The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820013_Routine inspection_20230725Itype in visit; , f t,ompnancc inspection lJ operation Keview U 6tructure Evaluation U I echnical Assistance I Reason for Visit: 0,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County. % "'Region: Farm Owner Name: �iL�l7 �ir ry ( p , t Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: (��e , ,;t, g& G Title: OnsiteRepresentative: t/ Certified Operator: &'� Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Email: Phone: Integrator:` Certification Number: `� L Certification Number: Latitude: Longitude: 3�#9 6 rtK34G4 $ a# naa six �� tom. #��Y $-44#$##d'Etarfr.&4S+#a $�...6§�. #'#.4o-#:q+LtN � $xan#a## sxmm w#xse x#�#�##as xaat $aYY eY 2aY 4§53#t #15 b'gBfi BH #'bP 449rfr ky#k#9'$`.##�:i'.# �a t�ar��d>�#��tav-#��,,. #fit#t'#ia#t5#'#dAa#d nffiM1&♦tgEaa:#Ya Ete,3�}9 '.. ##%#�#$$fit#&N¢a4k i46'$#%$MaadRsm^s#Y#'M#Sdp9#,tY� ##@fin+.###it#$X6snbkfi8 R3 �t� �R ybdY 3�b+�WIl��ata a.+aa�m �tn#�#paaett�dsrea�b #R8#ad<*:Fre##4tl#t¢ 6gis b39aa �Ytt#as�R�v�bta)�O�n��au�v§(`��aa�yxnaaamaat#*a n q #�sp RY! `. 3fi$IY�JN2 $&$5#{94, 1§.' mbn#M6leaxt& (({{yy��5Y$'#$11d* R # a gM#Yk 4$�+,j !to .�#.a n,.. La�" Y er �#n Da' Cow a a Wean to Feeder lObis� d�^JL1� Non Layer jai DairyCalf rr Fa ow to Wean g ¢ air § aam n4*'sa a it'l,v Hit It. # Da' Heifer ) to A Dry Cow #$ am a�at wsaaa xre&�? a & � fia p Farrow to Feeder tat n PolittY= at �c It e # Non -Dairy v# , Layers Beef Stocker Farrow to Finish a#' o' It i° 1#t Non -La ers ,„ Beef Feeder # t Gilts # at* Boars #* Pullets r Beef Brood Cow s°" #.#: ##{a5Affi'kA+* a fit# aaxa#ns# aa# �Ya9�n'a +anY t}4fi4'AA+#„„Bd9fii ha#a'�##rk - YW+T§h §afi#,§t$#5'a.#'§##6##&b&smY tofi.ra' Turke s trb� oa Wit # #.##xa&#'nx%x4am t�kwx"$nae#.s as>xa.x- tv# $a'' s4.#x'9a�a±ro�l .a .. Turke Poults*vy.#taxiyasa�#maaaa�t�ssnat§i$a*t. roau azcai§+ro ¢*k##3i � rx s#$$ i »aa{{v #s till � Other ig°t mxt$ a aiva'�t yeyYYvyy° S rou 44awwo-uai Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J:;?IQo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes EJ'FIo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes J2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: / Date of Inspection: SJ13 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ,Z 3 -y4v 6— Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): � L CZ Ili /9 1,5 Observed Freeboard (in): J�S_ -F3 3C-) 5�?2 :20 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E j No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L�J�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 1 '76_ 12. Crop Type(s): j /� LCii.[_iJ i� 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes [J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes,ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes--ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes�e_No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeses Io ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes _Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �❑/ NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: � Date of Inspection: ` �S 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes —Ef"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate boxes) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ,[�Pailure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: J� + O o2 5J + 615v 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes /E]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Q-�o ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes _-No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes J&No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 12' *;o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q-�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 8No ❑ NA ❑ NE ate) G ke L�Cc4 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: �k yr �797S' �; Date: �� / J'3 511212020 l 3 `e 6' 23 3b �z a6 i3 FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL- FACILITY 4:40 - .....-�-. ERMIT - DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERlATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - OIC CARD YES OR NO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOILTYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO _ WASTE REPORT (azi) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER / G 7 / 7-3 DATE l NITROGEN LEVEL DATE L(/�/3 NITROGEN LEVEL a r/U 6� ��+.� �., 5 pc • •3 �° �0 0 DATE a" I t %I 3 q NITROGEN LEVEL �2-1a-�1�� - airy 2sr s,�� !•�1 SOIL REPORT (1) - EVERY 3YEARS: - DATE - P-I (N.O MORETHEN 4003 - P H(Noce if 4ar 1..) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN MOO) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) IRR2 (#21) - - Not over PAN CROP TYPES .. FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) !� Not over PAN CROP TYPES - - FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) _ Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) - CALBRIATION (#za) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CAL GRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION Ct ✓'�' FLOW RATES . RAIN FALL #21> -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT . _ -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED. f t / �'/?SLUDGE (#2t a25) ( -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE O: A—, -7 P: Cf o 6RATIO OFSLUDGE �O tF7 O: S • a P: 7 % RATIO OF SLUDGE c Y l ,O�3 O: °i P: T % RATIO OF SLUDGE �J PUVI O: S-u P: 3. D % RATIO OF SLUDGE S 7 110l1 u4 0-1316 OTHER FORMS (#22 AND 921) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDSX _MORTALITY_ *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30t Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31•t Corn: Opens February 156 - Ends June 30m Cotton: Opens March 15 ^- Ends August 1st Rye: Opens September 1� - Ends March 31>t Oats: Opens September 1 �t- Ends April 15w Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 3P Soybeans: Opens April tst- Ends September 15t - Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15* - Ends August 31 st