Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0002284_Staff Report_20071030NON :D G REGI Ate. WATER QU, AL STAFF REPORT AND4MCOAU rIENDATI NTS, ; Datt: FVGWl1Glr211V7. f . P , iriounty.DAm To: Non-IHkhxmePenWtdne Unit Permittee: Outer BankaXinnakeet AaaQciatM U4 NDPU Reviewer. David GoodriaApplication No.: GE11 ERAL Ll1�FOR1�fATION 1. This application is (check au that apply): ❑ New ® Renewal ❑ .14iino; Modification [a Major Modification ; ❑ Surface Irrigation ® Reuse ❑ Recycle ® High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/IfilGratiom Lagoon ❑ Land , pplic tion of Residuals Q Attachmept B included as appropriate; : 503 xegiilated [� 503. Q Distribution of Residuals Q Surface Disposal 2. fWas �a'site visit conducted in order to preparelhis report? 2 Yes or fl No. a. Date of site visit: 09/13/2007 b.. Person contacted and contact information: rfiill geed:, Coatract Otiera#or c:. Site visit acted by . Robert Tankar&Wd1 Hart. and+Mg�an,Stilley .,A Inspection Report Attached:.N Yes or.❑ No. 3. Is the following information entered into the BWS-record fbi this Vplication correct? Yes ar ] No. If no, please complete the'following or indicate that it is correct on the current application. RENEWAL AND M0DIFIC4TI0NAPPLIC4IT0& i'u nreviorls sed3on' for new or maior ' mod<ii}ication systmn) DESCRIPTION OF WASUM AND FAC�r rrr�c 1. Are there an appropriately certified ORCs for the. fnoilities?; ®, ides or, ❑ No. Operator in Charge: David Robertson Certificate #: 89 77.14 Back- Operator in Charge: James Bliven Certificate #: 89 7715 2. Is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? N Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain: 3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain: 4. Is the residuals management plan for the facility adequate a nd/or•acceptable,to the Division?.: ® Yes or ❑ No.;, I.f no, -Please explain: FORM: NDSRR 03/02 1 a • , J. 1 NON-DISCI3ARGE- REGIONAL WATER QUALITY - STAFF REPORT AND RECOMWEENDATIONS S. Are the, existing application Fates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? Yes .or No. .If no, . . please eacpla#n 6. Ate there aay buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)? Yes or No. If yes, please attach a map showing conflict areas or attach any now maps. you have received £rom the applicant to be incorporated into the permit 7. Is the type and/or'vohune of wastes) as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No. If no; please explain 8. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existng permit correW ❑ Yes or Z No'. If no, please explain: AD dewriutioas d_ mbU the old plant Wwuld be removed 9. Has a review of all self monitoring data been conducted? ❑ Yes or [] No. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: 10. Check all that apply: ® No comphance issues; 0 Notice(s) of violation within the last permit cycle; Current enforcement actions) p Currently under SOC; .❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ .Currently under moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/commonts (such as NOV, NOD etc): 11. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing. permit, SOC, JOC, etc. been complied with? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain: 12. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please explain: MON 1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.: 2. List any items that you would luxe NDPU to obtain through an additional ii fmiation request. Make sure that you provide a reason for each item: . 3. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to, be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason far each condition: Condition Reason Description of old plant. Plant is no longer on site. FORM: NDSRR 03/02 2 i' " , NON-MSCHARGEREGIONALWATTER QUALITY'' STA►F;F' REPORT..