20190752 Ver 5_Chemours - Fayetteville - Barrier Wall - 401 Permit - REV1 9_16_22_20220916

GEOServices, LLC, Geotechnicai and Materials Engineers
Revised September 16, 2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Attention: Mr. Paul Wojoski
[e-mail]
Subject: Modified 401 Permit Document
Chemours Fayetteville Works — Barrier Wall Project
22828 Highway 87 West
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28306
Dear Mr. Wojoski:
GEOServices, LLC (GEOServices) thanks you for the opportunity to provide a response to the Request for Additional
Information dated August 25, 2022. Per the RAI the 401 Individual Water Quality Application has been modified to
include the impacted stream length and identify the streams to be monitored.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Butler at (865) 603-
8383 or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
GEOServices, LLC
Z-
Chris Butler
Project Manager
Enclosures
Attachment I
- Preliminary Plan Sheets
Attachment II
- Groundwater Drawdown Map (Planview)
Attachment III
- Wetland Monitoring Program
Attachment IV
- Waters of the U.S. Findings Report
Attachment V
- Credit Reservation Document
Byron L. Barton
Environmental Department Manager
GEOServices, LLC, 2561 Willow Point Way, Knoxville, Tennessee 37931 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB No. 0710-0003
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Expires: 02-28-2022
The public reporting burden for this collection of information, OMB Control Number 0710-0003, is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services,
at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-collections(amail.mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall
be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT
RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE ABOVE EMAIL.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act,
Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form
will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and
local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission of requested information
is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good
reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and/or instructions)
and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
System of Record Notice (SORN). The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been completed (SORN #A1145b)
and may be accessed at the following website: http://dpcld.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNslndex/DOD-wide-SORN-Article-View/Article/570115/al 145b-ce.aspxx
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - SEBASTIAN Middle - Last - BAHR
First - CHRIS Middle - Last - BUTLER
Company - THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
Company - GEOSERVICES, LLC
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 22828 NC HIGHWAY 87 WEST
Address- 2561 WILLOW POINT WAY
City - FAYETTEVILL State - NC Zip - 28306 Country -USA
City - KNOXVILLE State - TN Zip - 37931 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
NA 910-483-4681 NA
NA 865-539-8242 NA
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, GEOSERVICES, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
SAW-2019-00296 MODIFICATION - CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS - BARRIER WALL PROJECT
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
CAPE FEAR RIVER AND MULTIPLE TRIBUTARIES
Address 22828 NC HIGHWAY 87 W
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 34.839897 Longitude: -W-78.825989
City - FAYETTEVILLE State- NC Zip- 28306
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID NA Municipality NA
Section - NA Township - NA Range - NA
ENG FORM 4345, FEB 2019 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
STARTING FROM USACE (527 INTERCEPTOR RD, POPE FIELD, NC)
1. TAKE REILLY RD. TO ALL AMERICAN FWY S IN FORT BRAGG (2.9 MILES)
2. FOLLOW ALL AMERICAN FWY S TO OWEN DRIVE IN FAYETTEVILLE (8.1 MILES)
3. GET ON NC-87 S (5.3 MILES)
4. MERGE ONTO NC-87 S (14.1 MILES)
5. DRIVE TO GLENGERRY ROAD (2.1 MILES) ARRIVE AT PROJECT AREA WHERE ACCESS ROADS ARE PROVIDED TO SITE.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
SEE ATTACHMENT A
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
SEE ATTACHMENT A
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
IN ORDER TO IMPOUND AND CAPTURE SEEPS A AND B, CLEAN FILL MATERIAL WILL BE DISCHARGED INTO THE SEEPS.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
35 CONCRETE 1000 RIPRAP
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres
or
Linear Feet 707
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
SEE ATTACHMENT A
ENG FORM 4345, FEB 2019 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? ®Yes ❑ No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
AN ACCESS ROAD HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO ALLOW WORK CREWS ACCESS TO THE BARRIER WALL PROJECT SITE.
ADDITIONALLY, SEVERAL REMDIATION SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED THROUGHOUT TTHE FACILITY TO COLLECT
IMPACTED SURFACE WATERS FLOWING TOWARDS CAPE FEAR RIVER.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- US GOVERNMENT PARCEL NO. 035900667707 (NO ADDRESS LISTED)
City - State - Zip -
b. Address- NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST PARCEL NO. 035900228496 (NO ADDRESS LISTED)
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
NCDEQ LDP BLADE-2021-002 2021-11-23 2020-12-04
USACE INDIVIDUAL SAW-2019-00206 2020-10-05
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, FEB 2019 Page 3 of 3

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment A
SAW-2019-00296 — Request for Modification: Barrier Wall Project
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
On October 1, 2020, the North Carolina Superior Court for Bladen County entered a Consent Order (CO)
among The Chemours Company FC, LLC (Chemours) and the State of NC and Cape Fear River Watch to
address discharges of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS) at the Chemours Fayetteville
Works. As a result of the CO, Chemours must reduce the amount of impacted surface water draining
towards the Cape Fear River. As a part of the Addendum CO, a barrier wall has been proposed to capture
groundwater and surface waters from potentially discharging PFAS impacted waters to the Cape Fear
River.
Currently, flow -through cell technology is being utilized at major surface water discharges, identified as
Seeps A, B, C, and D from the facility. The flow -through cell implementation is part of a short-term
remediation schedule, and will need to be replaced with a long-term solution to reduce PFAS loading into
the Cape Fear River. The barrier wall will be constructed east of the facility in a north -south fashion and
will reduce surface/groundwater loading from the facility to the Cape Fear River. The barrier wall will be
installed above or at the 72-foot elevation (i.e. the 100-year floodplain). The barrier wall consists of a mix
of cement, bentonite clay, and onsite soils. The proposed mix design creates a minimum permeability of
1x10 -6cm/sec and installed at a minimum thickness of 1.5-feet. The barrier wall extends from the surface
to approximately 80-feet below existing grade. PFAS impacted surface/groundwater on the western side
of the barrier wall will be withdrawn via pumping stations and routed to on -site treatment facilities. With
the elimination of hydrologic connectivity between the two areas, it is expected that the presence of
surface or groundwater east of the wall will be from precipitation events, and fluctuation of groundwater
influence from the Cape Fear River. Preliminary plan sheets for the Barrier Wall and Ex -Situ Seep Capture
are included as Attachment I.
In addition to Seeps A, Seep A-Trib, Willis Creek Tributary and Seep B, numerous unnamed tributaries
were identified east of, and within the drawdown area of, the proposed barrier wall structure in the
Waters of the U.S. Findings Report; Chemours Fayetteville Works Project, Bladen and Cumberland
Counties, North Carolina; dated October 2020, prepared by Geosyntec Consultants of NC. These identified
features in the report will also be entirely hydrologically disconnected from groundwater and surficial

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
discharge activities west of the wall. Stream impacts at the location can be categorized into two general
groups. Those for which will be impacted due to physical displacement resulting from fill of the barrier
wall structure, and those impacts due to drawdown created from the proposed pumping system.
Alterations resulting from the structural fill will accumulate to approximately 733 Linear Feet (LFT) of
impacts. Additionally, alterations resulting from the expected groundwater drawdown area will
accumulate to approximately 3,864 LFT of impacts. The presumed alterations to existing
streamflow stemming from the above -mentioned hydrologic features will result in a total of
approximately 4,597 LFT of stream impacts at the project location.
Wetlands are present within the project area and are detailed further in the Waters of the U.S. Findings
report. However, due to the nature of activities, no impact is expected to wetland features within the
project limits. Groundwater modeling of the area has been completed by Geosyntec Consultants of NC
during the development of the groundwater remedy design (Attachment II). The modeling depicted a
drawdown of groundwater on the eastern portion of the project area ranging from 4.5' below ground
surface (bgs) to 0' of drawdown. It is our professional opinion that these wetlands are within the
floodplain of the Cape Fear River, and wetland hydrology within the project area is sustained by multiple
sources other than the seeps, including position within the floodplain/micro topography and geomorphic
position. It is not likely that a drawdown of a maximum of 4.5' bgs will impact the nature of these features.
We are proposing the development and implementation of a monitoring plan for this location, including
the collection of appropriate baseline data before construction begins to validate our position that
wetlands will not be impacted in a manner that will result in degradation.
The wetland monitoring plan and Waters of the U.S. Findings Report are included as Attachment III and
Attachment IV respectively.
19. Project Purpose
The purpose of the project is to comply with the Addendum CO between Chemours, the State of NC, and
Cape Fear River Watch to address discharges of PFAS at the Chemours Fayetteville Works. According to
the Addendum CO, Chemours is required to reduce total mass loading of PFAS substances during dry
weather by at least 99%, following rain events of 0.5 inches or less must reduce mass loading by at least
95%, and capture total dry weather flow plus rain events up to 0.5 inches in a 24-hour period upgradient

