enhancement, and preservation. The proposed treatments of
streams on the Site will directly and indirectly address stressors identified in the planning documents by
creating stable stream banks, restoring meandering pattern, and restoring, enhancing, and preserving
forested riparian buffers. The project will slow surface runoff, increase retention times, provide shade to
streams, and reconnect the streams to their historic floodplains and riparian wetlands, which will reduce
sediment and nutrient loads which contribute to eutrophication of downstream waters. In addition,
restoration will provide and improve instream and terrestrial (riparian) habitats while improving stream
stability and overall hydrology.
The watershed for Camp Creek is comprised of agriculture/pasture, forestland, and developed land
(42%, 51%, and 7% respectively). The Copley Branch drainage area consists of agriculture/pasture,
forestland, and developed land (80%, 15%, and 5% respectively).
2.4.2 Feasibility
A Radius Map Report was ordered for the Bank through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and
obtained on May 25, 2023. The target property was not listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal
environmental databases searched by EDR. However, Camp Butner, a historic and active Department of
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 4

Defense site is located 0.25 miles south of the target property. Wildlands will contact the Department of
Defense to determine what steps should be taken before any land clearing activities or grading are
conducted. A summary of the EDR report is included in the appendix.
The Bank is located in a rural watershed where the dominant land uses are agriculture, forest, and
residential. The site is located near Butner which could develop in the future as Durham County grows.
Future changes in land use might alter the watershed but it is likely that low density residential use
would result in minimal site hydrology changes.
Based on the preliminary existing conditions assessments performed at the Bank in 2023, Wildlands is
confident that the site has substantial potential for the development of a viable mitigation bank. The
project will provide substantial uplift to the Falls Lake watershed and the Neuse River Basin.
3.0 Ecological Suitability of Site
3.1 Bank Site Characterization
The Bank Site is currently maintained for agricultural with sparsely wooded buffers along the project
streams. In the case of Camp Creek downstream of Range Road and Copley Branch, one side of the
channels has a mature forested buffer. The majority of the Site is farmed in row crop agriculture. The
existing conditions of Bank streams are described in Section 3.1.1, existing wetlands are described in
Section 3.1.2, and existing vegetation is described in Section 3.1.3. The appendix contains stream
determination forms and stream geomorphic data. Figure 4 is a topographic map of the site, Figure 5
illustrates the existing Site conditions, and Figure 6 is a map of the project stream watersheds.
3.1.1 Existing Conditions - Streams
Camp Creek
Camp Creek flows from west to east through the Site. Reach 1 begins at
Bahama Road and ends at a relic beaver dam at Range Road. The channel
banks are steep but mostly stable above the water line. Below the water
level, which is backwatered from the dam, the banks are bare. The
stream is slightly disconnected from its floodplain. The riparian buffer is
limited to 5-10 feet in width and has a high proportion of river birch
(Betula nigra).
Reach 2 begins at Range Road as the bed elevation drops more than 4
feet from the top of the relic beaver dam to the existing bed. The stream is deeply incised through the
remainder of the Site (BHR=5.0). The banks are consistently eroding and the bedform is mostly uniform.
The substrate is primarily sand. However, the riparian buffer is very wide on the right side and at least
30 feet on the left side. The reach has been historically channelized.
Flli-; Rmnrh
Ellis Branch is a short intermittent reach that flows along Bahama Road
and enters Camp Creek just downstream from Bahama Road. While this
reach is not incised, it has been artificially located to the road fill slope
immediately adjacent to the Bahama Road right-of-way. There is
essentially no riparian buffer on Ellis Branch, with the road right-of-way
beyond the left bank and an agricultural field on the right bank.
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 5

Just upstream from the Site, Ellis Branch is a stable, forested stream with very different characteristics.
According to aerial photographs, the channel was moved to its current location between 1955 and 1972.
Copley Branch
Copley Branch is a perennial reach that enters the Site at Isham Chambers
Road and has been channelized to its confluence with Camp Creek. The
upper reach is only slightly incised but the degree of incision generally
increases in the downstream direction. Incision is reduced in two locations
where the farmer has attempted to hold grade. Bank erosion is correlated
with the degree of incision. Bedform diversity is limited to very shallow
pools. Gravel substrate is common with large amounts of sand and lesser
cobble. In some locations the farmer has added cobble and sheet plastic to
the bed in an apparent effort to stem headcut migration. The riparian buffer
on the right bank ranges from 0 to 10 feet, while on the left bank it extends
for more than 50 feet to the property line.
T1
T1 becomes an intermittent stream just below a utility easement. Its floodplain has been manipulated
such that subtle berms are present along the channel. The berms prevent field runoff from flowing into
the channel. It also becomes incised as it approaches and enters Camp Creek.
3.1.2 Existing Wetlands
The project area east of Range Road includes approximately 3.6 acres of existing wetland in the
floodplains of Camp Creek and Copley Branch. Existing wetland areas with persistent wetland hydrology
in the floodplain of Camp Creek, while influenced to an extent by groundwater, are also driven by
overland runoff from upslope impervious surfaces, agricultural fields, and hillslopes with moderate to
steep grades. Existing wetland areas in the valley of Copley Branch have persistent wetland hydrology
related to a high groundwater table and are found in the natural topographic valley bottom where the
stream is suspected to have once flowed. A natural upland levee is present along both banks of Camp
Creek and manmade upland berms are present on both banks of Copley Branch where it has been
excavated and modified. Vegetation communities vary in these wetlands with areas dominated by
bottomland hardwood forest, dense shrub/sapling strata, or invasive species. As a whole, prevalent
invasive vegetation is the primary impairment to existing wetlands (Figure 5). Wetland areas that occur
in the western project area are small linear features resulting from historic site manipulation (Figure 5).
An additional 10.4 acres of the project area east of Range Road contains hydric soil or buried hydric soil,
but lacks contemporary wetland hydrology. Wetland hydrology of these areas has been removed by
subsurface drainage to channelized streams and placement of spoil material on hydric soils. The spoil
originated from channel excavation along Copley Branch and earthwork upslope of the valleys.
Watershed characteristics, flashy hydrology, and limited floodplain access have resulted in excessive
sedimentation and formation of a natural upland levee along Camp Creek east of Range Road. Buried
floodplain soils were observed in several locations within the project area, suggesting the presence of
former wetlands.
3.1.3 Existing Vegetation
The condition of the riparian buffer along project streams varies throughout the site. Riparian buffers
are largely absent along Ellis Branch and T1 and consist of seasonal row crops with some black willow
(Salixnigra), sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), river birch (Betula nigra), and red maple (Acer
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 6

