20181097 Ver 3_As-Built_Report_6.29.23

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612

Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
res.us
June 27, 2023

Mr. Steve Kichefski U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801

Subject: Dogtown (SAW-2017-00608) As-Built Baseline Report Submittal
RES CATAWBA UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
HUC 03050101
Mr. Kichefski:
On behalf of Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), I am pleased to submit the Dogtown Stream Mitigation Project (SAW-2017-00608) As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report. Construction and planting for this project were completed in February 2023. The site was built to design and guidelines with
only minor adjustments.
The proposed tree species were planted on February 25, 2023. There were no changes to the planting plan. Minor monitoring
device location changes were made during as-built installation; however, the quantities remained as proposed in the Final Mitigation Plan.
RES setup cross sections, vegetation plots, and stream monitoring devices in April 2023. Monitoring data of the vegetation indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. The average stem height in the plots was 1.36 feet. Additionally, cross section data closely matches design parameters.
Upon approval of this as-built report, RES is requesting a 15% stream credit release (1,286.954 SMUs). Please see enclosed the credit release timeline and updated credit ledgers.
Thank you for all of your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project progresses. Please contact me at [phone] or [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any additional
information.

Thank you,

Ben Caroll I Project Manager
[e-mail] | 919-209-1077
Project Name:
Sponsor Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWQ Action ID:
Non-Forested
Wetland Credits
Warm
Water
Warm
Water Pres
Cool
Water Non-Riparian Coastal
8,655.818 76.100
8,579.718
Scheduled
Releases
Warm
Water Cold Water WQ SMUs
Scheduled
Releases Non-Riparian Scheduled
Releases Coastal
1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15%1363.060 15% 15%2/15/2021 2/12/2021
2 (Year 0/As-Built)3 15%1286.954 15% 15%8/1/2023
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10%857.972 10%10%
4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10%857.972 10%15%
5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10%857.972 15%20%
6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5%428.986 5%10%
7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10%857.972 15%15%
8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5%428.986 5%
9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10%857.972 10%
Stream Bankfull Standard4 10% 857.972
Total Credits Release to Date 1363.06
Date
Potential Credits from MP minus Preservation
Catawba
03010105
2020
6/23/2023
County:
8-Digit HUC:
Year Project Instituted:
Date Prepared:
Projected
Release Date
Actual Release
Date
Potential Credits from As-Built Survey
Stream Credits
Credit Classification
Non-Forested Wetland
CreditsForested Wetland CreditsStream Credits
Current and Future Credit Releases
Credit Release Milestone
Riparian
Riparian
Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
4 - A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
1 - The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
3 - The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as-built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
Contingencies (if any):
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
Dogtown Mitigation Site
EBX
SAW-2011-00608
DWR # 2018-1097v1
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan
Forested Wetland Credits
Total Potential Credits
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number Date HUC
1 1,363.06 2/12/21
2 386.00 Crescent Communities Westrow Phase 1 SAW-2021-01948 10/27/21 03050101
3 904.00 Trinity Capital Advisors Hambright Industrial SAW-2021-00094 11/15/21 03050101
4 73.00 McDonald Development Company Patterson Road SAW-2018-02209 12/15/21 03050101
Total 1,363.06 1,363.00 0.06 0.0
RES CATAWBA UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT
DOGTOWN STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03050101)
Wednesday, December 15, 2021
Credits Released: Task 1

As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

DOGTOWN STREAM
MITIGATION PROJECT
CATAWBA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-00608 | DWR Project # 2018-1097v2 RES CATAWBA UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
Catawba River Basin, HUC 03050101

Provided by:
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-770-5573
June 2023
Dogtown Stream 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
Table of Contents
1 PROJECT SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 Project Location and Description ........................................................................................... 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Project Success Criteria .......................................................................................................... 3
1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria ............................................................................... 3
1.3.2 Vegetation Success Criteria ............................................................................................ 4
1.4 Project Components ................................................................................................................ 5
1.5 Stream Mitigation Design/Approach ...................................................................................... 5
1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions ................................................................................... 8
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0) .............................................................................. 8
1.7.1 Vegetation....................................................................................................................... 8
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology .................................................................................................. 8
1.7.3 Stream Hydrology .......................................................................................................... 9
2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 9
3 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 10
Appendix A: Background Information
Table 1. Mitigation Assets and Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map

Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2A: Current Conditions Plan View (North)
Figure 2B: Current Conditions Plan View (South) Vegetation Plot Photos Monitoring Device Photos Culvert Photos Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data Table 4: Planted Species Summary Table 5: Main Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 6: Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 8: Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots

Appendix E: As-Built & Record Drawings
Dogtown As-Built Survey
Dogtown Sealed Record Drawings

Dogtown Stream 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
1 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Dogtown Mitigation Site (“the Project”) is located in Catawba County approximately four
miles north of Conover, NC. Water quality stressors currently affecting the Project include
livestock production, agricultural production, impoundments, and lack of riparian buffer. The
Project presents 11,602 linear feet (LF) of stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation,
generating 8,655.818 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) along Bakers Creek and seven unnamed tributaries. The Project is designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream and buffer impacts in the HUC 03050101. Consisting of agricultural fields, cattle pastures and disturbed wooded areas, the Project’s total easement area is approximately 61.04 acres within the overall drainage area of 4,095 acres. The Project consists of two easement areas along Bakers Creek which are separated by water quality improvement project site that is under its own distinct conservation easement. While each site has been developed independently of the other, the abutting easements will result
in greater continuity of protected corridors along the main stem of Bakers Creek.

The aquatic resources associated with the Project have been highly manipulated and degraded
over time due to agriculture and forestry practices. Grazing livestock have historically had
access to all stream reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation, deep-
rooted vegetation, and unstable channel characteristics had contributed to the degradation
of stream banks throughout the Project area.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project’s maximum functional uplift using the
Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives were realized
by the Project. These goals clearly addressed the degraded water quality and nutrient input
from non-point source pollution in the watershed and promote long-term resilience to the
inevitable, spiking population growth that were identified as major watershed stressors in the
2013 Catawba River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) goals. The Project addressed these stressors and supported the RBRP goals. The Project goals were:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner in a stable channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows and connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation;
• Indirectly support the goals of the Catawba RBRP to improve water quality and to
reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
Dogtown Stream 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023

The Project objectives that addressed these goals were:

• Design and reconstruct stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that will maintain a stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and reference reach conditions;
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the project that permanently excludes livestock from stream channels and their associated buffers;
• Add instream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and
pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach
conditions;
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along
the project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treat exotic invasive species;

1.3 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Project follows the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success
criteria components are presented below.
1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue
until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years.

The intermittent stream reach being restored will be monitored to document intermittent or
seasonal surface flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation and the use of
automatic-logging pressure transducers with data loggers (flow gauge). Reaches must
demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow each year.

There should be little change in as-built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for
example down-cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections.
Dogtown Stream 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures.
Longitudinal images should not indicate the development of bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
1.3.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the
Project will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project
will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3,
260 five-year old trees at 7 feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but will not be counted towards the success criteria of total planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success.
Dogtown Stream 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
1.4 Project Components
Through stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation the Project presented 11,602 LF of proposed stream, that generated 8504.333 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units (“SMU”) (Table 1). By incorporating wider buffers, the total adjusted SMUs for the Project amount to 8,655.818 credits of restoration, enhancement, and preservation.
Summary of Mitigation Plan Stream Credits
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Base Warm SMU
Restoration 7,389 1:1 7,389.000
Enhancement II 2,330 2.5:1 932.000
Enhancement III 538 7.5:1 71.733
Enhancement III 355 10:1 35.500
Preservation 761 10:1 76.100
No Credit 229 0 0
Total 11,602 8,504.333
Credit Loss in Required Buffer -663.181
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer +814.666
Total Adjusted SMUs 8,655.818

1.5 Stream Mitigation Design/Approach
The detailed treatment plan and design approach is as follows:
Bakers Creek totals 1,245 linear feet of Enhancement II to address livestock access and buffer
degradation. Enhancement activities included removal of invasive species, livestock exclusion,
and buffer planting to a minimum of 50 feet. A ford was installed in a new location further
upstream.

