Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230942 Ver 1_SPL review comments 7_28_2023 308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 919.422.3605 Natural Resource Consultants June 29, 2023 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charlotte Regulatory Field Office via online PCN Submittal NC Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch via online PCN Submittal RE: Nationwide Permit 14/Water Quality Certification 4246 Sugar Creek Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina NRC Project #: 21019 To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Mecklenburg County, we are applying for a Nationwide Permit 14 from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Water Quality Certification 4246 from the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with the project known as Sugar Creek Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. The purpose of the proposed project is to establish a new section of the existing Sugar Creek Greenway that will span north from McDowell Farms Drive to Yorkmont Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed project also includes a new trailhead/parking facility located off South Tryon Street and trail spurs that connect to Edgegreen Drive, Center Park Drive, and Memorial Parkway. A list of the attachments to the online Pre-Construction Notification Application and those attachments follow this letter. Your review of this project is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (919) 422-3605 or burdette@nrconsultnc.com. Sincerely, Natural Resource Consultants Jennifer Burdette, PWS Sr. Environmental Consultant Attachments ec: Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov) Jimmy Prestwood, McAdams (prestwood@mcadamsco.com) Graham Bruns, McAdams (bruns@mcadamsco.com) Natural Resource Consultants Sugar Creek- McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Dr. Permit Application List of Attachments DWR Prefiling Acknowledgement Agent Authorization Form Property Owner Certification Forms Figure 1. US Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangle Topographic Map Figure 2. Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Map Figure 3. Aerial Map Sugar Creek – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Dr. Impact Maps Construction Methods & Structure Plans Mitigation Documents Mitigation Reservation Letter NCSAM & NCWAM Forms & Results USFWS Letter State Historic Preservation Office Letter DWR Prefiling Acknowledgement 1 Jennifer Burdette From:401PreFile <401PreFile@ncdenr.gov> Sent:Friday, December 2, 2022 10:19 AM To:Jennifer Burdette Subject:Automatic reply: [External] Sugar Creek Greenway, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, PCN This email confirms receipt of your pre-filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your records and submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as required by federal law. DWR will not be able to accept your application without this federally required documentation. 401 applications received without documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be returned as incomplete. Responses to this email are not monitored. If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of staff contact list(s). For Non-Transportation Central Staff: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting/401- buffer-permitting-contacts For Non-Transportation Regional Staff: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1 For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation- permitting/staff-contacts Agent Authorization Form AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM 10212 Creedmoor Road, Raleigh, NC / 919. 422. 3605 All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Contract Purchaser FIELDS WITH * ARE REQUIRED Project Area PIN(s): 14327204, 14327203, 14327207, 14327209, 14327484, 14327481, 14327211, 14313306, 14313302, 14321103, 14320102, 14320101, 14322106, 14322110, 14322105, 16708110, 16708109, 16722196, 16722165, 16709401, 16722199, 16722197 Name: Mecklenburg County C/O Real Estate/Finance Department; POC: Jennifer Brooks Address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Ste. 6000, Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone: * 980-445-8724 Email: * jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Number: 21019 Project Manager: Jennifer Burdette, Graham Bruns US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 512 N. Salisbury Street Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: Clean Water Act & Riparian Buffer Related Consulting and Permitting To Whom It May Concern: I hereby designate and authorize Natural Resource Consultants to act on my behalf as my agent in obtaining verification of wetland delineations and processing of permit applications for the project listed above. I, the undersigned, a duly authorized contract purchaser of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water Resources to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer Rules. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by Natural Resource Consultants’ staff. Print Contractor Purchaser Name *Signature Asset and Facility Management Title *Date Property Owner Certification Forms Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: N/A City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14313306, 14320102, 14320101, 14322106, 14322110 Property Owner Information Name: City of Charlotte C/O Real Estate Division Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: 600 E 4th Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent Date Signature 704-560-1026 gregory.crawford@charlottenc.gov Greg A. Crawford 2/17/2023 Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: 2810 & 2815 Coliseum Centre Drive City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327204, 14327209 Property Owner Information Name: Coliseum NC Owner LLC C/O SPP Office LLC – ATTN Michael Meyer Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: Colliers Building Mgmt; Five Coliseum Centre, 2810 Coliseum Centre Drive, Ste 160, Charlotte, NC 28217 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent Date Signature 704.357.3282 mary.cook@colliers.com Mary M. Cook, Senior Property Manager X 2/6/2023 Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: N/A City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 16722165 Property Owner Information Name: Department of Transportation Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: 716 W Main Street Albemarle, NC 28001 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent Date Signature 980-523-0000 faobregon@ncdot.gov Felix A. Obregon, PE 02/06/2023 Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: N/A City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14313302 Property Owner Information Name: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent Date Signature 526 S. Church St ECII-05 Charlotte, NC 2820 (by Martha S Purser) Manager Land Services 704-382-4705 martha.purser@duke-energy.com Martha S Purser for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC January 30, 2023 Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: 2301 Yorkmont Road City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327203, 14327207, 14327207, 14321103, 14322105, 16708110, 16708109, 16722196, 16709401, 16722199, 16722197 Property Owner Information Name: Mecklenburg County Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: 600 E 4th Street, 11th Floor Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: Owner X Authorized Agent Date Signature 980-445-8724 jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway Project Manager: Graham Bruns Project Number: 21019 Property Owner Certification Information Parcel Information Street Address: Arbor Loop Drive City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217 County: Mecklenburg County Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327481 Property Owner Information Name: City Park Master Owners Association LLC Title (if applicable): P.O. Box 3340 Mailing Address: Fort Mill, SC 29716 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: Owner x Authorized Agent Date Signature June 23,2023 Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder) Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway  Project Manager: Graham Bruns  Project Number: 21019  Property Owner Certification Information  Parcel Information  Street Address: Arbor Loop Dr  City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217  County: Mecklenburg County  Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):  14327484  Property Owner Information  Name: P & L Coliseum Residential Developer, LLC  Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: 3330 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 300  Atlanta, GA 30339  Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification  By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on‐site investigation,  if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act  and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized  owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of  record of the property.  Print Name  Capacity:    Owner   x Authorized Agent   Date  Signature  6/23/2023 Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder) Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway  Project Manager: Graham Bruns  Project Number: 21019  Property Owner Certification Information  Parcel Information  Street Address: 4000 Memorial Parkway  City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217  County: Mecklenburg County  Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):  14327211  Property Owner Information  Name: P & L Coliseum LP  Title (if applicable): Mailing Address: 3330 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 300  Atlanta, GA 30339  Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: Property Access Certification  By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on‐site investigation,  if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act  and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized  owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of  record of the property.  Print Name  Capacity:    Owner  x Authorized Agent   Date  Signature  Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder) 6/23/2023 704-506-2161 rjersey@pepeandland.com Figure 1. US Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangle Topographic Map 0 2,0001,000 Feet1 inch = 2,000 feet $ FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPSUGAR C REEK GREEN WAY - MCD OW ELL FARMS DR . TOYORKMONT RD.CHAR LOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC NOTES:1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH C AROLINA; 20192. LAT: 35.174354, LONG: -80.9164763. The project area is approximately 96 acres in size. 6/28/2023 kaylieMEK-20000DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY: C:\Users\NRC \NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 1 USGS.mxd, 6/28/2023 1:57:43 PM, kaylie PRO JECT AREA 1VERSION: Legend Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC) Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC) Figure 2. Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Map MO UO WkE PaE PaE PaE CeD2 MeD CeD2 PaE MeD CeD2 CeD2 WkD WkD CeD2 NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis 0 1,400700Feet1 inch = 1,400 feet $ FIGURE 2. NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEYSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - M CDOWELL FARMS DR. TOYORKMONT RDCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COU NTY, NC NOTES:Web Soil Survey SSURGO Spatial Data: Mecklenburg County (Version 6, Sep 16, 2019) C:\Users\NRC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 2 Web SS.mxd, 6/27/2023 12:35:36 PM, kaylie PR OJECT AREA 6/27/2023 kaylieMEK-20000DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY: 1VERSION: 2017 Legend So il Ma p Unit Limit of Disturbance (+/- 23 AC) Previous Limit of Disturbance (+/- 96 AC) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Hydric Soil RatingCeB2Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perce nt slopes, moderately eroded NoCeD2Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 perce nt slopes, moderatel y eroded NoCuBCecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent sl opes NoMeDMecklenburg fine sandy l oam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NoMOMonacan loam, 0 to 2 perce nt slopes, fre quentl y flooded NoPaEPacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes NoPaFPacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes NoUOUdorthents, sanitary landfill NoWkDWilkes loam, 8 to 15 perce nt slopes NoWkEWilkes loam, 15 to 25 perce nt slopes No Figure 3. Aerial Map NCCGIA, NC911 Board 0 150 30075Feet1 inch = 150 feet¯ LEGEND Limit of Disturbance (+/- 23 AC) Original Study Area (+/- 96 AC) 2-ft Contours FIGURE 3A. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery C:\Users\NRC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3A Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 1:59:55 PM, kaylie 6/28/2023 kaylie MEK-20000 DATE: JOB NO: DRAWN BY: NCCGIA, NC911 Board NCCGIA, NC911 Board 0 150 30075Feet1 in ch = 150 feet¯ LEGEND Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC) Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC) 2-ft C ontours FIGURE 3B. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREE K GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery C:\User s\N RC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\D etailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3B Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 2:02:38 PM, kayli e 6/28/2023 kaylie MEK-20000 DATE: JOB NO: DR AWN BY: NCCGIA, NC911 Board 0 150 30075Feet1 in ch = 150 feet¯ LEGEND Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC) Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC) 2-ft C ontours FIGURE 3C. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery C:\User s\N RC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\D etailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3C Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 2:04:51 PM, kayli e 6/28/2023 kaylie MEK-20000 DATE: JOB NO: DR AWN BY: Sugar Creek Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. Impact Maps W T Y V O L A R D B E A M R D S H O P T O N R D NA T I O N S F O R D R D BIL L Y G R A H A M P K W Y YOR K M O N T R D WEST BLVD S TR Y O N S T CL A N T O N R D EDGE G R E E N D R W A R R O W O O D R D Y O R K M O N T R D EDGEGREEN DR W T Y V O L A R D S T R Y O N S T ( N C - 4 9 ) BIL L Y G R A H A M P K W Y YO R K M O N T R D ( S R - 1 1 5 6 ) MCD O W E L L F A R M S D R MOUN T I N G R O C K R D HARRY L. JONES SR. GOLF COURSE CENTER PARK DR COLISEUM CENTRE DR Y O R K M O N T R D ( S R - 1 1 5 6 ) M E M O R I A L P K W Y TYVO L A C E N T R E D R SUG A R C R E E K SUGAR C R E E K CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FARMERS MARKET =-Y3- STA. 30+00.00 -L1B- STA. 202+00.00 =-Y1- STA. 10+00.00 -L1A- STA. 116+84.60 BEGIN PROJECT L1A 100+80.00 END PROJECT L1D 412+10.00 =-Y2- STA. 20+00.00 -L1A- STA. 119+19.73 =-L1C- STA. 300+00.00 -L1B- STA. 285+91.88 =-Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00 -L1C- STA. 311+56.66 =-Y8- STA. 80+00.00 -L1C- STA. 322+88.45 =-Y9- STA. 90+00.00 -L1D- STA. 401+00.00=-Y4- STA. 40+00.00 -L1B- STA. 246+14.51 =-L1D- STA. 400+00.00 -L1C- STA. 326+01.73 =-L1B- STA. 200+00.00 -L1A- STA. 124+03.05 -L1A- -L1B--L1C- -L1D- -Y1--Y2- -Y3- -Y4- -Y8- -Y9- -Y11- TRAILHEAD -Y7- ALT 1-Y6- -Y5- =-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.00 -L1C- STA. 302+06.11 BRIDGE S1 BRIDGE S2 BRIDGE S3 =-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.00 -L1C- STA. 319+29.19 -Y7- ALT 2 -Y10- =-Y10- STA. 0+00.00 -L1D- STA. 411+96.32 H I V E D R -Y1- STA. 20+97.22 -Y2- STA. 22+79.15 -Y3- STA. 31+70.93 -Y4- STA. 49+87.03 -Y6- STA. 3+75.28 -Y7-ALT1- STA. 3+94.04 -Y7-ALT2- STA. 5+01.65 -Y8- STA. 82+04.26 -Y9- STA. 91+58.84 -Y10- STA. 3+65.23 -Y11- STA. 1102+69.20 -Y5- STA. 5+60.52 =-L1B- STA. 272+28.44 -Y5- STA. 0+00.00 =-Y11- STA. 1100+00.00 -L1A- STA. 101+01.87 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - C S . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 4 1 : 4 6 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP AS NOTED MEK-20000-CS.dwg 06-08-2023 1 COVER SHEET CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, STRUCTURES, RETAINING WALLS, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL VICINITY MAP GRAPHIC SCALESPROJECT LENGTH LENGTH OF BOARDWALK = 1,110 FT LENGTH OF BRIDGE = 460 FT TOTAL LENGTH OF MAINLINE = 2.79 MILES TOTAL LENGTH OF CONNECTIONS = 0.99 MILES DESIGN DATA DESIGN SPEED = 20 MPH LEAN ANGLE = 20 DEGREES FUNC. CLASSIFICATION = GREENWAY GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) GRAPHIC SCALE 0 3 6 12 1 inch = 6 ft. PROFILE (VERTICAL) METHOD OF GRADING: CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II. INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 1A GENERAL NOTES 1B CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS 1C OVERALL PLAN & KEY 2A-1 THRU 2A-6 TYPICAL SECTIONS 2B-1 THRU 2B-11 DETAILS 3B-1 EARTHWORK SUMMARY 3D-1 THRU 3D-2 DRAINAGE SUMMARY 4 THRU 34 PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS CA-1 THRU CA-2 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN PM-1 THRU PM-3 PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PLANS EC-1 THRU EC-25 EROSION CONTROL PLANS L2.00 THRU L2.01 TRAILHEAD PLANTING PLANS A0.01 THRU P102 TRAILHEAD BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL PLANS C2.00 TRAILHEAD SITE PLAN C3.00 TRAILHEAD GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4.00 THRU C4.01 TRAILHEAD UTILITY PLAN C7.00 THRU C7.11 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN UO-1 UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLANS XS-1A CROSS SECTION INDEX XS-1 THRU XS-31 CROSS SECTIONS S-1 THRU S-10 STRUCTURE PLANS W-1 WALL PLANS BEGINNING OF PROJECT END OF PROJECT NC-GRID-(NAD83) 200 GRAPHIC SCALE 4000 800 1 inch = 400 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) 95% PLANS TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:± 309.64 AC (± 13,487,918 SF) EXISTING ZONING:R-3, R-4, BP(CD), I-2(CD), UR-2(CD), MUDD-O, BP DEVELOPER:PREPARED BY:MCADAMS COMPANY 2100 S TRYON ST, SUITE 400 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 704.527.0800 SITE DATA - GREENWAY PID: 16722197, 16722199, 16722165, 16722196, 16708110, 16708109, 16709401, 14322105, 14322110, 14322106, 14320101 PARKS AND RECREATION 5841 BROOKSHIRE BLVD CHARLOTTE, NC 28216 980.314.1000 FRONT YARD SETBACK:N / A SIDE YARD SETBACK:N / A REAR YARD SETBACK:N / A MECKLENBURG COUNTY PROPOSED USE: VACANT / FLOODPLAIN / FORESTEXISTING USE: GREENWAY TRAIL PROPOSED PARKING:N / A PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING:N / A TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA:XXX,000 SF (X.XX% SITE AREA) REQUIRED TREE SAVE AREA:N / A PROPOSED TREE SAVE AREA:N / A ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:JUNE 2025 NOTE: SEE SHEET C2.00 FOR TRAILHEAD SPECIFIC SITE DATA TABLE 14321103, 14320102, 14313301, 14313302, 14313306, 14327207, 14327211, 14327484, 14327209, 14327203 , 14327204 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "NC811" (811) OR (1-800-632-4949) AT LEAST 3 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ANY LOCAL UTILITIES THAT PROVIDE THEIR OWN LOCATOR SERVICES INDEPENDENT OF "NC811". REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. R PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO MOUNTING ROCK RD CONNECTION (-Y11-) SEE SHEET 34 FOR PLAN & PROFILE SUGA R C R E E K 1 1 0 1 + 0 0 100+00 101+00 102+0 0 103+00 104+00 105+00 10 6 + 0 0 107+00 108+00 PC : 1 0 4 + 9 7 . 6 4 PC: 101+34.34 PC: 105+84.98 P C : 1 0 2 + 6 5 . 4 0 P C : 1 0 8 + 1 4 . 3 6 PT: 105+45.39 P T : 1 0 1 + 6 5 . 2 6 P T : 1 0 6 + 5 9 . 4 4 PT : 1 0 3 + 5 9 . 7 0 PT : 1 0 8 + 7 7 . 4 5 C 1 0 1 C 10 2 C103 C104 PROPOSED BOARDWALK #1 (30 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS=-Y11- STA. 1100+00.00 -L1A- STA. 101+01.87 C 10 5 Curve Table: Alignment - L1A - C101 C102 C103 C104 PI Sta 101+49.83 103+13.44 105+22.09 106+24.49 Δ 8°03'12" 27°00'49" 30°23'44" 47°24'11" D 026°02'36.73" 028°38'52.40" 063°39'43.12" 063°39'43.12" L 30.92 94.30 47.75 74.46 T 15.49 48.04 24.45 39.51 R 220.00 200.00 90.00 90.00 C105 C106 C107 C108 C115 108+46.38 109+43.55 111+18.76 114+70.08 113+19.14 24°05'55" 49°27'43" 32°56'04" 85°24'08" 14°00'27" N09° 55' 02 . 0 9 " W N17° 5 8 ' 1 4 . 0 3 " W N09° 02' 3 5 . 1 0 " E N39° 26' 18.61"E N07° 57' 52.1 8 " W N16° 08' 03.30"E BEGIN ALIGNMENT -L1A- STA. 100+00.00 N: 518356.4931 E: 1428388.6436 0402 0401 32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP 0403 0404 28 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP 100+89.23 6.00' R 101+09.25 6.00' R END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BOARDWALK #1 -L1A- STA. 105+55.00 END BOARDWALK #1 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- STA. 105+85.00 BEGIN PROJECT BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1A- 100+80.00 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 0501 0502 28 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BOARDWALK #2 -L1A- STA. 108+88.00 EXIST. 15' SSE TCE TCE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- 108+78.00 END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- 105+45.00 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' CONCRETE -L1A- 105+95.00 R=10' (TYP.) SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL A . 0 1 5 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 6 TON EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL A CLASS B R I P R A P EST 6 TON EST 13 SY G E O T E X T I L E CLASS I RIPRAP EST 10 TON EST 14 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 24 TON EST 33 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH M A T C H L I N E L 1 A - S T A 1 0 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 5 - L1A - 560 570 580 590 560 570 580 590 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 107+50 PI = 1 0 2 + 7 6 . 4 7 EL = 5 8 1 . 7 2 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 0 4 + 8 3 . 7 9 EL = 5 8 5 . 3 9 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 0 1 + 6 9 . 3 5 EL = 5 7 9 . 4 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 0 3 + 6 9 . 9 9 EL = 5 8 0 . 8 9 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 0 6 + 4 3 . 4 3 EL = 5 8 0 . 6 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.1592% -3.0000% +0.4501% -0.8814% +3.9519% +2.6871% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXIST. 8" SS BEGIN GRADE -L1A- STA. 100+80.00 EL. = 579.00 PROP. 18" RCP PROP. 24" RCP BEGIN BOARDWALK #1 -L1A- STA. 105+55.00 EL. = 583.25 END BOARDWALK #1 -L1A- STA. 105+85.00 EL. = 582.35 BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 104+49.69 EL. = 583.00 END DITCH RT STA. 105+52.12 EL. = 582.00 BEGIN DITCH LT STA. 105+85.68 EL. = 579.00 END DITCH LT STA. 106+73.10 EL. = 580.64 -0.4963%-1.4396% 0.4519%4.5494% 20' SPAN M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 1 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 2 : 4 9 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P1.dwg 06-08-2023 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) DETAIL A SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 2:1 2: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.0 FT -L1A- STA. 104+50 TO 105+54 RT. -L1A- STA. 105+85 TO 106+73 LT. PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO SUGAR CREEK 11+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110 + 0 0 111+ 0 0 112+00 113+00 114+ 0 0 115+00 1 1 6 + 0 0 117+0 0 PC: 109+09.00 P C : 1 1 0 + 7 4 . 4 2 P C : 1 1 4 + 0 0 . 8 7 PC: 1 1 6 + 5 5 . 1 1 P C : 1 0 8 + 1 4 . 3 6 P C : 1 1 2 + 9 4 . 5 7 P T : 1 0 9 + 7 3 . 7 5 P T : 1 1 1 + 6 0 . 6 5 PT: 1 1 5 + 1 2 . 6 6 P T : 1 1 7 + 1 7 . 5 0 P T : 1 0 6 + 5 9 . 4 4 PT : 1 0 8 + 7 7 . 4 5 P T : 1 1 3 + 4 3 . 