rubrum). Problematic native vegetation such as Carolina rose (Rosa caroliniana) and broadleaf cattail
(Typha latifolia), and exotic non-native vegetation such as Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum),
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), were also noted. The
riparian buffer along Camp Creek west of Range Road is sparse with few canopy trees and saplings
consisting of river birch, black willow, sweetgum, and red maple. The riparian buffer on the west bank of
Copley Branch and the north bank of Camp Creek to the east of Range Road adjoin an agricultural field
and have similar vegetative communities. Row crops and native species such as red maple, sweetgum,
box elder (Acer negundo), river birch, slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), and American elm (Ulmus americana)
were noted in the canopy and understory. However, the riparian buffers were largely dominated by
common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), honeysuckle, blackberry (Rubus pensilvanicus), and Japanese
stiltgrass due to disturbance and proximity to the fields. The riparian buffer along the eastern bank of
Copley Branch and southern bank of Camp Creek consisted of bottomland hardwood forest comprised
mostly of native species including white oak (Quercus alba), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), slippery
and American elm, musclewood (Carpinus caroliniana), green ash (Fraxinus pensylvannica), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), spicebush (Lindera benzoin), and box elder in the canopy and understory.
Chinese privet was dominant in the understory in the riparian buffers of Camp Creek and Copley Branch.
3.1.4 Soils
The floodplain areas of the proposed project are mapped by the Durham County Soil Survey as primarily
Chewacla soils (Figure 7). This complex transitions from a loam to a silty clay loam and then a clay loam
at depth. An unconsolidated bedrock layer may be found at 80 inches or deeper. This series often
contains inclusions of Wehadkee, which were identified during soil mapping exercises. Wehadkee are
listed on the National Hydric Soil list.
Much of the soils along Copley Branch are mapped as Helena Sandy Loam but are actually more similar
to the Chewacla series.
Table 3. Project Soil Type and Description
Soil Name
Description
Chewacla and
Wehadkee Soils
Generally found on floodplains. Somewhat poorly drained with bedrock layer more than
80 inches deep.
Helena Sandy Loam
Moderately well drained soil generally found on hillslopes.
Iredell Loam
Moderately well drained soil generally found on interfluves. Weathered bedrock at 72-80
inches.
Appling Sandy Loam
Well drained, found on summits and interfluves.
Source: Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoiISurvey.aspx
3.2 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
No sites listed on the National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office are located
immediately adjacent to or within the project area. The archaeological site files at the North Carolina
Office of State Archaeology (OSA) have not been reviewed at this time. All appropriate cultural resource
agencies will be contacted for their review and comment prior to any land disturbing activity.
Several registered Natural Heritage and Managed Areas located within one mile include the Camp
Butner National Guard Training Center, three Triangle Land Conservancy Preserves, a NC Land and
Water Fund Conservation Agreement and Project area, and two Durham County Easements.
w. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 7

3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the USFWS and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) databases to
identify federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species for Durham County, NC.
Table 4 details the current list of threatened and endangered species for Durham County. A cursory
pedestrian survey conducted on May 24, 2023 indicated that the project area does provide suitable
habitat for all species listed. Wildlands will conduct a full review for protected species in the mitigation
planning phase and will coordinate with USFWS and NCWRC as necessary based on that review.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species in Durham County, NC
Species
Federal Status
Habitat
Mammals
Tricolored bat
Proposed Endangered
Roost in trees during the summer and caves or mines in
(Perimyotis subflavus)
the winter. Prefers to forage in forested riparian areas.
Amphibians
NeusInhabits
River og
perennial streams with clean, flowing water
(Nect isi)
(Necturus lewisi)
Threatened
with high concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Often
found under leaf packs or rocks.
Fish
Carolina madtom
Endangered
Inhabits swiftly flowing, moderate gradient streams with
(Noturus furiosus)
sand and gravel substrates
Insects
Monarch butterfly
Candidate
Requires milkweed species for breeding habitat and
(Danaus plexippus)
flowering plants for foraging habitat.
Flowering Plants
Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Endangered
Inhabits disturbed areas with an open canopy on sandy
michauxii)
or rocky basic soils.
Smooth coneflower
Threatened
Inhabits open areas with little competition from other
(Echinacea laevigata)
plants on neutral to basic soils that are well drained.
Habitat information from the following website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-
county?fips=37037
3.4 Floodplain Compliance
The Site is represented on the Durham County Flood Map 3720094000M. Camp Creek and Site
tributaries are mapped in a Zone AE Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on Durham County Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 0904. A limited detailed study has been performed on Camp Creek
with base flood elevations defined and delineated floodplain. The remaining tributaries do not have
detailed hydraulic studies performed, but the downstream portions of said reaches fall within the Camp
Creek SFHA. Effective hydraulic modeling for Camp Creek will be obtained from the NC Floodplain
Mapping Program. A no -rise condition will be pursued if compatible with stream restoration and
floodplain enhancement grading. If a no -rise condition is not attainable, then a CLOMR will be prepared.
Wildlands' engineers have successfully navigated the CLOMR process for several similar mitigation
project sites. The project will be designed to avoid adverse floodplain impacts or hydrologic trespass on
adjacent properties or local roads.
3.5 Site Constraints and Access
No crossings are required on the Site property. However, an external crossing is required for the NCDOT
right-of-way for Range Road. The stream beneath the Range Road bridge will be designed to allow for
aquatic organism passage. Crossings are summarized and numbered below in Table 5 and on Figure 8.
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 8

Table 5. Proposed Easement Crossings
No.
Width (ft)
Location
Internal or
Crossing Type
Purpose
External
1
60
Camp Creek — Reach 2
External
Existing Bridge
NCDOT Right -of -Way
The easement boundaries around streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 50-foot
minimum riparian buffer for Piedmont streams. The entire easement area can be accessed for
construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Isham Chambers and Range Roads. No
airports are located within 5 miles of the Site.
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
Wildlands will begin the project by identifying the best design approach to meet the stated project
objectives and implement the appropriate degree of intervention. A combination of analog, empirical,
and analytical design approaches will potentially be used. All project resources will be designed to create
stable, functional stream channels and riparian wetlands.
4.1 Stream Restoration
All project reaches are proposed for restoration with
the exception of T1, Camp Creek Reach 1, TLC Branch,
and Copley Creek Reach 1. The restoration reaches will
be designed and built with appropriate dimension,
pattern, and profile to allow for frequent overbank
flooding, provide stable bank slopes, enable biological
lift, and reconnect streams with existing floodplains.
Reference streams will be identified and will serve as
one of the primary sources of information on which
restoration designs are based. Wildlands has developed
a general approach to be used as the basis for stream
restoration design. The design approach, which is tailored to each site, continues to develop as
additional projects are implemented.
All reaches proposed for restoration will be designed with a Priority 1 approach, raising channel beds to
reconnect them with existing floodplains. Priority 2 restoration will be required on the downstream end
of Camp Creek and Copley Branch to stably connect with existing grades. The Priority 2 length will be
minimized. Ellis Branch will be relocated to its historic alignment prior to 1972.
Stream structures will be installed to promote water quality, stabilize the bed and banks, provide
bedform diversity, and increase aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Wildlands plans to evaluate stream
substrate and determine appropriate gradations/bed features for the Site streams. At this stage,
Wildlands believes most of these channels will be built using a threshold channel approach with a
cobble -gravel substrate. Wildlands believes based on other work in this area that appropriate substrate
will be able to be harvested on -site.
4.2 Stream Enhancement I
T1 Reach 1 is slated for an Enhancement I approach. The channel has berms running along it so that
runoff from the adjacent fields cannot laterally enter the channel. The lower end is also incised. The
profile will be addressed by removing the berms and adding constructed riffles to stably drop grade to
the tie in with Camp Creek. Additionally, riparian buffer will be planted on both sides of the channel out
to the rights -of -way for Range and Bahama Roads.
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 9