Reach S1-A totals 1,034 linear feet of Priority I and II Restoration. The restoration began as
Priority II restoration just downstream of the NCDOT Right of Way. A Priority II approach was
chosen in this area to maintain the capacity of the existing 72” CMP. The design shifted the
channel alignment to the right floodplain and transitioned to a Priority I approach as the stream moves down valley. The last 400 feet of restoration transitions bank to a Priority II approach as the design ties back into the existing channel. A minimum 50-foot buffer was be established along the reach and livestock were removed from the site. Reach S1-B totals 538 linear feet of Enhancement III to address livestock access and buffer degradation. Enhancement activities included removal of invasive species, livestock exclusion, and buffer planting to a minimum of 50 feet. A 60-foot wide easement break was included along this reach to accommodate an existing ford crossing that has been rehabilitated as part of the project.

Reach S2-A totals 355 linear feet of Enhancement III. Enhancement activities have included
invasive species treatment, supplemental planting, and buffer protection to a minimum of 100
feet.
Dogtown Stream 6 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023

Reach S2-B totals 921 linear feet of Priority I and II Restoration. After the first 200 feet, this
reach transitions from a Priority II to a Priority I approach for the remainder of the reach that ultimately confluences with S1-A. The channel was shifted from its existing alignment and into the natural valley. The upstream limits of restoration were determined based on severe bank erosion currently threatening several large oak trees, and the presence of a relic channel in the center of the valley. A 90-foot wide easement break was constructed along this reach to accommodate a constructed crossing and an existing overhead utility. Reach S3-A totals 344 linear feet of Enhancement II addressing localized channel instability,
buffer degradation, and livestock impacts. Enhancement activities included installation of
grade control structures, stabilizing the banks, planting the buffer, and excluding cattle. In-
stream structures such as rock sills, brush toes, and constructed riffles were installed for
stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings to a
minimum of 50 feet and livestock exclusion.

Reach S3-B totals 840 linear feet of Priority II Restoration and 154 linear feet of Enhancement
II at the tie-in with Bakers Creek. Restoration begins on this reach just downstream of a large
bedrock outcrop which has prevented the upper portions of the reach from downcutting to
the extents seen in the restoration portion of the reach. Restoration involved shifting the
channel into the right floodplain and excavating a new Priority II floodplain. Restoration stops,
and the channel returns to the existing alignment and profile prior to the Bakers Creek floodway to limit the risk of structure failure on the reach. Enhancement II was adopted along the portion of the reach that ties into Bakers Creek and is within the floodway. Enhancement activities included planting a minimum 50-foot buffer. A 60-foot wide easement break was created along this reach to accommodate a crossing. The crossing was sized to allow the constructed stream to function as designed. Reach DT1-A totals 674 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. The two pond dams located along this reach were breached several months prior to the construction of the restored channel.
The channel was then constructed in the drained pond bottom. During channel construction
any unsuitable material located within the belt width of the channel was removed and replaced
with material from the dam excavation. A 175-foot easement break at the downstream end of
this reach was included to accommodate an existing power easement. No crossings were
constructed within this break.

Reach DT1-B totals 1,201 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. One large pond dam on this
reach was breached during a similar timeframe as the ponds on DT1-A. The channel was then
constructed in the drained pond bottom. During channel construction any unstable material
located within the belt width of the channel were removed and replaced with material from
the dam excavation. The portion of the reach not within the existing pond bottom was shifted
to the right overbank area and a Priority I approach was utilized to tie into DT3. A 60-foot wide easement break was created along this reach to accommodate a crossing. The constructed crossing was sized to allow the stream to function as designed.
Dogtown Stream 7 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023

Reach DT2-A totals 185 linear feet of Restoration and 384 linear feet of Enhancement II. The
design approach for the upstream portion of the reach was to grade a channel through the existing headcut. Due to the steep slopes in this are the constructed channel is straight with significant grade control throughout. This upstream restoration ties to the existing channel near the E/I transition and then restoration begins downstream of the confluence with DT2-B. The downstream portion of restoration involved removing the existing berm, plugging the ditched channel, and building a meandering channel to a confluence with DT1. No crossings were included along this reach, however an easement break for an existing powerline parallels the left bank.

Reach DT2-B totals 103 linear feet of Restoration, and 34 linear feet of Enhancement II. The
design approach for the upstream portion of the reach was to grade a channel through the
existing headcut. Due to the steep slopes in this area the channel are straight with significant
grade control throughout. This upstream restoration ties to the existing channel just upstream
of the confluence with DT2-A. The upstream portion of this reach is located in an existing
power easement. The entire reach including the portion in this power easement were planted
based on the planting outlined in the mitigation plan.

Reach DT3-A totals 761 linear feet of Preservation. Preservation activities included protecting
minimum 100-foot buffers on each bank.
Reach DT3-B totals 1,260 linear feet of Priority I and II Restoration and 169 linear feet of Enhancement II at the tie-in with Bakers Creek. Priority I restoration was utilized for the portion of this reach upstream of its confluence with DT1. The channel was shifted to both the left and right overbanks. A 235-foot-wide easement break was included along this portion of the reach to accommodate a crossing and an existing power easement. The created crossing was sized to allow the stream to function as designed. Downstream of its confluence the reach transitions to a Priority II approach as it ties back into the existing channel. Restoration stops, and the channel returns to the existing alignment and profile prior to the Bakers Creek
floodway to limit the risk of structure failure on the constructed reach. Enhancement II typical
methods were utilized along the portion of the reach that ties into Bakers Creek and is within
the floodway. Enhancement activities included planting a minimum 50-foot buffer and
livestock exclusion.

Reach DT4 totals 1,171 linear feet of Priority II Restoration. A Priority II approach was utilized
on this reach to prevent hydraulic trespass. The designed channel was shifted into the right
overbank and reconnects with the existing channel at its confluence with an existing linear
wetland. Restoration stops, and the channel returns to the existing alignment and profile prior
to the Bakers Creek floodway to limit the risk of structure failure on the reach.

Dogtown Stream 8 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions
Stream construction was completed in February 2023 and planting was also completed in February 2023. The Dogtown Stream Mitigation Site was built to design plans and guidelines except for a few changes. The furthest downstream log vane between stations 13+00 and 14+00 was shifted upstream and a channel plug wasn’t installed to allow for positive drainage from linear wetland. Furthermore, some pools were filled with sediment that was moving
through the system however pools were constructed to design specs. On Reach S1, the log sill
near station 9+00 was replaced with a log J-hook per site engineers recommendations to
further stabilize channel dimensions. Further minor changes occurred throughout
construction of the project, however no significant changes to design occurred. All
construction and design changes can be found inn the record drawings (Appendix E).