4 6 PROPOSED BRIDGE S1 (120 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS C 1 0 5 C 1 0 6 C 1 0 7 C 108 C 1 0 9 R 220.00 200.00 90.00 90.00 Curve Table: Alignment - L1A - C105 C106 C107 C108 C115 PI Sta 108+46.38 109+43.55 111+18.76 114+70.08 113+19.14 Δ 24°05'55" 49°27'43" 32°56'04" 85°24'08" 14°00'27" D 038°11'49.87" 076°23'39.74" 038°11'49.87" 076°23'39.74" 028°38'52.40" L 63.09 64.75 86.22 111.79 48.90 T 32.02 34.55 44.34 69.21 24.57 R 150.00 75.00 150.00 75.00 200.00 C 1 1 5 PROPOSED BOARDWALK #2 (20 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS N07° 57 ' 5 2 . 1 8 " W N16° 08' 03.30"E N33 ° 1 9 ' 3 9 . 4 3 " W N00° 23' 34. 9 7 " W N14° 2 4 ' 0 1 . 9 1 " W N00° 29' 11.6 0 " W N 7 1 ° 0 0 ' 0 6 . 2 8 " E . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 0501 0502 28 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BOARDWALK #2 -L1A- STA. 108+88.00 END BOARDWALK #2 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- STA. 109+08.00 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BRIDGE S1 -L1A- STA. 115+29.68 END BRIDGE S1 BEGIN BOARDWALK #3 -L1A- STA. 116+48.68 TCE TCE TCE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE .01 5 .01 5 END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- 108+78.00 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1A- 109+18.00 END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- 115+19.68 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' CONCRETE SEE TRAILHEAD SITE PLAN SPECIAL LAT E R A L ' V ' D I T C H SEE DETAIL A CLASS B RIPRAP EST 6 TON EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED 103 LF OF FARM FENCE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 32 TON EST 45 SY GEOTEXTILE E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E CLASS I RIP R A P EST 10 TON EST 14 SY G E O T E X T I L E CLASS I RIP R A P EST 24 TON EST 33 SY G E O T E X T I L E BEGIN FARM FENCE -L1A- STA. 114+22.15 8.00' LT END FARM FENCE -L1A- STA. 115+15.13 8.00' LT CLASS I RIPRA P EST 40 TON EST 56 SY GEO T E X T I L E M A T C H L I N E L 1 A - S T A 1 0 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 4 MAT C H L I N E L 1 A - S T A 1 1 6 + 6 0 - S E E S H E E T 6 - L1A - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 107+50 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 116+60 PI = 1 0 7 + 6 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 3 . 8 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 1 4 + 3 2 . 8 8 EL = 5 9 1 . 0 0 VC = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 0 8 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 2 . 2 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 1 0 + 2 6 . 9 4 EL = 5 8 2 . 2 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 1 2 + 6 5 . 1 7 EL = 5 8 3 . 4 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +4.5000% +0.0000% +0.5000%+0.0000% -1.8871% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 24" RCP BEGIN BRIDGE S1 -L1A- STA. 115+29.68 EL. = 591.00 END BRIDGE S1 BEGIN BOARDWALK #3 -L1A- STA. 116+48.68 EL. = 591.00 BEGIN BOARDWALK #2 -L1A- STA. 108+88.00 EL. = 582.26 END BOARDWALK #2 -L1A- STA. 109+08.00 EL. = 582.26 SUGAR CREEK M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 1 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 3 : 0 4 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P1.dwg 06-08-2023 5 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PCSO PCSO PC S O PCSO PCS O PCS O P C S O PC S O PC S O P C S O PCSO PCS O PCS O P C S O P C S O P C S O PCSO 20 1 + 0 0 SUGAR CREEK 22+ 8 4 21+00 22+00 11+00 114+00 115+00 1 1 6 + 0 0 117 + 0 0 118+00 119+ 0 0 120+ 0 0 121+00 122+0 0 1 2 3 + 0 0 12 4 + 0 0 PC : 1 1 8 + 2 2 . 6 9 P C : 1 1 4 + 0 0 . 8 7 PC: 120+64.13 P C : 1 2 1 + 7 3 . 1 9 PC: 11 6 + 5 5 . 1 1 PC : 1 2 3 + 0 8 . 4 2 PC: 122+56.44 P T : 1 1 8 + 6 0 . 9 7 PT: 11 5 + 1 2 . 6 6 P T : 1 2 0 + 9 8 . 7 3 PT : 1 2 2 + 1 1 . 4 1 PT : 1 1 7 + 1 7 . 5 0 PT: 123+39.06PT : 1 2 2 + 7 8 . 4 6 =-L1B- STA. 200+00.00 -L1A- STA. 124+03.05 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #1 SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y2-) SEE SHEET 25 FOR PLAN & PROFILE SEE SHEET 7 FOR -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE =-Y2- STA. 20+00.00 -L1A- STA. 119+19.73 108 C 1 0 9 C 1 1 0 C 1 1 1 C 112 C113 C 114 =-Y1- STA. 10+00.00 -L1A- STA. 116+84.60 EDGEGREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-) SEE SHEET 23 FOR PLAN & PROFILE N00° 29' 11.60"W N 7 1 ° 0 0 ' 0 6 . 2 8 " E N22° 2 5 ' 1 6 . 1 5 " W N02° 35' 48.74"W N21° 44' 14.40"E N 3 5 ° 4 5 ' 3 8 . 8 6 " E N26° 58' 59.31"E .0 1 5 END BRIDGE S1 BEGIN BOARDWALK #3 -L1A- STA. 116+48.68 0603 EXIS T . 1 9 0 ' R O W 28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP 0604 BEGIN SAFETY RAIL -L1A- STA. 120+64.17 7.00' LT END SAFETY RAIL -L1A- STA. 122+73.68 7.00' LT EXIST. 60' SSE PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE (STA. 120+15.00 TO 120+25.00) SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR DETAIL .015 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROPOSED 210 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B .015 TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO 16' CONCRETE (STA. 120+35.00 TO 120+55.00) REMOVE APPROX. 18 LF OF EXISTING 15" CMP SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL C SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL A BEGIN RETAINING WALL #1 -L1A- STA. 120+64.13 8.00' RT END RETAINING WALL #1 -L1A- STA. 122+73.68 8.00' RT 0602 0601 32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 7 S T R Y O N S T ( N C - 4 9 ) 123+20.33 -11.95' L 123+33.99 -6.00' L CLASS B RIPRAP EST 32 TON EST 47 SY GEOTEXTILE 122+93.68 6.00' R ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION TO 582.50' TO MATCH PROPOSED TRAIL CLASS I RIPRAP EST 151 TON EST 215 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 23 TON EST 33 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 3 TON EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 38 TON EST 84 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED BOARDWALK #3 (200 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS END BOARDWALK #3 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1A- 118+48.68 E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' CONCRETE -L1A- 118+58.68 END FARM FENCE -L1A- STA. 115+15.13 8.00' LT PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE Curve Table: Alignment - L1A - C109 C110 C111 C112 C113 C114 PI Sta 116+91.10 118+42.07 120+81.60 121+92.59 122+67.50 123+23.77 Δ 71°29'18" 21°56'05" 19°49'27" 24°20'03" 14°01'24" 8°46'40" D 114°35'29.61" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" 063°39'43.12" 063°39'43.12" 028°38'52.40" L 62.39 38.28 34.60 38.22 22.03 30.64 T 35.99 19.38 17.47 19.40 11.07 15.35 R 50.00 100.00 100.00 90.00 90.00 200.00 CLASS I RIPRAP EST 40 TON EST 56 SY GEOTEXTILE RETAIN APPROX. 34 LF OF EXISTING 15" CMP MATC H L I N E L 1 A - S T A 1 1 6 + 6 0 - S E E S H E E T 5 - L1A - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 116+60 117+00 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 124+25 PI = 1 1 6 + 9 9 . 1 1 EL = 5 9 1 . 0 0 VC = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 2 3 + 6 6 . 8 4 EL = 5 8 4 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 1 8 + 9 1 . 8 7 EL = 5 8 2 . 3 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 120+92.09 EL = 578.00 VC = 50.00' PI = 121+79.97 EL = 578.00 VC = 50.00' -4.500 0 % -2.1604% +0.0000% +0.0000% +3.2107% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXIST. 42" SS MIN. 9' VERTICAL CLEARANCE S TYRON ST BRIDGE PROP. 18" RCP END BOARDWALK #3 -L1A- STA. 118+48.68 EL. = 584.27 PROP. 18" RCP BEGIN DITCH LT STA. 119+12.34 EL. = 580.54 END DITCH LT STA. 120+28.43 EL. = 578.08 BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 123+24.74 EL. = 581.00 -2.1179% -1.4322%1.0244% BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 120+15.00 EL. = 579.665 END SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 120+25.00 EL. = 579.449 20' SPAN M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 1 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 3 : 1 6 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P1.dwg 06-08-2023 6 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) DETAIL A SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 2:1 2: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.0 FT -L1A- STA. 119+12 TO 120+29 LT. DETAIL B SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 3:1 3: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT -L1A- STA. 123+24 TO 124+03 RT. DETAIL C SPECIAL CUT DITCH NOT TO SCALE 2:1 NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT MAX d = 1.5 FT d -L1A- STA. 120+51 RT. TO 120+29 LT. TYPE OF LINER = CLASS B RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE 2: 1 NATURAL GROUND P C S O P C S O PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PCSO P C S O P C S O PC S O PC S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O 1 2 4 + 0 0 31+7 6 31+0 0 2 0 1 + 0 0 2 0 2 + 0 0 2 0 3 + 0 0 204+00 205+ 0 0 20 6 + 0 0 20 7 + 0 0 208 + 0 0 S T R Y O N S T ( N C - 4 9 ) SUGAR CREEK PC : 2 0 0 + 7 8 . 0 2 PC: 2 0 6 + 6 5 . 3 8 P C : 2 0 8 + 2 4 . 0 5 PC: 2 0 1 + 9 0 . 0 4 PC: 20 3 + 3 5 . 7 9 P C : 2 0 4 + 9 3 . 8 8 PT: 2 0 1 + 4 0 . 8 8 P T : 2 0 7 + 5 1 . 8 0 P T : 2 0 8 + 4 2 . 9 0 PT: 202+65.07 P T : 2 0 4 + 2 0 . 3 7 PT: 2 0 5 + 6 2 . 2 3 =-L1A- STA. 124+03.05 -L1B- STA. 200+00.00 S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y3-) SEE SHEET 25 FOR PLAN & PROFILE =-Y3- STA. 30+00.00 -L1B- STA. 202+00.00 SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE C 2 0 1 C 2 0 5 C 2 06 Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C201 C202 C203 C204 C205 C206 PI Sta 201+09.72 202+27.75 203+92.23 205+29.45 207+09.27 208+33.48 Δ 18°00'29" 14°19'51" 96°55'08" 39°09'26" 24°45'29" 5°24'00" D 028°38'52.40" 019°05'54.94" 114°35'29.61" 057°17'44.81" 028°38'52.40" 028°38'52.40" L 62.86 75.04 84.58 68.34 86.42 18.85 T 31.69 37.71 56.43 35.57 43.90 9.43 R 200.00 300.00 50.00 100.00 200.00 200.00 C 2 0 2 C 203 C 2 0 4 N 2 6 ° 5 8 ' 5 9 . 3 1 " E N 4 4 ° 5 9 ' 2 8 . 3 3 " E N59° 19' 19.31"E N37° 3 5 ' 4 9 . 1 9 " W N7 6 ° 4 5 ' 1 5 . 0 8 " W N51 ° 5 9 ' 4 6 . 4 9 " W N57 ° 2 3 ' 4 6 . 9 3 " W END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BOARDWALK #4 -L1B- STA. 204+26.00 END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 204+16.00 PROPOSED BOARDWALK #4 (40 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS END BOARDWALK #4 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB L1B - 204+66.00 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1B- STA. 204+76.00 SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 6 PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION 32 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP 0701 0702 EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 . 0 1 5 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 7 TON EST 15 SY GEOTEXTILE SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B CLASS I RIPRAP EST 26 TON EST 37 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 21 TON EST 29 SY GEOTEXTILE TYVOL A CENTR E D R EXIST . 1 9 0 ' R O W PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE SEE SHEETS L2.11 & L2.12 FOR ENLARGEMENT Null Structure Null Structure M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 0 8 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 8 - L1B - 568 570 580 590 600 568 570 580 590 600 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 207+00 208+00 208+50 PI = 2 0 2 + 6 0 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 4 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 0 6 + 0 5 . 9 2 EL = 5 9 0 . 0 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 0 3 + 3 1 . 9 1 EL = 5 8 1 . 8 1 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 0 6 + 9 8 . 3 2 EL = 5 8 7 . 6 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' -2.5785% +3.0000% +0.0000% -3.0475% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXIST. 16" SS EXIST. 54" SS BEGIN BOARDWALK #4 -L1B- STA. 204+26.00 EL. = 584.63 END BOARDWALK #4 -L1B- STA. 204+66.00 EL. = 585.83 PROP. 24" RCP BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 202+21.52 EL. = 581.00 END DITCH RT STA. 202+68.31 EL. = 579.21 -3.8231 % 20' SPAN 1.0398% END DITCH RT STA. 200+78.02 EL. = 581.59 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 0 : 5 7 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 7 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) DETAIL B SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 3:1 3: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT -L1B- STA. 200+00 TO 200+78 RT. -L1B- STA. 202+22 TO 202+68 RT. PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO 209+00 210+00 211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00 216+00 217+00 SUGAR CREEK P C : 2 0 9 + 1 6 . 7 5 PC : 2 1 1 + 1 0 . 9 2 P C : 2 1 4 + 4 6 . 3 7 PC : 2 0 8 + 2 4 . 0 5 PT : 2 0 9 + 8 8 . 6 4 P T : 2 1 1 + 5 0 . 0 6 PT : 2 1 4 + 9 1 . 1 2 P T : 2 0 8 + 4 2 . 9 0 C 2 0 6 C 2 0 7 C 2 0 8 C 2 0 9 N57° 23' 46.9 3 " W N43° 39' 58.17 " W N54° 52' 41.30"W N46° 19' 48.40"W .0 1 5 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 0802 0801 40 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP CLASS B RIPRAP EST 6 TON EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C207 C208 C209 PI Sta 209+52.87 211+30.55 214+68.79 Δ 13°43'49" 11°12'43" 8°32'53" D 019°05'54.94" 028°38'52.40" 019°05'54.94" L 71.89 39.14 44.76 T 36.12 19.63 22.42 R 300.00 200.00 300.00 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 0 8 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 7 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 1 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 9 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 208+50 209+00 210+00 211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00 216+00 217+00 217+50 PI = 2 1 3 + 4 4 . 8 8 EL = 5 8 7 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 1 6 + 3 4 . 8 2 EL = 5 8 3 . 8 2 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' -0.1000% +0.1884% -1.0980% EXIST. 54" SS EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 24" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 1 : 2 0 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 8 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO WLB W L B WL B WL B WL B WLB 217+00 218+00 219+00 220+00 221+00 222+00 223+00 224+00 225+00 226+00 SUGAR CREEK PC : 2 2 3 + 7 0 . 9 5 P C : 2 2 5 + 1 2 . 1 6 P T : 2 2 4 + 0 5 . 8 1 PT : 2 2 5 + 8 7 . 1 0 C 2 10 C 211 N46° 19' 48.40"W N50° 19' 28.84"W N41° 44' 16.07"W .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION PR O T E C T & P R E S E R V E M O N I T O R I N G WE L L D U R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B 36 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP 0902 0901 0904 0903 28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 23 TON EST 50 SY GEOTEXTILE SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C210 PI Sta 223+88.39 Δ 3°59'40" D 011°27'32.96" L 34.86 T 17.44 R 500.00 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 1 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 8 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 2 5 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 0 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 217+50 218+00 219+00 220+00 221+00 222+00 223+00 224+00 225+00 225+50 PI = 2 1 9 + 3 3 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 5 . 0 0 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 2 4 + 4 0 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 6 . 0 0 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 1 8 + 2 9 . 8 2 EL = 5 8 4 . 1 8 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 2 0 + 3 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 3 . 7 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 2 2 + 9 9 . 9 9 EL = 5 8 4 . 2 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 2 5 + 3 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 5 . 6 1 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +1.2395% -0.4111% +0.1884%+0.7912%-1.2103% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 219+27.70 EL. = 581.02 END DITCH RT STA. 220+14.32 EL. = 581.58 BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 223+13.80 EL. = 582.54 END DITCH RT STA. 225+14.24 EL. = 582.48 0.6522% -0.4256%0.6603% M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 1 : 4 3 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 9 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) DETAIL B SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 3:1 3: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT -L1B- STA. 219+28 TO 220+14 RT. -L1B- STA. 223+14 TO 225+14 RT. PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O WLB WLB W L B W L B W L B WLB 225+ 0 0 226+0 0 227+ 0 0 228+ 0 0 229+00 230 + 0 0 231 + 0 0 232 + 0 0 23 3 + 0 0 23 4 + 0 0 SUGAR C R E E K PC : 2 3 4 + 2 7 . 7 3 P C : 2 2 8 + 2 7 . 2 0 P C : 2 2 9 + 4 0 . 3 0 PC : 2 3 2 + 3 8 . 8 9 P C : 2 2 5 + 1 2 . 1 6 P C : 2 2 6 + 6 6 . 3 0 P T : 2 2 8 + 9 7 . 3 4 PT : 2 2 9 + 8 1 . 0 9 PT : 2 3 2 + 5 9 . 4 2 P T : 2 2 5 + 8 7 . 1 0 P T : 2 2 7 + 0 6 . 5 8 C 2 1 1 C 2 1 2 C 2 1 3 C 214 C215 C 2 1 N50° 1 9 ' 2 8 . 8 4 " W N41° 4 4 ' 1 6 . 0 7 " W N46° 2 1 ' 1 3 . 0 3 " W N26° 15' 35.73"W N02 ° 5 3 ' 0 4 . 8 8 " W N0 2 ° 5 9 ' 5 1 . 8 1 " E N0 2 ° 5 9 ' 5 1 . 8 1 " E . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION 0903 28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 32 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP 1002 1001 CLAS S B R I P R A P EST 2 3 T O N EST 5 0 S Y G E O T E X T I L E SPEC I A L L A T E R A L ' V ' D I T C H SEE D E T A I L B CLASS B RIPRAP EST 16 TON EST 35 SY GEOTEXTILE Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C211 C212 C213 C214 C215 PI Sta 225+49.70 226+86.46 228+62.63 229+60.98 232+49.16 Δ 8°35'13" 4°36'57" 20°05'37" 23°22'31" 5°52'57" D 011°27'32.96" 011°27'32.96" 028°38'52.40" 057°17'44.81" 028°38'52.40" L 74.93 40.28 70.14 40.80 20.53 T 37.54 20.15 35.43 20.69 10.28 R 500.00 500.00 200.00 100.00 200.00 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 2 5 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 9 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 3 3 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 1 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 225+50 226+00 227+00 228+00 229+00 230+00 231+00 232+00 233+00 233+50 PI = 2 3 1 + 5 0 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 8 . 4 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 3 0 + 2 9 . 4 9 EL = 5 8 5 . 7 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 3 2 + 4 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 6 . 1 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +0.0248%-0.1208% +2.2400%-2.4204% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 24" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 2 : 0 8 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 10 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O P C S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O 233+ 0 0 234+ 0 0 2 3 5 + 0 0 236+00 237+00 238+00 239+00 240+00 241+ 0 0 24 2 + 0 0 24 3 + 0 0 SUGAR CREE K PC : 2 3 9 + 6 6 . 7 0 PC : 2 3 4 + 2 7 . 7 3 PC: 239+05.17 P C : 2 4 1 + 0 5 . 9 0 PC : 2 3 2 + 3 8 . 8 9 PC : 2 3 5 + 5 5 . 7 9 P T : 2 4 0 + 1 3 . 8 0 PT : 2 3 4 + 6 7 . 9 0 PT : 2 3 9 + 3 1 . 4 3 PT: 241+86. 0 5 PT : 2 3 2 + 5 9 . 4 2 PT: 236+15.37 PROP O S E D B R I D G E S 2 ( 1 4 5 L F ) C215 C216 C217 C 218 C 2 19 20 0 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T 20 0 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T C220 EXISTING UTILITY POLE (NOT SHOWN IN SURVEY) N02° 5 9 ' 5 1 . 8 1 " E N02° 5 9 ' 5 1 . 8 1 " E N 2 2 ° 1 0 ' 4 4 . 0 1 " E N15° 45' 05.89"W N08° 13' 44.05"W N35° 1 3 ' 0 2 . 5 3 " W S8 3 ° 3 3 ' 2 6 . 0 3 " W END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 242+36.37 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BRIDGE S2 -L1B- STA. 242+46.37 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROTECT & P R E S E R V E M O N I T O R I N G WELL DURIN G C O N S T R U C T I O N E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 1102 1101 48 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP 32 LF OF 48" CLASS III RCP1103 1104 .0 1 5 .015 .015 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 6 TON EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 28 TON EST 61 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C216 C217 C218 C219 PI Sta 234+48.01 235+86.71 239+18.32 239+90.69 Δ 19°10'52" 37°55'50" 7°31'22" 26°59'18" D 047°44'47.34" 063°39'43.12" 028°38'52.40" 057°17'44.81" L 40.17 59.58 26.26 47.10 T 20.28 30.93 13.15 24.00 R 120.00 90.00 200.00 100.00 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 3 3 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 0 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 4 1 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 2 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 233+50 234+00 235+00 236+00 237+00 238+00 239+00 240+00 241+00 241+50 PI = 2 3 5 + 6 6 . 6 8 EL = 5 8 8 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 3 4 + 2 5 . 5 1 EL = 5 8 5 . 9 1 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 3 6 + 7 0 . 1 0 EL = 5 8 6 . 6 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 3 9 + 8 5 . 9 6 EL = 5 8 6 . 7 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +1.4778%+0.0289% -1.3057% +4.7000 % EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 48" RCP PROP. 24" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 2 : 3 1 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 11 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O WL B W L B W L B W L B W L B 240+ 0 0 241+00 24 2 + 0 0 24 3 + 0 0 24 4 + 0 0 245+00 246+00 24 7 + 0 0 2 4 8 + 0 0 2 4 9 + 0 0 2 5 0 + 0 0 2 5 1 + 0 0 S U G A R C R E E K PC : 2 3 9 + 6 6 . 7 0 PC : 2 4 1 + 0 5 . 9 0 P C : 2 4 4 + 0 3 . 6 0 PC : 2 4 6 + 7 8 . 4 0 PC: 245+89.77 PT : 2 4 0 + 1 3 . 8 0 P T : 2 4 1 + 8 6 . 0 5 PT : 2 4 4 + 7 4 . 2 9 PT: 2 4 7 + 1 8 . 9 9 PT : 2 4 6 + 1 0 . 3 6 CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-) SEE SHEET 26 FOR PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED BRIDGE S2 (145 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS PROPOSED BOARDWALK #5 (190 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS =-Y4- STA. 40+00.00 -L1B- STA. 246+14.51 RETAIN PIPE 1 2 5 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T 200 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T C 2 2 0 C 2 2 1 C 222 C223 EX I S T I N G U T I L I T Y P O L E (N O T S H O W N I N S U R V E Y ) N35° 13' 02 . 5 3 " W S8 3 ° 3 3 ' 2 6 . 0 3 " W N42° 26' 44.88"W N26° 4 2 ' 3 8 . 9 3 " W N 0 3 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 . 4 2 " W END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 242+36.37 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BRIDGE S2 -L1B- STA. 242+46.37 END BRIDGE S2 BEGIN BOARDWALK #5 -L1B- STA. 243+90.37 END BOARDWALK #5 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 245+80.37 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1B- STA. 245+90.37 N 0 3 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 . 4 2 " W 32 LF OF 48" CLASS III RCP . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 R=10' (TYP.) .0 1 5 .01 5 .01 5 PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PR O P O S E D C O N C R E T E SL A B W / B E N C H Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C220 C221 C222 C223 PI Sta 241+50.28 244+41.82 246+00.13 246+98.97 Δ 61°13'31" 53°59'49" 15°44'06" 23°15'24" D 076°23'39.74" 076°23'39.74" 076°23'39.74" 057°17'44.81" L 80.14 70.68 20.60 40.59 T 44.38 38.21 10.36 20.58 R 75.00 75.00 75.00 100.00 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 4 1 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 1 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 4 9 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 3 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 241+50 242+00 243+00 244+00 245+00 246+00 247+00 248+00 249+00 249+50 PI = 2 4 2 + 0 4 . 2 4 EL = 5 9 7 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 4 4 + 3 0 . 9 1 EL = 5 9 7 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 4 6 + 1 2 . 6 3 EL = 5 8 8 . 4 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 4 8 + 3 3 . 4 2 EL = 5 8 6 . 4 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +0.0000% -4.700 0 % -0.9322% +0.5065% EXIST. 