20230686 Ver 1_More Info Received_20230811

CLearWaLer
An FnviroScience Company
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.ewenv.com
August 11, 2023
Ms. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
RE: Asheville Airport Parking Expansion Project Individual Permit Application
Corps Comment/Responses
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Corps Action ID: SAW-2023-00994
Dear Ms. Jones,
Regarding the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority's Individual Permit application for the
Asheville Airport Parking Extension Project, ClearWater, an EnviroScience Company (ClearWater)
provides the following responses to the Corps' comments received via email on July 10, 2023, which
summarizes comments received from the public comment period. Comments received from NC DWR
were addressed in a separate letter dated July 20, 2023 to Ms. Stephanie Goss (DWR# 20230686).
Corps #1. Please provide a summary of parking facilities to date that the Airport utilizes (both on and
off Airport Property) to include when those facilities were constructed, # of spaces provided, what/if
any impacts to waters of the US were incurred and anticipated plans for changes to these areas.
Response: The following parking lots near the terminal are used by travelers and employees.
These provide 2,089 spaces for visitors and employees; they were constructed over a period
of more than 28 years with no known impacts to jurisdictional waterways.
• Primary short-term and long-term lot east of the terminal building.
o Constructed at the time of airport construction.
o Spaces = 613
o Impacts to jurisdictional waterways are unknown.
o No anticipated plans/changes
• New garage east of the terminal building
o Constructed in 2017
o Spaces = 1,076
o No impacts to jurisdictional waterways
o No anticipated plans/changes
• Lot at Site 2 (see Figure 1)
o Constructed in October 2022
o Spaces = 268
o No impacts to jurisdictional waterways
o No anticipated plans/changes
Lot at Site 5 (see Figure 1)
o Constructed prior to 1994
o Spaces = 687
o Impacts to jurisdictional waterways are unknown.

Asheville Airport IP
Corps Comment/Responses
SAW-2023-00994
o Anticipated plans/change: a parking deck is being planned for this site, but there
first needs to be parking available in other locations to offset the temporary loss
of spaces.
Two parking lots at intersection of Rental Car Drive and Terminal Drive
o Constructed between 1998 and 2002
o Spaces = 165
o No impacts to jurisdictional waterways
o These are employee parking lots. The north lot was modified in 2020 to expand
the terminal apron; this reduced the number of spaces from 204 to 119. No
further changes are anticipated.
Corps #2. Your Alternatives Analysis should include off -site locations to include sites currently
adjacenVnear the Airport and not necessarily owned by the Airport at the time of this analysis.
Response:
The following sites have been added to the Alternatives Analysis considerations:
• The WNC Agricultural Center is a state-owned property east of HWY 280 across from the
airport. It is a well -used location that hosts many events each year; we understand they are
also seeking to expand their parking availabilities.
• Properties north of runway (see Figure 2):
o There are several privately -owned properties that could be suitable for a parking
lot; however, the airport would need to purchase these, plus there are other
constraints as described further below.
o The airport also owns several properties in this area; their use for parking areas
would be limited due to being in the floodway or 100-year floodplain of the
French Broad River, and within the airport's Runway Protection Zone, Runway
Safety Area, and Runway Object Free Area (see Figure 3).
o The remaining area would not be large enough to construct a suitable parking
lot. Also, there is no direct connection from these properties to the terminal and
any access road would have to be built. Further, this area is harder to access
due to constraints from the highway, river, and airport, which would result in
higher development costs and longer shuttle times. There are also several
waterways that would likely have some jurisdictional impacts (see Figure 4).
• Property east of runway and north of terminal building: This area is part of the AVL airport
and has airfield access. It is therefore being planned for future aeronautical development,
including GA expansion and aviation related development (ex. cargo and airport support
facilities). This area is visible in Figure 3 (2020 Airport Layout Plan) as the area north of "H";
H is also identified as Site 1 in Figure 1 and discussed further below as an alternative. A
delineation was performed for this area as part of a previously permitted action (SAW-2007-
03766-311, see Figure 4).
• Properties south of runway (see Figures 5, 6 and 7): The airport owns several properties
adjacent to the southern end of the runway. These properties are in the floodway or 100-
year floodplain of the French Broad River and Cane Creek. There are also other smaller
streams and wetlands (see Figure 4), and one of the properties has a golf course, which
has several open water features. Other privately owned properties are either in the
floodway/floodplain, or are too isolated for efficient shuttle service unless major road
improvements were made, including potential bridge crossings.
