20230972 Ver 1_Farmington Road NWP 29 and 18 compressed_20230706

Angela Petros
From: 401 PreFile <401 [e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 8:11 AM
To: Angela Petros
Subject: Automatic reply: [External] Farmington Road NWP 29 Pre -Application
This email confirms receipt of your pre -filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your records and
submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as required by federal law. DWR
will not be able to accept your application without this federally required documentation. 401 applications
received without documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be
returned as incomplete.
Responses to this email are not monitored.
If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of staff contact
list(s).
For Non -Transportation Central Staff:
httos://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting/401-
buffer-permitting-contacts
For Non -Transportation Regional
Staff: https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.asox?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1
For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects:
httos://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation-
pe r m itt i ng/staff-contacts

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2023-00694 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Farmington Road
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑✓
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is for the construction of a residential subdivision including 72 individual
lots that will be used for town homes as well as the installation of a sewer line.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Owner: Robert and Kae Hendrix
Applicant: C2C Land Development LLC Attn: Richard Denzler
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form AS — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: None Known
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
405 Farmington Road, Mocksville, NC 27028
35.962041 °,-80.5341860
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 5840583409
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Davie
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: MOcksville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Dutchman Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Upper Yadkin 03040101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29 and 18
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
R
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

An/6
ENVIRQNMENTAL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Jennifer Lawrence
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Farmington Road +/- 19.02 acres
405 Farmington Road, Mocksville, NC 27028
Nationwide Permit 29/18 Application
Related Action ID: SAW-2023-00694
Jennifer and Stephanie,
July 3, 2023
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Stephanie Goss
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 227699-1617
Atlas Environmental Inc is submitting the enclosed package on behalf of Richard Denzler of C2C Land
Development LLC for approval of a Nationwide Permit 29/18 verification for unavoidable impacts to
Waters of the United States. Atlas Environmental completed a stream and wetland delineation on March
15, 2023. A delineation concurrence was originally submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
issued on May 09, 2023. There is one perennial stream, two intermittent streams, and three wetlands
within the review area.
The project purpose is for the construction of a residential development consisting of up to 72 individual
units that will be developed for townhomes as well as the installation of a sanitary sewer line. The
development will require three permanent and one temporary unavoidable impacts to Waters of the
United States. Impact W1 consists of 0.141 acre of fill to WL 2000. Impact W1 is necessary for grading
side slopes, the installation of an access road, and grading for the townhome lots and will permitted under
an NWP 29. Impact W2 is for the permanent fill of Wetland 2100 (0.035 acres). This impact is for the
grading of townhome lots and will be permitted under an NWP 29. Part of WL 2000 occurs with the
FEMA floodplain where Impact W3 will permanently impact 0.006 acres. This is for the construction of
the sewer line (NWP 18). Impact W4 is also an impact to the Southern section of WL 2000 and is
necessary for the installation of a sanitary sewer line (NWP 18). Impact W4 will temporarily impact 0.007
acres WL 2000. In total, there are approximately 0.182 acres of permanent wetland impacts proposed.
No stream mitigation will be required for this project as no streams are proposed to be impacted.
However, wetland impacts will be required since they exceed 0.10 acre. Because Impact W2 is a
temporary impact to an herbaceous wetland, no mitigation will be required for this impact. A ratio of 1:1 is
appropriate for the wetland impacts. The quality of the wetlands have been degraded due to the
agricultural and pastoral use of the site. The wetlands are located within cow pasture areas.
The site has been designed and engineered to avoid and minimize impacts to the greatest extent
possible. The design incorporates four common open spaces to reduce further impact. None of the
streams located on site are proposed to be impacted, including Dutchman Creek. A 100-year FEMA
floodplain is located within the Western region and the Southern region of the review area. A sanitary
sewer is proposed to be installed within this floodplain as well as side slopes. The impacts from the
sanitary sewer are temporary. The project engineers are working with the proper authorities regarding
this floodplain.
Enclosed are the necessary permit documents and additional information. Thank you for your attention to
the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any additional information.
Best regards,
Allyson Sinclair, Environmental Specialist
[e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (m) / 828-712-9205 (m) / 980-819-7780 (o) / 980-819-7876 (f)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

VIR�NMENTAL
Atlas Environmental Inc.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (m) / 828-712-9205 (m) / 980-819-7780 (o) / 980-819-7876 (f)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

