The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20080499 Ver 3_PEI 1010 - TBP Individual Permit_signed_20150721PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC U.S Army Corps of Engineers Attn: Mr David Bailey Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Attn: Ms Karen Higgins 401 Wetlands Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Reference Application for Section 404/401 Individual Per Proposed Phase II Triad Business Park Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No 1010 Dear Mr Bailey and Ms Higgins: 20150740 0150T40 July 21, 2015 Pilot Environmental Inc (PEI) is pleased to provide this application for a Department of the Army Section 404 Individual Permit and a corresponding North Carolina Individual Water Quality Certification for proposed impacts to waters of the U.S in connection with the proposed project referenced above. This application has been prepared on behalf of the site owner, TDO Land Holdings, LLC If there are questions regarding this application, or a need for further information, please contact us at 336 310 4527 Respectfully submitted, Bradley S. Luckey Project Manager Michael T Brame, PWS Principal Attachments 401 Individual Water Quality Certification Fee ($570 00) PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285 WWW P110tenviro com EE7 PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC July 21, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Attn: Mr. David Bailey Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins 401 Wetlands Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 Reference: Application for Section 404/401 Individual Permit Proposed Phase II Triad Business Park Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Higgins: Pilot Environmental Inc. (PEI) is pleased to provide this application for a Department of the Army Section 404 Individual Permit and a corresponding North Carolina Individual Water Quality Certification for proposed impacts to waters of the U.S. in connection with the proposed project referenced above. This application has been prepared on behalf of the site owner, TDO Land Holdings, LLC. If there are questions regarding this application, or a need for further information, please contact us at 336.310.4527. Respectfully submitted, r. Bradley S. Luckey Project Manager Michael T. Brame, PWS Principal Attachments: 401 Individual Water Quality Certification Fee ($570.00) PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285 www._ Com U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Form Approved - APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT ©MB No. 0710 -0003 33 CFR 325- The proponent agency is CECW -CO -R. Expires., 31- AUGUST -2013 Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of Information. including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710- 0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to Comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please OO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10. 33 USC 443, Clean Water Act, Section 404. 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USG 1413, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers: Final Rule 33 CFR 320 -332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law, Submission _ of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and /or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity- An application that is not completed in full will be returned. (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT) 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8 AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required) First - Brian Middle - Last - 1-1a1 l First - Bradley Middle -Stuart Last - Luckey Company - TDO Land Holdings, LLC Company - Pilot Environmental. Inc. E -mail Address - bhall( )sametcorp.com E -mail Address - bluckey(r�7i pi lotenviro.crJm 6, APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS: Address - 309 Gal Iiniore Dairy Road, Suite 102 Address- P.0, Box 128 city - Greensboro State - NC Zip - 27409 Country - U1 S. City - Kernersvilie State - NC Zip - 27285 Country - U.S. 7. APPLICANT'S PRONE NOs. w)AREA CODE 14. AGENTS PHONE Nos. WAREA CODE a. Residence b. Business c- Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax (336) 544 -2600 ( 336) 708 -4997 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION 11. 1 hereby authorize, Pilot Environmental, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish. upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. See Attached SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION of PROJECTOR ACTIVITY 12, PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) Triad Business Park 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) Unnamed Tributary to West Fork Deep River Address Triad Business Park 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Latitude: -N 36.109174 Longitude: •W - 80.024339 City - Colfax. State - NC Zip- 27235 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) State Tax Parcel ID 6896704201 Municipality Colfax - Guilford County - Book /Page 175- 98TRIAtD Section - Township - Range - ENG FORM 4345, JUL 2013 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE, Page 1 of 3 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From intersection of Interstate 40 and Highway 68 - Drive north approximately 1 mile - Drive west on West Market Street for approximately 4,5 miles - Turn left on 'Triad Park Turn left on Old Greensboro Road - Site is located immediately east of dead end at cuk de -sac. 18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features) The project includes the extension of Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill Road. In order to extend Old Greensboro Road it is necessary to impact a perennial stream and associated wetlands. 19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions) - - The project purpose is to provide safe and adequate industrial access to Phase Il of Triad 'Business Park. 118E BLOCKS 20 -23 IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHAR'G'ED 20. Reason(s) For Discharge In order to construct the road, a culvert, rip -rap and associated fill must be placed into a stream and associated wetlands. 21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards; Type Clean Earthen Fill Type Type Amount in Cubic Yards 621 Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see Instructions) Acres 0.59 acres wetlands or Linear Feet 190' stream channel 23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions) See Attached. ENG FORM 4345, JUL 2013 _ — Page 2 of 3 J 24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? E]Yes ®No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORE{ 25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (ii more than can to aritered here, please aisach a supplemental lisu I a. Address - See Attached City - State - zip - b. Address- City - - State - Zip - c. Address- city - State - Zip - d. Address- City - State - Zip . e. Address- city - State - Zip - 26, List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal. State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application, AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL` IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIFD DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED NUMBER NCI)ENR S&EC NA NCDENR -DW'R 4171 WQC NA City of Kenersville Buffer NA " Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits 27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of this applicant. DIN cc- Balled S.L-kay, Luckey DN:cn =Bradley S. Luckey,o =Pilot Environmental, Inc., on, email= bluckey @pilotenviracom, -US Date. 201 5.07.21 naeso- oa'oo' 7/21/15 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that. Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 er imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, JUL 2013 Page 3 of 3 AGENT AUTHORIZATION This form authorizes PEI to act as our agent in stream /wetland matters including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permitting, Property Address: Old Greensboro Road Kernersville, NC 27284 Owner Information: Name: TDO Land Holding LLC Address: P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, NC 27419 Telephone Number: 336 -544 -2600 Fax Number: 336- 544 -2638 E -mail Address: bhall @sametcorp,com Signature: S�_D Date: Map PIN Owner Name Street Address City Sate Zip Number 1 6896711446 Carol Page Armstrong Trust 12612 Celtic Court Rockville MD 20850 2 6896811024 Dirt Colfax Pipe LLC 3421 Old Vestal TF Vestal NY 13850 3 6896903733 Maxine S. Balla Sellers Post Office Box 91 Colfax NC 27235 4 6896908667 Gerald & Vicky Blackburn 8711 Sherfield Road Colfax NC 27235 5 7806000669 Lloyd & Debra Hayden 8707 Sherfield Road Colfax NC 27235 6 7806003674 David & Marsha Devane 202 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 7 7806004429 Hong Thi Ly 204 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 8 7806003297 Jeffery Wright 208 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 9 7806006123 Herbert Gray 213 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 10 7806005071 Limuel & Barbara Nance 600 Gray Wilson Road Colfax NC 27235 11 7805091955 Reba Fields 214 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 12 7805091814 Marcus Gray 216 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 13 7805095806 Tina Rierson 1220 N Main Street Kernersville NC 27284 14 7805093538 Chris & Sharon Combs 601 Gray Wilson Road Colfax NC 27235 15 7805090411 Limuel & Tammy Nance 600 Gray Wilson Road Colfax NC 27235 16 6895999070 Nora Newsome 608 Gray Wilson Road Colfax NC 27235 17 6895986782 Homer & Aileen Idol 321 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 18 6895982836 Brian Dooley & Kris Dooley 320 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 19 6895985750 Homer Idol 321 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 20 6895982720 Bobby & Edith Cook Post Office Box 66 Colfax NC 27235 21 6895889070 TDO Land Holding LLC Post Office Box 8050 Greensboro NC 27419 22 6895976796 Jerry & Patsy Perry 411 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 23 6895976681 Mark & Lisa Siepak 620 Rockspring Road High Point NC 27262 24 6895976475 Betty Jean Hedgecock 415 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 25 6895971475 Deborah Froelich 418 S Bunker Hill Road Colfax NC 27235 Hazel Henrix Living Trust 26 6895877232 110 Barden Drive Kernersville NC 27284 Hazel Hendrix Trustee 27 6895874204 Graland Stack 8949 Bending Road Colfax NC 27235 6895873316 6895870287 6895870499 6895870287 6895777745 28 6895766022 Janet Williamson & Marilyn Sealy 3719 Cora Drive Winston -Salem NC 27127 6895766022 Stack Family Grantor Retained 29 6895787078 Annuity Trust Irene 8924 Bending Road Colfax NC 27235 Stack 6895678728 6895881408 6895880876 Larry Stack, Joyce Nelson, Ronnie 30 6895880876 1841 Sandy Ridge Road Colfax NC 27235 Stack 6895689605 31 6895771146 Harold & Mary Stack 9034 Stack Road Colfax NC 27235 32 6895579465 Kathleen Atchison 45 Marshall -Smith Road Colfax NC 27235 SB Johnson II LLC & NB Johnson II 33 6895695819 Post Office Box 8050 Greensboro NC 27419 LLC T/C 34 6896700970 SFG Greensboro - I LLC 3414 Peachtree Road NE Atlanta GA 303236 LEGEND' TBP Boundary TBP Phase 1 /11 Boundary J i- ...... Project Area Parcel Owned By Applicant - Adjoining Parcel Identifier 'ti® ilk 5�I - JAL i ` for � �I1 �g F •, 11 �. 10i " W �► , 13 - 17 16 X18 19 Ed e w •. p. r °7 ®� ` Drawing 1 Site Vicinity Map 2010 Aerial Photograph Triad Business Park Guilford County GIS Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina SCALE: 1" = 1,000' PEI No. 1010 APPLICATION FOR SECTION 404/401 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT OLD GREENSBORO ROAD EXTENSION KERNERSVILLE, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR: TDO LAND HOLDINGS, LLC 309 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD - SUITE 201 GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409 PREPARED BY: PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PO BOX 128 KERNERSVILLE, NC 27285 JULY 21, 2015 PEI PROJECT NO. 1010 ■ TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVESUMMARY ................................................................................................... ............................... 1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................................... ..............................4 2.0 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... ..............................5 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................. ..............................8 3.1 Literature Review ......................................................................................... ............................... 8 3.2 Site Reconnaissance ..................................................................................... ............................... 9 3.3 Streams ......................................................................................................... .............................10 3.4 Wetlands ....................................................................................................... .............................11 3.5 Open Waters ................................................................................................. .............................12 3.6 Watershed Classification ............................................................................ ............................... 12 3.7 Vegetation .................................................................................................. ............................... 13 3.8 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................... ............................... 14 3.9 Biological Resources /Endangered Species ................................................. ............................... 15 4.0 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................ ............................... 17 5.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ..................................................... ............................... 18 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS .......................................................................................... .............................22 7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION ...................................................................... .............................23 8.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION .................................................................................... .............................25 9.0 CORRESPONDENCE /REFERENCES .................................................................... ............................... 26 10.0 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... .............................27 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This environmental report was prepared by Pilot Environmental Inc. (PEI) for use by TDO Land Holdings, LLC, the "applicant" in obtaining an individual permit that will allow the construction of a proposed road crossing. Stream and wetland impacts are required for completion of the proposed project. The purpose of the Environmental Report is to provide sufficient information that will enable the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) to evaluate the proposed project. The project purpose is to provide safe and adequate industrial access to Phase II of Triad Business Park (TBP) located south of East Mountain Street /West Market Street in Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina. Phase II of TBP is an approximate 180 acre portion of the larger 312 acre TBP industrial park. Phase II of TBP does not currently have safe and adequate industrial access and /or interconnectivity to Phase I of TBP. Therefore, the applicant is proposing the construction of a road crossing that would provide safe and adequate industrial travel to and from Phase II of TBP. A Transportation Analysis, prepared by Davenport, and evaluation of effects on emergency response personnel assisted the applicant in determining the preferred access location for Phase II of TBP. TBP was previously delineated in 2008 to facilitate the construction /infrastructure of an approximate 127 acre portion of TBP with FedEx Ground (Lot 4), to provide infrastructure to the remaining approximate 5 acres of Phase I of TBP and to provide sanitary sewer /water services to Phase II of TBP. Section 404/401 permit approvals associated with the construction of FedEx Ground and development of Phase I of TBP included the permanent impact to: 0.22 acres of open waters; 225 linear feet of stream channel; 0.19 acres of wetlands; 46,634 square feet of Zone 1 buffer; and, 23,954 square feet of Zone 2 buffer. Section 404/401 permit approvals associated with the installation of utility line infrastructure to Phase 1/11 of TBP included the temporary impact to 324 linear feet of stream channel and 0.50 acres of wetlands. As a special condition of the previously issued Section 404/401 authorizations, the permittee was required to preserve and maintain all the jurisdictional waters /wetlands and a 30 foot buffer around all of the streams and pond features (conservation area), excluding the waters /wetlands at the FedEx Ground (Lot 4) site. According to an Amendment to Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations dated December 31, 2008, the remaining jurisdictional waters /wetlands located within TBP (with the exception of Lot 4), have been placed into conservation areas which activities including but not limited to; fill, excavation, land disturbance, vegetation removal, construction of temporary /permanent structures, disruption or alteration of hydrology, etc. are prohibited. If the proposed action receives Section 404/401 approval, then the applicant will amend the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations dated December 31, 2008 such that the proposed road crossing can be constructed. The designated conservation areas on the remainder of jurisdictional 1 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 waters /wetlands located in Phase II of TBP will remain in place in efforts to preserve /avoid additional impacts to jurisdictional waters /wetlands. The proposed project is paramount to the growth and success of Phase II of TBP and thus, contributes to the overall community due to increased employment opportunities, increased tax revenue and various other socio- economic factors. However, to facilitate the proposed project, there will be unavoidable impacts to 190 linear feet of stream channel, 0.59 acres of wetlands and 28,751 square feet of cumulative Zone 1/2 riparian buffer. A letter of No Practical Alternatives is being submitted to the City of Kernersville simultaneously with this application to request the proposed impact to the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Riparian Buffers in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0250. The project, as being proposed, will meet the current and future needs of Phase II of TBP. The site design, as being proposed, allows for future development of Phase II of TBP to occur in upland areas without additional impacts to streams or wetlands. An extensive alternative's analysis has been conducted to determine the preferred access alternative. The alternative's evaluated include an off -site no build, an on -site no build and three interior crossing locations. A Transportation Analysis, evaluation of construction costs, economic evaluation and evaluation of impact to the environment were utilized in the alternative's analysis. The preferred alternative was selected due to limited impacts to the environment, the costs of development, operation, travel times, road capacity, public safety and anticipated positive benefits to TBP and the overall community in the vicinity of TBP. During design of the proposed project, the applicant has incorporated several design techniques to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands. Design specifications that avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands include the use of approximate 12 feet tall retaining walls that are approximately 65 and 85 feet long. The retaining walls will act as head /end walls and significantly reduce impacts to streams, associated stream buffers and wetlands. The sequence of construction phases has been designed to have minimal areas of exposed /bare soil. During construction of each of the phases of the project, erosion control measures will be implemented to avoid sediment runoff into nearby streams. Silt fencing and additional erosion control measures /devices will be used to prevent erosion and capture sediment. Disturbed areas will be immediately reseeded to prevent erosion and sedimentation runoff into streams. Stockpiling excavated soil will be avoided where possible. If temporary stock - piling is necessary, it will be bermed with bales of hay and or covered to prevent excessive run -off. The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional areas and will compensate to the extent practicable, for remaining unavoidable losses with mitigation. The applicant proposes a mitigation ratio of 2:1 for the stream and wetland impacts. The applicant proposes to compensate for impacts for the construction of the proposed project by offering payment into the NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Private mitigation banks, in the watershed of the proposed project, did not have credits available at the time of the applicant's request. At the 2 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 ratios proposed, the applicant will receive 380 linear feet of stream credits and 1.25 acres of wetlands credits, which will meet and /or exceed mitigation payment requirements. Additionally, mitigation for unavoidable impacts to riparian buffers will be satisfied by the applicant in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0250. Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED The project purpose is to provide safe and adequate industrial access to Phase II of TBP. Phase II of TBP is an approximate 180 acre portion of the larger 312 acre TBP industrial park. Phase II of TBP does not currently have safe and adequate industrial access and /or interconnectivity to Phase I of TBP. Therefore, the applicant is proposing the construction of a road crossing that would provide safe and adequate industrial travel to and from Phase 11 of TBP. Access to Phase II of TBP was evaluated by Davenport and summarized in a Transportation Analysis dated September 5, 2014 (Appendix IV). According to the Transportation Analysis report, the proposed road crossing and extension of Old Greensboro Road has significant benefit to TBP and the general vicinity by increased road capacity, more efficient travel time, operation and safety. Additionally, emergency response and occupancy safety was also considered during evaluation of alternatives to access Phase II of TBP. According to a June 25, 2015 letter from Mr. Scott Cunningham, Kernersville Chief of Police and a July 1, 2015 letter from Mr. Bruce Hennequin, Fire Marshall of the Kernersville Fire Department, the proposed interconnectivity of Phase II of TBP by the proposed road crossing would result in significant and immediate benefits to occupants of TBP, as well as, the overall community within the vicinity of TBP. According to the letters, more efficient response times to and within the general vicinity of Phase II of TBP will allow for more efficient patrols, reduce response times and overall enhance general service to the area. Copies of the letters are included in Appendix IV. 0 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 2.0 BACKGROUND The project area is located within the larger TBP. TBP is an approximate 312 acre tract, located south of East Mountain Street /West Market Street in Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina. TBP was previously delineated in 2008 to facilitate the construction /infrastructure of an approximate 127 acre portion of TBP with FedEx Ground, to provide infrastructure to the remaining approximate 5 acres of Phase I of TBP and to provide sanitary sewer /water services to Phase II of TBP. Drawing 1 shows the approximate locations of TBP (Phase 1 /II) and the proposed project area. USACE JDs were issued in conjunction with USACE approvals for the project areas as described below. Section 404/401 permit approvals associated with the construction of FedEx Ground and Phase I of TBP are described below and included as attachments in Appendix V: • SAW- 2008- 01894/DWQ # 08-0499— Project Hermes (FedEx Ground) o Nationwide Permit 39 dated July 31, 2008. The NWP 39 for Project Hermes (FedEx Ground) authorized the permanent impact to 0.22 acres of open waters, 0.19 acre of wetlands and 225 linear feet of stream channel. Mitigation was required for 0.19 acres of wetland impacts at a 1:1 ratio and 225 linear feet of stream channel at a 2:1 ratio. o 401 WQC and Major Variance Approval dated August 11, 2008. The 401 WQC and Major Variance Approval for Project Hermes (FedEx Ground) authorized the permanent impact to 0.22 acres of open waters, 0.19 acres of wetlands, 255 linear feet of stream, 46,634 square feet of Zone 1 buffer impact and 23,954 square feet of Zone 2 buffer impact. Mitigation was required for 255 linear feet of stream and 70,588 square feet of riparian buffer. As a special condition of the 401 WQC and Major Variance approval, deed restrictions prohibiting the future impact of riparian buffers was required. According to a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, dated January 20, 2009, a legal description by metes and bounds of remaining riparian buffers and surface waters for Lot 4 of Triad Business Park, Phase I have been placed into restricted areas in which activities including but not limited to; fill, excavation, land disturbance, vegetation removal, construction of temporary /permanent structures, disruption or alteration of hydrology, etc. are prohibited. A copy of the Declaration of Covenant and Restrictions is included in Appendix V. • SAW- 2008 -02092 —Triad Business Park (Sewer Line) o Nationwide Permit 12 dated September 12, 2008. The NWP for Triad Business Park (sewer line) authorized the temporary impact to 0.31 acres of wetlands and 5 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 125 linear feet of stream. Mitigation was required for 0.31 acres of wetland impact at a 2:1 ratio. As a special condition of the NWP 12, the permittee was required to preserve and maintain all the jurisdictional waters /wetlands and a 30 foot buffer around all of the stream and pond features (conservation area), excluding the waters /wetlands at the Project Hermes (SAW- 2008 - 01894) site. According to an Amendment to Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations dated December 31, 2008, the remaining jurisdictional waters /wetlands located within TBP (with the exception of Lot 4), have been placed into conservations areas which activities including but not limited to; fill, excavation, land disturbance activities, vegetation removal, construction of temporary /permanent structures, disruption or alteration of hydrology, etc. are prohibited. A copy of the Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations is included in Appendix V. • SAW- 2008 -01599 — NE Sewer Line Improvements, Phase I o Nationwide Permit 12 dated October 24, 2008. The NWP for the NE Sewer Line Improvements, Phase I authorized the temporary impact to 0.19 acres of wetlands and 199 linear feet of streams. Mitigation was required for impacts to 0.13 acres of wetlands at a 2:1 ratio. The above - referenced NWPs all contained remarks indicating that impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with the three above projects and all other proposed impacts to waters of the U.S. within or associated with TBP are considered a single and complete project as defined in the federal Code of Regulations (CFR) at 33 CFR 330.2(i). M Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 Cumulative impacts to jurisdictional features are summarized in the below table: Table 1. Previous Impacts to Waters of US and Riparian Buffers Project Open Waters (ac) Wetlands (a c' Stream (If) I Zone 1 Buffer I (sf) Zone 2 Buffer I (sf) Hermes 225 FedEx 0.22 0.19 46,634 23,954 - 255 DWR DWR Ground TBP Sewer 0 0.31* 125* n/a n/a Line NE Sewer 0 0.19* 199* n/a n/a Line *denotes temporary impact n/a denotes information not available 7 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Literature Review PEI reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, USDA Web Soil Survey of Guilford County, last published USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County, USFWS NWI maps, FEMA FIRMS and the Geologic Map of North Carolina to determine information about TBP and the project area. • The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 2) shows an unnamed tributary to the West Fork Deep River within the proposed impact area. An unnamed pond is shown north of the project area. Drainage swales that could contain surface waters or wetlands are depicted southeast, southwest and west of the project area. • The USDA Web Soil Survey of Guilford County (Drawing 3) shows a stream consistent with the unnamed tributary depicted on the USGS Topographic map located within the proposed project area. Soils within the proposed road crossing are mapped as: — Chewacla loam (ChA) — The Chewacla series consists of somewhat poorly drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on floodplains of the Piedmont and Coastal Plain river valleys. — Nathalie sandv loam (NaB) — The Nathalie series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on hills and ridges of Piedmont uplands. — Poplar Forest sandv loam (PaC) and clay loam (PpD2 —The Poplar Forest series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to steep Piedmont uplands. The Chewacla soil mapping unit (ChA) is identified on the 2014 National Hydric Soils List for Guilford County, North Carolina has having hydric inclusions of the un- drained Wehadkee component. The remainder of the soils located within the project area are not identified on the National Hydric Soils List for Guilford County, North Carolina. • The last published USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County (Drawing 3A), shows an unnamed tributary to the West Fork Deep River within the project area. Other surface waters or wetlands are not shown within the project area. Additionally, intermittent streams are located southeast and southwest of the project area. • The National Wetland Inventory Map (Drawing 4) does not identify surface waters or wetlands within the project area. A freshwater pond is located northeast of the project area. A freshwater pond and forested /shrub wetlands are shown southwest of the proposed road crossing. E Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 • The FEMA FIRMS (Drawing 5) identify the project area and remainder of TBP as Zone X, an area outside the 500 year floodplain. • The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province. In general, the soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in -place chemical weathering of rock underlying the site. Typically, shallow unconfined groundwater movement within soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally from higher to lower elevations. 