20150694 Ver 1_401 Application_20150715

WITHERS &— RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
LETTER OF T° ° I SIn�MALA
DATE 7/13/15 I JOB NO 02130270.00
ATrENTI ON
Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONE#
919 -807 -6363
RE: Weston Corners Apartments — Cary, Wake Co.
NWP 29 PCN & Buffer Authorization Request
TO: NC Division of Water Resources i
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9`h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change order ❑ Diskette ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
4 7/13/15 02130270.00 NWP 29 & Buffer Authorization PCN
1 7/13/15 02130270.00 CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS:
Signature:
Date:
COPY TO: File SIGNED: Troy Beasley
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS �. C R,A VEN EL
July 13, 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. David Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Weston Corners Apartments — NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Corps AID# SAW - 2013 -01605
W &R Project #02130270.00
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Woodfield Investments, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 29
for 90 if of permanent stream impacts for the construction of the proposed apartment complex. The
proposed impacts are less than 150 if and will occur to a non - buffered stream, and therefore, written
authorization from NCDWR is not required in regards to 401 requirements. However, we are
requesting a Buffer Authorization for 1,053 sq ft of permanent impacts to Neuse River Riparian
Buffers for the construction of a greenway trail and stormwater BMP bypass outfall.
The project is ±11.35 acres in size and is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of
Weston Parkway and Evans Road in Cary, Wake County (Latitude: 35.8261 °N; Longitude: -
78.8040 °W). The project is located in the Neuse River basin (HUC 03020201) and the site drains to
Crabtree Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Crabtree Creek is C; NSW and the Stream Index
Number is: 27-3341)•
Proposed Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 308 unit apartment complex to meet the
demand for housing within the Weston Parkway commercial corridor. The proposed project consists
of the construction of three apartment buildings, an amenity pool, a parking deck and associated
infrastructure (i.e. internal roads, utilities, greenway, stormwater management, etc).
The proposed apartment complex will provide housing within walking distance of 4000+ jobs within
the numerous offices along the Weston Parkway corridor. By providing housing within walking
distance of jobs, the project will help to decrease traffic on the main thoroughfares during the
morning and afternoon rush hour commutes.
Proiect History
The site was originally reviewed by David Shaeffer on May 31ST, 2013 (SAW -2013- 01605) and
confirmed that there were no wetlands on the site and three jurisdictional streams. I have enclosed
a Preliminary JD Request which documents the site conditions reviewed by David Shaffer in 2013.
We are requesting issuance of the Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832

Weston Corners Apartments — NWP 29 PCN
7/13/15
In an email dated March 27th, 2015, David Shaeffer confirmed that there were no prior permitting
actions associated with the subject property, and that any proposed impacts for the current project
would not be considered cumulative with any previous projects. A copy of the email has been
provided as an Appendix.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter (NBRRO# 14 -365) on October 7th, 2014. A copy of the
Buffer Determination letter has been provided as an Appendix.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of go if of permanent stream impacts and 1,053 sq ft of permanent
buffer impacts.
The proposed go if of permanent stream impacts (Impact #3) will occur from construction of building
1.
The proposed 1,053 sq ft of permanent buffer impacts will occur at Impacts 1 & 2. Impact #1 (Zone 2:
174 sq ft) consists of the construction of a 6' wide greenway trail, which will connect to the existing
greenway trail along the southern property boundary. Impact #2 (Zone 1: 633 sq ft; Zone 2: 246 sq
ft) is required for the construction of the high flow bypass for the constructed wetland BMP.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
The site design is constrained by the perennial stream and associated loo' Town of Cary buffers
along the southern property boundary. Additionally, due to the topography of the site, the
stormwater BMP must be located in the southern portion of the site, which is the lowest area, and
could not be relocated anywhere else on the site without massive earth removal to lower the grade
of the entire site, for which the cost would render the project unfeasible. These two constraints
pushed the proposed layout further north, resulting in impacts to the northern stream.
The proposed impacts have been limited to the northern stream. The proposed design will impact
the entire go if of the northern stream as a result of tying site fill to the existing grade at Weston
Parkway. The downstream portions of the stream proposed to be impacted have been historically
piped for the construction of Weston Parkway, Sage Commons and the Marriott Hotel. Additionally,
this stream is an unmapped, unbuffered stream and is fed entirely by ephemeral upland runoff, with
no wetlands upstream or adjacent to the stream. Overall, the functional value of the onsite stream
is extremely low, and should be considered an unimportant intermittent stream.
Therefore, impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable, while maintaining a
feasible project.
Mitigation
Since the proposed impacts are less than 150 If, and will occur to a low quality remnant stream, no
mitigation is proposed.
WITHERS & RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

