PCN_Linville Stream Crossing_Addtional Info_08.01.2023

August 1, 2023

RE: Linville Stream Crossing – (Avery County)
DWR #20230802

This package includes additional information and attachments pertinent to Pre-Construction
Notification for proposed stream crossings in Avery County, NC. The property is owned by
Grandfather Golf and Country Club and is located off Chestnut Road in Linville, NC. A PCN was
originally submitted on 06/05/2023.

Please find the following materials included in this submission:
• PCN Submission from 06/05/2023
• PCN amendments (PDF)
• PCN Attachments including:
a. Agent Authorization Form
b. Plat
c. USFWS Biological Assessment with Attachments
d. NC SHPO Map (HPO Web Mapper)
e. PJD Package with Attachments
i. Stream Determination Forms
ii. Wetland Determination Form
iii. Photographs
iv. USGS Topo Map
v. NRCS Soil Map
vi. NWI Map
vii. FEMA Firmette
f. Solid Rock Engineering Geotechnical Report
g. Site Plans (Jurisdictional Determination Map with Proposed Site Plans)
If you have any questions, please reach out to me directly.
Sincerely,

Sarah Kilby
Interface Environmental Consulting, LLC.
828-773-5523

PCN Submission Copy
06/05/2023
DWR#20230802
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 1/15

