20150712 Ver 1_401 Application_20150715

o� Unitel States
a Department of
Agriculture
Forest National Forests in 160A Zillicoa Street
Service North Carolina P.O. Box 2750
Asheville, NC 28802
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Dear NC DWR,
File Code: 2530 -3
Date: July 15, 2015
L� n
JUL 2 U
2015 '
This letter is to request Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality for U.S. Forest Service project: Little Buck Creek Dam
Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Proiect. Located on the Nantahala National Forest,
Tusquitee Ranger District in Clay County, North Carolina, this project is situated on Little Buck
Creek and Buck Creek, in the Little Tennessee River Basin.
The following three sites are proposed for rehabilitation and stabilization:
Site A: The Forest Service is proposing to remove the earthen dam structure and restore natural
drainage patterns and eliminate a high hazard dam. Recent inspections show indications of
structural and seepage problems with the dam. This project is located just upstream from two
road crossings which may be affected in the event of a dam failure. Approximately 500 feet of
stream restoration would be required from the dam to the inlet of the existing reservoir.
Additionally, restoration of the stream channel at the pond site would reconnect approximately
0.2 mile of streams by eliminating an aquatic organism passage barrier.
Site B: Removal of the log check dam in Little Buck Creek and reconstruction of the stream
bank would stabilize the stream channel and restore it to a natural condition.
Site C: Installation a boulder vane structure in lower Buck Creek would direct stream flow away
from the eroding stream bank adjacent to the Forest Service Road and prevent further erosion.
This project would improve water temperatures within the Buck Creek watershed and provide
improved habitat conditions for the native aquatic species within the watershed by restoring the
stream water temperatures and aquatic passage, and increasing stream habitat complexity.
A copy of the 404 permit application has also been sent to the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for review. An Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan will be submitted to NC Division of Land Quality since disturbed area is greater than one
acre.
Enclosed are the following materials:
Five copies of the Pre - Construction Notice (version 1.3), application for 404 permit
(Nationwide Permit #27), with the Letter of Delegation of Authority
Five copies of the vicinity map and site plans for the project
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

• Five copies of the signed NEPA documentation (Decision Memo) for the project
• A check made payable to the Division of Water Quality for $570.00 since the length of
stream channel impacts is more than 150 feet
If you require any additional information, please contact me at 828 - 257 -4214.
Sincerel ,
Brady'NV: odd
National Forests in North Carolina
Forest Hydrologist

1
U
of wArF9
�LI II III I� LL.�j a o
T�
1,®,, o
A. Applicant Information
I1. Processing
20150712
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number: n/a
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
/1
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
A
►lam
2a. Name of project: Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project
2b. County: Clay
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hayesville, NC
2d. Subdivision name: USDA Forest Service, Tusquitee Ranger District
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
USDA Forest Service
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
Kristin Bail
applicable):
3d. Street address:
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A
3e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
3f. Telephone no.:
828 - 257 -4269
3g. Fax no.:
828 - 259 -0584
3h. Email address:
kmbail @fs.fed.us
l�
JUL 2 0 2gt .0
1 � �
DENR - WATER RESOURCES
401 8 8UFFFR Pc,_..:::y:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
0 Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Brady Dodd
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
USDA Forest Service, Hydrologist
4d.
Street address:
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A
4e.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
4f.
Telephone no.:
(828) 257 -4214
4g.
Fax no.:
(828) 257 -4874
4h.
Email address:
bdodde- fs.fed.us
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e.
Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 14

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): - if you can't get
these, just include a very good vicinity map
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin: map is available at
http: / /h2o.enr.state.nc.us /admin /maps/
USDA Forest Service, National Forest in NC, Tusquitee
R.D.
Latitude: 35.0604 Longitude: - 83.5721
755,200 acres
Little Buck Creek, Buck Creek
C; Tr; ORW
Little Tennessee River Basin
Page 3of14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site A: The earthen dam is located on National Forest System lands in Clay County, North Carolina,
approximately 9 miles northeast of the town of Hayesville, NC. This action will restore natural drainage
patterns in the Little Buck Creek drainage; a state identified Outstanding Resource Water. The existing pond
was created by the previous land owners for private use. The earthen dam impounded approximately 0.6 acre
of Little Buck Creek in its headwaters.
Site B: An existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek has caused severe stream bank erosion and
channel widening. The log was installed at an elevation that is too high; therefore, it causes the stream
channel to be too wide and shallow. The site is located adjacent to a dispersed camp site and immediately
downstream of Forest Service Road 71.
Site C: A section of Forest Service Road 350A is located in close proximity to Buck Creek. Due to steep
terrain adjacent to the road, the road cannot be relocated away from the stream. Stream bank erosion is
occurring at this site and is threatening the existing road which also serves as the primary access for private
landowners downstream of the location.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
—0.4 acre of wetlands.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Site A —500 feet in the Little Buck Creek drainage.
Site B —50 feet in the Little Buck Creek drainage
Site C —50 feet in Buck Creek
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Site A: The Forest Service is proposing to remove the earthen
dam structure and restore natural drainage patterns and
eliminate a high hazard dam. Recent inspections show
indications of structural and seepage problems with the dam
(see photos). This project is located just upstream from two
road crossings which may be affected in the event of a dam
failure. Approximately 500 feet of stream restoration would be
required from the dam to the inlet of the existing reservoir.
Additionally, restoration of the stream channel at the pond site
would reconnect approximately 0.2 mile of streams by
eliminating an aquatic organism passage barrier.
Site B: Removal of the log check dam in Little Buck Creek and
reconstruction of the stream bank would stabilize the stream
channel and restore it to a natural condition.
Site C: Installation of a boulder vane structure in lower Buck Creek
would direct stream flow away from the eroding stream bank
adjacent to the Forest Service Road and prevent further erosion.
This project would improve water temperatures within the Buck
Creek watershed and provide improved habitat conditions for the
native aquatic species within the watershed by restoring the stream
water temperatures and aquatic passage, and increasing stream
habitat complexity.
Page 4 of 14