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
of the barrier wall for all streams. The addendum to consent order paragraph 12 states in paragraph 3(B)
that "Chemours shall proceed with the design and installation of a barrier wall and groundwater extraction
system to reduce PFAS loading from groundwater flow from under the facility to the Cape Fear River and
Willis Creek".
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation
Due to the nature of the activities that are herein described as "impacts" to surface waters, we are requesting
that a mitigation ratio for the unavoidable impacts be assessed at a 1:1 (Impacted LFT: Stream Credit) ratio
for groundwater drawdown areas, and a 2:1 ratio for in -channel fill of the barrier wall area per the applicable
USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
The impacts were determined based on conceptual models produced by Geosyntec. Alterations to natural
stream geomorphology, riparian zone, substrate, and hydrology will only be directly impacted at locations
where structural fill will be placed at the facility. These unavoidable and permanent impacts will result in
approximately 733 LIFT of stream channel disruption. For these specific impacts, we are request a
mitigation ration of 2:1. However, the other impacted areas will be limited to a change of
groundwater influence, particularly to the east side of the proposed barrier wall structure. It is of our
professional opinion, that the drawdown related impacts, resulting in 3,864 LIFT, should qualify for a 1:1
mitigation ratio due to the following factors: Minimization of geomorphological impacts, improvements to
stream geochemistry, and remedial improvements to improve stream biology.
The drawdown area is subject to disrupting the hydro connectivity of groundwater recharge from locations
upgradient, and west of the barrier wall structure. This will not directly remove all groundwater recharge
areas that are still existing east of the wall. Groundwater will continue to be heavily influenced by seasonal
fluctuations, weather patterns, and most importantly, the floodplain of the Cape Fear River. No alterations
to the existing stream bed, sinuosity, riparian zone, or channel substrate is proposed at areas outside the
footprint of the barrier wall fill. This being known, the channels will mimic the same geomorphological
attributes as before the installation of the barrier wall.
Given the current state of surface water chemistry at the Chemours facility, the value of water resources is
significantly undermined by the presence of PFAS. PFAS laden waters cannot be utilized as a drinking water

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
source, nor a recreational value. The installation of the barrier wall upgradient of these surface waters aims
to meet water quality standards that can improve functional uses of the channels by removing PFAS
constituents from the bedload. The proposed alterations will be improvements to general water quality of
the subject features. Without the installation of the barrier wall, and in turn a lack of groundwater drawdown,
the streams would continue to exist in an impaired condition with respect to geochemistry.
It is the facilities goal to improve biological conditions of downstream features stemming from the facility. To
achieve this, the barrier wall must be created to limit the exposure of PFAS laden runoff towards surface
waters. The barrier wall aims to restrain these specific surface waters from connecting to downstream
bodies. This will create conditions that are better suited for aquatic life and habitat of riparian ecosystems
nearthe vicinity of the property. The introduction of impacted waters can often times be attributed to benefit
successful establishments of invasive species in the ecosystem. To create conditions where native species
within the local watershed can thrive, biological conditions of the surface waters must be improved through
the removal of harmful constituents. A biological lift is evident with the addition of the barrier wall and
dysconnectivity of groundwater recharge from upgradient sources.
For the rational listed in above paragraphs, we wish to propose a mitigation ratio for the SAW-2019-00296
permit modification as a hybrid of 2:1 and 1:1 credit to debit value. Factored in at the respective lengths of
733 LFT of fill impacts and 3,864 LFT of drawdown impacts, we propose a total impact length of 4,597 LFT
will require 5,330 LFT of mitigation credits. We believe that through the alterations of jurisdictional
waters proposed, the Chemours Company is taking the preferred steps in order to better
accommodate the community in the vicinity. A total of824 LFT of mitigation credits have been reserved
through Davey Resource Group for a site located within the same HUC-08 as the project area.
Documentation containing credit reservations is provided as Attachment V The remaining credits have
been applied for utilizing the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) In -Lieu Fee Program.
The project has been designed to minimize stream and wetland impacts while providing a potential
remedy for PFAS impacts to the extent practicable. Access to the site will utilize the existing barrier wall
access road which was permitted through BLADE-2021-002 Chemours Temporary Geotechnical Access
Road Land Disturbance Permit. Chemours will compensate for unavoidable wetland and stream impacts
through the purchase of credits from an approved mitigation bank or purchase of in -lieu -fee mitigation,
as required. A draft plan for monitoring was submitted to the USACE on August 5, 2021, for review and

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
comment. If we observe wetlands losses in the project area following installation of the barrier wall, the
monitoring plan will allow us to quantify those impacts accurately and consult with USACE and NC DEQ,
in order to provide mitigation for them in a timely manner.

wauW3 gN,JilgN W� Imuy]i�tig'711�'SAryi§�y
skt3E)
VN1MV,] I].L ON 'A VIIA�AVd
w
v.is�s .o
IJNIMV2IQ .I ovdwI
sno[s[nag

wauW3 gN,JilgN W� Imuy]i�tig'711�'SAryi§�y
skt3E)
VNIMV,] I].L ON 'A
ANVJWOD SWflO HHD HHL
w
v.is�s .o
__ _ _
IJNI�YIF�2IQ .I �F�dL�II L�iF�d2I.LS
..���
sno[s[nag
-, � �-) (�� )�� ) 0
AWIF :T TE
NIT—
EE
0
moo
oM

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment I
Preliminary Plan Sheets

s
Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Engineers
BARRIER WALL AND
GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION AND
TREATMENT SYSTEM:
EX -SITU CAPTURE REMEDY
REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
Chemours Fayetteville Works
Prepared for
The Chemours Company FC, LLC
22828 NC Highway 87
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Prepared by
GEOServices, LLC
5559 North Lee Highway
Cleveland, TN 37312
December 2021

lE6Sc h n ica I, laa
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
2.0 SEEP CAPTURE AND REMEDY DESIGN............................................................. 1
2.1 SEEP CAPTURE BASIS OF DESIGN...................................................................... 2
2.1.1 SEEP CAPTURE................................................................................................. 3
2.1.2 COLLECTED WATER CONVEYANCE.......................................................... 3
2.2 MAINTENANCE........................................................................................................ 4
3.0 SUMMARY AND CLOSING...................................................................................... 4
Ex -Situ Capture Remedy Design i December 2021

lE6Sc h n ica I, laa
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Hydraulic Loading from Dry Weather Flow
Table 2: Hydraulic Loading from Stormflow
ATTACHMENTS
G-1.0 Cover Sheet
SC-0.1 Location Plan
SC-0.2 Surge Pond — Schematic Flow Diagram
SC-0.3 Drainage Areas
SC-1.0 Seep A Capture System Site Plan
SC-1.1 Seep A Capture System Grading Plan
SC-2.0 Seep B Capture System Site Plan
SC-2.1 Seep B Capture System Grading Plan
SC-3.0 Seep A Tributary Capture System Site Plan
SC-3.1 Seep A Tributary Capture System Grading Plan
SC-4.0 Main Surge Pond
Ex -Situ Capture Remedy Design ii December 2021

GENE
Grim-kni[at Envimnmenlal and Materials Engineers
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
The site for the proposed Barrier Wall and Groundwater Extraction System project is
located at the existing Chemours Fayetteville Works facility located at 22828 NC
Highway 87 in Fayetteville, North Carolina.
At the Chemours Fayetteville Works facility there are four on -site Seeps (A through D)
with identified discharges into the nearby Cape Fear River. The seeps are currently being
collected in in -situ flow -through cells to reduce loadings from the seeps to the Cape Fear
River pursuant to Consent Order Paragraph 12 Addendum (COA) paragraph 2(a). Under
the COA, the Long -Term Seep Remediation Objective is to reduce the total annual mass
loading of PFAS (as measured by indicator parameters) to the Cape Fear River from
Seeps A through D by: (i) during dry weather flow, reducing total mass by at least 99%;
(ii) during dry weather flow and following rain events of 0.5 inches or less, reduce total
mass loading by at least 95%; and (iii) for any seep that daylights upgradient of the Barrier
Wall, capture total dry weather flow plus rain events up to 0.5 inches in a 24-hour period
upgradient of the Barrier Wall and treat PFAS (as measured by indicator parameters) with
a removal efficiency of at least 99%.
The purpose of this document is to outline the conceptual design methods for the
collection of dry weather and 0.5-inch or less rain event flows from four seeps that
daylight upgradient of the Barrier Wall: Seep A, a Seep A tributary, Seep B, and a Willis
Creek tributary. The document also describes transportation of the collected water to the
on -site water treatment plant. The following sections of this document and the supporting
figures outline the design basis, capture basis, implementation, and verification methods
utilized for this portion of the design.
2 SEEPS CAPTURE REMEDY DESIGN
Per the COA, the seep remedy at the sites of seeps designated Seep A and Seep B will
consist of the ex -situ capture of dry weather baseflow and rain events up to one-half inch
in a 24-hour period. Based on topography and the observed seeps on site, the Seep A flow
and capture system is separated into two seeps designated as Seep A and Seep A tributary.
Dry weather baseflow will also be collected from the Willis Creek tributary seep and from
seven "weeps" that daylight upgradient of the Barrier Wall.
The seep remedy was developed based on flume data and catchment modeling prepared
by Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec). The tables outlining the flows used
for the design are included below.
December 2021

GENE
Grim-kni[at Envimnmenlal and Materials Engineers
Table 1: Hydraulic Loading from Dry Weather Flow
Channel
Dry Weather
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Willis Creek Tributary
39
Seep A Tributary
19
Seep A
31
Seep B
130
Weeps (7 total)
12 (each)
Table 2: Hydraulic Loading from Stormflow (0.5" event in 24 hours)
Channel
Stormflow Volume
(gallons)
Willis Creek Tributary
--
Seep A Tributary
26,000
Seep A
110,000
Seep B
46,000
Weeps (6 total)
--
The remaining sections of this document discuss the basis for the design, the collection,
storage, conveyance, and solid control and maintenance requirements for the Ex -Situ
Capture design.
2.1 Seep Capture Basis of Design
Conceptual ex -situ capture systems for both Seep A and B were described in the 60
percent design submittal pursuant to the COA. In the 60 percent design systems, the seeps
were captured and diverted to a series of storage ponds located near the seep collection
system. The ponds were designed to smooth the peak flows to the water treatment plant
while also settling solids from the seep waters very near their collection points.
December 2021