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right-click on the document and you can
print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:*
If this is a courtesy copy, please fill in this with the submission date.
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?*
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Is this a NCDMS Project *
A. Processing Information
5/4/2023
Yes No
Avery
Yes No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-applicant.
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 2/15
DO NOT CHECK YES, UNLESS YOU ARE DMS OR CO-APPLICANT.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
*
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Yes
No
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
Yes No
18 - Minor Discharges
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Yes No
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 3/15
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
You must submit a copy of the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-
Coordination/Trout.aspx
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
1b. Primary Contact Email:*1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
1d. Who is applying for the permit?*
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
Yes No
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
Yes No
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Rebekah Wood
rwood@grandfatherclubnc.
com
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
Yes No
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 4/15
2. Owner Information
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address *
2e. Telephone Number:*
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
Grandfather Golf & Country Club
283/294
(for Corporations)
Rebekah Wood
City
Linville
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
28646
Country
USA
Street Address
PO Box 368
Address Line 2
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
4a. Name:*
4b. Business Name:
Sarah Kilby
(if applicable)
Interface Environmental Consulting, LLC
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 5/15
1a. Name of project:*
1b. Subdivision name:
1c. Nearest municipality / town:*
4c. Address *
4d. Telephone Number:*
4e. Fax Number:
4f. Email Address:*
City
Boone
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
28607
Country
USA
Street Address
476 Hidden Pond Rd
Address Line 2
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
Linville Stream Crossing
(if appropriate)
Linville, NC
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 6/15
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey-grade GPS
device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile
phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal
place.)
Latitude:*Longitude:*
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
2. Project Identification
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
186700004108 (in acres)
City
Linville
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
28646
Country
Street Address
225 Chestnut Road
Address Line 2
36.108388
ex: 34.208504
-81.842346
-77.796371
Unnamed Tributary to Linville River
C;Tr
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 7/15
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application:*
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the
past?*
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Catawba
030501010301
The project site is located in the northeast portion of Grandfather Golf & Country Club, off Chestnut Rd and
comprised of one parcel, PIN 186700004108. Three (3) features exist on-site draining northeast to southwest;
one ephemeral channel, one intermittent channel, and one seep. The project site is forested and mountainous
with an old woods road. The surrounding area is comprised of private residences.
Yes No Unknown
0.017
(intermittent and perennial)
226
The purpose of the proposed project is to add a stream crossing over the intermittent channel (unnamed
tributary to Linville River) for a proposed driveway via a 20ftx36" arch culvert equivalent.
The proposed project to cross an unnamed tributary to Linville River using a 20ftx36" arch culvert equivalent.
Types of equipment used may include heavy machinery such as a track-hoe. Impacts to the unnamed
tributary to Linville River include 20ft of permanent impacts for the proposed culvert, and 40ft of temporary
impacts (20ft culvert, plus 10ft both sides) for dewatering during culvert installation.
Yes No Unknown
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 8/15
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant
Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant
crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don’t require pre-
construction notification.
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
3. Stream Impacts
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Example: SAW-2017-99999
Sarah Kilby and Carrie Caviness
Interface Environmental Consulting,
LLC
Yes No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 9/15
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on
the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for
impact *(?)
3b.Impact
type *
3c. Type of
impact *
3d. S. name *3e. Stream
Type *(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction *
3g. S.
width *
3h.
Impact
length *
S1
S2
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
3j. Comments:
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
Culvert Permane
nt
Culvert Unnamed
Tributary to
Linville River
Intermitten
t
Both 3
Average
(feet)
20
(linear
feet)
Culvert
Installation
Temporar
y
Culvert Unnamed
Tributary to
Linville River
Intermitten
t
Both 3
Average
(feet)
40
(linear
feet)
0
20
40
60
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
The proposed driveway crossing was designed to completely bypass the wetland on-site
and to cross the intermittent stream with the least possible impacts to aquatic resources.
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 10/15
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques:*
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website.
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT’s Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Work will take place from the streambank to reduce sedimentation. All disturbed areas of
the streambank will be seeded and matted at the close of the work day.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required
by DWR)
Yes No
This project it not adjacent to a protected riparian buffer listed under one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection
Rules.
Yes No
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 11/15
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
Comments:
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?*
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland
Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
2B .0200)?*
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
3b. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No
G. Supplementary Information
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
No future development is anticipated at this time. If a homesite were to be built on the lot
in the future, it will be done so in a way to not negatively impacts downstream water
quality.
Yes No N/A
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 12/15
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (CorpsRequirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by
machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?*
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Yes No
Yes No
Asheville
Yes No Unknown
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
USFWS IPaC Regulatory Review
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 13/15
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data:
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as
having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties
significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?*
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Yes No
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
Yes No
NCSHPO HPO Web Mapper
Yes No
FEMA Floodmaps - Firmette
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 14/15
Comments
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is
helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter,
Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
*
· The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete
to the best of my knowledge and belief’; and
· The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
· I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
· I agree that submission of this PCN form is a “transaction” subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC
General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
· I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC
General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
· I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as
a written signature; AND
· I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Miscellaneous
Attached:
-Agent Authorization Form
-Current Plat
-Site Plan
-USGS Topographic Map
-NC DEQ Stream ID Form(s)
-Biological Assessment for USFWS IPaC
-NC SHPO Map (HPO Web Mapper)
-FEMA Firmette
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Combined Package.pdf 48.52MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
Sarah Kilby
6/5/23, 11:15 AM Submission Completed
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 15/15
Signature *
Date
6/5/2023

PCN Amendments

PCN Amendments

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the
project at the time of this application: *
The project site is located in the northeast portion of Grandfather Golf & Country Club, off
Chestnut Rd and comprised of one parcel, PIN 186700004108. Four (4) features exist on-site
draining northeast to southwest; two ephemeral channels, one intermittent channel, and one
seep. The project site is forested and mountainous with an old woods road. The surrounding
area is comprised of private residences.
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
661lf when including ephemeral channels.
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to add a stream crossing over the intermittent
channel (UT 1 - unnamed tributary to Linville River) and ephemeral channel (EC 2 - ephemeral
channel 2) for a proposed driveway/property access. For UT 1 – 20ftx36in arch culvert
equivalent. For EC 2 – 20ftx24in arch culvert equivalent.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of
equipment to be used:*
The project proposes to cross an unnamed tributary to Linville River using a 20ftx36in arch
culvert equivalent and to cross an ephemeral channel using a 20ftx24in arch culvert
equivalent for property access. Types of equipment used may include heavy machinery such
as a track-hoe. Impacts include: 40ft of permanent impacts for the proposed culverts, and 80ft
of temporary impacts (20ft culvert, plus 10ft both sides- for each feature) for dewatering
during culvert installation. A pump around system should be used for culvert installation if
flowing water is present in the channel. All disturbed areas should be stabilized (seeded and
matted) at the end of each working day.