4.3 Stream Enhancement II
Camp Creek Reach 2 and Copley Branch Reach 1 are slated for an Enhancement II approach. In general,
these reaches are geomorphically stable in their current conditions and have lower bank height ratios,
low bank slopes, and a lesser degree of bank erosion than reaches slated for restoration. Camp Creek
Reach 1 will be targeted for riparian buffer planting. Copley Branch Reach 1 will have buffer planting on
the right bank, as well as spot stabilization of eroding streambank. Ell is proposed at a ratio of 4:1 for
Camp Creek and 5:1 for Copley Branch. Although the density of invasive species in these two reaches is
low, they will be treated.
4.4 Stream Preservation
TLC Branch is located in a wooded area of the Camp Creek floodplain. It is targeted for stream
preservation at a 10:1 ratio. There is a short segment where it leaves the project property and where no
stream credit is proposed.
4.5 Wetlands
Two activities will be used to improve wetland hydrology to justify wetland re-establishment in the
areas identified in Figure 8. First, and likely most relevant, the restoration of incised streams using
Priority 1 techniques will serve to effectively change the subsurface flow gradient and discharge
characteristics of the groundwater table to the receiving stream, rehydrating wetlands adjacent to the
channel. Tree planting and invasive species treatment will also occur in these areas to establish a
healthy riparian wetland buffer.
In areas that currently qualify as jurisdictional wetlands that are located adjacent to streams that are not
incised, wetland enhancement activities will occur. This will primarily include planting and invasive
species treatment. Wetland enhancement areas will also benefit from Priority 1 restoration techniques
that will raise the groundwater table and re-establish a more traditional wetland hydrology regime for
bottomland hardwood forests that is equally influenced by groundwater, flood flows, and overland flow.
The Site includes areas of wetland re-establishment and enhancement. Because some of the wetland
enhancement areas are located in forested areas, the overall credit ratio is proposed at 3:1. Additionally,
preservation of reference -quality jurisdictional wetlands is proposed at 10:1.
4.6 Vegetation Plan
Native riparian buffers will be planted along restored
and enhanced stream reaches, in all proposed wetland
restoration zones, and in all riparian restoration areas.
The ecological uplift can be summarized as transforming
an agriculturally impacted area to a protected riparian
corridor. Buffer restoration will involve planting
appropriate native tree species along the riparian
corridor. Herbaceous riparian vegetation will also be
planted, but additional herbaceous plants are expected
to re-establish naturally and through the placement of a
native seed mix in disturbed areas. Live stake shrub
species will be planted along restored streams.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications will
be needed over the first few years of tree establishment in the riparian buffer restoration areas to
prevent encroachment of invasive species. Portions of the site that have been maintained as cleared
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 10

agricultural fields will require little site preparation other than select herbicide treatments or limited
mechanical clearing to remove undesirable underbrush prior to planting.
The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearby reference community and past project
experience. The plan will be developed to restore appropriate strata (canopy, understory, shrub, and
herbaceous layers). Vegetation planted in restored wetland areas will be based on species identified
within appropriate reference locations and professional experience based on site conditions.
Areas with an existing wooded riparian corridor will be treated for invasive species. The Site will be
protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement and will be marked per IRT guidelines.
5.0 Determination of Mitigation Credits
The mitigation stream and wetland credit calculations were derived using the US Army Corps of
Engineers' Stream Mitigation Guidance and was based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum
ecological uplift. Given the existing conditions of the stream channels, wetlands, the disturbance factors,
and the constraints, management objectives for each reach have been established.
The Site will be a combination of stream restoration and enhancement level II activities. Stream
restoration is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and enhancement level II is proposed at ratios of 2.5:1 or 3:1 as
listed below. In general, if enhancement level II areas are located within wooded areas with minimal
opportunity for vegetative uplift but cattle have access and limited stream work is required, the 3:1 ratio
is proposed. Stream preservation is proposed at a 10:1 ratio. The management objective, the mitigation
type, and proposed amount of mitigation is presented in the below in Table 6.
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 11

Table 6. Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits
Stream Credits
Reach
Management Objectives
Type of Mitigation
(feet)
Ratio
CCedits
RESTORATION
Ellis Branch
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,
414
1
414
and profile with Priority 1 restoration.
Install habitat structures, allow bankfull
Camp Creek Reach 2
floodplain access. Establish native riparian
buffer, execute long term protection
Restoration
1,704
1
1,704
Copley Branch — Reach 2
instrument, mark easement.
782
1
782
Restoration Subtotal:
2,900
2,900
ENHANCEMENT
Remove berms along channel, stabilize
banks and add structures where needed,
T1— Reach 1
establish native riparian buffer where
Enhancement 1
220
2
110
needed, execute long term protection
instrument, mark easement.
Enhancement I Subtotal:
220
110
ENHANCEMENT II
Treat invasive species, stabilize banks and
Camp Creek — Reach 1
add structures where needed, establish
420
4
105
native riparian buffer where needed,
Enhancement II
Copley Branch - Reach 1
execute long term protection instrument,
380
5
76
mark easement.
Enhancement II Subtotal:
800
181
PRESERVATION
TLC Branch
Treat invasive species, long term
Preservation
760
10
76
protections instrument, mark easement.
Preservation Subtotal:
760
76
TOTAL
4,680
3,267
Table 7. Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits
Wetland credits
Type of
Area
Wetland
Area
Management Objectives
Ratio
Mitigation
(Acres)
Credits
Reduce soil compaction, raise adjacent stream
Wetland
beds and remove concentrated floodplain flow
Wetland
Reestablishment
paths (as needed) to restore hydrology, remove
9.187
1:1
9.187
Reestablishment
overburden and excess sediment, establish native
hydrophytic vegetation
Remove invasive species and improve native
Wetland
Wetland
hydrophytic vegetation community, raise slightly
3.499
3:1
1.166
Enhancement
Enhancement
incised adjacent stream beds to improve hydrology
Wetland
Wetland
Remove invasive species as necessary
0.134
10:1
0.013
Preservation
Preservation
TOTAL:
12.820
10.366
5.1.1 Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built surveys of the
Bank. Under no circumstances shall the Bank be debited until the necessary Department of Army (DA)
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 12