54" SS EXIST. 36" CMP STEXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN BRIDGE S2 -L1B- STA. 242+46.37 EL. = 597.00 END BRIDGE S2 BEGIN BOARDWALK #5 -L1B- STA. 243+90.37 EL. = 597.00 END BOARDWALK #5 -L1B- STA. 245+80.37 EL. = 589.98 SUGAR CREEK M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 2 : 4 7 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 12 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PC S O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WL BWLB WLB WLB WLB WLBWLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLBW L B W L B 249+00 250+00 251+00 252+00 253+00 254+00 255+00 256+00 257+00 258+00 PC : 2 5 7 + 7 6 . 5 7 PC : 2 5 2 + 3 1 . 6 1 PC : 2 5 4 + 9 9 . 8 9 PC : 2 5 6 + 3 8 . 0 0 PT : 2 5 2 + 4 0 . 7 0 PT : 2 5 5 + 8 3 . 7 4 PT : 2 5 6 + 8 2 . 5 9 RET A I N P I P E REMOVE APPROX. 61 LF OF EXISTING 36" CMP 125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EASEMENT C224 C 225 C 226 C227 N03° 27' 15.42"W N00° 50' 57.55"W N08° 45 ' 3 4 . 4 4 " E N04° 00' 54.35"W N04° 00' 54.35"W .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 RETAIN PIPE Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C224 C225 C226 PI Sta 252+36.15 255+41.91 256+60.39 Δ 2°36'18" 9°36'32" 12°46'29" D 028°38'52.40" 011°27'32.96" 028°38'52.40" L 9.09 83.85 44.59 T 4.55 42.03 22.39 R 200.00 500.00 200.00 C227 C228 C229 1301 1302 60 LF OF 36" CLASS IV RCP CLASS B RIPRAP EST. 9 TON EST. 20 SY GEOTEXTILE MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 4 9 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 2 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 5 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 4 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 249+50 250+00 251+00 252+00 253+00 254+00 255+00 256+00 257+00 257+50 PI = 249+51.69 EL = 587.00 VC = 50.00' PI = 2 5 5 + 5 1 . 6 1 EL = 5 8 8 . 6 2 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 5 3 + 2 7 . 1 8 EL = 5 8 7 . 7 4 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 5 4 + 7 7 . 1 5 EL = 5 8 7 . 6 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 257+48.53 EL = 590.25 VC = 50.00' +0.1979%-0.0728%+1.3292% +0.8246% EXIST. 10" SS PROP. 36" RCP EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 3 : 3 1 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 13 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O P C S O P C S O PC S O WLB WLB WLB WL B WLB WLB WLB 257+00 258 + 0 0 259+00 260+00 261+00 262+00 263+00 264+00 26 5 + 0 0 26 6 + 0 0 SUGAR CREEK PC : 2 6 4 + 1 6 . 2 3 P C : 2 5 7 + 7 6 . 5 7 P C : 2 5 6 + 3 8 . 0 0 P C : 2 5 9 + 3 3 . 2 0 PT : 2 6 4 + 9 9 . 1 0 P T : 2 5 8 + 6 7 . 0 6 P T : 2 5 6 + 8 2 . 5 9 PT : 2 6 0 + 5 4 . 5 0 125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EA S E M E N T C 2 2 6 C 2 2 7 C229 C 2 2 8 N08° 4 5 ' 3 4 . 4 4 " E N04 ° 0 0 ' 5 4 . 3 5 " W N04 ° 0 0 ' 5 4 . 3 5 " W N21° 54' 34.96"E N39° 17' 04.97"E N6 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 0 . 7 6 " E N6 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 0 . 7 6 " E . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C227 C228 C229 PI Sta 258+22.60 259+94.32 264+58.27 Δ 25°55'29" 17°22'30" 23°44'26" D 028°38'52.40" 014°19'26.20" 028°38'52.40" L 90.49 121.30 82.87 T 46.04 61.12 42.04 R 200.00 400.00 200.00 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 5 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 3 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 6 5 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 5 - L1B - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 257+50 258+00 259+00 260+00 261+00 262+00 263+00 264+00 265+00 265+50 PI = 2 5 8 + 2 8 . 7 8 EL = 5 9 2 . 8 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 6 0 + 4 4 . 7 6 EL = 5 8 9 . 7 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 6 1 + 2 0 . 1 8 EL = 5 8 9 . 6 9 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 5 9 + 2 3 . 3 9 EL = 5 8 8 . 9 2 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 6 1 + 8 8 . 5 9 EL = 5 8 8 . 6 1 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' -4.095 9 % +3.1777% +0.6958%-0.0977%-1.5825% +0.0063% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXIST. 8" SS M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 3 : 5 0 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 14 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O PCS O P C S O P C S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O W L B TCE TCE TCE TC E TC E TC E TC E T C E TC E TC E TC E TC E TC E TC E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PGE PGE PG E PG E P G E PG E P G E PG E PG E PG E P G E P G E 264+00 26 5 + 0 0 26 6 + 0 0 267+00 268+0 0 269 + 0 0 270 + 0 0 271+00 272+00 27 3 + 0 0 27 4 + 0 0 SUGA R C R E E K PC : 2 6 4 + 1 6 . 2 3 PC : 2 6 6 + 4 3 . 4 7 P C : 2 6 8 + 0 3 . 0 1 PC : 2 7 1 + 7 0 . 2 2 PT : 2 6 4 + 9 9 . 1 0 P T : 2 6 7 + 3 3 . 3 0 PT : 2 6 8 + 6 3 . 7 0 PT: 272 + 7 1 . 5 9 PROPOSED BRIDGE S3 (195 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS 125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EASEMENT C229 C230 C 2 3 1 C 2 3 2 =-Y5- STA. 0+00.00 -L1B- STA. 272+28.44 AVION POINT CONNECTION (-Y5-) SEE SHEET 28 FOR PLAN & PROFILE N6 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 0 . 7 6 " E N6 3 ° 0 1 ' 3 0 . 7 6 " E N20° 0 8 ' 0 3 . 3 1 " E N54° 5 4 ' 3 3 . 3 8 " E N4 1 ° 5 4 ' 0 2 . 3 1 " W END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 268+78.35 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BRIDGE S3 -L1B- STA. 268+88.35 END BRIDGE S3 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 270+81.35 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1B- STA. 270+91.35 N4 1 ° 5 4 ' 0 2 . 3 1 " W E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 1502 1501 40 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP .015 .015 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE RIP-RAP APRON AND BRIDGE FOUNDATION, SEE STRUCTURES PLANS (TYP.) PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C230 C231 C232 PI Sta 266+90.60 268+34.32 272+37.81 Δ 42°53'27" 34°46'30" 96°48'36" D 047°44'47.34" 057°17'44.81" 095°29'34.68" L 89.83 60.69 101.38 T 47.14 31.31 67.59 R 120.00 100.00 60.00 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 6 5 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 4 MATCH L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 7 3 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 6 - L1B - 573 580 590 600 610 573 580 590 600 610 265+50 266+00 267+00 268+00 269+00 270+00 271+00 272+00 273+00 273+50 PI = 2 6 8 + 2 5 . 5 0 EL = 6 0 1 . 0 0 VC = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 273+42.35 EL = 601.00 VC = 50.00' PI = 2 6 5 + 6 2 . 4 0 EL = 5 8 8 . 6 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +4.7000 % +0.0000% EXIST. 54" SS PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE PROP. 18" RCP BEGIN BRIDGE S3 -L1B- STA. 268+88.35 EL. = 601.00 END BRIDGE S3 -L1B- STA. 270+81.35 EL. = 601.00 SUGAR CREEK M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 1 3 / 2 0 2 3 4 : 3 8 : 0 6 P M , Ji m m y P r e s t w o o d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCSO T C E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE T C E T C E TCE TCE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE P G E PGE P G E PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PG E 273 + 0 0 274 + 0 0 275+ 0 0 276+00 277+00 278+00 279+00 28 0 + 0 0 2 8 1 + 0 0 282+00 SU G A R C R E E K W TV Y O L A R D P C : 2 7 4 + 6 6 . 2 9 P C : 2 7 6 + 8 2 . 9 5 PC : 2 7 9 + 0 4 . 7 8 PC : 2 8 1 + 3 8 . 6 2 P T : 2 7 2 + 7 1 . 5 9 P T : 2 7 5 + 2 6 . 2 2 PT : 2 7 7 + 9 0 . 2 6 PT : 2 8 0 + 5 5 . 1 7 P T : 2 8 2 + 3 4 . 5 5 DUK E E N E R G Y ACCE S S R O A D (GRA V E L ) C 2 3 3 C 2 3 4 C235 C236 D U K E E N E R G Y A C C E S S R O A D ( G R A V E L ) N41 ° 5 4 ' 0 2 . 3 1 " W BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 270+81.35 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1B- STA. 270+91.35 N41 ° 5 4 ' 0 2 . 3 1 " W N19° 00' 4 3 . 2 5 " W N01° 28' 5 6 . 3 8 " E N 2 6 ° 4 9 ' 3 4 . 8 4 " E N 2 6 ° 4 9 ' 3 4 . 8 4 " E N28° 0 8 ' 0 5 . 9 6 " W END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -L1B- STA. 282+17.35 1502 1501 40 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP . 0 1 5 EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 50' DUKE ENERGY ROW AGREEMENT . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 1702 1701 32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP BEGIN RETAINING WALL #2 -L1B- STA. 282+77.35 8.00' LT 1704 SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO 16' CONCRETE (STA. 282+17.25 TO 282+37.25) BEGIN SAFETY RAIL -L1B- STA. 282+37.35 7.00' LT C L A S S B R I P R A P E S T 4 T O N E S T 9 S Y G E O T E X T I L E CLASS B RIPRAP EST 37 TON EST 79 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #2 SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE NOTE: SEE SHEET CA-2 FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C233 C234 C235 PI Sta 274+96.66 277+37.19 279+81.23 Δ 22°53'19" 20°29'40" 25°20'38" D 038°11'49.87" 019°05'54.94" 016°51'06.12" L 59.92 107.31 150.39 T 30.37 54.23 76.45 R 150.00 300.00 340.00 M A T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 7 3 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 5 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 8 1 + 0 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 7 - L1B - 580 590 600 610 580 590 600 610 273+50 274+00 275+00 276+00 277+00 278+00 279+00 280+00 281+00 PI = 2 7 5 + 9 2 . 0 2 EL = 5 9 9 . 8 3 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 7 8 + 2 0 . 9 6 EL = 6 0 0 . 4 0 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 7 6 + 9 5 . 8 8 EL = 5 9 7 . 9 1 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 7 9 + 6 0 . 4 7 EL = 5 9 5 . 0 7 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' -1.8479%-3.8221 % +1.9907% -0.4672% -0.4432% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 5 : 1 1 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 16 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO P C S O P C S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO W L B WLB WLB WLB WLB WL B WLB WLB W L B WLB 301 + 0 0 302+00 PG E PG E PG E PG E TC E TC E TC E 279+00 28 0 + 0 0 2 8 1 + 0 0 282+00 283+ 0 0 284+00 285+00 SU G A R C R E E K SUGAR CREEK W TV Y O L A R D PC : 2 7 9 + 0 4 . 7 8 PC: 283+13.99 PC : 2 8 4 + 9 4 . 5 7 PC : 2 8 1 + 3 8 . 6 2 PT : 2 8 0 + 5 5 . 1 7 PT : 2 8 3 + 5 4 . 7 0 PT : 2 8 5 + 0 6 . 6 5 P T : 2 8 2 + 3 4 . 5 5 DUK E E N E R G Y ACCE S S R O A D (GRA V E L ) SEE SHEET 18 FOR -L1C- PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED BOARDWALK #6 (50 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS =-L1C- STA. 300+00.00 -L1B- STA. 285+91.88 MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 18 C235 C236 C 2 3 7 C238 D U K E E N E R G Y A C C E S S R O A D ( G R A V E L ) CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6-) SEE SHEET 29 FOR PLAN & PROFILE N01° 28' 5 6 . 3 8 " E N 2 6 ° 4 9 ' 3 4 . 8 4 " E N 2 6 ° 4 9 ' 3 4 . 8 4 " E N28° 0 8 ' 0 5 . 9 6 " W N02° 12' 59.66"W N05° 2 8 ' 4 1 . 9 0 " E END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -L1B- STA. 282+17.35 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN BOARDWALK #6 -L1B- STA. 285+15.35 END BOARDWALK #6 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 285+65.35 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1B- STA. 285+75.35 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 1702 1701 32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP BEGIN RETAINING WALL #2 -L1B- STA. 282+77.35 8.00' LT END RETAINING WALL #2 -L1B- STA. 283+27.35 8.00' LT 28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP 1704 1703 SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL B PROPOSED 258 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO 16' CONCRETE (STA. 282+17.25 TO 282+37.25) BEGIN SAFETY RAIL -L1B- STA. 282+37.35 7.00' LT END SAFETY RAIL -L1B- STA. 284+85.35 7.00' LT TRANSITION 16' CONCRETE TO 12' CONCRETE (STA. 284+85.35 TO 285+05.35) END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L1B- STA. 285+05.35 Curve Table: Alignment - L1B - C236 C237 C238 PI Sta 281+90.64 283+34.70 285+00.62 Δ 54°57'41" 25°55'06" 7°41'42" D 057°17'44.81" 063°39'43.12" 063°39'43.12" L 95.93 40.71 12.09 T 52.01 20.71 6.05 R 100.00 90.00 90.00 EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E .0 1 5 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 37 TON EST 79 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 45 TON EST 64 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #2 SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 28 TON EST 40 SY GEOTEXTILE M E M O R I A L P A R K W A Y REMOVE APPROX. 10 LF OF EXISTING 15" CMP RETAIN APPROX. 31 LF OF EXISTING 15" CMP CLASS I RIPRAP EST 35 TON EST 49 SY GEOTEXTILE 150.00 300.00 340.00 MA T C H L I N E L 1 B - S T A 2 8 1 + 0 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 6 - L1B - 572 580 590 600 572 580 590 600 281+00 282+00 283+00 284+00 285+00 286+00 286+50 PI = 2 8 2 + 0 2 . 3 5 EL = 5 9 6 . 0 0 VC = 9 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 8 3 + 2 5 . 2 4 EL = 5 9 1 . 0 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 285+02.70 EL = 589.49 VC = 50.00' PI = 2 8 1 + 1 6 . 6 0 EL = 5 9 4 . 3 8 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.8000% -0.8812% -4.0199 % +1.8840%MIN. 9' VERTICAL CLEARANCE PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXIST. 54" SS W TYVOLA RD BRIDGE PROP. 18" RCP PROP. 18" RCP BEGIN BOARDWALK #6 -L1B- STA. 285+15.35 EL. = 589.96 END BOARDWALK #6 -L1B- STA. 285+65.35 EL. = 591.25 BEGIN DITCH RT STA. 281+78.50 EL. = 591.50 END DITCH RT STA. 282+01.11 EL. = 591.02 -2.1407% 20' SPAN MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P2.dwg 06-08-2023 17 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 2 . d w g , 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 3 6 : 0 4 A M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 DETAIL B SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 3:1 3: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT -L1B- STA. 281+78 TO 282+01 RT. P C S O P C S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO W L B WLB WLB WLB WL B WLB WLB W L B WLB PC : 3 0 1 + 5 5 . 5 4 P C : 3 0 6 + 2 4 . 1 5 P C : 3 0 7 + 8 9 . 3 6 PC: 308+89.47 PC : 3 0 0 + 1 0 . 9 6 PC : 3 0 0 + 6 7 . 4 3 P T : 3 0 2 + 5 7 . 3 6 P T : 3 0 7 + 0 7 . 2 3 PT : 3 0 8 + 7 0 . 3 9 PT: 3 0 9 + 0 6 . 0 6 PT : 3 0 0 + 4 3 . 6 1 PT : 3 0 1 + 1 3 . 7 0 30 1 + 0 0 302+00 303+00 304+00 305+00 306+00 307+00 308+00 3 0 9 + 0 0 SUGAR CREEK W TV Y O L A R D =-L1C- STA. 300+00.00 -L1B- STA. 285+91.88 C301 C 3 02 C 3 0 3 C 3 0 4 SEE SHEET 17 FOR -L1B- PLAN & PROFILE MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 17 C 3 0 5 C306 Curve Table: Alignment - L1C - C307 C308 C309 C310 PI Sta 309+69.82 313+47.68 315+65.30 316+17.75 Δ 7°46'58" 24°14'04" 31°07'02" 12°52'48" E X I S T . 5 0 ' P N G E A S E M E N T E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E N 2 3 ° 4 7 ' 3 2 . 1 6 " E N10 ° 3 2 ' 2 1 . 4 1 " E N18° 37' 46.64 " W N28° 0 8 ' 5 8 . 5 3 " W N 3 3 ° 5 9 ' 2 6 . 0 4 " E 40 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP 1801 1802 PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE (STA. 301+60.00 TO 301+70.00) SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL EXIS T . 5 0 ' P N G EAS E M E N T PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE (STA. 303+25.00 TO 303+35.00) SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL .0 1 5 .0 1 5 N23° 25' 50.60"E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E TC E TC E TC E TC E .01 5 CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6-) SEE SHEET 29 FOR PLAN & PROFILE =-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.13 -L1C- STA. 302+06.10 R=10' (TYP.) CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN 12' CONCRETE -L1C- STA. 303+15.00 END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1C- STA. 303+45.00 END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN 12' CONCRETE -L1C- STA. 301+50.00 END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1C- STA. 301+80.00 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 46 TON EST 67 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 46 TON EST 67 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH PR O P O S E D C O N C R E T E S L A B W/ B E N C H Curve Table: Alignment - L1C - C301 C302 C303 C304 C305 C306 PI Sta 300+27.43 300+90.67 302+07.58 306+65.79 308+32.85 308+97.79 Δ 18°42'33" 13°15'11" 29°10'08" 9°31'12" 51°34'49" 10°33'35" D 057°17'44.81" 028°38'52.40" 028°38'52.40" 011°27'32.96" 063°39'43.12" 063°39'43.12" L 32.65 46.26 101.82 83.08 81.02 16.59 T 16.47 23.23 52.04 41.63 43.49 8.32 R 100.00 200.00 200.00 500.00 90.00 90.00 MAT C H L I N E L 1 C - S T A 3 0 9 + 0 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 9 - L1C - 575 580 590 600 610 575 580 590 600 610 300+00 301+00 302+00 303+00 304+00 305+00 306+00 307+00 308+00 309+00 PI = 3 0 0 + 8 3 . 9 3 EL = 5 9 4 . 3 5 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 2 + 0 8 . 6 4 EL = 5 9 4 . 6 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 4 + 0 4 . 6 7 EL = 5 9 2 . 8 8 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 2 + 6 8 . 3 8 EL = 5 9 2 . 6 1 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 6 + 2 7 . 3 2 EL = 5 9 1 . 8 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 8 + 2 5 . 8 8 EL = 5 9 3 . 6 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.8000%+0.8780%-0.4600%+0.2029% -3.4010 % +0.2313% EXIST. 54" SS EXIST. 8" SS EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 18" RCP BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 301+60.00 EL. = 594.526 END SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 301+70.00 EL. = 594.549 BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 303+25.00 EL. = 592.722 END SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 303+35.00 EL. = 592.742 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 3 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 5 : 0 8 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1C- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P3.dwg 06-08-2023 18 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCS O PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC: 308+89.47 PC : 3 1 3 + 0 4 . 7 4 PC : 3 1 6 + 6 2 . 9 1 PC : 3 0 9 + 5 6 . 2 2 P C : 3 1 7 + 3 9 . 9 1 P C : 3 1 5 + 4 0 . 2 4 PC : 3 1 6 + 0 6 . 4 7 PT : 3 0 8 + 7 0 . 3 9 PT : 3 0 9 + 0 6 . 0 6 P T : 3 1 3 + 8 9 . 3 4 P T : 3 1 7 + 1 0 . 5 1 PT : 3 0 9 + 8 3 . 3 9 P T : 3 1 7 + 8 3 . 7 8 PT : 3 1 5 + 8 9 . 1 2 PT : 3 1 6 + 2 8 . 9 5 309+ 0 0 310+00 311+00 312+00 313+00 314+00 315+00 316 + 0 0 317+00 318+0 0 SUGAR C R E E K 0 5 C306 C307 C 3 0 8 Curve Table: Alignment - L1C - C307 C308 C309 C310 C311 PI Sta 309+69.82 313+47.68 315+65.30 316+17.75 316+87.17 Δ 7°46'58" 24°14'04" 31°07'02" 12°52'48" 27°16'39" D 028°38'52.40" 028°38'52.40" 063°39'43.12" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" L 27.17 84.59 48.88 22.48 47.61 T 13.60 42.94 25.06 11.29 24.26 R 200.00 200.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 N33 ° 5 9 ' 2 6 . 0 4 " E N26° 12 ' 2 8 . 2 3 " E N01° 58 ' 2 3 . 8 3 " E N20° 12' 37.92"E N07° 0 4 ' 0 1 . 3 6 " W N02° 0 2 ' 2 3 . 9 5 " W 1902 1901 40 LF OF 54" CLASS IV RCP 1801 1802 C 3 09 C310 C 3 1 1 C 3 1 2 . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 N23° 25' 50.60"E N33° 05' 25.59"E PG E P G E PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PG E TC E T C E TCE TCE TC E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE PG E PGE PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E TC E TC E TC E .0 1 5 . 0 1 5 =-Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00 -L1C- STA. 311+56.66 EX I S T . 5 0 ' P N G EA S E M E N T EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E ARBOR LOOP DR CONNECTION (-Y7 ALT 1-) SEE SHEET 30 FOR PLAN & PROFILE BEGIN FARM FENCE -L1C- STA. 316+00.00 8.00' LT BEGIN FARM FENCE -L1C- STA. 316+39.82 8.00' RT END FARM FENCE -L1C- STA. 317+00.00 8.00' RT END FARM FENCE -L1C- STA. 317+00.00 8.00' LT PROPOSED 100 LF OF FARM FENCE PROPOSED 60 LF OF FARM FENCE ARBOR LOOP DR CONNECTION (-Y7 ALT 2-) SEE SHEET 31 FOR PLAN & PROFILE EST 4 T O N EST 9 S Y G E O T E X T I L E CLASS B RIPRAP EST 36 TON EST 80 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH M A T C H L I N E L 1 C - S T A 3 1 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 0 MA T C H L I N E L 1 C - S T A 3 0 9 + 0 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 8 - L1C - 577 580 590 600 610 577 580 590 600 610 309+00 310+00 311+00 312+00 313+00 314+00 315+00 316+00 317+00 317+50 PI = 3 1 0 + 2 8 . 5 3 EL = 5 9 8 . 0 0 VC = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 1 4 + 6 5 . 0 0 EL = 6 0 3 . 0 0 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 1 6 + 5 1 . 8 3 EL = 6 0 1 . 4 7 VC = 7 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 1 1 + 3 6 . 4 6 EL = 5 9 6 . 6 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 1 2 + 9 1 . 3 0 EL = 5 9 6 . 4 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 1 5 + 7 1 . 3 4 EL = 5 9 8 . 4 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.1701% +3.7782% -1.2627% -0.1293% -4.284 0 % +3.7548% +2.1701% +3.7782% -1.2627% -0.1293% -4.284 0 % +3.7548% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXIST. 8" SS PROP. 54" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 3 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 5 : 2 3 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1C- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P3.dwg 06-08-2023 19 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO P C S O P C S O P C S O PC: 319+24.86 P C : 3 2 1 + 8 2 . 9 7 PC: 324+07.62 PC : 3 2 4 + 8 8 . 7 1 P C : 3 1 7 + 3 9 . 9 1 P T : 3 2 0 + 2 6 . 2 7 P T : 3 1 7 + 1 0 . 5 1 PT : 3 2 3 + 0 8 . 1 5 PT : 3 2 4 + 2 3 . 5 2 PT: 325+73.60 P T : 3 1 7 + 8 3 . 7 8 81 + 0 0 82+00 91+64 9 1 + 0 0 318+00 319+00 320+00 321+0 0 322+00 323+00 324+00 32 5 + 0 0 3 2 6 + 0 0 SUGAR CREEK CO L I S E U M C E N T R E D R =-L1D- STA. 400+00.00 -L1C- STA. 326+01.73 COLISEUM CENTRE DR CONNECTIONS SEE SHEET 32 FOR PLAN & PROFILE =-Y8- STA. 80+00.00 -L1C- STA. 322+88.45 SEE SHEET 21 FOR -L1D- PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED 8 LF PIPE EXTENSION USING PIPE COLLAR Curve Table: Alignment - L1C - C312 C313 C314 C315 C316 PI Sta 317+61.86 319+75.84 322+46.49 324+15.59 325+36.35 Δ 5°01'37" 14°31'37" 23°54'28" 10°07'35" 64°50'59" D 011°27'32.96" 014°19'26.20" 019°05'54.94" 063°39'43.12" 076°23'39.74" L 43.87 101.42 125.18 15.91 84.89 T 21.95 50.98 63.51 7.97 47.64 R 500.00 400.00 300.00 90.00 75.00 N07° 04' 01 . 3 6 " W N02° 02' 23.95"W N16° 3 4 ' 0 1 . 2 0 " W N07° 20' 26.55" E N17° 2 8 ' 0 1 . 1 3 " E N82° 19' 00.44"E 2001 2002 32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP C 3 1 2 C 3 1 3 C 3 1 4 C 315 C 3 1 6 . 0 1 5 P G E P G E P G E T C E T C E TC E TCE TCE TCE T C E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E PG E PG E PG E PG E PG E TC E TC E . 0 1 5 .015 DEMO EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB PROP O S E D 1 0 0 L F O F F A R M F E N C E PROP O S E D 6 0 L F O F F A R M F E N C E SEE SHEET 31 FOR -Y7 ALT 2- PLAN & PROFILE =-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.66 -L1C- STA. 319+29.16 E X I S T . 5 0 ' P N G E A S E M E N T E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 2004 2003 PROPOSED 170 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL END 12' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -L1C- STA. 323+85.00 BEGIN SAFETY RAIL -L1C- STA. 324+05.00 7.00' LT END SAFETY RAIL -L1C- STA. 325+75.00 7.00' LT TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO 16' CONCRETE (STA. 323+85.00 TO 324+05.00) TRANSITION 16' CONCRETE TO 12' CONCRETE (STA. 325+75.00 TO 325+95.00) END 12' CONCRETE BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -L1C- STA. 325+95.00 MATCH LINE - S E E S H E E T 21 R=10' (TYP.) CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS I RIPRAP EST 67 TON EST 95 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE M A T C H L I N E L 1 C - S T A 3 1 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 1 9 - L1C - 577 580 590 600 610 577 580 590 600 610 317+50 318+00 319+00 320+00 321+00 322+00 323+00 324+00 325+00 326+00 326+25 PI = 3 1 8 + 7 4 . 