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason
for
impact* (?)
3b. Impact
type*
3c. Type
of
impact*
3d. S.
name*
3e. Stream
Type* (?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g.
Stream
width*
3h.
Impact
length*
S1 Culvert Permanent Culvert UT 1 Intermittent Both 3 20
S2 Culvert
Installation
Tempora ry Culverty UT 1 Intermittent Both 3 40
S3 Culvert Permanent Culvert EC 2 Ephemeral Corps 2 20
S4 Culvert
Installation
Permanent Culvert EC 2 Ephemeral Corps 2 40

3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
40
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
80
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
120

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques: *
Work will take place from the streambank to reduce sedimentation. A pump around system
will be used, if flowing water is present within the channel, to reduce sedimentation. All
disturbed areas of the streambank will be seeded and matted at the close of the work day.

PCN Att achments

Agent Authorization Form

Plat

USFWS Biological Assessment

Biological Evaluation for Threatened and Endangered Species
Linville Stream Crossing – Culvert Installation
Linville, NC

Prepared by:
Sarah Kilby
[e-mail]
Interface Environmental Consulting, LLC

Project Description
The project site is located off Chestnut Road within Grandfather Golf & Country Club in
Linville, NC. The vicinity is forest with private residences. Currently, the site is forested with 3
features: 1 ephemeral channel, 1 wetland seep, and 1 intermittent stream (Unnamed Tributary
to Linville River (C;Tr)).
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to a portion of the parcel by
crossing the Unnamed Tributary to Linville River (UT) using a 20’x36” arch culvert equivalent.
No work will take place from within the stream, all work will be completed from the stream
banks. Construction will be timed and conducted in a manner that will not contribute any
additional sediment/erosion into the UT. The “project site” consists of a 50ft radius around the
proposed culvert location.

Biological Evaluation
A Biological Evaluation was completed at the location of the proposed culvert location to
assess potential impacts of the proposed culvert installation to species of concern
(Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, etc.) listed on the USFWS Species List at the project
location. A site visit was performed by Sarah Kilby, IEC, on May 30th, 2023 focusing on the 50
feet radius of proposed culvert installation location. Both banks of the UT are forested, with
dominate species of maple, birch, and beech. See attached “Effect Determination Table” for a
detailed Effect Determination of each species and attached “photosheets” of the project site.