Weston Corners Apartments — NWP 29 PCN
7/13/15
Stormwater Management Plan
The stormwater management plan consists of a constructed wetland, which will provided go% TSS
removal, as well as nitrogen removal. The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and
approved by the Town of Cary.
The current request is for go if of permanent stream impacts and 1,053 sq ft of permanent buffer
impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Corps Stream Quality Form
• DWR Buffer Determination Letter
• Corps Email on No Previous Impacts
• Preliminary JD Request
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS & RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

O�O�_ W ATF9QG
Elm
1. Processing
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ No
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑ Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Weston Corners
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Highwoods Services, Inc
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 007744; Page: 00245
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3100 Smoketree Court; Suite 600
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604 -1050
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
� No �
i
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Mike Underwood
4c.
Business name
Woodfield Investments
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
300 Mountain Maple Drive
4e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27519
4f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 740 -8877
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
sunderwood @woodfieldinvestments.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
Withers and Ravenel
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
0755851694
Latitude: 35.8261'N Longitude: - 78.8040 °W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
±11.35 acres
Crabtree Creek {Stream Index: 27- 33 -(1)}
C;NSW
Neuse River (HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of undeveloped woodlands within the heavily developed Weston Parkway corridor. The
general land use in the vicinity consists of commercial development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A — There are no wetlands on the property.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
90 If of intermittent stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 308 unit apartment complex to meet the demand for housing within
the Weston Parkway commercial corridor. The proposed apartment complex will provide housing within walking distance
of 4000+ jobs within the numerous offices along the Weston Parkway corridor. By providing housing within walking
distance of jobs, the project will help to decrease traffic on the main thoroughfares during the morning and afternoon rush
hour commutes.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of a 308 unit apartment complex. Standard commercial construction equipment and techniques will
be used to construct the proposed project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No F1 Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: S &EC
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
David Shaeffer conducted a site visit with S &EC on May 31, 2013 (SAW- 2013 - 01605) and determined that there were no
wetlands, and the only jurisdictional features were the intermittent stream in the west, and a large perennial stream along
the southern property boundary. S &EC never submitted a JD Request associated with this site visit. Therefore, a
Preliminary JD Request has been submitted with this PCN, and we are requesting issuance of the Preliminary JD in
conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
Sarah Knies with NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter (NBRRO #14 -365) for the project site on October 7, 2014.
A copy of the Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Unknown
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑P ❑T
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #3
Fill
UT to Crabtree El PER
® Corps
3'
90 If
® P ❑ T
Lake ® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
90 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d.
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of
number pond
P1
I WAI
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a
Project is in which protected basin?
6b.
6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Permanent (P)
for impact
or Temporary
(T)
Impact #1
® P ❑ T
Greenway
Impact #2
BMP
® P ❑ T
Outfall
6i. Comments:
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. 6f.
Buffer Zone 1 impact
Stream name mitigation (square feet)
required?
UT to Crabtree Creek ® Nos N/A
UT to Crabtree Creek ® Nos 518 sq ft
6h. Total buffer impacts
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
