20150644 Ver 1_401 Application_20150615

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info: '2 0 1 .5019
44
1. Project Name Concord Airport Business Park Phase 11, SL Aviation Blvd, LLC (SLAB)
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: SLAB, Dan Lacz, 788 Morris Turnpike, Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Jennifer Robertson, Atlas Environmental, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): none known
5. Site Address: 7075 Aviation Blvd NW, Concord, NC 28027
6. Subdivision Name: not a subdivision, commercial development
7. City: Concord
8. County: Cabarrus
9. Lat: 35386632 Long : - 80.717384
10. Quadrangle Name: Kannapolis
11. Waterway: UT to Rocky River ( "C" waters)
12. Watershed: Yadkin
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 12 18
General Permit #
X Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre- Application Request
DWR # none known
(Decimal Degrees Please )
.19
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
commercial development
Site/Waters Name: UT to Rocky River ( "C" waters)
Keywords:

May 27, 2015
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. William Elliott
151 Patton Ave, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
Re: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II — 12.469 Acres
7075 Aviation Blvd NW, Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
Jurisdictional Determination / Nationwide Permits 12/18 Requests
William:
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC is requesting approval of the enclosed Waters of the US
delineation and Nationwide Permits 12/18 application. There are approximately 430
linear feet of perennial stream and 0.131 acre of wetlands on the subject property. The
permit application request is for 15 linear feet of temporary stream impact that is
necessary for the installation of a sewer line, 0.066 acre of permanent wetland impact
for the embankment of a water quality pond, and 0.008 acre of temporary wetland
impact for the installation of a sewer line.
The stream on site is an unnamed tributary to Rocky River which is classified as "C"
waters by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. The stream is assessed to
be a relatively permanent water (perennial stream). Atlas staff is not aware of any
other 404 permits previously issued for the property.
Enclosed are the necessary permit documents and additional project information.
Thank you for your attention to the enclosed delineation approval and permit
application requests. Please contact me if you need any additional information.
Best regards,
Jennifer L Robertson
IRobertson(@atlasenvi.com
Courtesy Copy To: Mr. Alan Johnson, NC DWR, Mooresville Office
ATLASEnvironmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 - 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 - 819 -7780 (o) / 980 - 819 -7876 (f)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh

iVV1RONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890
-and -
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, or right to purchase holder of the
property identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation
approval and /or permit processin/g� at the request of the Corps or WQP.
Project Name: i rm c rrr� A'fi+ 6 u5 � t'i.eSS ?cam i``` �t
Property Owner of Record: u I'a f I'rm
Contact Name: D" Lac7-
Address: 7� /�l <�Y)'► �,'
Address: S of 1 01115 A) � 0 �6 - 3
Phone /Fax Number: 3 16 .5 - U l U o / I � 3 - 765 --0/01
r
Email Address: (/lC"m a c Z �� S' � U` A-ftl, 2,t/l Qr 67A Q
�J I
Project Address: R� corw,r
Project Address:
Tax PIN:�'�
Signature:
Date:
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 -512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 -819 -7780 (o) / 980 - 819 -7876 (f)
jrobertson @atlasenvi.com
www.atlasenvi.com

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 7075 Aviation Blvd NW
City, State: Concord, North Carolina, 28027
County: Cabarrus
Directions: From Charlotte: Take 1 -85 E to Concord Mills, past Concord
Mills take a right onto Derita Road, right onto Aviation Blvd
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 468o- 80 -2118
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jennifer L Robertson, Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 712 English Tudor Lane, Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number: (704) 512 -12o6
Electronic Mail Address': JRobertson @atlasenvi.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: SL Aviation Blvd, LLC (Dan Lacz)
Mailing Address: 788 Morris Turnpike
Short Hills, NJ 07078
Telephone Number: 973- 765 -oioo (office) / 973-765 -wol (fax)
Electronic Mail Address3: [e-mail]
✓❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
*see agent authorization form May 13, 2015
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary_ JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
V1I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
✓❑ Size of Property or Project Area 12.469 acres
❑ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than ] 1 x l 7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets$
Upland Data Sheets
F] Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates: 35.386632 Latitude -80.717384 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
✓❑ Soil Survey Map
✓❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
httr): / /www.usace.armv.mil/ Missions/ CivilWorks/ ResulatorvProsramandPermits /res surmasox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htti3:Hr)ortal.ncdenr.ors /c /document library /set file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7fafo6f4c &sroupld =38364 and,
htto: / /www. saw.usace.armv.mil/ Portals /59 /docs /resulatory /r)ublicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.01'
$ Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
F] Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ✓❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
F✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑v Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
aApproved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one orisinal Plat (to scale) that is no larizer than I l "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I 1 "x 17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
F1Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
F] Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F] Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
F1Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
F] Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
FWhen the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (S) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action iD No.:
F1When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the low or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

moo/ Say
OF W A TE9
o`' pG Office Use Only:
- � Corps action ID no.
�. o < DWQ project no.
a G
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12/18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Cabarrus
Concord
not a subdivision, commercial development
not a DOT project
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC
11092/0286
Dan Lacz
788 Morris Turnpike
Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
973 - 765 -0100
973 - 765 -0101
danlacz @silvermangroup.net
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
I
I
I � f
�LN 2 �0�5
I r II
DENR -WATER RFcn�
104 & ovrrER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
same as above
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
same as above
4d. Street address:
same as above
4e. City, state, zip:
same as above
4f. Telephone no.:
same as above
4g. Fax no.:
same as above
4h. Email address:
same as above
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
712 English Tudor Lane
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.:
704 - 512 -1206
5f. Fax no.:
980 - 819 -7876
5g. Email address:
JRobertson @atlasenvi.com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.386632
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
46808021180000
Longitude: - 80.717384
12.469 acres
Rocky River
C
Yadkin
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: the majority of the property is early successional vegetation, there is a small forested area, a floodplain of the
UT to Rocky River is present; the general land use in the vicinity is commercial and industrial development, the Concord
Airport, some residential, and forested areas
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.131
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 430 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: to develop a commercial project to meet the needs of expanding
development surrounding the Concord airport
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Heavy earth moving equipment will be
used to grade the site. 15 linear feet of stream and 0.008 acre (WL -1000) will be temporarily impacted for installation of a
sewer line. 0.066 acre of wetland (WL -2000) will be permanently impacted for construction of an embankment for a water
quality pond.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: JD requested with this application
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD requested with this application
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
I ❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Choose one - -
S3 -
Choose one - -
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question
for each wetland area impacted.
S5 -
2a. 2b.
2c.
2d. 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 T Excavation
Seep
Yes Corps
0.008
W2 P Fill
Seep
Yes Corps
0.066
W3 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
W4 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
W5 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
W6 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
2g. Total wetland impacts:
I 0.074
2h. Comments: cubic yards of fill calculation: 2875 sq ft " .167 ft = 480.13 ft3 /
27 = 17.78 yd3
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d.
3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404, width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
S1 T Excavation
UT to Rocky River PER
Corps 15
15
S2 -
Choose one - -
S3 -
Choose one - -
S4 -
Choose one - -
S5 -
Choose one - -
S6 -
Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
3i. Comments: temporary stream impact for sewer line installation, stream bed elevation will be re- established
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
15

