Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100691 Ver 1_Nutrient Closeout Report_20150611Project Name Project ID Project Type Basin 14 digit CU County Applicable Buffer Rule Date Planted Date of Supplemental Plant Protection mechanism Easement Acreage Stewards Encroachments & Resolution Accepted for transfer to stewardship NC DMS Closeout Report 6/11/15 Heath Riparian Buffer site 94014 Nutrient Offset Project Neuse 03020202080010 Craven Neuse Buffer Rules 2/2010 NA Easement 60.63 ac DENR NA Table 1. Site Restoi,ation Structures and Objectives Component Summation Restoration Level Nuhient Offset Restoration Riparian buffer mitigation was completed by planting the entire Site with 59.95 Nutrient Offset Restoration Credits native forest vegetation. credit kvas received for 59.95 acres of the Site. Thi- project was constricted mi late minterear v � in;� 2'0'10_ Site restoradion .actilAtiea resulted iu j9.95 unit - o ° ripmiao. buffer restoration M be u3ed for nu ri.eut of eo mi6gauon. The Site will be protected ITy aeaneat crati eaeet_A- w ale, denitief- ee-ton plots acro3s the Site were above the re�giured .320 stems per afire with au i erage of 929 planted 3Tm3 per acre coun ug to -wards nParLari_ lxtifer su®cce ., in lie Fifth Mc itoring Year (-! D14)_ Heath Nutrient Offset Restoration Credits = 59.45 Easement = 60.62 acres Vegetation Plots - surface Water within Easement =0.67 acre Nutrient Offset Restoration Area = 59.95 acres (2,511,560 sq.ff) Vegetation Plot Origins MONITORING PLAN VIEW ��€ FlGIHi€ 2195now Avenge HEATH oar: ,�j Raleigh, HC 27603 Dec 24114 Ll (919) 215 -1993 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Craven County, North Carolina —­ IM. 10-001 Monitoring Summary and Data: Vegetation Data Summary Summary of Planted Stem Vegetation Plot Results Planted Stems/Acre (Hirdwood Trees Countinq Toward Riparian Buffer Success ❑111v) Plot Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year (2010) (2011) (2012) (2013) (2014) 1 890 1053 1053 1093 1053 971 972 972 891 931 850 1012 1012 1012 1012 4 1012 1053 1053 1053 1012 5 931 1012 1012 1134 1134 6 850 350 850 7695 769 7 1012 972 972 972 972 8 688 769 810 769 729 9 850 850 891 891 891 10 1012 1053 1012 1012 1053 11 931 1093 1134 1134 1134 12 850 810 810 810 810 13 728 729 719 688 729 14 890 891 931 891 850 15 850 850 891 891 769 16 728 729 607 607 607 17 931 850 850 850 769 18 728 729 810 769 810 19 728 648 729 729 688 20 1052 1012 1053 1053 972 21 1052 1053 1053 1012 972 22 931 931 931 9,31 931 23 1012 972 972 972 972 24 971 972 972 972 972 25 486 445 445 445 445 26 486 496 486 486 486 27 486 486 486 486 445 28 445 445 445 445 445 29 607 567 567 567 567 A) erase Plots 1-29 826 837 846 939 829 2014 — Year 5 Plot Data REAM 2O14 Year M Total Planted Stems (No Livestakeo by Plot and Species Type Species CemmonName 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1s 18 17 18 1'} 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (tree Cmprnwscaralinrana American hornbeam 1 8 1 6 3 2 1 2 2 31 tree Carya hickory 1 2 2 _ tree Caryaavata shagbark hickory 1 tree Ceitis Paevigato sugarberry 1 4 1 1 2 (tree Fra rnus peansylvan ra green ash 2 3 5 1 2 4 2 7 5 2 3 1 1 3 4 4 3 16 8 10 2 4 2 5 5 31 tree Magnahn virgWano sweetbay 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 11 tree Nyssa tupelo 1 3 1 (tree Nyssa syiv:arica blackgum 2 2 1 5 5 9 6 3 2 3 4 tree Persea paous0rrs swamp bay 1 tree Piatanus ocvdeatafis American sycamore i tree arrerrus oak 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 Itree Quercm michauxir swamp chestnut oak 13 6 8 8 19 4 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 4 8 iO 3 6 9 3 3 4 9 13 1 1 1 tree Quercus nigm water sale 4 3 10 3 1 2 1 6 1 1 6 5 6 2 6 2 3 2. 4 11 tree Qrrercus phefias wiI[Dw oak 2 1 7 2 7 2 2 4 10 17 7 4 11 3 2 4- 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 61 tree Quercm mbm northern red oak 1 Itree Ulmus elm 2 1 2 Itnee 01mus americana American elm 2 1 3 fi 7 1 2 9 3 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 Stem count 26 23 25 25 28 19 24 18 22 26 38 20 18 21 19 1.5 19 20 17 24 24 23 24 24 11 12 11 11 141 Totals I Species count 6 7 6 7 5 6 10 6 7 4 4 7 6 6 7 5 6- 6 S 7 5 6 5 5 5 4 5 3 61 Stems per ACRE 10153 931 1012 1012 1134 7fi9 972 72'5 891 1053 1134 810 729 850 769 EO7 769 8101 688 972 972 531 972 972 445 486 445 445 567 Stem count 26 23 25 25 28 19 24 18 22 26 28 24 18 21 19 15 19- 20 17 24 24 23 24 24 11 12 11 11 141 Riparian Buffer Success CrIberla Species count 6 7 6 7 5 6 10 6 7 4 4 7 6 6 7 5 6- 6 S 7 5 6 5 5 5 4 S 3 fil Stems per ACRE 10153 931 1012 1012 1134 769 972 723 891 1053 1134 810 729 850 769 fiO7 769 810 688 972 972 931 972 972 445 486 445 445 567 "Bolded hardwood tree species are counted tows n_ riparian buffer success cofterra Appendix A: Project Correspondence A� NCDENA Norin Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resouroes Pat 'Ac.-Crory Govet1or TO Jeff offer NCEEP From Katie _Merritt .ICI % Division of Water Resources Throws A. Reeder DIrKtOr Feb 257, 2014 Re_ Year 4 Monitoringy Report Re�.inv Con=ents Death Riparian Butfe- ';,atigyation Site Craven County EEP �- 0o??8f1 DW, � 14 -0691 John E_ SWarla. III ecretar f On T.au 21; 2014; the DIVision of Water RemLrces (DWR) received the Year 4 Monitoring Report for the above - referenced Site. dated— Noveaber 2013_ A review of the repor- showed that the entire Site etas nwetmg success C Gifu for plawed stems. cc rdin to t' e r eport; this site WE'l generate . # acres f Ripw=13u�er hfiti9ation L;nits. However, according to f.reliciv, correspondence from T}WT, only nurrient oft credit3 are approved to be generated siune tie -e are no btffered streams onsite. On Febniary 20, 2114: a regue3- for the subject site s ledoer info.mnzvn kka3 suhnntted to Ke114 Wli@lit-nn3 a -ith EE,P. On Febau;an 20; _'u14, Jeff Schaffer coed±.7t EEP' 14S project database shoes that rlus projectuiU provide 39.45 acres (2,589:642 sq. ft.) c:'_ NUtne.,t Oils ,& only. Please let free to contac- nie at (919) 07-6371 if you have and= questions regarding this correspondence. Cc.- File CoM, (Katie Merritt) Tim BatunLzaruer (E EP) Appendix B: Debit Ledger