• AVL owns a property west of the southern end of runway adjacent to a Henderson County
park (PIN 9643523273L0001). This area has jurisdictional waters that would need to be
accounted for in any development (see Figure 8), though most were filled as part of a
previous permit (SAW-2010-00036). AVL also has several improvements planned for this
area, as described in the next paragraph.
2

Asheville Airport IP
Corps Comment/Responses
SAW-2023-00994
There are several county and private business properties west of the runway, these would
need to be acquired. Also, AVL has already considered these in their 2020 Airport Layout
Plan (Figure 3), which includes the following improvements:
■ Two proposed commercial and non-commercial multi -use areas;
■ Proposed air cargo development area; and
■ Proposed air traffic control tower and rotating beacon.
In addition, all properties west of the runway do not have direct connection to the terminal.
Therefore, traffic and shuttles would have to leave the airport property onto Ferncliff Park
Drive and HWY 280, which could add significant time and cost shuttling passengers.
Corps #3. Site 1 Alternatives Discussion: Please clarify if this site could be used for future parking
expansion and a discussion on if this site would meet the project's purpose/need for parking regardless
of the commercial/multi-use designation. Your response should note the extent of wetland/water
impacts if any for development of this site. This discussion should also address/include the potential
alternative of relocating the existing Marathon Gas Station/Dunkin Donuts commercial facility to Site
1. This facility was sited on property shown as potential parking alternatives in the 2013 Airport Master
Plan and is on property still owned by the Airport. The construction of this commercial development
eliminates the opportunity to align the primary entrance off Terminal Drive in a way that could have
avoided/minimized impacts to approximately 745 linear feet of stream channel.
Response:
From a planning perspective, parking and access to parking are significant components to the
passenger experience. For efficiency, wayfinding, and even stress reduction, the airport should
consolidate the passenger parking locations to the greatest extent possible and retain the
parking options along a signal loop road. AVL's plan follows this approach (see Figure 1),
which is challenging as the airport is `land poor', and the terminal area is completely land-
locked by state and federal highways and other surrounding development. Remote parking
that is off the primary circulation route is the least desirable option for passengers (and the
parking vendor), as it results in confusion, additional vehicle traffic, and the need for longer
and/or multiple shuttle routes. Even with variable message signage identifying the available
parking, passengers will still seek to park in the primary lots, before then traveling to the remote
lots. Thus, increasing traffic congestion and time and traveler stress.
Also, the south area is more desirable for parking than the north area at Site 1 because the
south area does not have airfield access and is therefore better suitable for non -aeronautical
development. The north area, which does have airfield access, is needed for future
aeronautical development, including GA expansion and aviation related development (MRO,
cargo, and airport support facilities). The 2013 Master Plan included this as an alternative (see
Figure 9). The airport also wants to avoid mixing terminal area traffic with general aviation
traffic to minimize signage and enable more efficient traffic flow. This precludes the opportunity
to incorporate non -aeronautical businesses to this site, including relocating the Marathon Gas
Station/Dunkin doughnut shop complex. Further, due to the location of Site 1 adjacent to the
highway off -ramp and entrance airport, commercial properties that attract many short-term
visitors, such as gas stations and restaurants, could significantly add to the congestion exiting
the highway, traveling on HWY 280, and/or entering the airport, though there has been no
known traffic study of this area completed. It should be noted that the airport has a lease
agreement with the gas station complex, which would need to be addressed before it could be
relocated.
3

Asheville Airport IP
Corps Comment/Responses
SA W-2023-00994
Corps #4. Site 5 Alternative — Please clarify why expansion of this parking area/conversion into a
garage would not be considered practicable and why it's proximity to adjacent garages would preclude
this alternative from being further considered.
Response: A parking garage is anticipated for Site 5 in the future due to its proximity to the
terminal (see Figure 3); it is not practical at this time, however. A surplus of parking spaces
would be needed for this to be a feasible option. In order for construction to occur at this
existing lot, it would need to be closed to public parking for approximately two years for
construction, but temporarily eliminating those spaces would only exacerbate the airport's
parking issues. Because there is no surplus of parking at the airport and closing down existing
parking for construction of new parking is not practical, redevelopment of the Site 5 parking
area is not the preferred practical alternative. It is expected that when the garage is built, it will
be large enough to accommodate several thousand automobiles. It is also expected to have
stream impacts at that time, as well.
Corps #5. Site 6 Alternative: Please provide further clarification as to why moving the primary entrance
to the lot further south is not practicable. It appears that there is room to have two access points
without much impact/loss to the rental car facility. It is also not clear why access can't be
changed/allowed to make the primary route of shuttles along Rental Car Drive versus Terminal Drive
or why one access would be sufficient with proper access control points.
