20231094 Ver 1_NWP29 Request - Murphys Ridge Subdivision - Granville County - Sage #2023.055_20230807

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
E5
.21116
August 7, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Dicky Harmon
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
Request for Jurisdictional Determination, NWP 29, and GC 4256 Verification
Oxford, Granville County, NC
Sage Project #2023.055
On behalf of Askeaton Realty, LLC (c/o John Downes) (owner and applicant), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
(Project) may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and General Certification 4256 (GC 4256). A
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request is also being submitted with this permit application.
Project Purpose and Location
The purpose of the Project is to construct a residential subdivision with associated attendant features (roads,
utilities, and other infrastructure). The +/-220.12-acre Project is located immediately north of the intersection of
Enon Road and Crown Oaks Drive in Oxford, Granville County, NC. The coordinates of 36.2509°N, 78.7775°W
generally correspond to the center of the Site. The Site is within the piedmont region of North Carolina and within
the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202010401).
Protect Detail
The proposed Project involves construction of a residential development with attendant infrastructure. Impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands and streams are proposed to reach upland portions of the Site for development. Access
to the Site will be provided by one road connection to the existing Enon Road to the south. The Project proposes
to utilize on -site well and septic systems for drinking water and wastewater treatment, respectively.
The Site consists of mostly undeveloped forest, with a powerline easement and a small, maintained field located
in the southern portion of the Site. The tree canopy consists of mature pines and hardwood trees. Large portions
of the Site have been clearcut within the last decade and are undergoing succession. In these areas, juvenile
shortleaf and loblolly pines tend to be the dominant canopy species. The terrain of the Site ranges; with large
hills, steep drainages, and flat floodplains occurring throughout. Land use in the vicinity includes residential,
agricultural and forested land, and undeveloped land.
The Project is located within a High Quality Water (HQW) zone. Uncovered areas in HQW zones shall be limited
to a total of 20 acres within the boundaries of the tract at any given time. Disturbance will be split into three
phases: infrastructure phase 1, infrastructure phase 2, and phase 3 - individual lot construction. Sediment and
erosion control plans will be reviewed and approved by Granville County prior to any site disturbance.
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision Page 1 of 3

Proposed permanent wetland and stream impacts will result from one culverted road crossing. Proposed
permanent wetland impacts total 0.007 acre (333 SF) and proposed permanent stream impacts total 85 LF (664
SF / 0.015 acre) to install one culvert. A riprap dissipator pad at the culvert outlet is proposed as permanent — no
loss impacts totaling 32 LF (828 SF / 0.019 acre). The riprap will be keyed into the banks and will be installed
flush with the existing stream bed elevation. Temporary stream impacts due to dewatering to construct the culvert
will be 58 LF (467 SF / 0.01 acre). Proposed temporary wetland impacts total 387 SF (0.009 acre) for culvert
construction. Total riparian buffer impacts are 16,576 SF (0.38 acre) to construct the road crossing. Potential
sanitary sewerlines to reach additional septic areas will be directionally bored under the riparian buffer and
streams resulting in no impacts.
Stormwater detention ponds are proposed to treat stormwater on the Site. Typical equipment used in residential
construction and utility projects (i.e., backhoes, excavators, dump trucks) will be utilized.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database, four threatened and endangered species, one Proposed Endangered species, one Candidate species,
and the bald eagle are listed as potentially present on the Site. Potentially suitable habitat for Carolina madtom
and Neuse River waterdog is present within Stream SA (Knap of the Reeds Creek) and Stream SB. However,
the closest Identified Stream Reach (ISR) for each species is separated from the Site by the Lake Butner dam.
Potential marginal habitat for harperella is present in Stream SB. Suitable habitat for smooth coneflower is
present within the overhead transmission easement that runs along the southwestern corner of the Site. No work
is proposed in this area. Potential habitat for tri-colored bat (Proposed Endangered) and monarch butterfly
(Candidate) is present on the Site. Multiple farm ponds of sufficient size to support foraging habitat for bald eagles
are nearby the Site; however, no individuals or nests were observed during the Site visit.
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. No historic structures were found on the
Site and no historic properties were listed within one mile of the Site. Figure 4 provides a graphical representation
of nearby historic properties in relation to the Site.
Project History
A Site delineation was completed by Mr. Ryan Elliott and Mr. Ian Warr of Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage)
in May 2023. A PJD is being requested with this application. A Buffer Determination site meeting was held on
May 15, 2023, with Mr. Jim Wescott of NCDWR. The Buffer Determination Letter is attached.
Avoidance and Minimization
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation were performed to identify environmentally sensitive areas on
the Site prior to site design. The Project was designed to avoid & minimize impacts to jurisdictional features while
meeting the goals of the residential development plan. Lots were positioned to avoid impacts to wetlands. The
construction of the stormwater control measures avoids impacts to jurisdictional features. Sage worked closely
with the design engineer to minimize the impacts of the culverted stream crossing. The original iteration would
have required stream mitigation; however, the final site design is below mitigation thresholds.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any
accidental additional impacts. Equipment will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas.
Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and large bare
areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be
used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Project Impacts
Impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the US will result from a proposed road crossing to access upland portions of
the Site for the development. Construction of one culvert will result in permanent wetland impacts totaling 0.007
acre (WE & WE1) and temporary wetland impacts totaling 0.009 acre (WE). Permanent stream impacts total 85
LF (664 SF / 0.015 acre), permanent — no loss impacts for a riprap dissipater pad total 32 LF (828 SF / 0.019
acre), and total temporary stream impacts total 58 LF (467 SF / 0.01 acre) for dewatering (SE).
Impacts to riparian buffers will result from construction of the road crossing of Stream SE. Permanent Zone 1
impacts total 6,404 SF (0.14 acre) and permanent Zone 2 impacts total 6,402 SF (0.14 acre). Total temporary
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision Page 2 of 3