❑ Other:
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
272 sq ft
427 sq ft
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
The site design is constrained by the perennial stream and associated 100' Town of Cary buffers along the southern property
boundary. Additionally, due to the topography of the site, the stormwater BMP must be located in the southern portion of the
site, which is the lowest area, and could not be relocated anywhere else on the site without massive earth removal to lower
the grade of the entire site, for which the cost would render the project unfeasible. These two constraints pushed the
proposed layout further north, resulting in impacts to the northern stream.
The proposed impacts have been limited to the northern stream. The proposed design will impact the entire 90 If of the
northern stream as a result of tying site fill to the existing grade at Weston Parkway. The downstream portions of the stream
proposed to be impacted have been historically piped for the construction of Weston Parkway, Sage Commons and the
Marriott Hotel. Additionally, this stream is an unmapped, unbuffered stream and is fed entirely by ephemeral upland runoff,
with no wetlands upstream or adjacent to the stream. Overall, the functional value of the onsite stream is extremely low, and
should be considered an unimportant intermittent stream.
Therefore, impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable, while maintaining a feasible project.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed to prevent the escape of sediment into downstream waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) I Type I Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes [A No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
Town of Cary
® Phase II
® NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
ORW
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located within a heavily developed commercial corridor along Weston Parkway, and will not be a
specific catalyst for future development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Cary
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at httos:// ncnhde .natureserve.orq /content/mao to
identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the
NHP data did not identify any occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0
miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any
federally protected species known to occur in Wake County, except for the Northern Long Eared Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long -eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. Since the entire project area consists of mature forest over 3" DBH, there is potential northern
long eared bat habitat present. In an email from USFWS dated April 15, 2015, the USFWS has specified that a project
may result in an adverse effect on the NLEB is there will be cutting or destroying of mature forest within 0.25 miles of an
known roosting site, or if the project involves the cutting or destroying of known, occupied roost trees during the pup
season (June 1St — July 31St). The only known active roost tree site is in Currituck County. Therefore, the proposed
project is not located within 0.25 miles of any known roost trees. Furthermore, clearing of mature forest between June 1 St
and July 31 st is not anticipated for construction of the proposed project. Therefore, W &R concludes that the project "may
affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long -eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: htto: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hi)oweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaDs.com
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Troy Beasley — W &R
7/13/15
Authorized Agent
Applicant /Agent's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WITHERS RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS i SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, Woodfield Investments (Client) does hereby appoint
Withers & Ravenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a)
review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
permit applications /requests for the Weston Corners oroiect (PIN 0755851694), located in the
southeastern quadrant of the intersection of Weston Parkwav and Evans Road in Cara,
Wake Countv.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone
Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Carv. NC 27511
Tel. (919)- 469 -3340
Date:
Signature of(Client'
Sc L,-,t tju A uuvco
(Name - Prinxt) (Title)
Mailing Address
CL,v l 1,4ICr Zi7r-I l
City / State Zip
Phone: �% 7'.S 3' 6 2q,7
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive J Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com j License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