No fencing was installed at the Project site. Since the time of the final, approved mitigation
plan, cattle have not been onsite as RES is the property owner. If the property changes hands
then RES will ensure fencing is established under conditions of the transfer.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0)
The Dogtown baseline monitoring activities were performed between January 2023 and April
2023. All baseline monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Project is on
track to meeting vegetation and stream interim success criteria.
1.7.1 Vegetation
Setup and monitoring of 22 fixed vegetation plots and six random vegetation plots was
completed after planting and stream construction on March 8th, 2023. One of the fixed
vegetation plots was placed within the area RES is seeking additional stream credit for wider
buffers in accordance with the alternative monitoring plan and success criteria for that zone.
MY0 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 445 to 769 planted stems per acre
with a mean of 614 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of eight planted species
were documented within the plots. Additional volunteer species were noted at baseline
monitoring and are expected to further establish in upcoming years. The average stem height
in the plots was 1.39 feet. Data from the vegetation monitoring plots is in Appendix C,
associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B. Visual assessment
of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project.
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology
A total of 40 cross sections were installed and geomorphology data collection for MY0 was
conducted on April 20th, 2023. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D.
Overall, the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the design. The as-built
conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for the restoration reach.
The reach was designed as a gravel/cobble channel and remains classified as a gravel/cobble
channel post-construction.
Dogtown Stream 9 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023

Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such
as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
1.7.3 Stream Hydrology
One stage recorder was installed on January 5th and, 2023, to document bankfull events along
S3-B. Three additional stage recorders were installed on March 8th 2023 along DT1B, DT3B,
and DT4.

One flow gauge was installed on June 16th, 2023, on DT2A to document presence and
persistence of stream flow in the intermittent channel.

Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in
the appendices. The gauge locations can be found on Figure 2A and Figure 2B while
associated photos are in Appendix B.
2 METHODS
Stream cross section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-
dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83
State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 44 cross-sections. Survey
data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and
analysis.

The stage recorders and flow gauges documenting stream hydrology include an automatic
pressure transducer placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank
at each stage recorder are used to detect bankfull events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 22 fixed monitoring plots and six random monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year. The random plot data are collected in locations where there are no permanent vegetation plots. Random plots are typically collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with variable dimensions. Tree species and height are recorded for each
planted stem and the transects are mapped, and new locations will be monitored in
subsequent years.

Dogtown Stream 10 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site June 2023
3 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat,
T.F.MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina, (color Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs):
Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000).

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274 Resource Environmental Solutions (2019). Dogtown Final Mitigation Plan. Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT).

Appendix A
Background Tables

Project Segment
Existing
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Acreage
Migitation Category Restoration Level Priority Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Plan Credits
As-Built
Footage or
Acreage
Bakers Creek 1245 1245 Warm Enhancement II ‐2.5 498.000 1245
S1‐A 1034 1034 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 1034.000 1034
S1‐B 538 538 Warm Enhancement III ‐7.5 71.733 538
S2‐A 355 355 Warm Enhancement III (10)‐10.0 35.500 355
721 721 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 721.000 721
151 200 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 200.000 200
S3‐A 344 344 Warm Enhancement II ‐2.5 137.600 344
573 634 Warm Restoration 2 1.0 634.000 634
190 206 Warm Restoration 2 1.0 206.000 206
153 154 Warm Enhancement II ‐2.5 61.600 154
575 635 Warm Restoration 1 1.0 635.000 635
51 39 Warm Restoration 1 1.0 39.000 39
902 958 Warm Restoration 2 1.0 958.000 958
228 243 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 243.000 243
384 384 Warm Enhancement II ‐2.5 153.600 384
196 196 Warm Restoration ‐1.0 185.000 185
101 ‐Warm Restoration 103 0.0 103.000 103
34 ‐Warm Enhancement II 34 0.0 13.600 34
DT3‐A 761 761 Warm Preservation ‐10.0 76.100 761
852 842 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 842.000 842
354 418 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 418.000 418
169 169 Warm Enhancement II ‐5.0 67.600 169
DT4 1053 1171 Warm Restoration 1&2 1.0 1171.000 1171
No Credit 229 229 Warm N/A ‐‐0.000 229
Total 11193 11602 8504.333 11,602
S2‐B
Table 1. Dogtown Mitigation Bank ‐ Mitigation Assets and Components
Comments
An enhancement level II approach to address channel entrenchment and buffer impacts. 
A mix of inline and offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
An enhancement III approach. Protecting the buffer, Livestock exclusion, Fence removal, Invasive vegetation treatment,
DT3‐B
DT1‐B
DT1‐A
S3‐B
DT2‐A
DT2‐B
An enhancement level II approach to address headcuts, channel entrenchment and buffer impacts. 
An enhancement III approach. Protecting the buffer, Livestock exclusion, Fence removal, Invasive vegetation treatment,
A mix of inline and offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
A mix of inline and offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
An enhancement level II approach to address channel entrenchment and buffer impacts. 
Offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
Offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
An enhancement level II approach to address channel entrenchment and buffer impacts. 
Inline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and removal of pond dam.
Inline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and removal of pond dam.
A mix of inline and offline restoration downstream of removed pond dam to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment and tie into DT3
A mix of inline and offline restoration downstream of removed pond dam to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment and tie into DT3
An enhancement level II approach to address channel entrenchment and buffer impacts. 
Offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
Not for Credit
Inline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, steep grade, and removal of head cut.
Inline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and removal of head cut.
An enhancement approach via drop structures reducing grade. 
A preservation approach. Protecting buffers on either side of the bank and removing fencing.
A mix of inline and offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
A mix of inline and offline restoration to address eroding banks, channel entrenchment, and buffer impacts
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 3 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 3 months
Number of reporting Years1:0
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery
Restoration Plan NA Dec-20
Final Design – Construction Plans NA Jan-22
Stream Construction NA Feb-23
Initial bare root and live stake plantings NA Feb-23
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)Cross sections April-23
Veg plots March-23 Jun-23
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
DogtownMitigation Project
Designer RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC Frasier Mullen
Construction Contractor Baker Grading & Landscaping, Inc. / 1000 Bat Cave Road, Old
Fort, NC 28762
Construction contractor POC Paul Dunn
Survey Contractor Ascension - Land Surveying / Mocksville, NC
Survey contractor POC Chris Cole, PLS
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats
Planting contractor POC Will Skinner
Seeding Contractor Baker Grading & Landscaping, Inc. / 1000 Bat Cave Road, Old
Fort, NC 28762
Contractor point of contact Paul Dunn
Seed Mix Sources Green Resources
Nursery Stock Suppliers Shenandoah Habitats
Monitoring Performers RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Drive, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Monitoring POC Daniel Dixon (864.567.7761)
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Dogtown Mitigation Project
0 10.5
Miles
Dogtown Site Location Map
Dogtown Mitigation Site
Catawba C ounty, North Carolina
Legend
Proposed Easement
©Date: 6/21/2023
Drawn by: DGD
Checked by: RTM
Document Path: R:\Resgis\entgis\Projects\100148_Dogtown_Bank\MXD\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY0\Dogtown Site Figure.mxd
1 inch = 5,000 feet
Dogtown Mitgation Site