Response:
The entrances to the rental car parking lot from Terminal Drive and Rental Car Drive are gated
and locked for security reasons, which prevents Rental Car Drive from being used as a pass -
through for shuttle buses and visitors.
At least one of the parking lot access roads must have access to Terminal Drive. This enables
shuttle buses to stay on the airport property and help make round trips within a short time
frame. Also, Highway 280 is also a busy road so it gives vehicles turning north access to the
traffic signal. DOT will not allow a new signal to be placed at the Rental Car Drive intersection.
The applicant believes the information submitted in this letter addresses the comments provided by
the Corps. Should you have any further questions or comments, please contact me anytime at
[e-mail] or 828-698-9800. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Eric Romaniszyn
Senior Scientist
Copy issued:
Scott Jones - US Army Corps of Engineers
Sue Homewood - NC Department of Environmental Quality
Andrew Moore - NC Department of Environmental Quality
Andrea Leslie - NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Lew Bleiweis — President/Chief Executive Officer, Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority
Michael Reisman — Chief Operating Officer, Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority
James Moose — AVCON, Inc.
Travis Bird - AVCON, Inc.
Clement Riddle - ClearWater, an EnviroScience Company
4

c
m
c
0
a
m
a
r-
0
Q
M 0
C
o
W
L
as
aN
M V
r t�:
O
C
CL
m
L
L
i L
�a
c
L
Y
L
m
a
U-

: W-6. Iftmo,w
0
sit
P.- d

Figure 3
PROPQ�ED TERMINAL
_-
I
PROPOSED COMMERCII
VEHICLE LANE
WON
gym40 — � � -- �-..�•--1 r
. • . .,.� ■ �\ I Ilrr ■L �� I. • 1 O
f►1 �I 11����1� •-TH APROIN
_
IMISTI • �' t l t � � � ' • Irma. ../ �
-•-• - `g �'�i;:- -� - - . I ' • m Ll ® -sue_
RUNWAY PROTECTION Z NE
LAT: 5° 25' 47.39" IN v�->8
i
VISIBILITY 3/4 MILE vG-3o -
1/ 1' -
(1,000' x 1,[71] 0' x 2,500') �� ELEV: 2,1 HIGFPOINT
r/lip-
E O
ER OR\v /
/ aRIP— — o
MN �
N
VG-36 �, �
RUNWAY 34 END MAGNETIC
AT: 5' 33.12" N DECLINATION
2° 32' 13.85" W 6° 1 T W (12/2011)
LEV: 2 0.8 LOW POINT 0° 4' W/ YR
PROPOSED RUNWAY 35 END
LAT: 35' 25' 32.87" N
LON: 82' 32' 14.70" W
ELEV: 2,117.4
[Il
PROPOSED RUNWAY 35
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE
VISIBILITY < 3/4 MILE
(1,000' x 1,750' x 2,500')
[I] �-
RUNWAY 34 PROTECTION
ZONE VISIBILITY <3/4 MILE
(1,000 x 1,750' x 2,500') ' 'v
i
GOLF COURSE
P(
[V
V
M R
1 � AU A A6 Z j A5 «' ' �!� A4 A3 A2 Ali vG-7o-
J °
Ck1 ® x
I —
fi
� MA�S -��/�� ♦ — — — ROPOSED TRUE BEARING S20° 05' 33"E RUNWAY 17-35 8 0 ' x — _ -------
A PORT RSti Mk ti OFZ— ,4- A 8 RSA
E ROAD'70iA n
v TOFA TOFAEs" T FA T FAi o
R
MENTS & H EDNE RS N COUNTY
PROPOSE <tW
REHABILITATION &_3
IMPRO TS
[I ■*
�JNCOM
OPOSED OMMERCIAL AND
ERON UTICAL MULTI-rJSE
0
APR ROTATING BEACON
��■ 11■■.�■■rlll■�r,■■r i 1 •-•rim -- - - -_ - _ ��v,�R�'G•M'=- �
�� lifi'�•.••rc.