Conclusion
The proposed culvert installation will have minimal impacts to the stream and surrounding
area. No, or minimal, tree take is anticipated for this project as the work pertains to the
stream and an old woods road with small saplings. No tree take larger than 3 dbh with
exfoliating bark is proposed on the project site. No tree take with cracks, crevices, or cavities
is proposed on the project site. No road associated culvert, bridges, or structures were
observed on the project site. No caves or large boulders were observed within the project
site. IEC was able to determine “No Effect” for all species of concern listed by the USFWS
Species List for the project site.
Species Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status HABITAT Specific Indicators to
look for Effect Determination Notes: Effect Determination
Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii Threatened Shallow and ephemeral wetlands, spring fed wetlands, swamps. Ideal
habitat is slow, open streams with mud/silty beds, grasses and sedges.Shallow wetlands and bogs
The proposed culvert installtion will
not take place in, or effect, any
wetlands.
No effect
Virginia Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus Endangered Inhabit caves year round (karst topography), dominated by oak-hickory
OR beech-maple-hemlock forests
Oak-Hickory OR Beech-
Maple-Hemlock Forests.
Caves.
There are no caves located within
50ft of the proposed culvert
installation site. The project location
does not overlap with the critical
habitat for the SOC.
No effect
Carolina Northern Flying
Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered
Spruce-Fir and mixed spruce-fir northern hardwood forests are important
because they support truffle growth (food source). Generally look for a
combination of hardwoods and conifers (particularly spruce and fir). Most
are found in moist forest with at least some widely spaced, mature trees
and an abundance of standing and down snags (Old growth forests). Exist
in the natural cavities of old hardwoods... eat the wood born fungi and
lichen.
Red spruce, and fir,
mature beech, yellow
birch, sugar maple, red
maple, hemlock, and black
cherry.
Some birch and cherry trees were
located at the project site, but none
with snags. None of the SOC were
noted during the site visit. The
proposed culvert installation will
take place in the stream and
minimal trees will be disturbed.
Contractor to check for species
again when work commences.
No effect
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
Roost sites are nearly exclusively restricted to caves throughout the year
(Hall and Wilson 1966, Barbour and Davis 1969, Tuttle 1976), though only
a few percent of available caves are suitable (Tuttle 1979). Winter roosts
are in deep vertical caves with domed halls. Large summer colonies utilize
caves that trap warm air and provide restricted rooms or domed ceilings;
maternity caves often have a stream flowing through them and are
separate from the caves used in summer by males.
Would look for caves, deep
crevices in rocks/boulders
There are no caves or large
rocks/boulders located within 50ft
of the proposed culvert installation
site.
No effect
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No trees and/or snags ≥3 inches dbh
with exfoliating bark, cracks,
crevices, and/or cavities were
observed within 50ft of the
proposed culvert installation
(project site). No other cracks,
crevices, cavities, or trees with
exfoliating bark were located within
50ft of the project site.
No effect
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
During the winter, tricolored bats are often found in caves and abandoned
mines, although in the southern United States, where caves are sparse,
tricolored bats are often found roosting in road-associated culverts where
they exhibit shorter torpor bouts and forage during warm nights. During
the spring, summer, and fall, tricolored bats are found in forested habitats
where they roost in trees, primarily among leaves of live or recently dead
deciduous hardwood trees, but may also be found in Spanish moss, pine
trees, and occasionally human structures.
Caves, abandoned mines,
culverts, structures,
deciduous hardwood
trees, pine trees
There are no caves, mines, culverts,
or structures located within 50ft of
the proposed culvert installation
site.
No effect
Plants
Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered
This lichen grows only in areas of high humidity, such as high elevation
vertical rock faces that are frequently bathed in fog or in deep gorges at
lower elevations. Often found in Fraser fir forests at high elevations
>5,000ft.
Look for rock faces within
spruce fir forest… high
elevations or low gorges. If
none then necessary
habitat not present at site.
The elevation on-site is less than
4,600ft. In addition, this SOC was
not observed on the project site
during the site visit.
No effect
SPECIES COVERED BY DETERMINATION KEY - See MA Consistency Letter: NLEB
Blue Ridge Goldenrod Solidago spithamaea
Avery and Mitchells
Counties (NC), and
Carter County (TN).
Generally >4,600ft, full
sun.
Flat-topped flowers, toothed leaves. Flowers Jul-Sep, Fruits Jul-Oct. Full
sun, elevations >4,600ft.
Look for the plant as
described.
The elevation on-site is less than
4,600ft and is under tree canopy. In
addition, this SOC was not observed
on the project site during the site
visit.
No effect
Heller's Blazingstar Liatris helleri
Cliffs in shallow, acidic
soils, and high elevation
rock outcrops.
Threats include: trampling, acidic rain, air pollution. Check for any rock
outcrops and/or acidic soils. Found on high cliffs, rock outcrops, ledges,
and grassy balds in the Blue Ridge.
Look for the plant as
described.
There was no evidence of this
species observed within the
projectsite during the site visit.
No effect
Roan Mountan Bluet Hedyotis purpurea var. montana
Found on rocky
exposures at
evelevations 4,600-
6,200ft. Ground cover.
Blooms May-September. Found at eleveations 4,600-6,200.Look for the plant as
described.
The elevation on-site is less than
4,600ft. In addition, this SOC was
not observed on the project site
during the site visit.
No effect
Spreading Avens Geum radiatum
Endemic to a few
mountaintops. Grows in
shallow acidic soil of
high-elevation cliffs, and
steep slopes (>4,200ft).
Often in full sun. June
through Septemeber.
Full sun cliffs/slopes. Elevations >4,200ft Look for the plant as
described.
The elevation on-site is less than
4,200ft. There was no evidence of
this species observed within the
projectsite during the site visit.
No effect
Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus Bird of Concern Presence probabiliy highest in Aug. Breeding season Mar-Jul
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis Bird of Concern Breeding season May-Aug, highest probability of presence Apr-Sep.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Bird of Concern Breeds Mar-Aug, highest probability of presence Apr-Sep.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus practicus Bird of Concern Breeds Apr-Jul. Presence probability highest in June.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Migratory Birds
Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bird of Concern Breeds May-Jul. Presence probability highest in Sept.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Bird of Concern Breeds Apr-Jul. Presence probability highest in May.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Eagle Protection Act Breeds elsewhere. Presence probability highest in Jul or Sept.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Kentucky Warbler Oporonis formosus Bird of Concern Breeds Apr-Aug. Presence probability highest in Aug.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Bird of Concern Breeds May-Sept. Presence probability highest May, Sept, Oct.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Prarie Warbler Dendroica discolor Bird of Concern Presence probability highest in Jul, Sept and Oct. Breeding season May-
Jul.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Bird of Concern Presence probability highest in Mar. No breeding season listed
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Eagle Protection Act Year round presence, with probability highest in Fall.
Nests found on cliffs or
tallest trees with view.
Estuaries, large lakes,
rivers.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Bird of Concern Breeding season May-Aug; Winter in Central America. Presence
probability highest in Apr-Sept.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird of Concern Breeding season May-Oct with highest probability of presence in May or
Sept.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Bird of Concern Presence probability highest in May and Sep. Breeding season is May.
This SOC was not observed on the
project site during the site visit. Bird
take is prohibited and is not a
componant of this project.
No effect
Insects
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
During the breeding season, monarchs lay their eggs on their obligate
milkweed host plant (primarily Asclepias spp.). Individual monarchs in
temperate climates, such as eastern and western North America, undergo
long-distance migration.
Look for butterflies,
caterpillars, or chrysalis on
milkweed.
No milkweek at the project site.
Monarch butterflies having migrated
south for the winter and will return
in the coming months, howver
breeding will not occur in this region
until late summer.
No effect
Biological Assessment
Linville, NC Stream Crossing
Proposed Culvert –Linville, Avery County, NC
05/30/2023
Proposed culvert location on UT to Linville
River, via old woods road Facing upstream UT to
Linville River
Facing downstream UT to
Linville River
woods road
Typical conditions on the project site. Old woods road with saplings. Dominate vegetation
consisting of beech, birch, and maple.
May 02, 2023
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0076490
Project Name: GFCC Lot Suitability (224/225)