USGS QUAD &
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

y\ u f k
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
Lim�'a i 1 - ♦ Q \ l� \t bm! 0
1 inch = 2000 ft.
_ � C
"/
r3m, �
c- 1
\ `,�� t)rr• .19,";1�.� \�:�� +; \, rte% S /_ ��-' i
\`rte l 6ry V 1+ •:N,\� d�e� I D
• ��\� \ !Gems • .i,• y \�/ `1 l a �� J, J�`1 —.� I c i- �Il \ \, l 1 t:, > + .,. 1.
m 305
i
F .: _. ._�.- � - -• /I ' � ~ .��1 .� � ` fl �/ raj i� -- lid � `•• ^ �•_• _- r.
!1 / t' •� r��. 'J�__
Aso \, �. %� � i ? `'• '" �''
WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS USGS QUAD - CARY WITHER8 RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft. I
M
i/
000,
� • �AO
r .
WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
14*-
i_J
•' •
L Zo
I
(60
USGS QUAD - CARY WITHER8 & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS

WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 46 WITHERS RAVENEL
ENiINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
CAR, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

CORPS STREAM QUALITY FORM

USACE AID# SAW - 020 l 3 - O 160,5_ DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,®„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _AW
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:_ Wou ►_ iWeS' TS 2. Evaluator's name7l;�.f
3. Date of evaluation: 312 0 f rr 4. Time of evaluation:,- [;►l: �C7
5. Name of stream:_ UT +D ' f .6 Gle. e. k- 6. River basin: aj+P_I s e- - b 3 Cao xo
7. Approximate drainage area: ±4 aCv2S
9. Length of reach evaluated: ?o I ;
8. Stream order: L
10. County: WK 16e- -
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
�y
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35. '92161 a Al Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): _ r} ?-190400 t4J
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet 0rtho (Aerial) Photo /C, Other G[S Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map, identifying stream(s) location):
�t�r \ �•� (3 trk-7 � A e� 5'�Y�CX.i+41 a-` lLI C.YI+�c�.T�'1 �1 D�3 La.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): lz� 11
15. Recent weather conditions: A6,ve_ nalfrruJ mf rx-1rc 2
16. Site conditions at time of visit: rl ,*&If'
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES N,!�) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? N
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5z) % Residential 41/6 Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
10--0/0 Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
t
22. Bankfull width: 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): very 41 Ca SE
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) YGentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ✓Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): `v Comments: -EA
S�Ar�,rt .'�... rrr►�;v� �taw,�hroc�rvti O,rrr- �- ifs,rs 'rYr��ri� n11,+an�. a[nr�- F���t?h'►r�
Evaluator's Signature ( Bate JI z�
This channel evaluation form is in nded to be used only as "uide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by t e United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 -
4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
— Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0—
5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no dischar es = max points)
1
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0
-2
r/1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
( /
p"
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0—
5
0—
4
0—
2
(deepl entrenched = 0: frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0. large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0, little or no sediment = max points)
rl1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
_
0-4
0
- 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0
- 4
0-5
I
�r
(deeply incised = 0. stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0
-5
0
-5
0
-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0
-3
0
-4
0
-5
H
(no visible roots = 0, dense roots throughout = max oints)
rA
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
-5
0
-4
0
-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool/ripple -pool complexes
0
-3
0
-5
0
-6
F
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
t�
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0
— 5
0-5
(no shading vegeNtion = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
ubsfrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
a
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0
- 5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0-4
0
- 4
0-4
V►
21 Presence of amphibians
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es =max points)
a
O
22
Presence of fish
0
-4
0
-4
0
-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
a
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max p2intsl.
1
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

DWR BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER

FIFWA
NCDENi
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Martin Richmond
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
October 7, 2014
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO# 14 -3 65
Wake County
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) ❑ Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 213 .0267)
Project Name: Woodfield at Weston Apartments (Wake County Pin # 0755851694)
Location/Directions: Subject property is a privately owned lot located at project address; project
is located in southeastern quadrant of Weston Parkway and Evans Road in
Cary, Wake County
Subject Stream: UT to Crabtree Creek
Determination Date: 10/6/2014
Staff: Sara Knies
Stream/ El"* Not Subject Subject Start@ Stop@
Soil USGS
Feature to Buffers to
Survey Topo
Buffers
A I X Throughout Throughout
X X
B E X
X
C ** I X S &EC Flagging Throughout
*EIIIP = Ephemeral /Intermittent /Perennial
* *Features C is not depicted on Wake County Soil Survey or USGS Topographic maps, and
is therefore not subject
to DWR buffers. Feature C is subject t0 401 /isolated waters permitting.
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
NNo rthCarolina
ahmall,#
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.ora. Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

Woodfield at Weston Apartments
10/7/2014
Page 2 of 2
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)- 807 -6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -554 -4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Sara Knies • t (919) 791 -4258.
nicer y,
Danny Smi
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy

SAAR 4-4 401 /t4g6-1&kA4 wojefl,
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 z0n 200
1 inch — 200 ft.
WOODFIELD AT WESTON APTS
(Mfi %VAYS COUA]Y .NtCAMCARMN
I a mqm .1 Y V%k
044
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVE_ -SHEET 46 WITHERS RAVENEL
at�iAtett r ■lwkbatf 1 ■YR1ft••Rf
a

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1a0 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
�s
C
4 r_,lf V
a
1-
c
ySair —i
FE1ftE B
4 {
�, ,.�
„
' E '
do
�� ¢ r'' ' � � .,,� � �' /�• "' .:yw: sir
WOODFIELD AT WESTON APTS I USGS QUAD - CARY
WITHERS RAVENEL
lMlltlltf 1 •LI1t Mf tf 1 {U ■Vl1.Ot{
.CA$Y WAti MN1Y

1
~ r J
low
to ft.
TIP.,
t
Pi
`r -- STREAM NOT s.
F '- - DEPICTED` 14
FEATURE B
FEATURE A