3.2 Site Reconnaissance PEI has confirmed the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, within the TBP as depicted on the Wetlands PLAT from previous site delineation /verifications previously conducted in 2008. PEI performed a delineation of jurisdictional waters within the project area during several site visits from April 2014 to May 2014. The project area consist of grass- covered fields and wooded land. Portions of the grass- covered fields include fill from the adjacent pond dam, located immediately north of the project area. Wooded areas consist of mixed hardwood species. Based on the findings of the delineation, one perennial stream is located within the proposed area of impact. The stream contained a defined bed and banks, meanders, iron oxidizing bacteria and flowing water at the time of our site visits. Wetlands are located adjacent to the perennial stream within the project area. PEI flagged the centerline of the stream and boundary of the wetland during our site visits. The stream and wetland flags were verified in the field by Mr. David Bailey (USACE) and Ms. Sue Homewood (NCDENR -DWR) on May 15, 2014. Drawing 6 shows the approximate locations of the stream, wetlands, data point locations and our flag numbers within the proposed area of impact. Phase I of TBP is located west of the project area. FedEx Ground, other industrial buildings and graded lots are located within the remainder of Phase I of TBP. Old Greensboro Road, a stormwater pond and graded Lots 2 and 3 are located within Phase II of TBP, immediately northwest and west of the project area. The remainder of Phase 11 of TBP consists of undeveloped overgrown /fallow agricultural fields and wooded land. With the exception of dilapidated structures, structures are not located within areas east of the project area in Phase II of TBP. Several additional streams, wetlands and jurisdictional ponds are located within the remainder of Phase II of TBP. Impacts to these features are not anticipated. The remaining streams, wetlands and pond locations were confirmed by PEI and verified in the field by Mr. Bailey and 11 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 Ms. Homewood on May 15, 2014. A USACE Jurisdictional Determination, dated September 8, 2014 is included in Appendix V. 3.3 Streams Phase II of TBP contains 9 streams. The streams have been classified as perennial and intermittent. Stream descriptions are included in Table 1 below. Stream Identifier SA SB SC SCA ISC ISCA ISD Table 2: TBP Phase II Streams 0 Perennial Approximate Approximate Intermittent Length of Length of Stream 429 0 Intermittent Intermittent Perennial Classification 522 0 Total: Stream (linear Stream (linear feet) feet) Perennial 0 1,423 Intermittent 274 0 Perennial 0 3,701 Intermittent 329 0 Intermittent 429 0 Intermittent 66 0 Perennial 522 0 Total: 1,620 5,124 Stream SA is located on the central portion of Phase II -TBP and is perennial throughout its entirety. It will not be impacted by the project. Stream SA originates at an approximate 20 foot head -cut. Stream SA contained flowing water and moderate substrate sorting and riffle /pool complexes. Stream SA discharges into Stream SC. Fringe wetland pockets (WA) are located adjacent to Stream SA. Stream SB is located on the northeastern portion of TBP -Phase II and originates from an approximate four foot head cut. Stream SB leaves the site to the north and is presumed to be Steam SC as it re- enters the northern - central portion of the site. Stream SB did not contain flowing water or evidence of aquatic life. Stream SB contain a moderate bed and banks, meanders and substrate sorting. Stream SB will not be impacted by the proposed project. 10 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 Stream SC is a perennial stream that crosses the central portion of Phase II of TBP. The majority of Stream SC will not be impacted by the proposed project. Stream numbers SA, SB, ISC, ISCA, ISD, SF and SG are tributaries to Stream SC. Stream SC is presumed to originate as Stream SB on the northeastern portion of the site, leaves the site to the north, and re- enters the site boundary on the northern - central portion of the site. Stream 3 has a defined bed and banks, flowing water with a strong riffle pool sequence, strong substrate sorting ranging from Stream SCA is an intermittent stream located on the northern portion of the site and will not be impacted by the proposed project. Stream SCA originates at an approximate one foot head cut. Stream SCA has a defined bed and banks, meanders and moderate substrate sorting. Stream ISCA is located on the western portion of Phase II of TBP. Stream ISCA is an intermittent stream that will not be impacted by the project. The stream is relatively straight and portions contained a defined bed and banks and hydric soils. Flowing water was not observed in this stream. Stream ISD is located on the western portion of Phase II of TBP and will not be impacted by the proposed project. Stream ISD contains a weakly defined bed and banks, meanders and hydric soils. Water was not observed in Stream ISD. 3.4 Wetlands Descriptions of jurisdictional wetlands located on the site are included in Table 2. Table 3: TBP Phase II Wetlands Wetland I Approximate Acreage E WA 0.065 W PA 0.027 WC 8.850 WCA 0.040 Total: 8.892 A limited portion of Wetland WC is located within the proposed project area. The remainder of the wetlands located on the site are not proposed to be impacted. The wetlands located on the site are classified as broad - leaved deciduous forested palustrine using the Cowardian wetland classification system. The wetlands are separated from uplands by distinct breaks in topography, vegetation and /or soil. Upland areas surrounding wetland areas have bright soils that are well drained to depths of twelve inches and more below the ground surface. 11 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 The portion of Wetland WC that is proposed to be impacted contains drainage patterns, water stained leaves, hydric soils and limited areas of saturation. Vegetation, including sweet gum, black willow, green ash, beech, elm, silky dogwood, maple, sweet gum, cedar, American hornbeam, honeysuckle, common green- briar, iron weed, sedges and rush species is present in Wetland WC. Wetland Determination data forms are included in Appendix IV. 3.5 Open Waters Descriptions of the jurisdictional ponds are shown in table below. Table 3: TBP Phase II Open Waters Wetland I Approximate Acreage ID PA 1.516 PB 2.020 Total: 3.536 Jurisdictional ponds are located north and west of the project area, within Phase II of TBP. The ponds have distinct ordinary high water marks. Stream SCA /Wetlands WCA discharge into Pond PA. Pond PA discharges to Wetland WPA and eventually the Stream SC /Wetland WC complex. The up- gradient portion of Pond PB is located on Lot 4 of Phase I of TBP. Two streams and a headwater wetland (located on Lot 4, Phase I of TBP) discharge into Pond PB. Pond PB discharges to Stream SF and eventually the Stream SC /Wetland WC complex on the southwestern portion of Phase II of TBP. The ponds exhibit physical hydrologic connections to up and down - gradient Waters of the US and are deemed jurisdictional by the USACE and NCDENR -DWR. 3.6 Watershed Classification An unnamed tributary to the West Fork Deep River is located within the proposed project area. Additionally, unnamed ponds and other tributaries to the West Fork Deep River are located within Phase II of TBP. Phase II of TBP is located within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin and the West Fork Deep River has been classified as WS -IV* waters in the vicinity of the site. Surface waters, shown on the most recent version of the USGS Topographic Map and /or last published USDA Soil Survey, are subject to the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers (15A NCAC 02B .0250). Additionally, a minimum 100 foot vegetative buffer is required for all new development activities that exceed the low density option requirements as specified in Sub -Item (3)(b)(i)(A) or Sub -Item (3)(b)(ii)(A) of 15A NCAC 02B .0100, .0200 & .0300, otherwise a minimum 30 foot vegetative buffer for development shall be required along all perennial waters indicated on the most recent versions of U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) scale topographic maps or as determined by local government studies. 12 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 3.7 Vegetation The project area that will be altered by the proposed project contains undeveloped, wooded land and grass- covered fields. The grass- covered fields have been altered due to clearing /grading associated with the construction of a pond, stormwater pond and other previous infrastructure in TBP. The cleared /graded land, within the proposed project limits, consists of mixed grass and weed species that is regularly maintained by extensive mowing and herbicide applications. The area of impact within the previously cleared /graded area includes the following species: Fescue - Kentucky 31 (Schedonorus arundinaceus), Meadow Fescue (Schedonorus pratensis), Bermudagrass (cynodon dactylon), Bahiagrass (Papsalum notatum), Crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), Common Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), White Clover (Trifolium repens), Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense), Horseweed (Conyza canadensis), Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Wild Garlic (Allium canadense), common lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) and wild pear (Pyrus communis). The wooded land, located within the upland areas of impact, contains mixed hardwood species including various oak, hickory, beech, elm, cedar and gum and maple species within the tree /sapling stratum. Understory vegetation includes Christmas fern, Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), green briar (smilax rotundifolia), muscadine grape (Vitus rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron). 13 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 The wooded land, located within the jurisdictional areas of impact contain include the following species: Species Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip poplar Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Salix nigra Black Willow Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle Vitus rotundifolia Muscadine grape Toxicodendron radicans Poison Ivy Vernonia gigantea Ironweed Juncus effusus Common Rush Carex intumescens Bladder Sedge Smilax rotundifolia Green Briar Woodwardia aerolata Netted Chain Fern Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 3.8 Cultural Resources Table 4: Vegetation Stratum Canopy /Understory Tree /Sap Canopy /Understory Tree /Sap Canopy /Understory Tree /Sap Midstroy /Understory Tree /Sap Midstory /Understory Tree /Sap Midstory /Understory Vine /Herb Midstory /Understory Vine /Herb Understory Vine /Herb Understory Sap /Herb Understory Herb Understory Herb Understory Vine /Herb Understory Herb Understory Herb Wetland Indicator FAC FACW FAC FACW OBL FAC FAC FAC FAC FACW FACW FAC OBL FACW PEI reviewed the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Web GIS Service map of registered and eligible historic properties (Drawing 7) and the North Carolina Listings in the National Register of Historic Places, dated July 20, 2010. The North Carolina list and /or the map does not identify registered or eligible historic properties within the proposed project area, Phase II of TBP or vicinity of Phase II of TBP. 14 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 The portion of the site that will be altered by the proposed project contains undeveloped, wooded land and previously disturbed cleared /graded land. Therefore, it is our opinion that the proposed project will not cause impact to historic properties. 3.9 Biological Resources /Endangered Species PEI reviewed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service List of Federally Protected Threatened and Endangered Species for Guilford County, dated March 25, 2015 to obtain information regarding federally listed protected, threatened, and endangered species that could be located within the proposed project area. The following species were identified on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife List: Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) — The Bald Eagle is a regulated species under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA). Bald Eagles were removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species on August 9, 2007, and are no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act. However, Bald Eagles remain protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The Bald and Golden Eagle Act prohibits anyone from taking, possessing, or transporting a Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) or Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), or the parts, nests, or eggs of such birds without prior authorization. This includes inactive nests as well as active nests. Take means to pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, or disturb. Activities that directly or indirectly lead to take are prohibited without a permit. Bald eagles generally nest near coastlines, rivers, large lakes or streams that support an adequate food supply. They often nest in mature or old- growth trees; snags (dead trees); cliffs; rock promontories; rarely on the ground; and with increasing frequency on human -made structures such as power poles and communication towers. In forested areas, bald eagles often select the tallest trees with limbs strong enough to support a nest that can weigh more than 1,000 pounds. Nest sites typically include at least one perch with a clear view of the water where the eagles usually forage. Shoreline trees or snags located near reservoirs provide the visibility and accessibility needed to locate aquatic prey. Eagle nests are constructed with large sticks, and may be lined with moss, grass, plant stalks, lichens, seaweed, or sod. Nests are usually about 4 -6 feet in diameter and 3 feet deep, although larger nests exist. Water bodies of significant size that could provide foraging habitat for the Bald Eagle are not located with the proposed project area. Therefore, it is our opinion that the proposed project will not disturb the Bald Eagle. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) — The small - whorled pogonia is identified as a federally listed threatened species in Guilford County. It has a greenish -white stem that grows between 3 —13 inches tall. It gets its common name from the five or six grayish -green leaves that 15 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 are displayed in a single whorl around the stem. When the leaves are well developed, a single flower or sometimes a flower pair rises from the center of the circle of leaves. The flowers are yellowish -green with a greenish -white lip. Each flower has three sepals of equal length that spread outward. The flowers are scentless, lack nectar, and are primarily self - pollinating. It produces fruit which ripens in the fall. The seeds contain very little food reserves and therefore need to fall on soil containing mycorrhizal fungi in order for the seed to germinate and seedlings to become established. An over - wintering vegetative bud may form in late August or September. Occasionally small whorled pogonia will reproduce vegetatively, without the use of seeds. Small whorled pogonia can be limited by shade. The species seems to require small light gaps, or canopy breaks, and generally grows in areas with sparse to moderate ground cover. Too many other plants in an area can be harmful to this plant. This orchid typically grows under canopies that are relatively open or near features that create long- persisting breaks in the forest canopy such as a road or a stream. It grows in mixed - deciduous or mixed - deciduous /coniferous forests that are generally in second- or third - growth successional stages. The soils in which it lives are usually acidic, moist, and have very few nutrients. The project area consists of grass covered fields and wooded land. The wooded land consists of mixed hardwood species with a moderate to dense tree /sapling canopy. Canopy breaks are not located within the wooded land. Therefore, based on our field observations, suitable habitat for small - whorled pogonia is not present within the proposed impact area and the proposed project will not adversely affect the small - whorled pogonia. 16 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 4.0 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION The proposed installation of the proposed road, within the impact area, will be completed in the following sequence: • Survey disturbance limits and mark with high visibility fencing • Install temporary /permanent sediment control devices • Construct permanent wet detention pond that will serve as temporary device • Install temporary measure including silt fencing • Clear and grub • Install coffer dams /pump around system • Construct coffer dams • Install pump around • Begin placement of fill • Install culvert • Remove coffer dams /pump around system • Restore stream bank to similar pre- construction conditions • Place stabilization matting /live stakes and seed • Construct retaining walls • Continue to fill to final grade • Install roadway storm drainage and utilities • Seed per NCDENR requirements • Fine grade road • Place stone on road bed • Install curb and gutter • Pave road bed • Construct shoulders • Seed per NCDENR requirements • Following all disturbed areas are stabilized • Remove temporary erosion and sediment control devices • Seed temporary device areas • Convert temporary wet detention pond into permanent wet detention pond • Remove sediment and skimmer The sequence of construction phases has been designed to minimize areas of exposed /bare soil. During construction, erosion control measures will be routinely inspected and maintained as needed to prevent erosion and capture sediments. Disturbed areas will be immediately re- seeded to prevent erosion and sedimentation runoff into streams. Stockpiling excavated soil will be avoided where possible. If temporary stock piling is necessary, it will be bermed with bales of hay and or covered to prevent excessive run -off. Erosion control inspections will be scheduled with the Land Quality Section as necessary. A stormwater management plan will be submitted separate from this application to the NCDENR or an NCDENR approved local municipality. 17 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 5.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION The applicant has completed an extensive alternatives analysis in the attempt to determine the most plausible preferred alternative with a minimal impact to the environment. The applicant began its alternatives analysis prior to development of Phase I of TBP in 2008. The below off and on -site alternatives identifies the applicant's need, how alternatives to the proposed action affect those needs, any major direct environmental consequences and discussion of practicality, from an economically viable stand -point for each alternative. Off -Site No Build Alternative — Bunker Hill Road Access Under the no build /no crossing scenario for Old Greensboro Road, not providing the creek crossing demands that all industrial park traffic required to access Phase 2 of Triad Business Park be directed to existing W. Market Street and Bunker Hill Road to provide industrial grade access for all truck and employee activity and traffic to the property. Under a no creek crossing /no build scenario, the design would effectively require the industrial development's traffic to move off site, off of the industrial park's property, onto existing W. Market Street and existing Bunker Hill Road, potentially crossing the railroad mainline twice, resulting in a dramatic negative impact to the surrounding road infrastructure, compromising the safety of the vehicle occupants in the area and increasing the overall environmental impact of the industrial park development. Moving traffic from Old Greensboro Road, out to West Market Street and then to Bunker Hill Road to provide access to Phase 2 of Triad Business Park dramatically impacts the level of service of the surrounding intersections at Triad Business Park. The capacity analysis around the site, completed by Davenport Transportation Consultants, found that the lack of the crossing installed for Old Greensboro Road Extension resulted in the following service level declines for the three main intersections surrounding Triad Business Park: - W. Market St at Bunker Hill Road goes from a Level C intersection down to a Level E (unstable flow, operating at capacity) - W. Market St at Business Park Drive goes from a Level D intersection down to a Level E (unstable flow, operating at capacity) - W. Market St and Macy Grove Ramps goes from a Level B intersection down to a Level C In the No Build scenario, the majority of site traffic from the eastern portion of the industrial park will be required to travel through the intersection of Market Street and Bunker Hill Road. This intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service. Less traffic on the offsite roadways (W. Market St, Bunker Hill Road, Macy Grove) results in improved level of service for the affected intersections. Overall truck traffic on all of the off -site roadways will be dramatically increased with the no build scenario of Old Greensboro Road. IFE Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 The frequency of accidents generally increases with the amount of miles traveled and time spent per trip. In addition, vehicle /rail accident frequency is directly correlated with at -grade railroad crossings. As the number of crossings are increased, the number of rail related vehicle accidents are increased. By reducing the travel time and the distance site traffic is required to go, effectively the frequency and probability of accidents will also be reduced. By reducing interactions between vehicles and at -grade railroad crossings, potential vehicle /rail related accidents will go down. Under the no build scenario, vehicle crossings over two at -grade rail crossings surrounding Triad Business Park will increase. The at -grade crossing on Triad Business Park Drive will increase as well as the at -grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road will increase. Under the no -build scenario, truck and vehicular traffic coming from the 1 -40 /Macy Grove Interchange into the business park will be forced to cross the Norfolk Southern Mainline railroad track at least once, if not twice, before arriving at their destination in Phase 2 of Triad Business Park. With the Old Greensboro Road creek crossing in place, all traffic could reach the entirety of the business park without crossing the railroad at all. Under the no build scenario park traffic would potentially have to cross the railroad over the at -grade crossing on Triad Business Park Drive as well as over the at -grade crossing on South Bunker Hill Road. As the number of at -grade railroad crossings increase, the frequency and potential of vehicular /railroad accidents increase. Under the no -build scenario we would be increasing that frequency and increasing the interaction between all vehicles and the railroad tracks. Under any of the crossing scenarios we can eliminate the need for any railroad at -grade crossing trips to access Interstate 40 from all of Triad Business Park, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Under the no build scenario, site traffic will travel an additional distance of approximately 1.25 miles as compared to any of the crossing scenarios. Also, based upon Davenport Transportation's Analysis, site traffic will have approximately six minutes of additional travel time incorporated into each trip under the no build scenario as opposed to any of the crossing scenarios. Approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time and distance. Also, the safety of the surrounding intersection can be improved with better level of service and operation installing the Old Greensboro Road extension across the creek, as opposed to the no -build scenario. The extension of Old Greensboro Road is anticipated to improve the operation of several offsite intersections. The improved operation will enhance the safety of these intersections. This increased travel time and travel distance increases the potential and likelihood of traffic accidents and operator safety. Finally, with increased travel distances, increased travel time, longer waits interfacing with at- grade railroad crossings and poorer level of service operations at surrounding intersections, under the no -build scenario, emissions from all traffic to and from the industrial park would dramatically increase. These increased emissions from longer travel distances, travel times and delays negatively impact the environment in a much greater way than any of the proposed creek crossings. The emission impact is perpetual and difficult to quantify as traffic is expected to increase both in the park and along the railroad. Any effort to reduce travel times, travel 19 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 distances and overall traffic delays will only work to reduce emissions and their long term associated environmental impact. On -Site No Build Alternative — Bridge Crossing Design A cost analysis was performed to construct a bridge crossing to eliminate impact to streams and wetlands (attached). According to the cost analysis, the cost of constructing the bridge crossing is over one million dollars more than the preferred on -site alternative. Therefore, this alternative was not further evaluated as a viable and economical option for access to Phase II of TBP. On -Site Alternative Crossing Location 1 (Alternative Exhibits 1A) Exhibit 1 shows a costly approach to installing the infrastructure, only for the simple cost of the road and associated utility lines, but also from an industrial development stand point of each individual lot inside the industrial park. The design creates 11 potential developable industrial lots in Phase 2 of Triad Business Park, but access to lots 5, 6 and 7 being provided by a secondary road crossing the creek at the optimal location pinches Lot 5 and Lot 11. This narrowing effect on Lot 5 and Lot 11 exacerbates the topography on site, making the site very difficult to develop for industrial purposes as the topography dictates that much grading, retain wall and site work would need to occur to allow a large enough building pad area for typical industrial development. Exhibit 1 does preserve the integrity of the development of phase 1 of Triad Business Park and has no detrimental impact to the first phase of the industrial park. The impacts to the creek, by having to cross the creek with an industrial road twice significantly increases the amount of impact to the stream and therefore also increases the cost to develop the industrial park, creating inferior lots, especially for Lot 5 and Lot 11. On -Site Alternative Crossing Location 2 (Alternative Exhibits 2A) — Preferred Alternative Exhibit 2 shows a less costly approach to installing the infrastructure, only crossing the creek one time, yet still providing adequate access to a total of 11 developable industrial lots. The access to lots 5, 6 and 7 can be designed to accommodate allocating more space to Lot 5 and to Lot 11 to provide opportunity to soften the impact of the topographical challenges on site, providing higher ground on site to help offset some of the mass grading operations that will need to occur to make Lot 5 and Lot 11 efficiently developable. Also, this plan allows the buffer protection around Area SA to be protected by running the infrastructure parallel with this feature and not attempting to cross it. Lots 8, 9, 10, and 11 all have adequate access off of the main road, without additional creek impacts and all are adequately spaced and allocated for typical industrial development. Exhibit 2 does preserve the integrity of the development of phase 1 of Triad Business Park and has no detrimental impact to the first phase of the industrial park. Exhibit 2, of the constructed alternatives, with a head wall on each end of the creek crossing structure provides the least impact to the creek and wetlands. 20 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 On -Site Alternative Crossing Location 3 (Alternative Exhibits 3A) Exhibit 3 shows a less costly approach to installing the infrastructure, only crossing the creek one time, yet exhibit 3, as shown, severely impacts the development and access of 11 developable industrial lots. Essentially, Lot 3 is divided in half to allow the new road to pass through it for the creek crossing. Lot 3 is a graded, shovel ready pad site, where more than $1,500,000 has been invested installing storm water collection and retention on site, earthwork to accommodate a 350,000 SF building, utility work installed to the future building pad and all other accommodates to create a pad ready site. This $1,500,000 investment into Lot 3 would have to be abandoned to accommodate the infrastructure extension as shown in Exhibit 3. In addition, dividing Lot 3 into two smaller lots, not only requires the abandonment of the $1,500,000 invested in the site to date, but also creates two smaller, less developable lots, new Lot 3 and new Lot 11 as shown on the exhibit. Both new Lot 3 and Lot 11 are damaged from a development capability standpoint as the road pinches the available acreage for development. Also, this infrastructure design, as shown in Exhibit 3 creates an odd shape for Lot 5. This triangular shape diminishes land utilization rates as most industrial buildings are rectangular in shape. Placing a rectangular building on a triangular shaped lot requires more acreage to serve the same building size, as compared to rectangular shaped lots accommodating rectangular shaped buildings. Based on the infrastructure design as shown in Exhibit 3, Lot 3, Lot 5 and Lot 11 are severely negatively impacted by the proposed road route and design. All three of these damaged lots are either extremely inefficient from a land utilization standpoint or they are oddly shaped, not conducive to industrial development. The average price for an industrial lot in Triad Business Park to date has been approximately $800,000. The reduction or loss of one developable lot for the plan as shown on Exhibit 3 is a potential $800,000 loss to the development potential of phase 2 of Triad Business Park. With Lot 3, Lot 5 and Lot 11 all in question due to this plan, plus the addition of the abandonment of the existing investment in Lot 3, the infrastructure design as shown in Exhibit 3 would create the potential loss of more than $2,000,000 in addition to the cost of the infrastructure that would be needed to be installed in accordance with the plan as shown. Exhibit 3 is an extremely costly approach to providing infrastructure to Phase 2 of Triad Business Park. 21 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS Construction of the proposed project will require impacts to a perennial stream, wetlands and vegetative buffers. The unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional features are included in Tables 4, 5 and 6. Stream Classification WC Perennial Total Mitigable Impacts: Stream Classification Bottomland WC Hardwood Forest Total Mitigable Impacts: Stream Classification SC Randleman Total Mitigable Impacts: Table 5: Proposed Stream Impacts Permanent Impact (LF) 190 190 Temporary Impact (LF) 45 0 Table 6: Proposed Wetland Impacts Permanent Impact (Ac) Temporary Impact (Ac) 0.59 0.06 0.59 0 Table 7: Proposed Buffer Impacts Zone 1 (SF) Zone 2(SF) 18,296 10,455 18,296 10,455 Unavoidable impacts to surface water riparian buffers are being requested to be impacted in a letter of No Practical Alternatives submitted to the City of Kernersville simultaneously with this application. 