820090_Routine Inspection_20230801

JZ
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: iPlRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time. �l$/�/ Departure Time: ® County. F� Region:
Farm Name: &41y � 0 `G � ynp G Owner Email:
Owner Name: ar1M&t AD/ Cuivix2 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: G Title:
Onsite Representative: 4
Certified Operator: Iy [��
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator•
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
MAN z{aaa##lm.`at:Ft9di§00
0 #t MI±±ns@@ds## anIX b§4
ggggX# 9t##&sg8Spp4b i?'"+}d#d. dp&
fi4k &:bffi �ppd'G A/¢$Cffia#ffi
#9�§, 4# d# ,&
$iNeS n a�yrt#gt440#S4s#*Am
RO+k+#Nati mats awaa••aflus#3ff gigiA$+b#tY'4 maar 6fl$'�35,##P'It dt'bF#g4++50N,pd ld•A##%W sit{#@d0 tiA89#�YS&a#
`B6 ,s ssa#'fit#adk da$
#m4NO,460 1,ganyy9{Yl�}nn@ #s `MIA Yp* V,,tp0410,4so"M 54gb� I niR.(�y�
��i $&$tt
ays1q�A:Fg`#&4'P
4$s�VWgI¢L Va tsi a#n W. asr�ob $9 b0 N46R #ks tI,A4j,s#ffi�,4 wk> sCcP A #
fill,
$ Gt 4s�9ra dA4d48e#k#{a#5.�s9'#d
v
M.:'fr$+b a' i?i'd## s,NA Yd aV�Hka pB§iR #. $ ' IVIC's d+��£si �a �x o9WT*N 'A i .q
Wean to Finish
Layer Dairy Cow
d� Wean to Feeder
ar Non Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
jf¢�
a & fit bra It %' § p 2
s ran;#d a v$ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean1414,Dr
��g
Cow;
�taa
Farrow to Feeder
a� a
* rgJ us#aIS ,E.sxj ai Non -Dairy;
g' Farrow to Finish
a° Layers5 Beef Stocker'
*.. Gilts
p' Non -Layers Beef Feeder
94
&*;' Pullets to Beef Brood Cow
§ .d# a9�# m{ It id d§##.M A A a dE##,a#bk#R fr<08� 43 �
rya Boars
ask 6&d #atr 4€dk
#GSM de 96 £'d#d�'fi ffi'44 b#8#
4%49.'&4# 3
�da'aa tat ana a(a a
p #t 4 a a*
k$d^drdaf#4 man
"63aa 4 #$t �#S 4Es
as Turkeys era•• anaax arnara maaaxet namansnm#a.>d mdaa#a
n 4fl 4ic 6484, MAIN pffi.&ffiKK## @ %A 9 0.5*mrt'$a,#
�#MAN%s�••9
;b
MY ,�eaab'rIIYu«
maar*n
Turke Points n'°a3 Aa'�4a0*0aaranrana°taa,
r �{asaar an wro�'rrs a rfe d a #
Other § a �s°aw �r?�UHH1,1
a sstag s:, as .. k **.. �. #. w §&�aa' k8'r s
' xos a
AN
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes J::]�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes__�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes _-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 5/I212020 Continued

Facility Number: 9,1 - qO I I Date of Inspection: / �-3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E - o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 02
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 611
Cam/
Observed Freeboard (in): 7_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes _Lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need mntenance or improvement?
❑ Yes E'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack ad/equate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ,❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require ❑ Yes --E]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes -EfrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 'ley 0
S L/J '1- sw
13.Soil Type(s):�i1i�t�t/ter
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �F--No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes JD'l�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 4Er'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes -e-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes fn'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes -F rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes _,[D-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - ()
Date of Inspection: el , a-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _E�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes L2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
ew'n, a"O'd _'eeft� �k�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes 4ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes. 1:;PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,[jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �M-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes M-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes F.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Phone: 'Flo F-U = z�J
Date: r /�j
511212020

FACILITY#: V;' `6 FARM NAME: LJ LAGOON
PERMIT mg)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (Ki)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER ? C
DATE �(!S l a.,3 NITROGEN LEVEL / /! 4 FJ
DATE �I & 123 NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE '/ `7 1 a-Jl NITROGEN LEVEL
Id-1j lgla-) /%
SOIL REPOVw,) 1"d
- EVERY 3 YEARS: - DATE IO //fie /ab
P-1 (NO MORETHEN 400)
PH (Nate if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN N00)
OF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RA
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
IRR2 (421)
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N)
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION X4)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE C LI RATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION ; hh
FLOW RATES �, -b ;;k-05r-
RAIN FALL p2i)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT .
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (mi a2s)
DUE R: D VERY YEAR:
.� 0: % P:t % % RATIO OF SLUDGE
Ft .1 O: P: q'N % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (n22 AND 421)
IV
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1-t- Ends September 30t
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30w
Cotton: Opens March 15*h - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September in -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1-t- Ends April 15f^ -
Wheat: Opens September 1-t- Ends April 30t
Soybeans:OpensApriltst-Ends September15t^
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31st