• •7 RUNWAY34 IL��� II1
- ,. she- � - �,-�.� � � �a� - �rr��.■► �:ry I �� �
__ •V� � I -�r-- � - • • •---• ice. ��i m�� �: '-•�w►1 _ � I i
- I�
_ -
-'- - • - . - � — ='
/ [ l.-''`. 11 " . ', $4.- I �- - PRIMARY SURFACE v
/'
' - -
PROPOSED REL �� �
�• � ,
l / / �� -< i' i , RUNWAY 16-34 ARP
^
,'. 1 1 . I 1 1 1 , ,:' , � PROPOSED ""vc-ss
C a e PROPOSED / ; i --��-- -- - y ' I .C� --' - _ O/ FZp
1 ` --y- T: 35° 26' 10.30"N CONTROL T E ATCT),, ; ='" E / CRITICAL AREA
Q OW LEVEL DSHEAR �l 9 / LON: 82° 32' 30.50" ) �` / C� e
PO A CRITICAL A A, / / o i PROPOSED [I]
O 11 GLIDESLO. ,, I , I R � \
� ALERT SYS EM LLWAS �i I �--� i RELOCATE 8
GLEN ( ) �11 GGRITICAL AREA f // k-ate-� �F E SLOB P �� ��rr PAPI 4 LA 35° 26� B / ON E \ 'A0= / P \@\ LOCATED ASO1111111 � RUNWAY 34 PART 77
N BRIDGE m • �D .�-."_ [I] ` X 11 x 11 ,: I I ;. ";; 11 ;: 11 ;' I 1 ;: I 1 ;: „ I J I A GE RO 2 • L ��ti-y y y y-y-y-y y - =y F ( APPROACH SURFACE
AD SE U ) ` _------------ - - tON: 82° 32' 31.34 O P PROPOSED AND RIT ALA A
Z-------- i °J ; ' PRECISION INSTRUMENT
50:1 APPROACH INNER 10,000'
/ �� / i PROPOSED TEMPORARY F NON -AERONAUTICAL
T r I I / LOCAL 'O COMMERCIAL AND ]
W ( J�� I I �� i%j /%sc ) � i 1 ( )
RUNWAY 16 PART 77 LL I / r �N ' ♦ r / r I I ; \ / VAST 4
APPROACH SURFACE -
V ' `\ /f //�� T?�� / \� y\\��_ Y / F1J�LRE WEST SIDE [ ]" �y� MULTI USE VISIBILITY <3/4 MILE
l?� � ��\ � � G 40:1 APPROACH OUTER (40,000')
PRECISION INSTRUMENT �' i i l PARALLEL TAXIWAY O [U] (1,000 x 16 000' x 50,000')
:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000') / ♦ 4 tiC ��/ `' /` MI]
r
40:1 PROACH OUTER (40,000') / / .'f / / �F� y 10 2 `�o. �� 6 BUNCOMBE COUNTY
Vl ILITY <3/4 MILE_- ��or"� c3� i� r r�� %� �� R,, �i 1?o Q� `v °'o %�°, °,'�i'� ,�
(1,000 x 16,000' x 50,000') \� 60 \/)
10
2170
PROPOSED RUNWAY/1 7
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE
PRECISION INSTRUMENT
50:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000')
40:1 APP OACH OUTER (40,000')
VISIBILIT < 3/4 MILE
(1,000' x 1 ,000' x 50,000')
[Il
I
RUNWAY DATA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
RUNWAY 16/34
RUNWAY 17/35
EXISTING
PROPOSED
RUNWAY END COORDINATES (NAD 83)
LATITUDE
(16) 35' 26' 47.39" N
(17) 35° 26' 47.14" N
(34) 35° 25' 33.12" N
(35) 35° 25' 32.87" N
LONGITUDE
(16) 82° 32' 47.19" W
(17) 82° 32' 48.05" W
(34) 82° 32' 13.85" W
(35) 82° 32' 14.70" W
APPROACH MINIMUMS
(16) < 3/4 MILE
(17) < 3/4 MILE
(34) < 3/4 MILE
(35) < 3/4 MILE
PART 77 CATEGORY
OTHER THAN UTILITY
SAME
APPROACH SURFACE SLOPE
(16) 50:1
(17) 50:1
(34) 50:1
(35) 50:1
RUNWAY WIDTH
150'
SAME
RUNWAY LENGTH
8,001'
SAME
DISPLACED THRESHOLD
NONE
NONE
SURFACE TYPE
ASPHALT -GROOVED
SAME
PAVEMENT STRENGTH (LBS)
SINGLE WHEEL
120,000
SAME
DUAL WHEEL
160,000
SAME
DUAL TANDEM
260,000
SAME
RUNWAY LIGHTING
HIRL
SAME
RUNWAY MARKING
PRECISION
SAME
EFFECTIVE GRADIENT (%)
0.67
SAME
MAXIMUM GRADE (%)
-1.0
SAME
LINE OF SIGHT VIOLATIONS
NO
NO
WIND COVERAGE (%)
IFR: (16 KNOTS) 99.91%
SAME
VFR: (16 KNOTS) 99.51 %
SAME
ALL WEATHER: (16 KNOTS) 99.56%
SAME
VISUAL APPROACH AIDS
(16) MALSR, REILS, PAPI (P4L),
CENTERLINE LIGHTING
(17) MALSR, REILS, PAPI (P4L),
CENTERLINE LIGHTING
(34) MALSR, REILS, VASI (V4L),
TDZ & CENTERLINE LIGHTING
(35) MALSR, REILS, VASI (V4L),
TDZ & CENTERLINE LIGHTING
INSTRUMENT APPROACH AIDS
(16) ILS, GPS
(17) ILS, GPS
(34) ILS, GPS
(35) ILS, GPS
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)
C - III
C-IV
DESIGN AIRCRAFT
BOEING 737-700
BOEING 757
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA) DIM.
