Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0015931_More Information (Requested)_20230523ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR. Director CHARLES B. LONG — BACK-UP ORC TNGC CHARLOTTE LLC 120 TRUMP SQUARE MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28117 Dear Mr. Long: NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality May 23, 2023 Subject: Application No. WQ0015931 Additional Information Request #3 Trump National Golf Club Charlotte WWTP Reclaimed Water Generation & Dedicated Utilization System Iredell County Division of Water Resources' Central and Regional staff has reviewed the application package received on August 10, 2022, and subsequent additional information received on December 28, 2022, and March 3, 2023. However, additional information is required before the review may be completed. Please address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on June 22, 2023. Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the Applicant's responsibility. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the outstanding items in Section A, or failure to provide the additional information on or before the above -requested date may result in your application being returned as incomplete pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0107(e)(2). Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed, and dated (where needed), with an electronic response submitted to my attention at: hitps://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Fonns/NonDischarge-Branch- Submittal-Form-Ver2. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (919) 707-3658 or zachary.mega@deq.nc.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Docuftned by: A4-163- 45A56104B4524E7... Zachary J. Mega, Engineer II Division of Water Resources cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy) Donald L. Munday, PE — Piedmont Design Associates, P.A. (Electronic Copy) Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy) D North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources EQ7> 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 NORTH CAROLINA oeparonem of enmmamemai uuar� /`� 919.707.9000 Mr. Charles B. Long May 23, 2023 Page 2 of 2 A. Overall: The Applicant's description of the proposed Phase I facilities regarding dual facilities for essential treatment units (i.e., Comment A.I in the Response Letter dated April 3, 2023) does not meet 15A NCAC 02U .0402(c). The submitted Engineering Calculations show the effluent from the first textile filter unit does not meet the monthly average five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) of 10 mg/L before the polishing filter unit. If either the first textile filter unit or the polishing filter unit was to go offline for maintenance or repairs in this configuration, Type 1 reclaimed water effluent standards would not be met per 15A NCAC 02U .0301(b). Please either revise the application package: a. To show a piping configuration for the first textile filter unit that allows continued operation while it is isolated for repairs; or b. To install the second Phase II textile filter unit with the Phase I facilities. Additionally, can the UV units in series operate individually if one were to go offline for maintenance or repairs? 2. In regards to the Applicant's response to Comment A.2 in the Response Letter dated April 3, 2023, the permitted flow is the most restrictive of the treatment capacity and the disposal capacity. For the proposed Phase I facilities, the treatment capacity is 10,000 GPD (per the submitted Engineering Calculations) and the disposal capacity remains unchanged at 20,000 GPD between the existing drip and spray fields. A review of recent NDMRs shows the average monthly flow for the existing facility is well below 10,000 GPD. If the second Phase II textile filter unit is not installed with the Phase I facilities, the permitted flow for this permit renewal with major modification will be 10,000 GPD. No response is required. Maria Schutte of the Mooresville Regional Office has concerns about the location of the sampling port, which is currently proposed on the effluent side of the polishing filter unit prior to UV disinfection. She would prefer to see it moved to the effluent side of UV disinfection prior to irrigation. There is a potential for fecal coliform spikes in monitoring data with the sampling port in its current location. If the sampling port will not be moved, what will be done operationally to remedy this?