Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQCS00037_Remission Request (DV-2023-0095)_20230727 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY OF CLEVELAND IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND ) STIPULATION OF FACTS City of Shelby ) Shelby Collection System ) ) PERMIT NO.WQCS00037 ) CASE NO. DV-2023-0095 Having been assessed civil penalties totaling$2.278.16 for violation(s)as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated June 26.2023,the undersigned,desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty,does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above-stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within thirty(30)days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after(30)days from the receipt of the notice of assessment. This the % day of v" (1/ ,20 8-3 iVadi RECEIVED SIGNATURE J U L 2 7 2023 ADDRESS NCDEQIDWRINPDES City of Shelby PO Box 207 Shelby. NC 28151-0207 TELEPHONE 704-484-6801 ATTACHMENT A City of Shelby CASE NUMBER: DV-2023-0095 PERMIT NO: WQCS00037 REGION: Mooresville FACILITY: Shelby Collection System COUNTY: Cleveland Other Violations INCIDENT VIOLATION TOTAL VOLUME PENALTY NUMBER DATE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION DESCRIPTION (GALLONS) AMOUNT 202300756 4/28/2023 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 1,950 $0.00 202300755 4/28/2023 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 30,000 $900.00 202300757 4/28/2023 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 60,000 $1,250.00 JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST Case Number: DV-2023-0095 County: Cleveland Assessed Party: City of Shelby Permit No.: WQCS00037 Amount Assessed: $2.278.16 Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the "Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts"form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors apply. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents,as to why the factor applies(attach additional pages as needed). (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil penalty assessment document); X (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation(i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future occurrences); (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident(i.e., explain why the violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for); (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance). EXPLANATION: The City of Shelby continues to work towards reducing sewer overflows. This recent event was due to significant rain and although it did lead to a sewer overflow, staff were able to follow the trends which led us to check multiple other manholes. The City is actively looking for overflows to allow us to collect the necessary data now that we can make plans to prevent future occurrences. As part of our collection system modeling with HDR, we are able to use the flow monitors to get real-time information. Although this severe rain event led to the listed sewer overflows, it also allowed the engineers to better model the collection system for high rain events. This information will be used as we make decisions on the best use of funds to reduce the likelihood of sewer overflows in the future. The City contends that we were not negligent in our responsibilities as an owner/operator and believe that the State's fine is not justified based upon the City's ongoing collection system modeling in which the primary outcome is to prevent future occurrences. We would like the State to take this into account as we work on a long-term solution to sanitary sewer overflows and overturn this civil penalty.