20230647 Ver 1_More Info Received_20230808

4VIRONMENTAL
August 7, 2023
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Sue Homewood
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
and
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Doug Perez
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Town 1 Mixed Use Center +/- 70.194 acres
11101 Hambright Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Action ID #: SAW-2023-00966 / DWR Project #: 20230647
Sue/Doug:
See below for responses to the additional information request Sue emailed on June 26,
2023. The four items are addressed below. Enclosed are supporting documents and
additional information. Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please
contact me if you need any additional information.
1. Please provide a DWR stream identification form for CH 100 is intermittent
throughout the entire length of the project limits. If CH 100 becomes perennial at
any point within the project limits, please clearly indicate that location on plan sheets
and provide a separate DWR stream identification form for the perennial section.
Two DWR stream ID forms were completed for channel CH 100 and previously
submitted — (1) in the former pond bottom (i.e., Lower) and (2) upstream of the former
pond bottom (i.e., Upper). The Lower reach in the former pond bottom scored 24.5 and
the Upper reach scored 20.5. During the site meeting on July 12, 2023, it was
determined that channel CH 100 becomes perennial below the former pond. Atlas has
revised the aquatic resource sketch map and associated PJD documents for the Mt
Holly Huntersville Road project (SAW-2023-00962) reflecting this change. Additionally,
a stream ID form has been completed at the transition point scoring 32.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 1 704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

-q*
VIRONMI=NTAL
2. The narrative submitted with the Pre -Construction Form states that avoidance and
minimization of impacts has occurred as much as feasible. Please provide further
information regarding what other options have been considered and determined
impractical. It appears that removal of one building and parking area would reduce
the impacts significantly. Please provide a detailed explanation of why the project
overall would not be feasible with this slight reduction in development limits.
This development consists of mixed use, including residential, commercial, office, and
warehouse components. The existing encumbrances on the property have substantially
affected the site design including the layout and proposed impacts. Most of the
proposed wetland impacts (W2 and W3) are located within a Duke Power Right -Of -Way
(ROW), or in a clearing where a man-made pond previously existed (W4). We presume
the building referenced by DWR is Building R11. The location of Building R11 and the
surrounding buildings (e.g., R12, R6, R4, and R3) are dictated by the location of the
Duke Power ROW and cannot be constructed within the ROW. Much of the ROW is
being used for common open space and required parking based on the multi -use
density and required parking for residential, commercial, office, and warehouse
areas. The ROW consists of 14.18 acres of the 70.5 acre review area which is
approximately 20%.
Of the buildings referenced above Building R11 is associated with the greatest amount
of stream and wetland impacts when compared to R12, R6, R4, and R3. This building
cannot be shifted North or West due to the stormwater control measure and
preservation areas, or South due to the Duke ROW. Shifting the building to the East
would substantially reduce or likely eliminate the parking for Buildings R11 and R12 and
possibly eliminate the secondary point of access for Buildings R4 and R3. The
elimination of Building R11 and the associated parking is not a slight reduction as it
includes 17% (24 out of 138) of the units associated with the grouping of buildings.
Moving these buildings in any direction would result in additional impacts as the
stormwater control measures would encroach/impact on the buffer and un-impacted
stream. Losing 17% of the residential units associated with this group of buildings
creates a financial hardship as fewer residential units will be available to offset the costs
of the required infrastructure. The costs to construct and mitigate for Building R11 are
far less than spreading out the infrastructure costs among fewer buildings. Lastly, the
impacts associated with Building R11 are of a converted, lower quality wetland.
This property has been rezoned to TOD-R(CD) (Conditional Transit -Oriented
Development District — Residentially), TOD-E(CD) (Conditional Transit -Oriented
Development District — Employment), HC(CD) (Conditional Zoning Highway
Commercial District), and SP(CD) (Conditional Zoning Special Purpose District) within
the Town of Huntersville. This zoning allows for up to 70% impervious development.
As proposed this project will have 56.9% impervious coverage. The project area is
located within the transportation corridor of the larger Charlotte area having Interstate
77 and the HOV lanes bordering the East side of project. A CATS transportation HUB
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 1 704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

