Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0000795_Speculative Limits_20230714DocuSign Envelope ID: 305E55C3-7D77-415F-AB85-EEC9BFE9943B ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR. Director Mr. Kyle Breuer, Town Manager Town of Surf City P.O. Box 2475 Surf City, NC 28445 Dear Mr. Breuer: NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality 7/14/2023 Subject: Speculative Effluent Limits Surf City Discharge to Northeast Cape Fear River NPDES Permit No. WQ0000795 Pender County Cape Fear Basin The Town of Surf City provided a model evaluation results memo to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) on April 18, 2023, for a new discharge into the Northeast Cape Fear River. The DWR Modeling and Assessment Branch (MAB) and Municipal Permitting Unit (NPDES) has completed our assessment of this material and the following speculative effluent limits have been developed. Receiving Stream. The Northeast Cape Fear River is located within the Cape Fear River Basin. The Northeast Cape Fear River has a stream classification of C-Swamp (C-Sw). as provided in G.S. 143-215.1(c7), discharges to such surface waters shall not cause a reduction in the dissolved oxygen levels of more than 0.10 mg/1 below the approved modeled instream dissolved oxygen level for the surface waters. The 7Q10 could not be obtained from the closest USGS stream gage, Station 02108566 (Northeast Cape Fear River near Burgaw, NC), as that gage is under tidal influence. The Northeast Cape Fear River at the outfall location [stream segment 18-74-(29.5), from Rock Fish Creek to N.C. Hwy. 210] is not currently listed as an impaired waterbody on the 2022 North Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List. Based upon a review of information available from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Map Viewer, there are no Federally Listed threatened or endangered aquatic species identified within a 5-mile radius of the proposed discharge location. If there are any identified threatened/endangered species, it is recommended that the applicant discuss the proposed project with the US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine whether the proposed discharge location might impact such species. Speculative Effluent Limits. Based on the revised materials provided, NPDES concludes that a new discharge of 2.32 MGD should include the following permit limits (in Table 1). A complete evaluation of these limits and monitoring requirements for metals and other toxicants, as well as potential instream monitoring requirements, will be addressed upon receipt of a complete NPDES permit application. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 NORTH CARCLINA 919.707.9000 DocuSign Envelope ID: 305E55C3-7D77-415F-AB85-EEC9BFE9943B Every applicant shall also submit documentation of any additional pollutants for which there are certified methods with the permit application if their discharge is anticipated. These pollutants may be found in 40 CFR Part 136, if there are additional pollutants with certified methods to be reported, please submit the Chemical Addendum to NPDES Application and, if applicable, list the selected certified analytical method used. TABLE 1. Speculative Limits for the proposed Surf City Discharge to Northeast Cape Fear River (2.32 MGD) EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS EFFLUENT LIMITS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Flow 2.32 MGD BOD5, 20°C — Summer' 5.0 mg/L 7.5 mg/L BOD5, 20°C - Winter' 10.0 mg/L 15.0 mg/L Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (minimum) Daily average > 7.0 mg/l TSS 30 mg/L 45 mg/L NH3 as N - Summer' 1.0 mg/L 4.5 mg/L NH3 as N - Winter' 2.0 mg/L 9.0 mg/L Total Nitrogen 15.0 mg/L Total Phosphorus 5.0 mg/L - Monthly Total Residual Chlorine 28 ug/L Fecal coliform (geometric mean) 200/100 mL 400/100 mL Chronic Toxicity Pass/Fail (Quarterly test) 90%2 PFAS Monitoring (EPA Method 1633)3 M/R Quarterly ' Summer: April 1 — October 31 *Winter: November 1 — March 31 2 Subject to change. 3 The PFAS requirements will be effective six months after EPA publishes final Method 1633. After reviewing the model and results, DWR recommends [to minimize water quality impact while allowing for the discharge, especially given that the Northeast Cape Fear River discharges into the Lower Cape Fear River, which is already impaired for DO] the installation of an appropriately designed diffuser to provide mixing across the eight vertical layers. In addition, instream sampling for dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, upstream and downstream of the proposed discharge location would be included in any NPDES permit for this project. Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA). Please note that the Division cannot guarantee that an NPDES permit for a new or expanding discharge will be issued with these speculative limits. Final decisions can only be made after the Division receives and evaluates a formal permit application for the expanded discharge. In accordance with North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 214.0105(c), the most environmentally sound alternative should be selected from all reasonably cost-effective options. Therefore, as a component of all NPDES permit applications for new and expanding flow includes a detailed engineering alternatives analysis (EAA) that must be prepared. The EAA must justify the requested design flow and provide an analysis of potential wastewater treatment alternatives. A copy of the Division guidance for preparing EAA documents is attached and/or can be found online at: httDs://files.nc. Lyov/ncdea/Surface%20Water%2OProtection/NPDES/Hermits/eaa-guidance-20140501- dwr-swp-npdes_13.pd£ REQ5 North Carolina Department ofEnvironmental Quality I Division ofWater Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611 NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000 onparhnem of EmironmanW 9uallly DocuSign Envelope ID: 305E55C3-7D77-415F-AB85-EEC9BFE9943B State Environmental Polices (SEPA) EA/EIS Requirements. A SEPA EA/EIS document may be required for projects that: 1) involve $10 Million or more of state funds; or 2) will significantly and permanently impact 10 or more acres of public lands. Please check with the DWR SEPA coordinator (David Wainwright, 919-707-9045) as to whether your project requires SEPA review. For projects that are subject to SEPA, the EAA requirements discussed above will need to be folded into the SEPA document. If required, a FONSI must be issued prior to issuance of the NPDES permit for the expansion. Details related to FONSI can be found on-line at: https://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/sepa/review-process and at: https: //deq.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-infrastructure/documents/cdbgi-fonsiea We understand this expansion project is moving forward rapidly; however, we would expect that any request for NPDES permitting action for the expansion at either flow noted be taken within a five-year period from the date of this letter, or the noted speculative limits in Table 1 would be subject to reassessment and review. Should you have any questions about these speculative limits or NPDES permitting requirements, please feel free to contact Kristin Litzenberger at (919) 707-3699 / kristin.litzenbergerkncdenr.gov or Michael Montebello at Michael.Montebellokncdenr.gov. Respectfully, Do'c'fu,Si-gne'Id byy:k A A C464531431644FE... Michael Montebello NPDES Program Branch Chief Attachment: Link to EAA Guidance Document, Chemical Addendum Form, and NPDES application information: hLtps:Hdeq.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-pennittine/ni)des-wastewater/npdes-permitting-process/npdes- individual-permit-applications ec: NPDES Files [Laserfiche] Town of Surf City / Kyle Breuer, Town Manager [kbreuer@surfcitync.gov]; David Price [dprice@surfcitync.gov] HDR / Kim Colson, P.E. [kim.colson@hdrinc.com]; Adam Sharpe [adam.sharpe@hdrinc.com] Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C. / Ray Cox [rcox@hiepc.com]; Vance Brooks [vbrooks@hiepc.com]; Ward and Smith, P.A. / Whitney Campbell Christensen[WCChristensen@wardandsmith.com]; Trafton Dinwiddie [TPDinwiddie@wardandsmith.com] DWR / Michael J Montebello [michael.montebello@deq.nc.gov]; Richard Rogers [richard.rogers@deq.nc.gov]; [Julie Grzyb Uulie.grzyb@deq.nc.gov]; Pam Behm [pamela.behm@deq.nc.gov] DEQ Administration / Shrikar Nunna [shrikar.nunna@deq.nc.gov]; Skyler Golann [skyler.golann@deq.nc.gov] DWI / Corey Basinger [corey.basinger@deq.nc.gov] Wilmington Regional Office / Morella S. King [morella.sanchez-king@deq.nc.go] NC WRC / Maria Dunn [maria.dunn@ncwildlife.org] US FWS / Sara Ward [sara ward@fws.gov] DWR / Basinwide Planning / Nora Deamer [nora.deamer@ncdenr.gov] REQ5 North Carolina Department ofEnvironmental Quality I Division ofWater Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611 NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000 onparhnem of EmironmanW 9uallly