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 - Choose one Choose
02 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts:
4g. Comments: there is no open water on site
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or ake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation impact impact
Temporary (T) required? (square (square
feet) feet)
B1 -
Yes /No
B2 - I
Yes /No
B3 - I
Yes /No
B4 - I (
Yes /No
B5 - I I
Yes /No
B6 - I
Yes /No
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
15 linear feet of stream impact and 0.008 acre of wetland impact is temporary for the installation of a sewer line. 0.066 acre of
wetland impact is necessary for the construction of the embankment of a water quality pond. There are no permanent stream
impacts proposed for site development. WL -1000 will not be permanently impacted. The only permanent impacts are
necessary to construct a water quality pond per a local ordinance.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to the stream and WL -1000 are temporary for sewer line installation. The project engineers would have preferred to
permanently impact the stream and wetland thus not spending additional funds to re- establish these areas once construction
is completed A typical bank stablization is included for the stream crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: none
Type: Choose one Quantity none
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity none
Type: Choose one Quantity none
3c. Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: ( none acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: I none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: I none acres
4h. Comments: no comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 none none 3 (2 for Catawba) none
Zone 2 none none 1.5 none
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h. Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24% %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan will be approved locally.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
City of Concord / Cabarrus County
City of Concord / Cabarrus County
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
ORW
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This commercial development will access the existing municipal sewer system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIS Layer; see enclosed desktop review for Federal T &E
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
5/29/2015
Date
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

LEGEND:
#4`4%k�
Jurisdictional. E
00
Wetland Polyg(
'00- -W.,, OoOl*
Stream Impact,
Wetland Impac
Existing Culver
r 1
7
ft%,, Ogoo
0
2
co
-0
M
LOIJ
fN E
00
CN
Z
0
0 r,
M
.Lb 00
M

it
IF If
I f.11,11 � IMPACT 2:
0.066 ac.
WL -2000
ONMENTAL
712 English Tudor Lane, Charlotte, NC 28211
980 - 819 - 7780 - www.atlasenvi.com
VVL -1 000
0.065 ac.
20' 80'
Y 40'
SCALE: 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL =
PROP. 5TREAM CR055ING
`.�
WITH PUMP AROUND
.•
5EE DETAIL SHEETS. AFTER
�`.•
CONSTRUCTION 15 COMPLETE,
5TADILIZE EXI5TING CREEK WITH
CLA55 B RIP -RAP
(5EE 5TREAM DETAIL)
'`,;,IMPACT 1:
-
_ ___ .
0`.'008 ac.
WL -1000
rr>♦u�rrirrr�rr�rr�rrson
ONMENTAL
712 English Tudor Lane, Charlotte, NC 28211
980 - 819 - 7780 - www.atlasenvi.com
VVL -1 000
0.065 ac.
20' 80'
Y 40'
SCALE: 1" = 40' CONTOUR INTERVAL =
IMPACT 3:
15 If
Temporary
Impact
Concord Airport Busines Park
AQUATIC RESOURCES
IMPACT MAP (close -up)
Cabarrus County, NC
Ed - b*-* I
IN rm
SHEET:
B.1
PROP. 5TREAM CR055ING
`.�
WITH PUMP AROUND
.•
5EE DETAIL SHEETS. AFTER
�`.•
CONSTRUCTION 15 COMPLETE,
5TADILIZE EXI5TING CREEK WITH
CLA55 B RIP -RAP
(5EE 5TREAM DETAIL)
IMPACT 3:
15 If
Temporary
Impact
Concord Airport Busines Park
AQUATIC RESOURCES
IMPACT MAP (close -up)
Cabarrus County, NC
Ed - b*-* I
IN rm
SHEET:
B.1

Waters of the US and Isolated
Wetlands Delineation
Report of Findings
May 13, 2015
Parcel ID 46808021180000 — 12.469 Acres
Concord Airport Business Park, Phase 2
Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared For:
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC c/o The Silverman Group
788 Morris Turnpike
Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
Prepared By.,
UI ONMENTAL
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC c/o The Silverman Group, Parcel ID 46808021180000 - Page 1

Summary of Findings
Stream and Wetland Delineation
Introduction
At your request, during May 2015, staff from Atlas Environmental, Inc. (Atlas) performed a
pedestrian survey of Parcel ID 46808021180000 to identify the presence of surface waters and
wetlands that are subject to Federal and State regulations. Surface waters such as perennial (p-
RPW's) and intermittent (s- RPW's) streams and their impoundments are subject to Section 401
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. An area is determined to be a jurisdictional wetland if it
exhibits wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil characteristics. These
characteristics are required to be in accordance with the definitions in the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) Wetland Delineation Manual from 1987. Isolated wetlands are subject to the
North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Water
Resources (DWR) Isolated Wetlands Rules.
Surface Waters
Located on the Kannapolis topo -quad the site is within drainage areas of Rocky River within the
Yadkin River Basin (HUC 03040105). The DWR Water Quality Program (DWR, WQP) classifies
Rocky River as "Class C" waters. The field delineation of assessed jurisdictional stream features
was conducted utilizing current methodologies which are consistent with those outlined in the 1987
US Armv Corps Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement of the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Reaion (Version2.0). Aril 2012,
post Rapanos Supreme Court decision guidance (2007), other Regulatory Guidance Letters provided
by the Corps, and the latest DWR, WQP, Surface Water, Wetlands Branch, 401 and Buffer
Permitting Unit Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins (V.4.11, 2010) — effective September 1, 2010. Evaluations and assessments regarding
jurisdictional limits and permitting requirements made by consultants are subject to verification by
the Corps, the DWR, WQP, and other appropriate state and local regulatory authorities.
The limits of any jurisdictional streams are depicted on Figures Aquatic Resources Sketch Map.
This determination is subject to verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers and, in some cases,
the State agencies charged with the protection of surface water resources. The base map used for
Figure 1 was obtained from Fleming Engineering. Figures 2 and 4 were obtained from Cabarrus
County GIS. Figure 3 was obtained from Google Earth.
Upon review of the existing site conditions, Atlas has assessed that one perennial relatively
permanent jurisdictional stream is present on the property. This perennial stream is an unnamed
tributary to Rocky River and is approximately 430 linear feet within the property boundary. Other
drainage features were determined to be non - jurisdictional non - relatively permanent waters. It
should be noted that this time of year is typically when high flows would be observed. We
recommend that formal written concurrence of our assessments regarding the jurisdictional status
of all drainage features on site be obtained from the Corps. The formal final jurisdictional
determination will be valid for five years.
Wetlands and Isolated Wetlands
Potential wetland areas on the site were evaluated for the presence of hydric soils, evidence of
wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. In these areas, hydrologic proof would be the
existence of hydric soils with oxidized root channels in the upper soil horizons that have low
chroma matrix colors. Indicators of hydrology may include water borne deposits, drift lines, scour
marks, the presence of crayfish borrows, redoximorphic concretions, or regional indicators of soil
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC c/o The Silverman Group, Parcel ID 46808021180000 - Page 2