-q*
VIRONMI=NTAL
is planned to be located across Hambright Road from the project. This mixed used
development has been planned to interact directly with the transportation facilities and
infrastructure in the surrounding vicinity. Residents living at Town 1 will be able to use
public transportation modes to travel back and forth to Charlotte which puts less
pressure on the road network.
The Northern perennial stream corridor and buffer area is being used for on -site buffer
mitigation and cannot be encroached upon by stormwater. Additional avoidance and
minimization are occurring through the construction of a retaining wall which is
approximately 383 feet in length. The construction of this wall is avoiding additional
channel impacts to the higher quality, perennial section of channel CH 100. Lastly,
there is no stream crossing proposed to access the warehouse space in the Northern
region of the review area. These buildings are being accessed from a separate
entrance which also is avoiding impacts to the intermittent channel.
3. The development concept plan indicates that that buffer mitigation is provided for
grading encroachment adjacent to CH 300. The concept plan also indicates
development very close to CH3OO. Please provide a more detailed construction and
grading plan for the area adjacent to CH3OO. The plan should include the location of
any temporary impacts and/or sediment and erosion control measures in the vicinity
of CH 300.
A detail of the construction in the vicinity of channel CH 300 has been included within
this response package. The construction is 15 feet from the channel at the nearest
point with other areas averaging approximately 20 feet away from the channel. A
revised PCN also has been included which requests temporary impacts for a pump
around zone during the construction of the retaining wall.
4. Pursuant to 15A NCAC O2H.O5O6(b) "a 401 Water Quality Certification may only be
issued upon determining that the proposed activity will comply with state water
quality standards which includes designated uses, numeric criteria, narrative criteria
and the state's antidegradation policy, as defined in rules of 15A NCAC 028 .0200...
In assessing whether the proposed activity will comply with water quality standards,
the Division shall evaluate if the proposed activity: (2) would cause or contribute to a
violation of water quality standards; (3) would result in secondary or cumulative
impacts that cause or contribute to, or will cause or contribute to, a violation of water
quality standards;" Based on the current proposed plan the Division believes there is
potential for indirect impacts to the remaining portion of CH1OO as all surface flow to
this channel appears to be routed to two SCMs which would discharge at the lower
end of the project boundary. Please either, include indirect impacts to CH1OO within
the impact table and provide mitigation for this section, provide hydrologic
calculations to document that surface flow will continue to support the existing
function of the unimpacted portion of CH1OO, or provide a monitoring plan that will
document existing conditions of CH1OO and post construction conditions of CH1OO.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 1 704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

-q*
VIRONMI=NTAL
The proposed site plan should have no negative effect on the remaining, un-impacted,
section of channel CH 100. As described in the included Stormwater/Grading Plan, the
1-inch storm event will be treated by the utilization of infiltration pipes which will be
spread across the site. These infiltration pipes will ensure continued groundwater
recharge and will prevent any secondary impacts to the un-impacted section of CH 100.
For rainfall greater than the 1-inch storm event dry detention basins will detain the pre -
developed runoff rates and additional underground infiltration pipes will be installed to
detain the post -developed peak volume. Additionally, the maximum allowable
impervious surface is 70% and the proposed site plan includes 56.9% impervious
surface which allows for greater infiltration.
The following attachments are included: retaining wall exhibit at CH 300, stream impact
exhibit, impact map, revised ePCN, revised aquatic resources sketch map, DWR stream
form for CH 100 intermittent lower, DWR stream form for CH 100 intermittent upper,
DWR stream form for CH 100 perennial, DWR stream form map, site photographs,
photograph location map, SAM form CH 100 upper, CH 100 upper photograph map, CH
100 upper photographs, climate data, and stormwater plan.
Best regards,
�4" d11hZtW_'
Jennifer L Robertson, President
jrobertson(a)_atlasenvi.com
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 1 704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

ROPOSED RETAINING WALL
1 "=30'
I � /
PROPOSED SEGMENTAL
RETAINING WALL /
/
WETLANDS RETAINING WALL "EXHIBIT A"
O
N
M
Ili
N
r
OV
Z
�J
•u
CA
G
Z N
O O
�
N V
m
d
ro
w
Ci OR
NM
•r
°r,
O
O O
V N �
C O O
m o O
ma c
'ova
Sov
3 0
3
0 y
0
O T
3 �0
3 00
3
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
``'ISI••• Cq•• .
•.
c 't
:WOODBINE DESIGN P.0
c� F : N0: C-4063 : o
00*00.000000
IJ
NORTH ARROW
0 15 30 60
Graphic Scale 1" = 30 ft.