2 1 EL = 6 0 2 . 0 8 VC = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 2 0 + 1 3 . 8 2 EL = 6 0 0 . 2 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 2 3 + 1 6 . 6 7 EL = 6 0 0 . 4 3 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 2 5 + 3 7 . 5 2 EL = 5 9 6 . 4 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 2 0 + 8 6 . 8 6 EL = 5 9 8 . 6 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 2 2 + 2 0 . 0 0 EL = 5 9 8 . 5 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +0.2775% -3.5705 % -0.2487% +4.0000% -1.3087% -2.2043% -0.1130%+1.9983% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE EXIST. 54" SS EXIST. 8" SS EXIST. 54" SS EXIST. 36" RCP ST MIN. 9' VERTICAL CLEARANCE COLISEUM CENTRE DR BRIDGE PROP. 18" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 3 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 5 : 3 8 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1C- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P3.dwg 06-08-2023 20 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O 402+00 403+00 404+00 405+00 406+ 0 0 4 0 7 + 0 0 4 0 8 + 0 0 PC : 4 0 0 + 2 8 . 8 2 PC: 403+54.74 P C : 4 0 5 + 4 9 . 8 3 PC : 4 0 6 + 5 5 . 9 9 PC: 4 0 8 + 4 1 . 2 6 P T : 4 0 0 + 6 0 . 0 8 P T : 4 0 3 + 9 9 . 4 5 PT : 4 0 6 + 1 0 . 6 8 PT: 4 0 7 + 3 1 . 0 3 PT: 408 + 8 2 . 0 3 82 + 0 0 91 + 6 4 91+00 SUGAR C R E E K CO L I S E U M C E N T R E D R C 401 C 4 0 2 C 4 0 3 C 4 0 4 C 4 0 5 Curve Table: Alignment - L1D - C401 C402 C403 C404 PI Sta 400+44.61 403+77.11 405+81.23 406+95.37 Δ 19°54'05" 5°07'24" 34°52'03" 42°59'49" D 063°39'43.12" 011°27'32.96" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" L 31.26 44.71 60.86 75.04 T 15.79 22.37 31.40 39.39 R 90.00 500.00 100.00 100.00 =-L1C- STA. 326+01.73 -L1D- STA. 400+00.00 SEE SHEET 32 FOR -Y9- PLAN & PROFILE =-Y9- STA. 90+00.00 -L1D- STA. 401+00.00 SEE SHEET 20 FOR -L1C- PLAN & PROFILE MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 20 N82° 09 ' 0 8 . 4 2 " E N62° 15' 03 . 2 9 " E N57° 07 ' 3 9 . 6 3 " E S88 ° 0 0 ' 1 7 . 3 0 " E S45° 00' 28.77"E S 4 5 ° 0 0 ' 2 8 . 7 7 " E 2101 2102 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP TCE TCE TCE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE .0 1 5 .015 .015 EXIST. 5 0 ' P N G EASEM E N T E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E CLASS B RIPRAP EST 6 TON EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE MATC H L I N E L 1 D - S T A 4 0 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 2 - L1D - 575 580 590 600 610 575 580 590 600 610 400+00 401+00 402+00 403+00 404+00 405+00 406+00 407+00 407+50 PI = 4 0 0 + 5 4 . 3 0 EL = 6 0 1 . 1 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 403+67.14 EL = 602.23 VC = 50.00' PI = 4 0 5 + 0 2 . 3 8 EL = 5 9 7 . 5 2 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +4.0000% +0.2108% -3.4863 % +0.3389% EXIST. 54" SS EXIST. 54" SS EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 24" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 3 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 5 : 5 1 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1D- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P3.dwg 06-08-2023 21 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O WL B WLB W L B 407+00 408+00 409 + 0 0 410 + 0 0 411+00 41 2 + 0 0 PC : 4 0 8 + 4 1 . 2 6 PC : 4 1 0 + 2 5 . 0 2 P C : 4 1 1 + 0 9 . 4 8 PT : 4 0 7 + 3 1 . 0 3 PT : 4 0 8 + 8 2 . 0 3 P T : 4 1 0 + 7 5 . 9 5 PT: 4 1 2 + 2 9 . 8 6 SU G A R C R E E K YORK M O N T R D (SR-11 5 6 ) HI V E D R 4 0 4 C405 C 40 6 C 4 0 7 Curve Table: Alignment - L1D - C405 C406 C407 PI Sta 408+61.72 410+51.05 411+78.17 Δ 11°40'45" 29°10'49" 68°58'15" D 028°38'52.40" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" L 40.77 50.93 120.38 T 20.46 26.03 68.69 R 200.00 100.00 100.00 END PROJECT END 12' ASPHALT -L1D- STA. 412+10.00 YORKMONT RD/HIVE DR CONNECTION (-Y10-) SEE SHEET 33 FOR PLAN & PROFILE S45° 00' 28.77"E S45° 00 ' 2 8 . 7 7 " E S33 ° 1 9 ' 4 3 . 4 1 " E S62° 30' 32.05" E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE PG E PGE PGE PGE PGE P G E .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E END ALIGNMENT -L1D- STA. 412+91.99 N: 529626.3606 E: 1428148.6276 R=10' (TYP.) N4 8 ° 3 1 ' 1 2 . 5 6 " E 3+65 1+00 2+00 3+0 0 =-Y10- STA. 0+00.00 -L1D- STA. 411+96.32 PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH MA T C H L I N E L 1 D - S T A 4 0 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 1 - L1D - 578 580 590 600 610 620 578 580 590 600 610 620 407+50 408+00 409+00 410+00 411+00 412+00 413+00 PI = 4 0 9 + 6 5 . 7 4 EL = 6 0 5 . 9 3 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 0 8 + 0 1 . 8 4 EL = 5 9 8 . 1 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +4.7500 % -0.7758% EXIST. 54" SS END GRADE -L1D- STA. 412+10.00 EL. = 604.04 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 3 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 6 : 0 7 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION -L1D- PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P3.dwg 06-08-2023 22 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) P C S O PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO P C S O P C S O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB W L B W L B SUGAR CR E E K SE E S H E E T 4 F O R -L 1 A - P L A N & P R O F I L E 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+0 0 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19 + 0 0 P C : 1 4 + 7 4 . 4 9 PC : 1 7 + 7 6 . 4 6 P C : 1 0 + 2 0 . 6 6 PC : 1 5 + 9 4 . 9 6 P C : 1 2 + 2 3 . 8 6 PC : 1 3 + 3 6 . 6 0 PT : 1 5 + 2 6 . 6 2 PT: 18 + 5 3 . 1 5 P T : 1 0 + 5 4 . 6 9 PT : 1 6 + 2 4 . 4 9 PT : 1 2 + 5 4 . 7 4 P T : 1 3 + 9 7 . 7 0 1 1 6 + 0 0 11 7 + 0 0 =-Y1- STA. 10+00.00 -L1A- STA. 116+84.60 PROPOSED BOARDWALK #7 (320 LF) SEE STRUCTURES PLANS C 1 1 C 12 C 1 3 C 1 4 C15 Curve Table: Alignment -Y1- C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 PI Sta 10+38.36 12+39.42 13+68.14 15+01.16 16+09.73 Δ 38°59'41" 17°41'33" 35°00'31" 29°52'17" 3°23'03" D 114°35'29.61" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" 011°27'32.96" L 34.03 30.88 61.10 52.14 29.53 T 17.70 15.56 31.54 26.67 14.77 R 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 C 1 6 S51° 51' 29.54"E S12° 51' 48.73"E S04° 49' 44.62"W S30° 1 0 ' 4 6 . 5 8 " E S00° 18' 29.6 1 " E S03° 04' 3 3 . 3 2 " W END BOARDWALK #7 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -Y1- STA. 13+26.00 END APPROACH SLAB BEGIN 12' ASPHALT -Y1- 13+36.00 S03° 04' 33.32"W S8 4 ° 4 8 ' 1 1 . 7 4 " E .0 1 5 EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E BEGIN BOARDWALK #7 -Y1- STA. 10+06.00 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROPOSED 10' EDGEGREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-) PROPOSED 10' EDGEREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-) TRANSITION 12' TO 10' ASPHALT (STA. 14+00.00 TO 14+20.00) CLASS I RIPRAP EST 39 TON EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE PR O P O S E D C O N C R E T E S L A B W/ B E N C H CLASS I RIPRAP EST 30 TON EST 42 SY GEOTEXTILE MA T C H L I N E Y 1 - S T A 1 7 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 4 - Y1 - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 17+50 PI = 1 3 + 6 6 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 2 . 4 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 10+36.00 EL = 590.84 VC = 20.00' PI = 1 2 + 4 6 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 2 . 4 4 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 5 + 1 0 . 0 4 EL = 5 8 0 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +0.0000% -1.6907% +0.3084% +0.0000% -4.000 0 % EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN BOARDWALK #7 -Y1- STA. 10+06.00 EL. = 590.84 EXIST. 42" SS END BOARDWALK #7 -Y1- STA. 13+26.00 EL. = 582.44 20' SPAN M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 4 : 4 2 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 23 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O WL B WL B WL B WL B W L B WLB SEE SHEET 4 FOR -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE EDGEGRE E N D R 17 + 0 0 1 8 + 0 0 19+00 20+00 21+00 PC: 17+76.46 PC : 2 0 + 1 0 . 4 4 PT : 1 8 + 5 3 . 1 5 PT : 2 0 + 2 6 . 0 1 10 6 + 0 0 1 0 7 + 0 0 1 0 8 + 0 0 10 9 + 0 0 END -Y1- TIE TO EXISTING -Y1- STA. 20+97.22 C16 C 17 Curve Table: Alignment -Y1- C16 C17 PI Sta 18+24.65 20+18.24 Δ 87°52'45" 8°55'07" D 114°35'29.61" 057°17'44.81" L 76.69 15.57 T 48.18 7.80 R 50.00 100.00 S 0 3 ° 0 4 ' 3 3 . 3 2 " W S03° 04' 33.32"W S84° 48' 11.74"E S75° 53' 04 . 8 4 " E TC E TC E T C E P G E P G E PG E P G E PG E EXIST. 60' SS E .015 .015 .0 1 5 PROPOSED 10' EDGEGREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-) PROPOSED 10' EDGEREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-) INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE (1) AND PERMANENT (2) BOLLARDS SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y1- STA. 20+82.41 PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB W/ BENCH 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT SEE SHEET L2.10 FOR ENLARGEMENT 20+93.37 -12.27' L 21+01.07 12.29' R MATCH LINE Y1 - STA 17+50 - S E E S H E E T 2 3 - Y1 - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 17+50 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 21+25 PI = 1 9 + 5 3 . 8 0 EL = 5 8 1 . 7 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 17+51.74 EL = 580.75 VC = 100.00' +0.4706% +4.7500 % EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y1- STA. 20+97.22 EL. = 588.51 EXIST. 8" SS EXIST. 10" SS M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 5 : 4 1 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 24 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCS O PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PCS O WL B WLB W L B W L B SUGA R C R E E K 201+ 0 0 20 2 + 0 0 2 0 3 + 0 0 204+ 0 0 31+ 7 6 31+ 0 0 PC : 3 0 + 3 3 . 9 2 P T : 3 0 + 4 8 . 7 5 22 + 8 4 21+00 22+00 PC: 22+36.49 PC: 2 0 + 4 6 . 4 3 P T : 2 2 + 6 8 . 1 1 P T : 2 1 + 0 3 . 4 8 118+0 0 119 + 0 0 120 + 0 0 121+0 0 122+00 123 + 0 0 =-L1A- STA. 119+19.73 -Y2- STA. 20+00.00 END -Y2- TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK -Y2- STA. 22+79.15 C21 C 2 2 Curve Table: Alignment -Y2- C21 C22 PI Sta 20+78.52 22+52.85 Δ 65°22'32" 36°14'17" D 114°35'29.61" 114°35'29.61" L 57.05 31.62 T 32.08 16.36 R 50.00 50.00 =-L1B- STA. 202+00.00 -Y3- STA. 30+00.00 END -Y3- TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK -Y3- STA. 31+70.93 C 3 1 N 6 5 ° 3 9 ' 2 8 . 3 9 " E N00° 1 6 ' 5 6 . 1 1 " E N35° 57' 20.96"W E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL A PROPOSED 10' S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y2-) PROPOSED 10' S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y3-) . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 =-L1B- STA. 200+00.00 -L1A- STA. 124+03.05 END FARM FENCE -Y2- STA. 22+68.11 7.00' RT BEGIN FARM FENCE -Y2- STA. 21+03.48 7.00' RT INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND CLDSM 10.41C PROPOSED CURB RAMP NCDOT TYPE 2 PROPOSED CURB RAMP NCDOT TYPE 2 S T R Y O N S T (N C - 4 9 ) TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK Curve Table: Alignment -Y3- C31 PI Sta 30+41.35 Δ 8°29'52" D 057°17'44.81" L 14.83 T 7.43 R 100.00 INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL - Y2 - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 - Y3 - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 PI = 2 2 + 5 1 . 7 2 EL = 5 9 1 . 7 4 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 0 + 4 3 . 4 4 EL = 5 8 2 . 3 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +1.5000% +4.4990 % +2.0000% PI = 3 1 + 5 9 . 1 5 EL = 5 9 0 . 3 9 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 0 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 4 . 3 7 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' +1.5000% +4.4874% +2.0000% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y2- STA. 22+79.15 EL. = 592.29 BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1A- -Y2- STA. 20+06.00 EL. = 581.81 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y3- STA. 31+70.93 EL. = 590.63 BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1B- -Y3- STA. 30+06.00 EL. = 584.09EXIST. 42" SS EXIST. 42" SS BEGIN DITCH LT STA. 30+17.26 EL. = 581.02 END DITCH LT STA. 31+46.15 EL. = 588.448.045 8 % 4.3806% M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 6 : 4 5 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 25 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) SEE SHEET PM-1 FOR PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PLAN DETAIL A SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 2:1 2: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.0 FT -Y3- STA. 30+17 TO 31+46 LT. PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O WLB WL B W L B WLB WL B WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB W L B WLB W L B WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB W L B WLB W L B W L B W L B W L B W L B W L B WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB W L B 2 4 4 + 0 0 24 5 + 0 0 24 6 + 0 0 24 7 + 0 0 41+ 0 0 42+ 0 0 43+0 0 4 4 + 0 0 4 5 + 0 0 4 6 + 0 0 4 7 + 0 0 P C : 4 2 + 7 2 . 9 6 PC: 40+11.73 PC: 41+33.28 P C : 4 1 + 9 5 . 4 6 PT: 4 3 + 8 8 . 9 8 P T : 4 0 + 5 7 . 1 6 PT: 41+43.47 P T : 4 2 + 0 6 . 4 3 =-Y4- STA. 40+00.00 -L1B- STA. 246+14.51 2 0 0 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T 125 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T 2 0 0 ' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T C 4 1 C42 C 4 3 C 44 Curve Table: Alignment -Y4- C41 C42 C43 C44 PI Sta 40+37.25 41+38.38 42+00.95 43+46.19 Δ 65°03'54" 5°50'16" 3°08'43" 88°37'55" D 143°14'22.02" 057°17'44.81" 028°38'52.40" 076°23'39.74" L 45.42 10.19 10.98 116.02 T 25.51 5.10 5.49 73.23 R 40.00 100.00 200.00 75.00 S62° 50' 23.36"W S02 ° 1 3 ' 3 1 . 0 5 " E S08° 03' 46.61"E S04 ° 5 5 ' 0 3 . 1 6 " E S 8 3 ° 4 2 ' 5 1 . 9 7 " W S 8 3 ° 4 2 ' 5 1 . 9 7 " W 28 LF OF 36" CLASS IV RCP 2601 2602 R=10' (TYP.) 2603 2604 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP .01 5 PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-) . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 .01 5 REMOVE APPROX. 32 LF OF EXISTING 36" CMP PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-) CLASS B RIPRAP EST 16 TON EST 36 SY GEOTEXTILE CLASS B RIPRAP EST 11 TON EST 24 SY GEOTEXTILE BEGIN FARM FENCE -Y4- STA. 44+10.00 7.00' RT END FARM FENCE -Y4- STA. 45+70.05 7.00' RT PROPOSED 160 LF OF FARM FENCE PR O P O S E D 1 0 ' x 1 0 ' L A N D I N G (S T A . 4 7 + 4 0 . 0 0 T 0 4 7 + 5 0 . 0 0 ) MAT C H L I N E Y 4 - S T A 4 6 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 7 - Y4 - 570 580 590 600 570 580 590 600 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 46+50 PI = 4 0 + 3 2 . 3 9 EL = 5 8 9 . 2 7 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 4 + 7 4 . 9 8 EL = 5 9 2 . 7 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 0 + 8 2 . 7 1 EL = 5 8 6 . 8 8 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 3 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 8 7 . 0 0 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 6 + 2 8 . 7 6 EL = 5 9 1 . 4 8 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +0.0479% +2.0000%-4.744 3 % +3.8218% -0.8112% BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1B- -Y4- STA. 40+06.00 EL. = 588.74 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROP. 36" RCP PROP. 24" RCP PROP. 24" RCP M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 7 : 4 6 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 26 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WL B WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB WLB CE N T E R PA R K D R 44+ 0 0 45+ 0 0 46+ 0 0 47+ 0 0 48+ 0 0 49+ 0 0 50+ 0 0 PC : 4 8 + 2 9 . 9 8 PT : 4 3 + 8 8 . 9 8 PT : 4 8 + 3 8 . 9 6 END -Y4- TIE TO EXISTING -Y4- STA. 49+87.03 200' D U K E T R A N S M I S S I O N E A S E M E N T PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31B Curve Table: Alignment -Y4- Δ 65°03'54" 5°50'16" 3°08'43" 88°37'55" D 143°14'22.02" 057°17'44.81" 028°38'52.40" 076°23'39.74" L 45.42 10.19 10.98 116.02 T 25.51 5.10 5.49 73.23 R 40.00 100.00 200.00 75.00 C45 Curve Table: Alignment -Y4- C45 PI Sta 48+34.47 Δ 1°01'44" D 011°27'32.96" L 8.98 T 4.49 R 500.00 S83° 4 2 ' 5 1 . 9 7 " W S83 ° 4 2 ' 5 1 . 9 7 " W 2603 2604 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP .0 1 5 .0 1 5 .0 1 5 END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y4- STA. 49+73.92 PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-) CLAS S B R I P R A P EST 1 1 T O N EST 2 4 S Y G E O T E X T I L E END FARM FENCE -Y4- STA. 45+70.05 7.00' RT PROP O S E D 1 6 0 L F O F FARM F E N C E PROPOSED 10'x10' LANDING (STA. 47+40.00 T0 47+50.00) BEGIN FARM FENCE -Y4- STA. 46+55.00 7.00' RT END FARM FENCE -Y4- STA. 47+50.00 7.00' RTPROPOSED 95 LF OF FARM FENCE S84 ° 4 4 ' 3 5 . 8 9 " W TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31A INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL SEE SHEET PM-2 FOR PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT MA T C H L I N E Y 4 - S T A 4 6 + 5 0 - S E E S H E E T 2 6 - Y4 - 585 590 600 610 620 585 590 600 610 620 46+50 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 50+84 PI = 4 8 + 8 2 . 5 4 EL = 6 1 1 . 2 4 VC = 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' +3.0237% +8.00 0 0 % +8.00 0 0 % +2.5000% END GRADE TIE TO CURB RAMP -Y4- STA. 49+73.92 EL. = 614.00 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 8 : 4 7 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 27 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O WLB WLB 270 + 0 0 271 + 0 0 27 2 + 0 0 2 7 3 + 0 0 TCE TCE TCE T C E T C E T C E TCET C E T C E T C E P G E P G E P G E P G E P G E PGE PG E P G E P G E PGE P G E PGE P G E PGE PGE EXIST . 6 0 ' S S E =-L1B- STA. 272+28.44 -Y5- STA. 0+00.00 N89° 02' 09.52"E N82° 26' 44.51"E S86° 48' 47.43"E S83° 21' 52.89 " E 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+ 6 1 PC: 5+11.09 PC : 3 + 5 0 . 8 9 P C : 1 + 3 2 . 8 5 PC : 0 + 9 3 . 6 1 P T : 5 + 5 5 . 6 1 PT : 3 + 8 0 . 9 8 PT : 1 + 5 5 . 3 4 P T : 1 + 1 0 . 8 6 C 5 0 C 5 1 C 5 3 C 5 2 END -Y5- TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK -Y5- STA. 5+60.52 N45° 36' 55.07"E .0 2 . 0 2 PROPOSED LANDING PROPOSED LANDING PROPOSED 6' TO 8' AVION POINT CONNECTION (-Y5-) RETAIN PIPE Curve Table: Alignment -Y5- C50 C51 C52 C53 PI Sta 1+02.25 1+44.13 3+65.94 5+34.95 Δ 6°35'25" 10°44'28" 3°26'55" 51°01'12" D 038°11'49.87" 047°44'47.34" 011°27'32.96" 114°35'29.61" L 17.25 22.50 30.09 44.52 T 8.64 11.28 15.05 23.86 R 150.00 120.00 500.00 50.00 - Y5 - 590 600 610 620 630 640 590 600 610 620 630 640 -0+100+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+006+10 BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1B- -Y5- STA. 0+06.70 EL. = 601.09 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE PI = 1 + 5 6 . 8 7 EL = 6 0 4 . 9 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3+28.24 EL = 612.97 VC = 5.00' PI = 4 + 0 1 . 6 0 EL = 6 1 8 . 7 8 VC = 1 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 5+54.99 EL = 634.54 VC = 5.00' +1.5000% +4.2731% +1.0134% +1.5000% +11. 5 9 0 1 % +1.5000% +8.93 0 0 % +8.33 0 0 % +1.5000% PI = 0 + 9 8 . 4 1 EL = 6 0 2 . 4 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 + 4 2 . 5 2 EL = 6 0 5 . 8 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 + 3 8 . 2 4 EL = 6 1 3 . 1 2 VC = 5 . 0 0 ' PI = 4 + 2 1 . 5 9 EL = 6 1 9 . 0 8 VC = 1 0 . 0 0 ' END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y5- STA. 5+60.52 EL. = 634.62 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 1 3 / 2 0 2 3 4 : 3 9 : 5 4 P M , Ji m m y P r e s t w o o d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 28 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PCS O P C S O P C S O P C S O PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O WL B WLB W L B WL B W L B WLB S U G A R C R E E K ME M O R I A L P K W Y 3 0 1 + 0 0 3 0 2 + 0 0 3 0 3 + 0 0 3 0 4 + 0 0 3 0 5 + 0 0 PGE PGE PGE P G E PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PG E P G E PGE PGE TCE TCE TCE TCE T C E T C E TCE TCE TCE TCE EXIS T . 6 0 ' S S E 3+81 1+00 2+00 3+00 P C : 0 + 4 1 . 8 9 P C : 1 + 1 4 . 1 4 PC : 2 + 0 4 . 3 5 PC: 2+76.85 P T : 0 + 7 2 . 4 8 PT : 1 + 5 4 . 9 2 PT: 2 + 4 7 . 6 1 PT: 2+95.90 =-L1C- STA. 302+06.11 -Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.00 END -Y6 ALT2- TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK -Y6 ALT2- STA. 3+75.28 PROPOSED 10' CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6 ALT2-) C 6 1 C 6 2 C 6 3 C 6 4 N88 ° 4 6 ' 1 8 . 1 3 " E S73° 4 1 ' 5 7 . 3 5 " E S50° 20' 00.35"E S 0 0 ° 4 5 ' 3 8 . 0 4 " E S55° 19' 47.91"E Curve Table: Alignment -Y6- C61 C62 C63 C64 PI Sta 0+57.31 1+34.82 2+27.44 2+87.17 Δ 17°31'45" 23°21'57" 49°34'22" 54°34'10" D 057°17'44.81" 057°17'44.81" 114°35'29.61" 286°28'44.03" L 30.59 40.78 43.26 19.05 T 15.42 20.68 23.09 10.32 R 100.00 100.00 50.00 20.00 EXIST. 15' SSE PROPOSED LANDING 1+77.00 10.00' R 1+87.00 10.00' R . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31B NATIONAL AVE END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y6 ALT2- STA. 2+76.85 PROPOSED 10' CONCRETE 3+34.19 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT - Y6 ALT2 - 590 600 610 620 590 600 610 620 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 PI = 0 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL = 5 9 4 . 8 3 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' +1.5000% -5.52 8 7 % -0.6555% +8.28 7 0 % +2.0000% +4.7430 % EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1C- -Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+06.00 EL. = 594.54 END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y6 ALT2- STA. 3+75.28 EL. = 609.87 PV I S T A = 1 + 7 7 . 0 0 PV I E L E V = 6 0 7 . 4 2 PV I S T A = 2 + 9 9 . 9 2 PV I E L E V = 6 1 2 . 9 8 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 0 : 5 5 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 29 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCS O SUG A R C R E E K 309 + 0 0 310 + 0 0 311 + 0 0 312 + 0 0 313 + 0 0 31 4 + 0 0 P G E PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PG E PG E PGE T C E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE E X I S T . 5 0 ' P N G E A S E M E N T E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 0 + 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+0 0 3 + 0 0 4 + 0 0 PC: 0 + 4 6 . 0 6 P C : 2 + 4 2 . 2 9 P C : 1 + 9 0 . 6 3 PC : 3 + 2 9 . 6 5 PC : 3 + 6 7 . 8 4 P T : 0 + 9 6 . 8 0 PT: 3 + 0 0 . 3 2 P T : 2 + 0 4 . 4 8 PT : 3 + 4 0 . 2 2 PT: 3 + 7 6 . 7 9 ARB O R L O O P D R =-L1C- STA. 311+56.66 -Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00 PROPOSED 6' CONNECTION (-Y7-ALT1-) END -Y7-ALT1- TIE TO EXISTING -Y7-ALT1- STA. 3+94.04 ARBOR LO O P D R P R O P O S E D C U R B R A M P C L D S M 1 0 . 3 1 A S P E C I A L L A T E R A L ' V ' D I T C H S E E D E T A I L A T I E T O E X I S T I N G M U P - Y7-ALT1 - 590 600 610 620 590 600 610 620 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+25 PI = 1 + 0 2 . 9 7 EL = 6 0 2 . 7 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 + 3 8 . 3 6 EL = 6 1 8 . 6 4 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 0 + 3 4 . 5 0 EL = 5 9 7 . 3 0 VC = 3 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 1 + 5 9 . 5 2 EL = 6 0 3 . 7 5 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.0000% -0.6007% +8.32 9 1 % +7.96 2 2 % +1.7602% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 1 : 5 7 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 30 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) P C S O PC S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O P C S O 3 1 7 + 0 0 3 1 8 + 0 0 3 1 9 + 0 0 3 2 0 + 0 0 3 2 1 + 0 0 PG E T C E T C E T C E T C E TC E T C E T C E P G E P G E PG E PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE T C E EX I S T . 5 0 ' P N G EA S E M E N T EX I S T . 6 0 ' S S E 0+0 0 1 + 0 0 2+00 3+00 4+00 P C : 0 + 1 1 . 2 9 PC: 1 + 1 0 . 5 5 PC : 2 + 0 6 . 9 6 PC: 4+72.44 PT: 0 + 4 0 . 