500' x 10,001'
SAME
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA) DIM.
800' x 10 001'
SAME
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) DIM.
400' x 8,401'
SAME
PRECISION OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (POFZ) DIM.
200' x 800'
SAME
RUNWAY END ELEVATIONS (MSL)
(16) 2,164.4
(17) 2,164.0
(34) 2,110.8
(35) 2,117.4
MAX. ELEVATION (MSL)
2,164.4
SAME
TDZ ELEVATION (MSL)
(16) 2,164.4
(17) 2,164.4
(34) 2,140.0
(35) 2,140.0
If
� �`����� PROPOSED AIR CARGO �j �� (D N
DEVELOPMENT AREA p D ��� HENDERSON COUNTY = LU
117
��n/ \ 0 ` TRAFFIC CIRCLE t���' r J Z
0
A, PROPOSED Q / /( \` i mmm� }
J=COMMERCIAL AND n° �\ / - NCDOT PROJECT p
rm LOW LEVEL WINDSHEAR m
Q0 O NON-COMM RCIAL !� 6---' -� % %' mm"mmm , - -� J ALERT SYSTEM LLWAS
IVERVIEW DRl
j�_ ------ ________________________ ___ �1
° 00 00
oo ©©��
©o
FRENCH B o
ROAD RIVER �
BUNCOMBE COUNTY O tJ
HENDERSON COUNTY
LEGEND
DESCRIPTION
EXISTING
PROPOSED
ULTIMATE
AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
- -
— —
SAME
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR (ASR) CRITICAL AREA
- - - -
SAME
SAME
RUNWAY CENTERLINE
SAME
PART 77 SURFACE
SAME
PAVEMENT
-------------------
BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL)
BRL
BRL
SAME
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA)
RSA
RSA
SAME
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA)
ROFA
ROFA
SAME
RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ)
RPZ
RPZ
SAME
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ)
OFZ
OFZ
SAME
TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (TOFA)
%OFA
TOFA
SAME
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA (TSA)
TSA
TSA
SAME
PRECISION OBJECT FREE ZONE (POFZ)
POFZ
SAME
FENCE
SAME
>*
FLOODWAY (100-YEAR)
NA
NA
GROUND ELEVATION CONTOURS
NA
NA
TREE LINE
NA
NA
NON -AERONAUTICAL DEVELOPMENT
SAME
GLIDESLOPE CRITICAL AREA
- — — — -
SAME
LOCALIZER CRITICAL AREA
- - - - - - - - - - - -
--
SAME
AIRPORT BUILDINGS
L----=--------�
BUILDING REMOVAL
NA
SAME
UNUSABLE PAVEMENT
NA
NA
WETLANDS
NA
NA
ROTATING BEACON
SAME
WIND CONE/WINDSOCK
/
/
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ARP)
NA
AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEMS (ASOS)
c
SAME
SAME
MEDIUM INTENSITY APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH
RUNWAY ALIGNMENT INDICATOR LIGHTS (MALSR)
® rD
®°
SAME
PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)
❑oo❑
■■■■
NA
VISUAL APPROACH SLOPE INDICATOR (VASI)
;
SAME
SAME
LOW LEVEL WINDSHEAR ALERT SYSTEM (LLWAS)
0
SAME
FACILITIES TABLE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
TOP
TO PST.)