written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of
the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if performance standards
have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where
some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the
specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to
which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project credits will follow
the Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Compensatory Mitigation in North
Carolina, dated February 9, 2013. The proposed credit release schedule is shown in Tables 8 and 9.
Table 8. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
15%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
3
performance standards have been met
10%
40%
Second year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
4
interim performance standards have been met
10%
50%
Third year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
5
performance standards have been met
10%
60%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
65%
6
interim performance standards have been met
o
5%
(75%')
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
75°%
7
being met
10%
(85%.)
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
80%
8
being met
5%
(90%.)
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable,
90%
9
performance standards have been met.
0
10%
(100%.)
*A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule
Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
15%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance standards
3
are being met
10%
40%
Second year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
4
10%
50%
standards are being met
Third year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance standards
5
are being met
15%
65%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
6
standards are being met
5%
70%
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
7
being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT may
15%
85%
allow the Bank Sponsor to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after the fifth
w. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 13

Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
year, but vegetation monitoring must continue for an additional two years
after the fifth year for a total of seven years
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
8
being met
5°%
90°%
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
9
being met, and project has received close-out approval
10%
100%
5.2 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits is defined as Bank Establishment in the 2013 Wilmington District
credit release schedule guidance document. The initial allocation can be released without prior written
approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE.
b. Approval of the final mitigation plan.
c. Recordation of the conservation easement and delivery of a title opinion acceptable to the
USACE.
d. Delivery of the financial assurances described in the mitigation plan.
e. 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
5.3 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects, a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull events have occurred in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As the bank approaches milestones associated with the credit
release, Wildlands will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
6.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the October
2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be
conducted to assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components
are proposed for stream morphology, hydrology, and vegetation. The stream restoration reaches of the
project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology, vegetation, and
geomorphology. The enhancement II reaches will be assigned specific performance criteria components
for vegetation only. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the (up to) seven years of post -
construction monitoring. If all stream, vegetation, and hydrologic performance criteria have been
successfully met and at least four bankfull events have occurred during separate years, Wildlands may
propose to terminate stream and/or vegetation monitoring after five years with written approval from
the USACE and North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). An outline of the performance criteria
components follows.
w. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 14

6.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross sections should fall within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes
will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the
channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -
to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. These sorts of bed changes do not
constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions. If channel changes indicate a movement
toward stability, remedial action will not be taken.
In order to assess channel dimension performance,
permanent cross sections will be installed on restoration and
reaches per the IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines
(October 2016). Each cross section will be permanently
marked with pins to establish its location. Cross section
surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,
including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
Cross section and bank pin surveys (if applicable) will be
conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and
seven.
Profile and Pattern
Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted during the as -built survey but will not be conducted
during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a
trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will
follow standards as described in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field
Technique (Harrelson et. al., 1994) for the necessary reaches.
Substrate
Channel substrate materials will be sampled with the pebble count method along restoration, and
enhancement I reaches. These reaches should show maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle
features and smaller particles in the pool features. A reach -wide pebble count will be performed in each
restoration reach each monitoring year for classification purposes. A pebble count will be performed at
each surveyed riffle cross-section, only during the as -built survey to characterize the pavement.
6.2 Hydrology
Stream
Four bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the
form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented. Bankfull events will be
documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site
conditions. The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle
cross section. Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition.
Where restoration activities are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gages will be installed to
track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Continuous surface water flow within the
tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days during the seven-
year monitoring period. This 30-day period of flow can occur at any point during the year. Additional
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 15

monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to abnormally dry
conditions.
Wetland
Groundwater monitoring will be conducted for seven years after construction to evaluate the hydrologic
state of the restored wetland areas. Wetland groundwater gages will be installed in accordance with the
techniques and standards described in the USACE document entitled "Technical Standard for Water -
Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites" (ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2, June 2005). Groundwater
monitoring gages will be established throughout the wetland area to adequately characterize the
different soils, vegetation communities, and surface topographic variations that are found across the
site. According to Table 1 in the USACE Mitigation Guidance update, Wehadkee soils have a wetland
saturation range of 12-16% of the growing season. Based on this, the final criteria for wetland hydrology
will be groundwater levels within 12 inches of the soil surface for a minimum period of 12% of the
growing season.
6.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridors at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of vegetative
success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end of the
third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Also,
trees must average seven feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and ten feet in height at
the end of the seventh monitoring year. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem
density is trending towards success (i.e., vigor), and invasive species are not threatening ecological
success, monitoring of vegetation on the Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in
consultation with the IRT. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees. The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
October 2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the summer and
will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).
6.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid -channel bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment, so that the same
locations and view directions on the Site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration and enhancement areas, as well as vegetation plots.
Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross
section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the
vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point, cross section, and
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 16

vegetation plot will be taken when the stream and vegetation assessments are conducted. The
photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above. Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the
seven-year monitoring period. Problem areas such as channel instability (e.g. lateral and/or vertical
instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetation health (e.g. low
stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), or beaver activity will be noted.
Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed and will be accompanied by a written description in
the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent visual assessment. Should
remedial actions be required, a plan of action will be provided in the annual monitoring report.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site. Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (October 2012).
7.0 Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability
7.1 Maintenance
The Bank shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the project shall be
conducted at a minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that
require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance will be conducted to rectify identified deficiencies
and may include the activities listed in Table 10.
Table 10. Maintenance Plan
Component /
Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in -stream
structures to prevent piping, securing loose coir matting, and supplemental installations of live
Stream
stakes and other target vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain
flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -
cutting. Beaver dams that inundate the streams channels shall be removed and the beaver
shall be trapped.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
Vegetation
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species affecting the viability of the
mitigation shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation control
requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with the NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the bank site
Site
and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -
Boundary
blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary
markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as -needed
basis.
0y Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 17