Zone 1 impacts are 2,601 SF (0.06 acre) and total temporary Zone 2 impacts are 1,169 SF 90.02 acre). Total
riparian buffer impacts are 16,576 SF (0.38 acre).
Mitigation
Proposed stream and wetland impacts are below mitigable thresholds and proposed riparian buffer impacts are
considered "Allowable Upon Authorization." Therefore, no mitigation is required for this Project.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — Wetland and Stream Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
IPaC Resource List
Notice of Intent to File Permit Application (May 19, 2023)
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Determination (NBRRO #22-564)
Impact Maps
ORM Spreadsheet
Preliminary JD Package
Preliminary ORM Form
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
PJD Form
Granville County Tax Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
NCDWR Stream Forms
Site Photos
a4tcan Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision Page 3 of 3

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
2. Work Type: VPrivate ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of the Project is to construct a residential subdivision with associated attendant features (roads, utilities, and other
infrastructure).
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: ASkeaton Realty, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Kim Hamlin, Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
The +/-220.12-acre Project is located immediately north of the intersection of Enon Road and Crown Oaks Drive in Oxford,
Granville County, NC. The coordinates of 36.2509°N, 78.7775°W generally correspond to the center of the Site.
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 096000492238 & 096100516569
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Granville
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Oxford
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Knap of the Reeds
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
/All Blanks to He Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Re resentative
Name: FLSt� �2y-
Address:
C
Phone: �j-
Email:
✓ �' CSC � c4 _
— /
Project Name/Description: Mu h 's Ridge Subdivision
Sage Project # 2023.055
Date:
The Dcpartment of the Army NC Division of Water Resources
U-S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 3800 Barrett Drive
P.D. Box 1890 Raleigh, NC 27609
Wilmington, NC 29402
Attn: Dicky Harmon Attn: Zachary Thomas
Field Office. _ Raleigh Regional Office: Ralei
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby
designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit
applications, to Furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice. This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
k Pant Name of Landowner or t afore WLandowner or
Legal Representative Legal Representative

Feature A
Legend
Project Study Area
Map Location USGS Topographic Map
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
Sage Project #2023.055
Person Vance Warren
USGS Topo MapServer, 2021
Granville Moriah & Lake Michie, NC Quadrangle
•
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Orange Franklin May 18, 2023
Durham 1 inch = 1,000 feet
Wake j Nash 0 1,000 2,000
Feet
9
Figure 1
N
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757

r ` �
�1 Feature B
'� tmB � . �o� �►b 1�� -
Mac
.` Feature G
+ f" Na Feature N t
• � �- - d� � N\ -
i Feature F Feature M
Feature E N210 Feature L
Feature D
NOE .
r
Feature C Feature
Feature A
Feature J
Csr`
Feature I �•� ,
Feature H
Legend
EProject Study Area i
Map Location NRCS Soil Survey Map Figure 2
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
Sage Project #2023.055
Person Vance Warren N
Granville County Soil Survey, 1997 SAGE
Granville Sheet #8 and #11
•
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Orange Franklin May 18, 2023
Durham 1 inch = 1,000 feet Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Wake Nash 0 1,000 2,000 Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

I� `l
E
1 Legend
NOTE: Wetland features depicted herein must be field
verified by the USACE before being valid. Depected buffers
Project Study Area
are approximations from the DWR letter dated May 15, 2023.
Location, shape, and size of depicted features on the
Potential Wetland WOTUS
evaluated site are approximate and should be surveyed by a
licensed NC surveyor for final site planning.
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Stream
PoteWB1We0111aOTus"
4' Contours
5
Potential
Non-wetlandOTUS
StreamSB +/-654 LF
o
Data Point Location
Potential Wetland WOTUS
WB ac.
c
Stream Form Location
•
Potential Wetland WOTUS
L
i`
ROUL. :"
�-• F "-'i' Potential Wetland WO'
- ti Poten
V
Mao Location
Person VancFWarren
Granville
Orange Franklin
Durham
Wake Nash
PJD Sketch Map
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
Sage Project #2023.055
Prepared by: R. Elliott
June 27, 2023
1 inch = 800 feet
0 400 800
Feet
i
e��sr>!sTrs->r:
�rus
Potential
Non-wetlandWOTUS
StreamSH
etland
Figure 3
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

NCSHPO Data Download: 5-5-2023
hftp://www.ncdcr.gov
I
n I
� I
t �
r
N I
o-1
cn
7%rtc� i
x
a
3
n
e
¢a
A
a
w
Oda'
aek
-,Y Church RS
C
�
a
a
cG
A
4
---------------------
al"111
do d
`■1
r
THERE ARE NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES
WITHIN 1.0 MILE OF THE PROJECT
STUDY
Legend �n
Rp
Project Study Area SL entry, Gone
1-Mile Buffer Surveyed Only
NCSHPO Status Surveyed, Gone
Study List individual entry SL
Map Location NCSHPO Map
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision
Person Warren Sage Project #2023.055
Vance
Granville Prepared by: K. Hamlin
•
May 18, 2022
Orange Franklin
Durham 1 inch = 4,000 feet
Wake Nash 0 4,000 8,000
Fe
C;r
4� Moen tarn Rp
i
a
n
5
� V
S
S •
Northnda
I
a �
�rry@
+4�
SAGE
Figure 4
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