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.

A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other
05/02/2023   2

▪
▪
▪
▪
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur “but for” the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws.gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.

If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at-risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.

Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.

We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.

Attachment(s):
Official Species List
USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
Migratory Birds
Wetlands
05/02/2023   1

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]
05/02/2023   2

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code:2023-0076490
Project Name:GFCC Lot Suitability (224/225)
Project Type:Residential Construction
Project Description:Stream Crossing
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.108477500000006,-81.8423420570507,14z
Counties:Avery County, North Carolina
05/02/2023   3

1.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 12 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2657
Endangered
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329
Endangered
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Endangered
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Proposed
Endangered
Virginia Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) townsendii virginianus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8369
Endangered
1
05/02/2023   4

REPTILES
NAME STATUS
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii
Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Blue Ridge Goldenrod Solidago spithamaea
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5821
Threatened
Heller's Blazingstar Liatris helleri
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5962
Threatened
Roan Mountain Bluet Hedyotis purpurea var. montana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1087
Endangered
Spreading Avens Geum radiatum
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6854
Endangered
LICHENS
NAME STATUS
Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3933
Endangered
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
05/02/2023   1

USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
05/02/2023   1

1.
2.
3.
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to
Aug 31
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Breeds May 15
to Oct 10
1
2
05/02/2023   2

NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus practicus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Apr 10
to Jul 31
Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 20
to Jul 31
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 20
to Aug 10
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Breeds Apr 27
to Jul 20
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15
to Aug 25
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Breeds
elsewhere
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745
Breeds May 1
to Jul 20
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 20
to Aug 20
Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Mar 1 to
Jul 31
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1
to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds
elsewhere
05/02/2023   3

1.
2.
3.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
05/02/2023   4

no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Black-billed
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Black-capped
Chickadee
BCC - BCR
Bobolink
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Canada Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Golden-winged
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Northern Saw-whet
Owl
BCC - BCR
05/02/2023   5

▪
▪
▪
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
05/02/2023   6

1.
2.
3.
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
05/02/2023   7

For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
05/02/2023   1

WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
05/02/2023   2

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:Interface Environmental Consulting, LLC
Name:Sarah Duke
Address:476 Hidden Pond
City:Boone
State:NC
Zip:28607
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]
May 31, 2023
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project code: 2023-0076490
Project Name: Linville, NC Stream Crossing

Federal Nexus: yes
Federal Action Agency (if applicable):

Subject:Record of project representative’s no effect determination for 'Linville, NC Stream
Crossing'

Dear Sarah Duke:
This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on May 31, 2023, for
'Linville, NC Stream Crossing' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project
Code 2023-0076490 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please
carefully review this letter.
Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC
The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species’ determination keys in accordance
with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into
the IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately
represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern Long-eared Bat
Rangewide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter.
Determination for the Northern Long-Eared Bat
Based upon your IPaC submission and a standing analysis, your project has reached the
determination of “No Effect” on the northern long-eared bat. To make a no effect determination,
the full scope of the proposed project implementation (action) should not have any effects (either
positive or negative), to a federally listed species or designated critical habitat. Effects of the
action are all consequences to listed species or critical habitat that are caused by the proposed
action, including the consequences of other activities that are caused by the proposed action. A
consequence is caused by the proposed action if it would not occur but for the proposed action
and it is reasonably certain to occur. Effects of the action may occur later in time and may
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   2

▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
include consequences occurring outside the immediate area involved in the action. (See § 
402.17).
Under Section 7 of the ESA, if a federal action agency makes a no effect determination, no
consultation with the Service is required (ESA §7). If a proposed Federal action may affect a
listed species or designated critical habitat, formal consultation is required except when the
Service concurs, in writing, that a proposed action "is not likely to adversely affect" listed species
or designated critical habitat [50 CFR §402.02, 50 CFR§402.13].
Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area
The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following
ESA-protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area:
Blue Ridge Goldenrod Solidago spithamaea Threatened
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
Heller's Blazingstar Liatris helleri Threatened
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Roan Mountain Bluet Hedyotis purpurea var. montana Endangered
Rock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered
Spreading Avens Geum radiatum Endangered
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Virginia Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) townsendii virginianus Endangered

You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may affect the animal
species listed above and, if so, how they may be affected.

Next Steps
Based upon your IPaC submission, your project has reached the determination of “No Effect” on
the northern long-eared bat. If there are no updates on listed species, no further consultation/
coordination for this project is required with respect to the northern long-eared bat. However, the
Service recommends that project proponents re-evaluate the Project in IPaC if: 1) the scope,
timing, duration, or location of the Project changes (includes any project changes or
amendments); 2) new information reveals the Project may impact (positively or negatively)
federally listed species or designated critical habitat; or 3) a new species is listed, or critical
habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional coordination with the
Service should take place to ensure compliance with the Act.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code 2023-0076490 associated
with this Project.
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   3

Action Description
You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action.
1. Name
Linville, NC Stream Crossing
2. Description
The following description was provided for the project 'Linville, NC Stream Crossing':
Stream Crossing
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.108477500000006,-81.8423420570507,14z
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   4

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DETERMINATION KEY RESULT
Based on the information you provided, you have determined that the Proposed Action will have
no effect on the Endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). Therefore, no
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 884, as amended 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required
for those species.
QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW
Does the proposed project include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, intentional take of
the northern long-eared bat or any other listed species?