7.2 Adaptive Management
Upon completion of site construction, the Sponsor will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols and minor remedial actions (routine maintenance) will be performed as needed for the
duration of the monitoring period. The Sponsor will notify the USACE immediately if monitoring results
or visual observations suggest a trend towards instability, major remedial actions are needed, or that
performance standards cannot be achieved. Should major remedial measures be required, the Sponsor
will submit a Corrective Action Plan and coordinate with the USACE until authorization is secured to
conduct the adaptive management activities. The Sponsor is responsible for funding and/or providing
the services necessary to secure any necessary permits to support the proposed major remedial
adaptive management actions, to implement the corrective action plan, and to deliver record drawings
that depict the extent and nature of the work performed. If the USACE determines that the Bank is not
meeting performance standards or the Sponsor is not complying with the terms of the instrument, the
USACE may take appropriate actions, including but not limited to: suspending credit sales, utilizing
financial assurances, and/or terminating the instrument.
7.3 Long Term Management Provisions
The Sponsor will institute a Long Term Management Plan responsible for assessing the condition of the
Bank and implementing maintenance provisions to maintain performance of the Bank. The proposed
conservation easement will help to ensure that only IRT-allowable activities take place. This easement
will be transferred to an IRT-approved non-profit organization once monitoring success criteria have
been achieved.
The provider for long term management of the sites is anticipated to be Unique Places to Save
(UP2Save). UP2Save is a 501c3 nonprofit committed to land conservation through conservation planning
and management. The funding mechanism for long term management will be a stewardship
endowment funded by Wildlands. Contact information for UP2Save is listed below.
Unique Places to Save
206 Causeway Drive #206
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
To monitor the project's continued success, a Long Term Management Plan will be implemented
following the seven-year monitoring period. All components of the bank will be inspected annually or
less frequently as needed to ensure that the Bank remains stable in perpetuity. Sources of instability or
other deficiencies will be addressed. Invasive species will be managed annually or less frequently as
needed to ensure the long term survivability of the planned native vegetation community. All reporting
will be documented and kept on file for future reference.
8.0 References
Geologic Map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale, 1985. Compiled by Philip M. Brown at el. Raleigh, NC,
North Carolina Geological Survey.
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?a ppid=a8281cbd24b84239b29cd2ca7
98d4a10
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2011. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) 2009 Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan,
accessed at:
w. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 18

https://www.deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-planning/basin-planning/river-
basin-plans/neuse
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2018 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities
(RBRP), accessed at:
https://www.deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-
documents/neuse-river-basin-documents
Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS, accessed at
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
�. Widllands Upper Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
W Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 19

87
Service Area - HUC 03020201
58 14 Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
1
Oefoneechee "—I NC County Boundaries
State Park �••—s
_ NC Municipal Boundaries
95 49 — Camp Creek Mitigation Site
-..—..—.._..—..—'._..—..—..—..—..—....�..—..—.._.._..—i.—..�..—..—.-- .......15 ......1 . ,.....—..—..—;. •l
I
Sappony /dt' I } Kerr Lake Static
j Recreation A►Al r
-57 j - Person CO -
j Roxboro 1 La6 I l
L158i I � j i 1
- Caswell
Co-
� j I endersan � j
86 1 158 Oxfard , 1 i 401 l
Vance CC)- - Warren CO -
..—........—.. .............. --- - Granville 58 ,.
1
j leba
j illsbor
t
as 1 yZ. Q�
j !
s4 - orange co -
- Durham
Chape�I-fill
a
I
Pittsboro 8 Everett
Jordan
- Chatham Lake
CO-
i
87':
!o 11 Carolina ��..
i 42 •IN
87
ti
r Co -
I• 39
•��.
B r reedmoor }$ y 1
------
�• 43
L� I
�• Ln:ii;h:irrl
Franklin
�• -
._►---..
-
CO -
!
ake
est
- Nash C.O.
- Wake CO -
zebulr lti ►•
.�••
_
••
rY Raleigh
gMda . Wendell "I."
•�• -
Y
jj11jj
lolly Springs �' Clayton
i
-V 4
A 210 -Johnston
1
- Harnett Lillington o Coats
Co - Bepson
1
Z.
Coharie Sdtsa �'•
Erwin ti
u �
Dunn
Walkertown
210, n
Pi , t -Spring Lake
Fort Liberty Fort Bragg -
Military Cumberland
Reservation y
Co -
Hoke CO -
Fayeftevile
O
'401
Raeford �1 Hope f•;lil s
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
24
0 S 16 Miles
I i I i I
p
581
JI-1 7'
C%2111111111
50
Olive.
j +� -^ - 403� •�
- Sampson C701
Co - l
Duplin CO -
�i�
j
l
ginton ` Warsaw
241.
n
Figure 1 Service Area Map
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Durham County, NC

i i ■ i ■ i i pigg
i---■!�!— -- C_ •!i - ••■ ■fi`c'�� +!/ N1d■•�nta�•■Pand•� ■ /! i ■ ■
NC Division n
0 itigtion Services,
40 0 0 ■ �S� Easement" ii •�■■ �!f'■ I i ■ ■ • • ■ C CV. i- ■i i�TQp�■!LPr ■ ai!'=�i7 ■■''T■ #
0 Ohm
d It
■./ ■ -i ■ic, i ■ • i i
•
iver
Land ■ ! =� ! • �� ! • • • ■ i ■
i — t i ■ U� ■ • ■ Conservancy Easement „� ' n co * i ■! r ! ■ i 6
_ • r� ■ * ■ ! F!r i . C ; • ! / ■ i ! *
Sl
- - ■I ■ 6 i ■ ■ ■ i ■ PyrophyllitW i
r • ■ i ■ • ■ ■ • • • i S L j # • ■ Ridge'South
i - ■ ■ A ■ ■ i i ! • ■ ■ ■ j Tar.River. Land : '!I Pkophyllite Ridge
�i' 1 ■ i i • i ■ ■ / ■ i�oriservanry Preserve South Registered
�, ■ ■ i ■ / ■ i' ■ HIritage Area
Till FfrestghesVut ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ i i
■ - l 4pak/Shortbaf ■ ■ • �■ ■ ■ i
�ne.Faresti ■ ■ Pro ]ect■ i ■
i �► ! • Location �1 i • •
• ! ! • i i ! ! ! ji • • ■ ■ ! T, llyho
Person .o ■ ■ i ■ r • ■ / ■ ■ ��w Monadnock
co
i
-t MounY Tir Itr Durham �Co- y i i ■ qaµ • ■ `
or ` Slopes ■ ■ ! s, i. ' I Camp Butner ■ ■ ■
~` / * • • e ■ :� rp i]�-j i * j National Guard
- rham Count _ '�}
Y ■ ��* * i Training Center. Camp Butner* i
pen Space 07- m [ ® j Natural Area ■ /
°� I ■ i i
Durham County ! j i #
Open Space Hill Forest Dial Carrin ton Farm �'rs i Tar'River land
g • Durham County [anservancy Preserve
� Creek Hardwood &Cemetery
Forest
Easement
H
�1_
, i -
�ll Forest I i ■ i ' ■ i
� og Hoises •
Adolphus Umstead j + • • ! ! ■
Flat River Slopes House., I cry
above Lake'Michie + ! D..C. Umstead j ■ .
Store end House � •
„ . NC Qrvision
slake lGIlchiel �•" 1 Umstead Research, .
of Mitigation Services
i Oorrl r 4P [ ■ j �; r Farm
Easement:- Dry Creek
i Butner -Falls of/ Stem (-
■ i ry � * Mitigation Site Neuse Game Land •n s
ce ern Alp
'.. j
s i s.m a- - i.
G7
oe
Durham County Soil 0
�. Water District Property. I CD
al 0• 0
i ■ ey r.. ' Durham County Hampfon=Ellis` r fo �0 $
1
i Open Space Farm + ■
Project Location ® Water Supply Watershed NC Historic Preservation Areas
Five Mile Radius Water Features NC Natural Heritage Program
Municipalities F__] Water quality TRA Managed Areas
Hydrologic Unit Code {14-Digit} NC Significant Natural Heritage 303d Listed Streams
River Basin
Areas
NC County Boundaries
r�•_N
r-------- --Y - - — - .....- -- --
Figure 2 Vicinity Map
W I L D L A N D 5 ❑ 0.75 1.5 Miles Camp Creek Mitigation Site
ktwr E N G I N E E R I N G I 1 I Neuse River Basin 03020201
Durham County, NC