GENE
Grim-kni[at Envimnmenlal and Materials Engineers
Subsequent to the 60 percent design submittal, the flow rates have been refined using new
information and the design has been modified to reduce the size of the ponds at the seep
locations while maintaining the simultaneous benefits of the equalization of flows and
solids management before the water reaches the treatment plant. Additional dry weather
flows from the Willis Creek Tributary and seven "weeps" daylighting above the Barrier
Wall have also been included in the revised design.
Based on experience at the existing treatment plant at Outfall 003, the'/z" rainfall flow
is expected to be the most sediment laden component of the proposed network. To allow
for TSS control, the dry weather baseflow and stormflow will be pumped to a single surge
pond prior to entering the water treatment plant. The single surge pond functions similar
to the original design but combines all captured flow into one surge basin instead of
individual basins at each capture location.
2.1.1 Seep Capture
In the revised design, the seeps will still be collected in existing topographic channels or
adjacent low-lying areas, but the method of collection has changed to account for the
topography of each location.
Based on the topography and the relatively small flows, dry weather flow from the Willis
Creek Tributary and the seven surficial weeps will be collected in structures and pumped
directly to the lined surge pond.
At the Seep A Tributary and Seep B locations, the lined basin has been located and graded
such that the dry weather flow and stormflow will flow directly into the small basin
located at each location before being conveyed to the surge pond.
The flows from Seep A manifest from two drainage areas that currently (before the barrier
wall) convene into one collectable seep near the location of the temporary collection
system. Once the barrier wall is installed, the flows from the two areas will manifest
separately but close together so the revised design collects the north side of the Seep A
area and conveys it via actuated sluice gate into the lined Seep A basin located further to
the south (Sheet SC-0.3). Once both flows are collected into the Seep A basin near the
Barrier Wall, the water is conveyed to the surge pond and ultimately to the water
treatment plant.
2.1.2 Collected Water Conveyance
A series of pumps will be utilized to transport the dry weather flow and storm flow from
the individual collection locations to the large surge pond. The pump stations will provide
a steady/known flow to the surge pond via a force main system. Each seep (A and B, A
tributary) will include a pump station. The pump station will be sized to function with the
surge pond of each seep. A pump station will also be present at the Willis Creek feature.
December 2021

GENE
Grim-kni[at Envimnmenlal and Materials Engineers
The purpose of the single large surge pond is to replace the functionality (solids reduction
and consistent flow rates to the treatment plant) of the original design settling basins. The
combination of peak storm flow attenuation at the site of collection and the large surge
pond provides multiple layers of surge protection for the water treatment system that is
also handling flows from other sources. The Schematic Flow Diagram is shown on Figure
SC-0.2.
2.2 Maintenance
As with all systems, general maintenance will be required. A summary of expected
weekly inspections and maintenance is listed below:
• Inspect trash rack system at Seep A
• Remove all material from pipe guard grates (debris, leaves, limbs,
sticks, etc.)
• Inspect base flow collection structures at Willis Creek Tributary and
weeps including inlet grates. Remove any debris blocking the inlet
grate.
• Measure sediment in each pond and record depths. Remove sediment,
as necessary.
• Inspect pump stations and test each pump. Remove any collected
solids.
In addition to the general maintenance listed above, the system shall be monitored during
rainfall events to ensure proper operation.
3 SUMMARY AND CLOSING
The conceptual design of ex -situ seep capture is part of the overall Barrier Wall and
Groundwater Extraction System planned to accomplish the requirements of the Consent
Order Addendum with the State of North Carolina. Hydraulic modeling results and
subsequent hydraulic loading information prepared by Geosyntec Consultants of NC,
P.C. have been utilized to prepare the conceptual design documents which are attached
to this document.
The conceptual design plan is based on the collection system for each seep functioning
as part of an equalization chain between the seep capture and the treatment plant. This
storage chain function allows the flow to the treatment plant to be controlled. The design
of the seep capture system will capture and store both the dry weather flow and the peak
flow/volume from the'/z" rainfall event.
4 December 2021

u3=;oae0 y�xoN `a;;>=na;;a.ie,3
318801,
fi 3 sl¢u RW PUBle{uewu011113'I¢311431{oag
SgaE,
sxxoA� a;;>=naua.ie,3 s3nou3ag0 � d ,ry O
o S rl O
sued u`E-0 --deD d—S n33S-xg 3 y
S[IO;S;A2-d
ZQ
QO
� Z
d 0
K Z Z I K
a a y 0
� W W
❑ d Z d Z
0 ❑ ❑»
O wQw Qtny
ow ow
U NC7NC7KK
Q
WWWW❑❑
� yyyyQQ
69 UwwU
Z
2 ww ww ww ww ❑
U N WK WK WK WKww Z
N N Q Q Q p
❑ d O K F F F F��
w w ZO Z Qdddd
N 00000
ttlttl O
r OdQ
Q Q a a a a a a N
w > a019z.�Qwwwwww�
❑ O ttwwwwwwNQ
Z U N O W. W. W. W. W. §
O Z N
K
Q Wo O C7 Ch X NN N N N N N NN N

a u��oieJ 4uoN `a LL�n�Ro.Ce:l
s�ioM aiitiaua,cEd sirtouiay,�
"Id 11-1 ---1
s 1[d q_C1 a—ldeJ da S nziy-ra
fill
--0

ui;oae� g�xoN `a;;ina;;a.ie,3
fi 3 sl¢u {epyp �¢{¢BW¢011n¢3'!¢SIuy40{Bag 318801,
sxxom a;;inaRa.ie,3 sxnouxag�
°
t
�
d
O
O
O
seaEl
�
{
N
uce,E—(j moy3 a.;euxagag _ puod aE—S
,ry
sued uE-0 --deD daag n S-xg
3
y
saO;s;nag
„�avrv-
�¢s
m o
"
---------- ---'
m�E
v�
gmary _
w =
< m
m m m
0 o m
�.aroam
a aeas
�m m_n may
m
�
0
�a
3
mgmo rtu�e,�
0 -
- a
r
--
me -
p u s
E
�o
N-
----------------
a�
-
w
------------------
aci
�
M
�oEva e
N
E
U
- - -
N
o
d
w
n
o
a
c
=
n
`m
newawea�
o,'-peem,ea,e�suLe�'
rtu�o
Ern
------------------
% E
c
y j
H 6
� � E >
� � K
10
3
o
O _
d - -
N m
S
O
i
N N
----------------
L o
Y w
w
arcao E v
>
� _- -10
0 Z E
N
"m3�

a u��oieJ 41-IoN `a LLIn�Ro.Ce:l
s�ioA^ alileaua,cE,� sirtouiay,�
seaiy a5'eu�zaa
sueld 9—Cl —,,deJ d—S nziy-ra
\ 1111
'k-,=�=>�
ly�,'/ _; •C� _� v
\
MOISIAO-d
V
_�� 1�" l 1\ I / I\7� ` 1\ �/�,/--`•-�'=_� _may
71
�\\t\t \\ i/If �I1 Itl\I \hao�
i t illy
U
l 1
i • \\I\\= -~%%' � _` _� i IIII I I I \ \ 1 \
S i 1 ��l ill If J l\ l l l� II
i 1
\ �\ 1\ \ V 1 �l\ 1 1\ ► _ Il
�__�. "L^. �'S>-11.�1*k I
/ \II\ I 11 \
_ _ _____-__--
_ ---
/6,,{//_-_-__-\
__-:_-__/Y�
�' _______________---
IA
J

u3;oae� y�3oN `a;;Sna;;a.ie,3
318801,
fi 3 sl¢u RW PUBle{uewu011113'I¢311431{¢ag
seaEl sxxoA� a;;SnaRa.ie,3 s3nou3aq� � d ,rvn O
� { N
ue;d a43S —4a ,CS --deD y daaS ^tea=+a §
sued uE-0 -mdeD daaS n33S-xg 3 y
S[IO;S;A2-d
—---------- ----
I
-
\I
— ___ — --____ ao
pi
— —_
- _ _ _ —
��• - -s __ _ __-.
\_ s,
�I _�
I
1
�I kq.pI w
I y�r I I%
y 11

SUBBUIOU3 %leas{spy pus le)uewu011113'1e111411)Ba9
SgaE,
sxxoA� a;;%naRa.ie,3 sxnouxaq� � d ,ry O
o Y �ti O
� � N
ue;d `duT—D - u Z'CS o—deD y daaS
sued u`E-0 --deD daaS n S-xg 3 y
S[IO;S;A2-d
- � N
_ - U
V)
O
o - 3
d = d
Ll
O
_ � L
)
_ C
m-m
a Q
N
V)
— ;
9z F,
®F _ V)
� I
cn
N
� I 6A
O
l m
SI
N
Am S
w I
i
in
\ - - _ W-----"-"""-- -
i
i
i
'-
i
i

ui;oae� y�xoN `a;;ina;;a,ie,3
axxo� a;;ina;;a,ie,3 sxnouxaq�
ue;d a;�S uia;s,CS a deD g d—S
sued u`disao --deD aaaS n S-xg
I�
I:
o �'I
I
-- r
0 6
m a
sao;s;nag
s
— '
—
-----—
0
-----------
e
----- c
m
mam —
' G
a
I i
cr
I
i
--
i
i--------------
--" '
m �
i
4 I '

SUBBUIOU3 pus l!%uBWU011113'1e111411-9
sxxoA� a;;%naRa.ie,3 sxnouxaq� � ° S � _, N O
SgaE,
� � N
ue;d E-T—D u%a;s.is a—deD g daaS
sued uE—(I --deD daaS n;%S-xg 3 y
S[IO;S;A2-d
- N
U
i
_ N
O
o - _
Z A o
� a N
= O
- N
U
2n.
- V7
m
a m
N
N
•__ - - - _uk' 'p i
!
I
0
D o
I ! o �
tel:

ui;oae� g{.xoN `a;;ina;;a.ie,3
fi 3 sl¢u {epy PUB le{uewuo�!nu3'I¢S!uySa{oag 318801,'
seaEl
0
� { N
ue;d a;iS —4a ,CS —4deD .4e4nqu,L V d—S
sued uE-0 --deD daag n S-xg m 3
sao;s;nag s p