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

!>
!R
S1-B
S2-A
S3-B
S1-A
S3-A
S2-B
9
3
8
7
2
5
4
3
2 1
1
6
12
5
11
9
6
18
4
16
1
15
7
13
8
3
2
10
14
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
©
Figure 2A - CCPVDogtown Nor th
DogtownMitigation Project
Catawba County,North Carolina
Date: 6/22/2023 Drawn by: DGD
Document Path: R:\Resgis\entgis\Projects\100148_Dogtown_Bank\MXD\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY0\Layout_USACE_MY0-_Dogtown_Bank_CCPV_1.mxd
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world
1:3,000
0 400200
Feet
Legend
Dogtown Easement
Cross Sections
Vegetation Plots MY0
Fixed Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot
Structures
Stream Approaches
Restoration
Enhancement II
Enhancement III (10)
Enhancement III (7.5
Preser vation
Gauges
!. Flow Gauge
!R Ambient
!>Stage Recorder
Checked by: RTM
!>
!>
!>
!.
DT3-B
DT2
DT1-B
BakersCreek
DT2-B
DT2
DT2-A
DT4
DT1-ADT1-A
DT3-A
DT3-B
12 13
14
15
22
21
20
19
11
10
18
17
16
5
6
4
27
28
30
32
35 37
36
40
43
38
22
24
33
41
19
20
34
21
44
39
42
23
31
25
26
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
©
Figure 2B - CCPVDogtown South
DogtownMitigation Project
Catawba County,North Carolina
Date: 6/22/2023 Drawn by: DGD
Document Path: R:\Resgis\entgis\Projects\100148_Dogtown_Bank\MXD\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY0\Layout_USACE_MY0-_Dogtown_Bank_CCPV_1.mxd
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world
1:3,000
0 400200
Feet
Legend
Dogtown Easement
Cross Sections
Vegetation Plots MY0
Fixed Vegetation Plot
Random Vegetation Plot
Structures
Stream Approaches
Restoration
Enhancement II
Enhancement III (10)
Enhancement III (7.5
Preser vation
Gauges
!. Flow Gauge
!R Ambient
!>Stage Recorder
Checked by: RTM
Dogtown MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 (3/9/2023) Vegetation Plot 2 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 3 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 4 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 5 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 6 (03/09/2023)

Vegetation Plot 7 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 8 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 9 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 10 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 11 (03/09/2023)

Vegetation Plot 12 (03/09/2023)

Vegetation Plot 13 (Restored Pond Footprint) (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 14 (Restored Pond Footprint) (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 15 (Restored Pond Footprint) (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 16 (03/09/2023)

Vegetation Plot 17 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 18 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 19 (03/09/2023) Vegetation Plot 20 (03/09/2023)
Vegetation Plot 21 (03/10/2023) Vegetation Plot 22 (03/10/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 1 (03/10/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 2 (03/10/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (03/10/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 4 (03/10/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 5 (03/10/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 6 (03/10/2023)
Dogtown Monitoring Device Photos

DT3B Stage Recorder (03/08/2023)
DT2A Flow Gauge (06/16/2023)
DT1B Stage Recorder (03/08/2023) DT4 Stage Recorder (03/08/2023)

S1A Stage Recorder (01/07/2023)

Dogtown Culvert Photos
S2-B Culvert (US) (4/12/2023) S2-B Culvert (DS) (4/12/2023)
S3-B Culvert (US) (4/12/2023) S3-B Culvert (DS) (4/12/2023)
DT3-B Culvert (US) (3/07/2023) DT3-B Culvert (DS) (3/07/2023)
DT1-B Culvert (US) (3/07/2023) DT1-B Culvert (DS) (3/07/2023)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 4. Planted Species Summary

Common Name Scientific Quantity Planted % Composition
River Birch Betula nigra 3900 15
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 2600 10
Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 2600 10
American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 3900 15
Swamp Chestnut
Oak Quercus michauxii 2600 10
Water Oak Quercus nigra 3900 15
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 3900 15
Northern red Oak Quercus rubra 2600 10

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot # Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1 567 0 567 Yes 1.5
2 567 0 567 Yes 1.6
3 688 0 688 Yes 1.4
4 647 0 647 Yes 1.5
5 607 0 607 Yes 1.6
6 688 0 688 Yes 1.2
7 445 0 445 Yes 1.5
8 769 0 769 Yes 1.3
9 769 0 769 Yes 1.4
10 647 0 647 Yes 1.4
11 728 0 728 Yes 1.5
12 769 0 769 Yes 1.3
13 688 0 688 Yes 1.4
14 567 0 567 Yes 1.2
15 526 0 526 Yes 1.0
16 567 0 567 Yes 1.5
17 769 0 769 Yes 1.5
18 688 0 688 Yes 1.5
19 567 0 567 Yes 1.3
20 607 0 607 Yes 1.4
21 647 0 647 Yes 1.0
22 486 0 486 Yes 1.5
R1 445 0 445 Yes 1.6
R2 607 0 607 Yes 1.6
R3 567 0 567 Yes 1.3
R4 567 0 567 Yes 1.6
R5 445 0 445 Yes 1.7
R6 567 0 567 Yes 1.4
Project
Avg 614 0 614 Yes 1.4

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Current Plot Data (MY0 2023)
Scientific Name
Common
Name
Speci
es
Type
100148-01-
0001
100148-01-
0002
100148-01-
0003
100148-01-
0004
100148-01-
0005
100148-01-
0006
100148-01-
0007
100148-01-
0008
100148-01-
0009
100148-01-
0010
100148-01-
0011
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 5 5 5
Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
Liriodendron
tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
Platanus
occidentalis
American
sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5
Quercus
michauxii
swamp
chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 8 8 8 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercus rubra
northern red
oak Tree 6 6 6 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stem count 14 14 14 14 14 14 17 17 17 16 16 16 15 15 15 17 17 17 11 11 11 19 19 19 19 19 19 16 16 16 18 18 18
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 567
56
7
56
7 567
56
7
56
7 688
68
8
68
8 647
64
7
64
7 607
60
7
60
7 688
68
8
68
8 445
44
5
44
5 769
76
9
76
9 769
76
9
76
9 647
64
7
64
7 728
72
8
72
8

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Current Plot Data (MY0 2023)
Scientific Name
Common
Name
Speci
es
Type
100148-01-
0012
100148-01-
0013
100148-01-
0014
100148-01-
0015
100148-01-
0016
100148-01-
0017
100148-01-
0018
100148-01-
0019
100148-01-
0020
100148-01-
0021
100148-01-
0022
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Pno
LS
P-
all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 7 7 7
Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Liriodendron
tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Platanus
occidentalis
American
sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
Quercus
michauxii
swamp
chestnut oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercus rubra
northern red
oak Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1
Stem count 19 19 19 17 17 17 14 14 14 13 13 13 14 14 14 19 19 19 17 17 17 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 12 12 12
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 4 4 4
Stems per ACRE 769
76
9
76
9 688
68
8
68
8 567
56
7
56
7 526
52
6
52
6 567
56
7
56
7 769
76
9
76
9 688
68
8
68
8 567
56
7
56
7 607
60
7
60
7 647
64
7
64
7 486
48
6
48
6

Current Plot Data (MY0 2023) Annual Means
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 MY0 (2023)
PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T PnoLS
P-
all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 86 86 86
Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 25 25
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 35 35 35
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 54 54 54
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 51 51 51
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 55 55 55
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 58 58 58
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 5 5 5 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 61 61 61
Stem count 11 11 11 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 11 11 11 14 14 14 425 425 425
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 28
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.69
Species count 5 5 5 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8
Stems per ACRE 445 445 445 607 607 607 567 567 567 567 567 567 445 445 445 567 567 567 614 614 614