22 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION During design of the proposed project, the applicant evaluated three proposed interior crossing locations. Impacts to streams, wetlands and buffers from the evaluated crossing alternatives are shown below: Table 8: Interior Crossing Impact Analysis Alternative Permanent Impacts Estimated Cost of Stream Wetlands Riparian Buffer (SF) Crossing Construction ($) Designation (LF) (Ac) Zone 1 Zone 2 EXH -1A 555 0.69 44,432 22,652 3,181,894.44 *EXH -2A 190 0.59 18,296 10,455 2,718,074.85 EXH -2A 278 0.68 19,856 9,960 2,669,400.21 EXH -3A 174 0.85 19,602 11,762 2,770,746.71 *Preferred Alternative Using Retaining Walls The preferred alternative was determined to be the least practical damaging alternative to the environment while still meeting the applicant's purpose and need. The preferred alternative has far less negative impact to wetlands and riparian buffers than other considered alternatives. Likewise, the preferred alternative has significantly less impact to streams than alternatives EXH - 1A and EXH -2A (w /o retaining walls). Alternative EXH -3A impacts 16 linear feet less than the preferred alternative; however, impacts 0.26 more acres of wetlands and impacts 2,613 square feet of cumulative Zone 1 and 2 buffer impacts. Additionally, the applicant has incorporated the use of retaining walls at significantly increased construction costs in efforts to further minimize the impact to the environment and jurisdictional features. Approximate 12 feet tall retaining walls that will act as head /end walls are proposed to be constructed up and down - gradient of the proposed crossing location. The retaining wall on the up- gradient end of the crossing is approximately 65 feet long and the retaining wall on the down - gradient end of the crossing is approximately 85 feet long. The use of the retaining walls has further reduced the amount of impact of the preferred alternative by 88 linear feet of stream channel and 0.09 acres of wetlands. The applicant has conceptualized locations of proposed lots and shown designs for infrastructure, including roads and utilities to the lots without additional impact to jurisdictional features. Proposed lot boundaries have been designed based on locations of jurisdictional features; whereas, jurisdictional features serve as lot boundaries and /or are located in proximity to lot boundaries to the maximum extent possible in efforts to reduce the potential for future impacts to jurisdictional features associated with individual lot construction and full build out of Phase II of TBP. 23 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 The sequence of construction phases has been designed to minimize areas of exposed /bare soil. During construction, erosion control measures will be routinely inspected and maintained as needed to prevent erosion and capture sediments. Disturbed areas will be immediately re- seeded to prevent erosion and sedimentation runoff into streams. Stockpiling excavated soil will be avoided where possible. If temporary stock - piling is necessary, it will be bermed with bales of hay and or covered to prevent excessive run -off. Erosion control inspections will be scheduled with the Land Quality Section as necessary. A stormwater management plan will be submitted separate from this application to the NCDENR or an NCDENR approved local municipality. There are approximately 5,124 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 1,620 linear feet of intermittent steam channel, 8.892 acres of wetlands and 3.356 acres of jurisdictional open waters (ponds) located with Phase II of TBP. Impacts to 4,934 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 1,620 linear feet of intermittent stream channel, 8.33 acres of wetlands and 3.356 acres of jurisdictional open waters (ponds) has been avoided. The project as proposed allows for the future development of Phase II of TBP to occur in upland areas with no impact to jurisdictional features and /or the environment. Additional impacts to jurisdictional features beyond those that are proposed in this project are not anticipated. 24 Proposed Phase II TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 8.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION The applicant has shown an attempt to avoid and minimize where possible and will compensate to the extent practicable, for remaining unavoidable losses with mitigation. The proposed project will impact 190 linear feet of mitigable stream channel, 0.59 acres of mitigable wetland impacts, 18,296 square feet of Zone 1 buffer and 10,455 square feet of Zone 2 buffer. The application proposed the following mitigation for the unavoidable impact to mitigable features below: The applicant proposes to compensate for impacts for the construction of the proposed project by offering payment into the NCDENR- Division of Mitigation Services (NCDNER -DMS) and /or private mitigation banks. Private mitigation banks, in the watershed of the proposed project, do not have credits available at this time. According to an April 23, 2015 letter issued by the NCDENR -DMS, the required mitigation credits are available. A copy of the letter is included in Appendix XII. At the ratios proposed, the applicant will receive credits, which will meet and /or exceed mitigation payment requirements. 25 Table 9: Proposed Mitigation and Required Credits Proposed Mitigation Impact Feature Impact Amount Required Credits Ratio Streams 190 LF 2:1 380 LF Wetlands 0.59 Ac 2:1 1.18 Ac Zone 1 Buffer 18,296 SF 3:1 54,888 SF Zone 2 Buffer 10,455 SF 1.5:1 15,683 SF The applicant proposes to compensate for impacts for the construction of the proposed project by offering payment into the NCDENR- Division of Mitigation Services (NCDNER -DMS) and /or private mitigation banks. Private mitigation banks, in the watershed of the proposed project, do not have credits available at this time. According to an April 23, 2015 letter issued by the NCDENR -DMS, the required mitigation credits are available. A copy of the letter is included in Appendix XII. At the ratios proposed, the applicant will receive credits, which will meet and /or exceed mitigation payment requirements. 25 Proposed Phase 11 TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 9.0 CORRESPONDENCE /REFERENCES USGS Topographic Map, Kernersville North Carolina Quadrangle dated 1969 revised 1994. North Carolina Geological Survey Geologic Map of North Carolina dated 1985. Guilford County Hydric Soils List, provided by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service http: / /soils.usda.Rov /use /hvdric/ U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey of Guilford County, http : / /websoilsurvev.nres.usda.gov /app /HomePage.htm U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey, Published 1977, Sheet No. 19 Federal Emergency Management Act Flood Insurance Rate Map Numbers 3710689600K, 3710689500K, 3710780600 and 3710780500) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Maps http: / /www.fws.gov /wetlands /Data /Mapper.html North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, Listings in the National Register of Historic Places http:/ /www.hpo.ncdcr- gov /NR- PDFs.html North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, Web GIS Service htt gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife, List of Threatened and Endangered Species in Guilford County, Dated March 25, 2015 http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntvlist /guilford.html 26 Proposed Phase II TBP Access Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina PEI Project No. 1010 July 21, 2015 10.0 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Drawing 1— Site Vicinity Map Drawing 2 — USGS Topographic Map Drawing 3 — Soil Survey Map Drawing 3A — Last Published Soil Survey Map Drawing 4 — National Wetlands Inventory Map Drawing 5 — FEMA FIRM Map Drawing 6 — Project Area Delineation Map Drawing 7 — SHPO Web GIS Service Map Appendix II — Stream /Wetland Impact Exhibits Appendix III —Stream Evaluation Forms Appendix IV — Wetland Determination Data Forms Appendix V — USACE JD Dated September 9, 2014 Appendix VI - Previous Permit Approvals Appendix VII — Alternative Analysis Supplemental Information Appendix VIII — NCDENR -DMS Letter dated April 23, 2015 27 APPENDIX I 7 7e\�illIZW LEGEND' TBP Boundary TBP Phase 1 /11 Boundary J i- ...... Project Area Parcel Owned By Applicant - Adjoining Parcel Identifier 'ti® ilk 5�I - JAL i ` for � �I1 �g F •, 11 �. 10i " W �► , 13 - 17 16 X18 19 Ed e w •. p. r °7 ®� ` Drawing 1 Site Vicinity Map 2010 Aerial Photograph Triad Business Park Guilford County GIS Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina SCALE: 1" = 1,000' PEI No. 1010 66 V v� „ I , . I -L= 5 li }k I y' „4' "k- Lam' lil I � I '� r� - -- 16 0m 77-7 L 3- V” A 'A S1, '77 7 L LEGEND TBP Boundary Af Drawing 2 USGS Topographic Map N USGS Topographic Map 9- - I Triad Business Park Kernersville, NC Quadrangle Kernersville, North Carolina Dated 1969, Revised 1994 PEI No. 1010 SCALE: 1" = 2,000' _17: 1 Yr 1 H r-j- ` . Cl I,_ a i;cC2 Affil; CeC3�2 M f�2 —` f49cE2 Maf3 WD? n� r McE2 sr U M a Ei t F (> yo Cc E3 Ma MCE2 c I r Mc M ' `` CeC2 Co M1 C2 Ni Mi:L?: CeB2 r ... j �-1- -_ Colfax WkE VaB cE2 �--- I 42i ii IV cB2 N aB APB � Ap �, �a C�'� 1�1 McI32 Mc: B2 to i.` M VraB Mai Imo► ^ M MrU2 Mai Ata MrCi2 Drawing 3A USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County, Published 1977 Sheet Number 19 ` APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 1,000' Y m � 4 s SIR � , ti W d: k od, AM m s .�i Drawing 4 USFWS NWI Wetlands Mapper NOT TO SCALE is 4- 1 � u �1 Y d NWI Map N Triad Business Park Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 Y LEGEND Site Boundary NWI Designations Freshwxiter Emergent _ Freshwater ForesledlShrub _ Estuarine and Marine Qeepwater Estua6nem and Marine _ Freshwater Pond _ Lake Riverine _ ether Drawing 4 USFWS NWI Wetlands Mapper NOT TO SCALE is 4- 1 � u �1 Y d NWI Map N Triad Business Park Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 Y LEGEND Approximate Site Boundary SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHAS) SUBIELF TO Ff! INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT the a9r annual rharize flow (0171e r flood l, A60 kntrWn as me base fbod, Is me flpu3 mat hss a 1% d— d being squab or e..eded In any V,— year•. '11w Sin al Food Hazard Alta r. Ill, nrlla WbRd M MWdlnq of the 1% annual aaMM fWd. loess of SWIM Rota Hazain Include ZQnK A. At, AH, Al), AR, A9$ V, and VE.. the base Fkw E1eYabQn K the wat. su Nr d—Lun d the 1 %--1 dlanae thud. ZONE A No Base FIWC EIeyJ dttgsnllltp. Z ®NF Al Bas Flood Elev ud diterttla'MO- ZONE AN FMOd &01`6 of 1 M 3 teat (usually ardor pdadalgr; Baru Flood Ehvab r detylkllnyd. TONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 few (uwally sheet MW on sloWnp 06rraln); average d6BIM drt¢ lned. FM Maas of allW l ran FIDWtog, V0YMi1 a40 detemm~ ZOME AR Sqi r Flood Naaald Arta kmstntf geobmU d rmm tM l4k maul doom Fond by a f wd mnud Min not was svnaea eMp deCe S Aed. AD R AR md"i- mat the forms flood con" system Is D=ing 1 Toren to prwhde "tctian btYU the 1 % annual dalot8 uk gmattr llaw. ZONEA99 A6ai to be VDWt ed IAaln J% annual Cho flood Dy a Fethmal (load pm0.<11an s)A under rcmbu ; no Ila- Flood Ek. aeons d t—W d. ZONE V{ Coastal Hoed a wall v." Aa2ard (vane arnml; 83 Flood EllmbM tlCMlmined. OFLOOOWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE The 114Vdww Is ti* channel of a s plus any ad}xeot boodpLaln area That must be kept hoe at mamJlrY1ent so that the 1% annwl BNn[e Rood an ba camN WltlMlrt 5ub51anhal Vtowses m 6bbd t!eights. OTHER FLOOD AREAS TARE X Area of b2% annual clue roWi arm of 1% annual ariaate flood with artrage daWK of 46ea man 1 toot or With tlraiW a183a *sa (Fan 1 Tquaie rNel and areas propeclw by levp¢s Fr-1 % annual dwhte flood. OTHER AREAS ZONEX ARa>•deNmmlel t. br Xm. Vm 0.24 ar "1— ftftmh. ZONE 6 Arse n rvtsA Nwd IuranQ trc un9MVm.ad. kA polN*. W- E 4W gql l COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (C BRS) AREAS OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS) CBRe amasand OPAS are vwtlnaNM dpW[ed wiihm or adl—t W Spetlal Fhca Harare Aegis. 19S anrlW I manor naaogaw wnofl r 0.34% MgleNtrurwr nxA* nL mask __ L1fIeB- bwkldry ..................... COOS and OPA Mwdely tlnrA�aaN' cl ant Saaow FboO Haa1s0 am ia+e. aN oa3ma" ■ , Spr' M Floc H .,d Areas d d ini. Barr .F inl IWOW& tlwd �N w Mad v.—n °__ Flom B ttn"am Ol eksitn bH` lEL 8671 �^' PUaG `Y"^ wNa wlwp urcrP.m wlmm rwe: e+oatoo .n lest' • RtlQaAeA AIM Nwlh Amerbn 1.N[al JR—of 1986 Fjtrt.V'yGl l.r o- Q ran�har ....v Fri Wii' (Eaalwalq MaleA W k alr Neva AeesnM t74 H 1981(W a3) 1274x•.'' IDbamlte• -4 1Tla t+.itrsr M—W lid XkS aorle 17 Par- Slob FEET 5tl6b'mot Qrt ache fkM cap `aaa PFne cwrelnate Nr tFaP¢pNF UM. Sim Pane NAP 63 FWl 9M55TQ Wo ci.*i- Qbdw 54ray tona wink trn r+wc .,rarrnar r BM5S10© '�°"'� uoaNis al.�y hmd+ Pwln Star more nlumaVan Mesa r ws,% cis 2 -5 rn Wnwal C—,W tune o, LaYada -�esnm 13MS510 ry.TMP been k u drp Fero IINOxofwa. .ea i .11Z.tl RfYtt MIe I' h Drawing 5 FEMA FIRM Panel Numbers 3710689600K, 3710689500K,3710780600 & 3710780500J NOT TO SCALE rf =-� ii. It FEMA FIRM N Triad Business Park Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 I Surveyor Locate Pond WA 1 -28 SA 1 -57 r, Drawing 6 2010 Aerial Photograph Guilford County GIS SCALE: 1" = 1.000' FLAG NUMBERS /INFO WETLAND FLAGS= STREAM /POND FLAGS= FA* Stream Flags = 67 Pond Flags = 0 Wetland Flags = 130 Total Flags = 197 e / SA 1 -57 WAA 1 -92 DP -2 �f DP -1 SAA 1 -11 WAA 1 -92 THE LOCATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APRPDXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDENR- DWR ON MAY 15, 2014. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. Project Area Delineation Map N Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 ir - LEGEND Perennial Stream Wetlands h SA 1 -57 Flag Number DP -1 ■ Data Point Location I Surveyor Locate Pond WA 1 -28 SA 1 -57 r, Drawing 6 2010 Aerial Photograph Guilford County GIS SCALE: 1" = 1.000' FLAG NUMBERS /INFO WETLAND FLAGS= STREAM /POND FLAGS= FA* Stream Flags = 67 Pond Flags = 0 Wetland Flags = 130 Total Flags = 197 e / SA 1 -57 WAA 1 -92 DP -2 �f DP -1 SAA 1 -11 WAA 1 -92 THE LOCATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APRPDXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDENR- DWR ON MAY 15, 2014. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED. Project Area Delineation Map N Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 - Id` li .r I n i �•� -- ^- *—_ 3 � °+�- - - — y ®_ - � ",�, �' r ter` r I • � C � y II • . n _ +e � T i I Drawing 7 N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Website Not to Scale ■ �n n � 7 _—L 't N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Map N Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 m =e. Drawing 7 N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Website Not to Scale ■ �n n � 7 _—L 't N.C. SHPO HPO GIS Map N Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, North Carolina PEI No. 1010 APPENDIX II STREAM /WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBITS E 0 9 I:] F.� z I 3 PARCEL NO. 0168909 PIN: 6896502711 N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC DB 63630PG 393 1 PB 175 PG 97 & 98 1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD Ro P� PARCEL NO. 0168912 PIN: 6895495429 N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM,INC. DB 6939 PG 2918 0 PB 175 PG 97 & 98 1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD N >4 5g07 "W �b N>4 56,, 0 W 0 �;IIF � >\_ p, 970. I 1 1 ro LU i n C) C 0 1 N r 1 O z 4 -;&y S76 °7 7'3n'•,, ACCESS DRl VE ll0' R/W PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B PIN: 6896601860 N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102 2A PB 185 PG 89 OLD GREj�ENSBORO ROAD 80' PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY_ PARCEL NO. 0168911 PIN: 6895695819 N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND NB JOHNSON II, LLC DB 6786 PG 2506 0 2c PB 186 PG 102 0 E 2D in NPP ACOU /S /T /ON CO. DB 4497 PG 462 17 -94- 6946 - 1190 -59 ZONED: H1 LOT No. 7 5 6 o0 90 � S 0 IO"4 EAST mout, ST 0 p1D GREENSBORO RD SR 180 SITE —F 1-40 BUS /NfSS B > > Flo /NG R 0 0 K VICINITY MAP ° (SCALE 1 : 2000) LOT No. // LOT No. 8 LEGEND ® POND OR WETLAND STREAM I 5 i 0 NB5`1 266'4 ,E 8 S >0 °73 06' S �36'e 1 LOT No. /0 FARIAWAfewi PlAr L GR,4i=�4 f C SC,4L E 200 0 wo 200 400 C IN FEET I Inch = 200 ft. 6 C 1w tdaddesigngroup Architecture I Engineering I Interior Design Triad Design Group, P.0 4807 -C Koger Boulevard Greensboro, NC 27407 Telephone 336- 218 -8282 Facsimile 336- 218 -8010 www.triad- designgroup.com NC Architecture Reg. 50709 NC Engineering Lic. C -1108 /2SE7/ SAMET CORPORATION P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, NC D 27419 (336) 544 -2600 FAX: (336) 544 -2638 FS\GN GRo a PORq�F SEAL 1994 ,,,111111111] // •o C •'�c / NEB: ��: 1/1111411 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD: L. ALLAN HILL, P.E. F;1 Mk Date Description Revisions OVERALL EXHIBIT 1A Date: AUGUST , 2014 Drawn: P05 Check: LAH Job Number: 14 -064 Sheet: EXHmIA aC O 0 CU r/ —0 °O_ mO 0 O CU = 00, Z °' ° 0- 0 B X ��z W a ai ca cc a� V °L O L > s_ 0 0_ a �c F;1 Mk Date Description Revisions OVERALL EXHIBIT 1A Date: AUGUST , 2014 Drawn: P05 Check: LAH Job Number: 14 -064 Sheet: EXHmIA W �Y I �Y 4 41 1Y W 1 � �Y •, W / / / m m ITEMP.GkARY S " " T SEE SHEET DET -1 �4sTAnv s ---- - - - - - -- / / R r RESTORATION sr ------ - - - - -- W18 MIL POLYETHYLENE s m sR,e<6 FABRIC ON - - - -- / / -- I -_ ,,• _ -_ ., %r ,(8I2J _,' -•(9pe W -+-(9 W W �, W W W W W W,'' - -W, •- - -_, -' ,' T__ -- -_- J W -.y- yJ- �,-- W�9JJ%- W W '10. W */ W W W - Wes. y W WY W W W W W W - W - ` ` _ -- . IN 90p.�0�/ �- - - - - -- \ y _� W43,,00 _ �, , W A\roL W W W�-k� 174 4" PIP (� ,C"-- .+'__= W J5'XlO'Eh R6Y D1'S51pATOWR WY WY 'Y y/I O W W W W W W W / W W NW �y,�•W 899. 7- - - - _ _ _ 7- -"`�, `♦ (zTQ�_, p-_ _ _ . p2 }_.- • W - (906 (918)—___ _ (9/6J COFFER DAM - _ - - - PERMANEN_ T STREAM IMPACT = 397 LF 0T�02 o :9 /. / --- - - - - -- \'a E�AL i ----------------------- - - - - -- �. GRAPHIC SCALE 15809 40 0 10 40 e0 160 ., ` G 1 N IN FEET JUNE 10, 2015 1 inch = 40 ft. VICINITY MAP SCALE P = 2000' 1 North STREAM RUDER IMPACTS ZONE 1 = 31,364 5F ZONE 2 = 14,315 SF TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS = 20 LF PERM. STREAM IMPACTS = 397 LF TEMP. WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.003 AC. PERM. WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.68l AC. Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS SS-1 920 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 - ----------------------------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------------------ ----------------- - --------- ----- =� 'W: LL : = ]V,4# D=ES: ::.:..::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::__= _:::: :::::::::: :: _ w;� = =ws# - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -. - - -- fL -- - - - - -- -------- -------- - - - -- ::::::::::::::::::____ _:______ ____:___::_:_:___:___::___:_' _::::::: 7 . : : :: : : : :: : :: ::::::::::::::::::::::, :::::::: :. :..... ::- - - - -:- -- -- :::- :::::::: :::::::: - - -- :: �: : =f�O �'Tff�'L�J: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: -::: =:: - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- � - -� - -- ---- - - - - -- ' Bft�G:::::: :::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :::::::::::::::::::::: :: ::::::::: ':- -- - - - -- _ _::: = p::::::::::::::: ---- - - -- -- � # J. i _ -:_ :: :: :: - - -- - -- - &_CIE __�f�f�-- - - - - -- -- ---- - :: :: : : -0::Pu - lY �f _: --- - - - - - -- : � - - - - -- : : :::::::: -FA - fC ::::::::. . . . . .: a-------'--------�' ------------'-------- -------- --------'-------- --------'--------'----'----- - .0---- - :::::::: :::----- ------------------ :::: --- ::: - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- -------- ::::::::::: ?- :P: ----------- 7-A � u : : _ : - - - - - - - -- --- - - - - -- : :: , :: _ ::::: :::::: :::::::: :::: :::: ::::::::::::::::: ::: - - - - - -- - :SEE= :_�� -�_ �E = == = ::. - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - :::::::: :::: :::: ::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: : :::::: :::::::: E��I3:::� apt e r,::: C: :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: :: ::::::::::::: - ----- : :::::::: : :::: :::::: :: �� X = =S f3,� TC-,R :::::: -- - - - - -- -- - ----- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- STREAM CROSSING GR,41=H I C 5GALE 40 0 10 40 w *0 IN FEET 1 inch = 40 ft. pp�`q /1 VICINITY MAP North SCALE P = 2000' CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM /.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM. 2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N STREAM LIMITS. J. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS. 4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS. 6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG. 7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR. & UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS. 9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY. SARo• 9 .o •a SEAL ms's 15809 •111,94<AN N JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SS -2 (EXH1) �' P� �/ -------- - - - - -- 1 \ • 1/. F ------- - - - - -- l 12•LF. ':3 i -- - - - - -- "ZONE ZONE I PERMANENT STREAM \ I IMPACT = 156 LF COFFER DAM,. �\ CLASS '46&Z ONE W18 MIL %POEY.ETHYLEI / FABRIC ON • FA �Gi F ' \ 40 0 10 40 w w0 IN FEET I inch = 40 ft. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 24 LF SEE SHEET DET -I FOR STREAM BANK RESTORATION VICINITY MAP lob, North SCALE P = 2000' STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 = 13,066 SF ZONE 2 = 6,2 -1-1 SF TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS = 24 LF PERM. STREAM IMPACTS = 156 LF WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.0 AC, Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension ,,�•�'� -�N CARO�• Kernersville, NC ' F E s•s �0•�9 ': ° STREAM AND •a SEAL ms's 15809 WETLAND IMPACT •,',,94<AN N JUNE 10, 44 2015 SS-3 E WMI 0+00 1+00 2+00 L------ ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------------------ -------------------------- -------- -------- --------------------------- ------- -------- -------- -------------------- ---- -------- ------------------------------- -------- ------ -- -------- ---------------------- ----- ------------------------------------------------- ------- - - O'WkLL:: _V4RiE-S ------- -------- -------- ---------------------- :T7- ------- ------ 6: ST - -- -------------- --- ---------------------- -------- ------------ --------------------------------------------- -------- -------- --------------------------- ---------------------- -------- ------------- -------- ---- ----------- ---- ---------- -- -------- ---- - - --- -------- -- -------- ---- ---- --------- - ------ - - ---- -------- --- I ---- ---- ---- ------- ------- I ----- :: ---- :': :::::::: ---- ------ ---- :::: ---- _: E - - ------- ---- ---- -------------- ---- %_%_1 - --------------- �ANAK ---- ---- .......... ---- -------- -- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------------- - : -- -------- -------- ------------------ ft --------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ------------- -------- -------- -------- --------------------------- L ENE: ::: - _::: -:: i - � ::::: : ---------- -------- -------- -------- ------- - ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------------------ - ----- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - *-* - - - - - - - - - - - -------------- ---------------- VICINITY MAP A hill --------- -- -------- ---- - _ - ----- ' North ------------ R1 P R)I P - I --- -------- -------- ------------------ SCALE P = 2000 --------------- -------- -------- --- CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM ----- -------- ---------- ------ -------- --:: --------- -------- -------- --- ------- t -------- -4 R ---------- I. KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM. ------- -------- -------- ------------------------------ -------- -------- - ::::::: -::::::F' ----- -------- --------------- --------------------------- -------- -------- ------- C: Aml - -------- -------- -------- ------------------ - ---------- 2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF ------------ ------------- If. - L F 5491!:Pf RE :&: 30 ------------------------- -------- -------- ------------------ CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. ? -------- ------------- -------- --- — --- -------- - I ---------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- I ------------------ BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WITHIN STREAM LIMITS. _SEES E HE ------- --------- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ::::::: ----------- 3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE --------------- --------- AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS. ------- ------- - - - -- - - - ------- ------------- -------- -------- - - - - -- :I E S 7 0 T f: 0 P 1: -- -------- ------- - :::::: - -------- ----- :::::::: ------ -------- ------------- E A f E R G Y:: 0 �95 S Pj - T C_ R --------------- 4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA. &INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF AiAbj:: BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS. _71 6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG. 7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPATOR. - -- - - - - - - - B. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS. ----------- - --- - - - - - - - - & CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY. -------- ------ -------- -------- ----- Triad Business Park GRAPHIC SCALE 10 40 w IN FEET I inch = 40 ft. STREAM 160 CROSSING S 0�y •a SEAL ms's 15809 •1111,4LAN JUNE 10, 2015 Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SS-4 (EXH1) E 0 9 I:] F.� I z I 3 I PARCEL NO. 0168909 PIN: 6896502711 N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC DB 63630PG 393 / 1 PB 175 PG 97 & 98 1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD Ro P� b ?6 yc PARCEL NO. 0168912 PIN: 6895495429 N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM,INC. DB 6939 PG 2918 0 PB 175 PG 97 & 98 1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD N,4 58 00'W �b N-4 56,, 0 W 0 r;IIF 7\_ p, 910. I 1 1 ro LU i n C) C o N r 1 O z 4 -;&y S76 *1 7'3n PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B PIN: 6896601860 N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102 2A 2C PB 185 PG 89 PB 186 PG 102 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD 80' PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY_ PARCEL NO. 0168911 PIN: 6895695819 N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND NB JOHNSON II, LLC DB 6786 PG 2506 3 I 0 2D E 5 i IO"4 y0' o gU RVE NB5- 26-136'49" 8,E S>0.3 '36 6' S e LOT No. // LOT No. /0 OLD GREE VSBORO ROAD PROP. 80' R/W LOT No. 9 LOT No. 8 I LEGEND ® POND OR WETLAND STREAM !4' �- -.- X51 M o U 5�VEt 00 90 S. R 0 EAST MOON $T I� of GREENSBORO RD SR 180 � SITE BUSINf$� ZZ 00 U U K VICINITY MAP ° \ (SCALE 1 : 2000) GfR,4i=�4 f C SC,4L E 200 0 wo 200 400 ( IN FEI✓T ) I Inch = 200 ft. 5 6 kwl C 1w tdaddesigngroup Architecture I Engineering I Interior Design Triad Design Group, P.0 4807 -C Koger Boulevard Greensboro, NC 27407 Telephone 336- 218 -8282 Facsimile 336- 218 -8010 www.triad- designgroup.com NC Architecture Reg. 50709 NC Engineering Lic. C -1108 / I ff A 9/ SAMET CORPORATION P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, NC D 27419 (336) 544 -2600 FAX: (336) 544 -2638 FS\�N GRo SEAL •o C •'�c / NEB: ��: 1/1111411 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD: L. ALLAN HILL, P.E. he aC 0 O CU r/ -0 .O_ �O 0— Ca = 00, z 8 0- 0 B X ��z W a ai cc a� V •L O L > s_ 0 0_ a �c F;1 Mk Date Description Revisions OVERALL EXHIBIT 2A Date: AUGUST , 2014 Drawn: PCS Check: LAH Job Number: 14 -064 Sheet: EXHm2A COFFER DAM'-' " -- ♦ \\ i -W W W W W W W W W W W �' W W / W W CLAS J S' B STONE 0% ----------------------------- -W�'8' MIL POL- YETHYLENE W W W W W W W W W W j W W W \ \ \ \ \ FABRIC. - OIV FACE W W W W W W W W W W W W; W W SAS_ T PERMANENT STREAM y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W IMPACT = 190 LF v y 3BOR0 Rp *FeEj N OLD \ \'' NN \\ \\ \\ W \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \!, " \\ \` \ W - W W W W W W W W W , W mod• W' 140q \ `W \�92 \ L W W W W/ 1�• :Y- - `9 qJ •`\\ \ \\ K\ W \\ W W W W W \\ W W W W \ \W W` ; W \ \W \ W W W W W • \ \� \ \\ \ \\ \ \� �K\ \ate W\ \� W W W W \\ W W '4• W \ \\ !I _ _ \�\ Y W W W . • " W W 4% - Wi l -fir/\ \'� y ; ,� ¢' SEE -SHEET DET -1 FOR STREAWBANK y W W W W ,✓ y w- W W —�' __ ,l RESTORATION Y C0f! EI� ✓A�1 W y �y y W W y ` y _ _ W_ y \\ ` n ,• ' ao �OJ \ _ W W W / W W W/W W r� �V \ \ \ / , •� TEMPORARY STREAM yy y y y Wy W W - / �� ,� ,• 8 �� IMPACT = 45 LF 120 4 PI -PE 35'xl .67 ------------------ -------- y i�W5 � Cb �: / - / 1 —INV OUT- -8 8.05 , \� \ W W W W W W IV IV /y CARP 15809 40 0 10 40 80 V00 '11,11111111, IN FEET JUNE 10, 2015 1 inch = 40 ft. VICINITY MAP SCALE P = 2000' SR I"/ wi3 0 51 1 North STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE 1 = 16,296 SF ZONE 2 = 10,455 SF TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS = 45 LF PERM. STREAM IMPACTS = ISO LF TEMP. WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.06 AC. PERM. WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.59 AC. Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS W/RETAI N I N G WALL SS-1 920 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 __ - ::___ _________ 'r WA I-- I�,I:Rf_� .:::::::::::: ::: YAV : :E -L : 848 :'r7::::: Ihly- ,: l - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - ::::::::::::::::::::::::: =: - - -- - - -- r, :: -::: :f - -- - -- - -- i - -r- : --- -- --- -----`� - -------- ---- ------ ------ -- ---- : - ------ - --- -- - --- -a'-- -- --- - ----- 3 1 - - ------- ---- --- :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ::::::::::: --:-- - - -.._ - - - - -- - - -: :: - : - -8: - - -: -:::: :: - -- _ - -- --- ::PCIL1� - 74-4 - - -- ---- - - - - -- ::: A= - - - - -- : -- ---- :- : :::: : ::::::::::::::: ::: :: Al -i:- RAP : ::::::::::::: ::::::::::::: ::: :::::::: :: :::::: :::::: :: :::::::- - -- - - -- ----------- - - - - -- : :: :::::::: ::: :: ::: ::::::: :: ::::::::::::::: ::: ::::FO3 : :dTREAM= BARK :: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::- :::: -:::- - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - C------ -------- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- - - 1::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ::F :�? �f� :Tf N -- - - - - -- - -. -� G:-- - ---�� a --- --G R: - G�:�4 �A- _ STREAM CROSSING GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 IV 40 80 160 IN FEET I inch = 40 ft. pp�`q /1 VICINITY MAP North SCALE P = 2000' CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM /.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM. 2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N STREAM LIMITS. 3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS. 4.INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS. 6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG. 7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPATOR. B. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS. 9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY. SAR*��9 'a SEAL ms's 15809 •,�',94<AN N -,. JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAN D I M PACTS W/RETAI N I N G WALL SS -2 (EXH2) 3 Z "m 0m fi E E E E E E t E• E E E E I V / / '/. / LAJ r A \ / EC) E E E E E E E QE E`, E E < E •E E E OHO, / / / / •/ / / /,• j / , /FC E E E E E E b E E ED E� E E E E E• E E � / j / j j j/ , / /` �_, \Q E E E E E E 1E / ' ' /4-i /E / - - '� / j /r•• /_, ,L0 E E E E E \ E f• E �O--E--E. E E E E E�O� "\QQQ \ ` .CE E E E E E f /E / EI E �f' E / E / - ---- - --/ .E E E E / /E /E / t /E //?, \ �E� %E/ E / E E % E \ I E E E E E E E E yE E E E EI E E IE/ IE E E E E E i ; E' �Q� / E E / E E E� E /•� / \ 1' � � E E \ J E E E E O E E / E / \ E E/ E E E E, / E /f E� E / y I / E v A- ` E E / E 1r/ E E E • ,•, f ,I E /E E/ / E / IE E E E '�, \ r• \'• •i� / E 4 E/ E/ y /E E E E E E I IE ,- E, /E� E E E \ E E E E 00 N KQ�QE E E E E X00 E E E• \ O X 'd- II I ZEIi E E � K O� E DE E E E \ `L\1'� nr mOR1E /� \ -•/ ,, O \�Q O(O1 / /� E E E E E\ \ \ 61 / � / � ( \\ � • II /, `,/ ; E E E E \ EE �n3 m�-tI E Z E E E ( 8/ J, 1. : \= rri m` , yE E E E / \ �` F E E E j E,mE E E E E • E / ��••- E 61 I E E E \ E E E E E E / X / I O• � � E\ E E ' E E E E E E, E E ,`,,,1111111 /1j�,,,' // I y ,� E E EE E `E E E L `� �� / E E E E E E E E E M + + + cn al m m n :� •.C� r ••o: cn cn"', //1 „111111111'' o Cl) y CD W m z(D o —v �a Z X T — — m v xz Q- 0 m X = CD z r � m3rn300A N mrn -4-4 II II { T ��J W Z � ffi�� D ci U a b cn ANN -4 0 -U N N II II N II II N -1 N ;K- p 9 o ILI 920 0 +00 1+00 2 +00 a= : =E ,= : 5_____ ________ _________________ ____ ________ ______ ________:____:___:____:_ ______ ________ ________ ________ ________:____:___:____:___- oo_______ _ ______ __________________ ________ _____________ =____ ________ ________ _______ ________ ______________ -- ::::::: - -------- - --- INVr -4L -. -r '"'F !.