SUBBUIOU3 pus l!%uBWU011113'1e111411-9
sxxoA� a;;%naRa.ie,3 sxnouxaq� � ° S � _, � O
seaEl
� � N
ue;d `du%pe.xD u%a;s.iS aa%ydeD .txe;nqu,L y daaS
sued -E-0 --deD d—S n;%S-xg m 3
MO;S;A2-d e
---
I
ml III
1 I

ui;oae� y�xoN `a;;ina;;a.ie,3
fi 3 sl¢u {epyp le{uewuo�!nu3'I¢S!uySa{¢ag 318801,
seaEl sxxoA� a;;inaRa.ie,3 sxnouxaq� � S � d ,ry � O
O
� { N
puod alms IMVII a=aa §
sued u`disaQ --deD daag n S-xg 3 y
S[IOISIA2-d
ilk /
Zo1
I S
/ s
I I I
II _
II
l
I
I I _
I\ €
I I I
I
l� II II I
\1
\i
1. 11 j1 I I
I{ I
li I I 1 I
--
I I1 1 I
I
I
I
\ 1 I 1 I \
E
g
I 1
I 1
� 1
---------------
1 I
—__�
1 l I
1 I I
1
1 l I I PI
\ I I I I 1
I I I I 1
IL
1
I
1
a
- —-_-_-------_
I•
------� O
t
\
I
I
\ I I I I I € C
1 am
1 I!
n I 1 I
I I ,
I

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment II
Groundwater Drawdown Map (Planview)

Simulated Water Table Elevations Changes Post Remedy

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment III
Wetland Monitoring Program

DRAFT
Fayetteville Works Wetlands Monitoring Plan -- Barrier Wall Impact Monitoring
This draft monitoring plan describes the approach for monitoring and measuring possible impacts
on the wetlands caused by the construction of the barrier wall at Fayetteville Works. This is an
initial draft and will be refined in consultation with the Corps of Engineers.
Baseline Wetland Characterization
To provide for accurate measure of wetland impacts due to the construction of remediation activities,
a baseline assessment will be conducted prior to the commencement of construction. This
assessment will focus on a detailed characterization of wetlands previously identified in the project
area by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. and included in the previously submitted Wetland Delineation
Report (October 2020). Fourteen locations, corresponding with the existing U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) Wetland Routine Data Form plots completed during the 2020 wetland
delineation (7 wetland, 7 upland), will be revisited during the baseline wetland characterization field
effort to gather additional data not included in a typical wetland delineation for the purpose of
obtaining additional baseline characteristics. In addition, two new randomly selected sample plots
will be added during the baseline assessment that will be incorporated into the monitoring program
to fully characterize the upgradient/downgradient conditions along the fringe of each wetland.
Corresponding photographs will be taken at each monitoring plot (photo point) in each cardinal
direction, along with a photo of the soil profile. Additional representative photographs will also be
taken at fixed locations which best reflect the observed hydrological conditions of the site and
surrounding habitats. The same monitoring plots and photo points will be used during each
subsequent monitoring event to evaluate changes to the site hydrology and/or any response in the
characteristics of the wetland habitats. Upon completion of the baseline characterization survey, a
report of findings complete with a photographic record and figures will be submitted to the USACE
for review prior to the remediation activities to establish baseline conditions for comparison to
subsequent monitoring results.
Post -remedy Monitoring Plan
Post -remedy monitoring will be conducted for three years following implementation of remediation
activities, consistent with anticipated requirements of the permit modification. If the performance
standards defined below are met after three years, Chemours will petition the USACE to be released
from further monitoring requirements. If performance standards are not met after three years, post -
remedy monitoring will continue until the requirements are satisfied or until impacts to wetlands are
evident, thenceforth compensatory mitigation for the impacts will be assessed by the USACE. Post -
remedy monitoring will focus on monitoring changes (if any) in hydrology and follow-on effects to
the delineated wetland habitats within the project area and assessing the areal extent of the delineated
wetlands and overall functionality of the wetland habitat.
The performance standards for this monitoring plan are as follows:
1. No non -wetland determinations at any assigned wetland monitoring point.

DRAFT
2. Maintain an average areal extent of 90 percent of the delineated wetland boundary, as tabulated
by acres unit measurement, following three years monitoring.
Pre planning Desktop Review
Prior to commencing field activities, an office desktop review will be conducted to compile reference
materials on climatic and hydraulic conditions at the site prior to each monitoring event, as climatic
events (droughts, floods, etc.) can often impact qualitative wetland characteristics. The desktop
review will enable an understanding of the current climatic conditions and allow for a calibration of
the anticipated field monitoring. Data from the National Weather Service's Fayetteville Area, NC
climate station, U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) drought monitor, the nearest USGS river gauge for
the Cape Fear River at the W.O. Huske Dam (Station ID 02105500), the USACE's Antecedent
Precipitation Tool (APT), and available groundwater wells will be assessed against the Fall 2020
wetland delineation event, baseline assessment, and preceding monitoring events and included in the
monitoring reports.
Field Monitoring
Post -remedy field monitoring will consist of conducting site visits annually during the growing
season by qualified wetland biologists. The site visit will involve a quantitative assessment using the
USACE Routine Wetland Data Form in accordance with the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 at
each monitoring point identified in the baseline characterization assessment and a visual evaluation
of the physio state of the wetland and its surface hydrology. In addition, the site will be surveyed
for indications of potential negative wetland plant stressors (e.g. — lack of growth/vigor, mortality,
upland/pioneer plant competition) not related to natural climatic or storm -related damage.
Below is a schedule for field monitoring activities.
Monitoring Task
Schedule
Baseline Wetland Characterization
Summer/Fall 2021
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 1
Summer 2022
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 2
Summer 2023
Post Remedy Monitoring Year 3
Summer 2024
A global positioning system (GPS) receiver capable of submeter accuracy will be used for navigating
the perimeter of the wetland boundary and for collecting field data, per the USACE standard
operating procedures. GPS positions and final monitoring locations will be provided as part of the
baseline monitoring report.
Successive monitoring reports will be prepared each year, for three years, and provided to the
USACE by December 31 of the year subsequent to annual data collection. The overall objective of
each monitoring report will be to illustrate status quo, or deviation from, stipulated performance

DRAFT
standards. This will be achieved by summarizing data and providing comparisons to data collected
during previous years. Figures will be generated that identify areas of interest or concern, as well
as, trends of the wetland data forms results. For example, if the percent dominance test for a wetland
data form begins to trend towards less dominated by facultative species or if the number of hydrology
indicators are reduced, these changes will be mapped and indicated in the monitoring report.
Furthermore, a summary discussion of the monitoring event's pre -planning review and observed
surface hydrology shall be incorporated into the report. A statement defining the results of the
monitoring period, along with recommendations for specific monitoring observations/concerns, will
be provided in each report.
After Year 3 of the monitoring program, a formal wetland delineation will be conducted to compare
the areal extent with the initial Fall 2020 delineation. In accordance with standard USACE
delineation methodology, wetlands will be flagged and labeled with the feature identification (ID),
flag ID, and delineation date. A Wetland Delineation Report will be drafted with completed data
forms and tabulated acreages for each wetland feature. High -resolution figures will be generated
that show the current delineation results along with any changes in the wetland boundaries
highlighted in a contrasting color. Due to an expected maximum submeter-accuracy of the GPS data
collection, a 10 percent tolerance between areal extents will be permitted to quantify final
performance standard for this monitoring program. Since impacts to stream features will be
mitigated through purchase of compensatory mitigation credits for the project, the surface area for
ordinary high-water marks of streams will be excluded from the performance standard criteria.
If the monitoring program identifies that the performance standard cannot be achieved or if evidence
of permanent impacts to the wetlands from the activities is documented, Chemours agrees to consult
with the USACE to negotiate compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands.

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment IV
Waters of the U.S. Findings Report

Prepared for:
Chemours Fayetteville Works
22828 NC-87
Fayetteville, NC 28306
WATERS OF THE U.S. FINDINGS REPORT
Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Bladen and Cumberland Counties, North Carolina
Prepared By:
Geosyntec°
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Project Number TR0795
October 2020

Geosyntec°
consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 WETLAND AND STREAM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................... 2
3 FINDINGS................................................................................................................4
3.1 Wetlands, Streams and Other Waters Assessment ............................................... 4
3.1.1 Wetlands........................................................................................................... 5
3.1.2 Streams and Other Waters of the U. S............................................................... 6
4 CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................9
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Wetlands Identified Within the Survey Area
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map)
Figure 2AB Aerial Imagery Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Wetland and Water Resources Data Forms
Appendix B — Representative Photographs
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 1