TLAS
IRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams - Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 22699-1.650
1, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name: re rrl 5
Property Owner of Record: i. b 6,Li k a 4 Y& v d rl y
Contact Name: 4v ► - r rd -per Y_
Address:
Address: + d /9I 1C t14 Z 6- W o d rc.s Volk ►tJ C ? 1-117
Phone/Fax Number: ot - 60(- Tq S7-i
Email Address: r U C o 7,1 f-r 0 &c3O 4i)_ ra CAj)ru rrr -4-. co w�
Project Address: 3q2, &rminwho, AVd � rte- N
Project Address: _
Tax PIN: WI PW 5S V q a
Signature: 4AO-$Alpr�.
Date: ��� LZ3
A TL45 Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
yo + atlaser'yugm

ENORD( ROBERT S HENORD( KAE WALL Return/Appeal Notes: Percel: FS-000-00038
09 FARMINGTON RD PLAT. / UNIQ ID 9130
5276000 ID NO: 5840583409
COUNTY TAX (100), FIRE TAX (100) CARD NO. I of I
_al Year: 2013 Tax Year: 2013 18.85 AC FARMINGTON RD I8.6100 AC SRC= InspeGbn
21eetl 02 on 04 21 2008 03003 CEDAR CREEK TW-06 Cl- FR-08 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20130328
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
MARKET VALUE
DEPRECIATION
CORRELATION OF VALUE
OTAL POINT VALUE
BUILDING ADIIISTMEN
USE
MOD
EH. BASE
Area UAL RATE
RCN
EYB
AYB
CREDENCE TO
TALADJUSTMENT
97
00
%GOOD
OEPR. BUILDING VALUE
ACTOR
TAL QUALITY INDEX
TYPE: VaCent
STYLE:
DEPR. OB/XF VALUE -CARD 6,22
MARKET LAND VA- CARD 162,62
OTAL MARKET VALUE - CARD 168,
66 84
OTAL AP PRAISED VALUE -CARD 168,54
OTAL APPRAISED VALUE - PARCEL 16884
OTAL PRESENT USE VALUE - PARCEL 36,45
OTAL VALUE DEFERRED - PARCEL 132,39
OTAL TAXABLE VALUE -PARCEL 36,45
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE
OBXF VALUE 6,70
LAND VALUE 162,62
PRESENT USE VALUE 27,68
DEFERRED VALUE 134,94
TOTAL VALUE 169 32
PERMIT
CODE I DATE NOTE I NUMBER AMOUNT
ROUT: WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORPAGE TD ATE DEED
YPE
U I
INDICATE SAL.SAL.BOOK
PRICE
0895 0870 7 01 WD
0078 0410 2 196 WD
E V
X V
HEATED AREA
NOTES
OWNER
SWMH
IS PP
SUBAREA
D
DRI ESCPTION
UN
UN
UN"'O.G %
PRICE COND LDGAYB
EYB
ANN DEP
RATE
% OB/XF DEPIL
CON D VALUE
GS RPL
TYPE AREA CS
24
03
DS
SHED
RPORT
MH SITE
2 2
2 2
48
40
1
10.0 100.0 _
10.0 100.0 _
4,500.0 100.0 _
197
194
200
1986
1994
2007
S
S
S
4 17200
10 450
REPLACE
UMBER
OTALSTOTAL
OB/XF VALUE
6,22
UIIDING DIMENSIONS
AND INFORMATION
IGHEST
ND BEST USE LOLL
SE CODE MINING
FRON
TALE
EPTH
DEPTH
SIZE
LND
MOD
ER AD]USTMENTS
CON. D NOTES
FAR RF AC LC TO OT
OAD
TYPE
LAND
UN3T
PRICE
TOTAL
U1ND
UNITS
UNT
TYP
RICE
U1ND
VALUE
OVERRIDE
VAWE
LAND
NOTES
H HOMESI 0201
247
0
1.0110
4
0.9600 04 +20 -10 -10 +00
PW
9 000.0
18.6
AC
]39.0
16261
UARRYDTAL
MARKET
LAND
DATA
18.60E162
62L
HOMSITE
5000
0
0
1.0000
5
2.5000
9 000.0
1.00
AC
500.0
MAD3USTEDLANTED
2250GRI
11
5210
0
0
1.0000
5
1.0000
590.0
445GRI
111
5310
0
0
1.0000
5
1.0000
385.0
224GRI
IV
5410
0
0
1.0000
5
1.0000
C
40.0RST
11
6210
0
0
1.0000
5
1.0000
=OA
C
270.0
58RST
11163100
1.0000
5
1.0000
C
230.0
44
OTAL PRESENT
USE
DATA
6.
30,23
Owner: HENDRD( ROBERT 5