J16XAEi
v
0
N
L.
N
Ili
O
N
r
3
• r
cN
pL
v10
�
NV
N a0
7�
rno
O
O O
C O
E TC
V N �
• �m
ma
mva
0
STREAM IMPACT o®®
30
NOT FOR
o�� \ Ex. s0-FT CONSTRUCTION ; BUFFER
_ m \ �� ♦ j }' _
r\� \ SEAL
m \ '-FF�7 ...R
\ CA p Z
�STREAM TOP r WOODBINE DESIGN P.C:
\ OF BANK _� - ��: N0: C-4063 : o
PROPERTY LINE No INzu
OF
s
\ \ END OF
STREAM V�
NOTE: CONTOURS SHOWN
AT 2-FT INTERVALS
NORTH ARROW
STREAM IMPACT "EXHIBIT B" 30 60 120
Graphic Scale 1" = 60 ft.

ZH CARD
LFR R.
5 PIiJowpo
CN
�•,,OEf BURS,.•••
SEAL
i= SDL
i eONO: C-4063,J°rFo
i,
z
0
CQ
CQ
z
\
W
w
�
H
w
z
A
x
�
w
o
�
a
a
F
�
z
�
�
a
F
o
z
e
�
s
N
DEVELOPER/OWNER
HAMDRIGHT PARTNERS
Figure 2
Designed By
WOODBINE
Drawn By
WOODBINE
Date
3/20/23
Revisions
Sheet: C5.2of 12
Project Number: 21037

I z
DWR
R villsion of 14 ou Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print
a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30. pdf
A. Processing Information
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on: *
3/21 /2023
If this is a courtesy copy, please fill in this with the submission date.
Is this project connected with ARPAfunding?*
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located: *
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project*
Yes No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co -applicant.
DO NOT CHECK YES, UNLESS YOU ARE DMS OR CO -APPLICANT.
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
111111►1567
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
29 - Residential Developments
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
*
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes
►1
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Yes No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
12 Hambright Rd - SOA 3-31-23.pdf 161.79KB
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF

1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
Yes
1ITS
1 j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
Yes No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-
Coord ination/Trout. aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ben Geisler
1 c. Primary Contact Phone:*
1b. Primary Contact Email:* (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail] [phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?*
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
SB LAND LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
25647 / 133
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address*
Street Address
14316 Reese Blvd West B-15
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Huntersville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28078 USA

2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
CATAWBA PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
35055 / 718
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address
Street Address
14316 Reese Blvd West Unit B-15
Address Line 2
City
Huntersville
Postal / Zip Code
28078
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
John & Elaine Benjamin
2b. Deed book and page no.:
37323 / 611
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2d. Address*
Street Address
720 Foster Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Cleveland
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27103
USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: *
Clutch Investments of North Carolina LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
30852 / 184
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address*
Street Address
14316 Reese Blvd West B-15
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Huntersville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28078 USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]

2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Hambright Partners LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
36973 / 897
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address*
Street Address
428 South Main Street Suite B-101
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Davidson NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28036 USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: *
Catawba Property Investments LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
32347/18
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address*
Street Address
14316 Reese Blvd West Unit B15
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Huntersville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28078 USA

2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Joyce McKinney R/T Keller
2b. Deed book and page no.:
19764 / 312
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
2d. Address
Street Address
7257 Pineville Mathews Rd Suite 2100
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28226
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
John W Dellinger
2b. Deed book and page no.:
12529 / 524 and 12529 / 524
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2d. Address*
Street Address
5226 Drake Cove Road
Address Line 2
City
Huntersville
Postal / Zip Code
28078
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name-*
Ben Geisler
3b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Treenail Development
3c. Address*
Street Address
428 South Main Street Suite B-101
Address Line 2
City
Davidson
Postal / Zip Code
28036
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name: *
Jennifer Robertson
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Atlas Environmental Inc.
4c. Address*
Street Address
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28211
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project:*
Town 1
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Town 1 Mixed Use Center
1c. Nearest municipality / town:*
Huntersville
W4