5/19/23, 2:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to Avst
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area
referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly
or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on
trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude
and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities,
and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Granville County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
1B [phone]- No.
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 2 136-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, INC 27606-1487
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 1 /7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI)
for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by
activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the
species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species,
additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which
is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement cmmly be
obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an off' by
doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
S. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species- and their critical habitats are managed by thEEcological Servicm Pro ram t S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NO Fisheries
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOA�A Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please cont&OAA Fisheries
for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under theEndangered Species Act ire thr atened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See thelisting status page for mor information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries also known as the National �Mine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration within t Department of Commerce.
The following speciesp'oentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
l
NAME�rl
TricoloBat Perimyotis subflavus
Whe fiver found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/10515
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 2/7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/528
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.ggv/ecp//species/3739
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp//species/3473
Critical habitats
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Threatene
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all above listed species.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Adtand the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
Any person ortrganization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as describeslow.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concernhtt.Ds://www.fws. ov/pro ram/mi rator -by irds/sspecies
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to bird!https://www.fws.gay/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing incidental-
take-mi rg atory birds
Nationwide conservation measures for bird!https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pddf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on thldSFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)
list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQbelow. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this
list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit theE-bird data map�n tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 3/7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird
list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be founldelow.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds
on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucacephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of
the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
AI k
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
as a.
Kentucky Warbler Opercrnis fcrmosus Breeds Ap 0 to 2
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor e May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continen I USA a
Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughounge in the con nental USA and
Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelin a � Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska. ,
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below proJ6e our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this
report.
Probability of Presence(m)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected
divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability
of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in
week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the
year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall
between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 4/7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow
bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort(I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas
off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more
sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effor no to
SPECIES JAN FIB MAR APR Ma/ JUN JUL AUG SIP OCT N
Bald Eagle III IIII IIII IIII IIII hil III —++ IIII ANon-BCC VulnerableChimney Swift _--_---- ----
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Eastern Whip -poor -will — — — — — — — — ----
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Kentucky Warbler Al "" "" — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler ---- ----
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker _--' '---
BCC Rangewide (CON) .�
Wood Thrush ' Jill Jill 111� ' — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON) _
Tell me more about conservation measures I can Vplement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of
these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and aViding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be
breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summar)Additional measures orpermits may be advisable depending on the type of
activity you are J
ctingt'and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
Wh doesJ,RaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Mig"ratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWSirds of Conservation Concern LC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your
project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by thAvian Knowledge Network L)LK_N)The AKIN data is based on a growing
collection ofsurvey, banding. and citizen science datasetsand is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur
in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit tl-PfBpid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by th�&ian Knowledge Network LN.)This data is
derived from a growing collection ofsurvey, banding. and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of
presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 5/7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location
using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some
point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds areBirds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii,
the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of tKogle Act requirements (for eagles)
or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds
on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off
the Atlantic Coast, please visit theNortheast Ocean Data Portal The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through tNQAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Map in of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Contine al hell p ject
webpage. "w
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migratio�Models relying on survey
data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see thriving Bird Study and %enanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. P
What if I have m es on eagles list?
Y
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need tobtain a i vi ing the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your proje re ly a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is
generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in yo r project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)
that overlap your project; not your exact ;&�ct footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then
the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore,
a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential
to be in your project areewhen they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to
look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your
project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or min?mize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
N*1­11 '"Wo
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by thElational Wildlife Refugee system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 6/7

5/19/23, 2:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other
State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the locEU.S. Army Cor sp of Engineers District
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend
you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
RIVEPINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at th(National Wetlands Inventory website
16,
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information o
the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations 40
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information onfh}e location, type and size of these
resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.
A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any rti Ic ae may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the e e ence of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral
data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata oul e consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since th date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicthe map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to
detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats,
because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this
inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving
modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency
regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/42KLMDBJKJA4XIZRQ7QGCHR5MI/resources 7/7

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
May 19, 2023
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Enon Road; 2023.055
Dear Kim Hamlin:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
IR ►�70Id�7�A['i7�a
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

ƒ
/
/
$
\
\J
v
a
e
2 e
s
e
s
s
/
\
\ \
/
»
o e
v
e
3
e
3 ±
3
3
3
\
\
c
/
3 d
\
j
CC)
2 %
9 %
<
u
�
—
�z
�}
e z
«
» 2
/
s e
/[
©t/§
.k
~
\
�_
u
.���U
\\\®
2
e
s
e
s
e
s
e
s
CC)
2
m
n
/
/
Y
Y
Y
Y
\
0::°
/
\ \
Ln
u
&
&
&
&
>
_
\
^
CC)
}
a)o
9
>
® \
<
e
y
m
4/
/
\\
7-0
s
®
e
cs\G©±
/
E\ CC)
CC)e
u»
2(
3
*
/
/
*
g
a
g g x
E
g
.)
g\
\.z
/
\ / / \
=
s
\ \
ƒ
j
//
c a/
g
3
3
3
3
/
a c°
/=662
w\e%
%
%
%
�-0
2
/ 2%
o
0
0
0
\
m s:
<//>
e Z
-i e o
3
3
3
3
e:
e``
/
g g
oxe
/
3
3
3
3
_\
Z
g
a
a
a
a
\
|
\
2
o \
..
�^
c
\
/
2 =
-
/
e
)«
g
§
/
a)§
/
\
\ \
/
®
%
/
Z
g
=
D
o
ose
:
t
Co
2
©
���0
m
Z
\\/j
y
\
°)
m
/g
z z
/
\
\
\ S
e
±
»
<
\ \
o\
\
\ \
/ f
/ >
e
3 %
s %
®
k
± t
CC)\
2
\ \
\
)
CC)
\ %
(
?
e
o o
s
/ _
/ s
e/%
\ t
./ ƒ
®
%
E
`
/ E
$ %
o ®0
9/
c
2
: -%
\
ƒ \
2 ±
x /
x z
c
=
s
/ ƒ.\
\
\
u
\ 2
y t/
y t 2
t>
LE
»\*\
\
\
.k
z
/ %
\ /
\ / %
/ %
)
: /
CC)g§}<gx
e® -0 0) ®s
± \ \ t 5.±
e s
\.±
e
\
v
o
c a
.±
c
s a
c
c c
c
s
/§»°\
10
\
/
\
\ \
®
\
\
\
\
E
e
»
\ /
e
e
e
/
c
0)
0)o
cc)
cc)::
Z g
ME-0
z:
=}E
cc)
/�0�c�
>
>
>
>
CC)
z \
-0 2
ƒ
\ \
z
_/_
2
E
2
E
2
E 2
E
\/�
n\\\/
lcxc)
//
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
\
\
\
_ = o
r 0-
: a
^
/
/
e CC) %
0 ®
%
e 0
Z
e
Z
e
Z
e Z
e
z 7
e
x x e,J
9
e/
§
/

