20041466 Ver 2_401 Application_20150629

S &ME, Inc
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
(704) 525 -3953 fax
N C Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permittina Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleiqh, North Carolina 27604
Attn Ms Karen Hiagrns
•
Date: 06 29 2015 1 Job No.: 7335 -15 -021
Attention: Ms Karen Higgins
Re: Chesapeake Point
a
We are Sending You: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following
items
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
® Pre - Construction Notification NWP No 29
Copies Date No Description
5 06 29 2015 1 Pre- Construction Notification
1 06 29 2015 2 Copy of CD
1 05 08 2015 3 Check for Processing Fee
These are Transmitted as Checked Below:
❑ For your records ® For your approval
❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment
❑ For Bids Due _ /_/ ❑ Prints Returned after Loan to Us
Remarks: Please let us know if you have anv questions reqardina the above Thank you — Joev
Signed:
J Lawl P
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704 523 4726 IF 704 525 3953 / www smemc corn

June 29, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Attention: Ms. Tasha Alexander
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
•
P 0 bq'
JUN
3 0 2015
D _NR - WATER ' J
_ 401 $ gUFFER ERMITTINN
1
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 29/WQC No. 3890
Chesapeake Point Subdivision
Mooresville, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 7335 -15 -021
USACE Action ID No. 200421252
DWR Project No. 04 -1466
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Peachtree Residential Properties (Peachtree), S &ME is pleased to submit
this request for reauthorization of previously- approved activities involving a stream
crossing at Chesapeake Point subdivision. The subject property is an approximate 112 -
acre tract generally located south of and adjacent to Isle of Pines Road, east of Brawley
School Road, and north of and adjacent to Lake Norman, in southwestern Iredell County,
North Carolina (35.557 °N, 80.912 °W).
In support of this application, please find enclosed the following:
® Figures- Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), a Soil
Survey Map (Figure 3) and a 2014 Aerial Photograph (Figures 4)
® Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and Authorization to
Act as Agent
® Original Permit Authorization Letters
• Appendix III: Site Photographs
• Appendix IV: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Appendix V: Cross Section Drawing
• Appendix VI: Original Agency Scoping Correspondence
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc corn

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 7335 -15 -021
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization June 29, 2015
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND
The project area is located within an undeveloped portion of the Chesapeake Point
subdivision. S &ME conducted a jurisdictional delineation (JD) of the on -site wetlands
and waters of the U.S. in June 2003 (S &ME Project No. 1357-03-402-C). Later in 2004,
the developer's grading contractor constructed two temporary access roads across two of
the on -site streams without first providing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
with written notification. The work resulted in impacts to approximately 200 linear feet
(If) of stream. Upon Peachtree's discovery of the impacts, the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (now the Division of Water Resource [DWR]) and the USACE were
notified. On August 26, 2004, S &ME submitted an "After- the - Fact" permit application
to the USACE /DWR for permanent impacts to the two streams totaling 1401£ The
remaining 601f of affected stream was restored by the developer.
Authorization to construct the two crossings was granted by the DWR (Project No. 04-
1466) in September 2004 and by the USACE (Action ID No. 200421252) in October
2004. Following construction of one of the crossings, development of the subdivision
was placed on hold by the developer, and the second permanent stream crossings was
never constructed. Since that time, the USACE and DWR permits have expired, and
development of the subdivision has resumed. Accordingly, Peachtree is now seeking
reauthorization of the aforementioned permits, such that the remaining stream crossing
can be installed. Copies of the original permit authorization letters are included in
Appendix II.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The subject property is partially developed as a residential subdivision. Remaining
portions of the tract are undeveloped, and vegetated with a mixture of planted pine trees
and mature hardwood species. The surrounding area is comprised of a mix of residential
development, vacant woodland and farm fields. The location of the proposed crossing
consists of a former earthen access road and temporary crossing that have become
overgrown with invasive and volunteer vegetation. Photographs of typical conditions
observed within the project area are included in Appendix III.
As previously indicted, S &ME delineated jurisdictional boundaries within the
Chesapeake Point property in June 2003, and identified six jurisdictional streams and
adjacent wetland areas that flank the respective streams. The jurisdictional boundaries
were surveyed and platted on an August 12, 2004 map by Chas. H. Sells, Inc. Based on
an April 7, 2015 conversation between our Joey Lawler and Tasha Alexander, we
understand that the existing JD can no longer be relied upon due to the amount of time
that has passed since its expiration. Ms. Alexander stated that the jurisdictional
boundaries within and directly adjacent to the remaining stream crossing location, and
that a "Preliminary" JD would be sufficient to proceed with re- authorization of the
permit.
Accordingly, S &ME personnel visited the site on April 28, 2015, and conducted a
jurisdictional delineation of the proposed road crossing footprint in accordance with
2