Note: Intentional take is defined as take that is the intended result of a project. Intentional take could refer to
research, direct species management, surveys, and/or studies that include intentional handling/encountering,
harassment, collection, or capturing of any individual of a federally listed threatened, endangered or proposed
species?
No
Do you have post-white nose syndrome occurrence data that indicates that northern long-
eared bats (NLEB) are likely to be present in the action area?

Bat occurrence data may include identification of NLEBs in hibernacula, capture of
NLEBs, tracking of NLEBs to roost trees, or confirmed acoustic detections. With this
question, we are looking for data that, for some reason, may have not yet been made
available to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
No
Does any component of the action involve construction or operation of wind turbines?

Note: For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ if the construction or operation of wind power facilities is either (1) part
of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for a federal agency action (federal permit, funding, etc.).
No
Is the proposed action authorized, permitted, licensed, funded, or being carried out by a
Federal agency in whole or in part?
Yes
Is the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA),
or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding or authorizing the proposed action, in
whole or in part?
No
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   5

6.
7.
8.
9.
Are you an employee of the federal action agency or have you been officially designated in
writing by the agency as its designated non-federal representative for the purposes of
Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation per 50 CFR § 402.08?

Note: This key may be used for federal actions and for non-federal actions to facilitate section 7 consultation and
to help determine whether an incidental take permit may be needed, respectively. This question is for information
purposes only.
No
Is the lead federal action agency the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)? Is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) funding or authorizing the proposed action,
in whole or in part?
No
Is the lead federal action agency the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)?
No
Have you determined that your proposed action will have no effect on the northern long-
eared bat? Remember to consider the effects of any activities that would not occur but for
the proposed action.

If you think that the northern long-eared bat may be affected by your project or if you
would like assistance in deciding, answer “No” below and continue through the key. If you
have determined that the northern long-eared bat does not occur in your project’s action
area and/or that your project will have no effects whatsoever on the species despite the
potential for it to occur in the action area, you may make a “no effect” determination for
the northern long-eared bat.

Note: Federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representatives) must consult with USFWS on federal
agency actions that may affect listed species [50 CFR 402.14(a)]. Consultation is not required for actions that will
not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, this determination key will not provide a consistency or
verification letter for actions that will not affect listed species. If you believe that the northern long-eared bat may
be affected by your project or if you would like assistance in deciding, please answer “No” and continue through
the key. Remember that this key addresses only effects to the northern long-eared bat. Consultation with USFWS
would be required if your action may affect another listed species or critical habitat. The definition of Effects of
the Action can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-
selected-definitions
Yes
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   6

PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE
Will all project activities by completed by April 1, 2024?
Yes
05/31/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 671-127077806   7

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:Interface Environmental Consulting, LLC
Name:Sarah Duke
Address:476 Hidden Pond Rd
City:Boone
State:NC
Zip:28607
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]

NC SHPO Map

PJD Package

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______.
or Other (Name & Date): ______.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________.
Other information (please specify): ______________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
41
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if 19 or perennial if 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
2
3
3
1
0
1
2
1.5
1.5
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
ion (circle one)
Intermittent
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
41
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if 19 or perennial if 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
1
3
1
0
1
1
1
1.5
0
0
0
0.5
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Ephemeral
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
41
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if 19 or perennial if 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________)Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1.5
0
0
0
0.5
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Ephemeral
2
Project/Site: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
x
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes x
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
x No
x No X
x No
x
x
X
Yes x
Yes x
Yes x X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Seep on mountain slope. Bedrock exposed, surface water present.