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
SITE A:
Temporary gravity pumps will be utilized in conjunction with supplemental pumping systems to drain the
pond. Heavy equipment, such as trackhoes will be utilized to excavate the earthen berm. The existing
discharge flume, culverts, and related hardware will be removed. As needed, heavy equipment will be utilized
to restore natural contours (dimension, pattern and profile) of the Little Buck Creek stream channel affected
by the pond. Waste material will be removed from the site and native vegetation will be reestablished. Best
management practices to prevent nonpoint- source water pollution will be utilized to protect water quality
throughout the duration of the project. Approximately 500 feet of stream restoration would be required from
the dam site to the inlet of the existing pond to remove sediments and reestablish a stream environment.
Natural channel design concepts would be implemented to design channel dimension, pattern and profile
using reference reach data from the up and down stream reach.
The following stream work is proposed:
1. The earthen dam fill material would be removed (estimated 1,533 cubic yards of material) and
deposited and stabilized (graded, seeded and mulched) on adjacent areas including old roads.
2. Reservoir sediment deposits that restrict construction of the designed channel would be removed to
adjacent areas and stabilized (estimated depth of 1 foot of material).
3. Construct a channel with dimension, pattern, and profile to fit the site as defined by existing bedrock
and boulders, and the reference reach located up and down stream.
4. Incorporated into the channel design would be structures that mimic the natural involvement of trees
and boulders into the aquatic system. These structures could include J -hook vanes, vanes, root wads,
toe -wood, and woody debris placement that would promote wetland habitat.
5. Constructed stream banks would be covered with native seed and Coir matting, and planted with live
stakes and potted plants. The remaining disturbed soil would be seeded and mulched and planted with
potted plants.
Site B:
One existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek would be removed to restore the natural
width/depth ratio and to protect the stream banks. A new stream bank would be constructed and
revegetated.
Site C:
One boulder vane would be installed within Buck Creek adjacent to FS Road 350A using a trackhoe.
This structure will be placed at an elevation that will direct water away from the eroding stream bank
and also create a downstream scour pool.
6. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / El Yes ® No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
7. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ( ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 5of14

B. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes ® No
Page 6 of 14

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland Forested
(Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ®P ❑ T
Drained to restore
Reservoir created ® Yes
® Corps
0.2
natural condition
wetland ❑ No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
El Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.2
2h. Comments: The reservoir created wetland will be maintained as much as possible, but the extent will not be known until
the pond is drained.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial
or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c. 3d.
3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404, width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
Excavate a new
channel, install in-
stream structures
® PER
® Corps
S1 ®P ❑ T
& install
Little Buck Creek ❑ INT
® DWQ 4
500
vegetation
transplants on
banks
Remove log check
S2 ® P ❑ T
dam, construct
new bank,
Little Buck Creek ® PER
❑ INT
® Corps 6
® DWQ
50
revegetate
Install boulder
® PER
® Corps
S3 ®P ❑ T
vane, revegetate
Buck Creek, lower ❑ INT
® DWQ 20
50
eroding bank
S4 ®P ❑ T
® PER
® Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 ®P ❑ T
® PER
® Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
Page 7 of 14

5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: JI
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): l
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction: J
Page 8 of 14
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts I 600
3i. Comments:
l
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Drain /pump water & excavate
01 ®P ❑ T Little Buck Creek
fine sediment from behind Reservoir 0.4
Pond
reservoir. Restore stream
channel.
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts I 0.4
4g. Comments:
l
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or ake construction proposed, the
i complete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
l
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: JI
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): l
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction: J
Page 8 of 14

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
61 ❑P FIT
B2 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
6i. Comments:
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Page 9 of 14

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Construction at the existing pond site would occur largely in the absence of streamflow since streamflow would be
pumped around the excavation work. Still, temporarily increases in turbidity are likely from the work, especially when
streamflow is first released to the new channel, but because of erosion control features (transplants, coir matting, etc.) the
amount would be minimal. Potential adverse impacts would be avoided by minimizing excessive excavation and adhering
to the State turbidity standard. Stream work is expected to be completed over a three week period.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A. Minimize the area and degree of soil disturbance that reduces infiltration capacity and permeability, and destroys protective
forest floor and ground cover.
B. All hazardous materials will be stored outside of flood -prone areas and surrounded with sediment fence to reduce the risk of
materials reaching the river.
C. Work activities would not be scheduled on rainy days.
D. Heavy Equipment Operation.
1. All equipment shall be cleaned before entering the project area and stream, so as to reduce the risk of fine grained
sediment and oils and grease from entering the stream. This would also reduce the risk of invasive weed spread
onto the Forest.
2. Do not operate on wet soils when they are most susceptible to damage and erosion.
3. Operate heavy equipment on slopes less than 12 percent so as to reduce the risk of soil erosion. Avoid operating
heavy equipment on over- hanging stream banks.
4. Move large woody debris in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, exposure of mineral soil, or
degradation of stream bank stability.
E. Install sediment fence to trap potential sediment. Stabilize any disturbed area at the end of each workday.
F. Re- vegetate exposed soils as soon as possible to take advantage of the loose soil conditions for seeding.
1. Exposed soil will be covered with straw mulch or erosion control matting at the end of the project. Matting will be
secured in place with stakes and live stakes where conditions allow.
2. Temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term
erosion control.
3. Stabilize channel banks with a native seed mix as work is completed.
G. Do not move sediment trap devices until the vegetation in the disturbed areas has been established.
H. During on -going operations inspect the site frequently; inspect occasionally during inactive periods.
1. Check for potentially damaging or failing situations that may cause unacceptable water quality impacts.
2. Correct failing situations as soon as practical.
I. Conduct visual inspections of streams while the work is being conducted to maintain acceptable turbidity levels.
Use a skilled heavy equipment operator, trained in stream restoration and construction of in- stream structures. Instruct the
operator to minimize disturbance to the streambed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type I Quantity
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. I ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: I linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: I ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): I square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: I acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: I acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: I acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation? If yes. you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 11 of 14

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified El Yes ED No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑Yes No
❑
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The current site contains less than
24% impervious area and an increase in impervious area is not planned from the proposed work. Additionally, all
stormwater is transported primarily via vegetated conveyances.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Clay County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
® ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ® No
Comments: NEPA Decision Memo document is attached.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage disposal is necessary.
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or El Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ®Yes El No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A biological evaluation completed by the US Forest Service on February 3, 2015 determined that the project is
not likely to adversely affect the northern long -eared bat and Indiana bat. Concurrence with these
determinations of effect was made by the US Fish and Wildlife Service on May 20, 2014. There will be no
impacts to any other proposed, endangered, or threatened species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Data source is NOAA website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
An archeological review completed in March 2014 determined that the dam on Little Buck Creek is not
eligible for listing under § 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The State Historic Preservation Office
concurred with the Forest Service's determination on April 13, 2015.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
http: / /floodmaps.nc.gov /FMIS/
Brady N. Dodd
r'1�1 � 7oiApplicant/Agent's Printed Name Aature pplicanlJAgent's Signature ate
(Agent's sig va lid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 14 of 14