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 7335 -15 -021
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization June 29, 2015
guidance set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual as amended by the
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Guide. Field conditions were
documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as appropriate.
The stream feature was classified following guidance described in the 2010 NCDWR
Stream Identification Methodology of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins ver. 4.11. For purposes of the Preliminary JD, the "project area" was limited to
the location of the proposed crossing, and approximately 50 feet upstream and
downstream in either direction.
During the delineation, the jurisdictional boundaries were identified with a Trimble©
GeoXH GPS unit capable of sub -meter accuracy. S &ME also photographed
representative conditions and collected data necessary for submission of this Preliminary
Request for JD.
Aside from the subject stream channel, S &ME delineated a small wetland within the
project area that was not present during the original 2003 delineation. In accordance with
the N.C. Wetland Assessment Methodology, Wetland A was classified as a Headwater
Forest wetland type. Overstory vegetation included black willow (Salix nigra), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Soils within the wetland
area were hydric and exhibited a depleted matrix within 12 inches of the surface. In
addition to wetland hydrologic indicators such as water - stained leaves and sediment
deposition, saturation was observed at or within 12 inches of the surface. As stated
previously, the approximately 10 -foot wide earthen temporary channel crossing was
observed in its original location and has become overgrown with invasive and volunteer
vegetation.
The delineated boundaries are depicted on Figure 4. Additional information relative to
the Request for Preliminary JD is included in Appendix IV.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND IMPACTS
Peachtree proposes to construct the second vehicular access road across a portion of
Stream 2 (Figure 4). Stream 2 separates a developable, high - ground portion of the site
from the remainder of the property. The project civil engineers have designed the road
crossing such that only 75 if of Stream 2 (including the 101f of the existing temporary
crossing) will be permanently impacted, and the culvert has been oversized such that
placement of riprap material at the downstream portion of the culvert will be minimized.
A cross section drawing of the crossing is included in Appendix V.
Stream and wetland impacts resulting from the proposed project are identified in the
respective table located on the PCN form in Appendix I. Although 1401f of stream
impact was authorized by the original permit, construction of the single road crossing
only resulted in 701f of impact. Construction of the second crossing will result in 75 if of
impact, bringing the project -wide total to 145 If.
There were no wetland impacts associated with the original permit authorization.
Inclusion of Wetland A, which was not present during the 2003 delineation, will now
result in 0.02 acre of wetland impact.
3

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 7335 -15 -021
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization June 29, 2015
PROTECTED SPECIES
In connection with the original permit, S &ME conducted a protected species assessment
of the property in August 2004, in order to comply with applicable sections of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531- 1543). At that time, the
assessment determined that, based on the literature and pedestrian field review, no
suitable habitat for protected species is located within the site. Scoping letters were also
provided to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ( USFWS) and the N.C. Natural Heritage
Program ( NCNHP) requesting comment on the proposed project. Both the USFWS and
NCNHP responded, stated that they had no records of rare species, significant natural
communities or priority natural areas which would be affected by the project. Copies of
the original USFWS and NCNHP response letters are included in Appendix VI.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
Projects requiring a federal permit must also comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966. The Act provides that properties and districts
listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places must be
considered in the planning of federal undertakings. In connection with the original
permit application, S &ME provided project information and maps of the N.C. State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), requesting comment. The SHPO responded,
stating that they were aware of no historic resources that would be affected, and had no
further comment on the project. A copy original SHPO response letter is included in
Appendix VI.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Given that the subject stream channel bisects the subject property, alternatives to
construction of the proposed road crossing are not practicable. S &ME Natural Resources
personnel reviewed the initial development plans, and provided the project civil engineer
with a list of all specific, general and regional permit conditions. Accordingly, the
proposed stream crossings were been designed such that the cumulative extent of the
impacts is limited to 145 If, thereby avoiding over 6,000 if of remaining on -site streams.
Additionally, the proposed roadway has been narrowed and changed from a public street
to a private drive to allow for reduced construction.
During construction, Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized to ensure that
the impacts identified above are minimized. These BMPs will include; 1) strict adherence
to an approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan; 2) the use of siltation barriers,
sediment traps and diversion ditches; 3) the use of barricades identifying construction
limits such that sensitive areas are preserved; regular inspection and maintenance during
construction, and; 4) pre - construction meetings.
The proposed work should not cause degradation of area water quality or more than
minimal changes to the flow characteristics of the affected stream. As the pipe will be
buried, it should not substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the stream, and allow flow and circulation patterns of
waters of the U.S. remain largely unaffected. To the maximum extent practicable, the
project has been designed to maintain pre - construction downstream flow conditions, and
4

Pre - Construction Notification
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization
SWE Project No. 7335 -15 -021
June 29, 2015
will not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or expected high flows.
Efforts will be made to perform the work during periods of low flow.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices outlined in the most recent version of
the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual' and
approved by the local governing authority will be installed to prevent sedimentation of
jurisdictional features as a result of the work.
MITIGATION
The project will not result in minimal loss of waters of the U.S. Project -wide stream
impacts have been limited to less than 1501f, and project -wide wetland impacts are
limited to 0.02 acre. As such, anticipate that Peachtree has satisfied its mitigation
requirements through the avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken during the
project planning and design phases, and that further forms of mitigation, such as payment
into a private bank or in -lieu fee program, will not be required.
CLOSING
Thank you for your review of this PCN. If you have questions or need additional
information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
Joey awler, P.W.S. D. David Homans
Senior Project Manager Natural Resources Scientist
Senior Review by Jason Reeves, P.E., Senior Project Engineer
Attachments:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), a Soil
Survey Map (Figure 3) and a 2014 Aerial Photograph (Figures 4)
• Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and Authorization to
Act as Agent
• Original Permit Authorization Letters
• Appendix III: Site Photographs
• Appendix IV: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Appendix V: Cross Section Drawing
• Appendix VI: Original Agency Scoping Correspondence
5

FIGURES

I "`a `
`� Mclnors ..-
r oe Or
I -ftivm Hwy —.. NC1
Rozy r
rc
Way 1
dyers C
m d
Creew
n
- *
1 S C
Ci toe -
i ood r
Rack T
r
n r
\
o N
044^ a
a b
car
Rd °
° c grata \W
% P
Rq Pa r
rn
P� Farcn`'kead Ln
OaA V` \age Pano /ico a
a° O
j
e
Rd R
Re9encl, ftd o Cir O
McK� erH C
° u
,d B
off,DUCk a
- F a M
N °
ake Bfy d )
) 9. g
gvo
o a
_ o
ped
\� J
J
All w .
110 ?a Fa 'avP =
= a ° 9� O w W
WateriYn� _I.
\e R
_`c
�L
folk
N
O
N
M
M
d

0
J
� DIY
"W"
"�
tl � L ".o�koo4Tne
r_ 1
11 . E
7 'sck \ \ o
Cl
1
0 '—.�-00 j 4,000 4
..
l/ m
(IN -FEET)
REFERENCE: 1993 LAKE NORMAN NORHT [NC] USGS 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET MAP
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY a
ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. Parent Tract
r
SCALE: 1 „ _ 2'000 , FIGURE NO.
0
DATE: 05 -08 -15 #S&ME USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DRAWN BY DDH 2 c'
CHESAPEAKE POINT DEVELOPMENT a
PROJECT NO: MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
7335 -15 -021 �

Proposed Current Impact Area (SEE FIG. 4)
75 LF of Permanent Stream Impact
0.02 Acres Permanent Wetland Impact
(70 LF Permanent Stream Impact
Previously Authorized by D WQ #04 -1466
USACE Action ID: 200431252)
MENOUN, -
A 4w
AN
t x.
REFERENCE: 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 0 300
PROJECT ROADWAY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM COLEJENEST &STONE. BACKGROUND LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM
IREDELL COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AND NC ONEMAP. FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED
ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

0
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES IN THIS AREA WERE DELINEATED
BY J. LAWLER OF S &ME ON 4 -28 -2015 AND LOCATED USING A GPS
UNIT CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. FEATURE LOCATIONS
HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
NOR HAVE THEY BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE USACE OF NC DWR.
r
Head
01 Proposed 7'
Corrugated Metal Pir
STREAM S1 (PERENNIAL)
(Formerly "Stream 2 ")
65 LF of Permanent Loss of Waters
Due to Culverting / Riprap Outfall
Proposed 6' Riprap Outfall
�y
Rropo
f
80
Existing Temporary Crossing
Converted to Permanent Impact
10 LF of Permanent Loss of Waters
WETLAND A (PFO)
0.02 Acres of Permanent Loss of Waters
Due to Roadway Fill / Culverting
\
� Proposed Roadway
n
I (IN FEET)
REFERENCE:
PROJECT DESIGN INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM COLEJENEST &STONE. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY
INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
SCALE: 1 " = 40 '
1
Jurisdictional Stream Banks
Existing Culvert
> - - -> Stream Centerline
® Jurisdictional Wetlands
Permanent Stream Impacts
Temporary Stream Impacts
Permanent Wetland Impacts
FIGURE NO.
DATE: 06 -15 -15 PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
DRAWN BY: DDH *S&ME
CHESAPEAKE POINT DEVELOPMENT
+PROJECT NO: 7335 -15 -021 MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
4
0
N
M
d

APPENDIX 1:
COMPLETED PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN)
AND AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS AGENT

O dF WA7E19
I 1 �
1. Processing
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ No
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑ Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization
2b.
County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mooresville
2d.
Subdivision name:
Chesapeake Point
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
N/A
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
CP II LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
1845/277
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
Peachtree Residential, LLC
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7380 McGinnis Ferry Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Suwanee, GA 30024
3f.
Telephone no.:
770 - 622 -2522
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
See agent
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer, Authorized Signatory
4b.
Name:
Alec Rickenbaker
4c.
Business name
Peachtree Residential, LLC
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
7380 McGinnis Ferry Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Suwanee, GA 30024
4f.
Telephone no.:
770 - 622 -2522
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
See agent
5.
Agent /Consultant Information
(if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
5b.
Business name
S &ME, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
jlawler @smeinc.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
Subject parcel in the parent subdisvion is 4636047012.000
Latitude: 35.55911
(DD.DDDDDD)
< 2.036 acres
UT to Reeds Creek (11- 104 -(2))
WS- IV,B;CA
Catawba
Longitude: - 81.91394
(- DD.DDDDDD)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project Area is a portion of Parcel No. 4636047012.000, which itself is part of Chesapeake Point. Chesapeake Point is
partially developed as residential subdivision. Remaining portions of the subdivdion are undeveloped, and vegetated with
a mixture of planted pine trees and mature hardwood species. The surrounding area is comprised of a mix of residential
development, vacant woodland and farm fields. The location of the proposed crossing consists of a former earthen
access road and temporary crossing that have become overgrown with invasive and volunteer vegetation.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Less than 0.10 acre of wetlands are located within the project area.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
— 100 If of stream are located within the project area.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to re- authorize and existing permit originally granted by the DWR (Project No. 04 -1466) in
September 2004 and by the USACE (Action ID No. 200421252) in October 2004. Following construction of one of the
crossings, development of the subdivision was placed on hold by the developer, and the second permanent stream
crossings was never constructed. Since that time, the USACE and DWR permits have expired, and development of the
subdivision has resumed. Accordingly, the applicant is now seeking reauthorization of the aforementioned permits, such
that the remaining stream crossing can be installed.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Peachtree proposes to construct the second vehicular access road across a portion of Stream 2. Stream 2 separates a
developable, high - ground portion of the site from the remainder of the property. The project civil engineers have designed the
road crossing with an 84 -inch culvert and concrete wingwalls to minize impacts and the amount of riprap material at the
downstream portion of the culvert.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ®Preliminary ❑Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: S &ME, Inc.
Name (if known):. Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
See attached cover letter for details
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ❑ No
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
See attached cover letter for details
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
No additonal impacts beyond those specified in this PCN are required.
❑ Unknown
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1
®P ❑ T
Culvert Headwater Forest ❑ Yes
® No
® Corps 0.02
® DWQ
W2
❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3
❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete this
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4
❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
3d.
3e.
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5
❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Impact
number -
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6
❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
DWQ — non -404,
width
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.02
2h. Comments: No additonal wetland imapcts will occur
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including
temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T Culvert S2
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
75
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No additonal stream impacts will occur.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
75

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact
Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open -water impacts are required.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c.
5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction is required
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse F-1 Tar-Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
131 ❑P ❑T
B2 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
6i. Comments:
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Given that the subject stream channel bisects the subject property, alternatives to construction of the proposed road crossing
are not practicable. S &ME Natural Resources personnel reviewed the initial development plans, and provided the project civil
engineer with a list of all specific, general and regional permit conditions. Accordingly, the proposed stream crossings were
designed such that the cumulative, project -wide extent of the impacts are less than 150 If, thereby avoiding over 6,000 If of
remaining on -site streams within the subdivision. Additionally, the proposed roadway has been narrowed and changed from a
public street to a private drive to allow for reduced construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
During construction, Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized to ensure that the impacts identified above are
minimized. These BMPs will include; 1) strict adherence to an approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan; 2) the use of
siltation barriers, sediment traps and diversion ditches; 3) the use of barricades identifying construction limits such that
sensitive areas are preserved; regular inspection and maintenance during construction, and; 4) pre- construction meetings.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. Comments:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type
❑ Yes
0 linear feet
Quantity
❑ warm ❑ cool
0 square feet
0 acres
0 acres
0 acres
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
❑cold
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 14.7%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
The Chesapeake Pointe project is a 112 acre single family subdivision that is being developed in accordance with the
Iredell County Land Development Code. The property is zoned R -A and R -20 and is in the WS -IV -CA (Watershed Critical
Area) Overlay District. As such, minimum lot size is 30,000 SF and maximum built -upon area is 24% (low density). A 50'
buffer is to be maintained adjacent to all perennial stream channels. The project will include 79 residential lots at roughly
5000 SF impervious area per lot. Along with road right -of -way (5.5 acres impervious), sidewalk (0.71 acres impervious), the
amenity center (0.93 acres impervious), and two well lots (0.23 aces impervious), the total approximate impervious coverage
will be 16.5 acres, or 14.7 %.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
® Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
Mooresville
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
ORW
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will allow the remainder of the site to be developed, but no further impacts will be required.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage treatment for the subdivsion is indivudal spectic.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. F-1 Raleigh
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See prior agency scoping responses
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See prior agency scoping responses
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
.1 •
06.29.15
Applicant /Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: April 20, 2015
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: Chesapeake Point
Type of Project: Jurisdictional Delineation/NWP
Location: Mooresville, NC
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name: �,�G�..�� R� ���� P ��
Mailing Address: 73G� !�, `61 i��'�� %�`� �j�
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Z7fl � 622- �� 22 u 205
Contact:
Agent Information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
[phone]
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
.1
.1
S&ME is hereby authorized to submit information and conduct site visits with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or N.C. Division of Water Resources, as
necessary to secure confirmation of a jurisdictional determination and
reauthorization of the NWP for the subject property identified above.
�7-
6ignature of Property Owner or Appointed Representative
RaO
-4t)T+f 0 P-12-tZ)
Printed Name/Title

APPENDIX I1:
ORIGINAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION LETTERS

September 21, 2004
DWQ# 04-1466
iredell County
Mr. Bill Schmidt
Peachtree Residential Properties
Suwannee, GA 30024
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quaft Certification with Addkional Conditions
XTIT-7� Im
I,
I For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as well as
the additional conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining juris�lictional wetlands
and waters or areas ZZ 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be
put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later')-
A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 4011 NVetlands Unit web site at
hL"L.-/',/h2o,enr.s'L,ate.nc.us,'n-.We'Llands.

3. Sty ter discharge points shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential receiving streams (of
the discharge) at the site will not be impacted due to sediment a=rnulations, scouring or erosion of the
stream banks.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must art within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office & Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714, This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions,
, please telephone Alan Johnson in the Moorevville Regional Office at 704-
663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
EM
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands Unit
Land Quality., MRO
Joe Lawler, SNI&E
Central Files

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200431252 County: Iredell USGS Quad: Lake Norman North
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner 1 Authorized Agent: Mr.. Bill Schmidt
Address: Peachtree Residential Properties
7380 McGinnis Ferry Road
Suwannee, GA 30024
Telephone No.: 770 -622 -2522
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): The property is located on
the west side of Isle of Pines Road, south of Brawlev School Road, adiacent to Lake Norman, west
of Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina..
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the installation of culverts and
placement of full associated with the construction of two road crossings for the Chesapeake Pointe
subdivision. Permanent impacts to stream channels authorized by this permit are 140 linear feet of
unnamed tributaries to Lake Norman in the Catawba River Basin.
Applicable Law. [Q Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 39
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation
from your submitted plans may subject the pennittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate
legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, pricer to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is coanpieted within twelve ,:ionths of the date of the nationwide pemut's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA }, prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Amanda D. Jones at 828- 271 - 7980 x231.

APPENDIX III: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo 1. View of Stream 1 facing downstream.
Photo 2:View of existing culvert near location of proposed
permanent crossing.
Photo 3: View of Wetland A facing downstream of existing
culvert.
Photo.4: Second view of Wetland A facing downstream.
Photo 5: View of Wetland A upstream of existing culvert.
Project No.: 7335 -15 -021
Taken by: S &ME
Date: 04.28.2015
Photo 6: View of typical soil pedon taken from Wetland A.
S &ME CHESAPEAKE POINT SUBDIVISION
Mooresville, North Carolina
SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX IV: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 06.29.2015
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
JOEY LAWLER, PWS
S &ME, INC.
9751 SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: WILMINGTON DISTRICT
— ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE — CHESAPEAKE POINT -
ACTION ID NO. 200434252
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
THE REVIEW AREA IS CENTERED ON THE LOCATION OF A PROPOSED
PERMANENT ROAD CROSSING THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
BUT NOT CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF THE ORIGINAL
PERMIT. A TEMPORARY ROAD CROSSING WAS CONSTRUCTED AND
REMIANS IN PLACE AT THIS LOCATION.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NORTH CAROLINA County /parish /borough: IREDELL
City: MOORSEVILLE
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
35.55911 N, - 81.91394 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N, NAD83 NC STATE PLANE
Name of nearest waterbody: UT TO REEDS CREEK
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: SEE TABLE
Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Stream Flow: SEE TABLE
Wetlands: SEE TABLE
Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters: N/A

Tidal: N/A
Non - Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s)
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
2

permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that
apply) - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant: SEE ATTACHED FIGURES.
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: LAKE NORMAN
NORTH, NC, 1:24,000
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
IREDELL COUNTY.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of
1929 )
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date): S &ME REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): SEE ATTACHED WATERS UPLOAD
SHEET.
3

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
0
See attached Aqent Authorization
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)