/
J$
\
\
v
e
a
e
e
2 e
s
s
e
s
s
s
s 2
s
3
7 a
e
v
v
\
/
\
\
/
\
/
2
\ /
3®
3
3
3
E
CO
±
2
<
u
3 /`
%
/
0
2 %
(
®
g \
/
ƒ
±
g \
e
:
e
z
\
\ .
/
co
/\
CO
\ CO>2
2
\\
:
}
u
e
e
e
e
e
e
o
2
+ z
\/
/
2
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
J
e
}\
2
u
&
&
&
&
&
&
«
o
®
\
} Co Co / Co e e
/
u
/\\\\\\
\_\
/
\\\
c mo
CO
/
E\
CO Co
3
3
3
3
0Ln
J
e
2
\
\ a
\
9 E
\.\
/
\ \ \_
\ CO
ƒ
CO
\
c \ \
_
2
\
\
\
\
\
/
9
/
^
s
6
% c
/(
o
m
w 3
/ 2
0)
% o
v
0
v
0
v
0
v
0
\
u \ \ \ \
» \
\
m
/ / 2
m Z
y
<-i
e
o 3
3
3
3
3
3
\
e e e e e
`
g g
o x e
/
3
3
3
3
3
3
/
D D
/\
Z
t
g
a
a
a
a
a
a
-
m
E
e e c e e e
±
c
0
/\
<
//\//®
c
4a�
\
/////\
�0
/
/
/
u
/
/
°
9 \ \ CO
:
CO
\ \
\
CO
0
E
/
CO
�
\
\ \ / \ \ /
\
%
%
`
Z
®
e
$
/
3
/ / Z / / Z
Z Z
0 t
/
\_
\
3\
\
._ ._
/
\
}
\
7
\ \ Z \ \ Z
\ \
\
\
\
/
/
/
\ CO
\ \
\
=
e
e
S
E
»
E <
2 j
z
u\
o
o
®\(
§}
/ e
s\/
/
±
\\z
2fu\
\
\
<
\
°
\ /
E
a \
7
/ J
\
_
\
»_
\(
o>
e/
o
m o._
y
O
e
m o.2 t t 2
s
e
Z
s
ƒ g
._
2 »
=
x
= x
z
o
e
.k
» 2 %
°
® S
>
/ »
�
S t
® t
\
«
3
% e 2 / / }
\ z
t©
e w z—
c
c o
d a_
\\/ ®® ®
z°
+
e
t
O z y
G
.g E\
-0
y E
z E®
(
a
e e=/ /z
2 E
\
E.±
y ± a
4
\
a)3
\
E \
\
\
° > > > > /
-
_
/
/
o / /
\
d 2
%
/ 2
/ 2
/
\
\
/
\
\ \ \ \ \ /
0
\\
o
e
a
a
° e e c e e
o%
a
a
a
a
a
\o
/
z z ®
E _ _ / //\
%(
/
»
/
\ \
\
Ln
co
co -0 \ \ -0 -0
/
g
>
>
>
>
>
%
/
/
4
4 / / / / / /
2
\
/
\
/
m
\
t
e=
z
—�
2 E
—�
2
—�
E 2
E
—
2
—
E 2
E/
2`�
s
s 2 2/ 2 2 z
/ a
E°
D
E
E 2
E
E 2
E/
2\
0
//
2 2 a 2 2 0
\\
/\\do\/
\///
\////
\/
//o-
//\\/\\
ra
s
/

P21 abUey �
a
G
AeM seoiuuai
1°s-rP
o 1�M11J,
Rs al,,f7
'Pads Jv —11,
a
m
,Q o
i d a�rrR
46, Aa a
11
I
I
I
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
LO
ti
0
0
Q �
z
2 w
ce o
fo m
ru
fu wCYN
m
N d ru al N
N z M
m a
a
:1
G
u
N
a

Kim Hamlin
From:
Kim Hamlin
Sent:
Friday, May 19, 2023 10:33 AM
To:
401 PreFile
Subject:
Notice of Intent to File 401 Permit - Enon Rd Subdivision, Granville County
Good morning,
This email serves as our notice of intent to file a 401 permit for the Enon Road Subdivision (Murphy's Ridge) located in
Oxford, Granville County, NC.
Thank you,
Kim Hamlin
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919.622.7888
[e-mail]