4 7 PT : 1 + 4 6 . 6 5 P T : 2 + 4 0 . 0 1 PT: 4+95.90 A R B O R L O O P D R =-L1C- STA. 319+29.19 -Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.00 PROPOSED 6' ARBOR LOOP DR CONNECTION (-Y7-ALT2-) C 7 1 S 0 6 ° 1 5 ' 1 0 . 4 0 " E C72 S47° 37' 04.96"E C 7 3 Curve Table: Alignment -Y7- C71 C72 C73 C74 PI Sta 0+29.17 1+29.43 2+23.76 4+87.29 Δ 83°35'22" 41°21'55" 25°14'53" 89°05'59" D 286°28'44.03" 114°35'29.61" 076°23'39.74" 379°53'20.40" L 29.18 36.10 33.05 23.45 T 17.88 18.88 16.80 14.85 R 20.00 50.00 75.00 15.08 .0 1 5 . 0 1 5 C74 END -Y7-ALT2- TIE TO EXISTING -Y7-ALT2- STA. 5+01.65 PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.40B PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31A SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL A PROPOSED 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC PROPOSED 10'x10' LANDING (STA.1+90.00 TO 2+00.00) PROPOSED 140 LF OF FARM FENCE BEGIN FARM FENCE -Y7-ALT2- STA. 2+60.00 4.00' RT END FARM FENCE -Y7-ALT2- STA. 4+00.00 4.00' RT PROPOSED BOULDER (TYP.) TIE TO EXISTING MUP PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31B S72° 51' 57.64"E - Y7-ALT2 - 600 610 620 630 600 610 620 630 PI = 1 + 7 4 . 5 4 EL = 6 1 4 . 3 1 VC = 3 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 3 + 3 2 . 9 8 EL = 6 2 4 . 1 3 VC = 3 9 . 7 5 ' PI = 0 + 2 5 . 4 1 EL = 6 0 1 . 8 8 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 2 + 1 7 . 6 5 EL = 6 1 5 . 1 7 VC = 3 8 . 6 2 ' PI = 4 + 4 5 . 0 0 EL = 6 2 5 . 7 3 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' +2.0000% +8.33 0 0 % +2.0021% +7.76 4 9 % +2.0000% +6.827 0 % +1.4309% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE -0+100+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+006+10 BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1C- -Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+06.46 EL. = 601.51 END GRADE TIE TO EXISTING GRADE -Y7-ALT2- STA. 5+00.00 EL. = 629.38 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 2 : 5 4 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 31 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) DETAIL B SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 2:1 2: 1 O R FL A T T E R FILL SLOPE NATURAL GROUND D MIN D= 1.5 FT -Y7- STA. 3+79 TO 4+82 RT. PC S O PCS O PC S O PC S O PCS O PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O SUG A R C R E E K 32 1 + 0 0 32 2 + 0 0 323 + 0 0 324 + 0 0 325+0 0 3 2 6 + 0 0 81+00 82+00 PC: 80+18.51 P C : 8 1 + 3 0 . 5 3 PC: 81+68.24P T : 8 0 + 5 7 . 7 9 PT: 81+61.54 PT: 81+90.71 PC: 9 0 + 0 7 . 7 3 PC: 91+02.43 PT: 90+52.23PT: 91+41.58 91+00 400+00 402 + 0 0 403 + 0 0 =-Y8- STA. 80+00.00 -L1C- STA. 322+88.45 =-Y9- STA. 90+00.00 -L1D- STA. 401+00.00 END -Y8- TIE TO EXISTING -Y8- STA. 82+04.32 END -Y9- TIE TO EXISTING -Y9- STA. 91+58.84 PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31B PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.31A C 81 C 82 C83 C 9 1 C 9 2 Curve Table: Alignment -Y8- C81 C82 C83 PI Sta 80+39.90 81+46.68 81+80.83 Δ 56°15'25" 39°29'08" 64°21'28" D 143°14'22.02" 127°19'26.24" 286°28'44.03" L 39.27 31.01 22.47 T 21.38 16.15 12.58 R 40.00 45.00 20.00 Curve Table: Alignment -Y9- C91 C92 PI Sta 90+35.22 91+23.07 Δ 84°59'59" 44°51'41" D 190°59'09.35" 114°35'29.61" L 44.51 39.15 T 27.49 20.64 R 30.00 50.00 S88° 53' 46.85"E N34° 50' 4 8 . 4 7 " E N74° 19' 56.47"E N09° 58' 28.37"E S11° 19' 39.60"W S56° 11 ' 2 0 . 9 0 " W S28° 48' 38.06"E PGE PGE PGE TCE TCE TCE T C E TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGE PGEE X I S T . 5 0 ' P N G E A S E M E N T E X I S T . 6 0 ' S S E . 0 1 5 .0 1 5 R=10' (TYP.) END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y9- STA. 91+46.67 END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y8- STA. 81+93.49 PROPOSED 10' COLISEUM CENTRE DR CONNECTION (-Y8-) PROPOSED 10' COLISEUM CENTRE DR CONNECTION (-Y9-) C O L I S E U M C E N T R E D R INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT SEE SHEET PM-3 FOR PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN - Y8 - 590 600 610 620 590 600 610 620 - Y9 - 590 600 610 620 590 600 610 620 80+00 81+00 82+00 82+50 90+00 91+00 91+81 PI = 8 0 + 9 5 . 9 9 EL = 6 0 6 . 2 7 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 8 1 + 7 8 . 1 5 EL = 6 1 0 . 6 9 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 8 0 + 2 0 . 9 9 EL = 6 0 0 . 0 5 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' +0.9512% +1.5000% +8.30 0 1 % +5.3729 % PI = 91+31.15 EL = 610.02 VC = 20.00' PI = 9 0 + 2 6 . 8 3 EL = 6 0 1 . 7 3 VC = 2 0 . 0 0 ' +1.5000% +7.94 2 4 % +2.0000% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1D- -Y9- STA. 90+06.00 EL. = 601.42 END GRADE TIE TO CURB RAMP -Y9- STA. 91+46.67 EL. = 610.33 BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1C- -Y8- STA. 80+06.00 EL. = 599.82 END GRADE TIE TO CURB RAMP -Y8- STA. 81+93.49 EL. = 610.83 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 3 : 5 4 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 32 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O P C S O P C S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PCS O PC S O PC S O PC S O W L B WLB WL B WLB WLB W L B YORKMONT RD (SR-1156) HI V E D R 40 9 + 0 0 41 0 + 0 0 411+00 412 + 0 0 TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE PG E PGE PG E PGE PGE P G E 1+00 2+ 0 0 3+00 P C : 3 + 0 0 . 0 6 PC: 2+12.85 P C : 1 + 2 0 . 7 8 PC: 0+11.78 PT: 3+37.97 PT: 2+55.75 PT : 1 + 6 4 . 9 5 P T : 0 + 2 9 . 4 8 =-Y10- STA. 0+00.00 -L1D- STA. 411+96.32 PROPOSED 8' YORKMONT RD/HIVE DR CONNECTION (-Y10-) C101 S73° 55' 1 2 . 6 8 " E C 10 2 S40° 10' 28.26"E C 1 0 3 S89° 1 9 ' 4 0 . 7 3 " E C 1 0 4 S45° 53' 38.06"E S23° 12' 19.24"E SEE SHEET 22 FOR -L1D- PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE (STA. 1+97.00 TO 2+07.00) SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR DETAIL SUGA R C R E E K Curve Table: Alignment - Y10 - C101 C102 C103 C104 PI Sta 0+21.26 1+43.53 2+35.72 3+19.98 Δ 50°42'53" 33°44'44" 49°09'12" 43°26'03" D 286°28'44.03" 076°23'39.74" 114°35'29.61" 114°35'29.61" L 17.70 44.17 42.89 37.90 T 9.48 22.75 22.87 19.91 R 20.00 75.00 50.00 50.00 PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.40B END ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y10- STA. 3+41.08 END -Y10- TIE TO EXISTING -Y10- STA. 3+65.23 R=10' (TYP.) . 0 1 5 . 0 1 5 3301 3302 CLASS B RIPRAP EST 4 TON EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE 32 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP END 8' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y10- STA. 1+87.00 END CONCRETE BEGIN 8' ASPHALT -Y10- STA. 2+17.00 10' 10' TRANSITION 12' TO 8' TRANSITION 8' TO 12' 10' TRANSITION 8' TO 12' GRADE TO DRAIN CLASS B RIPRAP EST 39 TON EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL - Y10 - 595 600 610 620 630 595 600 610 620 630 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 3+75 PI = 1 + 5 4 . 9 7 EL = 6 1 2 . 3 8 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PI = 0 + 7 0 . 2 4 EL = 6 0 5 . 5 3 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.0000% +8.08 3 2 % +3.0000% BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1D- -Y10- STA. 0+06.00 EL. = 604.24 END GRADE TIE TO CURB RAMP -Y10- STA. 3+41.08 EL. = 617.96 EXIST. 8" SS PROP. 18" RCP BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 1+97.00 EL. = 613.637 END SWALE BRIDGE STA. = 2+07.00 EL. = 613.937 M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 4 : 5 1 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB JAP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 33 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O PC S O 10 0 + 0 0 10 1 + 0 0 1 0 2 + 0 0 1102+69 1101+00 1102+00 PC : 1 1 0 0 + 1 4 . 9 4 PT : 1 1 0 0 + 5 7 . 4 8 PC : 1 1 0 2 + 1 0 . 0 8 PT : 1 1 0 2 + 2 3 . 9 1 SU G A R C R E E K MO U N T I N G RO C K R D McDO W E L L FARMS D R =-L1A- STA. 101+01.87 -Y11- STA. 1100+00.00 END -Y11- TIE TO PROPOSED SIDEWALK -Y11- STA. 1102+59.27 C 110 1 Curve Table: Alignment - Y11 - C1101 C1102 PI Sta 1100+36.23 1102+16.99 Δ 4°52'29" 1°35'05" D 011°27'32.96" 011°27'32.96" L 42.54 13.83 T 21.28 6.92 R 500.00 500.00 PROPOSED CURB RAMP CLDSM 10.33 S80° 31' 47.76"W EX I S T . 1 5 ' S S E END 10' ASPHALT BEGIN CONCRETE -Y11- STA. 1102+54.32 C 110 2 S75° 39' 18.91"W S77° 14' 24.15"W R=10' (TYP.) SEE SHEET 4 FOR -L1A- PLAN & PROFILE PROPOSED 10' MOUNTING ROCK RD CONNECTION (-Y11-) .0 1 5 TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE (1) AND PERMANENT (2) BOLLARDS SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL DEMO & REPLACE 4' SIDEWALK 1' ASPHALT SAWCUT SEE SHEET L2.10 FOR ENLARGEMENT - Y11 - 565 570 580 590 600 565 570 580 590 600 1100+00 1101+00 1102+00 1102+80 PI = 1 1 0 1 + 4 9 . 7 9 EL = 5 8 2 . 0 6 VC = 5 0 . 0 0 ' +2.0000% +1.1989% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BEGIN GRADE TIE TO -L1A- -Y11- STA. 1100+06.00 EL. = 579.19 END GRADE TIE TO SIDEWALK -Y11- STA. 1102+59.27 EL. = 583.38 EXIST. 8" SS M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - P 4 . d w g , 6/ 8 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 5 5 : 4 5 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE 05/10/2305/10/23 MEK-20000 GB ED, JP 1" = 30' / 1"=6' MEK-20000-P4.dwg 06-08-2023 34 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. NC-GRID-(NAD83) 249 SF MEN'S 101 249 SF WOMEN'S 100 262 SF STORAGE 102 P C S O P C S O P C S O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO F-101 F-102 F-103 F-104 P-106 F-105 F-103 P-107R-103 R-103 M-101 FURNISHINGS CODE DESCRIPTION F-101 BENCH - OWNER PROVIDED F-102 BIKE RACK - OWNER PROVIDED F-103 COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD - OWNER PROVIDED F-104 PERMANENT BOLLARD - OWNER PROVIDED F-105 TRASH RECEPTACLE - OWNER PROVIDED MISCELLANEOUS CODE DESCRIPTION M-101 RESTROOM + STORAGE FACILITY - SEE ARCHITECTURE PAVING CODE DESCRIPTION P-106 CURB RAMP, TYP. P-107 CONCRETE PAVING RAILING, FENCES, AND GATES CODE DESCRIPTION R-103 ELECTRONIC SLIDING ACCESS GATE - PROVIDED BY OWNER. SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 2B-2 WALLS AND CURBS GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. SITE LEGEND GENERAL HARDSCAPE NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE PROPOSED CONDUIT LOCATIONS (E.G. IRRIGATION, ELECTRICAL, NATURAL GAS, ETC.) ARE COORDINATED AND PROPERLY INSTALLED PRIOR TO HARDSCAPE INSTALLATION. 2.ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS FOR PROPRIETARY HARDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE PROVIDED FOR CONSIDERATION, UNLESS THAT PRODUCT IS A DIRECT PURCHASE BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT INFORMATION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT. 3.FULL-SIZE MOCK UPS FOR EACH FORM OF CONSTRUCTION AND FINISH REQUIRED SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ON-SITE TO DO THE FOLLOWING: a.ILLUSTRATE FINISHES AND MATERIALS, JOINT PATTERNS, EDGE TREATMENTS, MATERIALS, AND COLORS b.DEMONSTRATE AESTHETIC EFFECTS c.DEMONSTRATE THE QUALITIES OF PRODUCTS AND WORKMANSHIP d.DEMONSTRATE ACCEPTABLE COORDINATION BETWEEN COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, e.DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED INSTALLATION TOLERANCES, f.PERFORM PRECONSTRUCTION TESTING g.ESTABLISH THE STANDARD BY WHICH COMPLETED WORK WILL BE JUDGED. BUILD MOCK UPS IN LOCATION AND OF SIZE AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. MOCK UPS MAY REMAIN PART OF THE COMPLETED WORK IF APPROVED, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4.FOR COLD WEATHER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, IF AIR TEMPERATURE HAS FALLEN TO OR IS EXPECTED TO FALL BELOW 40° F, CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY HEAT WATER AND AGGREGATES BEFORE MIXING TO OBTAIN A CONCRETE MIXTURE TEMPERATURE OF NOT LESS THAN 50° F AND NOT MORE THAN 80° F AT POINT OF PLACEMENT. 5.FOR HOT WEATHER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL COOL INGREDIENTS BEFORE MIXING TO MAINTAIN CONCRETE TEMPERATURE BELOW 90° F AT TIME OF PLACEMENT. 6.PROOF-ROLL PREPARED SUBBASE TO IDENTIFY SOFT POCKETS AND UNSTABLE AREAS. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADDITIONAL COMPACTION IS NEEDED. PROCEED WITH INSTALLATION ONLY AFTER UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBGRADE BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. PROOF ROLL WITHIN 72 HOURS OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT. 7.SET, BRACE, AND SECURE EDGE FORMS AND GUIDES TO REQUIRED LINES, GRADES, AND ELEVATIONS. INSTALL FORMS TO ALLOW CONTINUOUS PROGRESS OF WORK AND SO FORMS CAN REMAIN IN PLACE AT LEAST 24 HOURS AFTER CONCRETE PLACEMENT. CLEAN FORMS AFTER EACH USE AND COAT WITH FORM-RELEASE AGENT TO ENSURE SEPARATION FROM CONCRETE WITHOUT DAMAGE. 8.BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, INSPECT AND COMPLETE FORMWORK INSTALLATION, STEEL REINFORCEMENT, AND ITEMS TO BE EMBEDDED OR CAST-IN. REMOVE SNOW, ICE, OR FROST FROM SUBBASE SURFACE AND STEEL REINFORCEMENT BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON FROZEN SURFACES. REMOVE LOOSE MATERIAL FROM COMPACTED SUBBASE IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. MOISTEN SUBBASE TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM DAMPENED CONDITION AT TIME CONCRETE IS PLACED. DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE AROUND MANHOLES OR OTHER STRUCTURES UNTIL THEY ARE AT REQUIRED FINISH ELEVATION AND ALIGNMENT. 9.CONTROL, EXPANSION, AND OTHER JOINTS FOR CONCRETE SURFACES AND STRUCTURES, SUCH AS STAIRS, WALKS, ETC., SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND DETAILS. IF NOT SHOWN, CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE EQUAL TO WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BUT IN NO INSTANCE SHALL EXCEED 8'. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE MAXIMUM 30' SPACING. 10.CONSTRUCT CONTINUOUS, WATER-TIGHT EXPANSION JOINTS WHERE WALKS MEET RIGID STRUCTURES SUCH AS CURBS, STEPS, WALLS, FIXED SLABS, OR VERTICAL STRUCTURES. 11.WHERE NEW SIDEWALK ADJOINS EXISTING WALKWAY, PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT BY DRILLING INTO THE FACE OF THE EXISTING WALK FOR PLACEMENT OF DOWELS. TIE NEW SIDEWALKS INTO NEAREST EXISTING PAVEMENT JOINT; MATCH WIDTH OF EXISTING WALKWAY. 12.PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1% CROSS SLOPE, 1.75% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE ON WALKS, PAVED SURFACES, AND TRAILS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE NATURAL DRAINAGE FLOW. 13.FINISH GRADE OF CONCRETE OR PAVERS SHALL BE 1” ABOVE FINISH GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. FINISH GRADE OF ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT SHALL BE 1/2” ABOVE FINISH GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. 14.PER ADA GUIDELINES, TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES ARE REQUIRED 24” IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF ALL CURB RAMP LANDINGS. THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL START AT THE BACK OF ALL PROPOSED FLUSH CURBS. 15.PAVEMENT TOLERANCES SHALL BE WITHIN THE FOLLOWING: a.ELEVATION: 1/4 INCH b.RUNNING SLOPE: PLUS 0.5%, NO MINUS c.CROSS SLOPE: PLUS 0.5%, NO MINUS d.THICKNESS: PLUS 3/8 INCH, MINUS 1/4 INCH e.SURFACE: GAP BELOW 10-FOOT-LONG, UNLEVELED STRAIGHT EDGE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4 INCH f.JOINT AND SCORING SPACING: 1/2 INCH g.CONTRACTION JOINT DEPTH: PLUS 1/4 INCH, NO MINUS h.JOINT WIDTH: PLUS 1/8 INCH, NO MINUS i.JOINT AND SCORING LINES SHOULD BE IN STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT 16.PROHIBIT TRAFFIC FROM PAVEMENT FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS AFTER PLACEMENT. MAINTAIN PAVEMENT FREE OF STAINS, DISCOLORATION, DIRT, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE DAMAGED FINISHES AND REPLACE DAMAGED OR DEFECTIVE PAVER OR CONCRETE UNITS AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE TO THE OWNER. 18.LAYOUT OF CONCRETE JOINTS AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. LAYOUT NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE WALKS, HARDSCAPE, AND OTHER PAVED AREAS AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL IS AT RISK FOR REPLACEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 2.LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINES FROM WHICH THEY ARE MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 3.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TAKEN TO THE FACE OR CENTERLINE OF ELEMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.WRITTEN DIMENSIONAL AND COORDINATE INFORMATION SHALL PREVAIL. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 6.DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATES ARE PROVIDED IN DECIMAL FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.UTILITIES WITH SURFACE ACCESS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PAVING PATTERN AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO LAYOUT DRAWINGS. 8.ANGLES TO BE 90 DEGREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9.ALIGN ALL JOINTS, CORNERS, AND EDGES AS SHOWN. 10.FINAL LAYOUTS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. FURNISHING NOTES 1.INSTALL SITE FURNISHINGS PLUMB, LEVEL, TRUE TO LINE, AND SECURELY ANCHORED AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COMPLETE FIELD ASSEMBLY OF SITE FURNISHINGS WHERE REQUIRED. 2.ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS FOR PROPRIETARY SITE FURNISHINGS MAY BE PROVIDED FOR CONSIDERATION, UNLESS THAT PRODUCT IS A DIRECT PURCHASE BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT INFORMATION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. 3.FURNISHING LOCATION AND QUANTITIES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR FURNISHING PRODUCT SELECTIONS, LOCATIONS, STYLES, QUANTITIES, ETC. PRIOR TO PURCHASE. 4.FURNISHINGS TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE OPTION WHERE POSSIBLE. 5.BRING DISCREPANCIES THAT EXIST BETWEEN THE PLAN AND SUBSEQUENT DRAWINGS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO PURCHASING PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION. 6.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, INSTALL SITE FURNISHINGS AFTER LANDSCAPING AND PAVING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 7.AFTER COMPLETING SITE FURNISHING INSTALLATION, INSPECT COMPONENTS. REMOVE SPOTS, DIRT, AND DEBRIS. REPAIR DAMAGED FINISHES TO MATCH ORIGINAL FINISH OR REPLACE IF REPAIRS CANNOT BE MADE. REPAIRS SHALL BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. SHOULD REPAIRS BE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE FURNISHING OR DAMAGED COMPONENT AS APPLICABLE. CDOT NOTES: 1.NON-STANDARD ITEMS (IE: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BEFORE INSTALLATION. FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE MAINTAINED STREETS, CONTACT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV. 2.DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE CDOT WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK (WATCH), THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), AND THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS. 3.ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S ROW OR CITY MAINTAINED INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE APPROVED BY CDOT AND WILL REQUIRE A ROW USE PERMIT OR ROW LEASE DEPENDING UPON THE PROPOSED SCOPE AND DURATION OF CLOSURE. THESE APPROVALS ARE IN ADDITION TO SITE PLAN APPROVALS AND SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH CDOT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ROWUSEPERMIT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV AT LEAST 5 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR IMPACTS LESS THAN 30 DAYS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LEASING AGREEMENT@CHRLOTTENC.GOV AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR IMPACTS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS. EVERY EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO ALL USERS OF THE PUBLIC ROW. 4.THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT THE IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER, TONY TAGLIAFERRI, OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) OR THEIR DESIGNEE AT 704-336-4119 TO IDENTIFY ANY CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION EQUIPMENT. 60-90 DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE RELOCATION. DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELATED RELOCATION COST AND/OR ANY REPAIR COST CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER. 5.PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING AND/OR STREET LIGHTING SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CDOT. DEVELOPER TO CONTACT CANDANCE INGE (704-336-3932 OR CANDACE.INGE@CHARLOTTENC.GOV) FOR LOCAL STREET LIGHTING CRITERIA WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECTS AND TO CONTACT BRUCE HORLDT (704-589-5836 OR BRUCE.HORLDT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV) FOR ALL OTHER PROJECTS LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY AND CDOT AS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE LIGHTING LEVELS, LIGHTING LAYOUT AND REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION. 6.PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT UTILITY RELOCATION COORDINATION - FOR UTILITY COORDINATION RELATED TO BOTH EXISTING UTILITY RELOCATION NEEDS AND PROPOSED NEW UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT UTILITYWORKPERMIT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV. 7.A JOINT USE MANHOLE (MEET-ME MANHOLE) IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO ACCOMMODATE ALL UTILITY TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS. THE JOINT USE MANHOLE SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. MEK-20000 MDD APM MEK-20000-S1 Trailhead.dwg 08-31-2022 1"=30' C2.00 TRAIL HEAD SITE PLAN M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - S 1 T r a i l h e a d . d w g , 6/ 2 2 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 2 1 : 2 9 A M , Ji m m y P r e s t w o o d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION 249 SF MEN'S 101 249 SF WOMEN'S 100 262 SF STORAGE 102 P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PCS O PC S O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. GRADING LEGEND MEK-20000 MDD APM MEK20000-G1.dwg 08-25-2022 1"=30' C3.00 TRAIL HEAD GRADING PLAN M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K 2 0 0 0 0 - G 1 . d w g , 6/ 2 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 3 3 : 4 6 P M , Ji m m y P r e s t w o o d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION 249 SF MEN'S 101 249 SF WOMEN'S 100 262 SF STORAGE 102 P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O P C S O PC S O PCS O PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. GRADING LEGEND MEK-20000 MDD APM MEK20000-DA1.dwg 08-25-2022 1"=30' C3.01 TRAIL HEAD DRAINAGE PLAN TO DI-101 DA=0.26 AC C=0.95 TO DI-106 DA=0.20 AC C=0.95 TO DI-102 DA=0.26 AC C=0.95 TO DI-103 DA=0.12 AC C=0.95 TO DI-107 DA=0.04 AC C=0.95 TO CB-104 DA=0.13 AC C=0.95 TO CB-201 DA=0.17 AC C=0.95 TO JB-202 DA=0.39 AC C=0.95 SEE THIS SHEET SE E T H I S S H E E T TO OCB-202 DA=0.39 AC C=0.95 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 ft. M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K 2 0 0 0 0 - D A 1 . d w g , 6/ 2 3 / 2 0 2 3 2 : 5 6 : 4 9 P M , Br i a n B e r n a r d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO YI-105 DA=0.04 AC C=0.70 Construction Method & Structure Plans FLOW M: \ P r o j e c t s \ M E K \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 \ 0 4 - P r o d u c t i o n \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ C o n s t r u c t i o n D r a w i n g s \ C u r r e n t D r a w i n g s \ M E K - 2 0 0 0 0 - D 2 . d w g , 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 1 6 : 0 8 P M , Ji m m y P r e s t w o o d CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. www.mcadamsco.com phone 704. 527. 0800 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293, C-187 2100 South Tryon Street Suite 400 Charlotte, NC 28203 MEK-20000 GB JAP NTS MEK-20000-D2.dwg 06/23/2023 2B-11 CULVERT RIPRAP INFORMATION TABLE GENERAL NOTES: 1.THESE BRIDGES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LRFD GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES, 2009. 