20231137 Ver 1__20230809_H_B_PCN_FINAL_Draft_20230812

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2022-01741 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: ODFL Concord Service Center
2. Work Type: 7Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC is seeking authorization under NWP 39 to permanently impact 0.21-acre of wetlands and temporarily impact
0.065-acre of wetlands necessary for the development of a less than truckload (LTL) freight facility on an approximately 31.33-acre
property. The subject property is bound by undeveloped forest land and open fields to the north, New Town Way SW to the south,
undeveloped forest land to the east, and George W. Liles Parkway to the west in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC (POC: Kyle M. Hoyt)
346 Seacoast Parkway, Suite 200, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464; [phone]; [e-mail]
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The subject property is bound by undeveloped forest land and open fields to the north, New Town Way SW to the south, undeveloped forest land to
the east, and George W. Liles Parkway to the west in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. Project Coordinates (decimal degrees):
35.380067°,-80.641496°.
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a] : 55197810620000
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Wolf Meadow Branch
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin PeeDee 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404,71
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 39
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
::]Pre -Application Request
::]Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley»>Horn
August 9, 2023
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NC DWR, 401 & 404 Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Pre -Construction Notification (NWP #39 and Individual 401 WQC)
ODFL Concord Service Center (SAW-2022-01741)
Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Ms. Stygar and Mr. Wojoski:
On behalf of our client, Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed Section
404/401 Pre -construction Notification for the above -referenced project for your review pursuant to
Nationwide Permit #39 and Individual 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC). The proposed project
seeks to construct one (1) less than truckload (LTL) freight facility space totaling ±54,000 square -feet
(SF), including access roads, utilities, and stormwater management facilities. Authorization is requested
under NWP 39 to permanently impact 0.21-acre of wetlands necessary for the construction of the
interstate motor freight facility, and temporarily impact 0.065-acre of wetlands necessary for the sanitary
sewer connection. The center of the project area is located at 35.380067°,-80.641496°. The following
information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Agent Authorization
• Project Site Figures
■ Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
■ Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Kannapolis Quadrangle) Map
■ Figure 3 — Cabarrus Co. SSURGO Soils and NWI Map (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
■ Figure 4 — Existing Conditions (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Permit Drawings
• Agency Correspondence
• Compensatory Mitigation
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC is proposing the construction of one (1) LTL freight facility space on an
approximately 31.33-acre property. The subject property is comprised of undeveloped forest land and
open fields. The subject property is bound by undeveloped forest land and open fields to the north,
New Town Way SW to the south, undeveloped forest land to the east, and George W. Liles Parkway
to the west in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The site will be brought into compliance with
both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.

Kimley»>Horn
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
Page 2
JURIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Kimley-Horn submitted a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request package to the United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on August 9th, 2022. USACE responded with a PJD
verification letter (SAW-2022-01741) on August 18th, 2022. Kimley-Horn staff conducted a delineation
on an additional area of the subject property on April 19th, 2023. One (1) potentially jurisdictional non -
wetland WOTUS was identified within the additional area. The PJD Study area and aquatic resources
shown in Figure 4 correspond to the SAW-2022-01751 project and additional delineation.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS
service on December 9th, 2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within
the site boundary. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological,
cultural, or historic resources on December 9th, 2022. SHPO responded on January 20th, 2023, with no
comment on the proposed project. A copy of SHPO's response is attached.
PROTECTED SPECIES
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on October 26th, 2022,
did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary.
Potentially suitable habitat for threatened and endangered species on -site was surveyed. A
concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on October 27th, 2022. A concurrence
response letter from USFWS was received on October 28th, 2022, indicating that the USFWS was in
agreeance with the MANLAA biological conclusion. As of August 9th,2023, Northern Long-eared Bat is
no longer listed in Cabarrus County. A copy of the USFWS correspondence and an updated Official
Species List are included.
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 39 for wetland impacts associated with the
construction of the LTL freight facility space. The proposed project will result in 0.21-acre of permanent
impacts and 0.065-acre of temporary impacts to Wetland 2.
Impact 1 — Wetland 2
0 0.21-acre of permanent wetland impacts associated with the grading activities
necessary to construct the interstate motor freight facility.
Impact 2 — Wetland 2
0 0.065-acres of temporary wetland impacts associated with the conversion from
forested to herbaceous wetlands in order to provide connection to the sanitary sewer
main.
Overall, impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 0.21 acres of
permanent impacts and 0.065 acres of temporary impacts to wetland waters of the US.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the
greatest extent practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while
staying within nationwide permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and

Kimley)))Horn Page
minimization efforts by reducing the proposed wetland impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and
minimization efforts includes the following:
• A temporary timber crossing will be installed at Stream 2 to avoid any stream impacts
associated with the temporary mounding of soil during construction.
• Avoidance of the 1,722 LF of streams on -site.
• Avoidance of the remaining 4.75-acres of wetlands on -site.
• Impacts 1 — Wetland 2
o Retaining walls have been strategically placed to reduce grading fill slopes and to avoid
further impacts.
o A hammerhead turnaround is proposed at the terminus of the extension of New Town
Way SW to prevent future indirect impacts to wetlands on -site. A hammerhead
turnaround is necessary for vehicle access, specifically for Emergency Vehicles (refer
to detail).
• Impact 2 — Wetland 2
o Temporary wetland impacts will be restored to pre -construction grade contours and a
permanent wetland seed mix will be applied after connection to the sanitary sewer
main is completed.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) in -lieu fee program. Based on an NCWAM assessment of Medium for Wetland 2
mitigation is proposed at a 1.75:1 ratio for permanent impacts to this feature associated with the grading
necessary to construct the interstate motor freight facility, or 0.37 wetland mitigation credits. Mitigation
is proposed at a 1:1 ratio for the temporary impacts to this feature associated with the connection to
the sanitary sewer main that will result in the conversion from forested to herbaceous wetlands, or
0.065 wetland mitigation credits. In total, 0.44 wetland mitigation credits will be purchased to offset
impacts associated with this project. Quality assessment results and a Statement of Availability are
included.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Kimley>>>Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: ODFL Concord Service Center
Applicant Name and Address: Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC (POC: Kyle M. Hoyt)
346 Seacoast Parkway, Suite 200, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
Telephone Number: [phone]
Type of Request:
® Nationwide PCN (NWP #39) ❑ Individual Permit Application
❑ Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments:
® Project Plans
® USGS Map
® NRCS Soil Survey
® Agent Authorization
® Delineation Sketch
❑ Delineation Survey
® Data Forms (Up & Wet)
® NCDWR Stream Forms
❑ USACE Stream Forms
® NCDMS Confirmation
® Aerial Photo
❑ Site Photos
® Agency Correspondence
❑ Other:
❑ Other:
Check if applicable:
❑ CAMA County
❑ Trout County
❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA
❑ Section 106, NHPA
❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑
NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site
❑ Other)
County: Cabanas
Nearest City/Town: Concord
Waterway: Wolf Meadow Branch
River Basin: Yadkin Pee -Dee
H.U.C.: 03040105
USGS Quad Name: Kannapolis
Property Size (acres): 31.33-acres
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 1,722 LF & 526-ac
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.380067°N
-80.641496°W
Project Location: The subject property is bound by Concord Parkway to the north and George W. Liles Parkway to the
west in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
Site Description: The proposed project seeks to construct one (1) less than truckload (LTL) freight facility space totaling
±54,000 square -feet (SF), including access roads, utilities, and stormwater management facilities. Authorization is requested
under NWP 39 to permanently impact 0.21-acre of wetlands necessary for the construction of the interstate motor freight
facility and temporarily impact 0.065-acre of wetlands necessary for the sanitary sewer connection. The subject property is
comprised of undeveloped forest land and open fields. The subject property is bound by undeveloped forest land and open
fields to the north New Town Wav SW to the south. undeveloped forest land to the east. and George W. Liles Parkwav to
the west in Concord, Cabanas County, North Carolina.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 0.21-acre of permanent
wetland impacts associated with the grading activities necessary to construct the interstate motor freight facility and 0.065-
acre of temporary wetland impacts associated with the conversion from forested to herbaceous wetlands in order to provide
connection to the sanitary sewer main.
Stream Channel
Open Water
Wetland
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Perennial and/or Important
NWP
(acres)
(acres)
#
Aquatic Function
Aquatic Function
Tem
Perm.
Tem
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
if
ac
if
ac
if
ac
if
Ac
39
j
0.065
0.21
Total
0.065
0.21
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Wetland Waters of the U.S.
0.21 ac
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: chris.tinklenberg_kkimley-hom.com