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. M
1 INTRODUCTION
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec), on behalf of Chemours Fayetteville
Works (Chemours), conducted wetlands and waterbodies delineation at a section of
Chemours Fayetteville Works adjacent to the Cape Fear River, a 137.E-acre Project Area
in Fayetteville, Bladen/Cumberland County, North Carolina (Site) (Figure 1). Below is a
summary of the site conditions documented during field surveys, a project background,
and the objectives of this work.
1.1 Site Description
The Site is located in southern Cumberland and northern Bladen County, approximately
ten miles south of the town of Fayetteville (Figure 1). The north boundary of the Site
begins along the southern edge of Willis Creek and the Site continues south, bounded on
the east by a Cape Fear River, on the west by the plant Chemours plant facility, and on
the south by Glengerry Road/Bill Hall Road. Current land use includes woodlands, a
water treatment facility, monitoring wells, and access roads. A per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) containment system is being built on -site at this time.
The 137.E-acre ecological survey area (Figure 2), is composed of mixed hardwood/pine
forest habitat, monitoring wells, a water treatment facility, and several unimproved access
roads. Forested habitat within the Site is primarily mid- to late successional that naturally
regenerated following historic logging activities. Dominant canopy species include box
elder (Acer negundo), red maple (Acer rubrum), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum),
northern red oak (Quercus rubra), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Midstory
species include red maple (Acer rubrum), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), and invasive shrubs such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense).
1.2 Background
In response to a Consent Order entered into between Chemours and the State of North
Carolina and the Cape Fear River Watch, Chemours contracted Geosyntec to perform a
wetlands and waterbodies investigation to collect data for the planning of proposed
remediation activities on the property and future regulatory correspondence. The project
is collectively known as the Chemours Fayetteville Works Project.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 1 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. P(
1.3 Objectives
The objective of the wetlands/waters delineation and protected species survey was to
identify wetlands and other waters (streams, open waters, etc.) within the ecological
survey area and provide a general characterization of their condition (forested/scrub-
shrub/herbaceous, degraded/pristine), and provide a preliminary determination as to their
anticipated jurisdictional status. Experienced Geosyntec biologists conducted the
wetlands and waters surveys from September 14 to 17, 2020.
The remainder of this report summarizes the methodology used in the wetland and stream
assessment, delineation results, and summary of findings.
2 WETLAND AND STREAM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
In general, wetlands and other waters of the United States (U.S.) are federally protected
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The definition of wetlands (40 Code
of Federal Regulations §230.3(t)) is "those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar
areas."
Geosyntec performed a wetlands/waters delineation of the Site in accordance with the
three -parameter methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual' (Manual), the Regional Supplement to the
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain
Region and per recent guidance issued jointly by the U.S. Environmental Protection
1 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Department of the Army,
Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. 117 pages.
2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble.
ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 2 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, nl t . r[
Agency (EPA) and the USACE that resulted from the Rapanos vs. U.S. and Carabell vs.
U.S. Supreme Court decisions3.
The three parameters required for identifying a jurisdictional wetland are as follows:
• The presence of hydrology - At each data point, the delineator evaluates the area
for evidence of hydrology. The Manual identifies both primary and secondary
hydrologic indicators, where one primary indicator or two secondary indicators
must be evident. Some examples of wetland hydrology indicators include
saturation in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, inundation, water marks on
vegetation, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage patterns, oxidized root
channels, and waters stained leaves.
• The presence of hydrophytic vegetation - Plant species are assigned a regionally
based facultative status, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which
describes a particular species' tolerance of water. A plant's facultative status
suggests habitat preference(s) in a given region with respect to its aptitude to grow
in low -oxygen (anaerobic) conditions. Hydrophytic, or "water loving", vegetation
are those plants which have adapted to growing in the anaerobic conditions
associated with prolonged saturation or flooding. Hydrophytic species can have a
facultative status of "facultative" (FAC), "facultative wet" (FACW), or "obligate"
(OBL). If, after defining a study plot that contains vegetation representative of
the larger area being described and identifying all species within it, 50 percent or
greater of all identified species have an assigned facultative status of FAC, FACW
or OBL, wetland vegetation criteria is met.
• The presence of hydric soils - Evaluating the presence of hydric soils requires that
the delineator sample the upper 12 inches of soil to obtain a profile description
and identify hydric soil indicators, such as histosols, histic epipedons, sulfidic
odor, aquic moisture regime, reducing conditions, gleyed or low-chroma colors,
concretions, etc. In most cases, hydric soils are most efficiently identified by the
3 Rapanos, John, et al. v. United States. 2006. 61 Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Number 04-1034
Carabell, June, et al. v. United States. 2005. 6 h Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Number No. 04-1384
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 3 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl t . r[
profile description, where the soil coloration is compared to the Munsell Color
chart system to determine if the material meets hydric conditions.
An area is classified as a wetland only in instances where all three parameters exist (under
normal circumstances). If one or more criteria are absent, then the area is deemed an
upland. To sufficiently justify the wetland boundary line, a wetland data point and an
upland data point are obtained at each respective location (a minimum of one pair of data
points per wetland). As the delineator reviews the area and obtains data points, visible
indicators (e.g., abrupt changes in vegetation, elevation, surface water, etc.) often become
apparent, allowing the delineator to more efficiently establish the wetland boundary.
Streams were classified and characterized using North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins4. This method entails calculating a score for each stream based on its
characteristics. Streams with a score above 30 are considered perennial, 19 to 30 is
considered intermittent, and below 19 is ephemeral in nature.
Geosyntec biologists conducted on -site wetland assessments in accordance with the
methodologies prescribed by the USACE and EPA pursuant to Sections 401 and 404 of
the CWA. During the on -site wetland assessments, Geosyntec located and delineated the
boundaries of jurisdictional features within the ecological survey area as depicted in
Figure 2. Geosyntec flagged the boundaries of all delineated features with sequentially
numbered, high -visibility flagging (pink for wetlands; blue/white for streams) and
recorded the flag locations with Global Positioning System (GPS) units with submeter
capabilities (Manufacturer/Model: Trimble R-1 receiver and Trimble Geo-Explorer 7x).
3 FINDINGS
3.1 Wetlands, Streams and Other Waters Assessment
Seven wetlands and eleven streams, with one being the Cape Fear River and another
Willis Creek, were delineated within the ecological survey area; all of which are identified
in Table 2 and depicted on Figure 2. Geosyntec completed Wetland Determination Data
Forms and NC Stream Assessments (Appendix A), where appropriate, and documented
4 NC Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 4 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. P(
conditions observed during the assessments (Representative Site Photographs, Appendix
B).
3.1.1 Wetlands
Wetland 1: 0.7-acre Forested Wetland or Palustrine Forested (PFO)
Wetland 1 is a forested wetland associated with the Cape Fear River, a Water of the U.S.,
through a nexus with the 100-year floodplain and upland headwater seeps. Vegetation
was consistent with that of a PFO wetland, consisting of bald cypress and box elder, with
an understory of cut -grass (Leersia oryzoides). All of the species identified within
Wetland 1 were facultative to obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology
in the form of perennial seep heads.
Wetland 2: 4.7-acre PFO
Wetland 2 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River, Stream 1, Stream 2 and Stream 3. Vegetation was dominated by red maple and
sweetgum, with an understory of stilgrass (Microstegium vimineum) and river oats
(Chasmanthium sessiliflorum). All species identified within Wetland 2 were facultative
to obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of high water
table and upstream seep heads.
Wetland 3: 2.74-acre PFO
Wetland 3 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River, Stream 4, and Stream 5. Vegetation was dominated by green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica) and bald cypress, with a sparse understory of swamp smartweed
(Persicaria hydropiperoides). All species identified within Wetland 3 were facultative to
obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of shallow water
table and seep head flow from upstream.
Wetland 4: 0.51-acre PFO
Wetland 4 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Vegetation was dominated by bald cypress and sweetgum, with herbaceous
vegetation consisting of Cherokee sedge (Carex cherokeensis) and sensitive fern