2020-2029 STIP
Statewide Highway - Caswell
Regional Highway CO -
Division Highway
Interstate Maintenance
Bridge; None Bridge
Transition Highway ]]�'
Other Highway; None Highway; None Highway Safety 1
Statewide Aviation
Regional Aviation _
Division Aviation Alamance .01
Co -
+ Aviation; Ex Aviation
'; Regional Ferry
Division Ferry
Transition Ferry
w
0 Statewide Rail
Regional Rail
Division Rail
Transition Rail
Other Rail; None Rail
- Chatham
Regional Public Transit CO_
Division Public Transit
Other Public Transit
Division Bicycle And Pedestrian
Transition Bicycle And Pedestrian
- Lee CO -
- Person Co -
Camp Creek
Mitigation Site p
- Granville ,ram
CO-
I ! r��
o
0
L� 5G1 _ Franklin
e> W.W.
O —
1+ •
- Harnett
Co-
- Montgomery as
- Stanly CO - CO - - Moore CO -
4(l j s-
- Cumberland
- Richmond - Hoke CO - Co- Ao�
- Anson CO - CO -
j Service Area - HUC 03020201
�+ } NC Count Boundaries
l - Wilson CO - — y
A
0 - Pitt CO -
-Johnston
CO -S
Greene CO. •`
._. 3
ti
• IL �}
i - Wayne CO -
y
-Lenoir CO -
� Craven
CO. -
- Sampson
CO - i �� - Jones
- Duplin CO CO -
W I LD LAN D S Figure 3 NCQCiT Current STIR FY 2020-2029
ENGINEERING Camp Creel[ Mitigation Site
0 5 10 Miles Neuse River Basin 03020201
l i i i l
Durham County, NC

Durham, NC 7.5 Topographic Quadrangle
m
v
' r
► I
r
■ � r
1
*
Proposed Conservation Easement
�tttttttrr. —
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
kkWILDLANDS Camp Creek Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E IR t N G p 250 500 Feet Neuse River Basin 03020201
I I I
Durham County, NC

f: .
. . 1 .'..
Jr y �
`.'.
Q Project Location
;i
^'' 1 Proposed Conservation Easement
Utility Easement
Existing Wetlands
Perennial Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams *�
Non -Project Streams
Bank Erosion & Incision
Incision
Topographic Contours (2')
Cross -Sections
Existing Headcut
QQ Reach Breaks
WILDLANDS ❑
ENGINEERING I
200 400 Feet
I I
a;•.
$r
4 ff:
Figure 5 Site Map
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Durham County, NC

Figure G Watershed Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Camp Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I Neuse River Basin 03020201
Durham County, NC

ar Ir6.
f
i IrC
40
M r+-
i
rgHeB rh:1
Project Location
;__ i Proposed Conservation Easement Ch i
ApB - Appling Sandy Loam, 2-6%
Slopes A
P
ApC - Appling Sandy Loam, 6-10%
Slopes
Ch - Chewacla and Wehadkee
Soils, 0-2% Slopes, Freq. Flooded
HeB - Helena Sandy Loam, 2-6% =
Slopes Hed.
HeC - Helena Sandy Loam, 6-10% • ApC '
Slopes
HrB - Herndon Silt Loam, 2-6% ,
Slopes
IrB - Iredell Loam, 2-6% Slopes �.
IrC - Iredell Loam, 6-10% Slopes Ap6
Perennial Project StreamsA.
"
Intermittent Project Streams
Non -Project Streams
kbWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Figure 7 Soils Map
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
0 250 500 Feet Neuse River Basin 03020201
I I I I I
Durham County, NC

Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement F..
Utility Easement
Proposed Wetland Re-establishment {1:1} �": %°�'`:.�"'�'•
Proposed Wetland Enhancement(3:1) :-
�. Yy .
Proposed Wetland Preservation (1D:1)
Proposed Stream Restoration
Proposed Stream Enhancement f
Proposed Stream Enhancement fl
Proposed Stream Preservation 1.
No Stream Credit
Non -Project Streams
Topographic Contours (2')
CJ Proposed Reach Breaks
0 WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
4
Figure 8 Concept Design Map
0 200 40D Feet Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin 03020201
I I I I
Durham County, NC

Ror
a
Elevation (Feet)
� 525
460
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Utility Easement
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Proposed Stream Restoration
Proposed Stream Enhancement I
Proposed Stream Enhancement 11
Proposed Stream Preservation
No Stream Credit
Non -Project Streams
Topographic Contours (Y)
® Proposed Reach Breaks
•1i 4%.
Imbers Rd
Figure 9 tiDAR Map
Camp Creek Mitigation Site
0 300 600 Feet Neuse River Basin 03020201
1 1 1 1 1 Durham County, NC