REF
FACILITY NAME
REF
FACILITY NAME
ELEV
3
HANGAR
A
TERMINAL EXPANSION [III]
±
15
MAINTENANCE OFFICE AND BUILDING
*
B
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (ATCT) [III]
±
(AVIATION WAY)
15A
MAINTENANCE VEHICLE STORAGE
*
C
BOX HANGARS [II]
+
15B
MAINTENANCE STORAGE
*
D
CONVENTIONAL HANGARS [II]
+
20
HANGAR WITH OFFICE (LINDBERGH LANE)
*
E
AIR CARGO DEVELOPMENT [U]
±
20
T-HANGAR #3 (20-UNIT) (T-HANGAR ROW)
*
F
GENERAL AVIATION DEVELOPMENT [III]
±
21
OFFICE BUILDING (AVIATION WAY)
*
G
COMMERCIAL/NON-AERONAUTICAL
±
DEVELOPMENT [U]
30
BULK HANGAR (LINDBERGH LANE)
*
H
COMMERCIAL/NON-AERONAUTICAL
±
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [III]
31
CONVENTIONAL HANGAR (AVIATION WAY)
*
I
PARKING, COMMERCIAL/ NON -AERONAUTICAL
-
+
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [U]
35
HANGAR WITH OFFICE (AVIATION WAY)
*
J
COMMERCIAUNON-AERONAUTICAL
±
MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT [U]
40
FBO OFFICE BUILDING AND HANGAR
*
K
FUEL FARM [III]
--
±
(T-HANGAR ROW)
40
T-HANGAR #2 (17-UNIT) (T-HANGAR ROW)
71t
41
CARGO BUILDING (TERMINAL DRIVE)
2,165
45
HANGAR (AVIATION WAY)
is
60
T-HANGAR #1 (T-HANGAR ROW)
is
61
TERMINAL BUILDING (ATCT EL 2,226)
2,208
(TERMINAL DRIVE)
65
RENTAL CAR MAINTENANCE FACILITY
RENTAL CAR DRIVE
67
UTILITY BUILDING (TERMINAL DRIVE)
69
AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL VAULT
(TERMINAL DRIVE)
70
PARKING TOLL PLAZA (TERMINAL DRIVE)
87
RENTAL CAR MAINTENANCE FACILITY
(RENTAL CAR DRIVE)
99
RENTAL CAR READY/
RETURN SERVICE BOOTH
104
HANGAR #1 AND #2
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
120
HANGAR WITH OFFICE
2,187
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
122
HANGAR (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
2,186
134
OFFICE BUILDING
2,183
(WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
136
AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIRE FIGHTING FACILITY
(ARFF) (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
140
CONVENTIONAL HANGAR #1
2,198
168
BULK HANGAR (WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY)
220
AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR
240
FBO OFFICE BUILDING AND HANGAR
is
311
FUEL FARM
is
312
RENTAL CAR FUEL FARM
313
TERMINAL PARKING DECK
71C
* ELEVATIONS NOT AVAILABLE
PROPOSED RUNWAY 35
PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE
PRECISION INSTRUMENT
50:1 APPROACH INNER (10,000')
40:1 APPROACH OUTER (40,000')
VISIBILITY < 3/4 MILE
(1,000' x 16,000' x 50,000')
[I]
MODIFICATIONS OF DESIGN STANDARDS
NO.
STANDARD MODIFIED
FAA STANDARDS
EXISTING CONDITION
PROPOSED ACTION
DATE APPROVED
AERONAUTICAL STUDY
1
RUNWAY LONGITUDINAL GRADE
<0.5% 1ST QUARTER
>0.5% 1ST QUARTER
RELOCATE RUNWAY
AUGUST 16, 1978
ATL - 603: 7268: 8-07-78
2
RUNWAY TO TAXIWAY SEPARATION
400'
325'
RELOCATE RUNWAY
AUGUST 16, 1978
ATL - 603: 7268: 8-07-78
NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS
NO.
NON-STANDARD CONDITION
EXISTING CONDITION
FAA STANDARD
1
RUNWAY LONG GRADE
-1.0% 1ST QUARTER (RW 34)
<0.8% 1ST QUARTER
2
RUNWAY TO TAXIWAY
SEPARATION
325'
400'
ir NOTES
1. FAA'S APPROVAL OF THIS AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP) REPRESENTS
ACCEPTANCE OF THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE FUTURE FACILITIES
DEPICTED. DURING THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE, THE AIRPORT OWNER IS
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL THE FINAL LOCATIONS, HEIGHTS AND
EXTERIOR FINISHES OF STRUCTURES. FAA'S CONCERNS ARE OBSTRUCTIONS,
IMPACT ON ELECTRONIC AIDS AND ADVERSE EFFECT ON CONTROLLER VIEW
OF AIRCRAFT APPROACHES AND GROUND MOVEMENTS, WHICH COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SAFETY, EFFICIENCY OR UTILITY OF THE AIRPORT.
2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL).
3. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY
STANDARDS. SPOT ELEVATIONS AND GROUND CONTOURS ARE DERIVED FROM
AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMERTY AND ARE APPROXIMATE. GROUND SURVEYS ARE
RECOMMENDED TO VERIFY ACCURACY.
4. ALL LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES ARE NAD 83.
5. TOPOGRAPHY AND PLANIMETRICS FROM AERIAL SURVEYS OBTAINED FROM
WOOLPERT, INC., SURVEY DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 2011.
6. WETLANDS FROM ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT, RUNWAY RECONSTRUCTION
AND NEW PARALLEL TAXIWAY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT, THE LPA
GROUP AVIATION CONSULTANTS, MAY 2011.
7. THERE ARE NO KNOWN OFZ OBJECT PENETRATIONS.
8. THERE ARE NO KNOWN THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE (TSS) PENETRATIONS.
9. ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MUST MEET THE FULL DESIGN STANDARDS LISTED
IN FAA AC 150/5300-13.
10. THE BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL) SHOULD BE LOCATED ON AN AIRPORT
LAYOUT PLAN TO IDENTIFY SUITABLE LOCATIONS FOR BUILDING AREAS ON
AIRPORT PROPERTY. THE BRL IS DEPICTED BASED ON FAR PART 77 SURFACE
FOR A GIVEN DISTANCE FROM THE RUNWAY CENTERLINE. SPECIFIC SITE
DEVELOPMENT MUST BE FURTHER EVALUATED BASED ON TOP ELEVATION OF
PROPOSED STRUCTURE. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BRL ENCOMPASS
THE RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONES, THE RUNWAY VISIBILITY ZONE, AND AREAS
REQUIRED FOR AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER CLEAR LINES OF SIGHT.
11. LEGEND ELEMENTS REPRESENT DEPICTIONS ON DRAWING, BUT MAY VARY IN
SIZE DUE TO SCALING ON DRAWING.
12. GEOMETRICS DEVELOPED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE PUBLICATION OF
ADVISORY CIRCULAR 150/5300-13A.
AIRPORT DATA TABLE
AIRPORT DATA
EXISTING
PROPOSED
AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL)
2,165'
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (NAD 83)
LATITUDE
35' 26' 10.30" N
35' 26' 09.99" N
LONGITUDE
82° 32' 30.50" W
82° 32' 31.34" W
MEAN MAX. TEMPERATURE HOTTEST
MONTH
83.2° F
SAME
AIRPORT TERMINAL AREA NAVAIDS
ROTATING BEACON, SEGMENTED CIRCLE,
LOCALIZER, GLIDE SLOPE
SAME
NPIAS SERVICE LEVEL
PRIMARY - SMALL -HUB
COMMERCIAL SERVICE
SAME
STATE SERVICE LEVEL
AIR CARRIER
SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)
C-III
SAME
TAXIWAY LIGHTING
MITL
SAME
TAXIWAY MARKING
ENHANCED
SAME
ANY USE OR REUSE OF ORIGINAL OR ALTERED CADD DESIGN
MATERIALS BY CLIENT, AGENT, OR OTHER PARTIES SHALL BE AT THE
SOLE RISK OF THE USER. FURTHERMORE, THE USER AGREES TO
DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HARMLESS
FROM ALL CLAIMS, INJURIES, DAMAGES, LOSSES, EXPENSES, AND 500 0 500 1000
ATTORNEY'S FEES ARISING OUT OF THE MODIFICATIONS OR REUSE OF
THESE MATERIALS. SCALE: 1"=500' FEET
NO. REVISIONS
1 UPDATED TERMINAL BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION CHA MAR 2020 AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING
2 LAND RELEASED FOR NCDOT 1-26 / NC 280 CHA MAR 2020
INTERCHANGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (PENDING)
3 PROPERTY ACQUISITION INRPZ(GARAAFUNDS) CHA MAR 2020 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
4 RELOCATED LOW LEVEL WINDSHEAR ALERT SYSTEM CHA MAR 2020 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CA RO L I N A
UPDATED PROPOSED RUNWAY END
5 CHA MAR 2020 SHEET
COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
RELOCATED AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AND •
6 ROTATING BEACON CHA MAR 20203
sheV��lle'
'E F. 4 I O N A L AIRPORT
OF
DRAWN BY: RWW SCALE: 1" = 500' 21
CHECKED BY: RGL DATE: MARCH 2O20
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PHASE I DEVELOPMENT
[ I ]
PHASE II DEVELOPMENT
[ II ]
PHASE III DEVELOPMENT
[III ]
ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT
[ U ]
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
APPROVED DATE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF AVIATION
APPROVED
DATE
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
APPROVED
DATE

Asheville AirDort
Wetland RU
Stream RX
-A
Wetland RV
Stream RY
Stream RN
Wetland RY
G
9 o�Q'n
Q6p �o°cfp �/
�c "0
d o� o'
°a � •o
Stream RH
.ti
{ail#✓' i °r1`y's'1;';-a,',. x•1.,''c,.��.t,••,,
4 �i +-� � , fM��%'r!' '�' �>l. .ter• ..�, -
f+ T ? z 1' • rkr { i, ��i''
,
'0,
Legend
Property Boundary
Previously Verified
Previously Permitted
Area Not Delineated
Culvert
Stream
Open Water
Linear Wetland
Wetland
NWI Wetlands
SW Basin
Drawn by: RLN 02.01.11
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Feet
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
O dp j
s
39C' o �'i
Wetland RZ
!� .1 -s' �y-.