2.UNIFORM LIVE LOAD = 90 PSF AS PER LRFD GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES. 3.DESIGN VEHICLE LOADING = AASHTO H5 (INCLUDES AMBULANCES AND OTHER VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT UP TO 10,000 LB). 4.ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE AASHTO M270 GRADE HPS 50W. 5.BRIDGE STRUCTURES S1, S2, & S3 SHALL BE PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES. 6.FABRICATOR OF PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES SHALL INDICATE THE LOCATION OF DRAINAGE HOLES FOR THE BRIDGE TUBULAR MEMBERS IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS. 7.CONCRETE DECKS SHALL BE CLASS AA CONCRETE AND ADHERE TO NCDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND UTILITY ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITIES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED BY CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE COUNTY. 9.FOR SUBMITTALS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 10.FOR FALSEWORK AND FORMWORK, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 11.FOR CRANE SAFETY, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 12.FOR GROUT FOR STRUCTURES, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 13.FOR PLACING LOAD ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 14.FOR PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DETAILS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 15.BRIDGE LOADINGS ARE ESTIMATED. AFTER SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ARE SUBMITTED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CHECK THE END BENTS FOR ACTUAL BRIDGE LOADINGS. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE FORWARDED TO ENGINEER OF RECORD UPON RECEIPT. 16.FOR BOARDWALK CONNECTION TO BRIDGE END BENTS, SEE S-6. 17.EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIAL PROVISIONS, ALL MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2018 "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES" OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE (TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS) 12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH 6'-0"6'-0" 4' - 0 " M I N . RA I L I N G CL -L1A- OR -L1B- CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK GRADE POINT TYPICAL SECTION PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CHAIN BEGIN STATION ELEVATION ELEVATIONEND STATION LENGTH REMARKS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOCATIONS BRIDGE # -L1A-115+28.68 116+48.68S1 120.00' S2 591.00 591.00 S3 2 SPAN BRIDGE STRUCTURE (50' + 145') -L1B-242+45.37 243+90.37 145.00'597.00 597.00 -L1B-268+87.35 270+82.35 195.00'601.00 601.00 END BRIDGE FRAMES INTO BOARDWALK 3 END BRIDGE FRAMES INTO BOARDWALK 5 *SLOPE *REFER TO GREENWAY PLANS FOR REQUIRED BRIDGE DECK SLOPES S-1 GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL SECTION 210089 NM S-1 GENERAL NOTES.dwg 210089 JML S-1 GENERAL NOTES.dwg 08-19-2022 NTS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 1 G E N E R A L N O T E S . d w g , 8/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 2 1 : 4 2 : 5 9 P M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 115+00 116+00 117+00 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9) BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA 115+19.68 -L1A- ELEV. 591.00 FILL FACE AT END BENT 1 W.P.1 STA 115+28.68 -L1A- ELEV. 591.00 END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2 W.P.2 STA 116+48.68 -L1A- ELEV. 591.00 PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE BOARDWALK #3 HP12x53 STEEL PILE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED TRAIL 1' - 0 " 1. 5 : 1 S L O P E 2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE (SEE ROADWAY PLAN FOR LOCATION) HP14x73 STEEL PILE 3' - 6 " MI N . 10"MIN. TIP Ø TIMBER PILES (TYP.) TIMBER BOARDWALK RAILING EL. 585±EL. 588± EL. 579 ±EL. 581± EL. 578±EL. 581± EL. 580± EL. 570±EL. 570± FILL EXISTING GRADE PVI STA. 116+99.11 -L1A- EL. 591.00 VC = 75' 0.000 %-4.500 % GRADE DATA BOC EL. 585.17 BOC EL. 585.17 LOW CHORD EL. 588.75 115+00 116+00 11 7 + 0 0 12 ' - 0 " CL E A R SU G A R C R E E K FILL FACE AT END BENT 1 W.P.1 STA. 115+28.68 -L1A- EDGE OF PAVEMENT END OF BRIDGE S1 BEGIN BOARDWALK #3 W.P 2 STA. 116+48.68 -L1A- 1 2 ' - 0 " BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA. 115+19.68 -L1A- 90° (TY P . ) 120'-0" BOARDWALK #3 BOARDWALK #7 -Y1- -L1A- PT STA. 115+12.66 -L1A- R = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PC STA. 116+55.11 -L1A- R = 5 0 . 0 0 ' PT STA. 117+17.50 -L1A- PI STA. 116+91.10 -L1A- PI STA. 114+70.08 -L1A- PC STA. 10+20.66 -Y1- PI STA. 10+38.36 -Y1- R = 50 . 0 0 ' BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9) FARM FENCE (SEE GREENWAY PLANS FOR DETAILS) S-2 BRIDGE S1 210089 NM S-2 Bridge S1.dwg JML S-2 Bridge S1.dwg 08-19-2022 NTS N SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S1 END BENT 1 END BENT 2 10'0'10'20' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10' 10'0'10'20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10' BRIDGE S1 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 2 B r i d g e S 1 . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 4 5 : 1 6 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 243+00 244+00242+00 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA 242+36.37 -L1B- ELEV. 597.00 FILL FACE AT END BENT 1 W.P.1 STA 242+45.37 -L1B- ELEV. 597.00 END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2 W.P.2 STA 243+90.37 -L1B- ELEV. 597.00PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE BOARDWALK #5 HP12x53 STEEL PILE HP14x73 STEEL PILE 10"MIN. TIP Ø TIMBER PILES (TYP.) 1' - 0 " 1. 5 : 1 S L O P E 2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE (SEE ROADWAY PLAN FOR LOCATION) 3' - 6 " MI N . EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE TIMBER BOARDWALK RAILING EL. 588± EL. 588± EL. 576± EL. 584± EL. 586±EL. 586± PVI STA. 244+30.91 -L1B- EL. 597.00 VC = 50' 0.000 %-4.700 % GRADE DATA EXISTING GRADE FILL EXISTING GRADE EL. 573±EL. 573± BOC EL. 591.00 BOC EL. 591.00 LOW CHORD EL. 594.58 12 ' - 0 " CL E A R S U G A R C R E E K 242+00 BEGIN OF APPROACH SLAB STA 242+36.37 -L1B- FILL FACE AT BENT 1 W.P.#1 STA 242+45.37 -L1B- PROPOSED PATH END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2 W.P.#2 STA 243+90.37 -L1B- 243+00 244+00 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE -L1B- 12 ' - 0 " CL E A R 12 ' - 0 " 145'-0" PC STA. 244+03.60 -L1B- R = 7 5 . 0 0 ' PI STA. 244+41.28 -L1B- BOARDWALK 5 BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.) (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9) S-3 BRIDGE S2 210089 JML NM S-3 Bridge S2.dwgS-3 Bridge S2.dwg 08-19-2022 NTS N SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S2 BRIDGE S2 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK 10'0'10'20' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10' 10'0'10'20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10' Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 3 B r i d g e S 2 . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 4 6 : 2 7 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 270+00 271+00269+00 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.) (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA 268+78.35 -L1B- ELEV. 601.00 FILL FACE AT END BENT 1 W.P.#1 STA 268+87.35 -L1B- ELEV. 601.00 FILL FACE AT END BENT 2 W.P.#3 STA 270+82.35 -L1B- ELEV. 601.00 PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE HP12x53 STEEL PILE EXISTING GRADE 610 EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE HP12x53 STEEL PILE 1' - 0 " (T Y P . ) 1. 5 : 1 S L O P E 2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE (SEE ROADWAY PLAN FOR LOCATION) (TYP.) 3' - 6 " (M I N . ) (T Y P . ) 1.5: 1 S L O P E END APPROACH SLAB STA 270+91.35 -L1B- ELEV. 601.00 EL. 591± EL. 589± EL. 591± EL. 576± EL. 591± EL. 591± EL. 576± EXISTING GRADE FILLFILL BOC EL. 595.00 BOC EL. 595.00BOC EL. 595.12 HP14x73 STEEL PILE LOW CHORD EL. 598.58 12 ' - 0 " CL E A R SU G A R C R E E K BEGIN OF APPROACH SLAB STA 268+78.35 -L1B- FILL FACE AT END BENT 1 W.P.#1 STA 268+87.35 -L1B- PROPOSED PATH END OF APPROACH SLAB STA 270+91.35 -L1B- FILL FACE AT END BENT 2 W.P.#3 STA 270+82.35 -L1B- 145'-0" 269+00 270+00 271+00 50'-0" CL AT BENT 1 W.P. #2 STA 269+37.35 -L1B- -L1B- 90° (TY P . ) SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 195'-0" 1 2 ' - 0 " ( T Y P . ) BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.) (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9) S-4 BRIDGE S3 NM S-4 Bridge S3.dwg 210089 JML S-4 Bridge S3.dwg 08-19-2022 NTS N SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S3 BRIDGE S3 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE 10'0'10'20' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10' 10'0'10'20' VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10' Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 4 B r i d g e S 3 . d w g , 8/ 3 1 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 7 : 5 6 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 NOTE: SEE SHEET S-6 FOR SECTION CUT LOCATION TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS 12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH 2x6 TOP (TYP.) CANTED 2x8 TOP RAIL 30° TO HORIZONTAL PROVIDE 1/2" RADIUS CORNERS (TYP.) 4' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 4" 4x6 POSTS @ 5'-0" O.C. 2x6 BOTTOM RAIL (TYP.) HANDRAIL DETAIL 4"x4"x0.250" WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE PANEL (TYP.) SQUARE TENSION TIES (STAGGERED POSITION BEHIND RAILS) 3X12 SPACER BLOCK (TYP.) SIMPSON LTS12 TWIST STRAP (TYP. EA. JOIST) 3x12x1'-6" SPLICE BLOCK @ OUTSIDE STRINGERS (2)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS NOTCHED INTO EA. FACE OF PILING 3/4" THRU BOLTS (TYP.) 10" MIN. TIP Ø PILING 3x12 JOIST (TYP.) GALV. METAL DECKING *REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK SECTION A-A HIGH SLAB SECTION LOW SLAB SECTION REINFORCED CLASS AA CONCRETE 6" 4" 6x3x1/4 LIGHT GAUGE GALV. ANGLE WELDED TO GALV. METAL DECK 3x12 JOIST SHOWN (DOUBLE 3X12 SIMILAR) 4x4 - W4.0xW4.0 WELDED WIRE MESH GALV. METAL DECK 1 1/4" BBU @ 4'-0" CTS. 4x3x1/4 LIGHT GAUGE GALV. ANGLE WELDED TO GALVANIZED METAL DECK 3x12 JOIST SHOWN (DOUBLE 3X12 SIMILAR) NOTE: SEE SHEET S-7 FOR SECTION CUT LOCATION FOR RAIL DETAILS, SEE SECTION A-A 12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH 3X12 SPACER BLOCK (TYP.) SIMPSON LTS12 TWIST STRAP (TYP. EA. JOIST) (3)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS (1) MEMBER NOTCHED INTO FACE OF PILING ON EACH SIDE 3/4" THRU BOLTS (TYP.) 10" MIN. TIP Ø PILING DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST (TYP.) GALV. METAL DECKING *REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK SECTION B-B *CROSS SLOPE OF CONCRETE DECK SHALL BE ACHIEVED BY VARYING THE TOP SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE DECK WITH AN ADDITIONAL 2" ON ONE SIDE. DIRECTION OF CROSS SLOPE AS INDICATED ON ROADWAY PLANS. REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK DETAILS SLOPE*SLOPE* CHAIN BEGIN STATION ELEVATION ELEVATIONEND STATION LENGTH 20' SPAN REMARKSCHAIN BOARDWALK LOCATIONS BOARDWALK # NOTE: THERE IS ONE 20 FOOT BOARDWALK SPAN IN BOARDWALKS THAT INDICATE "YES" IN THE 20' SPAN COLUMN. BEGIN AND END ELEVATIONS SHOWN. FOR INTERMEDIATE ELEVATIONS, SEE ROADWAY PLANS. -L1A-105+55.00 105+85.00-L1A-1 -30.00' 2 - YES583.25 582.35 3 BEGIN BOARDWALK FRAMES INTO BRIDGE S1 4 - 5 6 - 7 - -L1A-108+88.00 109+08.00-L1A-20.00'YES582.26 582.26 -L1A-116+48.68 118+48.68-L1A-200.00'NO591.00 584.27 -L1B-204+26.00 204+66.00-L1B-40.00'YES584.63 585.83 243+90.37 245+80.37 190.00'NO597.00 589.98 285+15.35 285+65.35 50.00'YES589.96 591.25 -Y1-10+06.00 13+26.00-Y1-320.00'YES590.84 582.44 -L1B--L1B-BEGIN BOARDWALK FRAMES INTO BRIDGE S2 -L1B--L1B- NOTES: 1.TIMBER DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS ARE BASED ON NOMINAL TIMBER SIZES. 2.TREATED TIMBER AND LUMBER SHALL BE USED AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2018 NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 1082 AND SHALL BE SOUTHERN PINE, GRADE 1 OR BETTER. 3.EXPOSED CORNERS ON 2X RAILS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1/2". 4.PRE-DRILLED HOLES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SPLITTING OF TIMBERS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS, ETC. SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153. SIMPSON STRONG TIE CONNECTORS (WHERE USED) SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 6.PLACE 3X12 DIAPHRAGMS AT MIDSPAN OF JOISTS IN 10' SPANS AND 1 4 POINTS ALONG JOISTS IN 20' SPANS. 7.2X6 HANDRAIL SHALL BE CONTINUOUS ACROSS A MINIMUM OF THREE POSTS. 8.X-BRACE TIMBER PILES IN THE TRANSVERSE DIRECTION IN ALL BAYS WHEN TOP OF BOARDWALK EXCEEDS 7'-0" IN HEIGHT FROM TOP OF DECK TO GROUND SURFACE. X-BRACING IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. ATTACH X-BRACING TO POSTS W/ 5/8" DIA. HEX BOLT AT EACH END. 9.THE NOTCHED AREA ON TOP OF THE TIMBER PILES MUST BE TREATED WITH A WATERPROOFING SEALANT MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE NCDOT MATERIALS AND TESTS UNIT. 10.TIMBER PILES ARE DESIGNED BASED ON A MAXIMUM UNSUPPORTED LENGTH OF 6 FEET. 11.BOARDWALK DECKING SHALL BE A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE DECK. 12.CONCRETE DECK SHALL CONSIST OF CLASS AA CONCRETE REINFORCED WITH AN EPOXY COATED 4X4 - W4.0XW4.0 WELDED WIRE FABRIC. WELDED WIRE FABRIC MESH SHALL HAVE 8" MIN. LAPS AND MAINTAIN 2" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO ALL FORM ANGLES AND JOINTS. WELDED WIRE FABRIC MESH SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON 1 1/4" BBU SUPPORTS SPA. AT 4'-0" O.C. 13.CONCRETE DECK SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A METAL DECK FORM WITH WITH A GALVANIZED FINISH. DECK MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: MINIMUM SECTION MODULUS OF 0.071 IN^3/FT, MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 60 KSI, AND A MAXIMUM RIB DEPTH OF 5/8". 14.THE GALVANIZED METAL DECK FORM SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EACH JOIST AT 12" O.C. USING NO. 8 PAN HEAD SCREWS. AT LAP LOCATIONS OF THE GALVANIZED METAL FORMS, USE SHEET METAL SCREW CONNECTIONS AT 12" O.C.. 15.METAL DECK FORM ANGLES SHALL BE GALVANIZED LIGHT GAUGE METAL. WHERE FORM ANGLES ARE WELDED TO THE METAL DECK FORM, WELDS SHALL BE CLEANED AND COATED WITH AN INORGANIC ZINC PRIMER. FOR INORGANIC ZINC PRIMER, SEE SECTION 1082 OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 16.WHEN POURING CONCRETE FOR THE CONCRETE DECK, PROTECT THE METAL DECK AND WELDED WIRE FIBER MESH FORM AGAINST DEFORMATION. 17.1/2" OPEN JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT BENT LOCATIONS AT SPACINGS NOT EXCEEDING 50 FEET. TRANSVERSE CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 10' MAXIMUM CENTERS IN THE CONCRETE DECK ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE BOARDWALK. 18.ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND ON THIS DRAWING SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING. 19.BASIS OF PAYMENT FOR THE BOARDWALK WILL BE AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICES FOR TIMBER BOARDWALK, BOARDWALK TIMBER PILES 10" MIN. TIP DIAM., AND CONCRETE DECK AND WILL BE FULL COMPENSATION FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL, LABOR, TOOLS, AND INCIDENTALS NECESSARY FOR INSTALLING IN PLACE. 20.FOR TIMBER BOARDWALK, SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR "TIMBER BOARDWALK". 21.UNO = UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. S-5 BOARDWALK GENERAL NOTES NM S-5 BW GENERAL NOTES.dwg 08-19-2022 210089 JML NTS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 5 B W G E N E R A L N O T E S . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 4 9 : 0 9 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS ELEVATION VIEW - 10' SPAN BOARDWALKS PLAN VIEW - 10' SPAN BOARDWALKS DETAIL A PEDESTRIAN LIVE LOAD VEHICLE LIVE LOAD WIND LOAD ON SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN LOADS 90 PSF AASHTO H5 59 PSF DETAIL B (SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SECTION A-A) 3x12 SPLICE BLOCK 3x12 SPACER 3x12 JOIST 2 1 / 2 " 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS W/ WASHERS (TYP.) 2 1 / 2 " 3x12 JOIST SIMPSONS BP 5/8 - 3 (TYP.) SIMPSONS BP 5/8 - 3 (TYP.) 3x12 JOIST 3x12 SPACER 3x12 JOIST 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS W/ WASHERS (TYP.) 2 1 / 2 " 2 1 / 2 " 3x12 BLOCKING (TYP. @ MIDPOINT OF ALL JOISTS) 3x12 JOIST (TYP.) A DETAIL C 5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"7 1/4"10'-0" MAX. 9" BRIDGE END BENT 3/4"Ø THRU BOLTS W/ WASHERS (TYP.) 3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS (TYP.) 2 1/2" NOTCH IN TIMBER PILES TO PROVIDE FULL BEARING (TYP.) FENCE STAPLES SPACED @ 16" O.C. MAX. (ALL RAILS) 4"x4"x0.250" WELDED WIRE MESH PANELS 2x6 TOP RAIL CANTED 2x8 TOP RAIL 4x6 RAIL POST (TYP.) ATTACH 2x8 TOP RAIL W/ (2) #10x3" WOOD SCREWS @ 12" CTS. 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS (SEE DETAIL A) (TYP.)ABC STONE 3x12x16'-0" WING WALL BOARDS (3 REQUIRED) GALV. METAL DECK 3x12 JOIST 1 1/2"1 1/2" 1 1 / 2 " 2" 2 1 / 2 " 4" 3'-0" END BENT 1'-0" 4" 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS (SEE DETAIL B) (TYP.) 3x12x16'-0" WING WALL BOARDS (3 REQUIRED) 3x12 SPACER END BLOCKING (TYP. @ BRIDGE CONNECTION) SEE CONNECTION DETAIL C (TYP.) BRIDGE AND BENT BACKWALL SEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL B 3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS NOTCHED INTO EACH SIDE OF PILE (TYP.) 3x12x1'-6" SPLICE BLOCK (TYP. EA BUTTED JOINT)REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH 12 ' - 1 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 2" 2' - 0 1 2"6" MAX. (TYP.) 6" MIN. (TYP.) 1' - 6 1 2" 3x 1 2 J O I S T S @ 1 ' - 6 " O . C . M A X . 1' - 6 1 2" A 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS W/ WASHERS (TYP.) (INSTALLATION REQUIRED AT EVERY OTHER JOIST) S-6 10' SPAN DETAILS NM S-6 10' SPAN DETAILS.dwg 08-19-2022 210089 JML S-6 10' SPAN DETAILS.dwg NTS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 6 1 0 ' S P A N D E T A I L S . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 4 9 : 5 2 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS ELEVATION VIEW - 20' SPAN BOARDWALKS PLAN VIEW - 20' SPAN BOARDWALKS PEDESTRIAN LIVE LOAD VEHICLE LIVE LOAD WIND LOAD ON SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN LOADS 90 PSF AASHTO H5 59 PSF DETAIL A (SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SECTION A-A AND SECTION B-B) SIMPSONS BP 5/8 - 3 (TYP.) 3x12 SPACER DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS W/ WASHERS (TYP.) 2 1 / 2 " 2 1 / 2 " A 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS (SEE DETAIL B) (TYP.) 3x12 SPACER (TYP.) 3x12 BLOCKING (TYP. @ ALL JOIST QUARTER POINTS) SEE DETAIL A 3x12 PILE CAP MEMBER NOTCHED INTO SIDE OF PILE (TYP. FOR 10' SPANS) 12 ' - 1 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 2" 2' - 0 1 2" 6" MIN. (TYP.) A 6" MAX. (TYP.) SIMPSON/STRONG-TIE LSTA15 FLAT STRAP (TYP. AT FRAMING CONFLICTS) B B (2)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS W/ (1)-3x12 NOTCHED INTO SIDE OF PILE (TYP. FOR 20' SPANS) 1' - 4 1 2 " 1' - 4 1 2 " DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST (TYP.) 3x 1 2 J O I S T S @ 1 ' - 6 " O . C . M A X . 1' - 6 1 2" DO U B L E 3 x 1 2 J O I S T S @ 1 ' - 4 " O . C . M A X . DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST 5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 20'-0"10'-0"10'-0" (2)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS (TYP. FOR 20' SPAN) FENCE STAPLES SPACED @ 16" O.C. MAX. (ALL RAILS)4"x4"x0.250" WELDED WIRE MESH PANELS 2x6 TOP RAIL CANTED 2x8 TOP RAIL 4x6 POST (TYP.) 2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS (SEE DETAIL A) (TYP.) 5'-0"5'-0" 3x12 PILE CAP MEMBER (TYP. FOR 10' SPAN) 21 2" NOTCH IN PILE TO PROVIDE FULL BEARING OF (1) 3x12 MEMBER (TYP. EA. SIDE) DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST3x12 JOIST 3x12 JOIST ATTACH 2x8 TOP RAIL W/ (2) #10x3" WOOD SCREWS @ 12" CTS. 3x12 JOIST (TYP.) 1' - 6 1 2" S-7 20' SPAN DETAILS 210089 NM JML S-7 20' SPAN DETAILS.dwg 8-19-2022 NTS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 7 2 0 ' S P A N D E T A I L S . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 0 : 5 0 : 5 8 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 (BEGIN APPROACH SHOWN, END APPROACH SIMILAR BUT MIRRORED) BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINT (INCIDENTAL TO PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) 2'-0" #4 BARS @ 12" CTS., EACH WAY 2" 10 " ASPHALT TRAIL CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION 2" C L . (M I N . ) APPROACH SLAB TO TRAIL CONNECTION #4 BARS @ 12" CTS. #4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS.6" 3" CL. (TYP.) 6" 12 ' - 0 " A S P H A L T T R A I L #4 L O N G I T U D I N A L B A R S @ 1 2 " C T S . 6" 6" 2'-0"10'-0" 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TYPICAL SECTION FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION 6'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0" BRIDGE DECK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE #4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINT (INCIDENTAL TO PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) APPROACH SLAB/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONNECTION #4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS 3" C L . (T Y P . ) GRADE LINE 10 " M I N . #4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS 6"#4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS.6" 3" CL. (TYP.) BRIDGE APPROACH PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C 12 ' - 0 " B R I D G E D E C K SEE NOTE 2 SLOPE* APPROACH SLAB DETAILS NOTES 1.SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB. 2.CROSS SLOPE OF APPROACH SLAB SHALL TRANSITION FROM ASPHALT TRAIL TO MATCH CROSS SLOPE OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK. DIRECTION OF CROSS SLOPE AS INDICATED ON GREENWAY PLANS (BEGIN APPROACH SHOWN, END APPROACH SIMILAR BUT MIRRORED) 12" EXPANSION JOINT #4 BARS @ 12" CTS. #4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS.6" 3" CL. (TYP.) 6" 12 ' - 0 " A S P H A L T T R A I L #4 L O N G I T U D I N A L B A R S @ 1 2 " C T S . 6" 6" 2'-0"10'-0" 3" C L . (T Y P . ) BOARDWALK APPROACH PLAN VIEW 12 ' - 0 " B O A R D W A L K BACKWALL BOARDS (3 TOTAL) BOARDWALK DECK TIMBER PILE #4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION 12" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE/BOARDWALK CONNECTION #4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS SECTION D-D S-8 APPROACH SLABS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 8 C O N C R E T E A P P R O A C H . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 2 : 0 3 : 0 3 P M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 NM JML 08-19-2022 NTS S-8 APPROACH SLABS 210089 TYPICAL BOARDWALK NOTES: 1.ALL TREATED LUMBER FOR THE GUARDRAIL & POSTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1082 OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL SCREWS, BOLTS, NUTS AND WASHERS ARE TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. 3.THE LOCATION OF POST FOOTINGS AND END BLOCKS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. DEVIATIONS FROM PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 4.SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL. THE TOTAL QUANTITY IN THE BID ITEM SHALL INCLUDE EACH QUADRANT OF BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK THAT REQUIRES APPROACH RAIL. 5.SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR APPROACH RAIL LOCATIONS AT BRIDGES. BOARDWALK APPROACH RAILS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL QUANDRANTS FOR BOARDWALKS 1,2,4,6 & 7, AND AT END BOARDWALK QUADRANTS ONLY FOR BOARDWALKS 3 & 5. 