(Onoclea sensibilis). All species identified within Wetland 4 were facultative to obligate
wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of flow from five seep heads
upstream.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 5 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. M
Wetland 6: 4.63-acre PFO
Wetland 6 consists of both herbaceous and forested wetlands associated the 100-year
floodplain of the Cape Fear River, Stream 5, Stream 5 tributaries, Stream 6, Stream 7,
and Stream 7a. The trees within the herbaceous wetland were recently harvested at the
time of survey. Primarily vegetation within the emergent wetland portion was dominated
by Pennsylvania smartweed (Persicaria pensylvanica), redroot flatsedge (Cyperus
erythrorhizos), and soft rush (Juncus effusus). The species identified within Wetland 7
included 87 percent facultative to obligate wetland plant species. Primary observed
hydrology included upstream seep heads and a high water table.
Wetland 7: 6.15-acre PFO
Wetland 7 is a forested wetland within the active channel of Willis Creek (Stream 9).
Vegetation was dominated by bald cypress, sycamore and boxelder. The species
identified within Wetland 7 included 75 percent facultative to obligate wetland plant
species. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of water marks on the trees and an
obvious algal mat present that is indicative of recent inundation.
3.1.2 Streams and Other Waters of the U.S.
Stream 1/lb: 0.03-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 1 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. It begins at a seep head on the western edge of the floodplain and is joined by
Stream lb. At the time of the delineation, the water was flowing to the south with slightly
turbid water. The approximate bank width was 4 feet with moderately well-defined banks.
Stream bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 3-
6 inches.
Stream 2: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 2 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River that flows to the south from its source. The source includes seep heads to the west
and it serves as the primary drainage for the floodplain valley. Approximate bank width
was 4 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt
clay and cobble stones. Normal base flow depth is approximately 2-6 inches.
Stream 3: 0.01-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 3 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. It begins at a seep head on the western edge of the floodplain and terminates within
the floodplain valley, losing all bed/banks and becoming a zone of saturation. The channel
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 6 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crnrynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. P(
water was flowing to the east with slightly turbid water at the time of survey. Approximate
bank width was 2 feet with moderately well-defined banks. Stream bed substrate included
silt and mucky sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 3-6 inches.
Stream 4: 0.33-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 4 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River that drains to the Cape Fear River from its source. The source is Wetland 2 where
it flows north approximately 250 feet and turns east into Wetland 3 to flow approximately
300 feet to the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank width was 4-12 feet with a clear
incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base
flow depth is approximately 7-12 inches.
Stream 5 w/tributaries: 0.91-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 5 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is headwater seeps to the west and a few small tributaries. It flows
approximately 300 feet into the Cape Fear River. The portions of the stream below the
confluence of the tributaries was contained within Wetland 4 and Wetland 6.
Approximate bank width was 4-12 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream
bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 4-14
inches.
Stream 6: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 6 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its sources are Stream 7 and Stream 7a to the north. It flows approximately 200
feet into the forested Wetland 6 and ultimately the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank
width was 33 feet with a weakly defined bed and bank. Stream bed substrate included silt
and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 2-6 inches.
Stream 7: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 7 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is headwater flow from tributaries west of the Project Area. It had
recently been disturbed by timber harvest and road construction. Stream 7 flows
approximately 750 feet into Stream 6. One of its tributaries, Stream 7a, meets it just north
of the confluence of Stream 6. Approximate bank width was 4-6 feet with a moderate bed
and bank definition. Stream bed substrate included silt, sand, and some cobble. Normal
base flow depth is approximately 2-12 inches.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 7 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crngnn•r � �unvunm. nl 1p.. �'�
Stream 8: 0.06-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 8 is a perennial stream located outside of the floodplain of the Cape River and is
a tributary to Willis Creek. Stream 8 flows approximately 600 feet into the forested
Wetland 7 and Stream 9, and ultimately the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank width
was 4-10 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included
silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 5-10 inches.
Stream 9: 6.15-acre, Willis Creek, Perennial stream
Stream 9, Willis Creek, is a perennial stream located partially within the 100-year
floodplain of the Cape River, mostly in the area of its confluence with the river. Its
southern and western banks form the northern boundary of the Project Area. The majority
of the stream is outside of the Cape Fear River floodplain. Its source is several tributaries
to the north, west, and southwest; including Streams 8 and 10. It flows approximately
2,800 feet into the Cape Fear River and its ordinary high water mark encompasses most
of Wetland 7. Approximate bank width was 40-50 feet with a clear incised water line on
the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt, sand, and some cobble. Normal base now
depth is approximately 12-24 inches.
Stream 10: 0.09-acre, Un-named, Intermittent stream
Stream 10 is an intermittent stream located outside of the floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is primarily stormwater flow and shallow groundwater as it flows into
Stream 9, Willis Creek. Stream 10 flows approximately 400 feet into Wetland 7 and
Stream 9. The approximate bank width of Stream 10 was 4 feet with a moderately defined
bed and bank. Stream bed substrate included silt and clay. At the time of survey Stream
10 did not exhibit normal base flow, as the surveys were conducted during the seasonal
dry period.
Stream 11: 26.68-acre, Cape Fear River, Perennial Stream/River
The Cape Fear River is the perennial river in which its western banks form the eastern
perimeter boundary of the Site. Its 500-year and 100-year floodplains and Floodway
boundaries exist within the Project Area and it serves as the primary drainage for the site
tributaries. According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) the
established elevation for the 100-year floodplain is 68 feet, which encompasses a maj ority
of streams and wetlands identified within the Site, but less than 1/3 of the Site itself. The
approximate bank width of the Cape Fear River was 300-350 feet, and multiple wrack
lines of debris from past floods were observed within the floodplain. Stream bed substrate
included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is greater than 6 feet. Many aquatic fishes,
reptiles, and avian species were observed within the river during survey activities.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 8 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1u'W11tlm. nl M.. M
Less than a quarter mile downstream of the Project Area the William O. Huske Dam
serves as the flood control mechanism. Upper pool and lower pool U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) stream gauge stations (02104000/02105500, respectively) monitor the
water flow and stage height. The river was not at flood stage during surveys.
Table 2. Delineated Features Identified Within the Ecological Survey Area
Resource
Latitude
Longitude
Total Area
(acres)
Length
(linear feet)
Wetlands
W-01 (Forested wetland)
34.837128
-78.824049
0.70
NA
W-02 (Forested wetland)
34.83929
-78.823939
4.73
NA
W-03 (Forested wetland)
34.842317
-78.824885
2.75
NA
W-04 (Forested wetland)
34.844964
-78.826174
0.45
NA
W-06 Forested wetland
34.845613
-78825877
4.62
NA
W-07 (Forested wetland)
34.851793
-78.829302
6.15
NA
Wetlands Total
19.23
Streams
S-01/lb Perennial Stream
34.839165
-78.824940
<0.01
278
S-02 Perennial Stream
34.839358
-78.824812
0.10
517
S-03 (Perennial Stream)
34.839876
-78.825258
0.01
70
S-04 (Perennial Stream)
34.842190
-78.825166
0.33
1,913
S-05 (Perennial Stream)
34.84444223
-78.8260069
0.86
2,013
S-06 Perennial Stream
34.84602857
-78.82612713
0.17
651
S-07 (Perennial Stream)
34.84599
-78.828037
0.10
633
S-08 (Perennial Stream)
34.85170817
-78.82917242
0.20
435
S-09 (Willis Creek)
34.852174
-78.828725
6.18
2,645
S-10 (Intermittent Stream)
34.850458
-78.827737
0.05
320
S-11 (Cape Fear River
34.850219
-78.826644
26.75
5,416
Streams Total
34.49
Total
53.72
14,891
4 CONCLUSION
Geosyntec identified approximately 53.72 acres of potentially jurisdictional features
within the Site, including approximately 19.23 acres of wetlands and 34.49 acres of
streams. These findings were obtained utilizing wetland delineation methods
implemented by the USACE and NCDEQ. Please note, a formal Jurisdictional
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 9 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
crmynw, L1unv11tlfi1, nl M.. P(
Determination by the USACE (Wilmington District) had not been conducted at the time
of this report preparation and the results of this assessment and delineation has been
determined based on Geosyntec professional opinion and experience. Only the USACE
can make an official determination on the status and jurisdictional nature of the listed
features.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 10 October 2020