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6526FBEB-D9D6-49E5-8754-AACC76072264
RDY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
John P. Downes
150E Walkerwoods Lane
Clayton, NC 27527
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 15, 2023
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO# 22-564
Granville County
Determination Type
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0714)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0734)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
Project Name: Enon Road Subdivision
Address/Location: Enon Road (36.2481750,-78.7791
Stream(s): UT to Knapp of Reeds Creek
Determination Date: May 15, 2023
Staff: Jim Westcott
Feature
E/UP (i)
Not
Subject(2)
Subject
Start
Stop
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
Stream A
P
X
36.24761,-78.7801, Throughout
X
X
Stream B
P
X
36.24801,-78.7795, Throughout
X
X
Stream C
I
X
36.24679,-78.7798
X
Stream D
I
X
36.24764,-78.7763
X
Stream E
I
X
36.24852,-78.7812
X
Stream F
I
X
36.25657,-78.7785
X
Stream G
I
X
36.25716,-78.7775
X
Stream H
I
X
36.24760,-78.78013
X
Stream I
I
X
36.24678,-78.77981
X
Stream J
E
X
X
Stream K
E
X
X
Stream L
E
X
X
Stream M
E
X
X
Stream N
E
X
X
Stream 0
NP
X
X
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Dq.d. c .d4 BA , 919.791.4200
oePanmem m enwronmenW uuai�

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6526FBEB-D9D6-49E5-8754-AACC76072264
Enon Road Subdivision
Granville County
May 15, 2023
Page 2 of 3
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, N/A=Not Applicable, WL = Wetland, JD= Jurisdictional
Ditch
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality
standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Wake County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that are not depicted on the maps referenced above and
are therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract, they are subject
to all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B
and may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Supervisor; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-
1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Supervisor; DWR — 401
& Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jim Westcott at [phone].
Sincerely,
EDocuSigned by:
a f,,2916E6AB32144F...
Vanessa E. Manuel, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Laserfiche
NORTH CAROLINAD ��`E—/
oepenmem MFnwronmen:al ecallty\ r
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6526FBEB-D9D6-49E5-8754-AACC76072264
NORTH CAROLINA� ��`� �—/
w"amem ofawmomen:al ecallty\ r
Enon Road Subdivision
Granville County
May 15, 2023
Page 3 of 3
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6526FBEB-D9D6-49E5-8754-AACC76072264
Enon Road Subdivision
Granville County, NC-DWR Project # 22-564
depicted
USGS Topographical Map 0STATE,
Mix
Cary Quadrangle 2019 .. :: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
Legend:ence only
-Proposed Project Boundary 71

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6526FBEB-D9D6-49E5-8754-AACC76072264
Enon Road Subdivision
Granville County, NC-DWR Project # 22-564
f ' . Stream B : Subject
Gt� A
Na9J
1
Stream G : Subject
Stream N : Not Subject
Stream F : Subject
rc Stream M : Not Subiect
'.LL a
H W
Stream E : Subject
GeB
Hr�
— rJ Stream D : Subject F
Stream A : Subject
` Stream C :Subject �L
L rr► r� rt~ Stream H :Subject
TO - - FA r
A Stream I : Subject e B
eC
rZo R • n a - w HrR
Stream L : Not Subject
Stream K : Not Subject
. Map #8
Map ##11
Stream J : Not subject
INKS Soil Survey Sheet �-ST,7JF�
Granville Co., INC 1970 `"- :: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer -
Legend: enceonly:: M
-Proposed project boundary:

UeLUAr%08 aau3dd snood
� O
®"ass
a
n
a - �
3 a>
oU
A1NnOO 371InNVH`J
VNIIOHVO H1HON '4HOjXO
OVOH NON3
�Jgaf'I S,AHJHf1W
NVIdlOVdWIllVH3A0
�tlgm&'
ggG�sslat
(ar

-, niNnOO 371IANVUE) _ o
1�1�1�IM0 eL^ o vNnoavo HiaoN aaoaxo
8 aau3dLs000 rJavoaNON3�; =oho
�QT2I SAHd2If1W
(Zd0l)VESNI-iOVdMa3ddn8 WV3alS �'"•• �•" m -
Iill�lllll ll�Ii lip
f
I I' I ; I1 I IT Ili
II�I�I
1 1 r�JJ
o
O III 1 1 I a �J1,
�� IIII'I�I
Lr-, 6-1
�I
_ _ - - - - - - - � � � �,Ilo ah;Iw � � olio-�; ; ✓ -� .A� V � �� -- ,' _-_-- Id w
4�if
---
--------------
--------------- --
CD
-�>- nlLf
----- c� s ------ _-44
---
r
� I
i
o
Ln
N

-, A1NnOO 3„9 IANVa_ o
1�1e1�IM0 eL^ uo VNIlOtlVO HON 4aOdX0 8
8 aau3dL�s000 avoNON3
�gafld SAHd-df1W
„ paNLPLL1,o (Z 30 Z) V 13SNI - l0VdW1 H333f18'3 WV38iS m
I
�� a°°uou_uuu o
Sul alum=
obod
& �IIIII IIIII IIIII
O
E
a
a �
&� 2 U�
tzzo
w�LS 'sfG�

swra A1Nf00 3llIANVFiO
60 wo a nwgo a VNIIOkiVO H1kiON 'OkiOjXO
-sssrs sl a OVOki NON3
da 00 s,�Haxnrn yaH =W: p
dddes° 913SaI)ar(INI - lOvdWl ui=H o a WV3dls
uemm0s m -
JD
-- - ------
---------
_1 C
/ _--- - - -- - -- --- -- --- — - �� -____ ---____--_ —
77
-- _-_
_ _- _ ___�--_ -_
--- I ----
--------- ---_-- -- __ -` --_ ,-
wzowo _
w /--------- - - � .
LL / -----
'D
CP
i