M
o/�Q� INArF�9��
l I.�wu
O ,c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
ODFL Concord Service Center
2b.
County:
Cabarrus
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Concord
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Bootsmead Lease Co.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
11173/0099
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
1717 S Boulder Avenue Suite 400
3e.
City, state, zip:
Tulsa, OK, 74119
3f.
Telephone no.:
Mark Fiddes [phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Land purchaser
4b.
Name:
Kyle M. Hoyt
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC
4d.
Street address:
346 Seacoast Parkway, Suite 200
4e.
City, state, zip:
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c.
Street address:
580 Kingsley Park Drive, Suite 125
5d.
City, state, zip:
Fort Mill, SC 29715
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
55197810620000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.380067 Longitude:-80.641496
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c.
Property size:
31.33-acres (Project Boundary)
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed
Wolf Meadow Branch
project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin PeeDee 03040105
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC is proposing the construction of one (1) less than truckload (LTL) freight facility space on an
approximately 31.33-acre property. The subject property is comprised of undeveloped forest land and open fields. The
subject property is bound by undeveloped forest land and open fields to the north, New Town Way SW to the south,
undeveloped forest land to the east, and George W. Liles Parkway to the west in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
The site will be brought into compliance with both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping, and stormwater.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.03 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,722 linear feet.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct one (1) LTL freight facility space totaling ±54,000 square -feet (SF) and associated
infrastructure necessary to service the industrial development.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
ODFL Concord Service Center is the proposed construction of one (1) less than truckload (LTL) freight facility space totaling
±54,000 square -feet (SF), including access roads, utilities, and stormwater management facilities. Authorization is
requested under NWP 39 to permanently impact 0.21-acre of wetlands necessary for the construction of the interstate
motor freight facility, and temporarily impact 0.065-acre of wetlands necessary for the sanitary sewer connection.
General construction equipment includes, but is not limited to, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. used for
construction purposes.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps
or State been requested or obtained for this property / project
(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: (SAW-2022-01741) Kimley-Horn submitted a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request package to
the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on August 91h
2022. USACE responded with a PJD verification letter on August
181h, 2022. Kimley-Horn staff conducted a delineation on an
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
additional area of the subject property on April 191h, 2023. One (1)
potentially jurisdictional non -wetland WOTUS was identified within
the additional area. The PJD Study area and aquatic resources
shown in Figure 4 correspond to the SAW-2022-01751 project and
additional delineation.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of
®Preliminary El Final
determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Other: Kimley-Horn and Associates
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
8/18/2022
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of
number-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
jurisdiction
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
(Corps - 404, 10
Temporary (T)
DWQ - non-
404, other
Impact 1 - W2
®P❑T
Grading/Fill
PFO
Y
® Corps
®DWQ
0.21
Impact 2 - W2
® Corps
El P ®T
Open Cut and Backfill
PFO
Y
® DW
0.065
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.28
2h. Comments: The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP# 39 for wetland impacts associated with the
construction of the LTL freight facility space. The proposed project will result in 0.21-acre of permanent impacts and 0.065-
acre of temporary impacts to Wetland 2.
• Impact 1 - Wetland 2
0 0.21-acre of permanent wetland impacts associated with the grading activities necessary to construct the
interstate motor freight facility.
• Impact 2 - Wetland 2
0 0.065-acres of temporary wetland impacts associated with the conversion from forested to herbaceous
wetlands in order to provide connection to the sanitary sewer main.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(Corps - 404, 10
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
DWQ - non-
(feet)
feet)
404, other)
Impact
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
❑INT
❑DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact
- Permanent (P)
(acres)
or Temporary
T
41f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com fete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
p and
Exeadvat
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Flooded
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest extent
practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide permit
thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by reducing the proposed wetland
impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts includes the following:
• A temporary timber crossing will be installed at Stream 2 to avoid any stream impacts associated with the
temporary mounding of soil during construction.
• Avoidance of the 1,722 LF of streams on -site.
• Avoidance of the remaining 4.75-acres of wetlands on -site.
• Impacts 1 — Wetland 2
o Retaining walls have been strategically placed to reduce grading fill slopes and to avoid further impacts.
o A hammerhead turnaround is proposed at the terminus of the extension of New Town Way SW to prevent
future indirect impacts to wetlands on -site. A hammerhead turnaround is necessary for vehicle access,
specifically for Emergency Vehicles (refer to detail).
• Impact 2 — Wetland 2
o Temporary wetland impacts will be restored to pre -construction grade contours and a permanent wetland
seed mix will be applied after connection to the sanitary sewer main is completed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Stormwater facilities are sized and positioned to minimize impacts to the greatest extents practicable. Temporary erosion control
measures, including but not limited to skimmer basins and silt fences will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff
from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Quantity:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.28 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) in -lieu
fee program. Based on an NCWAM assessment of Medium for Wetland 2 mitigation is proposed at a 1.75:1 ratio for permanent
impacts to this feature associated with the grading necessary to construct the interstate motor freight facility, or 0.37 wetland
mitigation credits. Mitigation is proposed at a 1:1 ratio for the temporary impacts to this feature associated with the connection
to the sanitary sewer main that will result in the conversion from forested to herbaceous wetlands, or 0.065 wetland mitigation
credits. In total, 0.44 wetland mitigation credits will be purchased to offset impacts associated with this project. Quality
assessment results and a Statement of Availability are included.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers within one of the NC
❑ Yes ® No
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
32%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
A stormwater detention pond will be used in conjunction with a sand filter area to reduce
the amount of discharge in order to
provide treatment to any runoff that is routed to the pond. An outfall control structure in the sand filter area has been designed
so
that the discharge from the pond will be equal or less than predevelopment runoff conditions
from the site.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Concord
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to construct one (1) LTL freight facility space totaling ±54,000 square -feet,
on -site roadway,
truck/trailer parking, employee parking, and stormwater facilities. No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due
to the construction of the proposed project.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility:
Sanitary sewer service is to be provided via connection to a sanitary sewer main extension.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on October 26th, 2022, did not indicate known
occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat for threatened
and endangered species on -site was surveyed. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on October
27th, 2022. A concurrence response letter from USFWS was received on October 28th, 2022, indicating that the USFWS
was in agreeance with the MANLAA biological conclusion. As of August 9th,2023, Northern Long-eared Bat is no longer
listed in Cabarrus County. A copy of the USFWS correspondence and an updated Official Species List are included.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on December
91h 2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request letter was
submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological, cultural, or historic resources on December 91h, 2022. SHPO
responded on January 201h, 2023, with no comment on the proposed project. A copy of SHPO's response is attached.
8.
Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 3710551900K
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
—�
8/12/2023
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Old Dominion Freiaht Line. Inc.
Address: 500 Old Dominion Way, Thomasville, NC 27360
Email:
Project Name/Description:
ODFL Concord Service Center
Date:. G - o}7- v4 3
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attention: K sta SIy2ar
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional
Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications and
to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day
forward until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, under contract to purchase the propertylproperties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the fpC 7 —day of Vane,
22�
Aut prized epresentative Ailthorize ep sentative
(Print Name) (Signature