Appendix A
Historic Aerials

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 05/25/23
Site Name: Client Name:
Camp Creek Mitigation Site Wildlands Eng, Inc. Range Road and Isham Chaml 1430 South Mint Street CEDR
Rougemont, NC 27572 Charlotte, NC 28203
EDR Inquiry # 7347749.5 Contact: Tasha King
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
2020
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2020
USDA/NAIP
2016
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1998
1"=500'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998
USGS/DOQQ
1993
1 "=500'
Acquisition Date: March 15, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1983
1"=500'
Flight Date: March 02, 1983
NHAP
1974
1 "=500'
Flight Date: April 01, 1974
USGS
1972
1 "=500'
Flight Date: April 18, 1972
USDA
1955
1 "=500'
Flight Date: March 30, 1955
USDA
1950
1 "=500'
Flight Date: November 18, 1950
USGS
1940
1 "=500'
Flight Date: October 25, 1940
USDA
1937
1 "=500'
Flight Date: December 11, 1937
USDA
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an
"AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY
KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN
THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON -INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS
SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF
DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT.
Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment
performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any
property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
7347749 - 5 page 2

r �
6
�._7
A1'i
INQUIRY #: 7347749.5 /�
YEAR: 2020 "j�J�'
= 500'. N
EDR
s�

le
V.--

Val
.. g - �4.
7-3�72

4 �
y • / Y. � s
f
iFi • i
Ic' .. .
i� i� r.• r
tj
No
�/. L �y}��' 1 YLt'' r � K 1 : C l i� • V �� � �'•
'� a#-
IA
INQUIRY #: 7347749.5
YEAR: 2006

t
.l
b,;
INQUIRY k 7347749.5 /1
YEAR: 1998 4
= 500' EDR

* 4ij
INQUIRY #: 7347749.5
YEAR: 1974 1 N
= 500' (rEDR

it-1-7
INQUIRY k 7347749.5
YEAR: 1972
500,
41

INQUIRY k 7347749.5
YEAR: 1955 4 N
= 500' (rEDR

PF N-
� 4. . 0
INQUIRY k 7347749.5
YEAR: 1950 4 N
= 500' (rEDR
L2V

, %k *'Y
�-+a :�; + . �• —der
INQUIRY k 7347749.5 /1 K f
YEAR: 1940 �jJr w�
= 500' E OR -+

I \ `
IL -do
14�
.TA,

Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms

o NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: January 27, 2023
Project/Site:
Copley
Latitude: 36.2257190
Evaluator: CL
Trib/Reach: Ditch on Range Rd not inproject)
Longitude: -78.8290329
Total Points: 20.5
Stream Determination: Intermittent 19 to < 30
County: Durham
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
7.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed
and bank
❑ 0
❑ 1
102
❑ 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along
thalwe
❑ 0
0 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
3. In -channel structure
❑ 0
M 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
4. Particle size of stream
substrate
❑ 0
M 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
5. Active/relict floodplain
❑ 0
❑ 1
0 2
❑ 3
6. Depositional bars or
benches
0 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
8. Headcuts
D 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
9. Grade control
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
10. Natural valley
❑ 0
100.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
11. Second or greater order
channel
No - 0
❑ Yes - 3
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
14. Leaf litter
❑ 1.5
❑ 1
0 0.5
❑ 0
15. Sediment on plants or
❑ 0
101
❑ 1.5
debris
❑ 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
M 1
❑ 1.5
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of
❑ No = 0
0 Yes = 3
high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5)
18. Fibrous roots in
streambed
❑ 3
212
❑ 1
❑ 0
19. Rooted upland plants in
streambed
❑ 3
0 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
20. Macrobenthos (note
diversity and abundance
❑p 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
100
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
22. Fish
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
24. Amphibians
❑p 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
25. Algae
❑ 0
0 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
26. Wetland plants in
streambed
❑ FACW = 0.75; ❑ OBL = 1.5; 0 Other = 0
Notes:
roadside on right bank. affects some of the score. would jabe scored higher if not along road.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: January 27, 2023
Project/Site:
Copley
Latitude: 36.2260841
Evaluator: CL
Trib/Reach: Ellis Branch west of Bahama Rd
Longitude: -78.8303388
Total Points: 27.5
Stream Determination: Intermittent 19 to < 30
County: Durham
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
13.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed
and bank
❑ 0
❑ 1
102
❑ 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along
thalwe
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑✓ 2
❑ 3
3. In -channel structure
❑ 0
❑ 1
Z 2
❑ 3
4. Particle size of stream
substrate
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑✓ 2
❑ 3
5. Active/relict floodplain
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑✓ 2
❑ 3
6. Depositional bars or
benches
❑ 0
✓❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
❑ 0
✓❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
8. Headcuts
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
9. Grade control
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
10. Natural valley
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑O 1.5
11. Second or greater order
channel
No - 0
❑ Yes - 3
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
❑p 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
14. Leaf litter
❑ 1.5
211
❑ 0.5
❑ 0
15. Sediment on plants or
❑ 0
❑✓ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
debris
16. Organic debris lines or
❑ 0
Z 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of
❑ No = 0
❑O Yes = 3
high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6)
18. Fibrous roots in
streambed
❑p 3
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
19. Rooted upland plants in
streambed
❑p 3
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
20. Macrobenthos (note
diversity and abundance
❑p 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
100
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
22. Fish
M 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
23. Crayfish
M 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
24. Amphibians
❑p 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
25. Algae
❑p 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
26. Wetland plants in
streambed
❑ FACW = 0.75; ❑ OBL = 1.5; ❑✓ Other = 0
Notes:
did assessment from above the road. the project area in consideration would score out lower due to the affects of the roadside.
however, above the road is stream

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: January 27, 2023
Project/Site:
Copley
Latitude: 36.2273799
Evaluator: CL
Trib/Reach: Copley Branch
Longitude: -78.8250303
Total Points: 39.5
Stream Determination: Perennial >= 30
County: Durham
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
23)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed
and bank
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along
thalwe
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
3. In -channel structure
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
4. Particle size of stream
substrate
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
213
5. Active/relict floodplain
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
6. Depositional bars or
benches
❑ 0
❑ 1
0 2
❑ 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
❑ 0
❑ 1
0 2
❑ 3
8. Headcuts
00
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
9. Grade control
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
10. Natural valley
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
0 1
❑ 1.5
11. Second or greater order
channel
❑ No - 0
0 Yes - 3
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
0 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
14. Leaf litter
0 1.5
❑ 1
❑ 0.5
❑ 0
15. Sediment on plants or
❑ 0
0 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
debris
16. Organic debris lines or
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
0 1
❑ 1.5
piles
17. Soil -based evidence of
❑ No = 0
0 Yes = 3
high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5)
18. Fibrous roots in
streambed
0 3
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
19. Rooted upland plants in
streambed
103
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
20. Macrobenthos (note
diversity and abundance
❑ 0
✓❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
D 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
22. Fish
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
25. Algae
❑ 0
0 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
26. Wetland plants in
streambed
❑ FACW = 0.75; ❑ OBL = 1.5; 0 Other = 0
Notes:
several ispods.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
T-LC
Date: �'l2 1I Z
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent j
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = S-� 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
LiP
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = G • S- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
.1J
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
ro-575
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
_
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = < <
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
M
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
b.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 er =
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

