820729_Routine Inspection_20230725

Type of Visit: OTompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Pdtoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �% . Arrival Time: rJ0 Departure Time: : uo County: �� �Gn Region: I
Farm Name: dvt fi[.( ('Zel n Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1Gj/1/L� j G, Atl nr n �c Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: "� 7�-"
Facility Contact: ( Gcfirrs 4a,41Jtt Title:
Onsite Representative: 97
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
to it k'3,##1 9*%t♦*jsTEk4 §#sax$as beat a
to 4iL4bd8wv a�n.k.S##ardvaxa a �y
s *w4�tudai ikt�#H4 #k#'.4a9 a&U *§#bNex.
A*
st
asYisfrarI.y k#ip 8ba±s4
'#>9g#
0• b1as4
ff
is 6,itul,4§ �9A
0kk4e A6$w
tWoP0104
* 041 AaA�`
y
#�ee#a4
*$%Visit }i
. Y4k itWNrk #k#4'.ipkp :PA§S.i%##$:�Sbg$#
§ Wean to Finish I ILayer I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer_Dairy
*
Calf _
Feeder to Finish S(o� 53i9 „ s g
Farrow to Weanr
He s 'r # Dai Heifer
Di Cow
AI4�§�
Farrow to Feeder r "�il� a e '
EllV
n I ,, ml e.,, a `. Non -Dairy o
',
Farrow to Finish Layers
Beef Stocker
it
Gilts 14 Non -Layers
Beef Feeder'
M Boars Pullets
Beef Brood Cow *
�a#aa Arasamma SM `9Ak4Y §o-a �zA�e gas �A �..mmaa�aae�s Turkeys
R #t H'd ,9:.$6p4A 4tY.Ab frkAlAk@6 A84#Ak$§1 #eA94k y
4a s#f lra a « as is#r#
as..m4xi:Ws�#»t§s nxa anad�ww�A ff4+��x ea �.4aesxaxa A
A§��a9 AY§ffi'ffi§Po r&i§B A;d& 4iM&Wd&W #�9#&§k&#$Y b4
a# rgs 4
k"aas* mo-a$a �q mgl
§aaa Ot Turkey
grefrW;P $9x4iffi64xVivo `iG A�ae # #d88 §&ig"
g�g aR #
'§ipip i'##bddiyE#did$%dddttpndk dd6d&#dg,
IAx a i Other
AN a 46tMkata#wdx � is d� 1041A r...
$§. �. nA
§4 e +
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes _[2'IGo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes _❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ..�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 51I212020 Continued

Facility Number: % Date of Inspection: -
a�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes J2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?: _ k/
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes .01Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[—]Yes Z3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes Q o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes [3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes . /�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): /1GGYwLI 2Ged1 i > `✓f f 65, CngEn..- ` 4
0
13. Soil Type(s):� 162Ia-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ,allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:]Yes -0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable []Yes ID No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑i No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes fj No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? []Yes ENo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - jDate of Inspection: 2S
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 42<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes _[E[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,.E�J`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes '-E:j`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes -❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [—]Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes ,�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4E®Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
6 e&w� �� 65�`
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
[—]Yes _❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _L2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: PIO P3S =92e5—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 71;;Z5_12?
511212020

FACILITY#: 6?—/a15 FARMNAME: L.i6; ' LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (:Ne)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE
CURRENT NUMBER OF
OIC CARD YES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (420)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (a21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE. 10132 NITROGEN LEVEL �•�?
DATE 9/�J ` r� NITROGEN LEVEL 12, �5
DATE�/6/ 3 ll �'�' NITROGEN LEVEL %,
`7
'I'j`�3 �. aD
EVERY 3 YEARS:
P-1 (NO MORETHEN 400)
PH (Note If4or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN MOO)
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
SOIL REPORT (�1)
DATE �711b'I;y
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
IRR2 g2i)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES _
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (a24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION lld�alYJ
- FLOW RATES te
RAIN FALL (2q
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE(uzia2s)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
x
O: 3, (( P: ,6—, 9 % RATIO OF SLUDGE ` 33
Oi P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (n22 AND 921)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES .OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1=t- Ends September 30'
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October `�-Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 3&
Cotton: Opens March 15N - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September in- Ends March 31 �
Oats: Opens September 1 �t- Ends April 15�
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30t
Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September 15�
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31 st