o °
LL
11) a, �
o�6
NtC
O
oQ
EQ�jN
°
Q -o u, ) w .a,
Ea,
'
1 P2I uba6uiuiae�pi{;I pb aae s
'
c
a)
> :? � �E'
O C t
n (0
�Z °-o..
'
(0 N E O 2 Q
.° C U N°, +) N
1
1
N
0_
O
-6 O O m co:.N .� X
O
o.> CL
a
�°C'
'
ia,�U
O Q Z N�
'
O
Q Q =
M i C> (/1 t N
1
'
O
r
(0 Q.- 1O 0U
7
1
'
.�
v N
.� O
1
'
�O
Y .a) N m 0 Q
1
'
U1 O_
1
1
1
�
1
�
�
d
Q
'
u
a
1
m
1
'
1
U
'
N
�
CO
1
'
U
'
L
'
�
O
'
c^n,
'
W
'
1
1
�
U
--
}i
_'
--- - - - --
1
1 1
TTT��TTT
'
1
1
1
'
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
�
1
�
�
1
1
N
1
�
0
1
1
1
1
1
a�
U
L •
LL
•
a N
C
Q O fn
CO �
�
�o.moo
�Ec�
a�mo
a��
(
E cA C) U
J
co
N
O
N
L
L
U
O
(B
0
00
O
a�
N
0
N
U
Z
�
U
`.e
Q
00
0
O
O
U
J
J
1-
CO
�
CD
00
O
E
O
4)
Q
>
o—
O
LL
m
LL
O
0
O
CNO
C3)
M
O
mJ
Z
L
U
is
U
O
O
U
N
L
8
a-
-
�i
U
ra
ai
L
LM
a

�.. LL
O
-
P2l U046U!WJ2]pi{;I p21 aae S
:. O
►._.- is `r o
a
O
CO
CIO
Ar
Q O
>_
CO
V
cm
c
c E
•�
U) 0
C
a
N
00
O
0
C
N
�
U
m
Z
'
�
o
`e
Q
00
U
�
O
1-
J
�
J
CD
O
a0
O
O
E
o—
O
Q
CD
E
N
LL
m
a
0
C3)
LL
O
co
LOE CD
(B
m
J
Z
U
U
O
N
O
U
L
8
a-
�
LL
U
Li
J cn
a LE
z
LU
z
0
O
04

LL
GkPa m- $per
O
O
\
q
O
m
a
R
u 00
-0
\
/�
w
k/
O
$ o
m
\\
o
\\
��
\/
4
�/
�
�
m
�
�
U
/
�
�
56
\\
2A
/6
�/
U
I
'
O
�
�
e
\\
\C)
<
k\
\/
��
I6
\\
2©
7%
S ®LL
.
f q
\k
3 �
®��
'E
rL 04
I
R / _
\
E
[ m
> E > E •
7 7
� U) 3 3
_Q
\
/
\
\
/
U
Z
$
\
/
k
U
/
0
\
/
±
0
/
o.
/
\
/
'�
\
e
e
Ĥ
ƒ
O
a
®
a
r
7
cD
/
NT
/
k
�
f
5
/
\
.e
.
/
2
\
\
c
\
m
0

LL
O
O
CV
O
LO
O
O
O
LO
O
Q
C�
G
V J
U
L
U
N
>� LO
c0 (.0
fn
E M
C)U
z
m
m LL
7 J
a CV
C:
C:
co
c " co
mom
Q O
U :
�
.a� o
C:
C:�
C:m
U
N �cnC)U
m
a c�:
C:
--��
i
p
N
00
O 0
N �
U m
Z
Y Q
U
p
J
O J
O 0 �
Q
� � O
C
� � p
LL mLL
0
p L
mJ
Z U
U p N
� U
° 0 0
a_ J LL
co
N
O
N
L
L
U
i
(B
p
(B
0
(o
00
Ln
O
o'
C)
CV
LO
M
(B
g
N
7
p1
LL
N
N

\ \�\\
5;
/ '6
c \i0
�
�
cc
�
0
�
Ll
�^
C\2
g
-
0
g/
®j
`
2
\ o 5j7/;e
�< ;::2rJ
\!(}(::
~
^
~
. N -Lg©m&
LU
LO
LO
�
�
)(^
y
[»
LLI
$ °}2
°\\
Ld
�
}
„ ��
i\§§§
:;;)))))�
_I!!
:
..��,,,
!!!!l::;;;;;;!
;!\!!__||||!!!||..!!
..
„
§§§§§��
_____..
)§!!!!ll,;:�.EE|||||;;

