HomeMy WebLinkAbout820664_Routine Inspection_20230725Visit: _k�7- omplianceinspection VUperationmeview Vbtructure>vamanon V 1ecnmcalAssistance
for Visit: -e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ; U V Departure Time: County: cl� Region: CRIec
Farm Name: /99Ji� eo KD�c/rX oc�.�7
Owner Name: 6T a4,0Y2
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: aze� &e�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: / 6-6 /S 1c/
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
UU 4s#NSkF b§4kft%k$b#$b d#"8d 9d#;vi A4#§d#'Sgfi#E[W##kMkb{'tifl#kflk#F. $##9t 3ii9
#gift#gX#5##dada##dd 'fl,,,,,,.$##.sj Afi###k4#fid RkN p f4546 kxK6d46��n 0i'#ktl 4-4'9 dkAbK84#?}#N%kdikry#�p '6'#8
> 3$5'.3T£,}}yrys.k##d0##9d4 x;kY#R#485k xa..xb d#bp�)eSl¢¢,n t+4 YIOGSl�n4P�� q}984#3##a##k#m= 4#a*gtl-AleSl,+nAct'jnnnent#5#q#q##k
VI A#5§4ti:#W#Y:b4�•
V k'44ti4 YR.xck�W9#9#4:49 d$tl#p#.. 3b:#4b&. #3 %+4m&&fit#&kb%fl4A#9iR6m1Y4ffiSt#4s;$'$ $d'E
tltiM, #tt'4 #R d$t $3#4 Pb3$k#Fd k¢Fd #h }Y 4 d4, ly-�p ulHX4#ik$$b#kti $-0 ?�#F##44#4* #i/a kii�yy +rtp �y.��kfl#�1p P$44$fid„S£ 1(tkP n�}U�f_y��ghm\.A #b#b'ppyOP- R-0+ff.'d a a4Wes,pev&bp$Ut
9##RBdt'6tne9t}p •9 33tax #+tv!§pk}'.,a-l1WAK+4Yd 4'1+7k51s,§ro
6 atb
#aa*w 5pC'�P§N#ik3e2§dX 422§86#1'.d. *g.a a} g*4
#iu 9a A�#9a#+1 nt ku {t, LiY! b+#a#t §t•.x#qqq:k #aaa 4 "•'4 #§&avd4 kfi#r. ba Ma##a#&'fi
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 5�(3 ° Non -Layer Dairy Calf 0
k x amk#xa xa as# # s a 9
Feeder to Finish #a # # #44md}.##tA%A#M #x a a } p Dairy Heifer
pfip 8.q.#&0.9$#4.g#AFP4#9•k2Pa#a&.#jj���,,��,,,,,}g#�M
i
@q
AIA §N't+ @4@x4% a#r#Dpp8 t Pbld; 871 9fl Dry Cow ,iy1..
Farrow to Wean ####asea eanaa#y�°a#iiid#, ° r')m:#
a
Farrow to Feeder i xr#D'q#pQStI a#ska act 4§ 9di Non -Dairy *'
4sq qa
to
Farrow to Finish an% Layers k:a Beef Stocker 0
Gilts "I Non -Layers to Beef Feeder *#s.
iem
Boars maa Pullets xi,. Beef Brood Cow
### $R
K#@# d"i"Aflk### 3Ptis xit #fw 44%4#k&4#4Y§q44## #df•}4 #.A#b299k NN0. Pb#S#P.a4#tlk439#IY4'66$., 9M
# Turke s '#
{####A Mag4#ktka ik{s.iltr *dd£n s4Yn#?#ktr'd4#bk5##q
#b q3n#%#5$kigdan A#Ya4#Hd;',fl3##.x'Ad4#44{'##g &
h' anga ;:al(#k,�l KID Ilr< #fl#c# taa¢Rak Turke Pouets aa•m3 fl4rsfl #x##« AM "a�zs°4 �s i e°s' ar.
4qS qh. c <t #k
4
4
9,14, ipp stg`000ktr#+Y.q$ Kaa # "*It, W*b..
d #'%9k�#. 8x #4kigg5S9.d
f # Other it
i'
+ daddsAt Hti•z xtd, xaa -0kxS #8 xyme#"abx xk Nt3as &d a.a xi o- h##3etrem ai44kk xR ##E ro ia.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ri No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued
Facili Number: 6&q [Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
,❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: oe+ _k"
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
431�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
e'�,Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Q"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
12-1Go
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes E3�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): ccaa�L.L�/ c b* G1S
13. Soil Type(s): CL22�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes -{ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes AEl-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes -E:fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes _�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes Q'P o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did
the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes -[]/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes [::[*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes QTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes []f;o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued
Facili Number: a— - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes „❑i-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [_ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. T
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JE-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes _E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
EFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[—]Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[EkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Wa. ,t 313oh-3 ,!l. r v'_1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'me /50 /0 Phone: I10 535 — �j ids �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - YiA.rvi.9�— Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020