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.8 2
13.6 13.4 18.2 4
Floodprone Width (ft) 10.8 10.9 10.9 10.9 2
>30 >50 >50 4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.6 2
1.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2
1.8 1.7 2.1 4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)11.7 12.5 12.5 13.2 2
18.3 14.0 19.3 4
Width/Depth Ratio 5.4 6.0 6.0 6.6 2
10.1 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 2
>2.2 3.5 3.8 4
Bank Height Ratio 2.9 3.5 3.5 4.0 2
1.0 1.0 1.0 4
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
S1A
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
G4c E4 E4
N/A 1.16 1.16
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)6.4 1 7.4
7.4 7.5 2
Floodprone Width (ft)13.6 1 >17
41.6 48.0 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 1 0.8 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.4 1 1.0
0.9 1.0 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.9 1 5.9
7.4 7.5 2
Width/Depth Ratio 6.9 1 9.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 2.1 1 >2.2
5 6.3 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.3 1 1.0
1 1.0 2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.13 1.12 1.12
E4 E4 E4
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
S2B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)8.6 1 ‐‐‐11.3 1
Floodprone Width (ft)13.1 1 ‐‐‐19.9 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.0 1 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.2 1 ‐‐‐1.8 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.6 1 ‐‐‐12.0 1
Width/Depth Ratio 8.0 1 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1 ‐‐‐1.8 1
Bank Height Ratio 2.6 1 ‐‐‐1.0 1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.16 1.16 1.16
G4c G4c G4c
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
S3A
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)10.3 1 8.3
9.0 9.7 3
Floodprone Width (ft)40.0 1 >19
48.2 49.6 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 1 0.9 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.3 1 1.2
1.1 1.2 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.6 1 7.4
6.5 10.4 3
Width/Depth Ratio 11.1 1 9.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 3.9 1 >2.2
5.0 5.5 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.6 1 1.0
1.0 1.0 3
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.15 1.07 1.07
G4c C5 C5
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
S3B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)5.6 5.9
1
Floodprone Width (ft)>13 36.0
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 0.7
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.4 2.1
1
Width/Depth Ratio 9.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 6.1
1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.15 1.15
E4 E4
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
DT1A
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)4.8 1 7.0
7.0 8.9 3
Floodprone Width (ft)22.0 1 >16
36.0 44.0 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.4 1 0.8 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.2 1 1.0
1.1 1.3 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.9 1 5.3
5.1 5.9 3
Width/Depth Ratio 3.4 1 9.2 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 4.5 1 >2.2
4.0 6.3 3
Bank Height Ratio 2.2 1 1.0
1.0 1.0 3
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.17 1.07 1.07
E5 C5 C5
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
DT1B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)21.7 1 6.1
1
Floodprone Width (ft)24.3 1 40.2
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.2 1 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.5 1 1.1
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)4.0 1 2.7
1
Width/Depth Ratio 116.4 1 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 1 6.6
1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1 1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.15 1.15
B5 B5
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
DT2
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)14.8 1
11.6 12.6 12 12.7 2
Floodprone Width (ft)45.0 1
>19 >28 48 49.7 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.1 1
1.2 1.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.7 1
1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)16.2 1
13.8 15.8 12.7 13.1 2
Width/Depth Ratio 13.4 1
9.8 10.0 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 3.0 1
>2.2 >2.2 3.8 4.2 2
Bank Height Ratio 3.4 1
1 1.0 1 1.0 2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.24 1.09‐1.19 1.09‐1.19
C4 E4 E4
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
DT3B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)12.4 1 8.3
9.6 11.0 4
Floodprone Width (ft)22.2 1 >19
42.9 >50 4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 1 0.9 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 1 1.2
1.1 1.4 4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.0 1 7.4
6.6 8.5 4
Width/Depth Ratio 19.2 1 9.3 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Entrenchment Ratio 1.8 1 >2.2
4.4 5.3 4
Bank Height Ratio 4.6 1 1.0
1 1.0 4
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.11 1.16 1..16
C4 E4 E4
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
DT4
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 884.1 884.2 880.8 880.8 897.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1 14.9 13.4 14.4 18.2 8.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ->50>50--
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 884.10 884.2 880.8 880.8 897.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 14.0 17.3 16.7 19.3 5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -3.83.5--
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -1.01.0--
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 897.6 893.7 839.4 884.3 884.0
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.4 8.6 7.5 7.5 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 41.6 - 48 49.4 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.1 2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 897.6 893.7 893.4 884.3 884.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 4.5 7.3 5.0 5.7 8.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.0 - 6.3 6.6 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 886.2 886.0 882.2 881.8 878.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1 11.3 9.0 9.9 9.2 9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 19.9 - - 48.2 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.2 2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 886.19 886.0 882.2 881.8 878.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 12.0 10.7 10.4 7.5 10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 1.8 - - 5.2 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 - - 1.0 -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 878.8 874.5 874.0 877.6 877.3
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.0 9.7 10.4 12.7 15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.6 48.7 - 48.0 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1 1.2 2.4 1.7 3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 878.78 874.5 874.0 877.6 877.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 6.5 7.1 11.7 13.1 23.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.5 5.0 - 3.8 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 1.0 - 1.0 -
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Cross Section 15 (Pool)
Cross Section 16 (Riffle)
Cross Section 11 (Riffle) Cross Section 12 (Pool) Cross Section 13 (Pool) Cross Section 14 (Riffle)
Cross Section 17 (Riffle) Cross Section 18 (Pool) Cross Section 19 (Riffle) Cross Section 20 (Pool)
Cross Section 6 (Riffle) Cross Section 7 (Pool) Cross Section 8 (Riffle) Cross Section 9 (Riffle) Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Appendix D. Table 8 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Dogtown
Cross Section 1 (Pool) Cross Section 2 (Riffle) Cross Section 3 (Riffle) Cross Section 4 (Pool) Cross Section 5 (Pool)
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 873.9 873.7 866.3 865.3 917.4
Bankfull Width (ft)1 13.6 12.0 13.3 17.0 5.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 - 49.7 >50 - 36
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4 1.7 1.7 3.2 0.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 873.93 873.7 866.3 865.3 917.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 20.2 12.7 14.2 27.6 2.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 - 4.2 3.8 - 6.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.0
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 917.2 907.1 905.7 898.2 898.7
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.7 5.0 4.6 6.1 8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 - 13.3 23 40.2 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1 0.5 0.5 1.1 1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 917.2 907.1 905.7 898.2 898.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 3.9 1.7 1.6 2.7 6.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 - 2.7 4.9 6.6 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 892.3 892.0 886.4 885.5 876.1
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.6 8.9 7.2 9.0 7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 - 36.0 45 - 44
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8 1.1 1.3 2.2 1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 892.31 892.0 886.4 885.5 876.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 9.0 5.9 6.2 10.4 5.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 - 4.0 6.3 - 6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.0
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 876.2 872.3 872.4 869.5 869.5
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.6 9.7 10.7 12.7 11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 - 42.9 - - >49.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3 1.1 2.2 2.1 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 876.18 872.3 872.4 869.5 869.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 11.1 6.6 11.2 10.3 8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -4.4--4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -1.0--1.0
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 868.1 868.1 865.3 865.1
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.2 9.6 9.5 9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ->50>49-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.1 1.3 1.4 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 868.07 868.1 865.3 865.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.9 8.5 8.4 9.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -5.35.3-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -1.01.0-
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Cross Section 35 (Riffle)
Cross Section 36 (Pool) Cross Section 37 (Riffle) Cross Section 38 (Pool) Cross Section 39 (Pool) Cross Section 40 (Riffle)
Cross Section 31 (Pool) Cross Section 32 (Riffle) Cross Section 33 (Riffle) Cross Section 34 (Pool)
Cross Section 41 (Pool) Cross Section 42 (Riffle) Cross Section 43 (Riffle) Cross Section 44 (Pool)
Cross Section 30 (Pool)
Appendix D. Table 8 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Dogtown
Cross Section 21 (Pool) Cross Section 22 (Riffle) Cross Section 23 (Riffle) Cross Section 24 (Pool) Cross Section 25 (Riffle)
Cross Section 26 (Pool) Cross Section 27 (Riffle) Cross Section 28 (Riffle) Cross Section 29 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S1A - Cross Section 1 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 884.10
Bankfull Width (ft)1 14.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 884.10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 14.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S1A - Cross Section 2 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 884.16
Bankfull Width (ft)1 13.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 884.16
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 17.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S1A - Cross Section 3 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 880.82
Bankfull Width (ft)1 14.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 880.82
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 16.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S1A - Cross Section 4 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 880.79
Bankfull Width (ft)1 18.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 880.79
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 19.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 5 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 897.85
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 897.85
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 6 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 897.64
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 41.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 897.60
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 7 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 893.69
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 893.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 8 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 839.39
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 48
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 893.39
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 9 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 884.32
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 884.30
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S2B - Cross Section 10 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 883.98
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 883.98
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 8.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3A - Cross Section 11 -Riffle - Enhancement II
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA 1 886.19
Bankfull Width (ft)1 11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1 19.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 886.19
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 1.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 12 -Pool - Enhancement II
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 886.00
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 886.00
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 13 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 882.17
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 882.20
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 14 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 881.84
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 48.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 881.80
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 7.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 14 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 15 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 878.86
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 878.90
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 15 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 16 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 878.78
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 878.78
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 6.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 16 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 17 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 874.46
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 48.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 874.50
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 7.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 17 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -Reach S3B - Cross Section 18 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 874.01
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 874.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 11.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 19 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 877.58
Bankfull Width (ft)1 12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 48
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 877.58
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 13.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 19 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 20 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 877.32
Bankfull Width (ft)1 15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 877.30
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 23.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 20 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 21 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 873.93
Bankfull Width (ft)1 13.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 873.93
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 20.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 22 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 873.74
Bankfull Width (ft)1 12.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 873.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 12.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 4.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 22 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 23 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 866.29
Bankfull Width (ft)1 13.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 866.29
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 14.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 23 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT3-B - Cross Section 24 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 865.29
Bankfull Width (ft)1 17.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 865.29
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 27.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 24 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-A - Cross Section 25 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 917.36
Bankfull Width (ft)1 5.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 35.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 917.40