- C- -- - - - - -- - - -- -- _ E' ----------------- ______ -_ --_ _-- __ :__:_::: ________:� -- _EROh : -PUMP :�_ = - -- - - -::- VICINITY MAP - - ------- -' - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- ---- '-- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -------- '------------- '--- ' - - - -' - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - '-------- ' - - - - -- North - CL A- S = g SCALE 1 2000 _ : _ _:: CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM .�P� -- I� --- /.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM. __:::_ _____ _:___ :_ _ ___:_____________:____::__ ________ ___::____:_:::____::__= ____:___ f _ .. T - . _ _ _ _ . 2. CONSTRUCT ON AREA I TO TO PUMP OF AREA ON AREA. - - -- - - -- == :� " - - - - - - - " - _ � _ _ _ . BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WITHIN STREAM LIMITS. , =YFT YLENE I _ 3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE - Fa )3RIC_ AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS. -- A- __►_______ ____________ ___________________________ ________ ________ ________ "_______. ________.___- .___:____.______:_ 4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA. -- - i- :__ :_ = fimny__::__________________ ______________________:________ 5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF R — _____::_:___________ ______ ______________________:_:___:_: _____:_: __:____ :_:_:_::: _:__:_:_:_:_:::______:::_:_:_:_ _ _ 00= -. © _:::_:_:__:: BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS. _:i�: PIP:$= c'%=___:________: ____:___:____::_______:________ 6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION :::_:_:_::: AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG. :_:_::___:::_:::_:_:___: 7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR. iYt _ - - - - - - - _ - - - & UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS. EiEn -r: SIP- TOR &CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY. ________ -_-__-__--- __. -__ - ___ ________ ________ ________ _____________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________: ____:_:::____::_______::_______ ____:::_ ________ :___Tl- ��_el___ Triad Business Park 40 STREAM GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 40 w IN FEET I inch = 40 ft. CROSSING *0 SAR*��9 'a SEAL ms's 15809 •111,94LAN N -,. JUNE 10, 2015 Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAN D I M PACTS W/O RETAINING WALL SS -4 (EXH2) E 0 9 I:] F.� R� P� GR��NRgORo 0L0 d P6e yc PARCEL NO. 0168912 PIN: 6895495429 N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM,INC. DB 6939 PG 2918 0 PB 175 PG 97 & 98 1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD N,4 58 0 0 1 W �b N-456,; 0 W z I 3 4 2D 5 i IO"4 y0' o gU RVE TSB s !4' �- -.- X51 M o U 5�VEt 00 90 S. R 0 EAST MOON $T I� of GREENSBORO RD SR 180 � SITE BUSINf$� ZZ 00 U U K VICINITY MAP ° \ (SCALE 1 : 2000) 0 7\50, 910. QO w- `n o° C 4 o � N r 1 O z -;&y 0 E LEGEND ® POND OR WETLAND STREAM I 5 L GR,4i=�4 f C SC,4L E 200 0 wo 200 400 C IN FEET I Inch = 200 ft. 6 WE C 1w tdaddesigngroup Architecture I Engineering I Interior Design Triad Design Group, RC 4807 -C Koger Boulevard Greensboro, NC 27407 Telephone 336- 218 -8282 Facsimile 336- 218 -8010 www.triad- designgroup.com NC Architecture Reg. 50709 NC Engineering Lic. C -1108 AA14E;71 SAMET CORPORATION P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, NC D 27419 (336) 544 -2600 FAX: (336) 544 -2638 N GRo SEAL •o C •'�c / NEB: ��: ►111.11.► NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD: L. ALLAN HILL, P.E. he aC 0 O CU r/ -0 .O_ �O 0— Ca = 00, z 8 0- 0 B X ��z W a ai a� • L O L > s_ 0 � a �c F;1 Mk Date Description Revisions OVERALL EXHIBIT 3A Date: AL16LIST , 2014 Drawn: FCS Check: LAH Job Number: 14 -064 Sheet: EXHm3A TEMPOR4RY STREAM IMPACT I 26 LF PERMANtNT STREAM ; ., ' " • . - - - - - - - � ' �� = `\ - - CO / IMPACT = 174 LF � ' " ' � / FFER ,P M - - \ _ , _ CLA STONE w v • .fly - - _ _ _ - - - - - - o \ -J/ W!8' I L POLYETHYLENE wY w w W _ 1=' BrRIC ON FACE y ,. I NV. I N �3. 75 \ \ / / \ - - - - - - - - \ \ \ W y / 41, 41 Y - x'y ' o y 912) - w / - � y y v w" w \ 2 4,FF\8 � •'v " 4�PI PE . ^,, \\ J W w w V• \ •Y W • • w W .57 \ � L\ \ -� \ \` I • y y�Y y .� \ y\ w y w u• � ��• v u• y \ W \ w w w w , • w W\ V' W \ 3e 0 .Y WY W W RYA :OA, r /� `ti \' \ ` ` X SEE SHF,�T QET -k w R HIV. �!T 8 3.12 FOR ST EAM BANK, /0 RtSTO%ATI�ON / �1' \ �\ \�' �' W 'r\ J✓ W _� W \\ \\ iii y W W W W W Joso u• .v .r w w,,�� ; u• w p w \ w \ \ w u• w 14• X w ,' u• w W \ \\ ♦.\ �� / L y w u• F R 6A W ` .� \ \v\\ w w w \w ,•w W w \ \, :\ \�♦\ •.- �- - -'- y 35'X4 R&Y M TOR �✓ w \ �\ %41 w \ v` �\ ♦ w w v \ \ y + v w v /u• v .i. v ` /v w w v \a `� W \\ W \\ \� \w W W �\ ,y v \\ \ \' w w y w� y w �y y/..77�'.� y y y,' y \ � u.`\ y \\ ♦J\ \� y .' w , \xQ� y y w J• J• y y w y w,' w w `h\ \� y \y 1909.0) r w / ♦ \♦ \ \\ \ (91 0) /7Q� i •Y W w w w W •Y J' w W ,' •Y w w w V' �Y W ♦ �\ \ ♦ ♦\ \\ \ \ / � v. y w w w w y w y w 1 y w y w w w ♦ \'' � \\ �` "1\ v w ` v .v v .v u• v u• v w v u• v - ' -,i, - - - � - - - �% - �• .v / J\ �J1 /9 � �pO y w w .r w y w y w y w y �. y .r w, •'w / \T �Q � , J / T, \ iSIRA H SCALE 40 0 10 40 w 160 IN FEET I inch = 40 ft. VICINITY MAP A hill North SCALE P = 2000' STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS ZONE I = 1-5,602 5F ZONE 2 = 11,162 SF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT = 26 LF I PERM. STREAM IMPACT = 114 LF 1 TEMP. WETLAND IMPACT = 0.06 AC. PERM. WETLAND IMPACT = 0.85 AC. Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension -\N �ARo ��•, Kernersville, NC 'FES•S %p9': ° PERMANENT STREAM •a SEAL ms's 15809 AND WETLAND IMPACT 114LAN N JUNE 10, 2015 SS-1 E 910 0 +00 +00 2 +00 _____ -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -------- -------------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------------------ t == ________ ______ =___________ 6_= SAS_ #J0 : =__:_ _i _: "_"_ _'v -- - - - - -- ---- - - - -`_ f��.i. 1v, ��T �.,3rr - ________ ________ ----- ------ __E_:_: _:__: -------- -- - - - - -- --- -----. ____ -___ ___- ------ _ - ____ __. ____ __ - -7 _ ______ _ �= S- 7A: :1 +7 6 - _:: ________ ________::___ ___ ____:__::____::_______ ________ ________ ____::_: ____:: :__ ::__:____:___:_::: ________ ____---- i--------- -------- :------ �:��_: : - - - -- — :::::::::::: : ::::::::::::::::::::::: _ a :::_SIP - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- _1- 00EINK -E -HE_ _ _______ ___ _s___ ____= ___:____ ________ ________ ________ ____ =___ ____ =_ __ _:___:_____ = _:____ - _:______ _ ------ -- -------- --- -- --- -- c 1 .J - -- ,I�- FB-_____ _____ ________ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : __:___: _` ___:_= :_:___ t?� _ _P_____ ________ rr,,II� }' = = = - =::::::::: :_::: ---- i�f�:: :�f�K- ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ____ ________ _ :_____:____:________ _::::::::::::::_ ____ ___ ______ ___::_ =___ ________,��_____ S 5::::::::_ :::::::: ::::::.: :::::: --------- - - - - -- - - I �`r = - ---- 8 ---- APE = =& a - -0• . - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ----------------- ::::: :: :::::::: :::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::_.:::::::: :::::::: ::::::::::::::: �'__ --- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- R, kF�,. - - -- - - - - -- -- -- -- __ _�R;�1�JY(__�ia±tf� - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- EWR Y: � : - - TOP - -:___ ____J_ ________:____:___:____:________ ________ ________ ________ _______________________________ ___ __ ___�_ = ="_ ::::::::::::::- - -:: - -- ::: ::r_ :ex::: - - - -- - - - -- 1 - - - - - -- - - - -- STREAM CROSSING GRAPHIC; 6GALE 40 0 10 40 w 160 IN FEET I Inch = 40 ft. I "q 1 VICINITY MAP North SCALE P = 2000' CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM L KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM. 2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N STREAM LIMITS. 3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS. 4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA. 5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS. 6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG. 7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR. 8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS. 9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY. SARo• 9 .o •a SEAL ms's 15809 •,�',94<AN N JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC PERMANENT STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SS -2 (EXH3) 12" DIA. COIR FIBER ROLL 1/2 DIA: AREA I EL. 1665 _ p BANKFULL AREA 2 EL, 169.15 ELEVATION o ®mac '% i BACKFILL AS REQUIRED EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE FULL CONTACT OF LOG WITH THE SOIL O NOTE NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL EXTEND INTO CHANNEL TO COVER ONE -THIRD OF EXISTING AND /OR rwr-=w CHANNEL V 2"x2",36" WOOD STAKE NOTE I. STAKE SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED ALONG THE FIBER ROLLS (2' TO 3' APART). 2. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE FIBER ROLL, 3. TOP FIBER ROLLS SHALL NOT HORIZONTALLY EXTEND BEYOND THE END OF THE LOWER ROLL. 4. COIR FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE BIOLOGS BY BON TERRA AMERICA OR EQUIVALENT. S. NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL BE CF9 MATS BY BON TERRA OR EQUIVALENT. DOUBLE COIR FIBER ROLL TOE STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES. DETAIL A /DET -1 NO SCALE ANGLE CUT 30• - 45' BLACK WILLOW LIVE STAKE 3/4" 5/8" v �D - iv 3/S" THICK 12" ECO ANCHOR STAKE FOLD EDGE UNDER I' MINIMUM OVERLAP WITH FABRIC 6" AND ANCHOR UPSTREAM FABRIC ON TOP WITH STAKES I' OC OF DOWNSTREAM FABRIC I' TYP. o a a e o a o a f o o a o a a o 0 0 o I a o o LIVE STAKES J a a o a a a a a o I a o a SPACED ON O ® 2' ® ® O ® ® ® 2' CENTERS ® ® 4 ANCHOR STAKE I > o a a o a a a o o ® ® it ® O ® • ® ® ® ®I ® 3 • • O • • • O 0 ® I O 0 u 2"x2 "x36" WOOD STAKE FOR COIR LOG ANCHOR TYING DIAGRAM STREAM FLOW — FIBER ROLL TOE PROTECTION NOTE I. MATTING SHALL BE ROLLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR ALONG STREAMBANK. 2. MATTING SHALL EXTEND BELOW THE TOE PROTECTION TO 1/3 CHANNEL WIDTH AND A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OVER TOP OF BANK IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS REQUIRED, MID -BANK OVERLAP SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT AND SECURELY FASTENED WITH ANCHOR STAKES. 3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WILLOW. LIVE STAKES WITH NATURAL FIBER MATTING, DETAIL 5/DET -1 NO SCALE SARO`��'�9'': 'a SEAL �'s 15809 <<ANa40;•• JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS DET -1 � FOLD EDGE 4 > I p UNDER FABRIC NORMAL FLOW 6" NATURAL FIBER W.9 LIVE STAKES, 4. SQUARE GUT SEE PET. FOR SPACING o ®mac '% i BACKFILL AS REQUIRED EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE FULL CONTACT OF LOG WITH THE SOIL O NOTE NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL EXTEND INTO CHANNEL TO COVER ONE -THIRD OF EXISTING AND /OR rwr-=w CHANNEL V 2"x2",36" WOOD STAKE NOTE I. STAKE SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED ALONG THE FIBER ROLLS (2' TO 3' APART). 2. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE FIBER ROLL, 3. TOP FIBER ROLLS SHALL NOT HORIZONTALLY EXTEND BEYOND THE END OF THE LOWER ROLL. 4. COIR FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE BIOLOGS BY BON TERRA AMERICA OR EQUIVALENT. S. NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL BE CF9 MATS BY BON TERRA OR EQUIVALENT. DOUBLE COIR FIBER ROLL TOE STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES. DETAIL A /DET -1 NO SCALE ANGLE CUT 30• - 45' BLACK WILLOW LIVE STAKE 3/4" 5/8" v �D - iv 3/S" THICK 12" ECO ANCHOR STAKE FOLD EDGE UNDER I' MINIMUM OVERLAP WITH FABRIC 6" AND ANCHOR UPSTREAM FABRIC ON TOP WITH STAKES I' OC OF DOWNSTREAM FABRIC I' TYP. o a a e o a o a f o o a o a a o 0 0 o I a o o LIVE STAKES J a a o a a a a a o I a o a SPACED ON O ® 2' ® ® O ® ® ® 2' CENTERS ® ® 4 ANCHOR STAKE I > o a a o a a a o o ® ® it ® O ® • ® ® ® ®I ® 3 • • O • • • O 0 ® I O 0 u 2"x2 "x36" WOOD STAKE FOR COIR LOG ANCHOR TYING DIAGRAM STREAM FLOW — FIBER ROLL TOE PROTECTION NOTE I. MATTING SHALL BE ROLLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR ALONG STREAMBANK. 2. MATTING SHALL EXTEND BELOW THE TOE PROTECTION TO 1/3 CHANNEL WIDTH AND A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OVER TOP OF BANK IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS REQUIRED, MID -BANK OVERLAP SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT AND SECURELY FASTENED WITH ANCHOR STAKES. 3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WILLOW. LIVE STAKES WITH NATURAL FIBER MATTING, DETAIL 5/DET -1 NO SCALE SARO`��'�9'': 'a SEAL �'s 15809 <<ANa40;•• JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS DET -1 ANCHOR STAKE, FOLD EDGE P OC UNDER FABRIC 6" NATURAL FIBER LIVE STAKES, MATTINGs SQUARE GUT SEE PET. FOR SPACING y BUDS (FACING UPWARD)A b" LIVE CUTTING: (I" TO 2" DIAMETER) in C EXISTING/PROPOSED W 1 GROUND Q o ®mac '% i BACKFILL AS REQUIRED EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE FULL CONTACT OF LOG WITH THE SOIL O NOTE NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL EXTEND INTO CHANNEL TO COVER ONE -THIRD OF EXISTING AND /OR rwr-=w CHANNEL V 2"x2",36" WOOD STAKE NOTE I. STAKE SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED ALONG THE FIBER ROLLS (2' TO 3' APART). 2. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE FIBER ROLL, 3. TOP FIBER ROLLS SHALL NOT HORIZONTALLY EXTEND BEYOND THE END OF THE LOWER ROLL. 4. COIR FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE BIOLOGS BY BON TERRA AMERICA OR EQUIVALENT. S. NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL BE CF9 MATS BY BON TERRA OR EQUIVALENT. DOUBLE COIR FIBER ROLL TOE STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES. DETAIL A /DET -1 NO SCALE ANGLE CUT 30• - 45' BLACK WILLOW LIVE STAKE 3/4" 5/8" v �D - iv 3/S" THICK 12" ECO ANCHOR STAKE FOLD EDGE UNDER I' MINIMUM OVERLAP WITH FABRIC 6" AND ANCHOR UPSTREAM FABRIC ON TOP WITH STAKES I' OC OF DOWNSTREAM FABRIC I' TYP. o a a e o a o a f o o a o a a o 0 0 o I a o o LIVE STAKES J a a o a a a a a o I a o a SPACED ON O ® 2' ® ® O ® ® ® 2' CENTERS ® ® 4 ANCHOR STAKE I > o a a o a a a o o ® ® it ® O ® • ® ® ® ®I ® 3 • • O • • • O 0 ® I O 0 u 2"x2 "x36" WOOD STAKE FOR COIR LOG ANCHOR TYING DIAGRAM STREAM FLOW — FIBER ROLL TOE PROTECTION NOTE I. MATTING SHALL BE ROLLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR ALONG STREAMBANK. 2. MATTING SHALL EXTEND BELOW THE TOE PROTECTION TO 1/3 CHANNEL WIDTH AND A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OVER TOP OF BANK IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS REQUIRED, MID -BANK OVERLAP SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT AND SECURELY FASTENED WITH ANCHOR STAKES. 3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WILLOW. LIVE STAKES WITH NATURAL FIBER MATTING, DETAIL 5/DET -1 NO SCALE SARO`��'�9'': 'a SEAL �'s 15809 <<ANa40;•• JUNE 10, 2015 Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Kernersville, NC STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTS DET -1 APPENDIX III STREAM EVALUATION FORMS USACEIAID #M s B B DWQBIB B SiteIN113 (indicatelbnHttachedliap)B m mmmmmSTREAMBQUALITYBkSSESSMENTBWORKSHEETB ProvideStheffollowingBnformationBorBhelltreamBeachBunderB 3ssessment:B B l.Mpplicant'sBame:H'BPB B 2 .B?valuator'sBame:lLuckev.B'EIB B B 3.B)atel&Mvaluation:I4 /28/14B B 4.H'imeBfBvaluation:B:00B B B 5.] Namel& fl3tream :lllJTBNV.lForklDeeDfRiverB B 6.lRiverBasinACaneffearB B B 7.Blpproximateldrainagel $ rea:BOMcresB B 8.3treamBrder:Bs`B B B 9 .S,engthBfBeachBvaluated:1400'B B 10.1Dounty:llhruilfordB B B 11 .1S,iteBoordinatesloiflknown):B preferlRnldecimalldegrees.B 12.1$ubdivisionIDamegiflAny):IIB B B Latitude*x.B4.872312):]M ELongitude*x.R77.556611):B3 B B MethodWcationIdeterminedl $circle):B GPSB TopolSheetB Ortho4Aerial)1$hoto /GISB Other]UISB Otherl$ B 13 . lLocationl& fBeachEknderBvaluation4 noteliearbyBoadsl indBandmarksHndlittachffiapBdentifyingEtream (s)Bocation):IS eeB AttachmentsB B B D 14. 8' roposedBhannelBvorkI�ifBny):) �T /AjE,iiEl�liEliE1,9,1,f iil liEliili�E, iiiliiEl lEiiEbii1114i11, 4E, iiE1i�1k14iEEIEiiEEiiICEIiIE,ihiiEliih�Ef iE1, iEiiEl iil lE, iiEIII, hiE1�, EE, kEiiEl , iE4iEiiillE4iiE, iE, iiEl ii1; �EiiEl iEiiEbii1114i11, 4E, iiE1iB1,YE4iEE,iEliEEiillik B 15. HRecentBveatherBonditions: H' vnicall: l�EliiE, liil lillll lliill�Wllil llll�, ttlllbEfiEliil lililllilliiEl iillllll, tlllllllElll , il�llllllllll�, Illllltlllll, illllll, llldllEiiEliil lEYiEl , iEl �ll ll�, Illlllllll�il lllllllhiiEl iillEliil,�EbilliiflEiiitEJ B - 1 6. l�, iteBonditionsl �tBmeBfBrisita$ wpicall_ , �iE1iEl iE{ iiiEliGflif, 9iE{ , if, ViEliiE, ViEYiEl ll➢ iEiiif, GE, 3iE1�1f6iElii,{ , fiEl iEl �f1iElii{; iE, ViEl , if, BiEYiil , ViEliEl if, YiE, Yiih Yf, liEflE, iiEl iil6iE1iE,{ 1E, iiEliG11E, YiE{ , iE, ViEliiE, ViEYiEl ll➢ iEiiif; GE, iiEl �lf6iElii,{ ;iiEliEl�f1iElii{;iil� B 17.I 3dentifyBny> 3pecialBvaterway2lassificationsBnown: ` ectionBOi_ iii!iiiii�l il�iii,i�lil!lIl,iiidalBVaters ssentiallFisheriesBlabitatB B routlWaters utstandingfResourceBVaters !:ll,l,lil,l,lil, lilt ,lil.4utrientBensitivefVVaterS ater3upplyBVatershedlSBVl I -IV)B 18. SsH hereBlpondBrBakeB ocatedlipstreamB fBheBvaluationIooint?W ESIMff* es, Bstimate8heBvaterBurfaceB rea: 10. I5Mcres. iillilli!lii,i�idilii!iii,Hlii 6 B 19.8)oesshannelUppearBnl JSGSlAuadBlap ?BWES O.l DoesBhannell appearlbnitJSDA3oil3urvey ?WES>B B 21 .BEstimated>3vatershedRandBise: O)B/olResidential.:�lill�l ll�l!il1.11�llh 01& ]Commercial OHKBndustrial OMIAgriculturalB B BOB%11:brestedB B3 %lClearedEllogged %1DtherB B )B B 22.)$ ankfullBvidth:) 53- 6".: lliiil, lii, llIII�II�II, Yl, lii, ll, ll , ll, lihll, Illl�EllhEll, IlllI, YI, I�lilEllll, E�lllll , l' tl; ll, lll1, �. S. 1Bankl�eightl�froml�edI $oBopl�f�anlc):1� -� �.: II, Eillil, i, lil ill, ll, liillillill , YI, lilii,Yiililllihlil,i,likl B 24.( Channel BlopeldownBenterBfl3tream: latl$OBoEt%)B B ientlel�2Bog%) oderatel$4BoBO %) teepWIO %)B B 25.]ChannelBinuosity:HMMMraight ccasionallbends BMrequentBneander eryl3inuous .7lliilliihiii,iiii,i,E raidedBhannelB B InstructionsfforBcompletionElbfBvorksheetB (locatedlbnl�ageB2): Bl$eginB)yBieterminingHheHno stBtppropriate &coregionB)asedB)nB location, Berrain ,aegetation,BtrearnBlassifi cation,litc. BEveryl lharacteristicBnustaeRcoredlksingBhe $amelicoregion.lkssign*ointsB tolBachlBharacteristiclBvithin> She lBangelBhownlfforlBhelBcoregion. Bg'ageIB 4rovidesIBBbrieffkescriptionl BflbowlSolBeviewlBheB characteristicsfldentifiedBnBheB,vorksheet. fficoreslhhoulditcflectl 3tnlbverallBissessmentBbfS heRtreamSeach &nder)3'valuation.lHfEhB characteristic& annotB) e& valuatedBlueBol 3;iteB) rB, veatherR onditions, anterORnHheRcoringB) oxBind li)rovide&n&xplanationBnBheB commentl3ection. B3JVhereBhereBirel bbviousRhangesBnBhe> characterl bfUtEtreamllanderlteview 4e.g.,BheRtreani lowslfromB4astureB intol ilforest),B heB treamBnayBbel 3iividedBntoRmallerSeachesBhatE lisplayB norel tontinuity,a ndl iBeparatelformBisedBo livaluateRachB reach.B3TheBotalReoreI ssignedBoBtRtreamSeachBnustSangelbetweenID BmdEI00, RvithBtR coreB> fllOOSepresentingBtBtreamfbfSheB highestBivality.B B Total3coreMfromBeverse): tmmb HW erenniaLdh iiliilli, iiiliil Yi, iiil iii, i, iilil, iliiliiii, Yl, iiiii, 6illiliid, ViiliilliihiilihliPllilliifiii, iii, YiPl llfiiilliiiilii,1661iiliii;i6liiiiUliiJ P B Evaluator'sEEignaturel fl /29/ 14 ate Thisl thannellkvaluationlUoniig sBntendedIBoB )eIltsedlbnlyffsBt)�uidellolk ssistl3andownerstindBenvironmental 1professionalsMnB gatheringBhel Biatal B• equiredlbyBtheWnitedl]EtatesB3krmyWorpslibfEEngineersMoBmakelbBpreliminaryEks sessmentubffftreamB quality. BWhel SotalIBcorelSesulting> Bfroml$ he )BompletionHbfl3hislfonnB3sRubj ectBR oBUSACEBapprovalBtndlwoeslhotIHmplyluB particularlihitigationBratiolbrltequirement .BForml3ubj ectBolhhangeB RersionB6 /03.1golComment,loleaseBall» 19- 876 -8441 ]lB6.B B 1 B B #B 1B 11&B IB11183 IBM IBM r� IBM U C IBM a 1BM IDS B 0116 B I BB H a B3 B4 E~ B5 B 61B H B 71B H Bgl1B. x ' B 9IB 11018 El I fB O O 11218 F131113 STREAMBQUALITYBASSESSMENTBWORKSHEETB CHARACTERISTICSB PresencelbaowBlpersi stentl000lsBnBtreamB ( noBlowlbrBaturationB= M,Btroni4M owB=Bnax5oints)B EvidenceB )flpastEhumanlBlterationB (extensive] Alterationl 3=lfD;IDo}AlterationB�Bnaxli4oints)B RiparianaoneB ( nolbuffera lb;1$ontiguous,BvidelbufferRIl nax5oints)B EvidenceB )flbutrient]3rRhemicalffii schargesB (extensiveldischar�4esB= 10;lboldi schargesl=Bnax5oints)B GroundwaterlBli schargeB (noldi scharge1=1I1,1;13prings,>Beep s,Bvetl an ds,latc. al&iax5oints)B PresencelbflAdjacentMoodplainB (noBloodolainB=M;laxtensivel lloodplainl3-Bnax5oints)B EntrenchmentMoodplainRiccessB (deet)lylbntrenchedB =B; llireq uentBloodingl3= l3►axlboints )B PresenceBaflAdj acentl3vetlandsB ( noB vetlandsB= S;Bargel3diacentWetlandsail naxlboints)B ChannellBinuosityg ( extensivel$ hannelizationB= M;lkaturallkieandera]Maxlbo ints )B SedimentBinputB ( extensiveldeposition= 1 ]D;BittlelbrlAol3edimentR!l nax5oints)B S izel&Bliversitylbfl $ hannellbedlhub strateB (fine, lb omo genousB =1$1; B arse ,ldiversel3izesB= Bnax5oints)B Evidenc eB) fBhannelBincisionB>rBvideningB ( deeplylBncisedal@; 13tablelhedl klbanksB= Bnax]Ooints)B PresenceBaffMaj orlBanklfai lure sB (severe BrosionB M;1io13rosion,BtablelbanksB BnaxlOoints)B RootBlepthBandB_lens ityB)nll)anksB (noKi sib IeBootsB =10; Idens eBoots BhroughoutRIMaxlb o ints)B ImpactHbylAgriculture ,lfivestock,B>rBimberH1 )roductionB (substantialBmpactB =O; l&oBvidenceB= 1Max113oints)B Presencel3JfBlffle -pool /ripple- pooIB:omplexesB (noBiffles /ripples13rI]3oo1sR]D; Bvell- developedB= Bnaxlj§oints)B HabitatlkomplexityB (1 ittleBrlAo & ab itatRM;13req uent,RariedB abi tatsB= Bnax113o ints)B CanopyBcoverageBwerRtreambedB (noBhadingRegetationB 1D;IaontinuousBanopyB3 WaxlOoints)B SubstratefkmbeddednessB (deeplylhmbeddedB =I@; RooseStructureREkiax)B PresenceBofBtreamlBnvertebrate sWeelpagel4)B (nolavidenceI3 M;I common, likumerouslBvpesl3 =Bnaxlboints)B Presencefbf imphibiansB (nolavi denc eB=I@; IBommon,BiumerousWpesRl & iaxlOoints)B PresenceBafl ishB (nol &vi denc eB =161; I$ommon, l&umerou s}BmesRBnax5oints)B EvidenceB)fBvildlifeltiseB (noBvidenceB =1$1; IAbundantBvidencealMax5oints)B TotalEPo intsH'o ssibleB ECOREGIONIFOINT CoastallB PiedmontB3 B MountainB OR13B OR14B D OB13B O111613 OR13B D 013,14B 013 -16B O131413 D 0131313 O131313 O131413 D 0131313 013-BB 013-14B D O13-14B 013,1413 013-134B D OR13B 0131313 0131413 D 0R13B 013,1613 OR14B D OR16B OB-SB OB-14B D 0R13B OB-13B OB -14B D OB13B NA *B 013 -14B D OR14B 013 -13B 013-14B D 013 -13B OB-13B D ORBB 013-14B D 013-13B OR14B D ORBB 013 -13B D OR16B 013413 D 013-13B 013-13B D NA *B OR14B D OB14B 0R13B D OR14B OR14B D 0R14B 013,1413 D 0111613 01313B 10013 1 100B TOTALBSCORE IE(alsolanterl&nlhirstloage)B * H' heseBharacteristicslArelA otBssessedlfnlAoastall3treams.B B B B 2 WANGEB SCORE >3� MountainB 013-13B 3 OB13B 2 013-1313 3 013,14B 2 013,1413 4 0131313 3 013,1313 3 0131313 4 OB13B 3 O13-14B 2 OB-13B 1 OR13B 2 OB-13B 3 0R13B 3 OR13B 2 OR16B 2 013 -16B 4 0R13B 3 OR14B 2 OB13B 3 OR14B 3 OR14B 0 0613E 3 10013 59 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: 4/29/14 Project /Site; TBP Evaluator: Luckey, PEI Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent 37 if? 19 or perennial if? 30" County: Guilford Latitude: Longitude: Stream Determination (circ a Other Kernersville Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 18 Absent 1' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, 0 ripple -pool sequence 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 5. Active /relict floodplain 0 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 8. Headcuts 0 9. Grade control 0 10. Natural valley 0 Weak 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 11. Second or greater order channel No COD a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 1 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 14. Leaf litter 1.5 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = Q C. Biology (Subtotal = 10 1 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed n 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 21. Aquatic Mollusks COD 22. Fish 23. Crayfish 0 24. Amphibians 0 25. Algae 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: Moderate Strong 2 U 0 3 ® 3 2 M 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 M 1.5 0.5 1.5 Yes = 3 0.5 1 ® 3 2 3 0.5 0 0.5 � 1.5 0.5 1.5 Yes 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 (-2) 3 1 2 3 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 n 1.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other APPENDIX IV WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: TBP Old Greensboro Road Extension City /County: Kernersville /Guilford Sampling Date: 4/28/14 Applicant /Owner: TBP State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -1 Investigator(s): Luckey /Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Bottomland Hardwoods Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 2 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Madison clay loam (McD2) NWI Classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: The three sampling criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoDly) Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (1314) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Drift Deposits (133) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) X Water- Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >12" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches): >12" (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are present. VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP -1 Dominance Test worksheet: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Liquidambar straciflua 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A) 2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC 3. Prunus serotina 5 N FACU Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) 5. 6 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A /B) 7. 8. Prevalence Index worksheet: 55 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) FACW species X2= 1. Liquidambar straciflua 20 Y FAC FAC species X 3 - 2. Corpus amomum 10 Y FACW 3. Juniperus virginiana 2 N FACU FACU species X4= 4. Cornus florida 2 N FACU UPL species X 5 = 5. Column Totals: (A) (B) 6. 7. Prevalence Index = B/A = 8. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 9. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 10. X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50% 34 = Total Cover 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1. Eulalia viminea 20 Y FAC 2. Lonicera japonica 10 Y FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 2 N FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 5. 6. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 7. 8. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) g. or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), 10. regardless of height. 11. Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 12. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 32 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 1. Toxicodendron radicans 10 Y FAC Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 2. height. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6. Present? Yes X No 10 = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Hydrophytic vegetation is present. SOIL Sampling Point: DP -1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tye Loc2 Texture Remarks 0 -9 5YR 4/6 100 L 9 -16 2.5Y 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C RM CL 'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are present. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: TBP Old Greensboro Road Extension City /County: Kernersville /Guilford Sampling Date: 4/28/14 Applicant /Owner: TBP State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -2 Investigator(s): Luckey /Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Sideslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 4 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Madison clay loam (McD2) NWI Classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: The three sampling criteria are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoDly) Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (1314) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Drift Deposits (133) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Water- Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >12" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Saturation Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches): >12" (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are not present. No X VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP -2 Dominance Test worksheet: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Juniperus virginiana 20 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A) 2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC 3. Pinus taeda 5 N FAC Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 9 (B) 5. 6 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78 (A /B) 7. 8. Prevalence Index worksheet: 45 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) FACW species X2= 1. Liquidambar straciflua 10 Y FAC FAC species X 3 - 2. Juniperus virginiana 10 Y FACU FACU species X4= 3. 4 UPL species X 5 = 5. Column Totals: (A) (B) 6. 7. Prevalence Index = B/A = 8. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 9. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 10. X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50% 20 = Total Cover 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 1. Lonicera japonica 10 Y FAC 2. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 Y FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. Quercus sp. 5 Y FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 5. 6. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 7. 8. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) 9. or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), 10. regardless of height. 11. Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 12. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 25 = Total Cover Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 1. Lonicera japonica 10 Y FAC Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 2. height. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6. Present? Yes X No 10 = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Hydrophytic vegetation is present. SOIL Sampling Point: DP -2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tye LoC2 Texture Remarks 0 -12 5YR 5/6 100 CL 'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present. APPENDIX V USACEJD U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS copy WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SAW- 2013 -00556 County: Guilford U.S.G.S. [.quad: NC- KERNERSVILLE NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner: Samet Corporation Agent: Pilot Environmental, Inc. attn: Brian Hall attn: Michael Brame Address: P.U. Box 8050 Address: P.O. Box i ;J Greensboro. NC, 27419 Kernersville, NC 27285 Size (acres) 250 Nearest Town Kernersville Nearest Waterway Deen River River Basin Dees, North Carolina. USES HUC 3030003 Coordinates 36.107556 N. - 80.023197 W Location description: The oroiect area is located south of West Market Street and north of I -40 Business. between, the Guilford/Forsvthe County line and Bunker Hill Road in Kernersville, Guilford County.. North Carolina. Indicate Which of the Foliowine Apnlv,: A. Preliminary Determination Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD, B. Approved Determination There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. X There are waters of the U.S, including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps. _ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 9/812014. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the _ permit requirements of Section 444 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to determine their requirements. Page 1 of 2 Vy . Vb� .may_ � •4 +, •1' Pl'ii'cement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David Bailev at 910 -251 -4469 or David.E.Bailev2Q,usace.armv.mil. C. Basis For Determination: The site exhibits features with Grdinary High Water and wetlands as defined in the 1987 wetland delineation manual and applicable rezional sunnletnents. The waters on site include several Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to West Fork Deep River, all Relatively Permanent Waters (RP' ). which flow via West Fork Deep River to the Deep River. a Traditionallv Navigable Water -- and abutting and adincent wetlands. This determination is based on a field verification by David E. Bailev (USACE) on 5/15/2014. D. Remarks: The wetlands and other Waters of the US within the nronerty were orieinaliv flamed by ECS Carolinas. with updates made by Pilot Environmental. Inc. with chances made in the field by David E. Bailev (USACE), and are anuroximated on the attached figure entitled "Wetlands Delineation. Triad Business Park", dated 6/.23/2014. Note that Stream SE, wetland WE. and pond PCA. and at least portions of stream ISIi and wetland WSH were permanently filed as authorized by NWP 39 dated 7/31/2008. Action ID: SAW -2008- 01894. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food 'Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. above) This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Fart 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Ann: Jason Steele, Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 111'1`12014. * *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. ** Corps Regulatory Official: David E. Bailey Date: September 8.2014 Expiration Date: September S. 2019 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at ht tp : / /re2ulatorv,usacesurrev.com/. Copy furnished: Sue Homewood, NCDENR -DWR, 585 Waughtown Street, Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Allan Hill, Triad Design Group, P.C., 4807 -C Koger Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407 NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND RE, IT IOi k'EA Applicant: Samet Corporation (attn: Brian Hall) I Fite Number: SA'W' -2013- 00556 6 Date: September S, 2014 Attached is: See Section below [J INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B _ PERMIT DENIAL C �I APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D TJ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at littp./ Iwww .usace.rzrmv.millMissionslCivi ?Works /Re- ulate�ryPro�ranlandl ermits aspr or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Dart 331. - A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written, After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section H of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial ofa permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps %vithin 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved ID, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section lI of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECTION fl- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may appeal process you may contact: also contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer attn: David E. Bailey CESAD -PDO Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, Room IOMI5 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801 Phone: (404) 562 -5137 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, attn: David Bailey, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 1415, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 For permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8841 Phone: (444) 562 -5137 APPENDIX VI PREVIOUS PERMIT APPROVALS U.S. ARMY CURDS OF ENGYNEEka WILMINGTON DISTRICT VILE Action ID. SA'W- 2008 -01894 County: Guilford USGS Quad: Kernersville GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property Owner / Authorized Agent: FedEx Ground Package System, Inc, Address: Attn: William Conner 1000 FedEx Drive Moon Township, Pennsylvania 15108 Telephone No.: 412 -859 -2280 Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): 127.31 acres; located North of Interstate 40. West of Bunker Hill Road, South of West Market Street and East of the Forsyth, Guilford Countv line in Guilford, County North Carolina. Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for the discharge of clean fill material within 0.19 acre of adjacent wetland (impact site #1), 225 linear feet of perennial stream channel (impact site #2) and 0.22 acre of open water habitat (impact site #3) for the development of a commercial package distribution facility. The protect must be conducted in accordance with the application and drawings submitted on May 27, 2008. As compensatory mitigation. the applicant will provide payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), (See Special Conditions on Page 3). Applicable Law: Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) [� Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: Regional General'Permit Number: Nationwide Permit Number: 39 Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action. This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification, will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality ( telephone (419) 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management. This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Comps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at telephone number 919 -876 -8441 extension 26. Corps Regulatory Official Z�kwu -J Xavl�'-� Date: duly 31.2008 Expiration Date of Verification: July 31, 2010 Page 1 of 3 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. i o help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at httn_ :Hreizulatorv.usacesurvev.com/ to complete the survey online. Determination of Jurisdiction: ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference jurisdictional determination issued Action ID Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The stream is a relatively permanent water (RPW) and an unnamed tributary to an unnamed tributary (RPW) to the West Fork of the the Deep River (RPW). The West Fork of the Deep River flows to and through several impoundments, and is a tributary to the Deep River, a traditionally navigable water (TNW). The Deep River is a tributary to the Cape Fear River, a navigable water of the United States. The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the unnamed tributary was indicated by the following physical characteristics: clear natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of the soil, and the destruction of terrestrial vegetation. The wetlands are contiguous with the unnamed tributary and meet the hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soil criteria of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The open waters are an impoundment of the unnamed tributary to the unnamed tributary to the West Fork of the Deep River. This iurisdictional determination is only for the waters /wetlands proposed for impacts associated with this Nationwide Permit and does not include anv other waters /wetlands that may be located on the property. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.) Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit-a completed RFA form to the following address: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: Andrew Williams, Project Manager, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Car6lina 27587 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by September 29, 2008. * *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. ** Corps Regulatory Official: .! i�//�CCe� % ✓ /�=C� �-,.o Date July 31, 2008 Expiration Date July 31, 2012 Page 2 of 3 Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mitigation Action ID NWP / GP Open Water (ac) Wetland (ac) Unimportant Steam (1f) Important Stream (If) # # Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent SAW - 2008 - NWP 39 0.22 0.19 225 01894 1 Impact Totals 0 0.22 0 0.19 0 0 0 225 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) 0.436 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (If) 225 Required Wetland Mitigation (ac) 10.19 In- Lieu/EEP Required Stream Mitigation (If) 1 450 In- Lieu/EEP Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions: Special Conditions: As compensatory mitigation, the applicant will provide payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for 450 linear feet of warm stream credits to offset unavoidable impacts of 225 linear feet of warm water stream (2:1 ratio) and for 0.19 acre of riparian wetlands credit to offset unavoidable impact of 0.19 acre of riparian wetlands (1:1 ratio) within the Cape Fear River Basin, Hydrologic Unit Code 03030003. Payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. Remarks: Impacts to waters of the United States for this project (SAW- 2008 - 01894) and all other proposed impacts to waters of the United States within and associated with the Triad Business Park, including two (2) additional projects, SAW -2008- 02092 (Triad Business Park) and SAW- 2008 -01599 (NE Sewerline Improvements, Phase I) are a single and complete project as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 33 CFR 330.2(i). The use of more than one Nationwide Permit (NWP) for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specific acreage limit. Based on the information that has been submitted to date, impacts to waters of the United States for the three (3) project listed above, do-not exceed the threshold limits of the applicable NWPs. The threshold limits of the applicable NWPs are 0.5 acre loss of waters of the United States, including 300 linear feet of stream channels with important aquatic function. Therefore, if either of these threshold limits is exceeded within the boundary of Triad Business Park (including but not limited to, the three (3) projects listed above) then this NWP verification is not applicable to your project. SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE. Copy Furnished: Sue Homewood North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston- Salem, NC 27107 Phil May Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 8208 Brian Court Garner, North Carolina 27529 L. Allen Hill Triad Design Group, PC 4807 -C Koger Boulevard Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 Mr. Terry Houk City of High Point 211 South Hamilton Street High Point, North Carolina 27260 Brian Hall TDO Real Estate Holding, LLC P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, North Carolina 27419 Page 3 of 3 Action M. SAW - 2008 - 01599 UOARMY CORPS OF ENGINEEI.�S WILMINGTON DISTRICT County: Guilford USGS Quad: Kernersville S GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Citv of Hiah Point- -Attn: Terry Houk Address: 211 South Hamilton Street High Point, North Carolina 27260 Telephone No.: 336 - 883 -3215 Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): 11.5 acres (approximatelv), 17,000 feet (approximate) sewerline along an unnamed tributary to the West Fork of the Deep River located cast of the Forsvth, Guilford County line, south of Interstate 40 and north of SR 1850 in Guilford County, North Carolina. The project is known as the Nrrth",e.st Seiner frnprove» rents Phase I. Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for the temporary discharge of clean fill material within six (6) jurisdictional stream channels and six (6) adjacent wetlands. The authorized temporary impacts at each individual stream crossing are as follows: Site 2: 47 linear feet (if). Site 3: 26 If. Site 7: 33 If. Site 10: 31 If. Site 14: 31 If. Site 18: 31 If. 'rhe total authorized temporary stream impacts are 199 If. The authorized temporary impacts at each individual wetland are as follows: Site 8: 0.01 acre. Site 11: 0.04 acre. Site 12: 0.06 acre. Site 14: 0.04 acre. Site 15: 0.01 acre. Site 18: 0.03 acre. The total authorized temporary adjacent wetland impacts are 0.19 acre. This also authorizes the permanent maintenance of a 15 foot corridor at each wetland crossing for a total of 0.13 acre permantent impacts. Mitigation is required for the permanent impacts to wetlands (see Permit Conditions below). The project must be conducted in accordance with the application and drawings submitted on llav 06. 2008 accept for the proposed impacts plans and sheets. which were resubmitted with revisions on September 15, 2008. Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: Regional General Permit Number: Nationwide Permit Number: 12 Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action. This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under constnrction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (919) 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CANIA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management . This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the perrnittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals /permits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at telephone number 919 -876 -4884 extension 26. Corps Regulatory Official Xr1 —� � Date: October 24. 2008 Expiration Date of Verification: October 24. 2010 Page 1 of 3 0 0 The Wilmington Distract is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http :/ireaulatorv.usacesurvev.com/ to complete the survey online. Determination of Jurisdiction: ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ There are waters of the US and /or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The streams are relatively permanent waters (RPW) and an unnamed tributaries to an unnamed tributary to the Nest Fork of the Deep River, an RPW. The Nest Fork of the Deep River is a tributary to the Deep River, a traditionally navigable water (TNW). The Deep River is a tributary to the Cape Fear River, a navigable water of the United States. The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWi\I) of the unnamed tributaries were indicated by the followin;,T phvsical characteristics: clear natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, and the destruction of terrestrial vegetation. The wetlands are contiguous with and /or adjacent to the one of the unnamed tributaries and meet the hvdrophytic ve< (Yetatiou, wetland hvdrologv, and hvdric soil criteria of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. This iurisdictional determination is onlv for the waters /wetlands proposed for impacts associated with this Nationwide Permit and does not include anv other waters /wetlands that may be located on the propertv. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.) Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: Andrew Williams, Project Manager, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by December 22. 2008. * *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. ** Corps Regulatory Official: Date October 24. 2008 Page 2 of 3 Expiration Date October 24. 2013 0 0 Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required 'iNIitiQation Action ID NWP / GP Open Water (ac) Wetland (ac) Unimportant Steam (10 Important Stream (It) "Temporary li Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Pemianent Temporary Permanent SAW -2008- NWP 12 0.19 199 01599 Impact Totals 0 0 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) Required Wetland Mitigation (ac) 10.26 Special Permit Conditions: None 0.19 0 0 199 1 0 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (1f) In- Lieu/EEP Required Stream Mitigation (If) 10 i i o i 0 -d 1. In order to compensate for impacts to 0.13 -acre of riparian wetlands the permittee shall make payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) in the amount determined by the NC FEP, sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.26 -acre of riparian wetlands (2:1 ratio) in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030003. 2. Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment to the NC EEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to the Corps, and the NC EEP has provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, in compliance with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998. Remarks: Impacts to waters of the United States for this project (SAW- 2008 - 01599) and all other proposed impacts to waters of the United States within and associated with the Triad Business Park, including two (2) additional projects, SAW- 2008 -02092 (Triad Business Park) and SAW- 2008 -01894 (Project Bermes) are a single and complete project as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 33 CFR 330.2(1). The use of more than one Nationwide Permit (NWP) for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specific acreage limit. Based on the information that has been submitted to date, impacts to waters of the United States for the three (3) project listed above, do not exceed the threshold limits of the applicable NWPs. The threshold limits of the applicable NWPs are 0.5 acre loss of waters of the United States, including 300 linear feet of stream channels with important aquatic function. Therefore, if either of these threshold limits is exceeded within the boundary of Triad Business Park (including but not limited to, the three (3) projects listed above) then this NWP verification is not applicable to your project. SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE. Copy Furnished: Sue Homewood North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 585 Waug w hton Street Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Phil May Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 8208 Brian Court Garner, North Carolina 27529 Page 3 of 3 Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impad - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Wetland Impact Existing Conditions Legend Ripanan Buffer Top of Bank •• Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated iA_ I 1 1 . 1 1 1 i 1 €� 1 E I 1 I I Zone 1 Buffer Zone 2 Buffer RALEIGH RE(,i- [_BTU ,4v FIFLD oFFIrE Limit of construction Zone 2 Impact ,--= . ♦ SITE 1 A 622 sq. ft. _�: � Zone 1 Impact / ! �� 915 sq. ft. "' Non-jurisdictional ditch 1 � � Zone 1 Impact: 911 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact- j 611 sq. ft. i I I 100 0 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 W* design files. S Impact Site 1A Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 Ci 919 -606 -1065; F: 919 - 341 -4474 Butter Impact - Zone 1 Impact Legend Butter Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Wetland ImpactI RKIN on ft -- Existing Conditions Legend Ripanan Buffer Top of Bank Stream Centedine Wetland - Delineated ; C F, ��' , 20 d�l.F:'CE REGI LATuRY r[ELD �FF1CF 1 i i Zone 2 Impact: 1628 sq. ft. - -- I I Zone 1 Impact�__� 1599 sq. ft. j Zone 1 Imp 1019 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impa 654 sq. ft. 1 ct i i i i i 1� 1 1 1 z . ♦ 100 0 10 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. S Zone 1 Buffer Zone 2 Buffer SITE 2 Stream Impact: 47 linear ft. Limit of construction Impact Site 2 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 Oi 919 -606 -1065, F'. 919 - 341 -4474 Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Wetland Impact it1l_E:GN R�GCL:�T�'��" FIELD UFF!� i SITE 3 i i i i I i i f i i i i i i i i i i i !' 100 0 100 Notes: 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. Riparian Buffer Existing Conditions Legend Top of Bank ^ �" Stream Centerline Wedwid - Delineated Limit of construction Stream Impact: 26 linear ft. one Impact: 79 q. ft. Zone 2 Im t- pac . 615 sq. ft. Zone 1 Impact: 865 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 502 sq. ft. Zone 1 Buffer N � Zone 2 Buffer Impact Site 3 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court; Garner, NC 27529 S O: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919-341-4474 Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Riparian Buffer / / / , 'EIVE_ � i tt: >LEiGH REGL'L.aTORY FIELD OFFICF / I 1 1 i 1 1 i� i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 1 1 1 100 1 100 F et MM Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. E 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. S Existing Conditions Legend Top of Bank •• Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated Wetland Impact Zone 2 Impact: 642 sq. ft. ?one 1 Impact: )47 sq. ft. N n- jurisdictional ditch SITE 6A me 1 Impact: !3 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 611 sq. ft. Limit of construction Impact Site 6A Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919 - 606 -1065, F: 919-341-4474 Buffer Impact - Zone 1 it EJ aEP 1 5 iAH CH REGLLa:T,j 100 0 Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Wetland Impact Existing Conditions Legend Riparian Buffer Top of Bank •• Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated i V E Y) 2008 1 fit' FIELD OFFICE I 1 I � 1 1\ SITE 7 1 � j 1 y 1 i i i i i i i i i i i 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. s Zone 2 Impact: 885 sq. ft. Zone 1 Impact: 1142 sq. ft. 1 Stream Impact: 33 linear ft. Zone 1 Impact: 942 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 635 sq. ft. Limit of construction Impact Site 7 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 Zone 2 Irr — Brian Court; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919 -341 -4474 /f,4 1 _ — 4 i Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 1 1 - Riparian Buffer Impact Legend Buffer Impact- Temp Stream Impact Wetland Impact Existing Conditions Legend Top of Bank •• •' Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated Zone 2 Buffer tae 1 Buffer l I SITE 8 X i 0 100 0 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. S Zone 2 Impact: 1744 sq. ft. RECEIVED SEP ' 5 2008 RALEIGH REGGLATJKF FIELD oFFI (,E Wetland Impact: 0.01 ac Limit of construction Impact Site 8 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/081 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919- 606 -1065; F: 919- 341 -4474 Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Impact Legend SEP 1 'j; 2008 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact Wetland Impact SITE 9 - - - - -- - - - -- -- Existing Conditions Legend Riparian Buffer Top of Bank Stream Centerline 7 Wetland - Delineated 100 0 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 W* design files. S Zone 2 Impact: 167 sq. ft. i Zone 2 Buffer e 1 Buffer Impact Site 9 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 \ 8208 Brian Court, Garner, NC 27529 0: 919 -606 -1065, F: 919- 341 -4474 Impact Legend Ej Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp stre"ct 20M Wetland Impact' Existing Conditions §MdREGGLATi )�Y FIELD OFFICE Ripanan Buffer Top of Bank Stream Centerline rLAd Wetland - Delineated SITE 10 Zone 1 Impact: 932 sq. ft. \ Stream Impact: Zo 2 Impact: \ 31 linear ft. P � 619 s ft. l Zone 1 Impact: 929 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: i 816 sq. ft. i. Limit of construction Zone 1 Buffer °., Zone 2 Buffer 100 0 100 Feet Notes.- N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 W* design files. S `e Impact Site 10 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 O: 919 - 606 -1065, F: 919 - 341 -4474 v Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 f Ripanan Buffer Non - jurisdictional ditch Impact Legend RECEIVED Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Imp _j Wetland Impact r- i Existing Conditions Leg,�.nOiCf, REGCLATAY FIELD ( )FFICE Top of Bank Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated Zone 1 Impact: 1399 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 2043 sq. ft. 100 0 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. g Impact Site 11 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919- 606 -1065; F. 919- 341 -4474 Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 R,parian Buffer Wetland Impact: 0.01 ac. Wetland Impact: k 0.02 ac. Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact 14'd Impact Existing Conditions Legend Top of Bank I. - Stream 1� � r,� � yVC` n'( Delineated SITE 12 Wetland Impact: 100 0 100 Feet Notes: N 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. E 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. S Zone 2 Impact: 2105 sq. ft. Zone 1 Impact: 838 sq. ft. n- jurisdictional ditc Impact Site 12 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court, Garner, NC 27529 0: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919 - 341 -4474 Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Zone 2 Impa 642 sq. ft. Zone 1 748 sq. Zone 1 759 sq Zone 603 100 0 Notes.- 1. See accompanying plans for plan and pros 2. Data from DMP Au design files. Impact Legend RE CE TL D Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp Stream Impact J� Wetland Impact __ t jt - -SEP � . _ 2M Existing Conditions Legend Rlpanan Buffer Top of Bank •�•• str�IrEGC�L�I'I 1�FIEtLiilF�t1Giaratea E14 t of construction Wetland Impact: 0.01 ac. WPtlanri Imnart• 4 ewer Improvements C 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Garner, NC 27529 0: 919- 606 -1065. F: 919-341-4474 Impact Legend Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impact - Zone 2 Buffer Impact - Temp j I". t act - ",,/ Existing Conditions Legend E(' 1 2008 Riparian Buffer Top of Bank Stream Centerline lA Wetland - Delineated RALEIGH REGULAMY FIELD OFRCP Non - jurisdictional ditch- - I 100 0 100 F Notes: 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. one 2 Impact: 19 sq. ft. Impact: 1. ft. Impact: . ft. mpact: ft. Wetland Impact: 0.01 ac. Limit of construction SITE 15 _one 2 Impact: .88 sq. ft. Impact Site 15 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919 - 341 -4474 - -- - - l L.L- _ Impact Legend Buller Impact -Zone 1 Buffer Impact -Zone 2 Buffer Impact -Temp Stream XE C Existing Conditions Legend SFf' I Z��Q Riparian Buffer Top of Bank Stream Centerline Wetland - Delineated i L— — —— — — —- - - - - -- — — — — RjtL c�EGE 6�tT t�Y ff£ ±; }f}FffCl; i i i i i i i i� i� OF ♦ Notes: 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. SITE 17 Zone 2 Impact: 888 sq. ft. Limit of construction Zone 2 Buffer Zone 1 Buffer Impact Site 17 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 0 : 919 - 606 -1065, F: 919-341-4474 Buffer Impact - Zone 1 Buffer Impad - Zane 2 Riparian Buffer i i Impact Legend Buffer Imped - Temp Str ct \,Nat�d Existing Conditions Legend Top of Bank •• Stream t Wetland - Defineated ICH REG : q URY FIELD OFFICE I -- r - 1 1 I I % Zone 1 Buffe i Zone 2 Buffe� i Zone 1 Impact. 1206 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 639 sq. ft. 1 SITE 18 Stream Impact_ 31 linear ft. Wet;land Impact- - 0.03 ac. i l , 100 0 1 et Notes: 1. See accompanying engineering plans for plan and profile views. 2. Data from DMP August 2008 design files. S 1 i i i Zone 1 Impact: / 1038 sq. ft. ! Zone 2 Impact: ! 605 sq. ft. Zone 2 Impact: 620 sq. ft. Zone 1 Impact: 902 sq. ft. 1 1 Limit of construction Impact Site 18 Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, NC 09/05/08 8208 Brian Court ; Gamer, NC 27529 0: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919 341-4474 Northwest Sewer Improvements Revised Impacts Table 9/9/2008 IBuffers (square feet) L-n 11-at Site Coordinates Impacts Zone 2 tes and Chances Long Site Plan 1,233 Wetlands (acre) (Streams (linear feet) Number Sheet New Site? Cleared Maintained' Intermittent Perennial 11A 13 Yes I 0 0 I 0 0 11 INA No 1 0 0 I 0 5 12 4 No 1 0 0 1 0 _ _0 I <47 5�9 '13 2a No 1 0 0 1 0 1 26 14 N No 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 15 INA No I 0 I 0 1 0 I Q 16 INA No I 0 - _ 0 1 0 _ -0 16A 8 Yes 1 0 0 1 0 - 0 -5 p 17 19 No 1 0 0 1 0 33 Viz- 18 110 No 1 0.01 - 0:01 1 0 0 1 1.507 9 110 No 1 0 0 1 0 0 sc 10" 11 N 1 0 0 0 `31 WN 111 12 �11 INo 1 `0.04 _ _1 1 0.02 1 _ _ _ 0 0 WP 112 136.103763 INO I 0.06" 1 0.05" 1 0 + 0 113 NA No I 0 0 I 0 0 114 1_3,_14___ I No 1 0.04 OA3 I 0 31 L,) 115 114 No 1 0.01" 1 Q ] Q 116 INA INo 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 117 115,16 INo 1 0 1- 0 I 0 _ 6 _ t." 1 118 116 INo 1 0.03 1 0.02 1 0 31 1 ,` /�,1Totals I 0.19 - 0.13 I 0 199 15' maintained corridor " Previously cleared IBuffers (square feet) L-n 11-at Site Coordinates Zone 1 Zone 2 tes and Chances Long 1,826 1,233 404/401 iurisLd ditch - buffers only 0 (Corridor adjusted to avoid impacts ?;61A _ 2.982 IPpmendicuiar stream crossing 136.069406 - 80.021210 1,644 1._117 Temporary construction crossing 36.070435 - 80.020359 1 0 0 IComdor ad.usled to avoid impacts 0 0 [Corridor adjusted to avoid impacts. J 0 _ 0 ICorridor adjusted to avoid impacts 1.870 _ 1.253 - (Non 4041401 iurisd. - buffers only 2.084 1,520 Perpendicular stream crossing 36.085011 - 80.020879 0 1.744 Wetland crossin 36.087951 - 80.022097 0 1 167 Temporary buffer grading 1.861 1,435 Perpendicular stream crossing 36.092355 - 80.025122 1299 2.043 Pipeline crossing & 1 -40 boring 36.093673 - 80.028126 838 I 2.105 Wetland crossing & 1.40 boring 36,094470 - 80.029972 _ 1 0 0 (Alternate upland access being used I 1 1.507 1.245 1Perp. Stream & wetland crossing 136.096646 - 80.031903 1 1,850 I 1.746 [Non 404 /401 ditch crossin? 136.097531 - 80.032139 I 0 0 ICorridor adjusted to avoid impacts J I 0 888 IMinor buffer impact to avoid wetland I 3,146 1 1,864 ITemporary access eliminated 136.103763 - 80.029961 20,643 20,642 41.285 0 RECEIVED 50f}_ U �5 t1(yl�tr "CI-16 Gi Stream SA ., Intermittent RPW li j \r f'r II 11 Wetland WB ( Adjacent to RPW 943 Wetland WA t', 1i { a �` �' 1 `i �� \ { ` Abutting RPW f Wetland WH 1� Wetland WC`/ Abutting RPW (SB)� -�` / Adjacent to RPW �� :- ��`•� fStream SB Perennial RPW ; - °i T, 1tjfy ,') Wetland WE Abutting RPW D ' Wetland W x -.� �� Abutting RPW ' ,- " �� Perrennial RPW LJ sd Wetland WF l t /Abutting RPW etl and � WIG %r g d Adj acentto RPW t �; r• ,!! Wetland WI Abutting RPW I �1y , I —i J `� � G � � � `s it .J 1��•� �iS � , �� j I ��, ( � � .- - 1� Stream SD T k ( Perennial RPW j j )%`r Q ,';��, �� i �� `�'f,'l I}I i, •� i }�� ?`� (ice --.. _ /7 {ter 1 ,f,` � i �,i lj�! � ,_!� ! � 1� ..'4r- I � VX �`,� c .. � �� hi� 1 �at_�. :.1 r �, � ��1 �t + {�' J i t >l11+- it �; , /�/ � �y�✓._./ -; �7 j e j ! ` � � i � ,� � ,, t ljll`, ,,, , , i ' II,, ti � � ^� ,�,��\ ;A ,, ��;((��,�,,r(,J• {vi ✓ r �, ; ! 1 it �' )� �� } ,i / -�' USGS 1:24,000 93 } �i �\ ~ —9 Vt�Topographic Quad • r - I! Kernersvllle NC 'JJ <r% t ' z s i See original JD request for more detailed views of locations of ' � y . ti l/ r % / Qk wetlands and streams Stream r W (� � Perennial RP Jurisdictional Streams & Wetlands Northwest Sewer Improvements High Point, INC tl ' ----------- , --------- 0208 E3 -, C t. Garner NC 2. 529 _ \ / �! r /f - h 0 919 -6D(3-1065, F 919 - 3414474 J f I) ( t ARRMYCORPS OF ENGV1 EE N`?Y WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action ID, SAW -2008 -02092 County: {Guilford USGS Quad: Guilford GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property Owner 1 Authorized Agent: TDO Real Estate Holding. LLC -attn: Arthur Samet Address: P.O. Sox 8050 Greensboro, North Carolina 27419 Telephone No.: 336 - 544 -2+600 Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): 327 acre (approximately): The site is located approximately 2000 feet southeast of the easternmost intersection of West Market. Street and Old Greensboro Road, in Guilford County, North Carolina and is identified as the Triad Business Park. .Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for the temporary discharge of clean fill material within 0.011 acre of stream channel (125 linear feet) and 0.31 acre of iurisdictional forested wetlands at four (4) stream locations and two (2) wetland locations. These temporary impacts are associated with the installation of a sanitary sewer for the Triad Business Park. The proiect must be conducted in accordance with the application and drawings submitted on duly 21, 2008. As compensatory mitigation, for impacts to 0.31 -acre of riparian wetlands the permittee shall make payment to the North Carolina. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount determined by the NCEEP, sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.62 -acre of riparian wetlands, in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030003. Payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. Applicable Law: M Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: Regional General Permit Number: Nationwide Permit Number: 12 Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the peemittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action. This verification will remain, valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (919) 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management. This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvaWpermits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at telephone number 919- 876 -8441 extension 26. Corps Regulatory Official Date: September 12, 2008 Expiration Date of Verification: September 12. 