LZZT-d M Wald
vmnone�xm°m umnv avm asnu nm�n��wm
�iiaz �N a„xns�voow
6T6L-8Z6-{,NL
azan xoa oe
Z
WOO'INMJ9-NVO210C 9INVRl9'l1VW
-
»� iNaweo�anaa aNm
"'
SZ98Z 7N 'Alll AIVIS 'Mi NOINOWIS TS£Z
O U�.�
Jlld'SIVTOOSSV'31NVd0 NVdilOC
-tom mow=
9NINNVld • `ONIA3Adns • 5I9 NldlgNN3
as No aN.�� sae
1 NV' J E)
u
NVCMOf
3�Jb' MA XR (INIH
NMOHS H10IM M"d as
H1OIM Ai/L Olt',NMONANf1
— — —'21"S -'ab N019NIWLH� j
.4—y_„
P "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NO—...30 31tlO 'ON
0
0
U
:SNOISIh321 dVW

Z
"'
.dGZ ZP�'
g,,
LZZT-d M NJ
6T6L-8Z6-bOL
WOO'1N n9-NVMiOl lNV89'l1VW
SZ98Z 7N 'AIIIAS31tl1S ACM NOINOWIS IS£ZDlld
NINNVId - DNI55V'31NVd9 NVOiM
9NINNVId • ONIA3Ai1N5 • 9NIi133NION3
1N`d?JJI
NVCMOf
„w,one��n�N uNw 3��na d:o,LL
//.az �N a//xns�voow
azyn xoa oe
»� iN3weo/3n3a aNm �z�
aatiot�N.��V�6�e
ea
Noudrol—
alva
'oN
O
M
..
U
-
3rn.Ae Nnvaa
lov' ]In XR (INIH
:SNOISIhA2l dVW
NMOHS HlOIM M/N
pg
H14IM MM NMON)INn
NOILo
— JNIW21y�
--
a
e�+uao+u oz'sgoms+m
.-------
---
__
�----------
--
1
--- co z --
a
I
U
�. ti tW
z�
I
00
i d z
O
on
i
3W HN Ol
q ���� 03:
S ' TJd
M ��� ��------
i
,
1
M 'd :)'Il d SOS
1
---
I
/
z
HN Ol
--- -O / �.
i
lIN S 'd 21d
�-
Lp
_-
�p/ J
"I / / f it LL
-
CD N
_ F
i it
C7._I_�
��
w
tD Ida N i 'ii i i
i
Q
C-)cn
e
`
\
7LCJ 2
I
Z
_ —
Q.
Ile
Eli W�
.... . .-�
3NI7 RDI b7V
LU
LO
w CD

l lZ9Z 'ON 91101ae4O 991b£9 09- ' lbOZ96 S£ :saleuaipJ000 Jalzua4 pjeyoiy :ulld
�gq'pb 41!wv uae4S'S 9££
'TViN3WN0 8ZOLZ ON `all!ns1ooW O-n luawd0Iana4 pue� OZO :J0-�
peon u016u!uaae-� g0t,
LJ , H/N PalePdfl o
v
peOy uOjbull jej CZ0Z'£0Ainr area CE
NMpHS FltQIM lv 0
HLatM ti!M NMON;I,'JN
a

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 21, 2023
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Layla Tallent, Botanist ltallentkatlasenvi.com
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Re: Construct residential development, 409 Farmington Road, Mocksville, Davie County,
ER 23-0793
Dear Ms. Tallent:
Thank you for your letter of March 17, 2023, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental. reviewgncdcr. gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

David Rabon
From: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2023 10:27 AM
To: David Rabon
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Farmington Road T&E Report of Findings and Review Request (Davie
County)
Hey David,
We offer the following comments/concurrence to inform prudent effect determinations to federally listed species from
the appropriate action agency:
Based on the information provided, the proposed action occurs within the consultation area for the federally
endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus scwheinitzii), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). These species are
known to occur in a variety of habitats including maintained utility and road rights of way, forest edges, old pastures,
and woodland openings. These species may occupy habitats where the disturbance regime reduces competition from
other species. They do not typically occur in areas with dense understory vegetation, or in areas that experience
frequent mowing or disturbance during consecutive reproductive seasons. Your correspondence indicates that suitable
habitats for these species are not present present within the proposed action area (50CFR 402.02). Our concurrence
with "no effect" determinations from action agencies is not required.
Based on the information provided, suitable forage and/or roosting habitat for the proposed endangered tricolored bat
(Perimyotis subflavus), may occur within the proposed action area. To avoid impacts to this species, we encourage
project proponents to accomplish any necessary tree clearing outside of the "active season" for this animal. The active
season for tricolored bat occurs during the warmer time of year from April 1 - October 15. Although this species is not
currently afforded legal protection under the Endangered Species Act (Act), this impact minimization measure would
support our concurrence with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the appropriate action
agency should this species become listed in the future. If the proposed action would not affect suitable habitat for this
animal, we would not object to a "no effect" determination from the appropriate action agency.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is not present within the proposed action area for any other
federally listed species. Therefore, we require no further information and consider consultation to be complete at this
time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) the
identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards,
Byron
Byron Hamstead
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office

160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and maybe disclosed to third
parties.
From: Hamstead, Byron A <byron_hamstead @fws.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 8:47 AM
To: David Rabon <[e-mail]>; Reid, Rebekah N <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Farmington Road T&E Report of Findings and Review Request (Davie County)
Thanks David,
I have added this request to my list and will respond w/in 30d.
Regards,
Byron
Byron Hamstead
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and maybe disclosed to third
parties.
From: David Rabon <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 2:41 PM
To: Reid, Rebekah N <[e-mail]>; Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Farmington Road T&E Report of Findings and Review Request (Davie County)
I
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
Rebekah/Byron,
Please find attached the T&E report of findings and review request for Farmington Road project
located in Davie County.
Fish and Wildlife Service comments are being requested proactively as an Army Corps of Engineers
NWP 29 may be required for the project. A preliminary site plan has not been provided. The Aquatic
Resource Sketch Maps are included within the report along with additional resources.
Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to receiving your comments.
Thank you,

David
David Rabon, Ph. D.
Senior Environmental Specialist
Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

Jennifer Robertson
From: Lawrence, Jennifer L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 12:21 PM
To: Luke Diaz
Cc: Jennifer Robertson; Jacob Sinclair
Subject: SAW-2023-00694 Farmington Road Delineation Concurrence
Attachments: 20230315 Farmington Road Features Map.pdf
Mr. Diaz,
Reference is made to ORM ID SAW-2023-00694--please reference this number on any correspondence regarding this
action.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail, are
confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and
reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review area. The location
and extent of these aquatic resources are shown in callout areas on the attached delineation map, labeled Photograph
and Data Form Location Map dated 3/15/2023.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collection/P16021coll9/id/1256 provides guidance for Jurisdictional
Determinations (JD) and states "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD has been requested."
At this time, we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied upon for use in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. "This verification does not address nor include any
consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be interpreted as such. This delineation
verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331)."
Jennifer Lawrence, PWS (she/her)
Regulatory Specialist, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Email: [e-mail]
Cell: [phone]

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user Manual Version b.0
USACE AID # NCDWR#
Project Name Farmington Road Date of Evaluation March 15 2023
Applicant/Owner Name C2C Land Development LLC/ Wetland Site Name WL 2000, WL 2100
Robert & Kae Hendrix
Wetland Type
Seep
Assessor Name/Organization
Atlas Environmental
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Dutchman Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03040101
County
Davie
NCDWR Region
Mooresville
F-1 Yes 17 No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Lonaitude (deci-dearees)
35.962041°.-80.534186'
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
® Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition —assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
®B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
®B ®B ®B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
®E ®E ®E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer— assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
®C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
®I ®I ®I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
®D
®D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
T
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
CU ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
s ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
•i:.
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
The adjacent pond and the associated dam has significantly altered the surface flow of the drainage. The pond does not have a outlet structure
which is reducing hydrologic connectivity to the wetlands.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WL 2000, WL 2100 Date of Assessment March 15, 2023
Wetland Type Seep Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
NA
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

MMMMW4�
mmmra�
MMW4�
KCI
July 5, 2023
ENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls ofNeuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
Ms. Allyson Sinclair
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
P.O. Box 17323
Asheville, NC 28806
Subject: Mitigation Obligation — C2C Land Development, LLC
Project: Farmington Road, 405 Farmington Road, Mocksville, NC 27028
Statement of Availability
Dear Ms. Sinclair,
This letter serves to confirm that KCI Technologies Inc. (KCI) has 0.182 riparian wetland mitigation credits
available in HUC 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin to satisfy your client's obligation for their project,
Farmington Road, in Mocksville, NC. KCI is willing to sell these credits at a credit rate of $76,923/credit for
a total of $14,000.00.
This Statement of Availability does not serve as reservation. Once you have received your permit, please let
us know that you will need an invoice for this transaction. Once KCI receives payment for this transaction,
we will sign the Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form (to be provided) and return it to you.
We will also provide copies to the US Army Corps of Engineers as well as your client (C2C Land
Development, LLC).
Sincerely,
4/1-� L-\-��
Kirsten Ullman
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Natural Resources Project Manager