-ANDRECO ATIopis-. I. Performance Standards 1. Upon completion of Certification has-been sib, `. . - `: '•.:: :.' I. Performance Standards 2. The Washington Inspection has been completed. Regional Office... II. Operation and Maintenance Requires S. Spray fields have been removed. If this is a Adequate measures shall be taken to ... condition for the reuse fields then would use irrigation areas instead of spray fields. H. Operation and Maintenance Requirements. The rotaries are no longer at the site. Conditions 18., 19., and 20. III. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Old plant is no longer on site. Condition 3a. III. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Old plant is no longer on site. Condition 6. Remove "M(3a)" from the condition. IV. Groundwater Requirements. Remove Monitoring wells are no longer required at conditions 1., 2., and 3. the site. 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when issued Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition: Condition I Reason S. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue; ❑ Deny. ff deny, please state 6. Signature of report preparer. Signature of WQS regional supervisor. Date: fC7—�iU-0 l0 FORM: NDSRR 03102 3 FORM: NDSRR 03/02 4 Compliance, Inspection Report system cia"mcatlons: Primary ORC: David John Robertson secoedary ORC(sk On -sits Rspmentative(s): Inspection ate: 0fl11312007 Primary Wspeabr: Robert B Tanlard Secondary Inspeobr(s): VO T Flart Megan H StMey CertIf cation: QM14 Phone: 282-491-SM Entry Thm: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Reason for Inspection: Routine Permit Inspection Type: Reuse FsaMttystatus: ■ Comptfant ❑ Not Comphant Question Areas: . Tmabnent Flow ■ Treatrnsnt Flow Measuremsnt-Efllusnt MsasurenwAAntluent . Treatnw-d Barecreen Treatment Filters Trestrnent Clarifiers Treatment DbWn bctlon Treatrnent Return pumps End Us* Reuse (See attachment summary) Phone: EExt� 1 Phone: Phone: Inspaatlon Type: Compliance Evaluation Miscellaneous Qussdone ■ Treatment Flow Use Records Treatment AdIvated SkWgo T � SludgeStorat End Use-Ini ttraabon . Tmstrner t Flow 0 Standby Power M Coastal Requirements Pepe: 1 S . . 0. Pwmrt VY000024e4 Owner . Pict(Ry: Outer L L C D0w_0W.1W2007. ; ,• . nspedbn Type CoMpP&r o Ev&hjtbn;;,:.., for Vlft Rotes . Inspeftm 8urnriary' The plant appears to be operated wall. The IrNatlon zone around the Infltlraflon basin and 5-day reject pond was hot operable due to modlficatlon of disposal system. Owner had laid drip irrbation lines around ponds to ass yre no drift, would efRxA off -site property "vwnere. Irrigation pumps would not operate (may be due to low levels In Mid).' Operato s corrected problem. Kinnakeet had been Issued two No of Violations for monitoring and Rmf violations in 2007. Also, Perm tee has not 20submitted 7 Jury a ports shows that fact lty exceeded limits for Nitrogen. Nrenewal. PermIt e)#res In December 2007 and Aotic a of Intent tl ehwM have oEEnforce wiq bebsad to Permittee. Page: 2 M , ' V Permit: W00002284 Owner - Facil(ty: Outer Benks/Klnnekeet Assoolabs L_L C , :- . . InspecUonDah:i0911S2007.....: Inq*ctlon Type: CompQanoaHvefuatlon ::,., . ' Reason lbrMatti R011thO Tye Yes, No NA NE Lagoon Sprsyt l R! 0 Single Fan* Drip ❑ , .:: . AcdvaI:s&SkKlg* 4rayt HR Activated $ledge DripR Recycle/Rouse. Single Family gp v&, l ❑ Activated Sludge Spray+, LR . . Infiftratbn System Reuse (Qi4*) ,• ,I_ •_, ..:ts;,:... :,.... __r Treatrnent Flow McMurement4nfluent Yee,, No .N►,;:Nf ..,. . , Is 111owmetsr0alibrabe"nnually7 Q . Is flowrrwt6r opeM�"ropedy? ❑:. ❑,: ■ . Q.. Does flowrMir. m . h1t6r continuously? ❑. Q: ■ Q Does flowteiQl rdcbrd.iornft ❑ ❑ ■ .❑. • . Dose flowffitnr appe&-to monflior accurately? ❑ Comment Treatmentflow Mimmurement-Water Use Records Yes. tl9- —A Is water use- metered?';. ❑ ❑ ■ .