090022_routine_20230711

Type of Visit: (0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: 3: County:
Farm Name: J 1yWr) C Owner Email:
Owner Name: ay a l 1 d form I Cj Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region: FM
Facility Contact: Ckir-H r(,ti) Title: R(� �C,P (y Phone:
Onsite Representative: �J�,��I I -ad Integrator: SM U 11�, JN
Certified Operator: S--triy ik, to -�)m Certification Number: 1 05
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Design . Current '
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop
Wet Poultry :Capacity`"
""Pop
Cattle
Capacity Pop -
-
ry
- -
A
Wean to Finish
ILayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
Dairy Calf:.'
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design ,
Currents
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
'`' .g
IDry Pou try =jCapacity
l'o "'
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
I
,9
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
"
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
=
Other
Turkey Pouets
n
Other
_
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No
—\
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the,structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
ElYesp
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ YeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Ye No
s"R
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 0 H ., Rj e%
13. Soil Type(s): LI NC l �l , RVeW ) got&orc I���
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes _No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -- N
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per. the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes�RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes )qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'Cj-]�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes -[:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes >` J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of —Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check �] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ou t-
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �lo
��
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
ll
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes n No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
PX33.
❑ NA ❑ NE
Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer- question #): M laim any YES answers:and/or any°add tiona! recatnmendat ons. ar any other comments. -77
Use'drawings.of`facility�to better gxplain;'situations (use additional ecessary),
Ntm �5 In thQ ptnucess of cvfiting ho.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �_Uxt J
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020