090072_routine_20230712

Type of Visit: 'q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 12. Z7) Arrival Time: : y Q Departure Time: County: Region: F[b
Farm Name: C nk )f-h ft (V f-` Owner Email:
Owner Name: 271PW Pt/l � r V Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CA )IM LC1 rW lW Title: T—f Phone:
Onsite Representative: N Q 1w VI\ Integrator: C'm. fju d
Certified Operator: c; t',ewn P-eff.�00 Certification Number: 100 low
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
iN
es ign CurrentCmarrent�" DesigiaCurreut.
Swine - CaIa'l�ty Pap Wet Poultry
CapGl�1DOjDCat�C li Cai]�aC`Itj' ISip
Wean to Finish Layer
ow
Wean to Feeder of 0, ) _ Non Layer
I iry Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer €'
" Farrow to Wean Des `Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder20 s Dry Point o Ca �'acity', , 1'op Non -Dairy
,,�
Farrow to Finish_, Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts .3
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
a
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
�g•
Beef Brood Cow
'" Q4
U,flAer�
Turkey Poults
TT jig,Other
m . ..f�,
�E [ l
r.: ..
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 0 - 2 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �X 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 'jqNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes jSkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes -E,], No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes CZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes .[ENO
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes bNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 9Mnll d Q- I RU G �k�,vL_,
13. Soil Type(s): I `WO I
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'Eq'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 9�'o
❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes `EjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑ Yes J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes1�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,'check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -Q No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfe s
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes io
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [—]No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: --1 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
11
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑Yes JSNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes"'D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No Fj NA 0 NE
Comments (refee to questton #); Explain any, YES answers and/or any additional �recotncneudations or "-y other comaeients: `
Ilse rawings-f fac ityF to¢betiter explain situatiofs fuse additional pages asanecessary).
fame wo rv. _d on bore mot, fh-eq ame.4 � o
K Ca i 1 b rq t-i-on �,I ud q-e d v-P_ d «rnb
revs -aw d
PP2
wasi-� al Z� a. A.
q. q-ZZ ✓'bl
c 1 2021 V
winfall
Freeboard,/
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /l/�/ An! Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CDate: I ' L 7
Page 3 of 3 511212020