FIGURES

`oov .. rer br NW 4 aP �3
p\ Grand Cans �� a Or tv" ecooµW °o
O Pb� McGill Ave NW
e'r N`N PoPlar Tent Rd
a 1
r > 0`2
c' .lo°>es jai '1'•
L or
eo
Park
% o All Roo °
Pf = Ch 7
s ^o
i dR v
Z Nry Z
f
Wed - t n Rd
A
o.
ding o
-.untr�, �'. luh Ville i
a
of
�epJ` �
Qµ�yS 9\Q air '�.; ;d� SunUer�ac
n �
Dr NW
\\\,
n
_
a
� 2
�
c
q
�fL
U
p
c
fI �
. Saddte,Nood C:" RobeM1a�d o
Green St SW
A
e
c
Re Po
n�
Ra`FW
Frank
d
e �9el
�
Lis4e Paik
e
gFJdke
�Z oOr
O^S
�a
Sough
�a cotdpµ
q GOn
bs
o
-
o
o a
47--
N NC.49S
4y6 o
aseDrSW
Q
c
o o
c�
5 ire
U for
0
Mal srrid,+ar 2 M
�°u A °rrrs guT Dr
Pd
ria�
�
'" Ma•,pal.`.
� 5`t'I . .
aR6 O
Go`
\
Wheol Dr SW
l
Feet
yea
0 4,000 8,000
-
elack—
Figure 1
Legend Vicinity Map
ODFL Concord Service Center (SAW-2022-01741)
Kim ey>>> Horn Project Boundary Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
August 2023

Legend
Y
Project Boundary a o
p oTo r
•
Farr
6�j
29
eso
• . ��
• 91
1s BMW N
Cein
• � � pv _ J,• / / it � /
IK
1 `�- yoo� • • %�/ Feet
0 2,000 4,000
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Kannapolis) Map
ODFL Concord Service Center (SAW-2022-01741)
Kim ey >> Horn Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
August 2023

Legend
r19
Project Boundary
sv
NWI Wetlands
C3
SSURGO Soils
'. Hydric Rating
Hydric (1-32%)
Hydric (67-99%)
Not Hydric (0%)
b
i
d
O^s kv� v
SS t
Windswept-Rd*SW-111%
Ilk
e
:A
.aa......
I—— mea� a,ae,a;
Na
scabanas 1—a ,xartn mra-na(-.1)'y O'
ArAm� a Armenaloam, 112 p,,—nt slopes, rarely flaptleGe Wo k 1Totals
2 59 1 29 Mee pa for Area pf GAer
Kimley >>Horn
Al l
IME Feet
400 800
Figure 3
SSURGO Soils and NWI Map
ODFL Concord Service Center (SAW-2022-01741)
Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
August 2023

TAAE a r' Obi i
o
v on ,
a a. U q
`. }� '" ` 'i" ' " _ `{p•a r NL A t b 1
PAN
.,-
d
`^C d y�4 j're�
�o6�°r l .��� Wetland 1 (0.13 ac)
Stream 2 (1,621 LF/ 0.21 ac) A
ri d. rt*•�.$` �*"c a�.• ,'i:
` Stream 1 (201 LF/0 02 ac) L 3
•tee � � �- n � �.:
1y, 4I&
,
s
Legend 13
Project Boundary e ,
•
a, Wetland 2 (4.9 ac) 1I"
(SAW-2022-01741) PJD Study Area
Wetlands
Streams
Intermittent
Perennial Feet
'.
0 400 800
Kimley>>Horn
Figure 4
Existing Conditions
ODFL Concord Service Center (SAW-2022-01741)
Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
August 2023

PERMIT DRAWINGS

��o MS RGA irnol�NOO6Z
OOOOZ9046L64S5-N. -
W � i p¢o�N_A . . Nx _ d
4.
xI:., m� w
/,i � � \ I�I IIII illlllry�ll 111 llllNPlli�l � � �
ll � ,�� /� -i .ill r _ _ -�� % i�' iii�i li Ili n lilll l l r. �� r i I� ✓l l u III I I I l l
,,nl�,,,
IT
ir`
�, ,l(
��/v. I �✓ � �r i � l I � �. r �so l I � CI l' l =� .i I"I�uiilldm I I� ll� ri
l
— d i r M �� ,1 m I� ti��iilliililu�lii I°i i
l I r�
lii�ll
�,/��� i il�ui ill
�
5-� v II l�llllllllllllllll Z, �'IIL '
�I \\ I I .��1 I\l I 1�IIlllllll�l��ll II III Il
/�� ���� � l � � Illllllllllllllll I
/y I � � IIII Ipl I
ri 7
� ll � l a��.. �-•r-' �' � i � i Ji � i 'I �� i � o i' � �. liiii�iiiliiil ,i� I�i��i�
i �i 1, r.<$•� r i � i-T wi li
mlm cx i i � u In °4ii
q.aol� �' gllllii Ilwl
lz�iwl
.rlo rti` r � a � II I nll Ill
r��wl� w " �Illlllll I. 111 Ali
_,
�/ J`� � / r /Z i 7 F•\ vz o� / yj I i � - l � III\Illlll\ J II
lull, I
�riiir i �I ��IIIII 1pI,Il2 ,
lml'�Illllll\��
i
q
,_-'��k�' l I.\ `./ '.c ,,I.. , _ l ___,.-� \ � �l ♦ ,Nos �sr.esaE `, � _ l.� � �.��\II�LII�1
k

czoez oN'w��� �o woo
A- I., N—Z _
to# rEr", ^o*e., — 0000zeo 216119 Nid -
aYg
m3 pjouoo �A4o x $ a r
Q 1�a y
4� g}P5� g€1 2H ja
ss'j g He == ov =5a zz
��Hi H9e 4a b H £ � � i� � o w w � � � a
;aa 11� Y ppgY Al
All
9�R � 25'� a H' �� '� • � �,�
59995q n EyEy a p p5p5• g8 � � ; 6 H
pg6� @E�• �Rrt �; E 4
-
w
N F III
OD
IIYIII
ON I Y 6N11;
02 L6J
m� o
o uv
ZZ, SO o
OLL, Z R C.
0 5
LL V
A CH
p Z
d O �
N �
° Ear
d BEm°
y
p 01M.m_
a SCE H Ha s g i gy a 9H €p a se '�€ '8
s a H' � @g 4�y Q e� �$ �€ 5 ! gg• � � P ". R a. � � ggg 5 4 k �. 'g P
4Q $ B & qq $i R 53q3q $ : g93q q§q 3 4 e4 .�: 0H a Y€3ag¢ yjp �' 9
$$ 9g ei gE H;H •�i°.:C. "s y$ 1
!! i 1� gpgp $ a � � €9 Bjj gQQ � H ppy • �H8 €ay°04
• i a $9 4 QiH� 4g€ 4 #P �P ma A SQ S 5 aJ9il�a H g
19 a F a � �i 9 9;9a eH P $P
SQLa� �gP $ g aQYsR: g g do.QRc aH;a
9 P E� S RiS 6 9 R SR P �aa „ y8 EsE a 9 Q a� •! if. P'� a� 9 6S H{ H a g E. P
Q IN' Y 5 1!„ H! H 1 ',Pa;I; Agar" a;Q�
€ Pg� �� @a `H a� CaQ !!. ' ' . ail'
,bg°gill h
�� 9 yPy � jj3� a E`!J" f� g� E � s8� x9 ya � 3 j{q^ yi� �Y �� q�La a3Eg� Rs �R � Y i S ;q�g�� 1y'I •pYa� � � 1 yyx �999g�Y
gg dd 9 E ^- 998 9
�- � �$ R¢ �s ;: � �tl � a $�. i4 � �5 : 4E $� aH �` 9g°• @@ �� 1 `$� a€H ��;ye � � � $�, �•� 4�
H3 H i i� ag,.a 94g # 4PR Y '
to
F9 pgPH Pg@€ P$' #�yyQf .ea§¢4 Payg11y yq€ @1yg°H°g&
H nal § Val
3� �[e a�..
.� �Y :� a a�. Y

czoez oN'w��� ao wIo
A- I.,N ll. _
0000zeo1-119Nid CD
-
mj _� a
v pjoouop �A40
-,o
n�r ��ii 0
�`liq�� i /_ r ✓ `Gaa �� ' � `VD' w "� m �I i �iiJ4r °"'uuU w'I' '� I I °'' �'.a I'���'r
��
ilil� i r
ry d�i� hnM �� /' I r ' .r r � a Nn e•�u-r.�.�,�.�-� _ ��s��„i?rm -r /� ii r Wig�mmu Oi' � ' i � �i'�'�'r
i 1111� III � f 1 � r i �a nMmsn: \ �' F,,• __�___— _ _a� — — 'sir\ig I! lII I I d I I III II
��,// � rri I - r ' i �'mI � ' Ir i� r' r r � ' y IIII II � ✓ I �u �PIiill�iv�
r
�
�
I I
II =� iir
r r ou om w
` �i iiio`
iuii�iiiii
1111
,, IIIII ru��rf
�',��f ✓�� - .�r�l i i i I i �' a �� i i � �a�� � a ii mums s s it r' i i � �p'oJ Nif k
I' � rIOI14�41
WIUIIIIII I m t
$� Vr l a wail a IgII
N,o ,��
ewm�
- M o
A
,P
` o >
I14�PII�1
4 Ilnl1
I� b /
NZ,
'
iiririni'Igl4_
�
r)`bi � rir- �o°r ' ��Ini �i'h'i X, I �� r4 -fir/l � rnyo�i`ir�i I�rn _ ` i �0
�r // rl /�'IIII �II�rll �� ��� i' �I hr ' r �� ',[ III) III
����y��,-...i�` �rii rr ro l�l[ ' 'nll hll �`�.., [ Y` � � pq�� �� �' III
rVr I - n r r r ' "1 t �I ��/ III
�m
/��` •iti� � - rr 'iiinrr '' a � nl ll�l � [-51 II r,5°a�` — � I r
r
prlr II
�
-
/ /� 1+"{T�r II�IIIIIIIIIII - /l� Yzc
` �✓ l � /� rlpll�Il/l I i r / �^ �i /1//III _ � '�, � \ � � `� II I I
,✓` !` �. r4/rui � _ 6.i�91 �r ?��°��"—�— -`�= I, � �,�` ri `� r� ` � _ � (�i �il�l n�P�� y��,
' 4u In l,�c:' %, "'%�.�:*•%`i ��r <' � r- - _� '-� _ �ba � __, �. �.. .w .lo- - iii�� `� �i u�l � S
0�Lr1Ir j I Ll I r
"� � __ ' �Nr � � it � � �� '� I j �` --• -� ��o ��w8�� � ��� � ����' $ I

czoez oN'w���vo wlo
�3� „�'� � vom nns rtenn �MoiMaN ooez _
mx i =i p o.uo0 -U40 N
Pgit>i o on q���il�lll�
1.�'�/ ✓ rod vP ✓� i � ,a �`/i' i r` i� i ei� m o w iii r i �Pii��% �iiurllii�i APE
lui ilio M e
J
i(ollJlllllmlu
iiiiilii��ii 1 1 1
' W Il
0prywullll�ll
dr iin11 ii � in it uall
�.J�'
i
�pinl'II'ii I� ��
h� a ��� li i�u
Iry r iii v e vim,' v A' i �� `1''w�BA i i n"w
( I� � �,I1111 - 1\ _ � 1 \ � � R+�.c. W�� � ( ' I I f \ Il�l��i`''
v iJ7 is �hz�� A ' i '� i i i��� f� li�iw „�
�.
� `���i
Jo �i l��li �,/plliiilio^
X i° w�.pool
�-.�
—>kI
u� ' f I� wv a
yam' i � i� � �o iii
iii' 1' �. i n,Ij
i
slw44ipijl� �i iiill�llnl ��,i
r
— __ — v .. �U �i �—�may i e
��.
f
\
(�'li�� �y " \"�> ii"hi
`�'v
i icev

8� I
I
x7
Ui�
I
I
i
/
y \
i
ss
II
1
/\ 1 � I �^ 'l it �/ ✓I /
�
lull �Illllltl
/•'' 111 L�IIIIIIII � � � 11 II,I �/� im \\
Iv
—in,
�s
No> o _,
„//I k l l IIII I I
�;/�� I I I/✓, /;III II1�;I;II;,
,��
o
^ / I
II/
II1?o
IIII II II\
II 1
III I � I\I1
IIL lIj III
III III 111
II I 1i
11
III o / II Ili
I
IIII � IIIIII
III IIIIII
If \ IIIIII
III d I I III
\I I i Ili(11
I III \II
III I II\
III I I Y'.
_ y1 I� III
Ilv IIIII
111 Y �� II
IIII i �ry ill
�I II
t �II ��IIII III �/I I I ill
Ll G U��IIIIII / Iljll{
"— © II'� II II IIII IIII III LI'l
/ IIIII IIII 1 I'�11 \ /
I� ii IIIII IIIIII e ( IFiI111 Ic
1 \ 11 gIIIII III 1111g i� I I�j Il \I
�_ �1 IIII II II IIIII 1 / i I I.�GI \\
I� \I I`I—o1 ��II'I IIIIII Ig I�I111
II I �o pllllllll �� I/ I III I I IIIII' I III
- 1 I WII llley� / t1�1\i�
' \ I ���I1 � I I© IIII I'I II I'I y II1Ill
` i �I I\III III �d III \
\ y Iy
\ �l j1 �Illllltl��� IMP
I II � I° t I1111112 ��
% 1 II IIII \ II
tl t l t I III �1
�1 I
+ \t +
+�'-i
+
_\ +
_ _ \ pin90 �tr.oao2x I \Ill
I'
I
I'
L
/
rn\
-
\ \ p

czoez oN'w��� o woo
�216119 NII - 0
�ece�ss Nid -
mx pjouoo �A4o
-
r/
/ I
,ram
/
x
v I
a w x
�e v A x
\ \ soinv sm
R 1 �
_ k B
�aG
/ / / ✓ � // \� � \ � � e � � 3� � i � � � Inc I �
�g
1
a
33 + + +
P 11 1 A W+) + + 1
+ 1
+ + 1
1 \e3 emeanusa�/ bads +9 + + 1 i
+ + +
1 I
+ + + + + + + of
+ + + + + + + +
\\ pxnao e.xosx 1 a
E—

m o w � II I I II
A a I
o
soinv soy

czoez oN'wm�� �o woo
�216119 N11 _
�ece�ss Nid -
mx I =i pjouoo �A4o
HUM
x xx x x
x
V x i \ _ d' xx xx x to x xxx
soinv sm
AI
�q v
I
C
RIP
-> I
� � I
+ + +
+++
\\ A, +
+ +
+� + + 1 i
\ + + + + + + + + + + + I
_ \ Kn90 tr.osssx 1 1 � _
ei
\-A 1 1 1
1
�,. 1

}� ' ✓ �% r � / ''_, %I � � l �/�� r uteri e r
f � J
� - � � I -� y✓,� i � ' ' '"gam
I
� l
I
I o
tll F III
ll'I Fr
r !
�>71 I
/
I ��r
r
i
rl l
ail'/% i � iinllllquunl �\� ��. i
�r' r rl1°rdnnlll e-.1 �1 ,- I 'I II
In�'v�n��'�`.�
r
- I I r r l IeI IIIIII I r� />^ p
1` - 'I�'"�{ hlliir' Iligll'lllov ii�Ir�,�i I
I¢I i �611In 111✓1 �Iln m II,
' hl al I �I�II I"I'llllll I u1, 1'(I
� ea „�� No> o � o � _J irl r I 11 `i��'�' i'lll iil�iiillil IlliPllil�l li � '
�=_ - � "d' ✓ I ' II Ill�lp L III IIr o Ip�
", — - ✓� I "'' I'65� ✓III II ulll ulPul 1 I I
r 1 ull�lu
_ r I \NNI � I IpNlul � i I dill
r
6501� SOl ' � 8' 1 �A 'I rI011llUa d II'III
s"� i �. l 1 1 I 191 1II�IIIII i I I I'tII
_ I �"� I I I ' I jII�IIIIpNI I I I I I11
r � 1 q� 1 8s�3 � �i\ IJ � I IIIIIItulllllul I II` i
!1 ems:: �/ � I}`_ I IIIIgIIIJu I I I u I f
9^� o � ti`I�IIIIIIIIIIIII e �I I I I III'
-��II®® � i `, ��� �ol�uliilliilarlli �7i III"�li
I ', I Illulll III I
I - `, 'I lillllllluliii"I r� a� IIII
r -� � � , I IIIIIIilliallli' / � it l
_ � h � , ✓r � L- I 'll iun III i r
1
AHrg� uliui rrlll
1I u�
un
b II y f lili / Ilrlll
Nil,
§§3 Yet X o,� 9 i 5 1 nllu ill `I ` I i�'ll II
k� •-� mil t Y I i4 Il�ll�ll}P � ��1'II
., ly w�ln w � - i � k I � II pI II II IIIIII li Ili 'I
\� I k � 3 t sq . I ga a\ pon♦ _ Itl I I I II o% I � � II II<I I L
l JpJp I
I
1
--1 � 6,. • � � I o. � � � I I I`I � I'-1 ro I 'I II II
1I 1 I I
r p
T—
.I` l i .��'�✓.--i' - '- ,-�� �`���,6, � -`- `_ "���.� � _ _I — III ', 1 '� '{41�I o
nas mii. 1"I `
�..
I _
M (� i� ; �'/ (1 -- � w � ✓ ���,h , 1 IIII,`
1
I

® ®a
Frr,
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Illlllllllllll�i!!liiii!!!!llillllllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIII ;IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIII � IIIIIIIIIIII.._IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Illlr��l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .
IIII:::IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
fi
Id
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
®®®®®mmm
I I
®®®
!ll.ii
�
®� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .�w....:;::;,,:
Illllllllrllllllllllllllllllll (IIIIIIII .: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11111111111111-=_ IIIII (III IIII _ II-1111111111111111111111
III IIIII _-111111111 IIIIII=III (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I -
III IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
li lia! !! !!!� ..� 4•••�• -- •-
�.
IIIIIIIIIII

®
®a
LI.
-I I A
- - - -
_
r � ` �' u. �� ;,
°� � �°x� ��
A:3
..
-
I®I®I®IIIII®I®II
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIliiliiiiiiiiiliilllllllllllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-------
----liliriilliiiilliiiilllllllllllllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
II
II
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
(IIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
(IIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MEN
MEMEMEM

uoez oN'w��� /o wIo
�3� .,,,��, v nnsrtenn�MoiMallooez _
�u # � rE r", ^ �o*e., � 0000zeo lecelss Nld -
mj
pjoouop �A40
fl � /�% /% I � �� I� /</ r � �Yli��' a I I � �r I � e I I � � ��i'lipi Iql✓in �iii°ii�i�iiiil`ii i i'� I i �
/��'/// i' /I / ✓i 1 / //�� '�Iri a -loo m w - lII �i i �I/ryn/i'ioln�llllluuvudn 111
/uGiu to i/ 1 l ll!lf
f, Io, I_I a I D'hlk'((III�1'I�II �o
I II I ullunlll I I
�I I � � �> I � I `u _ _ o � _ � 11" / � � 111✓II Ih„q;''PoPlnnldll _ I I ,
I�✓_i ��//A� - '� ' / �'��rc��s�,�v ,� �=—_ _-�= --____ ��I ✓1 .� it lq �'nil'll'p l'� nlul IIII
III'ulpul
I - /�� / _ u11
Iv/'/'/C/ _ � __ spy`-;>c-�-__—_—"III III �I I I
ry � - � % 1` �-�I � � ✓�'�� °��
I
^{
/
`� 1\ ulllllyn eI I I
I / � E E, �t� / Ilp pulul I III
SOl � 11 I � p11 OIIUd J IIIIII
/- -�
\I�
1 d „�S P I i\ I i \ \�� I I\`�Illillli111 j I lly1� I�
\/'y� �or-ti��lllllllllllle I ' II
EINg \
I �' �,,�>�-''�1 `-� � _ . , . II I/ ` II `v P, _� � �r�/ �•��'li;��illlli��lll, I; .'I 11�
-Illiiiilillil 11 ii {IIII
Illomnll
I%���i
_6
l A �/I
II I III`,
p 7 I 11 I
'�I \I� I / 1\ `i \ �i /✓ I _ r 5'�`� �\Ir I I� I�i'l lli�l rll II111I
I
�'/%/ / / � /1�•1 ":, A i i / —J i/ �� I � � 1 I /v� 'vIIIII is I li i 11
Y� n
r I I I
tI 1 I ( 1 I II u11,�
III II'Ix
I 1
-
%��li//
/ � 111 ulllll I I I' / \ I I� � � 1444111}}}ggg ll
/ // IIIIIIIIIII II/ ���li l`rl II •',�- g 1.. 11 U'I'��u jl
flll`lllllll\ � I
1 � \III 11 11I /
11,41i1\
., m .! / / i li' (IIIIII II � �•�'\ N /� �� i I � '�1 k � .� Y \ � z. : \/ \\ I 1 � I� I 1 11I I I /0 1
Ir'If I tl Po 4-
— �✓`>��/ �Ir� �`��_—�___ �— _i1J _\ I�('�o�\-`�'t.� (�I ���) �I — \\_, `'\ 1� � IIII\e I /
� pin90 lS..oSc2 II\ 1
o.NRc
I
I YIn
I j/'/ \ � � �i yr� \•.^J r � `i �` �� R� V d � % ,\ 1 1 1 1 I I�'� I I
I / \ If �l 11 lllllll'
/ (','/
� � I
I

® ®a
d
1 1 r
1 11�
1 1
1

AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2022-01741 County: Cabarrus U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Kannapolis
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Bootsmead Lease Co LLC
Mark Fiddes
Address: 1717 S BoulderAvenue. Suite 400
Tulsa. OK 74119
Telephone Number: 704-549-4880
E-mail: marknguartilecapital.com
Size (acres) 60
Nearest Waterway Coddle Creek
USGS HUC 03040105
Nearest Town Concord
River Basin UnnerPeeDee
Coordinates Latitude:35.38002500
Longitude:-80.639759
Location description: Project is comprised of undeveloped forested land and open fields. The property is bound by Concord
Parkway to the North and George W. Liles parkway to the Westin Concord, Cabarrus County. North Carolina. PIN:
55197810620000
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appearto be waters onthe above described proj ectarea/property, that may be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate andreliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 8/2/2022. Therefore this preliminary jurisdictiondetermination
may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determinin g compensatory mitigation. Forpurposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and otherresource protection measures, a permit decision made onthe basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permittedactivity onthe site as if they
are jurisdictionalwaters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action underthe Regulatory Program
Administrative AppealProcess (Reference 33 CFRPart331). However, you may request an approved JD, whichis an appealable
action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appearto be waters onthe above described proj ectarea/property, that may be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdictiondetermination may notbe used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this prelim inary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over allof the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate andreliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend thaty on have the waters ony our project area/property delineated. As the Corps may notbe able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters ofthe United States within the above described project area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determinationmay be relied uponfor
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above describedproject area/property subjectto the permit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
WaterAct (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination maybe
relied upon fora period not to exceed five y cars from the date ofthis notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may notbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters onyourproject area/property have been delineated and the delineation hasbcenverifiedby theCorps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown onthe enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggestyouhave

SAW-2022-01741
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of allareas subject to CWAj urisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, maybe relied upon for a period notto exceedfive years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on theplat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination maybe relied
upon for aperiod not to exceedfive years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, presenton the above de scribed project area/property whichare subjectto the
permit requirements of Section404of the Clean WaterAct (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the laworourpublished
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon fora period notto exceedfive years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 CoastalCounties subject to regulation underthe Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contactthe Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Pla c em ent of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, in eluding wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute aviolationof Section301 of the C1eanWaterAct (33 USC § 1311). Placementof dredgedorfill material, construction or
placementof structures, orwork within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Armypermit may
constitute aviolationof Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or403). If you haveany questions
regardingthis determination and/orthe Corps regulatory program, please contact KrystynkaB Stygar at 252-545-0507or
krystynka.b.stygar amsace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the project area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33
CFR 328, Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05, the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and/or the
Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0: See the
preliminary _jurisdictional determination form dated 8/18/2022.
D. Remarks: see approximate aquatic resources on map, `PJD Field Sketch, Grounds at Concord —August
2022 "
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act j urisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or y o ur tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA pro gram s, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 3 3 CFR Part 3 3 1. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appeal this
determ ination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FloorM9
Atlanta, Georgia 3 0303 -8803
AND
PH ILIP.A. SHANNIN&USACE.ARMY.MIL,
In orderfor an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, thatit meets the criteriafor appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, andthatithas been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFAfonu, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit anRFAform to the Di vision Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 8/18/2022 ExpirationDate of JD-. Not applicable

SAW-2022-01741
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http: //corpsmapu. usace. army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Kimely-Horn
TaylorKiker
Address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 980-296-0810
E-mail: taylor.kikernkimely-horn com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Bootsmead Lease Co LLC,MarkFiddes File Number: SAW-2022-01741
Date: 8/18/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies yourrights and options regardingan administrative appealof the above decision.
Additionalinformation may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re"latoaProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Perm it, you may sign the perm it document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may acceptthe LOP andyourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeityourright to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of yourletter, the district engineer will evaluateyour
objections and may: (a) modify the perm itto address allof your concerns, (b) modify the perm itto address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the perm it having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluatingyour objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Perm it, you may sign the perm it document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may acceptthe LOP andyourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain term sand conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sendingthe form to the division engineer. This form mustbe received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denial of a perm it underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may acceptor appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appealthe approved JD underthe Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new inform ation for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR API IONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appea ling the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appealis limited to areview of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the appeal conference ormeeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neitherthe appellantnorthe Corpsmay addnewinformation oranalysesto the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regardingthis decision and/orthe If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHIL IP.A.SHANNINAUSACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15 -day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the oppornItunity to participate mall site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Krystynka B Stygar, 8430 University Executive park Drive, suite
615, Charlotte, North Carolina28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 1 OM15,Atlanta, Georgia30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 08/12/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Bootsmead Lease Co LLC, Mark Fiddes,
1717 S Boulder Avenue, Suite 400, Tulsa, OK 74119
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Grounds at Concord, SAW-
2022-01741
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project is comprised of undeveloped
forested land and open fields. The property is bound by Concord Parkway to the North and George W. Liles
parkway to the West in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. PIN: 55197810620000
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimalformat): Latitude: 35.38002500 Longitude:-80.639759
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearestwaterbody: Coddle Creek/wolf
meadowbranch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: August 18, 2022
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
(decimal
amountof
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
aquatic
wetland vs.
resource "may be"
resources in
non -wetland
subject (i.e., Section 404
reviewarea
waters)
or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Stream 1
35.380250
-80.639759
68 LF
Non -wetland
Section 440
waters
Wetland 1
35.382250
-80.643532
6.37 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 2
35.3772700
-80.638806
0.18 acres
Wetland
Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request

and obtain an approved 7D (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of 7Ds and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjectpermit authorization without
requesting an AID constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or
a PJD, the 7D will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U. S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U. S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Data sheets:
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
®U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 2, Kannapolis Map
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3, SSURGO Soils.
®Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 3, August 2022
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date): 07/12/2022-site photographs
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): LIDAR Figure 5
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily beenverified by the Corns
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
8/ 18/2022
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtainingthe signature is
impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Y' `" S �� XR k• 3
t y r t
�o,vel
c
L� r
17
•
Wetland 1 (6.37 ac),t ,
IIIC` _
j,
Q r, Stream 1 (68 LF/ 0.006 ac)
�o
„ �� � `y► Pf ri`:
r� O
Wetland 2 (0.18 ac)
Legend
o
13 Project Boundary
Photo Locations�5 �
5
Data Forms
flo
0 Up
O Wet
Wetlands (Potential Wetland WoUS)
Wetlands
Windswept Rd SW- ;_, .�� ..r �•
Streams (Potential Non -Wetland WoUS)-44
Feet
Streams
r; 0 370 740
Kimley>>Horn
Figure 4
PJD Field Sketch
Grounds at Concord
Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
August2022

ua
FIM
SE� .Fe
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 28, 2022
Gabby Barajas
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[e-mail]
Subject: Grounds at Concord Industrial Development; Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Dear Gabby Barajas:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received October 27, 2022, wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 etseq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the Applicant proposes to construct an industrial
development in Concord, North Carolina. The information provided suggests that the proposed
project will require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for unavoidable
impacts to Waters of the United States. No project design plans or a description of impacts to
onsite habitats have been prepared or provided to our office at this time
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
We appreciate your consideration for project -mediated impacts to the federally threatened
northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionahs). On September 21, 2022, the consultation range
for this animal was updated based on the best available scientific data. Based on the information
provided, the action area (50CFR 402.02) for this project is now outside of the species'
consultation range. Therefore, consultation for this animal is not required at this location.
Your correspondence indicates that suitable habitat is present onsite for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). However, targeted botanical surveys
conducted during the appropriate timeframes (September, 2022) did not detect evidence for this
species at that time. Based on the information provided, we believe that the probability for
inadvertent loss of this plant is insignificant and discountable and we would concur with a "may
affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the action agency. Botanical survey
results are valid for two years for the purposes of consultation under the Act:
httDS://www.fws. uov/asheville/Ddfs/ODtimal%20Survev%2OWindows%20for%2Olisted%20DIant
s%202020.pdf

Suitable habitat for tricolored bat (Perimyotis subfZavus) may present at the site. On September
14, 2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the tricolored bat as
endangered under the Act. The Service has up to 12 months from the date the proposal published
to make a final determination, either to list the tricolored bat under the Act or to withdraw the
proposal. The Service determined the bat faces extinction primarily due to the range -wide
impacts of WNS. Because tricolored bat populations have been greatly reduced due to WNS,
surviving bat populations are now more vulnerable to other stressors such as human disturbance
and habitat loss. Species proposed for listing are not afforded protection under the Act; however,
as soon as a listing becomes effective (typically 30 days after publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register), the prohibitions against jeopardizing its continued existence and "take" will
apply. Therefore, if you suspect your future or existing project may affect tricolored bats after
the potential new listing goes into effect, we recommend analyzing possible effects of the project
on tricolored bats and their habitat to determine whether consultation under section 7 of the Act
is necessary. Conferencing procedures can be followed prior to listing to ensure the project does
not jeopardize the existence of a species. Projects with an existing section 7 biological opinion
may require re -initiation of consultation to provide uninterrupted authorization for covered
activities. Please contact our office for additional guidance or assistance.
Monarch butterfly is a candidate species, and we appreciate the project proponent's
consideration of monarch butterfly when evaluating the action area for impacts to federally listed
species and their habitats. The species is not subject to section 7 consultation, and an effects
determination is not necessary. General recommendations for pollinators can be provided and
would be protective of monarch butterfly should the project proponent like to implement them in
the future.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled at this time. However,
obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not
previously considered, (2) the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was
not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that
may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following recommendations on behalf of natural resources:
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Impervious Surfaces and Low -Impact Development
Increased storm -water runoff also degrades aquatic and riparian habitat, causing stream -bank and
stream -channel scouring. Impervious surfaces reduce groundwater recharge, resulting in even

lower than expected stream flows during drought periods, which can induce potentially
catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other aquatic life. Accordingly, we recommend that all
new development, regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area they will create,
implement storm -water -retention and -treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the
hydrograph at the preconstruction condition to avoid any additional impacts to habitat quality
within the watershed.
We recommend the use of low -impact -development techniques, such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas, for
retaining and treating storm -water runoff rather than the more traditional measures, such as large
retention ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce
environmental impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used, storm -water outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior
to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow
for the slow discharge of storm water, attenuating the potential adverse effects of storm -water
surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges. Also, because the
purpose of storm -water -control measures is to protect streams and wetlands, no
storm -water -control measures or best management practices should be installed within any
stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-23-416.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0008949
Project Name: Grounds at Concord
August 09, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other

08/09/2023
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".

08/09/2023
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

08/09/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0008949
Project Name: Grounds at Concord
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: Less than truckload (LTL) freight facility
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/@35.380434550000004,-80.64148459364327,14z
Counties: Cabarrus County, North Carolina

08/09/2023
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME S TATU S
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME
S TATU S
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
S TATU S
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

08/09/2023
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treater of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.

08/09/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 28
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 20
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.

08/09/2023
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC ++++ ++1+ 41 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1- i� ++�+ ��++ +++1 ++++ ++++
Vulnerable
Cerulean Warbler I
C011
■■ ■■■
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ ++ ++++ ++.+ ..++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON) TEEN 1k'

08/09/2023
E
Chimney Swift ++++
BCC Rangewide I +++ 1 I L� 1 �i J0+10 0+1p —1" "++ ++++ ++++
(CON) — — — — — — — ---
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide +-I l l Jill l i l l 1 1 1 1- + I I I 1 I. I -. I I++-f I IIII d i l l
(CON)
Prothonotary +++ Z: ZJJJ '................ Warbler +++ + +++ + ++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ J+++ � �+ ��++ +'++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
MENMEN
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++.+ ..++ ++++'+'+ ++++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, ++'+ ++++ ++�+ ��'+ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.g//www.fws.gov/librqu/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-miuratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files///www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.Ddf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

08/09/2023 10
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

08/09/2023 11
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

08/09/2023
12
WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
• PF01A

08/09/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
Name:
Taylor Kiker
Address:
200 S Tryon St
Address Line 2:
Suite 200
City:
Charlotte
State:
NC
Zip:
28202
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9802960810

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
January 20, 2023
Doug Fox
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
doug foxgkimley-horn.com
Re: Construct ODFL Concord Service Center, Concord Parkway South and George W Liles Parkway
NW, Concord, Cabarrus County, ER 22-3036
Dear Mr. Fox:
Thank you for your letter of December 9, 2022, concerning the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental. reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

COMPENSATORY
MITIGATION

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Kyle Hoyt
Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC
346 Seacoast Parkway, Suite 200
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 25, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 1/25/2024
Project: ODFL Concord Service Center County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040105
Riparian Wetland
0.28
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Chris Tinklenberg, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street [ 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1652
OP9aIGnent of rnrnonmenldl a�al� �f 919,707,8976

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: SAW-2022-01741 NCDWR #:
Project Name ODFL Concord Service Center Date of Evaluation 07/12/2022
Applicant/Owner Name Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC Wetland Site Name W2
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Kimley-Horn
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Wolf Meadow Branch
River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040105
County Cabarrus NCDWR Region Mooresville
Yes i` No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.380067,-80.641496
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? C` Yes (-- No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes i No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
F_ Anadromous fish
F_ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
F_ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
F_ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
r Publicly owned property
r N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F_ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F_ Designated NCNHP reference community
F_ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
C` Blackwater
C` Brownwater
F_ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? f` Yes (+ No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
A A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Subsurface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief —assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
�+` C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. i` A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
i` C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
i` D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
i` E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. i+` A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
i` B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. i+` A No peat or muck presence
i` B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
F_ A F_ A F_ A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
F_ B F_ B F_ B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
F_ C F_ C F_ C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
F_ D F_ D F_ D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F_ E F_ E F_ E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F_ F F_ F F_ F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
F_ G F_ G F_ G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
(— Yes (— No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
A >_ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
(— <_ 15-feet wide (— > 15-feet wide (— Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
(— Yes (— No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A A >_ 100 feet
B B From 80 to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 80 feet
D D From 40 to < 50 feet
E E From 30 to < 40 feet
F F From 15 to < 30 feet
G G From 5 to < 15 feet
H H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
�` C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)

10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K' for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
A A A >_ 500 acres
B B B From 100 to < 500 acres
t` C t` C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D t` D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E t` E From 10 to < 25 acres
F t` F f` F From 5 to < 10 acres
G i G r G From 1 to < 5 acres
H i H r H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I i+' I (+ I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J r J i' J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K (— K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness —wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
A t` A >_ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C t` C From 50 to < 100 acres
D t` D From 10 to < 50 acres
E t` E < 10 acres
F t` F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
(— Yes (— No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect —wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
A 0
B 1to4
C 5 to 8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
r- Yes (— No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
above the
assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA
WT
�+` A
r: A
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
o
t` B
B
Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
m
U
C
C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
t` A
A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
in
r: B
r+ B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer

C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
s A A Dense shrub layer
t r: B r: B Moderate density shrub layer
c C C Shrub layer sparse or absent
A A Dense herb layer
B B Moderate density herb layer
C C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags —wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland typelopen water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B C D
Iv
1 \,
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual
Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name W2
Date
07/12/2022
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
Kimley-Horn
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Particulate Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Soluble Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Physical Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology Condition
Water Quality Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Habitat Condition
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: ODFL Concord Service Center City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2023-04-19
Applicant/Owner: Hoyt & Berenyi, LLC State: NofthCaroha Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Investigator(s):RDF, GFB Section, Township, Range: Concord
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 35.37836591 Long: -80.6390847 Datum. WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: ArA - Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No V (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No -
- Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �/ No
Remarks:
Sampling point W2-Wet is situated in the floodplain of Stream 1. The hydrology of W2 is primarily influenced by
overbank flooding from Stream 1, surface water runoff, and toe -of -slope seepage. According to the APT,
conditions were "wetter than normal".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology is primarily influenced by toe -of -slope seepage and overbank flooding of Stream
2. Hydrology indicators include a high water table (at depth of 6 inches), saturation (at depth
of 0 inches), and water stained leaves.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Quercus phellos
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r )
Acer rubrum
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
i Liquidambar stvraciflua
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r )
1. Carex brunnescens
2. Ligustrum sinense
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 23.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1.
2.
5.
50% of total cover:
numpers nere or on a sepa
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
20
✓
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7
(A)
15
✓
FAC
10
✓
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
8
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87•5
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
45% = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 9.0
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
_
FACW species
60
x 2 =
120
15 ✓ FAC
FAC species
65
x 3 =
195
15 ✓ FACW
FACU species
12
x 4 =
48
15 ✓ FAC
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
137
(A)
363 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.65
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
45% = Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20%of total cover: 9.0
-
-
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
30 ✓ FACW
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10 ✓ FACU
5 FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
47% = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 9.4
-
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present?
20% of total cover:
Yes ✓ No
Based on the dominance test and the prevalence index, a hydrophytic vegetation community
is present in the sampled area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-8 N 2.5/ 70
7.5YR 4/4 30 C M
Clay
8 - 20 N 2.5/ 90
7.5YR 3/4 10 C M
Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
An umbric surface was observed from 0 to 20 inches.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: ODFL Concord Service Center City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2023-04-19
Applicant/Owner: Hoyt + Berenyi, LLC State: NofthCaroha Sampling Point: W2-Up
Investigator(s):RDF. GFB Section, Township, Range: Concord
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 35.37764138 Long: -80.63809076 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: ArA - Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No V (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes — No
H dric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
y — — within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point W2-Up is located on the hillslope adjacent to the floodplain of Stream 1.
According to the APT, conditions were "wetter than normal".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators were not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Carya ovata
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4. Juniperus virginiana
s Ulmus alata
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 21.0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r )
1 Acer rubrum
2. Carya glabra
i Ilex opaca
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 12.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
4. Paspalum notatum
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
2.
5.
50% of total cover: 2•5
numpers nere or on a sepa
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
10
✓
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
(A)
10
✓
FACU
10
✓
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
10
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
10
✓
FACU
2
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
42% = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 8.4
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
_
FACW species 10
x 2 =
20
15 ✓ FAC
FAC species 30
x 3 =
90
5 ✓ FACU
FACU species 72
x 4 =
288
5 ✓ FACU
UPL species 0
x 5=
0
Column Totals: 112
(A)
398 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.55
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
25% = Total Cover
_
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 5.0
-
-
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
20 ✓ FACU
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10 ✓ FACU
5 FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
40% = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 8.0
-
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
5 ✓ FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5% = Total Cover Present?
20% of total cover: 1.0
Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed.
Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Sandy Clay
8 -16 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Clay Some gravel in soil
16 - 20 10YR 3/6 100 Sandy Clay High clay content, manganese present
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soil was not observed.
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 4/19/2023
Project/Site: S2 - oDFL Concord
Service Center
Latitude: 35.37923
Evaluator: RAF & GB
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.638613
Total Points: 34
Stream Determination (ci e)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:�K,annapolls
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 18
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2­1
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes
S2 originates off -site and flows for 1,621 LF before continuing off -site.