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 2.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 25 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-A - Cross Section 26 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 917.19
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 917.19
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 3.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 26 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
906
907
908
909
910
911
036912151821242730333639
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT2-A - Cross Section 27 -Riffle - Enhancement II
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 907.10
Bankfull Width (ft)1 5.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 13.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 907.10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 1.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 27 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
905
906
907
908
909
910
036912151821242730333639
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT2-A - Cross Section 28 -Riffle - Enhancement iI
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 905.72
Bankfull Width (ft)1 4.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 23
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 905.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 1.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 4.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 28 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT2-A - Cross Section 29 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 898.15
Bankfull Width (ft)1 6.1
Floodprone Width (ft)1 40
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 898.20
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 2.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 29 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT2-A - Cross Section 30 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 898.66
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 898.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 6.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 30 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B - Cross Section 31 -Pool - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 892.31
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 892.31
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 9.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -
Cross Section 31 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B - Cross Section 32 -Riffle - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 892.02
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 36.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 892.02
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 32 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B Cross Section 33 -Riffle - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 886.44
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 45.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 886.44
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 6.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 33 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B - Cross Section 34 -Pool - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 885.50
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 885.50
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 34 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B - Cross Section 35 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 876.12
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 43.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 876.10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 35 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown DT1-B Cross Section 36 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 876.18
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 876.18
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 11.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 36 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 37 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 872.32
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 42.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 872.32
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 6.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 4.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 37 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 38 - Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 872.35
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 872.40
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 11.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 38 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 39 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 869.52
Bankfull Width (ft)1 12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 869.50
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 39 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
0 3 6 9 12151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 40 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 869.46
Bankfull Width (ft)1 11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >49.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 869.50
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 8.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 40 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 41 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 868.07
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 868.07
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 10.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 41 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 42 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 868.07
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 868.07
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 5.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 42 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 43 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 865.27
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >49
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 865.27
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 8.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 5.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0
Cross Section 43 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
036912151821242730333639424548
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Dogtown -DT4 - Cross Section 44 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 865.13
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 865.10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 9.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 -
Cross Section 44 (Pool)
Appendix E
As-Built Survey and Sealed Record Drawings
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LCEL
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LCELCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE LCE LCE
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
T
BTBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTBTB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
PROJECT LOCATION
USACE ACTION ID #:SAW-2017-00608
SITE MAP
NTS
REACH S2REACH S1
REACH S3
REACH DT4
REACH DT2
REACH DT3
REACH DT1
AS-BUILT TOPOGRAPHY AND PLANIMETRICS SURVEY
WAS PROVIDED BY ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC
(NC FIRM LICENSE NUMBER C-4288, CHRISTOPHER L.
COLE, NC PLS L-5008), DATED JUNE 27, 2023.
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY WAS
SUPPLEMENTED WITH NOAA LIDAR DATA.
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SURVEYED BY:
ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC
116 WILLIAMS ROAD
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
PROJECT DIRECTORY
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
VICINITY MAP
NTS
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental LLC
License: F-1428
DOGTOWN STREAM MITIGATION SITE
CATAWBA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CATAWBA RIVER BASIN: HUC 03050101
JUNE 2023
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
----
100148
----
BRC
TRS
AFM
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number Sheet Title
--COVER
S1 REACH DT1
S2 REACH DT1
S3 REACH DT1
S4 REACH DT1
S5 REACH DT2
S6 REACH DT2-B
S7 REACH DT3
S8 REACH DT3
S9 REACH DT3
10 REACH DT3
S11 REACH DT4
S12 REACH DT4
S13 REACH DT4
S14 REACH S1
S15 REACH S1
S16 REACH S1
S17 REACH S2
S18 REACH S2
S19 REACH S3
S20 REACH S3
S21 REACH S3
S22 REACH S3
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE
LCE
LCE
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
B
B
B
B
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TBTB
TB
T
B
920
925
930
916
917
918
919
921922923
924
926
927928929
9319
3
2
9
3
3
9
3
4
925
930
926
927
928
929
931
912
913
914
905
910
910
907
915
920
920
925
930
915
910
0
+
0
0
1+0
0
2
+
0
0
3
+
0
0
4+00
5+00
6
+
0
0
7+0
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S2
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
905
910
915
920
925
905
910
915
920
925
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S1
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT1
VP12
VP13
XS 25/26 RP
XS 25 LP
XS 26 LP
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBBBB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BBBB
BB
B
B
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TBTB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
T
BTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTBTB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
T
B
TB
TBTB
TB
T
B
910
908
909
911
912
913
914
910
907
908909
8
9
5
891892893894
89
6
897
898
899
910
907
908
909
890
895
900
900
89
8
901
905
910
907
905
5+00
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+
0
0
10+
0
0
11+00 12+
0
0
13+
0
0
S1
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S
3
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
885
890
895
900
905
885
890
895
900
905
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S2
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT1
VP14
XS 31 LP XS 32 LP
XS 31 RP XS 32 RP
XS 29 LP
XS 29 RP
XS 30 RP
XS 30 LP
REACH DT2
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCELCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBB
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
B
B
BB
BBB
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TBT
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
BTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
8
9
5
891892893894
8
9
6
89
7
8
9
8
8
9
9
910
906
907908909
890
895
891
892
893
894
896
89
7
88
0
88
5
88
1
88
2
88
3
884
886
88
7
88
8
880
885
88
0
88
5 88
3
888
8
8
5
881
890
895
900
11+00
12+00
13+0
0
14+0
0
15+00
16+
0
0
17+
0
0
18+
0
0
19+00
S2
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
8
+
0
0
S
4
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
875
880
885
890
895
875
880
885
890
895
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S3
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT1 VP15
XS 33/34 RP
XS 33 LP
XS 34 LP
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
BB BB
BB
BB BB
BB B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BBBB
BBBBBB
BB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TBTB
TB
TBTB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
890
895
891
892
893
8
9
4
89
6
8
9
7
880
885
87
887988188288
3884
88688788
8
875
8
7
1
8
7
2
87
3
874
87
6
8
7
2
8
7
3
8
7
4
866
867
86
8
87
0
8
7
0
87
0
874880
885
880
17+00
18+0
0
19
+
0
0
20+
0
0
21+00 22+00
2
2
+
5
1
S
3
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
8
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
860
865
870
875
880
860
865
870
875
880
18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S4
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT1
VP18
XS 35/36 LP
XS 35 RP XS 36 RP
REACH DT3
XS 23 RP
XS 24 RP
XS 23 LP
XS 24 LP
57" x 38" CMPA
INV IN = 872.8' 872.91'
INV OUT = 872.3' 872.86'
57" x 38" CMPA
INV IN = 872.8' 872.91'
INV OUT = 872.3' 872.86'
LC
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
915
920
916
917
918
919
921
922
923
924
920
925
930
917918919921922923924
92692792892
9
931932933
9
2
5
9
3
0
93
5
9
2
3
9
2
4
92
6
9
2
7
9
2
8
9
2
9
9
3
1
9
3
2
9
3
3
9
3
4
93
6
93
7
93
8
920
925
916
917
918919
921
922
923
924
926
927
928
929
9
1
0
9
0
8
9
0
9
9
1
1
9
1
2
9
1
3
91
4
9
1
0
9
0
7
9
0
8
9
0
9
9
0
0
898
9
0
1
9
0
5
6
+
4
1
0+0
0
1+
0
0
2+00
3
+
0
0
4+
0
0
5
+
0
0
6
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
915
920
925
930
935
915
920
925
930
935
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
895
900
905
910
915
895
900
905
910
915
4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S5
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
2
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT2-A
XS 27 LP
XS 27 RP
XS 29 LP
XS 30 RP
REACH DT2-B
REACH DT1
XS 28 LP
XS 28 RP
XS 30 LP
XS 29 RP
0
+
0
0
1+00
2+00
3+003+06
LCE
LC
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB BB BB
B
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTBTB
TBTB
915
92
0
9
2
5
93
0
93
5
9
4
0
94
5
91
6917918919
92
192
292
3
9
2
4
92
6
92
7
92
8
92
9
93
1
93
2
93
3
93
4
93
6
9
3
7
9
3
8
93
9
9
4
1
9
4
2
9
4
3
9
4
4
94
6
92
0
9
2
5
9
3
0
9
3
5
9
4
0
9
4
5
91
7
91
8
91
9
92
1
92
2
92
3
92
4
9
2
6
9
2
7
9
2
8
9
2
9
9
3
1
9
3
2
9
3
3
9
3
4
9
3
6
9
3
7
9
3
8
9
3
9
9
4
1
9
4
2
9
4
3
9
4
4
9
4
6
9
4
7
9
4
8
949
92
5
930
92
3
92
4
9
2
6
927
928
929
931
932
92
0
92
5
91
6
91
7
91
8
91
9
92
1
92
2
92
3
924
92
6
92
7
92
8
92
9
91
0
90
8
909
91
1
912
91
3
9
1
4
945
940 935 930 925
940
935 930
925
92
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=6'
910
920
930
940
950
910
920
930
940
950
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S6
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
2
-
B
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT2-B
XS 27 LP
XS 27 RP
REACH DT2-A
XS 28 LP
XS 28 RP
0+
0
0
1+00
2
+
0
0
3
+
0
0
4+00
5
+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7+00
8+0
0
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
BB
TB
TB
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S8
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
-10
-5
0
5
10
-10
-5
0
5
10
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S7
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
REACH DT3
5
+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+00
8+00
9+00
10+0
0
11+00
12+00
13
+
0
0
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BBBB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
8
8
0
876
877
878
8
7
9
8
8
1
880
88
1
880
876
877
878
879
881
882
877
880
879
879
S
7
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S9
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
865
870
875
880
885
865
870
875
880
885
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S8
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT3-B
XS 19 LP
XS 19 RP
XS 20 LP
XS 20 RP
VP16
11+
0
0
12+0
0
13+00
14+
0
0
15+00
1
6
+
0
0
17+
0
0
18+00
19+
0
0
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BBBB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB TB
T
B
TB
TB TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
875
873
874
876
875
875
876
87
6
87
7
87
8
880
876
877
878879
881882
875
875
87
5
875
877
8
7
4
873
S
8
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
8
+
0
0
S1
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
865
870
875
880
885
865
870
875
880
885
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S9
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT3-B
XS 21 LP
XS 21 RP
XS 22 LP
XS 22 RP
VP17
17+00
1
8
+
0
0
19+00
20+00
21+00
22+00
2
3
+
0
0
24+
0
0
24+
3
5
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
TB
TB
8
7
8
8
7
5
871
872
87
3
8
7
4
8
7
6
872
873
874
8
6
6
86
7
86
8
873
870
870
8
7
0
875
875
873
8
7
4
S9
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
8
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
855
860
865
870
875
855
860
865
870
875
18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S10
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT1
XS 23 LP
XS 23 RP
XS 24 LP
XS 24 RP
VP18
REACH DT3
64" x 43" CMPA
INV IN = 869.3' 869.28'
INV OUT = 869.1' 869.25'
64" x 43" CMPA
INV IN = 869.3' 869.28'
INV OUT = 869.1' 869.25'
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BBBBBB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB T
B
TB T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB TB
88
0
8
7
8
879
881
8
7
2
8
7
3
8
7
4
871
872
873
8
7
5
8
7
3
8
7
4
8
7
6
87
5
8
8
0
875
8
7
5
872
880
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+00 3+
0
0
4
+
0
0
5+0
0
6+00
7
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S
1
2
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
865
870
875
880
885
865
870
875
880
885
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S11
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
4
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
XS 37 RP
XS 37/38 LP
XS 38 RP
VP19
REACH DT4
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BBB
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
BBB
B
B
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
87
2
87
1
8
7
2
870
875
869
871
872
873
874
87
6
8
6
5
866
867
870
866
867
868
869
871
872
86
4
875
8
7
0
870
865
867
8
7
2
5+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7
+
0
0
8+00 9+00
10
+
0
0
11+
0
0
12+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
S1
1
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S1
3
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
860
865
870
875
880
860
865
870
875
880
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S12
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
4
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
XS 39 RP
XS 40 RP
VP20
REACH DT4
VP21
XS 41 RP
XS 42 RP
XS 39 LP
XS 40 LP
XS 41/42 LP
VP22
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
8
6
5
866
867
870
866
867
868
869
871
872
873
863
864
865
865
867
1
6
+
7
6
11
+
0
0
12+00
13
+
0
0
14+00
15+00
1
6
+
0
0
S1
2
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
855
860
865
870
875
855
860
865
870
875
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S13
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