FIGURES

Oyer)
�d,ir.
G
fl
Greensboro
aRalelgh
s
0
v
ChTH
ar
hLINA
,
CAR n
Q
9
z
•eenvile
J
SA7'y
Columbia
fl
SOUTH
P^�
Y ��AROLENAS;,,
Rd
s
C:h
R'
r �[shronon�
ftd
c$
W-eir Ro
a
V41Ms Creek
yob
d
Iunly L1w° R _ }18 R
SF8
Gewga
Legend
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Fee f Project Area
Date: Scale: Dra«n By: Applicant No.:
GeOSytlteC° USGS SITE LOCATION MAP 10/21/2020 1 in:2,000 ft NSW
consultants �► ChBmours Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Chemours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No.
Gcorymrr_[:0r Dan is n€NC, P.G. WORLD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI
W, Lireasr Vn.: c 38oe mod C-zw" CumberlandBladen County, North Carolina

APPENDIX A
Wetland and Water Resources Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP01
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8371110 Long.-78.824054 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with a perennial seep discharge zone in the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
X
I Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation (A3)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits 132
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Shallow seep head associated with a backwater floodplain of the Cape Fear River. Perennial seep is the primar
hydrology. A lot of slash debris from windstorms.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP01
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium distichum
35 Y
OBL
2. Acer negundo
15 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
50 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 25
20% of Total Cover:
10
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 145 x 1 145
1. Acerrubrum
25 Y
FAC
FACWspecies 15 x 2 30
2. Taxodium distichum
10 Y
OBL
FAC species 45 x 3 135
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 205 (A) 310 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.5 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20% of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Leersia oryzoides
70 Y
OBL
2. Abildgaardia ovata
15 N
FACW
3. Rotala ramosior
15 N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Sagittaria calycina 10 N OBL
5. Persicaria amphibia
5 N
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
115 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 57.5 20% of Total Cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Campsis radicans
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP01
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-5
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Cla
5-14
10YR 4/1
98
7.5YR 4/6
2
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
jPolyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP02
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8372530 Long.-78.823952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the wetland, adjacent to the high bank of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP02
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
45
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 52.5
20%
of Total Cover:
21
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Ilex decidua
35
Y
FACW
FACW species 105 x 2 210
2.
Acernegundo
30
Y
FAC
FAC species 150 x 3 450
3.
Ilex opaca
15
N
FAC
FACU species 15 x 4 60
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 270 (A) 720 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.7 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
80
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 40
20%
of Total Cover:
16
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
FAC
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
3.
Arundinaria gigantea
10
N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Rubus trivialis
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
70
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 35 20% of Total Cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 7.5
20%
of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP02
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Cla
6-13
7.5YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP03
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8392840 Long.-78.824923 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear Rive
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Shallow exposed roots on many trees. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP03
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Acer rubrum
60
Y
FAC
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Betula nigra
20
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
4.
Taxodium distichum
20
N
OBL
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
130 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 65
20%
of Total Cover:
26
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 20 x 1 20
1.
Acerrubrum
30
Y
FAC
FACWspecies 40 x 2 80
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Y
FAC
FAC species 230 x 3 690
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 290 (A) 790 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.7 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
55
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 27.5
20%
of Total Cover:
11
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
30
Y
FAC
2.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
FAC
3.
Elymus virginicus
15
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex cherokeensis 10 N FACW
5.
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
10
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
95
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 47.5 20% of Total Cover: 19
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP03
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Cla
6-14
10YR 4/2
93
10YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP04
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8393880 Long.-78.825161 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. On a slope (0-5 % ). Convex feature, nothing problematic or atypical. Seasonal conditions normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP04
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus phellos
40
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carya glabra
25
N
FACU
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acerrubrum
20
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Quercus falcata
15
N
FACU
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
150 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 75
20%
of Total Cover:
30
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
FACW species 40 x 2 80
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 177 x 3 531
3.
FACU species 70 x 4 280
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 287 (A) 891 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.1 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
40
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 20
20%
of Total Cover:
8
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
35
Y
FAC
2.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
20
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
85
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 42.5 20% of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
7
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
12
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 6
20%
of Total Cover:
2.4
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP04
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-14
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Cla
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP05
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8423690 Long.-78.824866 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland at the confluence of multiple perennial seeps/tributaries within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits 132
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
X
Drift Deposits 133
X
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
magery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP05
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Y
FACW
2.
Taxodium distichum
20
Y
OBL
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Acernegundo
5
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
60 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 30
20%
of Total Cover:
12
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 65 x 1 65
1.
Ilex decidua
30
Y
FACW
FACW species 85 x 2 170
2.
FAC species 30 x 3 90
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 180 (A) 325 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 15
20%
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Persicana hydropiperoides
30
Y
OBL
2.
Unknown FACW
30
Y
FACW
3.
Saururus cernuus
15
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Microstegium vimineum 5 N FAC
5.
Rubus argutus
5
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
85
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 42.5 20% of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20%
of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP05
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-7
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
RM
M
Loam / Cla
7-15
5YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
D
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
jPolyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP06
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8424850 Long.-78.825086 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP06
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Quercus falcata
40
Y
FACU
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acernegundo
5
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 10 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
75 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 37.5
20%
of Total Cover:
15
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Acernegundo
10
Y
FAC
FACWspecies 5 x 2 10
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 330
3.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 60 x 4 240
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Aesculusglabra
5
Y
FACU
Column Total 175 (A) 580 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 15
20%
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40
Y
FAC
2.
Elymus villosus
5
N
FACU
3.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
5
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex grayi 5 N FACW
5.
Rubus trivialis
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
60
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 30 20% of Total Cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP06
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Cla
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP07
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8448730 Long.-78.82616 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear Rive
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation (A3)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is perennially flowing seep head donminated with nature cypress. Confluence of 5 seep head
is the primary hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP07
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1. Taxodium distichum
65
Y
OBL
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Acerrubrum
25
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4. Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 7 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
140 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 70
20%
of Total Cover:
28
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 80 x 1 80
1. Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
FACW species 100 x 2 200
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 330
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 290 (A) 610 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.1 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
25
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 12.5
20%
of Total Cover:
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Carex cherokeensis
55
Y
FACW
2. Onoclea sensibilis
20
Y
FACW
3. Saururus cernuus
15
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Dryopteris carthusiana 15 N FACW
5. Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
115
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 57.5 20% of Total Cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Smilax laurifolia
10
Y
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Exposed roots
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP07
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-12
10YR 4/1
95
10YR 3/4
5
C
M
Mucky Loam / Cla
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP08
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8450810 Long.-78.826096 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP08
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
65
Y
FACW
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Quercus rubra
15
N
FACU
Total number of dominant species
5.
Ulmus alata
10
N
FACU
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
160 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 80
20%
of Total Cover:
32
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Aesculus glabra
25
Y
FACU
FACW species 110 x 2 220
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 315
3.
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 280 (A) 795 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20%
of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Elymus virginicus
35
Y
FAC
2.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
20
Y
FAC
3.
Solanum carolinense
10
N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
75
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 37.5 20% of Total Cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax bona-nox
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax laurifolia
5
Y
FACW
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP08
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Cla
6-14
10YR 4/6
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP09
Investigator(s): N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flats Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8456050 Long.-78.82588 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes No X (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located in a herbaceous wetland along a depressional floodplain valley of the Cape Fear River. Trees were recently harvested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP09
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 4 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
0 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 0
20% of Total Cover:
0
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
OBL species 55 x 1 55
1.
FACW species 55 x 2 110
2.
FAC species 15 x 3 45
3.
FACU species 13 x 4 52
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 138 (A) 262 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.9 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 0
20% of Total Cover:
0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Persicana pensylvanica
35 Y
FACW
2. Cyperus erythrorhizos
30 Y
OBL
3. Juncus effusus
25 Y
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Andropogon glaucopsis 20 N FACW
5. Ligustrum sinense
10 N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Perilla frutescens
5 N
FACU
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 N
FAC
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8. Eupatorium capillifolium
3 N
FACU
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
133 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 66.5 20% of Total Cover: 26.6
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Lonicera japonica
5 Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Trees were recently harvested
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP09
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Cla
2-12
2.5YR 5/2
78
2.5YR 5/4
7
C
PI
Loam / Clay
2-12
7.5YR 5/6
15
C
M
Loam / Cla
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP10
Investigator(s): N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8455970 Long.-78.825632 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes No X (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent emergent wetland. Trees were recently harvested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomor hic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP10
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1. Aesculus flava
5
Y
FACU
2. Carya glabra
3
Y
FACU
Number of dominant species that are
3. Celtis laevigata
2
Y
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 38% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
10 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
OBL species 10 x 1 10
1. Aesculus flava
5
Y
FACU
FACW species 17 x 2 34
2.
FAC species 73 x 3 219
3.
FACU species 43 x 4 172
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 143 (A) 435 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.0 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
5
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20%
of Total Cover:
1
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Microstegium vimineum
65
Y
FAC
2. Perilla frutescens
25
Y
FACU
3. Cyperus erythrorhizos
10
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Persicaria pensylvanica 10 N FACW
5. Carex grayi
5
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Eutrochium purpureum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
120
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 60 20% of Total Cover: 24
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
8
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 4
20%
of Total Cover:
1.6
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Trees were recently harvested
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP10
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
2-14
10YR 4/4
100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
jPolyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
" Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP11
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8482360 Long.-78.827111 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear Rive
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
X
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
X
I Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and a high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP11
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium distichum
50
Y
OBL
2.
Acer rubrum
45
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Betula nigra
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 55
20%
of Total Cover:
22
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 60 x 1 60
1.
Acer rubrum
20
Y
FAC
FACWspecies 60 x 2 120
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 158 x 3 474
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 283 (A) 674 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.4 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 15
20%
of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
30
Y
FACW
3.
Urtica dioica
20
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Juncus effusus 10 N OBL
5.
Pluchea camphorata
10
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Persicaria pensylvanica
5
N
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Ulm us alata
5
N
FACU
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
N
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
140
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 70 20% of Total Cover: 28
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
3
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
3
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 1.5
20%
of Total Cover:
0.6
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc—
Texture
Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
95
10YR 3/6
5
C
M
Loam / Cla
3-9
10YR 5/2
90
7.5YR 4/6
10
C
M
Sandy
9-15
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 3/6
10
C
M
Sand
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
jPolyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P,
Marl F10 LRR U
* Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
X
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP12
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8480490 Long.-78.827408 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomor hic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP12
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus rubra
40
Y
FACU
2.
Pinus taeda
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 11 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 82 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
95 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 47.5
20%
of Total Cover:
19
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 95 x 3 285
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 45 x 4 180
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 140 (A) 465 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
20
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 10
20%
of Total Cover:
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
5
Y
FAC
2.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
5
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
q
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 7.5 20% of Total Cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20%
of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 3/3
100
Sand
6-16
10YR 5/4
100
Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
I Marl (F10) (LRR U)
" Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
iDepleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/17/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP13
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope % : 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8516350 Long.-78.828952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within the fringe of the active channel of Willis Creek. Mature forested vegetation extends beyond bank as the area is influenced by backwater
flooding from the Cape Fear River confluence.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
X
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
X
I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
X
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
lGeomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primarily hydrology is high water table and flooding from Willis Creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP13
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium distichum
70 Y
OBL
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
70 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 35
20% of Total Cover:
14
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 70 x 1 70
1. Ilex decidua
25 Y
FACW
FACW species 45 x 2 90
2.
FAC species 25 x 3 75
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 145 (A) 255 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
25 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 12.5
20% of Total Cover:
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Microstegium vimineum
15 Y
FAC
2. Panicum repens
10 Y
FACW
3. Carex grayi
10 Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5. Solanum carolinense
5 N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 22.5 20% of Total Cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 3/1
80
7.5YR 3/4
20
C
M
Mucky Loam / Clay
6-14
Gley1 4/10y
93
2.5Y 6/4
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
PolyvalueBelow Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
" Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/17/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP14
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8515270 Long.-78.829125 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require, check all that a
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
A uatic Fauna 1313
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
ISparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomor hic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) S ha num moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
--See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The field surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01 ", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9, respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, NC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP14
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Fagus grandifolia
60 Y
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
35 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Carpinus caroliniana
10 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 5 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80% A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 52.5
20% of Total Cover:
21
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1. Carpinus caroliniana
35 Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
FAC species 120 x 3 360
3.
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 185 (A) 620 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.4 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20% of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
25 Y
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5 N
FAC
3. Vaccinium arboreum
5 N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ilex opaca 5 N FAC
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 20 20% of Total Cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r- 30'
1. Vitis rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes No X
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Description: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc"
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Cla
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains "Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils —
Histosol Al
Polyvalue Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loam Muck Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
lRedox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
I Marl (F10) (LRR U)
" Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
iDepleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 14, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.839165
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.824940
Total Points: 30.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S1/S1 b
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks that is formed from a slope seephead.
exists within a forested wetland. A short tributary S1 b provides additional flow.
It serves as a tributary to S2 that
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.839358
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.824812
Total Points: 35.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S2
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 12.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage for the
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the south where it discharges
into the Cape Fear River.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.839165
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.824940
Total Points: 30.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S1
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
A shallow perennial stream that drains from a slope seep head into the floodplain valley where it loses it's bed/banks
and becomes a saturation zone. Weak sandy, mucky soil substrate. Heavy reduced iron in flow.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.842190
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.825166
Total Points: 45.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S4
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage for the
adjacent forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the east where it
discharges directly into the Cape Fear River.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.845324
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.825817
Total Points: 39.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: AS5-TRIBUTARIES
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
This is a perennial tributary to the cape fear river. Head water source are multiple seep heads. With a weak sandy
organic substrate. This stream received frequent high backwater flooding from the Cape Fear river. Several water
quality samplers installed.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.84444223
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82640069
Total Points: 36.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: AS5
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage for the
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the east where it discharges
directly into the Cape Fear River.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.84602857
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82612713
Total Points: 30.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S6
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage for the
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the south where it discharges
into S5. Substrate is a sandy, organic soil texture.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.848599
Evaluator: Alex Mathes
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.828037
Total Points: 36.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S7
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary hydrology source for
the forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology upstream and outside of the project
area. Flow is to the south where it discharges into the floodplain valley and loses its channel bed. Substrate is a
sandy, mucky soil texture.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.85170817
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.82917242
Total Points: 35
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S8
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial tributary to Willis Creek with a defined bed/banks. A single seep head provides its primary source of
hydrology. Flow is to the north where it discharges into Willis Creek. Substrate is a sandy, mucky soil texture.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.852174
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.828725
Total Points: 52.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S9
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (2)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream, Willis Creek, shortly before it flows into the Cape Fear River. Backwater flooding occurs up the
confluence, from the Cape Fear River when it floods. S8 and S10 provide additional drainage for this stream. A
mature forested wetland consisting of baldcypress are located within the stream channel and multiple sandy sediment
"islands" are present during low water conditions.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.850458
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.827737
Total Points: 19.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S10
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Intermittent (>19)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 2.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Tributary to Willis Creek with intermittent flow. Currently the stream is dry due to seasonally dry conditions. Channel
bed substrate is primarily clay loam with sandy depositing located in deeper pools.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.850219
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.826644
Total Points: 50.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S11
Stream is at least intermittent if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Absent (1.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
The Cape Fear River is perennial river with head water source from multiple upstream tributaries. Substrate is a mix of
sand and silt. The river frequently floods and inundates the floodplain within the project area. A lock and dam is
located within the river immediately downstream of the project area to provide navigable transportation and flood
control.
Sketch:
41

