Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820683_Routine Inspection_20230725for Visit: 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: - d County: S� P2j Region: �F?ed Farm Name: 'z'4� "�� Owner Email: Owner Name: n[�vum4 C222 iy Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: A Certified Operator: _ 'G4/Cc��^'' Certification Number: IF l --yam Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: *6'M19# $#. R4 #�Y 3ha-0pffitfi4B44ba§e44t $1}g 3{HIfi.*44#h66 <B +e 4#R M445 4b kb NON,' A..VN. Ek%9S di$t1h4'"s 4� 4%�$�qffi*ffiH99 Wf #.94 HH49i.9 &1N85N#3 k24#g#,6%'y£�iby,�k]%4 #A ¢.�&�n 3#65#9 #6Y 49%LeW 5i4 ply, p�p�p @�yg�+xt� ty4-#*i1,1tEkbslg9.�}#�k &;x74�gk upµ#:.{b�nW s4/Yx�9#f5,5lq,t�j�'&64£Ap4 en#4Fm'aa K'/K�.6,.#t4•�6ry04 +6'LN}#AEWVdeLtF kKi 10 ,ky{y#,y'A{g#s14£y4 KY43£uv � fiSa p#4'$4n4%kfr'kiK ,+'Y E�L"EN. lF OI£tV B'itO#ab %+6A 5#+Y»: � #`S £b`%.tf b A{, L1vkKaa4l.REy9 It8 0"604'$ 9 0 to #t4fktWee #ka 3iad mvW tl:'a Tkes, 2,�E 04a 0 S#b i �& �� # d b YhkR#s45 b iFkW 45 tld.0Q3.4 h� d au.{>mtr a.y s..,a#3tl s4.. a��traa#4�r�#ssa4aa''a'x I,,,.b Wean to Finish **# Layer w; # Wean to Feeder _ �.,� Non -La er fix`Calf Feeder to Finish (�QI#aazA�am"a£aes as&v s ifer pp$nrm Vxa $�^ d 4 a p`�� .yfi* £ # 44 Farrow to Wean £ + Farrow to Feeder 0fi%64£3S0 @abkis#%b5# If SEE i 04$ n°ea"oaP�sPrtultr,awI£� aai a*o e•piry jBcef La ers aSacker 44 Farrow to Finish; Gilts gNon-La ers#5derm '$a Boars Pullets asod Cow * A #9tl t V. Hd Sb945 i%o I ii��4Td'.@Y#4.. i:kPw s 9Y A£0$*4#8i# TUTkeys �IS•la#n*+tr#+a4£di�#a aT:w a»nx£btias#4Ys##§9#6.%PA4# k&'*11 tl*.*Mi£S$#hw�€Po9MN,ENO6ta#d#bi#4MON@'£k5 as ..£ $#YiR&'###$}+h. %, kitU 3tbVh"a#£9P $ #q%'d#.'R9dYckxx x#rt*4a 0.#kaoa4#S#v3+4 5 "#£04Y % dkm 4'#Pa+'ta3§#&baNA%eb%%s�#%£d§h4 ear#£o,..tiief4*ma*a#*#a #Ia t+z we$ss$a*} Turkey Pouets roo-xaam.%£�++44:4�•s�-a a�an*.ea:R�ee>m�a>aa.4*a.� £k s48*ti#N.9#t2#¢¢%+4 $'R&{.4$#h IS a8##k+k%t +#4 rRyy b}p #SS•b.t#44. 4t%%sa su*£t 441P£� 3$I AA: #ggpp @¢ £b 4tq Other 4 #yy.S6i ,2 iif #.A3 tR}x@*'tl ao%&bn C 1S0q...5699 $ ha&d4&»#•+x., SR # 4v + „�="a"..."rtpd ».�roW #$b46J 342E@#kE#�b6l#35#54O8b%#aki4 $8>#34d£dkd#a #i R •%' • ,., Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yq _j_ iV Ttt [_]NA ❑ NE [—]Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .E5"No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued �93 Facility Number: g Date of inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes _,®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): (IT 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ..®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,❑'fsIo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes QIo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [71`No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [—]Yes ,❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ­[J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes _EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes „e'JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes,,jE]`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes _E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis []Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes _[allo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Cow Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Z �5 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes .E No ❑ NA the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? /IMPOSE!i Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E]°No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .ED"No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes —ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes Ef�No ❑ Yes ,2 No ❑ Yes QiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Phone: C�?,) 53S , 9 ?? Date: 7 /as--1d_3 Page 3 of 3 511212020 FACILITY#v FARM NAME: _ /�/w„j� LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT R - DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS - CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - OIC CARD YES OR NO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (420) SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (m4) -GOOD FOR 600 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE / �5-b-3 NITROGEN LEVEL. 3 DATE LL! /G/!OG ;L-3 NITROGEN LEVEL ?� DATE 3-bg NITROGENLEVEL l•`!( roi 34/a' (• 3� cl SO/ILIRE/PORT (trzi) - EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE' - P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) - PH (Note if 4sr less) - CuIZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) I RR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES J1 NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN C P Y S FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (sza) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION rf t .9 Ce IJ-� FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (x i) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. DUVV5RY YEAR O: o P: 0: P: _ 0: P: _ 0: P: ul�la-� • RATIO OF SLUDGE y`7 • RATIO OF SLUDGE • RATIO OF SLUDGE • RATIO OF SLUDGE SLUDGE (m1 a2s) OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_ *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) - HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1�t- Ends September 30u Small Grain. Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st Corn: Opens February 15ffi - Ends June 30t Cotton: Opens March 15t -Ends August 1st Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31st Oats: Opens September 1-t-Ends April 15t - Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30th Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t Fescue: Opens August 1st -Ends July 31st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31 st