D
T
4
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH DT4XS 43 RP
VP22
XS 44 RP
XS 43/44 LP
LOG SILL SHIFTED UPSTREAM AND
CHANNEL PLUG NOT INSTALLED IN ORDER
TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM
LINEAR WETLAND
LCE
LCE
LCELCE
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
BBB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
0+00
1+00
2+00 3+0
0
4+
0
0
5+00 6+
0
0
7+0
0
885
88
2
88
3
88
4
885
88
4
886
887
888
885
886
887
888
889
885
882
8
8
3
8
8
4
890
886
887
888
889
891
892
893
89
4
885
886
88
2
88
3
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S
1
5
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
870
875
880
885
890
870
875
880
885
890
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S14
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S1
VP2
XS 1 RP
XS 2 RP
REACH S2
XS 1 LP
XS 2 LP
XS 9 LP
XS 10 LP
XS 9 RP
XS 10 RP
VP1
ENGINEER CONFIRMS THAT
POOLS WERE BUILT PER DESIGN.
POOLS WERE SILTED IN AT TIME
OF AS-BUILT SURVEY
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCELCELCELCELCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCELCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BBBBBB
BB
BBBBBB
BB
B
B
BBBB
B
B
BBBB
B
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
5+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7
+
0
0
8+00
9+
0
0
10+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13+00
880
8
7
7
8
7
8
8
7
9
885
884
886
887
8
8
0
88
1
882
883
8
8
5
8
8
2
88
3
8
8
4
880
88
1
882
883
8
8
1
880
878
879
885
883
884
886
887
S1
4
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S1
6
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
865
870
875
880
885
865
870
875
880
885
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S15
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S1
VP3
XS 3 RP
XS 4 RP
XS 3 LP
XS 4 LP
VP4
FORD CROSSING
ENGINEER CONFIRMS
LOG SILL INSTALLED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
PER ENGINEER'S DIRECTION
PROPOSED LOG VANE
REPLACED WITH LOG J-HOOK
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCELCELCELCELCELCELCELCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE LCE LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
11+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13+00 14
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
16+00
17
+
0
0
17
+
1
5
885
883
884
886
887
S1
5
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
-10
-5
0
5
10
-10
-5
0
5
10
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00
30 60
30
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S16
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
1
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
REACH S1
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
B
B
B
B
BB
BB
BBB
B
BBBB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BBBB
BBBB
BB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
T
BTBTBTB
TB
TB
0+00
1
+
0
0
2+00
3
+
0
0
4+00
5+00
6+00
7+00
896
89
7
89
8
9
0
5
9
0
3
9
0
4
9
0
6
9
0
7
90
0
905
89
9
90
1
90
2
903904
900
9
0
1
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S1
8
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
890
895
900
905
910
890
895
900
905
910
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S17
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
2
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S2
XS 5/6 RP
XS 5 LP
ENGINEER CONFIRMS
LOG SILL INSTALLED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCELCELCE
L
C
E
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
BBBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
BBB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BBBBB
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
BB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TBTB
TB
5+0
0 6+00
7+00
8
+
0
0
9
+
0
0
10+00
11+
0
0
12+0
0
13+0
0
8
8
5
89
0
89
5
886
88
7
8
8
8
88
8
8
8
8
88
9
891
8
9
2
8
9
3
8
9
4
896
89
7
89
8
9
0
5
9
0
3
9
0
4
900
905
899
901
902
903904
8
9
0
895
8
8
6
8
8
7
8
8
8
88
9
8
9
1
89
2
8
9
3
8
9
4
890
89
5
889
891892
893
894
89
0
88
9
89
1
8
9
5
900
9
0
1
S1
7
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S
1
9
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
880
885
890
895
900
880
885
890
895
900
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S18
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
2
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S2
VP6
XS 7 RP
XS 8 RP
XS 7/8 LP
49" x 33" CMPA
INV IN = 885.9' 886.07'
INV OUT = 885.6' 885.79'
49" x 33" CMPA
INV IN = 885.9' 886.07'
INV OUT = 885.6' 885.79'
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB BB
BB
BB BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B TB TB
TB TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
9
+
0
0
10+0
0
1
1
+
0
0
12+00
13+00
14+00 14+2288
5
890
8
8
3
8
8
4
886
887
88
8
888
88
8
889
891
89
2
89
3
8
8
5
89
0
8
9
5
8
8
4
88
688
788
888
989
1
89
2
8
9
3
89
4
885
88
6
88
7
88
8
88
9
885
884
89
0
88
6
88
7
88
8
88
9
89
1
89
2
89
3
894
88
5
88
6
8
9
0
8
9
5
8
8
9
8
9
1
8
9
2
8
9
3
8
9
4
890
889
891
8
8
3
S1
8
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
875
880
885
890
895
875
880
885
890
895
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S19
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S1
VP1
XS 9 RP
XS 10 RP
XS 9 LP
XS 10 LP
REACH S2
VP2
XS 1 LP
XS 2 LP
XS 2 RP
XS 1 RP
0+
0
0
1+00
2+
0
0
3+00 4+0
0
5+0
0
6+00
7+00
LCE
LCELCELCELCELCELCELCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE
LCE
BB
BBBBBB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
B
TB
TB
TBTB
T
B
TB
TBTBTB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
8
9
0
8
9
1
8
9
2
8
9
3
8
9
4
881
881
88
2
895
892
893894
896
890
8
8
9
891
892
893
88
1
885
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
S2
1
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
875
880
885
890
895
875
880
885
890
895
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S20
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
REACH S3
VP8
XS 11 RP
XS 12 RP
XS 11 LP
XS 12 LP
XS 13 RP
XS 13 LP
VP7
5+00
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+0
0
9
+
0
0
10+
0
0
11+00
12
+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BBBB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
B
B
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
T
B
TB
T
B
TBTBT
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
T
B
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
8
8
0
87
8
8
7
9
8
8
1
880
878
879
881
882
88
0
885
890
88
1
88
2
88
3
884
886
88
7888889
891
892
8
7
5
87
3
8
7
4
8
7
6
8
7
7
8
7
5
8
7
2
87
3
8
7
4
87
6
877
877
8
9
0
8
8
9
8
8
5
8
8
1
8
8
2
8
8
3
8
8
4
88
6
88
0
878
879
881
8
7
5
8
7
4
8
7
6
8
7
7
875
875
885
S2
0
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