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attn: Kim Hamlin, 3707 Swift Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE
TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Granville County City: Oxford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.2509°N, 78.7775°W
Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 17S 4014068.33 699687
Name of nearest waterbody: Knap of the Reeds
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAYBE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in review
area (acreage and linear
feet, if applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to which
the aquatic resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
Section 10/404)
SB
36.2595
-78.7762
654
non -wetland
Section 404
Sc
36.2481
-78.7791
462
non -wetland
Section 404
SD
36.2486
-78.7811
496
non -wetland
Section 404
SE
36.2516
-78.7746
2326
non -wetland
Section 404
SF
36.2554
-78.7749
2038
non -wetland
Section 404
SG
36.2570
-78.7779
727
non -wetland
Section 404
SH
36.2474
-78.7823
2522
non -wetland
Section 404
SI
36.2476
-78.7804
50
non -wetland
Section 404
WA
36.2477
-78.7840
0.095
wetland
Section 404
WAl
36.2484
-78.7842
0.106
wetland
Section 404
WA2
36.2490
-78.7844
0.242
wetland
Section 404
WB
36.2592
-78.7755
0.346
wetland
Section 404
WB1
36.2594
-78.7760
0.111
wetland
Section 404
WC
36.2481
-78.7791
0.002
wetland
Section 404
WD
36.2487
-78.7810
0.026
wetland
Section 404
WD1
36.2493
-78.7806
0.016
wetland
Section 404
WE
36.2514
-78.7759
0.014
wetland
Section 404
WEl
36.2516
-78.7762
0.004
wetland
Section 404
WE2
36.2515
-78.7768
0.005
wetland
Section 404
WE3
36.2517
-78.7771
0.009
wetland
Section 404
WE4
36.2517
-78.7774
0.002
wetland
Section 404
WE5
36.2518
-78.7777
0.017
wetland
Section 404
WF
36.2545
-78.7796
0.027
wetland
Section 404
WF1
36.2545
-78.7793
0.019
wetland
Section 404
WF2
36.2544
-78.7788
0.015
wetland
Section 404
WF3
36.2543
-78.7771
0.018
wetland
Section 404
WF4
1 36.2552
-78.7750
0.015
wetland
Section 404
WG
36.2564
-78.7794
0.023
wetland
Section 404
WGl
36.2567
-78.7782
0.046
wetland
Section 404
WG2
36.2572
-78.7776
0.071
wetland
Section 404
WE
36.2474
-78.7773
0.019
wetland
Section 404
WH1
36.2478
-78.7807
0.001
wetland
Section 404
WH2
36.2476
-78.7817
0.003
wetland
Section 404
WH3
36.2475
-78.7820
0.077
wetland
Section 404
WH4
36.2468
-78.7831
0.023
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types
of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or aNationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not
requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable
waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that
could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below
where indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: PJD Sketch Map — Figure 3
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Moriah & Lake Michie, NC Quadrangles
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Granville County soil survey. 1997 (sheets 8 & I D
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2021
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, May 2023
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory staff
member completing PJD
n 27, 2023
Sign tune and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary
prior to finalizing an action.

n
r�
�. )
V/
70
'
I.y
_V\J
CL
m
E
W
O p
LO
O Lo
p O
(2 N
O O
O O
0
L
2 n
Q

CDo
jmoo0i
O
J
o+
om
rnrn
♦Y
O�
J0M
0N
Q
0
0
00
co
U
aim
p>
00
O
00co
00
v
Z
J
F
0'
Z
u~i
II
N
L-L
p
W
W
II
W
Ul
m
coLL
J
o
o
>
Z�m
Q
F
t! coU
W
j
*
W
0]
ip
U)
z LU
'
p
Z
NLn
Z
O
CY
to
2
a
J O
>
LL
p
,�-i O
W
J
J
IL
W
J
Q
V
W
J
M
Q 00
W
-rq
M
co
00
W
Z
oo
Q
w
J
>
>f7
I
IL
w o
a
J
O
W
�
�0Wam
N >O
�o
L
LL
O
F
Z
w
DI
JW
Q S
V z OaW
Z
r'
Q
OC
x
J
a
U
00
>J
II
o a w a�
Q
CO
w
O
W>
00E- W W_
5
^
Lf)
F
a
F
O(A
OLQ.Lm
W
00
II
ooiU=L!
oaaJa
w
noo
C
Q
Z
O
w
0
�oGxQx
zaa
Q
W
a
WLU
Q F
*
Z
F
9
a
LL
Q
TZN
-N
O
U
Q
(LOOO
N(14fY
W
(A
p
*
IL
F
Q
U
m
LL
F
LL
C
Q
W
W
U.0
W
fY
W
x
z
O
QFQ
OC
_
*
W
N
Q
W
H
p
C
Q
U
a
0]
Z
O
W
00U0
C
J
F'T�oZ
U)
N
N
"
Z
a
II
O
0
O
J
F
}
?
a
LL
U
a
m
3
x
Z
NOONp
O� O O U)W
Lu
00
^
J
~
(A
m
(A
m
O
CO
K
C
O
�000
fl'
O
W
W
fY
fY
0
W
W
Z
p J
+
Z
O W
F
p
F
x
LL
O
O Q
Q
a
J
U) 0 0 U)
(^' C
LU
00
;
x
>
w
U
�
C) Q
W
>
N OG
W
+
W
c
W (!
(A
W
O
F
LU
Z
x
co
fY
a
LL
W
"c
W
c
F-W
p�
RUC)~
JpLL
Q
F-
W
U
O
O
O
m
Z
Q
fY
o000
F
W J
0
a
V
z
0
a~
W
Q
LL
(�
W
W
p
O O
LU
IL
cDa
F-~
0
a0
0
LL
o
J
-i
ao
0
W
0
aW
Q??w
W
Q
LLL
n>
>
a
Y U
J
.1
M
x
LL
W
~ W
00
N OLna�NQ
0
m O Z
�
Q
a
Q
F
C
M O
N N
aLU
m O
a z w
fY
Q
fY
ULU
O
N fY
fY
Q
II
=
LU a
0
x W
n
x
LL
F OG
=
IL
L-L
o
o
Coco
rn rn
*
m
x
0
o 0
=
C
o 0
W
t0
U
N
F-
LU
U
O
N
N O
Vl
{A
M
O
NU
i N
Nr
x
~
W
rl
r, U)
IL
U
Z
X
M
00
J � O
F
Z
O
C
N
a
Z
Q
I�Z
WOO
U0�
;
W
O
fY
F
LLO
U
y
NQ
oz0
0
O
oGUJ
Q W
>
Oy
LU
pZ0
Ln
a
Qzxwc
>Q�
-
-FO
i
mQLL
Q mLnO
LL
JO(AF
Q