saturation. Hydrophytic vegetation can range from facultative to obligate wetland plant species.
Based on site observations, Atlas staff assessed that two jurisdictional wetlands and no isolated
wetlands exist on the subject property. The wetlands were flagged in the field using sequentially
numbered orange and yellow flagging. Wetland 1000 directly abuts the unnamed tributary to
Rocky River and is approximately 0.065 acre. Wetland 2000 is adjacent to wetland 1000 and the
unnamed tributary to Rocky River and is approximately 0.066 acre.
Public Sourced Natural Resource MaDDinq
County GIS Tax Parcel (Figure 2)
Relevant water resource layers and hydrologic layers have been activated for this figure. Water
resources depicted on this figure are not typically field verified but rather they are generated at
the county's direction and are most likely based on other public sourced maps or by GIS staff
photo - interpretation.
County GIS Aerial (Figure 3)
Aerial maps help with site access and orientation in the field. These maps are also useful for
determining likely stream corridors and floodplain areas.
County GIS Topographical Map (Figure 4)
Generally, a feature that is depicted in blue or magenta is a water resource. However, some of
these features may not be jurisdictional resources due to complex nuances within the regulations.
Additional jurisdictional water resources may be present though they are not depicted on this
mapping resource. Wetland and stream jurisdictional determinations are based on field
evaluations not merely the presence or absence of blue or magenta features depicted on this
map.
Delineation Findings Summary
In summary Atlas assessed that there is one Corps jurisdictional stream and two Corps
jurisdictional wetlands on the subject parcel. Atlas assessed that there are no DWR isolated
wetlands on the property. Atlas can obtain written concurrence of the findings from the Corps.
Permitting
In general (with some exceptions) the permitting process is regulatory and not prohibitory. A Corps
404 permit verification and /or a 401 water quality certification from DWR is not required for work
on the subject property that is restricted to high ground areas /activities. Construction activities
within jurisdictional streams and wetlands (collectively referred to as Waters of the US) require
written authorization by the Corps and /or State (DWR -WQP) water resources agencies prior to
impacts. For most development projects a stormwater management plan will be required if
impervious surfaces exceed 24% over the entire project and /or high density areas and /or if
stormwater is not treated with predominantly vegetated conveyances for low density projects.
The project may be required to meet local NPDES Phase 2 or Water Supply Stormwater
Management requirements.
Impacts of 150 linear feet and less to the identified streams and fills of less than 1/10"' acre of
jurisdictional waters and wetlands are typically standard to permit under the Nationwide Permit
program, and may not require compensatory mitigation for impacts. Impacts to 150 linear feet of
stream up to 300 linear feet of stream and from 1 /10 to 1/2 acre of wetland impacts may be
authorized under the Nationwide Permit program as well, but a more thorough review for
avoidance and minimization of impacts will be conducted by both the Corps and the DWR -WQP.
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC cto The Silverman Group, Parcel ID 46808021180000 - Page 3

Compensatory mitigation will be required for stream and wetland losses under this permitting
scenario. Unavoidable impacts that exceed these thresholds may likely only be authorized under
an Individual Permit and Water Quality Certification, and these permits involve a public notice and
comment periods and may involve a public hearing.
Once an acceptable site plan is produced, Atlas can assist with the preparation and submittal of a
Pre - Construction Notification (permit application) to the Corps and NC DWR -WQP if it is
determined that impacts are unavoidable. The likely Nationwide Permit that is applicable for
commercial development is Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39. The Corps will review the application for
eligibility under NWP 39 which includes a review for impacts to cultural and historic resources,
natural heritage resources, impacts within FEMA regulated floodplains, and threatened and
endangered species. Upon their determination that the proposed development is not likely to
adversely impact those resources, they will issue their permit verification. NC DWR -WQP will
review the application for impacts to water quality and aquatic life. Storm water control and
treatment design will be reviewed by the local delegated authority, if applicable, otherwise the
North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources will review storm water plans or in
certain instances NC DWR -WQP may review the storm water plans.
The following links to the full text of the Corps Nationwide Permit 39 and NC DWR Water Quality
Certification (for commercial developments) are provided for your review:
http: / /www.saw. usace. army. mil/ WETLANDS / permits /NWP /N WP2012 /NW P39_3 -23. pdf
http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/ web /wq /swp /ws/ 401 /certsandpermits /gcs #Nationwide
Permittina Summary
If impacts to Waters of the US and /or isolated wetlands are necessary for site development a
Corps permit and /or DWR water quality certification may be required. Nationwide permits are
usually limited to 1/2 acre of stream /wetland /open water impacts as well as 300 linear feet of
stream impacts. Individual permits require an elevated review process.
Recommendations
The following is a very general summary of the recommended next steps.
1. Conduct a site visit with the Corps
2. Obtain Corps verification of the Atlas delineation
3. Desktop Federal T &E review for the Corps and /or DWR permit application
3. Submit a permit application to the Corps and possibly DWR for stream and wetland impacts
Conclusion
This concludes our project review and report of findings for the stream and wetland delineation.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. Please feel free to call with questions or
to discuss this report.
Best regards,
�64 d1"ZtW-'6'
Jennifer L Robertson
President
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC Go The Silverman Group, Parcel ID 46808021180000 - Page 4

Jurisdictional Waters of the US and Isolated Wetlands
Figures
SL Aviation Blvd, LLC c/o The Silverman Group, Parcel ID 46808021180000 - Page 5

LEGEND: Figure 1. Aquatic Resources Sketch Map
N
000m*%#'� : Jurisdictional Stream(s)
Wetland Polygon(s) "✓
Existing Culvert(s)
i 1
N. J, : Non - Jurisdictional Feature(s) �
s � /
/ W L-2000
0.066 ac. ! U.T, to
r ! % Rocky River
430 Lf.
0.15 ac.
` WL -1000
0.065 ac.
J
__ jr
Concord Airport Busines Park SHEET:
n 75" aoo' AQUATIC RESOURCES
ONMENTAL o' 150' SKETCH MAP A.1
712 English Tudor Lane, Charlotte, NC 28211
980 - 819 - 7780 - www.atiasenvi.com SCALE 1" = 150' CONTOUR NTERVAL = 2 FT Cabarrus County, NC

Figure 2. Tax Parcel Map 0
AvlAti7
ti! 771
Property Real ID 02- 032G- 0001.00
Parcel PIN
46808021180000
Physical Address: No Parcel Selected
Land Units
12.469
Owner Name 1: SLAVIATION BLVD
LLC Land Units Type
AC
Owner Name 2:
Calculated Acreage
12.48267
Mailing Address: CIO THE SILVERMAN GROUP 788 MORRIS TURNPIKE Land Value
832420
Mail City: SHORT HILLS
Building Value
0
Mail State: NJ
Assessed Value
832420
Mail Zip: 07078
Market Value
832420
Cabarrus County shall not be held fade for any errors in the
Map Created By Cabarrus County IT Department
datarepresented onthis record. This includes errors of omission,
Data Sources: CabffifUSCount Land Records
y
1:4,514
commssion, concerning the content of the data, and relatiae
positional accuracy of the data. The data cannot be construed to
0
0.0375 0.075 0.15 ft
be a legal document. Primary sources kom which this datawas
Sources: Esr4 HERE, DeLonne, TomTorn, Intennap, increment P Corp.,
- - - I
compiled mustbeconsukedforvedtcation
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGR Kadaster NL,
, , i ` I r
of information represented on this reap document.
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, 0
0.05 0.1 0.2 m
Mepmylndia, m OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS UserCommunity
CI Ahnio *inn Rlhirl
I I P n/n Tke, Cilhnnrmon ('-rnr in Dornnl Ir) AAQnQA':>9 1 fannnn - Dann 7

Figure 3. Aerial Map (2014)
GooSIC earth feet 1000
metersi 400
SI Aviation Rlvd I I C c/r) The Silverman Gmun Parcel In 4RRC)A[1911R(l(lol1 -Pane fi