2010 Page 1 of 4 The Wilmington District is committed to Opding the highest level of support to the publiihelp us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http : / /rePulatory.usacesurvev.com/ to complete the survey online. Determination of Jurisdiction: ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The streams are relatively permanent waters (RPW) and are unnamed tributaries to the an unnamed tributary to the West Fork of Deep River, an RPW. The West Fork of Deep River flows to and through Oak Hollow and High Point Lakes, impoundments of the West Fork of DeeD River. High Point Lake discharges to the DeeD River, a Traditionallv Navigable Water (7W), which is a tributary to the Cape Fear River, a navigable water of the United States. The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the unnamed tributary was indicated by the following physical characteristics: clear natural lineimpressed on the bank, shelving, and the destruction of terrestrial vegetation. The wetlands are contiguous with the unnamed tributary and meet the hvdroDhvtic vegetation, wetland hvdroloev. and hvdric soil criteria of the 1987 CorDS.of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The.DOnds located on site are impoundments of the unnamed tributaries. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.) Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: Andrew Williams, Project Manager, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Novemeber 10, 2008. * *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. ** Corps Regulatory Official: �� " Date September 12, 2008 Page 2 of 4 Expiration Date September 12, 2013 Action ID NWP / GP SAW-2008- NW I` 12 02092 Summa% f Authorized Impacts and Required ation Open Water (ac) Wetland (ac) Unimportant Steam (If) Important Stream (1f) Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Impact Totals 0 0 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) Required Wetland Mitigation (ac) 10.62 0.31 0.31 0 0 125 0 125 0 1 0 1 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (If) In- Lieu/EEP I Required Stream Mitigation (If) 10 Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions: Special Conditions: 1. In order to compensate for impacts to 0.31 -acre of riparian wetlands the permittee shall make payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) in the amount determined by the NCEEP, sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.62 -acre of riparian wetlands, in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030003. Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment to the NCEEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to the Corps, and the NCEEP has provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required, in compliance•with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998. 2. The Permittee shall preserve and maintain all the jurisdictional waters and wetlands at the Triad Business Park as shown on the wetlands delineation map received by the Corps of Engineers on July 21, 2008, excluding the waters /wetlands at the Project Hermes (SAW- 2008 - 01894) site. Additionally, the permittee shall preserve and maintain a 30 foot buffer around all of the stream and pond features shown on the wetlands delineation map received by the Corps of Engineers on July 21, 2008. The jurisdictional areas, including the 30 foot buffer area, is referred to as the conservation area. The permittee is prohibited from performing any of the following activities within the conservation area: Filling; grading; excavating; earth movement of any kind; construction of roads; walkways, buildings, signs, or any other structure; any activity that may alter the drainage patterns in the conservation area; the destruction, mowing, or other alteration of vegetation within the conservation area; disposal or storage of any garbage, trash, or other waste material; or any other activity which would result in the wetlands /waters being adversely impacted or destroyed. 3. Prior to December 31, 2008, the Permittee shall execute and cause to be recorded Restrictive Covenants, that comply with language specified by the Wilmington District Army Corps of Engineers Restrictive Covenant Guidance, August 2003, prohibiting those activities listed in condition 2 above. The only areas that are to be excluded from the restrictive covenants are those jurisdictional areas that have been permitted for impacts under nationwide permits for Triad Business Park (SAW- 2008 - 02092), Project Hermes (SAW- 2008 - 01894) and the City of High Point Sewer Line (SAW- 2008 - 01599). The permittee shall provide a copy of the recorded restrictive covenants to the Corps of Engineers within 30 days of recording. Remarks: Impacts to waters of the United States for this project (SAW- 2008 - 02092) and all other proposed impacts to waters of the-United States within and associated with the Triad Business Park, including two (2) additional projects, SAW- 2008 -01894 (Project Hermes) and SAW- 2008 -01599 (NE Sewerline Improvements, Phase I) are a single and complete project as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 33 CFR 330.2(i). The use of more than one Nationwide Permit (NWP) for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States authorized by the NWPs does -not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specific acreage limit. Based on the information that has been submitted to date, impacts to waters of the United States for the three (3) projects listed above, do not exceed the threshold limits of the applicable NWPs. The threshold limits of the applicable NWPs are 0.5 acre loss of waters of the United States, including 300 linear feet of stream channels with important aquatic function. Therefore, if either of these Page 3 of 4 threshold limits is exceeded within %th,oundary of Triad Business Park (includ, but not limited to, the three (3) projects listed above) then this N VP verification is not applicable to your project. SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE. Copy Furnished: Sue Homewood North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston- Salem, NC 27107 Phil May Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 8208 Brian Court Garner, North Carolina 27529 L. Allen Hill Triad Design Group, PC 4807 -C Koger Boulevard Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 Mr. Terry Houk City of High Point 211 South Hamilton Street High Point, North Carolina 27260 Brian Hall TDO Real Estate Holding, LLC P.O. Box 8050 Greensboro, North Carolina 27419 Page 4 of 4 0 W A T �9QG 6 > y O 'C Mr. William Connor FedeX Ground Package System, Inc. 1000 FedeX Drive Moon Township, PA 15108 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality August 11, 2008 DWQ# 08 -0499 Guilford County APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions and MAJOR VARIANCE APPROVAL per the Randleman River Riparian Area Protection Rule [15A NCAC 211 .02501 w/ ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Dear Mr. Connor: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 0.19 acres of wetlands, 0.22 acres of open waters, 255 linear feet of stream and 46,634 square feet of Zone 1 and 23,954 square. feet of Zone 2 of the protected Randleman Riparian Buffer in order construct the FedeX Ground Package Systems facility and associated amenities in Kernersville, NC in Guilford County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (Division) on May 27, 2008 and additional information since provided and as described in your Major Variance Request presented to the Water Quality Committee (WQC) of the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on May 7, 2008. This letter shall also act as your Major Variance approval as decided by the WQC on March 7, 2008 and described within 15A NCAC 2B .0250. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3705, which can be viewed on our web site at htto: / /www.ncwatercivality .ore_ /wetlands.html. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permits expire unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application and in your Major Variance Request. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this project (now or in the future) exceeds one acre, or total fill to perennial streams equals or exceeds 150 linear feet, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional conditions listed below: The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved: Amount Approved (Units) Stream 255 (feet) 404 /CAMA Wetlands 1 0.19 (acres) Waters 0.22 (acres) Zone 1 Buffers 46,634 (square ft.) Noe rthCarolina Zone 2 Buffers 23,954 (square ft.) alArallb( North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone (336) 771 -5000 Customer Service Winston -Salem Regional Office Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Fax (336) 771 -4630 1- 877 - 623 -6748 Internet: www.ncwateroualitv.ore An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper Mr. William Connor August 11, 2008 DWQ # 08 -0499 Page 2 2. Stream Mitigation: Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand that you wish to make a payment to the Stream and Buffer Restoration Funds administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at (919) 733 -5205 if you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have 60 days from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Stream and Buffer Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement: k Compensatory Mitigation River and Sub -basin Number Required Stream 255 (feet) West Fork Deep River 03030003 Buffer Mitigation: You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 70,588 square feet as required under this Authorization Certificate and your Major Variance Approval. We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the Division to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance with the Major Variance Approval, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at (919) 733 -5205 if you have any questions concerning payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. You have one month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 70,588 ftl of required riparian buffer mitigation of protected riparian buffers; 03- 03030003 river and subbasin. 4. Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained protective buffers in order to prevent future buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any buffers approved for impact under this Authorization Certificate. Documentation of these protection mechanisms must be submitted to the Division for final approval prior to impacting any buffers approved by this Authorization. 5. All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re- concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0250. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this certification shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification. The final, written stormwater management plan approval on letterhead from the reviewing government agency and one copy of the final approved stormwater management plan, including plan details, calculations and other supporting information (for new information or changes to that already submitted to the Division only), must be received by this Office before the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 12 in GC No. 3705. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The approved structural stormwater practices as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. 8. Any final construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and plans approved by the DWQ under this authorization letter and certification. 'Mr. William Connor August 11, 2008 DWQ # 08 -0499 Page 3 11. Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. This certificate should be returned to the Winston -Salem Regional Office of the NCDWQ at the address listed on the form. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact Sue Homewood in the DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office at 336- 771 -4964 or at sue.homewood @ncmail.net. Sincerely, Coleen H. Sullins cc: Andy Williams, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Denise Poulos, ECS Carolinas LLP, 4811 Koger Blvd, Greensboro NC 27407 Andrew Scales, Schneider Corp, 8001 Arrowridge Blvd, Charlotte NC 28273 Amy Chapman, DWQ - 401 Buffer Files Kelly Williams, NC EEP DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office DWQ Central Files DWQ Wetlands /401 Mr. William Connor August 11, 2008 DWQ # 08 -0499 Page 4 DWQ Project No.: County: Applicant: Project Name: Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: Agent's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: Engineer's Certification Partial Final I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. Date 0�0� W AT�991 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary \ Cq 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401 Water Quality Certification Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, Mr. William Connor of FedeX Ground Packaging Systems, Inc. has permission as outlined below to fill or otherwise impact 255 feet of perennial stream, 40,634 square feet of Zone 1 buffer and 23.954 square feet of Zone 2 buffers to construct the proposed distribution facility at the subject property which is located on Old Greensboro Road, Kernersville, in Guilford County, North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DWQ EXP PROJECT #: 2008 -0499 SITE NAME: FedeX Ground Packaging Systems, Inc. — Distribution Facility LOCATION: Kernersville COUNTY Guilford BASIN/ SUB BASIN Cape Fear (HUC: 03030003) As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Certification, you are required to compensate for the above. mitigable impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands, surface waters and riparian buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state. Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must be rounded to one - quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest foot according to 15 2R.0503(b). Impacts 225 linear feet of perennial stream 46,634 square ft. of Zone 1 Buffer 23,954 square ft. of Zone 2 Buffer Mitigation 225 linear feet of perennial stream 175,833 square feet of buffers One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands, Stream and Buffer Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail the form along with a copy of the 401 Certification and Variance Approval to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM. Signature Date ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM 1652 Mail Service Center RALEIGH, N.C. 27699 -1652 (919) 733 -5205 None Carolina NaAma!!y North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone (336) 771 -5000 Customer Service Winston -Salem Regional Office Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Fax (336) 771 -4630 1- 877 -623 -6748 Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.orp An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper Book 6963 Page 452 2008085841 GUILFORD CO, NC FEE $35.00 PRESENTED RECORDED: 12 -31 -2008 01:27:16 PM JEFF L. THIGPEN REGISTFROF DEEDS SY: MARY MORGAN DEPUTY -GB BK: R 6963 PG: 452 -459 NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY Prepared by and Return to: Donald G. Sparrow, Sparrow Wolf & Dennis, PA AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS r THIS AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENATNS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS made effective as of December 31, 2008. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 30, 2008, TDO Land Holding, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company ("TDO "), NB JOHNSON II, LLC and SB JOHNSON II, LLC, both Florida limited liability companies ( "Johnson ") collectively hereinafter sometimes referred to as Declarants, executed a Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations ( "Declarations "), the same being recorded in Book 6939, Page 2897, in the Guilford County Registry, and WHEREAS, Article 9 of the Declaration permits amendment by the Declarants; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a permit to TDO Land Holding, LLC to conduct certain activities and to establish certain wetlands delineation, as shown on a survey entitled "Wetlands Delineation, Triad Business Park, Deep River Township, Guilford County, Kernersville, North Carolina, prepared by Regional Land Surveyors, Inc. attached as Exhibits A and A -1; and Book 6963 Page 453 WHEREAS, as a condition to issuing said permit, entitled SAW - 2008 - 02092, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers required that Declarant place upon all areas shown as wetlands delineation on Exhibits A and A -1 of Triad Business Park, save and except Lot 4, Triad Business Park Phase I, as shown on plat recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Guilford County, North Carolina, in Plat Book 175, Pages 97 and 98 be further restricted in accordance with the restrictions set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby amend said Declaration by adding the following Article to the Declaration: ARTICLE 12: CONSERVATION AREA 12.0 The areas shown on the Wetland Delineation Plat as Conservation Areas as shown on Exhibits A and A -1 attached hereto shall be maintained in perpetuity in their natural or mitigated condition. No person or entity shall perform any of the following activities on such conservation area: a. fill, grade, excavate or perform any other land disturbing activities b. cut, mow, burn, remove, or harm any vegetation C. construct or place any roads, trails, walkways, buildings, mobile homes, signs, utility poles or towers, or any other permanent or temporary structures d. drain or otherwise disrupt or alter the hydrology or drainage ways of the conservation area C. dump or store soil, trash, or other waste f. graze or water animals, or use for any agricultural or horticultural purpose. This 31St day of December, 2008. SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW Book 6963 Page 454 TDO LAND HOLDING, LLC By: Arthur L. Samet, Manager NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY , Manager feqi�-5 , a Notary Public of North Carolina, certify that Arthur L. Samet, on behalf of 440 Land Holding, LLC personally appeared before me this day, acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated. Witness my hand and notarial seal this theL't*%ay o f 40C—.r 2008. Notary Public My commission expires: �qr p rq R cs NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY AUeR1G �G I, , a Notary Public of North Carolina, certify that , on behayof TDO Land Holding, LLC, personally appeared before me this day, acknowle ed to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose sta therein and in the capacity indicated. Witness my hand and notari My comnr is<on expires: this the day of Notary Public , 2008. Book 6963 Page 455 TDO LAND HOLDING, By; NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY , Manager I, nsrrsv e y �S , a Notary Public of . " North Carolina, certify that Arthur L. Samet, on behalf DO Land Holding, LLC personally appeared before me this day, ackonowledge to one that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose stated the in and in the he indicated. Witness my hand and notarial seal My commission expires: ,-2)�2 71d NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY J� � � of Q C.s 2QQ$. y Notary Public SOT ARy 'DV 9 LXG .*j I, 606 n , e- A A-8 L✓ , a Notary Public of 5(-1 `lam North Carolina, certify that (n rbv e r .514 ug �7 an behalf of TDOTand Holding, LLC, personally appeared before me this day, acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated. Witness my hand and notarial seal this they d y of Oe C_ , 2008. Notary Public My commission expires: ONN1,k Ow bi Nor � E 0/', ,.� •x,10 IN Book 6963 Page 456 NB JOHNSON II, LLC By. �- S E O FLORIDA tM bZatrs COUNTY I, { 1 �� , a Notary Public of��- , certify that ,00h s, on behalf of NB JOHNSON II, LLC, personally appeared before me this day, acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated. PIT Witness my hand and notarial seal thi WPPublic of �-r/, 2008. usanuYinr� `u�rup�YYneanmauuuqu� BMRLC Y FIiGEEl E 8aZ01M12 r� s Fbft Nowy Awe ' (no fl■ Y/ 4Y// Y / /Y { / /YYY /IIOiYYIn/YU. +agnn� My commission expires: Book 6963 Page 457 SB JOHNSON II, LL : t By-._ ST TE OF FLORIDA [ OJM &d/} _ COUNTY I, 4 .UUt (vv ( , a Notary Public of �r-to-k-cLC - certify that Sc+wtx � , on behalf of SB JOHNSON II, LLC, personally appeared before me this day, acknowledged to nie that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated. Witness my hand and notarial seal this the r of Q2cem. o -ev, 2008. a�.�.�rrrlruPE�I rrrinrrr� _� / ua•�" Comm# DD0794550 : Notary Public Expires 6120=12 Inc T': 1U. S-. ers1DGWAME7TF L) OlAmcnt mcntToRestrictiveCovenanis- Johnson.doc fb U-) ro a m rn m. �s 0 0 0 THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY .r•' ~. Slrri� a AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT i; x , I 1 REGULATIONS. I ►t, rill # rxf ! I II • 1 ._'• f I ,iarn...fa _i r-• f'i I I K l 1 !w U i a.•[s 4 vnlPIIW RAW �w ui "mks lie i -I r[ rt [�'�.M••'•' ^S [ L4r�l�::[ Y J}�' "��r[ l +'7r K.-1 r.�, .•a W ' i � 4w1 n M ` ` �f j ��aM•[O•.•)Y \`f �fa.�rFfF... _... t�1,�.��ry.� � ►•ay>w.�.r f //J _rp ;�' l i � .....s...� �� iiwiiZ� L JJ f l rw .r fit.' �. �� „ t �., i • �- -.«... �r �4 �, �---- '-------- ---- -- ' :n,':e'rf � �. o.• —tie. �.'. �L��'.' fixer ittred mNNSAlF ��' '.^Z �`L.�• _. ..;^,.;�"'"��e� ..` 1 .. _ rrx+xas *r`!t?r. eiRiG'�MU.. aIT t rS tr.a�1x, " ..._ *��ti: t`'1a % •ul as+•[Sn [. f�avf Book 6963 Page 459 ? !a' € �,� : i °S`4Y " �'i t ; }�{ 3! 3i i #! #!ii i� "4" i' `,",��l 39lS1! "! ' 1i7" i� ' { i0i i` " ; �S i]lS3 33�f�•� t 333! , 1115{ i 7i, 19, 1SS3 }30,11, _ }t�t�i 71.7323::�iS�S�:iil7S� ; 75�;�3:�7v:71j : 77IR", Y lf�i7�i77S3:1i�f7S7 7585 EHORIP iTiltlaY rl� ;�[ :ili: :i Y.ii 1 IS; ' A ud 3C;L :;i n:i ' '1fjt: ;iRf ;I :�Itl]3�i/ � !!!\aL \CtJ1�ai /; NJ ;t /aFli�/ ]i1 ;��;J= :jiYHf ■io ;1//lli tl' a/,',1:3 3n: a ,'.nJlY''alFe•u.e� : r.• . tS l ' . ;i! t: n ::•f t r •rn�f �• -. itlla sid �:1 � : �a:C3Lii : ;tl7 t ; ��'l�l3a�a' �� \a sM�Y �✓�R��Y � . � �Y � ��1� 1 �R:ai' �/�r�.�r ��'• i�_s �i { y �'!7 �i3� }� .�, 7575 537577 SSS777�3:�7�7'� :! ;A3 33iiYt�;s. .•� �.{+ �lLi4ii #5339 ?i : ��I,�;•s�. �! 773 SS 4r13t311 l7aS'ISSIa]L.3 ] � ! S 7 Si_.. 3 ra \a.r J ` r`u' :u : ;i/:'si31:: ;;.:7':11 1::i: ;::'.:'f::.:3:3a: ;:: i::I ;!°w.1:1;: 4 °:: 511: ::g�.ili:i :i.7 • _.:f. `a::i ;ir:3i n : ;P,li ;ii; 1p l� 'UP#!!3 ''}!!!'r�Jli•Sls. ��li 'i7 r :3755�'i5 } #��! 77SS1S�i7 =5� ; �}} ;��1�� 17�7� } }'I &�� 3:353}3:�7777557•y �Si'��7}7�73::5�3�73:� 77�� s .�757��SC . se;:;i _ ''li:r'.u4rcs� - ,; ;yi:: :i:1;'J j R75: ::: ;7 ' ;L'iift)i _, iid:a` :�:1 - ii::S•.�+C:;l, � •:.`..: �.:::: i:l:# RF::;.�.y.:.,::'::i;l:iC.,:.:'e aaa ,.a..ay.r. � u5 .. =..! T .au ...1 • F}�!i! '9!s 33 9!j9 3 4 ! }1, 7 +0=i S'Si� 1' ! !'dIS iis�'a !! #! "!i�}il6S' ii4# 4'111'! } i 13:13 =iSlj. , ;S i' i 3�; 1" ,' #s ji u! !'�'itg f 3 5;7'r >57�ii:i 97 7337 7 }3 757! � esii 7 ;xsiLis373i'i; s.:ii;i:s3 331? ss :7 � 3S:11S7s ssst i:r�* La 6513 :�.'l ii} 311 II 7 SLls s 7:�li L.. � 7S7:1i 'i1 :';�j�niaiil�ii iii:�atiii3i:iiiti vi'ieiuifinifiiltlt ax4ii:u.iriiiiiiiii ;1111 aiiiiiiYiifi�i it111lLllll:�i� :iiiia igiYri4]: iiiii�IJ�iauOiul iiiiiilY�\)seiil.i�.f %iniilif /• 1 3 }jtai � � i :let``��l'!: ! is;,•ii'3,9#al !!i` c!!!g3 ! 9Y 9S3y:7� }�yq� . M�i3i.11H� .S�if�`�:77375 m33�3s57l3H5�S�371 9 7 "!'' 'i:i 3��i3335��'7:s ! 9i' ''! °3]'11 !!�}�� ;y; j•'� •?�' 799��33'>�3i3�733?S' _ 751�X3�:s3 ' °-�� iiy � !,p'5!'��!#! : {; su} ! ii� ! u47e�s ! Zi�t:iSggij� _ i:3�Y.li 7IIifiHi�S.3s�35sS3 ;�93 S�}7ii�i�3',9l3l3�i! . 1 _ nm aao :1 - -ama -v nNimllnsi5ea13 :H:1i;:3:'.i's4 i= i35e +iGiiS: ;: "FM °. . 1:: /M/C _ Yf/ur. iiyw' h - - i-x ,{{ • m [i\n, /a:r/ra�,� :aa a'raa�n.rarrpuJn ' ;_F.0 ;a7 1p l� 'UP#!!3 ''}!!!'r�Jli•Sls. ��li 'i7 r :3755�'i5 } #��! 77SS1S�i7 =5� ; �}} ;��1�� 17�7� } }'I &�� 3:353}3:�7777557•y �Si'��7}7�73::5�3�73:� 77�� s .�757��SC . se;:;i _ ''li:r'.u4rcs� - ,; ;yi:: :i:1;'J j R75: ::: ;7 ' ;L'iift)i _, iid:a` :�:1 - ii::S•.�+C:;l, � •:.`..: �.:::: i:l:# RF::;.�.y.:.,::'::i;l:iC.,:.:'e aaa ,.a..ay.r. � u5 .. =..! T .au ...1 • F}�!i! '9!s 33 9!j9 3 4 ! }1, 7 +0=i S'Si� 1' ! !'dIS iis�'a !! #! "!i�}il6S' ii4# 4'111'! } i 13:13 =iSlj. , ;S i' i 3�; 1" ,' #s ji u! !'�'itg f 3 5;7'r >57�ii:i 97 7337 7 }3 757! � esii 7 ;xsiLis373i'i; s.:ii;i:s3 331? ss :7 � 3S:11S7s ssst i:r�* La 6513 :�.'l ii} 311 II 7 SLls s 7:�li L.. � 7S7:1i 'i1 :';�j�niaiil�ii iii:�atiii3i:iiiti vi'ieiuifinifiiltlt ax4ii:u.iriiiiiiiii ;1111 aiiiiiiYiifi�i it111lLllll:�i� :iiiia igiYri4]: iiiii�IJ�iauOiul iiiiiilY�\)seiil.i�.f %iniilif /• 1 371 3 3 :33s m5777� :93 { ;37x977 HAW N H 11 N::�� fS�\ \i�' JlHlril i; :il:li \f Yi` i3 \IfN)ru: ,' ;I �rlaai�r jit1� htpil li :l�4iil�[ ii ....'N' ... x..narn',riJ:l: .. i;4Ca:., r''ii ;a;a:.i: C; .'11111 j :C:;JJ'a,rL..:4ui:3 a t 'rb i r c V ��` 7r EWBIT A -I ' 91319011 MEMO #11% l �1377}'i7577i37f�7S �m r, S353j , 11117:1} 3ii;1:i3� ii }7151011i"111 ii! 547]SiS�CiS7lSNlSSiSj - 317�5713f4! j i� 1,7}7777i0.1 {{1 ;;e:ii ;ua ' +tE3s +ii:i ± a +u,:14CC :911 :ii3tii :i ::; .:: €:S;:i:ii:e 1:11713 ;S:Fn'YC ::: ; ;:: ;:7.1 :: :T.,i:C::ii ' aL'rF::E4::u;: ;iYl: o/t 371 3 3 :33s m5777� :93 { ;37x977 HAW N H 11 N::�� fS�\ \i�' JlHlril i; :il:li \f Yi` i3 \IfN)ru: ,' ;I �rlaai�r jit1� htpil li :l�4iil�[ ii ....'N' ... x..narn',riJ:l: .. i;4Ca:., r''ii ;a;a:.i: C; .'11111 j :C:;JJ'a,rL..:4ui:3 a t 'rb i r c V ��` 7r EWBIT A -I APPENDIX VII ALTERNATIVE'S ANALYSIS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION is • DAVENPORT Transportation Analysis Triad Business Park Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment Guilford County, NC Prepared for Samet Corporation September 5, 2014 Analysis by: Mary Morgan, P.E. Drafting /Graphics by: Mary Morqan, P.E. Reviewed by: John M. Davenport, Jr, P.E. Nick Liguori, P.E Sealed by: Mary Morqan, P.E. ti 11W This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post- consumer content. All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is * 100% recyclable. �■ This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Home Office: 305 West Fourth Street, Suite 2A Serving the Southeast since 2002 Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 DAVE MO RT Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment Guilford County, NC Prepared for Samet Corporation September 5, 2014 Executive Summary This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road through the Triad Business Park to Bunker Hill Road. The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots. DAVENPORT previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007 and provided recommendations for interim (Phase 1) and full build conditions. A portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. Old Greensboro Road runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream near the center of the site. The proposed extension of Old Greensboro Road will extend it from its existing eastern terminus to Bunker Hill Road. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. The following intersections were included in the study: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance • Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive • Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road • 1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road • 1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps To determine the impacts of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road, the above - mentioned intersections were analyzed for the following two scenarios: • Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension • Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension Assuming an absorption rate of 15 acres per year, a buildout year of 2028 was utilized for this analysis. This analysis was carried out based on North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) typical standards. Information regarding the property was provided by the developer, Samet Corporation. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary DAVE MO RT Benefits of the Old Greensboro Road Extension This section discusses the benefits of the Old Greensboro Road Extension and its impacts on roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. Capacity of Roadway Network As shown in the capacity analysis results, the surrounding roadway network is anticipated to be at or near capacity in future build conditions. With the extension of Old Greensboro Road, site traffic will be able to remain onsite using the extension when traveling to and from the west (see Exhibit A of the report). Without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, site traffic will have to travel on Bunker Hill Road then to Mountain Street to reach destinations to the west. Therefore, the Extension helps relieve congestion on offsite roadways and intersections by keeping the Triad Business Park traffic onsite. This results in improved level of service for the following intersections: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS E to LOS C) • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access (LOS B to LOS A) • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D) • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS C to LOS B) Additionally, the new 1 -40 Business interchange at Macy Grove Road that will be constructed with TIP U -2800 provides an ideal access to the interstate for truck traffic traveling to and from the Triad Business Park. The next nearest interchange with 1 -40 is located at Sandy Ridge Road, east of the site. This interchange currently experiences capacity deficiencies and is anticipated to worsen in future conditions as traffic volumes continue to grow. Therefore, the Extension will provide a more direct access to the interstate for Triad Business Park traffic and diverts site traffic from the congested interchange at Sandy Ridge Road. Travel Time As shown in Exhibit A of the report, site traffic traveling to /from the west from the eastern portion of the Triad Business Park will be routed around the site without the Old Greensboro Road Extension. This results in additional travel distance, travel time and emissions for affected site traffic. Site traffic will travel an additional distance of approximately 1.25 miles without the Extension and based on SimTraffic model results, will have approximately six minutes of additional travel time. Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time, distance, and emissions. Furthermore, since offsite intersections will experience increased traffic without the Extension, this will increase the delay, travel time, and emissions at affected intersections for both site traffic and background traffic. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary ii 0. DAVENPORT Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings The Old Greensboro Road Extension would allow for truck traffic to avoid the highway - rail grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road. This crossing is located just south of the intersection at Mountain Street. The control devices at this crossing consist of active flashing red lights and gates and a railroad crossing sign (Crossbuck, R15 -1) is provided at the crossing. In addition, advance warning signs (W10 -1) and grade crossing pavement markings are provided in advance of the crossing. As discussed in the Methodology section of this report, 15% of site traffic was assumed to travel to /from the west on Mountain Street and 40% was assumed to travel to /from the new 1 -40 Business interchange on Macy Grove Road. With the Extension in place, site traffic traveling to /from the west on Mountain Street will be able to remain on Old Greensboro Road and then travel on Business Park Drive to reach their destination. This site traffic would travel through the grade crossing located on Business Park Drive. Site traffic traveling to /from the new interchange on Macy Grove Road will be able to access the site directly from Old Greensboro Road and not travel through any at grade crossings. Without the Extension, affected site traffic will be rerouted around the site and through the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road to reach these destinations. Consequently, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the safety of this grade crossing by reducing the volumes of truck traffic on Bunker Hill Road. Moreover, the Extension will result in reduced traffic on all of the grade crossings in the area; this is due to the creation of a route from the new interchange on Macy Grove Road for site traffic via Old Greensboro Road without any rail crossings. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary iii DAVE MO RT Safety — General The frequency of accidents generally increases with the amount of vehicle -miles traveled. By reducing the travel time and distance of site traffic, this will tend to reduce the frequency and probability of accidents offsite. Also, the safety of an intersection can be improved with better level of service and operation. As discussed, the extension of Old Greensboro Road is anticipated to improve the operation of several offsite intersections. The improved operation will enhance the safety of these intersections. In addition, the Extension will decrease the offsite truck traffic associated with the Triad Business Park. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street. Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area As outlined in this report, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. This will inherently benefit the operations within the Park by provide safer and more efficient travel to and from the site. The Extension also allows site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to and from destinations within the Triad Business Park itself. This will enhance internal operations while relieving offsite congestion. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad Business Park. Without the Extension, the majority of site traffic from the eastern portion of the Park will have to travel through the intersection of Market Street at Bunker Hill Road. This intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service under this scenario (more information can be found in the Capacity Analysis section of this report). This is expected even with the recent improvements of TIP R -2611. As previously discussed, the lack of the Extension will also result in increased travel time and delay for affected site traffic. Therefore, the future construction of the remainder of the Triad Business Park is encumbered without the extension of Old Greensboro Road. The Triad Business Park has the ability to serve the Kernersville area with job growth, increased tax base, and overall economic development. As previously discussed, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the surrounding area with improved roadway capacity, operation, and safety. Therefore, the Extension will serve as a benefit to the Kernersville area. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary iv DAVE MO RT Recommendations The extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to enhance the operation of the surrounding roadway network by reducing offsite traffic and keeping site traffic within the site. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad Business Park and enhance onsite operations. Lastly, the Extension is anticipated to benefit the surrounding area with improved traffic operations and safety while also supporting future economic growth. The recommended cross section for the extension is three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn lane. Consistent with the prior study conducted by DAVENPORT for the Triad Business Park in 2007, the following improvements are recommended for the Proposed Access at Bunker Hill Road: • Signalization • A southbound right turn lane with 150 feet of storage • Separate right and left turn egress lanes The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots and if Old Greensboro Road extension is implemented. If needed, the future interchange of Macy Grove Road at 1 -40 Business can be further evaluated in the future when it is in operation to better determine expected operation and any needs. The recommended improvements are depicted in Figure 10 of the report. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary v DAVE MO RT Summary and Conclusion The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots and DAVENPORT previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007. A portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road through the Triad Business Park to Bunker Hill Road. Old Greensboro Road runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream near the center of the site. The proposed extension of Old Greensboro Road will extend it from its existing eastern terminus to Bunker Hill Road. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. Two scenarios were considered in this analysis: Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension; and Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension. The capacity analysis of this study found that the construction of the Extension results in improved level of service for the following offsite intersections: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS E to LOS C) • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access (LOS B to LOS A) • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D) • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS C to LOS B) This is due to the fact that site traffic is able to remain onsite when traveling to /from the west instead of being routed around the site and increasing traffic on offsite roadways. Less traffic on the offsite roadways results in improved level of service, delay, and safety for the affected intersections. Furthermore, the Extension will decrease the truck traffic associated with the Triad Business Park on offsite roadways and rail grade crossings. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid rail crossings and interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street. The absence of the Extension results in additional travel time, distance, and emissions for site traffic traveling from the eastern portion of the park to destinations to the west. An additional distance of 1.25 miles and time of approximately six minutes is estimated. Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time. Also, the extension will enhance internal operations by provide adequate access and allowing site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to destinations within the Triad Business Park. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary vi DAVE MO RT Based on the results of this study, the extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park, and enhance the safety and operation of the surrounding roadway network. The recommended cross section for the extension is three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn lane. Other improvements include signalization and turn lanes, consistent with the prior study conducted by DAVENPORT for the Triad Business Park in 2007, at the Proposed Access at Bunker Hill Road. The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots, particularly if Old Greensboro Road extension is constructed. In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of the proposed Old Greensboro Road Extension, and has determined that its construction is necessary in order to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park and improved operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. 9/5/14 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary vii 0- � DAVENPORT Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment Guilford County, NC Prepared for Samet Corporation September 5, 2014 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Figure1 — Site Plan ................................................................................................... ............................... 3 Figure2A — Site Location .......................................................................................... ............................... 4 Figure2B — Vicinity Map ............................................................................................ ............................... 5 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................. ............................... 6 2.1 Inventory ............................................................................................................. ............................... 6 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................... ............................... 6 Figure 3 — Existing Lane Geometry ............................................................................ ..............................7 Figure 4 — 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................. ............................... 8 3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements ............................... ............................... 9 3.1 Approved Developments .................................................................................... ............................... 9 3.2 Committed Improvements ................................................................................... .............................10 Figure5 — Future Lane Geometry ............................................................................. .............................11 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................... .............................12 4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards ..................................................................... .............................12 4.2 Trip Generation ................................................................................................... .............................13 4.3 Trip Distribution ................................................................................................... .............................14 4.4 Future No -Build Traffic ........................................................................................ .............................14 4.5 Future Build Traffic ............................................................................................. .............................14 Exhibit A — Site Traffic Rerouting with & Without Extension ...................................... .............................15 Figure 6A — Project Trip Distribution without the Extension ...................................... .............................16 Figure 6B — Project Trip Distribution with the Extension ........................................... .............................17 Figure 7 — 2028 Future No -Build Volumes ................................................................ .............................18 Figure 8A — Site Trips without the Extension ............................................................. .............................19 Figure 8B — Site Trips with the Extension ................................................................ ............................... 20 Figure 9A — 2028 Future Build Volumes without the Extension .............................. ............................... 21 Figure 9B — 2028 Future Build Volumes with the Extension ..................................... .............................22 5.0 Capacity Analysis .............................................................................................. ............................... 23 5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria .................................................................. ............................... 23 5.2 Discussion of Results ......................................................................................... .............................24 5.3 Level of Service Summary ................................................................................ ............................... 26 6.0 Benefits of the Old Greensboro Road Extension ........................................... ............................... 27 6.1 Capacity of Roadway Network ........................................................................... .............................27 6.2 Travel Time ......................................................................................................... .............................27 6.3 Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings .......................................................... ............................... 28 6.4 Safety — General ............................................................................................... ............................... 29 6.5 Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area ............................. .............................29 7.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................... .............................30 Figure 10 — Recommended Roadway Improvements ............................................... .............................31 9.0 Summary and Conclusion ................................................................................. ............................... 32 Appendix..................................................................................................................... ............................... 34 TripGeneration ........................................................................................................ ............................... 35 Levelof Service Analysis ........................................................................................... .............................36 TrafficVolume Data ................................................................................................. ............................... 45 ApprovedDevelopment ............................................................................................. .............................46 TIPInformation .......................................................................................................... .............................47 SupportingDocumentation ........................................................................................ .............................48 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment DAVENPORT Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment Guilford County, NC Prepared for Samet Corporation September 5, 2014 1.0 Introduction This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road through the Triad Business Park to Bunker Hill Road. The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford County, NC. Figure 1 provides a site plan and Figures 2A and 2B provide site location and vicinity maps, respectively. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots. DAVENPORT previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007 and provided recommendations for interim (Phase 1) and full build conditions. A portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. Old Greensboro Road runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream near the center of the site. The proposed extension of Old Greensboro Road will extend it from its existing eastern terminus to Bunker Hill Road. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. The following intersections were included in the study: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance • Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive • Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road • 1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road • 1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps To determine the impacts of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road, the above - mentioned intersections were analyzed for the following two scenarios: • Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension • Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension Assuming an absorption rate of 15 acres per year, a buildout year of 2028 was utilized for this analysis. This analysis was carried out based on North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) typical standards. Information regarding the property was provided by the developer, Samet Corporation. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 2 0- � DAVENPORT W- mss, Q NOSIIM A"D Wvoj Figure 1 —Site Plan Nne 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 3 0 FIGURE 2A SITE LOCATION MAP SITE INDICATOR I FIGURE 2B STUDY INTERSECTIONS VICINITY MAP EXISTING PROPOSED DAV LNPCORT 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Inventory A field investigation was conducted by DAVENPORT staff to determine the existing roadway conditions in the study area. Table 2.1 contains the results of this effort. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane geometry. Bunker Hill Road SR 2007 Old Greensboro Road SR 1846 Business Park Drive 1994 Macy Grove Road 1860 1 -40 Business 421 2 -lane undivided Approx. 20 feet 35 MPH NCDOT 2 -lane undivided Approx. 22 feet 45 MPH NCDOT 2 -lane divided 2 -lane w/ TWLTL Approx. 50 feet Not posted NCDOT at site 2 -lane undivided Approx. 22 feet 45 MPH NCDOT 8 -lane divided Approx. 96 65 MPH NCDOT feet 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff. Table 2.2 contains the dates these counts were conducted. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. More information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix. Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive DAVENPORT 8/5/2014 DAVENPORT 8/5/2014 DAVENPORT 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 6 A N 3 m o m G7 C C SPEED LIMIT 45 1 -40 Business a n O -i N O O O This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. d CL v m cn o x L 50' 0 0 i TD 5 Mountain Street AADT 7100 -. 0 o 0 AADT 7800 . 75' J► '4 75' W N Ln n -600' N M ROADWAY n N CA N � SPEED LIMIT CJt Old Greensboro Road `" ~ 1r 7r Jr 45 �► �► 200' 1 BLACK = EXISTING N) 3 m o m G7 C C SPEED LIMIT 45 1 -40 Business a n O -i N O O O This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. x z 0 W CL M I TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED 0 0 INTERECTION S . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION n ROADWAY n �► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT w 0 ° 0 L 300' BLACK = EXISTING N) 4— E, 4ALYZED ~ r 300' BLUE= PROPOSED Street CpMarket 200' , iii 200' n o 0 n y W O O x z 0 W CL M I TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N r L_J m m � I -40 Business I This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.'` NOT TO SCALE" d 0 CL N) INTERSECTION � A W cN0 127/114 oo W 1 6 / 32 227 / 793 w J ' j -11 1 �► 4- 255 / 670 48 / 56 r 5 / 25 4 I Mountain Street rool 0 Market Street 15/42 1 266 / 295 17/86 1 0 1 1 433 / 273 ---� h 1 %� 58/43 pp j 8/22- \� m co a p M m w w W O < N � N O O � d w rn F 1 4/6 Old Greensboro Road 41 1 / 0 228/155 1 2/4� F m x M 0 W 0. I -40 Business I This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.'` NOT TO SCALE" ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE = PROPOSED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE = PROPOSED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 DAVENPORT 3.OApproved Developments and Committed Improvements 3.1 Approved Developments Approved developments are developments that have been recently approved in the area, but not yet constructed. There are two (2) developments in the vicinity of the project to be included in the analysis. The Kernersville Medical Center and the VA Healthcare Center are located on Kernersville Medical Parkway in Kernersville, NC. An update to the traffic analysis for this development was last provided by Little John Engineering Associates in 2014. The site consists of a hospital, VA Clinic, medical offices, and the Blue Diamond Site which proposes retail, office, and industrial uses. Currently, the hospital has been constructed and is in operation. Therefore, potential trips from the VA Clinic, medical offices, and Blue Diamond Site were estimated and distributed onto the study area roadways. Another development in the area is the Carrollton Mixed Use Development. The proposed Carrollton Mixed -Use Development is located on the southwest quadrant of NC 66 and Old Salem Road in Kernersville, North Carolina. The transportation impact analysis was last updated by DAVENPORT in 2013 for this development. The proposed development will ultimately consist of retail, residential, and a commercial /business park. The development has a trip generation potential of 1,236 net trips in the AM peak and 1,673 net trips in the PM peak. Given this development's location, the background growth rate applied to existing volumes was assumed to account for traffic associated with this development. More information related to the approved developments can be found in the Supporting Documentation section of the appendix. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 9 0 DAVENPORT 3.2 Committed Improvements Committed Improvements are improvements that are planned by NCDOT, a local municipality, or a developer in the area, but not yet constructed. Per NCDOT, there are two (2) committed improvement in the study area. Project R -2611 is currently underway and involves widening Market Street to a multi- lane facility from Colfax to NC 68. The intersection of Market Street at Bunker Hill Road has been improved as part of this project to include additional through lanes and turn lanes. These improvements were assumed to be in place in existing conditions. TIP U -2800 involves widening Macy Grove Road to multi -lanes north of Industrial Park Drive. The project includes construction of an interchange with 1 -40 Business. Macy Grove Road will be grade separated from Mountain Street and will junction with Mountain Street with a roundabout configuration. The project will also remove the western leg of the Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road intersection, making it a signalized T- intersection. TIP U -2800 is scheduled to be complete in October 2015. TIP U -4734 proposes to extend Macy Grove Road north of Mountain Street to NC 150 (North Main Street). This project is currently unfunded for construction and therefore not considered in this analysis. A graphical representation of all committed improvements is shown in Figure 5. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 10 A N T C %-1001 350' A O 1 1 1 ~ r 550' C 0 tip W 0 0 a 350' 4. c F 1 1 r 400' r 350' J T c r r C r r 11� V O �► 0 t i �► 700' N u, Old Greensboro Road 1 -40 Business L 300' O p �� O O '- 4 JA 1 t. r 300' Mountain Street O Market Street 0 200' J -, i Ff. 200' o 0 GI 1 G Jr J c Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W I ID M 0 CL * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 O SIGNALIZED Ca -0 011 INTERSECTION CF, o x L 50' INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / 0 r 225' ROUNDABOUT J 75' o --► 75' �° N � -600' N n N CA N � v, F Jr 200' J 1 -40 Business L 300' O p �� O O '- 4 JA 1 t. r 300' Mountain Street O Market Street 0 200' J -, i Ff. 200' o 0 GI 1 G Jr J c Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W I ID M 0 CL * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE= PROPOSED TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 O SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION • LINSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT Ir� V ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY --► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE= PROPOSED TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 DAV LNPORT 4.0 Methodology 4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted NCDOT standards. The following table contains a summary of the base assumptions: Background Traffic Annual Growth Rate 2.0% per year for all roadways Analysis Software Synch ro/Si mTraffic Version 7.0 Sidra Intersection Version 5.1 Base Signal Timing /Phasing Provided by NCDOT Lane widths 12 feet Truck percentages 3% 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 12 DAV LNPORT 4.2 Trip Generation As indicated earlier, the Triad Business Park consists of over 300 acres comprised of 14 lots. Table 4.2 provides a summary of the developed and remaining acreage per lot. 9.26 33.53 30.47 125.74 14.31 12.98 25.3 6.05 28.4 14.77 7.65 7.95 16.44 8.27 15 125.74 9.26 18.53 30.47 0 14.31 12.98 25.3 6.05 28.4 14.77 7.65 7.95 16.44 8.27 Consistent with the TIA prepared by DAVENPORT in 2007, site densities for each lot were determined by using densities of square footage per acre at a comparable industrial park (Union Cross Industrial Park, Forsyth County - 5,960 square feet per acre). TripGen 2013 software, based on the 9`" edition of ITE Trip Generation Manual, was used to project trips for this development. Table 6.3 presents the results. Triad Business Park - Remaining Development Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak PM Peak Two -Way Hour Hour Land Use ITE Land Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Code General Light 110 1,194 Th.Sq.Ft. 8,819 1,162 158 186 1,364 Industrial GFA Total Trips 8,819 1,162 158 186 .- 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park - Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 13 DAVENPORT 4.3 Trip Distribution Site trips for the remainder of the Triad Business Park development were distributed based on the existing traffic patterns and engineering judgment. The directional distributions for site trips are as follows: • 30% to and from the east on Market Street • 25% to and from the west on 1 -40 Business • 15% to and from the west on Mountain Street • 15% to and from the east on 1 -40 Business • 10% to and from the south on Bunker Hill Road • 5% to and from the north on Bunker Hill Road With the extension in place, all site traffic entering and exiting from Macy Grove Road and the new 1 -40 Business interchange to the west will be able to access the site by using Old Greensboro Road. Without the extension in place, site traffic on the east side of the Triad Business Park will have to travel around the site via Bunker Hill Road, to Mountain Street, then finally to the new roundabout to access Macy Grove Road. Exhibit A provides a depiction of the routing of site traffic with and without the extension. The project trip distribution is shown in Figure 6A for the scenario without the Old Greensboro Road Extension and Figure 6B for the scenario with the extension 4.4 Future No -Build Traffic The 2028 future no build traffic volumes were computed by applying a 2.0% compounded annual growth rate to the 2014 existing traffic volumes. Future traffic volumes along Macy Grove Road were estimated by using traffic volume forecasts associated with TIP U -2800. These volumes were converted from two -way AADT to peak hour volumes using the NCDOT Volume Breakout Spreadsheet. Forecast volumes from years 2012 and 2030 were interpolated to obtain 2028 estimates. Volumes along Macy Grove Road were balanced by using forecast volumes from the future interchange and adjusting down, where necessary, to account for traffic due to the Triad Business Park. More information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix. Figure 7 shows the 2017 future no build traffic volumes for AM and PM peaks. 4.5 Future Build Traffic The 2028 build -out traffic volume was obtained by summing the 2028 future no build volumes and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips without the extension are shown in Figure 8A and with the extension in Figure 8B. 2028 future build volumes are shown for the scenarios with and without the Old Greensboro Road extension in Figures 9A and 9B, respectively. More information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 14 I EXHIBIT A ROUTE WITHOUT EXTENSION SITE TRAFFIC REROUTING WITH & ROUTE WITH EXTENSION WITHOUT EXTENSION PROPOSED EXTENSION N r,*"4\ N Z L 25% OUT �► 15% OUT 15% IN --- N 0 r 15% OUT 1 0 Old Greensboro Road o t 1 N � 8 8 0 0 Z Z v O C O A N 0 0 00 C C --i ---1 .j I It .__.... d CL v 35% OUT 0 r 15% IN 0 35% IN 0 h 5% IN O7 o' m O w - U [n N c o � lu Z Z x L 20% OUT �► X15% OUT r, r— Jr- 10% IN ---► 1 -40 Business C71 0 Z n 55% OUT 1 } 10% OUT - h_ O Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W c 7 m 2 M O m O. 15° ,�o IVF NODE TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED o 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT *-10% IN o y Z r 20% IN ROADWAY Mountain Street rol Market TRAFFIC MOVEMENT 1 Street 5% OUT �► 4% %* BLACK = EXISTING 10% OUT 35% IN W N o GREEN = COMMITTED o e O O ORIGIN C71 0 Z n 55% OUT 1 } 10% OUT - h_ O Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W c 7 m 2 M O m O. 15° ,�o IVF NODE TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N 4— 15% OUT �3 15% IN --- r 40% OUT N 0 Old Greensboro Road 0 �► A 0 Z fll O C O A N � 0 0 00 C C -q d a v x r15 %IN 0 0 15% IN --* O h t- 8;11 cn W o C v M O O N N c 0 l lu Z Z x L 30% OUT t'► 4-40% OUT r � 35% IN IN �► 1 -40 Business O Z 20%OUT a h 10% OUT --4 0 Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W c 7 m 2 M O m O. 15° ,�o IVF NODE TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED 0 (INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT *-10% IN o y Z r 20% IN ROADWAY Mountain Street FQj Market —pi.- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT , 0 I Street 5% OUT 10% OUT--* BLACK = EXISTING N GREEN = COMMITTED O 0 N ORIGIN O Z 20%OUT a h 10% OUT --4 0 Z This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. W c 7 m 2 M O m O. 15° ,�o IVF NODE TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N A CD N W O L 285 / 106 4-212/114 r0 /0 365 / 266 1 114 / 212 -ENO I O C 0/0 ^ + O O O w CO w CO rn w � l� o 0 0 L 8/8 r 467 / 244 Old Greensboro Road (� N � J CO J O) N J (0 J SIGNALIZED W � INTERSECTION Cr, J UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION v Cl) J CD ° O L 8/42 300 /1046 -11 �► C O r 7/33 rool A J w (n cn w w 20/55) 351 / 389 wJ 196/33 wa +-0 /0 1J 1 r 731/527 11/29-), NOS N 0 O v 0 'w m N t rn O J W W I I co-: C.P OO N J O O 14 w co F 0 453 / 33 1 0 0 X10 /0 0 /0� r (� N � J CO J O) I -40 Business I This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.'` NOT TO SCALE" 0 SIGNALIZED d CL INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION O \ O L36/150 Cl) J CD ° L 8/42 300 /1046 -11 �► 336 / 884 63/ 74 r 7/33 rool Mountain Street 0 Market Street 20/55) 351 / 389 i 22 /113) 0 571 / 360 ---� '111 i e. 77/57 pp o 11/29-), NOS N ' v w 'w m N W N N Q 00 d w co F %-5/8 4 X10 /0 x301 / 205 3/5� m M O W O. I -40 Business I This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.'` NOT TO SCALE" I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N r*"**\ N O 0 0 L 40/341 0 0 - 24 / 205 tt�r0 /0 0/0— y 1 174/28 ►I o 0 0 0 /0--* 0 0 0 A O L 0/0 C,O 0 r 24 / 205 0 Old Greensboro Road ° i r' V 4CD 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** fll d CL L1 iii Q O INTERSECTION A A N O L 2 2 2 00o Ao L174/28 �Q +-0 /0 «r 1 r 0/0 Mountain Street rool 0 0/o J 407 / 65 ---* -% t r, 0 58 / 9 pp °o o 0 N W O N p 7 O �t O N L� O Ary I FO A O N � II F L 32 / 273 O O C71 1 O 0 291 /47J 0 87/750 1 ° 0 /0� w o/o 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 d CL O 0 INTERSECTION . W O O L 0/0 2 2 2 00o 0/ 0 co 0o X116/19 -11 1 �► �� 55 / 477 174 / 28 r 232 / 37 Mountain Street rool Market Street rool 0/o J 407 / 65 ---* -% t r, 8/68 J 16 / 136 --O� ti t r 58 / 9 pp °o o 407 / 65 C o N N W O N p 7 O A O N V . N N � N � W V W W O n ? co M d m 'C"0) F L 32 / 273 N 4---24/205 O �- Jr T 0/0j 87/750 1 ° 116/19 16/136 rn m W C 3 2 X O N C 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N r-'� 0 o O t– 0/0 0 0 0 24 / 205 �l�►�r0 /0 0/01�� t 174/28 o O o 0 /0 0 0 0 22 lt.. NO L 0/0 r 63 / 546 Old Greensboro Road i� o +> rn o N A 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** fll SIGNALIZED L1 iii O- O INTERSECTION A A N O L m x Ao L174/28 �Q +-0 /0 «r 1 r 0/0 -11 1 �► 0 r 232 / 37 O Mountain Street p0 Market Street 0 O i �t 174/28 O N Ary 0/0'7 0 oN FO A O N � II O O N V O O (r N N 1 W N Cr, !R O 291 / 47 1 0 F 0/0� w o/o 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 SIGNALIZED d CL INTERSECTION . 