,�
0 0^
W
0
0
(3)
N
-4
kO
-�
r�
�p
000
O
O
O
p
7
�p
�p
to to
f7
fY
00
JW
OM
00 V
Lu
mOLn
pp
N
Q
N
N
00
(Qj
~
a
O
n>
p
>-
M
M M
0
Z
M
J
Q
F
O'
uJ
M
Z
N
N
0
w
IILU
II
~
Ul
J
m
J
m
a
J
Q
�ornLiOn��
CT
O
O
OLU
LL
C
N
co
O
I�
Ln
co~
N
>
W
Y
?
,--i
kD>
N
In co
L
LL
U
w
In
J O
*
W
m
r,
Ln
Cff
O
D
Z
Z
p
O
In
=
C
N
>
*
LL
x
Q
a
LU
V
W
p
J M
OLnr:
o.1Lno
OJ
Z
�O
'�
LU
FcOMN�
J
W
f7
a
a
F II
000
IL
000
>
�LU
0
(31 m0
W
p
n
000
m0Ln
N
LL
LL
F
0
00
Lu
O
Q
W
Lu
U
>J
lnzow LU
Z
Q
0
x
J
a
IY
*
Q
0>
00 ..
a
II
m
fY
0
LU
OF-w
�
Ln
Wx
ONJ
LU
0000
0�000
coo
000
rn0m
w�w
v
Z
o0o
a
O
,;g
0 a a a
U
Q
0
U
LU
O
~aa
ax
LU
� N
—Q
LU
Lu
Q F
LU0
0
0
*
�o
000
LU
0r,
0
N
r,
N
rl
N
Z
UN
mO
Ln
a
�e7f�
(AO
K K
LL,.I
OOOO
LU
N
F
*
IL
F- O
Q
U
m
LL
00
F
n
C
LULn
Q
fY
U
LL
W
O
OC
W
x
z
0
QFQ
OC
_
*
LU
4
W
,--i
N
r-i
~
0
U
m
Z
O
0093
O
0
0
Lon
pgyQ((
Nrn�o
z
II
O
N
QOG
O
U'
orj
�
O
F
?
LL
U
}
a
J
a
m
3
x
0000
LiOn
W
J
N000i
Z
Ln 00 00LU
LU
LL
0
LU
Z
.�
LU~
fY
O
fY
F
LL
LU
Z
a
O J
;
+
O
LU
03
K
0
000 a
Lu Q
O
Q
J.Mi00.M-iND
LU
fY
0�
LL
fY
Lu
_�
Q
>
x
>t0
rj N U)
0 0
U
En
>
D a
LU
f-
.--�
LU(/l
In
>
N N
N
N LU
+
LUOC
C
LULUu~i
C
(/1
v)
LU1
(D
O
F
C7
aa(7
C7
Lu
LU
Z
x
N
m
}
a
LU
..0
Qw
�1(D
U
0
cr�
O
O
0
O
a
00
~
fY
�-J
LLJa
a
U
O
z
aOLL
Lr)
Ln
O
Q
LU
Q
N
LL�1N
O
LU
LU
Go r1i
*
O
f7
QJ0
LU
OCi
LU
UUl
!
LL
J
J
J
(V
F
O
dZ
000
LU0
Q
�>
>
m M
IL
YU
Q�.�i
J,ti.--iNM�
.�-�j
W
x
LL
~
W
�
NM
TF
IL
M O���••�N
M
V
Q
0
w
~
U COO Z
a
Q
F
M O
N
� Q m O
fLU
0
fY
C
N fY
a z w
Q
ULU
fY
Q
II
N
LU
LU a
0
x W
n
x
LL
F OG
(n
+
IL
o
o
=
voov
'To �
*
oo
�� o
LU0
U
M
M M
N
F-
LU
U
N
N ON
V1
U1
M
0
rJ
x
~
N
rl
U N
J W LI1
W
IL
U
Z
rl
LU
M
J � O
F
Z
O
C
N�
LU
LU
En0
Q�
wOO�
Z
O
U
1�
NQ
Z U O
;
LufY
F
LL D
y
pwz0
O
N
0
J
OCUJ
C LUOY
>
LU
pD Z LU
a
Q
Z
v) Maw
>
Q�FO
i
a MtnO
��
J0En
Q