Figure 4. Topo Map
Camord
=
Property Real ID 02- 032G- 0001.00
Parcel PIN
46808021180000
Physical Address: No Parcel Selected
Land Units
12.469
Owner Name 1: SLAVIATION BLVD LLC Land Units Type
AC
Owner Name 2:
Calculated Acreage
12.48267
Mailing Address: C/O THE SILVERMAN GROUP 788 MORRIS TURNPIKE Land Value
832420
Mail City: SHORT HILLS
Building Value
0
Mail State: NJ
Assessed Value
832420
Mail Zip: 07078
Market Value
832420
Cabarrus County shall riot be held liable for any errors inthe
Map Created By Cabarrus County IT Department
data represented on this record. This includes errors of omission,
commission, concerning the content of the data, and relative
Data Sources: Cabarrus County Land Records
1:9,028
positional accuracy of the data. The data cannot be construed to
0
0.075 0.15 0.3 ft
be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was
Sources: Esr4 HERE, Del-orme, TomTom, Inlermap, increment P Corp.,
compiled nustbeconsutedforverification
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, Geoaase. IGN, Kadasler NL, I t
\ \ I 1,
r
of information represented an this map document.
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esd China (Fong Kong), swisslopo, 0
0.125 0.25 0.5 m
Mapmylndia, © OpenStreet Map contributors, and the G IS User Community
QI Aviofinn Pkiri
I 1 f^. r/n TFhn Qi1wormnn (grim Pnrnol 11) Agpilprl9i 1 RMM
- Ponn Q

Vicinity Map
Notes
mapquest
This map doesn't contain any items.
Concord Airport Business Park Phase 11
000ft_
rtlapquflsY 51000tH
CONCORD
REO,,GNAL
AIRPORT
A
G0.�6
C
�Srr� rh Blvd
qA Cnanorre Motor
Speedway
S
©2015 MapUuest - Portions ©2015 TomTom I _rerms I Privacy
©2015 MapOuest. Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the Mapouest Terms of Use We make no guarantee of the accuracy of their content, road conditions or route usability.
You assume all risk of use. View Terms of Use

Driving Directions
Notes
In mapquest'
Trip to:
7075 Aviation Blvd NW
Concord, NC 28027
14.50 miles / 17 minutes
[1900 - 2050] Interstate 85, Charlotte, NC 28216 Download ad
PP
• 1. Start out going west on Interstate 85 toward Vemdon St. Map 0.2 Mi
0.2 Mi Total
RAMP 2. Take the 1 -85 S ramp. Map 0.01 Mi
0.2 Mi Total
41
3. Take the 1st left onto Beatties Ford Rd. Map
0.1 Mi
0.3 Mi Total
r 1
4. Merge onto 1 -85 N toward Concord. Map
11.3 Mi
IV
11.6 Mi Total
®
5. Take the Concord Mills Blvd exit, EXIT 49, toward Mall. Map
0.3 Mi
11.9 Mi Total
6. Turn left onto Bruton Smith Blvd. Map 0.2 Mi
12.1 Mi Total
t 7. Stay straight to go onto Concord Mills Blvd. Map 1.0 Mi
13.1 Mi Total
ro 8. Turn right onto Derita Rd. Map 1.0 Mi
14.1 Mi Total
9. Turn right onto Aviation Blvd NW. Map 0.4 Mi
14.5 Mi Total
■ 10. 7075 AVIATION BLVD NW is on the right. Map
9 7075 Aviation Blvd NW, Concord, NC 28027
Total Travel Estimate: 14.50 miles - about 17 minutes
©2015 MapQuest, Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the MapQuest Terms of Use. We make no guarantee of the accuracy of
their content, road conditions or route usability. You assume all risk of use. View Terms of Use

Proof of Ownership
7075 AVIATION BLVD NW CONCORD NC 28027
Account Information
PIN14: 46808021180000
Account Name 1: SL AVIATION BLVD LLC
Account Name 2:
Mailing Address:
C/O THE SILVERMAN GROUP 788 MORRIS TURNPIKE
Mail City:
SHORT HILLS
Mail State:
NJ
Mail Zip Code:
07078
Property Real ID:
02 -032G- 0001.00
Plat Book:
Plat Page:
Land Units:
12.469
Units Type: AC
Calculated Acreage: 12.48267
Calculated Acreage is determined based size on the size of the parcel in the GIS dataset.
Land Value: 831680
Building Value: 0
OBXF Value: 0
Assessed Value: 831680
Market Value: 831680

35° 23' 1T N
35° 23 7" N
Web Soil Survey Map
35° 23' IT N
a
u9i
m
0
0�
^m
N
�C�.7tR1 �L7'1JV �C792A1 7C77.A7 Y7]OU �LxtA/ 7L]6tlU bzb/3U �IU /uj S1Sti3U 5z5mJ
� 3
e Map Scale: 1:2,520 if printed on A (11" x 8.5') sheet
N o 35 70 140 2105
I-et
0 100 200 400 600
Map p gecbon: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: N/GS84 Edge bcs: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
35° 23'7 N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
�j
Soil Map Unit Polygons
y
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
Borrow Pit
X
Clay Spot
-
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
O
Perennial Water
e
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
S=
Slide or Slip
o,
Sodic Spot
Soil Map — Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Spoil Area
6 Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
r-r Rails
Interstate Highways
., US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 9, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011 —Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map — Cabarrus County, North Carolina
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Cabarrus County, North Carolina (NCO25)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CcD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
0.4
3.3%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
ChA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2
1.7
13.8%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
CuB2
Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
2.9
24.3%
slopes, moderately eroded
CuD2
Cullen clay loam, 8 to 15
7.1
58.7%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Totals for Area of Interest
12.1
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

NWI Map
t.x.
IKVr�
National Wetlands Invento
Thla map Is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Senate Is not
msponsible for the accuracy or currentness of the bass data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used In accordance with the layer metadata found on
User Remarks:
the Wetlands Mapper web site.
Wetlands
- reohwatrr C ne Veit
- -resnwater hXeve(LJ)mrub
- = suanne anc Marine Ceepwater
l �:7 s ±.janne anc Marine
Frcohwotcr Panc
_ Lake
- Rwenne
- :wer

FEMA Map
Property Real ID
Physical Address:
Owner Name 1:
Owner Name 2:
Mailing Address:
Mail City:
Mail State:
Mail Zip:
02- 032G- 0001.00
7075 AVIATION BLVD NW CONCORD NC 28027
SL AVIATION BLVD LLC
C/O THE SILVERMAN GROUP 788 MORRIS TURNPIKE
SHORT HILLS
NJ
07078
Parcel PIN
Land Units
Land Units Type
Calculated Acreage
Land Value
Building Value
Assessed Value
Market Value
Concord
Regonal
A irporl
7-11.
e
a.
c
46808021180000
12.469
AC
12.48267
831680
0
831680
831680
caoarrus Colntyshall not be new liable for any errors in the
Map Created By Cabarrus County IT Department
datarepresented onthis record. This includes errors of omission,
Data Sources: Cabarrus County Land Records
H
1:9,028
eommission,concerningthe contentofthe data, and relative
positional accuracy of the data. The data cannot be construed to
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 ft
be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was
Sources: Esri, HERE, Delorme, TomTorrt Intermap, increment P Corp..
compiled must beconsulted forverification
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
\ I r I n
of information represented on this map document.
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esd China (Fong Kong), swisstopo,
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 m
Ma pmylnd ia, © Ope nS treet Ma p co ntributors, and the G IS User Co mmn iry

NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
.0309 YADKIN RIVER
BASIN
Class
Name of Stream
Description
Class
Date
Index No.
Cedar Creek
From a point 0.5 mile
WS -IV;CA
08/03/92
13- 12 -(2)
upstream of Stanly County
SR 1740 to Lake Tillery,
Pee Dee River
Bunny Creek
From source to Lake
WS- IV,B;CA
08/03/92
13 -13
Tillery, Pee Dee River
Richland Creek
From source to a point 0.5
WS - IV,B
00/03/92
13- 14 -(1)
mile upstream of Montgomery
County SR 1111
Richland Creek
From a point 0.5 mile
WS- IV,B;CA
08/03/92
13- 14 -(2)
upstream of Montgomery
County SR 1111 to Lake
Tillery, Pee Dee River
Lower Richland Creek
From source to a point 0.5
WS -IV,B
08/03/92
13- 15 -(1)
mile upstream of mouth
Lower Richland Creek
From a point 0.5 mile
WS- IV,B;CA
08/03/92
13 15 (2)
upstream of mouth to Lake
Tillery, Pee Dee River
PEE DEE RIVER
From Norwood Dam to mouth
WS -V,B
08/03/92
13- (15.5)
of Turkey Top Creek
Clarks Creek
From source to Pee Dee River
C
07/01/73
13 -16
Dumas Creek
From source to Clarks Creek
C
09/01/74
13 -16 -1
Lather Branch
From source to Clarks Creek
C
09/01/74
13 -16 -2
Stony Fork
From source to Clarks Creek
C
09/01/74
13 -16 -3
Lick Fork
From source to Clarks Creek
C
09/01/74
13 -16 -4
Hall Branch
From source to Lick Fork
C
09/01/74
13- 16 -4 -1
Big Branch
From source to Clarks Creek
C
09/01/74
13 -16 -5
>�' 9�iit�if;;
Me RiV*r
From sou 1pee M
L
08/03/92
13 -17
Dye Creek (Branch)
From source to Rocky River
C
09/01/74
13 -17 -2
West Branch Rocky River
From source to Rocky River
C
09/01/74
13 -17 -3
South Prong West Branch
From source to West Branch
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -3 -1
Rocky River
Rocky River
ClarkP rrPek
From sonrrP to Porky River
C
n7 /01/71
11 -17 -4
North Prong Clarke Creek
From source to Clarke Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -4 -1
South Prong Clarke Creek
From source to Clarke Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -4 -2
Cane Creek
From source to South Prong
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -4 -2 -1
Clarke Creek
Ferreltown Creek
From source to Clarke Creek
C
07/01/73
13- 17 -4 -3
( Ferreltown Lake)
Ramah Creek
From source to Clarke Creek
C
07/01/73
13- 17 -4 -4
Mallard Creek
r'rom source to Rocky River
C:
09/01/'/4
Griffith Lakes
Entire lakes and connecting
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -5 -1
stream to Mallard Creek
Clarks Creek
From source to Mallard Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -5 -2
Doby Creek
From source to Mallard Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -5 -3
Toby Creek
From source to Mallard Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -5 -4
Stony Creek
From source to Mallard Creek
C
09/01/74
13- 17 -5 -5
2B .0300
Page 39 of 57 2013 -12 -09 10:52:22

The National Map
NOTES: Data available from U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program.
Hydrography Flow Map
Pw� 1 : ; t v ► 1 ,, #, (134441105111 fill l ;tll't1Sl1I
�.;n.�r1 lnul nt. Ii ll r
v�n1 o' Air ort usi 0 s „palrivile.
C.
2 f° I I i l t. •, t„ u. 1.
a i a
), w
i
�� -,r �. � .� -.- 'l uilunrnturl ru�,.11 I• Illlr 12- _.
La1
.utlµnlninini _.
1 a r� {{''•
t�
i �' •: i 11 in {Iri hint rK �`�. H�l•
2-
► d ailµ0j!uSn141n
1 t1 4 n tl44 Oil ur 4114µ11l 0501
_lit 1. I- T � �” ., �� � �� �,rr �A. � � �.;• r j /
3141( 1'
d/ lu µli11)sIN71U
11 Ali to
to 111501141111:1 � r • �,4 lydltb , d f 11II( 1
�:'" S.t p` i,. - r I _ I1111•IIII IK I1111S .-yp- F� .�
t ,r, i; ♦ � •6, t;l� f� Rocki�
t r [1 11
11312}IIIIKf11.110'r „ illf. 14 -
At Y �11 l 1
I.II,K.'F.', ,j
, - 11 311- 11111ItIII IMt ,
.�•, � �. ;� � 11 111(1, IMi ,,j1� -� - n�11 ;nIJI15ui(w�
I u
Q ll c 111 11 I e / M US National S
�. -_./ A. 1111. 1�_..l....... ..AC; 113 .<\ - 112111[1111[1{1112 .. , I Q p
Open in The National Map Viewer

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #� 8(indicaie on attached map)
;,o,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: SL Aviation Blvd, LLC 2. Evaluator's name: J Robertson
3. Date of evaluation: 5 -1 -2015
5. Name of stream: UT to Rocky River
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 55o acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 Total Length 430
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.386632
J McSwain
4. Time of evaluation: 10:00 am
6. River basin: Yadkin River Basin
8. Stream order: 2
10. County: Cabarrus
12. Subdivision name (if any): commercial development
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): - 80.717384
Method location determined (circle): GPS Tcpo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other G: S Other Google Earth
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
only stream on the property, two wetlands
14. Proposed channel work (if any): temporary impact for sewer line installation
I c RPrvnt xxrPnthPr rnni11Y1nnC' Clear. 75 degrees F during site visit.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Recent spring rains. Normal rainfall
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? I/S NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.5 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? )VS NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? VS NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential 30 % Commercial 40 % Industrial % Agricultural
10 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other( TOTAL 100
22. Bankfull width: 12 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight t/ Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 72 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature .dzkztw, Date May 27, 2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
W rrl�,
72
W__1 �, " 70,
STIC
SC "O
�' ,I b , :a�(, i^.J
y " Al~
. .'fu, 5..• aw.%'n - § ..4aa;; m','ou Pte" s``�t ,s ^$ k ."sc , .eL.a `?', h i "P, e -mon
p"d 4
PJF_,,-, 7T�
AM
5y 4
�;'(no
4
2,
e iv' 'e, I t e i i 6 i i,,A; tti&W �ak 1� is) ni
a _=j in
W1,
7, 0 6 5
3
OJ Iguo u mil'
TV "C M
in VJ
"o
s
(ex' ive e scha:Zges, rn Z t
0 J' v,­_:_,V_ISII�,I�w r,
-"."Ooo " V,� 'e'e Mxo'l
4
12, sp s s la s,--
png
-'*W
6 _t,i�iejr& x4a
'6;`�kee&`
-0,1- t
no dOl a"in i*liin,��'-ma,
-.7
3
,j
�'V
Vli
5, 1!, W5, o pv
;)
1�y. e
= av W-0;,fre;k 400
!0,
3
wa4", kd*fpin e i�&f
_j -
'K 4
MI"
It , " a V, �3
3
14 an"4j"j ;a'&O ax4 ints _y�,
__P9
'A ""m
ti 7S ^ fy
gp_-
9
WkOmiv hr 17iza
W
2
0 0 lam 00 • Ov
jj�
2
,
;, __(extensive deposition =,0
W, 2
''ANO"�rF SRI
ze max
-fih IW6 6ndu`s'5��,,Q;' oi
large; 5 E
3
____p
*,Xyi&-4�6-, dii el U
�n
Vw_
2
d` -'--'s leb
eep y in
-P,
.1", "K
3 IN& __121
-,erosiod,= 0* nd'e &
yere _M P
dWINA
W4,
2
' —� -
Root ile Q t d�,&i i y on hanks
l"Z
,visible
3
th
dAse�oArOugho ut max po "*v
-
i1i'li6pi6t,6�,',40 iWe��, K" k;,"--" '_­_d`
R ti
QW ti A� u
3
4
IL
rton gm
IT
dty
7
f
W.
4
z
(111eo 15,
Fg" "g p p�gV r s
A
Ns�,, oi
-
5
:ad
no_shadin �J. e&A
N ,
r_ly
Sibs r 4m&dde6eW"
dee id!'E' foo
2
�j�`�biriFed
k",
0"1
-ce .ofstrea&Jp 6, pAg"b 4)
S" §6 -4,
TMM
4
Og
Mwmaxpo ifi&Y,62 15-
h
f? "J" Ai! 6' f N
�6M�� r N ei 66 q
(
5�
­
3
�+ r
(no ev_iiience = °0`;eommon; numerous types mak
S, A�il
fj � i��s
N 41
L
"-"-d of,, al' v
, ;,-Z, ' ' E ,J ,4
Avu,"A
;A �fi Q ',,'e`abphd a fi t, c y m
- -1 1
W go'
4
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
W rrl�,
72