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
01721104, 01721103,
01721102, 01721101,
01721107, 01721108,
2b. Property size:
01721109, 01721106, (in acres)
01721105 70.194
2c. Project Address
Street Address
11101 Hambright Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Huntersville NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28078 USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS
device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile
phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude: * Longitude: *
35.375790-80.852918
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Torrence Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011401

River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:*
The current land use of the review area is partially forested with dispersed single family residential. Interstate 77
abuts the review area to the East, Hambright Road is to the South, and Mt. Holly Huntersville Road is to the West.
An existing business is located near the intersection of Hambright Road and Mt. Holly Huntersville Road.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.117
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
1623
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The project purpose is for the construction of a mixed use development consisting of residential, commercial, and
industrial.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project will require land clearing and grading using heavy equipment for the preparation and construction of the
proposed development. The development includes 428 multi family units, open space, shop fronts, and commercial
spaces. Six permanent impacts are proposed including two intermittent stream impacts and four wetland impacts.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes No
Comments:
Atlas Environmental
Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
Not assigned yet
Not Verified Unknown N/A
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Atlas Environmental Staff

Agency/Consultant
Company:
Atlas Environmental Inc.
Other
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the
Corps or DWR.
Hambright Road PJD requested on May 02, 2023
Mt. Holly Huntersville Road PJD requested on May 02, 2023
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes
No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossing for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area
impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a. Site
#*
2a1 Reason*
Fill
Fill
2b. Impact
type* (')
P
P
2c. Type of W. *
Headwater Forest �Wl
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name*
1100
WL 2000
2e.
Forested
No
No
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition *
(�>
Both
Both
2g.
Impact
area
0.030
(acres)
0.023
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
Fill
P
Headwater Forest
WL 1000H
No
Both
0.027
(acres)

W4 I Fill P Headwater Forest
L 1000M No Both F(are
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.117
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.117
2i. Comments:
No impacts are proposed to forested wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the
site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for
impact*
3b.lmpact
type *
3c. Type of
impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream
Type *
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction *
3g. S.
width *
3h.
Impact
length
S1
Parking,
Permanen
Fill
CH 100
Intermittent
Both
3
600
Construction,
t
Average
(linear
Grading
(feet)
feet)
32
Parking,
Permanen
Fill
CH 200
Intermittent
Both
2
35
Construction,
t
Average
(linear
Grading
(feet)
feet)
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
635
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
635

3j. Comments:
All proposed impacts are to intermittent streams. No impacts are proposed to perennial
channels.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: *
The project has been designed and engineered to avoid and minimize impacts to the greatest
extent possible. No perennial channels are proposed to be impacted and approximately 868
linear feet of intermittent streams are being avoided. A vegetative buffer surrounding the
unimpacted stream sections is to remain undisturbed. Additionally, 19,216 square feet of
riparian buffer is proposed to be restored and 21,051 square feet of riparian buffer is
proposed to be preserved as part of the project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques: *
A retaining wall of approximately 383 linear feet is proposed to be constructed Northwest of
channel CH 100 to avoid additional impacts to this channel and adjacent riparian buffer. The
size positioning and layout of the stromwater control measures, buildings, and parking have
avoided impacts to the majority of channel CH 100.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Bank: Firestone Mitigation
Site and Double Rock Mitigation Site
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Stream 635

3c. Comments
Proposed stream mitigation is at a 1:1 ratio based on being intermittent and low quality. NC
SAM form included.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream
4b. Stream mitigation requested: temperature:
(linear feet)
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website.
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only)
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.117
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
Stream mitigation is being purchased from Wildlands Holdings IV and wetland mitigation is
being purchased from NC DIMS.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by
DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you
must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes
No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by
DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian
Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No

For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
Not adjacent to State protected riparian buffers
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
Yes No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater
program or state -approved local government stormwater program?*
Yes
No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
Hint: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or
locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer no to this question.
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply): *
Local Government State
If you have a local government approval please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Local Government Stormwater Programs*
Phase II NSW
USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. *
Huntersville
Comments
The proposed development includes the construction of four stormwater control measures
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state)
land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules
(15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development,
which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed development is a single and complete project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available
at that plant.
Project will connect to municipal sewer.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps
Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
/_11MAMM1[7.
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? *
Yes No
Unknown
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Yes No

Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
51h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* *
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,
such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat?*
IPaC and NHP
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data:
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having
historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North
Carolina history and archaeology)?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?*
NC HPO Buffer Map. NC HPO comment letters attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA NFHL .kml

Miscellaneous
Comments
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for
application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of
Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Town 1 NWP 29 ePCN Attachments compressed.pdf 10.91 MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• 1 agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• 1 understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• 1 intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Jacob Sinclair
Signature *
�r•� �c�r�rrr't
Date
5/2/2023

Legend
O Review Area
Streets
0 Mecklenburg Co
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
M Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Parcels
Aquatic Resources Sketch Map
Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes
and preliminary planning only. Not intended to
be relied upon for exact location, dimension,
or orientation. All findings and assessments
are subject to verification from the Army Corps
of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate local
authorities. Do not reproduce map set except
in its entiretv.
r -- - - -- -- - - - --- --
- - - -- - - - - - -
Detail 1: Page 3
' Detail 2: Page 4
'------ - - - - --
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
TL/6
75, IRONMENTAL
Page 1 of 4 Figure: la
Project Name: Mt Holly Huntersville Road
Location: 11700 Mt. Holly Huntersville Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Treenail Development Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.382488' /-80.852884'
Date: July 13, 2023

TL/6
VIRONIVIENTAL
Page 2 of 4 Figure: 1b
Project Name: Mt Holly Huntersville Road
Location: 11700 Mt. Holly Huntersville Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Treenail Development Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.382488° /-80.852884'
Date: July 13, 2023

Aquatic Resources Sketch Map
'I CH 100: Continued
Potential Non Wetland
CH 100 Perennial: - 360 LF, 0.031 Ac.
Legend /
r--1 Review Area
Streets Potential Non Wetland
0 Mecklenburg Co. Parcels CH 100 Intermittent: - 370 LF, 0.015 Ac.
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial VA
Intermittent 0 25 50 75 100 Ft
Wetland
TL/6
15VIRONMENTAL
Page 3 of 4 Detail: 1 Figure: 1c
Project Name: Mt Holly Huntersville Road
Location: 11700 Mt. Holly Huntersville Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Treenail Development Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.382488° /-80.852884'
Date: July 13, 2023

Aquatic Resources Sketch Map
CH 100: Continued
Potential Wetland
WL 1000: — 0.037 Ac.
CH 100: Continued
Legend
r--1 Review Area
Streets
0 Mecklenburg Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent 0 15 30 45 60 Ft
Wetland
TL/6
VIRONMENTAL
Page 4 of 4 Detail: 2 Figure: 1d
Project Name: Mt Holly Huntersville Road
Location: 11700 Mt. Holly Huntersville Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Treenail Development Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.382488° /-80.852884'
Date: July 13, 2023

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: November 14, 2022
Project/Site: Hambright RoadCH too Lower
Latitude: 35.38042
Evaluator:A Baggarley T Casey
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.85157
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 24.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quadrangle
at
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Inte ittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10•5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
0
0.5
0.5
3
2
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: November 14, 2022
Project/Site: Hambright RoadCH too Upper
Latitude: 35.37904
Evaluator:A Baggarley T Casey
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.85277
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 20.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quadrangle
at
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Inte ittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10•5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = S
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
0
0
0
1
0.5
0.5
3
2
2
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0
0

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 07-12-2023
Project/Site:CH ioo Mt. Holly Huntersvile
Latitude: 35 380954
Evaluator:T Casey A Baggarley
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.851225
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 32
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quad
at
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent PeWAnial
7T
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = a 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = a
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
IC,
3
3
1
0
0
1
0.5
0.5
0

■
.1 4 ►
t
E�.i ' ■ ■
Project Name: Hambright Road
Location: 11101 Hambright Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Hambright Partners LLC Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.375790°/-80.852918'
Date: June 29, 2023

2.) CH100
5]VVL1000(K4)
6.)VVL1000(M)

Site Photographs: July 03, 2023
7.) WL 1000 (M)
8.) WL 1100
t
10.) WL 2000 tied to CH 200
11.) WL 2000
`R
12.) WL 1000 (H)
i

Site Photographs: J
13.) WL 1000 (H)
14.) WL 1000 (H)
15.) CH 100
16.) CH 100
17.) CH 100 at headcut
18.) Above CH 100

Photograph
Map
v
c
0
=
Detail Page
c
0
I
0
Legend
p Review Area
0 Mecklenburg Co. Parcels
Hambri iht'Rd—state,Rd
2117
Streets
Delineation
Culvert Fill
Intermittent Fill
11w Perennial Fill
0 200 400 600 800 Ft
Wetland Fill
TL/6
(751RONMENTAL
Page 1 of 2
Project Name: Town 1 Mixed Use Center
Location: 11101 Hambright Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Hambright Partners LLC Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.375790°,-80.852918'
Date: July 03, 2023

Photograph Map
4
5 � �
2
AIZ 8
WL 1000M �� g
6
7 3
WL 1100
CH 200
11
v
V WL 2000 10
12
656 13
a
v
14 WL 1000H
c
r
15
0
2
= CH 100
0
16�
�7
18
Legend
p Review Area
0 Mecklenburg Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Fig —
Culvert Fill
Intermittent Fill Ik
11w Perennial Fill 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Wetland Fill Photo Location and Orientation
1
TL/6
75, IRONMENTAL
Detail Page Page 2 of 2
Project Name: Town 1 Mixed Use Center
Location: 11101 Hambright Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Hambright Partners LLC Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.375790°,-80.852918'
Date: July 03, 2023

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user manuai version z.-i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):
Town 1 Mixed Use Center
3. Applicant/owner name:
Ben Geisler
5. County:
Mecklenburg
7. River basin:
Catawba
2. Date of evaluation: 08/01/2022
4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmetnal Inc.
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Torrence Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.37932,-80.85256
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 100 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 286
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5-1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1-2 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (>- 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? []Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure —
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ®No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑ B 46 to < 67 ❑ C 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 ❑ E >_ 230
Notes/sketch: Please see associated photo map and photo document
showing conditions of reach

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Town 1 Mixed Use Center Date of Assessment
08/01/2022
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmetnal Inc.
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Figure:
Project Name: Hambright Road
Location: 11101 Hambright Road Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Hambright Partners LLC Attn: Ben Geisler
Coordinates: 35.375790°/-80.852918'
Date: June21, 2023

NC SAM Photos for CH 100 Intermittent Upper
7: CH 111
AW r
8: CH 112
1�

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
- Daily Total
- 30-Day Rolling Total
8 2023-05-04 30Year Normal Range
7-
6-
5 2 3- 6- 3
4
3
2023-04- 4
2
1
n
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023
Coordinates
35.375790,-80.852918
Observation Date
2023-06-03
Elevation (ft)
816.014
Drought Index (PDSI)
Mild drought (2023-05)
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Too
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301 %ile (in)
701 %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-06-03
1.852756
4.113386
4.326772
Wet
3
3
9
2023-05-04
2.600394
4.596851
8.393701
Wet
3
2
6
2023-04-04
1.969291
4.283465
1.901575
Dry
1
1
1
Result
Wetter than Normal - 16
■
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
MT HOLLY 4 NE
35.3339,-80.9867
609.908
8.075
206.106
5.298
10840
87
MOUNT HOLLY 4.4 ENE
35.3302, -80.96
729.003
1.527
119.095
0.869
356
0
MOUNT HOLLY 4.8 E
35.3073,-80.9469
674.869
2.9
64.961
1.493
82
3
STANLEY 4.8 E
35.3678,-81.013
750.984
2.772
141.076
1.638
1
0
PAW CREEK 1.2 N
35.2951,-80.9332
722.113
4.035
112.205
2.268
2
0
MC ADENVILLE
35.2625,-81.0778
609.908
7.122
0.0
3.205
19
0
BELMONT 0.4 E
35.249,-81.0335
673.885
6.432
63.977
3.306
13
0
CHARLOTTE 9.2 WNW
35.2264,-80.993
600.066
7.436
9.842
3.419
3
0
CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS AP
35.2225,-80.9544
729.987
7.91
120.079
4.509
37
0

LEGEND STORM WATER NARRATIVE:
PROPOSED WATER QUALITY FOR THE 1—INCH STORM EVENT SHALL BE MET BY UNU7ATION OF INFILTRATION PIPES SPREAD ACROSS THE SITE.
795 5' CONTOURS PIPES SHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE BOTH STORM EVENTS. PIPES SHALL BE SIZE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE
>9J V CONTOURS PRELIMINARY STORM WATER CALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING REZONING TO COMPUTE THE REQUIRED VOLUME.
—55 55 SANITARY SEWER
• — - - - - — - - — — - — —. STORM SEWER THE PRE —DEVELOPED RUNOFF RATES SHALL BE DETAINED WITHIN ABOVE GROUND EXTENDED DRY DETENTION FACILITIES WITH ADDITIONAL
SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND PIPES INSTALLED AS NEEDED TO DETAIN POST —DEVELOPED PEAK VOLUME PER THE HUNTERSVILLE STORM WATER
® MANHOLE REGULATIONS. BMP DESIGN. THE DESIGNS FOR THE SNIPS SHOWN ON THE REZONING PLAN SHALL BE FINALIZED
® ST.QLSEWER DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND SHALL BE COMPLETED AS A PART OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE
E IMPROVEMENTS. ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED BY THE ORDINANCE, PETITIONER SHALL USE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE
GRATE INLET EFFORTS TO EVALUATE AND CONSIDER MAINTENANCE OF THE PRE -DEVELOPED RATES FOR THE 25 YEAR STORM
Aj�= SPOT ELEVATION EVENT.
EXISTING
— — — —795— — —
-------796-------
—
5' CONTOURS
V CONTOURS
m ®�
SS ®®
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEV N
W55-�®
----w---- ----W—
WATER LINE
O
STORM SEWER
MANHOLE (MIT)
®
CURB INLET (a)
GRATE INL T YARD
INLET GI YI
MENEM
INFILTRATION PIPE
IMPERVIOUS AREA DATA
MAX. ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS: 70%
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: PAVEMENT/CONCRETE=1.183.557-SF 8LDG=564.600-SF
TOTAL PROPOSED=1,748,157-SF 56.9% IMPERVIOUS
WATERSHED: MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE PA-2 '..
NOTES:
1) THIS SITE SHALL UTILIZE THE HIGH DENSITY OPTION, BMP•S SHALL BE PROVIDED IN COMPUANCE WITH THE PCO AND
HUNTERSVILLE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS BY USING INFILTRATION/ UNDERGROUND DETENTION AND
OTHER APPROVED S.C.M.'S.
2) THIS PROJECT DOES NOT UE WITHIN A REGULATED FLOODWAY
3) SWIM BUFFER IMPACTS MUST BE PERMITTED VIA ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS & MECKLENBURG COUNTY STORM WATER
WATER
QUALITY VOLUME
DETENTION VOLUME
#
REQUIRED VOLUME
PROVIDED VOLUME
METHOD
#
REQUIRED VOLUME
PROVIDED VOLUME
METHOD
SCM#1
39,939-CF
40,000-CF
VIA INFILTRATION PIPES
SCM#1
13,655-CF
14,000-CF
COMBINATION OF PROVE
GROUND POND STORAGE
AND UNDERGROUND PIPES
SYSTEM.
SCM#2
49,985-CF
50,000-CF
VIA INFILTRATION PIPES
SCM#2
21,831-CF
22,000-CF
SCM#3
23,450-CF
24,000-CF
VIA INFILTRATION PIPES
SCM#3
8,799-CF
9,000-CF
SCM#4
44,061-CF
45,000-CF
VIA INFILTRATION PIPES
SCM#4
19,217CF
20,000-CF
PCO BUFFER MITIGATION OPTIONS'
THE PROJECT SHALL ADHERE TO THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS OF MITIGATION FOR DISTURBANCE OF THE POST CONSTRUCTION BUFFER ALONG THE CREEK.
THE DEVELOPER PROPOSES TO UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS:
\ STREAM RESTORATION,
THE OWNER MAY RESTORE AND PR
ESERVE THE BUFFER AREA ON ANY STREAM OF EQUIVALENT OR GREATER DRAINAGE AREA THE CONDITION
10 OF WHICH IS
\ DETERMINED TO BE QUALIFIED FOR RESTORATION BY THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY ON A 1:1 BASIS IN
\ LINEAR FEET OF STREAM. THIS RESTORATION SHALL INCLUDE STREAM BANK IMPROVEMENTS AND STREAM SIDE AND MANAGED USE ZONE RE -VEGETATION,
\ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BUFFER IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES, AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY
\ LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY.
\ BOTTOM LAND HARDWOOD PRESERVATION
\ ON A 2:1 ACREAGE BASIS FOR IMPACTED STREAM AND BUFFER AREA 2 ACRES OF BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD FOR EACH ACRE OF DISTURBED AREA), THE
\ OWNER MAY PROVIDE A COMBINATION OF THE PRESERVATION OF EXISTING BOTTOM LAND HARDWOOD FOREST OR OTHER SPECIFICALLY APPROVED
\ NATURAL HERITAGE AREA BY CONSERVATION EASEMENT OR OTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENT, AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STRUCTURAL OR NON-STRUCTURAL
BMPS TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIC POLLUT
ANT REMOVAL TARGETS WITHIN THE IMPACTED AREA. PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND USE
\ AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY.
_ J JJI)J JJJJJIJJJJJJJJJJ�%L
STORM WATER CONTROL MEASURES AND WATER QUALITY SHALL BE
COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE STORMWATER
ENGINEER TO ENSURE THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCES ARE MET,
THE LAYOUT BELOW IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE AND SHALL BE
MODIFIED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE TO
PROVIDE AN OVERALL COMPOSITE STORMWATER DESIGN THAT
MEETS THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
i
TREENAIL
DEVELOPMENT
• ZDt4
r�LJJ jJ� // // CLEARING LIMITS TYP
\JJJ\ \
PENDING STORM WATER APPROVAL'
WITH HUNTERSVILLE ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT, THIS AREA MAY
BE
J
UTILIZEDASPARKINGWITH /
'UNDERGROUND DETENTION/jh
L•,�.1��_!�y -
JJJ- J J JJJ JJ, JJtjJJ�l \
/ J-raj-' %�SJJ�JJ ✓/ //i .' SCM#4 \\ � �\\
1S�JJJ_1JJJ 1JJJJ1 '- -
35' PC BUFFER
-- _ -
�0' BUFFER
_ \T
i( \\ JI-
µ —
_!. JJJ\ \
\bvj�=/'�
6El
'
f
•I DRAINAGE LIMITS( ", ''•-
SCM
V
A 41"ll-'ll
1
STOgM
\
- DRAIN (ryP 1 I \ 1
/
J-
`�`
DRAINAGE LIMITS TYP / /`'y,---� -� / / iir 7<- X �I $ N
i
3pp1 S
EW
y�
SCM #2 DA 20 25-AC
#1 DA=16.18-AC
\BTOflMDgAiN(TYP) \ \ \ R� � � � \ - Z,G•B" '�' '. �
DISCHARGE (TYP.)
\ STORM DRAIN (TYP)
ql
0
i
aJFE.R MITIGATION SH;;:u"
/ _ \ PROVIDED IN ACCORDAN I mtsY'sa
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE OR
-------------
D® • � � � DRAINAGE LIMITS P --
- �
\\ \ C\
5 x �{5
.w4 -
I
�
h �
I
-
_ OFFSITE WATER SHALL BE
\
BY-PASSED AROUND BASIN
- —
DRAINAGE LIMITS (TYP)
/
SEAL
•`,eOEN �RG„ A••,
i 4.: •c
--NO; C-4063 ° -
P.
>-7 { j ) (Graphic Scale L" = 100 ft.
S/ /'� �', ( DRAINAGE LIMITS (TYP)
11�m �f
DA 17 85-AC
zz
24
\\
\Do
\ \Pq
w
z
\
FUTURE CATS -
�—
x
E_
PARK & RIDE
F
LOCATION
{
_
\
E-1
o
C
sI
h
DEVELOPER OWNER
HAMBRIGHT
PARTNERS
If
l t
'-------
I MT. HOLLY HUNTERSVILLE RD ---�-- _ --- y- ----- - ---- -----\ \
VARIABLE PUBLIC R/W
P\ _- ____—__
er MB 59 PG 525 \
(MAJOR THOROUGHFARE)
Designed By
WOODBINE
Drawn By
WOODBINE
Date
6/8/23
Revisions
5/11/23-4th Review C.—
I
IRGHt sfllaa�ow Sheet: C5.20f l 2
Project Number: 21037