6
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
S
2
2
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
870
875
880
885
890
870
875
880
885
890
6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S21
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S3
XS 14 RP
XS 15 RP
XS 15 LP
XS 14 LP
XS 16 RP
XS 16 LP
XS 17 LP
XS 18 LP
49" x 33" CMPA
INV IN = 875.0' 875.12'
INV OUT = 874.7' 874.91'
49" x 33" CMPA
INV IN = 875.0' 875.12'
INV OUT = 874.7' 874.91'
9
+
0
0
10
+
0
0
11+00
12
+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
14+00 14
+
8
9
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCELCELCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
B
B
BB
BB
B
B
BB
BBBB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB BB
B
B
BB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
T
B
TB
TB
TB
TB
T
B
TBTB
TB
TB
TB
TB TB
TB
TB
TB TB
T
B
TB
8
7
8
878
879
88
0
885
88
1
88
2
88
3
884
886
887
888
8
7
5
87
3
8
7
4
8
7
6
8
7
7
8
7
5
8
7
2
87
3
8
7
4
87
6
877
877
8
8
1
878
879
8
7
5
8
7
4
8
7
6
8
7
7
875
875
S
2
1
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

1
2
+
0
0
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1"=3'
865
870
875
880
885
865
870
875
880
885
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00
30 60
30
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS-BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
FI
L
E

N
A
M
E
:
R:
\
R
e
s
c
a
d
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
-
D
o
g
t
o
w
n
\
A
B
R
D
\
1
0
0
1
4
8
_
R
D
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
d
w
g
S
A
V
E
D

B
Y
:

Ts
w
a
r
t
z
f
a
g
e
r
DR
A
W
I
N
G

T
I
T
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NUMBER:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
:
PL
O
T

D
A
T
E
:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
SEAL
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
AFM
TRS
BRC
----
100148
S22
RE
C
O
R
D

D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6/
2
8
/
2
0
2
3
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
RE
A
C
H

S
3
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
LEGEND
TB
BB
OHE OHE
LCELIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
AS-BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK
AS-BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
PROPERTY LINE
AS-BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
VP#
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
AS-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED STONE TOE PROTECTION
AS-BUILT STONE TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
REACH S3
VP9
XS 17 RP
XS 18 RP