6.END OF APPROACH RAIL SHALL BE AT LEAST 2'-0" FROM EDGE OF GREENWAY WITH A MINIMUM ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES. SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C 2x6 RAIL END OF BRIDGE/BOARDWALK 1"1 1 1 / 2 " 15 ° 4x4 END RAIL 2x6 RAIL 5"x 1/4" CARRIAGE BOLT W/ NUT & WASHER 1"x 3/4" RECESS IN BACK OF POSTS CONNECTION DETAILS (OUTSIDE VIEW) 2x6 RAIL 1" CHAMFER 5"x 1/4" CARRIAGE BOLT W/ NUT & WASHER 1"x 3/4" RECESS IN BACK OF POSTS B B C C 2x6 RAIL 2x6 RAIL 4x4 POSTS 4x4 SUPPORT BLOCK 4x4 END RAIL 3- 3 1/2" WOOD SCREWS (TYP.) 2x6 RAIL 1 1 / 2 " 1 1/4" 1 1 / 2 " 1 1/4" PLAN SE E T Y P . RA I L P L A N TYPICAL RAIL PLAN BOARDWALK RAILING 1 5 ° ( M I N . ) 1'-0" HOLES TO BE FILLED WITH CONCRETE MIX AROUND POSTS 2" COMPACTED SAND OR STONE (TYP.) 4x4 POSTS & CONCRETE POST SUPPORT (TYP.) 4'-0" 4'-0" 2x6 4x4 1 ' - 0 " 2'-6" TYPICAL BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL ELEVATION 1'-0" 6"2' - 0 " GRADE ELEVATION END OF BOARDWALK 6" 2'-6" CONCRETE END BLOCK W/ EMBEDDED 4x4 4" 4x4 1' - 1 " 1' - 0 " 4' - 0 " TRIM ENDS FLUSH W/ 4x4 (TYP.) 4 0 ° BOARDWALK BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL ELEVATION SHOWING BACK FACE OF RAILING A A TYPICAL END BENT LINE IS FROM BOARDWALK RAIL EXTENDED BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL SET SHOWN POST SPACINGS AND DEFLECTION ANGLE IS SIMILAR FOR BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL SETS BRIDGE TRUSS S-9 APPROACH RAILS S-9 APPROACH RAIL.dwg BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL DETAILS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 9 A P P R O A C H R A I L . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 1 : 3 5 : 4 6 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 NM 08-19-2022 210089 JML NTS TOP OF FOOTING 12" MIN *SEE ROADWAY PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE DETAILS. BACKFILL MATERIAL EMBEDMENT 18" MIN 6" MIN 9" MIN 4" DIA. PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE, IF REQUIRED (SEE NOTE FOR PIPE) AGGREGATE (NO. 57 STONE) FOOTING 10" MIN (S E E W A L L E N V E L O P E ) DE S I G N H E I G H T - V A R I E S FINISHED GRADE* 2:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER STEP TOP OF FOOTING IN INCREMENTS OF SRW UNIT HEIGHT AGGREGATE (NO. 57 STONE) FOOTING 1:1 ( H : V ) 8" MIN 10" MIN SRW CAP UNIT (TYP)TOP OF WALL BOTTOM OF WALL MAX TOP OF WALL STEP HEIGHT = SRW UNIT HEIGHT 6" MIN SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYP) SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL - TYPICAL ELEVATION DE S I G N H E I G H T - V A R I E S (S E E W A L L E N V E L O P E ) SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL - TYPICAL SECTION SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE WALL FACE GRADE ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE* SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYP) BENCH 4' MIN FINISHED GRADE* 6:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER (TYP) 12" MIN 8" MIN NO. 57 STONE FOUNDATION MATERIAL BOTTOM OF WALL 2% PAVEMENT SECTION, IF APPLICABLE TOP OF WALL EXTENSION 4" MIN SRW CAP UNIT WALL BATTER 9 DEGREES MAX OVERHANG 1/2" - 11/2" SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE (OMIT FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT, FULL DEPTH ASPHALT OR CEMENT TREATED BASE) NOTES: 1.FOR SEGMENTAL GRAVITY RETAINING WALLS, SEE SECTION 454 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.FREEZE-THAW DURABLE SRW UNITS THAT MEET ARTICLE 1040-4 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED. 3.A DRAIN PIPE IS REQUIRED FOR RETAINING WALLS. 4.BEFORE BEGINNING SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL DESIGN FOR RETAINING WALLS, SURVEY WALL LOCATION AND SUBMIT A REVISED WALL PROFILE VIEW (WALL ENVELOPE) FOR REVIEW. DO NOT START WALL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE REVISED WALL ENVELOPE IS ACCEPTED. 5.DESIGN RETAINING WALLS FOR WALL HEIGHTS EQUAL TO THE DESIGN HEIGHT PLUS DEPTH TO TOP OF FOOTING (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRADE ELEVATION AND TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION). 6.THE MINIMUM EMBEDMENT ELEVATION FOR RETAINING WALLS INCLUDES EMBEDMENT FOR SCOUR. 7.DESIGN RETAINING WALLS FOR A PIPE EXTENDING THROUGH THE WALL AS SHOWN. VERIFY PIPE LOCATION AND ELEVATION BEFORE BEGINNING SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. 8.DO NOT PLACE NO. 57 STONE FOR FOOTINGS FOR RETAINING WALLS UNTIL EXCAVATION DIMENSIONS AND FOUNDATION MATERIAL ARE APPROVED. S-10 RETAINING WALLS 210089 NM S-10 RETAINING WALLS.dwg 210089 JML S-10 RETAINING WALLS.dwg 08-19-2022 NTS Q: \ R A \ 2 1 0 0 8 9 \ 2 0 C A D D \ P r e l i m i n a r y \ S - 1 0 R E T A I N I N G W A L L S . d w g , 8/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 2 1 1 : 5 3 : 5 5 A M , Lo f t u s , J e f f r e y CLIENT REVISIONS N0.DATE PROJECT NO. FILENAME CHECKED BY DRAWN BY SCALE DATE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 phone 919. 361. 5000 fax 919. 361. 2269 license number: C-0293 www.mcadamsco.com PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET & FACILITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD 50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRE L I M I N A R Y 4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD, SUITE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609 919-781-4626 Mitigation Documents June 21, 2023 Jennifer Brooks Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000 Charlotte, NC 28208 Expiration of Acceptance: 12/21/2023 Project: Sugar Creek Greenway - McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. County: Mecklenburg The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in- lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant’s responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website. Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below. River Basin Impact Location (8-digit HUC) Impact Type Impact Quantity Catawba 03050103* Riparian Wetland 0.35 *DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly.Williams@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, FOR James B. Stanfill Deputy Director cc: Jennifer Burdette, agent NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 USACE AID #: NCDWR #: INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant. NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area). PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION: 1. Project name (if any): Sugar Creek Greenway 2. Date of evaluation: 5/24/23 3. Applicant/owner name: Mecklenburg County 4. Assessor name/organization: JAB & AGP (NRC) 5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body 7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sugar Creek 8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.187550, -80.917905 STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations) 9. Site number (show on attached map): S-2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 130 11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 Unable to assess channel depth. 12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No 14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION: 15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O) 16. Estimated geomorphic 19 valley shape (skip for Tidal Marsh Stream): A B (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope) 17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2) for Tidal Marsh Stream) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V) Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area. List species: Designated Critical Habitat (list species) 19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No 1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) A Water throughout assessment reach. B No flow, water in pools only. C No water in assessment reach. 2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams, beaver dams). B Not A 3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert). B Not A 4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these disturbances). B Not A 5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap). A < 10% of channel unstable B 10 to 25% of channel unstable C > 25% of channel unstable 6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). LB RB A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching]) C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an interstream divide 7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric Check all that apply. A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam) B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone) C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors) E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch” section. F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc) I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section) J Little to no stressors 8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought. A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours C No drought conditions 9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition). 10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric 10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging) (evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12) 10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams) A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent vegetation C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter E Little or no habitat F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms G Submerged aquatic vegetation H Low-tide refugia (pools) I Sand bottom J 5% vertical bank along the marsh K Little or no habitat *********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS**************************** 11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams) 11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es). A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c) B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d) C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life) 11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach. NP R C A P Bedrock/saprolite Boulder (256 – 4096 mm) Cobble (64 – 256 mm) Gravel (2 – 64 mm) Sand (.062 – 2 mm) Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm) Detritus Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.) 11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Ch e c k f o r T id a l Ma r s h S t r e a m s On l y 12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) 12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual? If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other: 12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13. 1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams. Adult frogs Aquatic reptiles Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) Beetles Caddisfly larvae (T) Asian clam (Corbicula) Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp) Damselfly and dragonfly larvae Dipterans Mayfly larvae (E) Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae) Midges/mosquito larvae Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea) Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula) Other fish Salamanders/tadpoles Snails Stonefly larvae (P) Tipulid larvae Worms/leeches 13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff. LB RB A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes) 14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area. LB RB A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach. LB RB Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area? N N 16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach. A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges) B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins) C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir) D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage) E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present) F None of the above 17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all that apply. A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation) B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit) C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed) D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge F None of the above 18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition. A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes) B Degraded (example: scattered trees) C Stream shading is gone or largely absent 19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out to the first break. Vegetated Wooded LB RB LB RB A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees 20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width). LB RB A A Mature forest B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide D D Maintained shrubs E E Little or no vegetation 21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet). If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet LB RB LB RB LB RB A A A A A A Row crops B B B B B B Maintained turf C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use) 22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width). LB RB A A Medium to high stem density B B Low stem density C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground 23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide. LB RB A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent. B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent. C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent. 24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to assessment reach habitat. LB RB A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse. B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees. C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation. 25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams) 25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded? If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other: 25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter). A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230 Notes/Sketch: Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream Site Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Assessment 5/24/23 Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC) Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent Function Class Rating Summary USACE/ All Streams NCDWR Intermittent (1) Hydrology HIGH HIGH (2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow HIGH HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH HIGH (4) Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH (4) Microtopography LOW LOW (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability HIGH HIGH (4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW (4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM (2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA (2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA (2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA (3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA (1) Water Quality HIGH HIGH (2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM (2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH (3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH (3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH (2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO (2) Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA (1) Habitat LOW LOW (2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW (3) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM (3) Substrate LOW LOW (3) Stream Stability HIGH HIGH (3) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH (3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH (2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA (3) Flow Restriction NA NA (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA (4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA (4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA NA Overall HIGH HIGH 308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1 Natural Resource Consultants Sampling Point #4 - Supporting Photograph Photo 1. View of S-2 facing downstream toward Sugar Creek (5/24/23) NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 USACE AID #: NCDWR #: INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant. NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area). PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION: 1. Project name (if any): Sugar Creek Greenway 2. Date of evaluation: 5/25/23 3. Applicant/owner name: Mecklenburg County 4. Assessor name/organization: JAB & AGP (NRC) 5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body 7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sugar Creek 8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.172901, -80.918514 STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations) 9. Site number (show on attached map): S-7 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 120 11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.25 Unable to assess channel depth. 12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No 14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION: 15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O) 16. Estimated geomorphic 19 valley shape (skip for Tidal Marsh Stream): A B (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope) 17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2) for Tidal Marsh Stream) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V) Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area. List species: Designated Critical Habitat (list species) 19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No 1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) A Water throughout assessment reach. B No flow, water in pools only. C No water in assessment reach. 2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams, beaver dams). B Not A 3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert). B Not A 4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these disturbances). B Not A 5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap). A < 10% of channel unstable B 10 to 25% of channel unstable C > 25% of channel unstable 6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). LB RB A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching]) C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an interstream divide 7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric Check all that apply. A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam) B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone) C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors) E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch” section. F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc) I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section) J Little to no stressors 8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought. A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours C No drought conditions 9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition). 10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric 10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging) (evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12) 10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams) A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent vegetation C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter E Little or no habitat F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms G Submerged aquatic vegetation H Low-tide refugia (pools) I Sand bottom J 5% vertical bank along the marsh K Little or no habitat *********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS**************************** 11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) 11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams) 11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es). A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c) B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d) C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life) 11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach. NP R C A P Bedrock/saprolite Boulder (256 – 4096 mm) Cobble (64 – 256 mm) Gravel (2 – 64 mm) Sand (.062 – 2 mm) Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm) Detritus Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.) 11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Ch e c k f o r T id a l Ma r s h S t r e a m s On l y 12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) 12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual? If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other: 12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13. 1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams. Adult frogs Aquatic reptiles Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) Beetles Caddisfly larvae (T) Asian clam (Corbicula) Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp) Damselfly and dragonfly larvae Dipterans Mayfly larvae (E) Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae) Midges/mosquito larvae Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea) Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula) Other fish Salamanders/tadpoles Snails Stonefly larvae (P) Tipulid larvae Worms/leeches 13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff. LB RB A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes) 14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area. LB RB A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach. LB RB Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area? N N 16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach. A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges) B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins) C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir) D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage) E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present) F None of the above 17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all that apply. A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation) B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit) C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed) D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge F None of the above 18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition. A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes) B Degraded (example: scattered trees) C Stream shading is gone or largely absent 19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out to the first break. Vegetated Wooded LB RB LB RB A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees 20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width). LB RB A A Mature forest B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide D D Maintained shrubs E E Little or no vegetation 21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet). If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet LB RB LB RB LB RB A A A A A A Row crops B B B B B B Maintained turf C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use) 22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width). LB RB A A Medium to high stem density B B Low stem density C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground 23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide. LB RB A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent. B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent. C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent. 24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams) Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to assessment reach habitat. LB RB A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse. B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees. C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation. 