Wetland CY
Wetland CA
Wetland RC
CLearWaLer
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located
within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping grade Global
Positioning System (GPS) and the subsequent differential correction of that
data. GPS points may demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography,
vegetative cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These
areas have been flagged in the field; however, they have not been surveyed.
Although C1earWater Environmental Consultants, hic. (CEC) is confident in
our assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency
that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of
the US delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to
change until written verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that
written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance on this
determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC
at the time of production. This map is for informational purposes only and
should not be used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property
boundary lines, nor legal descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be
an official survey of any data depicted.
Source Data: Buncombe and Henderson County, Avcon, field collected data.
x,
' i e
Stream CW r
L
-1 Stream RK
t Stream RA
Wetland RD
Figure 4
Stream and
Wetland Map
lei

wpm
AL
'"--•r
}+� i y ' f •' rt ry 4.' f F I +'IL

Figure 6: AVL South Flood map Henderson Co
August 9, 2023 THIS IS NOT ASURVEY.
All information or data provided, whether subscribed, purchased or otherwise distributed, whether in
Local Roads hard copy or digital media, shall be at the user's own risk. Henderson County makes no warranties or
guarantees, including the warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. Map data
❑ Parcels is not appropriate for, and is not to be used as, a geodetic, legal, or engineering base system. The
data is not intended as a substitute for surveyed locations such as can be determined by a registered
Public Land Surveyor, and does not meet the minimum accuracy standards of a Land Information
System/Geographic Information System Survey in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56.1608).
1:33,046
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km

Highway 280 Automotive (+/- 8.0 AC)
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping grade Global Positioning System _ N
(GPS) and the subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or
multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field; however, they have not been surveyed. Although
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final
decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to change until written .
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or
making any legal reliance on this determination. - -
4
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for informational purposes only and should not
be used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official survey of any
data depicted.
Source Data:
Topo - NC One Map Geospatial Portal (Henderson County, 2021)
Parcel Boundary - NC One Map Geospatial Portal (Henderson County, 2021)
Potentially Jurisclictional Waters of the US
Wetland
Acres
W1 0.979
Total 0.979
e
Project Boundary
Potential
Waters of the US
W 1 - 0.979 Ac
Delineation stopped a i
at Project Boundary. !
Wetland may continue.
L_ Wetland
• Culvert
_ I Project Boundary
QHunter Auto Group Parcel
2 ft. Contours
0 75 150 300
Feet
Henderson County, aearWaLer Wetland Map
Delineated July 07, 2021
North Carolina --- Figure 7
145 7th Avenue W, Suite B g
Hendersonville, NC 28792

Asheville Airport
Location E
465 If
Legend
Linear Wetland
Stream
Wetland
Study Area
Drawn by: RLN 11.17.09
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
a
Location A
885 If
i
w
Location B
375 If
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These
areas have been flagged in the field; however, they have not been surveyed.
Although C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. is confident in our
assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that
can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the
US delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to
change until written verification is obtained. C1earWater Environmental
Consultants, Inc. strongly recommends that written verification be obtained
from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or
making any legal reliance on this determination.
Location F
0.10 ac
Location D
0.04 ac
N
Location D
720 If
0 250 500 1,000 1,500
Miiiiiiiiiiiiii Feet
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. Figure 8
Stream and Wetland
718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28791 Delineation Map

I
v
< J D
w L
a
a �.. wd
LL a
� Y
J J 0
z
r LL
d
r-
_ rn
L❑f
-
}
❑ ❑ W —
a m
� a d
J —j
M Ct d mum M B Ma BIF J
i16N B16 AD mom 99
Q <
w L.L
z 0
_ ❑
U
Mie 0110 �e aee
d --
�� A #8 AA 0
�.❑❑❑❑
5
4
I
H
aD
t
Q
M
0
N
0
0
.y
CL
C
K M
wa
c L
0 d
M N
Q
�Q
0 �
0 =
0
a�
>
M
c
L
Q
r