CORPS EMAIL ON
NO PREVIOUS IMPACTS

Beasley, Troy
From: Shaeffer, David L SAW < David .L.Shaeffer @usace.army.miI>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Beasley, Troy; Cherri Smith
Subject: RE: SAW- 2013 -01605 RE: Weston Corners Apartments - Cary, Wake County - Request
for Pre -App Consultation (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
No ... I never found anything so treat it as single and complete.
David L. Shaeffer, Geographer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: 919 - 554 -4884 ext. 31 Fax: 919 - 562 -0421
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http : / /regulatory.usacesurvey.com /
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Beasley, Troy [mailto:TBeasley @withersravenel.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:19 PM
To: Shaeffer, David L SAW; Cherri Smith
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: SAW- 2013 -01605 RE: Weston Corners Apartments - Cary, Wake County - Request for Pre -App
Consultation (UNCLASSIFIED)
Good afternoon David. I know you're out in the field today. Did you ever get a chance to do any research on this? We
are getting ready to submit the PCN for this, and I just need to know what you've decided about cumulative impacts and
whether or not mitigation is required. As I said in my previous email, I'm pretty sure that each parcel has been treated
as its own single and complete project with no overall permit for the entire development. So I don't believe that there
should be any cumulative impacts associated with this project.
Thanks for your help. Let me know if you have any questions.
Troy Beasley
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Unit 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Direct: 910.509.6512 Mobile: [phone] tbeasley @withersravenel.com www.withersravenel.com NOTICE OF
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE: This electronic message, which includes any attachments and other
documents referred to herein, contains information from Withers & Ravenel, Inc. that may be proprietary or
confidential. The information is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Copyright 2010 Withers & Ravenel, Inc. All Rights Reserved by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. This
electronic message, any attachments thereto and all documents referred to therein are provided for the recipient's
information only, and no rights are licensed, transferred or otherwise granted by the transmission of this electronic
message by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. or receipt of this message by the recipient or any other party.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:46 PM
To: 'Shaeffer, David L SAW'; Cherri Smith
Subject: RE: SAW- 2013 -01605 RE: Weston Corners Apartments - Cary, Wake County - Request for Pre -App Consultation
(UNCLASSIFIED)
David,
Thanks for the info. I'll plan on submitting a JD Request Packet with the PCN to tie up the loose ends.
This parcel is part of the overall Weston PUD, which literally includes everything on Weston Parkway. But I'm pretty sure
that each parcel that was developed that required impacts has been permitted separately. This project is just southeast
of the MetLife site. I believe that MetLife had impacts that required permitting. So the permitting for this site would be
the same as the MetLife site.
Troy
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Shaeffer, David L SAW [mailto:David.L.Shaeffer @usace.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:29 PM
To: Beasley, Troy; Cherri Smith
Subject: SAW- 2013 -01605 RE: Weston Corners Apartments - Cary, Wake County - Request for Pre -App Consultation
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
H i Troy,
I only conducted a site visit. No JD package was submitted. This is one reason I am much more strict with JD requests.
You will need to put one together. Another site visit is not necessary. The file number is SAW- 2013 - 01605.
Do you know if this area is part of a larger commercial /residential park that we previously permitted?
Thanks,
David L. Shaeffer, Geographer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: 919 - 554 -4884 ext. 31 Fax: 919 - 562 -0421