NoYes
0
Is the Sampled Area
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
1
1
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:GFCC - Lots 224/225 Linville, Avery County
W1
7/72022
Grandfather Golf and Country Club NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:Sarah Kilby, Carrie Caviness
10Concave- slightlyhillside, seep
Datum: NAD 8381.84271636.107948LRR N
NoneNWI classification:SpE - Spivey cobbly loam, 30-50% slopes, extremely bouldery
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. (A/B)
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: x 1 =
1. x 2 =
2. x 3 =
3. x 4 =
4. x 5 =
5. Column Totals: (B)
6.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: X
1. X
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.W1
Tree Stratum )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Betula nigra 10 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (B)
3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:10 =Total Cover
OBL species 0 0
5 2
FACU species 0
13065 (A)
Total % Cover of:
0
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00
UPL species 0 0
65 130
FAC species 0 0
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Impatiens capensis 25 Yes FACW
=Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Boehmeria cylindrica 30 Yes FACW
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
=Total Cover
28 11
)
River birch at seep edge. Mainly dominated by bedrock.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
)
)
55
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
x
Depth (inches): x
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Bedrock
1
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Oil sheen observed. Seep with bedrock exposed at 1-4 inches. The secondary horizon is thinner with fragmented soil material.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/2
10YR 3/1
3-4
0-3
W1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist) Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
% %
Seep
Texture
Seep
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7) unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
!9
&
!"
!"
!"
!"
!"
!F
2200
4600
2600
2200
2400
3400
3000
2400
2400
3800
3000
4800
2200 1800
2600
3400
3400
2000
2000
22002400
5600
4400
3200
3200
2800
3000
.H arper Creek Trl
Trl
Trl
T S /Tan
l
s t
e
L
W i ls on C reek pur Trl
464
58
1511
£¤221
¬«105
¬«1510
D
464
45
4
6
4
ALOS
NT PI OLA
¬«105
¬«1561
1
981
981
981
1513
464
4067
4
0
6
2
¬«1539
¬«90
HICKORY LN
L I
ROSEBORO RD
4068
£¤221
£¤221
¬«184
192
45
4
0
9
2
4053
4
5
1
ª«29
ª«29
Coffey
Trou t L ake
Dixon
tt le
o ug
Lake Kawahna
Inv er
Lochy Lake
ra ssy
p e
N
Gragg Cem
Cary Flat Cem
Webb Cem
Gragg Cem
Tanglewood
Cem
Little Lost
Cove Cliffs
Flat Rock
Rattlesnake
Cliffs
Edgemont
Bee Mtn
Headquarters Mtn
Sugar
Mountain
Flatt o p M tn
Tennessee
Valley
Divide
Seven Devils
Grandfather
Sugar Mtn
Linville Gap
Flattop
Cliffs
Raven Rocks
Tennessee
Valley
Divide
Blue Ridge
Roseborough
Grandmother Mtn
The Sphinx
Rock
Beacon Heights
Grandmother
Gap
Linville
Sassafras Knob
Marks Mtn
Linville
Bluffs
Little Bald
Brier Knob
Deep Gap
Old House Gap
Grandfather
Village
L a u r e l M t n
Big Lost
Cove Cliffs
Big Rough Knob
Gragg
G r e e n M t n
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
85
3998000mN
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
3985000mN
98
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3122 432000mE
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
422000mE 32
36.0000°
36.1250°
-81.8750° -81.7500°
36.1250°
36.0000°-81.7500°-81.8750°
NORTH
CAROLINA
8
4
7
5
2 31
6
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
×
GN
0°29´
9 MILS
7°15´
129 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
U.S. National Grid
1 Elk Park
8 Collettsville
2 Valle Crucis
3 Boone
4 Newland
5 Globe
6 Linville Falls
7 Chestnut Mountain
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard.
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
SCALE 1:24 000
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
21KILOMETERS00.51
1 0.5 0
MILES
1
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN, NC
2022
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Check with local Forest Service unit
for current travel conditions and restrictions.
FS Primary Route FS High
Clearance Route
FS Passenger
Routeª«
Interstate Route State RouteUS RouteWX./
Expressway Local Connector
Ramp 4WD
Secondary Hwy Local Road
Imagery.....................................................NAIP, September 2020 - September 2020
Roads......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 - 2016
Roads within US Forest Service Lands........................FSTopo Data
with limited Forest Service updates, 2016
Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2022
Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 2002 - 2018
Contours............................................National Elevation Dataset, 2022
Boundaries..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2021
Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory Not Available
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before
entering private lands.

Solid Rock Engineering Geotechnical Report

Site Plans
“Jurisdictional Determination Map with Proposed Site Plans”