20230979 Ver 1_PCN-JD Submittal_Huntington Hills_City of Lincolnton_Lincoln County_NC_6-30-23_20230710

a` STATE
*fie auwv�pk
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. N/A Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.502095
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD):-81.255700
Form Version 4.3, April 20, 2022
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 4.2, January 31, 2022))
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all
mandatory questions are answered.
The PCN help document may be found at this link:
https:Hedocs.deg. nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2196924&cr=1
Please ensure you have submitted a pre -filing meeting request at least 30 days prior to submitting this
form, as DWR will not be able to accept your application without documentation of this important first step.
The Division has developed a Pre -filing Meeting Request email address 401 PreFile(a)-ncdenr.gov to accept
the federally required pre -filing meeting request and provide confirmation receipt of submittal . This receipt
or similar documentation will satisfy 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to
submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying
agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all certification requests must
include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority at least 30
days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) : 3/21/2023
Page 1 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Lincoln Additional (if needed).
Is this an ARPA project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, ARPA project number:
" The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund"
(LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate
Click or tap here to enter text.
your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey
Basinger at core y.basinger(cilncdenr.gov for further assistance.
Is this a NCDMS project? *
(Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-
❑ Yes ❑x No
applicant)
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number:
Click to enter.
❑x Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?
❑ Yes ❑x No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.
Click tn antar a rant,
❑x Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek
❑Regional General Permit (RGP)
authorization?
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit
process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and
submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑x No
NWP number(s) (list all numbers):
NWP 58
RGP number(s) (list all numbers ):
Click to enter
Are you a federal applicant?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act
N/A
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Is this a courtesy copy notification
® Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
❑ Yes
❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes
❑ No
1f.
Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
❑ Yes
❑ No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 i.
Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ Unknown
1j.
Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 3 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

B. Applicant Information
1 a.
Who is the primary contact?
S. Paul Petitgout
1 b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
803-992-0910
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
BHR Land Holdings, LLC
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
DB 2872 Page 832
2c.
Contact Person (for corporations):
Johnathan McCall
2d.
Address
Street Address:
2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Monroe
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28110
Country:
USA
2e.
Telephone Number: * (###)###-####
704-774-1964
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
N/A
2g.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
Johnathan McCall
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Carolina Development Services, LLC
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Monroe
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28110
Country
USA
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
704-774-1964
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
N/A
3f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Page 4 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
S. Paul Petitgout
4b. Business Name:
Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC
4c. Address:
Street Address:
1823 Quinn Road
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Chester
State/ Province/ Region:
SC
Postal/ Zip Code:
29706
Country:
USA
4d. Telephone Number: (###)###-####
803-992-0910
4e Fax Number: (###)###-####
N/A
4f. Email Address:
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 5 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
la. Name of project: *
Huntington Hills
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Huntington Hills
1 c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Lincolnton, NC
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
3624858356
2b.
Property size (in acres):
±64-ac
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
Old Farm Road
Address line 2:
Click to enter
City:
Lincolnton
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country:
USA
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point):
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.502095
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD):--81.255700
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Clarks Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water:
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
httr)s:Hncdenr. mar)s.arcg is.com/apes/webappviewer/index. html?id=6el 25ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
Catawba
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located?
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030501020303
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https:Hncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85a0c6d644a0b97cd069db238ac3
Page 6 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4.
Project Description and History
4a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
NC Land Cover Categories that generally occur on site: Forest Land: Broadleaf Diceduous Forest (Bottomland
and Wet Hardwood Forests); Mixed Diced uous-Coniferous Forest (Other Mixed Diced uous-Coniferous Land);
Water Bodies - Linear Drainage (streams) and Inland Water Bodies (wetlands). NC Land Use Categories that
occur on site: Active Forest Management and Harvesting — Passively Managed Forest Stands; Water Bodies —
Non -Used or Passively Used Water Bodies. Current Site Conditions:The subject property is currently comprised
of forest land. These forested areas are dominated by loblolly pine and mixed hardwood species in the uplands
and mixed hardwood species in the floodplain (wetland) areas on site. Jurisdictional waters of the US were
classified according to USAGE and NCDWR guidance. The results of the jurisdictional determination
investigation indicated that there were two jurisdictional streams present within the subject property (Streams SA
and Clarks Creek forms the eastern boundary). Both are perennial streams. Clarks Creek is a part of the
Catawba River Basin (HUC#03050102)(USGS 1974). Additionally, there is one jurisdictional wetland located
within the project area (Wetland WA) The wetland occurred throughout much of the floodplain area of Clarks
Creek and the vegetation was dominated by sweetgum and red maple in the overstory and mid -story. Various
herbs and vines were also present in the understory. Land use in the vicinity of the project consists of
agricultural and forest lands with small patches of residential (mostly small farmsteads).
4b.
Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
N/A
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
N/A
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
02.
Is any portion of the work already complete?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the completed work.
N/A
4c.
List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work
described in this application not related to the 404 or 401.
N/A
4d.
Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e.
Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
±20 acres
property:
4g.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
±3,000 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
±0.0 acres
property:
4h.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The growth of the housing market in the greater Charlotte metropolitan area including Lincoln County, has been
enormous since the end of the "Great Recession." The demand for housing has skyrocketed since 2011.
However, within the last quarter, inventories have been increasing, suggesting that the housing market may be
growing more slowly than in years past. This slowing of growth has not translated into significant changes in
demand, even with the onset of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Currently, demand is still extremely strong in the
western portion of the greater Charlotte metropolitan area. With this in mind, the applicant proposes to construct
a ±64-acre single family residential development. The overall purpose of the project is to provide additional
housing to meet the growing needs of this area of Lincoln County and the greater Charlotte Metropolitan area
Page 7 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The impacts for this project consist of the following:
The impact consists of the mechanized land clearing of a ±30 foot wide easement (temporary and permanent
easement) for a sewer line to connect to an existing sewer manhole on the property. Within this new easement
area, a gravel road will be installed, at grade, to aid in the maintenance of the sewer line. This gravel road will be
10 feet wide and will occur within the new permanent easement (15 feet wide). The local sewer authority has
also requested that the gravel road be extended within the existing easement. The permittee has
accommodated this request and the 10 foot wide gravel road will be extended into the existing sewer easement
as shown on the accompanying engineering graphics. The permittee and the local sewer authority have agreed
where the gravel road should be terminated within the existing sewer easement (at a point where the project will
not exceed the 0.1-acre wetland mitigation threshold for permanent impacts).
The temporary impacts associated with the project will consist of the mechanized land clearing of the portion of
the easement for construction purposes and will be replanted with wetland vegetation (wetland trees/wetland
shrubs/wetland seed mix) after the area is returned to pre -construction contours.
Typical construction equipment will be used for this project. Those pieces of equipment include, but are not
limited to: bulldozers, track hoes, dump trucks, etc.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters?
❑ Yes 0 No
If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area.
N/A
Page 8 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

5.
Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.
Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
GIICK to enter text.
5b.
If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence
what type of determination was made?
❑x Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
^lirk fn An+a-
Name (if known): S. Paul Petitgout
5c.
If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Lowrys Environmental
areas?
Other: Click to enter
5d.
List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
N/A
5d1.
Attach jurisdictional determinations.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Huntington Hills development was started by others in 1999. The permittee is purchasing the tract that
surrounds the existing development and intends to construct a residential development that ties into the existing
road network that was initiated in 1999.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings
for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction
notification.
N/A
7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
N/A
8. Scheduling of activity:
Development to begin as soon as all permits have been issued.
Page 9 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries
1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Site #
2a1.
Impact
Reason/Type
2b.
Impact
Duration
2c.
Wetland Type
2d.
Wetland Name
2e.
Forested
?
2f.
Jurisdiction
Type
2g.
Impact Area
(ac)
W1
Mechanized
Clearing
Permanent
Riverine
Swamp
Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.049
W2
Mechanized
Clearing
Temporary
Riverine
Swamp
Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.05
W3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
--hoose one
Click to enter
W14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
--hoose one
Click to enter
W15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts
0.05 ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts
0.049 ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts
0.145 ac
2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards:
Clean fill (gravel) ±75 cubic yards
Page 10 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

2i. Comments:
The impacts for this project consist of the following:
W1: The impact consists of the mechanized land clearing of a ±30 foot wide easement (temporary and
permanent easement) for a sewer line to connect to an existing sewer manhole on the property. Within this new
easement area, a gravel road will be installed, at grade, to aid in the maintenance of the sewer line. This gravel
road will be 10 feet wide and will occur within the new permanent easement (15 feet wide). The local sewer
authority has also requested that the gravel road be extended within the existing easement. The permittee has
accommodated this request and the 10 foot wide gravel road will be extended into the existing sewer easement
as shown on the accompanying engineering graphics. The permittee and the local sewer authority have agreed
where the gravel road should be terminated within the existing sewer easement (at a point where the project will
not exceed the 0.1-acre wetland mitigation threshold for permanent impacts).
W2: The temporary impacts associated with the project will consist of the mechanized land clearing of the portion
of the easement for construction purposes and will be replanted with wetland vegetation (wetland trees/wetland
shrubs/wetland seed mix) after the area is returned to pre -construction contours.
Page 11 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #
3a
Impact
Reason*
3b.
Impact
Duration
3c.
Impact Type
3d.
Stream Name
3e.
Stream
Type
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft)
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft) *
S1
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S2
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S3
Slick to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S4
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S16
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S17
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S18
Slick to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S19
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S20
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch
impact:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
36. Total temporary stream
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i4. Total stream and ditch
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3j. Comments:
No Impacts
Page 12 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
Site #
4a1.
Impact Reason
4b.
Impact
Duration
4c.
Waterbody Name
4d.
Activity Type*
4e.
Waterbody
Type
4f.
Impact area
(ac)
01
;lick to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
02
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
03
:,lick to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
04
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
05
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
I Choose one
Click to enter.
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
No Impacts
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete
the table
below. (*This does NOT include ofFline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts
(ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
choose one
Click tc,
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P3
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5g.
Comments:
No Impacts
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter
Page13 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: Click to enter.
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
131
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
132
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
133
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
134
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
135
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
136
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
137
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
138
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
139
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
1311
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B16
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B17
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B18
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B19
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B20
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
No Impacts
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 14 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
The majority of the southern portion of the site (±20-acres) is a large wetland area. The vast majority of this area
is being avoided (except for the minor sewer line/access road proposed impact). Additionally, there is a stream
reach (Stream SA) that is completely being avoided). Impacts have been avoided to the maximum extent
practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The proposed gravel road will be constructed "at grade" so as to not impede surface water flow during periods of
high water. Other than the sewer line, there are no other planned impacts for the project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
No compensatory mitigation is being provided for this project because the impacts are believed to be minimal
and are below the mitigation thresholds for the proposed Nationwide Permits being requested.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter. linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
htti)s://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO: RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
Page 15 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4h. Comments:
No compensatory mitigation is being provided for this project because the impacts are believed to be minimal
and are below the mitigation thresholds for the proposed Nationwide Permits being requested.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including mitigation credits generated.
No compensatory mitigation is being provided for this project because the impacts are believed to be minimal
and are below the mitigation thresholds for the proposed Nationwide Permits being requested.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑ No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
GllcK to enter.
CIICK to enter.
Choose one
GllcK to enter.
Zone 2
:,lick to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
:,lick to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
No compensatory mitigation is being provided for this project because the impacts are believed to be minimal
and are below the mitigation thresholds for the proposed Nationwide Permits being requested.
Page 16 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
El Yes ❑x No
2b.
Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state.nc. us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environ mental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002 h%20.1003. pdf
2c.
Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
❑ Yes ❑x No
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program?
❑ n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2d.
Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
❑ Local Government
(Check all that apply.)
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Local Government Stormwater Programs
❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Page 17 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Click to enter.
State Stormwater Programs I ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Lincolnton, nor Lincoln County have a Phase II Stormwater requirement.
Page 18 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
El Yes El No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
N/A
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters
❑ Yes ❑x No
(15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
Additional development as a result of the proposed development is not anticipated.
3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR
policy. (Attach .pdo
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
Page 19 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
This project will be attached to an existing sewer main located on the property and will be treated at the local
municipal sewer treatment plant. We were not provided the capacity of the plant, but it can be provided upon
request.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
❑ Yes ❑x No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
® Yes ❑ No
Act impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another federal agency involved?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
:,lick to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8?
❑ Yes ❑x No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.?
® Yes ❑ No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
❑ Yes ❑x No
5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as
staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use
❑ Yes ❑ No
can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7.
Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to
NLEB SLOPES document: http:Hsaw-reg.usace. army. mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans
5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdo
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑ Yes ❑x No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdo
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat?
USFWS iPac List for the project area; NCNHP Data Explorer Report for the site. Both documents are attached.
Attach consultation documentation.
Page 20 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat?
El Yes ❑x No
Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity?
El Yes ❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
Explain: Click to enter.
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (2023)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
htti):Hqis.ncdcr.gov/hi)oweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
❑ Yes ❑x No
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
HPOWEB 2.0 (for DOT and Consultants)
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
This project meets the local Floodplain Manager's and FEMA Requirements as there is will be no change to the
elevation of the floodplain from the project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM 3710362400J effective date: 8/16/2007
H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
Page 21 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: S. Paul Petitgout
Signature: * PzPe6��at-
Date: " 6/30/2023
Page 22 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

Lowrys Environmental &
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Phone [phone]
June 30, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
Charlotte Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Mooresville Field Office
RE: Huntington Hills Site
Nationwide Permit 58 (NCDWR Certification No. 4276)
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC (LEES) has prepared a permit application
for the use of Nationwide Permit 58 (NCDWR Certification No. 4276 in order for the applicant
to construct a segment of new sewer line to service a residential development. The project area
is located at the intersection of Startown Road and Huntington Hills Drive in Lincoln County,
North Carolina.
The following documents, figures, etc. are provided to aid in your review of the project. Should
you have any questions regarding the project, please do not hesitate contacting me. We look
forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely yours,
;700�
#
S. Paul Petitgout
President/Managing Member
Attachments

TABLE OF CONTENTS
30-Day Pre -Filing Documentation
Property Ownership Information
Agent Authorization and Right of Entry Documentation
General Location Figures
Engineering Figures
Cultural Resources (NC HPO) Documentation
Threatened & Endangered Species Documentation
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request

30-DAY PRE -FILING DOCUMENTATION

M Gmaif
Paul Petitgout CPPetitgout@gmaiLcorn>
401/Buffer Pre -filing Meeting Requests: Barnette; St Martin; Blu South; Morrow Heights; Huntington Hills
1 message
Paul Petitgout <[e-mail]> Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:15 PM
To: "401 [e-mail]' <401 [e-mail]>
Please fill out the following information:
Project Name: Barnette Site
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Applicant Name: Suriano Homes, Inc
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Project Name: St. Martin Development
County: Stanly County, NC
Applicant Name: Burleson Development Group, LLC
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Project Name: Blu South Phase 5
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Applicant Name: Blu South, LLC
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Project Name: Morrow Heights Development
County: Stanly County, NC
Applicant Name: Pee Dee Land Development, LLC
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Project Name: Huntington Hills Development
County: Lincoln County, NC
Applicant Name: Carolina Development Services, LLC
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
"Please note that multiple projects may be submitted within the same email by supplying all the above information for each project.
—In the event your email is not allowing auto -responses, please save a copy of your sent email for your records and if necessary use that copy in application/form submittal.
Sent from Mail for Windows

PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Land Report
2023 Tax Values
Parcel 71879
Map 3624
Pin 3624-85-8356
Acres 63.906
Subdivision HUNTINGTON HILLS UNDEV
Plat Book -Page H - 314
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: BHR LAND HOLDINGS LLC
Deed:
2872-832
2908 MORGAN MILL RD
2019
Mailing Address:
MONROE NC 28110-7507
Deed Year:
Account: 0276525
Deed Acres:
Fire District: LINCOLNTON
Mapped Acres:
63.906
Township: LINCOLNTON
Neighborhood: 0324D
Land Market Value:
$560,203
Description: HUNTINGTON HILLS UNDEV
Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL
Total Market Value:
$560,203
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction
Acres
R-15 LINCOLNTON
63.906
63.906
East Lincoln Development District
District
Acres
Not In a District
63.906
63.906
Soil Types
Soil Type
Agriculture
Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2)
Class 2
Class 2 Class 2 0.233
Riverview loam: 0-2 Pct slopes(Occassional Flood) (RvA)
Class 1
Class 3 Class 3 3.567
Chewacle loam: 0-2 Pct slopes(Frequent flood) (ChA)
Class 3
Class 3 Class 3 11.922
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 3.498
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 1.365
Cecil sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (CeB2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 37.019
Helena sandy loam: 1-6 Pct slopes (HeB)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 6.302
63.906
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description
Panel Acres
SHA X
3710362400 1.915
AE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED - 100 YEAR 3710362400 4.020
X NO FLOOD HAZARD
3710362400 42.317
AEFW FLOODWAY AREA - 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD
3710362400 15.653
63.905
2020 Census Block
County Tract
Block
Acres
37109 070800
4004
8.126
37109 070800
4006
49.251
37109 070800
4011
0.002
37109 070800
4007
6.517
37109 070800
4029
0.011
63.907
1/2

Land Report
Sewer Districts
District
Acres
Not In a District
63.906
63.906
Watersheds
Watershed Class
Acres
Not in Watershed
63.906
63.906
Voting Precincts
Precinct
Acres
ST36_STARTOWN (ST36)
63.906
63.906
2/2

AGENT AUTHORIZATION AND RIGHT OF
ENTRY DOCUMENTATION

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Fhmtingting Frills
PARCEL ID: 3624858356
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Old Farm Road Lincoln County, NC
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Carolina Development Services, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 28110
PHONE: [phone]
The undersigned, registered property owners) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
S. Paul Petitgout, of Lowrvs Environmental & Ecological Services, LL a
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
Jurisdictional Determination, Permit or Certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and/or NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)- to enter upon the property herein described
(accompanied by the authorized agent) for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination and/or permit pursuant to Section 404/401 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of
record of the property identified herein.
I hereby certify the above information submitted in thisjurisdictional determination/application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
, �t tit AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
DATE: 4/24/23

GENERAL LOCATION FIGURES

Cy C
T
Fly ••
m
2
1271 '
a
/
1005
a
Lf]
1
7V
900F�V�c
r. \
f DR
Q tti
VF.4
0
BOO
/ram.
••"
..
�
� n
-
1,
z
A
/•
S?qTE-RD 270,
PARK C!R
i
�`�
e-
C—
E1 ¢
cLAg1�
o H ntington Hills Site
goo
±64-acres
r
0
G��
Huntington Hills Site
KrLLa R
0 1,000 2,000 I�LTR
R�
Feet ¢L OAK G
1 inch equals 2,000 feet E� T R0
L CO.
�o
Source: USGS Reepsville, NG Topo (2022)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
r
Huntington Hills Site
Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USGS 1:24,000 Topographic Map
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Drawn By: SPP
Date: 4-25-23
Rev.
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP
Scale: 1:24,000
Sheet: 1
803-992-0910

_ - Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres
ar
• . I • •I I I I I r�l
-
J ' . • r - -
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Lincoln County, NC GIS (Topographic) Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 2
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

IPZ�
I
a
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Lincoln County, NC GIS (Aerial) Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 3
Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres 1:
T _
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910
-M

SOILS LEGEND
CeB2 Cecil Sandy Clay Loam 2-8% Slope
ChA Chewacla Loam 0-2% Slope
HeB2 Helena Sandy Loam 1-6% Slope
LdB2 Lloyd Sandy Clay Loam 2-6% Slope
PeC2 Pacolet Sandy Clay Loam 8-15% Slope
RvA Riverview Loam 0-2% Slope
Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres
Huntington Hills Site = J
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Source: USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
J
Huntington Hills Site Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USDA NRCS Soil Survey Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:12,000 Sheet: 4 803-992-0910
�!I

1.�
4Y?II I R M ItJ11Jl'Y.
t�
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventor
IJ
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: As Shown
Source: USFWS NWI Mapper(2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map
Drawn By: SPP I Date: 4-25-23 1 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP I Scale: As Shown I Sheet: 5
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Wetlands
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

i Huntington Hills Site N
±64-acres
.I 1d dip
#�
y P
str_
A.
Ic
. } y fJ r
r" #':L } I
.110
f _
f
- 4i
Data Points
Huntington Hills Site Wetland and Stream Features
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023) `ream } Q /�A
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for Stream `-• ±1f300 LF (±0•15—ac•
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and p WA
is not suitable for legal or engiW
nearing purposes. Wetland: ±20.6—ae•
Huntington Hills Site Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina Ecological Services, LLC
Delineation Concurrence Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 6 803-992-0910

ENGINEERING FIGURES

.yay� a ♦� �w1°N""'" yo m 040 ON 133HS
mw w �m s o� mirasa�m a°�14uu ,a o u 8410J80 y;aoN 'fjunoC) ulooulN Z
xr a,umsuiiw a�in x�wo�xi awn w uo;ulooull;of110
0059'WS'YOL:3NOHd 8060-A NdL3 ONI6'33NION3 ON EZOZJL7l90 31VO 3f1SSl
VOZRZ ON'3LLO-IeVHO MD :ON 103roud
oos ann5 133H1S ll3Mo00N 'S we a 6L>IOB d
A311JUM o0❑❑ I!q!ux3 To�dual PueIIaM
❑❑❑ }aayg aano0 s!!!H uoibu!lunH
rr^^ Z
VJ J
J °C
—zU
Z�
zoo
Oc,z
C)zL}
r
LL zoo
Flo
zC)z
_ °
z
W
m r
XW°
W W
UU)�
:E<Q
z°QZ
(/)W
�cz
wW5
�oIr
0- W
O0-
I..L
E
c
0
N
W
j
m
N
N
U
N
U
N
.>
Z L]
_ c
5 W
m
O
(D a)
E
L J
N cl
.0
Y
U
U
K J
o` a
(n
co
C
_ '
E V o Y
U
c o
L
U° -o m y
w a N o E
I
O
ITO
1,00
!
O N O U
O O U � Z O
!
Cl Y Z
r
0 U C
cm c V7 N N
++
> t cp
(0 s m O r
O O l O t
W 2 .00
!
c O r
N L c0 N O
0
c '7- M c
N L
> O >
E U N 2 r
0I O r
W co (n U N
�
—
�
U
�
a 05
�%
W
r
Gt�
aC
s
U
'L
Ago
� BOA
goo n#as Pa um,o Js
N
00
C)
N
O

.NYd10� OHV M]tlY1 m� W Apo H�31lC�W >fiW93 tlOAld ]IL L%WM
�o wna�mn ao 3vm
'wroaa eww v aw ip+ewo aw3wm•�w � ¢rwewd rix�s n
�neryuwi w A w+awww gym. �wanwa mwo .p+ v. sou
OM'09'YOL 3NOHd BOSPd VUL ONIU33N3 ON
"ZBL ON `3l101NIOHb'NO
oos 3))ns 133kiLs m3Mouon 'S we
❑❑❑
Ji�lba3 W ❑013
N
N
7 E
w�
E
JE
0
mew
E
F
()
U)
U)
U)
O
U
N
215
sE
v�
E
01)
v� Ju
a E E 2 t
o
_ 3
E E
a
T
z
0
mEE
0 v
U
N
u
U)
U)
0
U
uafd If-eaanp 1
EL
d0 ON 133HS
eulpie0 LIuoN'f;unoC) ulooull
1O 3Sl
130i
0
co co
co co
LO O
0) LO
O O
O O
N U) O
V oo N N
w
V N �
II II 3
N
co co N
E d
N c O
N N co
C c1 U)
E O C
E N
N N X
a r w
J -
v)
o
`�
I"n
�I ✓
1
Iss
—
Lt
Lu
l
C,
a
v c!
cwco
(UD
co
co
LL
co
9
U)co
a
f f
• Q � N
+Wftm
m
"Wo
j Q LO
C
(n
i"
—
--
0 co
m - -- --
o
f•
C
O
F=
O
!
l C N
l
J
❑ pLL
m O
t
-.
C
0
0
O
Q
O
p
0 O
(7 U
o

CULTURAL RESOURCES (NC HPO)
GRAPHIC

Huntington Hills Preliminary Cultural Resources Map
Switch Basemap Add Resources Create
Layers [—Make a Map Feature Search
esource: 14:All surveyed resources
esource Visibility:
Attribute Search
Spatial Search ✓
Show Spatial Graphic Search Reset
Results
Historic Resources (SHPO)
14: All surveyed resources (6 found)
Costner-Sipe House
Hallman -McGinnis House
Lincolnton National Guard Armory
S.M. Smith House
Stroup Filling Station and Car Wash
W.T. Carpenter House
All of the resources listed above consist of
surveyed resources. None of the surveyed
resources are considered eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places.
Table Details Zoom
Flash
3 c
do
yr
a� nvn � o •
ac CO, = Poartll Ad
oap;"Is • 11 10
Horseshoe Lake
• � • �s II ShLr°r"'Po• q
• a I: •
_ .ra?lir •
• ass�r
P Goadsditrl� , .�
03 ¢ •4 BoaarW + •:}
wNi
2 y'
g"w `L+y l� ■� . y Keener Rd v
aY 27 x`ks�f\ • i,
m �,•�• Uncoirxon F s
. cou■rry orr6 N
• y
o-a L I ryc61►o n
+• .
v ` ° 150 ' 7
Roselbnd �
C � d •
a�� 1w1 0 mob;."

THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES
DOCUMENTATION

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0102226
Project Name: Huntington Hills
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other

activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0102226
Project Name: Huntington Hills
Project Type: New Constr - Above Ground
Project Description: Startown Road at Huntington Hills Drive, Lincoln County, NC; ±64-
acres; Residential Development; ASAP
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/@35.503758000000005,-81.26094324140684,14z
C
L'
Counties: Lincoln County, North Carolina

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME S TATU S
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME
S TATU S
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
S TATU S
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis nani flora
Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treater of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the 25
continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the 20
continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.

NAME
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds May 10 to Sep
10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to
Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
R' probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Chimney Swift III I��1 +++—
1i11 _ �"r Ir�� "-- — — — — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide �+-- +
(CON)
BCC RKentucangewide
Warbler _
+-- +++— +--- Al IIII "'I IIII III— — — — -
- — — -
- — — -
- — —
(CON)
Prothonotary
wrr
' q
Warbler —+--
+++— + --�__+i
1117-
+++— —
, son shoo
-- +--- — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide
`
r�
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker —+--
++U +---
---1
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird —+--
+++—
1--�
---+ --+— +++— ---- +--- — — — — — — — —
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide —+--+++—+--- ---� III IIII IIII IIII — — — — ----
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librqu/
collections/avoidin g-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds

4
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look

at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be

aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R4SBC
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
• PF01A

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC
Name: Paul Petitgout
Address: 1823 Quinn Road
City: Chester
State: SC
Zip: 29706
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
Paul Petitgout
Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, SC 29706
RE: Huntington Hills; 21008.00
Dear Paul Petitgout:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-22561
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(a ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

■
\
CO
e 0
U)0.
\ f 0 QO Ln
a
2% = 0\
ƒ/\/\
\/Z
Z
CO /j/e
y2\ Z
/ ®
\ \:
e = / _
/ $ ~ 0
/ E / e
w > ® 3
CO
%M E \
3z2>
/ § / E
} / \ °
y y n 4
/\-0\
\ % \ \
0 D- / ®
0)\ e 0
CO = z \
/ \ \ /
j / cn
% ®\ /
U CO « w
ewers
/ _ _ .k
& $ u .»
/ E / }
\
CO /\/
t u » _
//\\
2 0 f `
.k = / 9
\\0
ya2\
2 }=
o Z o e
/ G % ®
u w e e
/\%3
/\\E
> e CO 0
> 0 0)
0 E ® `
\\/\
\* ( \
En
0 z 2 2
\ \ 3
_ 6 w .e
/ 2 o O
\ \ / \
o / e ±
t*fCC3
Eo \
3 ul 2
\ \ \ \
\ % / \
E\}«
/ 0)2
o / \ /
0 \ \ /
_ ® e -
/ \ � \ %
e e $ o }
e 2 } u a
\ \ / / Coco
e Z w e s
CO
/
0
�\
0
3
CO
y u
O \
\ /:
z>nz
t:32
© t w §
\ \\
\ { } /
c} \\
0C:
^7 \2
\G^»
\ \ � \
y\/=
\
\o
%gƒ0
s :
0
s\y\
�0
U
\\�\
2\z/
ƒ/%2
3=s.?
z } \ /
� \-0\
\3\2
Etz°
0 0
\\\\
U -0
\\\\
0
-a0
\§�®
ze\/
3»f3
o 1)
}? co
E/
z\sz
\} \ \
sz\a
\n
0Z
J9j/
§
\
c

/
2
CO \
e
\
CO
\ /
®
-
t
n
CO/
±
�
/
2
}
c
/
0
CO %
/
CO
c
77
/
®
\
\
0
/
\\
\
3\
CO
s 2
z
®«
2
/s
CO
\§
»
t t t t
G
44
/
}
E
3/
E E E E
}
>
/
»
e E E E E
»®
g
=
% 4
z e e e e
\/
)
\
© \ \ \ \
\
\
\
\ \
\
\ u
\
/
u
/ \ \ \ \
»
_±
3
CO\\\
±
» \
m ®
J
e
2
- -
�/
/
\
3/
0
3 3 3
§.z
/?©\©
\
\ \
CO
*f0
2
mw\e\
CO
\ \ \ D /
\ \ \
\ %
ƒ \
\
CO
®
0
«
\
ƒ
_ _
\
u
��
\
`
u
/\
\ \
2
\
\ °
E
`
»
®
/ / / /
\
/ e
\
e
y
e e
« « _ _
: z
\
5 \
\
3 3
) }
\
CO
\/OO\\
)E
E
§
zE
e
»
g
/3
\
\
\/
/
\
0
\
O
/
E
s\
E
CO
CO`
a)
H
z e
-
2
O
\:
\
E
\ COCO/
\
CO
2
CO
u0
2
s®
u
g
-0
LEe
z /
\
.g
/
n
z
\/
\
\ \
cn
/
E
-03
CO e
\ /
\
/ s
2
/
®\ \
\
®
o
/
\
yz-
/!
o
%-
»
e
\
u
g\/\
E/
//
=
`
O .k e
/
/
/
==aJ
»
\\
E
±
22
\
/ /
}
@ \
\
\ .-
c
«
« / / / /
(
E
_
\
s
s g g e e
\\
3
=
e
e
\ a
// z
=
CO
s
s\\ 2 2
CO
E } /
°
®
7
> > / /
\ \
e e=0
COCOCO
COe
353
>
Z
2:2:GG22
\/
ra
s
\
/

c
0
c
c
2
r
co
LO
N
N
z
U
Z
u
G
\I
N
a

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION REQUEST

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Hunter Oaks Lane/Old Farm Road
City, State: Lincolnton, NC
County: Lincoln County, NC
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 3624858356
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Johnathan McCall - CDS
Mailing Address: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 28110
Telephone Number: 704-774-1964
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: BHR Land Holdings, LLC
Mailing Address: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 28110
Telephone Number: 704-774-1964
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
S. Paul Petitgout - Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
6-24-23
Date
1: Aled
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
ZI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
I I review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area ±64 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.502095
Longitude:-81.255700
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Fhmtingting Frills
PARCEL ID: 3624858356
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Old Farm Road Lincoln County, NC
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Carolina Development Services, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 28110
PHONE: [phone]
The undersigned, registered property owners) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
S. Paul Petitgout, of Lowrvs Environmental & Ecological Services, LL a
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
Jurisdictional Determination, Permit or Certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and/or NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)- to enter upon the property herein described
(accompanied by the authorized agent) for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination and/or permit pursuant to Section 404/401 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of
record of the property identified herein.
I hereby certify the above information submitted in thisjurisdictional determination/application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
, �t tit AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
DATE: 4/24/23

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: DATE
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Carolina Development Services, LLC, Johnathan
McCall, 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive, Monroe, NC 28110
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Huntington Hills, FILE
NUMBER
D. PROJECT LOCATIONS) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Old Farm Road Lincolnton, NC
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Lincoln City: near Lincolnton
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.502095 Longitude:-81.255700
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Clarks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
'may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
applicable
wetland waters)
10/404)
±1,300 LF
Non -Wetland-
Section 404
Stream SA
35.502095
-81.255700
(±0.15-ac.)
Waters
Wetland
35.502420
-81.255399
±20.6-ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WA

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein) , or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Delineation Concurrence Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS 1:24,000 Reepsville, NC Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey (2023)
® National wetlands inventory map (s). Cite name: USFWS Wetlands Mapper (2023)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map (s) :
❑ FEMA/F1RM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Lincolnton County, NC GIS Aerial (2021)
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify) :
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
7U i1A Gt K� !1✓(lrlL& 6-3 0-23
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
DATE (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
t Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. if the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Land Report
2023 Tax Values
Parcel 71879
Map 3624
Pin 3624-85-8356
Acres 63.906
Subdivision HUNTINGTON HILLS UNDEV
Plat Book -Page H - 314
OWNER INFORMATION
Owner Name: BHR LAND HOLDINGS LLC
Deed:
2872-832
2908 MORGAN MILL RD
2019
Mailing Address:
MONROE NC 28110-7507
Deed Year:
Account: 0276525
Deed Acres:
Fire District: LINCOLNTON
Mapped Acres:
63.906
Township: LINCOLNTON
Neighborhood: 0324D
Land Market Value:
$560,203
Description: HUNTINGTON HILLS UNDEV
Improvement Market Value: work in progress
Category: REAL
Total Market Value:
$560,203
Zoning
Zone Code Jurisdiction
Acres
R-15 LINCOLNTON
63.906
63.906
East Lincoln Development District
District
Acres
Not In a District
63.906
63.906
Soil Types
Soil Type
Agriculture
Forestry Horticulture Acres
Gaston sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (GnB2)
Class 2
Class 2 Class 2 0.233
Riverview loam: 0-2 Pct slopes(Occassional Flood) (RvA)
Class 1
Class 3 Class 3 3.567
Chewacle loam: 0-2 Pct slopes(Frequent flood) (ChA)
Class 3
Class 3 Class 3 11.922
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 3.498
Pacolet sandy clay loam: 8-15 Pct slopes(Eroded) (PeC2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 1.365
Cecil sandy clay loam: 2-8 Pct slopes(Eroded) (CeB2)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 37.019
Helena sandy loam: 1-6 Pct slopes (HeB)
Class 3
Class 2 Class 2 6.302
63.906
Flood Zones
Flood Zone Description
Panel Acres
SHA X
3710362400 1.915
AE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED - 100 YEAR 3710362400 4.020
X NO FLOOD HAZARD
3710362400 42.317
AEFW FLOODWAY AREA - 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD
3710362400 15.653
63.905
2020 Census Block
County Tract
Block
Acres
37109 070800
4004
8.126
37109 070800
4006
49.251
37109 070800
4011
0.002
37109 070800
4007
6.517
37109 070800
4029
0.011
63.907
1/2

Land Report
Sewer Districts
District
Acres
Not In a District
63.906
63.906
Watersheds
Watershed Class
Acres
Not in Watershed
63.906
63.906
Voting Precincts
Precinct
Acres
ST36_STARTOWN (ST36)
63.906
63.906
2/2

Cy C
T
Fly ••
m
2
1271 '
a
/
1005
a
Lf]
1
7V
900F�V�c
r. \
f DR
Q tti
VF.4
0
BOO
/ram.
••"
..
�
� n
-
1,
z
A
/•
S?qTE-RD 270,
PARK C!R
i
�`�
e-
C—
E1 ¢
cLAg1�
o H ntington Hills Site
goo
±64-acres
r
0
G��
Huntington Hills Site
KrLLa R
0 1,000 2,000 I�LTR
R�
Feet ¢L OAK G
1 inch equals 2,000 feet E� T R0
L CO.
�o
Source: USGS Reepsville, NG Topo (2022)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
r
Huntington Hills Site
Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USGS 1:24,000 Topographic Map
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Drawn By: SPP
Date: 4-25-23
Rev.
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP
Scale: 1:24,000
Sheet: 1
803-992-0910

_ - Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres
ar
• . I • •I I I I I r�l
-
J ' . • r - -
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Lincoln County, NC GIS (Topographic) Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 2
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

IPZ�
I
a
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Lincoln County, NC GIS (Aerial) Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 3
Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres 1:
T _
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910
-M

SOILS LEGEND
CeB2 Cecil Sandy Clay Loam 2-8% Slope
ChA Chewacla Loam 0-2% Slope
HeB2 Helena Sandy Loam 1-6% Slope
LdB2 Lloyd Sandy Clay Loam 2-6% Slope
PeC2 Pacolet Sandy Clay Loam 8-15% Slope
RvA Riverview Loam 0-2% Slope
Huntington Hills Site
±64-acres
Huntington Hills Site = J
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Source: USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey (2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
J
Huntington Hills Site Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USDA NRCS Soil Survey Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:12,000 Sheet: 4 803-992-0910
�!I

1.�
4Y?II I R M ItJ11Jl'Y.
t�
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventor
IJ
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Huntington Hills Site
Scale: As Shown
Source: USFWS NWI Mapper(2023)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Huntington Hills Site
Lincoln County, North Carolina
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map
Drawn By: SPP I Date: 4-25-23 1 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP I Scale: As Shown I Sheet: 5
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Wetlands
Lowrys Environmental 8,
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

i Huntington Hills Site N
±64-acres
.I 1d dip
#�
y P
str_
A.
Ic
. } y fJ r
r" #':L } I
.110
f _
f
- 4i
Data Points
Huntington Hills Site Wetland and Stream Features
Scale: Not to Scale
Source: Lincoln County, NC GIS (2023) `ream } Q /�A
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for Stream `-• ±1f300 LF (±0•15—ac•
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and p WA
is not suitable for legal or engiW
nearing purposes. Wetland: ±20.6—ae•
Huntington Hills Site Lowrys Environmental 8�
Lincoln County, North Carolina Ecological Services, LLC
Delineation Concurrence Map
Drawn By: SPP Date: 4-25-23 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 6 803-992-0910

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Huntington Hills City/County: near Lincolnton/Lincoln Co, NC Sampling Date: 12121
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Development Services, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: U1
Investigator(s): Petitgout Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.502095 Long:-81.255700 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil Sandy Clay Loam 2-8% Slope NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: U1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Juniperus virginiana
5
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
25
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Pinus taeda
5
Yes
FAC
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
Juniperus virginiana
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 45 (A) 150 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Asplenium platyneuron
5
Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-5
10YR 4/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
5-12
10YR 4/6
100
Loamy/Clayey
12-20
5YR 5/8
100
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Huntington Hills City/County: near Lincolnton/Lincoln Co. Sampling Date: 12121
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Development Services, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1
Investigator(s): Petitgout Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0.5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla Loam 0-2% Slope NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 75 (A) 215 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.87
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
5
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5•
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-2
7.5YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-8
7.5YR 4/2
70
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-20
7.5YR 4/2
80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Sulfide (A4)
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
? Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Hydrogen
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Dark Surface (Al 2)
? Redox Depressions (F8)
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Thick
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Very
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 124 Lp2f
Project/Site: Ha,3
Latitude: 3S, 50-2_'f 2 0 (`I
Evaluator: ���"�'�t}��
County: LiNcLx-J
Longitude: -
Total Points:c°PSJ�
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other � N�
Stream
a i erleastiif>_ intermittent
Stream is at least intermittent �' ��
I if
Ephemeral Intermitter erenni
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-jj-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
efp
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
<L
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 ,
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. AlgaeCO-,)0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 ter = 0„
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Ace
Sketch:
�i