APPENDIX B
Representative Photographs

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 1
-
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Southern
portion of the access
road through the center
of the Project Area.
t V
Photograph 2
-
I�
I�
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Southern
portion of the access
-
road through the center
of the Project Area.
n "
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 1 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 3
• "
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: East
Comments: An access
road to the Seep C work
area located near the
center of the Project
Area that cuts east/west
perpendicular to the
Cape Fear River.
0 RIM
Photograph 4
q r
`
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Another
view of the access road
x
to the Seep C work area.
�=
JL
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 2 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 5
�` "• 1-`
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: Northwest
Comments: Wetland 1
is located in the southern
portion of the Project
Area and flows into the
Cape Fear River (S 11).
Wetland boundary is
flagged with pink tape.
4
Photograph 6
1 f
Date: 9/14/2020
z _
Direction: Southeast
Comments: Stream 1
flows southeast towards
the Cape Fear River
(S 11) and is bounded on
both sides by Wetland 2.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape. Wetland:
boundary is flagged with
pink tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 3 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 7
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 2
within the Project Area.
Wetland 2 bounds
Stream 1 and Stream 2
and is within the Cape
Fear River Floodplain.
Wetland boundary is
flagged with pink tape.
Photograph 8
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stream 2
flows south towards the
Cape Fear River and is
bound by Wetland 2.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 4 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 9
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Road
crossing at Stream 4
Photograph 10
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: West
Comments: An access
road crosses the Project
Area, adjacent to Stream
4.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 5 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 11
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 4
drains from several seep
heads, moving east
towards the Cape Fear
River (S 11). Stream
boundary is flagged with
blue and white tape.
Photograph 12
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Stream 4
drains from several seep
heads, moving east
towards the Cape Fear
River (S 11). The
location shown is near
it's confluence with the
Cape Fear River. Stream
boundary is flagged with
blue and white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 6 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 13
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 3
is sourced by several
seep heads and flows
east to the Cape Fear
River (S 11).
Photograph 14
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: The
northern end of Wetland
3.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 7 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 17
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 4
is adjacent to Stream 5.
Photograph 18
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Wetland 6
is fed by Stream 6,
Stream 7, and Stream 7a.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works y 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 19
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: Southeast
Comments: Upper reach
of a seep head that flows
into Wetland 6.
Photograph 20
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 6
flows into Wetland 6.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 10 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 21
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: Northeast
Comments: Stream 7
flows into stream 6 and
spanned by a bridge
constructed with timber
mats. Despite the lack of
recent rain, water still
flowed in this stream.
Photograph 22
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stormwater
discharge from culvert
serves as the primary
hydrology for Stream 7a.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 11 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Cumberland County,
NC
Photograph 23
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: A storm
drain with erosion
control measures exists
on both sides of the
access road to the water
treatment facility that
bisects the northern
portion of the Project
Area.
Photograph 24
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: A dry wash
upgradient of Stream 10
with no evidence of
seasonal flow.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 12 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Location: Cumberland County,
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
NC
Photograph 25
Date:9/16/2020-"
Direction: West
Comments: Stream 8
flows east and north into
-
Stream 9 (Willis Creek).''
"
;v.
,-`
�yl�aw .4w
.1 z•.l �3 �iA�
R
i tr/
Photograph 26
-
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Stream 8
down gradient of timber
cleared areas before it
meets Stream 9 (Willis
Creek).
Y s = =�-
s - -. 4 R
�,� _
5(�
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 13 10.23.20

EC
NSULTANTS OF
II GEOSYNPxo oORaPxiC RECORD NC, P.C. II
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Cumberland County,
NC
Photograph 27
Date: 9/16/2020
I Direction: North
Comments: Stream 9
(Willis Creek)
confluence with the
Cape Fear River (S 11).
Stream 9 receives
backwater flooding from
the Cape Fear River in
this area.
Photograph 28
Date: 9/17/2020
I Direction: East
Comments: Stream 9
(Willis Creek) and
Wetland 7 flowing up
gradient of the Cape
Fear River. Wetland 7 is
mostly contained within
the Stream 7 ordinary
high water mark.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 14 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Cumberland County,
NC
Photograph 29
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: Northeast
Comments: Stream 11,
the Cape Fear River,
flows north to south
along the eastern
boundary of the Project
Area. This is within the
southern section of the
Project Area.
Photograph 30
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 11,
the Cape Fear River,
flows north to south
along the eastern
boundary of the Project
Area. This is within the
northern section of the
Project Area.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 15 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 31
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
1, a wetland data
point.
Photograph 32
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 1.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 16 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 33
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
2, an upland data
point.
Photograph 34
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 2, an upland
data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 17 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 37
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
4, an upland data
point.
Photograph 38
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 4, an upland
data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 19 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 39
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 40
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
5.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 20 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 41
]
Date: 9/15/2020"
=
Direction: N/A'"�
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 6, an1-
i_� �o"MlMM11
upland data point.
r
Photograph 42
Date:9/15/2020
Direction: South
I'
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
6, an upland data point.
44'
e
9
i4'
44..
�
:Al
�f. pd�•wi4 F � t3M1crs, J
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 21 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 43
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 7, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 44
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
7.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 22 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 45
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 8, an
upland data point.
Photograph 46
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
8, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 23 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 47
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 9, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 48
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
9.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 24 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 49
_
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 10, an
-
upland data point.
f 1 R I 13
J
Photograph 50
:
y. F
qy
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North0—Inu
Comments: Habitatconditions
at data point
_
10, an upland data point.
r
l
S
i
..
0
pmr-4.
s �,CEC'' �9'°a
�� �y. • ,�' Nth' r n 3�$� jM ����9�i:4�� �Fl i �`��£ €' -
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 25 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 53
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 12, an
upland data point.
Photograph 54
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
12, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 27 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 55
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 13, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 56
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
13.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 28 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 57
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 14, an
upland data point.
Photograph 58
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
14, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 29 10.23.20

USACE SAW-2019-00296 Request for Modification GEOServices Project: 45-20803A
22828 Highway 87 W / Fayetteville, NC September 7, 2022
Attachment V
Credit Reservation Document

LOWER CAPE FEAR UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
STATEMENT OF CREDIT AVAILIBILITY
February 7, 2022
TO: Byron Barton FROM: Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
GEOServices, LLC c/o Land Management Group
2561 Willow Point Way 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Knoxville, TN 37931 Wilmington, NC 28403
Project: Chemours Company (Bladen County, NC)
Dear Mr. Barton:
Per your recent request, the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank (LCFUMB) is providing confirmation
of acceptance to supply mitigation credits for proposed stream impacts associated with remediation work for
the Chemours Company site located east of Highway 87 in Bladen County, NC. This acceptance is conditional
upon receipt of payment as outlined below. Please refer to the table below depicting the amount of pending
stream credits (with anticipated credit availability within the next 90 days).
Mitigation Type I Credits Reserved I Fee Per Unit Fee
Stream I 824 I $573.00 $472,152.00
Non -Riparian Wetland
$67,422.06 I $0.00
Riparian (Riverine) Wetland 0.0 I $67,422.06
Total Feel $472,152.00
Note that the quantity of stream credits reserved under the pending credit release are subject to change
pending the review and concurrence by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). It is understood that
should pending stream credits not be available through the LCFUMB at the time of the project need,
Chemours may utilize stream credits from the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NC DMS).
LCFUMB will reserve 824 stream credits for Chemours project for up to 120 days from the date of this letter.
Note that requests to reserve credits beyond this time period will require a deposit.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer and based upon credit availability at such time, LCFUMB will
issue an invoice in the amount of $472,152. Upon receipt of payment, LCFUMB will provide an executed
Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's
responsibility to ensure that the credit types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the permit(s) issued. LCFUMB and/or its agents are not responsible for
determining the applicant's mitigation requirements. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact me by phone at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Davey Resource Group (agent for LCFUMB)
�iic�r rri
Christian Preziosi
Principal Consultant