U�S
Forest
Service
File Code: 2500
Route To: (2500)
National Forests in
North Carolina
Subject: Delegation of Authority
To: Brady Dodd
160 Zitticoa St, Ste. A
Asheville, NC 28801 -1082
828 - 2574200
Date: June 21, 2012
You are hereby delegated the authority to act as my agent for all phases of the application
process for permits required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for watershed restoration
and improvement projects such as aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement, habitat
restoration, channel stabilization, and channel relocation on the National Forests in North
Carolina. You are authorized to make formal application for all permits to the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, provide all necessary
information, and sign all correspondence.
Include this letter as part of all application for Section 404 permits to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Section 401 Water Quality Certification to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality.
xao,eoe-�
M. BAIL
orest Supervisor
USDA iO-
America's Working Forests - Caring Every Day in Every Way Printed on Recycled Paper

Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning
and Stream Improvements Project
Background
The project consists of three
separate sites (Figure 1) located on
National Forest System lands,
Tusquitee Ranger District, in Clay
County, North Carolina,
approximately 9 miles northeast of
the town of Hayesville, NC.
The goals and objectives of this
project are to improve the health of
the stream ecosystem by improving
channel stability and habitat
quality, along with improving
riparian and streamside vegetation
conditions. The desired condition
is to have high quality riparian
areas and aquatic habitat features
that maintain hydrologic function,
enhance stream stability, and
minimize erosion. The proposed
action is needed at this time, at
these locations, because taking no
action would lead to further
erosion and sedimentation which,
in turn, would cause further
damage to aquatic habitat and the
maintenance of designated uses.
Site A: This action will restore
natural drainage patterns in the
Little Buck Creek drainage; a state
identified Outstanding Resource
Water. The existing pond was
created by the previous land
owners for private use. The earthen
dam impounded approximately 0.6
acre of Little Buck Creek in its
headwaters (Figure 2).
a
Legend
- --
Road—Route
Trail—Route
— highways
0.2 0
7-
i i„MI(A
N' p. T 1 0 1ac4
Figure 1. Location of the Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning
and Stream Improvements Project
1 I Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Figure Z Photo of existing dam of Little Buck Creep
Site B: An existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek has caused severe stream bank
erosion and channel widening. The log was installed at an elevation that is too high; therefore, it
causes the stream channel to be too wide and shallow. The site is located adjacent to a dispersed
camp site and immediately downstream of Forest Service Road 71.
Site C: A section of Forest Service Road 350A is located in close proximity to Buck Creek. Due
to steep terrain adjacent to the road, the road cannot be relocated away from the stream. Stream
bank erosion is occurring at this site and is threatening the existing road which also serves as the
primary access for private landowners downstream of the location.
Proposed Action
Site A: The Forest Service is proposing to remove the earthen dam structure and restore natural
drainage patterns and eliminate a high hazard dam (Figures 3 & 4). Recent inspections show
indications of structural and seepage problems with the dam. This project is located just
upstream from two road crossings which may be affected in the event of a dam failure.
Approximately 500 feet of stream restoration would be required from the dam to the inlet of the
21Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

existing reservoir. Additionally, restoration of the stream channel at the pond site would
reconnect approximately 0.2 mile of streams by eliminating an aquatic organism passage barrier.
Figure 3. Little Buck Creek dam, project Site A, proposed excavation and fill locations.
3 1 P a g c
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Figure 4. Little Buck Creek dam, project Site A, proposed stream rehabilitation.
Temporary gravity pumps will be utilized in conjunction with supplemental pumping systems to
drain the pond. Heavy equipment, such as trackhoes and bulldozers will be utilized to excavate
the earthen berm. The existing discharge flume, culverts, and related hardware will be removed.
As needed, heavy equipment will be utilized to restore natural contours (dimension, pattern and
profile) of the Little Buck Creek stream channel affected by the pond. Waste material will be
removed from the site, deposited in the nearby road cut and forest area (Figure 3) and native
vegetation will be reestablished. Best management practices to prevent nonpoint- source water
pollution will be utilized to protect water quality throughout the duration of the project.
Approximately 500 feet of stream restoration would be required from the dam site to the inlet of
the existing pond to remove sediments and reestablish a stream environment (Figure 4). Natural
channel design concepts would be implemented to design channel dimension, pattern and profile
using reference reach data from the up and down stream reach.
The following stream work is proposed:
1. The earthen dam fill material would be removed (estimated 1,533 cubic yards of
material) and deposited and stabilized (graded, seeded and mulched) on adjacent areas
including old roads.
4 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

2. Reservoir sediment deposits that restrict construction of the designed channel would be
removed to adjacent areas and stabilized (estimated depth of 1 foot of material).
3. Construct a channel with dimension, pattern, and profile to fit the site as defined by
existing bedrock and boulders, and the reference reach located up and down stream.
4. Incorporated into the channel design would be structures that mimic the natural
involvement of trees and boulders into the aquatic system. These structures could include
J -hook vanes, vanes, root wads, and toe -wood.
5. Constructed stream banks would be covered with native seed and Coir matting, and
planted with live stakes and potted plants. The remaining disturbed soil would be seeded
and mulched and planted with potted plants.
Site B: One existing log check dam within Little Buck Creek would be removed to restore the
natural width/depth ratio and to protect the stream banks. A new stream bank would be
constructed and revegetated.
Site C: One boulder vane would be installed within Buck Creek adjacent to FS Road 350A using
a trackhoe. Installation a boulder vane structure in lower Buck Creek would direct stream flow
away from the eroding stream bank adjacent to the Forest Service Road and prevent further
erosion. This project would improve water temperatures within the Buck Creek watershed and
provide improved habitat conditions for the native aquatic species within the watershed by
restoring the stream water temperatures and aquatic passage, and increasing stream habitat
complexity.
5 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Appendix A - STREAM RESTORATION SPECIFICATIONS
EQUIPMENT AND OPERATOR SPECIFICATIONS
1. Manner of Construction -Excavation will be done in a manner which will minimize
sedimentation in the stream channel. Silt fence will be installed downstream of the
construction area to reduce the risk of sediment entering the stream.
Equipment Operator Performance - Equipment operators shall be experienced and
competent in the use of the equipment to which they are assigned. They shall be
expected to demonstrate a level of proficiency with the equipment which enables them
to be productive in all aspects of stream restoration work. Equipment operators shall
be experienced in the construction of Rosgen designed structures; including the cross
vane, J -hook vane, and Toe - wood /Sod mat.
3. Operators will be instructed by the construction inspector as to the desired result of
construction activities. Operators will be responsible for determining how best to use
equipment to achieve the desired results. Chain saw operators will be required to cut
trees, limbs and root masses as necessary to facilitate the removal and placement of
debris in the stream.
4. Environmental Considerations - Earth moving equipment will cross and operate in the
stream flow only when necessary and only when directed to do so by the construction
inspector. Equipment shall be new or of low hours and be maintained to prevent fuel,
oil and lubricant spills in the vicinity of the stream. Refueling, repairs and lubrication
will be performed at a safe distances from the stream and only at locations approved by
the construction inspector where water is controlled by runoff control measures.
5. Safety Considerations - At work sites, where equipment will be operated on Forest
Roads, flagman shall be stationed to warn oncoming traffic of congestion. Construction
road signs shall be in place and a means of removing sediment, mud or rocks from
roadways shall be established. The contractor will be responsible for the
implementation of these measures.
6. Equipment Specifications
Hydraulic Excavator: Track mounted, hydraulic powered.
Excavator:
a. Min weight — 30,000 Ibs
b. Min. Reach — 22 feet
c. Min Digging Depth — 20 feet
d. Min Bucket size —1.0 Cu Yd.
e. Min 115 HP
f. Equipped with hydraulic thumb, with experienced operator as described above.
(More than 1 excavator may be required. Unit price bid should be for one
excavator for one hour of running time).
6 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Dump — Track Truck:
Track mounted
• Min. weight — 8,000 Ibs
• Min. carrying capacity— 7,000 Ibs
(Unit price bid should be for one truck for one hour of running time).
IN- STREAM STRUCTURES SPECIFICATIONS
Structure Stone
Description
The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, stockpiling, placing and maintaining approved
stone to be utilized to construct rock and log vanes, root wad structures, the step -pool structures,
stream crossings, sediment and erosion control measures for use in locations as directed by the
Designer. The quantity of stone may be increased, decreased, or eliminated entirely at the direction of
the Designer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of
construction or a change in the character of the work.
Materials
Stone for Coarse Aggregate, No. 57 Stone, "Rip Rap -Class B ", and "Boulder" shall consist of blasted stone
or other stone approved by the Designer. The stone shall be sound, tough, dense, resistant to the action
of air and water, and suitable in all other respects for the purpose intended.
All stone shall meet the approval of the Designer. While no specific gradation is required, the various
sizes of the stone shall be equally distributed within the required size range. The size of an individual
stone particle will be determined by measuring its long dimension.
Acceptance Criteria for Stone
CLASS REQUIRED STONE SIZES (INCHES)
Minimum Average Maximum
Boulder 20 36 42
36" x 20" x 12"
No more than 5 percent of the material furnished can be less than the minimum size specified, more
than 10 percent of the material can exceed the maximum size specified. Boulders shall be relatively flat
on either side in the same dimension, preferably the long dimension.
Construction
The Contractor shall place stone, in locations shown on the construction plans to the thickness, widths,
and lengths as shown on the construction plans or directed by the Designer. All stone shall be placed
neatly and uniformly with an even surface to form an in- stream structure or a sediment and erosion
control device or in accordance with the construction plans and special provisions, and shall meet the
approval of the Designer.
Method of Measurement
7 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

The quantity of stone required to construct the structures or sediment and erosion control measures
detailed in these special provisions will be incidental to those bid items. However, field conditions may
warrant the need for additional stone greater than the quantity specified or detailed for each bid item.
The quantity of stone that has been incorporated into the project, as directed or approved by the
Designer, which exceeds 110% of the quantity required for each bid item will be measured by weight.
Measured by weight will require the quantity to be weighed in trucks on certified platform scales. Stone
that was previously stockpiled for other bid items will not be measured a second time for this provision.
Basis of Payment
When field conditions dictate the need for additional quantity greater than 10% of the bid item, the
quantity of stone measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per ton for
"Misc. Coarse Aggregate, No. 57 Stone ", "Misc. Rip Rap -Class B ", and "Misc. Boulder ". Such price and
payment will be full compensation for all work covered by this section, including but not limited to
furnishing, weighing, stockpiling, re- handling, placing, and maintaining the stone and disposal of any
materials not incorporated into the project if directed by the Designer.
Payment will be made under:
Misc. Boulder ............................................................... ............................... ............................TON
Log Vanes
Description
These structure serves to decrease stress in the near -bank region while promoting scouring in the
downstream pool. Logs are placed at an angle to the stream bank, gradually inclining in elevation until
they are located near % bankfull elevation directly adjacent to the stream bank. Water flowing
downstream is forced over these logs towards the middle of the channel, effectively scouring out a pool
below. The quantity of log vanes may be increased, decreased, or eliminated entirely at the direction of
the designer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of
construction or a change in the character of the work. The beaver dam simulation -cross vane is designed
to back up water to create a wetland feature.
Materials
Trees to be used for the vane shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. All log materials
shall be at least 10 inches in diameter. A sheet of non woven geotextile fabric (4oz, or greater) shall be
placed the length of the vane arm on the upstream side, stapled to the top log in a manner that they will
be covered by back fill material. Back fill material shall be obtained from the stream channel bed.
Installation
A trench shall be dug in such a manner that the footer and header logs are buried beneath the bed
surface elevation at least three feet. An excavator, with a bucket that includes a hydraulic thumb, shall
be used to place logs under the supervision of Designer. Logs shall be tightly sealed with no gaps
between the header and footer log. Filter fabric shall be placed on the upstream side of the structure
and backfilled with materials excavated on -site to prevent the washout of sediment through log gaps.
Filter fabric shall extend from the bottom of footer log to the finished grade elevation and shall be
placed the entire length of the structure. Header and footer logs shall be tied in securely to the bank in
81Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

such a way that eliminates the possibility of water diverting around them. Structures shall be built to the
approval of the Designer. The Designer may adjust the number and placement of structures in the field.
Basis of Payment
This payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling,
sorting, fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the Log Vane. Trees to be used for the
vane shall be provided by the Forest Service.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor ...................................................................... ............................... ..........................HOURS
Materials:
Non woven geotextile fabric ............................. ............................... .........................SQUARE YARD
9 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015
116 TO 114 OF END OF
- -
°
L uBEO ICI
i Log Vane Detail
BOULDER ON TOP AT
BED ELEVATION AS
NEEDED
a
m
Am
LOGS PLACED AT A20 - 300
o
A
ANGLE FROM BANK AND AT A
-
- 6% SLOPE FROM APPROX.
%BANKFULL ELEVATION.
EXTENDING FROM BANK TO %
TO 1/3 OF CHANNEL WIDTH
Constructed
pool
{�
Q�r
NONWOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
Banldull elsvMion
�}-
PLACED RIVER
n
ROCK
LOGS
TOPS OF TREES
BURIED UNDER
Construcled
FABRIC & RIVER
_9ool
ROCK
9 1 P a g e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Example of constructed Log vane Structure at Boone Fork, Grandfather RD
1/8 TO 114 OF ENI
BURIED IN STRE
USE BOULDERS
BED ELEVATION
APPROPRIATE
VEGETATION
TRANSPLANTS F
THESE LOCATIOI
;ROSS- SECTION:
INAK�MA�
C.�er�-^ne Ylll{
is
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015
Cross Vane
Detail
GS PLACED AT A 20 —
) ANGLE FROM BANK
AT A 2 — 6% SLOPE
DM APPROX. %
VKFULL ELEVATION,
(ENDING FROM BANK
Y2 TO 113 OF
ANNEL WIDTH
SILL LOGS
101Page

Cross Valley Debris - Beaver Dam Simulator
Description
This feature is constructed to mimic a beaver dam to maintain existing reservoir- wetland characteristics when a
dam is removed.
Materials
Trees and brush to be used for the structure shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. Shrubs and
willow shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. Seed, mulch, coir matting, and riparian
plantings (live stakes, potted material, etc.) shall be provided and installed by the contractor.
Installation
The basic concept is to place logs perpendicular to the valley bottom slightly arched upstream in the center. Logs
should be placed so they touch the ground as much as possible and smaller logs, branches and woody debris
placed on the upstream side, and Coir matting placed over that. Coir matting shall be staked into the ground to
hold it in place and additional small woody debris placed over it. Where the ground is too wet to allow heavy
equipment logs can be pushed into the area from the drier side slopes using equipment and smaller woody
material can be brought in by hand. On average the surface should be flat across the valley however the pour -
point(s) should be located to conned to the downstream channel as much as possible. Downstream grade control
might be needed to ensure channel stability. Therefore, consider adding structures such as log- vanes, woody
riffles, and boulder placement downstream of this feature.
PURPOSE: This feature is constructed to mimics beaver dam to maintain existing reservoir - wetland characteristics when a dam is
removed.
INSTALLATION: The basic concept is to place logs perpendicula r to the valley bottom sl ightly arched upstream in the center. Logs
should be placed so they touch the ground as much as possible and smaller logs, branches and woody debris pI aced onthe
upstream side, and Coir matting placed over that. Coir matting shall be staked into the ground to hold it in place and additional
sma II woody debris placed over it. Where the ground is too wet to allow heavyequipment logs can be pushed into the area from
the driers ide slopes using equipment and smeller woody materiel can be brought in by hand. On average the surface should be
flat across the valley however the pour- point(s) should be located to connect to the downstream channel as much as possible.
Downstream grade control might be needed to ensure channel stability. Therefore, consider adding structures such as log- vanes,
woody riffles, and boulder placement downstream of this feature.
•- � :F:'A:r'.Y.` rw �.. �.F � i .. .}- t :'>' '- :i F'" ti'r }i i �.r { {. r..{ . }�ri �4:
Mf q
_`�c , �, .:�{{;i;�?�;is. {,?i> n}, ct�', r`,{: r� ",�:,,•ti{:{a {;rc;r; {jr {tY;c;', ..z r;; ;wriw�t;; %,.' _c ,. • {.
S•
o;
venal structure
'Stream to
[rol grade w
ded
Cross Valley Debris -
Beaver Dam
_R ' Simulator
Typical
•? g
2 }}
11 JPage
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Basis of Payment
This payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling, sorting,
fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the bankfull bench. Trees to be used for the structure
shall be provided by the Forest Service.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor ............................................................................ ............................... ..........................HOURS
Materials:
CoirMatting ......................................................................................... ............................... SQUARE YARD
RiparianPlantings ..................................................................... ............................... ...........................EACH
Toe - wood /Sod mat (bankfull bench)
Description
This structure serves to protect a length of stream bank by biulding a new bank with a bankfull area where one did
not exist before due to unstable conditions (See Toe - wood /Sod mat detail below). The structure creates a large
undercut bank providing an abundance of aquatic cover type habitat.
Materials
Trees and brush to be used for the structure shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. Shrubs and
willow shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. Excavated soil shall be hauled off the site and
dumped within 5 miles by the contractor. Seed, mulch, coir matting, and riparian plantings (live stakes,
potted material, etc.) shall be provided and installed by the contractor.
Installation
The channel shall be excavated to build a bench on the channel bottom on the outside of the meander
bend. Its elevation shall be well below determined low water elevation. A deep pool shall be
constructed where the new thalweg will be located, and excavated material shall be used to build the
point bar and back fill the structure. Footer logs laying parrallel to the stream channel shall be placed on
the bench, then the toe -wood on top of that. Toe -wood shall consist of a mixture of sizes, but include
several large tree stems with root wads attached. Stems shall be pushed into the bank were possible.
Trees, brush, and limbs shall all be used to fill this area with woody debris, and be placed up to the low
flow elevation. Bundles of live stakes, e.g. willow, shall be placed on top of the woody debris and alluvial
backfill shall be placed on the structure (amount determined by Designer). Shrubs, excavated from
nearby, shall be placed on top of the toe -wood up to the bankfull elevation. This shrub mat will replace
the "sod mat". From the bankfull elevation the verticle slope shall be excavated to the 2:1 slope (run to
rise). Excavated soil material shall be scattered on the adjacent terrace. All slopes shall have seed,
mulch, and coir matting installed. Riparian plantings shall be installed on the slope and during the plant
dormant season, live stakes shall be installed in the bench and bank.
121Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Construction of TOE WOOD (with Transplants) & Bankfull Bench Typical
Structure mll be constructed using
Wddland Hydrology 2012 design
t hi
n Pre- eonstruarn Channe. Bart.
,�... . ----.- .. - - -.. ._.__ ____ _____ ____._.._..,
EXCAVATED
..
Cross Section
Il' \
` co, BANK
K MATERIAL
f ky
UPPER BANK
2-. 2
t....
) _
�
CO NMUCIlONitEMSAND SEQUENCE �
LNESTAKES
a. Excavate upper bank to constructa minimum 23 slope from i,. "r
/ e
• (C BenkfuH
banldato terrace elevation.
..................................... .......................... ........................ ! ;fg ...
r. Divert streamtlovfrom bank
,
;. Excavate &comtructtoewood benchandrim channelpool
feature based an reference pool
I
+ Place founde onIDVan bench ax5zs ° rd angle frombanka
TRANSPLANTSISOILMAY BALES
place root wad bgs caahlesered over famdation ktgs
y PlacefiDer material (e.g., trees, logs, taps (woody debris) parallel
to root wads.
b. Add temporary counterweight to submerge IM & place shallow s' .
• _ - _ BACKFILL A C.UIIU'1GS_ _ _ _ _ _L— Flow_
bacl9l an logs.
- Stage
7. Remove temporary weight & place live stake cuttings an toe r
Pre- eonstrudbn Channel Sotto -
wood, and place backfM over cuttings.
- _ -
- -
8. Place caa matting back to the bank, leaving remainin matting
hanging over the font of the toe wood in be pulled up over the
TOE WOOD
transplantsisoilthay bales m a'Surnin'. CONSTRUCTED
c
g. Excavate shrub transplants (eg., alder, spkebush, w•MJow•) and
place ® me wood up m banldull elevation; these may need to be WOOD BENCH
`.
layered bankfdU Place lire cuttings
to reach elevation. stake
- r- CONSTRUCTED
between layers (w•henavailable)-
w. Seed bankw• ith native seed & cover transplants and sloped bank
_ __
CHANNEL BOTTOM
with cuor erosion control mating.
n. Plant live steles into transplants 'hay bales and bank to help 'pm'
sod into bank
n. PI ant trees and shrubs on upper bank
Brady Dodd
NFNC Nydre
Example of constructed Toe - wood /Bankfull Bench Structure at Bent Creek, Pisgah RD
131Pa -e
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Basis of Payment
This payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling, sorting,
fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the bankfull bench. Trees to be used for the structure
shall be provided by the Forest Service.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor ............................................................................... ............................... ..........................HOURS
Materials:
CoirMatting .................................................................. ............................... .........................SQUARE YARD
Seed............................................................................................. ............................... ...........................ACRE
RiparianPlantings ....................................................................... ............................... ...........................EACH
EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS
Seed (Native)
Description
Seeding shall occur within 24 hours of ground disturbing activities. Seed shall be applied by hand or with
a cyclone seeder and on steep slopes be immediately covered with leaf litter, raked in from the
surrounding area. On stream banks, biodegradable matting /blanket shall be placed to keep seed and soil
in place. Below are native grass species to be sown and their seeding density of pure live seed.
Community Type: Riparian
Scientific Name
Common Name
Planting Density
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
22 Ibs /acre
Festuca rubra
Creeping red fescue
5 Ibs /acre
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deertongue
2 Ibs /acre
Aster sagittifolius
Arrow Leaved Aster
2 Ibs /acre
Rudbeckia hirta
Black Eyed Susan
2 Ibs /acre
Eupatorium fistulosom
Joe Pye Weed
1 Ibs /acre
Eupatorium perfoliatum
Boneset
1 Ibs /acre
Asclepias syriaca
Common Milkweed
1 Ibs /acre
Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of seed and mulch will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, rehandling, sorting, materials, and
incidentals necessary to seed and mulch.
Payment will be made under:
Seed.............................................................................................. ............................... ...........................ACRE
Reslope Bank & Matting
141Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer and include Coir fiber mat 700, hardwood stakes, and live
stakes (see "Planting" Specs).
Installation
Coir fiber mat 700 shall be used on upper and lower stream banks (above and below the bankfull
elevation). The matting shall be fastened in place using hardwood stakes. During the following plant
dormant season, live stakes shall be planted in the matting from water's edge to just above bankfull.
Species include silky dogwood (Cornus ammonum), black willow (Salix nigra), silky willow (Salix sericea),
ninebark (Physocarpus opulifolius) and common elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) from a local source.
Provide stakes made of hardwood to anchor the matting. Stakes shall be installed to no less than 1 foot
deep for use on side slopes and along the top edge of matting.
Place the matting upon final grading, following seed and mulch application. Provide a smooth soil
surface free from stones, clods, or debris which will prevent the contact of the matting with the soil.
Unroll the matting on the contour, starting at the bottom of the slope and apply without stretching such
that it will lie smoothly but loosely on the soil surface. Bury the top end of each piece of matting in a
narrow trench at least 6 in. (150 mm) deep and tamp firmly after staking with evenly spaced stakes.
Stake the matting according to the manufactures recommended pattern for specific product and slope.
Where one roll of matting ends and a second roll begins, install matting end - over -end with
approximately 6 inches of overlap. Stake through overlapped area. Install stakes across the matting at
ends, junctions, and trenches approximately 1.3 feet apart. See the figure below for the Erosion Control
Matting Detail.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of matting will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, stockpiling, rehandling, sorting, fitting,
materials, and incidentals necessary to install matting.
Payment will be made under:
Matting....................................................................................... ............................... .........................SQUARE YARD
151Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Plantings
Description
Plantings shall be specified in each contract as to type e.g., container, bare root, and live staking.
Plantings from containers shall be from one gallon containers and can be planted throughout the year.
Live staking and bare root planting shall occur during plant dormancy. Bare root seedlings shall be 6 to
12 inches tall. Below is a list of woody vegetation species to be planted on stream banks and floodplains.
Scientific Name
Container & Bare Root Species:
Alnus serrulata
Calycanthus floridus
Clethra acuminata
Hamamelis virginiana
Hypericum densiflorum
Itea virginica
Xanthorhiza simplicissima
Platanus occidentalis
Live Stake Species:
Cornus ammonum
Salix nigra
Salix sericea
Salix humilis
Sambucus canadensis
Physocarpus opulifolius
Common Name Percent of plantings Spacing (feet)
Tag Alder
TOP OF SANK
3
EROSION CONTROL
10%
BLANKET FROM BANKFVLL
Cinnamon Bark Clethra
TO I' ABOVE TOP OF BANK,
,-
Witch Hazel
COVERINO SEED
4
Bushy St. Johns
10%
4
760 ORAM COIR MATING
—.
VLONG
FROM TOE OF BANK TO
2.5
WOODEN
SANKFVLL ELEVATiON.
6
NW 1N STAKE
COVERING SEED
3
TOP OF 3'
20
3
STAKES
20
3
prairie willow
I OE 01
3
3' LONG
v wn��w4.r
3
WOODEN
10
3
STAKE
Plantings
Description
Plantings shall be specified in each contract as to type e.g., container, bare root, and live staking.
Plantings from containers shall be from one gallon containers and can be planted throughout the year.
Live staking and bare root planting shall occur during plant dormancy. Bare root seedlings shall be 6 to
12 inches tall. Below is a list of woody vegetation species to be planted on stream banks and floodplains.
Scientific Name
Container & Bare Root Species:
Alnus serrulata
Calycanthus floridus
Clethra acuminata
Hamamelis virginiana
Hypericum densiflorum
Itea virginica
Xanthorhiza simplicissima
Platanus occidentalis
Live Stake Species:
Cornus ammonum
Salix nigra
Salix sericea
Salix humilis
Sambucus canadensis
Physocarpus opulifolius
Common Name Percent of plantings Spacing (feet)
Tag Alder
20%
3
Sweetshrub
10%
3
Cinnamon Bark Clethra
10%
4
Witch Hazel
10%
4
Bushy St. Johns
10%
4
10%
4
Yellowroot
10%
2.5
Sycamore
20%
6
silky dogwood
10
3
black willow
20
3
silky willow
20
3
prairie willow
10
3
common elderberry
30
3
ninebark
10
3
161Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of plantings will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, rehandling, sorting, materials, and
incidentals necessary to plant.
Payment will be made under:
Plantings................................................................................................................................. ............................... EACH
Temporary Silt Fence
Description
Furnish material, construct, maintain, and remove temporary silt fence in locations shown on the plans
or in locations that require surface drainage to be filtered.
Materials
Posts:
Provide steel posts meeting the following requirements:
• Minimum 5 feet (1.5 meters) long.
• Minimum 1 3/8 inches (34.9 mm) wide measured parallel to the fence.
• Minimum weight of 1.33 lb /ft of length.
• Equipped with an anchor plate with minimum area of 14.0 square inches (9,032.1 square
mm).
• Have a means of retaining wire and fabric in the desired position without displacement.
Woven Wire Fence:
Provide woven wire fence meeting the following requirements:
• Minimum 32 inches (812.8 mm) high.
• Minimum 5 horizontal wires.
• Vertical wires spaced 12 inches (304.8 mm) apart.
• Minimum 10 gage top and bottom wires.
• Minimum 12 %2 gage all other wires.
Filter Fabric:
Provide Type 3 engineering fabric, Class A or B meeting the requirements of Section 1056 of the NCDOT
Specification book.
Attachment Device:
Provide an approved attachment device (e.g., plastic tie).
Installation
Install in locations as shown on the plans or as directed. Install wire and fabric as shown in the plans.
Class B synthetic filter fabric may be used without the woven wire fence backing, subject to the
following conditions: a maximum post spacing of 6 feet (1.8 m), fabric is approved by the Designer, and
post spacing is inclined toward the runoff source, at an angle of not more than 20 degrees from vertical.
171Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

Install posts at a 10 feet (3.0 m) maximum spacing with wire support, with not more than 4 feet (1.2 m)
of the post appearing above ground. Attach filter fabric to the wire fence on the upslope side of the
post with wire or other acceptable methods. Overlap filter fabric a minimum of 18 inches (457.2 mm) at
splice joints. Install fabric that is free of defects, rips, holes, flaws, deterioration, or damage. See figure
below for detail.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of silt fence will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, weighing, stockpiling, rehandling,
sorting, fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the silt fence.
Payment will be made under:
SiltFence ..................................................................................... ............................... .........................LINEAR FEET
TEMPORARY - - w°�' F.RMhOR 0=0
SEDIMENT/SILT FENCE
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 133 Ltl ILNIRR 1007
WTI PROJWrDNV
Installation
Step 1:
Drive steel posts at least 12 in
into ground and excavate a 4In. x
Bin. trench uphill along the line of
posts.
Step 2:
Attach wire fence to posts and
extend the bottom of the fence
8in. into the excavated trench.
Step 3:
Attach the filter fabric to the wire
fence and extend the bottom of
the fabric Bin. Into the trench.
Step 4:
Backfill the trench and compact
the sal firmly to anchorthe
bottom of the sittfence so that
runoff is forced to go through the
fence and cannot go around it.
r�r y.
MT
�+ FtlMD1NG NT.
133 LI ILINERR 100T F LLTER FAN RID ATTAC N ED
STEEL P0ETo.NLONO BBDtl RELY TOIPerReW
WITH PROJ WTI) No � SIDEOF POST
RUNOFF
I i
1t NA i
I rTRENCN
WfrN COWACTEN
IMMILL
■mNCAao r.cigi
TRENCH ■N TN NATIVE RI CRRII
P.7 NNIC, HT.
RINMT
r NA,1,
6TORACE HT. -
T F
1Y ON.
r
AITERIIATE DETAIL
TRENON MTN GRAVEL
NOTES:
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT &REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY.
2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE
& CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS To MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.
181Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015
11
�!
1QWAXIBPACNIGIAWMVIR IE
eN Pro IT FENCE
C NNRX ISIMINGWrrNONT
vms \NPPO RT FENCE
�+ FtlMD1NG NT.
133 LI ILINERR 100T F LLTER FAN RID ATTAC N ED
STEEL P0ETo.NLONO BBDtl RELY TOIPerReW
WITH PROJ WTI) No � SIDEOF POST
RUNOFF
I i
1t NA i
I rTRENCN
WfrN COWACTEN
IMMILL
■mNCAao r.cigi
TRENCH ■N TN NATIVE RI CRRII
P.7 NNIC, HT.
RINMT
r NA,1,
6TORACE HT. -
T F
1Y ON.
r
AITERIIATE DETAIL
TRENON MTN GRAVEL
NOTES:
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT &REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY.
2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE
& CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS To MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.
181Page
Little Buck Creek Dam Decommissioning and Stream Improvements Project 2015

M
L_�s.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Forest
Service
Decision Memo
Buck Creek Watershed Improvement Project
Tusquitee Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest
Clay County, North Carolina
For Additional Information Contact:
Tusquitee Ranger District
123 Woodland Drive
Murphy, North Carolina 28734
(828) 837 -5152

Decision
I have decided to implement a watershed improvement project within the upper Buck Creek
watershed on the Tusquitee Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest, Clay County, North
Carolina. My decision will decommission an earthen dam on Little Buck Creek, restore fish passage
at five road crossings, remove log -check dams which are causing stream bank erosion, and restore a
stream bank at an old ford that is diverting streamflow around a natural waterfall barrier (this barrier
is preventing invasion of brown trout into a Southern Appalachian brook trout population).
Additional watershed improvements would include vegetating disturbed stream banks, maintenance
of one - existing -k- dam, repairing-one road- glide; restoration-of- stream - channels- using-natural -charm -ei --- - - - - --
design techniques at the existing pond site and five fish passage improvement sites.
Restoration of stream channels will include excavation and reshaping of stream banks at specific
locations and installation of rock and/or log J -hook structures to stabilize stream banks. All
disturbed soils will be stabilized to prevent erosion. This analysis includes effects determinations
for Sites 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, and 23 (see the Appendix to this DM). All
other sites identified on the map will be analyzed in a later document.
Reasons for Categorical Exclusion of Project
Decisions may be categorically excluded from documentation in an Environmental Impact
Statement or Environmental Assessment when they are within one of the categories identified in
the Code of Federal Regulations 36 CFR 220, and when there are no extraordinary circumstances
related to the proposed action. This project is excluded under 36 CFR 220.6(e)(17) Restoring
wetlands, streams, riparian areas or other water bodies by removing, replacing, or modifying
water control structures such as, but not limited to, dams, levees, dikes, ditches, culverts, pipes,
drainage tiles, valves, gates, and fencing, to allow waters to flow into natural channels and
floodplains and restore natural flow regimes to the extent practicable where valid existing rights
or special use authorizations are not unilaterally altered or canceled, 36 CFR 220.6 (e)(19):
"Removing and /or relocating debris and sediment following disturbance events (such as floods,
hurricanes, tornados, mechanical/engineering failures, etc.) to restore uplands, wetlands, or
riparian systems to pre - disturbance conditions, to the extent practicable, such that site
conditions will not impede or negatively alter natural processes"; and 36 CFR 220.6 (e)(20):
"Activities that restore, rehabilitate, or stabilize lands occupied by roads and trails, excluding
National Forest System roads and National Forest System trails to a more natural condition that
may include removing, replacing, or modifying drainage structures and ditches, reestablishing
vegetation, reshaping natural contours and slopes, reestablishing drainage -ways, or other
activities that would restore site productivity and reduce environmental impacts. "
a. Federally listed endangered or threatened species, designated critical habitat,
species proposed for Federal listing or area proposed as critical habitat, and
regionally sensitive (S) species:
A biological evaluation completed on February 3, 2015 determined that the project is not
likely to adversely affect the northern long -eared bat and Indiana bat. Concurrence with

these determinations of effect was made by the US Fish and Wildlife Service on March 2,
2015. There will be no impacts to any other proposed, endangered, or threatened species.
Implementation of the Buck Creek Watershed Improvement Project will have no impacts
(1) to any regionally sensitive aquatic species because none occur within the treatment
areas and because no off -site effects would occur to any aquatic resources; (2) to any
regionally sensitive botanical species because none occur in the project area; and (3) to
any regionally sensitive terrestrial wildlife species because none occur in the project area.
b. Floodplains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds:
Some project activities will occur in the floodplain and in riparian areas that were
artificially converted to wetlands when the pond across Little Buck Creek was
established. Project activities in the floodplain are designed to restore natural conditions;
the Forest Service will obtain necessary and appropriate permits from the US Army
Corps of Engineers prior to conducting any activities in jurisdictional wetlands. No
project activities will occur in municipal watersheds.
c. Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or
national recreation areas:
None are located in the areas where project activities will occur.
d. Inventoried roadless areas (IRAs):
None are located in the areas where project activities will occur.
e. Research natural areas (RNAs):
The project areas does not include any RNAs
f. American Indian and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites, archaeological sites,
or historic properties or areas:
An archeological review completed in February 2015 determined that the project is an
Exempt Undertaking.
Purpose and Need for the Action
The purpose and need for the proposed treatments include restoring streams and riparian areas by
removing, replacing, or modifying water control structures and restoring native brook trout to the
watershed. Engineering assessments have identified seepage at the base of the dam on Little
Buck Creek as well as other structural concerns with the dam. US Forest Service engineers have
recommended that this dam be removed to eliminate safety concerns related to dam failure,
particularly at downstream campsites.
Scoping and Public Involvement
Providing public notice and identifying issues important to the public - - the scoping process - -
was conducted in February 2015 through direct telephone and e-mail correspondence with
individuals, groups, and other state and federal agencies known to be experts in watershed
management practices in the Southern Appalachian ecoregion. This rapid and targeted scoping
was conducted due to (1) the safety issues with the dam presented in the purpose and need
section and (2) because these types of watershed projects are conducted relatively infrequently
by the Nantahala National Forest and some of the persons contacted for this project are not
normally consulted on terrestrial land management projects. No negative comments were
received.

Public Notification
This Decision Memo and accompanying vicinity and unit maps will be posted on the NFsNC
web page at www.fs.usda.gov.nfsnc. This Decision will also be reported in the NFsNC Schedule
of Proposed Actions (SOPA) distributed by the Forest Supervisor's Office, Asheville, NC.
Findings Required by Other Laws
Forest Plan Consistency — The actions in this decision are consistent with the Land and Resource
Management Plan for the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests and all amendments to the
Endangered Species — Implementing the actions in this decision will not affect threatened or
endangered species, or result in loss of any other species' viability, or create significant trends
towards Federal listing of the species under the Endangered Species Act.
Cultural Resources — The actions in this decision will not adversely affect any sites listed, or
eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, nor will they cause the loss or
destruction of significant scientific, cultural or historic resources.
Notice, Comment, and Appeal Opportunities
This project is not subject to administrative review.
Contact Information
For further information about this project, contact Steverson Moffat, project manager, at the
Nantahala National Forest, 123 Woodland Drive, Murphy, NC 28906; or telephone at (828) 837-
5152 x108.
C
GELA M. GEE
Date
District Ranger
Cheoah and Tusquitee Ranger Districts

ku■
�r
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Banos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
April 13, 2015
Lynn Hicks
National Forests in North Carolina
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A
Asheville, NC 28801
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Removal of Little Buck Creek Dam, Tusquitee Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest,
Clay County, ER 15 -0758
Dear Mr. Hicks:
Thank you for your letter of March 20, 2015, regarding the above - referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
The Documentation and Assessment of the Little Buck Creek Dam and offer the following comments.
We understand the US Forest Service would like to remove the earthen dam structure, referred to as Little
Buck Creek Dam, and restore the natural stream channel so brook trout can be introduced to the creek and its
tributaries. We concur with your findings that the Little Buck Creek Dam is not eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places, as it lacks historical, architectural and cultural significance. Thus, the dam's
removal will not affect any historic properties which may be in the area.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental .reviewO..ncdcr.eov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
i.� ,� WRamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: [phone] -6599