25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams) 25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded? If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other: 25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter). A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230 Notes/Sketch: Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream Site Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Assessment 5/25/23 Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC) Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial Function Class Rating Summary USACE/ All Streams NCDWR Intermittent (1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW (4) Floodplain Access LOW (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (4) Channel Stability MEDIUM (4) Sediment Transport LOW (4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM (2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA (2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA (2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA (3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (1) Water Quality LOW (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW (3) Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM (3) Thermoregulation LOW (2) Indicators of Stressors NO (2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA (1) Habitat LOW (2) In-stream Habitat LOW (3) Baseflow MEDIUM (3) Substrate LOW (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (3) In-stream Habitat LOW (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Thermoregulation LOW (2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (3) Flow Restriction NA (3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA (4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA (4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA Overall LOW 308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1 Natural Resource Consultants Sampling Point #7 - Supporting Photograph Photo 1. View of S-7 facing upstream from sanitary sewer pipe (5/25/23) NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 USACE AID # NCDWR# Project Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Evaluation 5/24/23 Applicant/Owner Name Mecklenburg County Wetland Site Name W-7 Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC) Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Sugar Creek River Basin Catawba USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050103 County Mecklenburg NCDWR Region Mooresville Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.172716, -80.921225 Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area) Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following. • Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.) • Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.) • Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.) • Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.) Is the assessment area intensively managed? Yes No Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area. Anadromous fish Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA) Publicly owned property N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer) Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout Designated NCNHP reference community Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream What type of natural stream is associated with the wetla nd, if any? (check all that apply) Blackwater Brownwater Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both Is the assessment area on a coastal island? Yes No Is the assessment area’s surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No 1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition – assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment area based on evidence an effect. GS VS A A Not severely altered B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compact ion, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration) 2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration – assessment area condition metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch ≤ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable. Surf Sub A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered. B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation). C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change ) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines). 3. Water Storage/Surface Relief – assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT). AA WT 3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep 3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot 4. Soil Texture/Structure – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes) Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature. Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional indicators. 4a. A Sandy soil B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redox imorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres) C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redox imorphic features D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil E Histosol or histic epipedon 4b. A Soil ribbon < 1 inch B Soil ribbon ≥ 1 inch 4c. A No peat or muck presence B A peat or muck presence 5. Discharge into Wetland – opportunity metric Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank , underground storage tank (UST), etc. Surf Sub A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetla nd and stressing, but not overwhelming the treatment capacity of the assessment area C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area a nd potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive sedimentation, odor) 6. Land Use – opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). WS 5M 2M A A A > 10% impervious surfaces B B B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants C C C ≥ 20% coverage of pasture D D D ≥ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land) E E E ≥ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb F F F ≥ 20% coverage of clear-cut land G G G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area. 7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer – assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) 7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water? Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8. Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed. 7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbe d.) A ≥ 50 feet B From 30 to < 50 feet C From 15 to < 30 feet D From 5 to < 15 feet E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches 7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width. ≤ 15-feet wide > 15-feet wide Other open water (no tributary present) 7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend in to the bank of the tributary/open water? Yes No 7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed? Sheltered – adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic. Exposed – adjacent open water with width ≥ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic. 8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest only) Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries. WT WC A A ≥ 100 feet B B From 80 to < 100 feet C C From 50 to < 80 feet D D From 40 to < 50 feet E E From 30 to < 40 feet F F From 15 to < 30 feet G G From 5 to < 15 feet H H < 5 feet 9. Inundation Duration – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands) Answer for assessment area dominant landform. A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days) B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more) 10. Indicators of Deposition – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes) Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition). A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels. B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland. C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland. 11. Wetland Size – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable , see User Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select “K” for the FW column. WT WC FW (if applicable) A A A ≥ 500 acres B B B From 100 to < 500 acres C C C From 50 to < 100 acres D D D From 25 to < 50 acres E E E From 10 to < 25 acres F F F From 5 to < 10 acres G G G From 1 to < 5 acres H H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre I I I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre J J J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre K K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut 12. Wetland Intactness – wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only) A Pocosin is the full extent (≥ 90%) of its natural landscape size. B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size. 13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas – landscape condition metric 13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contigu ous naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundari es are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300 feet wide. Well Loosely A A ≥ 500 acres B B From 100 to < 500 acres C C From 50 to < 100 acres D D From 10 to < 50 acres E E < 10 acres F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats 13b. Evaluate for marshes only. Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands. 14. Edge Effect – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland) May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificia l edges include non-forested areas ≥ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessme nt area is clear cut, select option ”C.” A 0 B 1 to 4 C 5 to 8 15. Vegetative Composition – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat) A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata compo sed of appropriate species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area. B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions , but still largely composed of native species characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata. C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non - characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at least one stratum. 16. Vegetative Diversity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only) A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics). B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics. C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics). 17. Vegetative Structure – assessment area/wetland type condition metric 17a. Is vegetation present? Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18. 17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands. A ≥ 25% coverage of vegetation B < 25% coverage of vegetation 17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately. AA WT A A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes B B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps C C Canopy sparse or absent A A Dense mid-story/sapling layer B B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent A A Dense shrub layer B B Moderate density shrub layer C C Shrub layer sparse or absent A A Dense herb layer B B Moderate density herb layer C C Herb layer sparse or absent 18. Snags – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). B Not A 19. Diameter Class Distribution – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are present. B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH. C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees. 20. Large Woody Debris – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes) Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris. A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability). B Not A 21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion – wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only) Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. P atterned areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water. A B C D 22. Hydrologic Connectivity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only) Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D. A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area. B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area. C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area. D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area. Notes Ca n o p y Mi d -St o r y Sh r u b He r b NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0 Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO Wetland Site Name W-7 Date of Assessment 5/24/23 Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC) Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO Sub-function Rating Summary Function Sub-function Metrics Rating Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM Sub-surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Particulate Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Soluble Change Condition HIGH Condition/Opportunity HIGH Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Physical Change Condition LOW Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Pollution Change Condition NA Condition/Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW Vegetation Composition Condition LOW Function Rating Summary Function Metrics Rating Hydrology Condition MEDIUM Water Quality Condition MEDIUM Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES Habitat Condition LOW Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM 308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1 Natural Resource Consultants Sampling Point #1 - Supporting Photograph Photo 1. View of W-7 in power line easement off Center Park Drive facing east (5/24/23) USFWS Letter United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, North Carolina 28801 March 20, 2021 Amanda Bloom Environmental Consultant McAdams 3430 Toringdon Way, Suite 110 Charlotte, NC 28277 bloom@mcadamsco.com Dear Amanda Bloom: Subject: Sugar Creek Greenway; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your correspondence dated February 22, 2021 wherein you request our comments regarding potential project-mediated impacts to federally protected species resulting from the proposed federal action. The Service submits the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). Project Description According to the information provided, the proposed work may require a Section 404 Nationwide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project would entail the construction of a greenway, approximately 3.5 miles in length, on Sugar Creek in Charlotte, North Carolina. Onsite habitats are composed of successional forest, transitional habitats, rights of way and access to Sugar Creek. The project area is surrounded by residential and commercial developments. Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 – July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Although not required, we encourage you to conduct any associated tree clearing activities outside the pup season (June 1 to July 31) and/or active season (April 1 to October 15) to reduce the chance of impacting unidentified maternity roosts. 2 According to the information provided, suitable habitat occurs onsite for the endangered Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) and Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii). However, botanical surveys conducted during October 23, 29, to 31st and November 3, 2020 detected no evidence for these species at that time. Due to the presence of suitable habitat, but lack of onsite evidence for these species, we believe the probability for project-mediated loss is insignificant and discountable. Therefore, we would concur with a “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for these species from the applicable federal action agency. Moreover, we believe that suitable habitat is not present onsite for the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), and we require no further information at this time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. We offer the following general recommendations on behalf of natural resources: Erosion and Sediment Control Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground-disturbing activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed. Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose. Stream Channel and Bank Restoration A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly alter this equilibrium. We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant’s consideration: 1. Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole-tree revetment or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand, and dirt are not recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend above the bank-full elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural floodplain begins). Deep-rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced 3 at intervals no greater than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel. 2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and profile with minimal disturbance. 3. Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are based on the bank-full, or channel-forming, stage of the stream. Bank-full stage maintains the natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over time. Natural channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby stream reaches that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the pattern, dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project’s success. 4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures should be removed as soon as the work area is stable. 5. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during construction. 6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic resources. In North Carolina, non-cohesive and erosion-prone soils are most common in the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions. Therefore, reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized with seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion-control matting prior to the end of each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing). Pollinator Habitat Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, and other insects, including moths and butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and production of most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are pollinated by these types of fauna. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees (which are not native 4 to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a result of disease and the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat. Because loss of habitat and diminished native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators throughout the country, we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or wetlands. We have records of rare species in the area, including monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus plexippus), a federal candidate for listing.1 Monarch butterflies east of the Rocky Mountains used to number in the hundreds of millions but the population has declined by approximately 80 percent. Loss of habitat due to genetically modified crops, overuse of herbicides and insecticides, urban, suburban and agricultural development, disease, climate change, and overwintering site degradation are the leading causes of monarch decline. Adults use a wide variety of flowering plants throughout migration for nectar and breeding. However, milkweed plants (Asclepias spp.) are essential to monarch breeding as these are the only genus of plants that can host monarchs in their larval form. For a regional and seasonal list of plants important to monarch butterflies, please visit the Xerces Society website at: http://www.xerces.org/monarch-nectar-plants/. Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to candidate species or other non-listed pollinators, we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if monarch butterflies or suitable habitat for the species is present on the proposed project site. If individuals or suitable habitat is present, impacts should be avoided. More specific information about monarch butterfly can be found at the Service website dedicated to the species at: https://www.fws.gov/savethemonarch/. To reduce development impacts to monarch butterflies and other pollinators and/or to increase the habitat and species diversity within the project area, we recommend the following measures be incorporated into project designs: 1. Throughout the site, avoid non-native seed mixes and plants. Instead, sow native seed mixes and plant species that are beneficial to pollinators. a. Avoid seed mixes and plants that have been pre-treated with insecticides, such as neonictinoids. b. Taller-growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide benefits to pollinators, habitat for ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small mammals. 1“Taxa for which the [Fish and Wildlife] Service has on file enough substantial informati on on biological vulnerability and threat(s) to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning” (Federal Register, February 28, 1996). Taxa formerly considered as “Category 1” are now considered as “candidates.” 5 c. Native low-growing/groundcover species should be planted in areas that need to be maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the amount of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide treatment. d. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species is especially beneficial for monarch butterflies. The following website provides additional information and a comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators: http://www.xerces.org/pollinator-resource-center/mid-atlantic. We also offer our assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with fast growing erosion control seed mixes for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits. e. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat requirements can be provided upon request. 2. Mowing and grounds maintenance, including pesticide use, should be scheduled to not interfere with monarch breeding or nectaring at project sites that occur along the migration route. To reduce harm, we advise mowing in the fall or winter when flowers are not in bloom. 3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend project designs include a diverse array of habitats to accommodate varied pollinators. For example: a. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs. b. Many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. c. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems. d. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators, please visit the following website: https://www.fws.gov/pollinators/. 4. Minimize effects of outdoor light pollution. Recent studies indicate that artificial lighting disrupts the natural reproduction and feeding patterns of nocturnal pollinators such as beetles and moths. This disruption results in a decrease of pollination rates in plants and a decrease in the health and diversity of nocturnal pollinators. When developing an outdoor lighting plan or installing any outdoor lighting devices, we recommend the following measures be considered to minimize potential adverse effects of outdoor lighting: a. Decrease the number of light fixtures, as practicable, to meet lighting objectives. b. Install lighting only in areas that need illumination for safety (e.g. paths, roads, etc.). Avoid lighting landscape features such as trees, shrubs, or building facades. c. Install fully shielded lights that direct light downward. d. Use only low-pressure sodium (LPS), high-pressure sodium (HPS), or light emitting diode (LED) light sources that emit “warm” light. “Warm” light sources are those that contain low amounts of blue light in their spectrum. Choosing light sources with a color temperature of no more than 3,000 Kelvins will minimize the effects of blue light exposure. e. For additional information and actions that can be taken to reduce outdoor light pollution, please visit the following website: 6 https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for-citizens/lighting- basics/. The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Karla Quast of our staff at karla_quast@fws.gov, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-128. Sincerely, - - original signed - - Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor State Historic Preservation Office Letter North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 814-6570/814-6898 March 25, 2021 Amanda Bloom bloom@mcadamsco.com McAdams 3430 Toringdon Way, Suite 110 Charlotte, NC 28277 Re: Construct Sugar Creek Greenway, Yorkmont Road to instersection of McDowell Farms Drive and Mounting Rock Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 21-0616 Dear Ms. Bloom: Thank you for your letter of February 18, 2021, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments. We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number. Sincerely, Ramona Bartos, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer