HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230942 Ver 1_SPL review comments 7_28_2023
308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 919.422.3605
Natural Resource Consultants
June 29, 2023
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
via online PCN Submittal
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
via online PCN Submittal
RE: Nationwide Permit 14/Water Quality Certification 4246
Sugar Creek Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd.
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
NRC Project #: 21019
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of Mecklenburg County, we are applying for a Nationwide Permit 14 from the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) and Water Quality Certification 4246 from the NC Division of Water Resources
(DWR) for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with the project known as Sugar Creek
Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. The purpose of the proposed project is to establish a
new section of the existing Sugar Creek Greenway that will span north from McDowell Farms Drive to
Yorkmont Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed project also includes a
new trailhead/parking facility located off South Tryon Street and trail spurs that connect to Edgegreen
Drive, Center Park Drive, and Memorial Parkway.
A list of the attachments to the online Pre-Construction Notification Application and those attachments
follow this letter. Your review of this project is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact me at (919) 422-3605 or burdette@nrconsultnc.com.
Sincerely,
Natural Resource Consultants
Jennifer Burdette, PWS
Sr. Environmental Consultant
Attachments
ec: Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov)
Jimmy Prestwood, McAdams (prestwood@mcadamsco.com)
Graham Bruns, McAdams (bruns@mcadamsco.com)
Natural Resource Consultants
Sugar Creek- McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Dr. Permit Application
List of Attachments
DWR Prefiling Acknowledgement
Agent Authorization Form
Property Owner Certification Forms
Figure 1. US Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangle Topographic Map
Figure 2. Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Map
Figure 3. Aerial Map
Sugar Creek – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Dr. Impact Maps
Construction Methods & Structure Plans
Mitigation Documents
Mitigation Reservation Letter
NCSAM & NCWAM Forms & Results
USFWS Letter
State Historic Preservation Office Letter
DWR Prefiling Acknowledgement
1
Jennifer Burdette
From:401PreFile <401PreFile@ncdenr.gov>
Sent:Friday, December 2, 2022 10:19 AM
To:Jennifer Burdette
Subject:Automatic reply: [External] Sugar Creek Greenway, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, PCN
This email confirms receipt of your pre-filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your records and
submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as required by federal law. DWR
will not be able to accept your application without this federally required documentation. 401 applications
received without documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be
returned as incomplete.
Responses to this email are not monitored.
If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of staff contact
list(s).
For Non-Transportation Central Staff:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting/401-
buffer-permitting-contacts
For Non-Transportation Regional
Staff: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1
For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation-
permitting/staff-contacts
Agent Authorization Form
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
10212 Creedmoor Road, Raleigh, NC / 919. 422. 3605
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Contract Purchaser
FIELDS WITH * ARE REQUIRED
Project Area PIN(s):
14327204, 14327203, 14327207, 14327209, 14327484, 14327481, 14327211, 14313306, 14313302,
14321103, 14320102, 14320101, 14322106, 14322110, 14322105, 16708110, 16708109, 16722196,
16722165, 16709401, 16722199, 16722197
Name: Mecklenburg County C/O Real Estate/Finance Department; POC: Jennifer Brooks
Address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Ste. 6000, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone: * 980-445-8724
Email: * jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Number: 21019
Project Manager: Jennifer Burdette, Graham Bruns
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 512 N. Salisbury Street
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Clean Water Act & Riparian Buffer Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize Natural Resource Consultants to act on my behalf as my agent in obtaining
verification of wetland delineations and processing of permit applications for the project listed above.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized contract purchaser of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water
Resources to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer
Rules.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by Natural Resource Consultants’ staff.
Print Contractor Purchaser Name *Signature
Asset and Facility Management
Title *Date
Property Owner Certification Forms
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: N/A
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14313306, 14320102, 14320101, 14322106, 14322110
Property Owner Information
Name: City of Charlotte C/O Real Estate Division
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: 600 E 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
704-560-1026
gregory.crawford@charlottenc.gov
Greg A. Crawford
2/17/2023
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: 2810 & 2815 Coliseum Centre Drive
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327204, 14327209
Property Owner Information
Name: Coliseum NC Owner LLC C/O SPP Office LLC – ATTN Michael Meyer
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: Colliers Building Mgmt; Five Coliseum Centre, 2810 Coliseum
Centre Drive, Ste 160, Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
704.357.3282
mary.cook@colliers.com
Mary M. Cook, Senior Property Manager
X
2/6/2023
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: N/A
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 16722165
Property Owner Information
Name: Department of Transportation
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: 716 W Main Street
Albemarle, NC 28001
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
980-523-0000
faobregon@ncdot.gov
Felix A. Obregon, PE
02/06/2023
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: N/A
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14313302
Property Owner Information
Name: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ☒ Owner ☐ Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
526 S. Church St ECII-05
Charlotte, NC 2820
(by Martha S Purser)
Manager Land Services
704-382-4705
martha.purser@duke-energy.com
Martha S Purser for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
January 30, 2023
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: 2301 Yorkmont Road
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327203, 14327207, 14327207, 14321103, 14322105, 16708110,
16708109, 16722196, 16709401, 16722199, 16722197
Property Owner Information
Name: Mecklenburg County
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: 600 E 4th Street, 11th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner X Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
980-445-8724
jennifer.brooks@mecklenburgcountync.gov
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: Arbor Loop Drive
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327481
Property Owner Information
Name: City Park Master Owners Association LLC
Title (if applicable): P.O. Box 3340
Mailing Address: Fort Mill, SC 29716
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner x Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
June 23,2023
Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder)
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: Arbor Loop Dr
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327484
Property Owner Information
Name: P & L Coliseum Residential Developer, LLC
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: 3330 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30339
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on‐site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner x Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
6/23/2023
Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder)
Project Name: Sugar Creek Greenway
Project Manager: Graham Bruns
Project Number: 21019
Property Owner Certification Information
Parcel Information
Street Address: 4000 Memorial Parkway
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28217
County: Mecklenburg County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14327211
Property Owner Information
Name: P & L Coliseum LP
Title (if applicable):
Mailing Address: 3330 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30339
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Property Access Certification
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on‐site investigation,
if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the Undersigned, am either a duly authorized
owner of record of the property identified herein or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of
record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner x Authorized Agent
Date
Signature
Jennifer Brooks, Mecklenburg County (Easement Holder)
6/23/2023
704-506-2161
rjersey@pepeandland.com
Figure 1. US Geological Survey 7.5-minute Quadrangle Topographic Map
0 2,0001,000 Feet1 inch = 2,000 feet
$
FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPSUGAR C REEK GREEN WAY - MCD OW ELL FARMS DR . TOYORKMONT RD.CHAR LOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH C AROLINA; 20192. LAT: 35.174354, LONG: -80.9164763. The project area is approximately 96 acres in size.
6/28/2023
kaylieMEK-20000DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
C:\Users\NRC \NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 1 USGS.mxd, 6/28/2023 1:57:43 PM, kaylie
PRO JECT AREA
1VERSION:
Legend
Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC)
Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC)
Figure 2. Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Map
MO
UO
WkE
PaE
PaE
PaE
CeD2
MeD
CeD2
PaE
MeD
CeD2
CeD2
WkD
WkD
CeD2
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
0 1,400700Feet1 inch = 1,400 feet
$
FIGURE 2. NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEYSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - M CDOWELL FARMS DR. TOYORKMONT RDCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COU NTY, NC
NOTES:Web Soil Survey SSURGO Spatial Data: Mecklenburg County (Version 6, Sep 16, 2019)
C:\Users\NRC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 2 Web SS.mxd, 6/27/2023 12:35:36 PM, kaylie
PR OJECT AREA
6/27/2023
kaylieMEK-20000DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
1VERSION:
2017
Legend
So il Ma p Unit
Limit of Disturbance (+/- 23 AC)
Previous Limit of Disturbance (+/- 96 AC)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Hydric Soil RatingCeB2Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perce nt slopes, moderately eroded NoCeD2Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 perce nt slopes, moderatel y eroded NoCuBCecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent sl opes NoMeDMecklenburg fine sandy l oam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NoMOMonacan loam, 0 to 2 perce nt slopes, fre quentl y flooded NoPaEPacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes NoPaFPacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes NoUOUdorthents, sanitary landfill NoWkDWilkes loam, 8 to 15 perce nt slopes NoWkEWilkes loam, 15 to 25 perce nt slopes No
Figure 3. Aerial Map
NCCGIA, NC911 Board
0 150 30075Feet1 inch = 150 feet¯
LEGEND
Limit of Disturbance (+/- 23 AC)
Original Study Area (+/- 96 AC)
2-ft Contours
FIGURE 3A. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery
C:\Users\NRC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\Detailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3A Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 1:59:55 PM, kaylie
6/28/2023
kaylie
MEK-20000
DATE:
JOB NO:
DRAWN BY:
NCCGIA, NC911 Board
NCCGIA, NC911 Board
0 150 30075Feet1 in ch = 150 feet¯
LEGEND
Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC)
Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC)
2-ft C ontours
FIGURE 3B. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREE K GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery
C:\User s\N RC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\D etailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3B Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 2:02:38 PM, kayli e
6/28/2023
kaylie
MEK-20000
DATE:
JOB NO:
DR AWN BY:
NCCGIA, NC911 Board
0 150 30075Feet1 in ch = 150 feet¯
LEGEND
Limit of Disturbance (+/- 2 3 AC)
Original Stu dy Area (+/- 96 AC)
2-ft C ontours
FIGURE 3C. AERIAL MAPSUGAR CREEK GREENWAY - MCDOWELL FARMS DR. TO YORKMONT RD.CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:2017 OneMap Aerial Imagery
C:\User s\N RC\NRC Server\Projects\21019 Sugar\GIS\D etailed Delineation\Archive\MEK20000-SugarCk-Fig 3C Aerial.mxd, 6/28/2023 2:04:51 PM, kayli e
6/28/2023
kaylie
MEK-20000
DATE:
JOB NO:
DR AWN BY:
Sugar Creek Greenway – McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. Impact Maps
W
T
Y
V
O
L
A
R
D
B
E
A
M
R
D
S
H
O
P
T
O
N
R
D
NA
T
I
O
N
S
F
O
R
D
R
D
BIL
L
Y
G
R
A
H
A
M
P
K
W
Y
YOR
K
M
O
N
T
R
D
WEST BLVD
S TR
Y
O
N
S
T
CL
A
N
T
O
N
R
D
EDGE
G
R
E
E
N
D
R
W
A
R
R
O
W
O
O
D
R
D
Y
O
R
K
M
O
N
T
R
D
EDGEGREEN DR
W T
Y
V
O
L
A
R
D
S
T
R
Y
O
N
S
T
(
N
C
-
4
9
)
BIL
L
Y
G
R
A
H
A
M
P
K
W
Y
YO
R
K
M
O
N
T
R
D
(
S
R
-
1
1
5
6
)
MCD
O
W
E
L
L
F
A
R
M
S
D
R
MOUN
T
I
N
G
R
O
C
K
R
D
HARRY L. JONES SR.
GOLF COURSE
CENTER PARK DR
COLISEUM CENTRE DR
Y
O
R
K
M
O
N
T
R
D
(
S
R
-
1
1
5
6
)
M
E
M
O
R
I
A
L
P
K
W
Y
TYVO
L
A
C
E
N
T
R
E
D
R
SUG
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
SUGAR
C
R
E
E
K
CHARLOTTE
REGIONAL FARMERS
MARKET
=-Y3- STA. 30+00.00
-L1B- STA. 202+00.00
=-Y1- STA. 10+00.00
-L1A- STA. 116+84.60
BEGIN PROJECT L1A 100+80.00
END PROJECT L1D 412+10.00
=-Y2- STA. 20+00.00
-L1A- STA. 119+19.73
=-L1C- STA. 300+00.00
-L1B- STA. 285+91.88
=-Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00
-L1C- STA. 311+56.66
=-Y8- STA. 80+00.00
-L1C- STA. 322+88.45
=-Y9- STA. 90+00.00
-L1D- STA. 401+00.00=-Y4- STA. 40+00.00
-L1B- STA. 246+14.51
=-L1D- STA. 400+00.00
-L1C- STA. 326+01.73
=-L1B- STA. 200+00.00
-L1A- STA. 124+03.05
-L1A-
-L1B--L1C-
-L1D-
-Y1--Y2-
-Y3-
-Y4-
-Y8-
-Y9-
-Y11-
TRAILHEAD
-Y7- ALT 1-Y6-
-Y5-
=-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.00
-L1C- STA. 302+06.11
BRIDGE S1
BRIDGE S2
BRIDGE S3
=-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.00
-L1C- STA. 319+29.19
-Y7- ALT 2
-Y10-
=-Y10- STA. 0+00.00
-L1D- STA. 411+96.32
H
I
V
E
D
R
-Y1- STA. 20+97.22
-Y2-
STA. 22+79.15
-Y3- STA. 31+70.93
-Y4- STA. 49+87.03
-Y6- STA. 3+75.28
-Y7-ALT1- STA. 3+94.04
-Y7-ALT2-
STA. 5+01.65
-Y8- STA. 82+04.26
-Y9- STA. 91+58.84
-Y10- STA. 3+65.23
-Y11- STA. 1102+69.20
-Y5- STA. 5+60.52
=-L1B- STA. 272+28.44
-Y5- STA. 0+00.00
=-Y11- STA. 1100+00.00
-L1A- STA. 101+01.87
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
C
S
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
4
1
:
4
6
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
AS NOTED
MEK-20000-CS.dwg
06-08-2023
1
COVER SHEET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
TYPE OF WORK:
GRADING, PAVING, STRUCTURES, RETAINING
WALLS, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL
VICINITY MAP
GRAPHIC SCALESPROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF BOARDWALK = 1,110 FT
LENGTH OF BRIDGE = 460 FT
TOTAL LENGTH OF MAINLINE = 2.79 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF CONNECTIONS = 0.99 MILES
DESIGN DATA
DESIGN SPEED = 20 MPH
LEAN ANGLE = 20 DEGREES
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION = GREENWAY
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
HORIZONTAL
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 3 6 12
1 inch = 6 ft.
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
METHOD OF GRADING: CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II.
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE
1 COVER SHEET
1A GENERAL NOTES
1B CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
1C OVERALL PLAN & KEY
2A-1 THRU 2A-6 TYPICAL SECTIONS
2B-1 THRU 2B-11 DETAILS
3B-1 EARTHWORK SUMMARY
3D-1 THRU 3D-2 DRAINAGE SUMMARY
4 THRU 34 PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS
CA-1 THRU CA-2 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN
PM-1 THRU PM-3 PAVEMENT MARKING & SIGNAGE PLANS
EC-1 THRU EC-25 EROSION CONTROL PLANS
L2.00 THRU L2.01 TRAILHEAD PLANTING PLANS
A0.01 THRU P102 TRAILHEAD BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
C2.00 TRAILHEAD SITE PLAN
C3.00 TRAILHEAD GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C4.00 THRU C4.01 TRAILHEAD UTILITY PLAN
C7.00 THRU C7.11 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
UO-1 UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLANS
XS-1A CROSS SECTION INDEX
XS-1 THRU XS-31 CROSS SECTIONS
S-1 THRU S-10 STRUCTURE PLANS
W-1 WALL PLANS
BEGINNING OF PROJECT
END OF PROJECT
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
200
GRAPHIC SCALE
4000 800
1 inch = 400 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
95% PLANS
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:± 309.64 AC (± 13,487,918 SF)
EXISTING ZONING:R-3, R-4, BP(CD), I-2(CD), UR-2(CD), MUDD-O, BP
DEVELOPER:PREPARED BY:MCADAMS COMPANY
2100 S TRYON ST, SUITE 400
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
704.527.0800
SITE DATA - GREENWAY
PID: 16722197, 16722199, 16722165, 16722196, 16708110, 16708109, 16709401, 14322105, 14322110, 14322106, 14320101
PARKS AND RECREATION
5841 BROOKSHIRE BLVD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28216
980.314.1000
FRONT YARD SETBACK:N / A
SIDE YARD SETBACK:N / A
REAR YARD SETBACK:N / A
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PROPOSED USE:
VACANT / FLOODPLAIN / FORESTEXISTING USE:
GREENWAY TRAIL
PROPOSED PARKING:N / A
PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING:N / A
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA:XXX,000 SF (X.XX% SITE AREA)
REQUIRED TREE SAVE AREA:N / A
PROPOSED TREE SAVE AREA:N / A
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:JUNE 2025
NOTE: SEE SHEET C2.00 FOR TRAILHEAD SPECIFIC SITE DATA TABLE
14321103, 14320102, 14313301, 14313302, 14313306, 14327207, 14327211, 14327484, 14327209, 14327203 , 14327204
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "NC811" (811) OR (1-800-632-4949) AT
LEAST 3 FULL BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
OR EXCAVATION TO HAVE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ANY LOCAL UTILITIES THAT PROVIDE
THEIR OWN LOCATOR SERVICES INDEPENDENT OF "NC811".
REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
R
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
MOUNTING ROCK RD CONNECTION (-Y11-)
SEE SHEET 34 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
SUGA
R
C
R
E
E
K
1
1
0
1
+
0
0
100+00
101+00
102+0
0
103+00
104+00
105+00
10
6
+
0
0
107+00
108+00
PC
:
1
0
4
+
9
7
.
6
4
PC: 101+34.34
PC: 105+84.98
P
C
:
1
0
2
+
6
5
.
4
0
P
C
:
1
0
8
+
1
4
.
3
6
PT: 105+45.39
P
T
:
1
0
1
+
6
5
.
2
6
P
T
:
1
0
6
+
5
9
.
4
4
PT
:
1
0
3
+
5
9
.
7
0
PT
:
1
0
8
+
7
7
.
4
5
C 1 0 1
C 10 2
C103
C104
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #1 (30 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS=-Y11- STA. 1100+00.00
-L1A- STA. 101+01.87
C 10 5
Curve Table: Alignment - L1A -
C101
C102
C103
C104
PI Sta
101+49.83
103+13.44
105+22.09
106+24.49
Δ
8°03'12"
27°00'49"
30°23'44"
47°24'11"
D
026°02'36.73"
028°38'52.40"
063°39'43.12"
063°39'43.12"
L
30.92
94.30
47.75
74.46
T
15.49
48.04
24.45
39.51
R
220.00
200.00
90.00
90.00
C105
C106
C107
C108
C115
108+46.38
109+43.55
111+18.76
114+70.08
113+19.14
24°05'55"
49°27'43"
32°56'04"
85°24'08"
14°00'27"
N09° 55' 02
.
0
9
"
W
N17° 5
8
'
1
4
.
0
3
"
W
N09° 02'
3
5
.
1
0
"
E
N39° 26' 18.61"E
N07° 57' 52.1
8
"
W
N16° 08' 03.30"E
BEGIN ALIGNMENT
-L1A- STA. 100+00.00
N: 518356.4931
E: 1428388.6436
0402
0401
32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
0403
0404
28 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP
100+89.23
6.00' R
101+09.25
6.00' R
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK #1
-L1A- STA. 105+55.00
END BOARDWALK #1
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- STA. 105+85.00
BEGIN PROJECT
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1A- 100+80.00
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
0501
0502
28 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK #2
-L1A- STA. 108+88.00
EXIST. 15' SSE
TCE
TCE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE PGE
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- 108+78.00
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- 105+45.00
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' CONCRETE
-L1A- 105+95.00
R=10' (TYP.)
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
.
0
1
5
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
CLASS B R
I
P
R
A
P
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 10 TON
EST 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 24 TON
EST 33 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
A
-
S
T
A
1
0
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
5
- L1A -
560
570
580
590
560
570
580
590
100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 107+50
PI
=
1
0
2
+
7
6
.
4
7
EL
=
5
8
1
.
7
2
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
0
4
+
8
3
.
7
9
EL
=
5
8
5
.
3
9
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
0
1
+
6
9
.
3
5
EL
=
5
7
9
.
4
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
0
3
+
6
9
.
9
9
EL
=
5
8
0
.
8
9
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
0
6
+
4
3
.
4
3
EL
=
5
8
0
.
6
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.1592%
-3.0000%
+0.4501%
-0.8814%
+3.9519%
+2.6871%
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EXIST. 8" SS
BEGIN GRADE
-L1A- STA. 100+80.00
EL. = 579.00
PROP. 18" RCP
PROP. 24" RCP
BEGIN BOARDWALK #1
-L1A- STA. 105+55.00
EL. = 583.25
END BOARDWALK #1
-L1A- STA. 105+85.00
EL. = 582.35
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 104+49.69
EL. = 583.00
END DITCH RT
STA. 105+52.12
EL. = 582.00
BEGIN DITCH LT
STA. 105+85.68
EL. = 579.00
END DITCH LT
STA. 106+73.10
EL. = 580.64
-0.4963%-1.4396%
0.4519%4.5494%
20' SPAN
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
1
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
2
2
:
4
9
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P1.dwg
06-08-2023
4
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
DETAIL A
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
2:1
2:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.0 FT
-L1A- STA. 104+50 TO 105+54 RT.
-L1A- STA. 105+85 TO 106+73 LT.
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
SUGAR CREEK
11+00
107+00
108+00
109+00
110
+
0
0
111+
0
0
112+00
113+00
114+
0
0
115+00
1
1
6
+
0
0
117+0
0
PC: 109+09.00
P
C
:
1
1
0
+
7
4
.
4
2
P
C
:
1
1
4
+
0
0
.
8
7
PC: 1
1
6
+
5
5
.
1
1
P
C
:
1
0
8
+
1
4
.
3
6
P
C
:
1
1
2
+
9
4
.
5
7
P
T
:
1
0
9
+
7
3
.
7
5
P
T
:
1
1
1
+
6
0
.
6
5
PT: 1
1
5
+
1
2
.
6
6
P
T
:
1
1
7
+
1
7
.
5
0
P
T
:
1
0
6
+
5
9
.
4
4
PT
:
1
0
8
+
7
7
.
4
5
P
T
:
1
1
3
+
4
3
.
4
6
PROPOSED BRIDGE S1 (120 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
C 1 0 5 C 1 0 6
C 1 0 7
C 108
C
1
0
9
R
220.00
200.00
90.00
90.00
Curve Table: Alignment - L1A -
C105
C106
C107
C108
C115
PI Sta
108+46.38
109+43.55
111+18.76
114+70.08
113+19.14
Δ
24°05'55"
49°27'43"
32°56'04"
85°24'08"
14°00'27"
D
038°11'49.87"
076°23'39.74"
038°11'49.87"
076°23'39.74"
028°38'52.40"
L
63.09
64.75
86.22
111.79
48.90
T
32.02
34.55
44.34
69.21
24.57
R
150.00
75.00
150.00
75.00
200.00 C 1 1 5
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #2 (20 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
N07° 57
'
5
2
.
1
8
"
W
N16° 08' 03.30"E
N33
°
1
9
'
3
9
.
4
3
"
W
N00° 23' 34.
9
7
"
W
N14°
2
4
'
0
1
.
9
1
"
W
N00° 29' 11.6
0
"
W
N
7
1
°
0
0
'
0
6
.
2
8
"
E
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
0501
0502
28 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK #2
-L1A- STA. 108+88.00
END BOARDWALK #2
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- STA. 109+08.00
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BRIDGE S1
-L1A- STA. 115+29.68
END BRIDGE S1
BEGIN BOARDWALK #3
-L1A- STA. 116+48.68
TCE TCE
TCE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
.01
5
.01
5
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- 108+78.00
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1A- 109+18.00
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- 115+19.68
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' CONCRETE
SEE TRAILHEAD SITE PLAN
SPECIAL LAT
E
R
A
L
'
V
'
D
I
T
C
H
SEE DETAIL
A
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED 103 LF OF
FARM FENCE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 32 TON
EST 45 SY GEOTEXTILE
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
CLASS I RIP
R
A
P
EST 10 TON
EST 14 SY G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
CLASS I RIP
R
A
P
EST 24 TON
EST 33 SY G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-L1A- STA. 114+22.15
8.00' LT
END FARM FENCE
-L1A- STA. 115+15.13
8.00' LT
CLASS I RIPRA
P
EST 40 TON
EST 56 SY GEO
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
A
-
S
T
A
1
0
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
4
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
A
-
S
T
A
1
1
6
+
6
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
6
- L1A -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
107+50 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 116+60
PI
=
1
0
7
+
6
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
3
.
8
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
1
4
+
3
2
.
8
8
EL
=
5
9
1
.
0
0
VC
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
0
8
+
5
0
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
2
.
2
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
1
0
+
2
6
.
9
4
EL
=
5
8
2
.
2
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
1
2
+
6
5
.
1
7
EL
=
5
8
3
.
4
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+4.5000%
+0.0000%
+0.5000%+0.0000%
-1.8871%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 24" RCP
BEGIN BRIDGE S1
-L1A- STA. 115+29.68
EL. = 591.00
END BRIDGE S1
BEGIN BOARDWALK #3
-L1A- STA. 116+48.68
EL. = 591.00
BEGIN BOARDWALK #2
-L1A- STA. 108+88.00
EL. = 582.26
END BOARDWALK #2
-L1A- STA. 109+08.00
EL. = 582.26
SUGAR CREEK
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
1
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
2
3
:
0
4
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P1.dwg
06-08-2023
5
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
20
1
+
0
0
SUGAR CREEK
22+
8
4
21+00 22+00
11+00
114+00
115+00
1
1
6
+
0
0
117
+
0
0 118+00
119+
0
0
120+
0
0
121+00
122+0
0
1
2
3
+
0
0
12
4
+
0
0
PC
:
1
1
8
+
2
2
.
6
9
P
C
:
1
1
4
+
0
0
.
8
7
PC: 120+64.13
P
C
:
1
2
1
+
7
3
.
1
9
PC: 11
6
+
5
5
.
1
1
PC
:
1
2
3
+
0
8
.
4
2
PC: 122+56.44
P
T
:
1
1
8
+
6
0
.
9
7
PT: 11
5
+
1
2
.
6
6
P
T
:
1
2
0
+
9
8
.
7
3
PT
:
1
2
2
+
1
1
.
4
1
PT
:
1
1
7
+
1
7
.
5
0
PT: 123+39.06PT
:
1
2
2
+
7
8
.
4
6
=-L1B- STA. 200+00.00
-L1A- STA. 124+03.05
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #1
SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE
S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y2-)
SEE SHEET 25 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
SEE SHEET 7 FOR -L1B-
PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y2- STA. 20+00.00
-L1A- STA. 119+19.73
108
C
1
0
9
C 1 1 0
C 1 1 1
C 112
C113
C
114
=-Y1- STA. 10+00.00
-L1A- STA. 116+84.60
EDGEGREEN DR CONNECTION (-Y1-)
SEE SHEET 23 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
N00° 29' 11.60"W
N
7
1
°
0
0
'
0
6
.
2
8
"
E
N22°
2
5
'
1
6
.
1
5
"
W
N02° 35' 48.74"W
N21° 44' 14.40"E
N
3
5
°
4
5
'
3
8
.
8
6
"
E
N26° 58' 59.31"E
.0
1
5
END BRIDGE S1
BEGIN BOARDWALK #3
-L1A- STA. 116+48.68
0603
EXIS
T
.
1
9
0
'
R
O
W
28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
0604
BEGIN SAFETY RAIL
-L1A- STA. 120+64.17
7.00' LT
END SAFETY RAIL
-L1A- STA. 122+73.68
7.00' LT
EXIST. 60' SSE
PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE
(STA. 120+15.00 TO 120+25.00)
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR DETAIL
.015
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROPOSED 210 LF OF SAFETY RAIL
SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
.015
TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO
16' CONCRETE
(STA. 120+35.00 TO 120+55.00)
REMOVE APPROX. 18 LF
OF EXISTING 15" CMP
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
SPECIAL LATERAL
'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
BEGIN RETAINING WALL #1
-L1A- STA. 120+64.13
8.00' RT
END RETAINING WALL #1
-L1A- STA. 122+73.68
8.00' RT
0602
0601
32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
7
S
T
R
Y
O
N
S
T
(
N
C
-
4
9
)
123+20.33
-11.95' L
123+33.99
-6.00' L
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 32 TON
EST 47 SY GEOTEXTILE
122+93.68
6.00' R
ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
RIM ELEVATION TO 582.50' TO MATCH
PROPOSED TRAIL
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 151 TON
EST 215 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 23 TON
EST 33 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 3 TON
EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 38 TON
EST 84 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #3 (200 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
END BOARDWALK #3
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1A- 118+48.68
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' CONCRETE
-L1A- 118+58.68
END FARM FENCE
-L1A- STA. 115+15.13
8.00' LT
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
Curve Table: Alignment - L1A -
C109
C110
C111
C112
C113
C114
PI Sta
116+91.10
118+42.07
120+81.60
121+92.59
122+67.50
123+23.77
Δ
71°29'18"
21°56'05"
19°49'27"
24°20'03"
14°01'24"
8°46'40"
D
114°35'29.61"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
063°39'43.12"
063°39'43.12"
028°38'52.40"
L
62.39
38.28
34.60
38.22
22.03
30.64
T
35.99
19.38
17.47
19.40
11.07
15.35
R
50.00
100.00
100.00
90.00
90.00
200.00
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 40 TON
EST 56 SY GEOTEXTILE
RETAIN APPROX. 34 LF
OF EXISTING 15" CMP
MATC
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
A
-
S
T
A
1
1
6
+
6
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
5
- L1A -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
116+60 117+00 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 124+25
PI
=
1
1
6
+
9
9
.
1
1
EL
=
5
9
1
.
0
0
VC
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
2
3
+
6
6
.
8
4
EL
=
5
8
4
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
1
8
+
9
1
.
8
7
EL
=
5
8
2
.
3
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 120+92.09
EL = 578.00
VC = 50.00'
PI = 121+79.97
EL = 578.00
VC = 50.00'
-4.500
0
%
-2.1604%
+0.0000%
+0.0000%
+3.2107%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
EXIST. 42" SS
MIN. 9' VERTICAL CLEARANCE
S TYRON ST BRIDGE
PROP. 18" RCP
END BOARDWALK #3
-L1A- STA. 118+48.68
EL. = 584.27
PROP. 18" RCP
BEGIN DITCH LT
STA. 119+12.34
EL. = 580.54 END DITCH LT
STA. 120+28.43
EL. = 578.08
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 123+24.74
EL. = 581.00
-2.1179%
-1.4322%1.0244%
BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 120+15.00
EL. = 579.665
END SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 120+25.00
EL. = 579.449
20' SPAN
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
1
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
2
3
:
1
6
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P1.dwg
06-08-2023
6
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
DETAIL A
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
2:1
2:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.0 FT
-L1A- STA. 119+12 TO 120+29 LT.
DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
3:1
3:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
-L1A- STA. 123+24 TO 124+03 RT.
DETAIL C
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
2:1
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
MAX d = 1.5 FT
d
-L1A- STA. 120+51 RT. TO 120+29 LT.
TYPE OF LINER = CLASS B RIPRAP
GEOTEXTILE
2:
1
NATURAL
GROUND
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
1
2
4
+
0
0
31+7
6
31+0
0
2
0
1
+
0
0
2
0
2
+
0
0
2
0
3
+
0
0
204+00
205+
0
0
20
6
+
0
0
20
7
+
0
0
208
+
0
0
S
T
R
Y
O
N
S
T
(
N
C
-
4
9
)
SUGAR CREEK
PC
:
2
0
0
+
7
8
.
0
2
PC:
2
0
6
+
6
5
.
3
8
P
C
:
2
0
8
+
2
4
.
0
5
PC:
2
0
1
+
9
0
.
0
4
PC: 20
3
+
3
5
.
7
9
P
C
:
2
0
4
+
9
3
.
8
8
PT:
2
0
1
+
4
0
.
8
8
P
T
:
2
0
7
+
5
1
.
8
0
P
T
:
2
0
8
+
4
2
.
9
0
PT: 202+65.07
P
T
:
2
0
4
+
2
0
.
3
7
PT:
2
0
5
+
6
2
.
2
3
=-L1A- STA. 124+03.05
-L1B- STA. 200+00.00
S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y3-)
SEE SHEET 25 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y3- STA. 30+00.00
-L1B- STA. 202+00.00
SEE SHEET 6 FOR
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
C
2
0
1
C 2 0 5
C 2 06
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C201
C202
C203
C204
C205
C206
PI Sta
201+09.72
202+27.75
203+92.23
205+29.45
207+09.27
208+33.48
Δ
18°00'29"
14°19'51"
96°55'08"
39°09'26"
24°45'29"
5°24'00"
D
028°38'52.40"
019°05'54.94"
114°35'29.61"
057°17'44.81"
028°38'52.40"
028°38'52.40"
L
62.86
75.04
84.58
68.34
86.42
18.85
T
31.69
37.71
56.43
35.57
43.90
9.43
R
200.00
300.00
50.00
100.00
200.00
200.00
C
2
0
2
C
203
C 2 0 4
N
2
6
°
5
8
'
5
9
.
3
1
"
E
N
4
4
°
5
9
'
2
8
.
3
3
"
E
N59° 19' 19.31"E
N37°
3
5
'
4
9
.
1
9
"
W
N7
6
°
4
5
'
1
5
.
0
8
"
W
N51
°
5
9
'
4
6
.
4
9
"
W
N57
°
2
3
'
4
6
.
9
3
"
W
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK #4
-L1B- STA. 204+26.00
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 204+16.00
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #4 (40 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
END BOARDWALK #4
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
L1B - 204+66.00
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1B- STA. 204+76.00
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
6
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
32 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
0701
0702
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
.
0
1
5
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 7 TON
EST 15 SY GEOTEXTILE
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 26 TON
EST 37 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 21 TON
EST 29 SY GEOTEXTILE
TYVOL
A
CENTR
E
D
R
EXIST
.
1
9
0
'
R
O
W
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
SEE SHEETS L2.11 & L2.12
FOR ENLARGEMENT
Null Structure
Null Structure
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
0
8
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
8
- L1B -
568
570
580
590
600
568
570
580
590
600
200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 207+00 208+00 208+50
PI
=
2
0
2
+
6
0
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
4
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
0
6
+
0
5
.
9
2
EL
=
5
9
0
.
0
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
0
3
+
3
1
.
9
1
EL
=
5
8
1
.
8
1
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
0
6
+
9
8
.
3
2
EL
=
5
8
7
.
6
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
-2.5785%
+3.0000%
+0.0000%
-3.0475%
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EXIST. 16" SS
EXIST. 54" SS
BEGIN BOARDWALK #4
-L1B- STA. 204+26.00
EL. = 584.63
END BOARDWALK #4
-L1B- STA. 204+66.00
EL. = 585.83
PROP. 24" RCP
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 202+21.52
EL. = 581.00
END DITCH RT
STA. 202+68.31
EL. = 579.21
-3.8231
%
20' SPAN
1.0398%
END DITCH RT
STA. 200+78.02
EL. = 581.59
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
0
:
5
7
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
7
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
3:1
3:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
-L1B- STA. 200+00 TO 200+78 RT.
-L1B- STA. 202+22 TO 202+68 RT.
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
209+00
210+00
211+00
212+00
213+00
214+00
215+00
216+00
217+00
SUGAR CREEK
P
C
:
2
0
9
+
1
6
.
7
5
PC
:
2
1
1
+
1
0
.
9
2
P
C
:
2
1
4
+
4
6
.
3
7
PC
:
2
0
8
+
2
4
.
0
5
PT
:
2
0
9
+
8
8
.
6
4
P
T
:
2
1
1
+
5
0
.
0
6
PT
:
2
1
4
+
9
1
.
1
2
P
T
:
2
0
8
+
4
2
.
9
0
C 2 0 6
C 2 0 7
C 2 0 8
C 2 0 9
N57° 23' 46.9
3
"
W
N43° 39' 58.17
"
W
N54° 52' 41.30"W
N46° 19' 48.40"W
.0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
0802
0801
40 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C207
C208
C209
PI Sta
209+52.87
211+30.55
214+68.79
Δ
13°43'49"
11°12'43"
8°32'53"
D
019°05'54.94"
028°38'52.40"
019°05'54.94"
L
71.89
39.14
44.76
T
36.12
19.63
22.42
R
300.00
200.00
300.00
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
0
8
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
7
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
1
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
9
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
208+50 209+00 210+00 211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00 215+00 216+00 217+00 217+50
PI
=
2
1
3
+
4
4
.
8
8
EL
=
5
8
7
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
1
6
+
3
4
.
8
2
EL
=
5
8
3
.
8
2
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
-0.1000%
+0.1884%
-1.0980%
EXIST. 54" SS
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 24" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
1
:
2
0
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
8
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
WLB
W
L
B
WL
B
WL
B
WL
B
WLB
217+00 218+00 219+00 220+00 221+00 222+00 223+00 224+00
225+00 226+00
SUGAR CREEK
PC
:
2
2
3
+
7
0
.
9
5
P
C
:
2
2
5
+
1
2
.
1
6
P
T
:
2
2
4
+
0
5
.
8
1
PT
:
2
2
5
+
8
7
.
1
0
C 2 10
C 211
N46° 19' 48.40"W
N50° 19' 28.84"W
N41° 44' 16.07"W
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELLS DURING CONSTRUCTION
PR
O
T
E
C
T
&
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
WE
L
L
D
U
R
I
N
G
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
36 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
0902
0901
0904
0903
28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 23 TON
EST 50 SY GEOTEXTILE
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C210
PI Sta
223+88.39
Δ
3°59'40"
D
011°27'32.96"
L
34.86
T
17.44
R
500.00
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
1
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
8
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
2
5
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
0
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
217+50 218+00 219+00 220+00 221+00 222+00 223+00 224+00 225+00 225+50
PI
=
2
1
9
+
3
3
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
5
.
0
0
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
2
4
+
4
0
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
6
.
0
0
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
1
8
+
2
9
.
8
2
EL
=
5
8
4
.
1
8
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
2
0
+
3
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
3
.
7
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
2
2
+
9
9
.
9
9
EL
=
5
8
4
.
2
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
2
5
+
3
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
5
.
6
1
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+1.2395%
-0.4111%
+0.1884%+0.7912%-1.2103%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 219+27.70
EL. = 581.02
END DITCH RT
STA. 220+14.32
EL. = 581.58
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 223+13.80
EL. = 582.54
END DITCH RT
STA. 225+14.24
EL. = 582.48
0.6522%
-0.4256%0.6603%
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
1
:
4
3
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
9
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
3:1
3:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
-L1B- STA. 219+28 TO 220+14 RT.
-L1B- STA. 223+14 TO 225+14 RT.
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
WLB
225+
0
0
226+0
0
227+
0
0
228+
0
0
229+00
230
+
0
0
231
+
0
0
232
+
0
0
23
3
+
0
0
23
4
+
0
0
SUGAR
C
R
E
E
K
PC
:
2
3
4
+
2
7
.
7
3
P
C
:
2
2
8
+
2
7
.
2
0
P
C
:
2
2
9
+
4
0
.
3
0
PC
:
2
3
2
+
3
8
.
8
9
P
C
:
2
2
5
+
1
2
.
1
6
P
C
:
2
2
6
+
6
6
.
3
0
P
T
:
2
2
8
+
9
7
.
3
4
PT
:
2
2
9
+
8
1
.
0
9
PT
:
2
3
2
+
5
9
.
4
2
P
T
:
2
2
5
+
8
7
.
1
0
P
T
:
2
2
7
+
0
6
.
5
8
C 2 1 1
C 2 1 2
C 2 1 3
C 214
C215
C
2
1
N50°
1
9
'
2
8
.
8
4
"
W
N41° 4
4
'
1
6
.
0
7
"
W
N46°
2
1
'
1
3
.
0
3
"
W
N26° 15' 35.73"W
N02
°
5
3
'
0
4
.
8
8
"
W
N0
2
°
5
9
'
5
1
.
8
1
"
E
N0
2
°
5
9
'
5
1
.
8
1
"
E
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
PROTECT & PRESERVE MONITORING
WELL DURING CONSTRUCTION
0903
28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
32 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP
1002
1001
CLAS
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
EST 2
3
T
O
N
EST 5
0
S
Y
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
SPEC
I
A
L
L
A
T
E
R
A
L
'
V
'
D
I
T
C
H
SEE D
E
T
A
I
L
B
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 16 TON
EST 35 SY GEOTEXTILE
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C211
C212
C213
C214
C215
PI Sta
225+49.70
226+86.46
228+62.63
229+60.98
232+49.16
Δ
8°35'13"
4°36'57"
20°05'37"
23°22'31"
5°52'57"
D
011°27'32.96"
011°27'32.96"
028°38'52.40"
057°17'44.81"
028°38'52.40"
L
74.93
40.28
70.14
40.80
20.53
T
37.54
20.15
35.43
20.69
10.28
R
500.00
500.00
200.00
100.00
200.00
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
2
5
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
9
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
3
3
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
1
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
225+50 226+00 227+00 228+00 229+00 230+00 231+00 232+00 233+00 233+50
PI
=
2
3
1
+
5
0
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
8
.
4
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
3
0
+
2
9
.
4
9
EL
=
5
8
5
.
7
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
3
2
+
4
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
6
.
1
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+0.0248%-0.1208%
+2.2400%-2.4204%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 24" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
2
:
0
8
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
10
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
233+
0
0
234+
0
0
2
3
5
+
0
0
236+00
237+00
238+00
239+00 240+00
241+
0
0
24
2
+
0
0
24
3
+
0
0
SUGAR CREE
K
PC
:
2
3
9
+
6
6
.
7
0
PC
:
2
3
4
+
2
7
.
7
3
PC: 239+05.17
P
C
:
2
4
1
+
0
5
.
9
0
PC
:
2
3
2
+
3
8
.
8
9
PC
:
2
3
5
+
5
5
.
7
9
P
T
:
2
4
0
+
1
3
.
8
0
PT
:
2
3
4
+
6
7
.
9
0
PT
:
2
3
9
+
3
1
.
4
3
PT: 241+86.
0
5
PT
:
2
3
2
+
5
9
.
4
2
PT: 236+15.37
PROP
O
S
E
D
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
2
(
1
4
5
L
F
)
C215
C216
C217
C 218
C 2 19
20
0
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
0
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C220
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
(NOT SHOWN IN SURVEY)
N02°
5
9
'
5
1
.
8
1
"
E
N02°
5
9
'
5
1
.
8
1
"
E
N
2
2
°
1
0
'
4
4
.
0
1
"
E
N15° 45' 05.89"W
N08° 13' 44.05"W
N35°
1
3
'
0
2
.
5
3
"
W
S8
3
°
3
3
'
2
6
.
0
3
"
W
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 242+36.37
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BRIDGE S2
-L1B- STA. 242+46.37
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROTECT &
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
WELL DURIN
G
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
1102
1101
48 LF OF 24" CLASS III RCP
32 LF OF 48" CLASS III RCP1103
1104 .0
1
5
.015
.015
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 28 TON
EST 61 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE
SLAB W/ BENCH
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C216
C217
C218
C219
PI Sta
234+48.01
235+86.71
239+18.32
239+90.69
Δ
19°10'52"
37°55'50"
7°31'22"
26°59'18"
D
047°44'47.34"
063°39'43.12"
028°38'52.40"
057°17'44.81"
L
40.17
59.58
26.26
47.10
T
20.28
30.93
13.15
24.00
R
120.00
90.00
200.00
100.00
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
3
3
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
0
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
4
1
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
2
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
233+50 234+00 235+00 236+00 237+00 238+00 239+00 240+00 241+00 241+50
PI
=
2
3
5
+
6
6
.
6
8
EL
=
5
8
8
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
3
4
+
2
5
.
5
1
EL
=
5
8
5
.
9
1
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
3
6
+
7
0
.
1
0
EL
=
5
8
6
.
6
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
3
9
+
8
5
.
9
6
EL
=
5
8
6
.
7
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+1.4778%+0.0289%
-1.3057%
+4.7000
%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 48" RCP
PROP. 24" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
2
:
3
1
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
11
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
WL
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
240+
0
0
241+00
24
2
+
0
0
24
3
+
0
0
24
4
+
0
0
245+00
246+00
24
7
+
0
0
2
4
8
+
0
0
2
4
9
+
0
0
2
5
0
+
0
0
2
5
1
+
0
0
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
PC
:
2
3
9
+
6
6
.
7
0
PC
:
2
4
1
+
0
5
.
9
0
P
C
:
2
4
4
+
0
3
.
6
0
PC
:
2
4
6
+
7
8
.
4
0
PC: 245+89.77
PT
:
2
4
0
+
1
3
.
8
0
P
T
:
2
4
1
+
8
6
.
0
5
PT
:
2
4
4
+
7
4
.
2
9
PT:
2
4
7
+
1
8
.
9
9
PT
:
2
4
6
+
1
0
.
3
6
CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-)
SEE SHEET 26 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
PROPOSED BRIDGE S2 (145 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #5 (190 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
=-Y4- STA. 40+00.00
-L1B- STA. 246+14.51 RETAIN PIPE
1
2
5
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
200
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C 2 2 0
C 2 2 1
C 222
C223
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
P
O
L
E
(N
O
T
S
H
O
W
N
I
N
S
U
R
V
E
Y
)
N35° 13' 02
.
5
3
"
W
S8
3
°
3
3
'
2
6
.
0
3
"
W
N42° 26' 44.88"W
N26°
4
2
'
3
8
.
9
3
"
W
N
0
3
°
2
7
'
1
5
.
4
2
"
W
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 242+36.37
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BRIDGE S2
-L1B- STA. 242+46.37
END BRIDGE S2
BEGIN BOARDWALK #5
-L1B- STA. 243+90.37
END BOARDWALK #5
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 245+80.37
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1B- STA. 245+90.37
N
0
3
°
2
7
'
1
5
.
4
2
"
W
32 LF OF 48" CLASS III RCP
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
R=10' (TYP.)
.0
1
5
.01
5
.01
5
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
SL
A
B
W
/
B
E
N
C
H
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C220
C221
C222
C223
PI Sta
241+50.28
244+41.82
246+00.13
246+98.97
Δ
61°13'31"
53°59'49"
15°44'06"
23°15'24"
D
076°23'39.74"
076°23'39.74"
076°23'39.74"
057°17'44.81"
L
80.14
70.68
20.60
40.59
T
44.38
38.21
10.36
20.58
R
75.00
75.00
75.00
100.00
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
4
1
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
1
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
4
9
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
3
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
241+50 242+00 243+00 244+00 245+00 246+00 247+00 248+00 249+00 249+50
PI
=
2
4
2
+
0
4
.
2
4
EL
=
5
9
7
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
4
4
+
3
0
.
9
1
EL
=
5
9
7
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
4
6
+
1
2
.
6
3
EL
=
5
8
8
.
4
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
4
8
+
3
3
.
4
2
EL
=
5
8
6
.
4
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+0.0000%
-4.700
0
%
-0.9322%
+0.5065%
EXIST. 54" SS
EXIST. 36" CMP STEXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN BRIDGE S2
-L1B- STA. 242+46.37
EL. = 597.00
END BRIDGE S2
BEGIN BOARDWALK #5
-L1B- STA. 243+90.37
EL. = 597.00 END BOARDWALK #5
-L1B- STA. 245+80.37
EL. = 589.98
SUGAR CREEK
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
2
:
4
7
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
12
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
WLB WLB
WLB WLB WLB WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WL
BWLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLBWLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLBW
L
B
W
L
B
249+00 250+00 251+00
252+00
253+00 254+00 255+00
256+00 257+00
258+00
PC
:
2
5
7
+
7
6
.
5
7
PC
:
2
5
2
+
3
1
.
6
1
PC
:
2
5
4
+
9
9
.
8
9
PC
:
2
5
6
+
3
8
.
0
0
PT
:
2
5
2
+
4
0
.
7
0
PT
:
2
5
5
+
8
3
.
7
4
PT
:
2
5
6
+
8
2
.
5
9
RET
A
I
N
P
I
P
E
REMOVE APPROX. 61 LF OF
EXISTING 36" CMP
125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EASEMENT
C224 C 225
C 226 C227
N03° 27' 15.42"W N00° 50' 57.55"W
N08° 45
'
3
4
.
4
4
"
E
N04° 00' 54.35"W N04° 00' 54.35"W
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
RETAIN PIPE
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C224
C225
C226
PI Sta
252+36.15
255+41.91
256+60.39
Δ
2°36'18"
9°36'32"
12°46'29"
D
028°38'52.40"
011°27'32.96"
028°38'52.40"
L
9.09
83.85
44.59
T
4.55
42.03
22.39
R
200.00
500.00
200.00
C227
C228
C229
1301
1302
60 LF OF 36" CLASS IV RCP
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST. 9 TON
EST. 20 SY GEOTEXTILE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
4
9
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
2
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
5
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
4
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
249+50 250+00 251+00 252+00 253+00 254+00 255+00 256+00 257+00 257+50
PI = 249+51.69
EL = 587.00
VC = 50.00'
PI
=
2
5
5
+
5
1
.
6
1
EL
=
5
8
8
.
6
2
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
5
3
+
2
7
.
1
8
EL
=
5
8
7
.
7
4
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
5
4
+
7
7
.
1
5
EL
=
5
8
7
.
6
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 257+48.53
EL = 590.25
VC = 50.00'
+0.1979%-0.0728%+1.3292%
+0.8246%
EXIST. 10" SS
PROP. 36" RCP
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
3
:
3
1
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
13
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
WLB
WLB
WLB
WL
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
257+00
258
+
0
0
259+00 260+00 261+00
262+00
263+00
264+00
26
5
+
0
0
26
6
+
0
0
SUGAR CREEK
PC
:
2
6
4
+
1
6
.
2
3
P
C
:
2
5
7
+
7
6
.
5
7
P
C
:
2
5
6
+
3
8
.
0
0
P
C
:
2
5
9
+
3
3
.
2
0
PT
:
2
6
4
+
9
9
.
1
0
P
T
:
2
5
8
+
6
7
.
0
6
P
T
:
2
5
6
+
8
2
.
5
9
PT
:
2
6
0
+
5
4
.
5
0
125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
C 2 2 6
C 2 2 7
C229
C 2 2 8
N08°
4
5
'
3
4
.
4
4
"
E
N04
°
0
0
'
5
4
.
3
5
"
W
N04
°
0
0
'
5
4
.
3
5
"
W
N21° 54' 34.96"E
N39° 17' 04.97"E
N6
3
°
0
1
'
3
0
.
7
6
"
E
N6
3
°
0
1
'
3
0
.
7
6
"
E
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C227
C228
C229
PI Sta
258+22.60
259+94.32
264+58.27
Δ
25°55'29"
17°22'30"
23°44'26"
D
028°38'52.40"
014°19'26.20"
028°38'52.40"
L
90.49
121.30
82.87
T
46.04
61.12
42.04
R
200.00
400.00
200.00
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
5
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
6
5
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
5
- L1B -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
257+50 258+00 259+00 260+00 261+00 262+00 263+00 264+00 265+00 265+50
PI
=
2
5
8
+
2
8
.
7
8
EL
=
5
9
2
.
8
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
6
0
+
4
4
.
7
6
EL
=
5
8
9
.
7
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
6
1
+
2
0
.
1
8
EL
=
5
8
9
.
6
9
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
5
9
+
2
3
.
3
9
EL
=
5
8
8
.
9
2
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
6
1
+
8
8
.
5
9
EL
=
5
8
8
.
6
1
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
-4.095
9
%
+3.1777%
+0.6958%-0.0977%-1.5825%
+0.0063%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
EXIST. 8" SS
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
3
:
5
0
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
14
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
W
L
B
TCE
TCE
TCE
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
T
C
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PGE
PGE
PG
E
PG
E
P
G
E
PG
E
P
G
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
264+00
26
5
+
0
0
26
6
+
0
0
267+00
268+0
0
269
+
0
0
270
+
0
0
271+00
272+00
27
3
+
0
0
27
4
+
0
0
SUGA
R
C
R
E
E
K
PC
:
2
6
4
+
1
6
.
2
3
PC
:
2
6
6
+
4
3
.
4
7
P
C
:
2
6
8
+
0
3
.
0
1
PC
:
2
7
1
+
7
0
.
2
2
PT
:
2
6
4
+
9
9
.
1
0
P
T
:
2
6
7
+
3
3
.
3
0
PT
:
2
6
8
+
6
3
.
7
0
PT: 272
+
7
1
.
5
9
PROPOSED BRIDGE S3 (195 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
125' DUKE TRANSMISSION EASEMENT
C229
C230
C 2 3 1
C 2 3 2
=-Y5- STA. 0+00.00
-L1B- STA. 272+28.44
AVION POINT CONNECTION (-Y5-)
SEE SHEET 28 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
N6
3
°
0
1
'
3
0
.
7
6
"
E
N6
3
°
0
1
'
3
0
.
7
6
"
E
N20° 0
8
'
0
3
.
3
1
"
E
N54°
5
4
'
3
3
.
3
8
"
E
N4
1
°
5
4
'
0
2
.
3
1
"
W
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 268+78.35
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BRIDGE S3
-L1B- STA. 268+88.35
END BRIDGE S3
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 270+81.35
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1B- STA. 270+91.35
N4
1
°
5
4
'
0
2
.
3
1
"
W
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
1502
1501
40 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
.015
.015
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
RIP-RAP APRON AND BRIDGE
FOUNDATION, SEE STRUCTURES
PLANS (TYP.)
PROPOSED CONCRETE
SLAB W/ BENCH
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C230
C231
C232
PI Sta
266+90.60
268+34.32
272+37.81
Δ
42°53'27"
34°46'30"
96°48'36"
D
047°44'47.34"
057°17'44.81"
095°29'34.68"
L
89.83
60.69
101.38
T
47.14
31.31
67.59
R
120.00
100.00
60.00
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
6
5
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
4
MATCH
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
7
3
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
6
- L1B -
573
580
590
600
610
573
580
590
600
610
265+50 266+00 267+00 268+00 269+00 270+00 271+00 272+00 273+00 273+50
PI
=
2
6
8
+
2
5
.
5
0
EL
=
6
0
1
.
0
0
VC
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI = 273+42.35
EL = 601.00
VC = 50.00'
PI
=
2
6
5
+
6
2
.
4
0
EL
=
5
8
8
.
6
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+4.7000
%
+0.0000%
EXIST. 54" SS
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
PROP. 18" RCP
BEGIN BRIDGE S3
-L1B- STA. 268+88.35
EL. = 601.00
END BRIDGE S3
-L1B- STA. 270+81.35
EL. = 601.00
SUGAR CREEK
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
1
3
/
2
0
2
3
4
:
3
8
:
0
6
P
M
,
Ji
m
m
y
P
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
15
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
T
C
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
T
C
E
T
C
E
TCE
TCE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
P
G
E
PGE
P
G
E
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PG
E
273
+
0
0
274
+
0
0
275+
0
0
276+00
277+00 278+00
279+00
28
0
+
0
0
2
8
1
+
0
0
282+00
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
W TV
Y
O
L
A
R
D
P
C
:
2
7
4
+
6
6
.
2
9
P
C
:
2
7
6
+
8
2
.
9
5
PC
:
2
7
9
+
0
4
.
7
8
PC
:
2
8
1
+
3
8
.
6
2
P
T
:
2
7
2
+
7
1
.
5
9
P
T
:
2
7
5
+
2
6
.
2
2
PT
:
2
7
7
+
9
0
.
2
6
PT
:
2
8
0
+
5
5
.
1
7
P
T
:
2
8
2
+
3
4
.
5
5
DUK
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
ACCE
S
S
R
O
A
D
(GRA
V
E
L
)
C 2 3 3
C 2 3 4
C235
C236
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
(
G
R
A
V
E
L
)
N41
°
5
4
'
0
2
.
3
1
"
W
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 270+81.35
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1B- STA. 270+91.35
N41
°
5
4
'
0
2
.
3
1
"
W
N19° 00'
4
3
.
2
5
"
W
N01° 28' 5
6
.
3
8
"
E
N
2
6
°
4
9
'
3
4
.
8
4
"
E
N
2
6
°
4
9
'
3
4
.
8
4
"
E
N28°
0
8
'
0
5
.
9
6
"
W
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-L1B- STA. 282+17.35
1502
1501
40 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
.
0
1
5
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
50' DUKE ENERGY
ROW AGREEMENT
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
1702
1701
32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
BEGIN RETAINING WALL #2
-L1B- STA. 282+77.35
8.00' LT
1704
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO
16' CONCRETE
(STA. 282+17.25 TO 282+37.25)
BEGIN SAFETY RAIL
-L1B- STA. 282+37.35
7.00' LT
C
L
A
S
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
E
S
T
4
T
O
N
E
S
T
9
S
Y
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 37 TON
EST 79 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #2
SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE
NOTE: SEE SHEET CA-2 FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PLAN
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C233
C234
C235
PI Sta
274+96.66
277+37.19
279+81.23
Δ
22°53'19"
20°29'40"
25°20'38"
D
038°11'49.87"
019°05'54.94"
016°51'06.12"
L
59.92
107.31
150.39
T
30.37
54.23
76.45
R
150.00
300.00
340.00
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
7
3
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
5
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
8
1
+
0
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
7
- L1B -
580
590
600
610
580
590
600
610
273+50 274+00 275+00 276+00 277+00 278+00 279+00 280+00 281+00
PI
=
2
7
5
+
9
2
.
0
2
EL
=
5
9
9
.
8
3
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
7
8
+
2
0
.
9
6
EL
=
6
0
0
.
4
0
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
7
6
+
9
5
.
8
8
EL
=
5
9
7
.
9
1
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
7
9
+
6
0
.
4
7
EL
=
5
9
5
.
0
7
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
-1.8479%-3.8221
%
+1.9907%
-0.4672%
-0.4432%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
5
:
1
1
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
16
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
W
L
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WL
B
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
WLB
301
+
0
0
302+00
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
279+00
28
0
+
0
0
2
8
1
+
0
0
282+00
283+
0
0
284+00
285+00
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
SUGAR CREEK
W TV
Y
O
L
A
R
D
PC
:
2
7
9
+
0
4
.
7
8
PC: 283+13.99
PC
:
2
8
4
+
9
4
.
5
7
PC
:
2
8
1
+
3
8
.
6
2
PT
:
2
8
0
+
5
5
.
1
7
PT
:
2
8
3
+
5
4
.
7
0
PT
:
2
8
5
+
0
6
.
6
5
P
T
:
2
8
2
+
3
4
.
5
5
DUK
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
ACCE
S
S
R
O
A
D
(GRA
V
E
L
)
SEE SHEET 18 FOR
-L1C- PLAN & PROFILE
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #6 (50 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
=-L1C- STA. 300+00.00
-L1B- STA. 285+91.88
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
18
C235
C236
C 2 3 7
C238
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
(
G
R
A
V
E
L
)
CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6-)
SEE SHEET 29 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
N01° 28' 5
6
.
3
8
"
E
N
2
6
°
4
9
'
3
4
.
8
4
"
E
N
2
6
°
4
9
'
3
4
.
8
4
"
E
N28°
0
8
'
0
5
.
9
6
"
W
N02° 12' 59.66"W
N05° 2
8
'
4
1
.
9
0
"
E
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-L1B- STA. 282+17.35
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK #6
-L1B- STA. 285+15.35
END BOARDWALK #6
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 285+65.35
END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1B- STA. 285+75.35
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
1702
1701
32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
BEGIN RETAINING WALL #2
-L1B- STA. 282+77.35
8.00' LT
END RETAINING WALL #2
-L1B- STA. 283+27.35
8.00' LT
28 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
1704
1703
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
PROPOSED 258 LF OF SAFETY RAIL
SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL
TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO
16' CONCRETE
(STA. 282+17.25 TO 282+37.25)
BEGIN SAFETY RAIL
-L1B- STA. 282+37.35
7.00' LT
END SAFETY RAIL
-L1B- STA. 284+85.35
7.00' LT
TRANSITION 16' CONCRETE TO
12' CONCRETE
(STA. 284+85.35 TO 285+05.35)
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-L1B- STA. 285+05.35
Curve Table: Alignment - L1B -
C236
C237
C238
PI Sta
281+90.64
283+34.70
285+00.62
Δ
54°57'41"
25°55'06"
7°41'42"
D
057°17'44.81"
063°39'43.12"
063°39'43.12"
L
95.93
40.71
12.09
T
52.01
20.71
6.05
R
100.00
90.00
90.00
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
.0
1
5
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 37 TON
EST 79 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 45 TON
EST 64 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL #2
SEE SHEET W-1 FOR ENVELOPE CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 28 TON
EST 40 SY GEOTEXTILE
M
E
M
O
R
I
A
L
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
REMOVE APPROX. 10 LF OF
EXISTING 15" CMP
RETAIN APPROX. 31 LF OF
EXISTING 15" CMP
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 35 TON
EST 49 SY GEOTEXTILE
150.00
300.00
340.00
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
B
-
S
T
A
2
8
1
+
0
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
6
- L1B -
572
580
590
600
572
580
590
600
281+00 282+00 283+00 284+00 285+00 286+00 286+50
PI
=
2
8
2
+
0
2
.
3
5
EL
=
5
9
6
.
0
0
VC
=
9
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
8
3
+
2
5
.
2
4
EL
=
5
9
1
.
0
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 285+02.70
EL = 589.49
VC = 50.00'
PI
=
2
8
1
+
1
6
.
6
0
EL
=
5
9
4
.
3
8
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.8000%
-0.8812%
-4.0199
%
+1.8840%MIN. 9'
VERTICAL
CLEARANCE
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EXIST. 54" SS
W TYVOLA RD BRIDGE
PROP. 18" RCP
PROP. 18" RCP
BEGIN BOARDWALK #6
-L1B- STA. 285+15.35
EL. = 589.96
END BOARDWALK #6
-L1B- STA. 285+65.35
EL. = 591.25
BEGIN DITCH RT
STA. 281+78.50
EL. = 591.50
END DITCH RT
STA. 282+01.11
EL. = 591.02
-2.1407%
20' SPAN
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P2.dwg
06-08-2023
17
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
9
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
3
6
:
0
4
A
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1B- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
3:1
3:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
-L1B- STA. 281+78 TO 282+01 RT.
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
W
L
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WL
B
WLB WLB
W
L
B
WLB
PC
:
3
0
1
+
5
5
.
5
4
P
C
:
3
0
6
+
2
4
.
1
5
P
C
:
3
0
7
+
8
9
.
3
6
PC: 308+89.47
PC
:
3
0
0
+
1
0
.
9
6
PC
:
3
0
0
+
6
7
.
4
3
P
T
:
3
0
2
+
5
7
.
3
6
P
T
:
3
0
7
+
0
7
.
2
3
PT
:
3
0
8
+
7
0
.
3
9
PT:
3
0
9
+
0
6
.
0
6
PT
:
3
0
0
+
4
3
.
6
1
PT
:
3
0
1
+
1
3
.
7
0
30
1
+
0
0
302+00
303+00
304+00
305+00
306+00
307+00
308+00
3
0
9
+
0
0
SUGAR CREEK
W TV
Y
O
L
A
R
D
=-L1C- STA. 300+00.00
-L1B- STA. 285+91.88
C301
C
3
02
C 3 0 3
C 3 0 4
SEE SHEET 17 FOR -L1B-
PLAN & PROFILE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
17
C 3 0 5
C306
Curve Table: Alignment - L1C -
C307
C308
C309
C310
PI Sta
309+69.82
313+47.68
315+65.30
316+17.75
Δ
7°46'58"
24°14'04"
31°07'02"
12°52'48"
E
X
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
N
2
3
°
4
7
'
3
2
.
1
6
"
E
N10
°
3
2
'
2
1
.
4
1
"
E
N18° 37' 46.64
"
W
N28° 0
8
'
5
8
.
5
3
"
W
N
3
3
°
5
9
'
2
6
.
0
4
"
E
40 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
1801
1802
PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE
(STA. 301+60.00 TO 301+70.00)
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL
EXIS
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
EAS
E
M
E
N
T
PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE
(STA. 303+25.00 TO 303+35.00)
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
N23° 25' 50.60"E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
.01
5
CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6-)
SEE SHEET 29 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.13
-L1C- STA. 302+06.10
R=10' (TYP.)
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN 12' CONCRETE
-L1C- STA. 303+15.00
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1C- STA. 303+45.00
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN 12' CONCRETE
-L1C- STA. 301+50.00
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1C- STA. 301+80.00
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 46 TON
EST 67 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 46 TON
EST 67 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
L
A
B
W/
B
E
N
C
H
Curve Table: Alignment - L1C -
C301
C302
C303
C304
C305
C306
PI Sta
300+27.43
300+90.67
302+07.58
306+65.79
308+32.85
308+97.79
Δ
18°42'33"
13°15'11"
29°10'08"
9°31'12"
51°34'49"
10°33'35"
D
057°17'44.81"
028°38'52.40"
028°38'52.40"
011°27'32.96"
063°39'43.12"
063°39'43.12"
L
32.65
46.26
101.82
83.08
81.02
16.59
T
16.47
23.23
52.04
41.63
43.49
8.32
R
100.00
200.00
200.00
500.00
90.00
90.00
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
C
-
S
T
A
3
0
9
+
0
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
9
- L1C -
575
580
590
600
610
575
580
590
600
610
300+00 301+00 302+00 303+00 304+00 305+00 306+00 307+00 308+00 309+00
PI
=
3
0
0
+
8
3
.
9
3
EL
=
5
9
4
.
3
5
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
2
+
0
8
.
6
4
EL
=
5
9
4
.
6
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
4
+
0
4
.
6
7
EL
=
5
9
2
.
8
8
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
2
+
6
8
.
3
8
EL
=
5
9
2
.
6
1
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
6
+
2
7
.
3
2
EL
=
5
9
1
.
8
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
8
+
2
5
.
8
8
EL
=
5
9
3
.
6
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.8000%+0.8780%-0.4600%+0.2029%
-3.4010
%
+0.2313%
EXIST. 54" SS
EXIST. 8" SS
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 18" RCP
BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 301+60.00
EL. = 594.526
END SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 301+70.00
EL. = 594.549 BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 303+25.00
EL. = 592.722
END SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 303+35.00
EL. = 592.742
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
3
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
5
:
0
8
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1C- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P3.dwg
06-08-2023
18
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC: 308+89.47 PC
:
3
1
3
+
0
4
.
7
4
PC
:
3
1
6
+
6
2
.
9
1
PC
:
3
0
9
+
5
6
.
2
2
P
C
:
3
1
7
+
3
9
.
9
1
P
C
:
3
1
5
+
4
0
.
2
4
PC
:
3
1
6
+
0
6
.
4
7
PT
:
3
0
8
+
7
0
.
3
9
PT
:
3
0
9
+
0
6
.
0
6
P
T
:
3
1
3
+
8
9
.
3
4
P
T
:
3
1
7
+
1
0
.
5
1
PT
:
3
0
9
+
8
3
.
3
9
P
T
:
3
1
7
+
8
3
.
7
8
PT
:
3
1
5
+
8
9
.
1
2
PT
:
3
1
6
+
2
8
.
9
5
309+
0
0
310+00
311+00
312+00
313+00
314+00
315+00
316
+
0
0
317+00
318+0
0
SUGAR
C
R
E
E
K
0 5
C306
C307
C 3 0 8
Curve Table: Alignment - L1C -
C307
C308
C309
C310
C311
PI Sta
309+69.82
313+47.68
315+65.30
316+17.75
316+87.17
Δ
7°46'58"
24°14'04"
31°07'02"
12°52'48"
27°16'39"
D
028°38'52.40"
028°38'52.40"
063°39'43.12"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
L
27.17
84.59
48.88
22.48
47.61
T
13.60
42.94
25.06
11.29
24.26
R
200.00
200.00
90.00
100.00
100.00
N33
°
5
9
'
2
6
.
0
4
"
E
N26° 12
'
2
8
.
2
3
"
E
N01° 58
'
2
3
.
8
3
"
E
N20° 12' 37.92"E
N07°
0
4
'
0
1
.
3
6
"
W
N02° 0
2
'
2
3
.
9
5
"
W
1902
1901
40 LF OF 54" CLASS IV RCP
1801
1802
C 3 09
C310
C 3 1 1
C 3 1 2
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
N23° 25' 50.60"E
N33° 05' 25.59"E
PG
E
P
G
E
PGE PGE PGE
PGE PGE PGE PGE
PG
E
TC
E
T
C
E
TCE TCE
TC
E
TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE
TCE
PG
E
PGE
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
TC
E
TC
E
TC
E
.0
1
5
.
0
1
5
=-Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00
-L1C- STA. 311+56.66
EX
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
ARBOR LOOP DR CONNECTION (-Y7 ALT 1-)
SEE SHEET 30 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-L1C- STA. 316+00.00
8.00' LT
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-L1C- STA. 316+39.82
8.00' RT
END FARM FENCE
-L1C- STA. 317+00.00
8.00' RT
END FARM FENCE
-L1C- STA. 317+00.00
8.00' LT
PROPOSED 100 LF OF FARM FENCE
PROPOSED 60 LF OF FARM FENCE
ARBOR LOOP DR CONNECTION (-Y7 ALT 2-)
SEE SHEET 31 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
EST
4
T
O
N
EST
9
S
Y
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 36 TON
EST 80 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
C
-
S
T
A
3
1
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
0
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
C
-
S
T
A
3
0
9
+
0
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
8
- L1C -
577
580
590
600
610
577
580
590
600
610
309+00 310+00 311+00 312+00 313+00 314+00 315+00 316+00 317+00 317+50
PI
=
3
1
0
+
2
8
.
5
3
EL
=
5
9
8
.
0
0
VC
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
1
4
+
6
5
.
0
0
EL
=
6
0
3
.
0
0
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
1
6
+
5
1
.
8
3
EL
=
6
0
1
.
4
7
VC
=
7
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
1
1
+
3
6
.
4
6
EL
=
5
9
6
.
6
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
1
2
+
9
1
.
3
0
EL
=
5
9
6
.
4
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
1
5
+
7
1
.
3
4
EL
=
5
9
8
.
4
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.1701%
+3.7782%
-1.2627%
-0.1293%
-4.284
0
%
+3.7548%
+2.1701%
+3.7782%
-1.2627%
-0.1293%
-4.284
0
%
+3.7548%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
EXIST. 8" SS
PROP. 54" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
3
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
5
:
2
3
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1C- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P3.dwg
06-08-2023
19
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC: 319+24.86
P
C
:
3
2
1
+
8
2
.
9
7
PC: 324+07.62
PC
:
3
2
4
+
8
8
.
7
1
P
C
:
3
1
7
+
3
9
.
9
1
P
T
:
3
2
0
+
2
6
.
2
7
P
T
:
3
1
7
+
1
0
.
5
1
PT
:
3
2
3
+
0
8
.
1
5
PT
:
3
2
4
+
2
3
.
5
2
PT: 325+73.60
P
T
:
3
1
7
+
8
3
.
7
8
81
+
0
0
82+00
91+64
9
1
+
0
0
318+00
319+00
320+00
321+0
0
322+00
323+00
324+00
32
5
+
0
0
3
2
6
+
0
0
SUGAR CREEK
CO
L
I
S
E
U
M
C
E
N
T
R
E
D
R
=-L1D- STA. 400+00.00
-L1C- STA. 326+01.73
COLISEUM CENTRE DR CONNECTIONS
SEE SHEET 32 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y8- STA. 80+00.00
-L1C- STA. 322+88.45
SEE SHEET 21 FOR -L1D-
PLAN & PROFILE
PROPOSED 8 LF PIPE EXTENSION
USING PIPE COLLAR
Curve Table: Alignment - L1C -
C312
C313
C314
C315
C316
PI Sta
317+61.86
319+75.84
322+46.49
324+15.59
325+36.35
Δ
5°01'37"
14°31'37"
23°54'28"
10°07'35"
64°50'59"
D
011°27'32.96"
014°19'26.20"
019°05'54.94"
063°39'43.12"
076°23'39.74"
L
43.87
101.42
125.18
15.91
84.89
T
21.95
50.98
63.51
7.97
47.64
R
500.00
400.00
300.00
90.00
75.00
N07° 04' 01
.
3
6
"
W
N02° 02' 23.95"W
N16° 3
4
'
0
1
.
2
0
"
W
N07° 20' 26.55"
E
N17°
2
8
'
0
1
.
1
3
"
E
N82° 19' 00.44"E
2001
2002
32 LF OF 18" CLASS IV RCP
C 3 1 2
C 3 1 3
C 3 1 4
C 315
C
3
1
6
.
0
1
5
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
TC
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
T
C
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
PG
E
TC
E
TC
E
.
0
1
5
.015
DEMO EXISTING
CONCRETE SLAB
PROP
O
S
E
D
1
0
0
L
F
O
F
F
A
R
M
F
E
N
C
E
PROP
O
S
E
D
6
0
L
F
O
F
F
A
R
M
F
E
N
C
E
SEE SHEET 31 FOR
-Y7 ALT 2- PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.66
-L1C- STA. 319+29.16
E
X
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
2004
2003
PROPOSED 170 LF OF SAFETY RAIL
SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL
END 12' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-L1C- STA. 323+85.00
BEGIN SAFETY RAIL
-L1C- STA. 324+05.00
7.00' LT
END SAFETY RAIL
-L1C- STA. 325+75.00
7.00' LT
TRANSITION 12' CONCRETE TO
16' CONCRETE
(STA. 323+85.00 TO 324+05.00)
TRANSITION 16' CONCRETE TO
12' CONCRETE
(STA. 325+75.00 TO 325+95.00)
END 12' CONCRETE
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-L1C- STA. 325+95.00
MATCH LINE
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
21
R=10' (TYP.)
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 67 TON
EST 95 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
C
-
S
T
A
3
1
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
9
- L1C -
577
580
590
600
610
577
580
590
600
610
317+50 318+00 319+00 320+00 321+00 322+00 323+00 324+00 325+00 326+00 326+25
PI
=
3
1
8
+
7
4
.
2
1
EL
=
6
0
2
.
0
8
VC
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
2
0
+
1
3
.
8
2
EL
=
6
0
0
.
2
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
2
3
+
1
6
.
6
7
EL
=
6
0
0
.
4
3
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
2
5
+
3
7
.
5
2
EL
=
5
9
6
.
4
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
2
0
+
8
6
.
8
6
EL
=
5
9
8
.
6
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
2
2
+
2
0
.
0
0
EL
=
5
9
8
.
5
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+0.2775%
-3.5705
%
-0.2487%
+4.0000%
-1.3087%
-2.2043%
-0.1130%+1.9983%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
EXIST. 54" SS
EXIST. 8" SS
EXIST. 54" SS
EXIST. 36" RCP ST
MIN. 9' VERTICAL CLEARANCE
COLISEUM CENTRE
DR BRIDGE
PROP. 18" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
3
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
5
:
3
8
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1C- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P3.dwg
06-08-2023
20
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
402+00
403+00
404+00
405+00
406+
0
0
4
0
7
+
0
0
4
0
8
+
0
0
PC
:
4
0
0
+
2
8
.
8
2
PC: 403+54.74
P
C
:
4
0
5
+
4
9
.
8
3
PC
:
4
0
6
+
5
5
.
9
9
PC: 4
0
8
+
4
1
.
2
6
P
T
:
4
0
0
+
6
0
.
0
8
P
T
:
4
0
3
+
9
9
.
4
5
PT
:
4
0
6
+
1
0
.
6
8
PT: 4
0
7
+
3
1
.
0
3
PT: 408
+
8
2
.
0
3
82
+
0
0
91
+
6
4
91+00
SUGAR
C
R
E
E
K
CO
L
I
S
E
U
M
C
E
N
T
R
E
D
R
C 401
C 4 0 2
C 4 0 3
C
4
0
4
C
4
0
5
Curve Table: Alignment - L1D -
C401
C402
C403
C404
PI Sta
400+44.61
403+77.11
405+81.23
406+95.37
Δ
19°54'05"
5°07'24"
34°52'03"
42°59'49"
D
063°39'43.12"
011°27'32.96"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
L
31.26
44.71
60.86
75.04
T
15.79
22.37
31.40
39.39
R
90.00
500.00
100.00
100.00
=-L1C- STA. 326+01.73
-L1D- STA. 400+00.00
SEE SHEET 32 FOR -Y9-
PLAN & PROFILE
=-Y9- STA. 90+00.00
-L1D- STA. 401+00.00
SEE SHEET 20 FOR
-L1C- PLAN & PROFILE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
20
N82° 09
'
0
8
.
4
2
"
E
N62° 15' 03
.
2
9
"
E
N57° 07
'
3
9
.
6
3
"
E
S88
°
0
0
'
1
7
.
3
0
"
E
S45° 00' 28.77"E
S
4
5
°
0
0
'
2
8
.
7
7
"
E
2101
2102
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
TCE
TCE
TCE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
.0
1
5
.015
.015
EXIST.
5
0
'
P
N
G
EASEM
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 6 TON
EST 13 SY GEOTEXTILE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
MATC
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
D
-
S
T
A
4
0
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
2
- L1D -
575
580
590
600
610
575
580
590
600
610
400+00 401+00 402+00 403+00 404+00 405+00 406+00 407+00 407+50
PI
=
4
0
0
+
5
4
.
3
0
EL
=
6
0
1
.
1
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 403+67.14
EL = 602.23
VC = 50.00'
PI
=
4
0
5
+
0
2
.
3
8
EL
=
5
9
7
.
5
2
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+4.0000%
+0.2108%
-3.4863
%
+0.3389%
EXIST. 54" SS
EXIST. 54" SS
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 24" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
3
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
5
:
5
1
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1D- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P3.dwg
06-08-2023
21
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
WL
B
WLB
W
L
B
407+00
408+00
409
+
0
0
410
+
0
0
411+00
41
2
+
0
0
PC
:
4
0
8
+
4
1
.
2
6
PC
:
4
1
0
+
2
5
.
0
2
P
C
:
4
1
1
+
0
9
.
4
8
PT
:
4
0
7
+
3
1
.
0
3
PT
:
4
0
8
+
8
2
.
0
3
P
T
:
4
1
0
+
7
5
.
9
5
PT: 4
1
2
+
2
9
.
8
6
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
YORK
M
O
N
T
R
D
(SR-11
5
6
)
HI
V
E
D
R
4 0 4
C405
C 40 6
C 4 0 7
Curve Table: Alignment - L1D -
C405
C406
C407
PI Sta
408+61.72
410+51.05
411+78.17
Δ
11°40'45"
29°10'49"
68°58'15"
D
028°38'52.40"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
L
40.77
50.93
120.38
T
20.46
26.03
68.69
R
200.00
100.00
100.00
END PROJECT
END 12' ASPHALT
-L1D- STA. 412+10.00
YORKMONT RD/HIVE DR CONNECTION (-Y10-)
SEE SHEET 33 FOR PLAN & PROFILE
S45° 00' 28.77"E
S45° 00
'
2
8
.
7
7
"
E
S33
°
1
9
'
4
3
.
4
1
"
E
S62° 30' 32.05"
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
PG
E
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
P
G
E
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
END ALIGNMENT
-L1D- STA. 412+91.99
N: 529626.3606
E: 1428148.6276
R=10' (TYP.)
N4
8
°
3
1
'
1
2
.
5
6
"
E
3+65
1+00 2+00
3+0
0
=-Y10- STA. 0+00.00
-L1D- STA. 411+96.32
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ TRASH RECEPTACLE
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
L
1
D
-
S
T
A
4
0
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
1
- L1D -
578
580
590
600
610
620
578
580
590
600
610
620
407+50 408+00 409+00 410+00 411+00 412+00 413+00
PI
=
4
0
9
+
6
5
.
7
4
EL
=
6
0
5
.
9
3
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
0
8
+
0
1
.
8
4
EL
=
5
9
8
.
1
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+4.7500
%
-0.7758%
EXIST. 54" SS
END GRADE
-L1D- STA. 412+10.00
EL. = 604.04
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
3
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
6
:
0
7
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
-L1D- PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P3.dwg
06-08-2023
22
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
P
C
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
W
L
B
SUGAR CR
E
E
K
SE
E
S
H
E
E
T
4 F
O
R
-L
1
A
-
P
L
A
N
&
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+0
0
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19
+
0
0
P
C
:
1
4
+
7
4
.
4
9
PC
:
1
7
+
7
6
.
4
6
P
C
:
1
0
+
2
0
.
6
6
PC
:
1
5
+
9
4
.
9
6
P
C
:
1
2
+
2
3
.
8
6
PC
:
1
3
+
3
6
.
6
0
PT
:
1
5
+
2
6
.
6
2
PT: 18
+
5
3
.
1
5
P
T
:
1
0
+
5
4
.
6
9
PT
:
1
6
+
2
4
.
4
9
PT
:
1
2
+
5
4
.
7
4
P
T
:
1
3
+
9
7
.
7
0
1
1
6
+
0
0
11
7
+
0
0
=-Y1- STA. 10+00.00
-L1A- STA. 116+84.60
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #7 (320 LF)
SEE STRUCTURES PLANS
C 1 1
C 12
C 1 3
C 1 4
C15
Curve Table: Alignment -Y1-
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
PI Sta
10+38.36
12+39.42
13+68.14
15+01.16
16+09.73
Δ
38°59'41"
17°41'33"
35°00'31"
29°52'17"
3°23'03"
D
114°35'29.61"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
011°27'32.96"
L
34.03
30.88
61.10
52.14
29.53
T
17.70
15.56
31.54
26.67
14.77
R
50.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
500.00
C 1 6
S51° 51' 29.54"E
S12° 51' 48.73"E
S04° 49' 44.62"W
S30°
1
0
'
4
6
.
5
8
"
E
S00° 18' 29.6
1
"
E
S03° 04'
3
3
.
3
2
"
W
END BOARDWALK #7
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
-Y1- STA. 13+26.00 END APPROACH SLAB
BEGIN 12' ASPHALT
-Y1- 13+36.00
S03° 04' 33.32"W
S8
4
°
4
8
'
1
1
.
7
4
"
E
.0
1
5
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
BEGIN BOARDWALK #7
-Y1- STA. 10+06.00
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROPOSED 10' EDGEGREEN DR
CONNECTION (-Y1-)
PROPOSED 10' EDGEREEN DR
CONNECTION (-Y1-)
TRANSITION 12' TO 10' ASPHALT
(STA. 14+00.00 TO 14+20.00)
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 39 TON
EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
L
A
B
W/
B
E
N
C
H
CLASS I RIPRAP
EST 30 TON
EST 42 SY GEOTEXTILE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
Y
1
-
S
T
A
1
7
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
4
- Y1 -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 17+50
PI
=
1
3
+
6
6
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
2
.
4
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 10+36.00
EL = 590.84
VC = 20.00'
PI
=
1
2
+
4
6
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
2
.
4
4
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
5
+
1
0
.
0
4
EL
=
5
8
0
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+0.0000%
-1.6907%
+0.3084%
+0.0000%
-4.000
0
%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN BOARDWALK #7
-Y1- STA. 10+06.00
EL. = 590.84
EXIST. 42" SS
END BOARDWALK #7
-Y1- STA. 13+26.00
EL. = 582.44
20' SPAN
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
4
4
:
4
2
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
23
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
WL
B
WL
B
WL
B
WL
B
W
L
B
WLB
SEE SHEET 4 FOR
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
EDGEGRE
E
N
D
R
17
+
0
0
1
8
+
0
0
19+00 20+00
21+00
PC: 17+76.46
PC
:
2
0
+
1
0
.
4
4
PT
:
1
8
+
5
3
.
1
5
PT
:
2
0
+
2
6
.
0
1
10
6
+
0
0
1
0
7
+
0
0
1
0
8
+
0
0
10
9
+
0
0
END -Y1-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y1- STA. 20+97.22
C16 C 17
Curve Table: Alignment -Y1-
C16
C17
PI Sta
18+24.65
20+18.24
Δ
87°52'45"
8°55'07"
D
114°35'29.61"
057°17'44.81"
L
76.69
15.57
T
48.18
7.80
R
50.00
100.00
S
0
3
°
0
4
'
3
3
.
3
2
"
W
S03° 04' 33.32"W
S84° 48' 11.74"E S75° 53' 04
.
8
4
"
E
TC
E
TC
E
T
C
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
PG
E
P
G
E
PG
E
EXIST. 60' SS
E
.015
.015
.0
1
5
PROPOSED 10' EDGEGREEN DR
CONNECTION (-Y1-)
PROPOSED 10' EDGEREEN DR
CONNECTION (-Y1-)
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE (1) AND
PERMANENT (2) BOLLARDS
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y1- STA. 20+82.41
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
W/ BENCH
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
SEE SHEET L2.10 FOR ENLARGEMENT
20+93.37
-12.27' L
21+01.07
12.29' R
MATCH LINE Y1 - STA 17+50
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
3
- Y1 -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
17+50 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 21+25
PI
=
1
9
+
5
3
.
8
0
EL
=
5
8
1
.
7
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 17+51.74
EL = 580.75
VC = 100.00'
+0.4706%
+4.7500
%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y1- STA. 20+97.22
EL. = 588.51
EXIST. 8" SS
EXIST. 10" SS
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
4
5
:
4
1
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
24
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCS
O
WL
B
WLB
W
L
B
W
L
B
SUGA
R
C
R
E
E
K
201+
0
0
20
2
+
0
0
2
0
3
+
0
0
204+
0
0
31+
7
6
31+
0
0
PC
:
3
0
+
3
3
.
9
2
P
T
:
3
0
+
4
8
.
7
5
22
+
8
4
21+00
22+00
PC: 22+36.49
PC:
2
0
+
4
6
.
4
3
P
T
:
2
2
+
6
8
.
1
1
P
T
:
2
1
+
0
3
.
4
8
118+0
0
119
+
0
0
120
+
0
0
121+0
0
122+00
123
+
0
0
=-L1A- STA. 119+19.73
-Y2- STA. 20+00.00
END -Y2-
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
-Y2- STA. 22+79.15
C21
C 2 2
Curve Table: Alignment -Y2-
C21
C22
PI Sta
20+78.52
22+52.85
Δ
65°22'32"
36°14'17"
D
114°35'29.61"
114°35'29.61"
L
57.05
31.62
T
32.08
16.36
R
50.00
50.00 =-L1B- STA. 202+00.00
-Y3- STA. 30+00.00
END -Y3-
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
-Y3- STA. 31+70.93
C 3 1
N
6
5
°
3
9
'
2
8
.
3
9
"
E
N00° 1
6
'
5
6
.
1
1
"
E
N35° 57' 20.96"W
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
PROPOSED 10' S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y2-)
PROPOSED 10' S TRYON ST CONNECTION (-Y3-)
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
=-L1B- STA. 200+00.00
-L1A- STA. 124+03.05
END FARM FENCE
-Y2- STA. 22+68.11
7.00' RT
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-Y2- STA. 21+03.48
7.00' RT
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND
CLDSM 10.41C
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
NCDOT TYPE 2
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
NCDOT TYPE 2
S
T
R
Y
O
N
S
T
(N
C
-
4
9
)
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
Curve Table: Alignment -Y3-
C31
PI Sta
30+41.35
Δ
8°29'52"
D
057°17'44.81"
L
14.83
T
7.43
R
100.00
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
- Y2 -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
- Y3 -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 30+00 31+00 32+00
PI
=
2
2
+
5
1
.
7
2
EL
=
5
9
1
.
7
4
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
0
+
4
3
.
4
4
EL
=
5
8
2
.
3
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+1.5000%
+4.4990
%
+2.0000%
PI
=
3
1
+
5
9
.
1
5
EL
=
5
9
0
.
3
9
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
0
+
2
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
4
.
3
7
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
+1.5000%
+4.4874%
+2.0000%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y2- STA. 22+79.15
EL. = 592.29
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1A-
-Y2- STA. 20+06.00
EL. = 581.81
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y3- STA. 31+70.93
EL. = 590.63
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1B-
-Y3- STA. 30+06.00
EL. = 584.09EXIST. 42" SS
EXIST. 42" SS
BEGIN DITCH LT
STA. 30+17.26
EL. = 581.02
END DITCH LT
STA. 31+46.15
EL. = 588.448.045
8
%
4.3806%
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
4
6
:
4
5
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
25
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
SEE SHEET PM-1 FOR PAVEMENT
MARKING & SIGNAGE PLAN
DETAIL A
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
2:1
2:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.0 FT
-Y3- STA. 30+17 TO 31+46 LT.
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O WLB
WL
B
W
L
B
WLB
WL
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
WLB
W
L
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
WLB
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
W
L
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
2
4
4
+
0
0
24
5
+
0
0
24
6
+
0
0
24
7
+
0
0
41+
0
0
42+
0
0
43+0
0
4
4
+
0
0
4
5
+
0
0
4
6
+
0
0
4
7
+
0
0
P
C
:
4
2
+
7
2
.
9
6
PC: 40+11.73
PC: 41+33.28
P
C
:
4
1
+
9
5
.
4
6
PT:
4
3
+
8
8
.
9
8
P
T
:
4
0
+
5
7
.
1
6
PT: 41+43.47
P
T
:
4
2
+
0
6
.
4
3
=-Y4- STA. 40+00.00
-L1B- STA. 246+14.51
2
0
0
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
125
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
2
0
0
'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C 4 1
C42
C 4 3
C 44
Curve Table: Alignment -Y4-
C41
C42
C43
C44
PI Sta
40+37.25
41+38.38
42+00.95
43+46.19
Δ
65°03'54"
5°50'16"
3°08'43"
88°37'55"
D
143°14'22.02"
057°17'44.81"
028°38'52.40"
076°23'39.74"
L
45.42
10.19
10.98
116.02
T
25.51
5.10
5.49
73.23
R
40.00
100.00
200.00
75.00
S62° 50' 23.36"W
S02
°
1
3
'
3
1
.
0
5
"
E
S08° 03' 46.61"E
S04
°
5
5
'
0
3
.
1
6
"
E
S
8
3
°
4
2
'
5
1
.
9
7
"
W
S
8
3
°
4
2
'
5
1
.
9
7
"
W
28 LF OF 36" CLASS IV RCP
2601
2602
R=10' (TYP.)
2603
2604
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
.01
5
PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-)
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
.01
5
REMOVE APPROX. 32 LF OF
EXISTING 36" CMP
PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-)
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 16 TON
EST 36 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 11 TON
EST 24 SY GEOTEXTILE
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-Y4- STA. 44+10.00
7.00' RT
END FARM FENCE
-Y4- STA. 45+70.05
7.00' RT
PROPOSED 160 LF OF
FARM FENCE
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
1
0
'
x
1
0
'
L
A
N
D
I
N
G
(S
T
A
.
4
7
+
4
0
.
0
0
T
0
4
7
+
5
0
.
0
0
)
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
Y
4
-
S
T
A
4
6
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
7
- Y4 -
570
580
590
600
570
580
590
600
40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 46+50
PI
=
4
0
+
3
2
.
3
9
EL
=
5
8
9
.
2
7
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
4
+
7
4
.
9
8
EL
=
5
9
2
.
7
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
0
+
8
2
.
7
1
EL
=
5
8
6
.
8
8
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
3
+
2
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
8
7
.
0
0
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
6
+
2
8
.
7
6
EL
=
5
9
1
.
4
8
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+0.0479%
+2.0000%-4.744
3
%
+3.8218%
-0.8112%
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1B-
-Y4- STA. 40+06.00
EL. = 588.74
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROP. 36" RCP
PROP. 24" RCP
PROP. 24" RCP
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
4
7
:
4
6
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
26
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB WLB
WL
B
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
WLB
CE
N
T
E
R
PA
R
K
D
R
44+
0
0
45+
0
0
46+
0
0
47+
0
0
48+
0
0
49+
0
0
50+
0
0
PC
:
4
8
+
2
9
.
9
8
PT
:
4
3
+
8
8
.
9
8
PT
:
4
8
+
3
8
.
9
6
END -Y4-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y4- STA. 49+87.03
200'
D
U
K
E
T
R
A
N
S
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31B
Curve Table: Alignment -Y4-
Δ
65°03'54"
5°50'16"
3°08'43"
88°37'55"
D
143°14'22.02"
057°17'44.81"
028°38'52.40"
076°23'39.74"
L
45.42
10.19
10.98
116.02
T
25.51
5.10
5.49
73.23
R
40.00
100.00
200.00
75.00
C45 Curve Table: Alignment -Y4-
C45
PI Sta
48+34.47
Δ
1°01'44"
D
011°27'32.96"
L
8.98
T
4.49
R
500.00
S83°
4
2
'
5
1
.
9
7
"
W
S83
°
4
2
'
5
1
.
9
7
"
W
2603
2604
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
.0
1
5
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y4- STA. 49+73.92
PROPOSED 10' CENTER PARK DR CONNECTION (-Y4-)
CLAS
S
B
R
I
P
R
A
P
EST 1
1
T
O
N
EST 2
4
S
Y
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
END FARM FENCE
-Y4- STA. 45+70.05
7.00' RT
PROP
O
S
E
D
1
6
0
L
F
O
F
FARM
F
E
N
C
E
PROPOSED 10'x10' LANDING
(STA. 47+40.00 T0 47+50.00)
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-Y4- STA. 46+55.00
7.00' RT
END FARM FENCE
-Y4- STA. 47+50.00
7.00' RTPROPOSED 95 LF
OF FARM FENCE
S84
°
4
4
'
3
5
.
8
9
"
W
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31A
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
SEE SHEET PM-2 FOR PAVEMENT MARKING
AND SIGNAGE PLAN
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
Y
4
-
S
T
A
4
6
+
5
0
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
6
- Y4 -
585
590
600
610
620
585
590
600
610
620
46+50 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 50+84
PI
=
4
8
+
8
2
.
5
4
EL
=
6
1
1
.
2
4
VC
=
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
+3.0237%
+8.00
0
0
%
+8.00
0
0
%
+2.5000%
END GRADE
TIE TO CURB RAMP
-Y4- STA. 49+73.92
EL. = 614.00
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
4
8
:
4
7
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
27
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
WLB
WLB
270
+
0
0
271
+
0
0
27
2
+
0
0
2
7
3
+
0
0
TCE
TCE
TCE
T
C
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
TCET
C
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
PGE
PG
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
PGE
P
G
E
PGE
P
G
E
PGE PGE
EXIST
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
=-L1B- STA. 272+28.44
-Y5- STA. 0+00.00 N89° 02' 09.52"E
N82° 26' 44.51"E
S86° 48' 47.43"E
S83° 21' 52.89
"
E
0+00 1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
5+
6
1
PC: 5+11.09
PC
:
3
+
5
0
.
8
9
P
C
:
1
+
3
2
.
8
5
PC
:
0
+
9
3
.
6
1
P
T
:
5
+
5
5
.
6
1
PT
:
3
+
8
0
.
9
8
PT
:
1
+
5
5
.
3
4
P
T
:
1
+
1
0
.
8
6
C 5 0
C 5 1
C 5 3
C 5 2
END -Y5-
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
-Y5- STA. 5+60.52
N45° 36' 55.07"E
.0
2
.
0
2
PROPOSED LANDING
PROPOSED LANDING
PROPOSED 6' TO 8' AVION POINT CONNECTION (-Y5-)
RETAIN PIPE
Curve Table: Alignment -Y5-
C50
C51
C52
C53
PI Sta
1+02.25
1+44.13
3+65.94
5+34.95
Δ
6°35'25"
10°44'28"
3°26'55"
51°01'12"
D
038°11'49.87"
047°44'47.34"
011°27'32.96"
114°35'29.61"
L
17.25
22.50
30.09
44.52
T
8.64
11.28
15.05
23.86
R
150.00
120.00
500.00
50.00
- Y5 -
590
600
610
620
630
640
590
600
610
620
630
640
-0+100+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+006+10
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1B-
-Y5- STA. 0+06.70
EL. = 601.09
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
PI
=
1
+
5
6
.
8
7
EL
=
6
0
4
.
9
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 3+28.24
EL = 612.97
VC = 5.00'
PI
=
4
+
0
1
.
6
0
EL
=
6
1
8
.
7
8
VC
=
1
0
.
0
0
'
PI = 5+54.99
EL = 634.54
VC = 5.00'
+1.5000%
+4.2731%
+1.0134%
+1.5000%
+11.
5
9
0
1
%
+1.5000%
+8.93
0
0
%
+8.33
0
0
%
+1.5000%
PI
=
0
+
9
8
.
4
1
EL
=
6
0
2
.
4
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
+
4
2
.
5
2
EL
=
6
0
5
.
8
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
+
3
8
.
2
4
EL
=
6
1
3
.
1
2
VC
=
5
.
0
0
'
PI
=
4
+
2
1
.
5
9
EL
=
6
1
9
.
0
8
VC
=
1
0
.
0
0
'
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y5- STA. 5+60.52
EL. = 634.62
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
1
3
/
2
0
2
3
4
:
3
9
:
5
4
P
M
,
Ji
m
m
y
P
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
28
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCS
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
WL
B
WLB
W
L
B
WL
B
W
L
B
WLB
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
ME
M
O
R
I
A
L
P
K
W
Y
3
0
1
+
0
0
3
0
2
+
0
0
3
0
3
+
0
0
3
0
4
+
0
0
3
0
5
+
0
0
PGE
PGE
PGE
P
G
E
PGE PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PG
E
P
G
E
PGE PGE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
T
C
E
T
C
E
TCE TCE TCE
TCE
EXIS
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
3+81
1+00
2+00
3+00
P
C
:
0
+
4
1
.
8
9
P
C
:
1
+
1
4
.
1
4
PC
:
2
+
0
4
.
3
5
PC: 2+76.85
P
T
:
0
+
7
2
.
4
8
PT
:
1
+
5
4
.
9
2
PT:
2
+
4
7
.
6
1
PT: 2+95.90
=-L1C- STA. 302+06.11
-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+00.00
END -Y6 ALT2-
TIE TO EXISTING SIDEWALK
-Y6 ALT2- STA. 3+75.28
PROPOSED 10' CITY PARK CONNECTION (-Y6 ALT2-)
C 6 1
C 6 2
C
6
3
C
6
4
N88
°
4
6
'
1
8
.
1
3
"
E
S73° 4
1
'
5
7
.
3
5
"
E
S50° 20' 00.35"E
S
0
0
°
4
5
'
3
8
.
0
4
"
E
S55° 19' 47.91"E
Curve Table: Alignment -Y6-
C61
C62
C63
C64
PI Sta
0+57.31
1+34.82
2+27.44
2+87.17
Δ
17°31'45"
23°21'57"
49°34'22"
54°34'10"
D
057°17'44.81"
057°17'44.81"
114°35'29.61"
286°28'44.03"
L
30.59
40.78
43.26
19.05
T
15.42
20.68
23.09
10.32
R
100.00
100.00
50.00
20.00
EXIST. 15' SSE
PROPOSED LANDING
1+77.00
10.00' R 1+87.00
10.00' R
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31B
NATIONAL AVE
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y6 ALT2- STA. 2+76.85
PROPOSED 10' CONCRETE
3+34.19
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
- Y6 ALT2 -
590
600
610
620
590
600
610
620
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
PI
=
0
+
2
5
.
0
0
EL
=
5
9
4
.
8
3
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
+1.5000%
-5.52
8
7
%
-0.6555%
+8.28
7
0
%
+2.0000%
+4.7430
%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1C-
-Y6 ALT2- STA. 0+06.00
EL. = 594.54
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y6 ALT2- STA. 3+75.28
EL. = 609.87
PV
I
S
T
A
=
1
+
7
7
.
0
0
PV
I
E
L
E
V
=
6
0
7
.
4
2
PV
I
S
T
A
=
2
+
9
9
.
9
2
PV
I
E
L
E
V
=
6
1
2
.
9
8
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
0
:
5
5
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
29
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
SUG
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
309
+
0
0
310
+
0
0
311
+
0
0
312
+
0
0
313
+
0
0
31
4
+
0
0
P
G
E
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PG
E
PG
E
PGE
T
C
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
E
X
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
0
+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+0
0
3
+
0
0
4
+
0
0
PC:
0
+
4
6
.
0
6
P
C
:
2
+
4
2
.
2
9
P
C
:
1
+
9
0
.
6
3
PC
:
3
+
2
9
.
6
5
PC
:
3
+
6
7
.
8
4
P
T
:
0
+
9
6
.
8
0
PT:
3
+
0
0
.
3
2
P
T
:
2
+
0
4
.
4
8
PT
:
3
+
4
0
.
2
2
PT:
3
+
7
6
.
7
9
ARB
O
R
L
O
O
P
D
R
=-L1C- STA. 311+56.66
-Y7-ALT1- STA. 0+00.00
PROPOSED 6' CONNECTION (-Y7-ALT1-)
END -Y7-ALT1-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y7-ALT1- STA. 3+94.04
ARBOR LO
O
P
D
R
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
C
L
D
S
M
1
0
.
3
1
A
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
L
A
T
E
R
A
L
'
V
'
D
I
T
C
H
S
E
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
A
T
I
E
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
M
U
P
- Y7-ALT1 -
590
600
610
620
590
600
610
620
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+25
PI
=
1
+
0
2
.
9
7
EL
=
6
0
2
.
7
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
+
3
8
.
3
6
EL
=
6
1
8
.
6
4
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
0
+
3
4
.
5
0
EL
=
5
9
7
.
3
0
VC
=
3
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
1
+
5
9
.
5
2
EL
=
6
0
3
.
7
5
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.0000%
-0.6007%
+8.32
9
1
%
+7.96
2
2
%
+1.7602%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
1
:
5
7
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
30
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
3
1
7
+
0
0
3
1
8
+
0
0
3
1
9
+
0
0
3
2
0
+
0
0
3
2
1
+
0
0
PG
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
TC
E
T
C
E
T
C
E
P
G
E
P
G
E
PG
E
PGE PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
T
C
E
EX
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
EX
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
0+0
0
1
+
0
0
2+00
3+00
4+00
P
C
:
0
+
1
1
.
2
9
PC:
1
+
1
0
.
5
5
PC
:
2
+
0
6
.
9
6
PC: 4+72.44
PT:
0
+
4
0
.
4
7
PT
:
1
+
4
6
.
6
5
P
T
:
2
+
4
0
.
0
1
PT: 4+95.90
A
R
B
O
R
L
O
O
P
D
R
=-L1C- STA. 319+29.19
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+00.00
PROPOSED 6' ARBOR LOOP DR
CONNECTION (-Y7-ALT2-)
C 7 1
S
0
6
°
1
5
'
1
0
.
4
0
"
E
C72
S47° 37' 04.96"E
C 7 3
Curve Table: Alignment -Y7-
C71
C72
C73
C74
PI Sta
0+29.17
1+29.43
2+23.76
4+87.29
Δ
83°35'22"
41°21'55"
25°14'53"
89°05'59"
D
286°28'44.03"
114°35'29.61"
076°23'39.74"
379°53'20.40"
L
29.18
36.10
33.05
23.45
T
17.88
18.88
16.80
14.85
R
20.00
50.00
75.00
15.08
.0
1
5
.
0
1
5
C74
END -Y7-ALT2-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 5+01.65
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.40B
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31A
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
PROPOSED 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC
PROPOSED 10'x10' LANDING
(STA.1+90.00 TO 2+00.00)
PROPOSED 140 LF OF FARM FENCE
BEGIN FARM FENCE
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 2+60.00
4.00' RT
END FARM FENCE
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 4+00.00
4.00' RT
PROPOSED BOULDER (TYP.)
TIE TO EXISTING MUP
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31B
S72° 51' 57.64"E
- Y7-ALT2 -
600
610
620
630
600
610
620
630
PI
=
1
+
7
4
.
5
4
EL
=
6
1
4
.
3
1
VC
=
3
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
3
+
3
2
.
9
8
EL
=
6
2
4
.
1
3
VC
=
3
9
.
7
5
'
PI
=
0
+
2
5
.
4
1
EL
=
6
0
1
.
8
8
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
2
+
1
7
.
6
5
EL
=
6
1
5
.
1
7
VC
=
3
8
.
6
2
'
PI
=
4
+
4
5
.
0
0
EL
=
6
2
5
.
7
3
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
+2.0000%
+8.33
0
0
%
+2.0021%
+7.76
4
9
%
+2.0000%
+6.827
0
%
+1.4309%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
-0+100+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+006+10
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1C-
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 0+06.46
EL. = 601.51
END GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
-Y7-ALT2- STA. 5+00.00
EL. = 629.38
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
2
:
5
4
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
31
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
2:1
2:
1
O
R
FL
A
T
T
E
R
FILL
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
D
MIN D= 1.5 FT
-Y7- STA. 3+79 TO 4+82 RT.
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCSO PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
SUG
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
32
1
+
0
0
32
2
+
0
0
323
+
0
0
324
+
0
0
325+0
0
3
2
6
+
0
0
81+00
82+00
PC: 80+18.51
P
C
:
8
1
+
3
0
.
5
3
PC: 81+68.24P
T
:
8
0
+
5
7
.
7
9
PT: 81+61.54
PT: 81+90.71
PC: 9
0
+
0
7
.
7
3
PC: 91+02.43
PT: 90+52.23PT: 91+41.58
91+00
400+00
402
+
0
0
403
+
0
0
=-Y8- STA. 80+00.00
-L1C- STA. 322+88.45
=-Y9- STA. 90+00.00
-L1D- STA. 401+00.00
END -Y8-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y8- STA. 82+04.32
END -Y9-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y9- STA. 91+58.84
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31B
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.31A
C
81
C 82
C83
C 9 1
C 9 2
Curve Table: Alignment -Y8-
C81
C82
C83
PI Sta
80+39.90
81+46.68
81+80.83
Δ
56°15'25"
39°29'08"
64°21'28"
D
143°14'22.02"
127°19'26.24"
286°28'44.03"
L
39.27
31.01
22.47
T
21.38
16.15
12.58
R
40.00
45.00
20.00
Curve Table: Alignment -Y9-
C91
C92
PI Sta
90+35.22
91+23.07
Δ
84°59'59"
44°51'41"
D
190°59'09.35"
114°35'29.61"
L
44.51
39.15
T
27.49
20.64
R
30.00
50.00
S88° 53' 46.85"E
N34° 50' 4
8
.
4
7
"
E
N74° 19' 56.47"E
N09° 58' 28.37"E
S11° 19' 39.60"W
S56° 11
'
2
0
.
9
0
"
W
S28° 48' 38.06"E
PGE
PGE PGE
TCE TCE TCE
T
C
E
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGE
PGEE
X
I
S
T
.
5
0
'
P
N
G
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
E
X
I
S
T
.
6
0
'
S
S
E
.
0
1
5
.0
1
5
R=10' (TYP.)
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y9- STA. 91+46.67
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y8- STA. 81+93.49
PROPOSED 10' COLISEUM CENTRE
DR CONNECTION (-Y8-)
PROPOSED 10' COLISEUM CENTRE
DR CONNECTION (-Y9-)
C
O
L
I
S
E
U
M
C
E
N
T
R
E
D
R
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
SEE SHEET PM-3 FOR PAVEMENT MARKING
AND SIGNAGE PLAN
- Y8 -
590
600
610
620
590
600
610
620
- Y9 -
590
600
610
620
590
600
610
620
80+00 81+00 82+00 82+50 90+00 91+00 91+81
PI
=
8
0
+
9
5
.
9
9
EL
=
6
0
6
.
2
7
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
8
1
+
7
8
.
1
5
EL
=
6
1
0
.
6
9
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
8
0
+
2
0
.
9
9
EL
=
6
0
0
.
0
5
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
+0.9512%
+1.5000%
+8.30
0
1
%
+5.3729
%
PI = 91+31.15
EL = 610.02
VC = 20.00'
PI
=
9
0
+
2
6
.
8
3
EL
=
6
0
1
.
7
3
VC
=
2
0
.
0
0
'
+1.5000%
+7.94
2
4
%
+2.0000%
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1D-
-Y9- STA. 90+06.00
EL. = 601.42
END GRADE
TIE TO CURB RAMP
-Y9- STA. 91+46.67
EL. = 610.33
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1C-
-Y8- STA. 80+06.00
EL. = 599.82
END GRADE
TIE TO CURB RAMP
-Y8- STA. 81+93.49
EL. = 610.83
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
3
:
5
4
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
32
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
W
L
B
WLB
WL
B
WLB
WLB
W
L
B
YORKMONT RD
(SR-1156)
HI
V
E
D
R
40
9
+
0
0
41
0
+
0
0
411+00
412
+
0
0
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
TCE
PG
E PGE
PG
E
PGE
PGE P
G
E
1+00
2+
0
0
3+00
P
C
:
3
+
0
0
.
0
6
PC: 2+12.85
P
C
:
1
+
2
0
.
7
8
PC: 0+11.78
PT: 3+37.97
PT: 2+55.75
PT
:
1
+
6
4
.
9
5
P
T
:
0
+
2
9
.
4
8
=-Y10- STA. 0+00.00
-L1D- STA. 411+96.32
PROPOSED 8' YORKMONT RD/HIVE DR CONNECTION (-Y10-)
C101 S73° 55' 1
2
.
6
8
"
E
C 10 2
S40° 10' 28.26"E
C 1 0 3
S89°
1
9
'
4
0
.
7
3
"
E
C 1 0 4
S45° 53' 38.06"E
S23° 12' 19.24"E
SEE SHEET 22 FOR
-L1D- PLAN & PROFILE
PROPOSED SWALE BRIDGE
(STA. 1+97.00 TO 2+07.00)
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR DETAIL
SUGA
R
C
R
E
E
K
Curve Table: Alignment - Y10 -
C101
C102
C103
C104
PI Sta
0+21.26
1+43.53
2+35.72
3+19.98
Δ
50°42'53"
33°44'44"
49°09'12"
43°26'03"
D
286°28'44.03"
076°23'39.74"
114°35'29.61"
114°35'29.61"
L
17.70
44.17
42.89
37.90
T
9.48
22.75
22.87
19.91
R
20.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.40B
END ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y10- STA. 3+41.08
END -Y10-
TIE TO EXISTING
-Y10- STA. 3+65.23
R=10' (TYP.)
.
0
1
5
.
0
1
5
3301
3302
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 4 TON
EST 9 SY GEOTEXTILE
32 LF OF 18" CLASS III RCP
END 8' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y10- STA. 1+87.00
END CONCRETE
BEGIN 8' ASPHALT
-Y10- STA. 2+17.00
10'
10'
TRANSITION 12' TO 8'
TRANSITION 8' TO 12'
10'
TRANSITION 8' TO 12'
GRADE TO DRAIN
CLASS B RIPRAP
EST 39 TON
EST 55 SY GEOTEXTILE
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD
SEE SHEET 2B-4 FOR DETAIL
- Y10 -
595
600
610
620
630
595
600
610
620
630
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 3+75
PI
=
1
+
5
4
.
9
7
EL
=
6
1
2
.
3
8
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PI
=
0
+
7
0
.
2
4
EL
=
6
0
5
.
5
3
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.0000%
+8.08
3
2
%
+3.0000%
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1D-
-Y10- STA. 0+06.00
EL. = 604.24
END GRADE
TIE TO CURB RAMP
-Y10- STA. 3+41.08
EL. = 617.96
EXIST. 8" SS
PROP. 18" RCP
BEGIN SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 1+97.00
EL. = 613.637
END SWALE BRIDGE
STA. = 2+07.00
EL. = 613.937
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
4
:
5
1
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
JAP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
33
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
PC
S
O
10
0
+
0
0
10
1
+
0
0
1
0
2
+
0
0
1102+69
1101+00
1102+00
PC
:
1
1
0
0
+
1
4
.
9
4
PT
:
1
1
0
0
+
5
7
.
4
8
PC
:
1
1
0
2
+
1
0
.
0
8
PT
:
1
1
0
2
+
2
3
.
9
1
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
MO
U
N
T
I
N
G
RO
C
K
R
D
McDO
W
E
L
L
FARMS
D
R
=-L1A- STA. 101+01.87
-Y11- STA. 1100+00.00
END -Y11-
TIE TO PROPOSED SIDEWALK
-Y11- STA. 1102+59.27
C 110 1
Curve Table: Alignment - Y11 -
C1101
C1102
PI Sta
1100+36.23
1102+16.99
Δ
4°52'29"
1°35'05"
D
011°27'32.96"
011°27'32.96"
L
42.54
13.83
T
21.28
6.92
R
500.00
500.00
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
CLDSM 10.33
S80° 31' 47.76"W
EX
I
S
T
.
1
5
'
S
S
E
END 10' ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE
-Y11- STA. 1102+54.32
C 110 2
S75° 39' 18.91"W
S77° 14' 24.15"W
R=10' (TYP.)
SEE SHEET 4 FOR
-L1A- PLAN & PROFILE
PROPOSED 10' MOUNTING ROCK
RD CONNECTION (-Y11-)
.0
1
5
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
TIE TO EXISTING
SIDEWALK
INSTALL COLLAPSIBLE (1) AND
PERMANENT (2) BOLLARDS
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
DEMO & REPLACE 4'
SIDEWALK
1' ASPHALT SAWCUT
SEE SHEET L2.10 FOR ENLARGEMENT
- Y11 -
565
570
580
590
600
565
570
580
590
600
1100+00 1101+00 1102+00 1102+80
PI
=
1
1
0
1
+
4
9
.
7
9
EL
=
5
8
2
.
0
6
VC
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
+2.0000%
+1.1989%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
BEGIN GRADE
TIE TO -L1A-
-Y11- STA. 1100+06.00
EL. = 579.19
END GRADE
TIE TO SIDEWALK
-Y11- STA. 1102+59.27
EL. = 583.38
EXIST. 8" SS
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
P
4
.
d
w
g
,
6/
8
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
5
5
:
4
5
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTION PLAN & PROFILE
05/10/2305/10/23
MEK-20000
GB
ED, JP
1" = 30' / 1"=6'
MEK-20000-P4.dwg
06-08-2023
34
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC-GRID-(NAD83)
249 SF
MEN'S
101
249 SF
WOMEN'S
100
262 SF
STORAGE
102
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PCSO PCSO
PCSO
F-101
F-102
F-103
F-104
P-106
F-105
F-103
P-107R-103
R-103
M-101
FURNISHINGS
CODE DESCRIPTION
F-101 BENCH - OWNER PROVIDED
F-102 BIKE RACK - OWNER PROVIDED
F-103 COLLAPSIBLE BOLLARD - OWNER PROVIDED
F-104 PERMANENT BOLLARD - OWNER PROVIDED
F-105 TRASH RECEPTACLE - OWNER PROVIDED
MISCELLANEOUS
CODE DESCRIPTION
M-101 RESTROOM + STORAGE FACILITY - SEE ARCHITECTURE
PAVING
CODE DESCRIPTION
P-106 CURB RAMP, TYP.
P-107 CONCRETE PAVING
RAILING, FENCES, AND GATES
CODE DESCRIPTION
R-103 ELECTRONIC SLIDING ACCESS GATE - PROVIDED BY OWNER. SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 2B-2
WALLS AND CURBS
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
SITE LEGEND
GENERAL HARDSCAPE NOTES:
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE PROPOSED CONDUIT LOCATIONS (E.G.
IRRIGATION, ELECTRICAL, NATURAL GAS, ETC.) ARE COORDINATED AND
PROPERLY INSTALLED PRIOR TO HARDSCAPE INSTALLATION.
2.ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS FOR PROPRIETARY HARDSCAPE MATERIAL MAY BE
PROVIDED FOR CONSIDERATION, UNLESS THAT PRODUCT IS A DIRECT
PURCHASE BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ALTERNATIVE
PRODUCT INFORMATION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT.
3.FULL-SIZE MOCK UPS FOR EACH FORM OF CONSTRUCTION AND FINISH
REQUIRED SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ON-SITE TO DO THE FOLLOWING:
a.ILLUSTRATE FINISHES AND MATERIALS, JOINT PATTERNS, EDGE
TREATMENTS, MATERIALS, AND COLORS
b.DEMONSTRATE AESTHETIC EFFECTS
c.DEMONSTRATE THE QUALITIES OF PRODUCTS AND WORKMANSHIP
d.DEMONSTRATE ACCEPTABLE COORDINATION BETWEEN COMPONENTS
AND SYSTEMS,
e.DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIED INSTALLATION
TOLERANCES,
f.PERFORM PRECONSTRUCTION TESTING
g.ESTABLISH THE STANDARD BY WHICH COMPLETED WORK WILL BE
JUDGED.
BUILD MOCK UPS IN LOCATION AND OF SIZE AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE. MOCK UPS MAY REMAIN PART OF THE COMPLETED WORK
IF APPROVED, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
4.FOR COLD WEATHER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, IF AIR TEMPERATURE HAS
FALLEN TO OR IS EXPECTED TO FALL BELOW 40° F, CONTRACTOR SHALL
UNIFORMLY HEAT WATER AND AGGREGATES BEFORE MIXING TO OBTAIN A
CONCRETE MIXTURE TEMPERATURE OF NOT LESS THAN 50° F AND NOT MORE
THAN 80° F AT POINT OF PLACEMENT.
5.FOR HOT WEATHER CONCRETE PLACEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL COOL
INGREDIENTS BEFORE MIXING TO MAINTAIN CONCRETE TEMPERATURE
BELOW 90° F AT TIME OF PLACEMENT.
6.PROOF-ROLL PREPARED SUBBASE TO IDENTIFY SOFT POCKETS AND UNSTABLE
AREAS. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADDITIONAL
COMPACTION IS NEEDED. PROCEED WITH INSTALLATION ONLY AFTER
UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. OBTAIN FINAL
APPROVAL OF SUBGRADE BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. PROOF ROLL WITHIN 72 HOURS OF CONCRETE
PLACEMENT.
7.SET, BRACE, AND SECURE EDGE FORMS AND GUIDES TO REQUIRED LINES,
GRADES, AND ELEVATIONS. INSTALL FORMS TO ALLOW CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS OF WORK AND SO FORMS CAN REMAIN IN PLACE AT LEAST 24
HOURS AFTER CONCRETE PLACEMENT. CLEAN FORMS AFTER EACH USE AND
COAT WITH FORM-RELEASE AGENT TO ENSURE SEPARATION FROM CONCRETE
WITHOUT DAMAGE.
8.BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, INSPECT AND COMPLETE FORMWORK
INSTALLATION, STEEL REINFORCEMENT, AND ITEMS TO BE EMBEDDED OR
CAST-IN. REMOVE SNOW, ICE, OR FROST FROM SUBBASE SURFACE AND
STEEL REINFORCEMENT BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. DO NOT PLACE
CONCRETE ON FROZEN SURFACES. REMOVE LOOSE MATERIAL FROM
COMPACTED SUBBASE IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. MOISTEN
SUBBASE TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM DAMPENED CONDITION AT TIME
CONCRETE IS PLACED. DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE AROUND MANHOLES OR
OTHER STRUCTURES UNTIL THEY ARE AT REQUIRED FINISH ELEVATION AND
ALIGNMENT.
9.CONTROL, EXPANSION, AND OTHER JOINTS FOR CONCRETE SURFACES AND
STRUCTURES, SUCH AS STAIRS, WALKS, ETC., SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS
SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND DETAILS. IF NOT SHOWN, CONTROL JOINTS
SHALL BE EQUAL TO WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BUT IN NO INSTANCE SHALL EXCEED
8'. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE MAXIMUM 30' SPACING.
10.CONSTRUCT CONTINUOUS, WATER-TIGHT EXPANSION JOINTS WHERE WALKS
MEET RIGID STRUCTURES SUCH AS CURBS, STEPS, WALLS, FIXED SLABS, OR
VERTICAL STRUCTURES.
11.WHERE NEW SIDEWALK ADJOINS EXISTING WALKWAY, PROVIDE EXPANSION
JOINT BY DRILLING INTO THE FACE OF THE EXISTING WALK FOR PLACEMENT
OF DOWELS. TIE NEW SIDEWALKS INTO NEAREST EXISTING PAVEMENT JOINT;
MATCH WIDTH OF EXISTING WALKWAY.
12.PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1% CROSS SLOPE, 1.75% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE
ON WALKS, PAVED SURFACES, AND TRAILS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE
NATURAL DRAINAGE FLOW.
13.FINISH GRADE OF CONCRETE OR PAVERS SHALL BE 1” ABOVE FINISH GRADE
OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. FINISH GRADE OF ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT SHALL BE
1/2” ABOVE FINISH GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS.
14.PER ADA GUIDELINES, TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES
ARE REQUIRED 24” IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF
ALL CURB RAMP LANDINGS. THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL
START AT THE BACK OF ALL PROPOSED FLUSH CURBS.
15.PAVEMENT TOLERANCES SHALL BE WITHIN THE FOLLOWING:
a.ELEVATION: 1/4 INCH
b.RUNNING SLOPE: PLUS 0.5%, NO MINUS
c.CROSS SLOPE: PLUS 0.5%, NO MINUS
d.THICKNESS: PLUS 3/8 INCH, MINUS 1/4 INCH
e.SURFACE: GAP BELOW 10-FOOT-LONG, UNLEVELED STRAIGHT EDGE NOT
TO EXCEED 1/4 INCH
f.JOINT AND SCORING SPACING: 1/2 INCH
g.CONTRACTION JOINT DEPTH: PLUS 1/4 INCH, NO MINUS
h.JOINT WIDTH: PLUS 1/8 INCH, NO MINUS
i.JOINT AND SCORING LINES SHOULD BE IN STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT
16.PROHIBIT TRAFFIC FROM PAVEMENT FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS AFTER
PLACEMENT. MAINTAIN PAVEMENT FREE OF STAINS, DISCOLORATION, DIRT,
AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL.
17.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE DAMAGED FINISHES AND REPLACE DAMAGED
OR DEFECTIVE PAVER OR CONCRETE UNITS AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE TO
THE OWNER.
18.LAYOUT OF CONCRETE JOINTS AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN.
LAYOUT NOTES
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE WALKS, HARDSCAPE, AND OTHER PAVED AREAS
AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL IS AT RISK FOR
REPLACEMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE
OWNER.
2.LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINES
FROM WHICH THEY ARE MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
3.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TAKEN TO THE FACE OR CENTERLINE OF ELEMENTS
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4.WRITTEN DIMENSIONAL AND COORDINATE INFORMATION SHALL PREVAIL.
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND
NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START
OF CONSTRUCTION.
6.DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATES ARE PROVIDED IN DECIMAL FEET UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.UTILITIES WITH SURFACE ACCESS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PAVING
PATTERN AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO LAYOUT DRAWINGS.
8.ANGLES TO BE 90 DEGREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
9.ALIGN ALL JOINTS, CORNERS, AND EDGES AS SHOWN.
10.FINAL LAYOUTS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
FURNISHING NOTES
1.INSTALL SITE FURNISHINGS PLUMB, LEVEL, TRUE TO LINE, AND SECURELY
ANCHORED AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COMPLETE FIELD ASSEMBLY OF
SITE FURNISHINGS WHERE REQUIRED.
2.ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTS FOR PROPRIETARY SITE FURNISHINGS MAY BE
PROVIDED FOR CONSIDERATION, UNLESS THAT PRODUCT IS A DIRECT
PURCHASE BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ALTERNATIVE
PRODUCT INFORMATION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO PURCHASE.
3.FURNISHING LOCATION AND QUANTITIES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR FURNISHING PRODUCT SELECTIONS,
LOCATIONS, STYLES, QUANTITIES, ETC. PRIOR TO PURCHASE.
4.FURNISHINGS TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE OPTION WHERE POSSIBLE.
5.BRING DISCREPANCIES THAT EXIST BETWEEN THE PLAN AND SUBSEQUENT
DRAWINGS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR
RESOLUTION PRIOR TO PURCHASING PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION.
6.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, INSTALL SITE FURNISHINGS AFTER
LANDSCAPING AND PAVING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
7.AFTER COMPLETING SITE FURNISHING INSTALLATION, INSPECT COMPONENTS.
REMOVE SPOTS, DIRT, AND DEBRIS. REPAIR DAMAGED FINISHES TO MATCH
ORIGINAL FINISH OR REPLACE IF REPAIRS CANNOT BE MADE. REPAIRS SHALL
BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. SHOULD REPAIRS BE
DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE FURNISHING OR
DAMAGED COMPONENT AS APPLICABLE.
CDOT NOTES:
1.NON-STANDARD ITEMS (IE: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT
AGREEMENT WITH THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION BEFORE INSTALLATION. FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MAINTAINED STREETS, CONTACT ENCROACHMENT
AGREEMENT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV.
2.DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES DURING
ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST
EDITIONS OF THE CDOT WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK
(WATCH), THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
(MUTCD), AND THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS.
3.ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S ROW OR CITY MAINTAINED
INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE APPROVED BY CDOT AND WILL REQUIRE A
ROW USE PERMIT OR ROW LEASE DEPENDING UPON THE PROPOSED
SCOPE AND DURATION OF CLOSURE. THESE APPROVALS ARE IN
ADDITION TO SITE PLAN APPROVALS AND SHOULD BE COORDINATED
WITH CDOT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
ROWUSEPERMIT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV AT LEAST 5 BUSINESS DAYS
PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR IMPACTS LESS THAN 30 DAYS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LEASING
AGREEMENT@CHRLOTTENC.GOV AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR IMPACTS
GREATER THAN 30 DAYS. EVERY EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO
CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO ALL USERS OF
THE PUBLIC ROW.
4.THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT THE IMPLEMENTATION SECTION
MANAGER, TONY TAGLIAFERRI, OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) OR THEIR DESIGNEE AT 704-336-4119 TO
IDENTIFY ANY CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION EQUIPMENT.
60-90 DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE RELOCATION.
DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELATED RELOCATION
COST AND/OR ANY REPAIR COST CAUSED BY THE
CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER.
5.PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING AND/OR STREET LIGHTING SHALL NOT BE
INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT REVIEW AND
APPROVAL OF CDOT. DEVELOPER TO CONTACT CANDANCE INGE
(704-336-3932 OR CANDACE.INGE@CHARLOTTENC.GOV) FOR LOCAL
STREET LIGHTING CRITERIA WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECTS
AND TO CONTACT BRUCE HORLDT (704-589-5836 OR
BRUCE.HORLDT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV) FOR ALL OTHER PROJECTS
LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY AND
CDOT AS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE LIGHTING LEVELS, LIGHTING
LAYOUT AND REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION.
6.PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT UTILITY RELOCATION COORDINATION - FOR
UTILITY COORDINATION RELATED TO BOTH EXISTING UTILITY
RELOCATION NEEDS AND PROPOSED NEW UTILITY INSTALLATIONS,
PLEASE CONTACT UTILITYWORKPERMIT@CHARLOTTENC.GOV.
7.A JOINT USE MANHOLE (MEET-ME MANHOLE) IS TO BE PROVIDED BY
THE DEVELOPER TO ACCOMMODATE ALL UTILITY TELECOM SERVICE
PROVIDERS. THE JOINT USE MANHOLE SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
MEK-20000
MDD
APM
MEK-20000-S1 Trailhead.dwg
08-31-2022
1"=30'
C2.00
TRAIL HEAD
SITE PLAN
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
S
1
T
r
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
.
d
w
g
,
6/
2
2
/
2
0
2
3
1
0
:
2
1
:
2
9
A
M
,
Ji
m
m
y
P
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
249 SF
MEN'S
101
249 SF
WOMEN'S
100
262 SF
STORAGE
102
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PCS
O
PC
S
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
GRADING LEGEND
MEK-20000
MDD
APM
MEK20000-G1.dwg
08-25-2022
1"=30'
C3.00
TRAIL HEAD
GRADING PLAN
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
2
0
0
0
0
-
G
1
.
d
w
g
,
6/
2
2
/
2
0
2
3
3
:
3
3
:
4
6
P
M
,
Ji
m
m
y
P
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
249 SF
MEN'S
101
249 SF
WOMEN'S
100
262 SF
STORAGE
102
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
P
C
S
O
PC
S
O
PCS
O
PCSO PCSO PCSO PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
PCSO
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
GRADING LEGEND
MEK-20000
MDD
APM
MEK20000-DA1.dwg
08-25-2022
1"=30'
C3.01
TRAIL HEAD
DRAINAGE PLAN
TO DI-101
DA=0.26 AC
C=0.95
TO DI-106
DA=0.20 AC
C=0.95
TO DI-102
DA=0.26 AC
C=0.95 TO DI-103
DA=0.12 AC
C=0.95
TO DI-107
DA=0.04 AC
C=0.95
TO CB-104
DA=0.13 AC
C=0.95
TO CB-201
DA=0.17 AC
C=0.95
TO JB-202
DA=0.39 AC
C=0.95
SEE THIS SHEET
SE
E
T
H
I
S
S
H
E
E
T
TO OCB-202
DA=0.39 AC
C=0.95
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
2
0
0
0
0
-
D
A
1
.
d
w
g
,
6/
2
3
/
2
0
2
3
2
:
5
6
:
4
9
P
M
,
Br
i
a
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
TO YI-105
DA=0.04 AC
C=0.70
Construction Method & Structure Plans
FLOW
M:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
E
K
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
\
0
4
-
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
M
E
K
-
2
0
0
0
0
-
D
2
.
d
w
g
,
6/
2
7
/
2
0
2
3
5
:
1
6
:
0
8
P
M
,
Ji
m
m
y
P
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
HYDRAULICS ENGINEERGREENWAY ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
95% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
phone 704. 527. 0800
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293, C-187
2100 South Tryon Street
Suite 400
Charlotte, NC 28203 MEK-20000
GB
JAP
NTS
MEK-20000-D2.dwg
06/23/2023
2B-11
CULVERT RIPRAP INFORMATION TABLE
GENERAL NOTES:
1.THESE BRIDGES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LRFD GUIDE
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES, 2009.
2.UNIFORM LIVE LOAD = 90 PSF AS PER LRFD GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR DESIGN OF
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES.
3.DESIGN VEHICLE LOADING = AASHTO H5 (INCLUDES AMBULANCES AND OTHER
VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT UP TO 10,000 LB).
4.ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE AASHTO M270 GRADE HPS 50W.
5.BRIDGE STRUCTURES S1, S2, & S3 SHALL BE PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES.
6.FABRICATOR OF PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES SHALL INDICATE THE LOCATION
OF DRAINAGE HOLES FOR THE BRIDGE TUBULAR MEMBERS IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS.
7.CONCRETE DECKS SHALL BE CLASS AA CONCRETE AND ADHERE TO NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND UTILITY ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITIES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED BY CONTRACTOR AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE COUNTY.
9.FOR SUBMITTALS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
10.FOR FALSEWORK AND FORMWORK, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
11.FOR CRANE SAFETY, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
12.FOR GROUT FOR STRUCTURES, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
13.FOR PLACING LOAD ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
14.FOR PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DETAILS, SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
15.BRIDGE LOADINGS ARE ESTIMATED. AFTER SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ARE SUBMITTED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ENGINEER OF
RECORD TO CHECK THE END BENTS FOR ACTUAL BRIDGE LOADINGS. SHOP DRAWINGS
SHALL BE FORWARDED TO ENGINEER OF RECORD UPON RECEIPT.
16.FOR BOARDWALK CONNECTION TO BRIDGE END BENTS, SEE S-6.
17.EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIAL PROVISIONS, ALL MATERIAL
AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2018 "STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES" OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
(TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS)
12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH
6'-0"6'-0"
4'
-
0
"
M
I
N
.
RA
I
L
I
N
G
CL -L1A- OR -L1B-
CAST-IN-PLACE
REINFORCED
CONCRETE DECK
GRADE
POINT
TYPICAL SECTION PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CHAIN BEGIN STATION ELEVATION ELEVATIONEND STATION LENGTH REMARKS
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOCATIONS
BRIDGE #
-L1A-115+28.68 116+48.68S1 120.00'
S2
591.00 591.00
S3 2 SPAN BRIDGE STRUCTURE (50' + 145')
-L1B-242+45.37 243+90.37 145.00'597.00 597.00
-L1B-268+87.35 270+82.35 195.00'601.00 601.00
END BRIDGE FRAMES INTO BOARDWALK 3
END BRIDGE FRAMES INTO BOARDWALK 5
*SLOPE
*REFER TO GREENWAY PLANS FOR REQUIRED BRIDGE DECK SLOPES
S-1
GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL SECTION
210089
NM
S-1 GENERAL NOTES.dwg
210089
JML
S-1 GENERAL NOTES.dwg
08-19-2022
NTS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
1
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
.
d
w
g
,
8/
1
8
/
2
0
2
2
1
:
4
2
:
5
9
P
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
115+00 116+00 117+00
565
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA 115+19.68 -L1A-
ELEV. 591.00
FILL FACE AT END BENT 1
W.P.1 STA 115+28.68 -L1A-
ELEV. 591.00 END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2
W.P.2 STA 116+48.68 -L1A-
ELEV. 591.00
PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BOARDWALK #3
HP12x53
STEEL PILE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED TRAIL
1'
-
0
"
1.
5
:
1
S
L
O
P
E
2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE (SEE
ROADWAY PLAN FOR LOCATION)
HP14x73
STEEL PILE
3'
-
6
"
MI
N
.
10"MIN. TIP Ø
TIMBER PILES (TYP.)
TIMBER
BOARDWALK
RAILING
EL. 585±EL. 588±
EL. 579 ±EL. 581±
EL. 578±EL. 581±
EL. 580±
EL. 570±EL. 570±
FILL
EXISTING
GRADE
PVI STA. 116+99.11 -L1A-
EL. 591.00
VC = 75'
0.000 %-4.500 %
GRADE DATA
BOC EL. 585.17
BOC EL. 585.17
LOW CHORD
EL. 588.75
115+00 116+00
11
7
+
0
0
12
'
-
0
"
CL
E
A
R
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
FILL FACE AT END BENT 1
W.P.1 STA. 115+28.68 -L1A-
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
END OF BRIDGE S1
BEGIN BOARDWALK #3
W.P 2 STA. 116+48.68 -L1A-
1
2
'
-
0
"
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA. 115+19.68 -L1A-
90°
(TY
P
.
)
120'-0"
BOARDWALK #3
BOARDWALK #7
-Y1-
-L1A-
PT STA. 115+12.66 -L1A-
R
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PC STA. 116+55.11 -L1A-
R
=
5
0
.
0
0
'
PT STA. 117+17.50 -L1A-
PI STA. 116+91.10 -L1A-
PI STA. 114+70.08 -L1A-
PC STA. 10+20.66 -Y1-
PI STA. 10+38.36 -Y1-
R = 50
.
0
0
'
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)
FARM FENCE
(SEE GREENWAY PLANS
FOR DETAILS)
S-2
BRIDGE S1
210089
NM
S-2 Bridge S1.dwg
JML
S-2 Bridge S1.dwg
08-19-2022
NTS
N
SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S1
END BENT 1 END BENT 2
10'0'10'20'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10'
10'0'10'20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10'
BRIDGE S1 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
2
B
r
i
d
g
e
S
1
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
0
:
4
5
:
1
6
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
243+00 244+00242+00
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
605
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA 242+36.37 -L1B-
ELEV. 597.00
FILL FACE AT END BENT 1
W.P.1 STA 242+45.37 -L1B-
ELEV. 597.00 END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2
W.P.2 STA 243+90.37 -L1B-
ELEV. 597.00PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BOARDWALK #5
HP12x53
STEEL PILE
HP14x73
STEEL PILE
10"MIN. TIP Ø
TIMBER PILES (TYP.)
1'
-
0
"
1.
5
:
1
S
L
O
P
E
2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP
WITH GEOTEXTILE (SEE
ROADWAY PLAN FOR LOCATION)
3'
-
6
"
MI
N
.
EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE
TIMBER
BOARDWALK
RAILING
EL. 588±
EL. 588±
EL. 576±
EL. 584±
EL. 586±EL. 586±
PVI STA. 244+30.91 -L1B-
EL. 597.00
VC = 50'
0.000 %-4.700 %
GRADE DATA
EXISTING GRADE FILL
EXISTING
GRADE
EL. 573±EL. 573±
BOC EL. 591.00
BOC EL. 591.00
LOW CHORD
EL. 594.58
12
'
-
0
"
CL
E
A
R
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
242+00
BEGIN OF APPROACH SLAB
STA 242+36.37 -L1B-
FILL FACE AT BENT 1
W.P.#1 STA 242+45.37 -L1B-
PROPOSED PATH
END BRIDGE AT END BENT 2
W.P.#2 STA 243+90.37 -L1B-
243+00 244+00
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE
-L1B-
12
'
-
0
"
CL
E
A
R
12
'
-
0
"
145'-0"
PC STA. 244+03.60 -L1B-
R
=
7
5
.
0
0
'
PI STA. 244+41.28 -L1B-
BOARDWALK 5
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.)
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)
S-3
BRIDGE S2
210089
JML
NM
S-3 Bridge S2.dwgS-3 Bridge S2.dwg
08-19-2022
NTS
N
SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S2
BRIDGE S2 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK
10'0'10'20'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10'
10'0'10'20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10'
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
3
B
r
i
d
g
e
S
2
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
0
:
4
6
:
2
7
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
270+00 271+00269+00
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
605
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.)
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA 268+78.35 -L1B-
ELEV. 601.00
FILL FACE AT END BENT 1
W.P.#1 STA 268+87.35 -L1B-
ELEV. 601.00
FILL FACE AT END BENT 2
W.P.#3 STA 270+82.35 -L1B-
ELEV. 601.00
PREMANUFACTURED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
HP12x53
STEEL PILE
EXISTING GRADE
610
EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE
HP12x53
STEEL PILE
1'
-
0
"
(T
Y
P
.
)
1.
5
:
1
S
L
O
P
E
2'-0" THICK CLASS II RIPRAP WITH
GEOTEXTILE (SEE ROADWAY PLAN
FOR LOCATION) (TYP.)
3'
-
6
"
(M
I
N
.
)
(T
Y
P
.
)
1.5:
1
S
L
O
P
E
END APPROACH SLAB
STA 270+91.35 -L1B-
ELEV. 601.00
EL. 591±
EL. 589±
EL. 591±
EL. 576±
EL. 591±
EL. 591±
EL. 576±
EXISTING GRADE
FILLFILL
BOC EL. 595.00
BOC EL. 595.00BOC EL. 595.12
HP14x73
STEEL PILE
LOW CHORD
EL. 598.58
12
'
-
0
"
CL
E
A
R
SU
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
BEGIN OF APPROACH SLAB
STA 268+78.35 -L1B-
FILL FACE AT END BENT 1
W.P.#1 STA 268+87.35 -L1B-
PROPOSED PATH
END OF APPROACH SLAB
STA 270+91.35 -L1B-
FILL FACE AT END BENT 2
W.P.#3 STA 270+82.35 -L1B-
145'-0"
269+00 270+00 271+00
50'-0"
CL AT BENT 1
W.P. #2 STA 269+37.35 -L1B-
-L1B-
90°
(TY
P
.
)
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
195'-0"
1
2
'
-
0
"
(
T
Y
P
.
)
BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL (TYP.)
(SEE DETAILS ON SHEET S-9)
S-4
BRIDGE S3
NM
S-4 Bridge S3.dwg
210089
JML
S-4 Bridge S3.dwg
08-19-2022
NTS
N
SECTION ALONG CL BRIDGE S3
BRIDGE S3 PLAN - SUGAR CREEK
EXISTING 54"Ø PIPE
10'0'10'20'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1''=10'
10'0'10'20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1''=10'
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
4
B
r
i
d
g
e
S
3
.
d
w
g
,
8/
3
1
/
2
0
2
2
9
:
5
7
:
5
6
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
NOTE: SEE SHEET S-6 FOR SECTION CUT LOCATION
TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS
12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH
2x6 TOP (TYP.)
CANTED 2x8 TOP RAIL
30° TO HORIZONTAL
PROVIDE 1/2" RADIUS
CORNERS (TYP.)
4'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
4"
4x6 POSTS @ 5'-0" O.C.
2x6 BOTTOM RAIL (TYP.)
HANDRAIL DETAIL
4"x4"x0.250"
WELDED WIRE MESH
FENCE PANEL (TYP.)
SQUARE TENSION TIES
(STAGGERED POSITION
BEHIND RAILS)
3X12 SPACER BLOCK (TYP.)
SIMPSON LTS12 TWIST
STRAP (TYP. EA. JOIST)
3x12x1'-6" SPLICE
BLOCK @ OUTSIDE
STRINGERS
(2)-3x12 PILE CAP
MEMBERS NOTCHED
INTO EA. FACE OF PILING
3/4" THRU BOLTS (TYP.)
10" MIN. TIP Ø PILING
3x12 JOIST (TYP.)
GALV. METAL DECKING
*REINFORCED
CONCRETE DECK
SECTION A-A
HIGH SLAB SECTION LOW SLAB SECTION
REINFORCED CLASS
AA CONCRETE
6"
4"
6x3x1/4 LIGHT GAUGE
GALV. ANGLE WELDED TO
GALV. METAL DECK
3x12 JOIST SHOWN
(DOUBLE 3X12 SIMILAR)
4x4 - W4.0xW4.0
WELDED WIRE MESH
GALV. METAL DECK
1 1/4" BBU @
4'-0" CTS.
4x3x1/4 LIGHT GAUGE
GALV. ANGLE WELDED TO
GALVANIZED METAL DECK
3x12 JOIST SHOWN
(DOUBLE 3X12 SIMILAR)
NOTE: SEE SHEET S-7 FOR SECTION CUT LOCATION
FOR RAIL DETAILS, SEE SECTION A-A
12'-0" MIN. CLEAR WIDTH
3X12 SPACER BLOCK (TYP.)
SIMPSON LTS12 TWIST
STRAP (TYP. EA. JOIST)
(3)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS
(1) MEMBER NOTCHED INTO
FACE OF PILING ON EACH
SIDE 3/4" THRU BOLTS (TYP.)
10" MIN. TIP Ø PILING
DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST (TYP.)
GALV. METAL DECKING
*REINFORCED
CONCRETE DECK
SECTION B-B
*CROSS SLOPE OF CONCRETE DECK SHALL BE
ACHIEVED BY VARYING THE TOP SURFACE OF THE
CONCRETE DECK WITH AN ADDITIONAL 2" ON
ONE SIDE. DIRECTION OF CROSS SLOPE AS
INDICATED ON ROADWAY PLANS.
REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK DETAILS
SLOPE*SLOPE*
CHAIN BEGIN STATION ELEVATION ELEVATIONEND STATION LENGTH 20' SPAN REMARKSCHAIN
BOARDWALK LOCATIONS
BOARDWALK #
NOTE:
THERE IS ONE 20 FOOT BOARDWALK SPAN IN BOARDWALKS THAT INDICATE "YES" IN THE 20' SPAN COLUMN.
BEGIN AND END ELEVATIONS SHOWN. FOR INTERMEDIATE ELEVATIONS, SEE ROADWAY PLANS.
-L1A-105+55.00 105+85.00-L1A-1 -30.00'
2 -
YES583.25 582.35
3 BEGIN BOARDWALK FRAMES INTO BRIDGE S1
4 -
5
6 -
7 -
-L1A-108+88.00 109+08.00-L1A-20.00'YES582.26 582.26
-L1A-116+48.68 118+48.68-L1A-200.00'NO591.00 584.27
-L1B-204+26.00 204+66.00-L1B-40.00'YES584.63 585.83
243+90.37 245+80.37 190.00'NO597.00 589.98
285+15.35 285+65.35 50.00'YES589.96 591.25
-Y1-10+06.00 13+26.00-Y1-320.00'YES590.84 582.44
-L1B--L1B-BEGIN BOARDWALK FRAMES INTO BRIDGE S2
-L1B--L1B-
NOTES:
1.TIMBER DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS ARE BASED ON NOMINAL TIMBER SIZES.
2.TREATED TIMBER AND LUMBER SHALL BE USED AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2018
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 1082 AND SHALL BE SOUTHERN PINE, GRADE 1
OR BETTER.
3.EXPOSED CORNERS ON 2X RAILS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1/2".
4.PRE-DRILLED HOLES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SPLITTING OF TIMBERS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
5.ALL BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS, ETC. SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153. SIMPSON STRONG TIE CONNECTORS (WHERE USED) SHALL
BE GALVANIZED.
6.PLACE 3X12 DIAPHRAGMS AT MIDSPAN OF JOISTS IN 10' SPANS AND 1 4 POINTS ALONG JOISTS
IN 20' SPANS.
7.2X6 HANDRAIL SHALL BE CONTINUOUS ACROSS A MINIMUM OF THREE POSTS.
8.X-BRACE TIMBER PILES IN THE TRANSVERSE DIRECTION IN ALL BAYS WHEN TOP OF
BOARDWALK EXCEEDS 7'-0" IN HEIGHT FROM TOP OF DECK TO GROUND SURFACE.
X-BRACING IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. ATTACH X-BRACING TO
POSTS W/ 5/8" DIA. HEX BOLT AT EACH END.
9.THE NOTCHED AREA ON TOP OF THE TIMBER PILES MUST BE TREATED WITH A
WATERPROOFING SEALANT MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE NCDOT MATERIALS AND TESTS UNIT.
10.TIMBER PILES ARE DESIGNED BASED ON A MAXIMUM UNSUPPORTED LENGTH OF 6 FEET.
11.BOARDWALK DECKING SHALL BE A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE DECK.
12.CONCRETE DECK SHALL CONSIST OF CLASS AA CONCRETE REINFORCED WITH AN EPOXY
COATED 4X4 - W4.0XW4.0 WELDED WIRE FABRIC. WELDED WIRE FABRIC MESH SHALL HAVE
8" MIN. LAPS AND MAINTAIN 2" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO ALL FORM ANGLES AND JOINTS.
WELDED WIRE FABRIC MESH SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON 1 1/4" BBU SUPPORTS SPA. AT 4'-0"
O.C.
13.CONCRETE DECK SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A METAL DECK FORM WITH WITH A GALVANIZED
FINISH. DECK MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: MINIMUM SECTION MODULUS OF 0.071
IN^3/FT, MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 60 KSI, AND A MAXIMUM RIB DEPTH OF 5/8".
14.THE GALVANIZED METAL DECK FORM SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EACH JOIST AT 12" O.C. USING
NO. 8 PAN HEAD SCREWS. AT LAP LOCATIONS OF THE GALVANIZED METAL FORMS, USE SHEET
METAL SCREW CONNECTIONS AT 12" O.C..
15.METAL DECK FORM ANGLES SHALL BE GALVANIZED LIGHT GAUGE METAL. WHERE FORM
ANGLES ARE WELDED TO THE METAL DECK FORM, WELDS SHALL BE CLEANED AND COATED
WITH AN INORGANIC ZINC PRIMER. FOR INORGANIC ZINC PRIMER, SEE SECTION 1082 OF THE
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
16.WHEN POURING CONCRETE FOR THE CONCRETE DECK, PROTECT THE METAL DECK AND
WELDED WIRE FIBER MESH FORM AGAINST DEFORMATION.
17.1/2" OPEN JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT BENT LOCATIONS AT SPACINGS NOT EXCEEDING 50
FEET. TRANSVERSE CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 10' MAXIMUM CENTERS IN THE
CONCRETE DECK ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE BOARDWALK.
18.ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ANY DISCREPANCIES
FOUND ON THIS DRAWING SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER BEFORE
PROCEEDING.
19.BASIS OF PAYMENT FOR THE BOARDWALK WILL BE AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICES FOR
TIMBER BOARDWALK, BOARDWALK TIMBER PILES 10" MIN. TIP DIAM., AND CONCRETE DECK
AND WILL BE FULL COMPENSATION FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL, LABOR, TOOLS, AND
INCIDENTALS NECESSARY FOR INSTALLING IN PLACE.
20.FOR TIMBER BOARDWALK, SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR "TIMBER BOARDWALK".
21.UNO = UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
S-5
BOARDWALK GENERAL NOTES
NM
S-5 BW GENERAL NOTES.dwg
08-19-2022
210089
JML
NTS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
5
B
W
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
0
9
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS
ELEVATION VIEW - 10' SPAN BOARDWALKS
PLAN VIEW - 10' SPAN BOARDWALKS
DETAIL A
PEDESTRIAN LIVE LOAD
VEHICLE LIVE LOAD
WIND LOAD ON
SUPERSTRUCTURE
DESIGN LOADS
90 PSF
AASHTO H5
59 PSF
DETAIL B
(SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SECTION A-A)
3x12 SPLICE BLOCK
3x12 SPACER
3x12 JOIST
2
1
/
2
"
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
W/ WASHERS (TYP.)
2
1
/
2
"
3x12 JOIST
SIMPSONS BP
5/8 - 3 (TYP.)
SIMPSONS BP
5/8 - 3 (TYP.)
3x12 JOIST
3x12 SPACER
3x12 JOIST
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
W/ WASHERS (TYP.)
2
1
/
2
"
2
1
/
2
"
3x12 BLOCKING (TYP. @
MIDPOINT OF ALL JOISTS)
3x12 JOIST (TYP.)
A
DETAIL C
5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"
10'-0"10'-0"7 1/4"10'-0" MAX.
9"
BRIDGE
END BENT
3/4"Ø THRU
BOLTS W/
WASHERS (TYP.)
3x12 PILE CAP
MEMBERS (TYP.)
2 1/2" NOTCH IN
TIMBER PILES TO
PROVIDE FULL
BEARING (TYP.)
FENCE STAPLES
SPACED @ 16" O.C.
MAX. (ALL RAILS)
4"x4"x0.250"
WELDED WIRE
MESH PANELS
2x6 TOP RAIL CANTED 2x8
TOP RAIL
4x6 RAIL
POST (TYP.)
ATTACH 2x8 TOP RAIL
W/ (2) #10x3" WOOD
SCREWS @ 12" CTS.
1/2" EXPANSION JOINT
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
(SEE DETAIL A) (TYP.)ABC STONE
3x12x16'-0" WING WALL
BOARDS (3 REQUIRED)
GALV. METAL
DECK
3x12 JOIST
1 1/2"1 1/2"
1
1
/
2
"
2"
2
1
/
2
"
4"
3'-0"
END BENT
1'-0"
4"
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
(SEE DETAIL B) (TYP.)
3x12x16'-0" WING WALL
BOARDS (3 REQUIRED)
3x12 SPACER
END BLOCKING (TYP. @
BRIDGE CONNECTION)
SEE CONNECTION
DETAIL C (TYP.)
BRIDGE AND BENT BACKWALL
SEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL B
3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS NOTCHED
INTO EACH SIDE OF PILE (TYP.)
3x12x1'-6" SPLICE BLOCK
(TYP. EA BUTTED JOINT)REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH
12
'
-
1
"
8'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
1 2"
2'
-
0
1 2"6" MAX.
(TYP.)
6" MIN.
(TYP.)
1'
-
6
1 2"
3x
1
2
J
O
I
S
T
S
@
1
'
-
6
"
O
.
C
.
M
A
X
.
1'
-
6
1 2"
A
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
W/ WASHERS (TYP.)
(INSTALLATION REQUIRED AT EVERY OTHER JOIST)
S-6
10' SPAN DETAILS
NM
S-6 10' SPAN DETAILS.dwg
08-19-2022
210089
JML
S-6 10' SPAN DETAILS.dwg
NTS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
6
1
0
'
S
P
A
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
0
:
4
9
:
5
2
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
TYPICAL BOARDWALK DETAILS
ELEVATION VIEW - 20' SPAN BOARDWALKS
PLAN VIEW - 20' SPAN BOARDWALKS
PEDESTRIAN LIVE LOAD
VEHICLE LIVE LOAD
WIND LOAD ON
SUPERSTRUCTURE
DESIGN LOADS
90 PSF
AASHTO H5
59 PSF
DETAIL A
(SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SECTION A-A AND SECTION B-B)
SIMPSONS BP
5/8 - 3 (TYP.)
3x12 SPACER
DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
W/ WASHERS (TYP.)
2
1
/
2
"
2
1
/
2
"
A
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
(SEE DETAIL B) (TYP.)
3x12 SPACER
(TYP.)
3x12 BLOCKING
(TYP. @ ALL JOIST
QUARTER POINTS)
SEE DETAIL A
3x12 PILE CAP MEMBER
NOTCHED INTO SIDE OF PILE
(TYP. FOR 10' SPANS)
12
'
-
1
"
8'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
1 2"
2'
-
0
1 2"
6" MIN. (TYP.)
A
6" MAX. (TYP.)
SIMPSON/STRONG-TIE
LSTA15 FLAT STRAP
(TYP. AT FRAMING CONFLICTS)
B
B
(2)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS W/
(1)-3x12 NOTCHED INTO SIDE OF PILE
(TYP. FOR 20' SPANS)
1'
-
4
1
2 "
1'
-
4
1
2 "
DOUBLE 3x12
JOIST (TYP.)
3x
1
2
J
O
I
S
T
S
@
1
'
-
6
"
O
.
C
.
M
A
X
.
1'
-
6
1 2"
DO
U
B
L
E
3
x
1
2
J
O
I
S
T
S
@
1
'
-
4
"
O
.
C
.
M
A
X
.
DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST
5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"
20'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
(2)-3x12 PILE CAP MEMBERS
(TYP. FOR 20' SPAN)
FENCE STAPLES
SPACED @ 16" O.C.
MAX. (ALL RAILS)4"x4"x0.250"
WELDED WIRE
MESH PANELS
2x6 TOP RAIL CANTED 2x8
TOP RAIL
4x6 POST
(TYP.)
2- 5/8"Ø THRU BOLTS
(SEE DETAIL A) (TYP.)
5'-0"5'-0"
3x12 PILE CAP MEMBER
(TYP. FOR 10' SPAN)
21 2" NOTCH IN PILE TO
PROVIDE FULL BEARING OF
(1) 3x12 MEMBER
(TYP. EA. SIDE)
DOUBLE 3x12 JOIST3x12 JOIST 3x12 JOIST
ATTACH 2x8 TOP RAIL
W/ (2) #10x3" WOOD
SCREWS @ 12" CTS.
3x12 JOIST (TYP.)
1'
-
6
1 2"
S-7
20' SPAN DETAILS
210089
NM
JML
S-7 20' SPAN DETAILS.dwg
8-19-2022
NTS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
7
2
0
'
S
P
A
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
0
:
5
0
:
5
8
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
(BEGIN APPROACH SHOWN, END APPROACH SIMILAR BUT MIRRORED)
BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINT
(INCIDENTAL TO PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE)
2'-0"
#4 BARS @ 12" CTS., EACH WAY
2"
10
"
ASPHALT TRAIL
CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION
2"
C
L
.
(M
I
N
.
)
APPROACH SLAB TO TRAIL CONNECTION
#4 BARS @ 12" CTS.
#4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS.6"
3" CL.
(TYP.)
6"
12
'
-
0
"
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
T
R
A
I
L
#4
L
O
N
G
I
T
U
D
I
N
A
L
B
A
R
S
@
1
2
"
C
T
S
.
6"
6"
2'-0"10'-0"
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
TYPICAL SECTION
FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION
6'-0"
12'-0"
6'-0"
BRIDGE DECK
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
SUBSTRUCTURE
#4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS
REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION
BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINT
(INCIDENTAL TO PREMANUFACTURED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE)
APPROACH SLAB/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONNECTION
#4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS
3"
C
L
.
(T
Y
P
.
)
GRADE LINE
10
"
M
I
N
.
#4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS
6"#4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS.6"
3" CL.
(TYP.)
BRIDGE APPROACH PLAN VIEW
SECTION A-A SECTION B-B
SECTION C-C
12
'
-
0
"
B
R
I
D
G
E
D
E
C
K
SEE NOTE 2
SLOPE*
APPROACH SLAB DETAILS
NOTES
1.SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB.
2.CROSS SLOPE OF APPROACH SLAB SHALL TRANSITION FROM ASPHALT TRAIL
TO MATCH CROSS SLOPE OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK.
DIRECTION OF CROSS SLOPE AS INDICATED ON GREENWAY PLANS
(BEGIN APPROACH SHOWN, END APPROACH SIMILAR BUT MIRRORED)
12" EXPANSION JOINT
#4 BARS @ 12" CTS.
#4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS.6"
3" CL.
(TYP.)
6"
12
'
-
0
"
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
T
R
A
I
L
#4
L
O
N
G
I
T
U
D
I
N
A
L
B
A
R
S
@
1
2
"
C
T
S
.
6"
6"
2'-0"10'-0"
3"
C
L
.
(T
Y
P
.
)
BOARDWALK APPROACH PLAN VIEW
12
'
-
0
"
B
O
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
BACKWALL BOARDS
(3 TOTAL)
BOARDWALK
DECK
TIMBER PILE
#4 TRANSVERSE BARS @ 12" CTS
REINFORCED CONCRETE APPROACH
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILIZATION
12" EXPANSION JOINT
CONCRETE/BOARDWALK CONNECTION
#4 LONGITUDINAL BARS @ 12" CTS
SECTION D-D
S-8
APPROACH SLABS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
8
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
2
:
0
3
:
0
3
P
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
NM
JML
08-19-2022
NTS
S-8 APPROACH SLABS
210089
TYPICAL
BOARDWALK
NOTES:
1.ALL TREATED LUMBER FOR THE GUARDRAIL & POSTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1082 OF THE
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
2.ALL SCREWS, BOLTS, NUTS AND WASHERS ARE TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED.
3.THE LOCATION OF POST FOOTINGS AND END BLOCKS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. DEVIATIONS FROM PLAN
DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
4.SEE SPECIAL PROVISION FOR BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL. THE TOTAL QUANTITY IN THE BID ITEM SHALL INCLUDE
EACH QUADRANT OF BRIDGE AND BOARDWALK THAT REQUIRES APPROACH RAIL.
5.SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR APPROACH RAIL LOCATIONS AT BRIDGES. BOARDWALK APPROACH RAILS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL
QUANDRANTS FOR BOARDWALKS 1,2,4,6 & 7, AND AT END BOARDWALK QUADRANTS ONLY FOR BOARDWALKS 3 & 5.
6.END OF APPROACH RAIL SHALL BE AT LEAST 2'-0" FROM EDGE OF GREENWAY WITH A MINIMUM ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES.
SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C
2x6 RAIL
END OF
BRIDGE/BOARDWALK
1"1
1
1
/
2
"
15
°
4x4 END RAIL
2x6 RAIL
5"x 1/4" CARRIAGE
BOLT W/ NUT & WASHER
1"x 3/4" RECESS
IN BACK OF POSTS
CONNECTION DETAILS
(OUTSIDE VIEW)
2x6 RAIL
1" CHAMFER
5"x 1/4" CARRIAGE
BOLT W/ NUT & WASHER
1"x 3/4" RECESS
IN BACK OF POSTS
B
B
C
C
2x6 RAIL
2x6 RAIL
4x4 POSTS
4x4 SUPPORT BLOCK
4x4 END RAIL
3- 3 1/2" WOOD
SCREWS (TYP.)
2x6 RAIL 1
1
/
2
"
1 1/4"
1
1
/
2
"
1 1/4"
PLAN
SE
E
T
Y
P
.
RA
I
L
P
L
A
N
TYPICAL RAIL PLAN
BOARDWALK
RAILING
1
5
°
(
M
I
N
.
)
1'-0" HOLES TO
BE FILLED WITH
CONCRETE MIX
AROUND POSTS 2" COMPACTED SAND
OR STONE (TYP.)
4x4 POSTS &
CONCRETE POST
SUPPORT (TYP.)
4'-0"
4'-0"
2x6
4x4
1
'
-
0
"
2'-6"
TYPICAL BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL ELEVATION
1'-0"
6"2'
-
0
"
GRADE
ELEVATION
END OF
BOARDWALK
6"
2'-6"
CONCRETE END
BLOCK W/
EMBEDDED 4x4
4"
4x4
1'
-
1
"
1'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
TRIM ENDS FLUSH
W/ 4x4 (TYP.)
4
0
°
BOARDWALK
BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL ELEVATION
SHOWING BACK FACE OF RAILING
A A
TYPICAL
END BENT
LINE IS FROM BOARDWALK RAIL EXTENDED
BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL SET SHOWN
POST SPACINGS AND DEFLECTION ANGLE IS SIMILAR FOR BRIDGE APPROACH RAIL SETS
BRIDGE TRUSS
S-9
APPROACH RAILS
S-9 APPROACH RAIL.dwg
BOARDWALK APPROACH RAIL DETAILS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
9
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
R
A
I
L
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
1
:
3
5
:
4
6
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
NM
08-19-2022
210089
JML
NTS
TOP OF
FOOTING
12" MIN
*SEE ROADWAY PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE DETAILS.
BACKFILL MATERIAL
EMBEDMENT
18" MIN
6"
MIN
9"
MIN
4" DIA. PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE,
IF REQUIRED
(SEE NOTE FOR PIPE)
AGGREGATE
(NO. 57 STONE)
FOOTING
10" MIN
(S
E
E
W
A
L
L
E
N
V
E
L
O
P
E
)
DE
S
I
G
N
H
E
I
G
H
T
-
V
A
R
I
E
S
FINISHED GRADE*
2:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER
STEP TOP OF FOOTING IN
INCREMENTS OF SRW UNIT HEIGHT
AGGREGATE
(NO. 57 STONE)
FOOTING
1:1
(
H
:
V
)
8" MIN
10" MIN
SRW CAP UNIT (TYP)TOP OF WALL
BOTTOM
OF WALL
MAX TOP OF WALL
STEP HEIGHT =
SRW UNIT HEIGHT
6"
MIN
SEGMENTAL RETAINING
WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYP)
SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL - TYPICAL ELEVATION
DE
S
I
G
N
H
E
I
G
H
T
-
V
A
R
I
E
S
(S
E
E
W
A
L
L
E
N
V
E
L
O
P
E
)
SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL - TYPICAL SECTION
SEPARATION
GEOTEXTILE
WALL FACE
GRADE
ELEVATION
FINISHED GRADE*
SEGMENTAL RETAINING
WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYP)
BENCH
4' MIN
FINISHED GRADE*
6:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER
(TYP)
12" MIN
8" MIN
NO. 57 STONE
FOUNDATION
MATERIAL
BOTTOM
OF WALL
2%
PAVEMENT SECTION,
IF APPLICABLE
TOP OF WALL
EXTENSION
4" MIN
SRW CAP UNIT
WALL BATTER
9 DEGREES MAX
OVERHANG
1/2" - 11/2"
SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE
(OMIT FOR CONCRETE
PAVEMENT, FULL DEPTH
ASPHALT OR CEMENT
TREATED BASE)
NOTES:
1.FOR SEGMENTAL GRAVITY RETAINING WALLS, SEE SECTION 454 OF THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS.
2.FREEZE-THAW DURABLE SRW UNITS THAT MEET ARTICLE 1040-4 OF THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED.
3.A DRAIN PIPE IS REQUIRED FOR RETAINING WALLS.
4.BEFORE BEGINNING SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL DESIGN FOR RETAINING WALLS,
SURVEY WALL LOCATION AND SUBMIT A REVISED WALL PROFILE VIEW (WALL ENVELOPE)
FOR REVIEW. DO NOT START WALL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE REVISED
WALL ENVELOPE IS ACCEPTED.
5.DESIGN RETAINING WALLS FOR WALL HEIGHTS EQUAL TO THE DESIGN HEIGHT PLUS
DEPTH TO TOP OF FOOTING (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRADE ELEVATION AND TOP OF
FOOTING ELEVATION).
6.THE MINIMUM EMBEDMENT ELEVATION FOR RETAINING WALLS INCLUDES EMBEDMENT
FOR SCOUR.
7.DESIGN RETAINING WALLS FOR A PIPE EXTENDING THROUGH THE WALL AS SHOWN.
VERIFY PIPE LOCATION AND ELEVATION BEFORE BEGINNING SEGMENTAL GRAVITY WALL
DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION.
8.DO NOT PLACE NO. 57 STONE FOR FOOTINGS FOR RETAINING WALLS UNTIL EXCAVATION
DIMENSIONS AND FOUNDATION MATERIAL ARE APPROVED.
S-10
RETAINING WALLS
210089
NM
S-10 RETAINING WALLS.dwg
210089
JML
S-10 RETAINING WALLS.dwg
08-19-2022
NTS
Q:
\
R
A
\
2
1
0
0
8
9
\
2
0
C
A
D
D
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
\
S
-
1
0
R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
S
.
d
w
g
,
8/
2
4
/
2
0
2
2
1
1
:
5
3
:
5
5
A
M
,
Lo
f
t
u
s
,
J
e
f
f
r
e
y
CLIENT REVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE
SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone 919. 361. 5000
fax 919. 361. 2269
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
PLAN INFORMATIONMECKLENBURG COUNTY ASSET
& FACILITY MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
McDOWELL FARMS DR TO YORKMONT RD
50% DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
4700 FALLS OF NEUSE RD,
SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609
919-781-4626
Mitigation Documents
June 21, 2023
Jennifer Brooks
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Charlotte, NC 28208 Expiration of Acceptance: 12/21/2023
Project: Sugar Creek Greenway - McDowell Farms Dr. to Yorkmont Rd. County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant’s responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location
(8-digit HUC) Impact Type Impact Quantity
Catawba 03050103* Riparian Wetland 0.35
*DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly.Williams@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Jennifer Burdette, agent
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Sugar Creek Greenway 2. Date of evaluation: 5/24/23
3. Applicant/owner name: Mecklenburg County 4. Assessor name/organization: JAB & AGP (NRC)
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sugar Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.187550, -80.917905
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S-2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 130
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No
1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Ch
e
c
k
f
o
r
T
id
a
l
Ma
r
s
h
S
t
r
e
a
m
s
On
l
y
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Assessment 5/24/23
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC)
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH HIGH
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow HIGH HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4) Microtopography LOW LOW
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability HIGH HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH HIGH
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Substrate LOW LOW
(3) Stream Stability HIGH HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall HIGH HIGH
308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1
Natural Resource Consultants
Sampling Point #4 - Supporting Photograph
Photo 1. View of S-2 facing downstream toward Sugar Creek (5/24/23)
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Sugar Creek Greenway 2. Date of evaluation: 5/25/23
3. Applicant/owner name: Mecklenburg County 4. Assessor name/organization: JAB & AGP (NRC)
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sugar Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.172901, -80.918514
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S-7 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 120
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.25 Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No
1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Ch
e
c
k
f
o
r
T
id
a
l
Ma
r
s
h
S
t
r
e
a
m
s
On
l
y
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Assessment 5/25/23
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC)
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography HIGH
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM
(3) Substrate LOW
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW
(2) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW
308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1
Natural Resource Consultants
Sampling Point #7 - Supporting Photograph
Photo 1. View of S-7 facing upstream from sanitary sewer pipe (5/25/23)
NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID # NCDWR#
Project Name Sugar Creek Greenway Date of Evaluation 5/24/23
Applicant/Owner Name Mecklenburg County Wetland Site Name W-7
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Sugar Creek
River Basin Catawba USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050103
County Mecklenburg NCDWR Region Mooresville
Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.172716, -80.921225
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? Yes No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Anadromous fish
Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
Publicly owned property
N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetla nd, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? Yes No
Is the assessment area’s surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
A A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compact ion, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch ≤ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change )
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief – assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
4. Soil Texture/Structure – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redox imorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redox imorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon ≥ 1 inch
4c. A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland – opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank , underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetla nd and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area a nd
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use – opportunity metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
A A A > 10% impervious surfaces
B B B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
C C C ≥ 20% coverage of pasture
D D D ≥ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
E E E ≥ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F F F ≥ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
G G G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer – assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbe d.)
A ≥ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
≤ 15-feet wide > 15-feet wide Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend in to the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered – adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed – adjacent open water with width ≥ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A A ≥ 100 feet
B B From 80 to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 80 feet
D D From 40 to < 50 feet
E E From 30 to < 40 feet
F F From 15 to < 30 feet
G G From 5 to < 15 feet
H H < 5 feet
9. Inundation Duration – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition – assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable , see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select “K” for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
A A A ≥ 500 acres
B B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F F F From 5 to < 10 acres
G G G From 1 to < 5 acres
H H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I I I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J J J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness – wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (≥ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas – landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contigu ous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundari es are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
A A ≥ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificia l edges include
non-forested areas ≥ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessme nt area is clear cut,
select option ”C.”
A 0
B 1 to 4
C 5 to 8
15. Vegetative Composition – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata compo sed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions , but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).
17. Vegetative Structure – assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
A ≥ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
A A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
B B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
C C Canopy sparse or absent
A A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
B B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
A A Dense shrub layer
B B Moderate density shrub layer
C C Shrub layer sparse or absent
A A Dense herb layer
B B Moderate density herb layer
C C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion – wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. P atterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B C D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Ca
n
o
p
y
Mi
d
-St
o
r
y
Sh
r
u
b
He
r
b
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Wetland Site Name W-7 Date of Assessment 5/24/23
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization JAB & AGP (NRC)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Soluble Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM
308 W Millbrook Road, Ste D #200, Raleigh, NC 27609 1 of 1
Natural Resource Consultants
Sampling Point #1 - Supporting Photograph
Photo 1. View of W-7 in power line easement off Center Park Drive facing east (5/24/23)
USFWS Letter
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
March 20, 2021
Amanda Bloom
Environmental Consultant
McAdams
3430 Toringdon Way, Suite 110
Charlotte, NC 28277
bloom@mcadamsco.com
Dear Amanda Bloom:
Subject: Sugar Creek Greenway; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated February 22, 2021 wherein you request our comments regarding potential
project-mediated impacts to federally protected species resulting from the proposed federal
action. The Service submits the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the proposed work may require a Section 404
Nationwide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project would entail the
construction of a greenway, approximately 3.5 miles in length, on Sugar Creek in Charlotte,
North Carolina. Onsite habitats are composed of successional forest, transitional habitats, rights
of way and access to Sugar Creek. The project area is surrounded by residential and commercial
developments.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project
area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the
final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared
bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site,
and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1
– July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree
clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from associated
activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Although not required, we encourage you to conduct
any associated tree clearing activities outside the pup season (June 1 to July 31) and/or
active season (April 1 to October 15) to reduce the chance of impacting unidentified
maternity roosts.
2
According to the information provided, suitable habitat occurs onsite for the endangered
Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) and
Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii). However, botanical surveys conducted during October 23,
29, to 31st and November 3, 2020 detected no evidence for these species at that time. Due to the
presence of suitable habitat, but lack of onsite evidence for these species, we believe the
probability for project-mediated loss is insignificant and discountable. Therefore, we would
concur with a “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for these species from
the applicable federal action agency. Moreover, we believe that suitable habitat is not present
onsite for the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), and we require
no further information at this time.
Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following general recommendations on behalf of natural resources:
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground-disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of
the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor
aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as
changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly
alter this equilibrium.
We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant’s consideration:
1. Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian
areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole-tree
revetment or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand,
and dirt are not recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend
above the bank-full elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural
floodplain begins). Deep-rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks
where any channel work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced
3
at intervals no greater than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths
should be as wide as practical but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream
channel.
2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the
constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and
profile with minimal disturbance.
3. Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are
based on the bank-full, or channel-forming, stage of the stream. Bank-full stage
maintains the natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over
time. Natural channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby
stream reaches that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the
pattern, dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project’s success.
4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures
should be removed as soon as the work area is stable.
5. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary.
Machinery should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance
to woody vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant
residue prior to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to
ensure there are no leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants)
prior to and during construction.
6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground-disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non-cohesive and erosion-prone soils are most common
in the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions.
Therefore, reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be
stabilized with seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion-control matting
prior to the end of each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples;
stakes; or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to
temporary seed establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect
water quality along slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be
covered with plastic or other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing).
Pollinator Habitat
Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, and other insects, including moths and
butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and production of most
fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are
pollinated by these types of fauna. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America
by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees (which are not native
4
to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a
result of disease and the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat. Because loss of habitat
and diminished native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators
throughout the country, we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are
previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature
forests, streams, or wetlands.
We have records of rare species in the area, including monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus
plexippus), a federal candidate for listing.1 Monarch butterflies east of the Rocky Mountains
used to number in the hundreds of millions but the population has declined by approximately 80
percent. Loss of habitat due to genetically modified crops, overuse of herbicides and
insecticides, urban, suburban and agricultural development, disease, climate change, and
overwintering site degradation are the leading causes of monarch decline. Adults use a wide
variety of flowering plants throughout migration for nectar and breeding. However, milkweed
plants (Asclepias spp.) are essential to monarch breeding as these are the only genus of plants
that can host monarchs in their larval form. For a regional and seasonal list of plants important
to monarch butterflies, please visit the Xerces Society website at:
http://www.xerces.org/monarch-nectar-plants/.
Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to candidate species or
other non-listed pollinators, we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if
monarch butterflies or suitable habitat for the species is present on the proposed project site. If
individuals or suitable habitat is present, impacts should be avoided. More specific information
about monarch butterfly can be found at the Service website dedicated to the species at:
https://www.fws.gov/savethemonarch/.
To reduce development impacts to monarch butterflies and other pollinators and/or to increase
the habitat and species diversity within the project area, we recommend the following measures
be incorporated into project designs:
1. Throughout the site, avoid non-native seed mixes and plants. Instead, sow native seed
mixes and plant species that are beneficial to pollinators.
a. Avoid seed mixes and plants that have been pre-treated with insecticides, such
as neonictinoids.
b. Taller-growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery
of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the
summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide
benefits to pollinators, habitat for ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for
small mammals.
1“Taxa for which the [Fish and Wildlife] Service has on file enough substantial informati on on biological
vulnerability and threat(s) to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet
been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of
proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as
other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning” (Federal Register, February 28,
1996). Taxa formerly considered as “Category 1” are now considered as “candidates.”
5
c. Native low-growing/groundcover species should be planted in areas that need
to be maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also
minimizing the amount of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide
treatment.
d. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species is especially beneficial for
monarch butterflies. The following website provides additional information
and a comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
http://www.xerces.org/pollinator-resource-center/mid-atlantic. We also offer
our assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with
fast growing erosion control seed mixes for overall soil stability and pollinator
benefits.
e. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator
habitat requirements can be provided upon request.
2. Mowing and grounds maintenance, including pesticide use, should be scheduled to not
interfere with monarch breeding or nectaring at project sites that occur along the
migration route. To reduce harm, we advise mowing in the fall or winter when
flowers are not in bloom.
3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs
for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend project designs include a diverse array of
habitats to accommodate varied pollinators. For example:
a. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs.
b. Many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants.
c. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems.
d. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators,
please visit the following website: https://www.fws.gov/pollinators/.
4. Minimize effects of outdoor light pollution. Recent studies indicate that artificial
lighting disrupts the natural reproduction and feeding patterns of nocturnal pollinators
such as beetles and moths. This disruption results in a decrease of pollination rates in
plants and a decrease in the health and diversity of nocturnal pollinators. When
developing an outdoor lighting plan or installing any outdoor lighting devices, we
recommend the following measures be considered to minimize potential adverse
effects of outdoor lighting:
a. Decrease the number of light fixtures, as practicable, to meet lighting
objectives.
b. Install lighting only in areas that need illumination for safety (e.g. paths, roads,
etc.). Avoid lighting landscape features such as trees, shrubs, or building
facades.
c. Install fully shielded lights that direct light downward.
d. Use only low-pressure sodium (LPS), high-pressure sodium (HPS), or light
emitting diode (LED) light sources that emit “warm” light. “Warm” light
sources are those that contain low amounts of blue light in their spectrum.
Choosing light sources with a color temperature of no more than 3,000 Kelvins
will minimize the effects of blue light exposure.
e. For additional information and actions that can be taken to reduce outdoor
light pollution, please visit the following website:
6
https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for-citizens/lighting-
basics/.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Karla
Quast of our staff at karla_quast@fws.gov, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-128.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
State Historic Preservation Office Letter
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 814-6570/814-6898
March 25, 2021
Amanda Bloom bloom@mcadamsco.com
McAdams
3430 Toringdon Way, Suite 110
Charlotte, NC 28277
Re: Construct Sugar Creek Greenway, Yorkmont Road to instersection of McDowell Farms Drive and
Mounting Rock Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 21-0616
Dear Ms. Bloom:
Thank you for your letter of February 18, 2021, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review@ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer