NCS000222_BIMS Inspection Rpt_20230714

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit:NCS000222 Effective: 09/18/18 Expiration: 08/31/21 Owner: Leland Land LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Carolina Pole Leland Inc
County: Brunswick 1901 Wood Treatment Rd NE
Region: Wilmington
Leland INC 28451
Contact Person:Michele Reams Title: Phone:[phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/14/2023 Entry Time 10:15AM Exit Time: 11:35AM
Primary Inspector:Brian P Lambe Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCS000222 Owner-Facility:Leland Land LLC
Inspection Date: 07/14/2023 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Met with Mike Rouse, Plant Manager, and Michelle Reams, SHRE Cordinator.
Reviewed the SPPP.The SPPP included all required elements updated and documented in a timely manner.
Reviewed the monitoring data. The results did not warrant any current tier response.
The facility has changed methods from oil based application to water based application. The facility keeps less inventory on
site than previously. The treated poles are kept onsite no more than a week before shipped out.
The facility was very clean and organized. Oil products were maintained under cover and within secondary containment. No
odd hydraulic fluid buckets were laying around. No odd pollution sources were found during inspection.The site appeared to
be intentionally maintained.
Application requests removal of the dioxin special study. I did not have knowledge of dioxins or an answer for the request.
Application requests removal of copper and substitute Chromium III.We discussed the small benchmark value for the copper
and the typical tier process in relation to NCG190000 (Marinas). Discussed possible ramifications of Chromium and
sampling for total, III, and IV found in other permits. I suggested that it may be best left alone, especially considering the
pattern of diminishing presence in the samples. I said that if they ever reach Tier ll,they should contact me to evaluate.
Discussed possiblity of going to quarterly sampling.
i
i
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCS000222 Owner-Facility:Leland Land LLC
Inspection Date: 07/14/2023 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS)map? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices"? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan(SPRP)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
#If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non slormwater)discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Outfall was not observed due to snakes, mosquitos and excessive heat. The site drains into a
moat that is outletted to the south of the site.
Page 3 of 3