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http : / /regulatory.usacesurvey.com/
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Beasley, Troy [mailto:TBeasley @withersravenel.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:05 AM
To: Shaeffer, David L SAW; Cherri Smith
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Weston Corners Apartments - Cary, Wake County - Request for Pre -App Consultation
Good afternoon David / Cherri. I wanted to touch base with you guys regarding a project I am working on called Weston
Corners Apartments, which is located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection of Weston Parkway and Evans
Road in Cary.
David - you conducted a site visit to verify the wetland delineation with S &EC on May 31, 2013. 1 believe they may have
simply called the site "Weston Site ". I unfortunately don't have the AID #.
Sarah Knies issued a buffer determination for the site on October 7, 2014 (NBRRO #14 -365).
I have attached the proposed site plan which exhibits the proposed 90 If of stream impacts in the northwestern portion
of the site for construction of an apartment building. The site design is constrained by the perennial stream and
associated buffers along the southern property boundary. Additionally, due to the topography of the site, the
stormwater BMP must be located in the southern portion of the site which is the lowest area of the site. This pushed
the proposed design further north, resulting in impacts to the northern stream. The proposed design will result in the
impact to the entire 90 If of onsite stream as a result of tying fill for the apartment building to existing grade at Weston
Parkway.
The downstream portions of the stream proposed to be impacted have been historically piped for the construction of
Weston Parkway, Sage Commons and the Merriot Hotel. Only 90 If of the stream remains upstream of Weston Parkway
within the proposed project site. Furthermore, the stream proposed to be impacted is an unmapped, unbuffered
stream and is fed entirely by ephemeral upland runoff, with no wetlands upstream or adjacent to the stream. Overall,
the functional value of this section of stream is extremely low, and should be considered an unimportant intermittent
stream.
I would like to get your feedback prior to submitting the PCN so that I can address any comments or concerns in the
PCN. Also, since the stream impacts are less than 150 If and will occur to an unimportant intermittent channel, I was to
confirm that mitigation will not be required.
Thanks in advance for your help. Have a great day.

Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel< http:// www. withersraveneI .com /sigs /WRLogo.gif>
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Unit 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Direct: 910.509.6512 Mobile: [phone] tbeasley @withersravenel.com www.withersravenel.com
<http: / /www.withersravenel.com>
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE: This electronic message, which includes any attachments and other
documents referred to herein, contains information from Withers & Ravenel, Inc. that may be proprietary or
confidential. The information is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Copyright 2010 Withers & Ravenel, Inc. All Rights Reserved by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. This
electronic message, any attachments thereto and all documents referred to therein are provided for the recipient's
information only, and no rights are licensed, transferred or otherwise granted by the transmission of this electronic
message by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. or receipt of this message by the recipient or any other party.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

PRELIMINARY JD REQUEST

& tdi i4
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: as ni ht EE cW ni&hi (5 V% My ad En Rd
City, State: 4 �c
County: Wh GA
Directions:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: §T Yh -Uri & P&
Mailing Address: V OnT" po es 1) wi i c M
Telephone Number: e
Electronic Mail Address 1: a'
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: d
Mailing Address: a
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Versi&b 2013 g 3

& tdi i4
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
1% im A6 0 4 a Fe
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
W1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an a_mroved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Versi&b 2013 g 4

& tdi i4
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area acres
_Q I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑✓ Project Coordinates:a Latitude W Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Versi&b 2013 g 5

tdi i4
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑✓ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
✓❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http: / /www.usace.armv.miI/ Missions/ CivilWorks/ RegulatorvProgramandPermits /res supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htto: / /oortal.ncdenr.ore /c /document library /get file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &grouold =38364 and,
htto: / /www.saw.usace.armv.mil/ Portals /59 /docs /reaulatory /i)ublicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.odf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Versi&b 2013 g 6

& tdi i4
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Versi&b 2013 R 7

tdi i4
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larder than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I I "xI7 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Versibb 2013 g 8

tdi i4
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non-
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Versibb 2013 g 9

(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Versi" 2013 Ili

& tdi i4
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Versibb 2013 119

A TTA CHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
V am" eD eia 10 (*Vi W, 20
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
46 n k E w ui&hi 6 Vib Fly ad Em Rini (*
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: w& City: 4
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
Lat. a °N; Long. a °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: es is es
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
3 linear feet:aiz width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: -i#
Stream Flow: eg ;dmhi ea z -b
Wetlands: N acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s): W 3 2B TOM
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant:m/i & RA
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
app licant /consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � cw -z
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: wk co & * - Im
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): m 3 or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
0 Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
tz
Signature and date of Signature and 4a of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
2

Preliminary JD Inventory Table
Estimated Amount
of Aquatic
Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class
Resource in the
Review Area
Stream 1 35.8267 - 78.8049 Riverine;Intermittent
±90 if
Stream 2 35.8253 - 78.8043 Riverine;Perennial
±443 If
Class of Aquatic
Source
Non - section 10
non - wetland
Non - section 10
Non - wetland