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5-1-2015
Project/Site: SL Aviation
Blvd, LLC
Latitude: 35.386632
Evaluator:J Robertson J MCSwain
county: Cabarrus
Longitude:- 80.717384
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 51
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Kannapolis
at
if z 19 or perennial if 2: 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Per�flnial
P
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 25 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a_ Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual'
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 16.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
0
1
1
1.5
3
3
3
2
2
2
1.5
1.5
0
1.5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II City /County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 05/01/2015
Applicant/Owner: SL Aviation Blvd, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: UL
Investigator(s): Robertson MCSwain Section, Township, Range: Concord
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope ( %): 0 -2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.386632 Long: - 80.717384 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Mao Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation U Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes 0 No 0
Yes ❑ No_r_7_T
Yes= No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aaDly)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
lAquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches)
Yes 0 No 0
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present.) Yes n No Fy
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
floodplain area, frequently flooded for short duration
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
= Total Cover
30
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Celtis occidentalis
15
Y
FACU
2. Platanus occidentalis
20
Y
FACW
3. Juglans nigra
20
Y
FACU
4.
FAC species 3 x 3 = 9
5.
UPL species x 5 =
6.
(B)
55.00 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.50 20% of total cover: 11
SaDlino Stratum (Plot size: 15' 1
1. Acer negundo 15 Y FAC
2. Prunus americana 5 Y FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1
1. no shrubs
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Allium canadense
2.Oxalis corniculata
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Helianthus tuberosus
5. Galium mollugo
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
42 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 21 20% of total cover: 8.4
7 Y FAC
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1 .4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: UL
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20%
of total cover:
Number of Dominant Species
7
N
FACU
10
Y
FACU
10
Y
FAC
10
Y
FACU
7
N
FACU
42 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 21 20% of total cover: 8.4
7 Y FAC
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1 .4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: UL
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 44.4%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: MultiDIv bv:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 1 x 2 = 2
FAC species 3 x 3 = 9
FACU species 7 x 4 = 28
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 11 (A) 39
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
F-12 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes n No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0 -4 7.5 YR 3/3 100
4 -16 7.5 YR 4/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
02 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
E3 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
® Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
✓
❑ ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
project/site: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II City /County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 05/01/2015
Applicant/Owner: SL Aviation Blvd, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: WL 1000
Investigator(s): Robertson MCSWain Section, Township, Range: Concord
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope ( %): 0 -2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.386632 Long: - 80.717384 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E_71 No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil �, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes F71 0 No =
7 1
Yes I No=
Yes= No=
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired
❑Surface Water (Al)
F71 High Water Table (A2)
F71 Saturation (A3)
✓❑ Water Marks (Bi)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑✓ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
�✓ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Field Observations:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
check all that aaoly)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes EZI No 0
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes= No ❑ Depth (inches): 2-12
Water Table Present? Yes= No ❑ Depth (inches): 4 -6
Saturation Present? Yes Q No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WL 1000
30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Platanus occidentalis
15
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Betula nigra
7
N
FACW
Fi i
raxnus enns lvanca
3• p y
15
Y
FACW
Total Numbers Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4. Acer rubrum
20
Y
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
SaDlina Stratum (Plot size:
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acer negundo
3.
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Alnus serrulata
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Carex sop.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
57.00 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 28.50 20% of total cover: 11 Total %Cover of: MultiDiv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
15 1
15 Y FAC FACW species x 2 =
15 Y FAC FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
1
10 Y FACW
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
10 Y FACW
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
p✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
ED 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Ej Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes �✓ No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WL 1000
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -4 10 YR 4/2 70 masses and ox rhiz
7.5 YR 5/8 30
4 -16 10 YR 6/2 70
2.5 YR 3/6 15
2.5 YR 5/8 15
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
El 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) D Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ✓❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ® Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes Wl No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II City /County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 05/01/2015
Applicant/Owner: SL Aviation Blvd, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: WL 2000
Investigator(s): Robertson MCSWain Section, Township, Range: Concord
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope ( %): 2 -6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.386632 Long: - 80.717384 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CheWacla NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -L v No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetation Soil �, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes F__71 No =
Yes No=
Yes J L No =
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoaly)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
1 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Yes 571 No 0
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di )
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes= No ❑ Depth (inches): 0-2
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes Q No ❑ Depth (inches): 4 -12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
1. Salix nigra
10
Y FACW
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Y FACW
3. Acer rubrum
15
Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
35.00
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
17.50 20% of total cover: 7
SaDlino Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1, Liquidambar styraciflua
10
FAC
2. Acer negundo
10
FAC
3. Acer rubrum
10
FAC
4.
5.
6.
30
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Impatiens capensis
2. Juncus effusus
3. Carex spp.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
20% of total cover:
15
Y
FACW
15
Y
FACW
15
Y
FACW
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
20 Y FAC
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WL 2000
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Q✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Ej Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓n No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WL 2000
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0 -3 10 YR 2/2 65 masses and ox rhiz
10 YR 5/8 35
3 -16 7.5 YR 6/2 70
10 YR 3/6 15
2.5 YR 5/8 15
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
® Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
21-ocation: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
Ej 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
D Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑✓ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
® Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Rel NoEl
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II
State:NC County/parish/borough: Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.386632'_N, Long. - 80.717384° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Rocky River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Yadkin River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 030401050102
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
' Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
E3 Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 5/1/2015
SECTION lI: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There e -nq "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
R Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Q Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the US." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
>D TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
0 Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 4301inear feet: 15 width (fl) and/or 0.15 acres.
Wetlands: 0.131 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 4987�Deliiieationtftih l
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: non jurisdictional drainage, high ground within floodplain of UT to Rocky River.
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapaoos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
sldp to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 550 ac s
Drainage area: 550 acres
Average annual rainfall: 43.21 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4.12 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30:(or.'more) river miles from TNW.
,.. r-
Project waters are lY(or:Iess) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 30!(or.mo er) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are � or�less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: the project is not located along a state border.
Identify flow route to TNW5: UT to Rocky River to Pee Dee River to Yadkin River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 3.
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that anolv):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 15 feet
Average depth: 2 feet
Average side slopes: 3�1 .
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover: 5
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable.
Presence of run /riffle /pool complexes. Explain: beaver activity is affecting presence of runs and riffles.
Tributary geometry: Relatively stra 04
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 5 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: SeasonaGfloW
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20'' o`rIgrea`ter)
Describe flow regime: perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: ;Overland ilf - ow. Characteristics: overland flooding with floodplain for short duration.
Subsurface flow: ;I7nkn6vi n. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
® sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain: .
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 20 -30'.
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Wetland 1000.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.131 acres
Wetland type. Explain:herbaceous and forested.
Wetland quality. Explain:good.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: this project is not adjacent to a state border.
events.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Ii6e ,n tt67 fl, ow. Explain:
Surface flow is: O.,`verland"stieetfl_ ow
Characteristics: during storm events.
Subsurface flow: Unkiiowri. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
® Ecological connection. Explain: hydrologic connection from WL -2000 to Y&- 1000 frequently during storm
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximitv (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 30 „(4Wmore) river miles from TNW.
. 'P. L 1�1-. r.'r
Project waters are 30 (( more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland'to navigable wafeis.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500- y °ea`r.`ors "gieater, floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water color is brown, good quality.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:herbaceous and woody.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:beaver, birds, deer, etc.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Z
Approximately ( 0. 131 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Y 0.066
N 0.065
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: provides storm storage, provides
habitat, provides for water quality enhancement.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: WL 2000 has a significant nexus to WL 1000 which is directly abutting the UT to Rocky River, these two wetlands
are close in proximity just not directly abutting each other.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
[] Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: NCDWQ Stream ID form score is perennial, flow observed, macros found in stream bed. .
R Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 430 linear feetl5width (ft).
®_ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
B Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: direct hydrologic connection (surface water).
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.065acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Q Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
0 Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
E] which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
":.' from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
El which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Q Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III. D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Q If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: non jurisdictional
drainage feature.
da,
r� Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Q Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
t Other non- wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
® Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): 5001inear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
0 Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
0 Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
a Corps navigable waters' study:
Q U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:7.5 Kannapolis.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:NFHL GIS layer.
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):
El Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
El Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Q Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

Concord Airport Business Park Phase II - Site Photographs
Wetland 1000
Wetland 1000
Soils at upland data form
UT to Rocky River at sewer line crossing

UT to Rocky River looking upstream from sewer crossing
Wetland 2000
UT to Rocky River looking downstream from sewer crossing
Non - jurisdictional drainage feature

MA
RUN COIR ROLLS PARALLEL
TO THE STRE4MB4NK
� y
a
Q /�\ TRIANGULAR LIVE STAKE SPACING
STAGGERED I' — 3' APART
a O v O
NOTES
1. Run two rows of coin matting beyond the top of bank
2. Harvest and plant live stakes during the dormant season
J. Livestakes should extend down into mid — summer water table
4. Stagger live stakes and space them I' — 3' apart
5. Use a rigid steel pilot bar to prepare planting holes in firm soi /s
6. Soak live stakes for 24 hours prior to installation
7 After installing, tamp soil securely around the stake
I��]1GG'1�7�7�1y1��
VIRONMENTAL
712 English Tudor Lane Charlotte, NC 28211
(980) 819 - 7780 • www.attasenvi.com../ \
FINISH GRADE IS SEEDED,
AND COVERED WITH STR4W
AND COIR MATTING
TRENCH AND BURY
EDGES OF COIR FABRIC
?ED WITH
STAKES
1,
L/VESTAKE INSTALLED
WITH 75% BURIED
N
J
Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 1 of 1
Live Stakes and _ Construction Typical
C O i r Matting — - Live Stakes / Coir Matting
J ` *Conceptual Plan - Not For Construction.,/

Concord Airport Business Park Phase II, SL Aviation Blvd, LLC
Aviation Blvd, Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Desktop Review Summary (Federal Listed Species)
Summary of Database Searches and Desktop Review for Federal ME Species
-the project is located on the Kannapolistopoquadrangle
-a one mile radius from the approximate project boundary overlaps onto the Harrisburg topoquadrangle
to the south
- Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), an endangered species and Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), a threatened species are known to occur within Cabarrus County; Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocepholus), a protected species is known to occur within the Kannapolis topoquadrangle; and Schweinitz's
Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), an endangered species is known to occur within the Harrisburg
topoquadrangle
-there are five known element occurrence within a one mile radius of the boundary of the project
according to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer as of June 7, 2015; these are
Carolina Darter (Etheostoma collis) (a federal species of concern), colonial wading bird colony (an
animal assemblage), piedmont /mountain semipermanent impoundment (open water subtype) (a
natural community), piedmont /mountain semipermanent impoundment (piedmont marsh subtype),
and piedmont /mountain semipermanent impoundment (shrub subtype)
-the project area has been disturbed recently, the majority of the property is early successional field
growth with a small forested area, the project area is surrounding by existing development including
the Concord Airport
-no Schweinitz's Sunflower were observed during the Waters of the US delineation fieldwork
-it is highly unlikely that Northern Long -Eared Bat or Bald Eagle exist on the property due to the lack of
forested areas and distance from the nearest large body of water
Recommendation
-the completed database searches and summary above should be sufficient for any Waters of the US
permitting needs related to Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 39

Table 2. NC NHP Kannapolis Quadrangle Search Results (May 28, 2015)
STATE
AP
TAXONOMIC GROUP
(SCIENTIFIC NAME
(COMMON NAME
(STATUS
STATUS`
RANK
RANK
HABITAT COMMENT
TOPO MAP
STATUS
Vascular Plant
�Acmispon helleri
(Carolina Birdfoot - trefoil
ISC -V
FSC
S3
G3
open woods over clay soils, roadsides
Kannapolis
Current
Animal Assemblage
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
I
S3
G5
Kannapolis
Current
wetland forests in the Coastal Plain; rocky, upland forests
elsewhere [NHP tracking only den /hibernacula sites and
Reptile
Crotalus horridus
Timber Rattlesnake
SC
S3
G4
selected isolated populations]
Kannapolis
Current
Vascular Plant
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
E
FSC
S2
G3
grassy balds, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafic rock
Kannapolis
Historical
Vascular Plant
Desmodium sessilifolium
Sessile Tick - trefoil
SC -H
SH
G5
open woodlands
Kannapolis
Historical
Natural Community
Dry Basic Oak -- Hickory Forest
5253
G2G3
Kannapolis
Current
Freshwater Fish
Etheostoma collis
Carolina Darter
SC
FSC
S3
G3
streams in the Piedmont
Kannapolis
Current
53B,S3
mature forests near large bodies of water (for nesting); lakes
Bird
Halraeetus leucocephalus
Bald EagIF
T
N
GS
and sounds (for foraging) [nesting sites only]
Kannapolis
Current
Piedmont /Mountain Semipermanent
Natural Community
Impoundment (Open Water Subtype)
S4
G4G5
Kannapolis
Current
Piedmont /Mountain Semipermanent
Natural Community
Impoundment (Piedmont Marsh Subtype)
S4
G4?
Kannapolis
Current
Piedmont /Mountain Semipermanent
Natural Community
Impoundment (Shrub Subtype)
S4
G4
Kannapolis
Current
fields, pastures; host plants -- mustard species (Family
Butterfly
Pontia protodice
Checkered White
SR
SiS2
G4
<i >Brassicaceae < /i >)
Kannapolis
Current
dry woodlands, openings, and glades, especially over mafic
Vascular Plant
Pseudognaphalium hellen
Heller's Rabbit - Tobacco
SR -P
S3
G3G4
rocks
Kannapolis
Current
Vascular Plant
Silphium perfoliatum
Northern Cup -plant
T
S1
G5
floodpiains
Kannapolis
Current
Pee Dee, Catawba, and Cape Fear systems (endemic to North
Freshwater Bivalve
Villosa vaughaniana
Carolina Creekshell
E
FSC
S2
G2
Carolina and adjacent South Carolina)
Kannapolis
Current

Table 3. NC NHP Harrisburg
Quadrangle Search Results (May 28, 2015)
SIATE
1
TAXONOMIC GROUP
(SCIENTIFIC NAME
(COMMON NAME
(STATUS
(STATUS`
[RANK RANK
(HABITAT COMMENT TOPO MAP STATUS
Vascular Plant
Acmtspon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot - trefoil
SC -V
FSC
S3 G3
open woods over clay sods, roadsides Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Anemone berlandieri
Southern Anemone
E
S2 G4?
thin sods around rock outcrops, usually on basic soil Harrisburg Historical
Vascular Plant
Anemone caroliniana
Prairie Anemone
E
S1 G5
clayey woodlands over mafic rocks Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Baptisia australis var. aberrans
Prairie Blue Wild Indigo
E
S2 G5T2
glades and open forests on basic sods Harrisburg Historical
Natural Community
Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
S3S4 G3G4
Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Cardamine dissecta
Dissected Toothwort
SC -V
S2 G4?
rich woods, cove forests, bottomlands Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Carex baileys
Bailey's Sedge
SR -P
S2 G4
bogs and seeps Harrisburg Historical
bogs, marshes, swamps, brownwater floodplain forests and
Vascular Plant
Carex projecta
Necklace Sedge
SR -P
S3 GS
openings Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Cirsium carolinianum
Carolina Thistle
E
S2 G5
forests and disturbed areas, mostly on basic soils Harrisburg Historical
Animal Assemblage
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
S3 GS
Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
E
FSC
S2 G3
grassy balds, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafic rock Harrisburg Historical
Dry-Mesic Basic Oak -- Hickory Forest
Natural Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
S3 G3G4
Harrisburg Current
Dry-Mesic Oak -- Hickory Forest (Piedmont
Natural Community
Subtype)
S4 G4G5
Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Helianthus schweinitrn
Schweinitx's Sunflower
E
E
S3 G3
open woods, roadsides, and other tights -of -way Harrisburg Current
Vascular Plant
Hexalectris spicata
Crested Coralroot
SR -P
S2 G5
dry or mesic woods on basic sods Harrisburg Current
Catawba and Pee Dee drainages (endemic to this area in
Freshwater Bivalve
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
E
E
S1 G3
North Carolina and adjacent South Carolina) Harrisburg Historical
Natural Community
Low Elevation Seep (Typic Subtype)
53 G3?
Harrisburg Current
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Natural Community
Subtype)
54 G3G4
Harrisburg Current
Natural Community
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
S4 G4
Harrisburg Current
Natural Community
Piedmont Levee Forest (Typic Subtype)
S3S4 G3G4
Harrisburg Current
Piedmont /Mountain Semipermanent
Natural Community
Impoundment (Piedmont Marsh Subtype)
S4 G4?
Harrisburg Current
INatural
Piedmont /Mountain Semipermanent
Community
Impoundment (Shrub Subtype)
S4 G4
Harrisburg Current
dry woodlands, openings, and glades, especially over mafic
Vascular Plant
Pseudognaphalium helleri
Heller's Rabbit - Tobacco
SR -P
S3 G3G4
rocks Harrisburg Historical
Vascular Plant
Symphyotrichum georgianum
Georgia Aster
T
C
S3 G3
open woods, roadsides, and other rights -of -way Harrisburg Current
Natural Community
Upland Depression Swamp Forest
5253 G2G3
Harrisburg Current
Pee Dee, Catawba, and Cape Fear systems (endemic to North
Freshwater Bivalve
Villosa vaughaniana
Carolina Creekshell
E
FSC
S2 G2
Carolina and adjacent South Carolina) Harrisburg Current
INatural
Xeric Hardpan Forest (Basic Hardpan
Community
Subtype)
S2 G2G3
Harrisburg Current

AWMA a
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat Mc Cory Biyan Goway Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Dim=r Secretary
June 7, 2015
Jennifer Robertson
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211
[e-mail]
RE: Concord Airport Business Park Phase II
Dear Jennifer Robertson:
NCNHDE -333
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there
are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed
areas within the proposed project boundary.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference. Please note that although there may be no documentation of
natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area
may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for site - specific surveys
where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation /managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally - listed species are documented near the
project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at all ison.weaklev(@ncdenr.aov or
919.707.8629.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Concord Airport Business Park Phase II
June 7, 2015
NCNHDE -333
nt Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
a i ^55�� W,s,.''`,;;, rw.�Y,44`ig" •: bj r :' Y'
�+"ar 4.. ', z
'• a;X. .Arx �i` .rd .a,.,. - n'Y'}.`ri`,r ri ry l.af<N'`.P,: v1�S �+2+"
-�'a -'$: `9.�` •
',.
Statuses`s
,� g'�g,° 3Y92yb^�t y`uy • C ;da`aaY.9 . Q ,. _ •,a . �..„
.. ' u.. 5 l �N a -u .4' ?• }
N��
,.Dated
t ::..t;°
, .'.a
.,1'5928',,,
Colonial Wading Bird
2004.
Current` - •
5 -.Very
G5 S3
Colony
'�
.'Low
rater Fish
15945
Etheostoma collis
Carolina Darter 1998 -06 -23
Current
3- Medium Species of
Special G3 S3
Concern
Concern
I`
19888
Piedmont/Mountain
- -- _ 2010
„ ' Current.- , '
- `4 -Low - --
- -- G4G5 . S4 _
?nity '
Semipermanent
_
Impoundment (Open
=
Water Subtype)
.. �. -
1
30602
Piedmont/Mountain
- -- 2010
Current
3- Medium - --
- -- G4? S4
.Inity
Semipermanent
Impoundment (Piedmont
Marsh Subtype)
30603
- .Piedmont/Mountain
- -- , : 2010_, -�;
= �_- _Current_
37Medium - --
- -- G4 S4
unity ``: :,.
Semipermanent.,_
- ..: -,.
Impoundment (Shrub
Subtype)__
I Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Slx _ -I `1zn� -"-e , � ' i K °.,,...,.. �., . x .::.:x. ,mn^ - a.. a .,s... _a-^.. # r,., 1 ` a' t ;�..
mew _. �a " x „Representational Rating � _, Collective. Rating
_-
Creek Heron Rookery'" R4 (Moderate)_ ', a �- C5 (General) ;
ed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the
Area
is and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https:// ncnhde .natureserve.ora /content/help. Data query generated on June 7, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2015. Please resubmit your
on request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2of3

NCNHDE-333: Concord Airport Business Park Phase 11
June 7, 2015
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
[] Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
/* -
z
1:22,195
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources. Esn, HERE. Dkonne. TomTorm Intern p. incfen*m P Cap.,
GEBCO. USGS. FAO, NPS NRCAN. GeoBase, IGN, Kadastm NL.