� Are the daily iversip Muss property calculated? 0 ❑ ■ : 0... Comment _ Treatment Flow fgeariutrement-Effluent Yes, No N►.. NE .... ..,. Isflowmeter.ca tlbrstedannual►y? b .Q ❑ :.., .. Is ffowmstrr operating property? ®❑ ❑ , ❑ ... . Does flowmster morrttor continuously? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ .:. . Does flowmeter•recordflow7 Does flownisterspImt'to monitor accurately? ■ ❑' ❑ ❑ Comment: Standby PO4V6Y Yes No NA NE , . ..... Is automatically aWvabd standby power available? ■ ❑ . ❑.; �:. :.... Is generator tdited,wOldy by interrupting primary power source? ■ ❑ 0 ID Page: 3 Perdu W00002284 Owner - FsaiHty: Outer L L C. ) _:::; • ..r . . knPeaton Daba"Di M&2004 InspsatI n Type: Co Mftwe Wn R dri'iof NFs(C Routlrro' ,,::, ;' is gerwrotdr opem6b? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Dos 2wwaior have adequsie Aral? ■ Q"❑ ❑' : `: Comment: Treatment Bwscrsen Is It tee of excessive dObris? ',; ■. , ❑ ❑ .❑ ; :. • : ,.•:: Is disposal of screenings In compliance? ■ ❑ ❑ :❑ Are the bars spaced properly? ■ ❑ (3. 0.... < • r ,'..'. is ft urift In good condition,? ; . ■ Q G3 ❑. Comment t . Treafillent ACtivatsMkfdgo Yes No NA4.•. N E :• Is the serailon,huctianlsm operable? c ''_ik''• ?f:: <.' .•.;AI .Q ::..'; •_ Is the serailon'asiri thoroughty mbred? :. , • M ❑ ❑•.::❑ • ::; • ; Is the seretlon's pment easily accessed? ■; ❑. ❑:. ❑ Is Dissoived`Oiygsn adecLaia? ❑. ❑! fl;r ■ ... .. _ .. Are Settleome rsouf6i soceptable? ❑ ..❑ ❑ : # Is aottvatett eltge an acceptable color? ■ U ,.❑ : ❑• Comment Treatmstif•CltiFiff�l�s ..,..:.: . • ... , :.Y�►,- NO .t�4�►;�3�1t,... _. Are the warsKrel' ■ ❑-'❑ Q Are to W*s 16e'ci solids and algae? ■ : ❑ . ❑ U . Is ttw scum removal system operational? 000 G.- .:: is the scunti rerrtovel' eye6n accessible? ;} c . .: '.fl .{�: ] ; .... • , , "s Is the sludge bkrtkit at an acceptable level? ola ❑ ■ Is the •ffluent from the `Olerifler tree of excessive solids? 0000 Comment: Treatment Rimm'Orips Yas: No .NA,' :NE Are they ��?[.''. 'ri - ■ ❑: 0-0 . . Are they operabonal? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Treahltent FlHaft ...Yes No:.:NA...Ne ' is the fgter nWft prsi6nt? ■' ©: E Q . . , .. Page, 4 6 Pemft-VV00002284 Owrwr • FacUT. Outer BenkiJOrt•ItostAnacktes L.I.•rC kwPeatbn Da1s: 09/1=W kapaotbn Type: CowV%noa Eva uat n .. Reagan Ear Malt: Roldlns , Is the ftftsr medls the convot size and type? Is tt» slr scour »perattonal? Is the scouring aoospteble? is the clear vm04ei o xoessh a solids? is the mud YMN free of axcsssive solds and filter media? Does baolcwashing frequency appear adequats? Comment: . TrUftent 8116N1 a S!orspelTreatnteM Is the asrstlon bparationsl? is ft. aeration-pattsrrt`. even? tf required, are: 8anbr�*Ts' present In tankege? Comment: Treatment.DWI[n(action Is the system worft? Do the AKWc6liform results Y1dice1e pnoper.disinfso8on? Is there adequate 'dei *on tint. (>=30 minutes)? to the system pmpeity nwhitalned? If gas, does ft.:,cykx1sr storage appear safe? Is ttw fan lit: the dibrtne feed room and storage area operable? Is the chlodriatpr accessible? If tablets, are tablets present? Are the tablets lhrb proper aim and type? Is contact chamber firee of sludge, solids, and growth? If UV, are extra IN.bubs available? If UV, Is the 'UV htens y adequate? At Is It a dual feed eysWn? Does to Stationary Scums have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)+ If yes, then Is there 9 Mak Management Plan on site? If yes, then what Is the.EPA twelve digit ID Wrnber? (1000- - If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? ■ EY 0 G. ■0Cl0• ■' ❑ 13❑ " yes:. No NA IM ■❑0;,0: ■❑❑,G ❑❑■..❑ E.O. r Yes No NA PIE AQ❑ Q. . ■❑❑❑. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑0■.0 ❑0■❑. ❑❑00'.