0 0 o m x INTERSECTION � o 0 L.0 /0 000 L 0/0 co C0 X116/19 -11 1 �► 4 -0 /0 174 / 28 r 232 / 37 l Mountain Street p0 Market Street 0 01 J 0 � O i / 68 16%136 ti i r 174/28 �p o� 0/0'7 0 oN y p 7 N O N O O O O N V N N N cn Ut W N Cr, !R lu N m F L 47 / 409 X63/546 1r� O T 0/ 0 1 32 / 273, O 407/65 16/136 rn W C 7 i 2 M O W C 1 -40 Business 4 22 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is O O intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N A ? N A C L 325 / 447 X236/319 r0 /0 365 / 266 1 t 288/240--*I ° o O 0 /0--* 0 0 0 0) `? L8/8 4 00 r 491 / 449 INTERSECTION 0 Old Greensboro Road p1 xL8/42 ° L 36/150 CD +� rn° _ 416 /1065 Coa� w� 391 / 1361 237 / 102 N CD r 239 / 70 Mountain Street rool fll 0 Market Street 20/55) 758 / 454 L1 iii 135 /66 Q O J W c0 J A W J j - L 370 / 61 A° +-0 /0 1J 1 r 731/527 0 O W N OD N N M O N 0 N t ° rn rn 4---34/205 —�Il llL�� I c0 J C-: cT N� O c" l' W N N Jr 14 x301 / 205 1 0 87 / 750 1 744 / 80 1 0 0 16/136 0 /0� r 1 -40 Business W This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is N intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse vof, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorizatior cn rn and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 SIGNALIZED d CL INTERSECTION . J o p1 xL8/42 �' : L 36/150 J ° _ 416 /1065 ; -11 1 391 / 1361 237 / 102 r 239 / 70 Mountain Street rool 0 Market Street 20/55) 758 / 454 30/1811 0 587 / 496 --O� h j r 135 /66 0 418/94 rn No — O 00 O N A N N N A O W N OD N N M Wp � N F L 37/281 N 4---34/205 O Jr x301 / 205 1 87 / 750 1 0 h 119/24 16/136 rn W C 3 2 X O N C 1 -40 Business W This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is N intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse vof, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorizatior cn rn and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 N A CD N W C L 285 / 106 00 X236/319 r0 /0 365 / 266 288 / 240 . o 0/0-4 O O O rn D L 8/8 00 r 530 / 790 W OD 0 Old Greensboro Road ° J CA CPJ O W A W 1 -40 Business W This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is N intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse vof, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorizatior cn rn and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** fll SIGNALIZED d CL INTERSECTION L1 iii o Q C INTERSECTION L36/150 J w c0 J A W J L 370/61 A° 4-0/0 1J 1 r 731/527 rool 0 0 Market Street 20/55) 351 / 389 O 1 30/1811 0 587 / 496 --I� h r 0 pp o ao t ° rn rn —�Il llL�� I c0 J c-: cT N� O c" l' W N N 14 W N W N N W A 0 N 744 / 80 1 0 0 O 0 0 /0� 1 -40 Business W This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is N intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse vof, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorizatior cn rn and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 SIGNALIZED d CL INTERSECTION . o xL8/42 INTERSECTION L36/150 Cl) J CD ° RIGHT OUT _ 416 /1065 336 / 884 237 / 102 r 239 / 70 rool Mountain Street 0 Market Street 20/55) 351 / 389 1 30/1811 0 587 / 496 --I� h r 251/8 5 pp o ao 11/29--* ��+� N ° M O \ 7 v W N W N N W A N0 N A O 0 N N l d W N N can F L 52/417 73 / 546 1r� O x301 / 205 1 32 / 273, O h 410/70 16/136 O W C 7 i 2 M O W C 1 -40 Business W This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is N intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse vof, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorizatior cn rn and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT I ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED AM /PM PEAKS TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 DAVENPORT 5.0 Capacity Analysis 5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria The Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes a term "level of service" to measure how traffic operates in intersections and on roadway segments. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of service "A" represents the best conditions and Level of Service "F" represents the worst. Synchro Traffic Modeling software was used to determine the level of service for studied intersections. Note for unsignalized intersection analysis, the level of service noted is for the worst approach of the intersection. This is typically the left turn movement for the side street approach, due to the number of opposing movements. All worksheet reports from the analyses can be found in the Appendix. Levels of Service and Control Delay Criteria Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Control Delay Per Level of Service Delay Range vehicle (sec) (sec) A _ <10 A <_10 B >10and < -20 B >10and < -15 C >20and < -35 C >15and - <25 D >35and <55 D >25and < -35 E >55and580 E >35and < -50 F > 80 F > 50 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 23 DAVENPORT 5.2 Discussion of Results The results of the capacity analysis are discussed by intersection below: Market Street at Bunker Hill Road This signalized intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS B in the AM peak and LOS E in the PM peak in future conditions without the extension of Old Greensboro Road. With the extension in place, the LOS will remain at B during the AM peak, and improve to LOS C during the PM peak. Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access The proposed access on Bunker Hill Road was assumed to have the recommended improvements in place from the prior 2007 study which include signalization, a southbound right turn lane, and separate right and left turn egress lanes. With these improvements, LOS A is anticipated during the AM peak and LOS B during the PM peak in the scenario without the extension. In the scenario with the Old Greensboro Road extension, LOS A is expected to remain during the AM peak, and the LOS will be improved to LOS A during the PM peak. Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance Without the Old Greensboro Road extension, LOS C is anticipated during the AM peak and LOS E during the PM peak in future build conditions. With the extension in place, the intersection is anticipated to be improved to LOS B during the AM peak and LOS D during the PM peak. Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive The southbound approach of this unsignalized intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS D during the AM peak and LOS B during the PM peak without the Old Greensboro Road extension. With the extension in place, site traffic will have the opportunity to remain onsite and travel through this intersection to reach Macy Grove Road and the new 1 -40 Business interchange. While this will relieve congestion and delay on offsite roadways, this intersection will experience increased traffic and delay with the extension in place and operate at LOS F and E during the AM and PM peaks, respectively. As the Triad Business Park continues development of lots and if Old Greensboro Road extension is implemented, this intersection can be further evaluated for improvements to improve the LOS and accommodate future traffic volumes. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 24 DAVENPORT Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road This intersection will be signalized and three - legged in future conditions. LOS C is anticipated during the AM and PM peaks for the scenario without the extension. Increased traffic on the minor road (Old Greensboro Road) is anticipated with the extension in place and the intersection is estimated to operate at LOS D and C during the AM and PM peaks, respectively. 1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road In the scenario without the Old Greensboro Road extension, LOS C and F are anticipated during the AM and PM peaks, respectively. This is anticipated to remain unchanged in the scenario with the extension in place. As discussed in the Methodology section of this report, future traffic volumes at this interchange were estimated by using TIP forecast volumes. If needed, this interchange can be further evaluated in the future when it is in operation with actual traffic volumes to better determine expected operation and any needs. 1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road For both scenarios with and without the Old Greensboro Road extension, LOS E is anticipated during the AM peak and LOS D during the PM peak. As discussed with the eastbound ramps, this interchange can be further evaluated in the future if necessary. Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps This future intersection will be a roundabout and serve as the junction between Mountain Street and Macy Grove Road. In the scenario without the extension, LOS C is anticipated in the AM peak and LOS A in the PM peak. With the extension in place, less traffic is anticipated at this intersection and the LOS improves to LOS B during the AM peak and remains at LOS A during the PM peak. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 25 DAVENPORT 5.3 Level of Service Summary Table 5.2 summarizes the level of service analysis at the study intersections. Intersections that improve with the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension are shaded in yellow. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 26 DAVENPORT 6.0 Benefits of the Old Greensboro Road Extension This section discusses the benefits of the Old Greensboro Road Extension and its impacts on roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. 6.1 Capacity of Roadway Network As shown in the capacity analysis results, the surrounding roadway network is anticipated to be at or near capacity in future build conditions. With the extension of Old Greensboro Road, site traffic will be able to remain onsite using the extension when traveling to and from the west (see Exhibit A). Without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, site traffic will have to travel on Bunker Hill Road then to Mountain Street to reach destinations to the west. Therefore, the Extension helps relieve congestion on offsite roadways and intersections by keeping the Triad Business Park traffic onsite. This results in improved level of service for the following intersections: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS E to LOS C) • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access (LOS B to LOS A) • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D) • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS C to LOS B) Additionally, the new 1 -40 Business interchange at Macy Grove Road that will be constructed with TIP U -2800 provides an ideal access to the interstate for truck traffic traveling to and from the Triad Business Park. The next nearest interchange with 1 -40 is located at Sandy Ridge Road, east of the site. This interchange currently experiences capacity deficiencies and is anticipated to worsen in future conditions as traffic volumes continue to grow. Therefore, the Extension will provide a more direct access to the interstate for Triad Business Park traffic and diverts site traffic from the congested interchange at Sandy Ridge Road. 6.2 Travel Time As shown in Exhibit A, site traffic traveling to /from the west from the eastern portion of the Triad Business Park will be routed around the site without the Old Greensboro Road Extension. This results in additional travel distance, travel time and emissions for affected site traffic. Site traffic will travel an additional distance of approximately 1.25 miles without the Extension and based on SimTraffic model results, will have approximately six minutes of additional travel time. Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time, distance, and emissions. Furthermore, since offsite intersections will experience increased traffic without the Extension, this will increase the delay, travel time, and emissions at affected intersections for both site traffic and background traffic. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 27 DAV LNPORT 6.3 Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings The Old Greensboro Road Extension would allow for truck traffic to avoid the highway - rail grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road. This crossing is located just south of the intersection at Mountain Street. The control devices at this crossing consist of active flashing red lights and gates and a railroad crossing sign (Crossbuck, R15 -1) is provided at the crossing. In addition, advance warning signs (W10 -1) and grade crossing pavement markings are provided in advance of the crossing. As discussed in the Methodology section of this report, 15% of site traffic was assumed to travel to /from the west on Mountain Street and 40% was assumed to travel to /from the new 1 -40 Business interchange on Macy Grove Road. With the Extension in place, site traffic traveling to /from the west on Mountain Street will be able to remain on Old Greensboro Road and then travel on Business Park Drive to reach their destination. This site traffic would travel through the grade crossing located on Business Park Drive. Site traffic traveling to /from the new interchange on Macy Grove Road will be able to access the site directly from Old Greensboro Road and not travel through any at grade crossings. Without the Extension, affected site traffic will be rerouted around the site and through the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road to reach these destinations. Consequently, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the safety of this grade crossing by reducing the volumes of truck traffic on Bunker Hill Road. Moreover, the Extension will result in reduced traffic on all of the grade crossings in the area; this is due to the creation of a route from the new interchange on Macy Grove Road for site traffic via Old Greensboro Road without any rail crossings. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 28 DAVENPORT 6.4 Safety — General The frequency of accidents generally increases with the amount of vehicle -miles traveled. By reducing the travel time and distance of site traffic, this will tend to reduce the frequency and probability of accidents offsite. Also, the safety of an intersection can be improved with better level of service and operation. As discussed, the extension of Old Greensboro Road is anticipated to improve the operation of several offsite intersections. The improved operation will enhance the safety of these intersections. In addition, the Extension will decrease the offsite truck traffic associated with the Triad Business Park. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street. 6.5 Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area As outlined in this report, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. This will inherently benefit the operations within the Park by provide safer and more efficient travel to and from the site. The Extension also allows site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to and from destinations within the Triad Business Park itself. This will enhance internal operations while relieving offsite congestion. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad Business Park. Without the Extension, the majority of site traffic from the eastern portion of the Park will have to travel through the intersection of Market Street at Bunker Hill Road. This intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service under this scenario (more information can be found in the Capacity Analysis section of this report). This is expected even with the recent improvements of TIP R -2611. As previously discussed, the lack of the Extension will also result in increased travel time and delay for affected site traffic. Therefore, the future construction of the remainder of the Triad Business Park is encumbered without the extension of Old Greensboro Road. The Triad Business Park has the ability to serve the Kernersville area with job growth, increased tax base, and overall economic development. As previously discussed, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the surrounding area with improved roadway capacity, operation, and safety. Therefore, the Extension will serve as a benefit to the Kernersville area. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 29 DAVENPORT 7.0 Recommendations The extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to enhance the operation of the surrounding roadway network by reducing offsite traffic and keeping site traffic within the site. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad Business Park and enhance onsite operations. Lastly, the Extension is anticipated to benefit the surrounding area with improved traffic operations and safety while also supporting future economic growth. The recommended cross section for the extension is three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn lane. Consistent with the prior study conducted by DAVENPORT for the Triad Business Park in 2007, the following improvements are recommended for the Proposed Access at Bunker Hill Road: • Signalization • A southbound right turn lane with 150 feet of storage • Separate right and left turn egress lanes The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots and if Old Greensboro Road extension is implemented. If needed, the future interchange of Macy Grove Road at 1 -40 Business can be further evaluated in the future when it is in operation to better determine expected operation and any needs. The recommended improvements are depicted in Figure 10. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 30 A N -n C %-1001 350' A O 1 1 1 ~ r 550' 0 0 0 1 1 � W 0 a o m � a 'o 350' 4. c 1 1 r 400' r 350' J 1 T c cl r r 11� V O �► o TTY 700' N u, Old Greensboro Road Mountain Street 1 -40 Business This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. O co o O Q 0 0 zoo' J 200' i CT 1V L J � Z W c m s 0 m CL L 300' 4— r 300' Market Street ti i Ff. p O * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 0 O SIGNALIZED CL -0 011 INTERSECTION CF, o x L 50' INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / 0 r 225' ROUNDABOUT J 75' o --► 75' �° N � -600' N n N CA N � v, F Jr 200' J Mountain Street 1 -40 Business This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. O co o O Q 0 0 zoo' J 200' i CT 1V L J � Z W c m s 0 m CL L 300' 4— r 300' Market Street ti i Ff. p O * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE= PROPOSED TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 0 O SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION • LINSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT Ir� V ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY --► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREEN = COMMITTED BLUE= PROPOSED TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED CONNECTOR ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054 DAVENPORT 9.0 Summary and Conclusion The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots and DAVENPORT previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007. A portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential extension of Old Greensboro Road through the Triad Business Park to Bunker Hill Road. Old Greensboro Road runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream near the center of the site. The proposed extension of Old Greensboro Road will extend it from its existing eastern terminus to Bunker Hill Road. DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. Two scenarios were considered in this analysis: Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension; and Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension. The capacity analysis of this study found that the construction of the Extension results in improved level of service for the following offsite intersections: • Market Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS E to LOS C) • Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access (LOS B to LOS A) • Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D) • Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS C to LOS B) This is due to the fact that site traffic is able to remain onsite when traveling to /from the west instead of being routed around the site and increasing traffic on offsite roadways. Less traffic on the offsite roadways results in improved level of service, delay, and safety for the affected intersections. Furthermore, the Extension will decrease the truck traffic associated with the Triad Business Park on offsite roadways and rail grade crossings. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid rail crossings and interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street. The absence of the Extension results in additional travel time, distance, and emissions for site traffic traveling from the eastern portion of the park to destinations to the west. An additional distance of 1.25 miles and time of approximately six minutes is estimated. Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time. Also, the extension will enhance internal operations by provide adequate access and allowing site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to destinations within the Triad Business Park. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 32 DAV ENPORT Based on the results of this study, the extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park, and enhance the safety and operation of the surrounding roadway network. The recommended cross section for the extension is three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn lane. Other improvements include signalization and turn lanes, consistent with the prior study conducted by DAVENPORT for the Triad Business Park in 2007, at the Proposed Access at Bunker Hill Road. The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots, particularly if Old Greensboro Road extension is constructed. In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of the proposed Old Greensboro Road Extension, and has determined that its construction is necessary in order to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park and improved operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. 9/5/14 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 33 �ERNERSVk4,e VIRe a. u RFSC N.C. July 1, 2015 KERNERSVILLE SIRE RESCUE Fire Marshal's Office Post Office Drawer 728 • Kernersville, North Carolina 27285 -0728 Mr. Jeff Hatling Director of Community Development Town of Kernersville Mr. Hatling: This letter shall serve as a statement in support of the effort to establish a stream crossing and continue Old Greensboro Road from its current dead -end and through the eastern portion of the Triad Business Park to Bunker Hill Road. Without a crossing, the eastern portion of the business park is essentially cut -off from the western portion and emergency response times are extended beyond nationally recognized standards. In order to respond to the eastern portion of the park without a stream crossing, fire apparatus will be forced to travel W. Market Street outside the city limits to Bunker Hill Road as opposed to traveling a continuous route on Old Greensboro Road and remaining within current Kernersville city limits. This is a more direct route and would enable the fire department units to respond within appropriate time frames and provide emergency medical and/or emergency fire services as needed. Extended response times effect the Insurance Services Office ratings of the fire department and have a negative effect on insurance rates in the areas of extended response times. It is my opinion that the stream crossing will enable our department to better serve the occupancies within the eastern portion of the park thereby providing timely emergency services; protecting lives and reducing property loss. The proposed crossing is within the best interest of public safety. Please contact me if you need further information or have any questions. Respectfully, Bruce Hennequin Fire Marshal Kernersville Fire Rescue Telephone 336 - 996 -6791 • Fax 336 -996 -4298 Kernersville Police Department Scott A. Cunningham Chief of Police June 25, 2015 Mr. Jeff Hatling Director, Community Development Town of Kernersville Mr. Hatling; Post Office Box 728 Kernersville, NC 27285 Phone: 336.996.2390 Fax: 336.992.5470 I am writing in support of the project to establish a roadway across the stream near the current dead -end of Old Greensboro Road. Continuing the roadway across the stream will have immediate and definite benefits for the citizens regarding public safety. The proposed road continuance, which requires the stream to be crossed, will provide better access into the general area. It will allow for more frequent and efficient patrols by personnel of the Kernersville Police Department (KPD). Officers will have quicker response times to the immediate area and to the Macy Grove /421 interchange area. This would enhance general service to the area it would allow for a second ingress /egress route as opposed to the current one way in /out situation. As Chief of the Kernersville Police Department, I am interested in and will support any and all efforts to increase the safety of our community and our citizens. I believe this roadway expansion and stream crossing is essential and beneficial. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance in this or any other public safety matter. Respectfully, Scott A. Cunning h. D. Chief of Police Kernersville Police Department 134 E. Mountain Street • Kernersville, North Carolina, 27284 www.toknc.com • A Nationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Schematic Design Estimate Summary- TBP Road Extension Exhibit 2 Bridge Recap - With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Group 1: Divisions Estimator : Project Size : 0 SF I Description TotalCost 01 - General trades Design 64,635.44 Pre- Construction Services 17,972.96 Project Management and Coordination 130,274.18 Construction progress documentation 6,389.01 Quality control 42,593.37 Temporary utilities 3,194.50 Construction facilities 13,257.19 Construction aids 2,129.67 Project identification 661.53 Cleaning 7,458.74 Closeout submittals * Total 01 - General trades 288,566.58 02 - Sitework Mitigation Fees 247,618.71 Site demolition 7,217.98 Site clearing 34,607.12 Grading 222,859.02 Erosion and sedimentation control 194,420.38 Water distribution 170,554.52 Sanitary sewers Storm drainage 440,504.93 Flexible pavement 639,270.11 Curbs and gutters 65,873.31 Sidewalks 58,024.95 Fences and gates 21,464.40 Retaining walls Bridge Structure 2,129,668.70 Lawns and grass 47,917.55 * Total 02 - Sitework 4,280,001.67 21 - Contingency Other construction 159 „725.15 * Total 21 - Contingency 159,725.15 Total Estimate 4,728,293.41 Group 2: Minor ItemCode Groups 109 039 TBP Exhibit 2 B Bridge.est Page 1 3/1712015 09:38 AM Conceptual Design Estimate SUC1 matt' - TBP Road Extension Exhibit 1 Recap -With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Estimator: Project Size : 0 SF Description Quantity LIM TotalCost 01 - General trades Design 64,635.44 Pre - Construction Services 17,972.96 Project Management and Coordination 130,274.18 Construction progress documentation 6,389.01 Quality control 42,593.37 Temporary utilities 3,194.50 Construction facilities 13,257.19 Construction aids 2,129.67 Project identification 661.53 Cleaning 7,458.74 Closeout submittals * Total 01 - General trades 288,566.58 02 - Sitework Mitigation Fees 319,629.20 Site demolition 7,217.98 Site clearing 43,189.68 Grading 268,245.83 Erosion and sedimentation control 201,796.76 Water distribution 207,243.38 Sanitary sewers Storm drainage 604,822.72 Flexible pavement 14,596.00 SY 844,789.74 Curbs and gutters 89,978.50 Sidewalks 71,982.80 Fences and gates 21,464.40 Retaining walls Lawns and grass 53,241.72 * Total 02 - Sitework 2,733,602.70 21 - Contingency Other construction 159,725.15 * Total 21 - Contingency 159,725.15 Total Gross Cost 3,181,894.44 Group 1: Divisions Group 2: Minor ItemCode Groups ...109 039 TBP Exhibit 1.est Page 1 2/18/2015 02:15 PM Conceptual Design Estimate Summary- TBP Road Extension 2 A Recap - With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Estimator: Project Size : 0 SF I Description Quantity UM TotalCost 01 - General trades Design Pre - Construction Services Project Management and Coordination Construction progress documentation Quality control Temporary utilities Construction facilities Construction aids Project identification Cleaning Closeout submittals * Total 01 - General trades 02 - Sitework Mitigation Fees Site demolition Site clearing Grading Erosion and sedimentation control Water distribution Sanitary sewers Storm drainage Flexible pavement Curbs and gutters Sidewalks Fences and gates Retaining walls Lawns and grass * Total 02 - Sitework 21 - Contingency Other construction * Total 21 - Contingency Total Estimate 12,146.00 SY 64,635.44 17,972.96 130,274.18 6,389.01 42,593.37 3,194.50 13,257.19 2,129.67 661.53 7,458.74 288,566.58 207,612.88 7,217.98 34,607.12 220,729.35 194,420.38 170,554.52 531,315.07 703,390.38 72,528.53 58,024.95 21,464.40 47,917.55 2,269,783.11 159,725.15 159,725.15 2,718,074.85 Group 1: Divisions Group 2: Minor ItemCode Groups ...109 039 TBP Exhibit 2 A.est Page 1 2/18/2015 02:21 PM Conceptual Design Estimate Summary - TBP Road Extension Exhibit 2 B Recap - With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Estimator : Project Size : 0 5F I Descriation 01 - General trades Design Pre - Construction Services Project Management and Coordination Construction progress documentation Quality control Temporary utilities Construction facilities Construction aids Project identification Cleaning Closeout submittals * Total 01 - General trades 02 - Sitework Mitigation Fees Site demolition Site clearing Grading Erosion and sedimentation control Water distribution Sanitary sewers Storm drainage Flexible pavement Curbs and gutters Sidewalks Fences and gates Retaining walls Lawns and grass * Total 02 - Sitework 21 - Contingency Other construction *Total 21 -Contingency Total Estimate Quantitv UM TotalCost 64, 635.44 17,972.96 130,274.18 6,389.01 42, 593.37 3,194.50 13,257.19 2,129.67 661.53 7,458.74 288,566.58 247,618.71 7,217.98 34,607.12 222,859.02 194,420.38 170,554.52 440,504.93 12,146.00 SY 703,390.38 72,528.53 58,024.95 21,464.40 47,917.55 2,221,108.47 159,725.15 159,725.15 2,669,400.21 Group 1: Divisions Group 2: Minor ItemCode Groups ...409 039 TBP Exhibit 2 Best Page 1 211812015 02:22 PM Conceptual Design Estimate Summary- TBP Road Extension Exhibit 3 Recap - With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Estimator: Bill Wooten Project Size : 0 SF A Description 01 - General trades Design Pre - Construction Services Project Management and Coordination Construction progress documentation Quality control Temporary utilities Construction facilities Construction aids Project identification Cleaning Closeout submittals * Total 01 - General trades 02 - Sitework Mitigation Fees Site demolition Site clearing Grading Erosion and sedimentation control Water distribution Sanitary sewers Storm drainage Flexible pavement Curbs and gutters Sidewalks Fences and gates Retaining walls Lawns and grass * Total 02 - Sitework 21 - Contingency Other construction * Total 21 - Contingency Total Estimate Quantity UM TotalCost 64,635.44 17,972.96 130,274.18 6,389.01 42,593.37 3,194.50 13,257.19 2,129.67 661.53 7,458.74 288,566.58 268,610.85 7,217.98 36, 545.11 230,590.88 174,575.33 207,243.38 477,530.29 12,226.00 SY 708,007.51 76,348.62 61,078.90 21,464.40 53,241.72 2,322,454.97 159,725.15 159,725.15 2,770,746.71 Group 1: Divisions Group 2: Minor ItemCode Groups 109 039 TBP Exhibit 3.est Page 1 211812015 02:22 PM APPENDIX VIII NCDENR -DMS LETTER i rcd North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor Brian Hall TDO Land Holding, LLC 309 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro, NC 27409 Division of Mitigation Services Project: TBP- Old Greensboro Road Extension April 23, 2015 Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary Expiration of Acceptance: October 23, 2015 County: Guilford The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143 - 214.11. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.neeep.net. Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below. River CU I Stream (feet) I Wetlands (acres) Buffer ,1 I Buffer II Basin Location (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) Cold Cool I Warm Riparian Non - Riparian I Coastal Marsh Randleman Fear Impact Cape 03030003 I 0 0 I 235 0.65 0 I 0 20,000 I 13,000 Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915. Sincerely, JJ�as. B Stanfill cc: David Bailey, USACE- Raleigh Asset Management Supervisor Sue Homewood, NCDWR - Winston -Salem Brad Luckey, agent 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652 Phone: 919 - 707 -8976 t Internet: www,nceep.net An Equal Opportunity ? Affirmative Acton Employer — Made in part from recycled paper