-
5'
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 60 120
III
I inch 0 l
Y'Y t'• II
T.
�,a f it - • e •'� i " . � -�
.46 '.•�.. ��` , ,s•, - _ ,�,, 'k:��.• p'�., 'L N • V �: Y �• i A'O'9' R y e,'. .
L or
„y. ;,C- yi�1�:,,+`��4�.i�" �n!d�l_'R'��i "�L ►�. � 4�. f �'- " y �;: �� 3 a.j ' °���
4 ^7NlRi'�. ,L'!✓.r.Y
� �.`t !��'Z[�r��14 ,�,*,, : i�i�!L �y '-�j• 1 � k. �` � 1 �F �_ r �',4Y • '1
OF
'son vl�llm
!..,_�,•,t c1 ¢,t i -i! 1(.A.� °C Vii''•''
L,. J
r
WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA �j
AERIAL PHOTO
WITHERS tic RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 60 120
1 inch = 120 ft.
e 00 a .
r.
c'i' ^ °•�1 i�1 7
i.
WESTON CORNER APARTMENTS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA �j
Ku
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE EXHIBIT
r
WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS

y\ u f k
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
Lim�'a i 1 - ♦ Q \ l� \t bm! 0
1 inch = 2000 ft.
_ � C
"/
r3m, �
c- 1
\ `,�� t)rr• .19,";1�.� \�:�� +; \, rte% S /_ ��-' i
\`rte l 6ry V 1+ •:N,\� d�e� I D
• ��\� \ !Gems • .i,• y \�/ `1 l a �� J, J�`1 —.� I c i- �Il \ \, l 1 t:, > + .,. 1.
m 305
i
F .: _. ._�.- � - -• /I ' � ~ .��1 .� � ` fl �/ raj i� -- lid � `•• ^ �•_• _- r.
!1 / t' •� r��. 'J�__
Aso \, �. %� � i ? `'• '" �''
WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS USGS QUAD - CARY WITHER8 RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft. I
M
i/
000,
� • �AO
r .
WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
14*-
i_J
•' •
L Zo
I
(60
USGS QUAD - CARY WITHER8 & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS

WESTON CORNERS APARTMENTS WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 46 WITHERS RAVENEL
ENiINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
CAR, WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

lhiP rb
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Vft City /County: Sampling Date: 995
Applicant /Owner:dbw rwh State: rc Sampling Point: EFP
Investigator(s): f @h - WAR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): To 60 Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): iv0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat:� Long Datum: $
Soil Map Unit Name kw -4r0 # NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soilr Hydrolol Iii 16 I ❑ No El
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SMVI ng point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Remarks:
3Tn " t* sill r11 TW Id W ® 4
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
or k * fft
Yes ❑ No ❑
t kg /;bI &.i I in
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
0� Surface Water (Al)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
[_I. High Water Table (A2)
® True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑I Drainage Patterns (1310)
® Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
® Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ 01 F
❑ FAM T, 4
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No __0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): :9
Saturation Present? Yes No -0 Depth (inches): :0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. ❑ No _ x❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WW va 16 ap fa., ft "# .10
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and PiedmaW 2.0

Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 19 )
1.00 bb
dirL ofpI dt
3. PC &
4. (ifi
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ID hk
1b iod f #t
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:N
1
4
r
F
7
Herb Stratum (Plot sizes
4
r
F
7
R
a�
1n
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: lei
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
'5/o
'10
in/
6/0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Q' Oi # vas 16 # ish1t 0
❑
Sampling Point: EFP
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
1 - HO 1 of clt
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�O
x❑ RQ.1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2
(A)
NO
❑FAQ 1
®
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
�0
® K
Total Number of Dominant
4
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
El FAC a
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
❑ (
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑ S
Sql
Percent of Dominant Species
fVO
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
❑ t
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
®
❑ q
qhi ;W
® h
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
80
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
❑
OBL species x 1 =
5/0
x❑ K
FACW species x 2 =
❑
❑
FAC species x 3 =
❑ V
❑
FACU species x 4 =
Vegetation
= Total Cover P
❑
UPL species x 5 =
❑
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
'5/o
'10
in/
6/0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Q' Oi # vas 16 # ish1t 0
❑
® P
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover H
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - HO 1 of clt
❑ —
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ —
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_'3.0
❑ —
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
® d
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
®
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
® b
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Total Cover D
El FAC a
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
❑ (
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑ S
Sql
❑ a
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
❑ t
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
El a
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
❑ q
qhi ;W
® h
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
❑ 3
3 ft (1 m) in height.
❑
= Total Cover
❑
❑
❑
❑ H
❑ V
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover P
Present? Yes ❑ No 0
M ."
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: IF
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
® OR 44 0 3- ®i1 -
4 OR 6a 0 W
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
® Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
f:] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
.❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑- H dro en Sulfide ( A4 )
Depleted Matrix (F3)
f] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
sp
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Verde (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Stripped (
Matrix S6)
❑ Dark Surface x (S (LRR P, S, T, U) —❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
® Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
#I s 1 6 W 16 flip
tr.Crt ql�p .10
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedma* 2.0
x❑

