090122_routine_20230711

0 Divishin of Water Resonrces }
Faci>i Number��_
Q D1VL4YOn of Soil and Water Conservation L�
J 2 _ „0 Other�Agency s 6 j{
;
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 Arrival Time: Qq ; Departure Time: County: POICAe i Region:
Farm Name: I d W O C)d Owner Email:
Owner Name: t% Q V I �' / Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: j
Facility Contact: C U.l % PjQ I (, Title: j Cj��;( Phone:
Onsite Representative: w I I e Integrator: Sn tbm
Certified Operator: St-ev-e- f-Q f v ill Certification Number: 1 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Current `
Design
Currenf
�`
a
Design Cu�rr ent
Swine Capacity
Pop
Wet Poultry,
':Capacity
Pop.
Ca,"tile
Capacityop ft
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
=�
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
y p
�,`�
Dairy Heifer
��
°Desigp
Current
a
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
€'
my Pmt lir
, Ca pacitK'l
Pop U,Non-Dairy
`
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Stocker
Farrow to FinishI
Layers
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
°
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
-"
er
Turkey Poultsa
�a
g
Other
.
-
K,
fn .:
un
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated: at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes [�kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: I - a jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: N 0
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): c
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
-Kj�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
^`"� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
�
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Z],No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN.> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidenceof
(Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): I I 1 , R�Z 1 C V ['fJj , W %' +
13. Soil Type(s): �,1 J M) g t/ l d� b(D M, ►-i 10-1I ) 1 V V rf o I K
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWW?
❑ Yes
E] A o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
-.D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
`�
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
,Y
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Trans drs
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes N No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Useof faci�lity��t�go{/be�{t'tter explaVi�na, situa/t'i+ons/(use addMJoin/�afpag6 as'necessary)
ja
IG- fr,00S reed G010hurn p1un4l-�ed 19cip.
bnp, fW4d IS h0av,-4 11U CMb otos,.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes n No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes tNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA 1] NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
mments.
WINfQHJ
CQIlbrafiloN
12.20-22
I P-P, V
waste
S01'I; dup" 2023
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:-7- JI �/-->
511212020