310478_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230712

ivisiop of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 - ] O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
type of visit: Q-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Zeason for Visit: ("Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 71 I 1 13 Arrival Time: : Q Departure Time: Q : b M County: Dg-- ? en
Farm Name: (r(5 f t. "���� jcc� Fa(kf9 Owner Email:
Owner Name: � YL.c�- HuVj Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 3e
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: [7 2 Z t
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish p
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
La er I I :::]
Nan -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canaeity Pon -
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Points
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
Pi"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes []a -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe crosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered ,yes, and the situation poses an immediate public healtb
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
0 Yes
[D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑i No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApOication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[frNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
F—'T "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required_ Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfail ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes QNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: "3 I - Date of Inspection: '7 12 2 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2] No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Q"NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [;�J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [/7No
❑ Yes Z No
ElYes EQ//o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
jo�j Owl- ot y `s dA,,c 2o�y
e 5PXt� j/i.e W Li� S j-� lrc�Obir r�� ZQ @ �� � h C , 5b V
ov, ee recelVe-
UiA c i`�(e ►� 4� l 0 S� yt S C6,a.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:'.['fl j�fiTFy i �Z7
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
IJl
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 f c , 7� "z
Date: 7Z1zZ Z_ 3
511212020