IMPACT EXHIBITS

ri
VICINITY MAP
s
NTS
Ix
BUFFER IMPACT SUMMARY
PERMANENT PERMANENT
MAP IMPACT# ZONEIIMPACT(SF) ZONE2IMPACT(SF)
w,
R��t Plata R De.igaer scale
TI AS NOTED
Dawn By Date WESTON CORNERS
nEw mrams
Checked By JobNO.
waa N-270.d0 Town of Cary Wake Countv
North Carolina
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
0 174
633 246
633 420
M IMPACT
PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT (LF)
.1
N/LYYMD= WALrr
LOAM PARMRSAW
ad 9511. M 1410
PIN Na 0755.01- a5 -95m
�1Tf`
p0
!V
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100 200
WITHERS I&- RAVENEL en NO.
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 lNNYNrONf
115 M.cK .n Drive Ca , North Carolina 27511 tel:910-0 -"o www.wiMersravenel.com License No.-32

SS `-1
EW:319.1 — — — — _
— —
BMP
(CONSTRUCT
ED WETLgND)
—
IMPACT 1 _ /// I • / / /%jf�.% /,. % % /� / /�; /% / ---- -_ __-- '`.. — -- __ __- "_ _ ` " `- — - _ =—..
WCa - --
\ PERMANENT ZONE 1
BUFFER I -- - — / 6' PROPOSED
IMPACT - 0 SF — —
GREENWAY _ ` � ` - ----•. _ — — —
\ / PERMANENT ZONE 2 _
IMPACT 2
BUFFER IMPACT -174 SF
ANENT ZONE 1 PE RM 633 SF
s;a BUFFER IMPACT
//
--
_
J —
PERMANENT ZONE 2
cly
BUFFER IMPACT - 246 SF
—
\_�f� z
6' EXISTING \
GREENWAY \
11 10 10'
\ \
— _ - - -_ \
Lu
LA-
/ r f
IC SCALE
- -- \ m no RAPH
g RAVENEL I
WITHER A
1 SURVEYORS
PACT MAP 1 & 2 ENi1NLERi 1 PLANNERS w, aeeelm ❑eea No. eoe3z
IMPACT Ii MacKenan Dive CmYiNhCarolina2]511 te1: 914C59-33d0 ✓+✓w
p�;�e, As�,Eg
3 � WESTO N CORNERS
ace � � .u, North Carolina
'�oRevision brawn RV °` 1
1 ems, „mns l drake County
I che&mBy a Town of Car"
6 1 � WbR 025302iU.W
s I[
I

—
� 325
zo
i
IMPACT 3
co
t /
PERMANENT ZONE 1
BUFFER IMPACT - 90 LF
lz
�J\ 1 1\ �/ rte/ � /. "'► _ -- - -- - / ��\ l � ��.
C
GRAPHIC SCALE 40
10 zo
20 1
ER$ RA
WITH
/ NtRf 1 SURVEYORS
/ � / ENi{NEtRf 1 rLAN w;me uaVe °ei.e °,„ uee °se N °. cosai
C m i 1 1. / /� �; �; , PACT MAP 3 , „Mx°,;ea<Y,N °har °;na2Ji„ 9,33 <o ww
I �/ i / / r IM
3 l e i a WESTON CORNERS RS North Carolin
T a
bate �Pnl%^er u+ scale nsrorEo
Revision °"° Wake County
�+0, Uawn BY p� OTOiN5
d V °b " °. I Town of Cary
� � {.kkad 8Y W80. 21302i0.55