USACE Waters Upload Sheet
Chesapeake Point NWP Reauthorization
SME Project No. 7335 -15 -021
06.29.2015
Cowardin_
Area
Latitude
Longitude
Waters Name
HGM Code
Linear (ft)
Waters Types
Local
—
Code
—
(acres)
(dd nad83)
(dd nad83)
_Waterway
Stream 2 R2UB2 Riverine
100 RPW 35.55911
- 81.91394 UT to Reeds Creek
WA PFO1 Palustrine
<0.10 RPWWD 35.55911
- 81.91394 UT to Reeds Creek

APPENDIX V: CROSS SECTION DRAWING

PROPOSED GRADE
810 810
PROPOSED CONC. SEGMENTAL
BLOCK HEADWALL (TYP)
800 I 800
APPROX. LOCATION
OF 2" WATER MAIN
790 790
E ISTING CL — -- --- -- -- -- — — — — - - --- — — — — XISTING C
CREEK = 779.14 � REEK = 7 9.89
—� UPSTREAM INVERT
DOWNSTREAM INVERT I 6 LF — CLASS TRIP —RAP TOE RTOTECTION
ELEV= ±778.89
ELEV= ±778.14
770, 1 770
—50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50
LEEWARD SHOAL LANE — STA. 13 +40 60 LF — 84- CMP CULVERT,
BURY INVERT 1 FT. BELOW
STREAMBED
Realizing the Chesapeake Pointe NWP Reauthorization Leeward Shoal Ln. Culvert
Realizing the Possibilities
Land Plarnirg Zoo South Tryon Street Stream Cross Section A -A
Suite 1400
Landscape Architecture Charlotte, North Carolina
28202 Peachtree Residential Properties Project No. 4323
ColeJenest Civil Engineering p [phone] Issued 06110115
f [phone] Huntersville, NC 28078
& Stone Urban Design url +www.colejeneststone.com Scale 1" = 20' Sheet

APPENDIX V1: ORIGINAL AGENCY SCOPING
CORRESPONDENCE

,* SrAt g,
�¢ ,Fti
tilt ii
North Carolina D63artment of Cultural Resources
State Hisoric Preservation Office
Peter; Sandbeck, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
August 23, 2004
Suzanne L. Knudsen
Staff Professional
S &ME, Inc.
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte, NC 28241 -7668
Re: Chesapeake Pointe Property, Mooresville, Iredell County,
S &ME Project No. 1357 -03- 402 -D, ER 04 -2114
Dear Ms. Knudsen:
Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2004, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733 -4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Toter B. Sandbeck
BS:w
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Ra1et NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 (919)733- 4763/733 -8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Ra[,'a NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 (919)733- 6547/715 -4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street, Ra11]1, NC 46 17 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 (919)733 - 6545/715 -4801

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 14, 2004
Ms. Suzanne L. Knudsen
Staff Professional
S &ME, Inc.
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte, North Carolina 28241 -7668
Dear Ms. Knudsen:
Subject: Protected Species Assessment for the Chesapeake Point Property, Mooresville, Iredell
County, North Carolina (S &ME Project No. 1357- 03 -402D)
We received your letter of transmittal dated September 8, 2004, with the subject report and a
request for our comments. The following comments are provided in accordance with the
provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 -1543) (Act).
According to our records and a review of the information you provided, no listed species or their
habitats occur on the site. We concur with your determination that the proposed project will not
affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. Therefore, we believe the requirements
under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Thank you for allowing us to comment on this project. Please contact Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our
staff at 828/258 -3939, Ext. 229, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence
concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4 -2 -04 -285.
Sincerely,
( ';z—
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor

{
.-._�� Z
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 2, 2004
Ms. Suzanne L. Knudsen
S &ME, Inc.
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte, NC 28241 -7668
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Chesapeake Pointe Property, Lake Norman; Mooresville, Iredell County
S &ME Project No. 1357 -03 -402 -D
Dear Ms. Knudsen:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas at the site nor within a mile of the project area. Although our maps do not
show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean
that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of
Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if
the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
< wvvw. llcst)arks.net /nhn /search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919 -715 -8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
HEL /hel
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601 One
Phone: 919 - 733 -4984 • FAX: 919 - 715 -3060 • Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity • Affirmative Action Employer -50 % Recycled • 10 % Post Consumer Paper ahlrZ7111