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Murphy's Ridge City/County: Granville Sampling Date: 05/25/23
Applicant/Owner: Askeaton Realty, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: DP-01
Investigator(s): Ian Warr, Ryan Elliot Section, Township, Range: Tally Ho Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.2487 Long:-78.7844 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-01
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 47 x 2 = 94
1.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 145 x 3 = 435
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 6 x 4 = 24
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 198 (A) 553 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.79
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Carex squarrosa
20
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Carex intumescens
20
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Impatiens capensis 2 No FACW
4.
Microstegium vimineum
30
Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Woodwardia areolata
5
No
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Polystichum acrostichoides
2
No
FACU
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
79
=Total Cover
Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
Smilax glauca
2
Yes
FACU
2.
Lonicera japonica
2
Yes
FACU
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
9
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-01
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-12 2.5Y 5/3 80 10YR 4/4 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
F19 Indicator Present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Murphy's Ridge City/County: Granville Sampling Date: 05/25/23
Applicant/Owner: Askeaton Realty, LLC. State: NC Sampling Point: DP-02
Investigator(s): Ian Warr, Ryan Elliot Section, Township, Range: Tally Ho Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.2486 Long:-78.7843 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lignum silt loam, 2-6% slopes (LmB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-02
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Carpinus caroliniana
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 30
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Carpinus caroliniana
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Uominant
% Cover
Species?
40
Yes
10
No
10
No
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
idicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
85.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
5 No FAC
35
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Impatiens capensis
5
No
FACW
2.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes
FAC
4.
Woodwardia areolata
2
No
FACW
5.
Polystichum acrostichoides
2
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
29
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
4.
5.
12
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
6
20% of total cover:
3
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
7
x 2 =
14
FAC species
122
x 3 =
366
FACU species
7
x 4 =
28
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
136
(A)
408 (B)
Prevalence
Index
= B/A =
3.00
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-02
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-12 2.5Y 5/3 95 10YR 4/4 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
No F19 Indicator Present
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Stream ID: SD-01
NC+A1:Q2 DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
6/24/23
Project/Site:
Murphy's Ridge
Latitude:
36.2481
Evaluator:
Ian Warr, Ryan Elliot
County:
Granville
Lon itude:
-78.7818
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
> 19 or perennial if> 30
P
��'��
Stream
DeterminatlOn:
Ephemeral
Other:
e. . Quad Name:
g
Moriah & Lake
Michie, NC
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 7
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1 1.0
10.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
0.5
111. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 3.25
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified usina other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Channel Substrate
Velocity:
Clarity:
Sketch:

Stream ID: SF SH-01
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
5/24/23
Project/Site:
Murphy's Ridge
Latitude:
36.2475
Evaluator:
Ian Warr, Ryan Elliot
County:
Granville
Lon itude:
-78.7769
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
> 19 or perennial if> 30
21
Stream
Determination:
Intermittent
Other:
e.g. Quad Name:
Moriah & Lake
Michie, NC
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 6.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.0
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
111. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 4
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
'perennial stream may also be identified usina other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Channel Substrate
Velocity:
Clarity:
Sketch:

Stream ID: SF SI-01
NC+A1:Q2 DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
5/24/23
Project/Site:
Murphy's Ridge
Latitude:
36.2476
Evaluator:
Ian Warr, Ryan Elliot
County:
Granville
Lon itude:
-78.7805
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
> 19 or perennial if> 30
21
Stream
Determination:
Intermittent
Other:
e.g. Quad Name:
Moriah & Lake
Michie, NC
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 10
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
111. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
'perennial stream may also be identified usina other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Channel Substrate
Velocity:
Clarity:
Sketch:

SITE PHOTOS
1
r TF-
S r
.a►
�� war _. h� •�- f3"
-•
-i�
J _
y
PP��}} ~lam .R y � ll% �� -.
��-♦
�.
.r �'•
rev' - r+
Photo 1: View of Stream SB, facing west.
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision — Photo Log

Photo 3: View of the structures found in the southeastern portion of the Site.
Photo 4: Wetland WA2 looking west within the floodplain of Stream SA.
Murphy's Ridge Subdivision - Photo Log

Photo 5: Wetland WE looking east. WE is a small headwater forest wetland that exhibits a typical
view for the majority of wetlands located on the Site.
Photo 6: Wetland WB looking northwest within the floodplain of Stream SB.

T fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn fn
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
co N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Iw
-ja 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0
J C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
OON V LO (D (0 ONM f--(0 MM ON(0 M f-- tiON (0 MM MGM
-OV V V Lo (0 O LO(O(O I` ti ti 0) 0) 001` LO O M f-- ti O NM(00 V V I`NOCl)
00 00 00 ti ti ti 00 00 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 00 00 00 00 I` I` 00 ti ti ti 00 00 00
� ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
O) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
O ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
J
I` V O N V I` M Lo Lo V co N V I` N V 00 (0 LO 00 LO (0 (0 V O V (0 M
�I`000)0000000 V V V V LO(0(01` I` ti ti I`(000000 � LO I` ti ti 00
N N N N N N LO LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Lo N N N N LO LO N N N
(D (D (D (0 (0 (0 (0 (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (D (D
J CO CO CO M M M M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
'I' LO (0 1-000O7NM� L( (0 f�000O�NM V LO (0 f-00 OO
0 0 0 0 0 0 , � � � � N N N N N N N N N N M
cT
Qf1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 O O O O O O
N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
�QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ���������
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q: Q Q Q Q z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
13� Q� Q� ly- Q�ofofofofofofofof 13�000000000
�UUUUU0000000000000000000000000000000
LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
LO (0 N CD N(O(0 V V LO O N f-- ti O LO M LO M(0 O MI`M V N(0(0 Mr--N(DM
C 0')OIcT V �ONOOOON� EN V I`�001`NLOCDMNMNNLO-
707NC? C 0C 0000000000000000000(0 V V Cl) OI`LO
o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 N N N
Q
N
Q
T
H
I
(0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 N N N N N N N N N N M
. . C C C C C C C C C
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J J J J J J J J J
N
O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
U Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z�IO_
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
(D»» >»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» >
= E E E E E E E
N
O
U
c
I
co
0200000000000000000000000002
0 W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W M V V M M V M V V
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
-�?000000000000000000000000000000000000
� rr rr rr rr fY fY rr rr rr fY fY fY fY fY rr fY fY rr rr rr rr fY fY fY fY fY rr rr rr rr fY fY rr rr rr fY
fn Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY fY
000000000000000000000000000000000000
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
N
E
m
Z
NI
cy NMJ,Lf) NMI N NMI
�QQQmmU�� W W W W W WLLLLLLUUU=====mUO W LL( =—f1