- •❑ ❑❑ ■ElQ.0 ❑0■0 0.0.■❑. 0❑a0 Page: 5 rOM*. VtQOD02 54 Owr - F&cgkr VLd7L B@rO*1Vd*RJR AneodaUs L t V" t " tmpeatlon-Date:•t W13J2W brspection Type: Comps arm evatuetlon Reason for.Vh t: RouWs Comm$tl .. End Use4foftfatWnu Yes No .NA Ns 1« Is the applCaiiora High Rate or Low Rota? Huh. Are bufbm rndWa ? ■ . ❑, . Q . ❑ Are any supply vvelis Within the CB? Are any supply'.Welfawii,hln 25V of the CB? Is municipal water avaUble in the area? Are GW dvnitoring'y ak required? Are GW nwn1tw ing " located properly w/ respect to RB and CB? Are C3W monIt6ft wilts properly oone6voted, holudkV screened Interval? Is a useble.Dre6n area rneintvined? Is the disposal sits scoaptable? Is the dlstrlbu8on equipment acoephble? left dlepblaw site f Waf pmxft? Is the dlepoest a te-fie of breal=W Are the disposal aitesWee of solids, slgae, ft.? Do the moordi snow tat the fields are properly maintakwd? Are the dlaposal siias'tes of vegetation? Do any suria"ter'featres appear to be adversely hWctsd by GW diecturge? No dtemlo*h $r rotbtfller used to eliminate vegetation, eolids, algae, etc.? Comment: Is the acrea geM the permit being utilized? Does tins acreage epeolfied In the permit correspond to the measured acreage at the site? Are all eeserrtfal unHa*vldsd In duplicate? Is an autoinaMkAy activated standby power eource avallable? Is the egA&diton dapaclty adequate? to aerated`'isquaflzatlson present? Has the turbidity meter been oaUbrated In the last 12 monthe? Does the turbidity meter have recording capabilities? Page: 6 - . y '1 ' Pernft .R 0DO2284 owner - Iraclll. Oula1 BankOfOnmkoet Ass /{Aafti L L C Impaotbn Date: 09/1302007 4apectlon Types Compliance Evaluation Reason fbr Visit: RwAm Is aft flow diverted at the appropriste three? ■ 0 ❑ ❑ Is all upset wastewater dlveriied from reuse storage unit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is aft upset waslwmater treated, retreated, or disposed of accsptsbly? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is upset wastewater treated prior too discharge b irrigation storage? ■ ❑ ❑. Is publb access mWkAed from Mgatton area durfrrg active sits use? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If goof course, Is a sign posted in piah eight on the dub house? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Is the cover Drop acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are buffers adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of ponding/runofr? ■ O ❑ ❑ to the savage in the pern* being utilized? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is to application equonerrt acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the application area free of Nrni ft slopes? ■ Cl ❑ ❑ How obse Is the closest water supply wen? O ❑ ❑ ■ Are any supply wells wtthln the CB? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Are arty supply wells, within 2W of the CB? O ❑ ❑ ■ Is municipal water a"llable In the area? ■ ❑ ❑ 0 Are GW monitoring wells required? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Are OW monitoring webs located properly w/ rasped to RB and CB? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Are OW monitoring webs properly constructed Including savened iniervat? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Comment Irrigation equipment sprays reuse quality water on homeowner's lawns. Coastal Requirements Yes No MA ME Are essential troabnent units provided in duplicate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is an adequately sized aerated equaftaUon basin present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ If no, is It operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ If present, are dffkm s cleaned regularly? woo ❑ Is the *que ization capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment~ Page: 7