TI
),1,5)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1
Project/Site:Q�!2 C
Latitude:Nf ,aai 0%5
Evaluator: �4
County: w
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream D mina ircle one)
Other 0;L
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2: 19 or perennial if 2 30"
Epheme I Intermittent'Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
►�1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
anmciai ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual + _ V�
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _l b_. G)_) uJ
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of hie water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = & . )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 03K OBL = 1-VMther = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 5'\ 4M
1 V
)"
!'�Yw� W Q -�w "' 5 AfxAeA
qD'\
jlwmg� W* -Vvw-
a

Appendix C
Existing Geomorphic Data

96
Z 94
92
is
°' 90
w
Riffle - Camp Creek
(Downstream of Range Road)
0 20 40
Bankfull Dimensions
32.0
x-section area (ft.sq.)
17-9
'width (ft)
1-8
' mean depth (ft)
2.6
' max depth (ft)
19-6
■
wetted perimeter (ft)
1-6
' hydraulic radius (ft)
10-1
'width -depth ratio
60
80 100
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
28.2
W flood prone area (ft)
1-6
'entrenchment ratio
5-0
' low bank height (ft)
1.9
' low bank height ratio
Riffle - Ellis Branch
100
99
�98
.0 97
iz
96
w
95
--------- --- ---
------------------------------- ------
94
93
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
7-0
x-section area
12-3
'width (ft)
0-6
' mean depth (ft)
0-8
' max depth (ft)
12-5
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.6
' hydraulic radius (ft)
21.7
'width -depth ratio
Flood Dimensions
--- W flood prone area (ft)
-- ' entrenchment ratio
0-9 ' low bank height (ft)
1-1 ' low bank height ratio

Riffle - Copley Branch
95
94
93
0 92-----------------------------------------------------
91
w
90
89
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions Flood dimensions
98
97
96
95
94
° 93
m
> 92
W 91
90
89
5.8
x-section area (ft_sq_)
6.5
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.2
max depth (ft)
7.4
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.8
hydraulic radius (ft)
7.2
width -depth ratio
8.9 W flood prone area (ft)
1.4 entrenchment ratio
2.7 law bank height (ft)
2.3 low bank height ratio
Camp Creek R1 - Riffle
0 10 20 30
Bankfull Dimensions
32.0
'x-section area (ft.sq.)
14.2
'width (It)
2.3
mean depth (ft)
3.5
max depth (ft)
16.7
■
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.9
hydraulic radius (ft)
6.3
width -depth ratio
40 50 60
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
--- W flood prone area (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
5.1 low bank height (ft)
1.4 low bank height ratio
70
70 80

Appendix D
EDR Radius Report Summary

Camp Creek Mitigation Site
Range Road and Isham Chambers Road
Rougemont, NC 27572
Inquiry Number: 7347749.2s
May 25, 2023
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDR . Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary
ES1
OverviewMap-----------------------------------------------------------
2
DetailMap--------------------------------------------------------------
3
Map Findings Summary
4
MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist
from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES,
AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON -INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates,
ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property.
Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the
environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.
Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any
report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC7347749.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-22) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
RANGE ROAD AND ISHAM CHAMBERS ROAD
ROUGEMONT, NC 27572
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
36.2273960 - 36' 13' 38.62"
78.8279200 - 78° 49' 40.51"
Zone 17
695219.8
4011156.8
488 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13840561 LAKE MICHIE, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140618
Source: USDA
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
RANGE ROAD AND ISHAM CHAMBERS ROAD
ROUGEMONT, NC 27572
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
Reg NG MTA CAMP BUTNER DOD Same 1204, 0.228, South
7347749.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL---------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY---------. Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------ RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS------------------------ Land Use Control Information System
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST ------------------------- Regional UST Database
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST ----------------- State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP__________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY______________________
Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF
Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9-----------
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI
Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL---------------- Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS_______________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS
Spills Incident Listing
IMD
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90--------------------
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST ------------
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION
2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS_________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD
Records Of Decision
RMP_________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS___________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FUSRAP_____________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS_____________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES
Abandoned Mines
FINDS ------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO-------------------------.
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
PFAS NPL
Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information
PFAS FEDERAL SITES ------
Federal Sites PFAS Information
PFAS TSCA
PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST_____.
PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing
PFAS ATSDR________________
PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS WQP
Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
PFAS NPDES
Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information
PFAS ECHO_________________
Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING. Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT___
All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC-------
Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing
PFAS
PFAS Contamination Site Listing
AIRS
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS__________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance ----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP--------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
PFAS TRIS
List of PFAS Added to the TRI
CCB--------------------------
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS
Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS-------------------- Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Other Ascertainable Records
DOD: Consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of
Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.
Virgin Islands.
A review of the DOD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/07/2021 has revealed that there is 1 DOD
site within approximately 1 of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
NG MTA CAMP BUTNER S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) 0 8
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC7347749.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 7347749.2S
Target Property
o 114 1@
1 ones
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations BIA
Hazardous Substance
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
County Boundary
Disposal Sites
the target property
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Camp Creek Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Range Road and Isham Chambers Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Rougemont NC 27572 INQUIRY #: 7347749.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.227396 / 78.82792 DATE: May 25, 2023 1:59 pm
Copyright m 2023 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 7347749.2S
Target Property
o 1/8
Zia lnune5
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations BIA
Hazardous Substance
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
Special Flood Hazard Area (1 %)
Disposal Sites
the target property
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Wetland Inventory
r
Sensitive Receptors
State Wetlands
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Camp Creek Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Range Road and Isham Chambers Road CONTACT: Tasha King
Rougemont NC 27572 INQUIRY #: 7347749.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.227396 / 78.82792 DATE: May 25, 2023 1:59 pm
Copyright m 2023 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015.

Appendix E
Landowner Authorizations

LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRTTION:
Deed Reference: Estate File Number 1996-E/000135 County: Durham
Parcel ID Number: 0950-01-8432 and 0950-11-10-3503
Street Address: 5204 Isham Chambers Road, Rougemont, NC 27572
Property Owner: Steve Ray Copley and spouse, Debra R. Copley
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above property, do hereby authorize
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a
potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream
and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required
permit(s) or certification(s). We agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps
of Engineers, to visit the property as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: 6704 Bahama Road, Rougemont, NC 27572-7215
Property Owner Telephone Number:
We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
(Property Owner
l - '? --
(Date)
1-4 —/ k/ .23
(Property Owner Autho*ed Signature) (Date)