HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0015931_More Information (Requested)_20230523ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
CHARLES B. LONG — BACK-UP ORC
TNGC CHARLOTTE LLC
120 TRUMP SQUARE
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28117
Dear Mr. Long:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 23, 2023
Subject: Application No. WQ0015931
Additional Information Request #3
Trump National Golf Club
Charlotte WWTP
Reclaimed Water Generation &
Dedicated Utilization System
Iredell County
Division of Water Resources' Central and Regional staff has reviewed the application package
received on August 10, 2022, and subsequent additional information received on December 28, 2022, and
March 3, 2023. However, additional information is required before the review may be completed. Please
address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on June 22, 2023.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina
rules and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are
still the Applicant's responsibility. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the outstanding items
in Section A, or failure to provide the additional information on or before the above -requested date may
result in your application being returned as incomplete pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0107(e)(2).
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All
revised and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed, and dated (where needed), with an
electronic response submitted to my attention at: hitps://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Fonns/NonDischarge-Branch-
Submittal-Form-Ver2.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (919) 707-3658 or
zachary.mega@deq.nc.gov. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Docuftned by:
A4-163-
45A56104B4524E7...
Zachary J. Mega, Engineer II
Division of Water Resources
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy)
Donald L. Munday, PE — Piedmont Design Associates, P.A. (Electronic Copy)
Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy)
D North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
EQ7>
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
oeparonem of enmmamemai uuar� /`� 919.707.9000
Mr. Charles B. Long
May 23, 2023
Page 2 of 2
A. Overall:
The Applicant's description of the proposed Phase I facilities regarding dual facilities for essential
treatment units (i.e., Comment A.I in the Response Letter dated April 3, 2023) does not meet 15A
NCAC 02U .0402(c). The submitted Engineering Calculations show the effluent from the first
textile filter unit does not meet the monthly average five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)
of 10 mg/L before the polishing filter unit. If either the first textile filter unit or the polishing filter
unit was to go offline for maintenance or repairs in this configuration, Type 1 reclaimed water
effluent standards would not be met per 15A NCAC 02U .0301(b).
Please either revise the application package:
a. To show a piping configuration for the first textile filter unit that allows continued operation
while it is isolated for repairs; or
b. To install the second Phase II textile filter unit with the Phase I facilities.
Additionally, can the UV units in series operate individually if one were to go offline for
maintenance or repairs?
2. In regards to the Applicant's response to Comment A.2 in the Response Letter dated April 3, 2023,
the permitted flow is the most restrictive of the treatment capacity and the disposal capacity. For
the proposed Phase I facilities, the treatment capacity is 10,000 GPD (per the submitted
Engineering Calculations) and the disposal capacity remains unchanged at 20,000 GPD between
the existing drip and spray fields. A review of recent NDMRs shows the average monthly flow for
the existing facility is well below 10,000 GPD.
If the second Phase II textile filter unit is not installed with the Phase I facilities, the permitted flow
for this permit renewal with major modification will be 10,000 GPD. No response is required.
Maria Schutte of the Mooresville Regional Office has concerns about the location of the sampling
port, which is currently proposed on the effluent side of the polishing filter unit prior to UV
disinfection. She would prefer to see it moved to the effluent side of UV disinfection prior to
irrigation. There is a potential for fecal coliform spikes in monitoring data with the sampling port
in its current location. If the sampling port will not be moved, what will be done operationally to
remedy this?